Hubbry Logo
Roseate ternRoseate ternMain
Open search
Roseate tern
Community hub
Roseate tern
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Roseate tern
Roseate tern
Roseate tern
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Roseate tern
Nominate S. d. dougallii with all-black bill, Northumberland, UK
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Aves
Order: Charadriiformes
Family: Laridae
Genus: Sterna
Species:
S. dougallii
Binomial name
Sterna dougallii
Montagu, 1813

The roseate tern (Sterna dougallii) is a species of tern in the family Laridae. The genus name Sterna is derived from Old English "stearn", "tern",[2] and the specific dougallii refers to Scottish physician and collector Dr Peter McDougall (1777–1814).[3] "Roseate" refers to the bird's pink breast in breeding plumage.[4]

Taxonomy

[edit]

English naturalist George Montagu described the roseate tern in 1813.[5] Genetically, it is most closely related to the white-fronted tern (S. striata), with their common ancestor a sister lineage to the black-naped tern (S. sumatrana).[6]

This species has a number of geographical subspecies, differing mainly in bill colour and minor plumage details.

S. d. dougallii breeds on the Atlantic coasts of Europe and North America, and winters south to the Caribbean and west Africa. Both the European and North American populations have been in long-term decline, though active conservation measures have reversed the decline in the last few years at some colonies, most notably at Rockabill Island off the coast of Dublin, Ireland, which now holds most of the European population (about 1200 pairs). The tropical forms S. d. korustes and S. d. bangsi are resident breeders from east Africa across the Indian Ocean to Japan. They have more red on the bill. The long-billed and short-winged S. d. gracilis breeds in Australia and New Caledonia. The north-western Indian Ocean holds populations of S. d. arideensis. Some authors suggest that only three subspecies, nominate S. d. dougallii, S. d. arideensis, and S. d. gracilis, should be retained.[7][8]

Description

[edit]
Juvenile S. d. dougallii showing its scaly mantle. Northumberland, UK.
S. d. bangsi often has an all-red bill. Indonesia.

This is a small-medium tern, 33–36 cm (13–14 in) long with a 67–76 cm (26–30 in) wingspan, which can be confused with the common tern, Arctic tern, and the larger, but similarly plumaged, Sandwich tern. The thin sharp bill is black, with a red base which develops through the breeding season, and is more extensive (to fully red) in the tropical and southern hemisphere subspecies. It is shorter-winged and has faster wing beats than common or Arctic tern. The upper wings are pale grey and its under parts white, and this tern looks very pale in flight, like a small Sandwich tern, although the outermost primary flight feathers darken during the summer. The adults have very long, flexible tail streamers and orange-red legs. In summer, the underparts of adults take on the pinkish tinge which gives this bird its name.

In winter, the forehead becomes white and the bill black. Juvenile roseate terns have a scaly appearance like juvenile Sandwich Terns, but a fuller black cap than that species.

Behaviour and ecology

[edit]

Food and feeding

[edit]

As with other Sterna terns, roseate tern feeds by plunge-diving for fish, almost invariably from the sea; it is much more marine than allied terns, only rarely visiting freshwater lagoons on the coast to bathe and not fishing in fresh water. It usually dives directly, and not from the "stepped-hover" favoured by Arctic tern. The offering of fish by the male to the female is part of the courtship display.

Unusual for a tern, the roseate tern shows some kleptoparasitic behaviour, stealing fish from other seabirds, at British colonies most often from puffins. This habit greatly increases their food-collecting ability during bad weather when fish swim deeper, out of reach of plunge-diving terns, but still within reach of the deeper-diving Puffins.

Breeding

[edit]

This species breeds in colonies on coasts and islands, at times with other seabirds. In Australian colonies, it has been recorded nesting alongside the black-naped tern (S. sumatrana), lesser crested tern (Thalasseus bengalensis), greater crested tern (T. bergii), fairy tern (Sternula nereis), bridled tern (Onychoprion anaethetus) and silver gull (Chroicocephalus novaehollandiae).[9] It nests in a ground scrape, often in a hollow or under dense vegetation, and lays one or two (rarely three) eggs. It is less defensive of its nest and young than other white terns, often relying on Arctic and common terns in the surrounding colony to defend them. In smaller colonies, they may rarely mate with these other tern species.

