Hubbry Logo
SpectrofluorometerSpectrofluorometerMain
Open search
Spectrofluorometer
Community hub
Spectrofluorometer
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Spectrofluorometer
Spectrofluorometer
Spectrofluorometer
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Schematic diagram of the arrangement of optical components in a typical Spectrofluorometer

A spectrofluorometer is an instrument which takes advantage of fluorescent properties of some compounds in order to provide information regarding their concentration and chemical environment in a sample. A certain excitation wavelength is selected, and the emission is observed either at a single wavelength, or a scan is performed to record the intensity versus wavelength, also called an emission spectrum.[1] The instrument is used in fluorescence spectroscopy.

Operation

[edit]

Generally, spectrofluorometers use high intensity light sources to bombard a sample with as many photons as possible. This allows for the maximum number of molecules to be in an excited state at any one point in time. The light is either passed through a filter, selecting a fixed wavelength, or a monochromator, which allows a wavelength of interest to be selected for use as the exciting light. The emission is collected at the perpendicular to the emitted light. The emission is also either passed through a filter or a monochromator before being detected by a photomultiplier tube, photodiode, or charge-coupled device detector. The signal can either be processed as digital or analog output.

Systems vary greatly and a number of considerations affect the choice. The first is the signal-to-noise ratio. There are many ways to look at the signal to noise of a given system but the accepted standard is by using the Raman signal of water. Sensitivity or detection limit is another specification to be considered, that is how little light can be measured. The standard would be fluorescein in NaOH, typical values for a high end instrument are in the femtomolar range.

Auxiliary components

[edit]

These systems come with many options, including:

  • Polarizers
  • Peltier temperature controllers
  • Cryostats
  • Cold Finger Dewars
  • Pulsed lasers for lifetime measurements
  • LEDs for lifetimes
  • Filter holders
  • Adjustable optics (very important)
  • Solid sample holders
  • Slide holders
  • Integrating spheres
  • Near-infrared detectors
  • Bilateral slits
  • Manual slits
  • Computer controlled slits
  • Fast switching monochromators
  • Filter wheels

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Spectrofluorometer

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A spectrofluorometer is a specialized used to measure the emission spectra of samples by exciting them with selected of and detecting the resulting emitted , typically at a 90-degree angle to minimize scattered interference. It enables the analysis of molecular properties, such as intensity, distribution, and , providing detailed spectral data for qualitative and quantitative assessments. The operation of a spectrofluorometer relies on the principles of , a process in which molecules absorb photons—usually in the or visible range—to reach an excited electronic state, followed by relaxation to the with the emission of lower-energy photons at longer wavelengths, known as the . This selective excitation and emission allows for high sensitivity, often detecting concentrations as low as 10^{-9} to 10^{-12} M, making it superior to absorption-based techniques for trace analysis. Key components include a broad-spectrum light source, such as a or , to generate excitation light; excitation and emission monochromators with gratings for selection; a sample compartment quartz cuvettes to hold dilute solutions; and a detector, typically a (PMT), to convert emitted photons into electrical signals for spectral recording. In contrast to basic fluorometers, which use filters for fixed-wavelength measurements, spectrofluorometers provide scanning capabilities to generate full excitation-emission matrices, enhancing their versatility. Spectrofluorometers find extensive applications in diverse fields, including biochemistry for probing protein conformations and DNA interactions, environmental monitoring for detecting pollutants like polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and medical diagnostics for assays involving fluorescent biomarkers in cancer detection. Their ability to reveal molecular microenvironment effects, such as polarity or quenching, has made them indispensable tools in research and industry since their development in the mid-20th century.

