Hubbry Logo
FadFadMain
Open search
Fad
Community hub
Fad
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Fad
Fad
Fad
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Pet rocks were a short-lived fad in the 1970s.
A man performing the floss, a dance move that became popular in 2017

A fad, trend, or craze is any form of collective behavior that develops within a culture, a generation, or social group in which a group of people enthusiastically follow an impulse for a short time period.

Fads are products or behaviors that achieve short-lived popularity but fade away.[1] Fads are often seen as sudden, quick-spreading, and short-lived events.[2] Fads include diets, clothing, hairstyles, toys, and more. Some fads in the last hundred years include toys such as yo-yos, and hula hoops, and fad dances such as the Macarena, floss and the twist.[3]

Similar to habits or customs but less durable, fads often result from an activity or behavior being perceived as popular or exciting within a peer group, or being deemed "cool" as often promoted by social networks.[4] A fad is said to "catch on" when the number of people adopting it begins to increase to the point of being noteworthy or going viral. Fads often fade quickly when the perception of novelty is gone.[4]

Overview

[edit]

The specific nature of the behavior associated with a fad can be of any type including unusual language usage, distinctive clothing, fad diets or frauds such as pyramid schemes. Apart from general novelty, mass marketing, emotional blackmail, peer pressure, or the desire to conformity may drive fads.[5] Popular celebrities can also drive fads, for example the highly popularizing effect of Oprah's Book Club.

Though some consider the term trend equivalent to fad, a fad is generally considered a quick and short behavior whereas a trend is one that evolves into a long term or even permanent change.[6]

Economics

[edit]

In economics, the term is used in a similar way. Fads are mean-reverting deviations from intrinsic value caused by social or psychological forces similar to those that cause fashions in political philosophies or consumerisation.[7]

Formation

[edit]

Many contemporary fads share similar patterns of social organization.[8] Several different models serve to examine fads and how they spread.

One way of looking at the spread of fads is through the top-down model, which argues that fashion is created for the elite, and from the elite, fashion spreads to lower classes.[8] Early adopters might not necessarily be those of a high status, but they have sufficient resources that allow them to experiment with new innovations.[8] When looking at the top-down model, sociologists like to highlight the role of selection. The elite might be the ones that introduce certain fads, but other people must choose to adopt those fads.[8]

Others may argue that not all fads begin with their adopters.[8] Social life already provides people with ideas that can help create a basis for new and innovative fads.[8] Companies can look at what people are already interested in and create something from that information. The ideas behind fads are not always original; they might stem from what is already popular at the time. Recreation and style faddists may try out variations of a basic pattern or idea already in existence.[9]

Another way of looking at the spread of fads is through a symbolic interaction view. People learn their behaviors from the people around them.[2] When it comes to collective behavior, the emergence of these shared rules, meanings, and emotions are more dependent on the cues of the situation, rather than physiological arousal.[2] This connection to symbolic interactionism, a theory that explains people's actions as being directed by shared meanings and assumptions, explains that fads are spread because people attach meaning and emotion to objects, and not because the object has practical use, for instance.[10] People might adopt a fad because of the meanings and assumptions they share with the other people who have adopted that fad. People may join other adopters of the fad because they enjoy being a part of a group and what that symbolizes.[1] Some people may join because they want to feel like an insider.[1] When multiple people adopt the same fad, they may feel like they have made the right choice because other people have made that same choice.[1]

Termination

[edit]

Primarily, fads end because all innovative possibilities have been exhausted.[9] Fads begin to fade when people no longer see them as new and unique. As more people follow the fad, some might start to see it as "overcrowded", and it no longer holds the same appeal.[1] Many times, those who first adopt the fad also abandon it first.[1] They begin to recognize that their preoccupation with the fad leads them to neglect some of their routine activities, and they realize the negative aspects of their behavior.[9] Once the faddists are no longer producing new variations of the fad, people begin to realize their neglect of other activities, and the dangers of the fad. Not everyone completely abandons the fad, however, and parts may remain.[1]

A study examined why certain fads die out quicker than others. A marketing professor at the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School of Business, Jonah Berger and his colleague, Gael Le Mens, studied baby names in the United States and France to help explore the termination of fads.[11] According to their results, the faster the names became popular, the faster they lost their popularity.[11] They also found that the least successful names overall were those that caught on most quickly.[11]

Collective behavior

[edit]

Fads can fit under the broad umbrella of collective behavior, which are behaviors engaged in by a large but loosely connected group of people.[9] Other than fads, collective behavior includes the activities of people in crowds, panics, fashions, crazes, and more.[9]

Robert E. Park, the man who created the term collective behavior, defined it as "the behavior of individuals under the influence of an impulse that is common and collective, an impulse, in other words, that is the result of social interaction".[9] Fads are seen as impulsive, driven by emotions; however, they can bring together groups of people who may not have much in common other than their investment in the fad.