The white-bellied sea-eagle (Haliaeetus leucogaster) and silver gull are known to prey on eggs and chicks, while the turnstone (Arenaria interpres), black rat (Rattus rattus) and King's skink (Egernia kingii) are suspected predators.[9]

Vocalisations

[edit]

The call of the roseate tern is a very characteristic chuwit, similar to that of the spotted redshank, quite distinct from other terns.

Conservation status

[edit]
S. d. gracilis, Capricornia Cays National Park, Queensland, Australia

In the late 19th century, these birds were hunted for their plumes which were used to decorate hats. More recently, their numbers have decreased in some regions due to increased competition and predation by large gulls, whose numbers have increased in recent times. This species, as of 2019, is one of the UK's rarest breeding seabird.[10]

The largest European colony, accounting for more than 75% of the European population, is in Ireland, at Rockabill Island, County Dublin. In 2013, 1213 pairs nested at Rockabill. The colony at Lady's Island Lake, County Wexford, is also of crucial importance, with 155 pairs nesting there in 2013.[11]

With their favouring partly hidden nest sites, the provision of nestboxes has proven a dramatic conservation success, with the birds taking to them very readily. This results in greatly increased breeding productivity with the protection given to the young from predatory birds like herring gulls. At the UK's most important colony, on Coquet Island, Northumberland, the population rose from 25 pairs 1997 to 154 pairs in 2022 after nestboxes were provided. Similar measures have been undertaken at the Anglesey tern colonies along with clearance of vegetation, in particular Tree Mallow. In 2018, for the first time in more than a decade, a pair fledged two chicks on the Skerries, off Anglesey after a RSPB project over previous years involving wardening, newly designed nest boxes being placed strategically around the islands along with lures playing roseate tern calls and hand-made decoys.[10]

In the UK the roseate tern has been designated for protection under the official government's national Biodiversity Action Plan. One of the main reasons given in the UK plan for threat to the species is global warming, creating an alteration of vertical profile distribution for its food source fishes. The roseate tern is one of the species to which the Agreement on the Conservation of African-Eurasian Migratory Waterbirds (AEWA) applies.

The Canadian Wildlife Service lists the roseate tern as Threatened. The U.S. Department of Interior lists the northeastern population as Endangered and the Caribbean population as Threatened.[12]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Roseate tern

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The roseate tern (Sterna dougallii) is a slender, medium-sized in the family , notable for its graceful flight, predominantly white accented by a and shawl, long white tail streamers, and a faint pinkish suffusion on the underparts during breeding. Adults measure 33–41 cm in length, weigh 95–170 g, and possess a of about 76 cm, with light gray upperwings featuring black outer primaries. This breeds in dense colonies on coastal and rocky shores across temperate and tropical regions worldwide, often associating with common terns (Sterna hirundo), and forages by hovering and plunge-diving for small fish such as sand eels and . While globally assessed as Least Concern by the IUCN owing to its large range and stable overall population, the roseate tern faces regional threats including habitat degradation, predation by , and disturbance, rendering it endangered in areas like the and parts of .

Taxonomy

Classification and Subspecies

The roseate tern ( dougallii) is classified in the family , order , encompassing seabirds such as gulls, terns, and skimmers. Within the genus , which derives from the term "stearn" for , the species was formally described by George Montagu in 1813 based on a specimen from provided by Scottish physician and naturalist James Douglas (1675–1778), hence the specific epithet dougallii. The comprises multiple , differentiated primarily by subtle morphological traits including body size, bill proportions, and plumage nuances, with genetic evidence from and analyses supporting historical times on the order of 3.9% divergence between major lineages. The nominate S. d. dougallii predominates in the North Atlantic, characterized by relatively larger size and distinct bill coloration compared to tropical counterparts. In the , S. d. bangsi represents a distinct form with adaptations reflected in size and genetic structuring, while molecular studies reveal persistent differentiation between northwestern Atlantic and populations, though formal designation for the latter remains under evaluation based on ongoing genomic data. These divisions underscore allopatric evolutionary processes without evidence of widespread sufficient to homogenize populations.

