Hubbry Logo
Marsh funnelMarsh funnelMain
Open search
Marsh funnel
Community hub
Marsh funnel
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Marsh funnel
Marsh funnel
Marsh funnel
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Marsh Funnel: plastic with brass flow tube and mesh

The Marsh funnel is a simple device for measuring viscosity by observing the time it takes a known volume of liquid to flow from a cone through a short tube. It is standardized for use by mud engineers to check the quality of drilling mud. Other cones with different geometries and orifice arrangements are called flow cones, but have the same operating principle.

In use, the funnel is held vertically with the end of the tube closed by a finger. The liquid to be measured is poured through the mesh to remove any particles which might block the tube. When the fluid level reaches the mesh, the amount inside is equal to the rated volume. To take the measurement, the finger is released as a stopclock is started, and the liquid is allowed to run into a measuring container. The time in seconds is recorded as a measure of the viscosity.

Marsh Funnel top view showing the mesh through which drilling fluid is poured to retain particles which would not pass through the orifice.

The Marsh Funnel

[edit]

Based on a method published in 1931 by H.N.Marsh,[1] a Marsh cone is a flow cone with an aspect ratio of 2:1 and a working volume of at least a litre. A Marsh funnel is a Marsh cone with a particular orifice and a working volume of 1.5 litres. It consists of a cone 6 inches (152 mm) across and 12 inches in height (305 mm) to the apex of which is fixed a tube 2 inches (50.8 mm) long and 3/16 inch (4.76 mm) internal diameter. A 10-mesh screen is fixed near the top across half the cone.[2]

In American practice (and most of the oil industry) the volume collected is a quart. If water is used, the time should be 26 +/- 0.5 seconds.[2] If the time is less than this the tube is probably enlarged by erosion, if more it may be blocked or damaged, and the funnel should be replaced. In some companies, and Europe in particular, the volume collected is a litre, for which the water funnel time should be 28 seconds. Marsh himself collected 0.50 litre, for which the time was 18.5 seconds.[1]

The Marsh funnel time is often referred to as the Marsh funnel viscosity, and represented by the abbreviation FV. The unit (seconds) is often omitted. Formally, the volume should also be stated. The (quart) Marsh funnel time for typical drilling muds is 34 to 50 seconds, though mud mixtures to cope with some geological conditions may have a time of 100 or more seconds.[3]

While the most common use is for drilling muds, which are non-Newtonian fluids, the Marsh funnel is not a rheometer, because it only provides one measurement under one flow condition. However the effective viscosity can be determined from following simple formula.[4]

μ = ρ (t - 25)

where μ = effective viscosity in centipoise
ρ = density in g/cm3
t = quart funnel time in seconds

For example, a mud of funnel time 40 seconds and density 1.1 g/cm3 has an effective viscosity of about 16.5 cP. For the range of times of typical muds above, the shear rate in the Marsh funnel is about 2000 s−1.[4]

Other Flow Cones

[edit]

The term Marsh cone is also used in the concrete and oil industries. European standard EN445[5] and American standard C939[6] for measuring the flow properties of cement grout mixtures specify a funnel similar to the Marsh cone. Some manufacturers supply devices which they call Marsh cones, with removable tubes with size ranges from 5 to 15 mm. These can be used for quality control by selecting a tube which gives a convenient time, say 30 to 60 seconds.