Collective obsession

[edit]

Fads can also fit under the umbrella of "collective obsessions". Collective obsessions have three main features in common.[9] The first, and most obvious sign, is an increase in frequency and intensity of a specific belief or behavior.[9] A fad's popularity increases quickly in frequency and intensity, whereas a trend grows more slowly. The second is that the behavior is seen as ridiculous, irrational, or evil to the people who are not a part of the obsession.[9] Some people might see those who follow certain fads as unreasonable and irrational. To these people, the fad is ridiculous, and people's obsession of it is just as ridiculous. The third is, after it has reached a peak, it drops off abruptly and then it is followed by a counter obsession.[9] A counter obsession means that once the fad is over, if one engages in the fad they will be ridiculed.[9] A fad's popularity often decreases at a rapid rate once its novelty wears off. Some people might start to criticize the fad after pointing out that it is no longer popular, so it must not have been "worth the hype".[weasel words]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Fad

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A fad is an intense but fleeting enthusiasm or craze for a specific product, behavior, idea, or style that achieves widespread popularity rapidly within a group or but dissipates just as quickly, often within months. In sociological terms, fads represent a form of characterized by sudden adoption driven by , the pursuit of novelty, and pressures, typically affecting a specific segment of the population rather than at large. Unlike longer-lasting fashions, which evolve gradually and may persist or recur over years as accepted styles in areas like or , fads are marked by their brevity, heterogeneity, and lack of enduring institutional support, often emerging from cultural innovations or media amplification before declining due to saturation or shifting interests. Fads can manifest across diverse domains, including consumer goods like toys (e.g., the in the 1970s), dances (e.g., the Twist in the ), or even linguistic trends, as well as more recent viral items like Stanley tumblers in the early 2020s, and their "career" typically follows a predictable pattern of rapid , peak enthusiasm, and swift obsolescence. Sociologists view fads as indicators of underlying , such as uncertainty about the future or inter-class tensions, highlighting how they provide temporary outlets for collective expression without leading to permanent cultural shifts.

Introduction

Definition

A fad is a form of characterized by the sudden and enthusiastic adoption of a object, activity, , or idea by a significant group of people within a or social , followed by a rapid decline in popularity. This phenomenon typically involves arbitrary and short-lived enthusiasm, often without deep underlying utility or lasting value, distinguishing it as a temporary surge driven by rather than enduring needs. Sociologists view fads as manifestations of imitative in collective settings, where individuals participate to signal novelty, , or group identity, leading to widespread but fleeting participation. In , fads are often analyzed as abrupt shifts in mass opinion or lifestyle among dispersed populations, propelled by informational cascades—where people mimic others based on observed actions rather than independent evaluation—and normative pressures for social acceptance. Key characteristics include a rapid acceleration in adoption, a brief peak of instability, and a precipitous drop-off, resulting in a positively skewed lifecycle that rarely recurs in the same form. Unlike sustained cultural shifts, fads lack historical in their specific expression and are marked by their oddity or relative to established norms, though they can emerge in diverse domains such as consumer products, fashions, or social practices. Fads encompass both tangible items, like the 1950s hula hoop craze that swept millions of households before fading, and intangible behaviors, such as the 1970s streaking incidents that proliferated across U.S. college campuses as a momentary expression of rebellion. These examples illustrate how fads homogenize group actions temporarily, often amplified by media or institutional factors, but ultimately dissipate due to saturation, novelty loss, or external constraints like social sanctions. From a theoretical standpoint, frameworks like emergent norm theory explain fads as evolving from ambiguous situations where new norms justify the behavior, fostering quick spread until the context stabilizes or interest wanes. Fads are distinguished from fashions primarily by their brevity and lack of sustained . While fashions represent an unplanned process of recurrent change occurring against a backdrop of in the public realm, fads involve sudden, rapid shifts that spread quickly but fade away almost as abruptly, often without deeper institutional embedding. Fads are typically trivial variations in or activities, such as the brief popularity of specific dances like the Twist in the , lacking the pleasurable mass involvement and historical continuity that characterize fashions, which evolve gradually through cycles of acceptance in areas like clothing styles. In contrast to trends, which denote a broader, directional movement in cultural or stylistic preferences that can encompass multiple successive fashions—such as the ongoing shift toward sustainable materials in apparel—fads are more isolated and unpredictable, driven by novelty rather than underlying societal directions. Trends persist over longer periods, providing a framework for enduring changes, whereas fads, as modeled in informational cascade theory, emerge from sequential imitative behaviors where individuals disregard private information in favor of observed actions, leading to fragile, short-lived enthusiasms like the rapid adoption and abandonment of certain toys or gadgets. Fads also differ from crazes in intensity and duration, though the terms are sometimes used interchangeably. Crazes involve exciting mobilizations based on positive wish-fulfillment beliefs, lasting relatively longer than fads and often impinging more directly on social institutions, as seen in historical manias or booms. In sociological analyses, fads (or crazes) are viewed as random deviations not primarily motivated by social distinction, unlike fashions, which are constrained by established hierarchies and cultural references. This distinction underscores fads' role as ephemeral collective behaviors, separate from the more structured dynamics of customs—stable, uniform practices reinforced by —or panics, which are fear-driven flights from perceived threats.