Fundamentals

Definition and Purpose

A spectrofluorometer is a specialized analytical instrument designed to measure the intensity of emitted by a sample as a function of both excitation and emission wavelengths, providing detailed spectral information for characterization.An Introduction to Fluorescence Spectroscopy Unlike simpler fluorimeters, which typically use filters for wavelength selection, spectrofluorometers incorporate scanning monochromators—often grating-based—to achieve high and flexibility in selecting precise wavelengths.Fluorescence and Phosphorescence Instrumentation The instrument was invented in the early 1950s by Robert L. Bowman, an engineer, and Sidney Udenfriend, a , at the National Heart Institute, where they developed the first spectrophotofluorimeter for applications in biochemistry and .Spectrophotofluorimeter Its primary purpose is to enable qualitative identification and quantitative determination of fluorescent molecules in complex samples, leveraging the inherent sensitivity of to detect analytes at very low concentrations, often down to or even parts per trillion for highly fluorescent compounds like quinine sulfate.Evaluation of Molecular Luminescence Spectrofluorometers typically operate in the ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) wavelength range of approximately 200–800 nm, allowing excitation of samples with light in this spectrum while capturing the resulting emission.Fluorescence Excitation and Emission Fundamentals A key feature of fluorescence is the Stokes shift, where the emitted light occurs at longer wavelengths than the excitation light due to energy loss through vibrational relaxation, which minimizes interference from scattered excitation light and enhances measurement accuracy.Stokes Shift

Principles of Fluorescence

Fluorescence was first scientifically described in by George Gabriel Stokes, who observed the phenomenon in fluorspar () and coined the term in reference to the mineral's blue-white emission under . is a type of in which a absorbs a of , exciting an from the to a higher-energy singlet , followed by the emission of a at a longer wavelength as the returns to the . This process occurs on the order of nanoseconds and involves only singlet states, distinguishing it from , which involves a spin-forbidden transition to a triplet and results in much longer emission lifetimes ranging from milliseconds to seconds. Fluorophores, the molecules capable of , typically feature conjugated π-electron systems that allow for delocalized electrons and efficient absorption and emission; common examples include aromatic compounds such as , which exhibits strong due to its structure. The energy transitions in fluorescence are illustrated by the Jablonski diagram, which depicts the ground singlet state (S₀) and the first excited singlet state (S₁), along with vibrational sublevels within each electronic state. Upon absorption of light, the molecule is promoted from S₀ to S₁, often to a higher vibrational level, followed by rapid vibrational relaxation to the lowest vibrational level of S₁ (on the picosecond timescale). From there, non-radiative processes like internal conversion may compete, but fluorescence emission occurs as the electron relaxes back to S₀, typically to a vibrational level higher than the original, releasing a photon of lower energy. This energy loss during relaxation accounts for the Stokes shift, where the emitted light has a longer wavelength (lower energy) than the absorbed light, typically in the range of 10–100 nm depending on the fluorophore and solvent environment. The efficiency of fluorescence is quantified by the quantum yield, defined as Φ=number of photons emittednumber of photons absorbed\Phi = \frac{\text{number of photons emitted}}{\text{number of photons absorbed}}, which ranges from 0 to 1 and represents the fraction of excited molecules that emit light rather than dissipating energy through non-radiative pathways. Factors influencing quantum yield include the molecular structure (e.g., rigidity of the to minimize vibrational losses) and environmental conditions such as solvent polarity, , and the presence of quenchers, which can reduce Φ\Phi by providing alternative decay routes. High quantum yields, as seen in fluorophores like fluorescein (Φ≈0.95\Phi \approx 0.95 in basic ), are desirable for sensitive detection in spectrofluorometry.

