Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Lotus 43
View on Wikipedia
This article needs additional citations for verification. (January 2015) |
| Category | Formula One | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructor | Team Lotus | ||||||||||
| Designers | |||||||||||
| Predecessor | Lotus 33 | ||||||||||
| Successor | Lotus 49 | ||||||||||
| Technical specifications[1][2] | |||||||||||
| Chassis | Aluminium monocoque | ||||||||||
| Suspension (front) | top rocker arms, lower wishbones, inboard coil springs over dampers | ||||||||||
| Suspension (rear) | reverse lower wishbones, twin radius arms, coil springs over dampers, anti-roll bar | ||||||||||
| Engine | BRM P75 2,996 cc (183 cu in) H16 Naturally aspirated | ||||||||||
| Transmission | BRM T82 6-speed manual | ||||||||||
| Weight | 563 kg (1,241 lb) | ||||||||||
| Fuel | Esso | ||||||||||
| Tyres | Firestone | ||||||||||
| Competition history | |||||||||||
| Notable entrants | Team Lotus | ||||||||||
| Notable drivers | |||||||||||
| Debut | 1966 Belgian Grand Prix | ||||||||||
| Last event | 1967 South African Grand Prix | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
| Constructors' Championships | 0 | ||||||||||
| Drivers' Championships | 0 | ||||||||||
The Lotus 43 was a Formula One racing car designed by Colin Chapman and Maurice Philippe[3] for the 1966 season. Hampered by its heavy and unreliable BRM engine, it won only one race, the 1966 United States Grand Prix.
Concept
[edit]The Lotus 43 was partially based on the Lotus 38 Indycar, designed by Len Terry, due to Lotus's experience at Indy with larger engine capacity and tyre/suspension setup. The car was designed in this way in response to new F1 regulations which came into force in 1966, which increased the engine capacity to 3 litres. Along with newer, wider tyres better able to handle the power of the larger engines, the need for a more robust design was obvious.[4]
Cosworth were developing a new engine for Lotus, the DFV, to be introduced for the 1967 Formula One season, and in the meantime Chapman made a deal for use of the BRM P75 H16 engine. The P75 on paper was technically advanced and powerful, and Chapman had hopes that it would power his cars to another successful season.[5]
The first sign of trouble was when the H16 engine arrived at the Team Lotus factory in Hethel, Norfolk and it required four men to lift it from the truck. The engine proved to be overweight, unreliable and was unable to produce the promised power.[6]
Engine problems aside, the 43 chassis was considered an excellent design[according to whom?] and elements of it were used in its 1967 successor, the far more successful Lotus 49, including the use of the engine as a stressed structural member which bore weight and to which the rear suspension was attached.
Racing history
[edit]1966
[edit]The car was supposed to debut at the 1966 Monaco Grand Prix, driven by Peter Arundell, but it was unavailable. Its first outing at the following Belgian Grand Prix ended during practice, when the engine gave out.[1]
The 43 reappeared at the Italian Grand Prix but retired with gearbox failure. Clark then won the United States Grand Prix at Watkins Glen, the only race win for the P75 engine, using a spare engine loaned by the BRM team. However, gearbox failure again led to the 43's retirement from the final race of the season, the Mexican Grand Prix.
1967
[edit]In 1967 the 43 made its final appearance at the South African Grand Prix at the Kyalami circuit, where Clark and new team mate Graham Hill both retired their cars.
Only two cars were built and were later sold to Robert Lamplough and Jock Russell, who fitted them with 4.7 litre Ford V8 engines and competed in Formula 5000 events.
-
Lotus 43 at the BTCC Knockhill 2014
-
Lotus 43 being demonstrated in 2014
Complete results
[edit]Formula One World Championship results
[edit](key)
| Year | Entrant | Engine | Tyres | Drivers | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | Points | WCC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1966 | Team Lotus | BRM P75 3.0 H16 | F | MON | BEL | FRA | GBR | NED | GER | ITA | USA | MEX | 131 | 5th | |||
| Peter Arundell | DNS | Ret | |||||||||||||||
| Jim Clark | Ret | 1 | Ret | ||||||||||||||
| 1967 | Team Lotus | BRM P75 3.0 H16 | F | RSA | MON | NED | BEL | FRA | GBR | GER | CAN | ITA | USA | MEX | 62 | 8th | |
| Jim Clark | Ret | ||||||||||||||||
| Graham Hill | Ret |
^1 Total points scored by all Lotus-BRM cars, including 4 points scored by drivers of Lotus 33 variants.