Formation and Spread

Triggers and Origins

Fads typically originate from the discovery of a novel idea, product, or behavior that captures initial interest among a small group of individuals, such as producers, distributors, or early adopters. This discovery phase marks the inception of a fad, where something previously overlooked or newly invented gains attention due to its perceived uniqueness or appeal in addressing a temporary cultural or social need. For instance, the emerged in the 1950s as a simple plastic toy reinvented from ancient origins, quickly identified by manufacturers as having mass entertainment potential. Once discovered, the promotion stage propels the fad forward through deliberate efforts by originators to disseminate it via social networks, media, or channels, often amplified by labeling that gives it a catchy identity to facilitate recognition and sharing. This promotion transforms the initial spark into a contagious phenomenon, where early enthusiasts endorse it to others, creating momentum through word-of-mouth or public demonstrations. Labeling, such as naming the in the 1980s, solidifies its status as a distinct trend, making it easier for participants to identify and join. These early stages are triggered by factors like technological innovations, cultural shifts, or economic opportunities that align with collective curiosity, but they rely heavily on interpersonal influence to gain traction. Sociological theories further explain these origins through mechanisms like informational cascades, where individuals base decisions on observing others' actions rather than private information, leading to rapid adoption of fads even with limited evidence of value. In this model, fads trigger when sequential decisions by early actors—often influenced by subtle signals or chance events—create a , causing later participants to conform and ignore dissenting information. For example, the 17th-century in the began with speculative trading among a few, cascading into widespread frenzy as observers inferred value from rising prices. Such cascades highlight how fads arise from fragile , where small triggers like public endorsements or media buzz can initiate widespread but short-lived enthusiasm.

Mechanisms of Diffusion

Fads diffuse through society via processes rooted in , where ambiguous social situations foster the emergence of temporary norms that guide widespread adoption. According to emergent norm theory, individuals in uncertain contexts interpret others' actions as cues for appropriate behavior, leading to rapid without formal institutional direction. This mechanism is evident in fads like in the , where initial acts on campuses created perceived norms of acceptability, prompting across institutions. The theory posits that such norms arise spontaneously from milling—informal interactions that reduce ambiguity—and spread as participants reinforce the behavior, distinguishing fads from sustained traditions. A key driver of fad diffusion is informational , where individuals adopt trends by inferring desirability from others' actions, often amplified by or informational cascades. In these cascades, early adopters' visible choices outweigh personal signals, causing a of that ignores contrary private information and accelerates spread. For instance, the rapid popularity of the in the exemplified this, as consumers followed the perceived consensus among peers and media-promoted users. creates fragility, where fads peak quickly but decline upon contradictory public signals, such as expert critiques or saturation effects. Normative social influence further propels by pressuring to gain acceptance, particularly in interconnected networks where prestige and proximity enhance transmission. Fads often spread contagiously from influential sources—like high-status campuses or celebrities—to broader groups via and , with coverage accuracy and event complexity boosting adoption rates. In streaking's case, accelerated among socioculturally heterogeneous institutions near prestigious ones, where sanctions paradoxically increased visibility and allure. Bandwagon effects, triggered by chance social strains or charismatic promoters, sustain this until novelty wanes, leading to abrupt rejection. Modern digital networks intensify these mechanisms, enabling exponential spread through viral sharing, though core processes remain tied to and norm emergence. For example, the in 2014 spread rapidly on platforms like and , where participants nominated others, creating a cascade of videos and donations that raised over $115 million for ALS research in just two months. Unlike fashions, which evolve cumulatively via market dynamics, fad diffusion relies on transient bandwagon imitation, often non-rational and independent across adopters. This results in characteristic patterns: steep initial growth, brief plateau, and sharp decline, as seen in viral challenges on .

