Hubbry Logo
Electrochemical gradientElectrochemical gradientMain
Open search
Electrochemical gradient
Community hub
Electrochemical gradient
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Electrochemical gradient
Electrochemical gradient
Electrochemical gradient
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Diagram of ion concentrations and charge across a semi-permeable cellular membrane.

An electrochemical gradient is a gradient of electrochemical potential, usually for an ion that can move across a membrane. The gradient consists of two parts:

  • The chemical gradient, or difference in solute concentration across a membrane.
  • The electrical gradient, or difference in charge across a membrane.

If there are unequal concentrations of an ion across a permeable membrane, the ion will move across the membrane from the area of higher concentration to the area of lower concentration through simple diffusion. Ions also carry an electric charge that forms an electric potential across a membrane. If there is an unequal distribution of charges across the membrane, then the difference in electric potential generates a force that drives ion diffusion until the charges are balanced on both sides of the membrane.

Electrochemical gradients are essential to the operation of batteries and other electrochemical cells, photosynthesis and cellular respiration, and certain other biological processes.

Overview

[edit]

Electrochemical energy is one of the many interchangeable forms of potential energy through which energy may be conserved. It appears in electroanalytical chemistry and has industrial applications such as batteries and fuel cells. In biology, electrochemical gradients allow cells to control the direction ions move across membranes. In mitochondria and chloroplasts, proton gradients generate a chemiosmotic potential used to synthesize ATP,[1] and the sodium-potassium gradient helps neural synapses quickly transmit information.[citation needed]

An electrochemical gradient has two components: a differential concentration of electric charge across a membrane and a differential concentration of chemical species across that same membrane. In the former effect, the concentrated charge attracts charges of the opposite sign; in the latter, the concentrated species tends to diffuse across the membrane to an equalize concentrations. The combination of these two phenomena determines the thermodynamically-preferred direction for an ion's movement across the membrane.[2]: 403 [3]

The combined effect can be quantified as a gradient in the thermodynamic electrochemical potential:[citation needed]

with

  • μi the chemical potential of the ion species i
  • zi the charge per ion of the species i
  • F, Faraday constant (the electrochemical potential is implicitly measured on a per-mole basis)
  • φ, the local electric potential.

Sometimes, the term "electrochemical potential" is abused to describe the electric potential generated by an ionic concentration gradient; that is, φ.

An electrochemical gradient is analogous to the water pressure across a hydroelectric dam. Routes unblocked by the membrane (e.g. membrane transport protein or electrodes) correspond to turbines that convert the water's potential energy to other forms of physical or chemical energy, and the ions that pass through the membrane correspond to water traveling into the lower river.[tone] Conversely, energy can be used to pump water up into the lake above the dam, and chemical energy can be used to create electrochemical gradients.[4][5]

Chemistry

[edit]
See also: concentration cell, electrode potential, and table of standard electrode potentials

The term typically applies in electrochemistry, when electrical energy in the form of an applied voltage is used to modulate the thermodynamic favorability of a chemical reaction. In a battery, an electrochemical potential arising from the movement of ions balances the reaction energy of the electrodes. The maximum voltage that a battery reaction can produce is sometimes called the standard electrochemical potential of that reaction.[citation needed]

Biological context

[edit]

The generation of a transmembrane electrical potential through ion movement across a cell membrane drives biological processes like nerve conduction, muscle contraction, hormone secretion, and sensation. By convention, physiological voltages are measured relative to the extracellular region; a typical animal cell has an internal electrical potential of (−70)–(−50) mV.[2]: 464 

An electrochemical gradient is essential to mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation. The final step of cellular respiration is the electron transport chain, composed of four complexes embedded in the inner mitochondrial membrane. Complexes I, III, and IV pump protons from the matrix to the intermembrane space (IMS); for every electron pair entering the chain, ten protons translocate into the IMS. The result is an electric potential of more than 200 mV. The energy resulting from the flux of protons back into the matrix is used by ATP synthase to combine inorganic phosphate and ADP.[6][2]: 743–745 

