Respect all members: no insults, harassment, or hate speech.
Be tolerant of different viewpoints, cultures, and beliefs. If you do not agree with others, just create separate note, article or collection.
Clearly distinguish between personal opinion and fact.
Verify facts before posting, especially when writing about history, science, or statistics.
Promotional content must be published on the “Related Services and Products” page—no more than one paragraph per service. You can also create subpages under the “Related Services and Products” page and publish longer promotional text there.
Do not post materials that infringe on copyright without permission.
Always credit sources when sharing information, quotes, or media.
Be respectful of the work of others when making changes.
Discuss major edits instead of removing others' contributions without reason.
If you notice rule-breaking, notify community about it in talks.
Do not share personal data of others without their consent.
Kerala Varma Pazhassi Raja (IPA:[pɐɻɐʃːiɾaːd͡ʒɐ]) (3 January 1753 – 30 November 1805),[1] also known as Cotiote Rajah and Pychy Rajah, was the de facto head of the Kottayam Kingdom[note 1] in the Malabar region of Kerala between 1774 and 1805. His struggles with the British East India Company is known as the Cotiote War. Pazhassi's rebellion against the British is often touted as one of the earliest acts of freedom fight in India.[2] He earned the epithet "Kerala Simham" ("Lion of Kerala") on account of his martial exploits.[3]
Pazhassi Raja was a member of the western branch of the Kottayam royal clan. When Hyder Ali of the Kingdom of Mysoreoccupied Malabar in 1773, the Raja of Kottayam found political asylum in Kallara near Vaikom in Kottayam district of Kerala. Pazhassi Raja, the fourth prince in line for succession to the throne during this period, became one of the de facto heads of state, surpassing several older royal contenders. He fought a war of resistance against the Mysorean army from 1774 to 1793. On account of his refusal to flee and due to his effective resistance to Mysoreans, he gained firm support of his subjects.
In 1792, after the Third Anglo-Mysore War, the East India Company imposed control in Kottayam in violation of an earlier agreement of 1790 which had recognised its independence. Vira Varma, to whom Raja was a nephew, was appointed by the East India Company authorities as the Raja of Kottayam. To meet revenue targets fixed by Company authorities, Vira Varma ordered an exorbitant tax to be collected from the peasantry and this move was met in 1793 by a mass resistance led by Pazhassi Raja, who had always been opposed to the company's rule. In 1796, the company made an attempt to arrest Pazhassi Raja, but he evaded capture and instead fought back using guerilla warfare. After a string of serious setbacks, the Company sued for peace in 1797. The conflict was renewed in 1800 over a dispute on Wayanad and after a five-year-long war of insurgency, Pazhassi Raja was killed on 30 November 1805 in a gunfight at Mavila Thodu (small body of water), in the present-day Kerala-Karnataka border.
Pazhassi Raja was born as a Kshatriya Varma in the Royal Padinjare Kovilakam (Western Branch) of Purannattukara Swarupam, the royal lineage of Kottayam. This branch was located at Pazhassi which lay south west of Mattannur. Kerala Varma got the name Pazhassi Raja as he was a native of Pazhassi. The early British East India Company documents wrote Pazhassi Raja as Pychy Rajah, while the name Cotiote Raja comes from the anglicizing of Kottayam to Cotiote. Kottayam covers what is today the Thalassery taluk of the Kannur District and Wayanad district, along with the Gudalur taluk(Mudhumalai, Nellakotta, Srimadurai,Cherambadi, and Masinagudi) of Nilgiris district.[4]
As a royal clan, Purannattukara Swarupam had three branches: a western branch (Padinjare Kovilakam) at Pazhassi, near Mattannur, an eastern branch (Kizhakke Kovilakam) at Manatana, near Peravoor, and a southern branch (Tekke Kovilakam) at Kottayampoil, near Koothuparamba.[5]
Pazhassi Raja's warfare with Mysore troops can be divided into two phases based on the rulers of the kingdom of Mysore. First phase lasted from 1773 to 1782 during which time, the Mysore ruler was Hyder Ali. The second phase extended from 1784 to 1793 and during this phase he fought the troops of Tipu Sultan, son and successor of Hyder Ali.
In 1773, Hyder Ali marched into Malabar for the second time,[6] for non-payment of tributes from the Rajas (kings) of Malabar as agreed after the war in 1768. Most of the Rajas of Malabar, along with many Naduvazhis or vassals fled to Travancore. Yet numerous princes and younger noblemen refused to flee and organized partisan bands who waged guerrilla warfare on the Mysore army from the forests and mountains that covered much of Malabar. Pazhassi Raja was one among them.
In 1774, at the age of 21, Pazhassi Raja took over the throne to replace his uncle who had fled to Travancore. He vowed to resist Hyder Ali's troops, and stayed in Kottayam,[7] where he gathered a force and began guerrilla battles against the troops of Mysore as he had neither guns nor troops enough to face them in an open battle. He set up a large number of bases in the nearly impenetrable forested mountains of Puralimala and Wynad and repeatedly inflicted severe minor losses on the Mysore army in Kottayam as well as in Wayanad.[8][page needed][9] Pazhassi Raja's troops were recruited from several castes and tribes- that includes Nair forces Nambiars, Thiyyas, Kurichiyas and Mullukurumas[10][11][12]
Once the true Raja of Kottayam had fled, three royals rose to power in Kottayam. The nephew of the escaped Raja named Vira Varma and his nephews, Ravi Varma and Pazhassi Raja now took over the reins of government. Vira Varma was skilled in political intrigue and manipulation whereas Ravi Varma was too incompetent to play any serious political role and hence his role only was nominal. Pazhassi Raja become the most powerful figure in Kottayam, much to the chagrin of his uncle Vira Varma. Hence Vira Varma played a series of power games aiming to check the growing clout of his nephew. So the relation between Vira Varma and Pazhassi Raja was one of enmity right from the onset.
The military situation was grim for Pazhassi Raja and his troops – in 1774, Coorgs had joined hands with Hyder Ali on the promise of being gifted Wynad and a large Coorg army camped in Wynad to help Mysore troops. In 1776, Hyder Ali re-installed the Hindu Raja in Chirakkal [6] and the latter joined Mysore war effort to crush Pazhassi Raja.[7][13] This triple alliance which lasted till 1780 reached nowhere near defeating the Kottayam army.[8][page needed]
During his long war with the Mysore and then the East India Company, Pazhassi Raja increased his sphere of influence significantly eastwards as far as the outskirts of Mysore. His men regularly looted enemy treasuries and sandalwood from southern Karnataka and his enemies could do little to check these raids. This enabled him to lay claim on a great chunk of the Mysore district – as far as Nanjangod in the east. Also, Pazhassi Raja and his men frequently raided the domains of neighbouring Rajas in northern Malabar and Coorg to harass the enemy regiments posted there and he was often supported by local population of those territories. Along with this, he had close ties with Ravi Varma and Krishna Varma, who were princes of Calicut and popular rebel leaders of southern Malabar.
Thalasseri or Tellicherry in the late 18th century was a harbour-fort which was held by the East India Company as a factory. The value of Tellicherry as a naval base meant that her capture could seriously impact the situation of the Bombay Marine on the west coast. Also rebels in North Malabar bought arms and ammunition from the East India Company in Tellicherry. So if Hyder could capture this fort, he could, at a stroke, cripple both the rebels in North Malabar as well as Company rule in India at a regional basis.
