Hubbry Logo
NefermaatNefermaatMain
Open search
Nefermaat
Community hub
Nefermaat
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Nefermaat
Nefermaat
Nefermaat
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Nefermaat I (fl. c. 2570 BC) was an ancient Egyptian prince, a son of king Sneferu. He was a vizier possessing the titles of the king's eldest son,[1] royal seal bearer, and prophet of Bastet. His name means "Maat is beautiful" or "With perfect justice".

Key Information

Biography

[edit]

Nefermaat was the eldest son of Sneferu, the king and founder of the Fourth Dynasty of Egypt and his first wife. He was a half-brother of Khufu. Nefermaat's wife was Itet, also spelled as Atet. Fifteen of Nefermaat's offspring are named in his tomb, sons Hemiunu, Isu, Teta, Khentimeresh and daughters Djefatsen and Isesu are depicted as adults, while sons Itisen, Inkaef, Serfka, Wehemka, Shepseska, Kakhent, Ankhersheretef, Ankherfenedjef, Buneb, Shepsesneb and Nebkhenet and daughter Pageti are shown as children. His son Hemiunu is probably identical with vizier Hemiunu, who was believed to have helped plan the Great Pyramids.

One of Nefermaat's sisters, Nefertkau had a son also called Nefermaat.[2]

Tomb

[edit]
Tomb of Nefermaat in Meidum
Nefermaat at the sacrificial table framed by titles[3][4]

Nefermaat was buried in mastaba 16 at Meidum. He was one of several relatives of King Sneferu, who was buried in Meidum. The tomb is known for the special technique used for drawing the scenes. Sculptors carved deeply incised images that then were filled with colored paste. This method was labor-intensive because the paste tended to dry, crack, and then fall out.[5] The technique results in vividly colored scenes. This tomb is the only one known to date showing this technique. The fact that later, the plaster cracked and resulted in the loss of the paste, likely led to craftsmen abandoning this type of decoration.[6]

Nefermaat's tomb is famous for the scene referred to as the "Meidum Geese" (now in the Egyptian Museum, JE 34571/ CG 1742). Discovered in 1871 by Auguste Mariette and Luigi Vassalli, the scene was executed in painted plaster. The painting was removed from the wall in order to be reassembled inside the Bulaq Museum. The full scene depicts six geese (greylag, greater white-fronted and red-breasted geese, none of which call modern Egypt home); three pointing to the left and three pointing to the right. Each group of three geese consists of one goose shown with head bowed down, eating, and two geese with heads held up. Each group of three animals represents many geese, as three represents the plural in Egyptian imagery. There are differences in the plumage of the birds that breaks the overall symmetry of the scene. This example of Egyptian painting is considered a masterpiece.[6][7] A 2015 research paper by Francesco Tiradritti at the Kore University of Enna, published on LiveScience, suggested that the painting could be a nineteenth-century forgery, possibly made by Vassalli.[8][7] Tiradritti's claims were promptly dismissed by Zahi Hawass and other Egyptian authorities.[7][9]

A 2021 research paper[10] used a biodiversity indicator called the 'Tobias Criteria[11]' to assess the 'Meidum Geese[12]" to see if these geese match with the species they have been identified as depicting. While Greylag and Greater white-fronted geese were consistent with their respective images, Red-breasted geese was a mismatch according to the analysis. Reasons to account for these differences could be due to either: artistic/cultural license; the depiction being a blend of different animals; or is an accurate depiction of an animal that no longer exists. Of these reasons, the study considered other realistic animal art from the Chapel of Itet[13][14](waterfowl, dogs, jackal, leopard, antelope) that are also identifiable to species-level, and suggested it possible the geese painted with red-coloured breast regions may be an unknown extinct goose species.[15][16][17] A 2022 study found them to be within the plumage variation range and artistic licence for red-breasted geese.[18]

The Meidum Geese
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Nefermaat.

