Hubbry Logo
Large blueLarge blueMain
Open search
Large blue
Community hub
Large blue
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Large blue
Large blue
from Wikipedia

Large blue
Upperside
Underside
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Arthropoda
Class: Insecta
Order: Lepidoptera
Family: Lycaenidae
Genus: Phengaris
Species:
P. arion
Binomial name
Phengaris arion
Synonyms
  • Papilio arion Linnaeus, 1758
  • Glaucopsyche arion (Linnaeus, 1758)
  • Maculinea arion (Linnaeus, 1758)
  • Nomiades arion

The Large blue (Phengaris arion) is a species of butterfly in the family Lycaenidae. The species was first defined in 1758 and first recorded in Britain in 1795.[3] In 1979 the species became mostly extinct in Britain but has been successfully reintroduced with new conservation methods.[4] The species is classified as "near threatened" on the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species.[1] Today P. arion can be found in Europe, the Caucasus, Armenia, western Siberia, Altai, north-western Kazakhstan and Sichuan.[1]

The large blue can be distinguished by its unique speckled black dots on its wings with a blue background.

The large blue butterfly is well known in behavioural ecology as it is a brood parasite of a single species of red ant, Myrmica sabuleti.[3] The discovery was made by Captain Edward Bagwell Purefoy along with F. W. Frohawk and others.

Subspecies

[edit]
  • P. a. arion Mainland Europe, western Siberia, Altai, north-western Kazakhstan
  • P. a. delphinatus (Fruhstorfer, 1910)
  • P. a. zara (Jachontov, 1935) Caucasus, Armenia[5]
  • P. a. buholzeri (Rezbanyai, 1978)
  • P. a. eutyphron (Fruhstorfer, 1915) formerly southern Britain

Description

[edit]

Large blue caterpillars grow to about half an inch (13 millimetres) in length, and spend up to 9 months before they undergo metamorphosis to a chrysalis to become a butterfly. Large blue butterflies are one of the largest in the family Lycaenidae, known as the gossamer-winged butterfly, with a wingspan of up to 2 inches (51 millimetres), and live only for a few weeks. The wings of the large blue butterfly are speckled with black dots.[citation needed]

Description by Seitz

[edit]

L. arion L. (83 c). Larger, above of a lighter and more shining blue [than arcas], with a row of black spots across both wings, the spots being sometimes obsolete only on the hindwing of the male. At once recognized by the large number of ocelli on the underside, especially on the hindwing, and by the bright blue dusting of the base beneath. Europe and Anterior Asia, from North Europe, the Baltic provinces, and England to the Mediterranean (Corsica), and from Spain to Armenia and South Siberia. In ab. unicolor Hormuz. the upperside is entirely blue, all the black spots with the exception of the discocellular one being absent. ab. Arthurus Melvill is without ocelli beneath. In ab. jasilkowskii Hornuz the ocelli are absent beneath in the cell as in euphemus, from which this aberration is at once distinguished by its blue-green basal scaling on the underside. In ab. coalescens Gillm. the black spots of the upperside are confluent. — Quite a number of local forms have been separated Northern specimens, which are feebly spotted, are named alconides by Aurivillius. — obscura Christ. (83 c) is an alpine form in which the whole outer half of the wings above is black or dark brown; it occurs typically in the High Alps, being locally very plentiful, e. g. at Bergun, Zermatt, Stilvio and at many places in the Alpes Maritimes. This darkened form occurs also in the Ural (= ruehli Krulik.) — In the South two aberrant forms have been found, namely ligurica Wagn., at the Eiviera between San Remo and Bordighera, with a conspicuous row of white marginal ocelli on the upperside of the hindwing, and aldrovandus S. L., from the Vesuvius, the underside darkened with brown. — cyanecula Stgr. [ now species Phengaris cyanecula (Eversmann, 1848)] (83 d) is an Asiatic form, from the Caucasus to Mongolia, with the metallic blue green dusting of the hindwing beneath being abundant, bright, and extending almost to the distal edge. — Egg very flat semiglobular, pale bluish white, deposited on Thymus which just begins to flower. Larva adult pale ochreous, with a pale lilac tinge at the sides; head ochreous, marked with black anteriorly; prothoracic plate black; feeds until the autumn on Thyme, then disappears and is found full grown the next June in the nests of ants. It is therefore suggested that the ants feed it up (Frohawk) and perhaps also protect the pupae. The chrysalis the colour of amber except for the wing-cases, smooth, somewhat elongate, without web. The butterflies occur usually singly, being locally frequent on open ground, on broad roads through shrubby woods, flying about 1 m above the ground. They rest with closed wings, particularly on Thymes and Scabious. On the wing from the end of June into August.[6]

