Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Lotus 92
View on Wikipedia
| Category | Formula One | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructor | Lotus | ||||||||||
| Designers | Colin Chapman (Technical Director) Martin Ogilvie (Chief Designer) John Davis (Head of Aerodynamics and R&D) | ||||||||||
| Predecessor | 91 | ||||||||||
| Successor | 93T | ||||||||||
| Technical specifications[1] | |||||||||||
| Chassis | Carbon fibre and Kevlar monocoque | ||||||||||
| Suspension (front) | Lotus Active suspension | ||||||||||
| Suspension (rear) | Lotus Active suspension | ||||||||||
| Axle track | Front: 1,786 mm (70.3 in) Rear: 1,672 mm (65.8 in) | ||||||||||
| Wheelbase | 2,799 mm (110.2 in) | ||||||||||
| Engine | Cosworth DFV, 2,993 cc (182.6 cu in), 90° V8, NA, mid-engine, longitudinally mounted | ||||||||||
| Transmission | Lotus / Hewland 5-speed manual | ||||||||||
| Weight | 580 kg (1,280 lb) | ||||||||||
| Fuel | Elf | ||||||||||
| Tyres | Pirelli | ||||||||||
| Competition history | |||||||||||
| Notable entrants | John Player Team Lotus | ||||||||||
| Notable drivers | 11. 12. | ||||||||||
| Debut | 1983 Brazilian Grand Prix | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
| Constructors' Championships | 0 | ||||||||||
| Drivers' Championships | 0 | ||||||||||
The Lotus 92 was a Formula One racing car designed by Martin Ogilvie along with Team Lotus founder Colin Chapman before Chapman died in December 1982. The 92 was used by Lotus in the first part of the 1983 Formula One season.
The car was driven regularly by Nigel Mansell and also in one race (the 1983 Brazilian Grand Prix) by Elio de Angelis. Engine problems on the warmup lap for de Angelis' Renault turbo-engined Lotus 93T forced him into the spare 92, which eventually led to his disqualification, for changing from a Renault-engined car to a Cosworth-engined one. The 92's best result was sixth place for Mansell at the Detroit Grand Prix.
The 92 was the last non-turbo car designed and raced by Lotus until the turbo engines were banned from the 1989 season. It was also the last Lotus car to carry the Cosworth DFY V8 engine (a development of the Keith Duckworth designed Cosworth DFV which Lotus had introduced to F1 in 1967), while also being the first Lotus to use active suspension. The suspension system gave much trouble and virtually eroded Mansell's confidence in such things. Though he would eventually win the F1 title 9 years later in a car with active suspension - the Williams FW14B.
Complete Formula One results
[edit](key)
| Year | Entrant | Engine | Tyres | Drivers | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | Pts. | WCC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1983 | John Player Team Lotus | Cosworth DFV V8 NA |
P | BRA | USW | FRA | SMR | MON | BEL | DET | CAN | GBR | GER | AUT | NED | ITA | EUR | RSA | 1 | 12th | |
| Elio de Angelis | DSQ | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Nigel Mansell | 12 | 12 | Ret | 12 | Ret | Ret | 6 | Ret |
References
[edit]Lotus 92
View on GrokipediaDevelopment
Background and conception
The Lotus 92 emerged as Team Lotus's response to the evolving Formula One landscape at the start of the 1983 season, marking a strategic pivot amid the sport's shift toward turbocharged powertrains. While rivals like Renault and Ferrari had pioneered turbos in the late 1970s and early 1980s, Lotus opted to retain the reliable naturally aspirated Cosworth DFV V8 for the 92 due to the turbos' persistent issues with reliability, turbo lag, and excessive fuel consumption under the era's fuel-limited regulations. This decision allowed Lotus to prioritize proven mechanical dependability while developing their turbo program in parallel, which would culminate in the mid-season introduction of the 93T.[1] Central to the 92's conception was the visionary leadership of founder Colin Chapman, whose relentless pursuit of engineering innovation defined Lotus's golden era. Chapman, who passed away suddenly on December 16, 1982, oversaw the project's early stages, insisting on groundbreaking solutions to restore competitiveness after the Lotus 91's underwhelming 1982 performance. His final design directive emphasized radical advancements in vehicle dynamics, drawing from years of research into hydraulic systems conducted with Cranfield College of Aeronautics since 1976. The 92 represented Chapman's last major contribution to F1, with initial testing at Snetterton Circuit the day after his death.[1] The regulatory environment of early 1983 further shaped the 92's development, as the FIA's ban on sliding skirts—implemented for the season to curb extreme ground-effect aerodynamics—forced teams to seek alternatives for maintaining downforce and stability. Active suspension, permitted under these rules until its eventual prohibition a decade later, became a cornerstone of Lotus's approach, enabling real-time ride height control to optimize aerodynamic efficiency despite the mandated flat floors. Building directly on the Lotus 91's chassis architecture, the team focused on evolutionary refinements to enhance handling and airflow management, aiming to deliver superior cornering and straight-line speed without relying on unproven power upgrades.[3]Design process