Similar to the electron transport chain, the light-dependent reactions of photosynthesis pump protons into the thylakoid lumen of chloroplasts to drive the synthesis of ATP. The proton gradient can be generated through either noncyclic or cyclic photophosphorylation. Of the proteins that participate in noncyclic photophosphorylation, photosystem II (PSII), plastiquinone, and cytochrome b6f complex directly contribute to generating the proton gradient. For each four photons absorbed by PSII, eight protons are pumped into the lumen.[2]: 769–770 

Several other transporters and ion channels play a role in generating a proton electrochemical gradient. One is TPK3, a potassium channel that is activated by Ca2+ and conducts K+ from the thylakoid lumen to the stroma, which helps establish the electric field. On the other hand, the electro-neutral K+ efflux antiporter (KEA3) transports K+ into the thylakoid lumen and H+ into the stroma, which helps establish the pH gradient.[7]

Ion gradients

[edit]
Diagram of the Na+-K+-ATPase.

Since the ions are charged, they cannot pass through cellular membranes via simple diffusion. Two different mechanisms can transport the ions across the membrane: active or passive transport.[citation needed]

An example of active transport of ions is the Na+-K+-ATPase (NKA). NKA is powered by the hydrolysis of ATP into ADP and an inorganic phosphate; for every molecule of ATP hydrolized, three Na+ are transported outside and two K+ are transported inside the cell. This makes the inside of the cell more negative than the outside and more specifically generates a membrane potential Vmembrane of about −60 mV.[5]

An example of passive transport is ion fluxes through Na+, K+, Ca2+, and Cl− channels. Unlike active transport, passive transport is powered by the arithmetic sum of osmosis (a concentration gradient) and an electric field (the transmembrane potential). Formally, the molar Gibbs free energy change associated with successful transport is[citation needed] where R represents the gas constant, T represents absolute temperature, z is the charge per ion, and F represents the Faraday constant.[2]: 464–465 

In the example of Na+, both terms tend to support transport: the negative electric potential inside the cell attracts the positive ion and since Na+ is concentrated outside the cell, osmosis supports diffusion through the Na+ channel into the cell. In the case of K+, the effect of osmosis is reversed: although external ions are attracted by the negative intracellular potential, entropy seeks to diffuse the ions already concentrated inside the cell. The converse phenomenon (osmosis supports transport, electric potential opposes it) can be achieved for Na+ in cells with abnormal transmembrane potentials: at +70 mV, the Na+ influx halts; at higher potentials, it becomes an efflux.[citation needed]

Common cellular ion concentrations (millimolar)[8][9][10][11]
Ion Mammal Squid axon S. cerevisiae E. coli Sea water
Cell Blood Cell Blood
K+ 100 - 140 4-5 400 10 - 20 300 30 - 300 10
Na+ 5-15 145 50 440 30 10 500
Mg2+ 10 [a]
0.5 - 0.8 [b]		 1 - 1.5 50 30 - 100 [a]
0.01 - 1 [b]		 50
Ca2+ 10−4 2.2 - 2.6 [c]
1.3 - 1.5 [d]		 10−4 - 3×10−4 10 2 3 [a]
10−4 [b]		 10
Cl− 4 110 40 - 150 560 10 - 200 [e] 500
X− (negatively charged proteins) 138 9 300 - 400 5-10
HCO3− 12 29
pH 7.1 - 7.3[12] 7.35 to 7.45 [12] (normal arterial blood pH)
6.9 - 7.8 [12] (overall range)		 7.2 - 7.8[13] 8.1 - 8.2[14]
  1. ^ a b c Bound
  2. ^ a b c Free
  3. ^ Total
  4. ^ Ionised
  5. ^ Medium dependent

Proton gradients

[edit]

Proton gradients in particular are important in many types of cells as a form of energy storage. The gradient is usually used to drive ATP synthase, flagellar rotation, or metabolite transport.[15] This section will focus on three processes that help establish proton gradients in their respective cells: bacteriorhodopsin and noncyclic photophosphorylation and oxidative phosphorylation.[citation needed]

Bacteriorhodopsin

[edit]
Diagram of the conformational shift in retinal that initiates proton pumping in bacteriorhodopsin.

