Hubbry Logo
Promissory notePromissory noteMain
Open search
Promissory note
Community hub
Promissory note
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Promissory note
Promissory note
Promissory note
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
A 1926 promissory note from the Imperial Bank of India, Rangoon, Burma for 20,000 rupees plus interest

A promissory note, sometimes referred to as a note payable, is a legal instrument (more particularly, a financing instrument and a debt instrument), in which one party (the maker or issuer) promises in writing to pay a determinate sum of money to the other (the payee),[1] subject to any terms and conditions specified within the document.[2]

Overview

[edit]

The terms of a note typically include the principal amount, the interest rate if any, the parties, the date, the terms of repayment (which could include interest) and the maturity date. Sometimes, provisions are included concerning the payee's rights in the event of a default, which may include foreclosure of the maker's assets. In foreclosures and contract breaches, promissory notes under CPLR 5001 allow creditors to recover prejudgement interest from the date interest is due until liability is established.[3][4] For loans between individuals, writing and signing a promissory note are often instrumental for tax and record keeping. A promissory note alone is typically unsecured.

Terminology

[edit]

The term note payable is commonly used in accounting (as distinguished from accounts payable) or commonly as just a "note", it is internationally defined by the Convention providing a uniform law for bills of exchange and promissory notes, but regional variations exist. A banknote is frequently referred to as a promissory note, as it is made by a bank and payable to bearer on demand. Mortgage notes or real estate notes are other forms of promissory note.

A promissory note is said to be a negotiable instrument when it contains an unconditional promise.[5]

Demand promissory notes are notes that do not carry a specific maturity date, but are due on demand of the lender. Usually the lender will only give the borrower a few days' notice before the payment is due.

Promissory notes may be used in combination with security agreements. For example, a promissory note may be used in combination with a mortgage, in which case it is called a mortgage note.

Loan contracts

[edit]

In common speech, other terms, such as "loan", "loan agreement", and "loan contract" may be used interchangeably with "promissory note". The term "loan contract" is often used to describe a contract that is lengthy and detailed.

A promissory note is very similar to a loan. Each is a legally binding contract to unconditionally repay a specified amount within a defined time frame. However, a promissory note is generally less detailed and less rigid than a loan contract.[6] For one thing, loan agreements often require repayment in installments, while promissory notes typically do not. Furthermore, a loan agreement usually includes the terms for recourse in the case of default, such as establishing the right to foreclose, while a promissory note does not.

Difference from IOU

[edit]

Promissory notes differ from IOUs in that they contain a specific promise to pay along with the steps and timeline for repayment as well as consequences if repayment fails.[7] IOUs only acknowledge that a debt exists.[8]

Negotiability

[edit]

Negotiable instruments are unconditional and impose few to no duties on the issuer or payee other than payment. In the United States, whether a promissory note is a negotiable instrument can have significant legal impacts, as only negotiable instruments are subject to Article 3 of the Uniform Commercial Code and the application of the holder in due course rule.[9] The negotiability of mortgage notes has been debated, particularly due to the obligations and "baggage" associated with mortgages; however, in mortgages notes are often determined to be negotiable instruments.[9]

In the United States, the Non-Negotiable Long Form Promissory Note is not required.[10]

Use as financial instruments

[edit]

Promissory notes are a common financial instrument in many jurisdictions, employed as commercial paper principally for the short time financing of companies. Often, the seller or provider of a service is not paid upfront by the buyer (usually, another company), but within a period of time, the length of which has been agreed upon by both the seller and the buyer. The reasons for this may vary; historically, many companies used to balance their books and execute payments and debts at the end of each week or tax month; any product bought before that time would be paid only then. Depending on the jurisdiction, this deferred payment period can be regulated by law; in countries like France, Italy or Spain, it usually ranges between 30 and 90 days after the purchase.[11]

When a company engages in many of such transactions, for instance by having provided services to many customers all of whom then deferred their payment, it is possible that the company may be owed enough money that its own liquidity position (i.e., the amount of cash it holds) is hampered, and finds itself unable to honour their own debts, despite the fact that by the books, the company remains solvent. In those cases, the company has the option of asking the bank for a short-term loan, or using any other such short-term financial arrangements to avoid insolvency. However, in jurisdictions where promissory notes are commonplace, the company (called the payee or lender) can ask one of its debtors (called the maker, borrower or payor) to accept a promissory note, whereby the maker signs a legally binding agreement to honour the amount established in the promissory note (usually, part or all its debt) within the agreed period of time.[12] The lender can then take the promissory note to a financial institution (usually a bank, albeit this could also be a private person, or another company), that will exchange the promissory note for cash; usually, the promissory note is cashed in for the amount established in the promissory note, less a small discount.

Once the promissory note reaches its maturity date, its current holder (the bank) can execute it over the emitter of the note (the debtor), who would have to pay the bank the amount promised in the note. If the maker fails to pay, however, the bank retains the right to go to the company that cashed the promissory note in, and demand payment. In the case of unsecured promissory notes, the lender accepts the promissory note based solely on the maker's ability to repay; if the maker fails to pay, the lender must honour the debt to the bank. In the case of a secured promissory note, the lender accepts the promissory note based on the maker's ability to repay, but the note is secured by a thing of value; if the maker fails to pay and the bank reclaims payment, the lender has the right to execute the security.[13]

Use as private money

[edit]

Thus, promissory notes can work as a form of private money. In the past, particularly during the 19th century, their widespread and unregulated use was a source of great risk for banks and private financiers, who would often face the insolvency of both debtors, or simply be scammed by both.

