Hubbry Logo
Ion associationIon associationMain
Open search
Ion association
Community hub
Ion association
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Ion association
Ion association
Ion association
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

In chemistry, ion association is a chemical reaction whereby ions of opposite electric charge come together in solution to form a distinct chemical entity.[1][2] Ion associates are classified, according to the number of ions that associate with each other, as ion pairs, ion triplets, etc. Intimate ion pairs are also classified according to the nature of the interaction as contact, solvent-shared or solvent-separated. The most important factor to determine the extent of ion association is the dielectric constant of the solvent. Ion associates have been characterized by means of vibrational spectroscopy, as introduced by Niels Bjerrum, and dielectric-loss spectroscopy.[3][4]

Classification of ion pairs

[edit]
Schematic representations
  • Fully solvated ion-pair (SIP)
    Fully solvated ion-pair (SIP)
  • Solvent-shared ion-pair, Solvent-separated ion-pair, Cation outer-sphere complex
    Solvent-shared ion-pair
    Solvent-separated ion-pair
    Cation outer-sphere complex
  • Contact ion-pair (CIP), Cation inner-sphere complex
    Contact ion-pair (CIP)
    Cation inner-sphere complex

Ion pairs are formed when a cation and anion, which are present in a solution of an ionizable substance, come together to form a discrete chemical species. There are three distinct types of ion pairs, depending on the extent of solvation of the two ions. For example, magnesium sulfate exists as both contact and solvent-shared ion-pairs in seawater.[5]

In the schematic representation above, the circles represent spheres. The sizes are arbitrary and not necessarily similar as illustrated. The cation is coloured red and the anion is coloured blue. The green area represents solvent molecules in a primary solvation shell; secondary solvation is ignored. When both ions have a complete primary solvation sphere, the ion pair may be termed fully solvated (separated ion pair, SIP). When there is about one solvent molecule between cation and anion, the ion pair may be termed solvent-shared. Lastly, when the ions are in contact with each other, the ion pair is termed a contact ion pair (CIP). Even in a contact ion pair, however, the ions retain most of their solvation shell. The nature of this solvation shell is generally not known with any certainty. In aqueous solution and in other donor solvents, metal cations are surrounded by between 4 and 9 solvent molecules in the primary solvation shell,[6]

An alternative name for a solvent-shared ion pair is an outer-sphere complex. This usage is common in coordination chemistry and denotes a complex between a solvated metal cation and an anion. Similarly, a contact ion pair may be termed an inner-sphere complex. The essential difference between the three types is the closeness with which the ions approach each other: fully solvated > solvent-shared > contact. With fully solvated and solvent-shared ion pairs the interaction is primarily electrostatic, but in a contact ion pair some covalent character in the bond between cation and anion is also present.

An ion triplet may be formed from one cation and two anions or from one anion and two cations.[7] Higher aggregates, such as a tetramer (AB)4, may be formed.

Ternary ion associates involve the association of three species.[8] Another type, named intrusion ion pair, has also been characterized.[9]

Theory

[edit]

Ions of opposite charge are naturally attracted to each other by the electrostatic force.[10][11] This is described by Coulomb's law:

where F is the force of attraction, q1 and q2 are the magnitudes of the electrical charges, ε is the dielectric constant of the medium and r is the distance between the ions. For ions in solution this is an approximation because the ions exert a polarizing effect on the solvent molecules that surround them, which attenuates the electric field somewhat. Nevertheless, some general conclusions can be inferred.

Ion association will increase as:
  • the magnitude(s) of the electrical charge(s) q1 and q2 increase,
  • the magnitude of the dielectric constant ε decreases,
  • the size of the ions decreases so that the distance r between cation and anion decreases.

The equilibrium constant K for ion-pair formation, like all equilibrium constants, is related to the standard free-energy change:[12]

where R is the gas constant and T is the temperature in kelvins. Free energy is made up of an enthalpy term and an entropy term:

The coulombic energy released when ions associate contributes to the enthalpy term, ⁠⁠. In the case of contact ion pairs, the covalent interaction energy also contributes to the enthalpy, as does the energy of displacing a solvent molecule from the solvation shell of the cation or anion. The tendency to associate is opposed by the entropy term, which results from the fact that the solution containing unassociated ions is more disordered than a solution containing associates. The entropy term is similar for electrolytes of the same type, with minor differences due to solvation effects. Therefore, it is the magnitude of the enthalpy term that mostly determines the extent of ion association for a given electrolyte type. This explains the general rules given above.

Occurrence

[edit]

Dielectric constant is the most important factor in determining the occurrence of ion association. A table of some typical values can be found under dielectric constant. Water has a relatively high dielectric constant value of 78.7 at 298K (25 °C), so in aqueous solutions at ambient temperatures 1:1 electrolytes such as NaCl do not form ion pairs to an appreciable extent except when the solution is very concentrated.[13] 2:2 electrolytes (q1 = 2, q2 = 2) form ion pairs more readily. Indeed, the solvent-shared ion pair [Mg(H2O)6]2+SO42− was famously discovered to be present in seawater, in equilibrium with the contact ion pair [Mg(H2O)5(SO4)][14] Trivalent ions such as Al3+, Fe3+ and lanthanide ions form weak complexes with monovalent anions.

The dielectric constant of water decreases with increasing temperature to about 55 at 100 °C and about 5 at the critical temperature (217.7 °C).[15] Thus ion pairing will become more significant in superheated water.

