Hubbry Logo
Nod factorNod factorMain
Open search
Nod factor
Community hub
Nod factor
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Nod factor
Nod factor
Nod factor
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
The structure of the major Nod factor produced by Sinorhizobium meliloti.

Nod factors (nodulation factors or NF), are signaling molecules produced by soil bacteria known as rhizobia in response to flavonoid exudation from plants under nitrogen limited conditions. Nod factors initiate the establishment of a symbiotic relationship between legumes and rhizobia by inducing nodulation. Nod factors produce the differentiation of plant tissue in root hairs into nodules where the bacteria reside and are able to fix nitrogen from the atmosphere for the plant in exchange for photosynthates and the appropriate environment for nitrogen fixation.[1] One of the most important features provided by the plant in this symbiosis is the production of leghemoglobin, which maintains the oxygen concentration low and prevents the inhibition of nitrogenase activity.

Chemical Structure

[edit]

Nod factors structurally are lipochitooligosaccharides (LCOs) that consist of an N-acetyl-D-glucosamine chain linked through β-1,4 linkage with a fatty acid of variable identity attached to a non reducing nitrogen in the backbone with various functional group substitutions at the terminal or non-terminal residues.[2]

Nod factors are produced in complex mixtures differing in the following characteristics:[3]

  • Length of the chain can vary from three to six units of N-acetyl-D-glucosamine with the exception of M. loti which can produce Nod factors with two unit only.
  • Presence or absence of strain-specific substitutions along the chain
  • Identity of the fatty acid component
  • Presence or absence of unsaturated fatty acids

Nod gene expression is induced by the presence of certain flavonoids in the soil, which are secreted by the plant and act as an attractant to bacteria and induce Nod factor production. Flavonoids activate NodD, a LysR family transcription factor, which binds to the nod box and initiates the transcription of the nod genes which encode the proteins necessary for the production of a wide range of LCOs.[4]

Function

[edit]
See also: Common Symbiotic Signaling Pathway

Nod factors are potentially recognized by plant receptors made of two histidine kinases with extracellular LysM domain, which have been identified in L. japonicus, soybean, and M. truncatula [5]. Binding of Nod factors to these receptors depolarizes the plasma membrane of root hairs via an influx of Ca+2 which induce the expression of early nodulin (ENOD) genes and swelling of the root hairs. In M. truncatula, the signal transduction initiates by the activation of dmi1, dmi2, and dmi3 which lead to the deformation of root hairs, early nodulin expression, cortical cell division and bacterial infection. Additionally, nsp and hcl genes are recruited later and aid in the process of early nodulation expression, cortical cell division, and infection.[6] Genes dmi1, dmi2, and dmi3 have also been found to aid in the establishment of interactions between M. truncatula and arbuscular mycorrhiza, indicating that the two very different symbioses may share some common mechanisms.[7] The end result is the nodule, the structure in which nitrogen is fixed. Nod factors act by inducing changes in gene expression in the legume, most notable the nodulin genes, which are needed for nodule organogenesis.[8]

Nodulation

[edit]

Rhizobia bind to host specific lectins present in root hairs which together with Nod factors lead to the formation of nodulation. Nod factors are recognized by a specific class of receptor kinases that have LysM domains in their extracellular domains. The two LysM (lysin motif) receptor kinases (NFR1 and NFR5) that appear to make up the Nod factor receptor were first isolated in the model legume Lotus japonicus in 2003. They now have been isolated also from soybean and the model legume Medicago truncatula. NFR5 lacks the classical activation loop in the kinase domain. The NFR5 gene lacks introns. First the cell membrane is depolarized and the root hairs start to swell and cell division stops. Nod factor cause the fragmentation and rearrangement of actin network, which coupled with the reinstitution of cell growth lead to the curling of the root hair around the bacteria. This is followed by the localized breakdown of the cell wall and the invagination of the plant cell membrane, allowing the bacterium to form an infection thread. As the infection thread grows the rhizobia travel down its length towards the site of the nodule. During this process the pericycle cells in plants become activated and cells in the inner cortex start growing and become the nodule primordium where the rhizobia infect and differentiate into bacteroids and fix nitrogen. Activation of adjacent middle cortex cells leads to the formation of nodule meristem.[5]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Nod factor

