Hubbry Logo
ColonyColonyMain
Open search
Colony
Community hub
Colony
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Colony
Colony
Colony
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Part of a series on
Politics
Primary topics
Systems
Academic disciplines
Public administration
Policy
Government branches
Related topics
Subseries
icon Politics portal

A colony is a territory subject to a form of foreign rule,[1] which rules the territory and its indigenous peoples separated from the foreign rulers, the colonizer, and their metropole (or "mother country").[2] This separated rule was often organized into colonial empires, with their metropoles at their centers, making colonies neither annexed or even integrated territories, nor client states. Particularly new imperialism and its colonialism advanced this separated rule and its lasting coloniality. Colonies were most often set up and colonized for exploitation and possibly settlement by colonists.[3]

The term colony originates from the ancient Roman colonia, a type of Roman settlement. Derived from colonus (farmer, cultivator, planter, or settler), it carries with it the sense of 'farm' and 'landed estate'.[4] Furthermore, the term was used to refer to the older Greek apoikia (Ancient Greek: ἀποικία, lit. 'home away from home'), which were overseas settlements by ancient Greek city-states. The city that founded such a settlement became known as its metropolis ("mother-city"). Since early-modern times, historians, administrators, and political scientists have generally used the term "colony" to refer mainly to the many different overseas territories of particularly European states between the 15th and 20th centuries CE, with colonialism and decolonization as corresponding phenomena.

While colonies often developed from trading outposts or territorial claims, such areas do not need to be a product of colonization, nor become colonially organized territories. Territories furthermore do not need to have been militarily conquered and occupied to come under colonial rule and to be considered de facto colonies, instead neocolonial exploitation of dependency or imperialist use of power to intervene to force policy, might make a territory be considered a colony, which broadens the concept, including indirect rule or puppet states (contrasted by more independent types of client states such as vassal states). Subsequently, some historians have used the term informal colony to refer to a country under a de facto control of another state. Though the broadening of the concept is often contentious.

Contemporarily colonies are identified and organized as not sufficiently self-governed dependent territories. Other past colonies have become either sufficiently incorporated and self-governed, or independent, with some to a varying degree dominated by remaining colonial settler societies or neocolonialism.

Concept

[edit]

The word "colony" comes from the Latin word colōnia, used for ancient Roman outposts and eventually for cities. This in turn derives from the word colōnus, which referred to a Roman tenant farmer.

Settlements that began as Roman coloniae include cities from Cologne (which retains this history in its name) to Belgrade to York. A telltale sign of a settlement within the Roman sphere of influence once being a Roman colony is a city centre with a grid pattern.[5]

With a long and changing history of use colonies have been distinguished from "settler colonies", which are the more particular type of a settlement or community and not so much territorial.[3]

Ancient examples

[edit]
Further information: Colonies in antiquity

More modern historical examples

[edit]
Main article: List of colonies
See also: Timeline of national independence

Current colonies

[edit]
Dependent territories and their sovereign states. All territories are labeled according to ISO 3166-1[d] or with numbers.[e] Colored areas without labels are integral parts of their respective countries. Antarctica is shown as a condominium instead of individual claims.

The Special Committee on Decolonization maintains the United Nations list of non-self-governing territories, which identifies areas the United Nations (though not without controversy) believes are colonies. Given that dependent territories have varying degrees of autonomy and political power in the affairs of the controlling state, there is disagreement over the classification of "colony".

See also

[edit]
Settlements and outposts (civilian and military)
  • Border outpost – Outpost maintained by a sovereign state on its border
  • Human outpost – Human habitats located in environments inhospitable for humans
  • Outpost (military) – Military post
  • Bridgehead – Strategically important position on a river crossing which enemy forces seek to control
  • Military base – Facility directly owned and operated by or for the military
  • Military colony – Territory governed by another country
  • Crossroads village
  • Development town – Israeli towns established to house new immigrants
  • Mill town – Settlement that developed around one or more mills or factories
  • Railway town – Settlement developed when building a railway
Roads and road stops
  • Caravanserei – Type of roadside inn
  • Mountain pass – Route through a mountain range or over a ridge
  • Stage station – Place of rest provided for stagecoach travelers
  • Waypoint – Point on a route of travel
Trade and manufacturing areas
  • Entrepôt – Hub for commercial activity
  • Factory (trading post) – Transshipment zone (5th- to 19th-century name)
  • Free-trade area – Regional trade agreement
  • Free economic zone – Geographic area where economic activity between and within countries is less regulated
  • Exclusive economic zone – Adjacent sea zone in which a state has special rights
  • Special economic zone – Region with specialized business and trade laws
  • Industrial park – Area for development of industry
  • Spice Trade – Historic international commerce
  • Trading post – Area where economic activity between peoples is less regulated
Frontiers and extraterritorial areas
  • Border – Geographic boundaries of political entity
  • Frontier – Area near or beyond a boundary
    • Frontier thesis – Argument by historian Frederick Jackson Turner
  • No-go area – Area where authorities are unable to enforce law or sovereignty
  • No-mans land – Strip of land between wartime trenches
  • Terra nullius – International law term for unclaimed land

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Colony

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A colony is a under the control of a distant , often involving the extension of the metropole's political authority, settlement by its citizens, and economic exploitation of local resources. The concept traces its origins to , where coloniae were planned settlements of citizens established to farm land, secure frontiers, and integrate conquered territories. In the modern historical context, colonies proliferated during the Age of Exploration from the 15th century, as European powers like , , , , and the established overseas dominions to access trade routes, raw materials, and markets, frequently through , treaties, or settlement. Colonies varied in type, including settler colonies—characterized by large-scale migration that often displaced indigenous populations, as in parts of , , and —and exploitation or plantation colonies, which prioritized resource extraction and labor-intensive agriculture with limited permanent , exemplified by regions in , , and the . While colonial administration imposed governance structures, legal systems, and infrastructure that in some cases fostered long-term institutional development and , it also entailed profound costs such as warfare, enslavement, demographic collapse from , and cultural erosion. Empirical analyses reveal heterogeneous outcomes, with evidence of improved , access, and transport networks in many territories, though debates continue over net benefits versus the human and economic tolls, often skewed by ideological narratives in academic and media sources favoring condemnation without balanced accounting of causal factors like pre-existing conditions and post-independence policies. The era of in the mid-20th century transformed most colonies into independent nations, leaving legacies that shape global inequalities and institutions today.

Conceptual Foundations

Definition and Etymology

A colony is a subjected to the political, , or economic domination by a foreign power, typically involving the settlement of emigrants from the dominant state to exploit , secure strategic positions, or relieve population pressures in the . This control often entails the imposition of the colonizer's laws, administration, and cultural institutions over indigenous populations, distinguishing it from mere alliances or protectorates. Historically, the concept evolved from ancient practices of territorial expansion through settlement to the large-scale overseas empires of the early , where European states like and Britain established colonies in the , , and primarily for mercantile gain, with empirical records showing flows such as silver from mines funding 16th-century Spanish deficits exceeding 150 tons annually. The English word "colony" entered usage in the late , initially denoting ancient Roman settlements outside , derived from the Latin colonia ("settled land" or "farm"). This term stems from colonus ("farmer" or "tenant"), itself from the verb colere ("to cultivate, till, or inhabit"), reflecting agrarian roots in and population dispersal. In Roman antiquity, coloniae were deliberate outposts of citizens dispatched to conquered or regions, often numbering 300 families per early site, to foster loyalty, provide veteran land grants, and enforce Roman agrarian laws like the Lex Agraria of 111 BCE, which allocated public lands systematically. Roman writers extended colonia to translate Greek apoikia ("settlement away from home"), emphasizing emigrant bodies maintaining ties to the origin , a causal mechanism for evident in over 100 documented coloniae by the late . By the imperial period, the term connoted both privilege—full Roman rights for settlers—and utility in pacifying unrest, as seen in Philippi's designation as a colony post-42 BCE after the .