So in 1778, Hyder's vassal, the Raja of Chirakkal, besieged Thalasseri and enforced an economic blockade under order from Hyder himself.[14] The East India Company factories at Talassery armed Pazhassi Raja's men to enable them to recover Kottayam from the Mysorean occupation army. This move by the Company ensured that the Chirakkal army was now at risk of being struck in the rear by Pazhassi Raja's force. The Chirakkal troops began to retreat, but Pazhassi chased and devastated the Chirakkal army, and then marched to Kottayam where he obliterated the Mysorean occupation and overran all of western Kottayam. But at this critical moment when the Mysorean army in Malabar could have been destroyed by a joint action on the part of the Company and the Rajas, their factories at Talassery were instructed by the Governor not to upset the nominal peace with Hyder.[8][page needed]
Thus the EIC decision not to exploit the victory at Thalasseri was exploited by Mysore. The Chirakkal army reinforced by a Mysorean contingent under Balwant Rao marched into Kottayam. Pazhassi's men, though secretly supplied with arms and ammunition by the company, could not hold or defeat this huge host and soon the Kottayam army was forced to disperse after a fight. Then the Mysore-Chirakkal army captured Kadathanad and installed a puppet Raja who joined hands with Mysore. In 1779, a huge Mysore-Chirakkal-Kadathanad army besieged Thalasseri. Pazhassi Raja sent a force of 2000 Nairs to aid the EIC defence of Thalassery, and this enabled the factories to hold on successfully.[15][16]
By the end of 1779, Sardar Khan, the Mysorean general was sent to Thalasseri to bring the siege speedily to a successful conclusion.[14][16] Sardar Khan came with a force of 10,000 troops and 30 heavy guns.[17] Sardar Khan knew that it was Pazhassi Raja's help that enabled the East India Company to resist him and so he opened negotiations with Pazhassi – his offer was the restoration of Mysore occupied territories of Kottayam if Pazhassi would ally himself with Mysore and pay an immediate tribute of 500,000 rupees. It was well beyond the capacity of Kottayam to raise so huge a sum in so short a time. But Pazhassi did his best to pay Sardar Khan [probably in the hope that the latter would make concessions] and 60,000 rupees was paid to the latter. But Khan was not satisfied and rejected Pazhassi's request that his possessions in Malabar be restored.[18] This greedy and tactless approach of Sardar Khan's made sure that there was little chance for Mysore to capture Thalasseri. The Kottayam army became far stronger with their major victory in 1779 at Kalpetta (Wynad) where the whole Coorg army of 2,000 was surrounded and decimated by Pazhassi Raja's troops. The destruction of the Coorg army in Wynad enabled Raja to throw a whole new army into the contest at Thalasseri.[8][page needed]
In 1780, Pazhassi Raja proposed a plan to the East India Company to break the Mysorean siege of Thalassery: he and his men would strike the enemy in the rear from the east as the EIC came out of the fort and struck the Mysorean line in front. Both armies would effect a junction that would split the enemy into two. The Mysorean and allied troops could then be routed easily. But it was only in 1781 that the Company understood the value of this plan and their Bombay authorities agreed to it. An operation was carried out as per Pazhassi's plan; it ended with the destruction of the Mysorean forces. What followed was a rebellion in Kottayam by the Nair militia led by Pazhassi Raja. Soon, the Mysoreans were ousted.[19]
Map of the Malabar Province 1809, after the death of Pazhassi Raja
By 1782, Kottayam was once more a free land. But by the Treaty of Mangalore (1784) after the Second Anglo-Mysore War, the Company administration recognised Tipu Sultan's sphere of authority in Malabar. Thus with its only valuable ally lost, Kottayam was ready to become a vassal state of Mysore. Once more, as Sardar Khan did in 1779, Mysore exacted an exorbitant rate of tribute. Although Ravi Varma, the elder brother of Pazhassi Raja agreed to pay 65,000 rupees per year, Mysore demanded 81,000 rupees.[19] The hiked rate of tribute meant greater hardship for the peasantry (largely Thiyyar) who had suffered from years of foreign occupation. So Pazhassi Raja took up this issue and decided to launch a mass resistance struggle once more.[20][21]
What angered Pazhassi Raja even more was that his brother Ravi Varma who paid a visit to Tipu Sultan in 1786 for peace talks was forced to sign a treaty which ceded Wayanad to Tipu Sultan. Pazhassi Raja decided not to let Tipu enjoy Wayanad in peace and kept up a guerrilla warfare that constantly harassed Mysore troops in Wayanad and its neighbourhood. War in Wayanad lasted for seven years – till 1793 – when the last of the Mysorean garrisons were expelled from the soil of Wayanad.[5]
By the end of 1788, Pazhassi Raja's hatred of Tipu had shot up on account of the latter's policy of forcible conversion. So he strengthened his ties with the East India Company on one hand and with fellow rebel chiefs and princes in Malabar on the other. Tipu sent an army under a French general named Lally with a genocidal mission—the extermination of the Nair caste from Kottayam to Palakkad – as Tipu was determined to end the menace of Nair rebels in Malabar who had foiled all attempts of him and his late father Hyder Ali to subjugate and exploit Malabar.[21]
The senior Rajah of Kottayam fled to Travancore fearing the Sultan. But before that, he handed over charge of government to Pazhassi Raja and asked him to save the country from Mysore's onslaught. Given below is the observation made by historian Rajayyan about Pazhassi Raja's resistance to Tipu Sultan after the exodus of Rajas from Malabar in 1788:
Between 1787 and 1788, the thampurans or Rajahs of Malabar, threatened by the forces of Tipu, fled to Travancore. Among them were the princes of Kottayathu.....The Senior Rajah before his flight summoned Kerala Varma, the youngest prince, and instructed him to protect the country. Accordingly, the latter assembled the inhabitants, retired to the jungles and assisted them in the development of a new homeland. Frequently, in defiance to the authority of the Sultan, he with a band of determined followers issued forth from the woods and levied contributions.[22]
But in 1790, Tipu abandoned the war in Malabar as the war in Deccan drew his attention. Pazhassi Raja joined the East India Company with a force of 1500 Nairs to capture the Mysorean stronghold in Katirur (near Talassery).[23] After Katirur, Pazhassi Raja and his troops moved south-east and captured the Kuttiyadi fort from Tipu's men.[24] Thus once more, the whole of Kottayam was under the control of Pazhassi Raja.[25] In 1790, the Company recognised Pazhassi Raja as the head of Kottayam instead of the original Raja who was in refuge at Travancore. Raja agreed to pay 25,000 rupees as tribute to the company. But his struggle with the Mysore troops continued in Wayanad till 1793 when he freed that land also.[8][page needed]
But by the Treaty of Seringapatam (1792) signed between the EIC and Tipu after the latter failed in Third Anglo-Mysore War, Malabar was ceded to the EIC.[25] The East India Company then began to work for the establishment of their supremacy in Malabar.[citation needed] This was where the Company administration and Pazhassi Raja had opposite opinions – Pazhassi Raja helped the East India Company not because he was ready to accept Company rule but because he wanted his country Kottayam to be an independent land.[26]
Pazhassi Raja was disturbed when he heard about the terms which the Company put forward to the Rajas of Malabar in 1792, because the EIC had signed a cowl with him in 1790 which promised to respect the independence of Kottayam.[27][28] The summary of the East India Company terms in 1792 were as follows:
The Raja to be able to rule as before, but the East India Company to control him "in case of oppressing inhabitants".
A resident to be appointed to enquire about "complaints of oppression".
Two persons on the part of the company and two persons on the part of the Raja to make valuation of the land revenue of Kottayam.
The tax to be paid by each subject to be ascertained.
The Raja's tribute to be settled in October 1792 according to the appearance of crop.
The EIC share of the pepper to be delivered at a price fixed by their administration in December 1792.
The remainder of the pepper to be bought only by merchants appointed by the company.[8][page needed]
These terms converted monarchs to mere agents of the East India Company. Rajas were now stripped of their right to rule as they willed; they also lost control over their economies.
Kottayam was represented by Vira Varma, uncle of Pazhassi Raja during talks with the East India Company in 1792. Vira Varma concluded a treaty with Company = by which he accepted all terms and conditions put forward by them.[8][page needed]
Resistance to Company rule in India — the Cotiote War
Pazhassi Kudeeram-a memorial for Pazhassi Raja at his burial spot in Mananthavadi, Wayanad, Kerala, designed by Architect Eugene Pandala
Pazhassi Raja resisted the East India Company from 1793 onwards till his death in 1805.[25] He fought two wars to resist Company intervention in the domestic affairs of his kingdom. From 1793 to 1797 he fought over the question of the management of Kottayam and from 1800 to 1805 over the issue of who was to be master of Wynad. The East India Company called their wars with Pazhassi Rajah as Cotiote War.