^2 Total points scored by all Lotus-BRM cars, including 6 points scored by drivers of Lotus 33 variants.
Non-championship Formula One results
[edit](key)
| Year | Entrant | Engine | Tyres | Drivers | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1966 | Team Lotus | BRM P75 3.0 H16 | F | RSA | SYR | INT | OUL | |
| Jim Clark | DNS |
PC simulation
[edit]A driveable, detailed reconstruction of the Lotus 43 (with matching car physics) appeared in 2007 in the freely-available '66 Mod' for the PC-based racing simulation Grand Prix Legends.
References
[edit]- ^ a b "STATS F1 • Lotus 43". Statsf1.com. Retrieved 27 January 2015.
- ^ "Lotus 43 BRM". ultimatecarpage.com. Retrieved 27 January 2015.
- ^ "Lotus 43 BRM". ultimatecarpage.com. Retrieved 5 January 2025.
- ^ "The Lotus 43 and its Mighty 16-Cylinders! | HistoricRacingNews.com". www.historicracingnews.com. Retrieved 7 May 2020.
- ^ Perkins, Chris (19 June 2018). "The 1966 Lotus 43 Was a Magnificent Failure With a Bizarre Engine". Road & Track. Retrieved 7 May 2020.
- ^ Elson, James (12 July 2024). "Colin Chapman: Formula 1's greatest innovator". Motor Sport Magazine. Retrieved 11 June 2025.
Lotus 43
View on GrokipediaDevelopment
Background
In 1966, Formula One regulations underwent a significant change, doubling the maximum engine displacement from 1.5 liters to 3.0 liters to usher in an era of greater power and performance.[3] This shift, often dubbed the "return to power," prompted teams to seek new engine solutions, as existing suppliers like Coventry Climax were unwilling or unable to quickly scale up to the larger capacity.[4] Faced with tight development timelines for the new formula, Lotus team principal Colin Chapman opted to adapt the chassis from the successful Lotus 38 IndyCar, which had proven effective with larger engines and robust suspension setups at Indianapolis.[3] This decision allowed Lotus to leverage existing engineering while modifying the platform for Formula One demands. Designers Colin Chapman and Maurice Philippe played key roles in the adaptation, with Philippe focusing on integrating the chassis around the selected powerplant to maintain Lotus's emphasis on lightweight construction and handling agility.[4] To power the Lotus 43, Chapman forged a partnership with BRM to supply the innovative P75 H16 engine as a temporary measure, stemming from delays in the development of the Cosworth DFV V8, which was earmarked for the following year.[3] The H16 was initially expected to deliver around 420 horsepower at over 10,000 rpm, promising a competitive edge through its unique configuration of two stacked flat-eight cylinders geared together.[4] However, the engine faced substantial challenges, including excessive weight, mechanical complexity with multiple camshafts and crankshafts, and reliability issues that hindered its potential despite the high hopes.[3]Design features
The Lotus 43 employed an aluminum monocoque chassis adapted from the Lotus 38 Indy car design, re-engineered for Formula One's narrower track requirements and higher torsional rigidity demands while retaining the original's lightweight construction principles. Key dimensions included a wheelbase of 2,438 mm, and front and rear track widths of 1,524 mm, allowing for agile handling on European circuits.[5][6] Aerodynamic considerations centered on a low-profile bodywork configuration to integrate the exceptionally tall BRM H16 engine without compromising the car's streamlined silhouette. This resulted in a basic, wingless design emblematic of mid-1960s F1 aesthetics, with glass-fibre reinforced plastic panels for the nose and engine cover to minimize drag and enhance airflow over the chassis. The engine's height dictated a raised cowling, but the overall form prioritized simplicity and low center of gravity over complex downforce generation.[3][5] The braking system featured outboard disc brakes at all four wheels.[3][6] Wheels measured 15 inches in diameter, fitted with Firestone racing tires in sizes optimized for grip and durability on Grand Prix tracks, helping achieve the car's curb weight of 563 kg for superior power-to-weight performance.[3][7] Fuel system integration reflected Esso sponsorship, with a centrally mounted tank positioned behind the driver to optimize weight distribution and maintain rearward bias under varying fuel loads during races. This placement enhanced stability, particularly as fuel consumption altered the center of mass over long stints.[6]Technical specifications
Chassis and suspension