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Nefermaat

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Nefermaat I (fl. c. 2613–c. 2560 BC) was an ancient Egyptian prince and high-ranking official of the Fourth Dynasty, recognized as the eldest son of Pharaoh and serving as and overseer of the king's works. Likely born to one of Sneferu's minor wives, he held prestigious titles including "eldest son of the king" (possibly honorary) and "prophet of Bast," reflecting his close ties to the royal family and administrative elite. His role positioned him as a key figure in the early , potentially overseeing monumental projects like Sneferu's pyramids at , , and beyond. Nefermaat married Itet (also spelled Atet), a royal acquaintance whose exact lineage remains uncertain, and together they had at least 15 children, including sons such as (later architect of the Great Pyramid) and daughters like Isesu. Their mastaba tomb (designated M16), located less than a kilometer north of Sneferu's at , exemplifies early Fourth Dynasty architecture with its mudbrick structure, dual stone-lined chapels, and two burial shafts—one for each spouse. Excavated initially by in 1872 and re-examined by in 1890–1891, the tomb is celebrated for its pioneering wall decorations, including outdoor scenes of daily life, fowling, farming, and the iconic "Meidum Geese" painting (ca. 2600 BC), which showcases exceptional artistic detail in feathers and natural settings. The tomb's innovative features, such as unique paste-inlay reliefs intended as "writing that cannot be erased," highlight Nefermaat's desire for eternal commemoration and provide invaluable insights into elite artistry, family rituals, and societal activities during Sneferu's reign. These elements not only underscore his status but also mark a transitional phase in Egyptian tomb design from to Fourth Dynasty.

Background and Identity

Historical Context

The Fourth Dynasty of , spanning approximately 2613–2494 BC, represented a pinnacle of , characterized by monumental architecture and intensified royal authority. , the dynasty's founder and first , ruled from around 2613 to 2589 BC, establishing a legacy of construction that defined the era. His reign marked a departure from the Third Dynasty's stepped pyramids, initiating experiments that evolved into the true, smooth-sided pyramids emblematic of Egyptian kingship. Key events under Sneferu included ambitious building projects at Meidum and Dahshur, which demonstrated both innovation and adaptation in royal tomb design. At Meidum, he began with a step pyramid that was later converted into a true pyramid, though it partially collapsed in antiquity due to structural instability. This was followed by the Bent Pyramid at Dahshur, where the angle of the sides was abruptly changed mid-construction—likely from 54° to 43°—to avert failure, and the Red Pyramid, the first successfully completed true pyramid, named for its reddish limestone casing. These efforts not only advanced architectural techniques but also symbolized the pharaoh's divine power and command over vast resources, including quarried stone transported from distant sites. Sneferu's military campaigns further bolstered this era, with expeditions to Nubia and Libya yielding tens of thousands of cattle and thousands of prisoners. Trade expeditions to Byblos imported materials like cedar wood, while Sinai ventures secured mining operations and enhanced resource flow. Politically and socially, Sneferu's rule fostered a highly centralized state, with the pharaoh positioned as a living at the apex of a stratified . Power was concentrated in the royal , where administration relied on a burgeoning , including the emerging role of the as chief overseer of justice, taxation, and —positions increasingly filled by royal kin to ensure loyalty. The royal family's deep involvement in state affairs reinforced this structure, as princes and relatives managed key provinces and projects, tying their status and provisions to the king's favor. This environment of stability and control laid the groundwork for the dynasty's early prosperity. Nefermaat's activity, during Sneferu's reign (c. 2613–2589 BC), occurred in the late phase of his father's rule, bridging the foundational innovations of with the consolidated stability of the early Fourth Dynasty under .