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Marsh funnel

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Marsh funnel is a simple, cone-shaped device used primarily in the to measure the of drilling fluids, such as , by timing the flow of a standardized volume under gravity. It features a wide for filling, an integrated screen to exclude large particles, and a narrow tube at the bottom with a calibrated orifice (typically 3/16 inch (4.7 mm) in diameter) through which exactly one (946 mL) of fluid empties into a graduated cup, with results reported in seconds per quart. For at 21 ± 3°C (70 ± 5°F), the standard flow time is 26 ± 0.5 seconds, providing a baseline for comparison. Invented by mining engineer Hallan N. Marsh and first described in a technical paper, the device was developed to assess the flow properties of rotary muds during early operations. Marsh's work, published in the American Institute of Mining and Metallurgical Engineers (AIME) Transactions, emphasized its role in evaluating mud consistency to prevent issues like lost circulation or stuck pipe. Over time, it became a staple tool in due to its portability, low cost, and ease of use at remote rig sites, where it allows rapid checks without complex equipment. The Marsh funnel is standardized by the () under Recommended Practices 13B-1 for water-based muds and 13B-2 for oil-based muds, ensuring consistent measurements across global operations. In practice, it helps monitor stability by comparing inlet and outlet viscosities, detecting or degradation that could affect hole cleaning, pressure control, or bit performance. While it provides a reliable empirical indicator—often correlating higher times with thicker fluids suitable for high-pressure environments—its limitations include sensitivity to temperature, , and strength, making it a preliminary tool rather than a substitute for advanced rheometers like the Fann that measure shear-dependent behavior. Beyond oil and gas, variants are applied in for testing clay slurries in diaphragm walls or tunneling.

History

Invention

The Marsh funnel was invented by Hallan N. Marsh, an engineer affiliated with the General Petroleum Corporation of California and based in Los Angeles. In 1931, Marsh detailed the design and application of his funnel viscometer in the paper "Properties and Treatment of Rotary Mud," published in the Transactions of the AIME. The publication provided a comprehensive overview of rotary drilling mud properties, including humorous anecdotes about the funnel's development, such as Marsh's wry observation that he would be remembered more for the "d*** funnel" than for his other technical contributions. Marsh created the device as a straightforward, portable instrument to assess drilling mud directly in the field, enabling quick evaluations without laboratory setups. This addressed the need for reliable, on-site measurements of mud flow characteristics during rotary drilling operations. The invention arose amid the oil boom of the and early , a period of explosive growth in oil exploration and production in fields like Signal Hill and Huntington Beach, where efficient management became critical to operations.

Adoption and standardization

Following its invention in 1931, the Marsh funnel was rapidly adopted in oilfield operations during as a practical tool for routine assessment of , enabling field engineers to monitor fluid properties on-site without complex laboratory equipment. By the late , it had become integral to standard practices, with references to its use in conjunction with (API) methods for controlling water loss in producing zones during drilling in fields like . By the mid-20th century, the Marsh funnel was formally incorporated into recommended practices for field testing of drilling fluids, specifically outlined in API RP 13B (later evolving into API RP 13B-1 for water-based muds), which standardized procedures for measurements to ensure consistency across the industry. This standardization solidified its role as a benchmark tool in the oil and gas sector, with the device conforming to API specifications for dimensions and testing protocols that remain in use today. The Marsh funnel's adoption extended globally, becoming a staple in operations worldwide due to its simplicity and reliability, while adaptations appeared in international standards such as EN 445 (first published in 1996), which specifies a similar for measuring the fluidity of in prestressing tendons. Over more than 90 years, the original design has endured without significant modifications, continuing to serve as the primary field in and related applications.

Design and specifications

Components

The Marsh funnel consists of several key physical components designed for reliable measurement in fluids. The primary element is the main body, a cone-shaped constructed from impact-resistant , measuring approximately 305 mm (12 inches) in height and 152 mm (6 inches) in diameter at the top, with a total capacity of 1500 ml up to the bottom of the screen. At the base of the is the orifice, a tubular outlet with an inside of 4.7 (3/16 inch) and a length of 50.8 (2 inches), which controls the flow rate of the during testing. Over the top opening sits a fixed metal screen with 1.6 (1/16 inch) openings equivalent to 12 , covering half the area and positioned 19 below the funnel's top edge to prevent large particles from entering and clogging the device. The outflow is collected in a graduated made of impact-resistant plastic, with a minimum capacity of 946 (1 quart) and markings in milliliters and US ounces for precise measurement. An optional stand or support frame may be used to position the funnel stably during operation, ensuring consistent test conditions.

