Hubbry Logo
Link budgetLink budgetMain
Open search
Link budget
Community hub
Link budget
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Link budget
Link budget
Link budget
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

A link budget is an accounting of all of the power gains and losses that a communication signal experiences in a telecommunication system; from a transmitter, through a communication medium such as radio waves, cables, waveguides, or optical fibers, to the receiver. It is an equation giving the received power from the transmitter power, after the attenuation of the transmitted signal due to propagation, as well as the antenna gains and feedline and other losses, and amplification of the signal in the receiver or any repeaters it passes through. A link budget is a design aid, calculated during the design of a communication system to determine the received power, to ensure that the information is received intelligibly with an adequate signal-to-noise ratio. In most real world systems the losses must be estimated to some degree, and may vary. A link margin is therefore specified as a safety margin between the received power and minimum power required by the receiver to accurately detect the signal. The link margin is chosen based on the anticipated severity of a communications drop out and can be reduced by the use of mitigating techniques such as antenna diversity or multiple-input and multiple-output (MIMO).

A simple link budget equation looks like this:

Received power (dBm) = transmitted power (dBm) + gains (dB) − losses (dB)

Power levels are expressed in (dBm), Power gains and losses are expressed in decibels (dB), which is a logarithmic measurement, so adding decibels is equivalent to multiplying the actual power ratios.

In radio systems

[edit]

A link budget equation including the key effects for a wireless radio transmission system, expressed logarithmically, might look like:[1]

where:

, received power (dBm)
, transmitter output power (dBm)
, transmitter antenna gain (dBi)
, transmitter losses (coax, connectors...) (dB)
, path loss (dB)
, miscellaneous losses (fading margin, body loss, polarization mismatch, other losses, ...) (dB)
, receiver antenna gain (dBi)
, receiver losses (coax, connectors, ...) (dB)

The path loss is the loss due to propagation between the transmitting and receiving antennas and is usually the most significant contributor to the losses, and also the largest unknown. When transmitting through free space, it can be expressed in a dimensionless form by normalizing the distance to the wavelength:

(where distance and wavelength are in the same units)

When substituted into the link budget equation above, the result is the logarithmic form of the Friis transmission equation.

In some cases, it is convenient to consider the loss due to distance and wavelength separately, but in that case, it is important to keep track of which units are being used, as each choice involves a differing constant offset. Some examples are provided below.

(dB) ≈ 32.45 dB + 20 log10[frequency (MHz)] + 20 log10[distance (km)][2]
(dB) ≈ −27.55 dB + 20 log10[frequency (MHz)] + 20 log10[distance (m)]
(dB) ≈ 36.6 dB + 20 log10[frequency (MHz)] + 20 log10[distance (miles)]

These alternative forms can be derived by substituting wavelength with the ratio of propagation velocity (c, approximately 3×108 m/s) divided by frequency, and by inserting the proper conversion factors between km or miles and meters, and between MHz and Hz.

The gain of both the transmitting and receiving antennas is affected by the antenna's directivity. For example, antennas can be isotropic, omnidirectional, directional, or sectorial, depending on the way in which the antenna power is oriented.

  • Isotropic antennas radiate power equally in all directions.
  • Omnidirectional antennas distribute the power equally in every direction of a plane, so the radiation pattern has the shape of a sphere squeezed between two parallel flat surfaces. They are widely used in many applications, for instance in WiFi Access Points.
  • Directional antennas concentrate the power in a specific direction, called the bore sight, and are widely used in point to point applications, like wireless bridges and satellite communications.
  • Sector antennas concentrate the power in a wider region, typically embracing 45º, 60º, 90º or 120º. They are routinely deployed in Cellular towers.

Line-of-sight vs non-line-of-sight transmission

[edit]

For a line-of-sight (LOS) radio system, the path loss can be closely modeled by a single path through free space using the Friis transmission equation. This models the decrease in signal power as it spreads over an increasing area as it propagates, proportional to the square of the distance (geometric spreading) and the square of the frequency. This is a best case scenario, and additional losses are incurred in most radio links.

In non-line-of-sight (NLOS) links, diffraction and reflection losses are the most important since the direct path is not available. Building obstructions such as walls and ceilings cause propagation losses indoors to be significantly higher. This occurs because of a combination of attenuation by walls and ceilings, and blockage due to equipment, furniture, and even people.

  • For example, a "2 by 4" wood stud wall with drywall on both sides results in about 6 dB loss per wall at 2.4 GHz.[3]
  • Older buildings may have even greater internal losses than new buildings due to materials and line of sight issues.

Experience has shown that in dense office environments, line-of-sight propagation holds only for about the first 3 meters. Beyond 3 meters propagation losses indoors can increase at up to 30 dB per 30 meters. This is a good rule-of-thumb, in that it is conservative (it overstates path loss in most cases). [citation needed] Actual propagation losses may vary significantly depending on building construction and layout.

The attenuation of the signal is highly dependent on the frequency of the signal.

Further losses

[edit]

In practical situations (deep space telecommunications, weak signal DXing etc.) other sources of signal loss must also be accounted for, including:

  • The transmitting and receiving antennas may be partially cross-polarized.
  • The cabling between the radios and antennas may introduce significant additional loss.
  • Either antenna may have an impedance mismatch.
  • Fresnel zone losses due to a partially obstructed line-of-sight path.
  • Doppler shift induced signal power losses in the receiver.
  • Atmospheric attenuation by gases, rain, fog and clouds.
  • Fading due to variations of the channel.
  • Multipath losses.
  • Antenna misalignment.

