Hubbry Logo
Lotus 88Lotus 88Main
Open search
Lotus 88
Community hub
Lotus 88
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Lotus 88
Lotus 88
Lotus 88
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Lotus 88
A Lotus 88 driven by Takuma Sato in 2015
CategoryFormula One
ConstructorTeam Lotus
DesignersColin Chapman
Martin Ogilvie
Predecessor81 / 87
Successor91
Technical specifications[1]
ChassisTwin-chassis construction
Suspension (front)Top rocker arms, lower wishbones, inboard springs
Suspension (rear)As front
Axle trackFront: 1,778 mm (70.0 in)
Rear: 1,600 mm (63 in)
Wheelbase2,178 mm (85.7 in)
EngineCosworth DFV 2,993 cc (2.993 L; 182.6 cu in) V8
TransmissionLotus/Hewland 5-speed manual
Weight585 kg (1,290 lb)
TyresMichelin/Goodyear
Competition history
Notable entrantsTeam Essex Lotus
Notable drivers11. Italy Elio de Angelis
12. United Kingdom Nigel Mansell
Debut1981 United States Grand Prix West
RacesWinsPolesF/Laps
0000

The Lotus 88 is an innovative Formula One car designed by Colin Chapman, Peter Wright, Tony Rudd and Martin Ogilvie of Lotus in an effort to maximise the downforce produced by ground effect. The Lotus 88 made its debut at the first practice session of the 1981 season opener, the US Grand Prix West at Long Beach, but was ultimately not allowed to race. It still was the first Formula One car to use a carbon fibre monocoque chassis to debut at a Grand Prix event. The carbon fibre McLaren MP4 made its first appearance at the third Grand Prix of the season in Argentina.

Design

[edit]
Lotus 86, Goodwood Festival of Speed 2012

By 1981 the ground effect cars were so efficient and so fast that the drivers were suffering from the tremendous g-forces involved in cornering and braking. The FIA banned the moveable skirts fitted to the bottom of the cars' sidepods that were vital for achieving consistent ground effect and regulated a mandatory ground clearance of 6 cm, in the interests of driver safety.[2]

Brabham were the first to circumvent the rules by using hydropneumatic suspension which compressed under aerodynamic loading and lowered the Brabham BT49 onto the track surface. This had the side effect of rendering the car without any sort of suspension, causing the driver to be buffeted even more than before. However, the performance gains were such that other teams were soon following suit - although most had difficulty in replicating the Brabham system and used a simple switch to lower the car. Chapman had other ideas.

The twin chassis internal structure of the Lotus 88

The earlier Lotus 86 had been designed at the time when skirts were still legal, in the same layout as the 88 but only one prototype had been built. The performance gains were relatively small but significant over conventional ground effects cars. When the skirts were banned, Wright studied the car and its performance without skirts. The loss in performance was largely negligible, so the 88 was quickly designed as a re-engineered 86.

The 88 used an ingenious system of having a twin chassis, one inside the other. The inner chassis would hold the cockpit and would be independently sprung from the outer one, which was designed to take the pressures of the ground effects. The outer chassis did not have discernible wings, and was in effect one huge ground effect system, beginning just behind the nose of the car and extending all the way inside the rear wheels, thereby producing massive amounts of downforce.

The car was powered by the Ford Cosworth DFV engine. Lotus drivers Nigel Mansell and Elio de Angelis reported the car was pleasing to drive and responsive.[citation needed] To make the aerodynamic loads as manageable as possible, the car was constructed extensively in carbon fibre, making it the first Formula One car to use the material in large quantity, followed very shortly after by the McLaren MP4 .

Other teams were outraged at this exploitation of the regulations and protests were lodged with the FIA, on the grounds that the twin chassis tub breached the rules in terms of moveable aerodynamic devices. The FIA upheld the protests and consequently banned the car from competing. Chapman was adamant the car was legal and challenged the other teams and the FIA at every turn, but the decision stood. It reached the point where if the Lotus 88 were entered in the British Grand Prix at Silverstone, the team would lose its championship points and the race itself would lose its place as a championship round of the season.

