Hubbry Logo
8.8 cm Pak 438.8 cm Pak 43Main
Open search
8.8 cm Pak 43
Community hub
8.8 cm Pak 43
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
8.8 cm Pak 43
8.8 cm Pak 43
8.8 cm Pak 43
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The Pak 43 (Panzerabwehrkanone 43 and Panzerjägerkanone 43[2][3][4]) was a German 8.8 cm anti-tank gun developed by Krupp in competition with the Rheinmetall 8.8 cm Flak 41 anti-aircraft gun and used during World War II. The Pak 43 was the most powerful anti-tank gun of the Wehrmacht to see service in significant numbers, also serving in modified form as the 8.8 cm KwK 43 main gun on the Tiger II tank, the open-top Nashorn and fully enclosed, casemate-hulled Elefant and Jagdpanther tank destroyers.

Key Information

The improved 8.8 cm gun was fitted with a semi-automatic vertical breech mechanism that greatly reduced recoil.[5] It could also be fired electrically while on its wheels.[5] It had a very flat trajectory out to 910 m (1,000 yd), making it easier for the gunner to hit targets at longer ranges as fewer corrections in elevation were needed. The gun had exceptional penetration and could defeat the frontal armour of any Allied tank to see service during the war at long range, even the Soviet IS-2 tanks and IS chassis-based tank destroyers. The gun's maximum firing range exceeded 15 km (9.3 mi).

Design

[edit]

KwK 43 and Pak 43s were initially manufactured with monobloc barrels but the extremely high muzzle velocity and operating pressures caused rapid barrel wear, resulting in a change to a two-piece barrel. This did not affect performance but made replacing a worn out barrel much faster and easier than before. A new PzGr.39/43 APCBC-HE projectile was designed, which, apart from the addition of much wider driving bands, was identical to the older 10.2 kg (22 lb) PzGr.39-1 APCBC-HE projectile used by the 8.8 cm KwK 36 and Pak 43 guns. The wider driving bands resulted in an increased weight to 10.4 kg (23 lb) for the PzGr.39/43.[6] The older PzGr.39-1 was used for the KwK & Pak 43 before new PzGr.39/43 rounds came into use but only if the gun had fired no more than 500 rounds. Over this, the expected barrel wear combined with the narrow driving bands could lead to a loss of pressure. The new PzGr.39/43 could be fired without loss of pressure until the barrel was worn out, thus requiring no restriction.

PzGr.39-1 FES & Al all up weight: 10.2 kg (9.87 kg without fuse & bursting charge)

PzGr.39/43 FES & Al all up weight: 10.4 kg (10.06 kg without fuse & bursting charge)

The same 278-gram BdZ 5127 fuse and 59-gram Amatol bursting charge was used for PzGr.39-1 and PzGr.39/43 rounds, requiring armoured targets of 30 mm or thicker to ignite after penetration for maximum effect.

Versions

[edit]
Pak 43 and Pak 43/41 specifications[7]
Specification Pak 43 Pak 43/41
Weight Travel: 4,750 kg (10,470 lb)
Combat: 3,650 kg (8,050 lb)		 Combat: 4,350 kg (9,590 lb)
Length 9.2 m (30 ft 2 in) 9.144 m (30 ft 0 in)
Barrel length 6.35 m (20 ft 10 in) 6.36 m (20 ft 10 in)
Width 2.527 m (8 ft 3.5 in)
Height 1.7 m (5 ft 7 in) 1.981 m (6 ft 6.0 in)
Pak 43/41 in firing position overlooking a river in Ukraine in September 1943

The main version of the Pak 43 was based on a highly effective cruciform mount, which offered a full 360 degree traverse and a much lower profile than the ubiquitous anti-aircraft 8.8 cm Flak 37. However the manufacture of this version was initially slow and costly, a situation that was made worse by the destruction of the carriage production line by Allied bombing.