Dimensions and materials

The Marsh funnel features a conical with a top of 152 mm and a total height of 305 mm, providing a total volume capacity of 1.5 liters up to the screen before outflow measurement. These dimensions ensure consistent flow dynamics for testing of fluids, as specified in industry standards for field portability and accuracy. The discharge tube attached to the funnel's apex has an internal diameter of 4.7 mm (3/16 inch) and a length of 50.8 mm (2 inches), optimized to facilitate primarily for low- fluids like water-based muds. This configuration allows the device to measure the time for 946 ml of fluid to efflux, serving as a proxy for relative . The body of the Marsh funnel is typically constructed from molded, impact-resistant plastic to provide durability, corrosion resistance, and resistance to temperature variations encountered in drilling operations. The tube and the 12-mesh screen fitted at the top are usually made of or , enabling them to withstand exposure to aggressive chemicals without degradation. While plastic-bodied funnels represent the standard for routine field use due to their nature and cost-effectiveness, metal variants—often constructed from aluminum or full —are available for harsh environments requiring enhanced mechanical strength and chemical resistance.

Principle of operation

Viscosity measurement basics

The Marsh funnel quantifies by measuring the time required for exactly 946 ml (one ) of fluid to efflux through its standardized orifice under alone, without applied . This efflux time, denoted as tt in seconds, serves as the primary output, reflecting the fluid's resistance to flow in a simple, empirical manner suitable for field conditions. The device is calibrated according to (API) Recommended Practice 13B-1 such that fresh water at a of 21 ± 3°C (70 ± 5°F) discharges in 26 ± 0.5 seconds, establishing a baseline for low-viscosity Newtonian fluids. Although designed primarily for Newtonian fluids—where remains constant independent of —the Marsh funnel is routinely employed for non-Newtonian muds, which display variable under shear, such as shear-thinning common in bentonite-based suspensions. For these complex s, the measurement yields an that indicates overall consistency and stability rather than true rheological parameters like plastic viscosity or yield point. This application relies on the funnel's ability to simulate coarse flow conditions akin to those in operations, providing a practical, though approximate, indicator of fluid performance. The resulting viscosity is reported in units of "Marsh funnel seconds" or "funnel viscosity," which differ from absolute measures like centipoise (cP) and emphasize relative comparisons across samples rather than precise thermodynamic values. Conceptually, apparent viscosity scales directly with efflux time, such that higher tt corresponds to greater flow resistance: η∝t\eta \propto t. To estimate effective viscosity in centipoise for field use, particularly with non-Newtonian muds, the relation incorporates fluid density: μe=ρ(t−25)\mu_e = \rho (t - 25) where μe\mu_e is effective viscosity (cP), ρ\rho is density (g/cm³), and 25 seconds approximates the adjusted baseline for water's flow. This equation, derived from numerical simulations of power-law fluids validated against experiments, enables quick conversions while highlighting density's role in gravitational flow.

Flow characteristics

The Marsh funnel operates on a gravity-driven flow principle, where the is poured into the conical reservoir and flows downward through a narrow exit tube solely under the influence of gravitational . As the traverses the narrowing cone and constricts at the 4.7 mm tube, viscous s create resistance that slows the flow rate, with higher leading to greater opposition and longer efflux times. The device assumes predominantly laminar flow conditions during measurement, characterized by low Reynolds numbers typically below 2000, where viscous effects dominate over inertial forces to ensure smooth, predictable fluid motion without turbulence. This regime is maintained in calibration with water and for most drilling fluids exhibiting satisfactory flow properties, as transitional or turbulent behavior near the orifice can introduce inaccuracies if Reynolds numbers exceed this threshold. A 12-mesh screen (approximately 1.6 mm openings) positioned across half the funnel's top inlet filters out larger solid particles from the , preventing immediate clogging and allowing only finer suspensions to influence the flow. However, elevated concentrations of smaller can still accumulate, unpredictably increasing flow resistance or causing partial blockages that deviate from ideal viscous behavior. Fluid temperature significantly impacts flow rate, as higher temperatures reduce and accelerate efflux, while lower temperatures do the opposite; standards specify calibration and testing at 21 ± 3 °C to standardize measurements and minimize thermal variations. The efflux time measured serves as a practical proxy for relative , correlating inversely with flow ease under these controlled conditions.