Pazhassi Raja was not on good terms with his uncle Vira Varma, Raja of Kurumbranad. In 1793, foxy Vira Varma who had surrendered Kottayam to the EIC back in 1792, convinced Company commissioners to let him collect tax in Kottayam.[29] He calculated that a good collection might please the EIC and that they would let him seize all of Kottayam.[30] The company had by this time adopted a hostile approach to Pazhassi Raja who had consistently refused to accept Company suzerainty and hence they made the obedient Vira Varma head of Kottayam[25] Pazhassi Raja was angry at this move. He felt betrayed.[31] After all, he was the only Raja in Northern Malabar to have helped the East India Company consistently in the war with Mysore.[32]
Vira Varma Raja, on the one hand, undertook to collect tax in Kottayam directly, but on the other hand, he encouraged Pazhassi Raja to oppose the company's domination. Moreover, the tax imposed by the company was beyond the peasants' capacity to pay. They resisted attempts to collect these taxes by the agents of the East India Company, and Pazhassi Raja took up their cause.[33]
In 1793 Pazhassi Raja made sure that no tax was collected in Kottayam by the EIC – as a mark of his protest.[25] He also threatened that if Company officials did not give up their enumeration of pepper vines, he would have the vines destroyed.[31] Local Company authorities, however, debated with Raja and soon both discovered Vira Varma's deceptions. The East India Company put forward a solution acceptable to the Raja by which 20 percent of gross revenue would go to Raja and another 20 percent would go for temple expenses. No tax would be imposed on temple property in the immediate future.[34][35]
In 1793 Tipu's Vakils protested to the Company that Pazhassi Raja, who was an EIC subsidiary, had overrun most of Wayanad. Soon the Raja was supreme in the Wayanad Plateau.[36]
But the Governor General unwisely revoked the agreement in 1794 and gave Kottayam to Vira Varma, the Kurumbranad Raja on a five-year lease.[31][33][37][38] The Raja was very angry at this decision and decided to retaliate by ruling his country as per customary law. The year before the lease was concluded the Raja had provided asylum to a Nair noble, Narangoli Nambiar of the Iruvazinad royal clan, who had been declared an outlaw by the East India Company for the murder of three men who had killed his kinsman. The Raja's kind treatment of Nambiar irritated the EIC.[39][40] The EIC also became angry that the Raja had executed by impalement two robbers as per customary law.[41] The Company planned to arrest Raja 'for murder' but gave up the idea as the Raja had a bodyguard of 500 well-armed Wayanad Nairs.[8][page needed]
In 1795, after a year, Vira Varma Raja got Kottayam on lease but was not able to collect tax there due to the efforts of his nephew Raja. So East India Company troops arrived in Kottayam to help Vira Varma's tax collectors, but Pazhassi Raja's men resisted them with success.[37][41]
In 1796 orders were issued from Bombay to collect tax arrears for 2 years in Kottayam. For the Company administration, no more pretexts were needed to arrest the Raja. 300 men under Lieutenant James Gordon marched from Talassery and seized the Raja's fortified house at Pazhassi-but the Raja fled four days earlier to Manattana (near Kottiyur). Gordon sacked the palace where traditional treasure of the Raja was kept.[37][42] The Raja was angry at Gordon's actions and sent a letter to the Supervisor at Thalassery.[citation needed][39][41][43]
The Raja was also angry that one of his former generals, named Pazhayamviden Chandu, had become an agent of Kurumbranad Raja and what angered him even more was that this turncoat had the audacity to boss him with Vira Varma's and EIC blessings.[citation needed] The Raja shifted his HQ to Purali Range and then into Wayanad. The Raja then blocked all Company communications between Wayanad and Low Malabar through Kuttiyadi Pass.[43] The EIC retaliated by cutting all communications between the Raja and Low Malabar. But as they did not have enough troops to chase him they waited for reinforcements.[8][page needed]
The East India Company commandant was Colonel Dow, who the Raja knew well from the Siege of Thalassery. The Raja thought that this old friend might help him mediate with the Company administration. Raja offered to give up the struggle provided he was pardoned and his treasure and house restored.[42][44] The Colonel and the Raja being old soldiers in arms hated needless bloodshed, so he forwarded the Raja's request to the Commissioners, who though they were bitterly opposed to the Raja's independent style, agreed to the Colonel's request as there was a risk that the Raja might ally with Tipu.[8][page needed][42]
So Northern Superintendent ordered the restoration of the Raja's house [but not treasure], and the Raja's pardon was confirmed by the Bombay and Supreme Governments.[42] But the orders of government were communicated to the Raja via Vira Varma – which meant that the uncle Raja took care not to report to his nephew that the company had agreed to his requests. Uncle Raja had a vested interest in the war between the company and his nephew Pazhassi Raja.[44]
Vira Varma also removed Kaitheri Ambu, a favourite noble and general of Raja, from home administration of Kottayam. Ambu along with followers went to Kannavam [also spelled Kannavath and Kannoth], where he planned and executed a mass resistance with people's support, which made sure that Vira Varma could make no tax collection in Kottayam. Ambu clearly acted under the guidance of the Pazhassi Raja, who felt the expulsion of Ambu was another of his uncle's conspiracies to undermine him.[8][page needed]
The Raja feared that the East India Company planned to seize him [not knowing that their truce terms were kept blocked from him by his uncle] and retreated into the depths of Wayanad. Company troop build-up in Wayanad also amplified his doubts. However, the Raja was still eager to avoid a war and came to meet the Northern Superintendent with a bodyguard of 1500 armed Nairs. Vira Varma Raja was also ordered to be present. Pazhassi Raja's main demand was that Kottayam must be under his rule, a demand to which his uncle was not ready to accede.[8][page needed]
The EIC Commissioners' attitude also was arrogant; they were already prejudiced against Raja and were therefore blind towards Raja's logical argument that Vira Varma had no business in Kottayam. As talks broke down, the Commissioners' issued a proclamation in Kottayam that if those Kottayam men in service of Raja did not desert him and come home, they would be declared enemies and their properties confiscated.[41][42] But this proclamation had little effect in Kottayam where resistance to Company-Kurumbranad rule became stronger.[8][page needed]
The East India Company, to their horror, found out that a large number of Vira Varma's troops had deserted to join ranks of insurgents[41][42] and Vira Varma himself was not much interested to help the company; after all his aim was to create a flare-up between his nephew and the EIC for sake of pure self-interest.[8][page needed]
Raja then visited the Mysorean commandant at Karkankotta in 1796[39][45] and in 1797 held an audience with his old enemy Tipu in Mysore, who posted 6000 men at Karkankotta to aid Raja in case of war and to supply ammunition to rebels.[46] He also began to collect troops and armaments. War was imminent. 1200 troops and artillery under a Major General was sent by the Bombay Government to deal with Pazhassi. The company also began to set up outposts in Kottayam and sent more troops to Wayanad.[41][47]
In early 1797, the Nair militia uprose all over Kottayam[48] and Company outposts were trapped in a true state of siege. Partisan bands became active all over Kottayam and harassed reinforcements and supply convoys. The case was similar in Wayanad where East India Company troops that moved out of the safety of their garrisons risked being harried by Kurichia bowmen. The EIC suffered a good deal of loss in terms of men, ammunition and stores in these ambuscades.[41][49]
This event was the most important in the whole war. In 1797, Colonel Dow & force marched into Wayanad. His plan was to block Periya Pass and then crush a large rebel force in Kannoth once their retreat is blocked.[8][page needed]
Reinforcements under Lieutenant Mealy were to reach Dow at Periya, but on way they were severely harassed by a force of Nayars and Kurichias and suffered a casualty of 105 men. So instead of Periya they retreated to their original base.[48][50]
Dow's troops suffered chronic shortage of supplies and so Dow applied for reinforcements and re-supplies to be sent under Major Anderson of Bowles' regiment. But as Mappila guides of Anderson deserted at last moment. That caused a delay in journey of Anderson-a delay that had fatal consequence for the EIC.[51]
Dow then received news that Tipu had sent sepoys to aid Raja as Tipu considered the Company entry into Wayanad a violation of Seringapatam Pact. Dow decided that he will go to Talassery to consult authorities there and to plan a greater operation to deal with troops of the Raja and Tipu simultaneously in Wayanad. He left with a small band of men but was ambushed on way by the Raja's men aided by Mysorean sepoys but Dow escaped unhurt.[48][51]
The day after he left, an EIC force of 1100 under Major Cameroon in Periya decided to descend into Kottayam via Periya Pass as their supplies were exhausted.[52]
But what they did not know was that the Raja who learned of the true state of the Company expeditionary force laid a trap for them - he ordered troops lay concealed in camouflaged stockades built on both sides of the pass. Once the whole Company force entered the narrow pass, hidden troops were to pounce on their enemy who would be caught unawares.[41]
The plan worked well and what followed was a great slaughter of the Company force.[49][52][53] Had it not been for the arrival of Major Anderson's force the following day, hardly any would have survived due to lack of medical care. Most of the enemy were killed and all their guns, ammunition, baggage and cattle were plundered along with Union colours. Senior Company officers like Major Cameron, Lieutenant Nugent, Lieutenant Madge, and Lieutenant Rudderman were killed in action.[54]
Around this time, Commissioners took a decision on the advice of Swaminatha Pattar, a Tamil Brahmin who was the minister of Zamorin that sowed the eventual downfall of Pazhassi Raja. They decided to raise an irregular force of local traitors to harass Pazhassi Raja.[54] This force was a forerunner of the Kolkar,[52] who became hated because of their support of the company and cruelty to resisters and people.[8][page needed]
But for time being, the Raja was in a strong position.[52] On account of the disasters suffered by their army, Bombay Government sent a Committee of Government composed of men of highest ranks-Commander-In-Chief Lieutenant-General Stuart and Governor Jonathan Duncan.[47][54][55] They decided to make peace as they were anxious that guerrilla warfare in a mountainous and forested terrain could last long and that Raja might join forces with Tipu or French. They also decided that Kurumbranad Raja Vira Varma should be ousted from administration of Kottayam.[54] Rajas of Chirakkal and Parappanad acted as mediators in negotiation between Raja and the East India Company[47][49] and a peace pact was signed between Pazhassi and the Company in 1797.[55]
The Treaty of 1797 agreed on following points:[49][56]
Pazhassi Raja was to be 'pardoned'.
He would be returned his treasure.
He would be provided an annual allowance of 8000 rupees.
He would be given back his confiscated house at Pazhassi.