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Nod factors are lipo-chitooligosaccharide signaling molecules secreted by that initiate and regulate the symbiotic interaction with legume host plants, triggering the formation of root nodules essential for biological . These molecules enable specific recognition between compatible partners, allowing to enter root cells and convert atmospheric into usable by the plant, in exchange for from . Discovered in the early , Nod factors represent a cornerstone of plant-microbe communication, with their activity effective at concentrations as low as 10^{-12} M. Structurally, Nod factors consist of a chitooligosaccharide core of three to five N-acetyl-D-glucosamine residues linked via β-1,4 glycosidic bonds, with an N-linked acyl chain (typically C16 to C18 ) at the non-reducing end and various decorations such as sulfation, , or carbamoylation at the reducing end. These modifications, encoded by host-specific rhizobial nod genes (e.g., nodH for sulfation in Sinorhizobium meliloti), determine the molecule's ability to elicit responses in particular species, ensuring symbiotic specificity. Production occurs in upon perception of plant-root exudates, primarily , which activate the transcriptional regulator NodD to induce the nod gene cluster. Upon release into the , Nod factors diffuse to the root epidermis where they bind to LysM domain-containing receptor-like kinases, such as NFR1/NFR5 in or LYK3/NFP in , with high affinity ( in the nanomolar range). This binding initiates a rapid signaling cascade involving calcium oscillations, production, and activation of transcription factors like NIN (nodule inception), culminating in curling to entrap , thread formation, and dedifferentiation of cortical cells into nodule primordia. The process is tightly regulated by plant hormones, including auxins, cytokinins, and , which Nod factors modulate to balance establishment and prevent over-nodulation. The -rhizobia symbiosis mediated by Nod factors is ecologically and agriculturally vital, supporting input in natural ecosystems and reducing the need for synthetic fertilizers in legume crops like soybeans, , and peas, which account for a significant portion of global . Beyond legumes, Nod factor-like LCOs occur in other microbes, suggesting an ancient evolutionary origin shared with mycorrhizal associations, potentially over 400 million years old. Research continues to explore Nod factor analogs for engineering nitrogen-fixing symbioses in non-legumes, aiming to enhance .

Discovery and Background

Historical Context

The study of legume-rhizobia symbiosis originated in the late 19th century, when researchers began investigating the mechanisms behind the enhanced growth of leguminous plants in nitrogen-poor soils. In 1888, Hermann Hellriegel and Hermann Wilfarth conducted pivotal experiments demonstrating that legumes, such as peas and beans, could assimilate atmospheric nitrogen through associations with soil microorganisms, leading to the formation of root nodules that facilitate biological nitrogen fixation. This discovery shifted agricultural practices and laid the groundwork for understanding symbiotic nitrogen fixation, with Hellriegel hypothesizing microbial involvement in nodule development. Concurrently, Martinus Beijerinck isolated the first Rhizobium bacterium from lupin nodules in 1888, confirming the microbial basis of the symbiosis and naming it Bacillus radicicola. In the early to mid-20th century, research focused on characterizing the nodule-forming process and bacterial-host specificity. Edwin Broun Fred, Ira Lawrence Baldwin, and Elizabeth McCoy's 1932 monograph, Root Nodule Bacteria and Leguminous Plants, synthesized decades of observations, detailing the infection threads, nodule morphology, and environmental factors influencing across various . Their work emphasized the role of root exudates in attracting bacteria but did not yet identify specific chemical signals. Progress accelerated in the 1970s and 1980s with genetic analyses; Peter Gresshoff and colleagues identified regulatory mutants affecting nodulation in soybeans during the early 1980s, revealing genetic controls on efficiency. Similarly, Roland Rolfe contributed to early studies on host-bacteria interactions, including from roots that modulated rhizobial activity in the late 1980s. The 1980s marked a molecular breakthrough with the identification of nodulation (nod) genes in , essential for initiating . These genes were first cloned from meliloti in 1984, encoding proteins involved in signal production. In 1986, such as were shown to induce nod in , acting as plant-derived signals that trigger bacterial responses specific to host . The culmination came in the early 1990s, when Jean Dénarié and collaborators purified and structurally characterized Nod factors from R. meliloti as acylated lipo-chitooligosaccharides, demonstrating their role in eliciting curling and cortical in . This 1990 identification, built on prior genetic work, confirmed Nod factors as the key symbiotic signals, revolutionizing understanding of host specificity and signaling in the .