Chapman was thus forced to update two of his Lotus 87 chassis as replacements for his thwarted brainchild. The Lotus 88 remains a curiosity from a bygone age of F1. Some of the 88's aerodynamics and layout were worked into the successful Lotus 91 which followed in 1982.

Complete Formula One World Championship results

[edit]

(key)

Year Entrant Engines Tyres Drivers 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Points WCC
1981 Essex Team Lotus Ford Cosworth
DFV 3.0 V8 		M USW BRA ARG SMR BEL MON ESP FRA GBR GER AUT NED ITA CAN CPL 221 7th
Elio de Angelis PO PO DNP
John Player Team Lotus G PO
Nigel Mansell PO

^1 All points scored by the Lotus 81B and Lotus 87.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Lotus 88

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Lotus 88 was a Formula One car developed by Team Lotus for the 1981 season, featuring a revolutionary twin-chassis design to maximize ground effect aerodynamics without relying on sliding skirts, which had been banned by the FIA. It consisted of an inner sprung monocoque for the driver and mechanics, made from carbon fiber and Kevlar, and an outer aerodynamic chassis optimized for downforce generation, marking it as the first F1 car to debut a carbon fiber tub at a Grand Prix event. Powered by a Ford-Cosworth DFV V8 engine producing around 470 bhp, the car had a wheelbase of 107 inches, weighed approximately 585 kg, and used a 5-speed Hewland gearbox with inboard suspension for enhanced stability. Designed primarily by Colin Chapman, with key contributions from engineers Peter Wright and Martin Ogilvie, the 88 evolved from the experimental Lotus 86 and aimed to revive Lotus's competitive edge after a winless 1979-1980 period following the successful ground-effect Lotus 79. Despite passing scrutineering at events like the 1981 West in Long Beach and the at , the Lotus 88 was repeatedly protested by rival teams—such as Williams and Ferrari—and ultimately black-flagged by the FIA for allegedly violating regulations on suspension flexibility and ground clearance, amid the broader FISA-FOCA political tensions in . A revised version, the 88B, was prepared but also barred from racing, leading Lotus to abandon the project in favor of the more conventional , which drove to a few podiums that year. Only three examples were built, and the car never competed in an official Grand Prix, though testing by drivers like and de Angelis showed promising lap times, such as Mansell's 1:15.992 at . The 88's innovative approach to separating structural and aerodynamic functions influenced later F1 designs, underscoring Chapman's legacy of pushing technical boundaries, even as it highlighted the era's regulatory challenges.

Background and Development

Lotus's Challenges in the Ground Effect Era

Following the resounding success of the Lotus 79 in 1978, which secured both the Drivers' and Constructors' Championships for Team Lotus through Mario Andretti's title-winning campaign, the team faced a sharp decline in the ensuing ground effect era. The Lotus 80, introduced in 1979 as an evolution pushing the boundaries of ground effect aerodynamics with more extreme Venturi tunnels and pitch sensitivity, proved disastrously unstable, exhibiting severe porpoising and handling issues that rendered it uncompetitive after an initial third-place finish at the Spanish Grand Prix. This misstep contributed to Lotus slipping to fourth in the 1979 Constructors' Championship with just 39 points, a far cry from their prior dominance, as rivals like Ferrari capitalized on more reliable designs to claim the title with 113 points. The struggles persisted into 1980 with the , a more conservative design that reverted to elements of the proven 79 but still suffered from reliability woes and insufficient development amid the intensifying ground effect competition. Lotus managed only 14 points to finish fifth in the Constructors' Championship, trailing far behind Williams' dominant 120-point haul, while —paired with the aging —achieved the team's highlight with a second-place finish at the Brazilian Grand Prix, his lone podium of the season. Ferrari and emerging forces like further eroded Lotus's edge by refining turbocharged powertrains and aerodynamic packages, leaving the team outpaced in the technological arms race. Compounding these on-track setbacks were regulatory shifts announced by FISA in 1979, which mandated a minimum 6 cm ground clearance and banned sliding skirts effective for the 1981 season in an effort to curb the escalating speeds and safety risks of unrestricted ground effect designs. Under founder Colin Chapman's intense drive to reclaim championship contention, Lotus grappled with internal pressures to innovate radically against these constraints and the advancements of rivals like Williams and Ferrari, who had surged ahead in both car performance and sponsorship appeal. To bolster their aerodynamic capabilities, Chapman relied on key contributions from engineers like Peter Wright, who had joined from Lotus Cars' engineering division in the early 1970s and brought expertise in fluid dynamics honed on road car projects to F1-specific advancements. This twin-chassis concept for the Lotus 88 emerged as one such response to the impending skirt ban, aiming to preserve ground effect efficiency without relying on flexible seals.