Usage procedure

Step-by-step testing

To conduct the Marsh funnel test, begin by ensuring the device is clean and properly assembled, with the receiving cup positioned to collect exactly 946 ml () of fluid. The test measures the time required for a specified volume of to flow through the funnel under gravity, providing a simple field assessment of its consistency. The procedure follows these steps:
  1. Preparation: Cover the funnel's discharge orifice with a finger or plug to prevent flow. Pour freshly sampled and well-mixed through the built-in screen into the upright funnel until it reaches the bottom of the screen (filling to the brim, approximately 1.5 liters). This ensures large particles are filtered out and the sample is representative.
  2. Timing: Position the funnel over the empty graduated receiving . Remove the finger or plug to start the flow, simultaneously activating a . Continue timing until the fluid level in the cup reaches the 946 ml mark, recording the elapsed time to the nearest second. Measure the fluid immediately after, as it influences flow .
  3. Repetition: While a single test is standard, repeat with fresh samples from the same batch if inconsistencies such as air bubbles in the column or clogs in the orifice are observed, to ensure reliability. Discard any test showing anomalies and average consistent results as needed.
For verification, at 21 ± 3°C should flow 946 ml in 26 ± 0.5 seconds, serving as a baseline check before testing fluids. Operators must wear appropriate (PPE), such as gloves, eye protection, and protective clothing, when handling potentially hazardous fluids to mitigate risks like skin contact or inhalation. After each use, thoroughly clean and dry the funnel, screen, and cup to remove residues that could affect subsequent tests.

Result interpretation

The outflow time measured by the Marsh funnel provides a qualitative indicator of drilling fluid consistency, with fresh water serving as the baseline at approximately 26 seconds for one quart (946 ml) to discharge under standard conditions of 21°C ± 3°C. For typical water-based or oil-based muds, times range from 25 to 70 seconds, reflecting the desired thickening for suspension and hole cleaning; times exceeding this range signal a thicker , often requiring thinning agents, such as , or dilution to reduce and restore optimal flow properties. Trend monitoring with the Marsh funnel involves serial testing of mud samples to detect shifts in properties, such as increases due to solids contamination from drilled formations or decreases from dilution. This approach allows field personnel to track rheological stability over operations, enabling timely adjustments to maintain performance without advanced equipment. Results are interpreted through relative comparisons to a established baseline or prior tests, rather than as absolute values in centipoise, since the funnel measures flow at a single and cannot capture non-Newtonian behavior fully. This method supports by highlighting deviations, such as inconsistencies between entering and exiting the wellbore, which may indicate or degradation. In , advancements include empirical models derived from power-law that correlate Marsh funnel discharge times to plastic and yield point, offering improved field estimates; for instance, one study on bentonite-based fluids with a 38-second time yielded a plastic of 0.026 Pa·s and yield point of 21.2 Pa using modified hydraulic equations.