Earth–Moon–Earth communications

[edit]

Link budgets are important in Earth–Moon–Earth communications. As the albedo of the Moon is very low (maximally 12% but usually closer to 7%), and the path loss over the 770,000 kilometre return distance is extreme (around 250 to 310 dB depending on VHF-UHF band used, modulation format and Doppler shift effects), high power (more than 100 watts) and high-gain antennas (more than 20 dB) must be used.

  • In practice, this limits the use of this technique to the spectrum at VHF and above.
  • The Moon must be above the horizon in order for EME communications to be possible.

Voyager program

[edit]

The Voyager program spacecraft have the highest known path loss (308 dB as of 2002[4]: 26 ) and lowest link budgets of any telecommunications circuit. The Deep Space Network has been able to maintain the link at a higher than expected bitrate through a series of improvements, such as increasing the antenna size from 64 m to 70 m for a 1.2 dB gain, and upgrading to low noise electronics for a 0.5 dB gain in 2000–2001. During the Neptune flyby, in addition to the 70-m antenna, two 34-m antennas and twenty-seven 25-m antennas were used to increase the gain by 5.6 dB, providing additional link margin to be used for a 4× increase in bitrate.[4]: 35 

In waveguides and cables

[edit]

Guided media such as coaxial and twisted pair electrical cable and radio frequency waveguides have losses that are exponential with distance.

The path loss will be in terms of dB per unit distance. This means that there is always a crossover distance beyond which the loss in a guided medium will exceed that of a line-of-sight path of the same length.

In optical communications

[edit]

The optical power budget (also fiber-optic link budget and loss budget) in a fiber-optic communication link is the allocation of available optical power (launched into a given fiber by a given source) among various loss-producing mechanisms such as launch coupling loss, fiber attenuation, splice losses, and connector losses, in order to ensure that adequate signal strength (optical power) is available at the receiver. In optical power budget attenuation is specified in decibel (dB) and optical power in dBm.

The amount of optical power launched into a given fiber by a given transmitter depends on the nature of its active optical source (LED or laser diode) and the type of fiber, including such parameters as core diameter and numerical aperture. Manufacturers sometimes specify an optical power budget only for a fiber that is optimum for their equipment—or specify only that their equipment will operate over a given distance, without mentioning the fiber characteristics. The user must first ascertain, from the manufacturer or by testing, the transmission losses for the type of fiber to be used, and the required signal strength for a given level of performance.

In addition to transmission loss, including those of any splices and connectors, allowance should be made for at least several dB of optical power margin losses, to compensate for component aging and to allow for future splices in the event of a severed cable.

LT = αL + Lc + Ls

Definitions:

  • LT - Total loss
  • α - Fiber attenuation
  • L - Length of fiber
  • Lc - Connector loss
  • Ls - Splice loss

Passive optical networks use optical splitters to divide the downstream signal into up to 32 streams, most often a power of two. Each division in two halves the transmitted power and therefore causes a minimum attenuation of 3 dB ( ≈ 10−0.3).

Long distance fiber-optic communication became practical only with the development of ultra-transparent glass fibers. A typical path loss for single-mode fiber is 0.2 dB/km,[5] far lower than any other guided medium.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Link budget

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A link budget is a fundamental calculation in that quantifies the total gains and losses in signal power along a communication pathway from transmitter to receiver, enabling the of whether the link can achieve reliable performance. It serves as a tool to evaluate expected return, assess (SNR), and guide the design of , , or optical systems by balancing transmitted power against propagation losses and environmental factors. The analysis typically expresses all parameters in decibels (dB) for simplicity, relating them to key performance metrics such as carrier-to-noise ratio (C/N) or energy per bit to (Eb/N0). Central to a link budget are components like effective isotropic radiated power (EIRP), antenna gains at both ends, due to distance and medium (e.g., free space or atmospheric attenuation), receiver noise temperature, and miscellaneous losses from cables, interference, or . The basic equation often derives from the Friis transmission formula, adapted to include noise: received power equals transmitted power plus transmitter gain minus plus receiver gain, from which the carrier-to-noise (C/N0) is derived by subtracting the noise power spectral , and further metrics like SNR or Eb/N0 are obtained accordingly. To ensure robustness against uncertainties like weather-induced or hardware variations, a link margin—an additional SNR buffer, often 3 dB or statistically determined (e.g., 2-σ for downlink)—is incorporated, with values tailored to frequency bands and error rate targets like (BER) of 10⁻⁵. Link budgets are essential across applications, from terrestrial cellular networks and deep-space missions to underground mining communications, where they optimize throughput while maintaining amid statistical channel variations modeled via Gaussian approximations. In practice, they facilitate trade-offs in system parameters, such as increasing antenna size to offset higher path losses in links, and support standards from organizations like for inter-system compatibility. By providing a quantitative framework, link budgets mitigate risks in deployment, ensuring links meet predefined reliability thresholds despite real-world degradations.