Instrumentation

Core Components

The core components of a spectrofluorometer form the fundamental optical and electronic pathway for exciting a sample with selected wavelengths and detecting the resulting emission. These include the source, excitation and emission monochromators, sample compartment, and detector, arranged in an L-format geometry where the emission detection occurs at a 90-degree to the excitation beam to minimize interference from scattered . The light source provides the broadband illumination necessary to excite fluorophores across a wide range. High-intensity arc lamps are the standard choice, offering a continuous from approximately 200 to 2000 nm with power outputs typically ranging from 150 to 1000 , enabling versatile excitation for various samples. For applications requiring precise or monochromatic excitation, lasers such as or tunable models can replace lamps, though they limit the range. The excitation selects the desired wavelength from the light source for sample illumination. This grating-based system, often employing a Czerny-Turner design with plane diffraction gratings, disperses the broadband light and uses adjustable slits to control the spectral bandwidth, typically from 1 to 20 nm, balancing resolution and signal intensity. In the sample compartment, the excited sample is housed in a to ensure transparency in the UV-visible range, preventing absorption losses that would occur with . The right-angle geometry positions the cuvette such that the excitation beam enters one face while emission is collected perpendicularly from an adjacent face, exploiting the where emitted light is at longer wavelengths than the excitation to reduce overlap. The emission monochromator isolates the fluorescence signal from scattered or background light post-sample. Similar in construction to the excitation monochromator, it scans across longer wavelengths but may incorporate a double-grating to achieve stray light rejection levels as low as 10^{-8}, enhancing sensitivity for weak emissions. The detector converts the emitted photons into an electrical signal for analysis. Photomultiplier tubes (PMTs) are predominantly used due to their high sensitivity, providing internal gain up to 10^6 through , which amplifies low-level signals effectively. Charge-coupled devices (CCDs) serve as alternatives for array-based detection, offering simultaneous multi-wavelength readout but with lower gain compared to PMTs.

Auxiliary Components

Auxiliary components in a spectrofluorometer enhance accuracy, stability, and adaptability by addressing , environmental influences, and data handling beyond the primary optical elements. These include devices for signal modulation, selective light filtering, , digital processing, and specialized sampling interfaces. A chopper or modulator serves as a mechanical or electro-optic device that alternates the excitation light beam to minimize through lock-in amplification techniques, typically operating at frequencies between 10 and 100 Hz. In fluorescence spectrometers, this modulation suppresses and detector dark current, enabling detection of weak emission signals with improved signal-to-noise ratios. Filters augment selectivity in measurements; polarization filters, often placed before the sample and detector, facilitate anisotropy assessments by analyzing the rotational diffusion of fluorophores under polarized excitation. Interference filters, meanwhile, effectively block —elastic light scatter at the excitation wavelength—while transmitting the longer-wavelength , achieving optical densities exceeding 10^5 for rejection. Temperature control systems, such as Peltier coolers or circulating baths integrated into sample holders, maintain precise thermal stability (e.g., from 4°C to 60°C) essential for temperature-sensitive fluorophores whose quantum yields and lifetimes vary with heat. These thermoelectric elements enable rapid equilibration and automated ramping, preventing spectral distortions from thermal fluctuations. The system incorporates analog-to-digital converters (ADCs) to digitize detector outputs, often at 16-bit resolution, alongside software for real-time correction to account for variations in lamp intensity across wavelengths. This processing ensures quantitative accuracy in emission profiles, compensating for source instabilities without manual intervention. For versatility with non-liquid samples, integrating spheres enable uniform illumination and collection of fluorescence from solids, a technique refined in the and for diffuse and emission analysis. Similarly, fiber optic probes, developed during the same era, support by transmitting excitation and emission light to inaccessible sites, such as or industrial environments. Modern systems often feature automated sample changers, allowing of multiple cuvettes or microplates to accelerate biomedical assays.