Characteristics

Duration and Lifecycle

Fads exhibit a compressed lifecycle compared to longer-lasting trends or fashions, typically spanning from a few months to two years. on fads, particularly those targeting children, indicates that approximately 50% last one year or less, while over 70% endure up to two years, with variations depending on the fad's type—such as single-item fads (4 months to 2 years) or thematic fads (1 to 3 years cyclically). This brevity stems from the inherent novelty-seeking behavior in collective dynamics, where initial excitement drives but fades rapidly once saturation occurs. The lifecycle unfolds in four primary stages: introduction, where innovators or "fad setters" discover and promote a product or based on its perceived utility or uniqueness; growth, characterized by rapid through social imitation, often accelerated by influencers like celebrities or media; peak, a short maturity phase of intense, widespread participation affecting large populations; and decline, marked by swift abandonment as the item loses novelty and value perception decays. In agent-based sociological models, this decline is triggered when early adopters exit upon reaching a threshold of follower adoption, causing a decay in perceived value (e.g., via high decay rates of 0.4–1) that prompts mass exit. For instance, the fad of 2017 skyrocketed in popularity within weeks but declined sharply by mid-year, illustrating the brief peak and steep fall. Factors influencing duration include the initial utility value of the fad (higher values enable faster spread but shorter life) and social thresholds for adoption and exit, which ensure fads remain ephemeral rather than evolving into sustained trends. Unlike fashions, which cycle through longer phases (e.g., seasonal rises and declines over years), fads skip extended maturity, emphasizing their role as short-term collective behaviors driven by excitement rather than enduring utility. Examples like dolls, which peaked with $540 million in sales in 1984 before declining to $210 million by 1986, highlight how economic saturation accelerates the lifecycle's end.

Intensity and Participation Levels

Fads are characterized by varying degrees of intensity, defined as the level of and emotional investment participants exhibit, often manifesting as zealous or fervent of the or product. This intensity typically peaks rapidly due to and wish-fulfillment beliefs, leading to a "rush with sound and fury" toward perceived gratification, as seen in historical examples like economic booms or cycles. In Neil Smelser's framework, such arises from structural strains and generalized beliefs that short-circuit conventional responses, exaggerating the perceived benefits and drawing participants into high-energy engagement. Participation levels, meanwhile, refer to the proportion of a or segment involved, frequently reaching significant thresholds within targeted populations but remaining superficial or short-lived overall. Empirical studies illustrate these dynamics through specific cases. The 1974 streaking fad on U.S. college campuses exemplified high participation intensity, spreading to numerous institutions in a matter of weeks with over 1,000 documented incidents, and events displaying structured organization rather than random impulsivity. Survey data from 1,543 colleges revealed that adoption probability increased with institutional prestige and sociocultural heterogeneity, indicating broad involvement across diverse student bodies driven by emergent norms and peer influence. Similarly, consumer fads among children, such as the Cabbage Patch Kids dolls, achieved intense participation levels, with sales reaching 20 million units by 1984—equivalent to one doll per U.S. child aged 3-8—fueled by peer pressure and novelty-seeking. These examples highlight how fads mobilize a substantial segment of a group, often 30-50% or more in affected communities, through rapid diffusion mechanisms like word-of-mouth and media amplification. While intensity and participation can vary by context, fads generally feature higher enthusiasm in initial phases compared to sustained trends, with involvement tapering as novelty fades. Smelser notes that participation ranges from casual in expressive fads, like teenage jewelry trends, to more committed in crazes, such as political bandwagons, where diverse recruits join once appears likely. Factors like severity and media accuracy further modulate these levels; for instance, streaking's intensity waned in environments with stricter oversight, limiting sustained participation. Overall, the high but transient nature of fad engagement underscores their role as collective responses to ambiguity, prioritizing excitement over depth.