Solvents with a dielectric constant in the range, roughly, 20–40, show extensive ion-pair formation. For example, in acetonitrile both contact and solvent-shared ion pairs of Li(NCS) have been observed.[16] In methanol the 2:1 electrolyte Mg(NCS)2 is partially dissociated into a contact ion pair, [Mg(NCS)]+ and the thiocyanate ion.[17]

The dielectric constant of liquid ammonia decreases from 26 at its freezing point (−80 °C) to 17 at 20 °C (under pressure). Many simple 1:1 electrolytes form contact ion pairs at ambient temperatures. The extent of ion pairing decreases as temperature decreases. With lithium salts there is evidence to show that both inner-sphere and outer-sphere complexes exist in liquid-ammonia solutions.[18]

Of the solvents with dielectric constant of 10 or less, tetrahydrofuran (THF) is particularly relevant in this context, as it solvates cations strongly with the result that simple electrolytes have sufficient solubility to make the study of ion association possible. In this solvent ion association is the rule rather than the exception. Indeed, higher associates such as tetramers are often formed.[19] Triple cations and triple anions have also been characterized in THF solutions.[20]

Ion association is an important factor in phase-transfer catalysis, since a species such as R4P+Cl− is formally neutral and so can dissolve easily in a non-polar solvent of low dielectric constant. In this case it also helps that the surface of the cation is hydrophobic.

In SN1 reactions the carbocation intermediate may form an ion pair with an anion, particularly in solvents of low dielectric constant, such as diethylether.[21] This can affect both the kinetic parameters of the reaction and the stereochemistry of the reaction products.

Experimental characterization

[edit]

Vibrational spectroscopy provides the most widely used means for characterizing ion associates. Both infrared spectroscopy and Raman spectroscopy have been used. Anions containing a CN group, such as cyanide, cyanate and thiocyanide have a vibration frequency a little above 2000 cm−1, which can be easily observed, as the spectra of most solvents (other than nitriles) are weak in this region. The anion vibration frequency is "shifted" on formation of ion pairs and other associates, and the extent of the shift gives information about the nature of the species. Other monovalent anions that have been studied include nitrate, nitrite and azide. Ion pairs of monatomic anions, such as halide ions, cannot be studied by this technique. Standard NMR spectroscopy is not very useful, as association/dissociation reactions tend to be fast on the NMR time scale, giving time-averaged signals of the cation and/or anion. However, diffusion ordered spectroscopy (DOSY), with which the sample tube is not spinning, can be used as ion pairs diffuse more slowly than do single ions due to their greater size.[22]

Nearly the same shift of vibration frequency is observed for solvent-shared ion pairs of LiCN, Be(CN)2 and Al(CN)3 in liquid ammonia. The extent of this type of ion pairing decreases as the size of the cation increases. Thus, solvent-shared ion pairs are characterized by a rather small shift of vibration frequency with respect to the "free" solvated anion, and the value of the shift is not strongly dependent on the nature of the cation. The shift for contact ion pairs is, by contrast, strongly dependent on the nature of the cation and decreases linearly with the ratio of the cations charge to the squared radius:[18]

Cs+ > Rb+ > K+ > Na+ > Li+;
Ba2+ > Sr2+ > Ca2+.

The extent of contact ion pairing can be estimated from the relative intensities of the bands due to the ion pair and free ion. It is greater with the larger cations.[18] This is counter to the trend expected if coulombic energy were the determining factor. Instead, the formation of a contact ion pair is seen to depend more on the energy needed to displace a solvent molecule from the primary solvation sphere of the cation. This energy decreases with the size of the cation, making ion pairing occur to a greater extent with the larger cations. The trend may be different in other solvents.[18]

Higher ion aggregates, sometimes triples M+X−M+, sometimes dimers of ion pairs (M+X−)2, or even larger species can be identified in the Raman spectra of some liquid-ammonia solutions of Na+ salts by the presence of bands that cannot be attributed to either contact- or solvent-shared ion pairs.[18]

Evidence for the existence of fully solvated ion pairs in solution is mostly indirect, as the spectroscopic properties of such ion pairs are indistinguishable from those of the individual ions. Much of the evidence is based on the interpretation of conductivity measurements.[23][24]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Ion association

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Ion association, also known as ion pairing, is the process in electrolyte solutions where oppositely charged s interact electrostatically to form transient pairs or clusters, effectively reducing the number of free, mobile s and altering the solution's thermodynamic and transport properties such as conductivity, , and activity coefficients. This phenomenon occurs when the electrostatic attraction between s overcomes the screening effects of the , particularly in solutions with moderate to high concentrations, low constants, or in aqueous solutions at elevated temperatures where the dielectric constant of water decreases with increasing temperature, weakening ion solvation and favoring ion association, leading to ion pairs that can behave as neutral species. Historically, ion association was first systematically described by Bjerrum in 1926, who extended the Debye-Hückel theory of dilute solutions to account for non-contact ion pairs within a critical distance determined by the solvent's constant. Subsequent developments by Raymond Fuoss in the 1930s and 1960s refined this into distinct types of ion pairs: contact ion pairs (ions directly adjacent without solvent in between), solvent-shared ion pairs (ions separated by shared solvent molecules), and solvent-separated ion pairs (ions fully separated by solvent layers). These associations are quantified using association constants derived from the , which describe the equilibrium between free ions and paired species. In modern electrolyte theories, ion association is integrated into frameworks like statistical associating fluid theory (SAFT) and extensions of Debye-Hückel limiting laws to model both short-range (specific ion-solvent and ion-ion binding) and long-range electrostatic interactions, enabling predictions of properties in complex systems such as nonaqueous solvents used in lithium-ion batteries. For instance, in high-concentration electrolytes, cations like Li⁺ can form polydisperse clusters with anions and solvents, following polymer-like aggregation models, which impacts ion mobility and interfacial phenomena critical for energy storage devices. While early views emphasized ion pairing as a dominant chemical equilibrium, contemporary approaches balance it with continuum electrostatics to avoid overestimation, particularly at low concentrations where free ions predominate.