Name and Parentage

Nefermaat's name, rendered in hieroglyphs as nfr-mꜣꜥt, derives from the common Old Kingdom elements nfr ("beautiful" or "perfect") and mꜣꜥt (, the deification of truth, justice, and cosmic balance), and is interpreted as "Maat is beautiful" or "With perfect justice." This etymology highlights the integration of aesthetic ideals with the fundamental Egyptian concept of as the ordering principle of the universe, often invoked in royal and noble naming conventions to affirm alignment with divine harmony. Nefermaat was the eldest son of Sneferu, founder of the Fourth Dynasty (c. 2613–2589 BC), and an unnamed wife, likely a secondary or first consort rather than the principal queen Hetepheres I. As such, he was a half-brother to , Sneferu's successor and builder of the Great Pyramid. This parentage is confirmed by inscriptions on the facade of his tomb at , which explicitly identify him as "eldest son of the king" and reference Sneferu directly, establishing his royal lineage during the early Fourth Dynasty. Nefermaat must be distinguished from a later namesake, Nefermaat II (also known as Nefermaat the Younger), who served as under (c. 2558–2532 BC) around 2550 BC. While Nefermaat I was a direct son of (c. 2613–2589 BC), Nefermaat II was the son of Sneferu's daughter Nefertkau I and thus a grandson of the , active in the subsequent generation at . Contemporary records, including tomb inscriptions at Giza, clarify this separation, preventing confusion between the two high-ranking officials sharing the .

Family and Personal Life

Marriage to Itet

Nefermaat, a prominent prince and during the reign of his father in the Fourth Dynasty (c. 2613–2589 BCE), married Itet, a noblewoman whose familial origins remain unknown but whose elite status is evident from her prominent role in their shared funerary complex. Itet bore the title "King's Acquaintance," indicating familiarity with the royal court but suggesting she came from a less distinguished background than Nefermaat's royal lineage, possibly a minor noble family. This union likely served to consolidate alliances within the expanding during Sneferu's era of pyramid-building and administrative centralization, as evidenced by their joint tomb (M16) at , where shared titles and iconography underscore their partnership. The marriage is richly documented through tomb art that emphasizes equality and between Nefermaat and Itet, reflecting her high standing despite her non-royal birth. In reliefs and panels from their chapels, Itet is depicted alongside Nefermaat in domestic scenes, such as offering rituals and daily life activities, often shown seated or standing in symmetrical compositions that highlight mutual support and fertility symbolism—common motifs in elite burials to ensure prosperity. Notable examples include a panel (now in the Oriental Museum, OIM E9002) where Nefermaat appears in the upper register, with Itet and family members below, executed in an innovative inlaid colored paste technique that may have been pioneered under Nefermaat's to enhance visual permanence. These depictions, using paintings and sunken reliefs, portray Itet as an active consort, contributing to the tomb's narrative of familial unity. In the broader cultural context of Fourth Dynasty royal families, marriages like that of Nefermaat and Itet functioned as strategic tools for maintaining lineage continuity and providing administrative support to the king. Such unions integrated noble women into sphere, bolstering political stability and ensuring the transmission of power through close-knit networks, as seen in the elaborate provisions for their joint afterlife at . The emphasis on Itet's visibility in tomb iconography further illustrates how elite women reinforced dynastic harmony, aligning with ma'at principles of order and balance central to Egyptian society.

Children and Descendants

Nefermaat and his wife Itet had fifteen children, as recorded in inscriptions from their mastaba tomb at , with nine of them having reached adulthood at the time of the tomb's decoration. These offspring are depicted in multiple scenes within the tomb, including processional registers that show children at varying stages of life—from young figures to adults—emphasizing the family's prosperity and continuity. Among the named sons, stands out as a probable direct descendant who rose to prominence as under , holding titles such as "overseer of all construction projects of the king" and potentially serving as the architect of the Great Pyramid at . Other sons, including Isu, Teta, and Khentimeresh, are also attested in the tomb inscriptions and likely held administrative positions, contributing to the family's influence in the royal court. Daughters such as Djefatsen and Isesu appear depicted as adults in the reliefs, underscoring the breadth of Nefermaat's progeny. The extensive lineage of Nefermaat reinforced the continuity of the Fourth Dynasty's royal bloodline, with his multiple heirs ensuring a network of loyal administrators drawn from the family elite. This proliferation of descendants helped maintain the dynasty's stability during the transition from Sneferu to Khufu.