Types and Classifications

Colonies are classified primarily by the scale of metropolitan settlement, economic function, and administrative mechanisms. A core dichotomy separates settler colonies from exploitation colonies. Settler colonies feature extensive migration of families and individuals from the colonizing power, who establish enduring communities, farms, and governance structures, often displacing indigenous peoples through violence, disease, or land appropriation; between 1700 and 1820, the indigenous population in what became the United States declined by approximately 57 percent. Examples encompass British North America, Australia, Canada, and New Zealand. Exploitation colonies prioritize resource extraction or production with sparse permanent European presence, depending on local, enslaved, or indentured workers to supply raw materials like minerals, cash crops, or trade goods. Subcategories include planter colonialism, emphasizing large-scale plantations (e.g., sugar in the ), extractive operations targeting finite resources (e.g., or furs), and trade-oriented outposts controlling flows (e.g., British holdings in or Dutch ). exemplifies extractive focus, with infrastructure like railways built to export and minerals. Governance types further delineate colonial administration: , wherein metropolitan officials dismantle and replace indigenous institutions with centralized bureaucratic control, as practiced extensively by in and ; and , which integrates pre-colonial elites and structures to enforce policies cost-effectively, a British approach in and parts of . In early modern European expansion, particularly under Britain, charter-based classifications prevailed: royal colonies, directly administered by crown-appointed governors (e.g., after 1624); proprietary colonies, awarded to favored individuals for personal rule under loose oversight (e.g., ); and joint-stock or corporate colonies, operated by investor companies for profit with elements of (e.g., initial ). These systems evolved, with many proprietary and corporate entities transitioning to royal status by the .

Historical Development

Ancient and Pre-Modern Colonies

The earliest recorded colonies emerged from Phoenician city-states along the coast, beginning around the late BCE, primarily as trading outposts to secure maritime commerce in metals, timber, and dyes. Settlements included Utica in modern , dated traditionally to 1101 BCE, and Gades (Cádiz) in to 1110 BCE, with founded circa 814 BCE becoming the most prominent, evolving into an independent power by the 7th century BCE. These outposts, often fortified emporia rather than full territorial dominions, facilitated the Phoenicians' monopoly on purple dye production and shipbuilding expertise, extending to sites in (e.g., Citium circa 850 BCE), (, Eryx, Panormus), , and . By the BCE, had supplanted Tyre as the leading Phoenician hub, establishing sub-colonies across and the western Mediterranean to counter Greek expansion. Greek colonization, peaking during the Archaic period from approximately 800 to 580 BCE, involved over 1,500 settlements driven by , scarcity, and trade opportunities in the Mediterranean and regions. City-states like , , and dispatched apoikoi (emigrants) under oikistai (founders), establishing self-governing poleis such as Syracuse (founded 734 BCE by Corinthians) in , in (circa 750 BCE), and () in (circa 600 BCE), which formed in . These colonies, often replicating the mother city's institutions and cults, exported , wine, and ceramics while importing grain and slaves, with sites like and Sinope securing access to resources. Conflicts arose, notably with Phoenicians in , but the network enhanced Greek , including the alphabet's spread. Roman colonies, instituted from the BCE onward, served dual and administrative functions, initially as coastal outposts of about 300 citizen families to defend against incursions, evolving into inland settlements post-200 BCE for veteran resettlement and provincial control. Early examples included Ostia near and coastal Latina colonies like ; by the late , over 20 were founded in alone, such as Aquileia (181 BCE) and . In conquered territories, colonies like Cartagena (Carthago Nova, refounded 227 BCE after ) in and Hippo Regius in imposed , , and urban grids to Romanize locals and secure loyalty, with Sinope on the exemplifying eastern extensions. Under the , established over 100 veteran colonies, such as Emerita Augusta in (25 BCE), fostering like aqueducts and roads while suppressing revolts through land redistribution. Pre-modern Norse expeditions marked a northern extension of , with settled from starting circa 874 CE by figures like , reaching a population of 20,000-40,000 by 930 CE through pastoral farming and fishing. followed in 985 CE under , who established the Eastern and Western Settlements with around 2,000-5,000 inhabitants at peak, relying on trade with despite harsh climates. Brief ventures reached (Newfoundland) circa 1000 CE, evidenced by , but failed due to indigenous resistance and supply issues; 's colonies persisted until the mid-15th century, abandoned amid cooling temperatures and isolation. These efforts, distinct from Mediterranean models, emphasized to marginal environments over exploitation, with sagas documenting navigational prowess using sunstones and curraghs.

European Age of Exploration and Establishment

pioneered systematic and colonial outposts in the early , capturing the North African port of in 1415 to secure access to African gold and slaves, followed by the establishment of trading factories along the West African coast. reached the in 1488, demonstrating a viable sea route around Africa, while completed the voyage to Calicut, , in 1498 with a fleet of four ships and approximately 170 crew members, enabling direct European access to Asian spices and goods without Ottoman intermediaries. These efforts resulted in Portuguese feitorias (fortified trading posts) at sites like in modern , constructed in 1482 to control gold trade, and later expansions into , (such as Cochin in 1503), and . Spain entered the fray with Christopher Columbus's 1492 expedition, funded by the Catholic Monarchs Ferdinand II and Isabella I, which made landfall in and initiated claims over the islands and mainland . Columbus established , the first Spanish settlement, on in 1492, though it was destroyed; a permanent base followed at in 1493 with about 1,500 settlers. To avert rivalry, mediated the on June 7, 1494, allocating undiscovered lands east of a line 370 leagues west of the Islands to and west to , a division ratified by both crowns. This framework guided early establishments, with claiming after Álvares Cabral's accidental landing near on April 22, 1500, leading to captaincies for settlement by the 1530s. By the early , consolidated American holdings through conquests, including Hernán Cortés's 1519 invasion of , which toppled the by 1521 and yielded vast silver resources from mines like , and Francisco Pizarro's 1532 campaign against the Inca, capturing Cuzco in 1533. fortified Asian entrepôts, seizing in 1510 as a headquarters and in 1511 to dominate spice routes. Northern European powers joined later: the Dutch established the in 1602 for Asian trade, founding Batavia () in 1619; planted Jamestown in in 1607 with 104 settlers, surviving initial hardships to export tobacco; and France founded in 1608 under , focusing on fur trade with indigenous networks. These ventures shifted from mere outposts to structured administrations, with organizing viceroyalties in (1535) and (1542) to govern millions of square kilometers and indigenous populations exceeding 10 million in alone at contact.