Fundamentals

Definition and Formation

Ion association refers to the partial or complete neutralization of charges between oppositely charged in a , resulting in the formation of distinct chemical entities known as ion pairs, which exhibit reduced mobility compared to free . This process occurs in solutions where are not fully dissociated but instead interact to form species that behave as single units in transport properties like conductivity. The formation of ion pairs is driven primarily by Coulombic attraction, where the electrostatic forces between cations and anions overcome thermal disruptions from solvent motion and . This attraction leads to a temporary or stable pairing, depending on solution conditions, distinguishing ion pairs from freely diffusing s that contribute independently to and conductivity. Key factors influencing association include ion size, with smaller ions promoting stronger pairing due to closer approach; ion charge, where higher charges intensify electrostatic interactions; and the solvent's constant, as lower values weaken ion and favor pairing over dissociation. The extent of ion association is quantified by the association constant KaK_a, defined as Ka=[IP][C+][A−]K_a = \frac{[IP]}{[C^+][A^-]} where [IP][IP] is the concentration of the ion pair, and [C+][C^+] and [A−][A^-] are the concentrations of free cation and anion, respectively. This equilibrium constant reflects the balance between paired and dissociated states, with higher KaK_a values indicating greater association and potential formation of larger aggregates beyond simple pairs under extreme conditions.

Historical Context

The Debye-Hückel theory, introduced in , provided a foundational framework for understanding interionic attractions in dilute solutions through the concept of ionic atmospheres, but it exhibited significant limitations in predicting behaviors at higher concentrations where deviations from ideality were pronounced. These shortcomings, particularly in explaining reduced conductivities and activities in concentrated solutions, prompted early explorations into ion association as a corrective mechanism. In 1926, Niels Bjerrum advanced this line of inquiry with his seminal paper on ionic association, proposing that oppositely charged s within a critical distance—determined by the solvent's dielectric constant—could form associated pairs without direct contact, thereby accounting for the observed discrepancies in ion activities. This concept of ion pairs extended the Debye-Hückel model by incorporating statistical treatment of close-range associations. Building on this, Raymond Fuoss and Charles Kraus conducted pivotal experimental work in the 1930s, analyzing electrical conductivities of salts in low-dielectric solvents; their 1933 study integrated Bjerrum's ideas with mass-action principles to quantify association constants and explain conductivity minima as evidence of ion-pair formation. Following , advancements in the 1950s introduced dynamic perspectives on ion associations through relaxation techniques pioneered by , who developed methods like temperature-jump spectroscopy to probe fast reaction kinetics in the microsecond range. These approaches, refined in collaborations such as Eigen and Tamm's 1962 mechanism for ion recombination, confirmed the transient nature of ion-pair formation and dissociation in aqueous solutions, bridging theoretical predictions with measurable rate constants. From the 1980s onward, the historical development of ion association intersected with computational advances, as simulations began incorporating explicit solvent models to visualize and quantify pair formations in systems. By the , and polarizable force field simulations had integrated Bjerrum-like concepts to study association in complex media, providing atomistic insights that complemented earlier experimental validations. In the , further progress includes the development of new equations of state integrating statistical associating (SAFT) with variable-range interactions to model ion association in concentrated , and theories addressing competitive and aggregation in nonaqueous solvents for applications like lithium-ion batteries, as of 2023. These advancements balance traditional ion-pairing views with continuum to improve predictions across concentration ranges.

Classification

Contact Ion Pairs

Contact ion pairs (CIPs) consist of oppositely charged ions that are in direct contact, sharing a common without intervening molecules, often denoted as [M⁺X⁻]⁰ where M⁺ is a cation and X⁻ an anion. This close association arises from strong electrostatic attraction, distinguishing CIPs from looser ion pair configurations. In such pairs, the interionic distance is approximately the sum of the ionic radii, typically on the order of 2–4 depending on the ion sizes, which facilitates direct bonding interactions. The stability of contact ion pairs is enhanced by factors such as high on the ions and low constants of the , which reduce the screening of electrostatic forces. Small, highly charged ions like Li⁺ or divalent cations (e.g., Mg²⁺) form more stable CIPs compared to larger, monovalent ones due to stronger Coulombic binding. In aprotic with low polarity, such as (ε ≈ 37.5) or (ε ≈ 7.6), this stability increases significantly; for example, alkali halides like LiCl or NaI predominantly exist as solvated CIPs in these media, as opposed to dissociated . These conditions promote tight aggregation, with association constants that can exceed 10³ M⁻¹ for small in non-polar environments. Properties of contact ion pairs include reduced ionic conductivity owing to the neutralization of charges and decreased mobility of the paired species, which lowers the overall transport in solutions. Vibrational spectra are altered due to the direct ion-ion interaction, manifesting as changes in bond strengths and frequencies for ligands or anions involved. Spectroscopic signatures of CIPs are evident in (IR) and , where shifts in stretching modes occur; for instance, the CN stretch of ions bound in CIPs with alkali metals shows blue-shifts compared to free ions, reflecting the and perturbation of vibrational modes.