Physical Description

Morphology and Plumage Variations


The roseate tern (Sterna dougallii) possesses a slender, graceful morphology adapted for agile aerial pursuits, featuring a deeply forked tail that forms prominent streamers in flight. Adults typically measure 33–41 cm in total length, inclusive of 13–22 cm tail streamers, with a wingspan of 72–80 cm and body mass ranging from 95–130 g (mean approximately 110 g in northeastern populations). Breeding adults exhibit pale gray upperparts, white underparts often tinged with a subtle roseate flush on the breast and belly, a glossy black cap covering the crown and nape, and a black bill with a variable red-orange base that intensifies later in the season. The primaries include dark outer feathers, and the legs and feet are red. In non-breeding plumage, the forehead becomes whiter, the rosy tones fade, and the bill shortens and appears entirely black. Sexual dimorphism is minimal, with no plumage distinctions between sexes; males average slightly larger in linear measurements such as wing length (21.2–24.2 cm) and tail streamer length. Juveniles differ markedly with brownish-gray upperparts featuring a scaly appearance from broad dark feather tips, transitioning through pre-basic molts to adult-like plumage within the first year, as documented in banding recoveries.

Distribution and Habitat

Breeding and Non-Breeding Ranges

The Roseate Tern ( dougallii) exhibits a fragmented global breeding distribution, with major concentrations in the temperate North Atlantic and smaller, disjunct colonies in the . In the North Atlantic, the S. d. dougallii breeds primarily along the northeastern coast of the from New York to , including key sites such as and , as well as in the region encompassing the , Dry Tortugas, U.S. , and islands from to . European breeding occurs locally from Britain and to northwestern , with significant colonies in , including the and . In the , the S. d. bangsi breeds in scattered tropical locations, such as coastal , the , , islands including and , , , , and extending eastward to , , , , and . These populations show limited due to geographic separation, as indicated by distinctions and regional banding recoveries. During the non-breeding season, North Atlantic Roseate Terns migrate to tropical and subtropical waters off , with primary wintering areas along the Brazilian coast and in Suriname-Guyana, confirmed through banding data and geolocator tracking. Some individuals from European colonies utilize the in during early non-breeding periods. Indo-Pacific populations overwinter in adjacent tropical marine environments, including upwelling zones off and , though specific tracking data remain limited compared to Atlantic cohorts.

Preferred Habitats and Environmental Requirements

The roseate tern (Sterna dougallii) selects nesting sites on coastal islands featuring sandy, gravelly, or vegetated substrates that minimize exposure to mammalian predators such as raccoons and foxes. These sites often include dense vegetation cover or overhanging shrubs, providing concealment for ground nests, with a documented shift in northeastern during the from open beach habitats to rocky, glacial-till islands supporting such cover. Roseate terns exhibit less flexibility in site requirements than associated common terns (Sterna hirundo), preferentially colonizing larger mixed tern colonies where common terns dominate, as observed in empirical studies of and Canadian breeding grounds. For foraging, roseate terns target shallow marine waters adjacent to breeding colonies, including nearshore areas with tidal rips, shoals, and schools of small fish such as sandlance and , typically within 10-20 km of nest sites. Habitat suitability models derived from GPS tracking data confirm high use of coastal bays and estuaries with low gradients and predictable prey aggregation, reflecting observable correlations with bathymetric features that concentrate . Environmental requirements emphasize isolation from terrestrial disturbances and predators, with colony persistence linked to low mammalian incursion rates; sites lacking such isolation show reduced . Roseate terns demonstrate aversion to frequent or avian disturbances during nesting, flushing from sites at predator approaches, though managed colonies with predator exclusion maintain viability. As seabirds, they are physiologically adapted to high- marine environments via specialized salt glands, enabling sustained over brackish and oceanic waters without evident limitations from salinity exposure. Wind-exposed coastal sites facilitate efficient flight , with selections correlating to prevailing onshore breezes that aid prey detection and , as inferred from site-specific data across Atlantic populations.