Peak Imperialism and Major Empires

The era of peak , spanning roughly from the 1870s to the outbreak of in 1914, marked the zenith of European colonial expansion, during which powers formalized control over vast non-European territories through conquest, treaties, and diplomatic conferences. This period, often termed high , saw European nations partition and intensify holdings in and , driven by industrial demands for resources and markets alongside nationalist rivalries. By 1914, European empires controlled approximately 84% of the globe's land surface, with the —initiated by the of 1884–1885—resulting in nearly 90% of the continent under foreign rule by the war's eve. The reached its territorial apogee in 1920, encompassing 35.5 million square kilometers—about 24% of the Earth's land—and governing 412 million subjects, or roughly 23% of the world's . Key components included (under the , covering 4.57 million square kilometers and 300 million people), dominion settler colonies like , , and , and extensive African possessions such as , , and . This expanse generated immense wealth through trade and resource extraction, with Britain's naval supremacy enabling sustained dominance. The French Empire, second in scale, attained its maximum extent between 1919 and 1939, spanning 12.3 million square kilometers and including Indochina, vast swaths of West and (e.g., , , ), and . French holdings in alone covered over 10 million square kilometers by the early , bolstered by assimilationist policies aiming to integrate elites into French culture. Other significant empires included the Portuguese, with enduring African enclaves like (1.25 million square kilometers) and ; the Dutch, primarily through the (modern , totaling about 1.9 million square kilometers); and the Belgian, centered on the Congo (2.34 million square kilometers), a resource-rich territory exploited under King Leopold II from 1885 until its as a colony in 1908. Germany's pre-World War I empire featured , , , and , aggregating around 2.6 million square kilometers, while Italy acquired and post-1880s. These lesser empires paled in comparison to Anglo-French dominance but contributed to the competitive partition dynamics.
EmpirePeak YearLand Area (million km²)Approx. Population (millions)
British192035.5412
French1920s12.3110
Dutch1940s (post-peak focus)~3 (core holdings)60
focus)19082.34 (Congo alone)10
This table summarizes peak territorial metrics for select empires, highlighting Anglo-French preeminence during high .

Drivers and Mechanisms

Economic Motivations

European colonial powers pursued colonies primarily to enhance national under mercantilist doctrines, which emphasized accumulating precious metals through favorable balances and monopolizing supplies to fuel domestic and exports. Mercantilists argued that colonies should provide exclusive access to commodities like timber, furs, and agricultural products, reducing reliance on foreign suppliers and enabling the mother country to export finished goods in return, thereby amassing bullion reserves critical for military and economic power. This system viewed overseas territories not as self-sustaining entities but as appendages designed to generate , with policies like enforcing trade exclusivity—such as Britain's 1651 Navigation Act requiring colonial goods to pass through English ports. In the Americas, Spain's conquests were driven by the quest for and silver, exemplified by the rapid exploitation of and Peruvian deposits following Hernán Cortés's 1519-1521 campaign against the and Francisco Pizarro's 1532-1533 overthrow of the . The silver mine in , operational from 1545, yielded over 45,000 tons of silver by the , funding Spain's wars and imports while motivating further expeditions through the promise of quinto real—the Crown's one-fifth share of extracted metals. similarly targeted African and Brazilian and spices, establishing trading posts like in 1482 to control routes and later sugar plantations reliant on enslaved labor, which by 1550 accounted for over half of 's revenue. Northern European powers focused on Asian trade networks, forming joint-stock companies to secure spices and textiles amid competition with Iberian monopolies. The Dutch United East India Company (VOC), chartered in 1602, aimed to dominate the lucrative spice trade in nutmeg, cloves, and pepper from the Indonesian archipelago, capturing Banda Islands in 1621 to enforce monopolies that generated dividends averaging 18% annually until the mid-17th century. Britain's East India Company, established in 1600, pursued similar goals in India and Southeast Asia, exporting cotton, silk, indigo, and tea while importing bullion; by 1757, territorial gains like Bengal provided annual revenues exceeding £3 million through tax farming and opium trade facilitation to China. These enterprises exemplified profit maximization via armed trade, where economic control often required military forts and alliances to exclude rivals and coerce local suppliers. Plantation economies in the and further underscored labor-intensive extraction motives, with colonies like (seized by Britain in 1655) and (French from 1697) optimized for , , and production using imported African slaves, yielding profits that comprised up to 5% of Britain's GDP by the . Such systems prioritized high-value cash crops for European markets, with mercantilist restrictions preventing local to maintain dependency on imported , thereby sustaining imbalances favorable to the . While these pursuits enriched imperial treasuries—Spain's American silver inflows peaking at 300 tons annually in the 1590s—they relied on coercive mechanisms, reflecting a causal logic where economic gain necessitated territorial dominance over indigenous economies.

Strategic and Ideological Factors

European powers established colonies to secure strategic military advantages, including fortified bases that protected vital trade routes and enabled against rivals. In the , built a chain of coastal forts across and the —such as in (1482) and Ormuz in the (1507)—to dominate spice commerce, enforce naval blockades, and preempt Arab and Venetian intermediaries. These outposts allowed to monopolize high-value goods like pepper and cloves, generating revenues equivalent to several times the kingdom's annual budget by the early 1500s. By the 19th century, Britain exemplified strategic prioritization through acquisitions like (ceded 1713), (1814), and (founded 1819), which functioned as coaling stations and naval hubs encircling global sea lanes. , dubbed the "Gibraltar of the East," secured Britain's eastern trade corridor to amid competition with and the , facilitating the opium trade and military logistics that sustained imperial reach. Such positions denied adversaries resupply points and amplified fleet mobility, as steam-powered navies required reliable ports for the Royal Navy's "two-power standard" policy aiming to match the combined strength of the next two largest fleets. Ideological factors intertwined with these aims, particularly religious imperatives to evangelize non-Christians, which motivated early Iberian expansions under papal endorsements. Spanish conquistadors, backed by bulls like (1455), framed conquests in the as to supplant indigenous faiths, resulting in missions that baptized millions by 1600 while subordinating local populations. In the Protestant north, Dutch and British settlers invoked for settlement, though religious zeal often aligned with territorial claims. Later imperialism drew on nationalist fervor and racial hierarchies, with portraying European dominance as natural selection's outcome, justifying subjugation of "inferior" societies. This , popularized post-1859 by , informed policies equating imperial expansion with civilizational progress, as in Germany's 1880s African ventures. The "" ethos, epitomized in Rudyard Kipling's 1899 "White Man's Burden," cast as a sacrificial to impose order, , and governance on "half-devil and half-child" peoples, rationalizing despite underlying resource extraction. Nationalist pride amplified these narratives, viewing empires as emblems of superiority amid European rivalries, though empirical outcomes often prioritized coercion over uplift.