Distribution

[edit]

The large blue butterfly is found from coast to coast of the Palearctic realm, but is most concentrated in the areas from France to China.[7][8]

Habitat

[edit]
A large blue on Thymus praecox
A large blue on food plant, grooming itself and taking to the air. Underside of wings shown plus partial reveal of upperside.

The habitat of the large blue butterfly is largely influenced by location of its food sources. The species requires a combination of abundant amounts of its larval food plant, Thymus drucei and the presence of Myrmica sabuleti ants in order to survive.[7]

It has also been found that an underlying key factor for the survival of the large blue is site heterogeneity. The butterfly is most abundant in pastures and abandoned areas of diverse vegetation and shrubbery.[9] This preference can be explained by examining the result of a uniform landscape. A constant landscape synchronizes many biological activities including flowering of host plants, adult emergence dates, or larval pressures on the ant colonies.[9] If important biological functions take place at the same times, the population becomes much more susceptible to random unfortunate events such as environmental disasters.[10] Thus traditional farming acts to desynchronize the biological system, and allows for re-colonization of patches that are temporarily untouched.[9] The presence of differing sites and varied ecological structures provides differing microclimates that can make a huge impact on the survival of the large blue butterfly.[11]

Extinction/conservation

[edit]

In the late 1900s, Phengaris populations began decreasing drastically throughout Europe with the large blue butterfly being particularly affected. By the 1950s, only an estimated 100,000 adults remained in Britain, and by 1978, 48% of the UK's 91 known large blue populations had been lost.[12][13] Initially experts were completely baffled by the disappearance of large blues as the sites did not appear to have changed.[12] Leading hypotheses targeted collectors, insecticides, and air pollution as factors that led to the butterfly extinction.[13] A large number of projects were conducted to combat these factors, but all were completely unsuccessful.[13] The species became extinct in the Netherlands in 1964, in the UK in 1979. In Belgium, it had been considered extinct until 1996, when a recolonized population was discovered in the south of the country.[8] Severe decreases in population have also occurred in Denmark, Germany, France, and Estonia.[8] Because of this decline they are being protected. The succession of extinctions and decreases in population has been characterized as a result of unsuccessful conservation efforts that stemmed from a lack of understanding of the behaviour of the butterfly.[12][14]

Currently the large blue butterfly is classified as critically endangered in Britain as well as being endangered in many areas of Europe.[15] It is a priority species of under the UK Biodiversity Action Plan.[16] However, a long-term conservation project in the UK, led by the Royal Entomological Society, led to a significant increase in numbers in 2022, with the species described as "thriving".[17]

Recent findings have also shown that there is a positive correlation between large blue butterfly conservation success and that of other endangered species. One specific example is the relationship between Myrmica ants, the large blue butterfly, violet seeds, and the violet-feeding butterfly (Boloria euphrosyne).[18] The ants will bring the violet seeds into the nest. The seeds will often germinate in the nest, and their potential for germination increases as the nest becomes deserted.[9] Since large blue butterfly predation of ant larvae can lead to desertion of the nest and B. euphrosyne tend to prefer violets growing on deserted ant nests, the fitness of B. euphrosyne appears to be indirectly affected by the presence of the large blue.[9]

Behaviour

[edit]

Brood parasitism

[edit]

Like many members of the genus Phengaris, large blues are brood parasites, relying on another insect to raise their young. In this case, the hosts are species of Myrmica ant.[19] By being physically and chemically similar to Myrmica ants in their larval stage, and possibly by using other forms of mimicry, Phengaris caterpillars trick the ants into taking them back to the ant nest.[20] Once there, the caterpillar will either become a predator of the ant larvae, or beg for food by acting like an ant larva in what is known as a "cuckoo" strategy.[21] The "cuckoo" method is viewed as a more successful strategy, as studies have consistently found more larvae per nest for cuckoo butterfly species than predator butterflies.[22][23][24] Through much research, it has been well documented that large blue butterflies act as predators in the host nests.