The way bacteriorhodopsin generates a proton gradient in Archaea is through a proton pump. The proton pump relies on proton carriers to drive protons from the side of the membrane with a low H+ concentration to the side of the membrane with a high H+ concentration. In bacteriorhodopsin, the proton pump is activated by absorption of photons of 568nm wavelength, which leads to isomerization of the Schiff base (SB) in retinal forming the K state. This moves SB away from Asp85 and Asp212, causing H+ transfer from the SB to Asp85 forming the M1 state. The protein then shifts to the M2 state by separating Glu204 from Glu194 which releases a proton from Glu204 into the external medium. The SB is reprotonated by Asp96 which forms the N state. It is important that the second proton comes from Asp96 since its deprotonated state is unstable and rapidly reprotonated with a proton from the cytosol. The protonation of Asp85 and Asp96 causes re-isomerization of the SB, forming the O state. Finally, bacteriorhodopsin returns to its resting state when Asp85 releases its proton to Glu204.[15][16]

Photophosphorylation

[edit]
Simplified diagram of photophosphorylation.

PSII also relies on light to drive the formation of proton gradients in chloroplasts, however, PSII utilizes vectorial redox chemistry to achieve this goal. Rather than physically transporting protons through the protein, reactions requiring the binding of protons will occur on the extracellular side while reactions requiring the release of protons will occur on the intracellular side. Absorption of photons of 680nm wavelength is used to excite two electrons in P680 to a higher energy level. These higher energy electrons are transferred to protein-bound plastoquinone (PQA) and then to unbound plastoquinone (PQB). This reduces plastoquinone (PQ) to plastoquinol (PQH2) which is released from PSII after gaining two protons from the stroma. The electrons in P680 are replenished by oxidizing water through the oxygen-evolving complex (OEC). This results in release of O2 and H+ into the lumen, for a total reaction of[15]

After being released from PSII, PQH2 travels to the cytochrome b6f complex, which then transfers two electrons from PQH2 to plastocyanin in two separate reactions. The process that occurs is similar to the Q-cycle in Complex III of the electron transport chain. In the first reaction, PQH2 binds to the complex on the lumen side and one electron is transferred to the iron-sulfur center which then transfers it to cytochrome f which then transfers it to plastocyanin. The second electron is transferred to heme bL which then transfers it to heme bH which then transfers it to PQ. In the second reaction, a second PQH2 gets oxidized, adding an electron to another plastocyanin and PQ. Both reactions together transfer four protons into the lumen.[2]: 782–783 [17]

Oxidative phosphorylation

[edit]

Main article: Oxidative phosphorylation

Detailed diagram of the electron transport chain in mitochondria.

In the electron transport chain, complex I (CI) catalyzes the reduction of ubiquinone (UQ) to ubiquinol (UQH2) by the transfer of two electrons from reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) which translocates four protons from the mitochondrial matrix to the IMS:[18]

Complex III (CIII) catalyzes the Q-cycle. The first step involving the transfer of two electrons from the UQH2 reduced by CI to two molecules of oxidized cytochrome c at the Qo site. In the second step, two more electrons reduce UQ to UQH2 at the Qi site. The total reaction is:[18]

Complex IV (CIV) catalyzes the transfer of two electrons from the cytochrome c reduced by CIII to one half of a full oxygen. Utilizing one full oxygen in oxidative phosphorylation requires the transfer of four electrons. The oxygen will then consume four protons from the matrix to form water while another four protons are pumped into the IMS, to give a total reaction[18]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Electrochemical gradient

