Hubbry Logo
SélékaSélékaMain
Open search
Séléka
Community hub
Séléka
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Séléka
Séléka
Séléka
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Séléka fighter in Kaga-Bandoro, 2014

Key Information

Séléka CPSK-CPJP-UFDR[1] was an alliance of rebel militia groups[2] that subjugated the Central African Republic (CAR) on 24 March 2013.[3][4][5] After its official dissolution in September 2013, the remaining rebel groups became known as Ex-Séléka. Séléka leader Michel Djotodia became the nation's president from March 2013 until his resignation in January 2014.[3][6] Members of Séléka were almost all Muslim.[7][8][9][10]

Name

[edit]

The word seleka means "coalition" or "alliance" in Sango, one of the CAR's two national languages, the other being French.[11][12][13]: 125  The international media has shortened the full name Séléka CPSK-CPJP-UFDR (which incorporates the abbreviations for its component organisations) to la Séléka in French and Seleka in English.

The term Séléka had been used previously in CAR politics when Jean-Jacques Démafouth launched the political party New Alliance for Progress (French: Nouvelle Alliance pour le Progrès) with the Sango name Fini Seleka.[14]

Background

[edit]

The rebel coalition originated in an agreement signed between factions of the Convention of Patriots for Justice and Peace (CPJP) and the Patriotic Convention for Saving the Country (CPSK), two of the CAR's many anti-government militias, on 20 August 2012.[15] CPJP in this case refers to the "Fundamental" splinter group of the CPJP, one of many militias involved in the CAR's long-running civil war. A different faction of the CPJP signed a peace accord with the government on 25 August 2012.[citation needed]

The Séléka first emerged on 15 September 2012 under the name alliance CPSK-CPJP; when it published a press release taking responsibility for the attacks on three towns that day.[16] It was the last of the major rebel groups to do so.[17] The CPSK was hardly known.[17] On 15 December 2012 the group published its first press release using the full name "Séléka CPSK-CPJP-UFDR" thus including the Union of Democratic Forces for Unity (UFDR). Two groups that did not appear in the title, the long-standing militia Democratic Front of the Central African People (FDPC), and the newly minted Alliance for Revival and Rebuilding (A2R), were also reportedly part of the alliance.[3]

Members of the Séléka were usually Muslim, as was Michel Djotodia, the president the movement installed in March 2013 after taking power. However, it found its origin in social rather than strictly religious struggles. Muslims - who represent at most 15% of the country's population - have long been the victim of stigmatization and repressive policies, including great difficulty in obtaining legal documents, discrimination in the schooling system, and the systematic obligation to pay more than Christians at roadblocks.[13]: 131–132  Later, the frequent massacres against Muslim communities committed by the Anti-balaka, as well as French military cooperation with the Anti-balaka, would further cement the Séléka's popularity among these communities as they were seen as a "bulwark" against repression.[13]: 142 

On the international plan, Séléka reportedly enjoyed the support of Chadian president Idriss Déby, who had struck a deal with the group that Chadian agents would get hold of key posts in the Central African state apparatus after a takeover. Thus, according to certain observers, the 2013 coup occurred with Chadian backing,[18][19]: 189  although Déby denied these allegations.[20] The group was also partially made up of Sudanese Janjaweed fighters, who participated in summary executions and atrocities at some points in 2013.[19]: 189 

Civil War

[edit]

In the months after the coup, which brought Séléka figurehead Djotodia to power, fighters connected to the militia plundered villages and killed Christians as well as supporters of former president François Bozizé.[1] Throughout this period, Séléka operated as a "loose confederation of armed groups", largely beyond any effective control by commanders.[13]: 126 

In September 2013, Michel Djotodia announced that Séléka had been dissolved;[21] however, this had little effect on the rebel groups already roaming across the country.[19]: 189  Militias from Séléka, now dispersed into the countryside, went on to commit mass atrocities according to observers including Human Rights Watch.[22][23][24][25][26] Executions, rape and looting by Séléka fighters further escalated religious and ethnic tensions.[27] Largely Christian militias, using the name Anti-balaka, were formed from pre-existing village militias around this same period. These groups engaged in combat with Séléka, but also indiscriminately massacred Muslims.[8][9][22] In response, the United Nations considered sending troops to stop the atrocities,[28] and established the MINUSCA peacekeeping mission in September 2014.[29]

Involvement in illegal trade

[edit]

NGOs including Global Witness have criticized Séléka's connections to the illegal logging sector, in which the group was said to have a "particular interest" even prior to the 2013 coup.[30]: 11  After Djotodia's takeover, his government struck lucrative deals with timber logging companies. The French Industrie forestière de Batalimo (IFB), Lebanese Société d’exploitation forestière centrafricaine (SEFCA) and Chinese Vicwood Group reportedly made illegal tax payments totalling €3,7 million to the Ministry of Finance, as well as monthly payments to Séléka fighters to safeguard their installations.[30]: 12–15  SEFCA also paid an additional "advance" of €380,876 directly to Djotodia's government.[30]: 15  According to a report from the UN Security Council, "illegal artisanal exploitation surged in non-attributed forest areas" under the Djotodia government, while logging trucks were "systematically subjected to illegal tax levying".[31]: 75 

Aside from timber, the Central African economy is highly dependent on diamond and gold from its mining exploits. The sale of rough diamonds was temporarily suspended by the KPCS over fears of illicit trade by Séléka, Anti-balaka and other rebel groups. However, illegal trafficking of both diamond and gold (mainly to Cameroon, Chad and Sudan) continued, in which Séléka members were actively involved.[31]: 16–19  Séléka further engaged in elephant poaching, organising illegal sales of ivory on international markets.[30]: 10  According to the above-cited UN report, poaching and wildlife trafficking (also including antelope species) could be seen as "central elements of the Séléka rebellion".[31]: 19  Involvement of Séléka in these forms of illegal trade was to continue after Djotodia's demise.

Ex-Séléka militias

[edit]
Former combatants of the Séléka engaged in a DDR process, February 2017.

By 2015, there was virtually no government control outside of the CAR capital, Bangui.[32] Armed entrepreneurs have carved out personal fiefdoms in which they set up checkpoints, collect illegal taxes, and take in millions of dollars from the illicit coffee, mineral, and timber trades.[32]

Months after the official dissolution of Séléka, it was not known who was in charge of ex-Séléka factions during talks with Antibalaka. On 12 July 2014, Michel Djotodia was reinstated as the head of a faction of Séléka,[33] which renamed itself The Popular Front for the Rebirth of Central African Republic (FPRC), also translated as "The Popular Front for the Renaissance of Central African Republic".[34] Later in 2014, Noureddine Adam led the FPRC and began demanding independence for the predominantly Muslim north, a move rejected by another general, Ali Darassa.[35] He formed another Ex-Séléka faction called the Union for Peace in the Central African Republic (UPC) which is dominant in and around Bambari[32] while the FPRC's capital is in Bria.[36] Noureddine Adam declared the autonomous Republic of Logone on 14 December 2015; a spokesman for the Central African Republic's transitional government denounced the rebel's declaration. Another group is the Central African Patriotic Movement (MPC) founded by Mahamat Al Khatim.[36] Much of the violence in this phase of the conflict is between Ex-Séléka militias and is often ethnic in nature with the FPRC targeting Fulani people who largely make up the UPC and the UPC targeting the Gula and Runga people, who largely make up FPRC, as being sympathetic to FPRC.[35] Starting in November 2016, FPRC and MPC[36] allied with their former enemy, the Anti-balaka, and attacked UPC.[37][38] Most of the fighting is in the centrally located Ouaka prefecture, which has the country's second largest city Bambari, because of its strategic location between the Muslim and Christian regions of the country and its wealth.[36] The fighting displaced 20,000 with the FPRC singling out Fulani people.[39][38] In February 2017, Joseph Zoundeiko, the chief of staff of FPRC[40] who previously led the military wing of Séléka, was killed by MINUSCA after crossing one of the red lines.[38]