Conception of the Twin-Chassis Concept

The twin-chassis concept for the Lotus 88 was developed by a core team led by , alongside Peter Wright, Tony Rudd, and Martin Ogilvie, with the primary goal of decoupling the car's structural integrity from its aerodynamic performance to enable controlled deformation of the outer chassis under load. This innovative approach aimed to preserve effective ground effect despite the 1981 FISA regulations that prohibited flexible skirts and movable aerodynamic devices, mandating a minimum 6 cm ground clearance. By isolating mechanical forces on an inner rigid while allowing the outer aero-optimized frame to flex via specialized suspension linkages, the sought to maintain close proximity to the track surface without violating the rules on deformable structures. The concept's origins traced back to Peter 's explorations in late 1979, inspired by efforts to apply ground-effect principles to Lotus road cars, where regulatory constraints were absent; Chapman subsequently instructed and Ogilvie to adapt this hinged undertray idea for Formula One racing. Building on the Lotus 80's severe porpoising issues during 1980 testing—which highlighted conflicting demands between stiff suspension for handling and soft settings for aerodynamic stability—the team prototyped the twin-chassis layout on the Lotus 86 mule car, a modified Type 81 chassis first tested secretly at in mid-1980. Wind tunnel work on a 86/88 at Lotus's facility further validated the outer 's ability to deform predictably, confirming the approach's potential to generate high through a full-length undertray without relying on banned skirts. This phase of ideation, spanning summer sketches and initial engineering from mid-1980, reflected Chapman's enduring philosophy of "adding lightness" through radical efficiency, now balanced with enhanced safety considerations via hybrid materials. Development milestones included early integration of concepts, proposed by as a complementary "Plan B" to dynamically adjust but initially sidelined in favor of the passive twin- mechanism using gas struts and soft springs with hard end-stops. The decision to construct both chassis from carbon fiber reinforced with honeycomb—hand-laid in-house over four months—marked an ambitious step toward lighter, stronger structures, though budget constraints from Lotus's 1980 financial struggles necessitated this radical departure from incremental updates to prior designs like the 87 successor. These elements positioned the 88 as a high-risk, high-reward solution tailored for the restrictive environment, prioritizing conceptual breakthroughs over conventional evolution.

Design and Technical Features

Chassis and Structural Innovations

The Lotus 88 introduced a groundbreaking twin-chassis system, comprising an inner primary and an outer secondary linked by flexible mechanical connections that allowed independent movement. The inner served as the structural core, incorporating a carbon fiber and to ensure rigidity, mount the engine and transmission, and protect the driver, while being softly sprung for ride comfort and isolation from aerodynamic forces. The outer , formed by lightweight carbon fiber panels forming the bodywork, sidepods, and aerodynamic surfaces, was stiffly sprung with outboard coil springs and dampers to maintain optimal ground effect performance under high loads. This design pioneered the extensive use of advanced composite materials, including Kevlar-reinforced carbon fiber with a honeycomb core for both chassis elements, providing superior strength-to-weight ratios compared to traditional aluminum or constructions of the era. The overall dimensions reflected the ground effect requirements of 1981 1 regulations, with a of 2,692 mm, front track of 1,727 mm, and rear track of 1,626 mm. Safety was a key priority in the inner chassis design, which independently complied with the 1981 FIA crash protection standards through its energy-absorbing carbon-Kevlar , capable of withstanding frontal impacts comparably to aluminum monocoques without requiring external testing at the time. Lotus constructed three of the 88: chassis 88-01, used for initial testing and development, and chassis 88-02 and 88-03, used for further evaluation and presentations.