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
An electrochemical gradient is the combined effect of a chemical concentration gradient and an electrical potential gradient for an across a , representing the total driving force that determines the direction and magnitude of passive ion movement. This gradient serves as a form of stored in cells, essential for processes like maintaining membrane potentials and powering secondary . The chemical component of the electrochemical gradient arises from differences in ion concentration between the intracellular and extracellular environments; for instance, potassium ions (K⁺) are typically more concentrated inside cells, while sodium ions (Na⁺) are more abundant outside. The electrical component stems from the charge imbalance across the , often resulting in a negative intracellular potential (around -70 mV in many cells) due to the uneven distribution of charged ions and the activity of pumps like the Na⁺/K⁺-ATPase. Together, these components dictate whether an ion will diffuse into or out of the cell through open ion channels, with no net movement occurring at the point of electrochemical equilibrium. The magnitude of the electrochemical gradient for a specific is quantified using the , which calculates the equilibrium potential (E_ion) at which the chemical and electrical forces balance: E_ion = (RT/zF) ln([ion]_out / [ion]_in), where R is the , T is , z is the ion's valence, F is Faraday's constant, and [ion] denotes concentration inside and outside the cell. For example, the equilibrium potential for K⁺ is approximately -90 mV under typical physiological conditions, while for Na⁺ it is around +60 mV, contributing to the resting through weighted contributions from multiple ions. In biological systems, electrochemical gradients are crucial for cellular functions, including the generation of action potentials in neurons and muscle cells, where rapid changes in Na⁺ and K⁺ gradients enable signal propagation. They also drive secondary , such as the Na⁺-glucose symporter in intestinal cells, which uses the Na⁺ gradient to import glucose against its concentration gradient. Additionally, proton (H⁺) electrochemical gradients across mitochondrial or bacterial membranes power ATP synthesis via , highlighting their role in energy transduction. These gradients are dynamically maintained by primary mechanisms, ensuring cellular and responsiveness to environmental cues.

Basic Principles

Definition

The electrochemical gradient is the gradient in that drives the passive of s across a permeable barrier, such as a , arising from differences in concentration and electrical charge separation. This gradient combines a chemical component, stemming from unequal concentrations on either side of the barrier, and an electrical component, resulting from the separation of charges that creates a . As a key principle in chemistry and , the electrochemical gradient provides the foundational framework for analyzing fluxes, states, and processes in living organisms. It underpins the thermodynamic driving forces that govern how charged particles respond to both diffusive and electrostatic influences. The concept gained prominence in through Peter Mitchell's chemiosmotic theory in the 1960s, where it described the proton motive force enabling ATP synthesis. This gradient determines the direction and magnitude of net flow, with ions moving spontaneously toward equilibrium until the driving force dissipates.

Components

The chemical gradient is the difference in ion concentration across a , which drives the passive of s from regions of higher concentration to lower concentration. This movement follows Fick's first law of , which states that the flux of ions is proportional to the negative gradient of their concentration. The driving force behind this process is entropic, stemming from the tendency of systems to increase disorder through the equalization of concentrations, as described by the in ideal solutions. The electrical gradient, in contrast, results from the separation of electrical charges across the , creating a voltage difference known as the . This potential exerts electrostatic forces that attract oppositely charged ions toward the side of opposite charge and repel like-charged ions. Unlike the chemical gradient, the electrical gradient is energetic in nature, involving the work required to move charged particles against the electrostatic field. These components interact additively to influence net ion movement across the membrane, though they are analyzed independently here to clarify their distinct physical bases; their combined effect constitutes the full electrochemical gradient.

