Hubbry Logo
Hollywood Foreign Press AssociationHollywood Foreign Press AssociationMain
Open search
Hollywood Foreign Press Association
Community hub
Hollywood Foreign Press Association
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Hollywood Foreign Press Association
Hollywood Foreign Press Association
Hollywood Foreign Press Association
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The Hollywood Foreign Press Association (HFPA) was a nonprofit organization of journalists and photographers who reported on the American entertainment industry for predominantly foreign media markets.[4][5] It is best known for founding and conducting the annual Golden Globe Awards ceremony in Los Angeles, California, which honors notable achievements in film and television, from its inception in 1943 until 2023.[6][5] The HFPA consisted of about 105 members from approximately 55 countries with a combined following of more than 250 million.[7][8]

Key Information

HFPA was rebranded to the Golden Globe Foundation on June 12, 2023.[1]

History

[edit]
Hollywood Foreign Press Association building facade in West Hollywood, CA

The association was founded in 1943,[9] by Los Angeles-based foreign journalists who wanted a more organized distributing process for cinema news to non-U.S. markets.[9][10]

The first Golden Globes awardees were for the cinema industry in early 1944 with a ceremony at 20th Century Fox.[11] There, Jennifer Jones was awarded "Best Actress" honors for The Song of Bernadette, which also won for "Best Film", while Paul Lukas took home "Best Actor" laurels for Watch on the Rhine. Awards were presented in the form of scrolls.[12]

The following year members came up with the idea of presenting winners with a golden globe encircled with a strip of motion picture film and mounted on a pedestal.[13]

In 1950, differing philosophies among members caused a schism within the organization, resulting in a split into two separate groups: The Hollywood Foreign Correspondents Association and the Foreign Press Association of Hollywood. The separation ended in 1955 when the journalists reunited under the collective title The Hollywood Foreign Press Association with firm guidelines and requirements for membership.[14]

In 1955, the Golden Globes began honoring achievements in television as well as in film. The first honorees in the "Best Television Show" category that year were Dinah Shore, Lucy & Desi, The American Comedy and Davy Crockett.[15]

After multiple controversies and attempts at reform, HFPA was rebranded to the Golden Globe Foundation on June 12, 2023, and the assets related to the Golden Globes had been purchased by Dick Clark Productions and Eldridge Industries, with the proceeds going to a new non-profit created to continue the charitable giving of the HFPA.[16]

In December 2023, 64 former HFPA members (who had remained as Golden Globes voters) threatened to withhold their ballots after being informed they would not receive tickets to the Globes ceremony.[17]

At the 81st Golden Globe Awards in 2024, multiple celebrities thanked the now defunct organization.[18]

In February 2025, former HFPA members were informed they would no longer receive a yearly $75,000 payment from the Golden Globes Awards owners.[19]

Membership criteria

[edit]

Membership meetings were held monthly, and the officers and directors were elected annually.

In February 2021, the Los Angeles Times reported that none of the HFPA members were black.[20] In response, in early May 2021, the association announced a series of reforms aimed at increasing membership with a "specific focus on recruiting Black members,"[21] improving governance, and reducing conflicts of interest.[22]

Lorenzo Soria was elected President of Hollywood Foreign Press Association in 2019.[23] Helen Hoehne was named President in September 2021.[24]

Charity

[edit]

The HFPA was a nonprofit organization that donated funds to entertainment-related charities. The Golden Globe Awards generated $10 million from its television broadcast each year. The HFPA hosted an annual grants banquet to distribute funds; $2.1 million was donated to nonprofits in 2015, leaving $8 million not being donated to any charities.[25] According to the HFPA, from 1990 to 2015, over $23.9 million was donated to charity and used to fund scholarships and grants;[26] this averaged less than $1 million per year. In 2019, the organization disbursed grants worth under $6 million from a total income of over $30 million.[27]

Funds have also been used to restore more than 90 films, including King Kong (1933) and Woman on the Run (1950).[25]

With the winding down of the HFPA, its philanthropic activities transitioned to a new non-profit known as the Golden Globe Foundation.[28][29][30]

HFPA Residency

[edit]

In 2008, the HFPA announced its residency program in partnership with Film Independent. The program selects three winners from the Italian Venice Film Festival's Orizzonti section and three participants from Canada's Toronto International Film Festival to Los Angeles for an intensive workshop.[31]

The 2019 residency fellows included Emir Baigazin, Mahmut F. Coskun, Georgia Fu, Maria Bozzi, Avril Z. Speaks, Rati Tsiteladze, and Cynthia Kao.[32][33]

The 2020 residency program winners were TIFF participants: All These Creatures by Australian Charles Williams, Misterio by Chema Garcia from Spain, and Measure by Canadian director Karen Chapman. This is in addition to Venice winners: Atlantis, by Ukrainian Valentyn Vasyanovych, Blanco en Blanco by Spaniard Théo Court and Filipino Raymund Ribay Gutierrez.[34]

The 2021–22 residency fellows were: Maha Al-Saati (Saudi Arabia) Hair: The Story of Grass, Jeff Wong (Canada) H'mong Sisters, Alvaro Gago Diaz (Spain) Matria, Ahmad Bahrami (Iran) The Wasteland, Ana Rocha de Sousa (Portugal) Listen, Ricky D'Ambrose (USA) The Cathedral, Jose Maria Aviles (Ecuador) Al Oriente, Sol Berruezo Pichon-Riviére (Argentina) Nuestros Dias Mas Felices, Beatrice Baldacci (Italy) La Tana, Sahraa Karimi (Afghanistan), Rohena Gera (India), and Nuhash Humayun (Bangladesh).[35][36]

The 2023 residency program fellows were: Tahmini Raffaella (Banu), Monica Dugo (Come le tartarughe), Eldar Shibanov (Mountain Onion), Hanna Västinsalo (Palimpsest), Phumelele Mthembu (African America), and Soudade Kaadan (Nezouh).[37]

Controversies

[edit]

Membership and accusations of self-dealing

[edit]

Although it counted some prominent journalists among its membership,[38] since at least the 1990s, the HFPA has been accused of lax membership criteria, including accepting members with little or no journalistic background.[39] A 1996 article in the Washington Post alleged that the majority of HFPA members were not full-time professional journalists, but rather part-time freelance writers for smaller publications as well as non-journalists, ranging from a college professor to an appliance salesman.[40]

An antitrust lawsuit was filed against the HFPA in August 2020 by a Norwegian journalist, Kjersti Flaa, whose request for membership had been repeatedly rejected. She alleged that the group was operating as a cartel that monopolized the market of foreign entertainment journalism, that she had been rejected as not to cannibalize other Scandinavian members, and that her inability to join was impacting her ability to gain their "exclusive" access to celebrities and junkets. On November 24, 2020, a federal court threw out the lawsuit, arguing that Flaa did not define the "market" that the HFPA was allegedly monopolizing, and that the HFPA was not subject to the right of fair procedure, since engaging in an "activity of some interest to the public" was not the same as operating "in the public interest."[41]

An investigation by the Los Angeles Times in 2021 found that the HFPA regularly paid its members over $1 million annually for serving on various committees, which might jeopardize its status as a tax-exempt non-profit organization.[42] The report noted that the association's small membership made it easier to sway than the significantly larger voting bodies of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences (AMPAS) and the Television Academy. Members allegedly were offered access to actors and film sets, as well as expensive gifts, such as high-priced hotel stays and restaurant bookings.[42] The investigation alleged that many of HFPA members are not journalists, and that established foreign journalists who apply are regularly rejected.[42]

Black representation

[edit]

In 2021, the HFPA faced criticism for the lack of Black representation among its members; it was reported by the Los Angeles Times that the association had not had a new Black member since Meher Tatna, its former president, in 2002. Variety cited criteria requiring new members to have been sponsored by two current HFPA members as being a major roadblock towards recruiting new Black members, stating that "for a foreign journalist based in Los Angeles, building relationships with this small group, which are largely unknown to the public, is difficult due to its tight and exclusive membership policies. More transparency would help alleviate the public perception that the group doesn't seek to be inclusive."[43]

Ahead of the 78th Golden Globe Awards, Time's Up launched a social media campaign to draw attention to the issue. On February 25, 2021, the HFPA stated that it was "fully committed to ensuring our membership is reflective of the communities around the world who love film, TV and the artists inspiring and educating them" and that it planned to "immediately work to implement an action plan" to "bring in Black members, as well as members from other underrepresented backgrounds." The HFPA stated that over 35 percent of its members were people of color from non-European countries, but it was aware that none of its current members were Black.[44][45]

On March 9, 2021, the HFPA announced that it had hired Shaun R. Harper, executive director of the USC Race and Equity Center, as its new "strategic diversity officer," and hired Ropes & Gray to "support the continued development of a confidential reporting system for investigating alleged violations of our ethical standards and code of conduct."[46] In April 2021, former HFPA president Philip Berk was expelled after he emailed fellow members an article that described Black Lives Matter as a "racist hate movement" and slammed organizer Patrisse Cullors for purchasing a home in an upscale neighborhood.[47]