Aerodynamics and Suspension System

The aerodynamic philosophy of the Lotus 88 emphasized ground effect generated by Venturi tunnels integrated into the underbody of the outer , accelerating to produce low-pressure zones beneath the car and thereby enhancing grip without the use of banned sliding skirts. Following the FISA mandating a minimum 6 cm ground clearance, the design incorporated deformable sidepods that flexed to maintain an aerodynamic seal to the track surface, optimizing the Venturi channels' efficiency even under dynamic loads. This approach isolated aerodynamic forces from the inner mechanical , allowing the outer structure to respond compliantly to while transmitting it directly to the suspension uprights via coil-bound springs. The rear , rigidly mounted to the outer , served primarily as a trim device with adjustable endplates to refine wake management and balance, minimizing reliance on high-drag appendages for overall . Complementing this aero-centric layout, the suspension employed an independent double wishbone setup with pushrod actuation at all wheels, enabling precise control over camber and toe changes during cornering. The inner chassis bore mechanical road loads through softer inboard springs and gas struts, tuned for driver comfort and handling feedback, while the outer chassis handled aerodynamic compliance with stiffer outboard coil spring/damper units positioned near the uprights. These outer elements compressed progressively under increasing downforce—initially via soft springs, then solidifying against hard end-stops—to preserve optimal Venturi tunnel geometry without skirts, a separation that enhanced overall stability by decoupling ride quality from aero demands. Although early concepts explored active suspension for real-time ride height adjustment, the final specification omitted such elements, relying instead on passive high-rebound damping to keep the outer body low through low-speed maneuvers. To achieve a neutral handling , the system incorporated adjustable anti-roll bars, allowing teams to fine-tune roll stiffness front-to-rear for balanced cornering response across diverse track conditions. evaluations at Lotus's facility confirmed the design's efficacy, revealing superior and lift-to-drag ratios compared to prior models, with track testing at circuits like Ricard demonstrating time advantages of around one second over competitors in similar setups. This integration of aero and suspension via the twin-chassis framework—briefly referencing the structural separation detailed elsewhere—positioned the 88 as a forward-thinking solution to post-skirt challenges, prioritizing conceptual efficiency over exhaustive mechanical complexity.

Powertrain and Other Components

The Lotus 88 was powered by the Ford-Cosworth DFV , a 2,993 cc naturally aspirated unit that served as a fully stressed structural member bolted to the inner . This mounting arrangement contributed to the car's twin-chassis design philosophy, isolating engine vibrations from the outer aerodynamic shell to improve driver comfort and component longevity. The DFV produced a minimum of 470 at 11,100 rpm, with delivery optimized for the era's ground-effect demands through its four-valve-per-cylinder configuration. Power was transmitted via a 5-speed FGA manual gearbox, integrated into the inner alongside the for structural efficiency. The unit featured conventional dog-ring shifting and was adapted with Lotus-specific casing to handle the DFV's output, ensuring reliable gear changes under high-torque conditions typical of 1981 cars. Ancillary systems emphasized reliability and regulatory compliance. The fuel system utilized Lucas mechanical injection feeding Aerotech tanks with a 191-liter (42-gallon) capacity, positioned within the inner to maintain balance. Braking was handled by Lockheed calipers with pads acting on ventilated steel discs, providing consistent stopping power without advanced materials. Electronics were minimal, limited to a Lucas and basic Smiths/Veglia instrumentation powered by a Yuasa battery, reflecting the pre-ECU era of . Exhaust routing was customized to navigate the dual-chassis layout, directing gases around the outer shell to minimize aerodynamic interference. Tires were Goodyear slicks mounted on 13-inch wheels, with 11-inch front rim widths and 16-inch rear widths to support the car's weight and grip requirements.