Host species

[edit]

Early ideas of the Phengaris-Myrmica relationship resulted in the construction of a linear relationship between one predator and one host. It was proposed that each species of Phengaris had evolutionarily adapted to prey on one specific species of Myrmica with the large blue focusing on M. sabuleti.[22] More recent reports indicate that while each Phengaris species can prey on more than one Myrmica species, that ability varies between species and each butterfly species still prefers a specific ant species.[22] The large blue has also been documented to prey on M. scabrinodis.[23] Additional studies have also shown that the large blue may exhibit different host preferences depending on location. For example, in Finland, large blue butterflies exclusively fed off M. lonae nests[23] and in Poland they were found in the nests of M. rugulosa, M. hellenica, and M. schencki.[23]

Egg laying

[edit]

Since the parasitic-host relationship between the large blue and the Myrmica is essential for the caterpillar survival, female butterflies must lay eggs in areas where the larvae can be found by ant workers of the correct species. In the past it was unclear if Phengaris butterflies were capable of identifying areas of specific Myrmica species. It was believed that the certain species of Phengaris could detect specific odours to identify Myrmica species.[25] It was also thought that certain species of Phengaris were capable of avoiding overcrowding on food plants by detecting high egg loads.[25] New studies indicate that female egg laying is merely attuned to the Myrmica species, and that females do not take other factors into consideration.[22] Female Phengaris lay eggs on specific plants such as thyme.[26] Wild thyme is the preferred food plant in the UK and in cooler or more mountainous areas in Europe, marjoram is preferred by populations in warmer areas.[citation needed]

Larva/caterpillar stage

[edit]

After about three weeks, larvae hatch to feed on the seeds and flowers of the plant. The caterpillar will stay in the vicinity of its food plant until its 4th instar, when it will drop to the ground.[22] From there the caterpillar will adopt various strategies to be found by Myrmica ants. Large blue caterpillars will sometimes follow ant trails or move away from the food plant during peak-foraging time to expose themselves specifically to Myrmica and not other ants.[27] Several caterpillar species of Phengaris, such as P. rebeli and P. alcon, will secrete pheromones that are specific to their respective hosts. The purpose of such behaviour is to mimic the pheromones of ant larvae that will become workers in the future.[28] By successfully mimicking ant larvae, the caterpillars are taken back to the host nest and fed by the ants. Originally it was thought that the large blue butterfly behaved differently in that some believed it either secreted a poor pheromone mimic, or did not secrete one at all.[28] This was inferred from the fact that worker ants tended to neglect the caterpillars once in the nest.[28] Today it has been determined that it still secretes semiochemicals as a form of chemical mimicry to gain acceptance into the host ant nest.[20]

Behaviour in the host nest

[edit]
"Cuckoo" strategy
[edit]

While most Phengaris caterpillars behave similarly before entering the host ant nest, once adopted into a nest the larvae adopt one of two strategies. The first is the "cuckoo" strategy. This has been studied extensively in P. rebeli, and consists of continued interaction between the caterpillar and the host ants. Once in the nest, the caterpillar uses acoustic mimicry to hide its identity.[29] The large blue larvae using the cuckoo strategy stay in close quarters with the ants while producing a noise very similar to that of a larval queen ant.[30] By mimicking a queen, larva are fed by the worker ants and are given preferential treatment over the real ant larvae.[31] Cuckoo strategy users become such high-status members of the nest that the ants will kill their own larvae to feed the caterpillar and will rescue the caterpillar first in the face of danger.[31]

Predator strategy
[edit]

Unlike other members of the genus Phengaris, the large blue becomes a predator once in the ant nest. It feeds on the ant pupae while continuing to pose as a Myrmica ant. Even with mimicry, mortality for the large blue within the nest is high.[28] One explanation is that each species of Phengaris is most suited for a single species of Myrmica. Caterpillars that are adopted by an unfamiliar species of ant are often killed and eaten.[citation needed] Even if matched with the correct host, many large blue butterflies are unable to survive. If the mimicry is not perfect and the ants become suspicious, death is highly likely.[28] Further, ants in nests without a consistent supply of food are much more likely to identify the large blue as an intruder.[28] Large blue caterpillars are most likely to be attacked during the first 10 days after being adopted by the host ants.[28] This is because in this time the caterpillars become larger than typical Myrmica ant larvae.[28]