Empirical Impacts

Advancements in Infrastructure, Health, and Education

Colonial powers constructed extensive transportation networks across their territories to facilitate resource extraction and administration, resulting in infrastructure that surpassed pre-colonial capabilities in scale and durability. In British , the railway system expanded from negligible beginnings in the mid-19th century to approximately 65,000 kilometers by , connecting inland regions to ports and enabling efficient movement of goods and people. Similar developments occurred in Africa, where colonial railroads, such as those in linking interior mines to coastal ports, totaled thousands of kilometers and integrated remote areas into global trade, though primarily oriented toward export economies. Roads and ports were also modernized; for instance, British investments in sub-Saharan African roadways reached about 85,000 kilometers by the mid-20th century, supporting agricultural and mineral transport where wheeled infrastructure had previously been limited. These projects introduced engineering standards, including bridges, tunnels, and telegraph lines, that formed the backbone of post-independence systems, with empirical studies showing persistent effects from colonial rail alignments in . In , Dutch and British efforts yielded comparable port expansions, such as in and Malaya, enhancing maritime connectivity. While motivated by imperial interests, the net result was a measurable increase in transport capacity; for example, India's rail network carried 620 million passengers and 90 million tons of freight annually by the , far exceeding indigenous capabilities. In health, colonial administrations implemented reforms, drives, and medical facilities that reduced mortality from endemic diseases, though coverage was uneven and prioritized initially. Empirical analyses indicate that direct British rule in correlated with improved outcomes, including lower in administered districts compared to princely states. in settler-heavy colonies rose due to European-introduced measures; cross-national studies link higher colonial European population shares to gains in and declines across and . eradication efforts, such as British campaigns in from the 1800s, curbed epidemics that had ravaged pre-colonial populations, while research in targeted sleeping sickness and , establishing research stations like those in the . Hospitals and dispensaries proliferated; by the 1940s, British African colonies featured networks treating millions annually for preventable illnesses. Education systems expanded under colonial rule through mission schools and state initiatives, elevating from near-zero baselines in many regions. In , literacy rates reached about 12% by 1947, up from estimated single-digit figures in the pre-colonial era, driven by primary schools and the establishment of modern universities in 1857, including the Universities of Calcutta, Bombay, and Madras, which graduated thousands in sciences and administration. In , Protestant and founded thousands of schools, boosting enrollment; former British colonies exhibited higher levels by 1960 than French or ones, with lasting effects on . Universities emerged later, such as University College in (1948), building on earlier colleges, while in , colonial curricula emphasized English-medium instruction, producing elites who later led movements. Overall, colonial increased school enrollments substantially in the and , though access favored urban males and aimed at bureaucratic needs. These advancements, while extractive in intent, empirically raised literacy and skills metrics, as evidenced by comparative studies showing uniform positive colonial impacts on education across empires.

Institutional and Cultural Transfers

Colonial powers transferred institutional frameworks including legal systems, regimes, and administrative bureaucracies, which often persisted post-independence and influenced long-term quality. In British colonies, traditions emphasizing judicial precedent and protections were imposed, contrasting with the codified civil law systems exported by and , which prioritized state-centric administration. Empirical analysis indicates that these differences endure: former British colonies exhibit stronger rule-of-law indices and investor protections compared to civil-law counterparts, correlating with higher GDP levels today. For instance, settler mortality rates during colonization—lower in places like and —predicted the establishment of inclusive institutions that fostered economic investment, explaining up to 75% of variation in current prosperity across former colonies according to instrumental variable estimates. Administrative transfers included centralized tax collection and civil services modeled on metropolitan systems, which in extractive colonies like the prioritized revenue extraction over local accountability, leading to persistent weak governance. In contrast, high-settler colonies such as and adopted parliamentary assemblies early, with representative institutions dating to the that evolved into stable democracies. These structures' longevity is evidenced by Polity IV scores: former British dominions average democratic scores above 8 since 1900, versus lower averages in French Afrique Occidentale Française territories. is further shown in post-colonial legal reforms; many African nations retain colonial penal codes from the 1920s-1930s, hindering adaptations to modern needs like enforcement. Cultural transfers encompassed languages, religions, and educational norms, fundamentally altering societal compositions. European languages—English in 58 former British territories, French in 26—became official post-independence, facilitating global trade but marginalizing indigenous tongues; English proficiency correlates with 1-2% higher annual growth in . spread via missions, converting 40-90% of populations in and by 1900, introducing and ethical frameworks that supplanted animist practices but often eroded communal land norms, contributing to disputes. Western systems, emphasizing secular curricula, raised from near-zero in pre-colonial (under 10% in 1900) to 12% by independence, though curricula prioritized colonial languages over local histories. These shifts persisted, with missionary-educated elites dominating post-colonial bureaucracies in places like , where Protestant mission density predicts higher today. However, forced assimilation suppressed indigenous knowledge, as in Australia's Stolen Generations policy (1905-1969), which aimed at cultural erasure through institutional boarding schools. Overall, while enabling integration into global systems, these transfers created hybrid cultures marked by tensions between imported and pre-existing collectivism.

Exploitation, Conflicts, and Demographic Shifts

Colonial exploitation often involved systematic resource extraction and coerced labor systems, such as the rubber quotas imposed in the under King Leopold II from 1885 to 1908, where failure to meet demands resulted in mutilations, executions, and widespread famine, contributing to an estimated demographic collapse of up to 50% of the population, or roughly 10 million deaths, though figures vary due to limited records and methodological debates in . In British India, the "drain of wealth" theory, articulated by , quantified annual transfers to Britain—through uncompensated exports of goods, salaries for officials, and remittances—as approximately £30-40 million by the late , equivalent to about one-fourth of India's revenue, depriving local investment in infrastructure and industry without equivalent returns. The transatlantic slave trade, spanning 1515 to 1865, forcibly transported over 12.5 million Africans to the , with mortality rates during the alone exceeding 15%, exacerbating labor exploitation in plantation economies while depopulating source regions in West and Central Africa by an estimated 25% relative to non-exporting areas. Conflicts arose from indigenous resistance to land seizures and administrative impositions, manifesting in uprisings like the 1857 Indian Rebellion against rule, which resulted in over 100,000 Indian deaths from combat, reprisals, and , alongside 6,000 British casualties, ultimately leading to direct control. In settler colonies, such as , prolonged wars against Native American tribes from the 17th to 19th centuries, including the and later Indian Wars, displaced millions and caused tens of thousands of direct combat deaths, though indirect effects amplified losses. African colonial wars, such as the of 1879, saw Zulu forces suffer around 10,000-20,000 fatalities against British technological superiority, reflecting broader patterns where favored European firepower, leading to territorial consolidation but high indigenous tolls often exceeding 100,000 per major campaign. Demographic shifts were profound, primarily driven by introduced Old World diseases like smallpox and measles, which lacked immunity among indigenous populations; in the Americas, pre-Columbian estimates of 50-60 million natives declined by 90% (to 5-6 million) between 1492 and 1650, as virgin-soil epidemics cascaded through unexposed communities, compounded by warfare and enslavement. In Africa, the slave trade's extraction of prime-age adults skewed demographics toward vulnerable groups, reducing overall population growth and fostering social instability, while European settlements in places like Australia and southern Africa introduced small immigrant populations that eventually outnumbered or marginalized aboriginal groups through displacement and intermarriage. These changes, while enabling colonial economies, created long-term imbalances, with native populations in many regions not recovering pre-colonial densities until the 20th century or later, as evidenced by census data and genetic bottleneck studies showing severe contractions around contact periods.

Decolonization Processes

Post-World War II Independence Waves

The weakening of European imperial powers after , combined with surging nationalist movements and international advocacy for , triggered widespread starting in the late 1940s. Between 1945 and 1960, approximately three dozen new states in and transitioned to independence or autonomy from European rule. By the end of the 20th century, 80 former non-self-governing territories had achieved sovereignty, including all 11 UN Trust Territories. Decolonization commenced prominently in , where Britain granted to on August 15, 1947, and on August 14, 1947, amid partition that displaced millions and resulted in over 1 million deaths. followed on January 4, 1948, and Ceylon (now ) on February 4, 1948, both from British control without partition. declared from the on August 17, 1945, following Japanese occupation, with full sovereignty recognized after four years of conflict on December 27, 1949. The momentum extended to in the 1950s, with achieving independence from Britain on March 6, 1957, as the first sub-Saharan nation to do so post-WWII, inspiring further movements. The "" in 1960 marked a peak, as 17 countries gained sovereignty, primarily from and Britain, including on January 1, on October 1, and the on June 30. This surge continued, with 18 more African independences in 1961 and 13 additional by 1969. Portugal resisted decolonization longer, maintaining wars in Angola, Mozambique, and Guinea-Bissau until the 1974 prompted withdrawals. Mozambique became independent on June 25, 1975, and Angola on November 11, 1975, though both faced immediate civil conflicts involving proxies. These waves dismantled formal empires but often left new states with fragile institutions, ethnic divisions, and economic dependencies inherited from colonial boundaries.

