Hubbry Logo
Maximum sustained windMaximum sustained windMain
Open search
Maximum sustained wind
Community hub
Maximum sustained wind
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Maximum sustained wind
Maximum sustained wind
Maximum sustained wind
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The maximum sustained wind associated with a tropical cyclone is a common indicator of the intensity of the storm. Within a mature tropical cyclone, it is found within the eyewall at a certain distance from the center, known as the radius of maximum wind, or RMW. Unlike gusts, the value of these winds are determined via their sampling and averaging the sampled results over a period of time. Wind measuring has been standardized globally to reflect the winds at 10 meters (33 ft) above mean sea level,[nb 1] and the maximum sustained wind represents the highest average wind over either a one-minute (US) or ten-minute time span (see the definition, below), anywhere within the tropical cyclone. Surface winds are highly variable due to friction between the atmosphere and the Earth's surface, as well as near hills and mountains over land.

Over the ocean, satellite imagery is often used to estimate the maximum sustained winds within a tropical cyclone. Land, ship, aircraft reconnaissance observations, and radar imagery can also estimate this quantity, when available. This value helps determine the damage potential of a tropical cyclone, through use of such scales as the Saffir–Simpson scale.

Definition

[edit]
See also: Radius of maximum wind

The maximum sustained wind normally occurs at a distance from the center known as the radius of maximum wind, within a mature tropical cyclone's eyewall, before winds decrease at farther distances away from a tropical cyclone's center.[2] Most weather agencies use the definition for sustained winds recommended by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO), which specifies measuring winds at a height of 10 meters (33 ft) for 10 minutes, and then taking the average. However, the United States National Weather Service defines sustained winds within tropical cyclones by averaging winds over a period of one minute, measured at the same 10 meters (33 ft) height.[3] This is an important distinction, as the value of the highest one-minute sustained wind is about 14% greater than a ten-minute sustained wind over the same period.[4]

Estimation and measurement

[edit]
Main article: Tropical cyclone observation

In most tropical cyclone basins, use of the satellite-based Dvorak technique is the primary method used to estimate a tropical cyclone's maximum sustained winds.[5] The extent of spiral banding and difference in temperature between the eye and eyewall is used within the technique to assign a maximum sustained wind and pressure.[6] Central pressure values for their centers of low pressure are approximate. The tracking of individual clouds on minutely satellite imagery could be used in the future in estimating surface winds speeds for tropical cyclones.[7]

Ship and land observations are also used, when available. In the Atlantic as well as the Central and Eastern Pacific basins, reconnaissance aircraft are still utilized to fly through tropical cyclones to determine flight level winds, which can then be adjusted to provide a fairly reliable estimate of maximum sustained winds. A reduction of 10 percent of the winds sampled at flight level is used to estimate the maximum sustained winds near the surface, which has been determined during the past decade through the use of GPS dropwindsondes.[8] Doppler weather radar can be used in the same manner to determine surface winds with tropical cyclones near land.[9]

Satellite Images of Selected Tropical Cyclones and Associated T-Number from Dvorak technique
Tropical Storm Wilma at T3.0 Tropical Storm Dennis at T4.0 Hurricane Jeanne at T5.0 Hurricane Emily at T6.0

Variation

[edit]
See also: Planetary boundary layer

Friction between the atmosphere and the Earth's surface causes a 20% reduction in the wind at the surface of the Earth.[10] Surface roughness also leads to significant variation of wind speeds. Over land, winds maximize at hill or mountain crests, while sheltering leads to lower wind speeds in valleys and lee slopes.[11] Compared to over water, maximum sustained winds over land average 8% lower.[12] More especially, over a city or rough terrain, the wind gradient effect could cause a reduction of 40% to 50% of the geostrophic wind speed aloft; while over open water or ice, the reduction is between 10% and 30%.[8][13][14]

Relationship to tropical cyclone strength scales

[edit]
Main article: Tropical cyclone scales

In most basins, maximum sustained winds are used to define the category of a tropical cyclone on each basin's tropical cyclone scale. In the Atlantic and northeast Pacific oceans, the Saffir–Simpson scale is used. This scale can be used to determine possible storm surge and damage impact on land. In most basins, the category of the tropical cyclone (for example, tropical depression, tropical storm, hurricane/typhoon, super typhoon, depression, deep depression, intense tropical cyclone) is determined from the cyclone's maximum sustained wind over one minute.