Mimicry
[edit]

Even once Phengaris butterflies have infiltrated the host nest, they continue to hide their identity as caterpillars and will go further in their act of deception. There have been many studies documenting the use of acoustic communication in ants, and it has been found that members of the genus Phengaris exploit this behaviour. For example, P. rebeli mimics the unique sound of the queen to elevate its status in the nest. This mimicry is effective enough to cause worker ants to prefer to rescue the P. rebeli over their own pupae in times of danger.[32]

Previously it had been thought that only "cuckoo" strategy species used acoustic mimicry.[20] The sound was so similar, that the sounds of the two caterpillars differed more than each did compared to the sound of the queen. Different Myrmica species utilize distinct semiochemicals to distinguish themselves, but they use very similar acoustic commands once in the nest.[20]

Lab studies and applications
[edit]

Laboratory studies have shown that large blue butterfly larvae first consume the largest ant larvae. This evolved tactic maximizes efficiency not only because the largest larvae provide the most substance by volume, but also because it prevents the larvae pupating and becoming inaccessible prey. Further, it allows more newly hatched larvae time to grow bigger. While in the nest, large blue caterpillars acquire 99% of their final biomass, growing from an average of 1.3 mg to 173 mg. Results from laboratories estimate that 230 large larvae and a minimum of 354 Myrmica workers are needed to ensure the survival of one butterfly; however, such a large nest is very rarely found in the wild. This supports findings that large blue butterflies are extremely capable of withstanding starvation. This becomes extremely beneficial in situations when the ants desert the colony and leave the caterpillar behind. Large blue butterflies have been known to be capable of migrating to new nests once the original is deserted. In many cases, a nearby colony with a fresh brood will populate the nest allowing the surviving large blues to sequentially parasitize multiple Myrmica colonies.[33]

Cuckoo vs. predatory strategies
[edit]

Scientists remain unsure why there are multiple strategies within the host nest, but studies have been conducted to determine the effectiveness of each. The cuckoo strategy results in six times more butterflies per nest than the predatory strategy.[34] While this seems to indicate a dominance of the cuckoo strategy, there are other factors to consider. Since the cuckoo caterpillars remain in close vicinity of the ants, they must secrete chemicals that are almost identical to the host species in order to survive.[34] This explains why cuckoo strategy users are more likely to be predated by the host colony when adopted by a non-primary host than predatory strategy users.[32] Current data seem to support the idea that cuckoo strategy users depend on a specific species of Myrmica ant while predatory Phengaris are more versatile overall but still perform better with a specific species.[34]

The queen effect
[edit]

It has been found that large blue butterflies are three times less likely to survive in nests that have queen ants present. This discovery has been explained with a theory called the "queen effect". In most Myrmica nests, the queen ant will lay two main batches of eggs, and the females that hatch from these eggs will either become workers or virgin queens. Whether these females become workers or virgin queens is dependent on the status of the queen in the nest. If the queen dies, worker ants have the largest of the female larvae transition into virgin queens. If the queen is present and healthy, she influences the nurse workers to neglect, starve and bite the female larvae which results in restricted growth and aids in the transition to workers.[28] This indicates that Phengaris butterflies must maintain a strict balance between mimicking the queen in the presence of workers and appearing to be a worker to avoid the queen.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
The large blue (Phengaris arion) is a species of in the family , distinguished by its intricate parasitic life cycle that relies on specific ant hosts for larval survival. It is the largest and rarest of the blue in , with adults exhibiting dark blue wings featuring a distinctive row of black spots on the upper forewings, thick dark grey borders, and a of 38–52 mm. The inhabits warm, dry, unimproved grasslands rich in wild (Thymus polytrichus) and the red ant Myrmica sabuleti, and it is distributed across parts of , including reintroduced populations in the where it was declared nationally extinct in 1979 due to habitat degradation and intensified agriculture. The large blue's life cycle is one of the most specialized among , spanning 10–23 months and centered on . Females lay eggs singly on the flowerheads of wild thyme in , and the newly hatched caterpillars initially feed on the plant's seeds and for about two weeks before descending to the ground. There, they emit pheromones mimicking the scent of ant larvae, prompting worker Myrmica sabuleti to transport them into the nest, where the carnivorous caterpillars prey on the ' brood—primarily larvae and pupae—overwintering one or two times, depending on conditions, before pupating in spring and emerging as adults the following or . This obligate renders the highly sensitive to disruptions in density or host plant availability, with adults living only 2–3 days and relying on from various flowers during their brief flight period. Conservation efforts have transformed the large blue into a success story for recovery in the , where it was reintroduced starting in 1983 using eggs from Swedish populations and habitat management techniques like and scrub control to sustain habitats. As of 2024, the butterfly persists on more than 40 managed sites across south-west England, including the , Polden Hills, and , supporting some of Europe's largest colonies. Protected under the and the , it is listed as a priority species and Near Threatened on the , though ongoing climate pressures and pose continued risks across its European range.