As part of the design effort from Krupp to compete with the Flak 41, a barrel had been produced to prove the ballistics and design. This barrel design was developed, via an intermediate design known as the Gerät 42, to become the barrel used with Pak 43/41 design. When the Pak 43 was delayed, Krupp was asked to produce a weapon using this barrel using as many existing components as possible. This previous barrel design was then designated the Pak 41.[8]

The Pak 41 barrel was fitted with a horizontal sliding-block breech mechanism resembling that of the 7.5 cm Pak 40, and the semi-automatic gear was a simplified version of that used on the Pak 43. The two-wheel split-trail carriage was from the 10.5 cm leFH 18 field howitzer, with the wheels from the 15 cm s FH howitzer. The Pak 41 was ballistically identical to the Pak 43 and fired the same ammunition, hence its performance was identical. Sources are unclear as to whether the Pak 41 and the Pak 43 barrels were identical; either way it is responsible for the Pak 43/41 designation for the whole design.[9][10][11][12]

The 43/41 proved heavy and awkward to handle in the mud and snow of the Eastern Front and gunners referred to 43/41 as the "barn door" (German: Scheunentor),[13] a reference to the size and weight of the gun. Nevertheless, the improvised Pak 43/41 proved an effective substitute for the Pak 43 until sufficient numbers of the more complex cruciform mounts could be manufactured to replace it in service.

The Pak 43 was also mounted in German armored vehicles, and this version was known as the 8.8 cm KwK 43. Versions of this gun were mounted in a number of German armored vehicles under different designations, including the Tiger II heavy tank (KwK 43 L/71) and several tank destroyers: the Hornisse/Nashorn (Pak 43/1), Ferdinand/Elefant (Pak 43/2, early name Stu.K. 43/1), and Jagdpanther (Pak 43/3 and Pak 43/4, early name Stu.K. 43). A few examples of the Tiger II-based Jagdtiger were also completed with the 8.8 cm weapon due to a shortage of the 12.8 cm Pak 44, but these tank destroyers are not believed to have seen operational service.

Pak 43 on cruciform mount, in towing configuration
8.8 cm Pak 43/41 at US Army Ordnance Museum

Service

[edit]

There were 578 8.8 cm Pak in German army service on 1 October 1944 and 829 on 1 January 1945.[5]

The Royal Hungarian Army also had a minimum of 31 pieces. The Hungarian First Army used them in the Northeastern Carpathians and later withdraw them to the "Attila" Line for the defence of Budapest.[14]

Ammunition and penetration

[edit]
Pak 43 from the rear

The Pzgr. 39/43 and HE shells were generally available. Pzgr. 40/43 were in severely short supply.

Pzgr. 39/43 APCBC-HE

[edit]
  • Type: Armour-piercing Capped with Ballistic Cap - High Explosive
  • Projectile weight: 10.4 kg (22.92 lbs)
  • Muzzle velocity: 1,000 m/s (3,300 ft/s)
Performance
Penetration Hit probability versus 2.5 m x 2 m target[15]
Range RHA plate at
30° from vertical 		in training in combat
100 m 202 mm 100% 100%
500 m 185 mm 100% 100%
1,000 m 165 mm 100% 85%
1,500 m 148 mm 95% 61%
2,000 m 132 mm 85% 43%
2,500 m n/a 74% 30%
3,000 m n/a 61% 23%
3,500 m n/a 51% 17%
4,000 m n/a 42% 13%

Pzgr. 40/43 APCR

[edit]
Penetration figures established as average against a rolled homogeneous armour plate laid back 30 degrees from the vertical
Hit probability versus 2.5 m x 2 m target[15]
Range Penetration in training in combat
100 m 238 mm 100% 100%
500 m 217 mm 100% 100%
1000 m 193 mm 100% 89%
1500 m 171 mm 97% 66%
2000 m 153 mm 89% 47%
2500 m n/a 78% 34%
3000 m n/a 66% 25%

Gr. 39/3 HL (HEAT)

[edit]
  • Type: High explosive anti-tank
  • Projectile weight: 7.65 kg (17 lbs)
  • Muzzle velocity: 600 m/s (1,968 ft/s)
  • Penetration: 110 mm