Behavioral Ecology

Foraging Strategies and Diet

The Roseate Tern (Sterna dougallii) primarily forages by plunge-diving from flight, submerging completely to pursue and capture small schooling in shallow marine waters. This technique targets prey over sandbars, shoals, tide rips, inlets, or areas where herd schools to the surface, with dives often executed in mixed flocks alongside other species to exploit concentrated prey patches. Observations confirm rapid descent and brief submersion, distinguishing it from surface-plucking in congeners like the . Diet analyses from regurgitate samples and provisioning observations reveal a specialized piscivory, with comprising 93–97% of intake by frequency and mass in regions like the western , dominated by small pelagic species such as (Upeneus spp.) and scads (Decapterus spp.). In temperate North Atlantic sites, key prey includes American sandlance (Ammodytes americanus), (Clupea harengus), bay anchovy (Anchoa mitchilli), and (Brevoortia tyrannus), reflecting adaptation to locally abundant clupeids and ammodytids. like crustaceans appear sporadically (<5% in sampled diets), underscoring lower dietary diversity compared to sympatric terns. Foraging bouts extend 5–25 km from colonies, with birds concentrating efforts in productive nearshore zones accessible via multiple daily trips. Seasonal diet shifts align with prey , as sandlance and schoolings peak in summer, per direct observations tying composition to availability. In tropical breeding areas, frigatebirds (Fregata spp.) impose , forcing terns to evade pursuits or abandon catches, though affected individuals may offset losses via heightened self-foraging rates.

Breeding Biology and Reproduction

Roseate terns () nest colonially in the , with breeding activities peaking from May to . Nests consist of shallow scrapes on sandy beaches, rocky islands, or vegetated dunes, often in high-density aggregations alongside common terns (). Pairs typically produce a single brood per season, laying 1–3 eggs per , with averages of 1.8–2.0 eggs reported from long-term colony studies. Incubation commences upon laying the first egg and lasts 23–26 days, shared equally by both parents who alternate shifts to maintain constant coverage. is asynchronous within multi-egg clutches, leading to sibling size disparities that can influence chick survival. Both male and female parents provision chicks with small fish, guarding them closely in the early post- phase before the young become semi-precocial and mobile within the . Fledging occurs 22–30 days after hatching, with success rates of 50–70% in predator-protected sites based on monitored nests. Long-term banding data reveal high , with over 80% of adults returning to natal or prior breeding colonies annually, though entire groups may relocate following predation disturbances. Nest-site fidelity within colonies is strong, minimizing search costs but exposing pairs to localized risks. Mate selection correlates with early arrival timing, facilitating pair reformation; resighting of banded pairs indicates low rates, typically under 10% per year, supporting persistent monogamous bonds across seasons.

Migration and Movements

Following fledging, Roseate Tern ( dougallii) family units typically depart breeding colonies 5–15 days after chicks , congregating at post-fledging staging areas in coastal bays, sand spits, and beaches where adults continue provisioning young while foraging in adjacent waters. These staging periods last from mid-July through late in northeastern North American populations, with birds aggregating in large flocks at sites such as those in southern before initiating southward dispersal. Telemetry data from geolocators deployed on six northeastern North American adults reveal post-breeding dispersal beginning in July–, with initial staging around (41–42°N, 70–72°W) until late or early , followed by a direct of approximately 2,300 km to the northeastern (e.g., , ) for 7–13 days. From there, birds proceed southward along the and South American coasts, utilizing stopover sites in / and northern , to reach wintering grounds spanning / (56–58°W) to eastern (37–39°W, 10–20°S) by early ; total southward migration durations ranged 33–63 days (mean 50 days), exhibiting individual variability in stopover use and route fidelity. Northward migrations commence in , with fewer stopovers, averaging 28 days to return by May. In contrast, geolocator-tracked European Roseate Terns depart breeding sites in the around mid-September, migrating southward via the and along the West African coast to winter primarily in the (e.g., 67% in Large Marine Ecosystem off , 23% in /), with outward journeys averaging 18.5 days and returns 32 days. Intra-population variability includes shifts in wintering locations and optional staging at zones (used by 66% on return), highlighting differences from North American routes that target eastern rather than West African equatorial waters. Banding recovery data indicate annual adult return rates to breeding colonies of 70–80% across monitored sites, with apparent estimates varying by location (e.g., 0.74–0.84 after accounting for and band loss) but showing no systematic long-term declines; interannual fluctuations correlate with conditions during migration rather than persistent trends.