History

[edit]
500 piastre promissory note issued and hand-signed by Gen. Gordon during the Siege of Khartoum (1884) payable six months from the date of issue.[14]
500 piastre promissory note issued and hand-signed by Gen. Gordon during the Siege of Khartoum (1884) payable six months from the date of issue.[14]

Code of Hammurabi Law 100 stipulated repayment of a loan by a debtor to a creditor on a schedule with a maturity date specified in written contractual terms.[15][16][17] Law 122 stipulated that a depositor of gold, silver, or other chattel/movable property for safekeeping must present all articles and a signed contract of bailment to a notary before depositing the articles with a banker, and Law 123 stipulated that a banker was discharged of any liability from a contract of bailment if the notary denied the existence of the contract. Law 124 stipulated that a depositor with a notarized contract of bailment was entitled to redeem the entire value of their deposit, and Law 125 stipulated that a banker was liable for replacement of deposits stolen while in their possession.[18][19][17] In China during the Han dynasty promissory notes appeared in 118 BC and were made of leather.[20] The Romans may have used promissory notes in 57 AD as a durable lightweight substance as evidence of a promise in that time has been found in London among the Bloomberg tablets.[21]

Carthage was purported to have issued lightweight promissory notes on parchment or leather before 146 BC.[22][23][24] In China during the Han dynasty promissory notes appeared in 118 BC and were made of leather.[20] The Romans may have used promissory notes in 57 AD as a durable lightweight substance as evidence of a promise in that time has been found in London among the Bloomberg tablets.[21]

Historically, promissory notes have acted as a form of privately issued currency. Flying cash or feiqian was a promissory note used during the Tang dynasty (618 – 907). Flying cash was regularly used by Chinese tea merchants, and could be exchanged for hard currency at provincial capitals.[25] The Chinese concept of promissory notes was introduced by Marco Polo to Europe.[26]

According to tradition, in 1325 a promissory note was signed in Milan.[27] Around 1150 the Knights Templar issued promissory notes to pilgrims, pilgrims deposited their valuables with a local Templar preceptory before embarking, received a document indicating the value of their deposit, then used that document upon arrival in the Holy Land to retrieve their funds in an amount of treasure of equal value.[28][29]

Around 1348 in Görlitz, Germany, the Jewish creditor Adasse owned a promissory note for 71 marks.[30] There is also evidence of promissory notes being issued in 1384 between Genoa and Barcelona, although the letters themselves are lost. The same happens for the ones issued in Valencia in 1371 by Bernat de Codinachs for Manuel d'Entença, a merchant from Huesca (then part of the Crown of Aragon), amounting a total of 100 florins.[31] In all these cases, the promissory notes were used as a rudimentary system of paper money, for the amounts issued could not be easily transported in metal coins between the cities involved. Ginaldo Giovanni Battista Strozzi issued an early form of promissory note in Medina del Campo (Spain), against the city of Besançon in 1553.[32] However, there exists notice of promissory notes being in used in Mediterranean commerce well before that date.

In 2005, the Korean Ministry of Justice and a consortium of financial institutions announced the service of an electronic promissory note (eNote) service, after years of development, allowing entities to make promissory notes (notes payable) in business transactions digitally instead of on paper, for the first time in the world.[33][34][35][36]

In the United States, eNotes were made possible as a result of the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act in 2000 and the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA).[37]: 2  An eNote must meet all the requirements to be a written promissory note.[37]: 3 

International law

[edit]

In 1930, under the League of Nations, a Convention providing a uniform law for bills of exchange and promissory notes was drafted and ratified by eighteen nations.[38][39] Article 75 of the treaty stated that a promissory note shall contain:

  • the term "promissory note" inserted in the body of the instrument and expressed in the language employed in drawing up the instrument
  • an unconditional promise to pay a determinate sum of money;
  • a statement of the time of payment;
  • a statement of the place where payment is to be made;
  • the name of the person to whom or to whose order payment is to be made;
  • a statement of the date and of the place where the promissory note is issued;
  • the signature of the person who issues the instrument (maker).

Worldwide

[edit]

England and Wales

[edit]

The Bills of Exchange Act of 1704, also known as "An Act for giving like Remedy upon Promissory Notes, as is now used upon Bills of Exchange, and for the better Payment of Inland Bills of Exchange",[40] primarily aimed to extend the same legal remedies available for bills of exchange to promissory notes. This made promissory notes legally negotiable instruments, meaning they could be transferred to others via endorsement.

The 1704 legislation was repealed by the Bills of Exchange Act 1882 (45 & 46 Vict. c. 61).

§ 83. BILLS OF EXCHANGE ACT 1882. Part IV.[41]

...

Promissory note defined

(1) A promissory note is an unconditional promise in writing made by one person to another signed by the maker, engaging to pay, on demand or at a fixed or determinable future time, a sum certain in money, to, or to the order of, a specified person or to bearer.

(2) An instrument in the form of a note payable to maker’s order is not a note within the meaning of this section unless and until it is indorsed by the maker.

(3) A note is not invalid by reason only that it contains also a pledge of collateral security with authority to sell or dispose thereof.

(4) A note which is, or on the face of it purports to be, both made and payable within the British Islands is an inland note. Any other note is a foreign note.

United States

[edit]
A promissory note issued by the Second Bank of the United States, December 15, 1840, for the amount of $1,000

In the United States, a promissory note that meets certain conditions is a negotiable instrument regulated by article 3 of the Uniform Commercial Code. Negotiable promissory notes called mortgage notes are used extensively in combination with mortgages in the financing of real estate transactions. One prominent example is the Fannie Mae model standard form contract Multistate Fixed-Rate Note 3200, which is publicly available.[42] Promissory notes, or commercial papers, are also issued to provide capital to businesses. However, promissory notes act as a source of finance to the company's creditors.

The various State law enactments of the Uniform Commercial Code define what is and what is not a promissory note, in section 3-104(d):

§ 3-104. NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT.

...

(d) A promise or order other than a check is not an instrument if, at the time it is issued or first comes into possession of a holder, it contains a conspicuous statement, however expressed, to the effect that the promise or order is not negotiable or is not an instrument governed by this Article.

Thus, a writing containing such a disclaimer removes such a writing from the definition of negotiable instrument, instead simply memorializing a contract.

