Hubbry Logo
PhotoelasticityPhotoelasticityMain
Open search
Photoelasticity
Community hub
Photoelasticity
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Photoelasticity
Photoelasticity
Photoelasticity
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Plastic utensils in a photoelasticity experiment

In materials science, photoelasticity describes changes in the optical properties of a material under mechanical deformation. It is a property of all dielectric media and is often used to experimentally determine the stress distribution in a material.

History

[edit]
See also: Physical crystallography before X-rays § Photoelasticity

The photoelastic phenomenon was first discovered by the Scottish physicist David Brewster, who immediately recognized it as stress-induced birefringence.[1][2] That diagnosis was confirmed in a direct refraction experiment by Augustin-Jean Fresnel.[3] Experimental frameworks were developed at the beginning of the twentieth century with the works of E.G. Coker and L.N.G. Filon of University of London. Their book Treatise on Photoelasticity, published in 1930 by Cambridge Press, became a standard text on the subject. Between 1930 and 1940, many other books appeared on the subject, including books in Russian, German and French. Max M. Frocht published the classic two volume work, Photoelasticity, in the field.[4] At the same time, much development occurred in the field – great improvements were achieved in technique, and the equipment was simplified. With refinements in the technology, photoelastic experiments were extended to determining three-dimensional states of stress. In parallel to developments in experimental technique, the first phenomenological description of photoelasticity was given in 1890 by Friedrich Pockels,[5] however this was proved inadequate almost a century later by Nelson & Lax[6] as the description by Pockels only considered the effect of mechanical strain on the optical properties of the material.

With the advent of the digital polariscope – made possible by light-emitting diodes – continuous monitoring of structures under load became possible. This led to the development of dynamic photoelasticity, which has contributed greatly to the study of complex phenomena such as fracture of materials.

Applications

[edit]
Photoelastic model to validate the stiffener model. Isochromatic fringe patterns around a steel platelet in a photo-elastic two-part epoxy resin.

Photoelasticity has been used for a variety of stress analyses and even for routine use in design, particularly before the advent of numerical methods, such as finite elements or boundary elements.[7] Digitization of polariscopy enables fast image acquisition and data processing, which allows its industrial applications to control quality of manufacturing process for materials such as glass[8] and polymer.[9] Dentistry utilizes photoelasticity to analyze strain in denture materials.[10]

Photoelasticity can successfully be used to investigate the highly localized stress state within masonry[11][12][13] or in proximity of a rigid line inclusion (stiffener) embedded in an elastic medium.[14] In the former case, the problem is nonlinear due to the contacts between bricks, while in the latter case the elastic solution is singular, so that numerical methods may fail to provide correct results. These can be obtained through photoelastic techniques. Dynamic photoelasticity integrated with high-speed photography is utilized to investigate fracture behavior in materials.[15] Another important application of the photoelasticity experiments is to study the stress field around bi-material notches.[16] Bi-material notches exist in many engineering application like welded or adhesively bonded structures.[citation needed]

For example, some elements of Gothic cathedrals previously thought decorative were first proved essential for structural support by photoelastic methods.[17]

Formal definition

[edit]

For a linear dielectric material the change in the inverse permittivity tensor with respect to the deformation (the gradient of the displacement ) is described by [18]

where is the fourth-rank photoelasticity tensor, is the linear displacement from equilibrium, and denotes differentiation with respect to the Cartesian coordinate . For isotropic materials, this definition simplifies to [19]

where is the symmetric part of the photoelastic tensor (the photoelastic strain tensor), and is the linear strain. The antisymmetric part of is known as the roto-optic tensor. From either definition, it is clear that deformations to the body may induce optical anisotropy, which can cause an otherwise optically isotropic material to exhibit birefringence. Although the symmetric photoelastic tensor is most commonly defined with respect to mechanical strain, it is also possible to express photoelasticity in terms of the mechanical stress.

Experimental principles

[edit]
Tension lines in a plastic protractor seen under cross-polarized light

The experimental procedure relies on the property of birefringence, as exhibited by certain transparent materials. Birefringence is a phenomenon in which a ray of light passing through a given material experiences two refractive indices. The property of birefringence (or double refraction) is observed in many optical crystals. Upon the application of stresses, photoelastic materials exhibit the property of birefringence, and the magnitude of the refractive indices at each point in the material is directly related to the state of stresses at that point. Information such as maximum shear stress and its orientation are available by analyzing the birefringence with an instrument called a polariscope.

When a ray of light passes through a photoelastic material, its electromagnetic wave components are resolved along the two principal stress directions and each component experiences a different refractive index due to the birefringence. The difference in the refractive indices leads to a relative phase retardation between the two components. Assuming a thin specimen made of isotropic materials, where two-dimensional photoelasticity is applicable, the magnitude of the relative retardation is given by the stress-optic law:[20]

where Δ is the induced retardation, C is the stress-optic coefficient, t is the specimen thickness, λ is the vacuum wavelength, and σ1 and σ2 are the first and second principal stresses, respectively. The retardation changes the polarization of transmitted light. The polariscope combines the different polarization states of light waves before and after passing the specimen. Due to optical interference of the two waves, a fringe pattern is revealed. The number of fringe order N is denoted as

which depends on relative retardation. By studying the fringe pattern one can determine the state of stress at various points in the material.