Theoretical Justifications and International Frameworks

The principle of formed the core theoretical justification for , positing that colonized peoples possess an inherent right to freely choose their political status and pursue economic, social, and cultural development without external interference. This concept gained international traction through U.S. President Woodrow Wilson's , outlined in a speech to on , 1918, which called for adjustments in colonial claims with regard to fixed principles of , particularly for European nationalities emerging from the Austro-Hungarian and Ottoman Empires, though its application to non-European colonies was inconsistent and limited at the time. Philosophically, 's moral basis has been debated across associative theories (emphasizing the intrinsic value of collective self-association), democratic theories (linking it to and ), and remedial theories (framing it as a corrective to coercive domination), with the latter most directly supporting by arguing that colonial rule inherently violated the basic liberties of subject populations through non-consensual subjugation. Critiques of colonial justifications—such as the "civilizing mission" or economic stewardship, often invoked by European powers to legitimize control—further bolstered decolonization theory by highlighting their inadequacy as rationales for sustained domination, especially as empirical evidence of exploitation and resistance mounted post-World War II. Institutional analyses attributed rising demands for independence to expanded education and administrative experience in colonies, fostering expectations of sovereignty, while economic pressures from war debts rendered empires unsustainable for metropolitan powers. These arguments shifted focus from paternalistic governance to the causal reality that prolonged foreign rule perpetuated dependency rather than genuine development, aligning with first-principles views of political legitimacy rooted in consent and capacity for self-rule. International frameworks crystallized these justifications in binding and declarative instruments. Chapter XI of the United Nations Charter, effective October 24, 1945, established obligations for administering powers of non-self-governing territories to promote progressive development toward self-government, transmit regular information on conditions, and safeguard fundamental freedoms, thereby embedding self-determination as a dynamic obligation rather than an indefinite trusteeship. Complementing this, the UN Trusteeship Council under Chapter XII oversaw former League of Nations mandates and certain territories, aiming for self-governance or independence, with 11 such territories achieving sovereignty by 1994. The landmark UN General Assembly Resolution 1514 (XV), adopted December 14, 1960, by a vote of 89-0 with nine abstentions (including Portugal, Spain, and the UK), affirmed the inalienable right of all peoples to complete independence, rejected any pretext for delaying it based on purported unreadiness, and declared subjection to alien domination a denial of human rights contrary to the Charter—though non-binding, it exerted normative pressure accelerating transfers of power in Africa and Asia. Subsequent resolutions, such as 1541 (XV) in 1960, outlined modalities like emergence as a sovereign state, free association, or integration, providing procedural clarity amid geopolitical shifts. These frameworks, influenced by anti-colonial majorities in the UN, prioritized rapid sovereignty over gradual tutelage, despite debates over readiness in territories lacking cohesive institutions.

Post-Colonial Realities

Economic and Governance Outcomes

Post-decolonization economic trajectories in former colonies have been disparate, with many experiencing persistent underperformance relative to global benchmarks, especially in , where average annual GDP growth from 1961 to 1973 fell below the world average amid resource mismanagement and institutional weaknesses inherited or exacerbated after . In contrast, select Asian cases, such as , achieved rapid industrialization and income expansion through adoption of open-market policies and robust legal frameworks, elevating GDP from approximately $500 in to over $80,000 by 2023 in constant terms. similarly prospered under economic models during its post-1945 development phase, leveraging trade and minimal intervention to sustain high growth rates until the 1997 . These successes, however, represent outliers, as broader empirical analyses indicate that colonies with histories of resistance to European control—often in —exhibit 50-65% lower contemporary GDP than those more fully integrated under colonial administration. Governance outcomes frequently deteriorated post-independence, marked by elevated , authoritarian consolidation, and political fragmentation, particularly in extractive colonies where pre-existing systems prioritized elite enrichment over broad institutional capacity. In , for example, waves from the onward correlated with a surge in coups—over 200 attempted or successful by 2000—and entrenched , as low public-sector wages and weak mechanisms enabled systemic graft that eroded fiscal stability and deterred investment. Colonial legacies of centralized, extractive bureaucracies often persisted or intensified under local elites, fostering "neopatrimonial" systems where personal loyalty supplanted meritocratic rule, as evidenced in comparative studies linking prolonged colonial extraction to inferior modern government quality metrics like rule-of-law indices. Former British colonies, benefiting from relatively more inclusive late-colonial institutions such as limited franchises and electoral precedents, demonstrated higher initial post-independence scores—e.g., averaging higher scores in the first full post-colonial election decade compared to French or ex-colonies—but many regressed amid ethnic patronage politics and resource curses. Causal factors include the mismatch between imported Westminster-style or Napoleonic models and heterogeneous local ethnic structures, leading to in polities with arbitrary borders that aggregated rival groups, as seen in the of Congo's post-1960 descent into conflict-driven failures despite mineral wealth. Economic underperformance intertwined with these deficits, as corruption indices from consistently rank many post-colonial states—such as those in and parts of —among the lowest globally, with bribe solicitation rates exceeding 30% in public services in countries like by the 2010s, perpetuating low investment and . While outliers like mitigated these risks through authoritarian and enforcement under from 1965, the preponderance of evidence underscores how post-colonial agency often amplified rather than reformed extractive institutional paths, yielding environments conducive to inefficiency and over sustained development.