Official Career

Administrative Roles

Nefermaat held the position of vizier (tAyty zAb TAty) under his father Sneferu, serving as the highest-ranking administrative official in the early Fourth Dynasty. In this role, he oversaw the implementation of royal decrees, acted as chief judge in legal matters, and managed the governance of the Nile Valley, including Lower Egypt (xtm(ty)-bity). These duties encompassed coordinating state resources, ensuring the administration of justice, and supporting the centralization of power characteristic of the Old Kingdom. A key aspect of Nefermaat's responsibilities involved logistical coordination for Sneferu's monumental building projects, particularly the at , where he likely organized the workforce and resource allocation. His at the Meidum necropolis, adjacent to the , underscores his direct involvement in these efforts, as viziers typically supervised corvée labor systems that mobilized thousands of workers for royal constructions. Evidence from his titles and tomb location indicates he managed estates and taxation to sustain such large-scale operations, facilitating the early Old Kingdom's emphasis on centralized economic control. Nefermaat's administrative service under was followed by his son serving as under , suggesting a continuity in advisory functions during the dynastic transition. He also bore the of royal seal bearer, which reinforced his authority in authenticating royal documents and decrees.

Titles and Honors

Nefermaat bore several high-ranking titles that highlighted his privileged position in the Fourth Dynasty royal court, reflecting both his familial proximity to the and his administrative and religious responsibilities. Key among these were "King's eldest son" (sA-nswt smsw; possibly honorary), "royal seal bearer" (ḥtmty-bity), and "prophet of " (ḥm-nṯr Bꜣstt), alongside others such as "superintendent of all works of the king" (jmj-rꜣ kꜣt nb(t) n nswt) and "" (ḥꜣty-ꜥ). These titles, inscribed in hieroglyphs on the walls of his chapel at , accumulated during his mid-to-late career under his father, King . The title "King's eldest son" indicated his status as a favored son, though not necessarily the , despite his half-brothers from Sneferu's subsequent marriages, such as . As "royal seal bearer," he served as a trusted advisor with authority over official documents and royal decrees, a role denoting intimate access to the pharaoh's decisions and paralleling the prestige of other elite viziers in . The "prophet of Bastet" honor linked him to the cult of the goddess , associated with protection, fertility, and domestic well-being, underscoring religious connotations of safeguarding the royal lineage and state prosperity. Collectively, these titles represented some of the highest non-pharaonic honors available, affirming Nefermaat's multifaceted influence as a royal heir, administrator, and priest, comparable to esteemed figures like the Third Dynasty in terms of courtly elevation.

Tomb and Funerary Complex

Location and Architecture

Nefermaat's , designated as Mastaba 16, is located in the , approximately 100 kilometers south of near the Fayum Oasis, less than 1 kilometer north of Sneferu's pyramid. This positioning within the early Fourth Dynasty elite burial ground reflects the hierarchical placement of tombs adjacent to the pharaoh's monument, emphasizing familial ties and shared protections. The structure exemplifies typical construction for high-ranking officials' tombs of the period, with its core formed from unfired mudbricks and select areas lined with limestone blocks for durability and aesthetic enhancement. The mastaba's layout comprises a multi-room complex designed for funerary rituals and eternal sustenance, including two stone-lined niche chapels—one for Nefermaat and one for his Itet—along with possible serdabs for housing statues and two burial shafts. These chapels feature and passages oriented eastward for offerings, while the burial shafts—one to the south for Nefermaat and one to the north for Itet—descend into rock-cut chambers secured by blocking. The overall design aligns closely with the pyramid's axis, symbolizing the tomb's integration into the pharaonic afterlife framework and protection under Sneferu's eternal vigilance. Construction involved phased enlargement, resulting in final dimensions of approximately 120 meters by 68 meters, covering over 8,000 square meters, with a height exceeding 10 meters in its original state. Initial excavations occurred in 1871–1872 under , who uncovered the chapels and artifacts, followed by Flinders Petrie's re-examination in 1890–1891, during which he mapped the layout and searched for the burial chamber, confirming the use of with reinforcements at key points like entrances and niches. Later work in the , including restorations, further documented the tomb's eroded state but preserved its core architectural form.