Ravi Varma, elder brother of Pazhassi Raja would be head of Kottayam.
A pardon and restoration of property was also extended to Narangoli Nambiar of Iruvazinad.[57]
Thus the Raja's efforts of four years ended in a political victory. Peace dawned after four years of antagonism and war.
Tipu Sultan in his letter to French government notes with glee that East India Company had lost 1,000 European soldiers and 3,000 native sepoys in four years of war between the Presidency armies and Kottayam army.[8][54][58]
Despite the peace treaty of 1797, real peace did not emerge between Pazhassi Raja and the East India Company. Skirmishes continued across Kottayam. The main reason for this was that the Company did not attempt to end its efforts to annex Kottayam and collect tax. But this was successfully foiled by partisans of Pazhassi Raja headed by Kaitheri Ambu.[59] Pazhassi Raja also went ahead with his policy of defiance of East India Company directions, continued with his military enlargement program and even shifted his seat of power to Mananthavadi in Wayanad – all of which were deemed as "injurious to interests of Company in Kottayam" by Colonel Dow, the Company representative in Kottayam. But since Raja clearly had the upper hand since the victory of 1797, the East India Company was powerless to put an end to his activities.[60]
After the fall of Tipu, Wayanad fell to the East India Company. They sent a Mysore Commission to seize Wayanad and planned to annex it to either Canara or Coimbatore.[61] But as Wayanad was a traditional possession of Kottayam Raja and Pazhassi had been in control of this region since 1793, Pazhassi interpreted the move as an encroachment on his country's ancient provinces. Raja retaliated by collecting a large force of Nairs which was now supplemented by Mappilas and Pathans,[62] latter being ex-soldiers of Tipu who became unemployed after Tipu's death.[55]
The Company administration at Madras appointed Major General Arthur Wellesley as the Presidency army commandant of Mysore, Canara & Malabar.
He planned a double-pronged move from Malabar Coast and Mysore into Wayanad and began preparations for that end.[62] Raja observed Major General - the latter had brought reinforcements and was building roads in Wayanad and outposts across rebel country. In response, the Raja also recruited numerous men which so alarmed Wellesley that he even wanted to kidnap kith and kin of rebels so as to check Raja's recruitment.[8]
Raja learned that Wellesley had left for the Deccan on a military mission - the Raja who understood that Major General's absence is a great chance swiftly made his move. He marched across Kuttiyadi Pass and below he made a junction with Unni Mootha Mooppan, a Walluvanad Mappila leader & his men and soon several great nobles like Kampuratt Nambiar of Iruvazhinad, Peruvayal Nambiar and Kannavath Sankaran Nambiar also joined Raja with their men.[63][64][65]
By monsoon of 1800, rebels who controlled all of country-side of Kottayam threatened to overwhelm Company outposts in Kottayam.[55][66] Wellesley sent a large force under Colonel Sartorius to recapture rebel-held Kottayam.[64][66] But the plan could not be carried out as there were not enough troops in Malabar. Wellesley advised Commissioners to stop all communications with Wayanad so as to starve Raja of supplies.[67] But the shortage of troops also meant this plan too remained on paper. By the time, Wellesley decided to smash Raja by a double drive from Malabar Coast and Mysore into Wayanad, Manjeri Athan Gurikkal an Ernad Mappila leader along with his followers agreed to support of Raja.[8][page needed]
By 1801, a large East India Company force of over 10,000 men swarmed all over Kottayam and Wayanad and they blocked all passes that linked Wayanad[68] with Malabar. Before so large numbers, rebels thought wise to go under-ground for time being. Raja also found that he could no longer contact his supporters in Southern Wayanad and Southern Malabar.[69][70][71] Raja became a wanderer in forests but even then, to surprise of the East India Company, he ruled out compromise it seems he understood that there was no alternative to full freedom.[8][page needed]
Raja had six close aides and 25 musketeers in his wanderings.[71] First, he went north via Payyavur along montane forests of eastern Chirakkal to rally support.[72] But the EIC were on his trail but failed to catch him. Raja then visited his secret bases in Kottayam[72] and then moved into Kadathanad and into jungles of Kurumbranad.[68] The East India Company were angered that where ever he went, nobles supported him in secret and decided to punish them for their help to rebel Raja.[73]
As a part of their policies to quell the rebellion, Peruvayal Nambiar who was arrested was hanged. The East India Company also threatened to issue a penalty and confiscation of property for all those rebels who failed to surrender in six weeks time. But a pardon was also issued for surrendered rebels. But none of these threats and temptations worked and Raja was still at large. But some of his chief supporters were arrested of whom Kannavath Sankaran Nambiar was most famous. Kannavath Sankaran Nambiar and his son were hanged too and their property was confiscated.[71][74][75]
Following execution of Kannavath Nambiar, a deceptive calm descended on North Malabar-calm before the storm. Collector Major MacLeod believed that war was over and went ahead with his charged duties. He immediately declared total disarmament of Malabar[76] and threatened those who kept arms with the death penalty. He also doubled the rate of tax and ordered a reassessment of tax of whole Malabar in a mere forty days.[71][77][78]
All these 'reforms' paid back in 1803 when Malabar was on verge of revolt as people quickly became incensed.[71][77] MacLeod tried to calm this with corrective measure-He cancelled all his 'reforms' and old system was reinstated. But it was too late for Wayanad where Raja's men were prepared for a rebellion.[8][page needed]
Remains of the Moat surrounded the Panamaram fort. Now it is almost covered with creepers and bushes, Panamaram, Wayanad, Kerala.Koli tree near the Panamaram fort. Talakkal Chandu was executed somewhere near this tree., Panamaram, Wayanad, Kerala.
The first major event was the capture of Panamaram Fort. Edachena Kungan who planned the operation and was helped by 150 Kurichia bowmen under Talakkal Chandu. Fort had 70 men under Captain Dickenson and there was a large force of 360 men under Major Drummond only a few miles away in Pulinjali.[77] So if the Major came to help Captain Dickenson in time Kurichia force would be overwhelmed by gun-fire and numbers. Kungan and Chandu decided to take risk.[8][page needed]
The whole garrison was slaughtered in the surprise attack led by the two generals and they lost only 5 dead and 10 wounded. Dickenson himself was killed.[79][80] Rebels got 112 muskets, six boxes of ammunition and 6000 rupees. They also destroyed the whole fort.(The remains of the fort can be seen now near Panamaram High School).[81]
Wellesley was enraged at this rebel audacity and dispatched 500 men to retaliate. But by then rebel victory had roused all of Wayanad and Kottayam.[71] Edachena Kungan, the hero of Panamaram success, went to Pulpally shrine and issued a proclamation to people to join Raja's war.[78] 3000 men volunteered.[79] They were posted at Valliyurkav at Mananthavadi, Motimjarra [?], and Edappally and 100 of them under the brother of Kungan posted themselves at Periya Pass and 25 men were posted at Kottiyur Pass. Rebel outposts were set up en route from Dindimal to Valliyurkav. The rebel army was mostly composed of archers and swordsmen, but some had muskets.[82]
Edachena Kungan led an attack on a Company detachment headed from Mysore to Mananthavadi. The harassment began once this force entered Wayanad till it reached a stream between Manathavadi and Bhavully river. There they were blocked by a rebel force entrenched on the opposite side of the stream. But to ill luck of rebels, a reinforcement which had caught up with blocked Company army outflanked the rebel entrenchment and took a large number of prisoners of war.[8][page needed]
Besides, East India Company reinforcements arrived in Wayanad from all directions. But they could find rebels nowhere.[71]
The rebels now concentrated in Kottayam. In 1802, they raided a supplies convoy near Kottiyur.[79] The Company administration were frustrated by Kottayam people's total lack of co-operation. To add to their trouble, in 1803, a rebel force took to field in Kurumbranad* & Payyormala*[81] and people were sympathetic to rebels.[83] Kungan marched towards Pazhassi to wipe out the Company outpost there but had to retreat, though they suffered serious losses. Soon rebellion spread into Chirakkal where armed bands of partisans launched operations and often fought against the Presidency troops openly. The Raja's army by end of 1803 was ranging as far as Kannur and Thalasseri.[71][80][81][84][85] An estimated 3350 partisans of Pazhassi Raja took part in this operation that extended south as far as Ernad.[79]
In March 1803, a rebel force marched as far as Calicut and captured Sub-Jail where they killed all guards and seized their firearms and ammunition.[83] They also released prisoners, many of whom joined ranks of the rebel army.[80] This was too much for MacLeod and he resigned immediately after this event.[81][86]
In 1803, Wellesley, later destined to become Duke of Wellington, and the vanquisher of Napoleon at Waterloo, left for Europe, after three years of inconclusive war with Pazhassi Raja, .[87]
In 1803, the East India Company had 8,147 soldiers to fight Pazhassi Raja. But as the situation was slipping out of control, the EIC military command in Malabar requested for another 5,000 men. This reinforcement arrived in early 1804 and thus increasing their total force to 13,000 men.[85]
In 1804, a large Presidency army arrived and 1200 Kolkar were also ready for action.[84] Most importantly Thomas Hervey Baber, a civil servant was appointed as Sub-Collector.[88][89] It was he who crushed Pazhassi's Revolt forever. It is indeed ironic that what a military genius like Wellesley could not attain, was achieved by Baber – said to be just a 'civil servant.' Baber had both a personal motive – to avenge the death of his friend Major Cameron, the first husband of his wife Helen Somerville Fearon at the hand of Pazhassi Raja on 9 January 1797 at Periya Pass. Baber became a civil servant to protect the interests of a small but influential group of merchants that included his in-laws – the Inglis and Money families of Bombay. It is noteworthy that Baber's son Henry Fearon Baber married the Granddaughter of George Harris, 1st Baron Srirangapattam and the nemesis of Tipu Sultan.