Economic Dimensions

Market Dynamics

Fads introduce significant volatility into consumer markets by generating sudden, explosive demand surges driven by social imitation and informational cascades, where individuals increasingly base decisions on observed behaviors rather than private information. This mechanism, modeled as informational cascades, leads to rapid adoption but also fragility, as new public signals can abruptly reverse trends, amplifying market in sectors like , toys, and . For instance, the probability of a cascade forming rises with the number of early adopters, but such cascades are prone to error, with the likelihood of reversal being approximately 87% higher than under full information conditions, contributing to short-lived booms and busts. On the supply side, firms face intense pressure to scale production quickly to capitalize on , often resulting in strains such as shortages or rushed , while overinvestment risks massive write-offs upon decline. Agent-based models illustrate this lifecycle, where "fad followers" imitate innovators, creating spiky sales patterns—contrasting with smoother curves for durable —and requiring high novelty (e.g., value >1000 units) and decay rates (>0.4) for fads to emerge and fade. In the case of the consumption fad in the early , market dynamics unfolded through implementation via perceived newness and group differentiation needs, evolution fueled by amplification, and extinction when novelty waned, demonstrating how fads boost short-term sales but challenge sustained supply planning. Pricing dynamics during fads typically feature initial premiums due to , followed by sharp declines as supply catches up and interest evaporates, eroding margins for late entrants and favoring agile producers. Market segmentation reveals fad buyers as diverse groups motivated by needs like social conformity or novelty-seeking, allowing targeted to extract value but underscoring the transient economic opportunity—fads satisfy acute consumption urges yet rarely build long-term . Overall, while fads can generate substantial revenue spikes (e.g., through herd-like ), they heighten competitive churn, with new entrants flooding markets during ascent and exiting en masse during descent, destabilizing industry structures.

Consumer and Industry Impacts

Fads exert significant influence on patterns, often leading to impulsive purchases driven by social conformity and perceived novelty. In the informational cascade model, consumers may ignore personal information about a product's value and instead mimic others' behaviors, resulting in rapid adoption followed by potential regret when the fad wanes. For instance, during the 1975 craze, over 1.5 million units were sold within six months at $3.95 each, generating approximately $6 million in revenue for creator Gary Dahl, as buyers sought novelty without long-term utility. This can result in financial waste for consumers, as evidenced by the post-fad devaluation of items like fidget spinners, which saw millions of units sold globally in 2017 but led to widespread unsold inventory and buyer dissatisfaction by 2018. On a broader scale, fads contribute to overconsumption and environmental strain for consumers, particularly in sectors like apparel where fast fashion exemplifies fad-driven cycles. The fast fashion industry, valued at approximately $100 billion as of 2023, encourages frequent purchases of low-cost items to chase trends, with consumers buying 60% more clothing per capita since 2000 but retaining each garment for half as long. This results in heightened personal debt and landfill contributions, as 92 million tons of textiles are discarded yearly, much of it from fad-chasing behaviors that prioritize short-term gratification over durability. Psychological impacts include post-purchase dissonance, where initial excitement from social validation gives way to awareness of poor quality or ethical concerns, as seen in surveys of gin fad participants who valued perceived newness but later shifted consumption patterns. For industries, fads create volatile market dynamics, offering short-term booms that demand rapid scaling but risk oversupply and financial losses upon decline. The phenomenon illustrates how a simple can capture swiftly, with production costs under $1 per unit enabling high margins, yet its abrupt end left manufacturers without sustained revenue streams. In the beverage sector, the international from 2010 onward boosted sales through differentiation needs, but required distilleries to adapt quickly to geographic diffusion patterns to avoid inventory buildup. amplifies this, with companies like Zara achieving $30 billion in revenue by producing 450 million items yearly in response to weekly trend shifts, though it fosters vulnerabilities, including labor exploitation in developing economies where wages average around $0.28 per hour. Overall, while fads inject and economic activity—contributing to 2-8% of global via apparel alone—they compel industries to invest in agile forecasting to mitigate busts, as informational cascades can reverse suddenly, eroding market stability. As of 2024, the market has grown to about $150 billion, with textile waste reaching around 120 million tons annually, underscoring ongoing economic and environmental challenges.