For materials that do not show photoelastic behavior, it is still possible to study the stress distribution. The first step is to build a model, using photoelastic materials, which has geometry similar to the real structure under investigation. The loading is then applied in the same way to ensure that the stress distribution in the model is similar to the stress in the real structure.

Isoclinics and isochromatics

[edit]

Isoclinics are the loci of the points in the specimen along which the principal stresses are in the same direction.[citation needed]

Isochromatics are the loci of the points along which the difference in the first and second principal stress remains the same. Thus they are the lines which join the points with equal maximum shear stress magnitude.[21]

Two-dimensional photoelasticity

[edit]
Photoelastic experiment showing the internal stress distribution inside the cover of a Jewel case

Photoelasticity can describe both three-dimensional and two-dimensional states of stress. However, examining photoelasticity in three-dimensional systems is more involved than two-dimensional or plane-stress system. So the present section deals with photoelasticity in a plane stress system. This condition is achieved when the thickness of the prototype is much smaller than the dimensions in the plane.[citation needed] Thus one is only concerned with stresses acting parallel to the plane of the model, as other stress components are zero. The experimental setup varies from experiment to experiment. The two basic kinds of setup used are plane polariscope and circular polariscope.[citation needed]

The working principle of a two-dimensional experiment allows the measurement of retardation, which can be converted to the difference between the first and second principal stress and their orientation. To further get values of each stress component, a technique called stress-separation is required.[22] Several theoretical and experimental methods are utilized to provide additional information to solve individual stress components.

Plane polariscope setup

[edit]

The setup consists of two linear polarizers and a light source. The light source can either emit monochromatic light or white light depending upon the experiment. First the light is passed through the first polarizer which converts the light into plane polarized light. The apparatus is set up in such a way that this plane polarized light then passes through the stressed specimen. This light then follows, at each point of the specimen, the direction of principal stress at that point. The light is then made to pass through the analyzer and we finally get the fringe pattern.[citation needed]

The fringe pattern in a plane polariscope setup consists of both the isochromatics and the isoclinics. The isoclinics change with the orientation of the polariscope while there is no change in the isochromatics.[citation needed]

Transmission Circular Polariscope
The same device functions as a plane polariscope when quarter wave plates are taken aside or rotated so their axes parallel to polarization axes

Circular polariscope setup

[edit]

In a circular polariscope setup two quarter-wave plates are added to the experimental setup of the plane polariscope. The first quarter-wave plate is placed in between the polarizer and the specimen and the second quarter-wave plate is placed between the specimen and the analyzer. The effect of adding the quarter-wave plate after the source-side polarizer is that we get circularly polarized light passing through the sample. The analyzer-side quarter-wave plate converts the circular polarization state back to linear before the light passes through the analyzer.[citation needed]

The basic advantage of a circular polariscope over a plane polariscope is that in a circular polariscope setup we only get the isochromatics and not the isoclinics. This eliminates the problem of differentiating between the isoclinics and the isochromatics.[citation needed]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Photoelasticity

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Photoelasticity is a whole-field optical technique for measuring and visualizing stresses and strains in materials and structures, relying on the birefringence exhibited by transparent, isotropic materials when subjected to mechanical stress. This method involves creating scaled models from birefringent materials, such as plastics, and observing the resulting interference patterns—known as fringes—produced when polarized light passes through the stressed model. The fundamental principle of photoelasticity stems from the stress-optic law, first formulated by James Clerk Maxwell, which states that the difference in principal stresses (σ₁ - σ₂) in a is proportional to the relative retardation of waves passing through it, given by the equation σ₁ - σ₂ = N f_σ / h, where N is the fringe order, f_σ is the fringe value, and h is the model thickness. Under stress, the becomes temporarily birefringent, splitting incident polarized into two components with orthogonal polarizations and different refractive indices aligned along the principal stress directions; the phase difference (retardation) between these components creates isochromatic fringes (contours of constant principal stress difference) and isoclinic fringes (lines of constant principal stress direction). These patterns are viewed and analyzed using a polariscope, which consists of polarizing filters and often a source, allowing quantitative determination of stress fields without invasive measurements. Historically, the photoelastic effect was first discovered by in 1816, with theoretical foundations provided by Maxwell's work on the elasto-optic effect in the mid-19th century; practical applications in engineering stress analysis developed in the early with advancements in transparent polymers and optical instrumentation. It gained prominence during and 1940s for solving complex problems in and , where analytical methods were insufficient, and has since evolved with and computational enhancements for three-dimensional analysis. Key applications include stress analysis in structural components like bridges, aircraft parts, and machine elements with irregular geometries or holes, where it reveals stress concentrations that could lead to failure. The technique is also used in biomechanics for studying load distributions in dental restorations or orthopedic implants, in materials science for validating finite element models, and in dynamic testing under high-speed loading conditions. Advantages of photoelasticity encompass its non-contact nature, full-field visualization, and applicability to both static and transient events, though limitations include the need for transparent models and challenges in interpreting mixed fringe patterns or scaling results to prototypes.