Solvent-Shared Ion Pairs

Solvent-shared ion pairs (SSIPs) form when oppositely charged s are separated by a single layer of shared molecules, preventing direct contact while maintaining electrostatic association. This configuration arises from the balance between electrostatic attraction and forces, where the molecules bridge the s, partially screening the charges. The stability of SSIPs is favored in s with moderate to high constants, such as (ε ≈ 78.5 at 25°C), which provide sufficient screening but allow for shared . Larger s or those with moderate charge densities stabilize SSIPs by reducing short-range forces. For instance, in aqueous solutions, s like Na⁺ and Cl⁻ can form SSIPs due to the 's polarizing effect and sizes. Key properties of SSIPs include partial electrostatic screening by the shared layer, leading to higher ionic mobility than CIPs but lower than free ions. These pairs exhibit dynamic lifetimes on the order of picoseconds, reflecting rapid solvent exchange. The separation distance in SSIPs typically ranges from 4 to 5 , corresponding to one bridging the ions—for example, a single in aqueous media.

Solvent-Separated Ion Pairs

Solvent-separated ion pairs (2SIPs) occur when oppositely charged ions are fully separated by two or more layers of molecules, resulting in a loose association dominated by long-range . This form is prevalent in highly polar solvents where shells effectively screen interactions. Stability is enhanced in high dielectric solvents like , for larger or low-charge-density ions. Examples include salts in aqueous media at low concentrations. Properties include even higher mobility, longer lifetimes (nanoseconds), and larger separations (6–8 or more).

Theoretical Models

Bjerrum Theory

The Bjerrum theory, proposed by Niels Bjerrum in , provides a classical statistical mechanical framework for understanding ion association in electrolyte solutions as an extension to the Debye-Hückel theory. It posits that oppositely charged ions form associated pairs when their separation distance is sufficiently small, specifically less than a critical distance qq, due to the dominance of the Coulombic attraction over thermal motion. This critical distance is closely related to the , defined as lB=∣z+z−∣e24πϵ0ϵkTl_B = \frac{|z_+ z_-| e^2}{4\pi \epsilon_0 \epsilon kT}, where z+z_+ and z−z_- are the ion valences, ee is the , ϵ0\epsilon_0 is the , ϵ\epsilon is the relative dielectric constant of the solvent, kk is Boltzmann's constant, and TT is the absolute temperature. For typical 1:1 electrolytes in at , lB≈7l_B \approx 7 Å, marking the scale at which electrostatic interactions become comparable to . Central to the is the derivation of the association constant KK, which quantifies the equilibrium between free ions and associated pairs. Bjerrum derived this by integrating the pair under the assumption of a purely Coulombic potential, yielding K=4πNA1000∫0qr2exp⁡(∣z+z−∣e24πϵ0ϵkTr)dr,K = \frac{4\pi N_A}{1000} \int_0^{q} r^2 \exp\left( \frac{|z_+ z_-| e^2}{4\pi \epsilon_0 \epsilon k T r} \right) dr, where NAN_A is Avogadro's number and the factor of 1000 accounts for units in liters per mole. The upper integration limit qq is typically set to the for 1:1 ions, beyond which thermal disruption prevents stable association, while the lower limit assumes point-like ions with no . This integral cannot be evaluated analytically in closed form but can be computed numerically or approximated using series expansions, such as the Fuoss approximation for small lB/ql_B / q. The resulting KK predicts the fraction of associated ions, which decreases with increasing dielectric constant ϵ\epsilon (as in more polar solvents) and increases with ion valence product ∣z+z−∣|z_+ z_-|. The theory rests on key assumptions: ions are treated as point charges without finite size or short-range interactions, the is a structureless continuum with uniform properties, and association is limited to binary pairs without formation of higher-order aggregates. These simplifications allow a tractable mean-field description but introduce limitations, notably an overprediction of association in dilute solutions where experimental ion pairing is minimal, largely because the point-ion approximation allows unphysically close approaches that exaggerate the attractive potential at short distances. Despite these shortcomings, Bjerrum's framework has had profound historical impact, laying the groundwork for modern theories by highlighting the role of ion pairing in deviations from ideal behavior and influencing subsequent models of activity coefficients and conductivities.