Vocalizations and Social Interactions

The roseate tern (Sterna dougallii) produces a variety of sharp, high-pitched vocalizations, with the most common call described as a clipped "keek" or "ki-rik," which is sharper and less harsh than those of the (Sterna hirundo). Alarmed individuals at breeding colonies emit a lower, harsher series of notes, functioning primarily in threat signaling and territory defense. These calls also serve in mate attraction during advertising displays and in chick begging behaviors, where fledglings solicit food with repetitive high-pitched peeps. In social contexts, roseate terns exhibit limited intraspecific compared to sympatric , often nesting in mixed colonies where they rely on the more vigilant and defensive common terns to reduce individual predation risks and vigilance costs. This association allows roseate terns to space nests at densities influenced by colony-wide dynamics, with studies recording mean nearest-neighbor distances of approximately 0.66 meters and densities up to 0.2 nests per square meter in tropical sites, reflecting density-dependent territorial adjustments rather than intense pairwise conflicts. Social bathing occurs in compact mixed groups of up to 60 individuals, further integrating roseate terns into broader tern colony interactions without escalating .

Population Dynamics and Threats

The Roseate Tern experienced significant population declines in the late in the due to intensive for the millinery trade. Following legal protections enacted around 1918, the northeastern U.S. population rebounded in the early , peaking in the mid-1970s before reaching lows of approximately 2,500 breeding pairs in 1978. By the , counts stabilized at around 2,750–3,425 pairs across fewer colonies, reflecting ongoing fluctuations rather than further sharp declines. In the northeastern U.S., annual efforts documented a partial recovery, with s peaking at about 4,400 in 2000 and totaling roughly 3,200 pairs as of 2013, though numbers have since hovered lower amid variability. Globally, estimates have historically ranged from 20,000 to 30,000, though comprehensive recent es remain incomplete; the Atlantic subspecies (S. d. dougallii) accounts for approximately 12,000 pairs, concentrated in the northeastern U.S. (3,000–4,000 pairs), (6,000–7,000 pairs, showing relative stability), and Europe (2,300–2,900 pairs, with historical 20th-century declines offset by localized increases such as in Ireland). Standardized annual monitoring via ground counts and aerial surveys has facilitated trend detection across regions, supplemented by mark-recapture studies estimating rates (λ). In the northeastern U.S., recent λ values averaged 0.835, indicating sub-replacement levels, while northwestern European colonies showed positive means with variability between 0.9 and 1.1 across sites. These metrics highlight regional differences, with populations demonstrating greater consistency in pair counts over decades compared to more volatile North Atlantic trends.

Identified Threats and Causal Factors

Predation by large gulls, such as herring gulls (Larus argentatus) and great black-backed gulls (Larus marinus), constitutes a primary cause of egg and chick losses in roseate tern colonies, with gulls depredating up to 24% of eggs on sites like Country Island, , and displacing terns from historical breeding grounds through site takeover between 1930 and 1972. Mammalian predators including foxes, brown rats (Rattus norvegicus), (Neovison vison), and otters have documented impacts on eggs and chicks at European and North American sites, exacerbating mortality where access to islands increases. Avian predators like peregrine falcons (Falco peregrinus) and great horned owls (Bubo virginianus) further contribute, with increased incidence linked to predator range expansion rather than solely tern density declines. In tropical regions, particularly the Caribbean, egg collection by humans remains a documented threat, with licensed harvesting and unregulated adult shooting for bait or sport reported as reducing nest success, though quantitative incidence varies by site enforcement. Collisions with power distribution lines during non-breeding roosting in northeastern Brazil, especially near Galinhos, cause significant migrant mortality, with roseate terns comprising a notable portion of seabird carcasses recovered under lines, prompting binational monitoring since the early 2010s. Habitat erosion from storm overwash and coastal development erodes nesting substrates on low-lying islands, as observed at Ram Island (Connecticut) where winter erosion reduced available sites, forcing colony shifts, and at Tern Island (Scotland) where natural flooding and increased storm frequency have diminished shingle habitats. Competition for nest sites with common terns (Sterna hirundo) and arctic terns (Sterna paradisaea), intensified by gull colony expansion, limits roseate tern establishment, with interspecific aggression documented at shared European colonies. Food scarcity, evidenced by reduced chick provisioning rates correlating with declines in small fish like sand eels (Ammodytes spp.), has been linked to overharvest in the North Atlantic, where drops during periods of prey depletion independent of shifts, though variability in prey schools also contributes. and studies indicate potential displacement from offshore wind structures during staging, with roseate terns tracked within 1-2 km of proposed turbine sites in , though direct collision incidence remains empirically sparse compared to modeled risks.