Initial Identification

The initial identification of Nod factors relied on bioassays monitoring root hair deformation in compatible legume hosts, such as (Medicago sativa) and white clover (), as a rapid indicator of symbiotic signaling activity. In these assays, s from young seedlings were exposed to bacterial culture supernatants or fractions, with deformation—characterized by swelling, branching, or curling—observed within hours at sub-nanomolar concentrations, distinguishing active symbiotic signals from non-specific factors. This approach, developed in the late 1980s and refined in the early 1990s, allowed fractionation of bacterial exudates to isolate bioactive components from rhizobial strains like Sinorhizobium meliloti and trifolii. Purification of these signals involved sequential chromatographic techniques, including gel permeation, ion-exchange, and reversed-phase (HPLC), followed by structural characterization using and (NMR) spectroscopy. In , Lerouge et al. isolated the major alfalfa-specific signal, NodRm-1, from an overproducing S. meliloti strain, elucidating its structure as a sulfated β-1,4-linked tetrasaccharide of N-acetyl-D-glucosamine, with an N-linked C16:2 acyl chain on the non-reducing end and a group on the 6-position of the terminal N-acetyl-D-glucosamine residue at the reducing end. Subsequent work in expanded this to a family of related sulfated lipo-chitooligosaccharides varying in chain length and substitutions, confirming their role as core signaling molecules. Activity confirmation demonstrated that purified Nod factors elicit nodulation responses at picomolar concentrations (e.g., 10^{-10} M for deformation), far exceeding bacterial densities needed for . Host-specificity was evident in comparative tests: NodRm factors induced deformation and cortical cell divisions in but not in non-hosts like (Pisum sativum) or (Glycine max), underscoring structural determinants like sulfation for recognition. Plant root exudates, particularly flavonoids such as luteolin, initiate Nod factor production by inducing bacterial nod gene expression in a concentration-dependent manner (e.g., 10^{-6} M luteolin activates nodABC in S. meliloti). This triggers the regulated release of Nod factors into the , establishing the initial dialog for host-specific .

Chemical Composition

Core Molecular Structure

Nod factors are lipo-chitooligosaccharides characterized by a core backbone consisting of a β-1,4-linked of N-acetyl-D-glucosamine residues, typically comprising 3 to 5 units. This chitooligosaccharide structure is acylated at the nitrogen atom of the non-reducing terminal glucosamine residue with a chain, most commonly a C16 or C18 , which confers the lipophilic nature essential for interactions and . The seminal identification of this core in meliloti revealed a tetrameric form with a C16:2 acyl chain, establishing the foundational architecture shared across rhizobial species. Key functional groups on the core structure include the reducing end of the terminal glucosamine, which remains available for potential interactions, and modifications such as sulfate or carbamoyl groups on the reducing end glucosamine that can influence specificity without altering the fundamental scaffold. A representative general formula for the core trimeric structure is depicted as: R-C(O)-NH-GlcNAc-(β1,4)-GlcNAc-(β1,4)-GlcNAc\text{R-C(O)-NH-GlcNAc-}(\beta 1,4)\text{-GlcNAc-}(\beta 1,4)\text{-GlcNAc} where R denotes the acyl chain (e.g., a 16-carbon fatty acid) and GlcNAc represents N-acetyl-D-glucosamine. Longer oligomers follow the same linkage pattern with the acyl attachment at the non-reducing terminus. Physicochemically, the acyl renders Nod factors amphipathic, with facilitating across bacterial membranes and interaction with receptors, while the hydrophilic oligosaccharide portion enables specific binding. Their molecular weight generally ranges from 1,200 to 1,500 Da, depending on length and substitutions, allowing high potency at nanomolar concentrations in symbiotic signaling.