Attempts at reforms, boycotts

[edit]

On May 3, 2021, the HFPA announced plans for a reform package, including a 50 percent increase in members over the next 18 months with a particular focus on underrepresented groups (with at least 20 new members over the next year, which would have a focus on new Black members), new professional administrative positions (including a CEO, CFO, chief diversity, equity, and inclusion officer, and chief human resources officer), establishing an oversight board for a "critical organizational reform," and other accountability improvements (including term limits for board members and restricting internal "gifts").[48] The majority of the HFPA's members voted in favor of the package on May 6; due to California law, the changes to the organization's bylaws are subject to further votes by the HFPA's full membership scheduled in June and July.[49]

While Dick Clark Productions and NBC—the long-time producer and broadcaster of the Golden Globes respectively—supported the planned reforms, Time's Up and a group of 100 PR firms criticized the lack of given timelines for filling some of the new management positions, arguing that they would not be completed soon enough to have any material impact on the cycle of the next Golden Globes. Time's Up further argued that the package "largely contains no specifics" nor "commitments to real accountability or change." In addition, the HFPA did not open up the positions of General Counsel and COO as incumbent George Goeckner would continue in these roles, so he was seen as "holding almost all the keys to all the cabinets and skeleton closets of the HFPA" making him "the real power in the place by many in the know".[50]

On May 7, 2021, both Amazon Studios and Netflix announced that they would stop their activities with the HFPA until sufficient actions on reforms are made. Netflix co-CEO Ted Sarandos explained that the company "[doesn't] believe these proposed new policies—particularly around the size and speed of membership growth—will tackle the HFPA's systemic diversity and inclusion challenges, or the lack of clear standards for how your members should operate."[51][52]

On May 10, AT&T-owned WarnerMedia and its subsidiaries similarly boycotted the HFPA, stating that the proposed reforms "[don't go] far enough in addressing the breadth of our concerns, nor does your timeline capture the immediate need by which these issues should be addressed," and also criticizing "special favors and unprofessional requests [that] have been made to our teams and to others across the industry," the lack of diversity among Golden Globe nominees and winners, and the HFPA not having an "enforced code of conduct that includes zero tolerance for unwanted physical contact of all talent and staff."[53]

The same day, NBC announced that it would not broadcast the 79th Golden Globe Awards ceremony in 2022, stating that "change of this magnitude takes time and work, and we feel strongly that the HFPA needs time to do it right," and that "we are hopeful we will be in a position to air the show in January 2023."[54] In support of the boycotts, Tom Cruise returned the Golden Globes that he won for Born on the Fourth of July, Jerry Maguire and Magnolia.[55] Following these events, the HFPA released a new timeline for its reforms, which would see the process completed by the week of August 2.[56]

On October 1, the HFPA released a list of 21 new members that it had recruited under these reforms, increasing its membership by 20 percent.[57] The HFPA then announced on October 15 that it still planned to hold the 79th Golden Globe Awards ceremony anyway, with or without a U.S. broadcaster.[58] The ceremony was ultimately held as a private event with only HFPA beneficiaries present, and contained a major focus on its philanthropic activities.[59]

In July 2022, the HFPA approved a major restructuring, under which interim CEO Todd Boehly would establish a for-profit entity via his holding company Eldridge Industries (owner of ceremony producer Dick Clark Productions, as well as the entertainment trade publication The Hollywood Reporter) that will hold the Golden Globe Awards' intellectual property and oversee the "professionalization and modernization" of the ceremony, including "[increasing] the size and diversity of the available voters for the annual awards." The HFPA's philanthropic activities would continue separately as a non-profit entity, the Golden Globe Foundation.[60][61]

HFPA was rebranded to Golden Globe Foundation on June 12, 2023.[1]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Hollywood Foreign Press Association

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Hollywood Foreign Press Association (HFPA) was a comprising around 90 international journalists and photographers residing in who reported on the American film and television industries for media outlets in their native countries. Founded in 1943 as the Hollywood Foreign Correspondents' Association by Los Angeles-based foreign correspondents seeking to streamline access to Hollywood events and talent, the HFPA established the in 1944 to recognize outstanding achievements in motion pictures and, later, television. The Golden Globes, voted on exclusively by HFPA members, evolved into a high-profile event often viewed as a for the , with the association wielding significant influence over industry narratives through its selections and celebrity interactions. Over decades, the HFPA also engaged in , donating millions to , scholarships, and entertainment-related causes, funded largely by awards revenue. However, the organization drew intense scrutiny starting in the late for its stagnant membership structure, which included no journalists among its roughly 87 voters until 2021, alongside documented ethical concerns such as members soliciting gifts, paid trips, and undue access from studios and publicists in potential exchange for coverage or votes. A 2021 investigative report amplified these issues, prompting major Hollywood studios to declare they would not participate in HFPA events and broadcaster to cancel airing the 2022 Golden Globes. In a bid to , the HFPA pledged membership expansion to at least 50% non-white journalists by , hired external auditors for compliance, and barred gifts exceeding nominal value, but skepticism persisted amid internal disputes and perceived superficial changes. These pressures culminated in 2023 with the sale of the production rights to investor Todd Boehly's for an undisclosed sum, accompanied by the HFPA's formal disbandment as its nonprofit structure proved untenable. By 2025, the awards had resumed under new ownership with a reconstituted voting body of over 300 international journalists selected via an application process emphasizing diversity, while a faction of former HFPA board members pursued independent revival efforts for , highlighting ongoing tensions over legacy influence and governance.

Founding and Early Development

Establishment in 1944

The Hollywood Foreign Press Association originated as the Hollywood Foreign Correspondents' Association (HFCA) in 1943, formed by a small group of Los Angeles-based foreign journalists covering the U.S. entertainment industry for overseas publications. Amid World War II's disruptions to international travel and communication, these correspondents—numbering around eight to fourteen from various nations—banded together to coordinate access to Hollywood studios, facilitate interviews with actors and directors, and organize the distribution of news to non-U.S. markets. The initiative addressed practical barriers, such as fragmented studio relations and wartime restrictions, enabling more efficient reporting without reliance on ad hoc arrangements. The HFCA's establishment emphasized professional unity, adopting an early motto of "Unity Without Discrimination of or Race" to foster collaboration among diverse expatriate reporters. No single individual is credited as the sole founder in primary accounts; instead, the group effort reflected the collective needs of journalists like those writing for European, Latin American, and Asian outlets, who were often isolated in due to global conflict. This structure provided a formal platform for negotiating press credentials and event invitations, distinguishing it from informal networks. By early 1944, the HFCA had formalized its operations sufficiently to host its inaugural event, an informal luncheon on February 11 at 20th Century Fox Studios, where it presented the first —initially as scrolls honoring distinguished film achievements. This step transitioned the association from a journalistic to an influential awards body, though the HFCA name persisted until a reincorporation following internal disputes renamed it the Hollywood Foreign Press Association.

Inception of the Golden Globe Awards

The Hollywood Foreign Correspondents Association (HFCA), the immediate predecessor to the , initiated the in to honor distinguished achievements in the motion picture industry. Founded in by a group of international film journalists based in , the HFCA sought to formalize relationships with Hollywood studios and facilitate access to stars for interviews. The awards emerged as a means to recognize excellence amid the wartime film landscape, with the first ceremony held on February 11, , as an informal luncheon at 20th Century Fox Studios. Winners, including for Best Actress in The Song of Bernadette, for Best Actor in , and The Song of Bernadette for Best Picture, received scrolls rather than physical trophies. The early format emphasized simplicity, reflecting the nascent organization's limited resources and the era's constraints, with no televised broadcast or extensive publicity. By 1945, the HFCA elevated the event to a formal banquet at , introducing a statuette design contest and awarding the first physical trophies, such as to for Best Picture, for Best Actress, and for Best Actor. In 1946, the iconic globe trophy—depicting a world held aloft on a pedestal—debuted at the March 30 ceremony held at the Hollywood Knickerbocker Club, marking a shift toward a more recognizable emblem of global cinematic recognition. Subsequent ceremonies varied in venue, including the Hollywood Roosevelt Hotel from 1947 to 1949 and the Ambassador Hotel in 1950, before settling at nightclub from 1951 onward. Categories initially encompassed general merits but split into drama and musical/comedy divisions by 1951, broadening the awards' scope. A in 1950 led to the formation of a rival group, the Foreign Press Association of Hollywood, but the organizations merged on October 19, 1955, adopting the Hollywood Foreign Press Association name and unifying administration of the Golden Globes thereafter. This consolidation stabilized the awards' governance, though early iterations remained modest compared to the , focusing on international journalistic perspectives rather than broad industry consensus.