Sociological and Psychological Aspects

Collective Behavior Theories

Collective behavior theories in provide frameworks for understanding fads as temporary, widespread enthusiasms that arise from rather than individual actions alone. These theories emerged in the early to explain non-institutionalized social phenomena, including fads, which involve rapid adoption and of behaviors, objects, or ideas across populations. Unlike routine social interactions governed by established norms, fads represent spontaneous alignments where participants engage in novel activities perceived as exciting or status-enhancing, often without long-term commitment. Seminal works emphasize factors like , predispositions, norm formation, and structural conditions as drivers of such collective episodes. One foundational perspective is the contagion theory, originally articulated by in his 1895 book The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind. Le Bon posited that crowds induce a hypnotic, irrational state in individuals, where emotions and behaviors spread contagiously like a , overriding personal inhibitions and leading to uniform actions. In the context of fads, this theory suggests that initial enthusiasm from a few influencers "infects" others through , amplifying participation until saturation occurs; for instance, viral dance crazes or slang terms propagate via social in groups. Critics later noted its overemphasis on irrationality, but it remains influential for explaining the rapid, emotional spread of fads in modern media environments. In contrast, convergence theory, developed by Floyd H. Allport in his 1924 text , rejects the idea of crowd-induced transformation, arguing instead that collective behaviors reflect the aggregation of individuals already predisposed to similar traits or motivations. Applied to fads, this view holds that people who share underlying frustrations, desires for novelty, or status-seeking tendencies naturally converge during opportunities for expression, such as cultural shifts or economic booms, resulting in amplified but predictable patterns. For example, during the 1630s in the —a classic fad-like speculative craze—participants were drawn together by pre-existing speculative inclinations rather than hypnosis. This theory underscores that fads do not create new impulses but channel latent ones, though it underplays how group settings can escalate involvement beyond individual baselines. Emergent norm theory, proposed by Ralph H. Turner and Lewis M. Killian in their 1957 book , addresses limitations in prior models by focusing on the development of temporary norms within ambiguous situations. It asserts that when standard guidelines are unclear—such as during emerging trends—group members collectively negotiate and adopt new norms through key influencers, leading to coordinated yet rational behavior. For fads, this manifests as initial uncertainty about a item or practice (e.g., a viral challenge on ) giving way to improvised rules of participation, like sharing protocols or aesthetic standards, which legitimize widespread adoption. Turner and Killian emphasized that not all participants fully conform, allowing for variation in intensity; empirical tests, such as analyses of disaster evacuations, support its applicability to fad-like rushes by showing norm emergence reduces chaos. This framework highlights fads as adaptive responses to situational ambiguity rather than mere . A more comprehensive structural approach is Neil J. Smelser's value-added theory, outlined in his 1962 book Theory of Collective Behavior, which treats fads as subtypes of "crazes"—mobilizations driven by positive wish-fulfillment s amid societal strains. Smelser's model sequences six determinants: structural conduciveness (e.g., communication networks enabling ), structural strain (e.g., status ambiguities prompting novelty-seeking), generalized s (e.g., fantasies of quick gratification through trend-following), precipitating factors (e.g., media exposure), mobilization (e.g., opinion leaders rallying participants), and operation of (e.g., saturation or backlash curtailing the fad). He defines a craze as "mobilization for action based on a positive wish-fulfillment ," distinguishing fads like teenage clothing trends or the 1959-60 swastika epidemic (a short-lived fad with 559 incidents peaking rapidly) from panics by their optimistic orientation. Unlike earlier theories, value-added integrates psychological and sociological elements, explaining why fads thrive in flexible societies like the U.S. but fade when strains resolve or controls activate, as seen in fashion cycles where over-adoption leads to decline. These theories collectively illuminate fads as emergent from interplay between individual inclinations and group processes, evolving from early psychological emphases on contagion to structural analyses like Smelser's. While contagion and convergence highlight diffusion mechanisms, emergent norm and value-added theories better account for the normative and conditional aspects of fad lifecycles, informing studies of contemporary phenomena like trends.

Role of Obsession and Hype

Obsession plays a pivotal role in the psychological dynamics of fads, manifesting as an intense, temporary that drives widespread participation within . In sociological terms, fads often begin with small groups exhibiting obsessive engagement, where individuals prioritize novelty and social conformity over rational evaluation, leading to rapid adoption. This obsession is fueled by and the desire for belonging, particularly among , as participants seek to enhance their status and through alignment with the trend. For instance, crazes like in the involved obsessive among college students, spreading through social mimicry before fading. Hype amplifies this obsession by creating artificial urgency and excitement, often through media and marketing strategies that exaggerate the trend's value and exclusivity. Media hype functions as a promotional mechanism in collective phenomena, generating anticipation and accelerating diffusion via word-of-mouth, social networks, and endorsements, which transform minor interests into cultural obsessions. Sociologists view this as part of emergent norm theory in collective behavior, where hype establishes temporary norms that encourage conformity and emotional investment. A classic example is the Cabbage Patch Kids doll fad of the 1980s, where manufactured scarcity and media coverage of shortages led to frenzied purchases, with parents and children obsessing over acquisition despite high resale prices exceeding $100. Similarly, the Tickle Me Elmo toy in 1996 saw hype-driven sales surge to over 1 million units in weeks, with resale values reaching $500 due to perceived exclusivity. The interplay of obsession and underscores fads' short lifecycle, as initial gives way to disillusionment when the trend fails to sustain its promised novelty or social rewards. This dynamic is evident in diffusion theory, where early adopters' obsessive promotion via social channels creates a , but oversaturation leads to rapid decline. In children's fads, from commercial tie-ins and peer emulation accounts for significant economic impact, with tweens influencing $21.7 billion in annual spending through "pester power." Overall, these elements highlight fads as expressions of excitement rather than enduring cultural shifts, often critiqued for promoting superficial consumption.