Structural Diversity Across Rhizobia

Nod factors exhibit significant structural diversity across different rhizobial species, primarily in the acyl chain and oligosaccharide decorations, which underpin host specificity in legume symbiosis. The core chitooligosaccharide backbone consists of 3-5 N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) units, but variations in attached substituents modulate recognition by host plants. The acyl chain, attached to the terminal GlcNAc, varies in length from C14 to C26 carbons and , influencing the molecule's hydrophobicity, , and interaction with receptors. For instance, many , including Rhizobium species, incorporate cis-vaccenic acid (C18:1), a monounsaturated that enhances membrane association and signaling efficiency. Longer chains, such as C20 or C26 variants with multiple unsaturations (e.g., C20:3), are common in slow-growing like Bradyrhizobium, contributing to specificity for tropical . Oligosaccharide decorations further diversify Nod factor structure, with additions like O-methyl groups, , , or on the reducing or non-reducing ends. These modifications, often species-specific, fine-tune host recognition; for example, in Rhizobium leguminosarum, the NodFe factor features fucosyl residues on the terminal GlcNAc, essential for nodulation of peas (Pisum sativum). Similarly, Sinorhizobium meliloti produces NodSm factors with a C16:2 polyunsaturated acyl chain and a group at the reducing end, conferring specificity for (Medicago sativa). In Bradyrhizobium spp., such as those nodulating soybeans, decorations combined with longer acyl chains (e.g., C18:1) enable infection of tropical . Structure-activity relationship studies from the , including NMR analyses, have elucidated how these variations impact . Acyl chain length and unsaturation affect and to root hairs, while decorations like or lower recognition thresholds by enhancing receptor affinity, sometimes by orders of magnitude in nodulation assays. For instance, desulfated NodSm analogs show reduced activity on roots, highlighting the sulfate's role in precise host discrimination. These findings underscore the evolutionary adaptation of Nod factor structures to match specific receptors, ensuring symbiotic fidelity.

Biosynthesis and Regulation

Genetic Basis in Bacteria

The nod gene clusters in are typically organized as conserved loci responsible for the synthesis of Nod factors, key signaling molecules in legume symbiosis. These clusters are commonly located on large symbiotic plasmids, such as the pSymA megaplasmid in Sinorhizobium meliloti, though some species carry them on the . The core genes, nodA, nodB, and nodC, form the foundational essential for Nod factor backbone assembly: nodC encodes a that polymerizes β-1,4-linked N-acetyl-D-glucosamine oligomers, nodB encodes a chitooligosaccharide deacetylase that removes acetyl groups from the non-reducing end, and nodA encodes an acyltransferase that attaches a fatty acyl chain to the terminal sugar, conferring lipochitooligosaccharide structure. Accessory genes within the cluster add host-specific modifications to the core Nod factor structure, enhancing recognition by particular legumes. For instance, nodH and nodI in S. meliloti encode sulfotransferases for O-sulfation at the reducing end and an ATP sulfurylase, respectively, while nodL encodes an O-acetyltransferase for acetylation on the terminal residue. Host-specificity determinants include nodF and nodE in Rhizobium leguminosarum, which direct fucosylation and the incorporation of specific acyl chain lengths, respectively. These modifications, produced by the accessory genes, allow Nod factors to elicit tailored symbiotic responses in host plants. Regulation of nod gene expression is primarily controlled by the NodD protein, a LysR-type transcriptional activator present in multiple copies (e.g., nodD1, nodD2, nodD3 in S. meliloti). In the presence of plant-derived , NodD binds to conserved nod box promoter sequences upstream of the nod operons, inducing transcription of the biosynthetic genes. This flavonoid-NodD interaction ensures nod gene activation only in proximity to compatible host roots. In S. meliloti, the full nod cluster spans over 20 genes organized in multiple operons on pSymA, encompassing core and accessory loci as well as regulatory elements. Mutational studies confirm their essentiality: disruptions in nodABC abolish Nod factor production and prevent nodule formation on , while accessory gene mutants (e.g., nodH) produce unmodified factors that fail to induce effective , underscoring the cluster's role in host specificity.