Fundamentals

Definition and Principles

Photoelasticity is an optical technique that visualizes and quantifies stress distributions in transparent materials by exploiting the phenomenon of stress-induced , where mechanically loaded specimens exhibit temporary double refraction, producing observable interference fringes when viewed under polarized light. This method relies on the material's ability to alter its under stress, transforming otherwise isotropic substances into birefringent ones, which allows for full-field mapping of internal stresses without . To understand photoelasticity, it is essential to grasp basic concepts of polarization and . behaves as a transverse electromagnetic wave with oscillations that can be restricted to a single plane using polarizers, which filter out components perpendicular to the desired direction, yielding linearly polarized . occurs when a causes polarized to split into two rays with orthogonal polarizations that propagate at different speeds, resulting in a phase difference upon emergence; in unstressed isotropic , this does not happen, but mechanical stress induces such by aligning molecular chains or distorting the lattice. The core principle governing photoelasticity is the stress-optic law, which states that the induced is directly proportional to the difference between stresses in the material, creating principal stress directions that modify the refractive indices along those axes and generate measurable phase shifts in the transmitted waves. This proportionality arises because applied stresses alter the material's and molecular orientation, leading to a stress-dependent change in the propagation for differently polarized components. Photoelastic materials, such as polymers like resins and , are selected for their high stress-optic coefficients—measures of birefringence sensitivity per unit stress—and optical transparency, which ensure clear fringe visibility and accurate stress representation in scaled models. In a basic experiment, when linearly polarized passes through a stressed photoelastic model, the emerging exhibits retardation due to , and a second (analyzer) converts this phase difference into intensity variations, manifesting as colorful interference fringe patterns that highlight regions of and magnitude. These fringes provide an intuitive visual indication of stress gradients, with denser patterns signaling higher stress levels, enabling engineers to identify potential failure points in structures.

Mathematical Formulation

The mathematical formulation of photoelasticity is grounded in the stress-optic law, which quantifies the relationship between applied stresses and the resulting birefringence in a transparent, isotropic material under load. This law, originally formulated by Maxwell, states that the difference in principal refractive indices, or birefringence Δn=n1−n2\Delta n = n_1 - n_2, is proportional to the difference in principal stresses σ1−σ2\sigma_1 - \sigma_2: Δn=C(σ1−σ2),\Delta n = C (\sigma_1 - \sigma_2), where CC is the material's relative stress-optic coefficient, typically on the order of 10−1010^{-10} to 10−1210^{-12} Pa−1^{-1} (or m2^2/N). For example, polycarbonate has C≈−78×10−12C \approx -78 \times 10^{-12} Pa−1^{-1}. The induces a relative retardation Γ\Gamma of waves polarized along the principal stress directions as they propagate through the of thickness tt: Γ=Δn⋅t=C(σ1−σ2)t.\Gamma = \Delta n \cdot t = C (\sigma_1 - \sigma_2) t. This retardation corresponds to a phase difference δ\delta between the waves: δ=2πΓλ=2πC(σ1−σ2)tλ,\delta = \frac{2\pi \Gamma}{\lambda} = \frac{2\pi C (\sigma_1 - \sigma_2) t}{\lambda}, where λ\lambda is the of the monochromatic used. The fringe order NN observed in the photoelastic pattern is directly related to this phase retardation: N=δ2π=C(σ1−σ2)tλ.N = \frac{\delta}{2\pi} = \frac{C (\sigma_1 - \sigma_2) t}{\lambda}. Rearranging yields the stress-optic relation for determining the principal stress difference: σ1−σ2=NλCt=Nfσt,\sigma_1 - \sigma_2 = \frac{N \lambda}{C t} = \frac{N f_\sigma}{t}, where fσ=λ/Cf_\sigma = \lambda / C is the material's stress-fringe value, a constant that encapsulates the optical sensitivity for a given wavelength and material. In a polariscope setup, the observed light intensity II arises from the interference of the orthogonally polarized waves and depends on both the phase retardation δ\delta and the orientation θ\theta of the principal stress directions relative to the . For a plane polariscope in dark-field configuration, the intensity is given by I=I0sin⁡2(δ2)sin⁡2(2θ),I = I_0 \sin^2\left(\frac{\delta}{2}\right) \sin^2(2\theta), where I0I_0 is the incident intensity; this equation shows how isoclinics (sin⁡2(2θ)=0\sin^2(2\theta) = 0, I=0I=0) and isochromatics (sin⁡2(δ/2)=0\sin^2(\delta/2) = 0 or 1) emerge. For a circular polariscope, the intensity simplifies to I=I02sin⁡2(δ2),I = \frac{I_0}{2} \sin^2\left(\frac{\delta}{2}\right), eliminating angular dependence and isolating the retardation effect. These formulations assume plane stress conditions (σ3=[0](/page/0)\sigma_3 = [0](/page/0)), linearly elastic and initially isotropic of the , monochromatic illumination to avoid dispersion, and a constant stress-optic CC independent of stress level and within the elastic regime.