Organizational Framework

Membership Eligibility and Selection Process

Membership eligibility for the Hollywood Foreign Press Association (HFPA) historically required applicants to be full-time journalists employed by non-U.S.-based media outlets specializing in coverage, with a primary residence in and submission of at least 24 recent clippings demonstrating regular reporting on film and television. Prospective members also needed sponsorship from two existing HFPA members, after which the full membership body voted, admitting up to five top candidates as provisional members for one year, subject to activity requirements for full status. In response to 2021 scandals involving ethical lapses and lack of diversity, the HFPA approved sweeping reforms to bylaws and membership guidelines, eliminating the residency mandate, removing the two-sponsor requirement, and broadening eligibility to journalists across all media formats—including broadcast, digital, and —provided they covered entertainment for foreign-language outlets. These changes aimed to expand access nationwide and internationally while prioritizing credible, verified journalistic experience over prior geographic or sponsorship barriers. The reformed selection process shifted to a more transparent vetting mechanism led by a Credentials Committee, composed of a of non-HFPA members—including external journalists and diversity experts—to review applications for journalistic merit, ethical standards, and alignment with inclusion goals. Applicants submit portfolios of recent work, which the committee evaluates without traditional voting by the full body, though final approvals incorporate oversight from an focused on equity. This structure facilitated rapid diversification, with 21 new members added in October 2021, including the first members in decades, and further expansions to 310 total voters by April 2023 through recruitment of international journalists residing outside the U.S. with verified reporting for global media. Following the HFPA's reconstitution in July 2025 after a period of operational disbandment, membership criteria continue to emphasize non-U.S. residency for voters and sustained coverage of Hollywood for international outlets, with the Credentials Committee retaining authority over selections to maintain journalistic integrity amid ongoing scrutiny. No major alterations to eligibility were announced in the reboot, preserving the post-2021 framework's focus on expanding and diversifying the pool of qualified foreign correspondents.

Historical Membership Demographics and Size

The Hollywood Foreign Press Association (HFPA), initially established as the Hollywood Foreign Correspondents Association in 1943, originated with a modest cadre of foreign journalists stationed in during , who sought formalized access to Hollywood studios for reporting purposes. Exact founding membership numbers remain undocumented in primary records, but the group functioned as a tight-knit assembly of international correspondents rather than a large collective, reflecting the limited pool of overseas media personnel in the U.S. at the time. Over subsequent decades, the HFPA sustained a deliberately compact size, averaging 80 to 90 members, which it preserved through stringent eligibility criteria favoring established foreign-based journalists over rapid expansion. By early , membership stood at precisely 87 individuals, a figure emblematic of the organization's historical stasis despite its 75-year tenure by 2018. These members hailed from roughly 55 countries, underscoring a multinational composition geared toward global coverage, though the small scale drew scrutiny for potentially amplifying individual influences within voting processes like the Golden Globes. Demographically, pre-2021 membership skewed toward experienced international reporters, with a majority—over 50%—identifying as female and approximately 35% from non-European nations, indicative of a focus on diverse nationalities but limited domestic U.S. representation. Racial and ethnic diversity was notably sparse; while some members of color were present from Asian, Latin American, and other backgrounds, the HFPA maintained zero Black members across its nearly eight-decade history prior to reforms, a gap highlighted in investigative reporting as stemming from recruitment patterns favoring established foreign outlets over broader inclusion efforts. This homogeneity persisted amid the group's motto of "Unity Without Discrimination of Religion or Race," yet empirical membership data revealed practical shortcomings in racial representation. Reform initiatives in prompted the largest single admission in HFPA history, with 21 new members—including six journalists—elevating the total to 105 and yielding a post-addition breakdown of 57.1% women, 17.1% Asian, 11.4% Latinx, and 5.7% . Subsequent additions, such as 103 voters in (bringing the voting pool to its then-largest at around 200, with 43.5% European, 18.5% Latin American, 17% Asian, and 9% Middle Eastern/North African origins), further diversified the body amid external pressures, though these expansions coincided with operational upheaval, culminating in the HFPA's effective disbandment in 2023 and a residual core of about 60 members by mid-2025.

Core Activities

Administration of the Golden Globe Awards

The Hollywood Foreign Press Association (HFPA) administered the annually from their establishment on January 18, 1944, as an informal luncheon event, through the ceremony's evolution into a televised broadcast spectacle, until the HFPA's dissolution in June 2023. During this period, the HFPA's approximately 80 to 90 active members—international entertainment journalists based in the area—held sole responsibility for determining nominees and winners across categories honoring film and television achievements. Eligibility for consideration required submitted works to meet defined criteria, including U.S. theatrical releases for films (minimum 500 screens or streaming equivalents) or qualifying broadcast dates for television within the eligibility year, typically from January 1 to December 31 preceding the awards. Studios and distributors initiated the process by submitting official entry forms online, providing screeners and promotional materials to HFPA members, who reviewed entries independently without mandatory screenings. Nominations, announced in mid-December, were selected by all active members voting electronically; each could nominate up to five candidates per category, ranking them from 1 to 5, with the highest aggregate scores advancing the top five or six per category to the final ballot. Final winners were determined in early through a similar full-membership vote, where every active HFPA member, irrespective of their journalistic beat, cast ballots across all categories, including both film and television. Ballots were tabulated by an independent accounting firm to ensure secrecy and integrity, with results embargoed until the live ceremony. The HFPA coordinated the event logistics, traditionally held at Hotel in , in partnership with production entities like for staging, celebrity hosting, and national broadcast on networks such as until 2021. HFPA administration generated substantial from broadcast rights, sponsorships, and ticket sales, which funded philanthropic but also drew for member perks and ethical lapses detailed elsewhere. Following 2021 exposés on operational deficiencies, the HFPA implemented interim reforms like ethics training and membership expansion attempts, yet these proved insufficient, culminating in the 2023 asset sale to and , transferring awards administration to a new for-profit entity with an expanded pool of around 300 vetted international journalists as voters. As of 2025, residual HFPA members have pursued revival efforts and audits of the dissolution agreement, but control of the Golden Globes remains with the acquiring parties.

Philanthropic Efforts and Grants

The Hollywood Foreign Press Association (HFPA) operated a philanthropic program through its , established to distribute grants derived from revenues generated by the telecast and related licensing fees. This initiative supported nonprofit organizations focused on , , , and cultural programs, with funding directed toward both domestic and international entities aiding underserved communities and emerging artists. From the program's inception in 1989 through its active years, the HFPA awarded over $50 million in total grants, including more than $44 million by the 2020-21 cycle alone. Annual distributions varied, with notable examples including $4.5 million across 112 grants to 93 programs and organizations in the 2022-23 fiscal year, marking a 3.2% increase from the prior period and encompassing restoration efforts, university fellowships, and journalism training. Earlier cycles saw $3.8 million disbursed in 2019 and $5 million in another recent year, prioritizing entities like universities and film schools for scholarships and residencies in and . Key recipients included the , which received nearly $2 million since for defending press freedoms globally, as well as academic institutions such as New York University's Tisch School of the Arts for HFPA fellowships in and television production. Grants also funded restoration projects, such as those preserving classic international cinema, and educational programs nurturing young talent in the entertainment industry, reflecting the HFPA's emphasis on fostering cross-cultural exchange and professional development. Following the HFPA's restructuring in 2023, these efforts transitioned to the Golden Globe Foundation, which continued annual grant cycles using similar revenue streams, awarding millions in 2024-25 to aligned causes.

Other Programs and Residencies

The HFPA Residency program offered emerging international filmmakers a three-week intensive experience in , featuring master classes, workshops on and distribution, sessions, screenings, and networking opportunities with industry professionals. Developed in partnership with Film Independent, the initiative selected participants from specialized sections of major film festivals, such as the Biennale College at the Venice International Film Festival, typically awarding fellowships to four individuals including writers, directors, and producers. Fellows received additional support like Film Independent membership and orientation events to facilitate integration into the Hollywood ecosystem. The program extended collaborations to other festivals, including the , where HFPA awarded residency prizes to promising talents starting in 2018. In September 2022, the HFPA renewed the fellowships specifically for College participants, emphasizing global mentorship and ties to the international film community. Participants showcased their work through public screenings and Q&A sessions moderated by HFPA journalists; for instance, in one cohort, Azeri filmmaker Raffaella presented Banu, a exploring themes of emancipation amid patriarchal constraints. Beyond the residency, the HFPA administered targeted fellowships and scholarships aimed at nurturing future journalists and filmmakers, including support for undergraduate and graduate programs in and . These initiatives funded pre-professional training for young artists, such as MFA projects at institutions like , with awards dating back to at least 2011. The HFPA also backed endowments and production grants, prioritizing educational access for underrepresented or international talents in fields.