Environmental Influences on Production

Acidic conditions significantly influence Nod factor production in , often enhancing yield and modifying molecular profiles to adapt to stress. In tropici CIAT899, exposure to low (specifically pH 4.5) increases overall Nod factor production compared to neutral conditions (pH 7.0), with the bacterium synthesizing 52 distinct Nod factor variants under acidic stress versus 29 at neutral pH. This is particularly relevant for symbioses in acidic soils common to cultivation, where the altered profiles include structural variations that may improve host recognition and infection efficiency. Studies from 2005 indicate that such changes under pH 5-6 promote higher Nod factor yields and shifts toward more saturated acyl chains, enabling better resilience in low-pH environments. Nutrient availability, particularly limitations in key elements like , iron, and , modulates Nod factor synthesis by impacting nod gene expression in . Iron limitation disrupts nod gene regulation due to its role in essential enzymatic processes and regulatory proteins, reducing expression and altering production profiles in strains like Bradyrhizobium japonicum. Temperature and oxygen levels further regulate Nod factor production, with optimal conditions aligning to microenvironments during . Nod factor yields peak at around 28°C in species such as Bradyrhizobium japonicum and Rhizobium leguminosarum, where lower temperatures (e.g., 15-17°C) suppress synthesis while higher ones inhibit overall rhizobial viability.

Perception and Signaling

Receptor Recognition in Plants

Nod factors are perceived by plants through lysin motif (LysM) receptor-like kinases (RLKs), which feature extracellular LysM domains that bind the chitooligosaccharide backbone and the acyl chain of the Nod factor. In the model legume Lotus japonicus, the receptors NFR1 and NFR5 were identified in 2003 as essential LysM-RLKs required for Nod factor perception and symbiotic signaling upstream of the common symbiosis pathway. Similarly, in Medicago truncatula, the LysM-RLKs LYK3 and NFP perform analogous roles, with LYK3 acting as an entry receptor for rhizobial infection and NFP facilitating Nod factor binding. The extracellular LysM domains of these receptors specifically recognize the Nod factor's core structure, including the β-1,4-linked N-acetylglucosamine oligomers and the N-linked acyl moiety, enabling host-specific symbiotic interactions. The binding mechanism involves high-affinity interactions in the nanomolar range, as demonstrated by and assays with purified NFR1 and NFR5 ectodomains from L. japonicus, where dissociation constants (K_d) were measured at 0.61–10.1 nM for compatible Nod factors. Decorations such as groups on the reducing-end (critical for S. meliloti Nod factors in M. truncatula) or fucose residues on the non-reducing end (key for M. loti Nod factors in L. japonicus) enhance specificity by fitting into dedicated pockets within the LysM domains, as revealed by structural analyses including NMR and motif mapping in the . These modifications discriminate compatible symbionts, with desulfated or defucosylated Nod factors showing reduced affinity and eliciting weaker or no symbiotic responses. LysM receptors localize to the plasma membrane of root epidermal cells. An immediate downstream response is calcium influx at the tip, which precedes sustained calcium spiking patterns essential for initiation. Recent studies have elucidated the receptor complex assembly, confirming that NFR1 and NFR5 form a core heterocomplex essential for initiating symbiotic signaling, with a conserved juxtamembrane motif in NFR5 promoting these interactions (as of 2024). Genetic evidence confirms the essentiality of these receptors: knockout mutants of nfr1 or nfr5 in L. japonicus fail to respond to Nod factors, showing no root hair deformation, calcium responses, or nodulation, even with compatible rhizobia. Analogous lyk3 and nfp mutants in M. truncatula abolish infection thread formation and nodule development, underscoring their non-redundant roles in establishing host-symbiont compatibility.