In 1804, a huge rising led by Kalyat Nambiar [a powerful Chirakkal noble but Raja's sympathiser] and Raja's men in largely forested eastern Chirakkal was defeated by the company.[84][90][91] If there was large and long revolt warfare in Chirakkal, it would have immensely profited Raja. Though there was a lot of supporters of Raja in Chirakkal, as revolt collapsed fast as rebels opted for open confrontation instead of time-honoured guerrilla warfare. Another cause for the failure of revolt was treacherous Kolkar also served their White pay-masters well.[8][page needed]
So once more rebel force had retreated to Wayanad. They were hotly chased by East India Company who had 2000 Sepoys and 1000 allied Kolkars. A reward of 3000 pagodas was offered for Raja along with 1000 Pagodas for Edachena Kungan and bounties were put on heads of 10 other associates of Raja.[8][page needed]
But rebels, mostly Kurumbas, struck at Churikunji [?] in Wayanad.[92] Though they had to withdraw, they had devastated their enemy. That year, a party of Kolkar nearly caught Raja but he escaped thanks to timely warning of a Kurumba guard.[93]
But monsoon and brutal climate of Wayanad soon aided Raja. Of 1300 Kolkar only 170 were not sick by October.[94] The Raja and Edachena Kungan organised a large force of Kurichias and Kurumbas at Pulpally shrine and positioned them to as far as Kurichiyat.[92] Also, the effort of Kungan to rally Nair nobles of Wayanad to support Raja's war-effort had also succeeded.[8][page needed]
The EIC for past couple of years did not have to suffer the loss on a scale of Periya in 1797, but matters were not easy for the Company at all. Even in Kottayam which had become quiet might explode once more and a large rebel force with Raja as the head was still at large. But one must remember that the whole revolt is a one-man show as Wellesley himself remarked once-“We are not fighting 1000 men [Raja's army] ... but one man ... Kerala Varma.”-Raja's end would mean end of revolt.[87]
T.H. Baber went to Mysore to direct operations himself and began a large search for informants and traitors. The East India Company themselves admitted that they did not get a lot of informants as locals were devoted to Raja, but some of those few informants proved devastating to revolt-one of them a Chetti, found out where Raja had camped and informed Baber who took to field with 100 Kolkar and 50 Sepoys.[95]
There is one school of thought that blames Pazhayamviden Chandu as solely responsible for fall of Raja and end of his revolt.[96] Pazhayamviden worked with the East India Company administration as an "adviser" like Pallore Eman, but in reality, spied for Raja. But in autumn of 1805 Pazhayamviden decided to betray all military secrets of his master for a large sum of money.
In light of the above points, it will not be far-fetched to believe that Chetti who guided Company troops to Raja's hideout mentioned by Baber in his letter could be a servant or agent of Pazhayamviden Chandu.
On 30 November 1805, the Raja and retainers were camped close to Karnataka on the shore of a stream named Mavila or Mavila Tod [not far from Pulpally]. The Raja and his party were caught by surprise and an intense but short fight followed. Six rebels were killed. One of the earliest rebels to be killed was Pazhassi Raja.[8][page needed]
But evidently, wounded Raja did live long enough for a few more minutes to raise his loaded gun and then tell Canara Menon, an East India Company minor official, not to come too close to his dying body and pollute it.[97] Raja's contempt and sarcasm for a man who chose to serve unclean foreigner are evident. But it also showed his uncompromising stand towards collaborators and foreign invaders.
The precise nature of Raja's death is controversial. Folklore insists that he committed suicide by swallowing a diamond ring to avoid capture after he was wounded[98] but Baber says he was killed by a clerk named Canara Menon.[citation needed] W. J. Wilson, who wrote on the history of the Madras Regiment, credits Captain Clafam and his six sepoys for killing. This third version is more likely as Baber was not on good terms with military authority throughout the war. He is alleged to have credited Menon so as to deny credit to Clafam and his superior Colonel Hill.[99]
Kunjani, the wife of Raja who was taken the prisoner, committed suicide in captivity at Kappanaveedu, near Thalassery. As reprisal on his family, property was confiscated and the palace at Pazhassi was demolished and replaced with a highway.[18][100][96] The sorry state of his family aroused sympathy in local Thiyyas, who were loyal followers and built a new house for his family.[101]
...but in all classes, I observed a decided interest for the Pyche Raja, towards whom the inhabitants entertained regard and respect bordering on veneration, which not even his death can efface.
Descriptive account of Pazhassi Raja as early as 1775 confirm his later day image as a courageous warrior committed to the freedom of his country.[102]
Walter Ivor, a member of Court of Directors, who had taken part in negotiations with Pazhassi Raja in 1797 notes that Company losses that year in Cotiote War exceeded their losses in Third Anglo-Mysore War.[99]
War waged by Pazhassi Raja was the longest insurgency against the Company in Indian history[99] and forest warfare waged by Raja had no parallel in the history of India in late eighteenth and early nineteenth century India.[103]
The Company military command always wondered at the logistics of Raja's army. How he organized supplies for his several thousand strong armies remained a puzzle for them[103]
To fight overwhelmingly superior enemies, Raja imparted military training to his peasantry wholesale and recruited them into his military force. This military policy of wholesale militarization was novel in the history of pre-modern Kerala. His war-effort was marked by the participation of members of all creeds, classes, and castes who took up arms due to his inspiration. Nobles, headmen, peasants, shopkeepers, merchants, artisans, and forest tribes rallied to fight in his campaigns — first the Kingdom of Mysore and later the East India Company.[103]
East India Company losses were severe in terms of men and ran into several thousand. Death toll was particularly high with officers of commissioned ranks. So high were the losses suffered by Bombay army regiments that operated in North Malabar that they had to be withdrawn in 1803 fearing that further losses would cripple Bombay Army as a respectable body of troops.[103]
Raja shared all the privations of his ordinary soldiers during the war and took part in all major military action exposing himself to personal danger. On account of these attributes, he commanded great respect of his troops.[104]
Royal regiments from Britain also took part in Cotiote War along with Company troops.[105]
Anti-British rebels in Tamil Nadu and Karnataka also were allied to Pazhassi Raja.[105]
Arthur Wellesley, later Duke of Wellington, adopted methods of guerrilla warfare used by Pazhassi Raja to defeat Napoleon's armies in Spain.[106]
Memory of Pazhassi Raja and his struggle inspired freedom struggle in 20th century Kerala.[107]
Swaminatha Iyer, a Company agent had noted as early as 1797 that extreme popularity of Raja was because he remained in his country with his subjects during Mysore invasions and shared with them the trials and tribulations and also due to his extreme generosity to this peasantry. It was on account of love and support from his subjects that Raja could evade and fight the East India Company for a decade even when he had a bounty on his head.[108]
After his fellow Rajas in Malabar submitted to East India Company after 1798, Raja himself knew well that he will be defeated and killed in the long run if he chose to continue to fight against the East India Company. But yet he refused to compromise. In a letter to Kalyat Kuttieman, he revealed his intent to resist the company's authority to the end.[108]
He took initiative to rebuild his country which was devastated by Mysore invasions. As part of this, he borrowed money from Tellicherry Factory and gave financial help to his peasants to resume agriculture along with distribution of seeds and cattle. This was in contrast to rest of Rajas of Malabar who squeezed peasants. This was one reason why his popularity with masses remained high.[109]
Raja is also credited with the spread of agriculture in Wynad. He started a program that encouraged tribesmen in Wynad to adopt settled agriculture. As part of this program, he instructed his vassals in Wynad to distribute cattle and seeds to tribesmen in Wynad.[109]
In his decades-long war to oust invaders, the Raja developed an elaborate system of cantonments and forts in the jungly and mountainous part of his country.
Four of them are most important – granite fort on Purali range [modern Muzhakunnu] which was built by his ancestor Harischandra Perumal over a thousand years ago. He had another granite fort at Manatana. In Wayanad, he had a great fort in Mananthavady which was reported to have ability to house his whole army of 6000 men. He also had a stronghold in Todikulam near Kannavam which belonged to his supporter Kannavath Sankaran.