Quantitative Formulation

Electrochemical Potential

The electrochemical potential μˉ\bar{\mu} of an ion species quantifies the total Gibbs free energy per mole associated with its position in a system, incorporating both diffusive and electrostatic influences. It is expressed by the equation μˉ=μ∘+RTln⁡[ion]+zFψ,\bar{\mu} = \mu^\circ + RT \ln [\text{ion}] + zF\psi, where μ∘\mu^\circ is the standard chemical potential at a reference state, RR is the gas constant, TT is the absolute temperature, [ion][\text{ion}] is the ion concentration (or more precisely, its activity), zz is the ion's valence (charge number), FF is the Faraday constant, and ψ\psi is the local electrical potential. This formulation arises from combining the chemical potential, μchem=μ∘+RTln⁡[ion]\mu_\text{chem} = \mu^\circ + RT \ln [\text{ion}], which describes the entropic contribution from concentration differences, with the electrical potential energy term zFψzF\psi, representing the work required to position a charged particle in an electric field. The derivation follows from the general thermodynamic relation for the Gibbs free energy change dG=∑μˉidnidG = \sum \bar{\mu}_i dn_i, where the electrochemical potential μˉi\bar{\mu}_i drives the flux of species ii toward regions of lower μˉi\bar{\mu}_i. In the context of ion movement across a membrane, μˉ\bar{\mu} determines the total free energy change per mole for transferring the ion from one compartment to another, with spontaneous transport occurring when Δμˉ<0\Delta \bar{\mu} < 0. An electrochemical gradient exists when the electrochemical potential differs between compartments, i.e., Δμˉ=μˉinside−μˉoutside≠0\Delta \bar{\mu} = \bar{\mu}_\text{inside} - \bar{\mu}_\text{outside} \neq 0, providing the thermodynamic driving force for ion redistribution.

Equilibrium Potential

The equilibrium potential for an ion, denoted EionE_{\text{ion}}, represents the transmembrane electrical potential difference at which the net flux of that ion across a semipermeable membrane is zero, as the driving forces from its chemical concentration gradient and electrical potential gradient exactly balance each other. This condition occurs when the electrochemical potential difference for the ion, Δμ\Delta \mu, equals zero. The equilibrium potential is quantified by the : Eion=RTzFln⁡([ion]out[ion]in)E_{\text{ion}} = \frac{RT}{zF} \ln \left( \frac{[\text{ion}]_{\text{out}}}{[\text{ion}]_{\text{in}}} \right) where RR is the gas constant, TT is the absolute temperature, zz is the ion's valence, FF is Faraday's constant, and [ion]out[\text{ion}]_{\text{out}} and [ion]in[\text{ion}]_{\text{in}} are the extracellular and intracellular concentrations, respectively. The derivation of the Nernst equation stems from setting Δμ=0\Delta \mu = 0 in the expression for the electrochemical potential, which combines the chemical potential μchem=RTln⁡([ion]in[ion]out)\mu_{\text{chem}} = RT \ln \left( \frac{[\text{ion}]_{\text{in}}}{[\text{ion}]_{\text{out}}} \right) and the electrical potential term zFΔψzF \Delta \psi, where Δψ\Delta \psi is the membrane potential (inside relative to outside). Solving for Δψ\Delta \psi yields Eion=−RTzFln⁡([ion]in[ion]out)E_{\text{ion}} = -\frac{RT}{zF} \ln \left( \frac{[\text{ion}]_{\text{in}}}{[\text{ion}]_{\text{out}}} \right), equivalent to the standard form above. This equilibrium arises from the balance described by the Nernst-Planck equation at zero current, integrating the diffusive and electrophoretic fluxes across the membrane. In physiological contexts, such as mammalian neurons at 37°C, the potassium equilibrium potential EKE_{\text{K}} is approximately -90 mV when the extracellular concentration is 4 mM and the intracellular concentration is 140 mM, reflecting the steep inward chemical gradient for K+^+. At Em=EionE_{\text{m}} = E_{\text{ion}}, the outward electrical driving force precisely counters the inward diffusive force due to the concentration difference, resulting in no net ion movement and a stable zero-flux state for that ion species.