Taxonomy

Classification and Synonyms

The large blue butterfly is scientifically classified as Phengaris arion (Linnaeus, 1758), within the order , family , and subfamily Polyommatinae, commonly known as the gossamer-winged butterflies. Originally described by in his (1758) as Papilio arion, the species was subsequently placed in the genus Maculinea (as Maculinea arion), a classification widely used until the early 2000s. In 2007, a comprehensive phylogenetic study using total evidence from molecular and morphological data reclassified the species into the genus Phengaris, establishing it as part of a monophyletic that includes all former Maculinea species and the Oriental Phengaris species. This reclassification was formalized by the in 2017, prioritizing Phengaris as the senior synonym (Opinion 2399). The genus Phengaris is distinguished by its unique obligate myrmecophilous traits, including predatory parasitism on ant brood, a life history strategy shared with close relatives such as P. rebeli.

Subspecies

The large blue butterfly, Phengaris arion, exhibits considerable intraspecific variation, leading to the description of multiple subspecies primarily based on morphological differences in wing patterns, size, and phenology. However, the taxonomic validity of these taxa remains debated, with recent genetic studies indicating clinal variation rather than discrete genetic boundaries. Up to 10 subspecies have been proposed across its Eurasian range, though many are considered forms or ecotypes rather than distinct taxa. As of 2025, many authorities treat these variations as clinal, recognizing primarily the nominal subspecies in classifications. The nominal subspecies P. a. arion (Linnaeus, 1758) is distributed in , including the Carpathian Basin and , where it typically flies from mid-May to mid-June. It serves as the type subspecies, with diagnostic traits including prominent black spots and stripes on the wings. The type locality is (). This form shows intermediate melanization on the wing upperside, with darker females compared to males. In and , P. a. ligurica (Wagner, 1904) is recognized, characterized by a later flight period (late to mid-August), smaller size, and reduced scaling on the wings, resulting in a more subdued upperside pattern. It was described from upland Italian woodlands, where it utilizes Origanum vulgare as a host plant. Genetic analyses using microsatellites reveal no significant differentiation from P. a. , suggesting phenological and morphological differences may reflect local to warmer climates rather than subspecific divergence. Another proposed subspecies, P. a. obscura (Christoph, ), occurs in the , including and mountainous pastures, with a flight period overlapping P. a. but associated with spp. host plants. It exhibits higher melanization in wing patterns, potentially as a clinal to cooler, higher-altitude environments. Post-2010 DNA studies, including allozyme and analyses, show low genetic differentiation (F_ST = 0.073–0.124) across populations, with no support for obscura as a distinct evolutionary unit; instead, variation appears continuous and isolation-driven. Eastern European populations, such as those in the and , have been attributed to P. a. wolgensis (Forster, 1936), described from the Volga area and noted for subtle variations in wing spotting and size adapted to habitats. Additional debated subspecies include P. a. eutyphron (Fruhstorfer, 1915) from the (now extinct there) and P. a. zara (Jachontov, 1935) from the , each with localized wing pattern differences but lacking robust genetic validation. Overall, 2020s analyses emphasize clinal gradients in morphology and genetics, leading some taxonomists to lump these into a single variable species rather than recognizing multiple discrete .
SubspeciesType LocalityKey Diagnostic TraitsYear DescribedDistribution
P. a. arion (Nuremberg)Intermediate melanization, black spots/stripes, wingspan 38–52 mm1758 (e.g., , Carpathians)
P. a. liguricaUpland Smaller size, reduced blue scaling, later 1904,
P. a. obscura (e.g., )Higher melanization, Thymus-associated1878Alpine
P. a. wolgensis, Subtle spotting variation, steppe-adapted1936,