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

8.8 cm Pak 43

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The 8.8 cm Pak 43 (Panzerabwehrkanone 43) was a highly effective German 88 mm towed developed by during , renowned for its long-barreled L/71 design that delivered exceptional armor-piercing performance against contemporary Allied and Soviet tanks. Introduced in 1943 as a response to increasingly thick enemy armor, it featured a carriage for stability and a low , allowing effective deployment in defensive positions across European theaters. Development of the Pak 43 stemmed from a 1942 competition between Krupp and Rheinmetall to create a dedicated anti-tank weapon surpassing earlier 88 mm Flak guns repurposed for ground combat, with Krupp's design selected for its superior ballistics and the Rheinmetall Flak 41 rejected due to production complexities. Production commenced in late 1943 at Krupp's Essen factory and continued until 1945, yielding approximately 2,100 units despite resource shortages, making it a cornerstone of late-war German anti-tank defenses. The gun's semi-automatic vertical sliding breech enabled a rate of fire of 6-10 rounds per minute, supported by a six-man crew, while its maximum range exceeded 15 km, though effective anti-tank engagement occurred up to 4,000 m. Key specifications included a total weight of 3,650 kg (firing position), a barrel length of 6.61 m (71 calibers), and muzzle velocities reaching 1,000 m/s with armor-piercing rounds like the PzGr. 39/43, enabling penetration of over 200 mm of armor at 1,000 m—sufficient to defeat heavy tanks such as the Soviet or British Churchill from the front at combat ranges. Ammunition weighed 9.85-10.4 kg per , with the gun's barrel life limited to approximately 1,200 rounds due to high pressures. Variants included the Pak 43/41, a variant with a split-trail for expedited production, and extensive mounting as the PaK 43/2 or KwK 43 in vehicles like the Sd.Kfz. 164 , Ferdinand/, Jagdpanther, and heavy tank, where it served as primary armament. In combat, the Pak 43 proved devastating during defensive battles from to the Eastern Front, often earning the "Eighty-Eight" for its lethality, though its size and weight (requiring or ) limited mobility compared to lighter Allied guns. Deployed in formations—concentrated batteries protecting key sectors—it inflicted heavy casualties on advancing armor, but Allied air superiority and eventually overwhelmed many positions by 1945.

Development and Production

Background and Design Requirements

Prior to World War II, German anti-tank doctrine emphasized mobile, lightweight artillery such as the 3.7 cm Pak 36 to counter expected infantry support tanks with thin armor. However, the invasion of the Soviet Union in June 1941 exposed severe limitations when German forces encountered the T-34 medium tank and KV-1 heavy tank, which featured sloped armor up to 70 mm thick on the T-34 and 120 mm on the KV-1, rendering the standard 5 cm Pak 38 nearly ineffective beyond close ranges even with armor-piercing composite rigid (APCR) ammunition. This antitank crisis prompted a doctrinal shift toward heavier calibers, with the 7.5 cm Pak 40 entering service in late 1942 to reliably penetrate Soviet armor at combat distances. In response to these evolving armored threats, the Heereswaffenamt issued design requirements in 1942 for a dedicated high-velocity 8.8 cm , specifying penetration of at least 100 mm of armor at 1,500 meters under a 30-degree impact angle and a long L/71 barrel length to achieve superior compared to adaptations of the existing 8.8 cm Flak 18/36 anti-aircraft . The emphasis on extended barrel length and aimed to enable engagements at standoff ranges, addressing the Pak 40's vulnerabilities against thicker frontal armor. Allied tank developments further underscored the need for such a , as the British Churchill infantry 's up to 152 mm armor and the American M4 Sherman's increasing variants with improved protection began challenging the Pak 40's effectiveness beyond 1,000 meters, particularly in anticipated Western Front operations. Early prototyping efforts included Rheinmetall's adaptation of the 8.8 cm Flak 41 anti-aircraft gun into the Pak 43/41 configuration, but testing revealed insufficient to meet the penetration requirements at long range, leading to its rejection in favor of Krupp's dedicated design.