See also

[edit]
Look up promissory note in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Promissory note

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A promissory note is a legally binding written instrument in which one , known as the maker or borrower, unconditionally promises to pay a definite sum of to another , the payee or lender, either on demand or at a specified future date. It must be signed by the maker and typically includes details such as the principal amount, , repayment schedule, and maturity date to ensure enforceability. Promissory notes serve as a formal alternative to traditional loan agreements, offering a simpler structure while providing legal protection for both parties involved. They can be secured, backed by collateral such as property or assets that the lender can seize in case of default, or unsecured, relying solely on the borrower's promise without such backing. Common repayment options include lump-sum payments, installments over time, or open-ended arrangements, depending on the terms outlined in the document. Among the various types, student loan promissory notes formalize borrowing for expenses, often covering multiple disbursements under a master agreement that may extend up to ten years. Mortgage promissory notes, to home financing, detail the borrower's obligation to repay the loan principal plus , serving as the core promise enforceable by if breached. Corporate credit promissory notes facilitate short-term , typically carrying higher rates due to elevated risk. These instruments are widely used in personal loans between family or friends, vehicle financing, business expansions, and transactions, where they outline essential elements like late payment penalties and acceleration clauses to address defaults. For added security, promissory notes may be notarized, though they remain enforceable under applicable state laws without it, provided all parties sign and the terms comply with regulations limiting interest rates. While advantageous for accessible financing outside banks, they carry risks such as potential disputes or collection challenges if the borrower fails to repay.

Definition and Basics

Core Definition

A promissory note is an unconditional written by one , known as the maker, to pay a definite sum of to another , the payee, or to the bearer of the note, either on demand or at a specified future date. This instrument serves as a binding legal document that evidences the obligation, which must be supported by for enforceability (often presumed under the UCC if issued for value). The primary purpose of a promissory note is to formalize obligations in commercial, personal, or financial contexts, providing clear of the debt and protecting both the lender and borrower by outlining repayment expectations. It facilitates transactions where formal loans might be impractical, such as private lending or short-term financing, while ensuring enforceability through its written form. The basic structure of a promissory note typically includes the principal amount owed, the interest rate (if applicable), the repayment terms such as schedule or due date, the issuance date, and the signatures of the involved parties to confirm execution. These elements ensure the note's clarity and legal validity as a standalone agreement. The term "promissory note" derives from "promissory," meaning involving a promise, and "note," referring to a written record, highlighting its role as a formalized pledge in legal systems dating back to early commercial practices. Promissory notes often feature negotiability, allowing transfer to third parties under applicable laws.

Essential Elements

A promissory note must contain an unconditional promise by the maker to pay a fixed amount of to ensure its validity as a under the (UCC). This promise must specify a definite sum representing , without contingencies that could alter the obligation, such as performance of additional services. The note also requires identification of the payee, typically by naming the person or entity to whom payment is directed, often phrased as "payable to order" or "to bearer" to facilitate transferability. Additionally, the maker's is essential, authenticating the document and binding the maker to the promise; without it, the instrument imposes no liability on the signer. The date of issuance must be included to determine whether the note is payable on demand or at a definite time, as this affects enforceability timelines. While not mandatory for basic validity, many promissory notes include provisions for , which may be simple (calculated on principal only) or compound (accruing on principal and prior ), stated as a fixed or variable rate to comply with UCC guidelines. A maturity date specifying when is due enhances clarity, particularly for time notes, and acceleration clauses allow the entire balance to become due upon default events like missed payments. Specification of the governing , such as the state UCC adoption, helps resolve jurisdictional ambiguities in multi-state transactions. The absence of key elements can severely impact enforceability; for instance, lacking the maker's renders the note non-binding as a , though it might still serve as evidence of an underlying if other proofs exist. Omission of a definite sum or payee identification may invalidate the note entirely, preventing its treatment as a standardized . Promissory notes can be prepared in standard formats such as handwritten documents, typed agreements, or electronic records, provided they maintain clarity to prevent interpretive disputes over terms. Electronic formats, including e-signatures, are valid under the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act (ESIGN), as long as they demonstrate intent and are tamper-evident. Precise wording in any format supports negotiability by avoiding conditions that undermine the unconditional promise.

Distinctions from Similar Instruments

A promissory note differs from an in its formality and structure. While an IOU serves as an informal acknowledgment of a without specifying repayment terms or timelines, a promissory note constitutes a formal, unconditional written to pay a definite sum, including details on , maturity date, and repayment method. In contrast to a , a promissory note represents a unilateral where only the borrower (maker) signs to promise repayment, lacking mutual commitments from the lender such as fund conditions or covenants. agreements, however, are bilateral contracts signed by both parties, outlining comprehensive terms including collateral, default provisions, and lender duties, making them suitable for complex transactions. Promissory notes also vary from bills of exchange in their and parties involved. A promissory note is a two-party instrument—a direct promise by the maker to the payee—whereas a bill of exchange is a three-party order directing a drawee (often a ) to pay the payee, requiring by the drawee for enforceability. Under the , this distinction aligns promissory notes with promises and bills of exchange with drafts or orders. Finally, promissory notes are simpler and typically non-securitized compared to bonds. Promissory notes function as individual, short-term instruments without public trading or collateral requirements, while bonds are issued in series as long-term securities, often backed by assets and designed for public markets with more regulatory oversight.

Negotiability Features

Negotiability refers to the legal quality of a promissory note that allows it to be transferred from one party to another by delivery or endorsement, thereby conferring on the transferee the right to enforce as if they were the original payee. This transferability is a hallmark of negotiable instruments under Article 3 of the (UCC), enabling the note to circulate freely in commerce. A key aspect of negotiability is the status of a , which protects the transferee from most defenses that the maker might raise against the original payee, such as personal claims or breaches of underlying agreements, provided the holder meets specific criteria. Under UCC § 3-302, a is one who takes the instrument for value, in , and without of any defects or defenses. This status ensures that the instrument is enforced according to its terms, free from equities or claims arising between prior parties. For a promissory note to qualify as negotiable under UCC § 3-104(a), it must constitute an unconditional promise to pay a fixed amount of money, with or without interest or described charges. The note must be payable to bearer or to order at issuance or upon first possession by a holder; payable on demand or at a definite time; and free of any undertaking by the promisor to perform acts beyond payment, except for permitted provisions like collateral security or confession of judgment. Similar requirements apply in jurisdictions adopting equivalent commercial s, emphasizing the note's independence from external conditions. The benefits of negotiability significantly enhance the utility of promissory notes in financial transactions by promoting and confidence in . Holders can readily transfer the note without fear of hidden defenses, facilitating its use as a substitute for cash in trade and reducing transaction costs. This protection for good-faith transferees shields them from disputes between the original maker and payee, thereby encouraging the widespread acceptance and circulation of such instruments. However, negotiability is not automatic and can be lost if the note fails to meet the strict UCC criteria. For instance, a is conditional—and thus non-negotiable—if it is subject to or governed by another record, or if it limits to a particular fund or source other than the general of the promisor. Additionally, inclusion of unauthorized clauses, such as extraneous promises unrelated to or , renders the note non-negotiable, though it remains enforceable as an ordinary . Notes explicitly marked "non-negotiable" also forfeit these transfer protections.