Atrocities

[edit]

On 18 September 2013, the Séléka killed scores of unarmed civilians, according to Human Rights Watch.[when?] The Séléka has also engaged in wanton destruction of numerous homes and villages. The 79-page report The Forgotten Human Rights Crisis in the Central African Republic details the deliberate killing of civilians – including women, children, and the elderly – between March and June 2013 and confirms the deliberate destruction of more than 1,000 homes, both in the capital, Bangui, and in the provinces. Many villagers have fled their homes and are living in the bush in fear of new attacks. Human Rights Watch documented the deaths of scores of people from injuries, hunger or sickness.

"Séléka leaders promised a new beginning for the people of the Central African Republic, but instead have carried out large-scale attacks on civilians, looting, and murder", said Daniel Bekele, Africa director at Human Rights Watch. "What's worse is that the Séléka have recruited children as young as 13 to carry out some of this carnage."

On 28 May 2014, the Séléka members threw grenades before shooting indiscriminately at the Church of Fatima in the capital Bangui, killing at least 11 people.[41] In July 2014, the government of Uganda declared that it was at war with Séléka, accusing them of forcing civilians to give food and medicine to the Lord's Resistance Army and of trading ivory and minerals with them. Séléka denied the accusation.[42]

Séléka leader Abdoulaye Hissène said in an interview that: "We have killed, murdered and violated, but what happened, happened".[43][44]

On 9 November 2015, armed men cut the throats of 10 people in the village of Ndassima before carrying out an overnight attack nearby in Mala. Local administrator Yves Mbetigaza said "They came from two places, some from Bambari and others from Mbres." While a report on national radio described the attackers only as armed members of the Fula ethnic group (in French: Peul), Mbetigaza said they were Séléka fighters, adding that eight villagers were kidnapped in Mala and dozens of others were missing. On 12 November, six hunters were killed in the village of Bandambou.[45]

On 3 December 2015, the Séléka armed men killed eight civilians at a camp for displaced people and wounded one U.N. peacekeeper, just days after the pope visited the capital. The attacks took place at Ngakobo, about 60 km (40 miles) south of the central town of Bambari.[46]

Séléka often contends that mercenaries are to blame for the abuses. It is reported that official Séléka fighters are called for help to protect against mobs of ex-Séléka fighters.[32]

In October 2021, Confirmation of charges hearings against ex-Séléka militiaman Mahamat Saïd opens before the International Criminal Court (ICC). This former militiaman is suspected of crimes against humanity and war crimes committed in 2013 and 2014. This is the first time that a former member of the Séléka has faced the judges of the Court.

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Séléka

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Séléka was a loose of predominantly Muslim rebel groups from northeastern and neighboring countries, formed in December 2012 to challenge the government of President . Led by , the alliance launched an offensive that captured the capital on 24 March 2013, deposing Bozizé and installing Djotodia as interim president. Under Djotodia's rule, Séléka forces—nominally dissolved in September 2013 but retaining cohesion—committed widespread war crimes, including killings, rapes, and village burnings targeting the Christian majority population, prompting massive internal displacement and the formation of self-defense militias known as . These predations escalated the conflict into between Muslim and Christian communities, with Séléka's failure to control its fighters contributing to state collapse and international intervention. Djotodia resigned in January 2014 amid pressure from regional bodies and the , but Séléka splinter groups persisted, evolving into entities like the Union for Peace in Central African Republic (UPC) that continued armed activities. The Séléka episode highlighted underlying ethnic and religious tensions in , exacerbated by marginalization of northern Muslim groups, though empirical accounts emphasize the coalition's opportunistic alliances and indiscipline as primary drivers of the ensuing chaos rather than purely defensive motivations. Post-coup accountability efforts, including the , have pursued prosecutions for atrocities by ex-Séléka elements, underscoring the coalition's role in initiating a cycle of retaliatory violence that displaced over a million people.

Etymology and Composition

Name and Symbolism

The term Séléka derives from the , a and one of the two official languages of the alongside French, where it translates to "" or "union." This etymology reflects the entity's character as a loose of northern-based rebel factions, including the Patriotic Convention for Saving the Country (CPSK), the Convention of Patriots for Justice and Peace (CPJP), and the Union of Democratic Forces for Unity (UFDR), rather than a unified ideological or sectarian force. The choice of a neutral, non-ethnic term in Sango—spoken widely across the country—facilitated broad appeal and pragmatic coordination among diverse groups sharing grievances over government marginalization. The name was first publicly adopted in November–December 2012 during the coalition's assembly in the northeast, appearing in an initial by the CPSK-CPJP alliance on approximately December 12, 2012, which formalized the grouping under the "Séléka CPSK-CPJP-UFDR" designation. This timing coincided with escalating offensives against President François Bozizé's forces, positioning "Séléka" as a for unified resistance without initial emphasis on , despite the predominantly Muslim composition of its fighters from northeastern provinces. The label thus served a tactical function, enabling recruitment and operations across factional lines while sidestepping divisive identifiers that could alienate potential southern or non-Muslim allies. Symbolically, "Séléka" connoted collective strength and redress against central authority neglect, as evidenced in founding statements proclaiming aims to "liberate the and bring and to the ." In propaganda and communications, the term evoked unity amid diversity, countering portrayals of the coalition as inherently extremist by framing it as a remedial born of unfulfilled 2007 peace accords with prior rebel groups. This pragmatic symbolism aligned with empirical patterns of northern rebel coalitions since the early 2000s, prioritizing political and economic demands over confessional rhetoric in initial declarations.

Coalition Structure and Key Leaders

The Séléka coalition formed in late 2012 as an alliance of northern Central African rebel groups, primarily drawing from the Union of Democratic Forces for Unity (UFDR) and factions of the Convention of Patriots for Justice and Peace (CPJP), including the Central African Patriotic Séléka Coalition (CPSK) led by and the fundamentalist CPJP under Noureddine Adam. These groups, rooted in northeastern ethnic communities like the Goula and Runga, united opportunistically with regional commanders of Chadian and Sudanese origin, incorporating cross-border fighters motivated by grievances and potential spoils rather than solely religious solidarity. Initial estimates placed Séléka's forces at approximately 1,600 to 3,000 fighters upon assembly in November 2012, with fluid recruitment swelling numbers through mercenaries and defectors from prior conflicts. Michel Djotodia, a former and CPSK commander, emerged as the coalition's overall political and military leader, coordinating operations from exile in and leveraging personal networks across the northeast. Noureddine Adam, heading a CPJP splinter, commanded key contingents and influenced strategy through his ties to Darfuri elements, while other figures like Martin Kutrumin and Hassan Al-Hadj provided tactical leadership over specialized units. The structure remained decentralized and pragmatic, accommodating non-ideological participants—including some non-Muslims drawn by anti-government sentiment or economic incentives—amid a core of Muslim northeasterners, underscoring alliances driven by shared regional marginalization and power ambitions over uniform doctrinal cohesion. This loose federation enabled rapid mobilization but sowed internal rivalries, as factional commanders retained autonomy over their forces.