Development Process and Manufacturers

The development of the 8.8 cm Pak 43 was initiated in late 1942 by as part of a competition with , where Krupp's design was selected for its superior ballistics, while Rheinmetall's Flak 41-based proposal was rejected due to production complexities. The first prototypes, featuring the characteristic long L/71 barrel, underwent initial testing, where they demonstrated superior penetration capabilities against simulated heavy armor. Key engineering challenges included attaining a of approximately 1,000 m/s to ensure and penetration, while effectively managing the intense generated by the high-pressure charges. engineers addressed this through the adoption of a semi-automatic vertical sliding block breech mechanism, which allowed for rapid reloading and improved under combat conditions. These innovations were refined during iterative trials, balancing the gun's power with the structural integrity of the split-trail carriage design. Following successful trials which confirmed the weapon's ability to penetrate frontal armor at extended ranges, the Pak 43 was officially adopted by the . Initial production commenced in at Krupp's main factory in , with early units prioritized for frontline deployment. By the end of the war, approximately 2,100 towed units and around 1,500 vehicle-mounted guns were produced, for a total of about 3,600 L/71 guns. Production peaked at around 100 units per month in , though output was hampered by Allied bombing raids on German industrial centers, leading to frequent relocations and delays. Krupp relied on subcontractors like Rheinmetall-Borsig for critical components, including barrels and systems, to accelerate assembly. Wartime resource shortages prompted adaptations such as the use of stamped for non-critical parts, simplifying processes and reducing reliance on precision without compromising the gun's core performance.

Design and Specifications

Gun Mechanism

The 8.8 cm Pak 43 was equipped with an 88 mm barrel measuring 71 s in length, equivalent to approximately 6.28 meters overall, featuring a rifled bore with 32 grooves in a right-hand twist to ensure stabilization during flight. The barrel incorporated a hydropneumatic system capable of managing significant forces generated during firing, with a normal recoil length of 47.5 inches. The breech mechanism employed a horizontal sliding-block design operated semi-automatically and electrically fired, enabling efficient reloading and a practical of 6-10 rounds per minute under optimal conditions. This configuration allowed the breech to open and close via mechanical interlocks tied to the motion, with manual override handles for emergency operations. Sighting was provided by dual telescope mounts positioned side-by-side on the left of the gun, including a primary rocking-bar type optimized for direct anti-tank fire with a range drum graduated from 0 to 4,000 meters, alongside a secondary mount featuring scales for (0 to 800 mils in 2-mil increments) and adjusted ranges for specific types such as the 8.8 cm Sprenggranate L/4.7 (up to 5,500 meters) and 8.8 cm Sprenggranate 39/1 (up to 3,000 meters), supporting both direct and limited roles with an elevation range of -8° to +40°. A double-baffle was fitted to the barrel end, effectively reducing impulse to facilitate sustained fire from relatively lightweight mountings without undue strain on the crew or platform. The gun tube itself weighed 1,155 kg, contributing to an overall service weight in the firing position of approximately 3,583 kg when integrated with mountings.

Carriage and Mobility

The standard carriage of the 8.8 cm Pak 43 featured a two-bogie mount with tubular steel construction, enabling a full 360° traverse and a low firing height of 4 ft 6 in (1.37 m) that supported hull-down firing positions. This design incorporated extendable side legs for stability when firing beyond 30° from the longitudinal axis without lowering the central platform. Mobility relied on towing, typically by the half-track, achieving road speeds up to 50 km/h; the gun was transported on two single-axle limbers with pneumatic tires on light alloy wheels for rough terrain traversal. In travel configuration, it weighed 13,000 lb (5,897 kg) and stood 5 ft 6 in (1.68 m) high, rendering it vulnerable to aerial observation and attack. Off-road performance was limited by its mass, with the heavy weight impeding movement across soft or uneven ground compared to lighter anti-tank guns. A six-man —comprising a , gunner, loader, and support personnel—handled operations, including rapid setup using spade anchors at the trail ends to counter and ensure stability in firing. The carriage included a thin armored shield, optional on later models, offering basic protection against shell fragments but little against direct hits. Hydro-pneumatic mechanisms integrated with the mounting allowed for controlled firing, though was restricted to 12–16° when traversing over the legs.