Enforceability Requirements

As a signed writing, a promissory note generally satisfies the requirements applicable to promises to pay debts, preventing enforcement of purely oral agreements that fall within its scope (such as suretyship provisions). This writing requirement ensures the terms of the obligation, including the principal amount, , and repayment schedule, are clearly documented, rendering the instrument valid as a binding contract absent such formalities. Enforcement of a promissory note may be subject to various defenses raised by the maker, including in the inducement, duress, illegality of the underlying transaction, or prior payment of the , though these personal defenses are typically unavailable against a who takes the note without notice of such issues. Real defenses, such as in the factum (where the maker was deceived about the nature of the document signed) or illegality rendering the note void, can defeat enforcement even against a . These defenses protect against unjust claims while upholding the note's role in commercial transactions, with negotiability features further safeguarding transferees by limiting maker defenses in good-faith transfers. Upon default, the payee or holder may pursue remedies including a to recover the principal amount plus any at the rate specified in the note, as well as stipulated attorney fees and costs if the instrument explicitly provides for them. Many promissory notes include clauses that, upon default in payment of principal or , allow the holder to the entire unpaid balance immediately, streamlining collection efforts without awaiting maturity. Actions to enforce a promissory note are subject to statutes of limitations, typically six years from the date the accrues—such as the of the missed payment or —for negotiable instruments under the . This time limit varies slightly by jurisdiction but generally runs from the maturity date or default, barring claims brought after the period to promote finality in obligations.

Formalities and Execution

The execution of a promissory note requires the maker to sign the document, thereby creating a binding obligation to pay the specified amount. Under the (UCC) § 3-401, liability on the instrument arises only if the maker's is present, and the lender's signature is not required. Witnesses are not mandatory for validity in most jurisdictions, though including one or more disinterested third parties—typically adults of sound mind not involved in the transaction—can provide evidentiary support in disputes over authenticity. Electronic signatures are fully valid for promissory notes under the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act (ESIGN Act) of 2000, as long as they demonstrate the signer's intent and are attributable to them, enabling efficient digital execution without compromising enforceability. As of 2025, amendments to UCC Article 3 in adopting jurisdictions recognize controllable electronic (CERs) as negotiable instruments, allowing electronic promissory notes to meet negotiability requirements when transferred via controllable electronic means, provided they comply with new provisions on attribution and control. Notarization serves as an optional step to authenticate the maker's identity and but is not essential for the note's legal binding effect, provided it meets basic statutory requirements. It is particularly advisable for high-value notes or those involving international parties, as the notary's seal and can facilitate proof of execution in foreign courts or during enforcement actions. During execution, incorporating essential elements—such as the unconditional promise to pay, amount, and maturity date—ensures the note's operability from the outset. Amendments to a promissory note must be documented in a written signed by the involved parties to preserve its negotiability under UCC Article 3; oral modifications risk being deemed alterations that discharge non-assenting obligors per § 3-407. The original terms remain controlling unless the explicitly supersedes them with clear, unambiguous , preventing unintended loss of the note's transferability. Standard practice involves attaching the to the original note and referencing it to maintain a complete record. Common pitfalls in the formalities and execution of promissory notes include employing vague or ambiguous phrasing, which courts may interpret against the and lead to costly litigation over obligations. Omitting specification of the payment currency—such as explicitly stating U.S. dollars—can result in disputes, especially if the note circulates internationally, as the default assumption under UCC § 3-104 is of the but clarity avoids confusion. Similarly, failing to designate a governing or choice-of-law provision exposes the note to unpredictable under varying state laws, potentially complicating recovery.

Historical Context

Early Origins

The earliest precursors to promissory notes emerged in ancient around 3000 BCE, where clay tablets were used to record loans of silver, grain, or other commodities, functioning as written acknowledgments of debt obligations with specified repayment terms. These tablets, often inscribed in , served as enforceable records in temple and economies, with thousands of such documents detailing interest-bearing loans and collateral from the Ur III period (c. 2100–2000 BCE). In this context, the tablets acted as primitive promissory instruments, bridging oral agreements and formal accounting to facilitate trade and agricultural credit in a barter-dominant society. In , the stipulatio represented an early evolution toward structured promises, initially as a strictly verbal formalized through a ritual question-and-answer exchange between parties, enforceable under civil law as early as the fifth century BCE. By the late and into the , this oral form increasingly incorporated written memoranda, such as the cautio, to document the promise of payment, laying groundwork for written debt instruments that influenced later European commercial practices. During the medieval period, promissory notes began to formalize in 12th-century , where merchants in cities like and developed instruments akin to letters of , including written orders for payment at distant locations to support long-distance trade without transporting coinage. These practices were paralleled and advanced in Jewish and Islamic finance through the suftaja, a transferable bill of exchange or promissory note used from the onward, allowing assignment across regions while adhering to religious prohibitions on via agency-based transfers. By the , these traditions converged in European commercial law, with promissory notes gaining standardized features in and as unconditional written promises to pay, building on merchant customs and leading to codification under the , which defined their form and negotiability. A key milestone occurred in the American colonies, where promissory notes became integral to colonial trade and land sales from the , often issued as deferred payment for goods or , with median terms of about 17.5 months and implicit interest rates of 3.75% to 7%, helping to mitigate currency shortages in agrarian economies.