Description

Adult Morphology

The adult Large blue butterfly (Phengaris arion) is one of the larger members of the family, with a ranging from 38 to 52 mm, though measurements can vary slightly by population and sex, with males typically 38-48 mm and females 42-52 mm. The body is robust relative to other blues, covered in fine scales, and features black antennae that are clubbed at the tips with white markings, a characteristic trait of the family. The upperside of the wings displays pronounced in coloration. In males, the wings are a deep, iridescent with broad margins and a row of spots along the forewing costa, creating a striking contrast. Females show similar coloration but are darker overall with more prominent spotting due to increased melanization. This dimorphism in color intensity is consistent across populations. The blue suffusion can vary subtly, with fresher specimens showing a shinier hue that dulls with age and exposure. The underside of both wings is more cryptically patterned, mottled in gray-brown tones with a series of black spots and distinctive red lunules or crescents along the hindwing margin, aiding in against rocky or earthy substrates. This ventral coloration is similar between sexes but less vibrant in worn individuals. Seasonal forms are minimal in this univoltine species, with little morphological variation between early and late emergents. , such as P. a. liguriensis in , show minor differences in the extent of blue suffusion and spot prominence on the upperside. Historical descriptions, such as that by Adalbert Seitz in the , emphasize the species' distinctiveness from related blues like Phengaris teleius, noting the variability in blue suffusion and the robust wing margins as key diagnostic features in palearctic lycaenids.

Immature Stages

The of the Large blue (Phengaris arion) is small, measuring approximately 0.8 mm in diameter, and pale bluish-white in color. It is laid singly and possesses a sculptured surface that facilitates adhesion to the buds of host plants. Hatching occurs after 2-3 weeks. The larval stage consists of four instars, with the first three being free-living and the fourth being the final, ant-mimetic . Early s (L1–L3) are pale with a dark head capsule and covered with short, transparent setae at medium , the distance between setae roughly equal to their length; the third (L3) additionally features some longer setae fringing the body. The final (L4) is reddish in color, onisciform in body shape, and equipped with sparse, regularly distributed long (100–700 µm), thick, transparent setae. It reaches a length of about 13 mm and includes morphological adaptations such as a prominent dorsal nectary organ (DNO), or "honey gland," located on the dorsal surface of the seventh abdominal segment, as well as scattered pore cupola organs (PCOs) on the dorsal side for chemical production. The early instars develop over about 2 weeks collectively, while the final instar lasts ~10 months without further , during which the body mass increases nearly 100-fold. The pupa measures 15-20 mm in length, is brown in color, and forms within a silk cocoon, serving as the overwintering stage either in the ant nest or soil. Pupal development takes 2-3 weeks, after which the adult emerges.

Distribution and Habitat

Geographic Range

The large blue butterfly (Phengaris arion) is native to the Palaearctic region, with its distribution extending from western Europe—including the United Kingdom and France—across central and southern Europe to eastern Asia as far as Japan. The core of its range lies in central and southern Europe, where populations are concentrated in temperate grasslands and meadows. Isolated pockets occur further east in areas such as the Caucasus, Armenia, western Siberia, Altai Mountains, north-western Kazakhstan, and Sichuan Province in China. Historically, P. arion was more continuously distributed across much of its range, but it has undergone significant contractions due to habitat loss and fragmentation. The species became extinct in the in 1979 and in the in 1964. In the , remaining populations are fragmented and occur sporadically in countries including , , , , , , , , , and . There are no records of true vagrants, as the butterfly's sedentary lifestyle limits long-distance dispersal beyond suitable habitats. Recent efforts have resulted in range expansions through reintroductions, particularly in the , where populations established since the early 2000s have naturally colonized over 40 restored sites by 2024. In , populations remain relatively stable in fragmented habitats despite ongoing threats. Populations persist in , including in restored grasslands, contributing to the species' current global extent of occurrence estimated at approximately 1 million km² based on IUCN mapping data.