Variants

Towed Configurations

The primary towed configuration of the 8.8 cm Pak 43 utilized a low-profile mount introduced in 1943, designed to provide a stable firing platform with full 360° traverse while minimizing the gun's silhouette for concealed anti-tank operations in defensive lines supporting units. This mount rested on four outriggers for stability during firing, with the gun's weight at 3,650 kg, enabling effective engagement of armored threats at long ranges. A total of approximately 2,100 units in towed form were produced from 1943 to 1945 by manufacturers including and . Due to production challenges with the complex cruciform carriage, the Pak 43/41 variant was introduced as an interim solution in late 1943, adapting the Pak 43 barrel to a modified split-trail carriage borrowed from the 8.8 cm Flak 41 anti-aircraft gun to accelerate output and conserve materials. This configuration, adopted more widely in 1944, offered a traverse of 56° and elevation from -5° to +38°, but resulted in a higher of approximately 1.7 meters and combat weight of 4,380 kg, which compromised concealment and cross-country mobility compared to the standard Pak 43. An estimated several hundred units were manufactured before production shifted back to the cruciform mount by August 1944. A late-war adaptation involved mounting the Pak 43 on the Sonderanhänger 204, a lightweight split-trail towing trailer originally developed for heavy anti-aircraft guns, which allowed for improved cross-country towing and even direct firing in emergencies with a simplified . This setup reduced the overall transport weight while maintaining the gun's combat readiness at 3,650 kg, enhancing mobility for rapid deployment in fluid fronts such as during the Ardennes Offensive in December 1944. Towed Pak 43 configurations provided exceptional armor penetration capabilities surpassing lighter anti-tank guns like the , capable of defeating heavy Allied tanks at distances up to 2,000 meters, but their multi-part assembly and disassembly for —requiring a crew of six to seven and up to 30 minutes—severely limited repositioning in dynamic combat environments. These guns were primarily deployed with battalions in divisional anti-tank units for static defense.

Vehicle-Mounted Versions

The KwK 43 represented a direct of the Pak 43 for installation in the turret of the Panzerkampfwagen VI Ausf. B , featuring a 7.92 mm for secondary fire support. This tank-mounted version maintained the L/71 barrel length but incorporated modifications for enclosed turret integration, including a semi-automatic vertical sliding breech to manage within the confined space. Production of the , and thus the associated KwK 43 guns, totaled 489 units by Henschel from January 1944 to March 1945, with the turret allowing full 360-degree rotation powered by a hydraulic system geared to engine speed. Casemate-mounted variants of the Pak 43 provided self-propelled antitank capability on various chassis. The Pak 43/1 was mounted in the Nashorn (Sd.Kfz. 164), utilizing an open-top superstructure on a modified Panzer IV chassis, produced from 1943 to 1944 in 494 units by Alkett and Famo, exposing the crew to small-arms and artillery fire but enabling rapid deployment for long-range engagements. The Pak 43/2 was used in the Ferdinand/Elefant (Sd.Kfz. 184), a heavy casemate design on the Porsche VK 45.01 (P) chassis, with 91 units produced in 1943 by Nibelungenwerke; it featured an open-top superstructure (later fitted with a ball-mounted MG 34 for close defense) and limited gun traverse of approximately 10° left and 30° right. The Pak 43/3 was mounted in the Jagdpanther (Sd.Kfz. 173), featuring an enclosed casemate on the Panther chassis for superior crew protection, with 415 units manufactured from January 1944 to April 1945 by MIAG, MNH, and Daimler-Benz, prioritizing sloped armor up to 80 mm thick. A combined production of over 1,000 such vehicles was achieved across these designs. Both the Nashorn and Jagdpanther limited gun traverse to approximately 10-13 degrees left and right due to the fixed superstructure, relying on vehicle hull pivoting for broader targeting, while the Elefant had a slightly wider arc. Installation in these vehicles required adaptations such as a shortened recoil mechanism using hydraulic buffers to fit the gun within hull constraints, reducing overall length while preserving . The Jagdpanther employed a hydraulic traverse system for fine adjustments within its limited arc, complemented by manual elevation controls. Ammunition storage varied by design: the carried 24-40 rounds in the fighting compartment and rear bins, the held 36 rounds, while the held up to 57-60 rounds in side racks and hull stowage, emphasizing armor-piercing projectiles for antitank roles. Following initial towed deployments, vehicle-mounted Pak 43 variants gained priority in production after mid-1944 to address the vulnerability of static guns to air and attacks, with over Nashorns, 91 Ferdinands/Elefants, and 415 Jagdpanthers deployed to heavy antitank battalions on both fronts. However, these integrations often overloaded the chassis, leading to mechanical issues; the Nashorn's HL 190 P30 engine (320 hp) proved underpowered for the 24-ton vehicle's off-road demands, resulting in frequent breakdowns and limited operational range of about 260 km.