Neo-Colonialism Critiques and Evidence

Neo-colonialism critiques posit that formal from European powers did not end exploitative relationships, with former colonies remaining economically and politically subordinate through mechanisms like , aid conditionality, and resource extraction contracts favoring multinational firms from the Global North. articulated this in his 1965 book Neo-Colonialism: The Last Stage of , arguing that powerful states direct weaker nations' policies via economic and cultural ties. These claims often highlight persistent trade imbalances, where post-colonial states export primary commodities while importing manufactured goods, perpetuating dependency as theorized by dependency theorists like André Gunder Frank. A prominent example is 's influence in under the framework, involving military pacts, economic privileges, and control over the currency used by 14 nations. The requires 50% of foreign reserves to be held in the French Treasury, limiting monetary sovereignty and channeling funds to , with critics estimating this has facilitated capital outflows exceeding aid inflows since the 1960s. conducted 122 military interventions in between 1960 and 2020, often to protect aligned regimes or secure resources like uranium in . Recent coups in (2020), (2022), and (2023) reflect backlash against perceived French overreach, with juntas expelling troops and rejecting . International financial institutions have also faced accusations of enforcing neo-colonial policies through structural adjustment programs (SAPs) in the 1980s–1990s. IMF and World Bank loans to indebted developing countries mandated privatization, trade liberalization, and fiscal austerity, which studies link to short-term GDP contractions of 0.5–1.5% annually in sub-Saharan Africa and rising inequality, as social spending cuts disproportionately affected the poor. In Zambia, SAPs from 1985 led to copper mine privatization benefiting foreign firms while unemployment surged to 20% by 1990. Proponents counter that SAPs curbed hyperinflation—e.g., reducing Zimbabwe's rate from 500% in 1990 to under 20% by 1995—and fostered long-term stability, though empirical reviews show mixed poverty outcomes, with growth elasticity of poverty reduction declining by 0.2–0.4 percentage points per adjustment loan. Critiques of neo-colonialism theory emphasize overreliance on external causation, downplaying endogenous factors like and failures. Post-independence with former metropoles fell by 20–40% in many cases, enabling diversification—e.g., Ghana's exports to non-colonial partners rose from 30% in to 70% by 2000—undermining claims of locked-in dependency. Africa's GDP stagnated at 1–2% annual growth from –1990 largely due to import-substitution industrialization and state-led corruption, not Western diktats, as evidenced by successes in under export-oriented models without colonial legacies. Empirical analyses attribute 60–70% of variance in post-colonial growth to institutional quality, such as , rather than ongoing foreign influence. Sources advancing neo-colonial narratives, often from dependency school academics, exhibit by highlighting outliers like CFA zones while ignoring cases of agency, such as Botswana's diamond revenue management yielding 5% annual growth since 1966 through prudent domestic governance. Multinational corporations from former colonial powers extract resources under terms skewed by historical networks, but data show host countries retain 40–60% of mining profits via taxes and local content rules, with outflows offset by technology transfers and FDI averaging $50 billion annually to since 2010. Aid dependency persists, with comprising 5–10% of GDP in low-income states, correlating with erosion as leaders prioritize donors over taxpayers, per panel regressions across 50 countries from 1970–2010. However, shifts toward —providing $150 billion in loans from 2000–2020 without strings—have diversified dependencies, boosting but sparking parallel critiques of debt traps, suggesting neo-colonialism is not uniquely Western but a feature of power asymmetries. Overall, while structural legacies enable influence, causal evidence prioritizes internal reforms for , as high-dependency states underperform peers with strong institutions by 2–3% in GDP growth.

Modern Dependencies and Remnants

United Nations Non-Self-Governing Territories

The United Nations designates Non-Self-Governing Territories (NSGTs) as those under Chapter XI of the UN Charter, where administering powers hold responsibilities for territories whose populations have not fully exercised self-government. Established in 1945, this framework requires administering states to transmit annual reports on economic, social, and educational conditions, while advancing political development toward self-determination options: independence, free association, or integration. As of May 2024, the list comprises 17 territories, unchanged into 2025, spanning Africa, the Americas, Asia-Pacific, and Europe, with administering powers obligated to foster self-rule without prejudice to sovereignty claims. Administering powers include the (10 territories), (3), France (2), and (1), while Western Sahara remains without one amid ongoing disputes between and the . Territories vary in size from Pitcairn's 47 residents to New Caledonia's 271,000, often featuring overseas dependencies with local legislatures but ultimate authority vested in the administering state for defense, foreign affairs, and citizenship. The UN (C-24), comprising 24 members, monitors progress, though administering powers like the and argue many territories voluntarily retain their status for economic stability and security benefits. Self-determination processes have yielded mixed outcomes, with referendums frequently rejecting full independence in favor of continued association. In , voters rejected Spanish co-sovereignty in 1967 (99.2% against) and upheld UK ties in subsequent polls; the similarly affirmed British sovereignty by 99.8% in a 2013 , citing resource rights and protection from Argentine claims. held three independence referendums (2018: 56.4% no; 2020: 53.3% no; 2021: 96.5% no, boycotted by pro-independence Kanaks), reflecting loyalty amid . twice declined self-government in 2006 and 2007 (both by slim margins under 50% yes), preferring New Zealand's oversight. These results underscore that NSGT status often aligns with local preferences for prosperity—evidenced by high GDP in places like ($118,000 in 2023) and [Cayman Islands](/page/Cayman Islands)—over sovereignty risks seen in post-colonial states. Critiques of the UN framework highlight its rigidity, as the list persists despite evidence of voluntary dependencies, potentially overlooking integration or association as valid self-determination paths under . Administering powers contend the C-24's emphasis on independence ignores resident majorities' views, influenced by historical non-aligned bloc pressures rather than empirical outcomes; for example, Puerto Rico's 1953 delisting followed local choice for commonwealth status, yet similar options face resistance in ongoing NSGT deliberations. Western Sahara's stalled process, with administering de facto since 1975, exemplifies geopolitical blocks hindering resolution, as UN missions (MINURSO) monitor ceasefires without advancing plebiscites promised in 1991. Despite annual UN sessions, only two territories— and —have advanced to stages since 2000, indicating stalled amid preferences for stability.
TerritoryAdministering PowerPopulation (2023 est.)Key Status Notes
45,443Unincorporated territory; U.S. citizenship denied.
15,753British Overseas Territory; local autonomy.
64,000Self-governing; high autonomy.
31,000British Overseas Territory.
68,000Financial hub; significant self-rule.
3,500Disputed with ; 2013 favored UK.
281,000; 2013 UN relisting.
34,000Disputed with ; multiple pro-UK votes.
153,000Unincorporated; strategic military base.
4,400Post-volcano recovery; UK aid reliant.
271,000Three referendums rejected independence.
Pitcairn47Smallest by population; UK governance.
, Ascension, 5,500Remote; airport built 2016 for connectivity.
1,800Referendums favored association.
45,000 economy; past governance suspension.
U.S. Virgin Islands87,000Unincorporated; U.S. .
None (disputed)620,000 controls 80%; UN .

Sovereignty Disputes and Self-Determination Debates

disputes persist over several territories classified as remnants of colonial rule, particularly those listed by the as non-self-governing territories (NSGTs), where administering powers face claims from neighboring states invoking historical or geographical arguments against of . The UN Charter's Article 1(2) and Chapter XI emphasize , yet applications often conflict with territorial integrity doctrines, leading to selective enforcement influenced by geopolitical interests among member states. In cases like the , maintains a claim based on proximity and from Spanish colonial titles, but local referendums demonstrate strong preferences for retaining ties to the administering power. The exemplify tensions between and revanchist claims, with a 2013 yielding 99.8% approval (on 92% turnout) for remaining a British Overseas , a result dismissed by as non-binding on the question. Similarly, Gibraltar's residents rejected shared with in a 2002 by 98.97% (99% against in broader polls), echoing a vote of 12,138 to 44 favoring continued British administration, underscoring that prioritizes current populations over historical cessions when demographics reflect long-term settlement. These outcomes highlight critiques that UN frameworks, while promoting via Resolution 1514 (1960), sometimes subordinate resident wishes to uti possidetis principles favoring post-colonial borders, potentially enabling rather than genuine . In contrast, the Chagos Archipelago dispute illustrates complications absent a resident population, where the UK detached the islands from Mauritius before the latter's 1968 independence to establish a U.S. base on Diego Garcia, prompting Mauritius to claim violation of self-determination. The International Court of Justice's 2019 advisory opinion and subsequent UN actions pressured the UK, culminating in a 2025 treaty ceding sovereignty to Mauritius while securing a 99-year lease for the base, reflecting strategic concessions over pure legalism but raising questions about enforcing self-determination without indigenous voices. Puerto Rico's status debates further reveal inconsistencies in applying to U.S.-administered territories not formally NSGTs under UN listing, with plebiscites since 1967 showing fluctuating support for statehood (52% in 2020), (under 5%), or enhanced status, yet lacking binding congressional action due to U.S. domestic priorities. Critics argue this perpetuates colonial dynamics, as federal oversight limits fiscal autonomy despite local governance, while proponents of the Puerto Rico Status Act emphasize negotiated over unilateral referendums. Overall, these cases underscore that debates hinge on verifiable popular consent via referendums where feasible, balanced against security and economic realities, rather than abstract historical grievances often amplified by UN majorities favoring anti-Western resolutions.

