Hubbry Logo
HMS FridayHMS FridayMain
Open search
HMS Friday
Community hub
HMS Friday
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
HMS Friday
HMS Friday
HMS Friday
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

HMS Friday is an urban myth concerning a disastrous attempt by the Royal Navy to dispel the superstition against sailing on a Friday. While widely circulated, the story is in fact untrue;[1] moreover, there was never even a ship named HMS Friday.[2]

The details of the story vary, but it usually follows this form:

Sometime in the 19th century, the Royal Navy attempted to finally dispel the old superstition among sailors that beginning a voyage on a Friday was certain to bring bad luck. To demonstrate the falseness of this belief, they decided to commission a ship named HMS Friday. Her keel was laid on a Friday, she was launched on a Friday, and she set sail on her maiden voyage on Friday the 13th, under the command of a Captain James Friday. She was never seen or heard from again.

This story, in numerous variations, is frequently recounted, often as fact.[3][4][5][6][7] It also appeared as a small "filler" item in the magazine Reader's Digest, its format giving the impression of having been historically researched.[citation needed]

In fact, there has never been any Royal Navy ship of that name.[7][8][9] It is unclear where the story originated; however, it seems to have gained in popularity after its recounting by comedian Dave Allen on his BBC television show Dave Allen at Large, Series 1, Episode 2, first broadcast 4 February 1971.[10] It also was retold in detail in the 1983 book Destiny by Paul Aurandt Jr., the son of Paul Harvey as part of the elder Harvey's The Rest Of The Story book series.

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

HMS Friday

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
HMS Friday is the subject of a longstanding urban legend in British naval folklore, purporting to describe a Royal Navy ship built in the 18th or 19th century to disprove the widespread superstition among sailors that setting sail on a Friday invites misfortune. According to the myth, the ship's keel was laid on a Friday, it was launched on a Friday, and it embarked on its maiden voyage on a Friday under the command of a Captain Friday, only to vanish at sea with all hands lost during a storm on the following Friday. The story is often cited as an official effort by the Admiralty to eradicate the taboo, which was thought to hinder naval operations and commercial shipping. Despite its enduring popularity in books, articles, and oral traditions, the legend of HMS Friday has been thoroughly debunked by historians and naval archivists, who have found no evidence of such a vessel in official Royal Navy records or ship registries from the period. The tale likely originated in the 19th century as a cautionary anecdote or humorous fabrication, possibly inspired by genuine maritime superstitions and amplified through print media and storytelling. It continues to be referenced in discussions of nautical folklore, serving as an example of how myths can persist even in the face of contradictory historical evidence.

The Legend

Construction and Naming

In the 19th-century legend of HMS Friday, the Royal Navy commissioned a special naval vessel to deliberately confront and disprove the longstanding maritime that beginning voyages on Fridays invited , a rooted in associations with biblical events like the . To maximize the challenge to this , the ship's construction adhered to a deliberate timeline aligned with Fridays: her was laid on a Friday, she was launched on a Friday, and her crew was assembled on a Friday. The vessel was explicitly named HMS Friday to symbolize the Navy's intent to nullify the unlucky connotations of the day, with command entrusted to a Captain Friday—referred to as James Friday in some retellings and Jim Friday in others—to further underscore the symbolic defiance. While details of the ship's design vary in folk accounts, she is commonly depicted as a or comparable suited for active service, emphasizing her role as a purposeful instrument in the myth's narrative of superstition-testing.

Maiden Voyage and Fate

In the legend of HMS Friday, the ship's maiden voyage commenced on a Friday, often specified as in retellings, as a deliberate challenge to maritime superstitions surrounding the day. Commissioned by the British Royal Navy to prove that Fridays were not inherently unlucky for sailing, the vessel departed under the command of James Friday, whose surname was chosen to further mock the . The crew, also selected on a Friday, set out from an English port amid fair initial conditions, with the voyage intended as a routine demonstration of safe passage. The journey, however, took a dramatic turn shortly after departure, as the ship vanished without a trace during what some retellings describe as a sudden and unforeseen on the following . No distress signals were reported, and despite extensive searches, neither the vessel, its crew, nor any wreckage was ever recovered, leading to the presumption that HMS Friday was lost at sea with all hands. This abrupt disappearance reinforced the very superstitions the ship was meant to debunk, serving as a about tempting fate with unlucky omens. Variations in the legend's retellings emphasize different aspects of the fate: some accounts specify that the ship sank outright on a , claiming all hands, while others imply a more ethereal vanishing, as if the vessel and crew were swallowed by the sea's mysteries without earthly remnants. In all versions, the lack of survivors or evidence symbolizes the ultimate irony of the anti-superstition experiment, transforming HMS Friday into a enduring emblem of maritime peril tied to the day.

Maritime Superstitions

Origins of Friday as an Unlucky Day

The superstition that Friday is an unlucky day for seafaring activities has deep roots in , particularly the association with , the day commemorating the Christ. This event, viewed as a day of profound mourning and divine judgment, imbued Friday with connotations of suffering and misfortune, which sailors adopted as a caution against embarking on voyages. Historical accounts indicate that this belief led many mariners to avoid starting journeys on Fridays, perceiving it as inviting calamity at sea. Further reinforcing this view was the biblical narrative of surrounding the . In , Fridays became linked to ill omens. Sailors extended the to maritime endeavors, often citing the day's historical ties to treachery and punishment as reasons to delay departures. An alternative origin traces the superstition to , associating Friday with Frigga (or Freya), the goddess believed to cause harm to sailors on her day. By the 18th and 19th centuries, this persisted in naval and merchant marine contexts, with from captains' practices showing deliberate postponements of sailings to preserve crew morale and avert perceived risks. Such delays, documented in maritime folklore collections, underscored the enduring influence of Friday's inauspicious reputation on seafaring routines, even as rational advanced. This general aversion to Fridays later contributed to the amplified fear of in broader cultural superstitions.