Basic Principles

Definition and Components

A link budget is a systematic analysis of all power gains and losses in a communication system from the transmitter to the receiver, ensuring that the received signal power exceeds the noise threshold to enable reliable communication. This power accounting tool evaluates the overall performance of the link by balancing transmitted energy against propagation and system impairments, providing engineers with a predictive framework for signal strength at the receiver. It is essential across various communication media, including radio frequency, guided wave, and optical systems, to determine if the link meets required bit error rate or signal-to-noise ratio specifications. The fundamental components of a link budget include the transmitter power (PtP_t), which represents the output power from the transmitter; transmit antenna gain (GtG_t), quantifying the antenna's ability to direct power; and receive antenna gain (GrG_r), similarly directing incoming power toward the receiver. (FSPL) accounts for the geometric spreading of the signal over in unobstructed . Additional losses encompass factors such as atmospheric absorption, misalignment, or other environmental effects that attenuate the signal. On the receiver side, key elements are receiver sensitivity, the minimum detectable signal level; , which measures degradation of the ; and fade margin, a buffer to compensate for unexpected signal variations. Link budgets are typically expressed in decibels (dB), allowing gains and losses to be added or subtracted logarithmically, which simplifies handling the wide dynamic ranges encountered in communication systems. This logarithmic scale facilitates precise comparisons and optimizations without dealing with cumbersome linear power values spanning multiple orders of magnitude. The concept of link budget originated in early 20th-century radio engineering practices for assessing signal propagation and system reliability, with its theoretical foundation formalized by the Friis transmission equation in 1946. This equation provided a cornerstone for quantifying power transfer between antennas, influencing the development of modern link budget methodologies across diverse communication technologies.

Calculation Framework

The calculation of a link budget begins with the primary for received power, Pr=Pt+Gt+Gr−LtotalP_r = P_t + G_t + G_r - L_{\text{total}}, where PrP_r is the received power, PtP_t is the transmitted power, GtG_t and GrG_r are the transmitter and receiver antenna gains, respectively, and LtotalL_{\text{total}} encompasses total losses including and miscellaneous system losses; this is typically evaluated in logarithmic units such as dBm or dBW for convenience in handling gains and losses additively. The step-by-step process for evaluating a link budget involves: (1) identifying and quantifying all relevant gains (e.g., antenna gains) and losses (e.g., , cable losses) in decibels; (2) algebraically summing the gains and subtracting the losses from the transmitted power to obtain the estimated received power; (3) calculating the carrier-to-noise (C/N) or (SNR) from the received power PrP_r by subtracting the receiver noise power (computed as N=kTB×NFN = kTB \times NF, where kk is Boltzmann's constant, TT is the , BB is the bandwidth, and NFNF is the in linear units, or equivalently in dB as N=−174+10log⁡10B+NF+10log⁡10TN = -174 + 10\log_{10}B + NF + 10\log_{10}T dBm/Hz adjusted), and comparing this to the minimum required threshold, which determines the system's or modulation performance; and (4) incorporating a fade margin, typically 10-20 dB, to account for signal fluctuations and ensure link reliability under varying conditions. At the core of many link budget calculations, particularly for free-space propagation, is the Friis transmission formula, originally derived for radio circuits assuming far-field conditions and matched polarization. The formula equates the power ratio as PrPt=GtGr(λ4πd)2\frac{P_r}{P_t} = G_t G_r \left( \frac{\lambda}{4 \pi d} \right)^2, where λ\lambda is the wavelength and dd is the distance between antennas; this arises from the product of the transmitted power density at distance dd, given by PtGt4πd2\frac{P_t G_t}{4 \pi d^2}, and the effective area of the receiving antenna, Ae=Grλ24πA_e = \frac{G_r \lambda^2}{4 \pi}, yielding the received power as the density times the area. In decibel form, the free-space path loss (FSPL) component integrates as FSPL=20log⁡10(d)+20log⁡10(f)+20log⁡10(4πc)\text{FSPL} = 20 \log_{10}(d) + 20 \log_{10}(f) + 20 \log_{10}\left( \frac{4\pi}{c} \right), where ff is the frequency in Hz, dd is in meters, and cc is the speed of light (3×1083 \times 10^8 m/s), providing the basis for estimating propagation loss in the total LtotalL_{\text{total}}. Error sources in link budget analysis stem primarily from underlying assumptions in models like Friis, such as isotropic radiators (ideal point sources with uniform radiation), plane-wave propagation (valid only in the far field, beyond d>2D2/λd > 2D^2 / \lambda where DD is the largest antenna dimension), and neglect of multipath or atmospheric effects, which can lead to overestimation of received power in non-ideal environments. mitigates these by varying key parameters—such as distance, frequency, or gain—through partial derivatives or simulations to quantify impacts on PrP_r and overall margin.