Extensions and Modern Theories

Extensions beyond the classical Bjerrum theory have incorporated more sophisticated statistical mechanical approaches to better account for ion correlations and in solutions. The mean spherical approximation (MSA) treats s as with smeared charges, providing an analytical framework to compute pair correlation functions and thermodynamic properties like activity coefficients in ionic systems. This approximation extends earlier models by incorporating short-range repulsions and long-range interactions, yielding improved predictions for association constants in concentrated solutions. For instance, MSA combined with mass action law has been used to describe the degree of in symmetric s, showing enhanced accuracy over Debye-Hückel limits at higher concentrations. The hypernetted chain (HNC) approximation offers a further refinement by solving the Ornstein-Zernike with a closure that captures bridge functions neglected in simpler theories, thus providing a more accurate description of spatial ion correlations in electrolytes. HNC has been particularly effective for higher-valence electrolytes, where it predicts radial distribution functions that reveal pronounced structuring due to strong forces. In aqueous systems, HNC calculations demonstrate how ion-ion correlations lead to enhanced association at distances near the , without assuming pairwise decomposability. Recent implementations of HNC for mixtures in dipolar solvents have extended its applicability to realistic ion scenarios. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations with explicit solvent models have revolutionized the study of ion association by capturing the dynamic nature of pair formation and dissociation in real time. These simulations reveal that ion pairs form transiently, with lifetimes on the picosecond to nanosecond scale, influenced by solvent reorganization. Analysis of radial distribution functions (RDFs) from MD trajectories often shows sharp first peaks at ion distances of 2-4 Å for contact pairs in water, indicating strong local coordination, while broader second peaks reflect solvent-separated configurations. For example, in NaCl solutions, explicit water MD simulations exhibit RDF peaks that quantify the probability of ion pairing under varying concentrations and temperatures. Such approaches highlight the role of hydration shells in modulating association, with ions like Li⁺ forming tighter pairs due to their small size. Quantum mechanical treatments, particularly (DFT) and methods, are essential for understanding contact ion pairs where partial covalent character emerges, blurring the ionic-covalent boundary. These calculations reveal that in tight ion pairs, such as those involving highly polarizable anions like F⁻ or in organometallic complexes, electron density sharing leads to bond orders intermediate between pure ionic and covalent limits. For instance, DFT studies of alkali halide pairs in gas phase or low-dielectric environments show orbital overlap contributing to stability, with binding energies reflecting mixed character. In ion-pair complexes like hydrocarbon systems, computations confirm covalent contributions through natural bond orbital analysis, explaining spectroscopic signatures of association. These methods provide precise potentials of mean force for contact pairs, correcting classical overestimations of purely electrostatic interactions. Post-2000 developments have integrated (ML) potentials into large-scale simulations of ion association, enabling efficient exploration of systems with explicit ion size and hydration effects that were computationally prohibitive. ML potentials, trained on quantum mechanical data, approximate high-fidelity energy surfaces for electrolytes, allowing microsecond-long MD runs to observe rare pairing events and dynamics. These models incorporate corrections for finite ion sizes via Gaussian charge distributions and explicit hydration by learning water-ion interactions, improving predictions of association free energies in complex media. For aqueous electrolytes, ML-driven simulations have quantified how partial dehydration facilitates contact pair formation, with applications to battery electrolytes revealing size-dependent selectivity. Such approaches bridge with atomistic detail, offering scalable tools for modern electrolyte design.

Contexts of Occurrence

In Electrolyte Solutions

Ion association becomes prevalent in concentrated solutions, particularly those above 0.1 M for 1:1 electrolytes like NaCl, where the fraction of ion pairs can rise from approximately 4% at 0.5 mol/L to nearly 50% at 4 mol/L. This association diminishes upon dilution as interionic distances increase and stabilizes free ions. Water's high dielectric constant, approximately 78.3 at 25°C, effectively screens electrostatic attractions and favors the predominance of free s in dilute to moderate solutions. However, multivalent ions exhibit greater association due to stronger Coulombic interactions; for instance, in aqueous MgSO4 solutions up to 2.24 M, extensive formation of contact, solvent-shared, and solvent-separated ion pairs occurs, along with triple ions at higher concentrations. The temperature dependence of ion association is significant, as water's dielectric constant decreases with increasing temperature, thereby weakening solvation and favoring ion association in certain systems. In aqueous CaCl₂ solutions, ion pairing generally increases with increasing temperature, in contrast to MgCl₂ solutions where ion association decreases with temperature. This difference arises from variations in ion hydration properties. At low temperatures near room temperature, ion pairing in CaCl₂ is limited, particularly in dilute solutions. At elevated temperatures, significant ion pairing occurs, with the stability of charged CaCl⁺ pairs decreasing while neutral CaCl₂⁰ pairs increase sharply; the association constant K₂ for CaCl₂⁰ reaches 4.95 × 10⁴ at 360°C. Above 400°C, substantial ion pairing is detected, including stepwise ionization effects. In natural systems like (salinity ~35), ion pairing among major constituents such as Mg²⁺ and SO₄²⁻ alters ion activities and influences models critical for geochemical assessments, including those related to determination via conductivity. Industrial brines, such as chloride-rich solutions in closed-basin environments, similarly feature widespread ion pairing of major cations and anions (except Cl⁻), which impacts thermodynamic predictions and processes. The extent of association is often quantified using conductivity data, where the apparent degree of dissociation α = Λ/Λ₀ (with Λ as the and Λ₀ as the limiting value) falls below 1, signifying reduced mobility from paired ions; in concentrated NaCl, this deviation highlights substantial pairing effects on transport properties.

In Non-Aqueous and Specialized Media

In solvents with low constants, such as alcohols (ε ≈ 20–30) and acetone (ε ≈ 21), ion association is markedly enhanced compared to aqueous environments, primarily due to diminished electrostatic screening of ionic charges. This promotes the formation of contact ion pairs, where cations and anions interact directly without solvent molecules intervening, as the reduced solvent polarity limits effective shells. For instance, in (ε ≈ 24.5) and acetone solutions of halides, the association constants increase significantly with decreasing constant, leading to predominant contact pairing and reduced ionic mobility. Molten salts and ionic liquids exhibit pervasive ion association, often forming transient clusters or extended networks driven by strong Coulombic forces. In high-temperature molten salts like alkali halide mixtures (e.g., LiF-LiCl eutectics), ions form short-lived, charge-balanced clusters that influence transport properties, with association increasing at elevated temperatures due to weakened . Similarly, in room-temperature ionic liquids such as 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate ([EMIM][BF4]), cations and anions engage in correlated motion and cluster formation, deviating from ideal ionic behavior and resulting in dynamic networks rather than fully dissociated ions; this association is evident in deviations from the Nernst-Einstein relation for conductivity. Specialized media like supercritical fluids and deep eutectic solvents (DES) further highlight unique association behaviors under extreme conditions. In supercritical fluids, such as water-CO2 mixtures under supercritical conditions (ε effectively low due to density variations), NaCl ions form stable contact pairs with association constants that rise sharply as the dielectric constant drops below 10, favoring polyatomic clustering over free ions. In DES, particularly type V formulations (e.g., terpene-based with LiTFSI), long-lived ion pairs dominate, as indicated by matched diffusion coefficients for Li⁺ and TFSI⁻, moving as neutral entities and limiting conductivity. Examples include their use in formulations where such pairing modulates charge transport. Viscosity plays a critical role in determining ion pair lifetimes in these non-aqueous systems, with higher correlating to prolonged pair stability and reduced dissociation rates. In polymer electrolytes and viscous ILs, low solvent polarity (ε < 10) extends pair lifetimes (τ⁺⁻ > 1 ns), trapping s in neutral aggregates and impeding conductivity, as pair dissociation becomes rate-limited by solvent dynamics. Recent studies (2020s) on CO2-expanded liquids, such as CO2-dissolved ILs, demonstrate that CO2 incorporation increases free volume and reduces , thereby weakening ion pairing and enhancing mobility compared to pure ILs.