Testing Phase

Initial Testing Sessions

Initial testing of the Lotus 88 was conducted in late 1980 by drivers and to assess the twin-chassis system's functionality. The first shakedown of the completed 88 took place at the circuit in early 1981, where it demonstrated promising performance, lapping approximately 1 second quicker than a contemporary car in damp conditions. These sessions focused on validating structural integrity, handling, and aerodynamic performance, confirming the design's potential without major mechanical incidents. The testing was limited due to the car's developmental stage and weather constraints, providing data for further suspension and setup refinements. Logistically, the team used prototype chassis supported by engineers at the circuits, with test tires to evaluate grip. Subsequent evaluations at included practice sessions ahead of the , where Mansell set a lap time of 1:15.992, about 3.8 seconds off the pace of Rene Arnoux's . This highlighted the ground effect optimizations' promise compared to the predecessor, though overall mileage remained constrained by the project's timeline and regulatory preparations. The twin-chassis design's ability to isolate driver inputs from aerodynamic loads showed conceptual viability during these runs.

Pre-Season Evaluations and Adjustments

Following initial prototype testing, the Lotus 88 underwent further evaluations in early 1981 at the circuit in and in the , with adjustments at the Lotus Hethel facility. These sessions refined the twin-chassis system's compliance with ground effect regulations. Key adjustments included optimizing suspension linkages to minimize flex within limits and incorporating driver feedback from on control improvements. At Long Beach practice for the season opener, de Angelis was about 1 second off the pace. Silverstone tests positioned the car as potentially competitive against the Williams FW07C. Minor aerodynamic modifications addressed heat management. The team accumulated limited test mileage across these activities, preparing the car for regulatory scrutiny despite the brief development window.

Controversy and Regulatory Battles

Attempted Debut at Long Beach

The Lotus 88 was set to make its competitive debut at the 1981 West, held on March 15 at the Long Beach in . The two cars were transported to the venue via air freight, with and rookie assigned as drivers for . On March 13, ahead of official practice, the Lotus 88 passed FIA technical scrutineering without any noted violations, allowing it to proceed to on-track sessions. During Friday's practice session, de Angelis took to the track in the Lotus 88, posting competitive times despite the car's unproven setup following pre-season testing. The team made the car publicly available for display in the paddock, drawing significant media and crowd attention to its unconventional "double body" structure, which featured a secondary for enhanced ground-effect . The atmosphere in the paddock was charged with tension, as (FOCA) teams including Williams and expressed strong reservations about the Lotus 88's potential aerodynamic superiority, fueling immediate rival protests and underscoring the era's intense regulatory scrutiny over ground-effect innovations.

FISA Ban, Appeals, and Resolution

Following the initial scrutineering clearance at the 1981 West in Long Beach, where the Lotus 88 passed technical inspection, the Fédération Internationale du Sport Automobile (FISA) intervened decisively. On March 14, 1981, FISA declared the car's twin-chassis design a "moveable aerodynamic device" in violation of Article 274/3, Rule 7 of the technical regulations, which prohibited aerodynamic components from moving relative to the sprung portion of the vehicle; the governing body threatened substantial fines and exclusion if Lotus attempted to race it. Lotus team principal mounted a vigorous , publishing an to FISA president in March 1981 that argued the twin- concept legitimately separated aerodynamic and mechanical functions, with the outer chassis dedicated solely to generation and the inner to structural integrity and suspension. The dispute escalated legally, involving Lotus lawyers in to challenge the interpretation before FISA's technical commission. Appeals allowed limited practice sessions at the Brazilian Grand Prix on March 29 and the on April 12, where the car was displayed and tested but barred from qualifying, underscoring the ongoing regulatory standoff. In May 1981, the FIA's international tribunal upheld FISA's ban after reviewing the design's compliance, ruling that the twin deformed under aerodynamic loads in a manner that contravened the immobility requirement for aero elements, rendering it illegal for competition. With no avenue for further appeal and mounting pressure from rival teams, Lotus abandoned the 88 entirely, switching to the conventional single-chassis for the midway through the season. The car never entered an official championship race, accruing zero points, though the controversy prompted FISA to tighten aerodynamic regulations for , mandating rigid underbody designs to prevent similar innovations.