Path Loss Models

In line-of-sight (LOS) scenarios for radio frequency links, is primarily governed by the , which models the propagation as spherical spreading of the wavefront in free space without obstructions. The equation expresses the received power PrP_r relative to transmitted power PtP_t as Pr=PtGtGrλ2(4πd)2P_r = P_t \frac{G_t G_r \lambda^2}{(4\pi d)^2}, where GtG_t and GrG_r are the transmitter and receiver antenna gains, λ\lambda is the , and dd is the distance; this assumes isotropic radiators and no atmospheric absorption. This model is directly applicable to unobstructed paths, such as satellite-to-ground communications, where the link distance is large and terrain effects are minimal. In non-line-of-sight (NLOS) environments, path loss incorporates additional mechanisms like diffraction over obstacles, reflection from surfaces, and scattering from irregular structures, leading to higher than in LOS conditions. A widely adopted empirical model for urban NLOS propagation is the Okumura-Hata model, derived from extensive field measurements in metropolitan areas. The model approximates path loss PLPL as PL=A+Blog⁡10(d)+CPL = A + B \log_{10}(d) + C, where dd is the link in kilometers, A=69.55+26.16log⁡10(f)−13.82log⁡10(hb)A = 69.55 + 26.16 \log_{10}(f) - 13.82 \log_{10}(h_b) accounts for base station height hbh_b and ff in MHz, BB is the distance-dependent varying with mobile height and environment, and CC is a correction factor for urban, suburban, or open areas based on terrain. This formula, applicable for frequencies between 150 MHz and 1.5 GHz and distances from 1 to 20 km, enables practical predictions for cellular systems by fitting measured data to account for building-induced losses. For scenarios approximating a flat earth with ground reflections, the two-ray ground reflection model extends the LOS framework by considering both the direct path and a single reflected path from the ground, resulting in constructive or destructive interference depending on distance. At large distances (typically beyond a few wavelengths), the model simplifies to a path loss of approximately PL≈40log⁡10(d)PL \approx 40 \log_{10}(d), where dd is in meters, yielding a steeper d−4d^{-4} dependence compared to free-space d−2d^{-2}; this arises from the near-cancellation of the direct and reflected waves' phases. The model is particularly useful for terrestrial links over smooth terrain, such as rural highways, assuming perfect reflection and antenna heights much smaller than the distance. Path loss exhibits strong frequency dependence, as evident in the free-space component where attenuation increases with 20log⁡10(f)20 \log_{10}(f) due to the and wavelength scaling; at higher frequencies like millimeter waves (mmWave, above 30 GHz), this results in significantly greater (FSPL), often 20-30 dB more than at 2 GHz for the same distance, thereby limiting practical range to hundreds of meters without relays. Measurements confirm this quadratic frequency scaling holds in mmWave bands, constraining applications to short-range, high-directivity links like urban . The transition from LOS to NLOS propagation introduces shadowing effects, where large-scale obstacles cause random variations in signal strength modeled as a superimposed on the mean . Shadowing is characterized by a zero-mean Gaussian in the log-domain with a standard deviation typically ranging from 8 to 10 dB in urban environments, reflecting the variability from building blockages and undulations as observed in empirical datasets. This statistical approach allows link budget analyses to incorporate probabilistic margins for reliable coverage.

Environmental and System Losses

In radio frequency links, environmental losses primarily arise from atmospheric effects that attenuate the signal beyond . Gaseous absorption due to oxygen and is a key factor, with notable peaks at approximately 22 GHz for and 60 GHz for oxygen absorption, leading to increased in millimeter-wave bands. These absorptions can exceed 1 dB/km under standard atmospheric conditions at the peaks, though they diminish at lower frequencies. , another dominant environmental loss, is modeled using the P.838 recommendation, which provides the specific γ in dB/km as γ=a fb Rc\gamma = a \, f^b \, R^c where f is the frequency in GHz, R is the rainfall rate in mm/h, and a, b, c are coefficients dependent on polarization, elevation angle, and frequency. For instance, at 10 GHz with 20 mm/h rain, γ may reach 0.05 dB/km for horizontal polarization, scaling higher at Ku- and Ka-bands. System losses encompass hardware-induced degradations that further reduce effective signal power. Polarization mismatch between transmitting and receiving antennas introduces losses up to 3 dB when polarizations are orthogonal, as only the aligned component of the electric field is captured. Pointing errors in directive antennas, such as misalignment due to mechanical tolerances or platform motion, cause beam squint losses; for example, a 1° error in a narrow-beam Ka-band antenna can incur 1-2 dB loss depending on the beamwidth. Branching and feeder losses occur in the transmission line from the transceiver to the antenna, typically 1-4 dB from connectors, splitters, and coaxial/waveguide inefficiencies, which must be minimized through low-loss materials. Noise considerations are integral to link budgets, as they determine the required for reliable . Thermal , the fundamental limit, is given by the power N_0 = kT, where k is Boltzmann's constant (1.38 × 10^{-23} J/K), yielding total power kTB over bandwidth B at temperature T (often 290 K for standard conditions), typically -174 dBm/Hz plus 10 log_{10}(B). Interference from adjacent channels or external sources adds to this, necessitating a link margin to achieve the required E_b/N_0 (energy per bit to density ratio) for the modulation scheme; for QPSK at 10^{-5} BER, E_b/N_0 ≈ 9.8 dB is common, with margins of 3-10 dB allocated for variability. To mitigate these losses, diversity techniques are employed, providing redundancy to combat . Spatial diversity uses multiple antennas separated by distances greater than the (e.g., λ/2), combining signals to reduce multipath or rain-induced fades by up to 20 dB in severe conditions. Frequency diversity transmits on parallel carriers spaced beyond the fade correlation bandwidth (e.g., 100-500 MHz apart), exploiting decorrelated atmospheric effects for improved availability. The impact of these losses varies significantly by frequency band. VHF (30-300 MHz) and UHF (300 MHz-3 GHz) experience minimal atmospheric absorption (<0.01 dB/km) and rain fade, making them robust for terrestrial links but limited by regulatory power constraints. In contrast, Ka-band (26-40 GHz) suffers high sensitivity to weather, with gaseous absorption up to 15 dB/km at peaks and rain attenuation exceeding 10 dB/km at 50 mm/h rates, requiring adaptive modulation or higher margins for reliable operation.