Following the sudden death of Lotus founder Colin Chapman on December 16, 1982, chief designer Martin Ogilvie took the lead in finalizing the Lotus 92 project, building on the groundwork laid by Chapman and the team earlier that year.[1][4] Ogilvie, who had joined Lotus in 1970 and contributed to previous designs like the Lotus 88, focused on integrating innovative systems while ensuring compliance with FIA regulations.[1] Development of the Lotus 92 began in late 1982 as an evolution of the Lotus 87/87B chassis, with prototype construction emphasizing a carbon fibre and Kevlar monocoque for improved strength-to-weight ratio.[1] Wind tunnel testing was limited or possibly absent, as the design prioritized rapid iteration over extensive aerodynamic simulation, with styling adjustments made to accommodate sponsor requirements.[1] By early 1983, multiple prototypes were built, incorporating hydraulic and electronic components, culminating in a debut-ready car for the Brazilian Grand Prix in March.[4] The team faced significant challenges in balancing the integration of advanced systems with the FIA's 575 kg minimum weight limit and turbocharged engine compatibility constraints.[1] New materials like the carbon fibre-Kevlar composite added complexity in fabrication and certification, while the overall setup increased vehicle weight and incurred a 5-6 horsepower penalty due to system demands.[1] Reliability concerns, including vibration-induced failures in control components, necessitated careful engineering trade-offs to maintain structural integrity under racing loads.[4] Initial pre-season testing commenced with a shakedown on December 17, 1982, at Snetterton Circuit, where driver Nigel Mansell reported positive feedback on the car's stability, noting minimal pitch and roll during runs.[1][4] Feedback from this session prompted minor modifications to suspension tuning and electronic calibration, refining handling responses ahead of further winter tests and the 1983 season opener.[4] These iterations ensured the prototype met performance targets despite the rushed timeline post-Chapman's passing.[1]Design
Chassis and aerodynamics
The Lotus 92 utilized a carbon fibre and Kevlar sandwich monocoque chassis, a construction that delivered superior lightweight strength, enhanced torsional rigidity, and improved crash safety over preceding aluminium designs in Formula One.[1] This composite structure, pioneered in earlier Lotus models but refined for the 1983 regulations, contributed to the car's overall rigidity, allowing better force transmission to the suspension while reducing flex under high loads.[2] The monocoque's honeycomb core sandwiched between carbon fibre and Kevlar layers provided a balance of stiffness and impact absorption, aligning with the era's push toward advanced materials for performance and driver protection. Aerodynamically, the Lotus 92 adopted a flat underbody mandated by 1983 rules to prohibit venturi ground-effect tunnels, shifting reliance to overbody elements for downforce generation.[5] Wing configurations featured low-drag front wings with adjustable endplates for fine-tuning balance and multi-element rear wings optimized to produce consistent downforce across varying speeds, integrated seamlessly with the car's carbon-fibre body panels to minimize turbulence and drag.[6] This bodywork design emphasized smooth airflow over the sidepods and cockpit, reducing wake effects and enhancing high-speed stability without the complexity of sliding skirts from prior ground-effect eras. The chassis met the 1983 Formula One minimum weight requirement of 540 kg, though the Lotus 92's race-ready configuration, incorporating its innovative active suspension, resulted in an approximate curb weight of 580 kg for better component integration and durability.[7] Compared to the Lotus 91, the 92's composite monocoque offered incremental rigidity gains through optimized layup patterns, improving chassis response and weight distribution for more neutral handling characteristics. The active suspension further complemented the chassis by maintaining a constant low ride height, optimizing aerodynamic efficiency without detailed dynamic adjustments covered elsewhere.[1]Suspension and active system