Downstream Signal Transduction

Upon perception of Nod factors by plant receptors, one of the earliest intracellular responses in root hair cells is a rapid influx of calcium ions (Ca²⁺) through plasma membrane channels, including the cyclic nucleotide-gated channel CNGC15, which contributes to the initial depolarization and subsequent nuclear-localized Ca²⁺ oscillations. These oscillations, characterized by periodic spikes in nuclear Ca²⁺ concentration, are a hallmark of symbiotic signaling and are essential for decoding the Nod factor signal. In legumes such as Medicago truncatula and Lotus japonicus, these Ca²⁺ signatures differ in frequency and amplitude depending on the symbiotic partner, enabling specificity in the response. The Ca²⁺ oscillations are transduced into downstream signaling by calcium- and -dependent (CCaMK), a key decoder that autophosphorylates upon binding in response to the spiking pattern. Identified in 2007 through genetic studies in , CCaMK is required for Nod factor-induced and nodule , as mutants lacking functional CCaMK fail to progress beyond early calcium responses. This kinase integrates the symbiotic Ca²⁺ code to activate transcriptional regulators, linking perception to cellular reprogramming. The core symbiotic signaling pathway, often referred to as the common SYM pathway, involves conserved genes shared between rhizobial nodulation and arbuscular mycorrhizal , such as DMI1 and DMI3 in . DMI1 encodes a nuclear envelope-localized that facilitates Ca²⁺ release from intracellular stores to initiate oscillations, while DMI3 is the Medicago ortholog of CCaMK, functioning downstream to propagate the signal. Specific components within this pathway, including formins like those mediating cortical dynamics, support localized cellular responses in the root cortex, such as rearrangements necessary for infection structure accommodation. Downstream of Ca²⁺ decoding, is orchestrated by the NIN (Nodule Inception) transcription factor, a RWP-RK domain protein directly induced by Nod factor signaling. NIN integrates inputs from the symbiotic pathway with signaling, binding promoter regions to activate early nodulin (ENOD) genes, including ENOD11 and ENOD40, which drive cortical cell divisions and formation. This integration ensures coordinated epidermal and cortical responses, with NIN restricting certain genes to specific tissues for precise nodule patterning. To prevent excessive nodulation and maintain resource balance, feedback autoregulation occurs via CLE (CLAVATA3/EMBRYO SURROUNDING REGION-related) peptides, small signaling molecules produced in roots upon Nod factor stimulation. These root-derived CLE peptides, such as MtCLE12 and MtCLE13 in Medicago, are transported to the shoot, where they bind leucine-rich repeat receptor kinases like SUNN (SHOOT-RUNNING NODULATION), triggering a shoot-to-root inhibitory signal that limits further nodule initiation. This long-distance shoot-root communication fine-tunes nodule number in response to environmental nitrogen levels, ensuring symbiotic efficiency.

Role in Nodulation Process

Initiation of Symbiosis

Upon exposure to Nod factors produced by compatible , root hairs of legume plants exhibit rapid deformation within hours, beginning with tip swelling and progressing to curling that forms a characteristic structure, which entraps to initiate infection. This morphological change is driven by reorganization of the , where Nod factors trigger fragmentation of actin bundles into diffuse networks and short filaments at the growing tip, redirecting polar growth toward the signal source. A key early intracellular response is the generation of calcium spiking patterns, with nuclear- and perinuclear-localized oscillations emerging approximately 10-15 minutes after Nod factor application. These rhythmic calcium fluxes are distinctive to Nod factor perception, differing from those elicited by other microbial signals in frequency and localization, and are subsequently decoded by the calcium- and calmodulin-dependent CCaMK to activate downstream symbiotic pathways. Within 3-8 hours of Nod factor treatment, early nodulin genes such as ENOD40 and the root hair infection peroxidase gene RIP1 are transcriptionally activated, particularly in dividing cortical cells adjacent to deforming s. ENOD40, encoding a small regulatory , promotes cortical cell divisions essential for primordium initiation, while RIP1 contributes to management during early infection site preparation. Host specificity is evident in the partial nature of these responses, as Nod factors from incompatible rhizobia often induce root hair tip swelling in non-host legumes but fail to elicit full curling or shepherd's crook formation, preventing progression to infection.