The Lotus 43 employed an aluminium monocoque tub as its core structural element, constructed from riveted and bonded sheet metal panels to deliver a lightweight yet rigid framework capable of withstanding high cornering loads. This design incorporated three steel bulkheads for enhanced torsional strength, contributing to the car's overall dry weight of approximately 567 kg. The monocoque was derived from the Lotus 38 Indy car, adapting its proven architecture for Formula 1 demands while integrating the fuel cell within the tub for efficient packaging.[5][8] The front suspension followed established Lotus principles with upper rocker arms, lower wishbones, and inboard coilover dampers to optimize camber control and ride compliance during high-speed circuits. At the rear, the setup utilized reversed lower wishbones, twin radius arms for lateral location, outboard coilover dampers, and an adjustable anti-roll bar, allowing fine-tuning for varying track conditions. This configuration supported the car's mid-engine layout while maintaining geometric consistency under load.[5][8] Steering was handled by a rack-and-pinion system with geometry tuned for quick response and precise feedback, aiding driver confidence in tight corners. Overall, the chassis and suspension combination was engineered for neutral handling balance, prioritizing high-speed stability through its low polar moment of inertia and stiff structure. However, the substantial rear weight bias introduced by the BRM H16 engine—tipping the scales at 232 kg—affected dynamic equilibrium, leading to potential understeer in low-speed maneuvers despite the inherent design strengths.[5][9]Engine and drivetrain
The Lotus 43 was powered by the BRM P75 H16 engine, a naturally aspirated unit with a displacement of 2,996 cc configured as two stacked 180-degree V8s—essentially two flat-eight cylinder banks one above the other—with separate crankshafts geared together for synchronization.[5][10] This complex layout, featuring an aluminium alloy block and heads, DOHC valvetrain with two valves per cylinder, and gear-driven camshafts, was designed to deliver high-revving performance in the new 3.0-liter Formula One formula.[5] The engine produced approximately 420 hp at around 10,500 rpm, making it one of the most potent power units available at the time, though its output was somewhat hampered by development delays.[3][11] Despite its theoretical advantages, the BRM P75 faced significant challenges that undermined its effectiveness. At 232 kg, it was substantially overweight compared to rival V8 and V12 engines, which typically weighed around 150 kg, contributing to the Lotus 43's overall balance issues.[5][12] The 16-cylinder design also led to high fuel consumption, requiring larger tanks and more frequent pit stops, while reliability was plagued by excessive vibration from the geared crankshafts and overheating due to the compact packaging of the stacked banks.[3][13] These problems often resulted in mechanical failures during testing and races, limiting the engine's potential.[12] Fuel delivery was handled by a Lucas mechanical port fuel injection system, which provided precise metering to each cylinder for optimal combustion efficiency in the high-revving H16.[5][6] This setup, combined with Lucas transistorized ignition and a single 10 mm sparking plug per cylinder, supported the engine's 11.5:1 compression ratio and dry-sump lubrication, though it added to the unit's maintenance demands.[5][6] The drivetrain featured a BRM T82 six-speed manual transmission integrated with the final drive unit, delivering power to the rear wheels.[5][6] This setup, while robust in theory, inherited some of the engine's vibration issues, necessitating careful synchronization during shifts. The overall combination weighed around 306 kg for the engine and gearbox assembly, further emphasizing the packaging challenges.[14] Maintaining the H16 required frequent rebuilds—often after just a few hours of running—due to wear from vibrations and thermal stresses, along with specialized tools to access the stacked cylinder banks and geared components.[13][10] These complexities made the powertrain a high-risk choice for Team Lotus, selected as an alternative to the emerging Cosworth DFV V8.[3]Racing history
1966 season
The Lotus 43 made its competitive debut at the 1966 Belgian Grand Prix at Spa-Francorchamps, entered by Team Lotus with the BRM H16 engine. Peter Arundell was scheduled to drive the new car but did not start after an engine seizure during practice, while teammate Jim Clark raced the older Lotus 33-Climax but retired on the formation lap following an accident in wet conditions.[15][16] This early reliability setback highlighted the challenges with the complex H16 powerplant, which suffered from overheating and mechanical fragility right from the outset.[17] The car skipped the Dutch Grand Prix at Zandvoort due to persistent transmission issues that required extensive rework, preventing Team Lotus from fielding it. The Lotus 43 was also absent from the British Grand Prix at Brands Hatch due to these ongoing transmission problems.