Habitat Preferences

The large blue butterfly, Phengaris arion, primarily inhabits calcareous grasslands and well-drained unimproved meadows characterized by short turf heights of 2-5 cm, which support the growth of its essential host plants. These habitats include grasslands and acidic coastal grasslands, where the turf is maintained through to prevent succession into taller or scrub. The butterfly requires abundant stands of wild thyme (Thymus polytrichus) or, less commonly, wild marjoram (Origanum vulgare) for oviposition, with host plant coverage often exceeding 10-20% in occupied patches to ensure sufficient larval food resources. Microhabitat conditions are critical for all life stages, favoring sunny, south- to south-west-facing slopes that provide warmth and shelter from wind, typically on clay s that dry out quickly to host colonies. Larvae depend on nests of Myrmica sabuleti s as primary hosts (with M. scabrinodis as a secondary option), requiring temperatures elevated by short turf and solar exposure for successful and pupation. Shaded or north-facing areas are avoided due to cooler microclimates that reduce activity and larval survival, while fertilized grasslands are unsuitable as they promote rank growth that suppresses host and alters distributions. The species occupies an altitudinal range from to approximately 1,500 m across its European distribution, thriving in temperate climates with warm summers averaging 15-25°C to support adult flight and larval development. It is sensitive to climatic extremes, such as prolonged droughts that can reduce nest viability, and to changes like , which eliminates host plants, or abandonment, which allows sward heights to exceed 10 cm and promotes shading from encroaching vegetation. A 2025 study of reintroduction sites found that maintaining sward heights below 2 cm through targeted grazing optimized larval survival rates, with densities varying up to 100-fold across sites primarily due to differences in M. sabuleti colony abundance rather than weather fluctuations.

Life History and Behavior

Life Cycle Overview

The Large Blue butterfly, Phengaris arion, follows a univoltine life cycle, completing one generation annually. Adults emerge from pupae in late June to early July, with females ovipositing on the flower buds of thyme (Thymus spp.) during this period. Eggs hatch after about one week in July, releasing first-instar larvae that feed externally on the host plant's flowers and developing seeds for approximately three weeks. By early August, fourth-instar larvae detach from the plant and descend to the ground, where they secrete pheromones to attract worker for adoption into nearby nests. Once integrated, the fourth-instar larvae overwinter as mature individuals within the ant colonies, entering triggered by declining autumn temperatures. The following spring, from May to June, these larvae pupate inside the nests, with adults eclosing in June to July under the influence of increasing photoperiods that cue emergence. Survival through the cycle is challenging, marked by high egg and early larval mortality, with 20-40% of the population dying from predation, weather, and competition on the host plant, while larval survival hinges on ant adoption and ranges from about 2% in less suitable hosts to 15% in preferred ones such as Myrmica sabuleti. These rates underscore the species' vulnerability during early stages. The immature stages feature morphological adaptations, such as larval chemical , that facilitate ant . Population dynamics are shaped by habitat , with 2025 models estimating densities ranging from approximately 100 to 12,900 per in restored grasslands, varying over 100-fold based on ant nest density and site quality.

The larvae of Phengaris arion, known as the large blue butterfly, engage in social , targeting colonies of Myrmica as their primary hosts. After hatching from eggs laid on flower buds of the host plant Thymus or Origanum and feeding externally for about three weeks, the fourth-instar larvae drop to the ground and await discovery by ant workers. Upon contact, the ants transport the larvae to their nests, where the parasites spend approximately 10 months developing. Inside the nest, the larvae prey on the ' brood—primarily larvae and pupae—to sustain growth. Successful integration relies on sophisticated mimicry mechanisms. The larvae produce cuticular hydrocarbons that chemically mimic those of Myrmica larvae, allowing them to evade recognition as intruders and be accepted as nestmates. Complementing this, the caterpillars emit stridulatory sounds—vibrations produced by rubbing body parts together—that closely resemble the queen ant's calls, prompting workers to provide elevated care, such as grooming and priority feeding. Early in the nest phase, the dorsal nectary organ on the larva's back secretes a nutritious, sugary fluid that attracts ants, facilitating "begging" behavior where the parasites solicit trophic eggs or regurgitated food via trophallaxis before transitioning to active predation. Adoption rates vary significantly by ant species, ranging from 20% in less suitable hosts like Myrmica scabrinodis to over 80% in preferred ones such as Myrmica sabuleti, with failures often resulting in larval ejection or consumption by the ants. The predatory phase imposes severe costs on the host . A single P. arion typically consumes 100–300 larvae and pupae over its tenure, often destroying up to 50% of the nest's brood and disrupting colony . This intensity underscores the parasitic strategy's efficiency for the but highlights its dependence on abundant, suitable ant nests for population viability. Evolutionary dynamics between P. arion and Myrmica hosts reflect long-term co-adaptation, with the 's evolving in response to ant recognition systems. Recent studies from the 2020s have elucidated the role of semiochemicals, including cuticular profiles and volatile cues, in refining host specificity and enabling occasional shifts to alternative Myrmica species under ecological pressures. These insights reveal a geographic of co-evolution, where local adaptations enhance parasitic success amid varying host availability.