Legacy and Impact

Immediate Aftermath for Lotus

Following the definitive ban on the Lotus 88 by the FIA in late April 1981, after appeals and protests at the early-season races in Long Beach, , and , Team Lotus abandoned further development and racing of the twin-chassis design. The team shifted operations to the hastily produced , a conventional single-chassis ground-effect car designed as a contingency; only four examples were built using carbon fiber and composites, with the first chassis rushed into service for the in May. Initially, drivers and continued competing in the older Lotus 81B through the first four rounds, before transitioning to the 87 for the European season. In the 1981 season, Lotus secured 22 points overall, finishing seventh in the Constructors' Championship—all points derived from performances in the 81B and 87, with highlights including de Angelis's second-place finish at the and Mansell's fourth at the season finale in . De Angelis ended eighth in the Drivers' Championship with 14 points, primarily from the 87, while Mansell scored his first career (third in Britain) and eight points in total, marking a promising debut full season boosted by the switch to the more reliable 87. The ban's fallout inflicted a significant financial strain on Lotus, with the £1 million development investment in the 88 effectively lost, exacerbating the team's budgetary pressures amid sponsor Essex's limited support. The controversy surrounding the 88 deepened Colin Chapman's frustration with Formula 1's regulatory politics, contributing to his mounting stress and disillusionment; this culminated in a fatal heart attack on December 16, 1982, at age 54. Internally, key engineer Peter Wright remained with the team to lead aerodynamics on the 87, ensuring continuity in design philosophy; Wright, who contributed significantly to the 88's design, passed away on November 6, 2025, at the age of 79. Three chassis were built for the Lotus 88, but only one (chassis 88/1, updated to 88B specification) was preserved in its twin-chassis form and stored at Lotus's Hethel facility by Classic Team Lotus; the other two were rebuilt as Lotus 87 chassis.

Long-Term Influence on Formula One

The controversy surrounding the Lotus 88's twin-chassis design, which separated aerodynamic and mechanical loads to maximize ground-effect efficiency while complying with regulations on sprung components, directly influenced subsequent regulatory changes. In response to the car's innovative but contentious approach to maintaining rigid amid the new 6 cm ground clearance mandate, the FISA introduced stricter rules for the 1982 season, requiring aerodynamic elements to be more rigidly attached to the sprung portion of the chassis to prevent similar flexibility exploits. Technologically, the Lotus 88 advanced the adoption of carbon-fiber composites in , featuring the first full carbon-fiber chassis to appear on track during official sessions, predating McLaren's MP4/1 race debut later in and paving the way for widespread use of the material in subsequent cars. Its Venturi underbody tunnels for enhanced ground effect echoed in the 2022 regulations, which reintroduced mandated underfloor tunnels to generate , marking a revival of the principle first popularized by Lotus in the late 1970s and refined in the 88. The 88's separation of aero and also resonated in ongoing flexible floor debates from 2023 to 2025, where teams exploited compliant underbodies for aerodynamic gains, prompting FIA tests and adjustments similar to the 1981 scrutiny. Despite never racing, the Lotus 88 represented Colin Chapman's final major innovation, embodying his philosophy of pushing regulatory boundaries through radical engineering. One of the two built chassis was offered at auction in in January 2020, highlighting its enduring collectible value as a "what-if" icon of untapped potential. In modern perspectives, 2025 analyses praise its genius amid discussions of AI-assisted design in , positioning it as a precursor to computational optimization in . The car has appeared in racing simulations like , allowing enthusiasts to experience its hypothetical performance, while the surviving chassis was previously preserved in the until its 2018 closure.