Calibration and maintenance

Calibration method

The calibration of a Marsh funnel is verified by measuring the outflow time of under controlled conditions to ensure it meets the manufacturer's specifications. The standard test uses at a temperature of 21 ± 3 °C (70 ± 5 °F), where the time required for 946 ml (1 quart) to flow out should be 26 ± 0.5 seconds. To perform the calibration check, fill the funnel with the prepared while covering the discharge tube orifice with a finger or plug to prevent premature flow. Position a graduated cup below the outlet, remove the cover to start a , and record the time until exactly 946 ml has discharged. Conduct at least three trials under identical conditions and calculate the average time to account for minor variations. If the average time deviates from 26 ± 0.5 seconds, inspect the funnel for potential issues such as blockages in the discharge tube or screen, which can be cleared using a or soft brush, or signs of wear like enlarging the tube. The device has no user-adjustable components, so persistent inaccuracies require dimensional verification against the manufacturer's specifications or replacement of the funnel. Calibration checks should be performed periodically, particularly before critical field tests, to maintain accuracy amid potential environmental factors or usage wear. Regular cleaning after each use with water or appropriate solvents prevents buildup, and storage in a dry place avoids deformation.

Standards compliance

The Marsh funnel viscosity measurement is governed by Recommended Practice (RP) 13B-1 (5th ed., 2023) for water-based drilling fluids, which in section 6.2 details the test procedure using a funnel calibrated to discharge 946 ml (1 ) of in 26 ± 0.5 seconds at 21 ± 3 °C (70 ± 5 °F). The test is performed at ambient , with the fluid reported. This standard ensures consistent field testing by specifying apparatus dimensions, including a 4.76 mm (3/16 in) orifice diameter and a screen to prevent . For oil-based drilling fluids, API RP 13B-2 (6th ed., 2023, Addendum 1, 2025) outlines a comparable procedure in section 7.2, emphasizing controls to account for the higher sensitivity of these fluids to thermal variations, with the test performed at ambient and the fluid reported. The practice aligns with the geometry of API RP 13B-1 but includes adjustments for fluid and potential effects during the efflux time recording. ASTM D6910/D6910M-19 (2019) establishes a standard for Marsh funnel viscosity specifically for clay construction slurries, modifying the approach to suit and similar non-drilling applications by focusing on relative consistency indicators rather than absolute . This method retains the core funnel design but prioritizes field for slurries in geotechnical and foundation work, reporting viscosity in seconds for 946 ml outflow without requiring rotational correlation. Internationally, the EN 445:2007 addresses grout fluidity testing for prestressing tendons using a flow cone that aligns with Marsh funnel geometry, including a 10 mm orifice for measuring the time to discharge 1 liter of cement to assess workability and injection properties. This standard adapts the principle for thixotropic grouts, ensuring compatibility with post-tensioned concrete structures while specifying calibration against water baselines for reproducibility.

Applications and variants

Primary uses in drilling

The Marsh funnel serves as a fundamental tool in oil and gas for monitoring the of drilling fluids, which is essential for ensuring efficient cuttings transport out of the wellbore and maintaining stability during operations. By providing a quick measure of , it helps prevent issues such as stuck pipe or poor hole cleaning that could arise from inadequate fluid properties. This monitoring is particularly critical in real-time field conditions, where viscosity fluctuations can impact overall drilling efficiency. In field , the Marsh funnel enables routine testing of samples, often comparing inlet and outlet viscosities to identify changes caused by factors like variations, accumulation of drilled solids, or the addition of chemical additives. These checks are typically conducted frequently during active circulation—such as hourly or as needed—to maintain consistent fluid performance and allow for prompt adjustments by mud engineers. The simplicity of the test supports its integration into daily rig workflows without requiring specialized laboratory equipment. The device's cost-effectiveness stems from its portable, lightweight construction and minimal maintenance requirements, making it well-suited for remote and rigs where advanced instrumentation may be impractical. Constructed from durable materials like or , it delivers reliable on-site results at a low operational cost, facilitating widespread adoption since its inclusion in the American Petroleum Institute's () Recommended Practice 13B, first published in 1962. It is routinely applied across various drilling fluid systems, including water-based, oil-based, and synthetic-based muds, to gauge and support formulation adjustments tailored to specific well conditions. For instance, in synthetic-based fluids, the Marsh funnel helps correlate flow times with rheological behavior under high-temperature or high-pressure environments common in . This versatility ensures its role in optimizing fluid performance for diverse geological challenges. Beyond oil and gas drilling, the Marsh funnel is used in construction to measure the viscosity of clay-based slurries for applications such as diaphragm wall construction and tunneling, following ASTM D6910 standards. This helps ensure proper fluid properties for excavation support and stability.