The Lotus 92 introduced the first active suspension system in Formula One racing, debuting at the 1983 Brazilian Grand Prix. This innovative setup replaced traditional springs and dampers with hydraulic actuators controlled by an onboard computer, enabling real-time adjustments to ride height and damping. The system utilized high-pressure hydraulic rams fed by a pump and regulated by fast-acting valves from Moog Inc., allowing the suspension to respond to road conditions and aerodynamic loads within milliseconds.[4][8] By continuously monitoring and adapting the vehicle's attitude, the active suspension maintained optimal ground clearance, which was crucial for the aerodynamic efficiency of the flat-floor design. This prevented excessive pitch under braking or acceleration and minimized roll during cornering, thereby preserving downforce and improving both straight-line speed and cornering grip. The computer's control algorithms, developed in collaboration with the Cranfield Institute of Technology, processed inputs to ensure the car's underbody remained parallel to the track surface, reducing porpoising and enhancing overall stability.[8][9] The front and rear suspension geometry featured a double wishbone configuration, integrated with the active elements for precise wheel control. Sensors on the wheel hubs and body monitored motion and ride height—using technologies like laser or acoustic detectors—providing feedback to the electronic control unit for dynamic adjustments. This setup optimized tyre load distribution and suspension kinematics, contributing to better handling despite the system's complexity.[9][8] Although the Lotus 92's active suspension offered a significant competitive edge, reliability issues led to its replacement with a passive system after the first two races of 1983. The technology persisted in F1 until the FIA banned active suspension at the end of the 1993 season, citing its dominance in performance advantages like those demonstrated by later implementations.[4][8]Engine and drivetrain
The Lotus 92 utilized the venerable Cosworth DFY V8 engine, a naturally aspirated 90-degree V8 with a displacement of 2,993 cc, mounted longitudinally behind the driver.[10] By 1983, this power unit delivered approximately 520 bhp at 11,000 rpm, marking its final major application in a Lotus Formula One car before the team shifted to turbocharged engines.[1] The DFY's design emphasized reliability and broad power delivery, though integration challenges during the 92's development included occasional misfires triggered by engine vibrations affecting electronic controls.[1] Fuel was supplied via a system optimized for Elf gasoline, which supported the engine's high-revving naturally aspirated operation amid the era's turbo dominance. The drivetrain incorporated a Hewland/Lotus five-speed manual transmission, with gear ratios selected to balance acceleration and top speed across varied Formula One circuits, such as shorter ratios for traction-limited tracks and taller ones for high-speed venues.[1] Exhaust and cooling systems were specifically configured for the DFY's atmospheric induction, featuring efficient radiators and ducting to manage moderate thermal loads without the intense heat rejection demands of turbochargers, thereby aiding overall vehicle balance in a turbo-dominated grid.[10] This setup contributed to the drivetrain's compatibility with the active suspension, which enhanced traction delivery from the rear wheels.[1]Racing history
Team and drivers
Following the sudden death of founder Colin Chapman in December 1982, Peter Warr assumed the role of team principal at Team Lotus, guiding the organization through a transitional period marked by the introduction of new technical partnerships and driver expectations for the 1983 season.[11] Warr, who had previously served as competition manager, focused on stabilizing operations while leveraging Chapman's final design legacy. Key personnel included chief designer Martin Ogilvie, who oversaw the integration of innovative features into the Lotus 92 chassis.