Development in International Law

The development of international law on promissory notes accelerated in the early with efforts to standardize negotiable instruments amid growing global trade. The Geneva Convention of 1930, formally titled the Convention Providing a Uniform Law for Bills of Exchange and Promissory Notes, marked a pivotal step by establishing uniform rules on the form, transfer, and enforcement of promissory notes across signatory states. Signed on June 7, 1930, in under of Nations, this convention harmonized key aspects of negotiability, such as the requirement for an unconditional promise to pay a fixed sum, the holder's rights, and protest procedures for non-payment, thereby facilitating cross-border circulation. It was ratified by over 30 countries, primarily in (including , , , and ) and (such as , , and ), promoting consistency in regions with active commercial exchanges while excluding jurisdictions like the and the , which preferred their domestic frameworks. Building on the framework, the United Nations Convention on International Bills of Exchange and International Promissory Notes, adopted on December 9, 1988, by the UN , addressed limitations in earlier efforts by introducing modern provisions tailored to international transactions. This convention applies specifically to instruments labeled as "International promissory note (UNCITRAL Convention)" and incorporates elements from the Uniform Law, the English , and the U.S. to resolve conflicts of , enhance cross-border enforceability, and standardize transfer warranties. It emphasizes the autonomy of the instrument from underlying contracts, protects bona fide holders, and provides rules for international protest and recourse, aiming to boost confidence in negotiable paper for . However, despite signatures from major economies like the , , and the , it has seen limited ratifications, with only a handful of states (e.g., and the Russian Federation) formally adopting it, underscoring ongoing disparities in . In the post-World War II era, promissory notes gained prominence in as tools for reconstruction and economic stabilization, influenced by UNCITRAL's harmonization efforts. Under the (1948–1952), the U.S. provided over $13 billion in aid to , with approximately 10% structured as loans evidenced by promissory notes issued by recipient governments or the administering Economic Cooperation Administration, enabling structured repayment and supporting recovery projects. This use highlighted the instrument's utility in multilateral lending, while UNCITRAL's 1988 Convention further shaped their role by promoting optional uniform rules for international , integrating protections against fraud and facilitating their use in without displacing national laws. Despite these advances, challenges persist in achieving universal standardization, including non-universal adoption of key conventions, which perpetuates jurisdictional fragmentation and complicates enforcement in mixed-law scenarios. The 's exclusion of Anglo-American systems and the 1988 UN Convention's low ratification rate—due to concerns over compatibility with domestic codes and the rise of electronic alternatives—have limited their global impact, with major trading nations relying instead on bilateral agreements or regional rules.

Jurisdictional Variations

United States Practices

In the , promissory notes are primarily governed by Article 3 of the (UCC), which classifies them as negotiable instruments when they constitute an unconditional promise by one person to pay a fixed amount of money, with or without interest, payable to bearer or to order at the time of issuance or on a stated date. The UCC, promulgated by the and the , has been adopted in all fifty states, the District of Columbia, and U.S. territories, providing a standardized framework for their creation, transfer, and enforcement, though enforcement falls under state jurisdiction. State codes, such as California's Commercial Code, largely mirror the UCC's provisions on negotiable instruments, including the definition of promissory notes, with minimal variations primarily in procedural or interpretive applications rather than substantive rules. A key feature of promissory notes under U.S. is the (HDC) doctrine, codified in UCC § 3-302, which protects a holder who takes the instrument for value, in , and without notice of any apparent evidence of , alteration, or defenses against it, allowing free from most personal defenses that could be raised against the original payee. This doctrine facilitates the free transferability of notes in commercial transactions by shielding innocent subsequent holders from underlying disputes, such as failure of , though real defenses like in the factum or discharge in remain available. For instance, in Stevens v. Pierce (1920), the reversed a judgment for the defendant on a promissory note, holding that the , as a holder without notice of defects, qualified under the HDC rules prevailing at the time and could enforce the note despite potential defenses. At the federal level, promissory notes may fall under securities regulation if issued as investments to the public, requiring registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or qualification for an exemption under the , particularly when they promise returns based on the efforts of others rather than personal obligations. The SEC views most investment-oriented promissory notes as securities, subjecting them to antifraud provisions and disclosure requirements to protect investors from unregistered offerings. Tax treatment of promissory notes is handled under (IRS) rules, where interest paid by the maker is generally deductible as a business expense under IRC § 163 if the underlying is for purposes, or as qualified residence interest under specific conditions for personal secured by a principal residence. Conversely, interest received by the payee constitutes , reportable on Form 1099-INT if exceeding $10 annually, regardless of whether the note arises from a or personal transaction. Contemporary practices have adapted to electronic formats through the (UETA), adopted in 49 states, which validates electronic promissory notes (eNotes) as equivalent to instruments when they include an and are capable of retention in a form that accurately reflects the agreement, enabling their use in digital lending without compromising negotiability under the UCC. UETA ensures that eNotes maintain the same legal enforceability, provided no party opts out and the record is accessible for later reference.

England and Wales Regulations

In , the regulatory framework for promissory notes is primarily governed by the , which codifies the law on negotiable instruments including promissory notes. Under section 83(1) of the Act, a promissory note is defined as "an unconditional promise in writing made by one person to another signed by the maker, engaging to pay, on demand or at a fixed or determinable future time, a sum certain in money, to, or to the order of, a specified person or to bearer". This statute applies across , , and , providing a uniform basis for their creation, transfer, and enforcement, distinct from Scotland's separate legal traditions. Negotiability under the Act requires strict adherence to formalities, particularly the "sum certain" requirement, where the amount payable must be precisely ascertainable without contingencies such as interest calculations that render it uncertain. For a note to qualify as negotiable, it must be in writing, signed by the maker, and contain an unconditional promise of payment, enabling transfer by endorsement and delivery to confer good title to a holder in due course, free from most defenses available against the original payee. Unlike more flexible arrangements in other jurisdictions, English and Welsh law emphasizes these rigid criteria to ensure the instrument's reliability as a commercial tool, with non-compliance potentially rendering the note a mere simple contract rather than a negotiable one. Key court precedents have shaped the treatment of promissory notes as currency-like instruments. In the landmark case of Miller v Race (1758) 1 Burr 452, the Court of King's Bench, led by Lord Mansfield, ruled that a stolen note—functioning as a promissory note—passed absolute property to a for value, treating it as rather than a mere subject to prior claims. This decision established the foundational principle that negotiable instruments circulate freely, protecting innocent holders and promoting commerce. In modern contexts, electronic execution of promissory notes is facilitated by the Electronic Communications Act 2000, which recognizes electronic signatures as valid for non-deed instruments like promissory notes, provided they demonstrate the signer's intent. Courts have upheld this in cases involving digital documents, affirming that electronic promissory notes meeting the 1882 Act's criteria are enforceable, though best practices recommend secure methods like qualified electronic signatures to mitigate disputes. Consumer protections apply when promissory notes are linked to regulated credit agreements under the Consumer Credit Act 1974. Section 123 of the Act prohibits the use of promissory notes to discharge or secure consumer credit obligations in certain cases, aiming to prevent evasion of statutory safeguards such as licensing requirements, disclosure rules, and unfair terms protections for borrowers. If a promissory note forms part of a regulated agreement—for personal, non-business purposes—it must comply with the Act's execution formalities, including pre-contract information and cooling-off periods, with the overseeing enforcement. Non-compliance can render the note unenforceable or subject to court orders for repayment adjustments, underscoring the Act's role in balancing commercial flexibility with rights.