Similar flow cones

Grout flow cones, standardized under ASTM C939, are designed for measuring the flowability of fluid hydraulic cement grouts used in preplaced-aggregate concrete. These cones feature a larger orifice, typically 13 mm (0.5 inch) in diameter, compared to the Marsh funnel, and a specified volume of 1.725 L, with efflux time determining workability for cement mixtures. The test procedure involves filling the cone to a precise level and timing the discharge, ensuring consistent assessment of grout consistency in construction applications. General flow cones extend the gravity-driven efflux to other materials, such as paints and varnishes, but with varied geometries tailored to specific viscosities. For instance, ISO 2431-compliant flow cups, often conical in , use orifices ranging from 3 mm to 8 mm and a typical volume of 100 ml to measure efflux times between 30 and 100 seconds for coatings. These devices are calibrated differently from the Marsh funnel to suit Newtonian or near-Newtonian fluids like inks, prioritizing application consistency over drilling mud . Adaptations of the Marsh funnel design include metal constructions, such as versions, for enhanced durability in high-temperature environments where might deform. Modern kits often integrate digital timers for precise efflux measurements, automating the process and improving accuracy in field testing. Key differences from the original Marsh design lie in its specificity to a 946 ml volume and approximately 4.7 mm diameter orifice tube, optimized for the non-Newtonian of muds, whereas variants adjust these parameters for broader material compatibilities.

Limitations and alternatives

Measurement constraints

The Marsh funnel provides an empirical measure of for fluids but exhibits significant inaccuracies when applied to non-Newtonian fluids, such as those exhibiting shear-thinning or gelling . These fluids often overestimate due to the device's reliance on a narrow range of shear rates at the orifice (approximately 500–1000 s⁻¹), which fails to capture the complex flow characteristics under varying shear conditions. For gelling or high-yield-point fluids, progressive gelation during the test causes flow rates to slow nonlinearly, leading to unreliable results that deviate exponentially from true rheological . Several environmental and compositional factors further constrain the accuracy of Marsh funnel measurements. Temperature variations, typically calibrated at 21 ± 3°C, can alter substantially, with higher temperatures reducing flow times and thus underestimating consistency, while even small deviations of ±3°C introduce measurable errors in field conditions. in the influences results through potential clogging at the orifice, particularly with high-solids content exceeding 22.5 lb/bbl, which exacerbates deviations and prevents consistent flow. Additionally, the method does not directly account for fluid density, limiting its applicability to comparative assessments within similar density ranges. The Marsh funnel measures only as the time required for a fixed volume (946 mL) to flow through the device, offering no insight into key rheological parameters such as plastic viscosity, yield point, or gel strength, which are essential for comprehensive . This limitation renders it unsuitable for detailed analysis, as it cannot differentiate between viscous and yield-dominated flow regimes in complex muds. In field operations, operator variability introduces additional constraints, including inconsistencies in timing the flow to the nearest second and maintaining consistent head pressure, which can lead to scattered results across repeated tests. The device is particularly unreliable for very low viscosities below 20 seconds, where precision is insufficient for thin fluids near water-like consistency, or high viscosities exceeding 100 seconds, where flow may halt due to gelling or clogging, making measurements impractical.