Art and Artifacts

The decorative program of Nefermaat's tomb at is renowned for its innovative use of deeply incised reliefs carved into the walls, which were then filled with colored pastes to create vivid, level-surfaced images. This technique, involving undercut edges to secure the paste inlays, was a novel approach attributed to Nefermaat himself and described in inscriptions as producing "unspoilable writing" that ensured the permanence of the scenes for the . The pastes incorporated pigments in shades such as red from , green from , blue from compounds, and other hues like and , allowing for striking contrasts that highlighted figures and hieroglyphs against the stone background. This method was applied extensively in the tomb chapel, differing from more common painted plaster or shallow carvings of the period, and emphasized themes of eternal provision through depictions of daily life, offerings, and natural elements. One of the most iconic artifacts from the tomb is the "Meidum Geese" panel (Egyptian Museum, Cairo, JE 34571/CG 1742), a painted plaster fragment depicting six geese in a naturalistic composition that has been hailed as an early masterpiece of Egyptian art for its lifelike detail and symmetry. The panel shows three pairs of birds—two greylag geese (Anser anser) on the outer edges, two white-fronted geese (Anser albifrons) in the middle, and two unidentified central geese possibly representing a now-extinct species with red-breasted features—striding amid stylized vegetation, capturing motion and individuality rarely seen in Old Kingdom art. This identification of the central pair as a potentially extinct species has been supported by recent taxonomic analyses but remains debated among scholars due to the limitations of ancient art for precise identification. This piece, originally part of a larger scene on the lower part of a wall in the passage leading to Itet’s chapel, exemplifies the tomb's focus on nature's abundance as a metaphor for sustenance in the afterlife, with the birds' varied postures and feather textures demonstrating advanced observational skill. Beyond the geese, the reliefs feature dynamic scenes of farming, , and family processions, underscoring Nefermaat's prosperity and the perpetual offerings intended for his ka. Agricultural vignettes portray workers plowing fields, cattle, and harvesting crops under the watchful gaze of Nefermaat or his members, such as a son wielding a , symbolizing control over resources and continuity. Family processions depict Itet and their children presenting offerings of food and goods, while natural motifs like birds and reinforce themes of renewal and divine favor, all rendered with the paste to evoke a vibrant, enduring world. Many artifacts from the tomb were removed during 19th-century excavations, with the Meidum Geese panel extracted in 1871 by and later conserved in . Other fragments, including reliefs of offering bearers and hieroglyphic inscriptions, were dispersed to institutions like the (Acc. No. 5168), where they preserve elements of herding and procession scenes in their original paste-inlaid form.

Legacy

Influence on Later Generations

Nefermaat's lineage exerted a notable influence on Fourth Dynasty administration through his descendants, particularly his son , who succeeded him as and served as overseer of all construction projects under , including the Great Pyramid at . This succession perpetuated Nefermaat's administrative model, where high-ranking royal kin managed key state functions, ensuring continuity in governance during the pyramid-building era. Nefermaat's contributions extended to elite burial traditions, as his at (M16) introduced innovative decorative elements, such as expanded scenes of daily life, , and family rituals, which influenced subsequent art and architecture. His family's relocation to for burials, exemplified by Hemiunu's (G4000), reinforced these practices among the royal elite, integrating them into the necropolis's evolving funerary landscape. As the eldest son of , Nefermaat embodied a symbolic model for royal heirs, balancing high civil duties like with familial obligations, a pattern mirrored in his descendants' roles within the court. This archetype underscored the Fourth Dynasty's reliance on members for positions, shaping governance by centralizing power among kin to oversee monumental projects. Genealogical evidence of this legacy appears in inscriptions from Nefermaat's Meidum tomb, which lists Hemiunu among his sons, and in Hemiunu's Giza mastaba elements, such as the chapel entrance lintel (now in Hildesheim, inv. 2380), affirming his direct descent and inherited titles.