Historical Development

Origins and Early Work

The phenomenon of photoelasticity originated in the early through observations in , where researchers examined in transparent crystals under mechanical stress. In 1814, independently discovered the effect in glass, observing stress-induced double refraction. In 1815, Sir documented the phenomenon while studying Icelandic spar (), a doubly refracting mineral, under compression; he observed that the application of stress induced temporary double refraction, altering the 's when viewed through a polarizer. This finding, initially rooted in investigations of natural minerals like , marked the first documentation of stress-induced in transparent , distinguishing it from inherent crystal birefringence. Building on Brewster's empirical observations, theoretical advancements in the provided a foundation linking photoelasticity to elasticity theory. Later, in the , James Clerk Maxwell extended this by predicting stress-induced in isotropic materials, deriving relations that form the basis of the stress-optic law, which quantifies the relative retardation of light waves proportional to principal stress differences. Maxwell's analysis, grounded in , shifted photoelasticity from a curiosity in mineral optics to a predictable physical response in elastic solids. Although early work remained largely theoretical and observational, practical applications emerged in the early , with roots tracing back to these studies. In the , E.G. Coker conducted pioneering experiments adapting photoelastic methods for stress analysis in components, such as beams and plates made from transparent models like glass or ; his work demonstrated how fringe patterns could visualize stress distributions qualitatively. By , these techniques achieved first widespread practical use in for analyzing scaled models of structures, enabling non-destructive visualization of complex stress fields before computational methods were available.

Key Advancements

In the 1930s and 1940s, frozen-stress photoelasticity emerged as a pivotal advancement, allowing the capture and preservation of transient three-dimensional stress fields in photoelastic models through thermoelastic freezing. This method, pioneered by German engineer Walter Oppel in 1937, involves heating a model made from suitable polymers, such as bakelite or epoxy resins, above their glass transition temperature (typically 120–180°C), applying mechanical loads to induce birefringence, and then slowly cooling the model to "freeze" the internal stresses in a rigid state. Once frozen, the model can be sectioned into thin slices for conventional two-dimensional polariscope analysis without relaxation of the stress patterns, enabling detailed volumetric stress evaluation that was previously infeasible with dynamic loading. This technique significantly expanded photoelasticity's applicability to complex geometries, such as turbine blades and pressure vessels, by overcoming limitations of real-time observation in opaque or thick specimens. From the 1940s onward, scattered-light introduced a non-destructive approach for direct three-dimensional stress without physical sectioning, marking a shift toward volumetric of stress states. Developed by F. L. Weller in 1941, this method exploits the of polarized within a loaded transparent model to measure the difference between principal stresses along light paths, using immersion in a refractive index-matching fluid to minimize unwanted refraction. By illuminating the model with a laser or collimated beam and analyzing scattered light intensities at multiple orientations, researchers could map full stress tensors in situ, providing higher resolution for internal stress gradients compared to frozen-stress slicing. Subsequent refinements in the 1960s, including automated scanning systems, further enhanced its precision for engineering applications like fracture mechanics. The integration of photoelasticity with finite element analysis (FEA) during the 1980s fostered hybrid experimental-numerical methods, combining empirical fringe data with computational simulations for validated stress predictions. This synergy, exemplified in works like those by Sanford and Ragland in , uses photoelastic measurements to calibrate FEA boundary conditions or inversely optimize material models, reducing uncertainties in simulations of irregular structures. By overlaying fringe orders onto FEA meshes, discrepancies between experiment and theory could be quantified, achieving stress accuracy within 5–10% for complex loadings, as demonstrated in component validations. This approach bridged the gap between physical testing and predictive modeling, becoming a standard for hybrid validation in . In the 1980s, phase-shifting photoelasticity advanced fringe analysis by enabling sub-fringe resolution and simultaneous determination of isoclinics and isochromatics through automated rotations. Introduced by Friedrich W. Hecker and B. Morche in , the technique captures multiple intensity images at phase steps (e.g., 0°, 45°, 90°) using a rotating analyzer or quarter-wave plate, solving the light intensity equations via least-squares fitting to extract phase maps with resolutions down to 0.01 fringes. This method, building on , eliminated ambiguities in manual compensation techniques, improving measurement efficiency by factors of 10–20 in processing time. Post-2000 developments in digital photoelasticity have revolutionized and analysis, incorporating (CCD) cameras and advanced image processing for automated, high-fidelity fringe interpretation. Ramesh's comprehensive framework in 2000 laid the groundwork, but subsequent integrations of CCD arrays with algorithms like Fourier transforms and carrier fringe methods, as in Lesniak and Sanford's 2004 work, enabled real-time extraction of full-field stress data with noise reduction below 2% via and unwrapping techniques. These advancements surpass manual Tardy compensation by providing quantitative isochromatic orders directly from grayscale images, enhancing accuracy in dynamic and reflective photoelastic setups. In the 2020s, further innovations have integrated photoelasticity with , such as deep convolutional neural networks for automated stress field recovery from fringe patterns, as demonstrated in 2022 studies achieving high accuracy in inverse problems. Additionally, as of 2024, new high-sensitivity approaches enable quantitative whole-field visualization of continuous stress evolution in digital photoelasticity, expanding applications in real-time monitoring.