Infection and Nodule Development

Upon recognition of Nod factors by root hairs, which have undergone deformation and curling as an early symbiotic response, the infection thread (IT) initiates through polar growth from the curled root hair tip. This structure elongates inward via inverted tip growth, guided by localized Nod factor signaling that sustains cytoskeletal reorganization involving actin and microtubules, as well as ion fluxes and reactive oxygen species production. The IT is lined by a plant-derived membrane, facilitating bacterial invasion without breaching the host cell wall, and its progression depends on continuous low-concentration Nod factor activity to maintain elongation and prevent premature termination. Concurrent with IT formation, Nod factors induce cell division in the root cortex and pericycle, establishing the nodule primordium through a meristematic zone. In indeterminate nodules, typical of species like Medicago truncatula and Pisum sativum, a persistent apical meristem drives longitudinal growth with ongoing IT branching and cortical divisions, resulting in a zoned structure with a developmental gradient. In contrast, determinate nodules, as in Lotus japonicus and soybean (Glycine max), feature a transient meristem without persistent activity, leading to spherical nodules where cell divisions occur more uniformly and IT growth ceases earlier, influenced by Nod factor-mediated cytokinin signaling. These differences arise from variations in Nod factor perception and downstream transcriptional responses, such as those involving NSP1 and NSP2 transcription factors, which promote meristem initiation. As the IT reaches the cortical cells of the , are released from the thread tip or droplets into the cytoplasm via endocytosis-like processes, forming organelle-like symbiosomes enclosed by a host-derived peribacteroid . This release involves the shedding of bacterial exopolysaccharide capsules and fusion with vesicular trafficking components, such as VAMP721, ensuring enclosed differentiation without free bacterial proliferation. Within symbiosomes, terminally differentiate into nitrogen-fixing bacteroids, a process regulated by symbiotic signals including Nod factor-induced . Nitrogen fixation commences in mature infected cells approximately 7–14 days post-infection, coinciding with bacteroid activation and the production of , a that buffers oxygen levels to protect the oxygen-sensitive enzyme while facilitating its diffusion. To prevent excessive nodule formation and resource depletion, autoregulation of nodulation integrates responses via miR172, which targets the AP2 NNC1 in , repressing excessive primordia development and maintaining symbiotic balance.

Evolutionary and Applied Aspects

Evolutionary Origins

The Nod factor-mediated symbiosis between rhizobial and represents a relatively recent evolutionary innovation, building upon an ancient foundation of -based signaling that dates back approximately 400 million years to the origin of land and their association with arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi. Nod factors, which are lipochitooligosaccharides structurally derived from oligomers produced by AM fungi (known as Myc factors), exploit a conserved common (SYM) pathway in to initiate mutualistic interactions. This pathway, involving key components like the calcium-calmodulin-dependent CCaMK and the nuclear ion channel CASTOR/POLLUX, was originally co-opted for nutrient exchange with fungi and later adapted for bacterial nodulation, highlighting a shared evolutionary module that predates legume-specific traits by hundreds of millions of years. Rhizobial diversification and the spread of Nod factor production were driven by (HGT) of nod gene clusters, which are often located on mobile plasmids or symbiotic islands, allowing rapid dissemination across bacterial lineages. Phylogenetic analyses indicate that nod genes originated in alpha-proteobacteria (Rhizobiaceae family, around 51 million years ago), with subsequent HGT facilitating spread to other alpha- and beta-proteobacteria lineages and broader host colonization. This HGT mechanism underscores the dynamic, opportunistic nature of symbiotic evolution, where nod genes were acquired and refined multiple times to match diverse hosts. Extensions of Nod factor responsiveness beyond legumes are evident in non-legume like Parasponia, the sole non-leguminous genus capable of rhizobial nodulation, which exhibits partial responses to Nod factors through conserved LysM receptor kinases that trigger root hair deformation and cortical responses. Genomic studies from the 2020s reveal that these symbiotic pathways arose via co-option of pre-existing plant defense mechanisms, particularly those involving perception for resistance, allowing Nod factors to suppress immunity and promote accommodation of beneficial microbes. A pivotal event in legume evolution was the duplication of LysM receptor genes around 60 million years ago, coinciding with the diversification of the family, which enabled the evolution of receptor specificity for distinct Nod factor structures and restricted nodulation to compatible rhizobial partners.