Biological Roles

Membrane Transport

Electrochemical gradients provide the driving force for passive membrane transport, enabling ions and solutes to move across lipid bilayers without direct energy input from ATP hydrolysis. This process occurs spontaneously down the electrochemical potential difference (Δμ), favoring net flux from regions of higher to lower μ. Passive transport encompasses simple diffusion through ion channels, which are selective pores that allow specific ions like Na⁺, K⁺, or Ca²⁺ to permeate rapidly, and facilitated diffusion via carrier proteins, such as uniporters, which bind and translocate solutes across the membrane. Both mechanisms rely solely on the existing Δμ, comprising chemical (concentration) and electrical (membrane potential) components, to dictate direction and rate. The net flux (J) of ions in passive transport is governed by the electrochemical driving force. This relation indicates that flux is proportional to the gradient strength, with movement directed toward decreasing μ until equilibrium is approached, where transport effectively ceases (corresponding to the equilibrium potential). Permeability varies with channel or carrier density and gating properties, allowing rapid equilibration of ion distributions in excitable cells. Electrochemical gradients also power secondary active transport by coupling favorable passive ion flows to uphill movement of other solutes via symporters and antiporters. In symporters, such as the sodium-glucose cotransporter (SGLT1), the inward Na⁺ gradient (driven by Δμ_Na) is harnessed to drive glucose uptake against its concentration gradient in intestinal epithelial cells. Antiporters, conversely, exchange ions in opposite directions, like Na⁺/Ca²⁺ exchangers that extrude Ca²⁺ using the Na⁺ influx. This coupling amplifies transport efficiency without primary energy expenditure, relying on the preexisting ion Δμ maintained by other cellular processes. Many passive and secondary transport mechanisms are electrogenic, meaning the net translocation of charged species alters the membrane potential (V_m), either amplifying or dissipating the electrical component of the gradient. For instance, opening of voltage-gated Na⁺ channels during neuronal signaling generates a depolarizing current that temporarily reduces the transmembrane potential, while Cl⁻ influx through channels can hyperpolarize cells. In secondary transporters like SGLT1, the coupled Na⁺-glucose entry produces a net positive charge influx, further influencing V_m and modulating excitability or secretion. These effects create feedback loops that regulate overall gradient dynamics and cellular signaling.

Energy Transduction

Electrochemical gradients function as an intermediate form of stored energy in cellular bioenergetics, particularly through the process of chemiosmosis, where they couple oxidation-reduction reactions to the synthesis of . Proposed by Peter Mitchell in his seminal 1961 paper and elaborated in his 1978 Nobel lecture, this theory posits that the translocation of protons across a coupling membrane generates an that serves as the primary energy currency for driving ATP production, bypassing the need for direct chemical intermediates between electron transport and phosphorylation. In this framework, the gradient's potential energy is harnessed by membrane-bound , where the flow of protons induces rotational motion that catalyzes the phosphorylation of ADP to ATP. A key manifestation of this process is the proton motive force (PMF), which represents the electrochemical gradient specifically for protons (Δμ_H+) and combines electrical and chemical components. The PMF is quantitatively expressed as: Δp=Δψ−2.303RTFΔpH\Delta p = \Delta \psi - \frac{2.303 RT}{F} \Delta \mathrm{pH} where Δψ is the transmembrane electrical potential difference (membrane potential), ΔpH is the transmembrane pH difference, R is the gas constant, T is the absolute temperature, and F is the ; this formulation derives from the and underscores how both the voltage gradient and proton concentration difference contribute to the driving force. The dissipation of the PMF through proton influx via provides the energy for ATP formation, linking the gradient's stored potential directly to biosynthetic work. The energy transduction efficiency highlights the gradient's role as a versatile intermediary: the hydrolysis of ATP releases approximately 57 kJ/mol under physiological conditions, sufficient to establish or maintain such gradients, while the reverse process—using the gradient to synthesize ATP—achieves an efficiency of about 60% in oxidative systems by capturing a substantial portion of the free energy from electron transport. This delocalized coupling via the gradient enables flexible energy conversion, where membrane transport mechanisms dissipate the gradient to perform mechanical or chemical work without requiring stoichiometric chemical bonds between redox carriers and ATP-producing enzymes.