Ethical and Operational Challenges

Accusations of Corruption and Self-Dealing

In February 2021, a investigation accused the Hollywood Foreign Press Association (HFPA) of systemic , alleging that board members and executives prioritized personal interests over organizational reforms, including blocking efforts to limit conflicts of interest that allowed members to accept studio perks while voting on awards. The report highlighted instances where HFPA leaders, operating as a tax-exempt nonprofit, maintained bylaws that entrenched their control, such as requiring a vote for changes that could curtail member benefits derived from Golden Globe-related revenues, which exceeded $20 million annually in licensing fees prior to the scandals. These claims were echoed in a lawsuit filed by Norwegian member Kjersti Flaa, who alleged the HFPA fostered a "culture of corruption" by treating the organization as a "personal fiefdom," with executives engaging in self-dealing through opaque decision-making and retaliation against critics, including threats of expulsion for pushing ethical reforms. Flaa's suit, filed in Los Angeles Superior Court, sought to invalidate board actions and compel transparency, asserting that the HFPA's structure enabled leaders to derive undue personal advantages from its nonprofit status without accountability to members or the public. Earlier precedents included a 2011 by former HFPA Michael Russell, who claimed members routinely accepted cash payments, luxury vacations, and other emoluments from studios in exchange for favorable coverage and award considerations, violating the organization's nonprofit and constituting by conflating personal gain with official duties. Although the was settled out of , it exposed longstanding patterns, such as board resistance to codes that would limit such practices, allowing a small cadre of long-serving members to influence allocations from Golden Globe proceeds for personal or affiliated perks. In June 2021, resigning members cited persistent and as reasons for departure, accusing the HFPA of accommodating "" and protecting insiders who blocked investigations into financial improprieties, including the misuse of millions in award-show revenues for non-charitable purposes. These allegations contributed to broader scrutiny, including a 2022 congressional request for an IRS into potential financial , though no formal charges resulted, underscoring the challenges in proving intent amid the HFPA's opaque . Despite reforms post-2021, such as new bylaws prohibiting certain conflicts, critics argued the accusations revealed a causal link between the HFPA's insular leadership—dominated by non-U.S. journalists with limited editorial oversight—and incentives for self-perpetuating over journalistic integrity.

Influence Peddling and Perks from Studios

The Hollywood Foreign Press Association (HFPA) long permitted its members to accept extravagant perks from film studios and producers, including all-expenses-paid junkets, luxury accommodations, gourmet meals, and promotional gifts, which critics argued fostered influence peddling by compromising journalistic independence and voting . These practices were enabled by the absence of a formal code until 2021, allowing the roughly 80-90 members—many of whom wrote for small foreign outlets with limited resources—to receive such benefits in exchange for access, favorable coverage, and potential support in Golden Globe nominations. Studios actively courted HFPA voters due to the group's small size and outsized influence over awards, with publicists organizing events that blurred lines between reporting and promotion. Notable examples included a 2010 six-day Paris junket funded by the producers of The Tourist, where over 50 HFPA members enjoyed private River cruises, high-end dinners, and celebrity interactions with stars like and , timed to coincide with press activities that boosted the film's profile ahead of awards season. Similar studio-sponsored trips to film sets, festivals, and international locations were routine, often covering , hotels, and for members and sometimes their companions, with HFPA bylaws until 2021 explicitly permitting such travel as part of professional duties. Gifts ranged from designer swag bags to high-value items like jewelry and electronics provided during promotional events, which members were not required to disclose or reject. Norwegian reporter Kjersti Flaa, a former HFPA member, publicly stated in 2021 that such "swag from the studios" inevitably swayed votes, as the perks created personal obligations amid the competitive awards process. Lawsuits underscored the systemic nature of these arrangements. In 2011, HFPA publicist Michael Russell filed a wrongful termination suit alleging that members accepted direct payments from studios for colleagues on nominations and awards, including fees for "representing" films in HFPA circles, which the organization denied but which highlighted risks. Flaa's separate 2021 lawsuit described an "institutionalized culture of ," claiming HFPA leadership overlooked members' acceptance of studio bribes disguised as perks to secure positive press and votes, with little oversight despite the nonprofit's tax-exempt status. Historical precedents, such as 1980s allegations around Pia Zadora's Globe win tied to her parents' lavish voter parties at a rented Beverly Hills , reinforced perceptions of dynamics dating back decades. These perks eroded HFPA credibility, as investigations revealed members' dual roles as voters and beneficiaries of studio largesse, potentially prioritizing access over in a group lacking diverse journalistic standards. Studios' targeted efforts amplified influence, given HFPA's determined winners in key categories, leading groups like Time's Up to demand bans on gifts and self-funded travel by 2021 amid broader ethical scrutiny. Despite occasional denials from HFPA , the practices persisted as a Hollywood norm until external pressure forced policy shifts, though earlier reforms had proven insufficient.

Diversity and Representation Debates

Pre-2021 Lack of Demographic Variety

Prior to , the Hollywood Foreign Press Association (HFPA) maintained a membership of 87 individuals, all of whom were international journalists required to cover for non-U.S. markets and hold non-U.S. or . This body included representatives from more than 50 countries, such as , , , , , and , with approximately 35% of members originating from non-European nations. Despite this geographic spread and the presence of some non-white members, the group had zero members, a fact confirmed by HFPA representatives and unchanged for nearly two decades due to the organization's selective admission practices. The HFPA's structure enforced one member per designated territory, fostering territorial that limited turnover and new entrants, as acknowledged in former president Philip Berk's 2014 memoir. This policy, combined with rigorous eligibility criteria emphasizing established foreign media affiliations, contributed to a stagnant pool that underrepresented certain demographics, including journalists who might otherwise qualify but faced barriers from entrenched incumbents. While the HFPA described its ranks as including "a number of people of color," the absence of representation highlighted a specific gap in racial diversity relative to the global entertainment press landscape. Gender composition leaned toward a female membership, though exact pre- figures were not publicly detailed beyond HFPA statements during early reforms. Age demographics skewed older, with a significant portion of members elderly; for instance, at least one was in their 90s and reportedly deaf and legally blind, reflecting limited renewal and the long tenures enabled by the territorial system. Overall, these factors resulted in a membership that, while international in origin, lacked variety in race—particularly Black inclusion—and featured an aging profile that prioritized continuity over broader demographic reflection.

External Pressures and Media Backlash

In February 2021, a investigation exposed that the Hollywood Foreign Press Association (HFPA) had no members among its approximately 87 voters, a situation unchanged for nearly two decades, prompting widespread media condemnation and demands for accountability. The report, which also highlighted ethical lapses such as substantial payments from studios to members, fueled accusations of systemic exclusion and irrelevance in an industry increasingly focused on representational equity, leading outlets like and Vanity Fair to portray the HFPA as emblematic of Hollywood's entrenched insularity. The backlash intensified during the February 28, 2021, Golden Globe telecast, where hosts and directly lampooned the absence of Black voters, with Fey stating, "The HFPA is made up of around 90 international—no Black—journalists who attend movie junkets each year in search of a better life." This on-air critique, amplified by social media campaigns from groups like Time's Up, drew endorsements from high-profile figures; publicly declined future HFPA participation, citing a "toxic" culture of ethical compromises. Industry guilds, including the Hollywood Foreign Press Guild via publicists, issued advisories urging talent to avoid HFPA events, framing cooperation as complicity in perpetuating homogeneity. External pressure peaked in May 2021 when announced it would not broadcast the 2022 Golden Globes, citing the HFPA's "insufficient" diversity reforms and ongoing scandals as eroding . Concurrently, actor returned his three Golden Globe trophies—earned for Born on the Fourth of July (1990), (1997), and (2000)—in a symbolic rejection of the organization, a move covered extensively as emblematic of celebrity disavowal. These actions, rooted in the verifiable demographic void rather than unsubstantiated claims, underscored a causal link between the HFPA's stagnant membership criteria—prioritizing foreign-based print journalists—and broader industry intolerance for such gaps, though critics noted the pressures often conflated diversity deficits with prior ethical issues without distinguishing root causes.

Internal Justifications and Structural Realities

The Hollywood Foreign Press Association's membership criteria, codified in its bylaws, mandated that applicants be full-time employees of non-U.S. media outlets regularly publishing coverage of the American entertainment industry, maintain in , and demonstrate sustained professional output in that specialty. These requirements, rooted in the organization's 1943 founding as a for international correspondents based in , structurally constrained the voter pool to a niche demographic: journalists assigned by foreign publications to Hollywood beats, a role rarely filled by professionals owing to global media hiring practices that prioritized established networks in , , and over underrepresented groups from or the . This setup yielded a body of 87 members in 2021 with zero voters, reflecting not deliberate exclusion but the empirical of qualifying candidates from foreign outlets willing to sponsor long-term U.S. relocations for such specialized roles. Internally, HFPA leadership had long justified the composition as merit-driven, emphasizing members' expertise in bridging Hollywood to global audiences via their employers' platforms, without formal demographic quotas or affirmative recruitment. Prior to the 2021 investigation exposing the absence of Black members, the organization viewed its international focus as inherently diverse in nationality—spanning over 50 countries—dismissing calls for racial parity as secondary to journalistic qualifications. This stance aligned with first-come, peer-vetted admissions processes that favored continuity over engineered change, though it overlooked how self-perpetuating networks among existing members amplified homogeneity. Under mounting external scrutiny, HFPA officials conceded the underrepresentation in February 2021, stating, "We understand that we need to bring in members, as well as members from other underrepresented backgrounds," and pledging immediate recruitment efforts without retroactively defending the prior beyond vague commitments to "transformational change." By March, the board formalized a target of at least 13% membership to match U.S. population proportions, framing it as a pragmatic response to sustain relevance amid boycotts, yet internal documents revealed resistance from some members who argued that rushed inclusions risked diluting professional standards and that true diversification required organic growth from foreign media pipelines rather than lowered thresholds. These structural realities—tied to verifiable dependencies and geographic mandates—persisted as barriers even post-reform, as evidenced by the HFPA's subsequent expansion to include digital and non-print journalists only after altering bylaws in , underscoring how the original model prioritized functional expertise over representational equity. Internal rationales thus pivoted from unapologetic professionalism to coerced adaptation, highlighting a causal disconnect between the group's operational imperatives and Hollywood's identity-driven expectations.