Experimental Setups

Plane Polariscope Configuration

The plane polariscope configuration is a fundamental optical setup in photoelasticity, consisting of a light source, a , a sample stage for the birefringent model, and an analyzer. The light source can be monochromatic for precise fringe order determination or white for colorful visualization of stress patterns. The and analyzer are linear polarizing elements positioned with the model between them, allowing the transmission axis of the to be aligned relative to the incident light direction. This setup operates in two primary modes: parallel and crossed polarizers. In the parallel configuration, the transmission axes of the polarizer and analyzer are aligned, resulting in a bright field where unstressed models appear uniformly illuminated, and stress-induced causes variations in intensity. The crossed configuration, with axes at 90 degrees, produces a dark field; an unstressed model appears completely dark due to , while applied stresses generate bright fringes where light is transmitted. The crossed mode is preferred for most experiments as it enhances contrast for observing stress distributions. In the light path, unpolarized light from the source passes through the polarizer to become linearly polarized, then traverses the stressed model, which introduces a phase retardation between orthogonal components due to the principal stress difference. This retarded light reaches the analyzer, which extinguishes it unless a phase difference is present, allowing transmission proportional to the retardation and orientation. This arrangement reveals both the magnitude and direction of stresses through the resulting interference patterns. A key feature of the plane polariscope is its ability to determine principal stress directions qualitatively via isoclinic fringes, which appear as dark bands when the polarizer and analyzer are oriented parallel or to the principal axes; rotating the polarizers or model extinguishes these fringes at specific angles corresponding to the stress orientation. For operation, the system is first aligned to achieve in the crossed position with no load, ensuring proper polarization. The model is then loaded mechanically, and fringes are observed: white light highlights color sequences for qualitative assessment, while monochromatic light facilitates counting fringe orders for quantitative analysis.

Circular Polariscope Configuration

The circular polariscope configuration in photoelasticity builds upon the basic components of a plane polariscope—namely, a source, linear , transparent model, and analyzer—by incorporating two quarter-wave plates, one positioned before and one after the model, with their fast and slow axes oriented at 45° to the transmission axes of the polarizer and analyzer. This setup generates circularly polarized , which is particularly effective in a crossed polarizer-analyzer arrangement for isolating stress magnitude information. In operation, unpolarized light from the source passes through the linear polarizer to become linearly polarized, and the first quarter-wave plate then converts this into circularly polarized light by introducing a 90° phase shift between the orthogonal components. As this circularly polarized light traverses the birefringent model under stress, the relative retardation δ—arising from the principal stress difference—alters the polarization state to elliptical. The second quarter-wave plate further modifies this elliptical polarization, and the analyzer, oriented perpendicular to the polarizer, transmits light intensity that depends solely on the phase difference δ, given by the equation: I=I0sin⁡2(δ2)I = I_0 \sin^2\left(\frac{\delta}{2}\right) where I0I_0 is the incident intensity amplitude. In this crossed configuration, the resulting fringe patterns consist exclusively of isochromatics, manifesting as concentric dark rings around stress concentrations when using monochromatic illumination, without the directional isoclinic patterns observed in plane polariscopes. This configuration is ideal for quantitative measurement of fringe orders NN, as the suppression of isoclinics eliminates orientation-dependent effects, allowing precise determination of the principal stress difference σ1−σ2=Nfσh\sigma_1 - \sigma_2 = \frac{N f_\sigma}{h}, where fσf_\sigma is the material fringe value and hh is the model thickness; monochromatic enhances accuracy by producing sharp, countable fringes corresponding to integer multiples of the retardation. To set up the system, the quarter-wave plates are inserted with their axes aligned at 45° to the polarizers, ensuring the fast axes of the plates are crossed relative to each other. is verified by observing the unstressed model, which should exhibit no isoclinics or uniform darkness in the crossed state, confirming the absence of directional fringes. The model is then loaded mechanically, and images are captured to analyze the isochromatic patterns for stress evaluation.