Operation

Basic Workflow

The basic workflow for acquiring a standard spectrum using a spectrofluorometer begins with meticulous to ensure accurate and interference-free measurements. The is dissolved in a suitable , such as high-purity deionized or , to achieve a concentration typically in the range of 10−610^{-6} to 10−910^{-9} M, which balances sensitivity with minimal self-absorption. Care is taken to avoid quenchers like dissolved oxygen or , often by the solution with or using anaerobic conditions, as these can reduce intensity non-radiatively. The prepared sample is placed in a , filled to about two-thirds capacity, and the exterior is wiped clean to prevent artifacts from dust or residue. Next, the excitation setup is configured to optimize light delivery to the sample. An appropriate is selected based on the fluorophore's absorption maximum, such as 280 nm for proteins containing residues, using the instrument's . Slit widths on the excitation and emission sides are adjusted, typically starting narrow (e.g., 1-5 nm) for higher but widened if needed to increase signal intensity, trading off resolution for better in low-concentration samples. The xenon lamp is allowed to stabilize for about 30 minutes before proceeding. Emission scanning follows, where the detector, often a photomultiplier tube, records the fluorescence intensity as a function of emission wavelength. Scanning begins just beyond the excitation wavelength plus the Stokes shift—typically 10-100 nm depending on the fluorophore—to avoid Rayleigh scattering—and extends to around 800 nm to capture the full emission profile. The right-angle geometry between excitation and emission paths minimizes direct scatter. A typical scan takes 1-10 minutes, depending on speed settings and resolution. Post-acquisition signal processing is essential for reliable data. Background fluorescence from the solvent is subtracted by measuring a blank and deducting its spectrum. Corrections for the inner filter effect are applied, particularly at higher concentrations where reabsorption of emitted light distorts intensities; this involves mathematical adjustments based on the sample's absorbance. The processed output is presented as excitation or emission spectra (intensity versus wavelength) or, for multi-wavelength scans, three-dimensional plots. The fundamental relationship governing fluorescence intensity IfI_f is given by If=Φ⋅I0⋅(1−10−ϵcl)I_f = \Phi \cdot I_0 \cdot (1 - 10^{-\epsilon c l}) where Φ\Phi is the quantum yield, I0I_0 is the incident excitation intensity, ϵ\epsilon is the molar absorptivity, cc is concentration, and ll is path length; for low concentrations where ϵcl≪1\epsilon c l \ll 1, this approximates to If≈Φ⋅I0⋅ϵclI_f \approx \Phi \cdot I_0 \cdot \epsilon c l, aligning with the Beer-Lambert law for absorbed light.

Measurement Techniques

In spectrofluorometry, excitation spectra are obtained by fixing the emission monochromator at a specific , typically the peak emission, and scanning the excitation monochromator across a range of wavelengths to identify the optimal excitation that maximizes intensity. Conversely, emission spectra are recorded by selecting a fixed excitation , often at the absorption maximum, and scanning the emission monochromator to capture the output as a function of , revealing the and spectral shape. These complementary scans provide essential data for selecting wavelengths in subsequent analyses, as the excitation spectrum mirrors the absorption profile while the emission spectrum reflects the relaxed excited-state energy distribution. Time-resolved fluorescence measurement extends steady-state spectrofluorometry by using pulsed excitation sources, such as lasers, to probe the temporal decay of fluorescence intensity following excitation, yielding insights into decay kinetics and excited-state dynamics. The fluorescence lifetime τ\tau, defined as the average time a fluorophore spends in the excited state, arises from the competition between radiative and non-radiative decay pathways. The excited-state population N∗(t)N^*(t) follows the differential equation dN∗dt=−(kf+knr)N∗\frac{dN^*}{dt} = -(k_f + k_{nr}) N^*, where kfk_f is the radiative decay rate constant and knrk_{nr} is the sum of all non-radiative decay rate constants, including internal conversion, intersystem crossing, and quenching. Solving this first-order differential equation with initial condition N∗(0)=N0N^*(0) = N_0 gives N∗(t)=N0e−t/τN^*(t) = N_0 e^{-t/\tau}, where the fluorescence intensity I(t)∝N∗(t)I(t) \propto N^*(t). Thus, τ=1kf+knr\tau = \frac{1}{k_f + k_{nr}}, quantifying the total decay rate and enabling separation of radiative efficiency from environmental influences. This technique is particularly valuable for distinguishing fluorophores with overlapping steady-state spectra based on lifetime differences. Fluorescence anisotropy, or polarization, measures the rotational diffusion of fluorophores during their excited-state lifetime using polarized excitation and detection, providing information on molecular size, shape, and binding interactions. Excitation with vertically polarized light selects fluorophores oriented parallel to the polarization axis, and the emitted light's polarization depends on the degree of rotation during τ\tau. The steady-state anisotropy rr is calculated as r=I∥−I⊥I∥+2I⊥r = \frac{I_{\parallel} - I_{\perp}}{I_{\parallel} + 2 I_{\perp}}, where I∥I_{\parallel} and I⊥I_{\perp} are the fluorescence intensities parallel and perpendicular to the excitation polarization, respectively. This Perrin equation-derived metric, introduced by Weber in 1952, decreases with increasing rotational mobility, as faster tumbling randomizes emission polarization. Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) analysis in spectrofluorometry quantifies non-radiative energy transfer from a donor to an acceptor within 1-10 nm, probing biomolecular proximity and interactions. The transfer efficiency EE is determined from donor lifetime changes as E=1−τDAτDE = 1 - \frac{\tau_{DA}}{\tau_D}, where τDA\tau_{DA} is the donor lifetime in the presence of the acceptor and τD\tau_D is the unquenched donor lifetime, reflecting the additional decay pathway introduced by FRET. This distance-dependent process, theoretically formulated by Förster in 1948, requires spectral overlap between donor emission and acceptor absorption, with EE scaling as 1/(1+(r/R0)6)1/(1 + (r/R_0)^6), where rr is the donor-acceptor separation and R0R_0 is the Förster distance. Synchronous scanning maintains a constant wavelength difference Δλ\Delta \lambda between excitation and emission monochromators while scanning both simultaneously, simplifying spectra of mixtures by enhancing selectivity and reducing Rayleigh scatter interference. Introduced by Lloyd in 1971, this technique produces narrow, characteristic bands for each component, facilitating multicomponent analysis without prior separation.