Reform Attempts and Industry Responses

2021-2022 Membership Expansions and Code Changes

In response to widespread criticism over its lack of diversity and ethical lapses, the Hollywood Foreign Press Association (HFPA) implemented significant reforms in 2021, including revisions to its and bylaws. On , 2021, HFPA members voted to approve a new Code of Professional and Ethical Conduct, which prohibited verbal or physical , the use of membership for personal gain or to influence awards decisions, and the acceptance of gifts or inducements from studios or publicists. This code required all members to sign it, with violations subject to disciplinary action, including potential expulsion, and emphasized anti-bullying, anti-, and non-discrimination policies. Further structural changes followed in July 2021, when the HFPA adopted revised bylaws that codified reforms in , membership criteria, Golden Globes voting procedures, and ethical standards, including a universal ban on gifts regardless of value. These updates expanded the board's and introduced stricter oversight mechanisms, such as hiring an independent ethics and establishing a whistleblower , aimed at addressing prior accusations of self-dealing and influence peddling. The reforms were partly driven by NBC's May 10, 2021, decision to forgo broadcasting the 2022 Golden Globes, which pressured the HFPA to accelerate changes, including a commitment to expand membership by 50% over 18 months to incorporate more underrepresented voices. Membership expansion materialized prominently in September 2021, when the HFPA admitted its largest-ever class of 21 new international journalists on October 1, increasing total membership from approximately 84 to 105 and representing a more than 20% growth. This cohort was notably diverse, with 48% identifying as women, 29% as , 24% as Asian, 29% as Latinx, and 19% as Middle Eastern or North African; it included six members, addressing the prior absence of any journalists in the organization. New members gained immediate voting rights for the Golden Globes under the updated bylaws, with the HFPA announcing intentions for additional recruitment in 2022 to sustain diversification efforts. Into 2022, the HFPA continued refining these changes amid ongoing , enforcing the gift ban and code adherence as prerequisites for participation in awards processes, though the organization faced persistent questions about the depth of cultural shifts within its ranks. These reforms enabled a tentative return to televised Golden Globes in January 2023 under a one-year deal, contingent on demonstrated progress.

Studio Boycotts and Broadcast Pullouts

In May 2021, major Hollywood studios initiated boycotts against the Hollywood Foreign Press Association (HFPA) following revelations of its lack of racial diversity and ethical lapses, as detailed in a February 2021 investigation. became the first major studio to formally boycott the HFPA and Golden Globes on May 7, 2021, stating it would halt all participation, including submissions, events, and advertising, until substantive reforms addressed the organization's diversity deficit and allegations of favoritism. Amazon Studios followed suit shortly thereafter, citing similar concerns over the HFPA's failure to represent broader industry demographics and its history of accepting undue perks from studios. WarnerMedia escalated the industry response on May 10, 2021, announcing that its divisions—including , HBO Max, , Warner Bros. Television, and networks TNT and TBS—would cease all involvement in HFPA activities, expressing regret for prior support amid the unfolding scandals. These actions reflected a coordinated pushback from streaming giants and traditional studios, with additional companies like NBCUniversal's entertainment arms implicitly aligning by withholding support; the boycotts effectively limited the HFPA's access to new film and television submissions for the 2022 Golden Globes, though some legacy entries persisted. The broadcast fallout culminated on May 10, 2021, when , the long-standing network partner for the Golden Globes since 1996, declared it would not air the 2022 ceremony, emphasizing that while the HFPA showed commitment to reform, "change of this magnitude takes time and work" requiring further verification before resuming partnership. This decision left the January 9, 2022, event untelevised—held privately at with winners announced via a news release and livestreamed on platforms like —depriving the HFPA of its primary revenue stream from 's $60 million annual deal and amplifying financial strain amid the organization's pre-existing operational deficits. The pullout underscored broader industry skepticism toward the HFPA's reform pledges, with conditioning a potential 2023 return on demonstrated progress in diversity hiring and ethical standards.

Effectiveness and Criticisms of Reforms

Despite implementing a series of reforms in and , including expanding membership from 87 to 105 voters by adding 21 new members in with a focus on underrepresented groups and 103 additional international journalists by late , the HFPA struggled to restore industry trust. The organization adopted a new prohibiting gifts over $100 from studios, mandatory ethics training, and a for-cause removal for violations, aiming to curb influence peddling. These changes enabled a limited return of the Golden Globes broadcast in January 2023 under new ownership, with airing the event after a one-year hiatus, suggesting partial operational stabilization. However, the reforms failed to prevent the HFPA's ultimate dissolution in June 2023, when its assets were acquired by , indicating insufficient long-term efficacy in addressing systemic issues. Critics from Hollywood publicists and advocacy groups like Time's Up argued that the reforms were inadequate and reactive, with over 100 PR firms signing a letter in August 2021 demanding faster inclusion standards before granting access to clients, highlighting persistent ethical lapses such as a "toxic" internal culture of and retribution. Internal HFPA members expressed dissatisfaction, with some resigning in June 2021 over perceived during reform deliberations and others criticizing the diversity quotas as overly focused on U.S. demographics rather than global representation. Former members, including Chinese journalist Wenting Xu, voiced skepticism about the changes' depth, citing ongoing and fear among voters despite the new bylaws approved in August 2021. The inclusion of U.S.-based journalists working for foreign outlets drew particular for diluting the HFPA's original mandate of exclusively non-U.S. resident foreign correspondents, potentially undermining the awards' unique international perspective while failing to fully resolve conflicts of interest. Industry observers noted that prior reform pledges post-controversies had historically faltered, and the 2021-2022 efforts, while structurally altering governance, did not eradicate allegations of , as evidenced by continued studio boycotts from and Amazon in May 2021. This pattern contributed to the HFPA's inability to sustain independence, culminating in its replacement by a new voting body under Eldridge control.

Dissolution and Asset Transfer

2023 Acquisition by

In June 2023, , in partnership with (DCP)—a owned by —acquired all assets, , and properties associated with the from the Hollywood Foreign Press Association (HFPA). The transaction, announced on June 12, 2023, effectively marked the end of the HFPA as an operational entity, with plans to wind down its activities and dissolve the organization. The deal followed a July 2022 vote by HFPA members to adopt a proposal from Eldridge, which laid the groundwork for deeper involvement by the investment firm led by . Under the 2023 agreement, proceeds from the sale, combined with the HFPA's remaining resources, were designated to fund a newly established for-profit Golden Globe Foundation aimed at supporting emerging journalists and underrepresented voices in entertainment. DCP retained responsibility for producing and managing the Golden Globes telecast, ensuring continuity of the awards show under new ownership. Financial terms of the acquisition were not publicly disclosed. This acquisition came amid ongoing scrutiny of the HFPA's governance and ethics reforms implemented since , following scandals involving diversity deficits and ethical lapses in awards processes. California regulators approved the reorganization plan, which facilitated the transfer while addressing prior nonprofit compliance issues tied to the HFPA's structure. The move shifted control of the Golden Globes from the HFPA's foreign correspondent membership to a corporate entity, with Eldridge committing to modernize operations and expand voter diversity beyond the original international press focus.

Shutdown of HFPA Operations

In June 2023, the Hollywood Foreign Press Association (HFPA) ceased operations as part of a settlement agreement that transferred its assets, including the , to and . The transaction, announced on June 12, required the dissolution of the HFPA as a nonprofit entity under law, with the organization's board voting to approve the wind-down to facilitate the asset sale. California Attorney General Rob Bonta approved the reorganization plan on the same date, resolving a prior investigation into the HFPA's governance and finances that had begun amid scandals involving ethical lapses and demographic imbalances in membership. The shutdown ended the HFPA's role in administering the Golden Globes, with its approximately 100 members losing voting privileges; instead, a new voting body was established under the buyers' control, comprising international journalists but without the HFPA's direct oversight. The dissolution addressed persistent industry distrust stemming from documented issues, such as the lack of members until and allegations of pay-for-access practices, which had prompted to drop broadcast rights in and studios to submissions. Despite interim reforms like membership expansion to over 300 and new ethics codes, the HFPA's structure as a standalone nonprofit was deemed untenable for restoring credibility, leading to the full operational closure rather than continued reform. The asset transfer included rights, historical archives, and future revenue streams from the awards, valued implicitly through the deal's structure but not publicly disclosed in exact figures.