Specialized Applications

In Earth-Moon-Earth (EME) communications, also known as moonbounce, link budget calculations must account for the extreme round-trip path of approximately 760,000 km, resulting in free-space path losses exceeding 250 dB depending on frequency, such as 252.1 dB at 144 MHz or 271.2 dB at 1296 MHz. These losses follow a 1/d⁴ law due to spherical spreading and lunar reflection, necessitating high-gain antennas with gains typically in the 20-30 dBi range, such as arrays of four Yagis providing 21 dBi at VHF or parabolic dishes yielding 29.5 dBi at microwave frequencies. Low-noise receivers are essential, with system noise temperatures as low as 70 K at 1296 MHz achieved using low-noise amplifiers (LNAs) like GaAsFET or HEMT devices mounted near the antenna feed. The noise budget is dominated by galactic background radiation, contributing around 160 K at 144 MHz, far outweighing thermal or receiver noise in most setups. The Voyager program's deep-space links exemplify link budget challenges at interstellar distances, with Voyager 1 reaching approximately 25.3 billion km (169 AU) from Earth as of November 2025. Operating in X-band at around 8.4 GHz (wavelength 3.7 cm) with a 3.7 m high-gain antenna providing 48 dBi gain and X-band transmitter power of up to 23 W via the traveling-wave tube amplifier (TWTA), which can operate in low-power mode at 12 W, the link relies on NASA's Deep Space Network (DSN) 70 m antennas for reception. Free-space path loss exceeds 300 dB, compounded by challenges like planetary conjunctions, where alignment with the Sun causes occultation and temporary signal loss of up to several weeks. Power constraints from radioisotope thermoelectric generators (RTGs) further limit the budget. Adaptations in deep-space radio links include Doppler shift compensation to counter frequency offsets from relative motion, achieved through precise uplink frequency predictions and turnaround ratios like 880/221 for X-band, enabling velocity measurements accurate to 0.05 mm/s. Arraying multiple DSN ground stations, such as combining a 70 m antenna with several 34 m ones, boosts effective gain by up to 5.6 dB, improving signal-to-noise ratios without increasing spacecraft power. Modern extensions of these principles appear in CubeSat missions like MarCO (Mars Cube One) in 2018, which demonstrated interplanetary relay capabilities using proximity links to support the InSight lander. For the Mars relay phase, MarCO employed UHF at 401 MHz with path losses under 155 dB over short ranges up to 3,500 km during entry, descent, and landing (EDL), achieving data rates of 8 kbps with margins of 5-10 dB after accounting for electromagnetic interference. Overall mission performance included relaying 93-97% of InSight's EDL data, validating low-power budgets for small satellites in deep space. Voyager's data rate evolution illustrates the impact of power budget constraints over decades, starting at 115.2 kbps during the 1977 Jupiter encounter using high-rate modes with 70 m DSN antennas, but declining to a standard 160 bps by the 2020s, which remains the rate as of 2025, with further reductions expected in the late 2020s as power reserves dwindle to around 40 bps on 34 m antennas.

Waveguide Systems

Waveguide systems utilize hollow metallic structures, typically rectangular or circular tubes, to guide electromagnetic waves at microwave and millimeter-wave frequencies. These waveguides, such as the WR-90 rectangular type designed for X-band operation (8.2–12.4 GHz), confine wave propagation within the metal walls, preventing radiation losses inherent in free-space transmission. They support transverse electric (TE) and transverse magnetic (TM) modes, with the dominant TE10 mode being most commonly used for its lowest cutoff frequency and efficient power handling. The cutoff frequency for the dominant mode is given by fc=c2af_c = \frac{c}{2a}, where cc is the speed of light and aa is the waveguide width, below which propagation ceases and the wave becomes evanescent. Attenuation in waveguides arises primarily from conductor losses due to the finite conductivity of the metal walls and, if present, dielectric losses from any filling material. Conductor loss is approximated as αc≈Rsaη\alpha_c \approx \frac{R_s}{a \eta}, where RsR_s is the surface resistance (dependent on skin depth and material conductivity) and η\eta is the free-space impedance, with actual values modulated by mode-specific factors and frequency relative to cutoff. For air-filled waveguides, dielectric loss is negligible (αd≈0\alpha_d \approx 0), but in dielectric-filled designs, it follows αd≈ωμεrtan⁡δ2β\alpha_d \approx \frac{\omega \mu \varepsilon_r \tan \delta}{2 \beta}, where tan⁡δ\tan \delta is the loss tangent, β\beta is the propagation constant, and other terms are standard electromagnetic parameters. Typical conductor attenuation for copper waveguides at mid-band frequencies ranges from 0.1 dB/m at 10 GHz (WR-90) to 2.7 dB/m at 90 GHz (WR-10). In link budget calculations for systems, the total propagation loss is Lwg=αlL_{wg} = \alpha l, where α\alpha is the attenuation constant and ll is the length, integrated alongside transmitter power, receiver sensitivity, and other system gains. These systems exhibit frequency-dependent above , which introduces dispersion that can limit performance with signal over distances up to several meters. However, additional losses occur at bends and joints, with typical values of 0.5–1.2 dB per 90-degree bend or junction due to mode conversion and reflection. Careful design mitigates these through gradual mitered bends or precision to maintain below 20 dB. Waveguide systems find primary applications in high-power links for systems and payloads, where their ability to handle peak powers exceeding 1 MW without breakdown is critical. Operating across 1–100 GHz, they connect components like antennas to transceivers in airborne s (e.g., reducing weight by 30% in flexible designs) and manage signals in communication filters. A key trade-off in design involves single-mode versus multimode operation: single-mode propagation (typically TE10 only) minimizes loss and simplifies mode control, while multimode operation above higher cutoffs allows increased power capacity but elevates due to greater wall current interactions in higher-order modes. This makes single-mode preferable for long, low-loss links, whereas multimode suits short, high-power scenarios like feeds.