Conservation and Management

The roseate tern ( dougallii) receives protections under multiple international treaties and national due to regional population vulnerabilities. Globally, the is classified as Least Concern on the , reflecting its widespread distribution and stable overall numbers despite localized declines. In the United States, the northeastern population of the subspecies is listed as endangered under the , covering breeding areas from to New York and extending to parts of . The Caribbean population of the same subspecies is designated as threatened under the same act. Additionally, all populations are safeguarded by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918, which prohibits the take, possession, or disturbance of migratory birds, including their nests and eggs, without authorization. In , the roseate tern is included in Annex I of the EU Birds Directive (Directive 2009/147/EC), mandating special conservation measures such as the designation of Special Protection Areas for breeding and migration sites. It is also listed under Appendix II of the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS or Bonn Convention), which promotes cooperative management across flyways for species requiring international agreements. The species appears in Appendix II of the Bern Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats, affording similar protections in signatory European countries. These frameworks emphasize habitat safeguards and restrictions on activities at colony sites but defer detailed enforcement to national jurisdictions.

Implemented Measures and Interventions

Conservation efforts for roseate terns include predator management at breeding colonies, such as disturbance techniques, egg and nest removal of large , and targeted lethal control of specialist gull predators to reduce predation and displacement. Artificial nest boxes and terraces have been deployed across colonies to provide sheltered nesting sites under or in open areas, accommodating the ' preference for concealed scrapes. Habitat restoration protocols involve clearance to maintain open nesting spaces, removal, and measures to preserve colony substrates. Monitoring programs utilize metal banding and GPS transmitters attached to breeding adults during incubation to track migration routes, wintering grounds, and foraging areas, with deployments such as 12 roseate terns fitted with satellite tags in early 2022. Disturbance minimization strategies at active colonies enforce restricted access zones and seasonal closures to human activity, coordinated through site-specific management plans. Internationally, collaborations between U.S. and Brazilian institutions have implemented powerline marking and mitigation at key stopover sites, including visual markers on distribution lines in Galinhos, Brazil, following increased collision detections in the 2010s. These efforts extend to public awareness campaigns in coastal communities to reduce incidental disturbances and promote habitat stewardship.