Fringe Patterns and Analysis

Isoclinics

In photoelasticity, isoclinics are defined as the dark bands or fringes that represent loci of points where stress directions are aligned parallel to the axes of the and analyzer in a plane polariscope setup. These fringes arise because, at such alignments, the relative retardation δ between the components polarized along directions equals zero (δ = 0), resulting in complete of the transmitted and the appearance of dark lines independent of the stress magnitude. The formation of isoclinics is tied to the orientation of the principal stresses relative to the polariscope axes. Specifically, they occur at angles θ where the principal stress directions coincide with the orientation, governed by the relation tan⁡(2θ)=2τxyσx−σy\tan(2\theta) = \frac{2\tau_{xy}}{\sigma_x - \sigma_y}, which connects the isoclinic directly to the component τ_xy and the difference in normal stresses. This alignment causes no effect in the direction of polarization, eliminating phase difference and leading to zero light intensity for crossed polarizers. Isoclinics are observed in a plane polariscope by incrementally rotating the and analyzer together, typically in steps of 10° to 15°, to capture the fringes at successive orientations. Unlike magnitude-dependent fringes, isoclinics have no associated order and solely indicate direction; a series of curved patterns emerges, each corresponding to a fixed principal direction across the model. In a crossed plane polariscope, these appear as black lines superimposed on the field, requiring multiple exposures or rotations to construct a complete directional of the stress field. A key aspect of isoclinic observation is that they become prominent under low loads or with materials exhibiting high fringe values, minimizing overlap with intensity-based fringes. By plotting the family of isoclinics from these rotations, the principal direction field can be determined across the specimen, enabling visualization and quantification of distributions through the angular relation to stress components.

Isochromatics

Isochromatics represent contours of equal fringe order NN, along which the absolute difference between the principal stresses ∣σ1−σ2∣|\sigma_1 - \sigma_2| remains constant. These fringes manifest as vibrant, colorful bands when observed under white light illumination due to the wavelength-dependent , or as alternating dark and bright lines under monochromatic light, where darkness corresponds to integer orders and brightness to half-integer orders. The formation of isochromatics arises from the phase difference δ=2πN\delta = 2\pi N between the orthogonally polarized light components propagating through the stressed material, induced by temporary . In white light, chromatic dispersion causes specific colors to appear at discrete retardation values; for instance, in certain photoelastic materials under dark-field circular polariscope conditions, the first-order fringe (N=1N=1) exhibits a dull tint corresponding to approximately 520-577 nm retardation. This color sequence repeats cyclically for higher orders, aiding in visual order identification up to about N=3N=3 before fading into neutral tints. In a circular polariscope, isochromatics appear isolated as closed-loop rings or bands centered on points, unaffected by directional effects. Conversely, in a plane polariscope, these fringes overlay with isoclinics, requiring careful angular adjustments to distinguish them. Fringe density increases markedly toward stress raisers, such as holes or notches, where higher NN values signal elevated ∣σ1−σ2∣|\sigma_1 - \sigma_2|. Calibration involves applying known uniform loads to the material and measuring NN to determine the fringe constant CC, enabling quantitative evaluation via ∣σ1−σ2∣=NCt|\sigma_1 - \sigma_2| = \frac{N C}{t}, with tt as the specimen thickness. Interpretation of isochromatic patterns emphasizes higher fringe orders as indicators of steeper stress gradients and greater principal stress differences. These fringes facilitate qualitative mapping of stress magnitude distributions across the model, offering an intuitive visual tool for identifying regions of potential without resolving individual stress components.

Photoelasticity Methods

Two-Dimensional Photoelasticity

Two-dimensional photoelasticity employs scaled, thin-sheet models made from birefringent materials, such as resins or , to analyze states where the out-of-plane stress component is zero (σ3=0\sigma_3 = 0). The procedure starts with fabricating the model to replicate the prototype's at a reduced scale, ensuring geometric similarity. The model is then subjected to controlled loading within a polariscope setup, where isoclinic fringes (indicating principal stress directions) are captured using a plane polariscope configuration, and isochromatic fringes (indicating principal stress differences) are recorded separately using a circular polariscope. Monochromatic is often preferred for clear fringe definition, particularly near stress concentrations, while white aids initial ordering via color sequences. Stress separation in two-dimensional photoelasticity requires determining both the magnitude and direction of principal stresses from fringe data. The Tardy compensation method addresses fractional fringe orders by rotating the analyzer in a circular polariscope until a dark fringe passes through the point of interest, achieving accuracies of about 0.02 fringes; the fractional order is calculated from the analyzer rotation angle relative to extinction. For full separation, the shear-difference method integrates isoclinic angles (θ\theta) and isochromatic fringe orders (NN) with the equations of static equilibrium, using finite-difference approximations along scan lines to compute individual stress components. The principal stress difference is given by the stress-optic law: σ1−σ2=Nfσt\sigma_1 - \sigma_2 = \frac{N f_\sigma}{t}, where fσf_\sigma is the material's fringe value (in units of length/stress), NN is the fringe order, and tt is the model thickness; individual σ1\sigma_1 and σ2\sigma_2 are then derived via the shear-difference relations, such as σx=σ1cos⁡2θ+σ2sin⁡2θ\sigma_x = \sigma_1 \cos^2 \theta + \sigma_2 \sin^2 \theta after integration for the stress sum. To relate model results to the prototype, scale factors account for differences in geometry and loading under assumptions. The geometric scale factor SgS_g is the ratio of prototype to model dimensions (Sg=Lp/LmS_g = L_p / L_m). The measured model stresses σm\sigma_m are scaled to prototype stresses using σp=σm⋅(Pp/Pm)⋅(Lm/Lp)2=σm⋅Sf/Sg2\sigma_p = \sigma_m \cdot (P_p / P_m) \cdot (L_m / L_p)^2 = \sigma_m \cdot S_f / S_g^2, where Sf=Pp/PmS_f = P_p / P_m is the force (loading) scale factor. The loading on the model is chosen to produce clear fringes, ensuring geometric and loading similarity for valid stress distribution transfer. Material differences, such as mismatch, may introduce minor distortions if significant. Analysis proceeds by digitizing the captured fringe patterns, often via scanning photographs or direct , to map isoclinics and isochromatics onto a grid. Fringe orders are unwrapped starting from known boundary values (e.g., zero at unloaded edges), resolving ambiguities in wrapped phases by propagating orders across the field while minimizing discontinuities. Principal stresses are then computed pointwise using the separated θ\theta and NN, incorporating the stress-optic law and equilibrium-derived relations. Error sources include edge effects from model boundaries, where free-surface conditions (σn=0\sigma_n = 0) introduce inaccuracies, and residual in the material, typically mitigated by annealing; classical analog methods have transitioned to digital processing for automated unwrapping and higher precision.