References

  1. https://www.ultimatecarpage.com/car/683/Lotus-88B-Cosworth.html
  2. https://www.goodwood.com/grr/f1/the-lotus-88-is-the-most-ingenious-f1-car-ever--thank-frankel-its-friday/
  3. http://www.jpslotus.org/88/88spec.htm
  4. https://www.grandprix.com/features/peter-wright/technical-lotus-t88.html
  5. https://www.racefans.net/2011/07/01/lotus-88b-f1-car-banned/
  6. https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article/tech-tuesday-the-lotus-79-f1s-ground-effect-marvel.sAD9PXt7mC8iMSwwe6CCw
  7. https://www.motorsportmagazine.com/archive/article/march-2012/80/chapmans-last-big-thing/
  8. https://www.formula1.com/en/results/1979/team
  9. https://www.formula1.com/en/results/1980/team
  10. https://www.formula1.com/en/results/1980/drivers/ELIDEA01/elio-de-angelis
  11. https://www.motorsportmagazine.com/articles/single-seaters/f1/five-classic-formula-1-ground-effect-cars/
  12. https://www.racecar-engineering.com/articles/peter-wright-1946-2025/
  13. https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/peter-wright-1946-2025/10774339/
  14. https://www.motorsportmagazine.com/archive/article/july-2005/60/x-ray-spec-lotus-88/
  15. https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/banned-the-ingenious-twin-chassis-lotus-f1-car-4983190/4983190/
  16. https://www.f1technical.net/f1db/cars/473/lotus-88
  17. https://www.ultimatecarpage.com/spec/683/Lotus-88B-Cosworth.html
  18. https://www.racingsportscars.com/type/Lotus/88.html
  19. https://www.motorsportmagazine.com/archive/article/june-1981/45/the-lotus-88-ingenuity-quashed/
  20. https://www.gptoday.net/en/news/f1/209953/forgotten-ingenuity-the-twin-chassis-lotus-88
  21. https://www.reddit.com/r/formula1/comments/7j0rmn/formula_1_history_project_the_lotus_88/
  22. https://www.motorsportmagazine.com/archive/article/april-1981/30/the-united-states-west-grand-prix/
  23. https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/banned-tech-twin-chassis-lotus/4780030/
  24. http://www.allinsport.ch/history/part-two/
  25. https://www.ultimatecarpage.com/car/5041/Lotus-87-Cosworth.html
  26. https://www.formula1.com/en/results/1981/team
  27. https://www.formula1.com/en/results/1981/drivers/ELIDEA01/elio-de-angelis
  28. https://www.motorsportmagazine.com/articles/single-seaters/f1/chapmans-final-years/
  29. https://classicteamlotus.co.uk/en/about/team-lotus-register-2/type-88/
  30. https://classicteamlotus.co.uk/en/news/posts/2022/the-carbon-fibre-composite-chassis-is-1-on-the-top-10-biggest-technical-revolutions-in-formula-1/
  31. https://www.theautopian.com/how-lotus-revolutionized-formula-1-with-ground-effect-aerodynamics/
  32. https://www.antonioeiras.com/a/ground_effect_and_vt
  33. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WO8ZKMmPaws
  34. https://www.motorsportmagazine.com/articles/single-seaters/f1/watch-lotuss-last-great-formula-1-innovation/
  35. https://www.hagerty.com/media/buying-and-selling/infamous-one-of-two-lotus-88/
  36. https://www.jalopnik.com/1962307/lotus-type-88-twin-chassis/
  37. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p3tRu--8mmQ
  38. https://www.speedhunters.com/2008/06/museum_gt_gt_donington_park_grand_prix_collection/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.