Of all his strongholds, none survive today such as Kottamalai in Cherambadi and Nellakotai in Pandalur etc. Only ruins of Purali fort survive today. It is today a heap of granite boulders. Only a tank still survives today. A nearby black-stone cave where Raja once lived can still be found.[112]
Pazhassi's CavePazhassi's Cave [7]: a historic marvel in Cherambadi, was inaugurated on 28-02-2025 by Kochu Thampuratty Subha Varma, the 6th-generation great-granddaughter of Pazhassi Raja, and her husband, Dr. Kishore. This ancient cave, built by the legendary king, stands as a tribute to his legacy and the region’s rich heritage.
Surya TV telecasted a serial with popular film actor Sai Kumar playing the title character.
The 2009 Malayalam film Kerala Varma Pazhassi Raja depicts the life of the Raja. Directed by Hariharan and written by M. T. Vasudevan Nair. starring Mammootty as pazhassi Raja. The political situation of the time is portrayed from different viewpoints, and the locals are treated sympathetically in this film.[116]
In S.S. Rajamouli's Telugu film RRR. In the song 'ettuka jenda', he has been mentioned along with some other historical personalities who fought against the British Raj in India.
Pazhassi Raja's heroic life and resistance against British colonial rule are an integral part of the school curriculum in Kerala, taught from elementary to higher levels. As a result, he is widely known and respected across the state, with generations of students growing up learning about his courage, leadership, and unwavering patriotism[11][12]
^Murland, Lieutenant Colonel HF (2005). Baillie-Ki-Paltan: A History of the 2nd Battalion, Madras Pioneers 1759 – 1930. East Sussex: The Naval and Military Press Ltd. p. 48.
^Evolution of Kerala History and Culture, Prof. T. K. Gangadharan, 2004, Calicut University Central Cooperative Stores Ltd, No.4347, Calicut University 673,635
^Menon, A Sreedhara (2007). Kerala Charitrashilpikal. Kottayam 686 001: DC Books. p. 191. ISBN978-81-264-1584-7.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location (link)
Kerala Varma Pazhassi Raja (3 January 1753 – 30 November 1805), also known as the Cotiote Raja or Pychy Raja, was a prince and warrior from the western branch of the Kottayam royal family in the Malabar region of present-day Kerala, who asserted de facto control over his territories and led a protracted guerrilla resistance against the British East India Company's administrative and fiscal impositions.[1][2]
His campaigns, spanning two phases from 1793 to 1797 and 1800 to 1805 and collectively termed the Cotiote War, were precipitated by British revenue collection policies that undermined local sovereignty and by the Company's seizure of Wayanad following the Treaty of Srirangapatna after Tipu Sultan's defeat.[3][4]
Pazhassi Raja mobilized tribal allies, exploited the dense forests and hills of Wayanad for ambushes, and inflicted tactical defeats on British forces, notably repelling an expedition led by Arthur Wellesley in 1800, marking one of the earliest organized indigenous oppositions to British expansion in southern India prior to the 1857 revolt.[1][2]
Betrayed by a local informant, he was surrounded and killed in combat near Pulpally on 30 November 1805, ending the uprising but cementing his legacy as a symbol of defiance against colonial overreach.[1][2]
Early Life and Kingdom
Birth, Family, and Lineage
![Veera Kerala Varma Pazhassi Raja][float-right]
Kerala Varma, later known as Pazhassi Raja, was born in 1753 into the Kottayam royal family, which ruled territories in northern Malabar, present-day Kerala.[5][6] He belonged to the Padinjare Kovilakam, the western branch of the Purannattukara Swarupam, the primary royal lineage governing the Kottayam kingdom from its headquarters at Pazhassi near Mattannur.[7][8][2] This branch derived its name and prominence from the village of Pazhassi, where family members often resided, leading to the titular designation "Pazhassi Raja" for Kerala Varma.[5][9]The Kottayam royal family identified as Brahma-Kshatriyas of lunar descent, claiming origins linked to ancient dynasties such as the Cholas, though historical records provide no definitive evidence for these assertions.[10][11] Kerala Varma had an elder brother, Ravi Varma, who was occasionally acknowledged as the nominal head of the family during periods of external pressure.[12] Specific details on parents remain sparsely documented in available historical accounts, with the focus in records centering on the collective authority exercised by branches of the lineage amid regional conflicts.[2]
Rule Over Kottayam-Malabar Territories
Kerala Varma Pazhassi Raja, born on January 3, 1753, assumed de facto rulership of the Kottayam-Malabar territories in 1774 following the flight of senior royal family members to Travancore during Hyder Ali's Mysore invasions, which began impacting the region from 1766 onward. Tasked by the nominal Raja with protecting the kingdom, he administered from the family headquarters at Pazhassi, ensuring continuity of local governance amid repeated external incursions. His rule extended until his death in 1805, during which he prioritized regional defense and autonomy.[2][1]The Kottayam kingdom, alternatively termed Cotiote, covered northern Malabar areas including the Tellicherry taluk, Kurumbranad, Wayanad, and extensions to Gudalur in present-day Tamil Nadu. Governance adhered to the traditional Malabar structure, segmented into three kovilakams representing the eastern (Kizhakke), western (Patinjare), and southern (Thekke) branches of the Kottayam lineage. Authority was decentralized through naduvazhis as district heads, desavazhis as sub-rulers, and mukhyastans as administrative officials, supporting a feudal hierarchy reliant on martial Nair clans for enforcement and loyalty.[2]The economy centered on agrarian production, with janmis holding proprietary land rights, kanamkars or kanomdars managing tenurial leases with hereditary claims, and verumpattadars as lower-tier cultivators. Pazhassi Raja championed tenant protections against exploitative revenue demands, refusing tribute payments to Mysore sultans post-1773 conquests to preserve local resources and sovereignty. This stance cultivated widespread support among peasants and warriors, enabling effective mobilization against invaders. By the 1790s, British recognition of his authority as Kottayam's head underscored his established control, though it precipitated conflicts over fiscal impositions.[2][1]
Conflicts with Mysore Rulers
Resistance to Hyder Ali's Invasions (1773–1782)
In 1773, Hyder Ali, ruler of Mysore, launched a second invasion of Malabar to enforce tribute payments from local rajas who had withheld them following his initial conquest in 1766. The senior members of the Kottayam royal family, including Raja Vira Varma, fled to Travancore for safety, leaving the young Kerala Varma—later known as Pazhassi Raja, born in 1753 and approximately 20 years old—as the de facto leader of the Kottayam territories. Assuming command, he mobilized local Nair warriors and tribal groups to mount a sustained resistance against the Mysorean forces, prioritizing the protection of the populace from Hyder Ali's exactions and forced conversions.[13][1][14]Pazhassi Raja employed guerrilla tactics suited to the rugged terrain of Wayanad's hills and dense forests, conducting hit-and-run ambushes to disrupt Mysorean supply lines and garrisons while avoiding pitched battles against superior numbers. This approach drew on local knowledge of the landscape, enabling small bands of fighters to inflict attrition on Hyder Ali's troops, who faced logistical challenges in the region. By 1774, at age 21, he had established a pattern of defiance that inspired broader participation among Kottayam's inhabitants, contrasting with the submission or flight of other Malabar chiefs.[13][1][15]A notable success occurred in 1781 during the Second Anglo-Mysore War, when Pazhassi Raja coordinated with British forces to recapture the Thalassery (Tellicherry) fort, a key coastal outpost seized by Hyder Ali's army in prior campaigns. This operation weakened Mysorean control in northern Malabar, facilitating the temporary liberation of Kottayam territories and boosting rebel morale. Resistance persisted through Hyder Ali's final campaigns until his death on December 7, 1782, after which Mysorean authority in Malabar transitioned to his son Tipu Sultan, though Pazhassi Raja's efforts had prevented full consolidation of power in the region.[1][16][13]
Campaigns Against Tipu Sultan (1788–1793)
In 1788, Tipu Sultan intensified efforts to enforce Mysore's authority over Malabar by demanding personal oaths of allegiance and substantial tribute from local rulers, prompting many Nair chieftains to flee southward to Travancore for refuge. Kerala Varma Pazhassi Raja, however, rejected submission and mobilized resistance forces within his Kottayam-Malabar domains, particularly leveraging the rugged Wayanad highlands to evade and counter Mysore's superior numbers.[14]Pazhassi Raja's strategy emphasized guerrilla warfare, including ambushes on foraging parties and disruption of supply routes through the dense forests, which compensated for his limited conventional resources and inflicted sustained attrition on Mysore detachments. This approach allowed his irregular troops, drawn from local Nairs and tribal allies, to maintain control over key passes and villages despite repeated Mysore punitive expeditions.[1][17]Notable victories included the coordinated recapture of Katirur fort near Thalassery and Kuttiyadi fort, supported by approximately 1,500 Nair fighters, which seized Mysore armories and restored Pazhassi Raja's dominance over central Kottayam territories by the late 1780s. These operations not only replenished his arsenal but also boosted morale among resistors, tying down thousands of Mysore troops in protracted low-intensity conflict.[17][8]The outbreak of the Third Anglo-Mysore War in 1790 prompted Pazhassi Raja to forge a tactical alliance with the British East India Company, furnishing intelligence, logistical aid, and auxiliary contingents that aided British advances against Tipu Sultan's forces in Malabar and diverted resources from Mysore's core defenses. This cooperation proved pivotal, as it aligned local resistance with broader coalition efforts.[8]Tipu Sultan's decisive defeat at Seringapatam in 1792, followed by the Treaty of Seringapatam ceding territories, weakened Mysore's grip; Pazhassi Raja capitalized on this by escalating operations, culminating in the clearance of lingering Mysore garrisons from Wayanad by 1793 and full restoration of regional autonomy under his rule.[1]