Global Perspectives

In civil law jurisdictions such as France and Germany, promissory notes are primarily governed by national commercial codes that prioritize strict formal requirements over the fluid negotiability seen in common law systems. In France, promissory notes, known as billets à ordre or simply effet de commerce, are regulated under Articles L. 512-1 to L. 512-8 of the French Commercial Code, which mandate specific elements like an unconditional promise to pay, the amount, due date, and signatures to ensure enforceability as commercial paper. Similarly, in Germany, these instruments fall under the Handelsgesetzbuch (Commercial Code), particularly § 344(2), where promissory notes (Schuldscheine) serve as bilateral debt acknowledgments emphasizing documentary form and direct creditor-debtor relations rather than easy transferability. In Islamic finance, prevalent in the and parts of , promissory notes are adapted to comply with principles by avoiding riba (interest) and instead incorporating profit-sharing or cost-plus structures, such as murabaha financing. Under murabaha, a financier purchases an asset and resells it to the client at a marked-up price payable in installments, often secured by a promissory note that documents the deferred payment obligation without implying a ; this model is widely used by Islamic banks for and personal financing. Among emerging markets, India's promissory notes are standardized under the , which defines them as unconditional written promises to pay a specified sum, payable on demand or at a fixed future time, and treats them as transferable by endorsement and delivery to facilitate commerce. In , promissory notes are regulated by the Negotiable Instruments Law of the (1995), integrated into the broader framework of the (2020), which recognizes them as unconditional payment undertakings but imposes restrictions on foreign enforcement, requiring reciprocity and court approval for cross-border recognition to protect domestic legal . In Mexico, promissory notes are known as pagaré and are regulated by the General Law of Commercial Paper and Credit Transactions (LCPCT). If a pagaré is not paid, the private lender can demand payment judicially through an executory proceeding, which allows for an executive judgment and immediate seizure of assets without the need to post a bond, provided the note meets the formal requirements outlined in Article 170 of the LCPCT and the action is initiated within three years from the date of maturity. Digital adaptations are advancing globally, particularly in the , where the Regulation (EU No 910/2014) provides a framework for electronic signatures and identification, enabling the creation and enforceability of electronic promissory notes equivalent to handwritten ones when using qualified electronic signatures. In , harmonization efforts through organizations like the Organisation for the Harmonisation of Business Law in (OHADA), supported by the , aim to unify rules on negotiable instruments, including promissory notes, across 17 member states via uniform acts that standardize formalities and enforcement to boost regional trade. In Denmark, promissory notes are referred to as gældsbrev and are commonly employed in private loan agreements to document debt obligations between individuals. Danish practices recommend that a gældsbrev include the full names and CPR (civil registration) numbers of the parties involved, the principal loan amount, the interest rate (which may be set at 0% for non-commercial loans), a specified repayment schedule (such as monthly installments of 1,000 Danish kroner), and provisions outlining consequences for payment delays, such as additional fees or legal action. The document requires signatures and a date from both the lender and borrower, with the presence of two witnesses advised to enhance evidentiary value, though not strictly mandatory. Each party should retain a copy of the executed note, and the transfer of loan funds via bank transfer is standard to establish a verifiable record of the transaction. For digital execution, MitID (the Danish digital identification system) enables electronic signing, with services like Legal Desk or Dokument24 providing paid platforms as reliable alternatives to free options for secure and legally compliant processing.

Uses and Applications

Role in Financial Transactions

Promissory notes serve as essential instruments in business loans, particularly for short-term financing needs where borrowers require quick access to capital without the complexities of traditional underwriting. In seller-financed purchases, for instance, a buyer may execute a promissory note to the seller, outlining installment over a specified period, often with , to facilitate the acquisition of goods or services without immediate full . This structure is common in transactions, such as equipment purchases or inventory financing, allowing sellers to provide while retaining a legal claim to repayment. In private loan agreements, practical considerations include specifying the parties' full names and identification numbers (such as CPR in Denmark), the loan amount, interest rate (which may be 0%), a repayment plan (e.g., monthly installments of 1,000 DKK), and consequences for delays; both parties should sign and date the note, preferably with two witnesses, retain copies each, and document the fund transfer via bank for records, while digital signing using MitID through paid services like Legal Desk or Dokument24 provides convenient alternatives. According to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), promissory notes in this context function as instruments that companies use to raise capital by promising a fixed return over a set period, enhancing for operational needs. In investment contexts, promissory notes play a pivotal role in funding startups and ventures. promissory notes are widely used in early-stage startup financing, where investors lend money that converts into equity shares upon a triggering event, such as a future funding round, at a discounted valuation to reward early -taking. This mechanism avoids immediate company valuation disputes and provides startups with non-dilutive capital in the short term. The Carey Law School notes that such notes typically convert during events like a qualified financing round, with terms including accrual and conversion caps to protect investors. In , promissory notes underpin by representing the borrower's unconditional to repay the principal and , secured against the to mitigate lender in acquisitions or refinancings. The (CFPB) explains that the promissory note in mortgage closings formalizes the borrower's repayment obligation, distinct from the security instrument that pledges the . Promissory notes are integral to , often accompanying to support international commercial transactions by ensuring payment security for . In scenarios, an importer may issue a promissory note to the exporter, backed by a 's , which guarantees payment upon fulfillment of shipment terms, thereby reducing cross-border risks. frequently discount these notes—purchasing them at a reduced value to provide immediate to the holder—enabling exporters to access funds before maturity without waiting for the buyer's payment. The highlights that in arrangements, promissory notes or bills of exchange, often avalized (guaranteed) by a , are sold without recourse to the exporter, facilitating medium-term in capital goods. This discounting process enhances in global supply chains. For in financial transactions, promissory notes can be collateralized or syndicated to distribute and mitigate potential defaults. Collateralized notes are secured by assets such as , , or , granting lenders recourse to seize and liquidate the collateral if the borrower defaults, thereby lowering the overall compared to unsecured obligations. In large-scale deals, syndicated promissory notes involve multiple lenders pooling funds through a shared note or participations, spreading exposure across institutions while allowing borrowers to secure substantial financing for projects like or expansions. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) describes how such syndications in commercial loans, often documented via promissory notes, enable risk diversification among participants, with lead banks coordinating terms to align interests. Their negotiability further aids by allowing transfer in secondary markets, though this is governed by specific legal frameworks.