Decline and Legacy

Factors in Termination

Fads typically terminate through a combination of intrinsic and external pressures that erode their novelty and appeal. One primary mechanism is the exhaustion of innovative possibilities, where participants deplete all feasible variations of the or product, leading to saturation and disinterest. For instance, in the case of the Hula-Hoop craze of the late , children explored every conceivable way to use the until no new applications remained, prompting a swift decline. Similarly, drug fads among youth end when all relevant settings and combinations have been tested, rendering further experimentation unappealing. Another key factor is the breakdown of informational cascades, where initial adopters' actions create a herd-like based on inferred private information, but this fragile equilibrium shatters upon the of contradictory public signals. According to informational cascade theory, even a modestly informative public announcement—such as new medical evidence—can reverse widespread adoption, as seen in the decline of procedures in the mid-20th century once studies highlighted risks. In fads like in the 1970s, the rapid diffusion across campuses halted abruptly due to this inherent instability, with participation dropping after the novelty waned and collective norms shifted. Agent-based models further illustrate this by showing how "fad setters"—early innovators—abandon the trend once follower numbers exceed a threshold, triggering decay that cascades to others and accelerates termination. Social identity motives also contribute to fad endings, as individuals balance with desires for , leading to cycles where over-adoption prompts differentiation. Game-theoretic analyses reveal that in networked populations, strong uniqueness preferences prevent equilibrium, causing trends to bust once they become too mainstream; hipster subcultures exemplify this by rejecting popular items to signal distinction, hastening decline. External interventions, such as institutional controls, can hasten termination; during the fad, university arrests and punishments at institutions like the University of Texas effectively curtailed participation by imposing social costs. Overall, these factors underscore fads' ephemeral nature, driven by rapid saturation rather than fundamental flaws.

Long-Term Cultural Effects

While fads are inherently ephemeral, research indicates they can exert subtle long-term influences on by serving as selective pressures that alter the frequency of ideas, behaviors, and artifacts across generations. In mathematical models of cultural transmission, fads driven by or anticonformity contribute to dynamic shifts in population-level preferences, potentially leading to cyclic patterns or stable equilibria in cultural traits, such as fluctuating styles like short versus long skirts. This process mirrors Darwinian selection, where temporary surges in popularity amplify certain variants, embedding them into broader societal norms over time. A prominent example is phenomenon of the , which, though short-lived as a specific style, accelerated shifts in gender roles and women's social freedoms in the United States. —characterized by bobbed hair, short hemlines, and loose silhouettes—symbolized newfound independence following and wartime workforce participation, challenging Victorian-era constraints and paving the way for enduring changes in female attire and behavior. This fad normalized more liberated expressions of femininity, influencing subsequent generations' views on and contributing to the evolution of modern women's toward practicality and self-expression. Similarly, the 1958 hula hoop craze, which sold over 25 million units in its first four months, with more than 100 million sold worldwide in 1958, left a lasting mark on fitness and performance culture despite its rapid decline. Initially a , the evolved into a tool for physical exercise and , integrating into countercultural festivals like and contemporary wellness practices that emphasize mindful movement. Its commercialization also transformed strategies, emphasizing mass appeal and , effects that persist in the global fitness industry today. The fad of the early 1940s among African American, Mexican American, and Filipino youth further illustrates how fads can highlight and perpetuate social dynamics. Originating in scenes as an exaggerated, fabric-efficient style during wartime , it became a symbol of cultural pride and resistance against assimilation, sparking the 1943 in and exposing racial tensions. These events amplified discourse on , influencing later and embedding the as an enduring icon in culture and . Overall, these cases demonstrate that fads often seed incremental cultural changes, from normative shifts to innovative practices, by embedding novelty into and behavior patterns that outlast the original hype.