Rebellion Against British Administration
Background: British Policies and Malabar Acquisition
The Third Anglo-Mysore War (1790–1792) concluded with the Treaty of Seringapatam, signed on 18 March 1792, under which Tipu Sultan ceded the Malabar Coast territories to the British East India Company as part of the reparations imposed by the victorious alliance of the Company, the Nizam of Hyderabad, and the Maratha Empire.[18][19] This acquisition encompassed the coastal region from the northern boundaries of Cochin to Canara, including the principalities of Calicut, Badagara, and Kottayam, placing them under the Bombay Presidency's administration.[20] The cession aimed to secure strategic ports for trade in pepper and other spices while providing revenue to offset the Company's military expenditures.[21]British governance in Malabar prioritized fiscal stability and direct oversight, replacing Mysorean centralization with Company-led reforms. Initial collectors, such as Jonathan Duncan appointed in 1790 and confirmed post-treaty, focused on surveying lands and establishing revenue assessments to maximize collections amid post-war fiscal pressures.[22] Traditional Malabar land tenures, characterized by janmam rights granting native rulers hereditary control over estates and tribute (pattom) from tenants, clashed with British views of land as crown property subject to state revenue demands.[23]Revenue policies from 1793 onward introduced direct assessments on cultivators (ryots) and verumpattamdar tenants, bypassing intermediaries like local jenmis and poligars who expected recognition of their customary dues. This shift, intended to eliminate perceived inefficiencies and corruption under prior Mysorean and native systems, provoked resentment among chieftains whose authority derived from revenue privileges. In Kottayam-Malabar, Kerala Varma Pazhassi Raja, having previously aided British forces against Tipu Sultan, contested these impositions as violations of his territorial prerogatives, halting revenue flows to the Company and igniting initial unrest.[1][8] The policies' emphasis on immediate fiscal extraction, without accommodating local hierarchies, sowed seeds for organized resistance by undermining the socio-economic order that sustained regional loyalty.[24]
Initial Uprising and Cotiote Conflicts (1793–1800)
Following the cession of Malabar to the British East India Company under the 1792 Treaty of Seringapatam, the Company sought to implement direct revenue collection in Kottayam (Cotiote), sidelining Kerala Varma Pazhassi Raja, who had administered the territory during Mysore's occupation and disputed the allocation of revenues.[25] In 1793, Pazhassi Raja launched initial resistance against these policies, refusing to submit to British suzerainty and halting tax payments to preserve local autonomy, marking the onset of the Cotiote conflicts.[4] The British recognized Pazhassi's uncle, Vira Varma, as nominal ruler of Kottayam, but Pazhassi, backed by Nairs and Kurichiya tribesmen, mobilized local forces to obstruct Company officials.[6]Tensions escalated in 1795 when British troops plundered Pazhassi's palace in April, prompting him to retreat into the Puralimala jungles and adopt guerrilla tactics leveraging the rugged Wayanad terrain.[4] On 28 June 1795, Pazhassi's forces explicitly blocked revenue collection across Kottayam, intensifying the uprising.[4] By June 1796, he disrupted British supply lines at Kuttiyadi Ghat, while a Company proclamation on 18 December 1796 banned local cooperation with him, further alienating communities.[4]Clashes peaked in early 1797, with British detachments overpowered by Pazhassi's irregulars, including Nairs and Kurichiyas, in January.[4] Between 9 and 11 March, Company forces suffered defeats at Periya Pass during attempts to penetrate Wayanad.[4] The decisive engagement occurred on 18 March 1797, when Pazhassi's ambush annihilated a British column of approximately 1,100 troops under Major Cameron at Periya Pass, inflicting heavy casualties and marking a significant setback for the Company.[1][26]A peace agreement followed later in 1797, under which the British withdrew from Wayanad and granted Pazhassi a pension of 8,000 rupees, temporarily halting open hostilities.[4] From 1797 to 1800, undeclared skirmishes persisted as Pazhassi evaded renewed British encroachments on his authority, maintaining mobilization in forested strongholds amid ongoing revenue disputes.[15] These years solidified Pazhassi's reliance on asymmetric warfare, drawing support from tribal allies and exploiting British overextension in Malabar.[1]
Final Guerrilla Resistance and Death (1800–1805)
Following the temporary cessation of hostilities in 1797, Pazhassi Raja resumed armed resistance in 1800, prompted by British annexation of Wayanad after the Fourth Anglo-Mysore War and imposition of stringent revenue demands that alienated local populations.[13] Operating from the dense jungles and hills of Wayanad, he mobilized a militia comprising Nairs, Kurichiya tribesmen under leaders like Talakkal Chandu, and other locals, employing hit-and-run tactics to disrupt British supply lines and outposts.[2] These guerrilla operations inflicted significant casualties on British forces, tying down troops under ColonelArthur Wellesley, who responded by constructing roads and fortified posts to penetrate the terrain but ultimately withdrew for other campaigns.[13][2]Key engagements marked the phase, including attacks on British holdings such as Brown's spice plantation at Anjarakandi and outposts at Kodolli and Manattana. In October 1802, forces led by Edachena Kungan Nair captured Panamaram fort, killing approximately 70 British soldiers and seizing ammunition, which bolstered the rebels' capabilities.[2] British collectors like Major Macleod attempted revenue enforcement and coercion through Kolkars—irregular police numbering around 1,200—but faced resignations and limited success amid ongoing ambushes.[2] Pazhassi Raja's strategy emphasized mobility, local intelligence, and alliances with tribal groups for ambushes in passes and forests, evading larger conventional forces.[1]By 1805, British sub-collector Thomas Harvey Baber intensified the pursuit, offering a 3,000-rupee reward for the Raja's capture amid scorched-earth measures and recruitment drives. On November 30, 1805, Pazhassi Raja's location near Mavila Thodu stream—close to the Kerala-Karnataka border—was betrayed by a Chetti informant, leading to an ambush by Baber's contingent.[2][13] In the ensuing skirmish at the Kanguara River, the Raja was fatally wounded by gunfire from a sepoy and died alongside supporters like Edachena Kungan Nair and Talakkal Chandu.[2] His body was transported in Baber's palanquin to Mananthavady and cremated with customary honors, signaling the effective end of organized resistance in the Cotiote region.[2][1]
Military Strategies and Alliances
Guerrilla Tactics and Forest Fortifications
Pazhassi Raja employed guerrilla tactics characterized by hit-and-run ambushes and rapid mobility, leveraging the dense Wayanad forests to evade superior British forces during the Cotiote War from 1793 to 1805.[27] His familiarity with the terrain's twisting paths and wooded hills allowed forces to launch surprise attacks on supply convoys and outposts, such as the 1803 assault on the British garrison at Panamaram, where over 100 soldiers were killed.[15] These operations disrupted British logistics and prevented consolidation of control in Malabar, forcing the enemy to divide troops across inhospitable jungle regions.[28]Similar tactics were used earlier against Mysore invasions, harassing Hyder Ali's and Tipu Sultan's troops in Wayanad through constant skirmishes that denied peaceful occupation.[15] Pazhassi's strategy emphasized small, mobile units of local warriors and tribal allies, avoiding pitched battles in favor of attrition warfare suited to the forested environment, which neutralized British advantages in artillery and disciplined infantry.[29]For fortifications, Pazhassi Raja constructed a network of hill forts in Wayanad, including those at Muzhakunnu, Mananthavady, and Kannavam, serving as defensive bases and staging points for raids.[29] These structures, often integrated with natural barriers like moats and dense vegetation, provided refuge during pursuits and enabled sustained resistance by storing arms and provisions. Additionally, strategic camps were established deep within the thick forests, utilizing caves and elevated terrains for concealment and quick dispersal.[28] This combination of man-made forts and natural forest strongholds prolonged the rebellion, compelling British commanders like Arthur Wellesley to expend resources on road-building and scorched-earth countermeasures.[8]
Key Supporters and Local Mobilization