Cable Systems

Cable systems in link budgets encompass and twisted-pair cables, which serve as guided media for electrical in wired communication links. These systems are characterized by frequency-dependent primarily due to in conductors and losses in the insulation material. In cables, the confines current to the conductor surface at higher frequencies, increasing resistive losses proportional to the of , while losses arise from dissipation in the insulating material and scale linearly with . The total α is commonly approximated as α ≈ (k₁ √f + k₂ f) dB/m, where f is the in Hz and k₁, k₂ are cable-specific constants. For example, exhibits approximately 0.8 dB/m at 1 GHz, illustrating how these losses intensify with and limit over distance. Twisted-pair cables, such as Category 6 (Cat6), face similar challenges but are additionally affected by crosstalk between wire pairs, which degrades signal quality in unshielded configurations. The ANSI/TIA-568 standard defines performance models for insertion loss and near-end crosstalk (NEXT) in these cables, specifying maximum insertion loss limits—for instance, up to 32.8 dB at 250 MHz for a 100 m channel—to ensure reliable data transmission. Connector losses, typically 0.1–0.2 dB per coaxial connector and 0.2 dB per RJ45 connector in twisted-pair systems, must also be factored into the budget, as they introduce additional signal degradation at mating points. In link budget calculations for cable systems, the total cable loss L_cable is given by L_cable = α l + L_connectors, where l is the cable length and L_connectors accounts for all junctions; short lengths under 100 m are preferred to minimize cumulative attenuation, and shielding in cables like shielded twisted pair (STP) or coaxial designs reduces electromagnetic interference (EMI) from external sources. These systems find applications in base stations for connecting antennas to transceivers and in local area networks (LANs) for intra-building connectivity, where low-loss cables support RF signals up to several GHz. A notable extension is (MoCA) technology, which repurposes existing infrastructure for Ethernet transport, achieving up to 1 Gbps with a typical link budget allowance of around 50 dB to accommodate in . However, trade-offs are inherent: rises exponentially with frequency, constraining the bandwidth-distance product—for instance, higher data rates demand shorter runs or lower-loss cables to maintain adequate signal-to-noise ratios.

Fiber Optic Systems

In fiber optic systems, the link budget accounts for the transmission of optical signals through guided media, primarily silica-based fibers, where losses are dominated by material and structural imperfections rather than free-space effects. Single-mode fibers, such as the widely used Corning SMF-28, support a single mode at wavelengths around 1310 nm and 1550 nm, enabling low-loss transmission over long distances with typical attenuations of 0.35 dB/km at 1310 nm and 0.20 dB/km at 1550 nm, the latter minimized by the wavelength dependence of , which decreases as λ−4\lambda^{-4}. In contrast, multimode fibers, designed for shorter at 850 nm or 1300 nm, exhibit higher intrinsic losses of approximately 3.0 dB/km at 850 nm due to and increased scattering from multiple paths, limiting their use to premises applications under 500 meters. Losses in optic links are categorized as intrinsic, arising from the material itself, and extrinsic, from installation and connections. Intrinsic losses primarily stem from and residual absorption by impurities like OH ions, yielding an α≈0.35\alpha \approx 0.35 dB/km at 1310 nm and lower at 1550 nm, where the scattering minimum occurs. Extrinsic losses include fusion splice attenuations of about 0.1 dB per and connector losses of 0.3 dB per interface, influenced by alignment precision and surface cleanliness. The total loss is calculated as Lfiber=αl+Nsplice⋅αsL_{\text{fiber}} = \alpha l + N_{\text{splice}} \cdot \alpha_s, where ll is the in km, NspliceN_{\text{splice}} is the number of splices, and αs\alpha_s is the splice loss per ; this forms the core of the power budget alongside transmitter output and receiver sensitivity. Link budget calculations in fiber optics extend beyond power loss to incorporate signal quality factors like chromatic dispersion, which broadens pulses due to wavelength-dependent group velocities, degrading the (SNR) and limiting bit rates over distance. For Ethernet applications, 10GBASE-LR links allocate a power budget of approximately 7 dB for 10 km reaches, while 100GBASE-LR4 supports up to approximately 8 dB for 10 km reaches, balancing , dispersion penalties, and a margin of 3-5 dB. In long-haul , dense wavelength-division multiplexing (DWDM) systems achieve spans up to 80-120 km between erbium-doped fiber amplifiers to compensate losses, with total budgets exceeding 30 dB per span when including multiple channels. systems, facing additional microbending losses from hydrostatic pressure (adding ~0.05 dB/km), incorporate low-loss fibers with attenuations of 0.17 dB/km at 1550 nm and design budgets that account for aging margins of 0.005 dB/km over 25 years. Nonlinear effects further constrain high-power budgets in fiber optics, particularly self-phase modulation (SPM), where intensity-dependent refractive index changes induce phase shifts that distort signal amplitude after detection, especially in high-bit-rate systems above 10 Gb/s. SPM becomes prominent at launch powers exceeding -5 dBm, limiting the effective link budget by necessitating power reductions to maintain SNR above 20 dB for error-free transmission.