Applications

Biomedical and Chemical Analysis

Spectrofluorometers play a crucial role in biomedical and chemical analysis by enabling sensitive detection of biomolecular interactions and concentrations through measurements. In protein quantification, the intrinsic of aromatic such as (emission around 350 nm upon excitation at 280 nm) and allows for direct assessment of protein content without additional labeling, providing a non-destructive method superior to absorbance-based techniques for low-concentration samples. For DNA quantification, extrinsic fluorescent dyes like PicoGreen, which intercalate specifically with double-stranded DNA, are employed; the resulting enhancement in intensity (excitation at 480 nm, emission at 520 nm) permits accurate down to picogram levels in spectrofluorometric setups. Binding assays further leverage quenching, where the interaction of proteins with ligands reduces emission intensity, allowing researchers to monitor affinity and stoichiometry in real-time. Enzyme kinetics studies benefit from spectrofluorometry's ability to track real-time changes in fluorescence as substrates convert to fluorescent products or vice versa, offering kinetic parameters like Michaelis constant (Km) and maximum velocity (Vmax) with high . For instance, assays monitoring the of fluorogenic substrates provide continuous data on reaction progress, essential for understanding catalytic mechanisms in biochemical pathways. In drug discovery, spectrofluorometers facilitate of fluorophore-labeled compounds, where polarization or intensity shifts indicate binding to target proteins, enabling rapid identification of hits; subsequent dose-response curves yield half-maximal inhibitory concentration () values for lead optimization. This approach has accelerated the evaluation of thousands of candidates in assays for enzymes like kinases and proteases. A pivotal application in metabolic studies involves the fluorescence of reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH), excited at 340 nm with emission at 460 nm, which serves as an endogenous reporter of cellular redox state; this technique, pioneered by Britton Chance in the 1950s, has been foundational for non-invasive monitoring of mitochondrial function and oxidative phosphorylation in live tissues. For cell viability assays, extrinsic dyes such as fluorescein diacetate are loaded into cells, where esterase activity in viable cells hydrolyzes it to fluorescent fluorescein (excitation 488 nm, emission 520 nm), allowing spectrofluorometric quantification of live cell populations in suspension-based experiments. The high sensitivity of spectrofluorometry, often detecting nanomolar fluorophore concentrations, underpins these biomedical applications by enabling precise analysis in complex biological matrices.