Function as Private Currency

In the 19th-century , prior to the establishment of a uniform national currency, private banks issued their own banknotes that functioned as a for everyday transactions. These notes, which were essentially promissory notes promising redemption in or silver upon presentation at the , circulated widely within local economies but often at discounts outside the bank's vicinity due to varying degrees of trust in the issuer's solvency. By the mid-1800s, thousands of such notes from hundreds of banks formed the primary , filling the void left by limited federal coinage and early bills of credit. A notable variant of emerged in isolated company towns, where employers issued —promissory notes redeemable exclusively at company-owned stores for —as partial or full for wages. This system, prevalent in 19th- and early 20th-century and communities, created closed economies that bound workers to the employer, often leading to debt cycles as scrip values depreciated against external . For instance, coal companies in distributed scrip tokens or paper notes, effectively serving as localized private while circumventing cash shortages. In modern contexts, promissory notes continue to underpin community currencies in regions with limited access to official , acting as mutual IOUs to facilitate local trade. During economic crises, such as the immediate post-World War II period in , barter systems supplemented by informal IOUs and private emerged to sustain commerce amid currency shortages and ; in occupied , for example, cigarettes and handwritten promises of payment circulated alongside Allied military notes in black markets. Contemporary examples include community promissory systems in developing areas, like Nairobi's Kawangware settlement, where residents issue notes backed by future labor or goods to complement national currency in informal exchanges. Additionally, some crypto-backed promissory notes have appeared as experimental private currencies, redeemable against digital assets in niche networks. Legally, promissory notes functioning as face strict limits to prevent them from resembling official , which could violate counterfeiting statutes under laws like 18 U.S.C. § 471 prohibiting the of obligations or securities. If circulated widely or sold to investors, such notes may be classified as securities requiring registration with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, particularly if they promise returns or involve third-party transfers, to protect against . These private currencies offer advantages by enabling trade in environments lacking oversight, such as remote towns or zones, where they provide without relying on distant financial institutions. However, they carry significant disadvantages, including high default from —as seen in 19th-century bank failures that rendered notes worthless—and potential for localized if overissued without backing.

Contemporary and Specialized Uses

In the digital era, promissory notes have evolved into electronic formats, particularly through technology, where smart contracts on platforms like automate the creation, transfer, and of these instruments. These digital promissory notes function as tokenized assets on s, enabling secure, tamper-proof recording of obligations without intermediaries, as demonstrated in the Project Promissa proof-of-concept (April 2025), which uses the Canton protocol on a for tokenized promissory notes to streamline the of member countries' financial commitments to multilateral development banks. Such implementations align with international standards, including the UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Transferable Records (MLETR), adopted in 2017, which provides a legal framework for recognizing electronic equivalents of traditional transferable records like promissory notes, ensuring their functional equivalence to paper-based versions in domestic and cross-border transactions. This compliance enhances enforceability in digital form by addressing issues of authenticity, , and control. Within fintech, promissory notes underpin (P2P) lending platforms, where they formalize borrower obligations to individual investors. For instance, historically issued promissory notes to lenders as evidence of their in loans, allowing borrowers to access credit through an while investors received interest-bearing notes tied to repayment streams. This model democratized lending by bypassing traditional banks, with notes structured to distribute principal and interest payments proportionally among noteholders, though platforms like transitioned away from pure P2P operations by 2020 to focus on bank-integrated services. Specialized variants of promissory notes address niche needs, such as demand notes, which offer flexible repayment by allowing the lender to call the full amount due at any time without a fixed , making them suitable for short-term or arrangements in commercial contexts. Non-interest-bearing promissory notes, meanwhile, are commonly used in charitable pledges, where donors commit future payments to nonprofits without accruing interest, often formalized as enforceable contracts to support campaigns; for example, such notes enable deductions upon execution if they meet criteria for binding obligations, though enforceability depends on reliance by the charity. Emerging trends integrate promissory notes with and (DeFi). ESG-linked promissory notes tie interest rates or repayment terms to environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance indicators, incentivizing issuers to meet goals; PALFINGER AG, for instance, issued a €150 million ESG-linked note in 2023, with rates adjusted based on carbon emissions and accident rates, while launched a €5 billion sustainable promissory note program in 2021 aligned with UN . In DeFi, promissory notes manifest as smart contract-based debt instruments on s, where protocols issue tokenized loans representing borrower promises, as seen in lending platforms that use "promissory tokens" to collateralize overcollateralized loans without central authorities. These applications leverage for automated execution, reducing risk in decentralized ecosystems.