Historical Context and Grievances

Failures of the Bozizé Regime

François Bozizé's regime, which seized power in a 2003 coup and ruled until , repeatedly failed to honor peace agreements aimed at resolving armed rebellions, exacerbating instability in the (CAR). The 2007 Birao Agreement and the subsequent 2008 Libreville Comprehensive Peace Agreement required the integration of former rebels into the national , demobilization of irregular forces, and payment of salaries to ex-combatants, but Bozizé's did not implement these provisions, leading to continued arms proliferation and unpaid fighters who remained a destabilizing force. This non-compliance violated the accords' core terms for national reconciliation, as noted in analyses of the regime's governance shortcomings, and contributed to the persistence of rebel groups in the northeast. Governance under Bozizé was marked by electoral irregularities and favoritism, undermining institutional legitimacy. The presidential election, which secured Bozizé a second term with 64.4% of the vote, was criticized by international observers for fraud, including discrepancies in and ballot counting, prompting opposition candidates to reject the results and the to urge investigations into alleged irregularities. Additionally, the regime appointed family members to key positions during Bozizé's second term, such as roles in security and administration, exemplifying that concentrated power and alienated broader political actors. Economic management faltered amid resource constraints, with GDP stagnating or declining in real terms from approximately $236 in 2003 to around $300 by 2012, reflecting inadequate investment and conflict-related disruptions. Poverty rates exceeded 70% of the living below the international poverty line throughout the period, compounded by neglect of such as roads and public services in rural areas, which hindered development and fueled grievances in marginalized regions. These failures, rooted in unfulfilled commitments and poor resource allocation, eroded and created preconditions for further unrest.

Marginalization of Northeastern and Muslim Communities

The northeastern prefectures of Vakaga and Haute-Kotto in the () have long experienced chronic underdevelopment, with limited , , and services compared to the national average. These regions, predominantly inhabited by Muslim communities including Fulani pastoralists, received minimal state investment under President François Bozizé's regime (2003–2013), exacerbating poverty and isolation; for instance, access to basic services remained far below urban centers in the southwest, contributing to a cycle of neglect that fueled local resentments. Bozizé's administration, dominated by Christian elements from the southwest, pursued policies perceived as favoring , including the exclusion of northeastern from political and economic opportunities, which deepened sectarian divides. Reports indicate that of Chadian or Sudanese descent faced barriers to documentation, such as difficulties obtaining birth certificates and identity cards, despite many holding legal status, reinforcing narratives of second-class treatment. This marginalization intertwined with ongoing pastoralist displacements, where Fulani herders in the northeast encountered repeated conflicts over grazing lands, , and incursions from Sudanese and Chadian transhumants, often without government intervention to mediate or protect local livelihoods. These grievances crystallized in Séléka's 2012 formation, with coalition leaders like Noureddine Adam denouncing the Bozizé government's failure to address northeastern underrepresentation and security threats, positioning the as a response to systemic exclusion rather than mere . Empirical patterns of state , including unaddressed cycles of herder-farmer and resource disparities, provided causal grounds for , distinct from later escalations.

Formation and Objectives

Alliance Assembly in 2012

In late , disparate rebel factions in northeastern , including Michel Djotodia's Union des Forces Démocratiques pour le Rassemblement (UFDR), the Convention des Patriotes pour la Justice et la Paix (CPJP) under leaders such as Noureddine Adam and Abdoulaye Issaka Demana, and smaller groups like the Patriotic Convention for the Salvation of the Country-Karim, engaged in negotiations to form the Séléka . These realignments were pragmatic, as former rivals set aside localized disputes to exploit the Bozizé government's non-compliance with prior peace deals, including the accords for the UFDR and similar arrangements for the CPJP, which had left northern fighters demobilized and unpaid. The process prioritized mutual non-aggression over unified , reflecting opportunistic convergence amid shared exclusion from state resources rather than a structured ideological framework. Djotodia assumed leadership of the nascent , coordinating initial command through informal pacts that subordinated factional militias under a collective banner for joint operations. This loose federation drew strength from an estimated several thousand fighters, bolstered by recruits from marginalized northeastern communities and foreign elements from and , though cohesion relied more on anti-Bozizé grievances than robust or . logistical facilitated arms and mobility for some units, but the primary impetus remained domestic resentment toward Bozizé's centralization of power and neglect of peripheral regions. The assembly's fragility was evident in persistent factional , with commanders retaining operational despite nominal unification, setting the stage for coordinated advances but foreshadowing later fractures. This pragmatic banding enabled the coalition's first major offensive in December 2012, targeting northern towns and exposing the regime's weakened defenses.

Ideological and Political Aims

The Séléka coalition's self-proclaimed objectives focused on rectifying perceived violations of prior peace agreements by the government, emphasizing pragmatic demands for power-sharing, security sector reform, and equitable resource allocation to address northeastern neglect. Central to these aims was enforcement of the 2008 Inclusive Political Dialogue recommendations, which included integration of rebel fighters into the national army and fair distribution of national resources to marginalized regions. Séléka leaders cited Bozizé's failure to honor these terms as justification for their mobilization, framing the as a corrective to systemic exclusion rather than ideological conquest. The January 11, 2013, ceasefire agreement between Séléka and the government further delineated these goals, stipulating immediate cessation of hostilities, of coalition forces in designated areas under international , and establishment of a to facilitate political transition and . Séléka insisted on verifiable implementation, including progressive and reintegration of approximately 5,000 fighters into state structures, alongside measures to empower underrepresented communities in the resource-scarce northeast. Alleged non-compliance, such as delayed payments and obstructed sites, eroded trust and propelled the coalition's demands toward broader . Although predominantly Muslim in composition, Séléka's rhetoric prioritized secular political grievances—such as ethnic marginalization and unfulfilled accords—over religious expansionism, with leaders like advocating national within existing constitutional frameworks rather than theocratic ambitions. This positioning contrasted with later jihadist framings in media reports, which analysts attribute to post-coup escalations rather than foundational motives; primary demands remained rooted in regional equity and institutional inclusion, not caliphate-building. Some observers critiqued these aims as veneers for opportunistic resource extraction in diamond-rich eastern zones, yet Séléka consistently invoked accord violations as causal drivers.

Military Rise to Power

Initial Offensive Operations

The Séléka coalition launched its offensive against the Central African Republic government on 10 December 2012, beginning with the seizure of several northeastern towns including N'Délé, Sam Ouandja, and Ouadda. In Ouadda, rebels encountered minimal resistance as government soldiers fled, abandoning weapons that were subsequently captured by Séléka forces. This initial success reflected broader weaknesses in the Forces Armées Centrafricaines (FAR), including poor morale and logistical deficiencies that facilitated rapid rebel advances from border areas near Chad. By mid-December, Séléka fighters captured Bria, a significant diamond-mining center, on 18 December, where clashes resulted in over 15 government soldiers killed. The coalition continued its momentum, seizing additional northern and central towns such as Kaga-Bandoro and Bambari amid reports of limited FAR engagement, often due to desertions and inadequate deployment. Logistical support for these operations included smuggled and ammunition, enabling sustained incursions despite the government's prior peace accords. In early 2013, Séléka forces approached key southern positions, prompting President to appeal for international assistance and engage in negotiations. On 3 , rebels announced a temporary halt to their advance, followed by a formal agreement on 11 that included provisions for withdrawal from captured areas, though implementation faltered due to mutual accusations of violations. These developments underscored the rebels' tactical gains, driven by the FAR's inability to mount effective defenses, setting the stage for further escalation.