References

  1. https://dictionary.apa.org/fad
  2. https://study.com/academy/lesson/fad-definition-examples-quiz.html
  3. https://fiveable.me/key-terms/intro-to-sociology/fads
  4. https://docmckee.com/oer/soc/sociology-glossary/fads-definition/
  5. https://www.differencebetween.com/difference-between-fashion-and-vs-fad/
  6. https://sk.sagepub.com/ency/edvol/processes/chpt/fads-fashions
  7. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254463680_The_Collective_Behavior_of_Fads_The_Characteristics_Effects_and_Career_of_Streaking
  8. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/12/style/stanley-cups-tiktok-viral.html
  9. https://www.sociologydiscussion.com/articles/collective-behaviour-meaning-factors-and-its-types/2476
  10. https://www.uh.edu/margo/paper.pdf
  11. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev-soc-071811-145526
  12. https://www.yourarticlelibrary.com/sociology/collective-behavior/5-forms-of-collective-behaviour/31281
  13. https://snap.stanford.edu/class/cs224w-readings/bikhchandani92fads.pdf
  14. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2573395
  15. https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/march-5/hula-hoop-patented
  16. https://www.thoughtco.com/history-of-the-rubiks-cube-1779400
  17. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/222108
  18. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2138632
  19. https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/15570913/the-dutch-tulip-mania-maurits-van-der-veen
  20. https://books.google.com/books/about/Collective_Behavior.html?id=BMVgGmWlAHwC
  21. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2138632
  22. https://business.columbia.edu/sites/default/files-efs/pubfiles/4108/employeemanagement_techniques.pdf
  23. https://www.als.org/ibc-how-it-started
  24. https://surface.syr.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1631&context=honors_capstone
  25. https://courses.lumenlearning.com/wm-introductiontosociology/chapter/collective-behavior/
  26. https://courses.cit.cornell.edu/cuttingedge/lifeCycle/03.htm
  27. https://open.lib.umn.edu/communicatingfashion/chapter/chapter-6-trend-lifecycles-and-adopter-categories/
  28. https://archive.org/download/theoryofcollecti00smel/theoryofcollecti00smel.pdf
  29. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333905544_Consumer_Fad_Dynamic_the_consumer_behavior_and_the_Gin_case
  30. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/247614772_Fads_Segmenting_the_fad-buyer_market
  31. https://www.npr.org/2015/04/04/397107966/pondering-the-popularity-of-the-pet-rock-and-other-fads
  32. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/two-charts-show-meteoric-rise-fidget-spinners-204612470.html
  33. https://www.wri.org/insights/numbers-economic-social-and-environmental-impacts-fast-fashion
  34. https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/mckinsey-explainers/what-is-fast-fashion
  35. https://www.uniformmarket.com/statistics/fast-fashion-statistics
  36. https://www.bcg.com/publications/2025/spinning-textile-waste-into-value
  37. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/psychology/collective-behavior-contagion-theory
  38. https://pressbooks.howardcc.edu/soci101/chapter/21-2-explaining-collective-behavior/
  39. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/social-sciences-and-humanities/emergent-norm-theory
  40. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257770268_Looking_at_Smelser%27s_Theory_of_Collective_Behavior_After_Almost_50_Years_A_Review_and_Appreciation
  41. https://web.mit.edu/gtmarx/www/cbchap1.html
  42. https://2012books.lardbucket.org/pdfs/sociology-comprehensive-edition/s24-collective-behavior-and-social.pdf
  43. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/download/1441/736
  44. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/089124167700600205
  45. https://www.cmu.edu/dietrich/sds/docs/golman/hipsters_and_the_cool.pdf
  46. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2107204118
  47. https://news.stanford.edu/stories/2021/09/modeling-role-influencers-shaping-fads
  48. https://academicworks.cuny.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1262&context=gc_etds
  49. https://247wallst.com/special-report/2023/05/28/the-biggest-fads-of-the-last-100-years/
  50. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/arts-culture/iconic-hula-hoop-keeps-rolling-180969355/
  51. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/hula-hoop-marketed
  52. https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/story/2023-06-13/zoot-suit-how-the-bold-look-made-history-and-continues-to-influence-fashion
  53. https://www.santafenewmexican.com/opinion/commentary/the-lasting-impact-of-the-zoot-suit-riots/article_54a376cd-56ea-5335-992a-93f918eac122.html
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.