Environmental and Industrial Uses

Spectrofluorometers play a crucial role in by enabling the detection of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in , including through excitation-emission matrices that provide characteristic fingerprints for identifying these pollutants. detection has been integrated into U.S. Agency (EPA) methods, such as Method 610 (established in 1984), allowing for sensitive quantification of PAHs like and in drinking and at concentrations as low as . These fluorescence-based techniques leverage the inherent emissive properties of PAHs under excitation, facilitating rapid screening without extensive sample pretreatment. In response, spectrofluorometry distinguishes between crude and refined oils by analyzing their distinct emission spectra, which reflect differences in composition. For instance, crude oils typically exhibit broader, red-shifted peaks due to higher polycyclic content, while refined products show narrower spectra from reduced heavy aromatics, enabling on-site classification during spill assessments. This differentiation supports efforts by identifying spill sources and tracking dispersion in marine or coastal environments. Remote sensing applications advanced in the with the development of fiber-optic probes coupled to spectrofluorometers for in-situ analysis, allowing direct measurements without soil extraction. These probes, often equipped with excitation sources, detect fluorescent contaminants like PAHs or hydrocarbons at depths up to several meters, providing real-time data for site characterization and cleanup monitoring. In the , spectrofluorometers detect adulterants such as in using labeled fluorescent probes that exhibit or enhancement upon binding, ensuring product safety and . For example, lanthanide-based probes form complexes with , resulting in intensified emission at specific wavelengths measurable by spectrofluorometry, with detection limits below 1 ppm suitable for routine . Pharmaceutical manufacturing employs spectrofluorometers for purity assessments by identifying and quantifying fluorescent impurities in drug substances and formulations. Techniques involve exciting samples at optimal wavelengths to monitor impurity emissions, such as those from genotoxic amines like , ensuring compliance with pharmacopeial limits through high-sensitivity detection. This method's selectivity for aromatic fluorophores aids in and batch release testing.

Advantages and Limitations

Strengths

Spectrofluorometers offer exceptional sensitivity, capable of detecting fluorophores at concentrations as low as 10−1210^{-12} M, owing to the measurement of emitted signals against a low background noise, typically near zero in the absence of emission. This contrasts sharply with absorption-based techniques, where sensitivity is constrained by the need to differentiate small differences in transmitted light intensity from a bright background, resulting in fluorescence methods being 1,000 to 10,000 times more sensitive than UV-Vis governed by the Beer-Lambert law. The technique provides high selectivity through precise control of excitation wavelengths, which minimizes interference from non-fluorescent or those with mismatched emission profiles, enabling targeted analysis of specific analytes in complex mixtures. Furthermore, the generation of excitation-emission matrices (EEMs) yields multidimensional spectral data, allowing discrimination of multiple fluorophores based on their unique excitation and emission signatures, enhancing resolution in samples with overlapping spectra. As a non-destructive method, spectrofluorometry preserves sample , permitting reuse for subsequent analyses or experiments without alteration, which is particularly advantageous for valuable or limited quantities of material. Spectrofluorometers demonstrate versatility across diverse sample types, including liquids, solids, suspensions, and gases, through the use of appropriate accessories such as cuvettes, front-face holders, or flow cells, broadening their utility in various analytical contexts.