[17] Further troubles plagued the French Grand Prix at Reims, where Arundell retired on lap 4 after gear selection problems caused the distributor drive to shear.[17] These non-finishes stemmed primarily from the H16's overheating tendencies and the gearbox's inadequate strength under race loads, prompting ongoing testing and tweaks by the Lotus team, including efforts to revise the cooling system for better heat management.[17] The Italian Grand Prix at Monza offered a brief glimmer of potential, with Clark qualifying strongly in the Lotus 43, but he retired on lap 59 due to gearbox failure.[16][17] The season's highlight came at the United States Grand Prix at Watkins Glen, where Clark delivered the Lotus 43's—and the BRM H16's—sole Formula One victory. Qualifying second just 0.1 seconds off pole, Clark dropped to fourth at the start but methodically climbed through the field, taking the lead on lap 56 after Jack Brabham's engine failure; he maintained control to win by over 30 seconds, completing all 108 laps without issue in a dominant display that masked the car's earlier woes.[18][19] At the season-ending Mexican Grand Prix, Clark qualified second but retired on lap 9 with gearbox failure.[20][17] Despite the promise shown at Watkins Glen, the Lotus 43's 1966 campaign was marred by unreliability, with only that single finish across five entries. Team Lotus scored 13 points in the Constructors' Championship via the US win and other minor contributions, securing fifth place overall.[21] Clark, blending results from both the Lotus 43 and 33-Climax, ended the drivers' standings in sixth with 16 points, underscoring his skill in extracting performance from troubled machinery.[22]1967 season
The Lotus 43 made only a single appearance during the 1967 Formula One World Championship, at the season-opening South African Grand Prix at Kyalami on 2 January.[23] Team Lotus entered two examples of the car, assigning the new chassis 43/2 to Jim Clark and the older chassis 43/1 to Graham Hill, who had joined the team that year as Clark's teammate.[24] Both drivers qualified with mechanical issues including a leaking fuel bag, with Clark in 3rd place (1:29.0) and Hill 15th (1:32.6).[25] In the race, Clark retired on lap 22 due to engine failure in his BRM H16 power unit, while Hill lasted until lap 64 before withdrawing with suspension failure.[24] Neither car finished, resulting in zero points for the Lotus 43 entries.[26] These retirements underscored the persistent reliability challenges of the heavy and complex BRM H16 engine, which had plagued the car since its debut.[2] With the arrival of the revolutionary Lotus 49 and its Cosworth DFV V8 engine later in the season, Team Lotus shifted focus entirely to the new model starting from the Dutch Grand Prix, demoting the 43 to non-competitive reserve status.[27] The South African Grand Prix marked the Lotus 43's final competitive outing, bringing an end to Lotus's experimentation with H16 power in Formula One as the team embraced the more reliable and potent DFV era.[28]Results
World Championship Grands Prix
The Lotus 43 participated in five World Championship Grands Prix across 1966 and 1967, with entries in the French, Italian, United States, Mexican, and South African races.[23]| Grand Prix | Date | Circuit | Driver | Grid Position | Finish Position | Points Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French GP | 3 July 1966 | Reims | Peter Arundell | 17 | Retired (lap 3, gearbox) | 0 |
| Italian GP | 4 September 1966 | Monza | Jim Clark | 3 | Retired (lap 58, gearbox) | 0 |
| United States GP | 2 October 1966 | Watkins Glen | Jim Clark | 2 | 1st | 9 |
| Mexican GP | 23 October 1966 | Mexico City | Jim Clark | 2 | Retired (gearbox) | 0 |
| South African GP | 2 January 1967 | Kyalami | Jim Clark | 3 | Retired (engine) | 0 |
| South African GP | 2 January 1967 | Kyalami | Graham Hill | 15 | Retired (accident) | 0 |
Non-championship races
The Lotus 43 saw limited participation in non-championship Formula One events, primarily in 1966 following its late-season debut, with no recorded entries in 1967 as Team Lotus shifted focus to World Championship races and the development of the Lotus 49. These appearances highlighted the car's ongoing reliability challenges with the BRM H16 engine, resulting in no race finishes or competitive results.[16] The sole non-championship outing for the Lotus 43 occurred at the Gold Cup meeting at Oulton Park on 17 September 1966. Entered for Jim Clark, the car was used only in practice sessions before the BRM engine failed, forcing Clark to revert to a Lotus 33-Climax for the race itself, where he finished second. This incident underscored the engine's fragility outside of controlled Grand Prix conditions.[36][37]| Event | Date | Location | Driver | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gold Cup | 17 Sep 1966 | Oulton Park, UK | Jim Clark | Non-start (engine failure in practice) |