Seizure of Bangui and Regime Change

On March 24, , Séléka coalition forces advanced into , encountering minimal organized resistance from the depleted (FACA), which had largely collapsed following the rebels' earlier captures of key northern towns. The rapid incursion culminated in the seizure of the at around midday, prompting President François Bozizé to flee by helicopter to , where he sought refuge in . This marked the effective end of Bozizé's decade-long rule, with Séléka fighters exploiting the government's weakened defenses, bolstered by defections and the prior Libreville peace accord's failure to disarm or integrate rebel elements. Immediately after securing the palace, Séléka leader Michel Djotodia proclaimed himself president of the Central African Republic, announcing the suspension of the constitution and the dissolution of parliament to establish transitional authority. Séléka elements swiftly occupied administrative offices, radio stations, and other state infrastructure in Bangui, facilitating a hasty power transition amid reports of opportunistic alliances with elements of the FACA loyal to the new regime. However, the takeover triggered widespread initial disorder, including extensive looting of residences, businesses, and humanitarian compounds by undisciplined fighters seeking spoils and settling personal or ethnic scores against Bozizé supporters. Gunfire echoed through neighborhoods, with isolated clashes contributing to civilian casualties and prompting thousands to flee the capital toward the Ubangi River or surrounding areas. Internationally, the coup faced swift condemnation, with the suspending the Central African Republic's membership on March 25, 2013, pending restoration of constitutional order, while regional Economic Community of Central African States leaders withheld recognition of Djotodia's self-declared presidency, citing violations of the agreement. The similarly declined to acknowledge the new leadership, emphasizing the need for elections within timelines outlined in prior accords. These delays compounded domestic instability, as refugee flows accelerated, with initial displacements from swelling cross-border movements into the Democratic Republic of Congo and , foreshadowing broader humanitarian strains.

Period of Control

Djotodia's Transitional Government

Following the Séléka coalition's capture of on March 24, 2013, , the group's leader, consolidated power by announcing a transitional on March 31. This 34-member cabinet included eight ministers from the former democratic opposition, one from the ousted regime, and the remainder predominantly Séléka loyalists, with Djotodia retaining the defense ministry portfolio himself. On April 13, a unanimously elected Djotodia as interim president, formalizing the structure amid international pressure for inclusivity. Despite these steps toward a broader political base, the administration suffered from deep internal factionalism, as Séléka comprised disparate rebel factions with competing interests, and from widespread indiscipline among fighters who operated outside central command. Stabilization initiatives faltered due to limited and failure to rein in elements. Djotodia's government issued declarations promoting national in mid-2013, but these were undermined by persistent Séléka fragmentation and refusal of many commanders to submit to authority. A key effort came on September 13, 2013, when Djotodia promulgated a presidential formally disbanding Séléka as an armed group, aiming to integrate fighters into state structures; however, most units rejected the order, continuing autonomous operations that eroded governmental control. The loose alliance's structure, reliant on loyalties rather than unified command, exacerbated these constraints, leaving the transitional authority unable to enforce or foster genuine cohesion. Economic management reflected acute continuity disruptions, with the crisis triggering a severe contraction in output. Real GDP plummeted by 36 percent in , as political halted production, disrupted , and deterred investment, according to analyses of the period's fallout. IMF assessments highlighted how the upheaval amplified preexisting vulnerabilities, including reliance on and diamonds, further straining fiscal resources and public service delivery under the transitional framework. These dynamics underscored the administration's overarching challenge: aspiring to govern a fragmented state while lacking the coercive or administrative tools to impose order.

Administrative and Security Policies

The transitional government under , established following the Séléka seizure of power on March 24, 2013, suspended the constitution, dissolved the , and governed by decree, with administrative functions centralized in but largely absent elsewhere due to a filled by autonomous Séléka commanders. A transitional formalized Djotodia's on August 18, 2013, aiming to restore basic governance structures, though implementation faltered amid ongoing rebel indiscipline and lack of resources. Security policies centered on incorporating Séléka elements—estimated at 6,000 to 8,000 fighters—into the Forces armées centrafricaines (FACA), with proposals debated to integrate up to 30,000 personnel, but these stalled owing to absent unified command, vetting difficulties, and insufficient international support for disarmament, demobilization, and reintegration processes. Djotodia ordered the formal dissolution of Séléka on September 13, 2013, nominally to professionalize forces, yet the government exerted minimal authority over dispersed units, resulting in a fragmented security apparatus dominated by undisciplined ex-rebels rather than reformed national institutions. To rectify longstanding northeastern Muslim marginalization under Bozizé's Christian-dominated regime—which had neglected integration of prior rebel agreements—Djotodia's administration elevated Séléka-affiliated northern Muslims to key posts, fostering perceptions of redress for regional grievances like underinvestment and exclusion from roles. Critics, including southern Christian communities, decried this as ethnic favoritism exacerbating divisions, though empirical context reveals Bozizé's policies had similarly privileged non-Muslim elements, contributing to Séléka's initial mobilization. Limited successes emerged in select northeastern zones, where Séléka consolidation suppressed sporadic pre-2013 banditry through localized pacts, yet overall urban insecurity rose in from unchecked fighter activities, per reports of eroded on force.

Descent into Civil War

Rise of Anti-Balaka Militias

The militias coalesced in late 2013 as decentralized formations drawing from Bozizé-era loyalists, ex-soldiers from the disbanded national army, and village-based Christian groups seeking to repel Séléka incursions. These units originated in regions like Ouham prefecture, where Séléka forces—predominantly Muslim and from the northeast—had failed to impose control amid widespread indiscipline, including targeted killings and against Christian populations following the March 2013 seizure of . Séléka actions provided the proximate catalyst: documented patterns of , , and summary executions in Christian-majority areas eroded any perceived legitimacy of Michel Djotodia's transitional , prompting locals to arm themselves with available weapons such as hunting rifles and machetes rather than await ineffective state or international safeguards. and reports, based on eyewitness accounts and victim testimonies, link this mobilization directly to Séléka's failure to restrain rogue elements, though these sources emphasize that Anti-Balaka responses often exceeded defensive bounds by framing all Muslims as complicit. While proponents portrayed as avengers restoring pre-Séléka security—echoing Bozizé's rhetoric of national defense against northern predation—observers including UN monitoring teams identified revenge as the core driver, with ethnic-religious overlays amplifying recruitment but not originating the conflict dynamic. The militias' rapid westward expansion by October-November 2013, reclaiming sites like Bossangoa through ambushes on Séléka convoys, underscored this causal chain, yet also sowed seeds for reciprocal escalation as isolated reprisals against Muslim traders blurred lines between self-protection and predation.