Implications for Agriculture

Research on Nod factors has led to the development of commercial rhizobial inoculants engineered to produce higher levels of these signaling molecules, enhancing nodulation efficiency in nutrient-poor soils. For instance, modified strains with upregulated nod gene expression have demonstrated improved nodule occupancy and in like , allowing better establishment in acidic or low-fertility environments. These inoculants are particularly valuable for sustainable farming in regions with marginal soils, where native may underperform. Synthetic Nod factors, often applied as foliar sprays or seed treatments, have shown promise in boosting legume productivity by mimicking natural signaling to accelerate nodulation and growth. In greenhouse trials with peas (Pisum sativum), foliar application of lipo-chitooligosaccharides (LCOs, a class of Nod factors) at concentrations around 10^{-11} M increased yield by 22-32% compared to controls, attributed to enhanced nodule formation and nitrogen uptake. Field studies from the , such as those on soybeans, reported similar applications leading to 20-30% improvements in biomass and under stress conditions like , supporting reduced reliance on synthetic fertilizers. These approaches promote early symbiotic responses, as Nod factors initiate root hair deformation and cortical essential for nodule development. Advances in have extended Nod factor perception to non-legume crops, aiming to enable nitrogen-fixing symbioses in cereals. Using CRISPR/Cas9, researchers have introduced legume-derived Nod factor receptors (e.g., NFR1 and NFR5 from ) into and , allowing these plants to respond to signals with curling and infection thread formation. In 2020s studies, such edited lines exhibited partial symbiotic responses, with potential to reduce needs by up to 40-90% based on modeling, though full field trials demonstrating these reductions while maintaining yields are ongoing as of 2025. Similar efforts in have focused on integrating Myc factor receptors alongside Nod pathways to support dual symbioses with arbuscular mycorrhizae and . Recent 2024-2025 research highlights persistent challenges, including oxygen sensitivity of and high energy demands, indicating that while signaling is partially established, complete functional nodules in cereals remain elusive. Despite these innovations, practical adoption faces challenges including Nod factor instability in diverse conditions, where microbial degradation and environmental factors like can reduce . Regulatory hurdles for genetically modified and receptor-engineered crops, particularly concerning and , also limit commercialization, though non-GM synthetic Nod factor products offer a pathway for faster integration into . Overall, these applications could significantly cut global use, enhancing and crop resilience.

References

  1. https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nph.12898
  2. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/microbiology/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2020.585749/full
  3. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33090749/
  4. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2018.01247/full
  5. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC151258/
  6. https://www.lindahall.org/about/news/scientist-of-the-day/hermann-hellriegel/
  7. https://books.google.com/books/about/Root_Nodule_Bacteria_and_Leguminous_Plan.html?id=tAj8ZWCJLG4C
  8. https://www.nature.com/articles/344781a0
  9. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Root-hair-deformation-in-the-white-clover-rhizobium-Bhuvaneswari-Solheim/2e4f123bf35b3cb5f860a52857f13fb0559ef21b
  10. https://academic.oup.com/glycob/article/12/6/79R/719765
  11. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.3738520
  12. https://doi.org/10.1038/344781a0
  13. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1360138500018100
  14. https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.64.1.180-201.2000
  15. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.1996.00644.x
  16. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.8.10.1885
  17. https://enviromicro-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03366.x
  18. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC214293/
  19. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC55547/
  20. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16183027/
  21. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1074552105002310
  22. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3772312/
  23. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0176161705001823
  24. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1205171109
  25. https://academic.oup.com/glycob/article/16/9/801/736240
  26. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abb3377
  27. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.ade9204
  28. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2405671121
  29. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-08424-7
  30. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0803499105
  31. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1369526612000684
  32. https://apsjournals.apsnet.org/doi/10.1094/MPMI.2002.15.11.1108
  33. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2022.984909/full
  34. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26672071/
  35. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2023.1284720/full
  36. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20348212/
  37. https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nph.17010
  38. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC35089/
  39. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.230439797
  40. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC384810/
  41. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046/j.1365-313X.1995.08010111.x
  42. https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/mmbr.68.2.280-300.2004
  43. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10051050
  44. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14611
  45. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13792
  46. https://doi.org/10.1093/plphys/kiaa049
  47. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ery046
  48. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13837
  49. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-020-0613-7
  50. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4311200/
  51. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5940448/
  52. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2017.02229/full
  53. https://academic.oup.com/plphys/article/149/1/306/6107804
  54. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7643967/
  55. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S094450132100094X
  56. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020FrPS...10.1779D/abstract
  57. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1706795114
  58. https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nph.12549
  59. https://bioscipublisher.com/index.php/msb/article/download/4099/3163
  60. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2021.690567/full
  61. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/15/11/2536
  62. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09064711003730740
  63. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0944501311000462
  64. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590346222003467
  65. https://www.cell.com/plant-communications/fulltext/S2590-3462%2822%2900346-7
  66. https://www.embopress.org/doi/10.1038/s44319-025-00618-y
  67. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7748023/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.