Operational History

Introduction and Deployment

The 8.8 cm Pak 43 anti-tank gun entered service with the German in mid-1943, marking a significant upgrade in anti-tank capabilities amid escalating armored threats on the Eastern Front. Initial deployments were limited due to production delays, with the first combat uses occurring during the in summer 1943, primarily in vehicle-mounted form. Elite units, such as the Grossdeutschland Division, received priority issuances, integrating the gun into their battalions to counter Soviet heavy tanks like the KV series and early IS models. These early fieldings emphasized the weapon's role in defensive positions, where its long-barreled L/71 design provided superior range and penetration over predecessors like the 7.5 cm Pak 40. By mid-1944, the Pak 43 had scaled to over 1,000 units in active service, reflecting accelerated production that totaled approximately 2,900 guns by war's end. These were primarily organized into independent schwere Abteilungen, each equipped with 12 guns and supporting 192 personnel, and assigned to Panzer divisions for mobile defense. Examples include allocations to the 1st SS Panzer Division, with strategic priority shifting to the Western Front in anticipation of the , where battalions were rushed to bolster defenses against anticipated Allied armored assaults. This expansion allowed for broader integration into infantry and formations, though full equipping remained incomplete in many sectors until early 1945 due to ongoing resource strains. Logistical challenges hampered the Pak 43's effectiveness from the outset, as its 4.38-ton (4,380 kg) weight on a split-trail carriage made rapid repositioning difficult without prime movers like the half-track, exacerbating transport bottlenecks on disrupted front lines. Ammunition supply was particularly acute, with tungsten-core Pzgr. 40/43 APCR rounds strictly rationed due to critical shortages of the strategic metal, forcing reliance on standard Pzgr. 39/43 APCBC projectiles that offered reduced penetration against heavily armored targets at longer ranges. These issues delayed widespread adoption and contributed to uneven distribution across theaters. Allied intelligence efforts were spurred by early encounters with the Pak 43, which informed countermeasures like the Soviet 100 mm D-10 tank gun's development as a response to its penetration capabilities. Limited foreign aid extended to involved training programs for Romanian and Hungarian forces on Pak 43 operations, but production constraints prevented any operational transfers. The Hungarian Army fielded examples independently by late war, though without significant combat impact. On the Italian front, towed Pak 43s and -mounted variants were deployed with units such as s.Pz.Jg.Abt. 525, engaging Allied forces in defensive battles from to the in 1943-1945, where their long-range fire contributed to delaying advances despite mobility limitations.

Combat Performance and Notable Uses

The 8.8 cm Pak 43 demonstrated exceptional combat effectiveness on the Eastern Front, particularly in defensive roles where its long-range capabilities allowed for first-shot engagements against Soviet armor. During the in July-August 1943, a equipped with Ferdinand tank destroyers mounting the Pak 43 claimed the destruction of 320 Soviet tanks while suffering only 13 losses, primarily to mines and mechanical failures rather than enemy fire. On the variant, Schwere Panzerjäger Abteilung 655's 2nd Company at Orel in July 1943 claimed 430 tanks, 19 KV-1s, and other vehicles, losing just two Nashorns in the process. Later, in the Vitebsk region during December 1943 to February 1944, Abteilung 519 destroyed 290 enemy tanks, including multiple heavy tanks engaged from hull-down positions at ranges exceeding 2,000 meters, enabling high first-hit probabilities against heavily armored targets. On the Western Front, the Pak 43 proved equally lethal in ambushes and defensive stands, leveraging its flat trajectory for accurate fire up to 3,200 meters. During the Western Allied advance into Germany in March 1945, a Nashorn of Schwere Panzerjäger Abteilung 93 destroyed an M26 Pershing heavy tank at close range near Niehl, north of Cologne, contributing to broader claims of over 100 Allied Sherman tanks ambushed by German anti-tank units in the sector. German tactical doctrine emphasized camouflaged emplacements and hull-down firing to maximize the gun's 4,000-meter effective range, allowing crews to engage advancing armor before it could close; however, the low rate of fire (6-10 rounds per minute) left guns vulnerable to infantry assaults at short ranges, often resulting in close-quarters losses. Overall, the Pak 43 achieved an estimated 10:1 kill ratio against Allied armor in defensive operations, with individual aces like Lieutenant Albert Ernst of Abteilung 519 destroying 14 T-34s in a single day on December 23, 1943, using just 21 rounds. Limitations included crew exposure to , leading to high casualties, and late-war shortages of fuel and ammunition that immobilized vehicle-mounted versions. Post-1945, captured Pak 43s influenced anti-tank designs; the Soviets extensively them to develop frontal armor for T-54/55 tanks.