Challenges and Considerations

One major challenge in spectrofluorometry is , the irreversible degradation of due to prolonged exposure to excitation light, which reduces signal intensity over time and limits measurement duration. This process is exacerbated by high light intensity and , leading to covalent modifications in the fluorophore structure. strategies include using low excitation intensities, minimizing exposure times, and employing antifade agents or oxygen to preserve sample integrity during analysis. Inner and outer filter effects arise from the absorption of excitation or emission light by the sample itself, distorting intensity and spectral shape, particularly in concentrated solutions where exceeds 0.1. The primary inner filter effect occurs when excitation light is reabsorbed before reaching all fluorophores, while the secondary effect involves reabsorption of emitted light; outer filter effects stem from similar processes at the walls. A common correction for primary and secondary inner filter effects uses the formula Fcorr=Fobs×10(Aex+Aem)/2F_{\text{corr}} = F_{\text{obs}} \times 10^{(A_{\text{ex}} + A_{\text{em}})/2}, where FobsF_{\text{obs}} is the observed intensity, and AexA_{\text{ex}} and AemA_{\text{em}} are the at the excitation and emission wavelengths, respectively, assuming a simple model for low to moderate values in a 1 cm . Accurate corrections require simultaneous measurement of spectra and may involve more sophisticated models for high-concentration samples. Scattering artifacts, such as Rayleigh (elastic) and Tyndall (colloidal) , introduce background noise that overlaps with signals, especially in turbid or particulate samples, reducing sensitivity and accuracy. These effects are prominent when emission wavelengths are close to excitation wavelengths, as scattered light follows the same profile. Reduction is achieved through the standard 90-degree detection geometry, which minimizes direct scatter from the excitation beam, combined with cutoff filters or polarizers to suppress unwanted light. Instrument drift, often caused by lamp aging in or sources, leads to variations in excitation intensity and output over time, compromising across measurements. Such drift can alter baseline by up to several percent per hour without intervention. Daily using stable standards like sulfate in is essential to normalize intensity and correct for these instabilities, ensuring to primary references. Modern challenges in spectrofluorometry include handling nanomaterials like quantum dots, which emerged prominently after 2000 for their tunable emission properties but exhibit issues such as photoblinking—intermittent due to charge trapping—and size polydispersity affecting spectral uniformity. These properties complicate quantitative analysis in complex media, requiring specialized protocols for stabilization and characterization. For analyzing complex mixtures with overlapping spectra, best practices involve spectral deconvolution software employing multivariate methods like linear unmixing or to resolve individual contributions without prior separation. Tools such as those based on enable accurate component identification by modeling excitation-emission matrices, improving resolution in biological or environmental samples.