Free-Space Optical Systems

Free-space optical (FSO) systems utilize unguided beams propagating through the atmosphere or to transmit data, contrasting with guided fiber optics by relying on line-of-sight paths vulnerable to environmental perturbations. The link budget in FSO accounts for transmitter power, beam characteristics, propagation losses, and receiver sensitivity to ensure reliable signal detection above noise thresholds. Unlike links, FSO operates at visible or near-infrared wavelengths (typically 850–1550 nm), enabling high data rates up to hundreds of Gbps but with tighter and greater susceptibility to atmospheric and . Path loss in FSO primarily arises from geometric spreading of the laser beam, analogous to the Friis transmission equation but adapted for optical diffraction and divergence. For a divergent beam, the geometric loss LoptL_{\text{opt}} is approximated as Lopt=20log⁡10(θdλ)+10log⁡10(Ar)L_{\text{opt}} = 20 \log_{10} \left( \frac{\theta d}{\lambda} \right) + 10 \log_{10} (A_r), where θ\theta is the beam divergence angle, dd is the link distance, λ\lambda is the wavelength, and ArA_r is the receiver aperture area; this formulation captures the reduction in received power due to beam expansion over distance. In diffraction-limited cases without significant divergence, the received power follows Pr=PtAtAr(λd)2P_r = P_t \frac{A_t A_r}{(\lambda d)^2}, where PtP_t and AtA_t are the transmitted power and transmitter area, respectively, yielding a loss scaling with (λd)−2( \lambda d )^{-2}. These models prioritize beam waist and aperture matching to minimize spreading losses, often achieving 20–40 dB over kilometer-scale terrestrial links. Atmospheric effects dominate FSO degradation, with scintillation caused by index-of-refraction fluctuations inducing intensity variations. The scintillation variance for a spherical wave in weak turbulence is given by σ2≈1.23Cn2k7/6d11/6\sigma^2 \approx 1.23 C_n^2 k^{7/6} d^{11/6}, where Cn2C_n^2 is the refractive index structure parameter (typically 10−1510^{-15} to 10−1310^{-13} m−2/3^{-2/3} near ground), k=2π/λk = 2\pi / \lambda is the wavenumber, and dd is the path length; values exceeding 1 indicate strong turbulence requiring advanced mitigation. Absorption and scattering by aerosols contribute additional losses, with clear-weather attenuation ranging from 0.2 to 1 dB/km at 1550 nm due to molecular absorption and Mie scattering under low-visibility conditions. These effects limit terrestrial FSO ranges to 1–5 km in clear air, with scintillation index often below 0.5 for short paths but rising sharply over longer distances. System factors in FSO link budgets include transmitter output, typically up to 1 W for eye-safe eye-compliant designs at 1550 nm, and receiver sensitivity via avalanche photodiodes (APDs), achieving -40 to -45 dBm at gigabit rates for direct detection. Alignment losses from pointing errors, such as beam wander or platform jitter, introduce 0.5–2 dB penalties, calculated via overlap integrals and minimized through fine tracking systems. These components yield budgets of 30–60 dB for terrestrial systems, balancing power efficiency with regulatory limits on intensity. FSO applications span short-range indoor setups like , achieving 10–100 m ranges at data rates exceeding 1 Gbps using visible light LEDs or for high-speed wireless networking. Long-range terrestrial links support metropolitan connectivity over 1–10 km, while space-based systems demonstrate extreme performance; NASA's Lunar Laser Communications Demonstration (LLCD) in 2013 achieved 622 Mbps downlink over 384,000 km using a 0.5 W and 40 cm , with a link budget accommodating and minimal losses. Emerging satellite constellations, such as Starlink's inter-satellite links deployed since 2024, enable 100 Gbps per terminal across low-Earth orbit distances of hundreds of kilometers, forming a global mesh network with aggregate throughputs exceeding 42 PB/day. Weather mitigation in FSO employs (AO) to correct distortions from , using deformable mirrors and sensors to improve Strehl ratios and coupling efficiency by 5–10 dB in moderate conditions. Diversity techniques, such as wavelength diversity across 850 nm, 1550 nm, and 10 µm bands, alleviate attenuation by selecting or combining clearer channels, extending range by 15–20% in low-visibility scenarios like 200–500 m advection . These methods enhance availability to 99.9% for hybrid RF-FSO backups, prioritizing real-time control for dynamic links.