[1] The driver lineup featured Elio de Angelis as the lead pilot, entering his fourth full season with Lotus after joining in 1980, where he was expected to provide consistency and mentor the second driver amid the team's shift toward turbocharged engines later in the year. De Angelis, contracted through 1983, brought experience from prior campaigns, aiming to challenge for podiums with the evolving car package. His teammate was Nigel Mansell, promoted from reserve and test driver duties since 1980 to a full-time seat in 1982, with his 1983 contract emphasizing development work and aggressive racing to establish himself as a championship contender. Mansell was seen as a high-potential talent, tasked with contributing to car setup while adapting to the pressures of a lead team environment.[12] Team Lotus maintained a structured organization with around 80 personnel, including specialized mechanics for engine preparation and aerodynamics, operating from the Hethel base in Norfolk, England. Sponsorship from John Player Special provided financial backing and dictated the iconic black-and-gold livery, enhancing visibility and supporting the team's ambitions in a competitive turbo era.[13] Pre-season preparations centered on driver familiarization sessions at circuits like Paul Ricard, where de Angelis and Mansell conducted extensive testing of the Lotus 92's active suspension system to optimize ride height and handling under varying conditions. These runs, involving hydraulic adjustments monitored by engineers, allowed the drivers to build confidence in the technology's reliability before the Brazilian Grand Prix opener.[1]Performance in 1983
The Lotus 92 made its debut at the 1983 Brazilian Grand Prix, where Elio de Angelis was forced to use a spare chassis after engine issues with the turbocharged Lotus 93T during the warmup lap, leading to his post-race disqualification for starting in a different car than the one used in practice.[14] Nigel Mansell, driving the primary 92, qualified 10th and finished 12th, marking a challenging start for the car against the dominant turbocharged machinery.[14][15] Throughout the early season, the 92 showed flashes of potential in qualifying, where its advanced active suspension and handling allowed drivers to post respectable grid positions, but race performance was consistently undermined by the power deficit of its naturally aspirated Cosworth DFV engine compared to rivals' turbos, which delivered up to 150 horsepower more.[2] The best result came at the Detroit Grand Prix, where Mansell fought through the field from 14th on the grid to secure 6th place and Lotus's sole point of the year with the 92, navigating the tight street circuit effectively despite ongoing reliability concerns. However, setbacks were frequent, such as in Monaco, where Mansell retired on lap 1 after colliding with Michele Alboreto's Tyrrell, and in Belgium, where Mansell retired due to gearbox failure while de Angelis (in the 93T) finished 9th, highlighting the car's teething issues with the new active system and carbon-fiber components.[16] The 92 was raced in the first eight events of the 1983 calendar before being replaced by the turbo-equipped Lotus 94T for the British Grand Prix, as Team Lotus sought to close the performance gap to turbo frontrunners like Renault and Ferrari.[17] Over its brief campaign, the car achieved no podiums, pole positions, or victories, underscoring Lotus's transitional struggles in the turbo era despite innovative design elements that promised better handling. This period reflected broader team challenges following Colin Chapman's death, with reliability and power shortfalls limiting the 92's competitiveness.[18]Complete Formula One results
(key) (Races in bold indicate pole position) (Races in italics indicate fastest lap)| Year | Entrant | Chassis | Engine | Tyre | Driver | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | WDC Points | WCC Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1983 | John Player Team Lotus | Lotus 92 | Cosworth DFV/DFY V8 | P | Elio de Angelis | Ret (DSQ) | 0 | 1 | ||||||||||||||
| 1983 | John Player Team Lotus | Lotus 92 | Cosworth DFV/DFY V8 | P | Nigel Mansell | 12 | 12 | DNS | 12 | Ret | Ret | Ret | 6 | Ret | 1 | 1 |
- De Angelis: DSQ = Disqualified (Brazil, changed car).
- Mansell: DNS = Did not start (France, injury); Ret = Retired (Monaco collision, Belgium gearbox, Canada handling, San Marino wing issue).
- Source for results: STATS F1[27]
References
- /wiki/Brazilian_Grand_Prix
- /wiki/1983_United_States_Grand_Prix_West
- /wiki/1983_French_Grand_Prix
- /wiki/1983_San_Marino_Grand_Prix
- /wiki/1983_Monaco_Grand_Prix
- /wiki/1983_Belgian_Grand_Prix
- /wiki/1983_Detroit_Grand_Prix
- /wiki/1983_Canadian_Grand_Prix