Restructuring of Golden Globes Voting Body

Following the June 12, 2023, acquisition of Golden Globes assets by and , the former Hollywood Foreign Press Association's approximately 90 members were integrated into the new ownership structure under Penske Media Eldridge (PME), transitioning from HFPA employees to compensated voting participants in the reorganized awards process. This shift dissolved HFPA operations while preserving a core of legacy voters, who numbered around 50 and received $75,000 annual base salaries as stipulated in the asset transfer agreement, prompting concerns over potential incentives for biased or influenced voting. To address prior criticisms of limited size and demographic homogeneity—stemming from HFPA's pre-2021 membership of 87 predominantly non-diverse journalists—the voting body was substantially expanded post-acquisition to include broader international representation. For the 81st Golden Globes in January 2024, the electorate grew to 300 journalists from over 75 countries, comprising 47% women and 60% identifying as racially or ethnically diverse (26.3% Latinx, 13% Asian, 11% , 9% Middle Eastern/North African). This included new additions from underrepresented nations such as , , and , with eligibility restricted to active foreign-language media professionals meeting criteria like five years of experience and 20 annual stories on . Further adjustments refined the pool: in September 2023, 18 legacy HFPA-affiliated voters were removed for failing to participate actively, ensuring only engaged members influenced outcomes for the 81st ceremony. By February 2025, PME terminated the salary policy for legacy voters, offering each $102,500 in severance while permitting continued voting privileges through 2026 without compensation, a move aimed at eliminating pay-for-vote perceptions and aligning with nonprofit awards standards like the Oscars. Critics, however, noted that retaining legacy members—despite expansions—risked perpetuating HFPA-era ethical lapses, such as past ethical complaints over , though no formal investigations confirmed voting integrity post-reform.

Recent Revival Initiatives

2025 Reconstitution Efforts

In July 2025, approximately 60 remaining members of the Hollywood Foreign Press Association (HFPA) voted on July 1 to reconstitute the organization, reinstating its board and membership structure two years after the group's dissolution in the 2023 asset sale to . The move stemmed from dissatisfaction among "legacy voters"—holdover HFPA members integrated into the restructured Golden Globes voting body—following the February 2025 termination of their annual $75,000 payments by owners and (affiliated with Penske Media). The reconstitution efforts included ousting HFPA president and Golden Globes co-CEO Helen Hoehne on July 3, 2025, amid accusations of her prioritizing the interests of Eldridge and Penske over members' concerns, as well as launching an of the 2023 acquisition deal that had dissolved the HFPA as a nonprofit. An independent board member resigned in protest, citing a "clear breach of fiduciary duty" in the revival push, which sought to challenge the terms under which HFPA assets, including Golden Globes , were transferred to private ownership. On July 17, 2025, members elected Scott Orlin, the U.S. correspondent for German magazine Cinema, as president of the reconstituted HFPA, signaling intent to reassert influence over awards governance and potentially renegotiate control from Eldridge, whose acquisition had been framed as resolving prior diversity and scandals but left legacy members with reduced roles. These actions escalated legal and operational tensions, placing the January 2026 Golden Globes broadcast—contracted to —in uncertainty as the revived HFPA aimed to "reexamine" the 2023 agreement approved by a majority of its then-90 members. The efforts highlight ongoing fractures between the original foreign press cohort and corporate overseers, with members arguing the dissolution undervalued HFPA's nonprofit legacy in and recognition.

Disputes with Current Golden Globes Owners

In July 2025, surviving members of the Hollywood Foreign Press Association (HFPA) voted to formally reactivate the organization, two years after its reported dissolution as part of the 2023 asset sale to Eldridge Industries, amid ongoing grievances over the terms of that transaction and subsequent treatment by the buyers. The reactivation included a mandate to audit the 2023 acquisition by Eldridge—led by Todd Boehly—and its affiliates, including Dick Clark Productions and Penske Media Corporation, with members alleging procedural irregularities and potential undervaluation of HFPA assets during the nonprofit's distress sale following diversity and ethics scandals. Central to the disputes were the termination of annual stipends and perks for legacy HFPA voters, who had received $75,000 salaries as part of the restructured voting body post-2023; Eldridge ended these payments in February 2025, prompting claims from holdover members that they were entitled to continued compensation under prior agreements. Eldridge offered severance packages to these members contingent on accepting the end of their roles after the 2026 Golden Globes, but mediation between the parties remained unresolved as of July 2025, with HFPA members rejecting the terms as insufficient. Allegations of "fraudulent behavior" in the acquisition process, including rushed dissolution votes and opaque financial dealings, led sidelined ex-HFPA members to threaten legal action against Boehly and associates as early as November 2024, prompting the California Attorney General's office to reassess the deal's compliance with nonprofit regulations. These claims, detailed in member communications obtained by reporting outlets, centered on assertions that the sale undervalued the Golden Globes franchise—estimated at over $100 million—and bypassed proper fiduciary duties to HFPA stakeholders. No formal lawsuit had been filed by October 2025, but the reactivation vote positioned the revived HFPA to potentially challenge Eldridge's control over awards governance and intellectual property rights.

Broader Impact and Evaluation

Contributions to Hollywood Recognition

The Hollywood Foreign Press Association (HFPA), originally formed as the Hollywood Foreign Correspondents' Association in 1943 by a group of international journalists based in , established the to honor achievements in the American film industry. The inaugural ceremony occurred on February 11, 1944, as an informal luncheon at 20th Century Fox Studios, recognizing outstanding motion pictures and performers with a focus on entertainment value from an international vantage point. This early initiative provided a dedicated platform for foreign media to spotlight Hollywood's output, distinguishing it from domestic awards like the Oscars by emphasizing global appeal and accessibility. Through the Golden Globes, the HFPA contributed to heightened international visibility for Hollywood talent and productions, as its voting body—composed exclusively of non-U.S. journalists—offered validation from overseas perspectives, often amplifying films' worldwide marketability. The awards' structure, which separated categories for drama and musical/comedy films starting in the , encouraged broader recognition of genre diversity within Hollywood's annual slate, influencing subsequent industry practices. Winners frequently gained momentum in the broader awards season, with Golden Globe successes correlating to Oscar nominations and box-office boosts, thereby reinforcing Hollywood's prestige on the global stage. In 1952, the HFPA introduced the Award for "outstanding contribution to the entertainment field," first given to the director himself, which evolved into a lifetime achievement honor that celebrated veteran Hollywood figures and sustained long-term industry legacies. By televising the ceremony from onward, the HFPA expanded Hollywood's reach to international audiences via broadcast, fostering cultural exchange and elevating the perceived glamour of American cinema abroad. These efforts collectively positioned the Golden Globes as a for Hollywood's annual highlights, drawing foreign press engagement that translated into enhanced promotional opportunities for studios and stars.

Critiques of the Foreign Press Model

The HFPA's restriction of voting membership to foreign-born journalists based in , numbering approximately 87 in 2021, created a small, homogeneous electorate that critics argued lacked the breadth to credibly represent global cinematic tastes or domestic diversity. This structure amplified the influence of individual voters, many from smaller international outlets, over awards decisions affecting major studios and talent, often prioritizing access to perks over rigorous critique. A 2021 investigation exposed zero members in the group, sparking industry backlash for failing to reflect Hollywood's multicultural workforce despite the "foreign press" branding intended to signal international perspective. Ethical lapses inherent to the model drew further scrutiny, as members' reliance on studio-hosted events, gifts, and sponsored trips—documented in exchanges with publicists—fostered accusations of vote-trading and rather than independent evaluation. Reports detailed instances of , including the HFPA selling event tickets to non-members and tolerating smear campaigns against critical journalists, which undermined the awards' integrity. The opaque membership criteria, requiring applicants to navigate discretionary approvals, led to lawsuits alleging , with rejected candidates from reputable outlets claiming arbitrary exclusion to preserve insider dynamics. Critics contended that the foreign-only mandate, while aiming for outsider insights, instead insulated the group from and broader journalistic norms, enabling financial irregularities like unscrutinized expenditures and favoritism toward films with promotional largesse. Post-2021 reforms, including salary payments to voters starting at $75,000 annually, intensified perceptions of commodified influence, culminating in the model's collapse as studios and networks distanced themselves, viewing it as structurally prone to bias over merit-based awards. This framework's emphasis on exclusivity over inclusivity and transparency ultimately eroded trust, positioning the Golden Globes as less predictive of Oscar success than peer-voted alternatives like the .