Cellular Examples

Ion Gradients

In cellular physiology, ion gradients refer to the unequal distribution of charged ions across the plasma membrane, primarily involving monovalent cations such as and , as well as divalent cations like . These gradients are essential for maintaining cellular homeostasis and are characterized by steep concentration differences between the intracellular and extracellular compartments. For instance, intracellular Na⁺ concentration is approximately 10 mM, compared to about 140-145 mM extracellularly, while K⁺ is around 140 mM inside the cell versus 4-5 mM outside. Similarly, cytosolic Ca²⁺ levels are maintained at a very low ~100 nM, in stark contrast to extracellular concentrations of 1-2 mM. These disparities create electrochemical driving forces that underpin numerous cellular processes. The maintenance of these ion gradients relies on primary active transport mechanisms that consume ATP to move ions against their concentration gradients, counteracting passive leaks through ion channels. The Na⁺/K⁺-ATPase, a ubiquitous transmembrane enzyme, plays a central role by hydrolyzing ATP to export three Na⁺ ions out of the cell and import two K⁺ ions inward per cycle, thereby sustaining the low intracellular Na⁺ and high intracellular K⁺ levels. For Ca²⁺, dedicated pumps such as the plasma membrane Ca²⁺-ATPase (PMCA) actively extrude ions from the cytosol to preserve the low concentration gradient. These pumps ensure the gradients remain stable despite ongoing passive fluxes, with the Na⁺/K⁺-ATPase alone accounting for 50-75% of a cell's ATP consumption in excitable tissues. Physiologically, these ion gradients are critical for establishing the resting membrane potential, which in neurons is typically around -70 mV (inside negative relative to outside). This potential arises from the selective permeability of the membrane to different ions, as described by the Goldman-Hodgkin-Katz (GHK) voltage equation, which integrates the contributions of multiple ions weighted by their permeability coefficients (P): Vm=RTFln⁡(PK[K+]out+PNa[Na+]out+⋯PK[K+]in+PNa[Na+]in+⋯)V_m = \frac{RT}{F} \ln \left( \frac{P_K [K^+]_{out} + P_{Na} [Na^+]_{out} + \cdots}{P_K [K^+]_{in} + P_{Na} [Na^+]_{in} + \cdots} \right) Here, R is the gas constant, T is temperature, and F is Faraday's constant; the high K⁺ permeability (P_K >> P_Na) dominates, pulling V_m toward the K⁺ equilibrium potential. Disruptions in these gradients, such as in (low extracellular K⁺), can hyperpolarize the membrane, impair excitability, and lead to cardiac arrhythmias or by altering the electrochemical driving forces. Additionally, gradients contribute to at the cellular level by influencing osmotic water flow across membranes, helping cells maintain volume in response to environmental salinity changes.

Proton Gradients

Proton gradients, a specialized form of electrochemical gradient, involve the translocation of H⁺ ions across energy-transducing membranes such as the inner mitochondrial membrane and the thylakoid membrane in chloroplasts, establishing a proton motive force (Δμ_H⁺) that drives ATP synthesis. In mitochondria, protons are pumped from the matrix to the intermembrane space, creating an acidic environment outside (ΔpH ≈ 0.5–1 unit, with higher [H⁺] in the intermembrane space) and a positive membrane potential outside (Δψ ≈ 150–180 mV, matrix negative). Similarly, in chloroplasts during photosynthesis, the electron transport chain translocates protons into the thylakoid lumen, rendering it acidic (ΔpH ≈ 3–3.5 units, lumen pH 4–5) with a smaller but positive Δψ on the lumen side (≈ 20–50 mV), where the proton motive force is predominantly ΔpH-dominated under steady-state illumination. This Δμ_H⁺, combining ΔpH and Δψ, powers rotary ATP synthases by allowing protons to flow back across the membrane down their electrochemical gradient. These gradients are generated by electron transport chains that harness redox energy from substrate oxidation in mitochondria or light-driven electron flow in chloroplasts to actively pump protons against their electrochemical gradient. In respiring mitochondria, complexes I, III, and IV of the couple the exergonic transfer of electrons from NADH or FADH₂ to O₂ with the endergonic translocation of 4, 4, and 2 H⁺ per two electrons, respectively, resulting in approximately 10 H⁺ pumped per NADH oxidized. In photosynthetic thylakoids, photosystems II and I, along with the cytochrome b₆f complex, similarly use light energy to drive proton pumping into the lumen, with a net translocation of about 12 H⁺ per four electrons transferred (per O₂ evolved) from to NADP⁺. The resulting proton motive force () typically reaches ~200 mV in energized mitochondria, providing sufficient energy to support ATP synthesis at an efficiency equivalent to approximately 3 ATP molecules per 10 protons translocated through . A notable example of a light-driven is , a retinal-containing protein in halophilic such as , which absorbs green light to translocate protons outward across the plasma membrane, generating a Δμ_H⁺ for ATP production without an . The of proton translocation in ATP synthesis varies with the structure of the ATP synthase c-ring, a rotor composed of 8–15 c-subunits, where the H⁺/ATP ratio equals the number of c-subunits per three ATP (e.g., 8/3 ≈ 2.67 H⁺/ATP in some mitochondria, up to 15/3 = 5 H⁺/ATP in chloroplasts). Recent cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) structures post-2020 have revealed these variations in atomic detail, such as an 8-subunit c-ring in human mitochondrial and dynamic interactions between the c-ring and a-subunit half-channels that facilitate proton-coupled . These insights underscore how c-ring adapts to cellular bioenergetic demands, optimizing the proton-to-ATP conversion efficiency across organisms.