Ammunition

Projectile Types

The 8.8 cm Pak 43 utilized a variety of fixed ammunition rounds with brass cartridge cases (88x571R) measuring approximately 571 mm in length, loaded with diglycol-based RPC 39 tubular propellant charges weighing around 4.8 kg for standard anti-tank rounds to achieve high muzzle velocities. These rounds were single-loaded into the semi-automatic vertical sliding breech for rapid fire, while vehicle-mounted variants like the Jagdpanther could carry up to 60 rounds in dedicated storage racks. The primary anti-tank projectile was the PzGr. 39/43, an armor-piercing capped ballistic cap with high-explosive filler (APCBC-HE) round designed for engaging armored vehicles at typical battlefield ranges. This round featured a core with a ballistic cap to improve and accuracy, along with a small explosive charge (approximately 59 grams of /wax) to enhance post-penetration fragmentation and damage inside the target. Weighing 10.16 kg for the , it served as the general-purpose for most anti-tank engagements. For confronting heavily armored targets at longer distances, the PzGr. 40/43 was developed as a high-velocity armor-piercing composite rigid (APCR) round with a core to achieve superior penetration. Lighter at 7.3 kg, this projectile relied on its reduced mass and higher for , but its deployment was severely restricted due to tungsten shortages by late war. The Gr. 39/3 HL/A served as the hollow-charge () anti-tank round, providing consistent penetration regardless of engagement range through a shaped charge that generated a high-velocity metal jet upon impact. With a weight of approximately 7.65 kg, it doubled as a dual-purpose munition effective against , fortifications, and light vehicles, filling a gap in versatility for the otherwise specialized Pak 43. Supporting roles were covered by the Sprgr. L/4.5 high-explosive (HE) round, optimized for against soft targets or unarmored positions, featuring a 7 kg projectile filled with about 0.58 kg of TNT or for fragmentation effects at a of 720 m/s. Additionally, Nebelgranate rounds were available to create obscuring screens for troop movements or to mask gun positions, dispersing a chemical to produce dense white upon bursting.