Advanced viscometers

Rotational viscometers, such as the Fann Model 35, provide precise measurements of by applying controlled shear rates to the sample in a Couette , where the resides in the annular space between an outer rotating cylinder and an inner stationary bob. The torque generated by viscous drag on the bob is measured via spring deflection, allowing calculation of (τ) at the bob surface. This instrument operates at standardized speeds, typically 3, 6, 100, 200, 300, and 600 rpm, corresponding to shear rates of approximately 5.1, 10.2, 170, 340, 511, and 1022 s⁻¹, respectively, enabling determination of (μ_p) and yield point (τ_y) for models through dial readings and the Bingham straight-line equation derived from two-speed data subtraction. The relationship between and is governed by the fundamental τ = μ · γ, where μ is and γ is , though for non-Newtonian drilling fluids, effective varies with γ, necessitating multi-speed measurements to characterize . In applications, the Fann 35 adheres to Recommended Practice 13B-1 standards, using a sample cup to evaluate consistency under simulated wellbore conditions. Rheometers, such as the MCR 301, extend beyond basic to capture full rheological profiles of drilling fluids, employing advanced coaxial cylinder geometries for steady-state flow curves, , and viscoelastic properties. These lab instruments measure flow by fitting data to models like Herschel-Bulkley, quantifying yield stress, consistency index, and flow index (n) for power-law fluids; for instance, oil-based muds exhibit n ≈ 0.73 with yield stress around 1.86 Pa, while water-based muds show n ≈ 0.48 and higher yield stress of 2.32 Pa. Thixotropy is assessed through step-change shear rate tests (e.g., from 1021 s⁻¹ to 5.1 s⁻¹), where breakdown and buildup curves are modeled using approaches like the Dullaert-Mewis framework to determine thixotropic timescales, revealing slower recovery in water-based fluids compared to oil-based ones. Elasticity is evaluated via oscillatory amplitude sweeps at fixed frequencies (e.g., 10 rad/s), identifying the linear viscoelastic and storage/loss moduli; oil-based muds display higher moduli and smaller strain limits (~5%) than water-based muds (~10%). These capabilities make rheometers essential for into complex behaviors like stress overshoots after rest periods, which increase logarithmically with time in water-based systems. Unlike the Marsh funnel's relative measurement in seconds, which approximates fluidity under gravity-driven flow, rotational viscometers and rheometers yield absolute units like centipoise (cP) or pascal-seconds (Pa·s) for , providing quantifiable shear-dependent profiles critical for hydraulic modeling and fluid optimization. Marsh funnel tests serve as rapid field indicators for consistency changes, while advanced instruments support detailed lab analysis and research. Recent hybrid approaches leverage correlations between Marsh funnel times and rheometer-derived data to enhance field accuracy, using models such as artificial neural networks to predict plastic viscosity and yield point from funnel viscosity and mud density inputs, achieving improved real-time rheological estimation for non-Newtonian fluids. These methods bridge simple on-site tests with lab precision, reducing errors in operations.