Cycle of Retaliatory Violence and Atrocities

Following the Séléka coalition's seizure of power in March 2013, its fighters, including foreign elements from and , perpetrated widespread atrocities against Christian and animist civilians, particularly in rural areas and the capital . These acts included summary executions, rapes, and systematic looting of villages, often targeting non-Muslim communities perceived as supportive of the ousted Bozizé regime. documented war crimes by ex-Séléka rebels, such as the killing of civilians and destruction of property in neighborhoods in November 2013. reported that during their nearly ten months in control, Séléka forces were responsible for massacres, extrajudicial executions, and , exacerbating ethnic and religious tensions. These predations, characterized by indisciplined foreign fighters' brutality, displaced hundreds of thousands and fueled local grievances, setting the stage for retaliatory mobilization. In response, predominantly Christian militias emerged in late 2013 as self-defense groups but rapidly devolved into perpetrators of revenge killings and against Muslim populations, including Fulani herders and Séléka remnants. fighters conducted massacres in western , such as the January 2014 killing of over 100 Muslims in Bossemptele, and forced the exodus of Muslim communities from through arson, looting, and targeted violence. recorded attacks in February 2014 where Christian militias displaced Muslims from the capital, partitioning the city along sectarian lines. described this as systematic , with international peacekeepers failing to halt the sectarian killings. The cycle intensified as Séléka splinters retaliated in northern strongholds, but neither side secured decisive control, resulting in mutual atrocities and a fragmented . Overall, the retaliatory violence claimed thousands of lives—over 2,000 documented deaths between Séléka and forces by mid-2014—and triggered massive displacement, with UNHCR estimating nearly 1 million internally displaced persons at the crisis's peak in 2014, predominantly fleeing westward. While Séléka's initial dominance eroded due to internal fractures and foreign fighter excesses, groups, often drawing from former national army elements, lacked unified command, perpetuating localized pogroms without restoring centralized authority. This bidirectional pattern of abuses, driven by revenge and ethnic targeting rather than strategic gains, underscored the failure of both coalitions to achieve lasting , entrenching communal partitions and ongoing insecurity.

Dissolution and Splintering

Formal Disbandment Efforts

In September 2013, following international of Séléka's role in widespread violence and atrocities after the March coup, President issued a presidential formally dissolving the . The order directed fighters to integrate into the or demobilize, ostensibly to restore state authority and curb militia excesses amid reports of thousands of civilian deaths and displacements attributed to Séléka elements. However, the faced immediate , as many commanders and rank-and-file fighters rejected it, viewing the as their primary source of power, resources, and protection in a context of ethnic tensions and weak state institutions; empirical evidence of non-compliance included ongoing Séléka-linked attacks on civilians and security forces in and provincial areas through late 2013. External pressures intensified in early 2014, with the (AU) and () demanding verifiable disbandment and as conditions for continued support to Djotodia's transitional government. The AU Peace and Security Council, in a January 29, 2014, heads-of-state meeting, issued an ultimatum requiring Djotodia to neutralize ex-Séléka elements and restore order, threatening sanctions and suspension otherwise—a move tied to escalating that had displaced over 935,000 people by year's end. Partial efforts emerged, such as limited pledges during regional consultations hosted in , , involving Chadian mediation and Economic Community of Central African States (ECCAS) representatives, but these yielded only token compliances, with fewer than 1,000 fighters surrendering arms amid reports of hidden stockpiles and continued operations under "ex-Séléka" labels. These disbandment initiatives reflected dual motives: genuine international aims to halt retaliatory cycles and stabilize the transitional regime versus tactical maneuvers by Djotodia to buy time and legitimacy without fully relinquishing militia leverage, as evidenced by his administration's failure to prosecute internal dissenters or enforce integration into the Forces Armées Centrafricaines (FACA). The efforts ultimately failed, as Séléka fragments persisted in controlling northeastern territories and engaging in resource extraction, contributing to Djotodia's forced resignation on January 10, 2014, and the coalition's splintering rather than dissolution. This outcome underscored the limits of decree-based disbandment in low-trust environments lacking robust verification mechanisms or incentives for compliance.

Emergence of Successor Factions

Following the Peace Forum's failure to unify ex-Séléka elements and Michel Djotodia's ousting in January 2014, the coalition fragmented into autonomous armed groups prioritizing territorial control in the northeast and east over any shared ideological framework. By mid-2014, these splinters had delineated spheres of influence, with factions carving out zones amid the power vacuum left by the transitional government's collapse. The Patriotic Front for the Rebirth of (FPRC), led by , emerged on July 10, 2014, in Birao, consolidating ex-Séléka forces in the northern prefectures like Vakaga and Haute-Kotto. , a Chadian-CAR national previously aligned with Séléka's UFDR component, positioned the FPRC to dominate the northeast, rejecting integration into national structures and advocating for regional autonomy in response to perceived marginalization by the Christian-majority south. This contrasted with portrayals of such groups as mere enterprises, though analysts note their operations often devolved into localized fiefdoms enforcing ethnic Muslim dominance in controlled areas. In October 2014, Ali Darassa formed the Union for Peace in Central Africa (UPC), primarily Fulani ex-Séléka fighters, securing influence in Ouaka and Bamingui-Bangoran prefectures around Bria, a key eastern hub. The UPC's territorial hold emphasized defensive consolidation against incursions rather than expansionist ideology, with Darassa's group clashing with FPRC units over overlapping claims in diamond-prospective eastern zones by late 2014. These inter-factional hostilities escalated after Adam's FPRC proposed northern —a demand Darassa and UPC rejected—leading to open fighting that partitioned ex-Séléka holdings and undermined any remnant coalition loyalty. Leadership fissures exacerbated the splits, particularly between Adam and Djotodia, whose July 12, 2014, reinstatement as a Séléka figurehead failed to bridge rifts, as Adam's FPRC sidelined Djotodia's influence in favor of independent northern command. Further splintering produced groups like the Renewal of the Patriotic Front for the Central African Republic (RPRC) in November 2014, initially FPRC-affiliated but diverging over internal power disputes. By year's end, at least four major ex-Séléka-derived entities controlled discrete territories, reflecting pragmatic divisions driven by ethnic ties, local grievances against central neglect, and competition for strategic locales rather than unified rebellion.

Economic and Illicit Engagements

Control of Natural Resources

Séléka forces seized control of major sites in the Haute-Kotto prefecture following their advance in late , including the diamond-rich hub of Bria on December 18, , and the Ndassima mine by November 2014, dominating extraction and trade routes in eastern (CAR). Ex-Séléka factions, such as the Front Populaire pour la Renaissance de la Centrafrique (FPRC) and Union pour la Paix en Centrafrique (UPC), imposed taxes on miners, traders, and transport, generating revenues estimated at $3.87–$5.8 million annually from illicit trade alone, supplemented by and site-specific fees like UPC's $150,000 yearly from Ndassima licenses. Approximately 82% of and 90% of from these areas were smuggled to neighboring countries like and , bypassing state oversight and fueling group finances through unregulated networks. This resource dominance provided a critical economic lifeline, enabling ex-Séléka groups to procure weapons, pay minimal stipends to fighters (often limited to one daily meal), and maintain operations amid chronic shortfalls in external aid and formal governance, as evidenced by IPIS conflict mappings linking mining control to sustained insurgencies in ungoverned eastern CAR. Inter-factional violence, such as FPRC-UPC clashes in Bria and Haute-Kotto over tax shares, underscored resource extraction as a primary motivator beyond initial ideological grievances, with revenues prioritizing commander enrichment and territorial hold. While enabling informal economic activity that supported local miners' livelihoods in state-absent zones, Séléka control drew criticism for systematic of artisanal workers, environmental degradation from unchecked alluvial , and displacement of communities through forced labor and site seizures. These practices exacerbated poverty cycles, as groups extracted rents without reinvestment, contrasting with potential state-regulated benefits in more controlled sectors.