Modern Scholarly Analysis

The excavation of Nefermaat's mastaba tomb at Meidum began in 1872 under Auguste Mariette, who uncovered the structure but left much of the detailed recording incomplete. Flinders Petrie re-examined and systematically documented the site during his 1890–1891 season, revealing key reliefs and architectural features, with many artifacts subsequently entering collections like the British Museum. Later efforts, including Ludwig Borchardt's work on the broader Meidum necropolis in the early 20th century, focused on pyramid-related contexts but contributed to contextual understanding of the site's Old Kingdom remains. Modern analysis of the tomb's art, particularly the famous "Meidum Geese" panel, has sparked significant debate. In 2015, Italian Egyptologist Francesco Tiradritti proposed that the painting was a 19th-century forgery, citing inconsistencies in style and context from its discovery by Luigi Vassalli during Mariette's excavations. This claim was swiftly dismissed by , who argued that it lacked rigorous scientific examination, such as material testing, and emphasized the panel's integration with authentic tomb elements. Renewed interest emerged in 2021 when paleontologist Anthony Romilio applied the Tobias criteria—a quantitative method for species delimitation—to the geese depictions, suggesting the central bird represented an extinct with unique red-breasted and speckled not matching any known modern or . A 2021 rebuttal by ornithologist Guy Kirwan and colleagues countered this, attributing the differences to ancient rather than taxonomic evidence, noting that early Egyptian art often stylized for symbolic purposes while maintaining high realism elsewhere in the same tomb. Epigraphic studies have clarified aspects of Nefermaat's identity, confirming his status as "eldest king's son" of through repeated titles on walls, though some scholars debate whether this denotes strict chronological or a for in administrative roles. Similar analyses of inscriptions alongside Itet reveal her as a royal consort with independent titles like "Royal Acquaintance," indicating elevated status beyond typical noblewomen, potentially reflecting ties to the royal family. Recent non-invasive techniques, including for pigment characterization on artifacts, have identified traditional materials like and red ochre, supporting the panels' authenticity without direct CT applications specific to Nefermaat's reliefs. Despite these advances, significant gaps persist in understanding Nefermaat's life due to sparse textual records outside his inscriptions, which focus primarily on titles and offerings rather than biographical details. Ongoing DNA analyses of mummies, including a 2025 whole-genome sequence from a contemporary non-royal individual at Nuwayrat, aim to trace genetic lineages and confirm familial ties, though no direct samples from Nefermaat or his immediate kin have yet yielded results to verify descent from .