Conservation

Status and Threats

The global conservation status of Phengaris arion is Near Threatened on the IUCN Red List. Regionally, it is assessed as Endangered on the European Red List due to ongoing declines. Nationally, statuses vary; in the United Kingdom, it is classified as Endangered, having been extinct prior to reintroduction efforts, while in parts of Europe it remains at risk due to fragmented populations. Population trends indicate a severe decline across , with grassland butterfly abundances, including P. arion, dropping by more than 50% since 1990, and the species specifically experiencing an 82% reduction in monitored sites. Recent 2025 studies of restored conservation grasslands report adult densities varying by 100-fold, ranging from as low as 0.1 to over 10 individuals per , highlighting the influence of site-specific quality on recovery potential. Primary threats include habitat loss from agricultural intensification, which reduces host plant availability through use and , and natural succession leading to scrub encroachment that shades out essential short grasslands. exacerbates these pressures via increased droughts that stress larval host plants like Thymus species and disrupt ant nest conditions, with models forecasting range contractions in drought-prone regions. Declines in host ant populations (Myrmica sabuleti) from exposure further compound risks, as the butterfly's larval stage depends entirely on these ants for . Ongoing monitoring through schemes like the UK Butterfly Monitoring Scheme and the European Butterfly Monitoring Scheme provides critical data on abundance trends, enabling targeted interventions to track and mitigate these threats across core habitats.

Reintroduction Efforts

Reintroduction efforts for the Large blue butterfly (Phengaris arion) began in the in the 1980s following its there in 1979, using stock from a genetically similar population in to closely match the former British subspecies. Initial releases targeted restored grasslands in southwest , with ongoing efforts establishing core colonies at multiple sites and enabling natural colonization of additional areas through habitat management. As of 2024, the species had naturally spread to over 40 sites across restored habitats, with 33 actively managed, marking a significant recovery from zero populations. In , conservation programs have focused on stabilizing existing populations and targeted releases, particularly in central and eastern regions. Hungary maintains stable core populations of P. arion in managed grasslands, where local metapopulations demonstrate remarkable persistence despite broader threats. In , releases occurred during the 2010s as part of broader habitat restoration initiatives, though detailed outcomes remain limited. EU-funded projects have supported these efforts by financing the restoration of ant-host plants and dry grasslands essential for the butterfly's lifecycle, enhancing connectivity across fragmented landscapes in multiple countries. Key management techniques include tailored regimes to maintain short sward heights of less than 2 cm, typically using sheep at densities that prevent overgrowth while supporting thyme ( spp.) and hosts. translocation has been employed to bolster Myrmica populations at release sites, ensuring availability of brood chambers for parasitic larvae. Captive rearing trials, involving laboratory rearing of early-instar larvae on host plants before transfer to nests, have supplemented wild releases but face challenges in scaling due to the species' obligate . Success is evident in the 's 2025 population metrics, where densities in optimized grasslands have increased up to 100-fold compared to early post-release levels, supporting thousands of adults annually across managed sites. Genetic monitoring using markers has confirmed that reintroduced populations retain diversity comparable to source stocks after nearly two decades, mitigating risks through periodic augmentation. Challenges in these efforts center on source population selection, prioritizing genetically compatible stocks to preserve local adaptations, as seen in the choice of Swedish material for the . Post-release monitoring employs mark-recapture methods to track adult dispersal and survival, informing and revealing rapid evolution in dispersal traits within restored landscapes.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.