Involvement in Arms and Contraband Trade

The Séléka coalition sourced a significant portion of its weaponry from porous borders with and , facilitating the influx of that sustained its military operations during the 2013 offensive and subsequent fragmentation. Reports indicate that fighters from these neighboring countries brought arms caches, including assault rifles and launchers, which were integrated into Séléka arsenals alongside stockpiles seized from government forces. These supply lines, often traversing northeastern prefectures like Vakaga, enabled ex-Séléka factions such as the Front populaire pour la renaissance de la Centrafrique (FPRC) and Union pour la paix en Centrafrique (UPC) to maintain combat capacity post-2013 through illicit trafficking networks originating in . Parallel to arms flows, Séléka elements engaged in of and , leveraging alliances with pastoralist communities, particularly Fulani herders, to generate revenue and logistical support. Séléka units exploited in eastern areas, participating directly in hunts and facilitating routes toward and , where tusks were exchanged for goods or cash to procure ammunition. trafficking, intertwined with these networks, involved protection rackets and cross-border herding corridors, allowing Séléka to tax livestock movements and offset operational costs amid . This dual trade in arms and fostered Séléka's operational by providing non-state funding streams, circumventing formal supply dependencies and perpetuating factional viability through border-based exchanges rather than centralized logistics. UN assessments highlight how such activities, concentrated in the northeast, reinforced cycles of armament without reliance on domestic structures.

International Responses and Interventions

African Union and Regional Initiatives

In response to escalating violence by the Séléka coalition, the Economic Community of Central African States (ECCAS), as the primary regional body, mediated the Comprehensive Peace Agreement on January 11, 2013, establishing a , power-sharing arrangements, and integration of rebel forces into the national army. The accord required Séléka to halt advances and the government to reform , yet Séléka forces violated terms by capturing additional territories, culminating in the March 24, 2013, seizure of and ouster of President , demonstrating ECCAS's inability to enforce compliance amid weak monitoring mechanisms. The (AU) authorized the African-led International Support Mission in the (MISCA) on December 5, 2013, under UN Security Council Resolution 2127, tasking it with protecting civilians, restoring state authority, and disarming ex-Séléka elements and other militias in a deployment initially planned for 3,600 troops from AU states including , Congo, and . MISCA inherited elements from ECCAS's earlier Force Multinationale en Centrafrique (FOMAC), aiming to transition from regional to continental leadership, but operational delays and logistical shortages restricted effective coverage, with violence displacing over 935,000 people by mid-2014 despite patrols in and select provinces. contributed approximately 850 troops to MISCA but faced accusations of partiality, including reports of Chadian forces colluding with ex-Séléka in door-to-door killings of suspected militias on December 5, 2013, exacerbating sectarian tensions. These perceptions of bias prompted Chad's full withdrawal from MISCA on April 3, , reducing troop strength and straining the mission's mandate as retaliatory attacks persisted, with documenting ex-Séléka war crimes in areas nominally under AU protection. Outcomes reflected limited stabilization: MISCA secured parts of the capital but failed to disarm core Séléka factions, contributing to over 5,000 deaths and intercommunal clashes through , as non-compliance with persisted. AU initiatives drew mixed assessments, with proponents citing prevention of through rapid deployment versus critics arguing delayed post-coup action and troop biases effectively prolonged Séléka influence by undermining neutral enforcement.

UN, French, and Other Foreign Involvement

In December 2013, France launched Operation Sangaris in response to escalating sectarian violence following the Séléka coalition's seizure of power, deploying approximately 2,500 troops alongside the African Union's MISCA force under a UN Security Council mandate to protect civilians and restore security in Bangui. The operation succeeded in reducing urban combat and mass killings in the capital, where Séléka-allied militias had targeted non-Muslim communities, enabling some internally displaced persons to return from camps; however, it faced accusations of uneven enforcement, with reports of French forces prioritizing Christian areas amid retaliatory anti-Balaka attacks, exacerbating perceptions of partiality in a conflict fueled by resource grabs and proxy influences from neighboring Sudan. Sangaris wound down by October 2016 after stabilizing key urban zones but failed to neutralize rural Séléka holdouts, contributing to sustained displacement of over 400,000 people by early 2014 as militias regrouped along Sudanese borders for arms flows. The United Nations Multidimensional Integrated Stabilization Mission in the Central African Republic (), authorized in April 2014 with an initial force of up to 12,000 troops, assumed primary responsibility for civilian protection after absorbing MISCA elements, conducting operations against ex-Séléka factions holding northeastern territories and diamond mines. 's mandate included disarming armed groups and facilitating political dialogue, yet empirical assessments show mixed results: early deployments correlated with a 50% drop in civilian casualties in protected areas from 2014-2016, but violence surged post-2016 as ex-Séléka coalitions like the Union for Peace in evaded UN patrols, exploiting Sudan's porous frontiers for logistics and recruitment. By 2017, intensified clashes prompted to expand troop numbers beyond 13,000, though mandate constraints limited offensive actions, allowing proxy dynamics—such as Sudanese support for Séléka remnants via cross-border trade in arms and —to persist and drive recurrent displacement waves exceeding 600,000 internally by 2018. Post-Sangaris, emerged as a key foreign actor from 2018, deploying mercenaries—initially up to 1,000 personnel—to bolster the Touadéra government against ex-Séléka offensives, reclaiming over 80% of territory from rebel control by through aggressive tactics that included concessions in exchange for basing rights. This support countered Sudanese-backed networks sustaining Séléka splinters, reducing urban displacement but drawing UN and critiques for alleged summary executions and exploitation, with Wagner forces accused of prioritizing interests over humanitarian goals. Overall, these interventions mitigated immediate Séléka threats in population centers but amplified geopolitical rivalries, as French withdrawal created vacuums filled by Russian proxies, perpetuating low-intensity conflicts tied to external patronage rather than resolving underlying grievances.

Legacy and Contemporary Relevance

Long-Term Sociopolitical Impacts

The Séléka rebellion of 2013 entrenched warlordism across the (CAR), particularly in the northeast, where former Séléka factions have sustained autonomy in prefectures like Vakaga and Bamingui-Bangoran, limiting reach and fostering parallel governance structures reliant on armed patronage networks. This dynamic has perpetuated a fragmented authority landscape, with armed groups exercising control over local administration, taxation, and , as documented in conflict mappings post-2013. The uprising intensified ethnic and religious polarization, transforming pre-existing north-south divides into entrenched sectarian cleavages between predominantly Muslim northeastern communities and Christian/animist southern populations, with inter-communal violence persisting in cycles of retaliation long after the initial takeover. Such divisions have eroded social cohesion, as evidenced by sustained displacement of over 700,000 people internally by 2023 and recurrent clashes framing conflict along identity lines. CAR's state fragility deepened enduringly, with the country scoring 103.9 on the 2024 —among the world's highest—reflecting breakdowns in legitimate governance, security provision, and institutional coherence exacerbated by the Séléka era's institutional collapse. Pre-Séléka vulnerabilities, including Bozizé's corruption and neglect from 2003–2013, were laid bare by the coup, arguably catalyzing a transitional process that culminated in Faustin-Archange Touadéra's election as a nominally democratic outcome, though marred by fraud allegations. Perspectives on Séléka's legacy diverge: some analyses frame it as a disruptive catalyst exposing Bozizé-era rot and prompting elite turnover, while others emphasize its role as a destroyer of social fabric through widespread atrocities, infrastructure devastation, and the normalization of militia rule. Overall, the rebellion has locked CAR into a low-trust equilibrium, with governance metrics showing minimal recovery in state legitimacy or cohesion metrics by 2024.