Three-Dimensional Photoelasticity

Three-dimensional photoelasticity extends the technique to analyze complex stress states in volumetric models, primarily through two methods: the scattered light technique and integrated transmission photoelasticity. The scattered light technique involves illuminating thin slices of the photoelastic model with a polarized , where light scatters at 90 degrees due to induced by stress, allowing detection of local relative retardation at points within the volume without physical sectioning. In contrast, integrated transmission photoelasticity measures the cumulative along the light path through the model, providing an average value of the principal stress difference through the thickness. Adaptations for experimental setups in three-dimensional photoelasticity often require transparent models made from materials like epoxy resins or , which can be stress-frozen to lock in the stress-optic effects for subsequent analysis. To minimize artifacts at internal interfaces, models are embedded in immersion fluids with matching refractive indices, enabling clearer of scattered or transmitted rays. Full-field may involve multiple optical slices, rotational scanning of the model, or to map the entire volume. Analysis in three-dimensional photoelasticity derives the principal stress difference |σ₁ - σ₂| from isochromatic fringes observed in the scattered or integrated patterns, while 3D isoclinics, indicating principal stress directions, are obtained through model or scanning under crossed polarizers to isolate orientation effects. The full stress tensor is then solved by incorporating these measurements with equilibrium equations of elasticity, often requiring to disentangle the three-dimensional components. This field emerged in the , with significant contributions from researchers like A.J. Durelli, who advanced optical slicing and stress-freezing methods for practical 3D applications. Key challenges persist, including artifacts from index mismatches and the complexity of integrating scattered data across volumes for accurate tensor reconstruction. The fringe order in integrated transmission is given by N3D=Cλ∫(σ1−σ2) dsN_{3D} = \frac{C}{\lambda} \int (\sigma_1 - \sigma_2) \, ds along the light ray path, where CC is the stress-optic coefficient, λ\lambda is the , and the captures the path length through the stressed medium. In modern developments post-2000, three-dimensional photoelasticity has been hybridized with computed (CT) scanning to enable non-destructive, full-volume stress reconstruction, addressing limitations in data completeness from traditional slicing by iteratively solving inverse problems for the stress field. Recent advancements as of 2024 include high-speed photoelastic for reconstructing dynamic axisymmetric stress fields in soft materials, improving non-destructive analysis of transient loading.

Applications

Mechanical Engineering

Photoelasticity has been a cornerstone in for analyzing stress concentrations in parts, such as and pressure vessels, by providing visual representations of stress distributions in scaled models or prototypes. This technique enables engineers to identify high-stress regions that could lead to failure, facilitating design improvements before full-scale production. For instance, it is routinely employed to validate finite element analysis (FEA) models, where experimental fringe patterns are compared against numerical predictions to ensure accuracy in stress forecasting, often achieving agreement within 10% for complex geometries like auxetic structures. Additionally, photoelasticity supports prototype optimization by allowing iterative testing of load-bearing components under simulated operating conditions. Historically, photoelasticity was extensively used from the 1930s to the 1970s, prior to the widespread adoption of FEA, for stress analysis in critical infrastructure like bridges and aircraft components. Engineers created transparent models of bridge piers and suspension elements to map stress fields under load, revealing potential weak points in designs such as cable tensions and pier foundations. In aviation, it was applied to aircraft structures, including turbine blades and welds, to assess interior stresses through the frozen-stress method, which involved slicing models post-loading for detailed examination. Today, it continues to serve as a verification tool in modern applications, particularly for composite materials and additive manufacturing, where 3D-printed photoelastic models help evaluate residual stresses in layered structures. Specific examples illustrate its versatility: in two-dimensional analysis, photoelastic models of beams under reveal fringe orders corresponding to shear stresses, while plates with notches simulate crack propagation by highlighting stress gradients around flaws. For three-dimensional cases, such as blades or welded joints, multi-slice techniques provide volumetric stress data, aiding in the of high-performance parts. Compared to strain gauges, which offer point measurements, photoelasticity delivers full-field visualization, making it more effective for complex geometries and cost-efficient for early-stage prototyping without requiring extensive instrumentation. A notable application involves photoelastic coatings applied directly to actual parts for surface stress using a reflection polariscope. These birefringent coatings, such as those from Vishay's PhotoStress system, are bonded to components like pressure vessels or automotive castings, where polarized light illuminates fringe patterns under load to quantify surface strains. This method is particularly valuable for non-destructive testing of irregular shapes, providing immediate feedback on stress hotspots without model fabrication.