Prospective Colonies

Extraterrestrial Colonization Initiatives

Extraterrestrial colonization initiatives encompass efforts to establish permanent human settlements beyond , primarily targeting the and Mars, driven by goals of scientific advancement, resource utilization, and ensuring human survival through multi-planetary expansion. These programs, led by government agencies and private entities, emphasize developing , in-situ resource utilization (ISRU), and habitable infrastructure to overcome challenges like , microgravity effects, and logistical supply chains. As of 2025, no self-sustaining colonies exist, with initiatives focusing on precursor missions for landing, testing habitats, and scaling operations amid significant technical and financial obstacles. SpaceX, under Elon Musk's direction, pursues Mars colonization as a core objective to render humanity multi-planetary, with vehicles designed for mass transport of cargo and crews. The company plans uncrewed launches to Mars in 2026 during the next Earth-Mars alignment to collect entry, descent, and landing data essential for future crewed missions. Subsequent plans outline escalating flight cadences—potentially 100 by 2031 and 500 by 2033—to deliver equipment, propellant production facilities, and initial settlers, aiming for a self-sustaining city-scale settlement by the 2040s through ISRU for methane-oxygen and construction from local . has emphasized enlarging future variants to 142 meters in length for enhanced payload capacity, though timelines have historically slipped due to iterative testing failures. NASA's targets a sustainable lunar presence as a stepping stone to Mars, involving international partners for lunar surface operations rather than immediate full . Artemis II, slated for September 2025, will send four astronauts on the first crewed Orion flight around the Moon to validate systems for deeper space. Artemis III aims for human landings near the by 2026-2027, focusing on resource prospecting like water ice for and , with the station serving as an orbital outpost for extended stays. The program includes competitions for commercial landers and envisions a foundational surface by the late , but emphasizes scientific and technology demonstration over population-scale settlement, with delays attributed to development complexities in partners like SpaceX's . China, collaborating with Russia and other partners, advances the International Lunar Research Station (ILRS) at the Moon's , projected for basic operational capability by 2035 to support extended human presence and scientific endeavors. The initiative plans phased deployment starting with robotic precursors like the Chang'e-8 mission in 2028 for ISRU testing, incorporating a for power generation to enable continuous operations independent of solar variability. By 2030, China aims for crewed lunar landings, expanding to a network of surface nodes and orbital elements involving over 50 countries and 500 research institutions, prioritizing resource extraction and international cooperation despite geopolitical tensions excluding U.S. participation. This contrasts with Western efforts by focusing on state-led for long-term habitation, though scalability to true remains unproven amid and durability challenges.