Outcomes, Achievements, and Ongoing Challenges

Conservation efforts for the northeastern North American of the roseate tern have resulted in modest recovery since the late 1970s lows, with breeding pairs increasing from approximately 2,500 in 1978 to peaks exceeding 4,400 around 2000 and stabilizing around 3,200–4,500 pairs through the . This stabilization follows targeted interventions such as gull reductions and habitat enhancements at key sites like Bird Island, Massachusetts, which correlated with higher nest —often exceeding 1 young fledged per pair in managed years compared to sub-replacement levels (below 0.7) prior to management. annual rates, estimated at 0.80–0.90 after correcting for band loss, showed consistency across managed colonies, though year-to-year variation linked to weather and food persisted independently of interventions. In non-breeding seasons, initiatives targeting at power lines in Brazilian wintering grounds reduced documented mortality, with post-intervention surveys recording 17 dead adults in one recent monitoring effort—a decline from prior years' higher tolls, though still exceeding zero-mortality goals. European projects, such as the LIFE Roseate Tern initiative, achieved habitat restoration and threat mitigation at multiple sites, contributing to localized gains, but these remain subscale relative to North American efforts. Empirical before-after comparisons attribute gains partly to reduced predation and disturbance, yet natural fluctuations in prey availability confound direct causation, as metrics varied widely even in unmanaged periods. Persistent challenges include incomplete mitigation of off-season threats, particularly in understudied West African and South American winter ranges where , shifts from , and unknown factors contribute to unexplained adult disappearances. Over 80% of the northeastern population still concentrates in fewer than five colonies, amplifying vulnerability to localized events like the 2022–2023 highly pathogenic outbreak that halved some European pairs—a risk unaddressed by breeding-focused measures. Dependency on ongoing subsidies for predator control and barriers raises concerns, as lapses correlate with rapid declines, while regulatory restrictions on access in protected areas have delayed . Sea-level rise exacerbates , with projections indicating 20–50% loss of low-elevation nesting islands by 2100 absent elevation interventions, underscoring gaps in addressing causal drivers like global warming over symptomatic fixes.