References

  1. https://archive.cdc.gov/www_cdc_gov/niosh/mining/content/commglossary.html
  2. https://ipnpr.jpl.nasa.gov/2010-2019/progress_report/42-183/183B.pdf
  3. https://wireless-systems.ece.gatech.edu/6604/2019-lectures/week2.pdf
  4. https://s3vi.ndc.nasa.gov/ssri-kb/static/resources/15-0025_A1b.pdf
  5. https://www.mathworks.com/discovery/link-budget.html
  6. https://resources.altium.com/p/rf-signal-chain-and-link-budget-basics-iot
  7. https://www.qorvo.com/design-hub/blog/designing-efficient-satellite-links-a-review-of-the-link-budget-analysis
  8. https://s.campbellsci.com/documents/us/technical-papers/link-budget.pdf
  9. https://www.analog.com/en/resources/technical-articles/radio-linkbudget-calculations-for-ismrf-products.html
  10. https://pysdr.org/content/link_budgets.html
  11. https://capmimo.ece.wisc.edu/capmimo_papers/friis_original_1946.pdf
  12. https://www.mathworks.com/help/satcom/gs/satellite-link-budget.html
  13. https://www.internetsociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Link-Budget-Calculation.pdf
  14. https://resources.system-analysis.cadence.com/blog/rf-link-budget-calculation-guide
  15. https://www.mmmut.ac.in/News_content/53555dep-notice_04292020.pdf
  16. https://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/en/Appnotes/00001631A.pdf
  17. https://pubs.aip.org/aapt/ajp/article/81/1/33/1039899/Radiometry-and-the-Friis-transmission-equation
  18. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1622772
  19. https://www.gaussianwaves.com/2019/03/two-ray-ground-reflection-model/
  20. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1511.07345
  21. https://www.itu.int/rec/R-REC-P.838
  22. https://www.microwaves101.com/encyclopedias/polarization-mismatch-between-antennas
  23. https://www.sss-mag.com/pdf/an9804.pdf
  24. https://www.sss-mag.com/ebn0.html
  25. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/frequency-diversity
  26. https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/9/10/1598
  27. https://wsjt.sourceforge.io/Hbk_2010_Ch30_EME.pdf
  28. https://science.nasa.gov/mission/voyager/where-are-voyager-1-and-voyager-2-now/
  29. https://www.seti.org/news/detecting-voyager-1-with-the-ata/
  30. https://public.nrao.edu/ask/how-strong-is-the-signal-from-the-voyager-1-spacecraft-when-it-reaches-earth/
  31. https://voyager.gsfc.nasa.gov/Library/DeepCommo_Chapter3--141029.pdf
  32. https://deepspace.jpl.nasa.gov/files/820-100-H.pdf
  33. https://descanso.jpl.nasa.gov/DPSummary/DESCANSO18_MarCO.pdf
  34. https://science.nasa.gov/mission/voyager/spacecraft/
  35. https://www.microwaves101.com/encyclopedias/waveguide-mathematics
  36. https://web2.ph.utexas.edu/~vadim/Classes/2024s-g/waveguides.pdf
  37. https://courses.egr.uh.edu/ECE/ECE5317/Class%20Notes/Notes%207%205317-6351%20Waveguiding%20Structures%20Part%202%20(Attenuation).pdf
  38. https://www.microwaves101.com/encyclopedias/waveguide-loss
  39. https://dolphmicrowave.com/default/6-side-effects-of-introducing-corners-and-bends-into-waveguides/
  40. https://www.dolphmicrowave.com/default/what-is-waveguide-corners-bends-and-twists/
  41. https://www.microwaves101.com/encyclopedias/power-handling-in-waveguide
  42. https://dolphmicrowave.com/default/why-use-flexible-waveguides-in-radar-systems/
  43. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/3427543_Waveguide_filters_for_satellites
  44. https://www.analog.com/en/resources/technical-articles/impact-of-cable-losses.html
  45. https://pa3fwm.nl/technotes/tn33b-cable-attenuation.html
  46. https://www.w4rp.com/ref/coax.html
  47. https://www.cablestogo.com/learning/library/standards-specs-certs/ansi-tia
  48. https://www.amphenolrf.com/faq/technical/what-is-insertion-loss-and-how-is-it-specified/
  49. https://www.flukenetworks.com/knowledge-base/copper-cable-testing/what-insertion-loss
  50. https://urgentcomm.com/broadband/the-importance-of-coaxial-cable-to-base-station-performance-low-loss-flexible-cable-provides-an-alternative-to-semi-rigid-corrugated-cable-with-advantages-in-loss-handling-ease-of-installation-and-ruggedness-compensating-for-tradeoffs-in-shielding-and-i
  51. https://www.ccbp.in/blog/articles/coaxial-cable-in-computer-network
  52. https://dongknows.com/moca-explained/
  53. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10160112/
  54. https://www.thefoa.org/tech/loss-est.htm
  55. https://www.aflglobal.com/en/au/AFL-Blog/Intrinsic-and-Extrinsic-Attenuation-in-Fiber-Optic-Cables
  56. https://www.thefoa.org/tech/lossbudg.htm
  57. https://www.viavisolutions.com/sites/default/files/support/fiberguide1_bk_fop_tm_ae.pdf
  58. https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/ba/public/jul08/isono_01_0708.pdf
  59. https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/global/de_at/assets/docs/dwdm.pdf
  60. https://www.itu.int/rec/dologin_pub.asp?lang=s&id=T-REC-G.978-202505-I%21%21PDF-E&type=items
  61. https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/10GEPON_study/public/may06/ten_1_0506.pdf
  62. https://opg.optica.org/ao/fulltext.cfm?uri=ao-49-28-5333&id=205899
  63. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6292739
  64. https://ijritcc.org/index.php/ijritcc/article/download/803/803/778
  65. https://electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/260130/atmospheric-attenuation-calculation-for-a-1550nm-link-budget
  66. https://www.cablefree.net/wirelesstechnology/free-space-optics/fso-avalanche-photodiode-apd/
  67. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA474922.pdf
  68. https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/conference-proceedings-of-spie/12777/2691100/Effects-of-pointing-errors-on-intensity-losses-in-the-optical/10.1117/12.2691100.full
  69. https://www.ipms.fraunhofer.de/en/Components-and-Systems/Components-and-Systems-Data-Communication/Li-Fi-Data-Communication.html
  70. https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/nasa-laser-communication-system-sets-record-with-data-transmissions-to-and-from-moon/
  71. https://hackaday.com/2024/02/05/starlinks-inter-satellite-laser-links-are-setting-new-record-with-42-million-gb-per-day/
  72. https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/conference-proceedings-of-spie/12266/122660B/Investigation-of-advanced-control-for-adaptive-optics-in-free-space/10.1117/12.2636270.short
  73. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237634255_Wavelength_diversity_in_free-space_optics_to_alleviate_fog_effects
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.