Long-Term Legacy in Awards Culture

The Hollywood Foreign Press Association (HFPA), founded in 1943 as the Hollywood Foreign Correspondents' Association, established the on February 11, 1944, as an informal luncheon event to honor film achievements from an international journalistic viewpoint. This outsider perspective, drawn from foreign-based reporters rather than Hollywood insiders, introduced a populist element to awards culture, emphasizing star appeal and global marketability over the peer-reviewed craftsmanship prioritized by the . Early innovations, such as polling over 900 international readers for "World Favorites" awards, underscored the HFPA's role in bridging Hollywood with overseas audiences, fostering early buzz for films' international viability. The Golden Globes' structural distinctions—separating from television categories starting in the early and dividing awards into versus musical or comedy—created a more expansive framework than the Oscars' initial -only focus, allowing broader contender slates and influencing studio strategies to position projects across genres for maximum nominations. Held annually just before Oscar nominations voting, the event has historically amplified awards-season momentum, with Globe winners often securing traction through heightened visibility, though best-picture alignment occurs in only about 40% of cases over recent decades, reflecting divergent voter priorities. This timing and format have embedded the Globes as a for Oscar predictions, shaping campaign expenditures and media narratives. Critics have long argued that the foreign-press voting model undermined , as the small cadre of journalists—peaking at around 90 members pre-2021—lacked the specialized expertise of industry peers, leading to selections perceived as swayed by glamour, studio perks, or limited exposure rather than rigorous evaluation. Ethical lapses, including documented instances of undisclosed gifts and favors from studios, reinforced views of the awards as a "popularity contest" susceptible to influence, diminishing their status relative to the Oscars. The HFPA's 2021 scandals over diversity deficits—no Black members for two decades—and ethical violations catalyzed industry-wide reforms, exposing vulnerabilities in awards governance and prompting enhanced transparency standards across bodies like the . Following the HFPA's dissolution on June 12, 2023, and asset transfer to , the restructured Golden Globes—now with over 300 voters from 76 countries, 58% identifying as ethnically diverse—perpetuate the bifurcated categories and pre-Oscar timing, but with diluted ties to the original foreign-press . This cements the HFPA's legacy as both innovator of accessible, buzz-generating awards and cautionary exemplar of insularity's risks in elite cultural institutions.