Current Factions and Role in Ongoing Conflicts

Successor factions to Séléka, notably the Union for Peace in Central Africa (UPC) and Return, Reclamation, and Rehabilitation (3R), joined the (CPC) upon its formation in December 2020 to oppose the government. These groups clashed with (CAR) forces supported by Russian private military contractors, contributing to ongoing instability in rural areas. A peace agreement signed on April 19, 2025, in N'Djamena between the CAR government and 14 armed groups, including UPC and 3R, aimed to end hostilities and facilitate disarmament; the African Union Commission Chairperson welcomed the accord as a step toward reconciliation. On July 10, 2025, UPC and 3R formally dissolved during a public ceremony in Bangui, with leaders committing to cease operations and support national reintegration efforts. Despite these developments, residual factional activity endures. Clashes between rival 3R elements in Bozoum on June 24, 2025, resulted in at least six civilian deaths and displaced 5,000 to 6,000 people. In October 2025, further 3R demobilizations occurred in northwestern Sanguéré-Lim, indicating piecemeal compliance amid persistent splinter threats. UN reports document continued attacks by armed groups, including CPC remnants, between 2023 and 2025, often targeting civilians and exacerbating tensions from the influx of over 29,000 Sudanese refugees since April 2023. Northeastern regions like Vakaga retain pockets of ex-Séléka influence, where non-signatory elements reject integration and sustain low-level operations against state authority. Debates persist on balancing disarmament, demobilization, and reintegration (DDR) processes against targeted elimination of irreconcilable holdouts to secure territorial control.