Characterization Techniques

Spectroscopic Methods

Spectroscopic methods provide molecular-level insights into association by probing electronic, vibrational, and nuclear environments perturbed by proximity. Ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) spectroscopy is particularly effective for detecting contact pairs through charge-transfer transitions, where an is transferred between the cation and anion, often resulting in intense absorption bands in the visible or near-UV region. For instance, in solutions of iodide ions with iodine, the formation of the triiodide ion (I₃⁻) as a contact pair exhibits characteristic charge-transfer bands around 350 nm and 290 nm, enabling quantification of association constants via Beer's law analysis of absorbance changes. Similarly, in aqueous solutions, UV-Vis absorption of the shifts hypsochromically with increasing concentration due to cation polarization effects in pairs, confirming association in strong electrolytes. Infrared (IR) and reveal ion pairing through shifts in vibrational frequencies, especially for solvent molecules bridging ions or for coordinated ligands. In -bridged (solvent-shared) ion pairs, such as those in aqueous LiCl, the symmetric O-H stretching mode of red-shifts by approximately 20-50 cm⁻¹ compared to bulk , reflecting strengthened hydrogen bonding in the shared hydration shell, as observed in the 3200-3600 cm⁻¹ region. For contact ion pairs, ligand modes like asymmetric stretch (ν₃) shift to higher wavenumbers (e.g., from 1380 cm⁻¹ in free NO₃⁻ to 1420 cm⁻¹ when paired with Li⁺), indicating direct coordination and reduced symmetry. complements IR by enhancing symmetric modes, allowing differentiation between free ions, contact pairs, and solvent-separated pairs based on band intensities and positions. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy detects ion association via chemical shift perturbations and diffusion measurements. Chemical shifts of ions or ligands change upon pairing due to altered electronic environments; for example, in aqueous NaOH and LiOH, the ¹⁷O of hydroxide ions moves downfield by 5-10 ppm in contact pairs, reflecting desolvation and direct ion interaction. Pulsed gradient spin-echo (PGSE) quantifies pairing through self- coefficients: paired ions exhibit slower, similar diffusion rates (e.g., D ≈ 0.5 × 10⁻⁹ m²/s for both cation and anion in concentrated LiCl, versus 1.0 × 10⁻⁹ m²/s for free ions), allowing estimation of association fractions via the Stokes-Einstein relation. Recent advances in have elucidated the ultrafast dynamics of ion pairing. Two-dimensional infrared (2D-IR) spectroscopy captures chemical exchange between free and paired states on picosecond timescales; for Li⁺-SCN⁻ in , 2D-IR cross-peaks reveal ion pair formation with a rate constant of ~10¹⁰ s⁻¹ and dissociation lifetime of 20 ps, resolving contact versus solvent-separated configurations. stimulated Raman spectroscopy tracks pair formation rates post-photoexcitation, showing contact ion pair assembly in 3 ps for radical ion systems, highlighting solvent-mediated barriers in aqueous environments. These techniques, developed since 2010, enable direct observation of transient intermediates, complementing equilibrium measurements.