Connection to Friday the 13th

The superstition surrounding the number 13 as unlucky is often traced to Christian traditions, particularly the , where dined with his 12 apostles—making 13 attendees in total—and , the betrayer, was considered the 13th guest. This biblical event linked the number to treachery and misfortune. Another key historical association comes from the arrest of the Knights Templar on , October 13, 1307, when King ordered the simultaneous seizure of the order's members across the kingdom, leading to their persecution and dissolution. These events compounded the dread of 13 with Friday's existing ill repute, creating a potent symbol of doom in Western . In maritime contexts, this intersection amplified fears among sailors, who viewed a departure as doubly cursed, blending the day's standalone bad omens with the number's ominous weight. Historical records from the illustrate this caution; for instance, in 1848, the British ship Wellesley, bound for the , was recalled by the Port Admiral and delayed until the following to evade a launch, reflecting entrenched naval reluctance to tempt fate on such dates. Sailors' logs and accounts from the era often noted similar hesitations, prioritizing ritual over schedule to ward off perceived perils at . The combined superstition permeated and , enriching narratives with heightened tension and moral undertones. Thomas W. Lawson's 1907 novel Friday, the Thirteenth dramatized crashes tied to the date, popularizing its cultural resonance and influencing subsequent tales of inevitable disaster. In seafaring lore, this duality intensified stories like the HMS Friday legend, where the ship's ill-fated voyage on a Friday underscored the irresistible pull of compounded omens, making the myth a cautionary emblem of against tradition. Despite rational dismissals, avoidance of persists in modern shipping, with some captains and companies still opting to delay departures or schedules to appease lingering beliefs.

Historical Analysis

Evidence of Non-Existence

Extensive archival research into records has yielded no evidence of a vessel named HMS Friday. Comprehensive inventories, such as those maintained by the Admiralty and detailed in J.J. Colledge's authoritative reference Ships of the : The Complete Record of All Fighting Ships of the from the to the Present, list thousands of commissioned ships across centuries but contain no entry for HMS Friday or any similar nomenclature. Similarly, searches of of Shipping for the 18th and 19th centuries, which cataloged both naval and vessels, reveal no matching ship built or launched under that name, particularly from purported sites like . These absences persist across primary documents, including muster rolls, commissioning logs, and shipyard manifests held at The in . Naval historians affiliated with the National Museum of the have consistently affirmed the non-existence of HMS Friday. In 2007, curator Julian Thomas stated that the story "regularly arose" around but that "there has never been a ship named HMS Friday—or after any other day of the week for that matter." This position aligns with the museum's official records and expert analyses, which emphasize that naming conventions favored mythological figures, historical events, or royal personages rather than weekdays. Independent scholars, drawing on the same archival base, have echoed this, noting the myth's incompatibility with documented fleet compositions during the periods in question. The legend's timeline further undermines its credibility, as no Royal Navy launches align with the described events. Variants place the ship's construction in the (circa 1803–1815) or the broader , yet shipyard records from key naval bases like , Plymouth, and even private yards such as those in show no or named Friday entering service during these times. For instance, Liverpool's 19th-century launches, well-documented in local and national gazettes, include numerous merchant and hired armed vessels but none matching the HMS Friday profile—a deliberate anti-superstition commission that would have warranted contemporary Admiralty notice. This discrepancy highlights the story's fabrication, as actual naval operations in the prioritized combat readiness over symbolic gestures against .

Origins and Spread of the Myth

The legend of HMS Friday appears to have been invented in the mid-20th century, emerging as a fabricated within nautical traditions. The earliest documented printed reference to the story dates to March 1949, in the Startling Stories, where it is presented as a yarn reinforcing the perils of defying Friday's reputed unluckiness. Prior to this, no verifiable records or naval archives mention such a vessel, suggesting the narrative was a creative amalgamation rather than a historical event. The myth likely drew inspiration from genuine maritime disasters involving ships that departed or were launched on Fridays, which were retroactively linked to longstanding superstitions about the day to heighten dramatic effect. For instance, historical accounts of vessels like the HMS Victoria, which sank in 1893 after a collision (though not directly tied to a Friday launch), contributed to a broader pattern of where Friday departures were blamed for subsequent misfortunes. These elements were exaggerated in oral traditions among sailors, blending with established beliefs in Friday's inauspiciousness—rooted briefly in Christian associations with the and Norse tales of Loki's disruptive influence—to create a compelling, self-reinforcing . Dissemination of the HMS Friday story accelerated through 20th-century print and broadcast media, particularly in superstition anthologies and periodical features timed to . The myth gained significant popularity after comedian Dave Allen recounted it on his television show Dave Allen at Large on 4 February 1971. It gained traction in newspapers and magazines during the post-World War II era, often retold in columns on and oddities, such as those in British publications exploring naval myths. By the and beyond, the tale appeared in popular compilations of urban legends and maritime lore, including works like the Now You Know series, which cataloged it as a classic example of fabricated nautical history. Radio segments on programs further propagated it, embedding the narrative in cultural consciousness as a staple of eerie storytelling. Despite its invention, the has served a paradoxical cultural function as a tale in efforts to combat , highlighting how unfounded stories endure and influence behavior. Organizations and historians have invoked the fabricated saga to demonstrate the absence of behind Friday fears, using it to promote in maritime and everyday contexts. This ironic deployment underscores the legend's role in , where it persists not as history but as a tool for reflection on belief versus fact.
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.