References

  1. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/colony
  2. https://www.etymonline.com/word/colony
  3. https://education.cfr.org/learn/reading/what-colonialism-and-how-did-it-arise
  4. https://www.nas.org/academic-questions/31/2/the_case_for_colonialism
  5. https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/economic-impact-colonialism
  6. https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/colony/
  7. https://www.postcolonialweb.org/poldiscourse/colondef.html
  8. https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/the-roman-roots-of-colony/
  9. https://www.historians.org/perspectives-article/a-typology-of-colonialism-october-2015/
  10. https://escholarship.org/content/qt5xn5n555/qt5xn5n555.pdf
  11. https://www.aehnetwork.org/blog/continuity-or-change-new-evidence-on-indirect-rule-in-british-and-french-colonies/
  12. https://phoenicia.org/colonies.html
  13. https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/acref/9780191736063.timeline.0001
  14. https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/ancient-cultures/ancient-near-eastern-world/who-were-the-phoenicians/
  15. https://www.heritage-history.com/index.php?c=read&author=rawlinson&book=phoenicia&story=colonies
  16. https://www.worldhistory.org/Greek_Colonization/
  17. https://greekreporter.com/2025/07/22/ancient-greek-colonies/
  18. https://mappinghistory.uoregon.edu/english/EU/EU05-00.html
  19. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/greeks-colonize-mediterranean-and-black-sea-regions
  20. https://www.britannica.com/topic/colony-ancient-Roman-settlement
  21. https://www.livius.org/articles/concept/colonia/
  22. https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/secondary/SMIGRA%2A/Colonia.html
  23. https://www.encyclopedia.com/humanities/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/viking-settlements-iceland-and-greenland
  24. https://oceanwide-expeditions.com/blog/the-norse-settlement-of-greenland-and-their-discovery-of-north-america
  25. https://courses.lumenlearning.com/suny-jcc-ushistory1os/chapter/the-origins-of-european-exploration/
  26. https://www.history.com/articles/portugal-age-exploration
  27. https://www.bbc.co.uk/history/british/tudors/vasco_da_gama_01.shtml
  28. https://mappinghistory.uoregon.edu/english/US/US02-00.html
  29. https://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/era.cfm?eraid=2&smtid=1
  30. https://study.com/academy/lesson/treaty-of-tordesillas-definition-and-lesson.html
  31. https://pressbooks.oer.hawaii.edu/honcchist151/chapter/14-european-exploration-and-colonization/
  32. https://www.britannica.com/event/Scramble-for-Africa
  33. https://worldhistoryedu.com/scramble-for-africa-history-berlin-conference-outcome-facts/
  34. https://www.historyskills.com/classroom/year-9/british-empire-size/
  35. https://www.statista.com/chart/20342/peak-land-area-of-the-largest-empires/
  36. https://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/French_Empire
  37. https://louis.pressbooks.pub/westernciv2/chapter/chapter-2-3-the-mercantilist-economy/
  38. https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/041615/how-did-mercantilism-affect-colonies-great-britain.asp
  39. https://www.worldhistory.org/article/2049/the-silver-of-the-conquistadors/
  40. http://museum.wa.gov.au/explore/dirk-hartog/voc-united-dutch-east-india-company
  41. https://www.battlefields.org/learn/articles/british-east-india-company
  42. https://www.history.com/articles/east-india-company-england-trade
  43. https://www.worldhistory.org/article/1798/the-portuguese-in-east-africa/
  44. https://byustudies.byu.edu/article/the-rise-and-fall-of-portugals-maritime-empire-a-cautionary-tale
  45. https://imperialglobalexeter.com/2016/01/06/conquerors-how-portugal-seized-the-indian-ocean-and-forged-the-first-global-empire/
  46. https://wavellroom.com/2020/03/26/how-the-gibraltar-of-the-east-fell-a-historical-analysis-of-the-singapore-strategy-up-to-wwii/
  47. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/singapore/1929-01-01/strategy-singapore
  48. https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/us-history/precontact-and-early-colonial-era/old-and-new-worlds-collide/a/motivations-for-conquest-of-the-new-world
  49. https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/abstract/document/obo-9780199730414/obo-9780199730414-0311.xml
  50. https://fiveable.me/key-terms/ap-euro/social-darwinism
  51. https://visualizingcultures.mit.edu/civilization_and_barbarism/cb_essay01.html
  52. https://www.studentsofhistory.com/perspectives-on-the-white-man-s-burden
  53. https://www.studentsofhistory.com/motives-for-european-imperialism
  54. https://unacademy.com/content/ssc/study-material/general-awareness/development-of-railways-in-india/
  55. https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/how-colonial-railroads-defined-africas-economic-geography
  56. https://www.dartmouth.edu/neudc2012/docs/paper_34.pdf
  57. https://www2.gwu.edu/~iiep/assets/docs/papers/Jedwab_IIEPWP_2014-3.pdf
  58. https://www.railway-technology.com/features/timeline-165-years-history-indian-railways/
  59. https://www.sciencespo.fr/ecole-recherche/sites/sciencespo.fr.ecole-recherche/files/Master-Thesis_Kunal-Panda.pdf
  60. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090944320303811
  61. https://oxfordre.com/africanhistory/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190277734.001.0001/acrefore-9780190277734-e-620
  62. https://testbook.com/question-answer/when-the-british-rule-ended-in-india-in-the-year-1--64a0cdcfd41be4c88cc45d64
  63. https://dial.ird.fr/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/2003-01.pdf
  64. https://www.britannica.com/topic/education/Colonialism-and-its-consequences
  65. https://www.nas.org/academic-questions/35/1/the-case-for-colonialism-a-response-to-my-critics
  66. https://economics.mit.edu/sites/default/files/publications/colonial-origins-of-comparative-development.pdf
  67. https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/aer.91.5.1369
  68. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w7771/w7771.pdf
  69. https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4043&context=dlj
  70. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-institutional-economics/article/copying-informal-institutions-the-role-of-british-colonial-officers-during-the-decolonization-of-british-africa/D849E6274C321C381BD90025DF7289EF
  71. https://courses.lumenlearning.com/suny-ushistory1os2xmaster/chapter/the-impact-of-colonization/
  72. https://www.worlddevelopment.uzh.ch/en/research/impa/socim.html
  73. https://study.com/academy/lesson/effects-of-european-colonization-christopher-columbus-and-native-americans.html
  74. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-world-history-of-genocide/crime-of-the-congo/C5FBAECD74F63A3265464AB0AFEA2BA1
  75. http://piketty.pse.ens.fr/files/NoguesMarco2020.pdf
  76. https://www.slavevoyages.org/
  77. https://www.aeaweb.org/conference/2023/program/paper/TKFNEafy
  78. https://monthlyreview.org/articles/the-drain-of-wealth/
  79. https://ourworldindata.org/war-and-peace
  80. https://ourworldindata.org/conflict-deaths-breakdown
  81. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277379118307261
  82. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7413858/
  83. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1112563108
  84. https://history.state.gov/milestones/1945-1952/asia-and-africa
  85. https://www.un.org/en/global-issues/decolonization
  86. https://www.iwm.org.uk/history/britain-and-decolonisation-in-south-east-and-south-asia-1945-1948
  87. https://blogs.loc.gov/maps/2023/10/mapping-the-year-of-africa/
  88. https://origins.osu.edu/article/year-of-africa-1960-rumba-pan-africanism-Kariba
  89. https://history.state.gov/countries/angola
  90. https://history.state.gov/milestones/1914-1920/fourteen-points
  91. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/social-philosophy-and-policy/article/decolonization-and-selfdetermination/A5E1F0CE272476C91C15E1BB82CF4A4F
  92. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/colonialism/
  93. https://www.un.org/en/about-us/un-charter/chapter-11
  94. https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/declaration-granting-independence-colonial-countries-and-peoples
  95. https://opil.ouplaw.com/display/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e922
  96. https://crei.cat/wp-content/uploads/users/working-papers/colonization.pdf
  97. https://mises.org/mises-wire/economic-success-singapore-and-hong-kong
  98. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00220388.2023.2182685
  99. https://www.aeaweb.org/conference/2019/preliminary/paper/nh5TRbTd
  100. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0305750X16304855
  101. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09750878231176260
  102. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24751963
  103. https://www.rochester.edu/college/faculty/alexander_lee/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Lee-and-Paine-Britain-and-democracy.pdf
  104. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0014292107000116
  105. https://shs.hal.science/halshs-04031961/document
  106. https://economics.brown.edu/sites/default/files/papers/2012-5_paper.pdf
  107. https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1007&context=scom542
  108. https://iep.utm.edu/neocolon/
  109. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9067341/
  110. https://wjarr.com/sites/default/files/WJARR-2024-2832.pdf
  111. https://swp-berlin.org/10.18449/2023C51/
  112. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/entities/publication/4a4575b6-58c4-59e5-b8d6-af8d5f83025b
  113. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9172087/
  114. https://www.nber.org/system/files/chapters/c9656/c9656.pdf
  115. https://www.elibrary.imf.org/display/book/9781557753021/ch05.xml
  116. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0954349X23001510
  117. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/07036337.2021.1902318
  118. https://academic.oup.com/book/45803/chapter/400649389
  119. https://nigerianjournalsonline.org/index.php/NJAH/article/download/733/706
  120. http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1866148/FULLTEXT02.pdf
  121. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/entities/publication/03392597-6fbe-5fba-bbee-1ef0b67344d5
  122. https://www.un.org/dppa/decolonization/en/nsgt
  123. https://www.un.org/en/observances/non-self-governing-week
  124. https://www.statista.com/chart/34512/territories-defined-as-%252522non-self-governing%252522-by-the-united-nations/
  125. https://press.un.org/en/2010/gaspd450.doc.htm
  126. https://www.un.org/dppa/decolonization/en/about
  127. https://www.france24.com/en/20130312-falklands-vote-overwhelmingly-remain-british
  128. https://www.reuters.com/article/world/falkland-islanders-vote-overwhelmingly-to-keep-british-rule-idUSBRE92B02T/
  129. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-39478636
  130. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm199899/cmselect/cmfaff/366/36604.htm
  131. https://lordslibrary.parliament.uk/uk-mauritius-treaty-on-the-chagos-archipelago/
  132. https://www.reuters.com/world/uk/uk-set-sign-deal-ceding-sovereignty-chagos-islands-mauritius-2025-05-22/
  133. https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-10273/
  134. https://www.britannica.com/place/Puerto-Rico/The-debate-over-political-status
  135. https://democrats-naturalresources.house.gov/news/in-the-news/the-puerto-rico-status-act-is-a-real-opportunity
  136. https://press.un.org/en/2024/gaspd802.doc.htm
  137. https://www.forbes.com/sites/kevinholdenplatt/2025/05/24/nasa-spacex-and-scientists-speed-up-human-race-to-colonize-mars/
  138. https://www.spacex.com/humanspaceflight/mars
  139. https://aerospaceamerica.aiaa.org/features/a-closer-look-at-spacexs-mars-plan/
  140. https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2025/05/future-starship-block-3-mars/
  141. https://www.nasa.gov/humans-in-space/artemis/
  142. https://assets.science.nasa.gov/content/dam/science/psd/planetary-science-division/2025/implementation-plan-lunar-science-strategy-disclaimer-11202024pdf.pdf
  143. https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2025/10/nasa-competition-artemis-iii-lunar-lander/
  144. https://www.space.com/china-moon-base-south-pole-2035
  145. https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/china-led-lunar-base-include-nuclear-power-plant-moons-surface-space-official-2025-04-23/
  146. https://global.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202508/27/WS68ae3ed4a3108622abc9d498.html
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.