References

  1. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/electrochemical-gradient
  2. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK26910/
  3. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK538338/
  4. https://www.physiologyweb.com/lecture_notes/resting_membrane_potential/derivation_of_the_nernst_equation.html
  5. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28383767/
  6. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK547718/
  7. https://bio.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_and_General_Biology/General_Biology_%28Boundless%29/05%253A_Structure_and_Function_of_Plasma_Membranes/5.10%253A_Active_Transport_-_Electrochemical_Gradient
  8. https://www.jove.com/science-education/v/14889/electrochemical-gradient-and-channel-proteins-an-overview
  9. https://groups.molbiosci.northwestern.edu/holmgren/Glossary/Definitions/Def-E/electrochemical_gradient.html
  10. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/chemistry/1978/press-release/
  11. https://flexbooks.ck12.org/cbook/ck-12-advanced-biology/section/4.31/primary/lesson/the-electrochemical-gradient-advanced-bio-adv/
  12. https://www.cco.caltech.edu/~brokawc/Bi145/Diffusion.html
  13. https://bpc.uchicago.edu/files/2019/07/10.-Diffusion-08-04-2018.pdf
  14. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927519304800330
  15. https://pages.jh.edu/motn/coursenotes/thermodynamics.pdf
  16. https://books.google.com/books/about/Nonequilibrium_Thermodynamics_in_Biophys.html?id=znxYNDpXGM0C
  17. https://www-archiv.fdm.uni-hamburg.de/b-online/library/crofts/bioph354/lect9.html
  18. http://www.columbia.edu/cu/biology/courses/w3004/Nernstequationderiv.pdf
  19. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK11102/
  20. https://ghk.academic.csusb.edu/the-ghk-equation-eqauilibrium-potentials-and-membrane-potentials/
  21. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK26815/
  22. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK26896/
  23. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15476411/
  24. https://www.nobelprize.org/uploads/2018/06/mitchell-lecture.pdf
  25. https://book.bionumbers.org/how-much-energy-is-released-in-atp-hydrolysis/
  26. https://ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub/bioc2580/chapter/the-overall-efficiency-of-oxidative-phosphorylation/
  27. https://bionumbers.hms.harvard.edu/bionumber.aspx?id=103966
  28. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3020095/
  29. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK537088/
  30. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3299169/
  31. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5399982/
  32. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/neuroscience/osmoregulation
  33. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2662253/
  34. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8418402/
  35. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2016.00218/full
  36. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK26904/
  37. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221323172030879X
  38. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rstb.2016.0381
  39. https://bionumbers.hms.harvard.edu/bionumber.aspx?s=n&v=1&id=101775
  40. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005273622000098
  41. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3651500/
  42. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10945847/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.