Ballistics and Penetration

The 8.8 cm Pak 43 exhibited exceptional ballistics due to its long 71-caliber barrel, which imparted high muzzle velocities to its projectiles. The standard armor-piercing capped ballistic cap (APCBC) round reached 1,000 m/s, while the armor-piercing composite rigid (APCR) variant achieved 1,130 m/s, and the high-explosive anti-tank (HEAT) round was fired at 600 m/s. These velocities enabled a maximum effective range of 15,300 meters for indirect fire, though practical anti-tank engagements were most effective up to 4,000 meters where accuracy and penetration remained optimal. Penetration performance against homogeneous armor at a 30° obliquity angle was a key strength, allowing the Pak 43 to defeat heavy Allied and Soviet tanks at extended ranges. The APCBC round penetrated 203 mm at 100 meters, 165 mm at 1,000 meters, and 132 mm at 2,000 meters. The higher-velocity APCR round offered superior close-range capability with 231 mm at 100 meters and 185 mm at 1,000 meters, though its effectiveness dropped more sharply beyond that due to aerodynamic drag. In contrast, the round provided a consistent 90 mm penetration regardless of distance, owing to its shaped-charge mechanism that relied on rather than kinetic impact.
Ammunition TypeMuzzle Velocity (m/s)Penetration at 100 m (mm, 30°)Penetration at 1,000 m (mm, 30°)Penetration at 2,000 m (mm, 30°)
APCBC1,000203165132
APCR1,130231185145
600909090
The gun's projectiles featured drag-stabilized designs with favorable ballistic coefficients, resulting in a flat and a 50% hit probability against a typical tank-sized target at 1,500 meters. Penetration could be approximated using the simplified kinetic formula: P=(m⋅v2d)⋅fP = \left( \frac{m \cdot v^2}{d} \right) \cdot f where PP is , mm is , vv is impact , dd is , and ff is a material factor accounting for the core's hardness and the target's armor composition. This model highlighted the Pak 43's reliance on high and for superior delivery compared to shorter-barreled contemporaries. In comparative terms, the Pak 43 outperformed the Soviet 85 mm ZiS-S-53 gun, which achieved approximately 150 mm penetration at 1,000 meters under similar conditions, but it was closely matched by late-war Soviet 100 mm field guns like the BS-3, which reached comparable levels against sloped armor. Environmental factors, such as temperature variations, influenced by up to ±5%, potentially altering range and penetration in field conditions. German testing of the Pak 43's ballistics occurred primarily at the , where trials utilized captured enemy armor plates to simulate scenarios and validate penetration claims under controlled conditions. Post-war analyses by British and American ordnance experts corroborated these results through independent firings and metallurgical examinations, confirming the gun's reported performance metrics.

References

  1. https://www.wealdfoundation.org/collection/pak-43-8-8-cm/
  2. https://www.militaryfactory.com/armor/detail.php?armor_id=461
  3. https://ww2db.com/weapon.php?q=313
  4. http://www.coulthart.com/134/german-armaments.pdf
  5. https://www.dday-overlord.com/en/material/artillery/pak-43
  6. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA428697.pdf
  7. https://panzerworld.com/8-8-cm-pak-43-l-71
  8. https://tanks-encyclopedia.com/ww2/germany/panzerjager-iv-krupp-mit-8-8-cm-pak-43-l-71/
  9. https://www.ww2-weapons.com/88-mm-anti-tank-gun-pak-43/
  10. https://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?f=76&t=281488&start=105
  11. https://www.bulletpicker.com/pdf/Catalog-of-Enemy-Ordnance-Materiel.pdf
  12. https://www.ibiblio.org/hyperwar/Germany/HB/HB-7.html
  13. https://archive.org/stream/CatalogOfEnemyOrdnanceMateriel/CatalogOfEnemyOrdnanceMateriel_djvu.txt
  14. https://www.lonesentry.com/ordnance/2009/12/30/88mm-pak-43-antitank-gun/
  15. https://germanwarmachine.com/weapons-technology/artillery/pak-43.html
  16. https://www.dday-overlord.com/en/d-day-overlord-en/material/material-artillery/canon-pak-43-de-88-mm-histoire-fiche-technique-et-photo/
  17. https://www.wehrmacht-history.com/heer/anti-tank-artillery/8-8-cm-pak-43-41.html
  18. http://www.kfzderwehrmacht.de/Homepage_english/Trailers/Special_trailers/Sd__Ah__204/sd__ah__204.html
  19. https://id3486.securedata.net/fprado/armorsite/tiger2.htm
  20. https://tanks-encyclopedia.com/ww2/nazi_germany/sd-kfz-164_nashorn.php
  21. https://www.defensemedianetwork.com/stories/german-88mm-artillery-pak-43/
  22. https://tanks-encyclopedia.com/ww2/nazi_germany/panzerjager_tiger-p_elefant/
  23. https://panzerworld.com/german-ammunition-nomenclature
  24. https://www.tankarchives.com/2022/11/100-mm-d-10-vs-88-mm-kwk-43.html
  25. https://panzerworld.com/8-8-cm-kw-k-43-l-71
  26. http://www.panzer-war.com/page59.html
  27. https://achh.army.mil/history/book-wwii-woundblstcs-chapter1/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.