References

  1. https://www.chem.uci.edu/~dmitryf/manuals/Fundamentals/Fluorescence%20Spectroscopy.pdf
  2. https://iss.com/media/Fluorescence_Spectroscopy.pdf
  3. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/335060282.pdf
  4. https://micro.magnet.fsu.edu/primer/lightandcolor/fluorescencehome.html
  5. https://micro.magnet.fsu.edu/primer/techniques/fluorescence/fluorescenceintro.html
  6. https://www.sjsu.edu/people/steven.lee/courses/c3/s4/fluorescence_molecular_probes.pdf
  7. https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/jres/80A/jresv80An3p389_A1b.pdf
  8. https://www.horiba.com/usa/scientific/technologies/fluorescence-spectroscopy/what-is-a-fluorescence-measurement/
  9. https://www.jasco-global.com/principle/principles-of-fluorescence-spectroscopy-3-instrument-configuration/
  10. https://www.horiba.com/usa/scientific/products/detail/action/show/Product/fluoromax-1576/
  11. https://www.vanderbilt.edu/vinse/instrumentation/spectrofluorometer/
  12. https://www.edinst.com/resource/what-is-a-fluorescence-spectrometer/
  13. https://sites.olemiss.edu/files/cgri/files/FluoroMax_Plus_Spectrofluorometer_datasheet.pdf
  14. https://www.thorlabs.com/newgrouppage9.cfm?objectgroup_id=5943
  15. https://static.horiba.com/fileadmin/Horiba/Technical_Notes/Intermediate_Slits_on_double_monochromator_FL-TN-2020-04-22.pdf
  16. https://www.edinst.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/TN5-Stray-Light-Double-Monos.pdf
  17. https://www.horiba.com/usa/scientific/products/detail/action/show/Product/photon-counting-pmt-detection-system-1623/
  18. https://psec.uchicago.edu/library/photomultipliers/Photonis_PMT_basics.pdf
  19. https://www.jasco.hu/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/FP-8000E-Presentation-ABLE_small.pdf
  20. https://scian.cl/scientific-image-analysis/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/2006_PrinciplesOfFluorescenceSpectroscopy_Springer_Lakowicz-1.pdf
  21. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.147.3659.729
  22. https://iss.com/media/publications/single-molecule.pdf
  23. https://www.horiba.com/usa/scientific/products/detail/action/show/Product/rapid-peltier-based-temperature-controlled-sample-holders-6199/
  24. https://www.hitachi-hightech.com/us/en/products/analytical-systems/spectrophotometers/fl/f2700-f2710.html
  25. https://opg.optica.org/abstract.cfm?uri=ao-36-6-1289
  26. https://www.shimadzu.com/an/products/molecular-spectroscopy/fluorescence/fluorescence-spectroscopy-software/ilabsolutions-rf/features.html
  27. https://iss.com/sample-compartments/integrating-sphere
  28. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA213951.pdf
  29. https://www.agilent.com/en/product/molecular-spectroscopy/fluorescence-spectroscopy/fluorescence-accessories/cary-eclipse-thermostatted-multicell-holders
  30. https://biolabscientific.com/content/manuals/BSFL-103.pdf
  31. https://www.thermofisher.com/us/en/home/references/molecular-probes-the-handbook/introduction-to-fluorescence-techniques.html
  32. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389556719300875
  33. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/fluorescence-intensity
  34. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2924670/
  35. http://nathan.instras.com/MyDocsDB/doc-800.pdf
  36. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14944566/
  37. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-47658-8
  38. https://www.perkinelmer.com/library/app-fluorescence-quantification-of-dna-using-picogreen-the-spectrometer.html
  39. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4284722/
  40. https://www.jasco-global.com/solutions/enzyme-kinetics-probed-by-fluorescence-spectroscopy/
  41. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844023110723
  42. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6352511/
  43. https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/US/en/technical-documents/technical-article/cell-culture-and-cell-culture-analysis/imaging-analysis-and-live-cell-imaging/cell-viability-and-proliferation
  44. https://www.spectroscopyonline.com/view/fluorometric-assay-for-the-study-of-enzymatic-kinetics
  45. https://opg.optica.org/oe/fulltext.cfm?uri=oe-24-14-A1148&id=344503
  46. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-10/documents/method_610_1984.pdf
  47. https://www.witpress.com/Secure/elibrary/papers/WP06/WP06026FU1.pdf
  48. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsestwater.3c00648
  49. https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/conference-proceedings-of-spie/1269/1/Fiber-optic-based-chemical-sensors-for-in-situ-measurement-of/10.1117/12.20353.full
  50. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-017-2484-5_5
  51. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9855360/
  52. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/00037028211022375
  53. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-19603-9
  54. https://static.horiba.com/fileadmin/Horiba/Application/Materials/Forensics/Detection_of_Explosives_with_Fluorescence.pdf
  55. https://docs.turnerdesigns.com/t2/doc/appnotes/998-0050.pdf
  56. https://www.agilent.com/en/support/molecular-spectroscopy/fluorescence-spectroscopy/what-is-fluorescence-spectroscopy-faqs
  57. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/materials-science/excitation-emission-matrix-fluorescence-spectroscopy
  58. https://www.oceanoptics.com/measurement-techniques/fluorescence/
  59. https://www.emsl.pnnl.gov/science/instruments-resources/fluorescence-spectroscopy
  60. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006349509003087
  61. https://www.nature.com/articles/srep30892
  62. https://www.enzo.com/note/how-to-minimize-photobleaching/
  63. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ac50030a047
  64. https://static.horiba.com/fileadmin/Horiba/Products/Scientific/Molecular_and_Microanalysis/Duetta/Duetta_Automatic_Correction_of_Fluorescence_Spectra_for_Primary_and_Secondary_Inner-filter_Effects-Final.pdf
  65. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9118198/
  66. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341305202_Rayleigh_scattering_correction_for_fluorescence_spectroscopy_analysis
  67. https://www.drawellanalytical.com/how-to-reduce-fluorescence-measurement-errors/
  68. https://www.nist.gov/pml/sensor-science/optical-radiation/calibration-and-transfer-standards-total-spectral-radiant-flux
  69. https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/IR/nistir7458.pdf
  70. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/6395983_Fluorescence_correlation_spectroscopy_using_quantum_dots_Advances_challenges_and_opportunities
  71. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aaz8541
  72. https://www.microscopyu.com/techniques/confocal/spectral-imaging-and-linear-unmixing
  73. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/6663613_Deconvolution_of_fluorescence_spectra_Contribution_to_the_structural_analysis_of_complex_molecules
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.