References

  1. https://egyptmanchester.wordpress.com/2012/10/14/object-biography-10-a-relief-from-the-tomb-chapel-of-nefermaat-and-itet-acc-no-5168/
  2. https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/Y_EA69015
  3. https://open.library.ubc.ca/cIRcle/collections/ubccommunityandpartnerspublicati/52387/items/1.0401715
  4. https://www.si.edu/spotlight/ancient-egypt/pyramid
  5. https://www.metmuseum.org/essays/egypt-in-the-old-kingdom-ca-2649-2150-b-c
  6. https://as.nyu.edu/content/dam/nyu-as/faculty/documents/RothSocialChangeFourthDynasty.pdf
  7. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Snefru
  8. https://www.academia.edu/358643/_War_in_Old_Kingdom_Egypt_2686_2125_BCE_In_J_Vidal_ed_Studies_on_War_in_the_Ancient_Near_East_Collected_Essays_on_Military_History_AOAT_372_Ugarit_Verlag_M%25C3%25BCnster_2010_p_5_41
  9. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Nefermaat
  10. https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/Y_EA1510
  11. https://ancientegyptonline.co.uk/p-nefermaati/
  12. https://ancientegyptonline.co.uk/sneferu-family/
  13. https://open.library.ubc.ca/media/download/pdf/52387/1.0401715/2
  14. https://isac.uchicago.edu/sites/default/files/uploads/shared/docs/nn214.pdf
  15. https://isac.uchicago.edu/sites/default/files/uploads/shared/docs/oimp23.pdf
  16. https://web.ujaen.es/investiga/egiptologia/journalarchitecture/downloads/JAEA3/JAEA3_Monnier.pdf
  17. https://figshare.com/ndownloader/files/34535882
  18. http://gizamedia.rc.fas.harvard.edu/images/MFA-images/Giza/GizaImage/full/library/smith_old_kingdom.pdf
  19. https://oi-idb-static.uchicago.edu/multimedia/189628/Petrie%2C%20W.%20F.%20-%20Medum%20%281862%29.pdf
  20. https://knowledge.uchicago.edu/record/685/files/Lorenz_uchicago_0330D_13655.pdf
  21. https://brill.com/display/book/edcoll/9789004442825/BP000009.xml
  22. https://www.britishmuseum.org/learn/schools/ages-7-11/ancient-egypt/ancient-egyptian-gods-and-goddesses
  23. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/museums-static/digitalegypt/meydum/nefermaat/index.html
  24. https://open.library.ubc.ca/media/stream/pdf/52387/1.0401715/2
  25. http://egyptphoto.ncf.ca/meidum12.htm
  26. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/museums-static/digitalegypt/meydum/nefermaat/decoration.html
  27. https://egyptianmuseumcairo.eg/the-restoration-project-of-nefermaat-and-his-wife-itet/
  28. https://egypt-museum.com/the-meidum-geese/
  29. https://www.academia.edu/15163838/Writing_that_cannot_be_erased_investigations_of_a_box_of_pigmented_inlays_from_the_tomb_chapel_of_an_Old_Kingdom_noble
  30. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X21000468
  31. https://egyptianmuseumcairo.eg/artefacts/meidum-geese/
  32. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/366723725_Why_the_ancient_Meidum_Geese_painting_might_show_an_unknown_species
  33. https://egypt-museum.com/farming-in-the-tomb-of-nefertmaat-itet/
  34. https://www.encyclopedia.com/humanities/culture-magazines/hemiunu-son-nefermaat
  35. https://ancientegyptonline.co.uk/p-hemiunu/
  36. http://giza.fas.harvard.edu/ancientpeople/1186/full/
  37. https://www.touregypt.net/featurestories/vizier.htm
  38. https://globalegyptonline.co.uk/p-nefermaati/
  39. https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/Y_EA69014
  40. https://madainproject.com/meidum_pyramid
  41. https://english.ahram.org.eg/News/126823.aspx
  42. https://www.theartnewspaper.com/2015/05/01/backlash-over-claim-that-egyptian-geese-were-cooked-up-in-1800s
  43. https://www.sci.news/archaeology/meidum-geese-09407.html
  44. http://www.tobiaslab.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Kirwan-et-al.-2021-The-%25E2%2580%2598Meidum-geese%25E2%2580%2599-revisited-Early-historical-art-is-not-a-suitable-basis-for-taxonomic-speculation.-J-Archaeological-Science.pdf
  45. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/kingship-power-and-legitimacy-in-ancient-egypt/early-old-kingdom/F56720CE257920651C95846E4016785B
  46. https://air.unimi.it/handle/2434/955624
  47. https://www.jstor.org/stable/542154
  48. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-09195-5
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.