References

  1. https://www.rcfp.org/hfpa-la-times-press-freedom-week/
  2. https://goldenglobes.com/articles/how-it-all-began-hfpa-started-hfca/
  3. https://www.reuters.com/lifestyle/golden-globe-awards-sold-hollywood-foreign-press-group-shut-down-2023-06-12/
  4. https://goldenglobes.com/articles/hfpa-highlights-philanthropy-grants-dinner/
  5. https://nypost.com/2022/01/08/hfpa-controversy-timeline-why-2022-golden-globes-almost-werent/
  6. https://www.newsweek.com/golden-globe-2022-controversies-hfpa-diversity-annual-awards-1666306
  7. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/06/12/business/media/golden-globes-sale.html
  8. https://variety.com/2025/tv/news/hfpa-revive-disputes-golden-globe-awards-dick-clark-boehly-1236446656/
  9. https://www.cbc.ca/news/entertainment/golden-globes-1.7424163
  10. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/10/style/hfpa-golden-globes.html
  11. https://www.oscars.org/news/hollywood-meets-press
  12. https://goldenglobes.com/history-golden-globes/
  13. https://goldenglobes.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/hfpa-rules-for-membership-application-2018.pdf
  14. https://www.thewrap.com/hfpa-reimagines-golden-globes-new-membership-criteria-more-diversity-new-board-election/
  15. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/golden-globes-hfpa-reforms-1234949339/
  16. https://nabjonline.org/blog/nabj-responds-to-hfpa-plan-to-overhaul-organization-include-more-black-journalists/
  17. https://deadline.com/2021/09/hfpa-adds-five-credentials-committee-new-members-1234845096/
  18. https://goldenglobes.com/articles/hfpa-adds-outside-journalists-aid-new-member-selection-process/
  19. https://www.seattletimes.com/entertainment/embattled-hfpa-announces-reforms-to-bylaws-membership/
  20. https://variety.com/2021/awards/news/golden-globes-hfpa-2021-new-members-1235078322/
  21. https://variety.com/2023/biz/news/golden-globe-awards-hfpa-voting-body-1235578116/
  22. https://ew.com/awards/golden-globes/golden-globes-adds-215-new-hfpa-members/
  23. https://theankler.com/p/hfpa-reboots-upends-golden-globes
  24. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/hollywood-foreign-press-association-announces-historic-transformation-with-member-approval-of-new-strategic-vision-301595817.html
  25. https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/business/story/2021-02-21/hfpa-golden-globes-2021
  26. https://ggfdn.org/our-story/
  27. https://deadline.com/2021/02/hollywood-foreign-press-association-diversity-golden-globes-diversity-hfpa-1234697981/
  28. https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/business/story/2021-02-21/hfpa-golden-globes-2021-who-are-the-members
  29. https://www.indiewire.com/awards/industry/new-hollywood-foreign-press-association-105-1234668670/
  30. https://goldenglobes.com/articles/the-hfpa-adds-103-new-voters-for-the-golden-globe-awards/
  31. https://variety.com/feature/who-votes-golden-globes-hollywood-foreign-press-association-hfpa-1203435020/
  32. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/golden-globes-hfpa-turmoil-1236306509/
  33. https://ew.com/golden-globes/2018/12/04/golden-globes-2019-nominations-voting/
  34. https://goldenglobes.com/festival/golden-globe-awards-ceremony/
  35. https://www.thenationalnews.com/arts-culture/film-tv/2023/12/12/golden-globes-voting-2024-explained/
  36. https://www.indiewire.com/awards/industry/hfpa-dissolving-golden-globes-bought-by-dick-clark-productions-eldridge-1234873969/
  37. https://tisch.nyu.edu/giving/institutional-giving/hollywood-foreign-press-association.html
  38. https://ggfdn.org/
  39. https://variety.com/2022/film/news/hfpa-golden-globes-grants-1235326150/
  40. https://goldenglobes.com/tags/philanthropy/
  41. https://ggfdn.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/HFPA_PhilanthropyBooklet_2020-21.pdf
  42. https://goldenglobes.com/articles/hfpa-announces-45-million-grant-awards-2022-23/
  43. https://philanthropynewsdigest.org/news/golden-globes-foundation-announces-grants-totaling-5-million
  44. https://uncsa.academicworks.com/donors/hollywood-foreign-press-association-endowed-scholarship-in-filmmaking
  45. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/lifestyle/lifestyle-news/golden-globe-foundation-grant-recipients-2024-2-1236072118/
  46. https://goldenglobes.com/articles/hfpa-announces-renewal-residency-fellowships-filmmakers-venice/
  47. https://goldenglobes.com/tags/hfpa-residency/
  48. https://goldenglobes.com/articles/residency-fellows-show-impressive-work/
  49. https://mtsacfoundation.org/new-scholarships-for-202122/hollywood-foreign-press-association-journalism-scholarship
  50. https://www.calstatela.edu/al/television-film-and-media-studies/hollywood-foreign-press-award-application
  51. https://www.indiewire.com/awards/industry/golden-globes-hfpa-la-times-1234618341/
  52. https://www.indiewire.com/awards/industry/golden-globes-scandal-timeline-1234631848/
  53. https://www.theguardian.com/film/2021/jun/18/golden-globes-two-members-resign-from-toxic-hollywood-foreign-press-association
  54. https://www.thewrap.com/congresswomen-irs-investigation-hfpa/
  55. https://www.npr.org/2021/05/10/995668540/nbc-warnermedia-join-companies-turning-away-from-hollywood-foreign-press-associa
  56. https://variety.com/2021/film/news/hfpa-golden-globes-publicists-1234931336/
  57. https://www.npr.org/2021/12/10/1063171412/golden-globes-hfpa-controversy-investigations
  58. https://www.vox.com/2016/1/10/10747362/denzel-washington-golden-globes-corruption
  59. https://www.economist.com/culture/2022/01/10/the-hollywood-foreign-press-association-does-penance-for-its-sins
  60. https://variety.com/2021/tv/news/golden-globes-hollywood-foreign-press-association-freebies-1235021873/
  61. https://www.businessinsider.com/golden-globes-scandal-timeline-hfpa-lack-diversity-2021-5
  62. https://www.insideedition.com/journalist-alleges-hollywood-foreign-press-association-members-are-given-perks-to-sway-golden
  63. https://ew.com/awards/golden-globes/golden-globes-scandals-through-the-years/
  64. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/general-news/l-a-times-reveals-hfpa-has-zero-black-members-raises-new-questions-about-ethics-of-golden-globe-voters-4136107/
  65. https://www.screendaily.com/news/la-times-report-scrutinises-hfpa-ethics/5157302.article
  66. https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/business/story/2021-03-09/golden-globes-fallout-hfpa-emergency-meeting-reforms-diversity-consultant
  67. https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2021-02-26/editorial-the-group-behind-the-golden-globes-needs-a-shakeup
  68. https://variety.com/2021/awards/news/hfpa-13-black-members-1234931605/
  69. https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2021/05/golden-globes-cancel-nbc-hfpa
  70. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/golden-globes-hosts-tina-fey-and-amy-poehler-mock-hfpa-lack-of-diversity-4140307/
  71. https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/awards/story/2021-02-28/golden-globes-2021-hfpa-diversity-response
  72. https://www.cnn.com/2021/05/10/entertainment/tom-cruise-scarlett-johansson-golden-globes
  73. https://variety.com/2021/film/news/golden-globe-hfpa-hollywood-publicists-1234930321/
  74. https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/tv/2021/05/11/golden-globes-nbc-drops-show-tom-cruise-returns-trophies-what-next/5029701001/
  75. https://variety.com/2021/film/awards/tom-cruise-golden-globes-returns-trophy-1234969999/
  76. https://deadline.com/2021/05/tom-cruise-returns-golden-globe-trophies-three-join-protest-jerry-maguire-born-on-the-fourth-of-july-magnolia-protest-1234753324/
  77. https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/business/story/2021-05-02/golden-globes-hollywood-foreign-press-association-turmoil-what-went-wrong
  78. https://cinemontage.org/hfpa-responds-to-criticism-about-its-lack-of-diversity-we-need-to-bring-in-black-members/
  79. https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/publicists-press-hfpa-lack-black-004706940.html
  80. https://deadline.com/2021/06/golden-globes-hfpa-members-quit-toxic-place-1234777701/
  81. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/golden-globes-times-up-hfpa-reforms-1234949561/
  82. https://variety.com/2021/film/news/hfpa-code-of-conduct-golden-globes-overhaul-1234979073/
  83. https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2021/05/the-hollywood-foreign-press-association-announces-new-code-of-conduct
  84. https://goldenglobes.com/articles/hfpa-brings-largest-group-new-members-its-history/
  85. https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/business/story/2021-07-26/golden-globes-hfpa-bylaws-vote-crisis-pr
  86. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/05/movies/golden-globes-hfpa-reforms.html
  87. https://deadline.com/2021/06/golden-globes-rules-changes-foreign-language-animated-films-hfpa-reforms-1234784471/
  88. https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/10/nbc-will-not-air-2022-golden-globes-due-to-ongoing-hfpa-controversy.html
  89. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/general-news/hfpa-21-new-members-six-black-1235023761/
  90. https://deadline.com/2021/10/hollywood-foreign-press-new-members-1234847963/
  91. https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/movies/story/2021-10-01/golden-globes-hfpa-21-new-members-diversity
  92. https://www.reuters.com/lifestyle/golden-globes-group-adds-new-members-it-works-diversify-2021-10-01/
  93. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-features/golden-globes-group-head-interview-hfpa-boycott-awards-1235276198/
  94. https://goldenglobes.com/articles/golden-globes-2022-the-hfpa-announces-details-for-the-79th-annual-golden-globe-awards/
  95. https://variety.com/2021/awards/awards/golden-globes-warnermedia-hbo-warner-bros-boycott-1234969813/
  96. https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/business/story/2021-10-29/golden-globes-2022-submissions-hfpa-scandal
  97. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/10/movies/nbc-golden-globes.html
  98. https://variety.com/2021/tv/awards/golden-globes-nbc-2022-1234969976/
  99. https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/2022-golden-globes-winners-losers-won-t-be-tv-so-ncna1287197
  100. https://variety.com/2021/tv/news/golden-globes-hollywood-foreign-press-association-bylaws-election-1235035432/
  101. https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/story/2021-03-06/hfpa-announces-transformational-reforms-after-times-investigation
  102. https://deadline.com/2021/08/hfpa-reform-vote-golden-gobes-hollywood-nbc-1234809729/
  103. https://apnews.com/article/golden-globe-awards-hollywood-foreign-press-association-tv-television-9ee1a25e378b0c707dcd1f5f205c405b
  104. https://www.cbc.ca/news/entertainment/golden-globes-sold-hfpa-disbanded-1.6874486
  105. https://deadline.com/2021/05/hfpa-slammed-times-up-hollywood-pr-reform-inclusion-golden-globes-1234752046/
  106. https://www.thewrap.com/golden-globes-canceled-netflix-amazon-boycott-hfpa-reform/
  107. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/golden-globes-dcp-eldridge-complete-acqusition-hfpa-wind-down-1235513278/
  108. https://deadline.com/2023/06/golden-globes-acquired-dick-clark-productions-eldridge-hfpa-shut-down-1235414600/
  109. https://variety.com/2023/biz/news/golden-globe-hollywood-foreign-press-dick-clark-eldridge-1235641091/
  110. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/general-news/hfpa-acquired-eldridge-industries-membership-size-diversity-1235188845/
  111. https://www.sidley.com/en/newslanding/newsannouncements/2023/06/sidley-represents-eldridge-in-the-acquisition-of-the-golden-globes
  112. https://www.cnbc.com/2023/06/12/the-golden-globes-find-new-home-as-the-hollywood-foreign-press-ends.html
  113. https://www.cbsnews.com/losangeles/news/golden-globes-under-new-ownership-hollywood-foreign-press-association-dissolved/
  114. https://abc7.com/post/golden-globes-hollywood-foreign-press-association-dick-clark-productions-sold/13373116/
  115. https://www.pmc.com/news/dick-clark-productions-and-eldridge-acquire-golden-globes
  116. https://www.screendaily.com/news/hfpa-to-wind-down-as-dick-clark-productions-eldridge-acquire-all-golden-globes-assets/5183046.article
  117. https://www.thewrap.com/golden-globes-sold-reform-who-votes/
  118. https://variety.com/2025/film/news/golden-globes-ends-salaries-hfpa-members-1236324170/
  119. https://www.reuters.com/lifestyle/golden-globes-expands-300-members-highlighting-diversity-gains-2023-10-02/
  120. https://variety.com/2023/awards/awards/golden-globes-new-members-diversity-1235742185/
  121. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/2024-golden-globes-voters-list-1235606055/
  122. https://www.thewrap.com/golden-globes-lose-voters-18-members/
  123. https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/story/2025-02-28/penske-golden-globes-salaries-awards-hollywood-voting
  124. https://deadline.com/2025/02/golden-globes-ends-voter-salaries-1236306004/
  125. https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/movies/story/2023-01-09/golden-globe-awards-2023-hfpa-investigation-controversy-reforms-return
  126. https://www.vulture.com/article/golden-globes-ends-75000-salary-legacy-voting-members.html
  127. https://www.goldderby.com/film/2025/golden-globes-controversy-explained/
  128. https://www.thewrap.com/hfpa-rejects-dissolution-audit-eldridge-acquisition/
  129. https://tvnewscheck.com/business/article/hollywood-foreign-press-association-members-seek-to-restore-organization-amid-disputes-with-new-owners-of-golden-globes/
  130. https://variety.com/2025/film/news/scott-orlin-president-hollywood-foreign-press-association-1236464271/
  131. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/03/business/media/golden-globes-hfpa-penske-media-eldridge.html
  132. https://www.worldofreel.com/blog/2025/7/4/globes
  133. https://thewrap.com/hfpa-rejects-dissolution-audit-eldridge-acquisition/
  134. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/golden-globes-salaries-voting-members-1236150364/
  135. https://theankler.com/p/scoop-attorney-general-reassessing
  136. https://theankler.com/p/golden-globes-california-attorney-general-reassessing-deal
  137. https://goldenglobes.com/articles/the-golden-globes-at-75-hollywood-means-the-world-to-us/
  138. https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/story/golden-globes-winners-recap-awards-insider
  139. https://screenrant.com/oscars-golden-globes-matter-impact-op-ed/
  140. https://qz.com/golden-globes-award-hollywood-foreign-press-association-1850532880
  141. https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/business/story/2021-02-27/hfpa-fallout-black-golden-globes-voters-hollywood
  142. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/23/movies/the-golden-globes-lawsuit-hollywood-foreign-press.html
  143. https://medialaw.org/court-tosses-journalists-lawsuit-against-hollywood-foreign-press-association-for-denying-her-admission/
  144. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/golden-globes-2022-hfpa-nbc/
  145. https://www.forbes.com/sites/conormurray/2024/01/05/first-golden-globes-after-embattled-voting-body-disbanded-airs-sunday-heres-what-to-expect/
  146. https://goldenglobes.com/articles/how-we-changed/
  147. https://www.vox.com/culture/2017/12/11/16762660/golden-globes-voting-explained-hfpa
  148. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/11/business/media/golden-globes-tom-cruise-nbc.html
  149. https://www.vox.com/22301883/golden-globes-2021-bad-corrupt-emily-paris-music-minari
  150. https://ew.com/awards/golden-globes/hfla-membership-dissolved-golden-globes-acquired-dick-clark/
  151. https://www.forbes.com/sites/jeetendrsehdev/2025/01/05/the-golden-globes-2025-ushering-in-a-golden-era-of-modern-culture/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.