Pazhassi Raja's military efforts against British forces were bolstered by a cadre of loyal local chieftains and tribal commanders who provided tactical leadership and manpower. Prominent among them was Edachena Kunkan, a Nair noble from Tirunelli in Wayanad, who rallied fellow Nair elites to the cause and led assaults such as the 1803 seizure of Panamaram Fort, where his forces overpowered a British garrison of 25 soldiers.[30] Another key figure was Thalakkal Chandu, an expert archer who commanded the Kurichya tribal contingent, organizing their archery units for ambushes in forested terrain.[31][32]Local mobilization centered on recruiting from Wayanad's indigenous communities, particularly the Kurichya tribes, whom Pazhassi Raja trained and integrated into guerrilla operations, leveraging their knowledge of rugged landscapes for hit-and-run tactics that sustained resistance from 1800 to 1805.[28] This drew broader participation from Kottayam-Malabar's peasantry and martial-trained locals, including those skilled in Kalaripayattu, enabling sustained harassment of British supply lines despite numerical disadvantages.[8][32]The uprising's grassroots nature involved cross-caste alliances among Hindus, with tribal and Nair elements forming the core, though some Mappila Muslims occasionally aligned against common British impositions, as seen in joint actions near Kuttiyadi.[33] British records noted the effectiveness of this decentralized structure, which tied down significant troops under commanders like Arthur Wellesley.[8]
Historical Assessment
Achievements and Defensive Motivations
Pazhassi Raja's primary achievements lay in sustaining a prolonged guerrilla resistance against British forces in the Malabar region, spanning two phases from 1793 to 1797 and 1800 to 1805, which delayed effective British consolidation of control over Kottayam and Wayanad territories.[2] He organized a militia comprising Nair warriors and local tribal groups, enabling the capture of strategic British outposts such as Panamaram Fort in October 1802, where his forces under commanders Edachenna Kungan Nair and Talakkal Chandu killed approximately 70 British soldiers and seized supplies.[2] Additional successes included ambushes on British positions at Kodolli and Manattana in 1800, as well as raids on European plantations like Captain Brown's spice estate at Anjarakandi in 1803, which disrupted British economic operations and supply lines.[2] These actions frustrated major British offensives, including a 1801 pincer maneuver led by Colonel Arthur Wellesley, who failed to encircle or decisively engage Pazhassi's mobile forces despite deploying thousands of troops from the Malabar coast and Mysore frontiers.[29]His defensive motivations stemmed from the British East India Company's disregard for prior agreements recognizing Kottayam's autonomy, such as the 1790 treaty following the Third Mysore War and the 1792 Treaty of Srirangapatnam, which ceded Wayanad to Pazhassi as a buffer against Mysore incursions.[2] The Company instead leased revenue collection rights in Kottayam to Pazhassi's uncle Vira Varma in 1793 and 1794, bypassing Pazhassi's hereditary claims and imposing direct administrative oversight that eroded local princely authority.[2] Central to his resistance was opposition to the Company's harsh revenue policies, including rapid tax assessments, doubled rates on land and produce, and coercive collections that burdened peasants and tenants, prompting Pazhassi to position himself as their protector against exploitative foreign governance.[1][34] This stance reflected a commitment to preserving traditional revenue-sharing arrangements under native rule, rather than ideological anti-colonialism, as evidenced by his earlier alliances with the British against Hyder Ali and Tipu Sultan to safeguard regional sovereignty.[2]
Criticisms, British Perspectives, and Regional Impacts
British colonial records portrayed Kerala Varma Pazhassi Raja as a persistent rebel whose actions undermined the East India Company's authority in Malabar following the 1792 Treaty of Seringapatam, which transferred the region from Tipu Sultan. Officials like Thomas Harvey Baber, who led the 1805 expedition resulting in Pazhassi's death on November 30, depicted him in reports as a courageous yet intractable leader whose guerrilla campaigns inflicted heavy losses, including the deaths of three lieutenants and a major between 1800 and 1805.[35][26] Baber's December 31, 1805, dispatch from Cannanore emphasized the necessity of relentless pursuit to restore order, framing the conflict as a defense of legitimate revenue administration against localized insurgency rather than imperial overreach.[35]Criticisms of Pazhassi Raja's campaigns, primarily from select Indian historians, center on their parochial scope, arguing that resistance stemmed more from defending personal prerogatives over Kottayam's revenues than from principled opposition to foreign rule. Authors in regional debates have contended that his focus remained confined to northern Kottayam's hamlets, prioritizing feudal restoration over wider anti-colonial mobilization, as evidenced by initial alliances with the British against Mysore before turning against them upon perceived slights to his authority.[36] Such views contrast with nationalist narratives but align with causal analysis of pre-modern polities, where local potentates like Pazhassi often rebelled to preserve customary exactions amid disrupted tribute flows post-Mysore conquests, rather than ideologically driven independence.[32]The rebellion's regional impacts in Malabar included acute disruptions to British revenue extraction, with Pazhassi halting collections across Kottayam from 1793, compelling the Company to deploy additional forces from Bombay and enlist local collaborators like the Kolkar militia to counter forest-based ambushes.[1][37] Militarily, it exacted a toll of over a dozen European officers killed or wounded, prompting tactical shifts toward informant networks and scorched-earth operations, while economically accelerating transitions to direct assessments that alienated Nair elites but stabilized collections by 1806.[26] In forested Wayanad and surrounding areas, the prolonged conflict from 1793 to 1805 entrenched patterns of intermittent unrest, influencing subsequent British policies to integrate cooperative locals via settlements, though it failed to ignite broader peasant revolts, limiting diffusion to elite-led skirmishes.[25][4]
Long-Term Legacy and Debates
Pazhassi Raja's resistance against British rule has been recognized as one of the earliest organized challenges to colonial authority in India, predating the 1857 Sepoy Mutiny by over half a century.[38][39] His efforts are credited with inflicting significant casualties on British forces, estimated at around 1,000 soldiers and 3,000 native sepoys between 1793 and 1797 alone.[14] In Kerala, he is revered as the "Kerala Simham" (Lion of Kerala), with his valorous exploits forming part of local folklore passed down through generations.[5]His legacy endures through physical memorials, including the Pazhassi Raja Tomb in Mananthavady, Wayanad, constructed shortly after his death in 1805 or 1806, reportedly by British authorities as a mark of respect for his formidable opposition.[40] Additional sites, such as the Pazhassi Raja Museum in Kozhikode, preserve artifacts and exhibits highlighting his role in regional history.[41] These commemorations underscore his status as a symbol of indigenous defiance, influencing perceptions of pre-nationalist resistance in southern India.[2]Debates surrounding Pazhassi Raja's motivations center on whether his actions represented a proto-nationalist struggle or a defense of feudal privileges against encroaching British revenue policies. Some historians argue that his primary grievance stemmed from the East India Company's failure to honor promises of tax collection rights in Kottayam, framing the rebellion as localized rather than ideologically anti-colonial.[1] Critics have questioned his earlier alliance with British forces against Mysore rulers Hyder Ali and Tipu Sultan, suggesting it prioritized princely interests over broader anti-foreign unity.[42] British accounts, while acknowledging his military prowess, portrayed him as a disruptive rebel whose guerrilla tactics prolonged regional instability.[43] In contrast, Indian nationalist interpretations elevate him as a foundational figure in the fight for sovereignty, though his limited geographic scope has led to relative obscurity in pan-Indian historical narratives.[44]
Depictions in Culture and Memory
Literature, Film, and Memorials
Pazhassi Raja's resistance against British forces has inspired numerous literary works, including biographies and historical accounts emphasizing his role as a regional leader. Publications such as The Royal Rebel Pazhassi Raja, part of the Great Patriots of India series and issued by Macmillan India Limited in 1997, highlight his patriotic efforts.[45] Similarly, Pazhassi Keral Verma: The Lion of Kerala by Kousik Sastri provides a biographical narrative of his rule over the Kottayam princely state and conflicts with colonial authorities.[46]His life has also been portrayed in films, with the 1964 Malayalam production Pazhassi Raja, directed by Kunchacko, focusing on the East India Company's encroachments during his era.[47] A more recent depiction appears in the 2009 Malayalam historical drama Kerala Varma Pazhassi Raja, directed by Hariharan and starring Mammootty in the lead role, which details his guerrilla campaigns in the Wayanad forests against British troops in the early 19th century.[48]Memorials to Pazhassi Raja include the Pazhassi Raja Tomb in Mananthavady, Wayanad district, constructed at the site of his cremation on the banks of the Kabani River following his death on November 30, 1805; the structure now functions as a museum displaying artifacts from his time and guerrilla warfare methods.[49] This tomb, designated as Pazhassi Kudeeram, is maintained as a protected historical monument by the Kerala State Archaeology Department.[50] Additional commemorations feature a memorial tower erected over his entombment site shortly after 1805, underscoring local recognition of his defensive stand.[51]