Conductivity and Other Measurements

Conductometric serves as a primary method for detecting ion association in solutions by measuring deviations in from ideal behavior. In dilute solutions, the Λm\Lambda_m of electrolytes follows the Kohlrausch , approaching a limiting value Λm0\Lambda_m^0 at infinite dilution, but at higher concentrations, ion association reduces the number of free charge carriers, leading to a steeper decline in Λm\Lambda_m. This non-ideal behavior is quantified through plots of Λm\Lambda_m versus concentration, where the extent of curvature indicates the degree of pairing. Deviations from the rule, which posits that the product of and ηΛm\eta \Lambda_m remains constant across for fully dissociated , provide evidence of association. In associated systems, such as certain ionic liquids or non-aqueous electrolytes, ηΛm<Λm0η0\eta \Lambda_m < \Lambda_m^0 \eta_0 (where η0\eta_0 is the ), reflecting reduced ion mobility due to paired that do not contribute to conduction. For instance, in molten salts like NaCl, plots show sublinear trends attributable to transient ion pairing. The Fuoss formalizes this by relating the association constant KAK_A to conductivity , for both electrophoretic and relaxation effects in the ion atmosphere. Derived from the paired ion model, it expresses Λm\Lambda_m as a function of concentration cc, with KAK_A obtained via extrapolation methods like Fuoss-Onsager or Fuoss-Hsia. In the seminal formulation, for a 1:1 electrolyte, KA=1−αα2cK_A = \frac{1 - \alpha}{\alpha^2 c}, where α\alpha is the degree of dissociation derived from Λm/Λm0\Lambda_m / \Lambda_m^0, enabling quantitative assessment of ion pair formation in solvents like or . This approach has been applied to salts, yielding KAK_A values on the order of 10-100 L/mol depending on the constant. Potentiometric measurements determine ion activity coefficients γ±\gamma_\pm from (EMF) data in cells without liquid junctions, revealing association through non-ideal activity behavior. For associated electrolytes, log⁡γ±\log \gamma_\pm deviates positively from Debye-Hückel predictions at moderate concentrations, as pairs reduce effective ion numbers and alter mean activity. In studies, the product KspK_{sp} of sparingly soluble salts like AgCl increases beyond ideal values due to complex formation or association, with activity coefficients derived from EMF titrations showing enhancements up to 20-50% in mixed electrolytes. These techniques complement conductivity by providing thermodynamic insights into pairing equilibria. Dielectric relaxation , particularly in the range (1-100 GHz), probes the reorientation dynamics of pairs by analyzing the frequency-dependent ϵ(ω)\epsilon(\omega). Associated ions exhibit slower rotational compared to free ions or molecules, manifesting as distinct relaxation modes with time constants τ\tau in the to regime. For example, in aqueous solutions, the pair relaxation time τIP\tau_{IP} around 10-50 ps reflects hindered reorientation due to electrostatic binding, distinguishable from the bulk relaxation at ~8 ps. This method quantifies pair lifetimes and correlates with association strengths in low- media. Calorimetric techniques measure the of ion association ΔHA\Delta H_A through heats of dilution or , capturing the exothermic or endothermic nature of pairing. In classical dilution experiments, the differential heat qq upon diluting concentrated solutions arises from dissociation of pairs, with ΔHA\Delta H_A derived from temperature-dependent or data; for instance, in aqueous MgSO4, dilution heats indicate ΔHA≈−5\Delta H_A \approx -5 to -15 kJ/mol for solvent-separated pairs. Modern (ITC) directly titrates ions into solutions, yielding ΔHA\Delta H_A, binding stoichiometry, and KAK_A in a single experiment. ITC studies of polyion associations, such as polyelectrolyte-metal ion pairs, report ΔHA\Delta H_A values from -10 to -30 kJ/mol, driven by and modulated by . These enthalpies align with spectroscopic observations of pair stability.

Applications and Implications

In Electrochemistry

Ion association plays a critical role in electrochemical processes by affecting ion transport dynamics, particularly in battery systems where paired ions exhibit diminished mobility relative to free ions. In lithium-ion batteries, the formation of solvent-coordinated pairs, such as [Li(solvent)_n]^+ with anions like PF_6^-, results in lower Li^+ transference numbers, as these clusters migrate collectively and impede individual ion diffusion to the surface. This reduced impacts kinetics, leading to slower charge-discharge rates and potential limitations in . Studies using simulations have quantified these association constants, revealing that while pairing generally decreases bulk conductivity, it can influence selective transport in concentrated electrolytes. At electrochemical interfaces, pairing modifies the electrical double-layer structure, thereby altering interfacial and charge storage mechanisms. In systems like s or carbon-based supercapacitors, paired ions disrupt the ideal Helmholtz-like layering, leading to variations in differential that depend on ion packing and . For instance, pairing near the can lead to variations in differential , as observed in simulations of interfaces. This effect is particularly relevant in non-aqueous media, where on pairing subtly influence double-layer properties without dominating the overall structure. In corrosion and electrodeposition processes, ion association governs the speciation and reduction kinetics of metal ions, affecting deposit morphology and uniformity. During copper electrodeposition from CuSO_4 electrolytes, the formation of Cu^{2+}-SO_4^{2-} ion pairs influences the speciation of copper ions, thereby affecting the reduction kinetics and promoting irregular deposits under certain pH and concentration conditions. Dielectric spectroscopy confirms that such pairing increases with temperature in aqueous CuSO_4 solutions, linking it directly to altered electrochemical behavior. Similarly, in corrosion scenarios involving metal ions, pairing can stabilize intermediate species, modulating dissolution rates at anodic sites. Recent 2020s research highlights nuanced implications of pairing in solid-state electrolytes for batteries, where strategic association can enhance conductivity by facilitating defect-mediated transport or stabilizing grain boundaries. In hybrid solid electrolytes, controlled pairing reduces energy barriers for Li^+ hopping across interfaces, countering traditional views of pairing as solely detrimental and enabling higher room-temperature conductivities in sulfide-based systems. This approach has been modeled to show improved overall flux, supporting advancements in all-solid-state battery performance.