Biomedical and Materials Science

In , photoelasticity has been employed to analyze stress distributions in orthopedic implants, such as hip prostheses, where photoelastic models simulate periacetabular stresses during implantation to predict implant-bone interactions and potential failure sites. For dental materials, the technique evaluates stress concentrations around restorations and implants, revealing how factors like post length and material influence root stresses in endodontically treated teeth, thereby guiding prosthetic to minimize risks. Additionally, birefringent tissue-mimicking phantoms leverage photoelasticity to quantify optical and mechanical deformations in soft tissues, aiding surgical planning by replicating fibrous structures like for non-destructive assessment of deformation under load. A notable application involves three-dimensional photoelasticity for modeling under load, where stress-frozen models of -implant interfaces visualize principal stress trajectories, informing the biomechanical adaptation of around orthopedic devices. Similarly, in vascular mechanics, 3D photoelastic techniques have been adapted to study wall stresses in models, providing insights into rupture risks through full-field stress mapping in compliant biomaterials. In , photoelasticity assesses residual stresses in polymers and composites, such as those induced during processing of matrices, by measuring to quantify and cure-related strains that affect dimensional stability and delamination propensity. Photoelastic extends this to reconstructing complete 3D stress fields in soft materials via high-speed imaging, which is useful for evaluating dynamic stress distributions under large deformations. Since the 1990s, digital photoelasticity has driven growth in micro-scale applications, enabling high-resolution stress analysis in devices through techniques that detect in silicon-based structures. of collagenous tissues supports studies of structural changes and fatigue resistance in biomaterials like bovine used in implants, revealing mechanisms of deformation and crack . These advancements underscore photoelasticity's non-destructive nature, high sensitivity to low stresses (down to 0.1 MPa), and compatibility with for integrating optical and mechanical data in biomedical contexts.

References

  1. https://depts.washington.edu/mictech/optics/me557/photoelasticity.pdf
  2. https://courses.washington.edu/me354a/photoelas.pdf
  3. https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/jres/20/jresv20n3p393_A1b.pdf
  4. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/materials-science/photoelastic-stress-analysis
  5. https://www.doitpoms.ac.uk/tlplib/photoelasticity/printall.php
  6. https://home.iitm.ac.in/kramesh/Photoelasticity.pdf
  7. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5420075/
  8. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273743089_IV-On_the_Equilibrium_of_Elastic_Solids
  9. https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/fluidsengineering/article-pdf/53/2/151/7004736/149_1.pdf
  10. https://www.doitpoms.ac.uk/tlplib/photoelasticity/history.php
  11. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321613048_Digital_Photoelasticity_Advanced_Techniques_and_Applications
  12. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/297712774.pdf
  13. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-4-431-68039-0.pdf
  14. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jap/article/12/8/610/141869/Three-Dimensional-Photoelasticity-Using-Scattered
  15. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02319261
  16. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA129045.pdf
  17. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0045794984902098
  18. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0143816602000982
  19. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1243/03093247V316423
  20. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/239403319_Digital_Photoelasticity_Advanced_Techniques_and_Applications
  21. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/bioengineering-and-biotechnology/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2022.818112/full
  22. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0143816624003944
  23. https://www.eolss.net/sample-chapters/c05/E6-194-05-00.pdf
  24. https://academic.mu.edu/phys/matthysd/L1980205.htm
  25. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7292679/
  26. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA063300.pdf
  27. https://www.asprs.org/wp-content/uploads/pers/1990journal/apr/1990_apr_495-499.pdf
  28. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1475-1305.2003.00073.x
  29. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/014381668190021X
  30. https://www.epj-conferences.org/articles/epjconf/pdf/2010/05/epjconf_ICEM14_32006.pdf
  31. https://www.usbr.gov/tsc/techreferences/hydraulics_lab/pubs/EM/EM23.pdf
  32. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02408446
  33. https://www.witpress.com/Secure/elibrary/papers/SECM05/SECM05017FU.pdf
  34. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0997753899001059
  35. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0093641377900386
  36. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/307738014_Photoelastic_tomography_as_hybrid_mechanics
  37. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0143816624002033
  38. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/15/3/1250
  39. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19730015946/downloads/19730015946.pdf
  40. https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/101729860
  41. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452321621000202
  42. https://docs.micro-measurements.com/?id=2534
  43. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10611871/
  44. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9572149/
  45. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8781524/
  46. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-011-7432-9_110
  47. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2795364/
  48. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359835X06002223
  49. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0143816624005451
  50. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9984180/
  51. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/3-540-48800-6_6
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.