References

  1. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/promissory_note
  2. https://www.legalzoom.com/articles/what-is-a-promissory-note
  3. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/promissorynote.asp
  4. https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/3/3-303
  5. https://www.bdc.ca/en/articles-tools/entrepreneur-toolkit/templates-business-guides/glossary/promissory-note
  6. https://www.rocketmortgage.com/learn/promissory-note
  7. https://www.legalzoom.com/articles/how-to-write-a-promissory-note
  8. https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/3/3-104
  9. https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/3/3-401
  10. https://www.uniformlaws.org/acts/ucc
  11. https://mathresearch.utsa.edu/wiki/index.php?title=Promissory_Notes
  12. https://www.sec.gov/investor/pubs/promise.htm
  13. https://cunninglaw.ca/lawyer-for-promissory-note/
  14. https://www.formpros.com/when-to-use-a-promissory-note-vs-a-loan-agreement/
  15. https://www.legalzoom.com/articles/what-are-the-differences-between-a-promissory-note-and-bill-of-exchange
  16. https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/042415/what-difference-between-bill-exchange-and-promissory-note.asp
  17. https://sterling.com.jm/simpler-bond/
  18. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/n/note.asp
  19. https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/3/3-302
  20. https://saylordotorg.github.io/text_law-of-commercial-transactions/s27-01-holder-in-due-course.html
  21. https://www.lawdepot.com/resources/business-articles/are-verbal-contracts-legally-binding/
  22. https://www.sussmanshank.com/news/late-payments-on-a-promissory-note-after-acceleration/
  23. https://www.uniformlaws.org/viewdocument/final-act-with-comments-235?CommunityKey=043b9065-3b44-49d9-9af8-0d8e8b0b8b8b&tab=librarydocuments
  24. https://economics.yale.edu/sites/default/files/yale_money-prices-markets.pdf
  25. https://www.sfu.ca/~poitras/jesho_UR_14.pdf
  26. https://academic.oup.com/book/47266/chapter/422652313
  27. https://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1491&context=fac_artchop
  28. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdf/10.1086/252472
  29. https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3612&context=scholarly_works
  30. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Vict/45-46/61
  31. https://eh.net/encyclopedia/credit-in-the-colonial-american-economy/
  32. https://treaties.un.org/pages/LONViewDetails.aspx?src=LON&id=559&chapter=30&clang=_en
  33. https://repository.law.miami.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1405&context=umialr
  34. https://uncitral.un.org/en/texts/payments/conventions/bills_of_exchange
  35. https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=IND&mtdsg_no=X-12&chapter=10&clang=_en
  36. https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/R45079.html
  37. https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media-documents/uncitral/en/bills_of_exchange_expl_note.pdf
  38. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=COM&sectionNum=3104.
  39. https://law.justia.com/cases/oklahoma/supreme-court/1920/35058.html
  40. https://www.investor.gov/protect-your-investments/fraud/types-fraud/promissory-notes
  41. https://www.irs.gov/taxtopics/tc505
  42. https://www.irs.gov/publications/p550
  43. http://euro.ecom.cmu.edu/program/law/08-732/Transactions/ueta.pdf
  44. https://fullertonlaw.com/newsletters-published/the-uniform-electronic-transactions-act-ueta
  45. https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/5-107-7067?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29
  46. https://www.lexisnexis.co.uk/legal/guidance/form-of-promissory-notes-bills-of-exchange
  47. https://www.cliffordchance.com/content/dam/cliffordchance/briefings/2023/09/bills-of-exchange-the-new-law.pdf
  48. https://vlex.co.uk/vid/miller-v-race-803121617
  49. https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/a-132-9818?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29
  50. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1974/39
  51. https://french-business-law.com/french-legislation-art/article-l512-1-of-the-french-commercial-code/
  52. https://solent-avocats.com/en/the-promissory-note-a-payment-and-credit-tool-to-be-mastered/
  53. https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_hgb/englisch_hgb.html
  54. https://www.beissenhirtz.com/en/corporate-financing-promissory-note-loans/
  55. https://www.cov.com/-/media/files/corporate/publications/2017/12/common_islamic_finance_structures.pdf
  56. https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1132672/
  57. https://english.www.gov.cn/services/doingbusiness/202102/24/content_WS6035f46ec6d0719374af97ba.html
  58. http://en.npc.gov.cn.cdurl.cn/pdf/civilcodeofthepeoplesrepublicofchina.pdf
  59. https://hmhlegal.com/blog/pagares-promissory-notes-in-mexico/
  60. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32014R0910
  61. https://collectia.dk/en/debt-collection-blog/hent-gratis-gaeldsbrev-skabelon/
  62. https://www.legaldesk.dk/
  63. https://www.sec.gov/pdf/promissory.pdf
  64. https://www.law.upenn.edu/clinic/entrepreneurship/startupkit/convertible-note.pdf
  65. https://www.consumerfinance.gov/ask-cfpb/im-about-to-close-on-a-real-estate-purchase-transaction-with-a-mortgage-what-can-expect-in-the-mortgage-closing-process-en-1905/
  66. https://beta.trade.gov/article?id=Trade-Finance-Guide-Chapter-11-Forfaiting
  67. https://www.occ.gov/publications-and-resources/publications/comptrollers-handbook/files/commercial-loans/pub-ch-commercial-loans.pdf
  68. https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1053&context=ncbi
  69. https://daily.jstor.org/banks-own-private-currencies-in-19th-century-america/
  70. https://www.uscurrency.gov/history
  71. https://www.pmgnotes.com/news/article/7953/
  72. https://tontinecoffeehouse.com/2022/01/03/barter-and-money-in-post-war-germany/
  73. https://www.voanews.com/a/nairobi-residents-turn-to-community-currency/3096861.html
  74. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/private-currency.asp
  75. https://www.clevelandfed.org/publications/economic-commentary/2007/ec-20070101-private-money-in-our-past-present-and-future
  76. https://www.bis.org/publ/othp93.htm
  77. https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media-documents/uncitral/en/mletr_ebook_e.pdf
  78. https://academy.iccwbo.org/digital-trade/article/mletr-an-overview-of-uncitrals-model-law-on-electronic-transferable-records/
  79. https://sbnk.senate.ca.gov/sites/sbnk.senate.ca.gov/files/2-3-10_p2p_background.pdf
  80. https://datasociety.net/pubs/dcr/PeertoPeerLending.pdf
  81. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2817&context=nlr
  82. https://www.kelleydrye.com/viewpoints/client-advisories/enforcing-charitable-pledges-new-yorks-shifting-landscape
  83. https://www.palfinger.ag/en/news/palfinger-ag-issues-esg-linked-promissory-note-worth-eur-150-million_nag_917722
  84. https://www.iberdrola.com/press-room/news/detail/iberdrola-launches-billion-sustainable-promissory-note-programme-largest-ever-spanish-company
  85. https://www.nadcab.com/blog/debt-issuing-in-defi
  86. https://www.moodys.com/web/en/us/insights/credit-risk/block-by-block-assessing-risk-in-decentralized-finance.html
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.