References

  1. https://glossary.slb.com/terms/m/marsh_funnel.aspx
  2. https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/materials/administration/resources/library/publications/fstm/methods/fm8-rp13b-2.pdf?sfvrsn=1a2cc4c6_2
  3. https://www.iadd-intl.org/drilling-fluid-rheology-for-drilling-engineers
  4. https://www.astm.org/d6910_d6910m-09.html
  5. https://onepetro.org/TRANS/article/92/01/234/161443/Properties-and-Treatment-of-Rotary-Mud
  6. https://www.glossary.oilfield.slb.com/terms/m/marsh_funnel.aspx
  7. https://la.curbed.com/maps/oil-los-angeles-drill-sites-offshore
  8. https://crudesciences.substack.com/p/seconds-to-viscosity-the-story-of
  9. https://onepetro.org/PTECH/article-pdf/2150443/spe-939086-g.pdf
  10. https://standards.globalspec.com/std/584555/api-rp-13b
  11. https://www.mudtest.com/media/cement/downloads/en/instruction_manual_marsh_funnel.pdf
  12. https://www.scribd.com/document/726016624/BS-EN-445-1997
  13. http://www.chinajorson.cn/indexfile/upload_c28ad669455b32706a19472d60cafa5a.pdf
  14. https://www.ofite.com/publications/instructions/5518-110-10-instructions/file
  15. https://www.fann.com/en/products/marsh-funnel-viscometer
  16. https://www.mudtest.com/en/products/marsh-funnel.php
  17. https://www.alfatest.com.tr/en/product/marsh-funnel
  18. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0920410517305478
  19. https://onepetro.org/DC/article-pdf/15/01/3/2587463/spe-62020-pa.pdf
  20. https://www.jafmonline.net/article_537_38898ec9ec78e6bc69375dbaac81d216.pdf
  21. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/238447317_The_Marsh_Funnel_and_Drilling_Fluid_Viscosity_A_New_Equation_for_Field_Use
  22. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318493574_Numerical_experimental_and_analytical_studies_on_fluid_flow_through_a_Marsh_funnel
  23. https://mudex.com.au/product/marsh-funnel/
  24. https://www.amazon.com/Plastic-Viscometer-Petroleum-Drilling-Detector/dp/B0DSBXDS6B
  25. https://www.expotechusa.com/Catalogs/OFITE/Instructions/110-10.pdf
  26. https://www.osha.gov/etools/oil-and-gas/drilling/drilling-ahead
  27. https://www.drillingmanual.com/marsh-funnel-viscosity-test-procedure/
  28. https://www.drillingformulas.com/what-is-marsh-funnel-viscosity-for-drilling-fluid/
  29. https://iadc.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/preview-fl.pdf
  30. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/391982165_IMPROVED_TECHNIQUE_FOR_MEASURING_RHEOLOGICAL_PROPERTIES_OF_DRILLING_FLUID
  31. http://www.shaletechsolutions.com/Drilling_Fluid_Testing/Viscosity/Marsh_Funnel.pdf
  32. https://ftp.dot.state.tx.us/pub/txdot-info/cst/TMS/100-E_series/pdfs/clean/soi130-c.pdf
  33. https://www.ofite.com/knowledgebase/api-rp-13b-2
  34. https://www.astm.org/d6910_d6910m-19.html
  35. https://knowledge.bsigroup.com/products/grout-for-prestressing-tendons-test-methods
  36. https://cdn.standards.iteh.ai/samples/25455/7df1909acb13429d9019e97b285e7c94/SIST-EN-445-2008.pdf
  37. https://glossary.oilfield.slb.com/terms/m/marsh_funnel.aspx
  38. https://amcmud.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2017/10/AMC-MARSH-FUNNEL-AND-MEASURING-CUP-PDS.pdf
  39. https://www.humboldtmfg.com/marsh-funnel-viscometer.html
  40. https://www.api.org/~/media/files/publications/2020_catalog/historical_publications.pdf
  41. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.1c04937
  42. https://www.astm.org/c0939-10.html
  43. https://www.humboldtmfg.com/grout-flow-cone-set.html
  44. https://www.astm.org/c0939_c0939m-16a.html
  45. https://www.gardco.com/Products/Viscometers/Viscosity-Cups/ISO-Flow-Viscosity-Cups/c/p-16344
  46. https://www.rigchina.com/marsh-funnel-viscometer-SS.html
  47. https://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/MLN-4-Portable-Rotational-Digital-Display_1601126484043.html
  48. https://www.thedriller.com/articles/92467-marsh-funnel-limitations-in-field-testing-drilling-fluids
  49. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ese3.647
  50. https://www.impact-test.co.uk/docs/user-guide-CE550.pdf
  51. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0920410513000818
  52. https://www.thedriller.com/articles/92491-fann-rheometer-advantages-and-marsh-funnel-testing-tips
  53. https://www.fann.com/en/products/model-35
  54. https://nrs.blob.core.windows.net/pdfs/nrspdf-cd333e74-9cfc-4ce5-a9c1-0d553188c96f.pdf
  55. https://www.anton-paar.com/corp-en/products/details/mcr-301/
  56. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037702570600066X
  57. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/306927800_Real_Time_Prediction_of_Drilling_Fluid_Rheological_Properties_Using_Artificial_Neural_Networks_Visible_Mathematical_Model_White_Box
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.