References

  1. https://www.ushmm.org/genocide-prevention/countries/central-african-republic/history-of-the-conflict
  2. https://www.crisisgroup.org/africa/central-africa/central-african-republic/dix-ans-apres-le-coup-detat-la-republique
  3. https://www.cfr.org/global-conflict-tracker/conflict/violence-central-african-republic
  4. https://www.hrw.org/news/2013/11/24/central-african-republic-war-crimes-ex-seleka-rebels
  5. https://www.hrw.org/news/2013/06/27/central-african-republic-seleka-forces-kill-scores-burn-villages
  6. https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/afr19/006/2014/en/
  7. https://news.un.org/en/story/2014/01/459652
  8. https://www.hrw.org/news/2020/01/15/djotodia-returns-central-african-republic
  9. https://www.iiss.org/online-analysis/online-analysis/2019/04/central-african-republic-armed-groups/
  10. https://www.rulac.org/browse/conflicts/non-international-armed-conflict-in-the-central-african-republic
  11. https://www.globalr2p.org/countries/central-african-republic/
  12. https://www.hrw.org/report/2017/07/05/killing-without-consequence/war-crimes-crimes-against-humanity-and-special
  13. https://www.hrw.org/report/2013/09/18/i-can-still-smell-dead/forgotten-human-rights-crisis-central-african-republic
  14. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2014/04/qa-central-african-republic-s-human-rights-crisis/
  15. https://caert.org.dz/Publications/Journal/Journal-no-5.pdf
  16. https://ipisresearch.be/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/IPIS-CAR-Conflict-Mapping-November-2014.pdf
  17. https://www.ipinst.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/1701_Peace-by-Pieces.pdf
  18. https://www.clingendael.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/CAR_Report.pdf
  19. https://www.borgenmagazine.com/sectarianism-central-african-republic-conflict/
  20. https://enoughproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/SplinteredWarfare_August2017_Enough_final.pdf
  21. https://gsdrc.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/CAR_GSDRC2013.pdf
  22. https://www.clingendael.org/pub/2015/speculating_on_crisis/1_governance_of_the_car/
  23. https://docs.un.org/en/A/HRC/36/47/Add.1
  24. https://institute.global/insights/geopolitics-and-security/what-seleka
  25. https://www.securitycouncilreport.org/atf/cf/%257B65BFCF9B-6D27-4E9C-8CD3-CF6E4FF96FF9%257D/s_2014_452.pdf
  26. https://enoughproject.org/wp-content/uploads/SplinteredWarfare2_Enough_Nov2018-web.pdf
  27. https://www.crisisgroup.org/africa/central-african-republic/failure-has-many-fathers-coup-central-african-republic
  28. https://qz.com/403428/history-shows-that-the-peace-agreement-in-the-central-african-republic-probably-wont-stick
  29. https://www.securitycouncilreport.org/monthly-forecast/2013-04/2013_04_central_african_republic.php
  30. https://news.un.org/en/story/2013/01/429722
  31. https://news.un.org/en/story/2011/02/366282
  32. https://ideasforpeace.org/content/understanding-the-2013-coup-detat-in-the-central-african-republic/
  33. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD?locations=CF
  34. https://databankfiles.worldbank.org/public/ddpext_download/poverty/33EF03BB-9722-4AE2-ABC7-AA2972D68AFE/Global_POVEQ_CAF.pdf
  35. https://www.globalr2p.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/OccasionalPaper_CAR_Final.pdf
  36. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:952873/FULLTEXT01.pdf
  37. https://ipisresearch.be/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/1809-CAR-conflict-mapping_web.pdf
  38. https://www.paradigmpress.org/SSSH/article/download/472/411/609
  39. https://bti-project.org/en/reports/country-report/CAF
  40. https://www.crisisgroup.org/africa/central-africa/central-african-republic-chad/317-violence-et-transhumance-en-centrafrique-le-temps-dagir
  41. https://www.voanews.com/a/seleka-rebellion-in-car-sparks-cycle-of-violence/1850183.html
  42. https://ucdp.uu.se/additionalinfo/416/1
  43. https://pksoi.armywarcollege.edu/index.php/minusca-missions-political-activities/
  44. https://www.securitycouncilreport.org/atf/cf/%257B65BFCF9B-6D27-4E9C-8CD3-CF6E4FF96FF9%257D/s_2013_557.pdf
  45. https://docs.un.org/en/A/HRC/24/59
  46. https://www.securitycouncilreport.org/whatsinblue/2013/03/central-african-republic-briefing.php
  47. https://press.un.org/en/2013/sc10879.doc.htm
  48. https://enoughproject.org/reports/dangerous-divisions-central-african-republic-faces-threat-secession
  49. https://www.cnn.com/2013/12/12/world/africa/car-violence
  50. https://www.voanews.com/a/central-african-republic-rebels-seize-another-town/1572552.html
  51. https://fides.org/en/news/32910-AFRICA_CENTRAL_AFRICAN_REPUBLIC_Rebels_of_the_coalition_Seleka_conquer_Bria_an_important_diamond_center
  52. https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2012/dec/21/rebel-central-african-republic-humanitarian
  53. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-20775788
  54. https://news.un.org/en/story/2012/12/429092
  55. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2012/12/28/central-african-rebels-advance-on-capital
  56. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/photo/rebels-central-african-republic-say-they-have-halted-advance-agreed-flna1b7810444
  57. https://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/12/world/africa/rebels-agree-to-cease-fire-in-central-african-republic.html
  58. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-21915901
  59. https://www.armedgroups-internationallaw.org/2013/03/25/timeline-seleka-alliance-what-is-it-and-what-were-the-events-that-lead-to-its-taking-of-bangui/
  60. https://globalvoices.org/2013/03/24/meet-michel-djotodia-self-declared-president-of-the-central-african-republic/
  61. https://www.fidh.org/IMG/pdf/rca616a2013basdef.pdf
  62. https://www.hrw.org/news/2013/05/10/central-african-republic-rampant-abuses-after-coup
  63. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2013/3/25/looting-and-gunfire-in-captured-car-capital
  64. https://www.france24.com/en/20130403-central-african-republic-president-djotodia-rebel-elections
  65. https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL5N0CM0GK/
  66. https://www.unhcr.org/us/news/briefing-notes/new-refugee-outflows-follow-new-violence-central-african-republic
  67. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2013/3/31/car-president-forms-caretaker-government
  68. https://www.france24.com/en/20130331-central-african-republic-transitional-government
  69. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-22139544
  70. https://www.theafricareport.com/5256/for-now-djotodia-holds-on-in-central-african-republic/
  71. https://docs.un.org/en/S/2016/133
  72. https://www.crisisgroup.org/africa/central-africa/central-african-republic/central-african-republic-third-government-thirteen-months-gets-under-way
  73. https://afrodad.org/sites/default/files/publications/Central-Africa-Debt-Profile-2018.pdf
  74. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/scr/2016/cr16272.pdf
  75. https://2009-2017.state.gov/p/af/rls/rm/2013/217725.htm
  76. https://www.securitycouncilreport.org/atf/cf/%7B65BFCF9B-6D27-4E9C-8CD3-CF6E4FF96FF9%7D/s_2013_557.pdf
  77. https://2009-2017.state.gov/j/drl/rls/hrrpt/2013/af/220095.htm
  78. https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2014/country-chapters/central-african-republic
  79. https://www.globalr2p.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/2014-May-car-brief.pdf
  80. https://www.hrw.org/report/2013/12/18/they-came-kill/escalating-atrocities-central-african-republic
  81. https://www.imctc.org/en/eLibrary/Articles/Pages/article24082025.aspx
  82. https://www.unrefugees.org/news/violence-in-bangui-triggers-fresh-displacement-in-central-african-republic/
  83. https://www.unhcr.org/node/16368
  84. https://www.france24.com/en/20130913-central-african-republic-djotodia-dissolves-seleka-rebel-group
  85. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2013/9/14/cars-new-president-dissolves-rebel-group
  86. https://docs.un.org/en/S/2014/172
  87. https://www.dw.com/en/chads-role-behind-the-scenes-in-the-central-african-republic/a-17426113
  88. https://issafrica.org/iss-today/dissolving-the-seleka-rebel-group-could-be-a-recipe-for-disaster-in-the-car
  89. https://2009-2017.state.gov/j/drl/rls/hrrpt/2014/af/236340.htm
  90. https://www.reuters.com/article/world/africa/cafrica-republics-ousted-leader-back-in-charge-of-seleka-idUSL6N0PN0KN/
  91. https://www.thenewhumanitarian.org/feature/2017/05/18/central-african-republic-rebels-turn-each-other-violence-flares
  92. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/para/fprc.htm
  93. https://www.reuters.com/article/world/central-africa-republics-ousted-leader-back-in-charge-of-seleka-idUSKBN0FH0NL/
  94. https://reliefweb.int/report/central-african-republic/dangerous-divisions-central-african-republic-faces-threat-secession
  95. https://www.voanews.com/a/rebels-retain-control-mine-central-african-republic/2530046.html
  96. https://enoughproject.org/reports/warlord-business-cars-violent-armed-groups-and-their-criminal-operations-profit-and-power
  97. https://ipisresearch.be/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/20130326_CAR.pdf
  98. https://www.conflictarm.com/car_publications/NONSTATE_ARMED_GROUPS_IN_CENTRAL_AFRICAN_REPUBLIC.pdf
  99. https://www.conflictarm.com/download-file/?file_id=2434&report_id=2433
  100. https://reliefweb.int/report/central-african-republic/final-report-panel-experts-central-african-republic-extended-1
  101. https://enoughproject.org/blog/new-un-investigative-report-reveals-failures-tackle-root-causes-conflict-car
  102. https://www.securitycouncilreport.org/atf/cf/%257B65BFCF9B-6D27-4E9C-8CD3-CF6E4FF96FF9%257D/s_2017_639.pdf
  103. https://globalvoices.org/2013/03/31/inside-the-2013-central-african-republic-crisis/
  104. https://press.un.org/en/2013/sc11200.doc.htm
  105. https://docs.un.org/en/S/2013/677
  106. https://www.securitycouncilreport.org/atf/cf/%257B65BFCF9B-6D27-4E9C-8CD3-CF6E4FF96FF9%257D/s_2013_787.pdf
  107. https://www.reuters.com/article/world/un-points-to-chadian-collusion-in-central-african-republic-killings-idUSBREA0D0VO/
  108. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-27052367
  109. https://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/04/world/africa/as-leaders-meet-report-describes-chaos-in-central-african-republic.html
  110. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2013/12/26/chad-troops-in-car-accused-of-pro-seleka-bias
  111. http://www.globalr2p.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/OccasionalPaper_CAR_Final.pdf
  112. https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=92855
  113. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/dec/05/central-african-republic-un-vote-french
  114. https://www.csis.org/analysis/france-rescue-again-central-african-republic
  115. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-37823047
  116. https://theglobalobservatory.org/2016/11/sangris-central-african-republic-france-peacekeeping/
  117. https://www.crisisgroup.org/fr/africa/central-african-republic/b096-centrafrique-lintervention-de-la-derniere-chance
  118. https://peacekeeping.un.org/en/mission/minusca
  119. https://reliefweb.int/report/central-african-republic/assessing-effectiveness-un-mission-central-african-republic
  120. https://www.thenewhumanitarian.org/analysis/2023/09/07/wagner-woes-and-rebel-crackdown-briefing-central-african-republics-shifting
  121. https://www.hrw.org/news/2022/05/03/central-african-republic-abuses-russia-linked-forces
  122. https://icoca.ch/case-studies/modern-mercenaries-the-wagner-group-in-central-african-republic/
  123. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/africa/wagner-ukraine-russia-central-african-republic-gold-mine-putin-rcna86392
  124. https://globalinitiative.net/analysis/warlord-business-cars-violent-armed-groups-and-their-criminal-operations-for-profit-and-power/
  125. https://www.theglobaleconomy.com/Central-African-Republic/fragile_state_index/
  126. https://blogs.worldbank.org/en/developmenttalk/unraveling-the-fragility-trap-in-the-central-african-republic-ci
  127. https://www.hrw.org/news/2023/03/27/decade-after-central-african-takeover-justice-still-needed
  128. https://www.bti-project.org/en/reports/country-report/CAF
  129. https://www.ushmm.org/genocide-prevention/countries/central-african-republic/political-and-ethnic-violence
  130. https://au.int/en/pressreleases/20250718/auc-chairperson-welcomes-19-april-peace-agreement-central-african-repuplic
  131. https://peacenews.com/central-african-republic-see-major-progress-on-disarmament-and-reintegration-of-former-fighters/
  132. https://amaniafrica-et.org/update-on-the-situation-in-central-african-republic/
  133. https://www.ungeneva.org/en/news-media/news/2025/10/111911/central-african-republic-3r-combatants-northwest-lay-down-their-arms
  134. https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2025/country-chapters/central-african-republic
  135. https://www.crisisgroup.org/africa/central-africa/central-african-republic
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.