References

  1. https://birdsoftheworld.org/bow/species/roster/cur/introduction
  2. https://www.fws.gov/species/roseate-tern-sterna-dougallii-dougallii
  3. https://guides.nynhp.org/roseate-tern/
  4. https://www.mass.gov/info-details/learn-about-roseate-terns
  5. https://www.audubon.org/field-guide/bird/roseate-tern
  6. https://wildlife-species.canada.ca/species-risk-registry/virtual_sara/files/cosewic/sr_roseate_Tern_0809_e.pdf
  7. https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/roseate-tern-sterna-dougallii
  8. https://wildlife-species.canada.ca/bird-status/oiseau-bird-eng.aspx?sY=2019&sL=e&sM=a&sB=ROST
  9. https://avibase.bsc-eoc.org/species.jsp?avibaseid=74236837A4AFD042
  10. https://www.abcbirds.org/bird/roseate-tern/
  11. https://eprints.jcu.edu.au/1132/2/02whole.pdf
  12. https://academic.oup.com/icb/article/62/6/1838/6628793
  13. https://researchonline.jcu.edu.au/1132/
  14. https://birdsoftheworld.org/bow/species/roster/cur/identification
  15. https://eaaflyway.net/roseate-tern/
  16. https://www.allaboutbirds.org/guide/Roseate_Tern/overview
  17. https://www.allaboutbirds.org/guide/Roseate_Tern/id
  18. https://birdsoftheworld.org/bow/species/roster/cur/appearance
  19. https://birdsoftheworld.org/bow/species/roster/1.0/introduction
  20. https://bioone.org/journals/waterbirds/volume-35/issue-3/063.035.0312/Morphometric-Sexing-of-Northwest-Atlantic-Roseate-Terns/10.1675/063.035.0312.full
  21. https://birdsoftheworld.org/bow/species/roster/cur/distribution
  22. https://www.fnai.org/PDFs/FieldGuides/Sterna_dougallii.pdf
  23. https://birdsoftheworld.org/bow/species/roster/1.0/introduction?printable
  24. https://seabirdgroup.org.uk/journals/seabird-27/seabird-27-1.pdf
  25. https://www.ospar.org/documents?v=7180
  26. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ibi.12915
  27. https://extapps.dec.ny.gov/docs/wildlife_pdf/sgcnroseatetern.pdf
  28. https://www.mass.gov/info-details/roseate-tern
  29. https://birdsoftheworld.org/bow/species/roster/cur/conservation
  30. https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/species-risk-public-registry/recovery-strategies/roseate-tern-amended-2010.html
  31. https://www.int-res.com/articles/esr2021/44/n044p339.pdf
  32. https://explorer.natureserve.org/Taxon/ELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.105391/Sterna_dougallii
  33. https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=22785&context=auk
  34. https://oar.marine.ie/bitstream/10793/557/1/
  35. https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=22909&context=auk
  36. https://birdsoftheworld.org/bow/species/roster/cur/foodhabits
  37. https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=22076&context=auk
  38. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25148323
  39. https://www.allaboutbirds.org/guide/Roseate_Tern/lifehistory
  40. https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2012.02026.x
  41. https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=19324&context=auk
  42. https://nhpbs.org/wild/roseatetern.asp
  43. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1521572
  44. https://www.science.gov/topicpages/b/breeding%2Bsite%2Bfidelity
  45. https://pacificseabirdgroup.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Abstracts_PSG2018.pdf
  46. https://www.mass.gov/files/documents/2016/08/wh/roseate-tern.pdf
  47. http://www.goldenrod.org/images/projects/residency/Roseate-Tern-Report-2008.pdf
  48. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/ibi.12915
  49. https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2307/2265817
  50. https://bioone.org/journals/waterbirds/volume-28/issue-1/1524-4695%282005%29028%255B0079%253AASAMPO%255D2.0.CO%253B2/Annual-Survival-and-Movement-Patterns-of-Roseate-Terns-Breeding-in/10.1675/1524-4695%282005%29028%5B0079:ASAMPO%5D2.0.CO%3B2.short
  51. https://www.allaboutbirds.org/guide/Roseate_Tern/sounds
  52. https://birdsoftheworld.org/bow/species/roster/cur/sounds
  53. https://birdsoftheworld.org/bow/species/roster/cur/behavior
  54. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00306525.1981.9633579
  55. https://abcbirds.org/bird/roseate-tern/
  56. https://birdsoftheworld.org/bow/species/roster/cur/demography
  57. https://ecos.fws.gov/docs/recovery_plan/981105.pdf
  58. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0006320783900551
  59. https://jco.birdscaribbean.org/index.php/jco/article/download/1217/955/3737
  60. https://buzzardsbay.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/USFWS-2010-roseate-tern-5-year-plan.pdf
  61. https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/am-pdf/10.1111/1365-2656.12904
  62. https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/10.1139/z99-047
  63. https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/5223851
  64. https://roseatetern.org/threats.html
  65. https://ecos.fws.gov/docs/recovery_plan/930924_v2.pdf
  66. https://www.fws.gov/story/teaming-terns
  67. https://attentiveenergy.com/protecting-the-roseate-tern-a-conservation-story/
  68. https://academic.oup.com/condor/article-pdf/90/4/852/28192365/condor0852.pdf
  69. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/B07O
  70. https://www.nps.gov/caco/learn/nature/the-roseate-tern.htm
  71. https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/life/publicWebsite/project/LIFE14-NAT-UK-000394/improving-the-conservation-prospects-of-the-priority-species-roseate-tern-throughout-its-range-in-the-uk-and-ireland
  72. https://www.ospar.org/site/assets/files/44255/roseate_tern.pdf
  73. https://roseatetern.org/managing-large-gulls.html
  74. https://roseatetern.org/terraces-and-nest-boxes.html
  75. https://roseatetern.org/uploads/3/5/8/0/35804201/babcock_and_booth__2020__roseate_tern_terraces_and_nest_boxes._tern_conservation_best_practice._%25E2%2580%258B%25E2%2580%258B.pdf
  76. https://roseatetern.org/habitat-creation-and-restoration.html
  77. https://atlanticmarinebirds.org/downloads/Satellite_telemetry_report.pdf
  78. https://www.massaudubon.org/news/latest/the-intercontinental-effort-to-save-the-roseate-tern
  79. https://nuttallclub.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/2023-2024-R5-Mass-Audubon-Roseate-Tern-report-on-2023-funding-Copy-Copy.pdf
  80. https://www.birdwatchingdaily.com/news/conservation/roseate-tern-numbers-up-but-perils-remain/
  81. https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/5222274
  82. https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=21972&context=auk
  83. https://oap.ospar.org/en/ospar-assessments/committee-assessments/biodiversity-committee/status-assesments/roseate-tern/
  84. https://extapps.dec.ny.gov/fs/programs/dfw/SWAP2025/Birds/Roseate%2520tern%2520SSA.pdf
  85. https://roseatetern.org/index.html/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.