In Biological and Materials Systems

Ion pairing plays a crucial role in biological systems, particularly in stabilizing protein structures through salt bridges, which are electrostatic interactions between oppositely charged amino acid side chains such as arginine and glutamate. In enzymes, these salt bridges contribute to thermostability; for instance, thermophilic enzymes exhibit an increased number of salt bridges compared to mesophilic counterparts, enhancing resistance to thermal denaturation by strengthening hydrogen-bonding networks. Similarly, in collagen triple helices, salt bridges between lysine and aspartate residues decrease the unfolding rate, thereby increasing kinetic stability as demonstrated in model peptides and native collagens. In DNA, counterion condensation involves multivalent cations like Mg²⁺ associating with the negatively charged phosphate backbone, neutralizing approximately 60-70% of the DNA charge and reducing electrostatic repulsion to promote structural stability and folding. This process is essential for RNA folding kinetics, where condensed counterions facilitate compact conformations in ribozymes by mitigating phosphate-phosphate repulsions. In , ion pairing governs in polymers and colloids by modulating electrostatic interactions and phase behavior. For block copolymers, ion pairs between charged segments drive formation, influencing microphase separation and enabling tunable nanostructures as predicted by self-consistent field theory models that account for pairing effects. In colloidal systems, hydrophobic ion pairing with oppositely charged or polymers directs hierarchical assembly, such as in polyelectrolyte-surfactant complexes that form redox-active materials with controlled electrochemical properties. These interactions are particularly vital in ion-conducting membranes, where ion association models describe uptake and selectivity; for example, in ion-exchange membranes, pairing between fixed charges and mobile ions reduces osmotic swelling while maintaining high conductivity through micro-heterogeneous pore structures. Ion association also impacts environmental processes, notably in soils where it influences nutrient by altering and . Nutrient s like form stable pairs with calcium (e.g., CaSO₄⁰), which decreases free concentrations and adsorption onto clay surfaces, thereby affecting plant uptake and microbial activity. Similarly, s pair with calcium in soils, enhancing retention and reducing leaching, which can limit for crops in high-pH environments. Emerging applications in 2025 highlight ion pairing's role in solar cells, where multifunctional ion-pairing additives passivate defects at grain boundaries and interfaces, suppressing non-radiative recombination and improving charge separation efficiency. For quasi-2D perovskites, additives like diethylammonium diethyldithiocarbamate form ion pairs that stabilize the structure, boosting power conversion efficiencies beyond 20% in both light-emitting diodes and solar cells by facilitating balanced carrier extraction. These advancements underscore ion pairing's potential to enhance device performance and longevity in next-generation .

References

  1. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article/160/15/154509/3283307/Theoretical-and-practical-investigation-of-ion-ion
  2. https://chemistry-europe.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/batt.202400160
  3. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PRXEnergy.2.013007
  4. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0016703789903839
  5. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/cr040087x
  6. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2698044/
  7. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Physical_and_Theoretical_Chemistry_Textbook_Maps/Topics_in_Thermodynamics_of_Solutions_and_Liquid_Mixtures/01%253A_Modules/1.16%253A_Ion_Interactions/1.16.1%253A_Ion_Association
  8. https://www.nobelprize.org/uploads/2018/06/eigen-lecture.pdf
  9. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00763
  10. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article/113/23/10676/183826/Ab-initio-molecular-dynamics-simulation-of-LiBr
  11. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b03550
  12. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5920006/
  13. https://www.ias.ac.in/article/fulltext/jcsc/106/06/1315-1320
  14. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/je800152d
  15. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article/151/22/224504/198515/Electrical-conductivity-ion-pairing-and-ion-self
  16. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article/161/3/034507/3303594/Uncovering-the-binding-nature-of-thiocyanate-in
  17. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp809782z
  18. https://goldbook.iupac.org/terms/view/I03231
  19. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6936746/
  20. http://publ.royalacademy.dk/backend/web/uploads/2019-07-23/AFL%25202/M_7_00_00_1925-1927_6374/M_7_09_00_1926_857.pdf
  21. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article/146/19/194904/195623/Bjerrum-pairs-in-ionic-solutions-A-Poisson
  22. https://arxiv.org/html/2012.12194v10
  23. http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1876699/FULLTEXT01.pdf
  24. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/226529407_Concept_of_Ion_Association_in_the_Theory_of_Electrolyte_Solutions
  25. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/j100195a044
  26. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00667599
  27. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.65.041202
  28. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0953-8984/3/40/012
  29. https://hal.sorbonne-universite.fr/hal-03380313v1/document
  30. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jp902584c
  31. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3944826/
  32. https://www.halide-crylink.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/2-A-molecular-dynamics-simulation-study-of-KF-and-NaF-ion-pairs-in.pdf
  33. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jpcc.4c06414
  34. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.82.032715
  35. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.4c04914
  36. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2110077118
  37. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2024/fd/d4fd00025k
  38. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2515-7655/acbbef
  39. https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/jres/56/jresv56n1p1_a1b.pdf
  40. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(89)90383-9
  41. https://doi.org/10.2475/ajs.282.10.1666
  42. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279226672_Ion_association_characteristics_in_MgCl2_and_CaCl2_aqueous_solutions_A_density_functional_theory_and_molecular_dynamics_investigation
  43. https://aslopubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.4319/lo.1972.17.1.0001
  44. https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/70011622
  45. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.0c03013
  46. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14195617
  47. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/4261004
  48. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9814786/
  49. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ja906337p
  50. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S016773221734312X
  51. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.3c12877
  52. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c02474
  53. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2213343725038989
  54. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ja01148a504
  55. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/1999/cp/a806961a
  56. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1386142521011203
  57. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/1999/cp/a806961a
  58. https://par.nsf.gov/servlets/purl/10299074
  59. https://chemistry-europe.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/chem.200305719
  60. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article/134/6/064506/645724/Ion-pairing-dynamics-of-Li-and-SCN-in
  61. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b01431
  62. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ja01494a003
  63. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7497660/
  64. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.4c07525
  65. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667312622000645
  66. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2009/cp/b906555p
  67. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2012/cp/c2cp23137a
  68. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-16597-7
  69. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1149/2.1061914jes
  70. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article/142/17/174704/940708/Influence-of-ion-pairing-in-ionic-liquids-on
  71. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/6916024_Ion_Association_and_Hydration_in_Aqueous_Solutions_of_CopperII_Sulfate_from_5_to_65_C_by_Dielectric_Spectroscopy
  72. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0009250908000948
  73. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667141724000624
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.