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Maximum sustained wind

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Maximum sustained wind refers to the highest average occurring within a , calculated over a specified short time period at a of 10 meters above the surface in an unobstructed exposure over water, and it serves as the primary indicator of the storm's intensity. In the United States and North Atlantic basin, this average is taken over one minute, while the (WMO) standard, used by most other agencies globally, employs a ten-minute averaging period. The measurement of maximum sustained winds can be direct, using anemometers on buoys, ships, or coastal stations, but in remote areas, it is often estimated through reconnaissance flights that deploy dropsondes to sample wind profiles, or via satellite-based techniques such as the , which analyzes cloud patterns to infer intensity. These estimates are crucial for real-time forecasting, as direct observations are limited, and inaccuracies can affect warnings and evacuations. The value excludes brief gusts, focusing instead on the sustained component to better represent the overall destructive potential. Maximum sustained winds form the basis for tropical cyclone classification systems worldwide, such as the Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Wind Scale in the U.S., which categorizes hurricanes from 1 to 5 based on one-minute winds starting at 74 mph (119 km/h), and similar scales elsewhere that use ten-minute averages for thresholds like tropical storm status above 63 km/h (34 knots). Higher sustained winds correlate with greater , rainfall, and structural damage, though other factors like storm size and forward speed also influence impacts. This metric has been refined over decades through international agreements to improve consistency in global monitoring and disaster preparedness.

Definition and Fundamentals

Definition

Maximum sustained wind refers to the highest average over a specified averaging period, typically 1 minute , measured or estimated at a of 10 meters above the surface in open terrain or over water, and it represents the standard metric for assessing the intensity of a . This measurement is taken near the storm's center, often within the eyewall where the strongest winds are concentrated. In other regions, such as those following standards, a 10-minute averaging period may be used instead, though the core concept remains the average speed over the defined interval to capture persistent wind strength. Unlike instantaneous gusts, which are brief peaks in wind speed lasting only a few seconds and can exceed sustained values by 20-50% in tropical cyclones due to , maximum sustained wind filters out these short-term fluctuations to provide a more representative measure of the storm's overall power. This distinction is crucial because gusts reflect momentary extremes that may cause localized damage, whereas sustained winds indicate the enduring force capable of widespread structural impacts. The maximum sustained wind typically occurs at the radius of maximum wind (RMW), the distance from the storm center where these peak speeds are found, serving as a key indicator of intensity and aiding in forecasts of potential devastation. It plays a central role in classifying storms, such as defining hurricanes under the Saffir-Simpson scale when speeds reach 74 mph or higher. The concept of maximum sustained wind originated in mid-20th century monitoring, building on early records from the 1930s and 1940s that often used 5-minute or hourly averages to document storm winds, as seen in reanalyses of events like the . By the 1970s, the term had evolved into a standardized metric with the development of the Atlantic hurricane database (HURDAT), adopting the 1-minute averaging period for consistent intensity tracking across U.S. agencies.

Radius of Maximum Wind

The radius of maximum wind (RMW) is defined as the distance from the center of a to the annular region where the highest sustained wind speeds occur. In intense tropical cyclones, this distance typically ranges from 20 to 50 km, reflecting the compact structure of stronger storms. The peak winds at the RMW are concentrated in the eyewall, a cylindrical band of deep encircling the calm eye, where intense updrafts driven by release accelerate tangential flow. Moisture convergence in the funnels humid air into this region, enhancing convective activity and conservation, which culminates in the maximum wind speeds typically exceeding 74 mph (119 km/h). The RMW varies considerably throughout a tropical cyclone's , often contracting during periods of intensification as diabatic heating strengthens low-level inflow and reduces the radial extent of peak flux. This inward contraction can occur rapidly, sometimes preceding by enhancing the efficiency of energy transfer to the winds. In contrast, the RMW tends to expand during weakening phases or eyewall replacement cycles, when outer rainbands organize and the inner eyewall dissipates, redistributing the convective maximum outward. Representative examples illustrate this range: (2005) exhibited an exceptionally small RMW of about 10 km during its peak intensity in the northwestern , contributing to its record-low central pressure. Weaker systems, by comparison, often feature larger RMWs exceeding 100 km, resulting in broader but less intense wind fields.

Measurement and Estimation

Direct Measurement Methods

Direct measurement methods for maximum sustained winds in tropical cyclones primarily involve in-situ observations from aircraft reconnaissance and surface-based instruments, providing the most accurate data for operational intensity assessment, particularly in the Atlantic basin where routine missions occur. Aircraft reconnaissance has evolved significantly since the 1940s, when the U.S. military's 53rd Weather Reconnaissance Squadron began flying manned missions into hurricanes to collect basic pressure and wind data using rudimentary instruments. By the 1990s, advancements introduced GPS dropsondes, parachute-borne sensors deployed from NOAA and U.S. Air Force aircraft that measure high-resolution vertical wind profiles from flight levels down to the surface, achieving accuracies of 1-4 mph with 15 ft resolution. Additionally, the Stepped Frequency Microwave Radiometer (SFMR) on board these aircraft directly estimates surface wind speeds by measuring microwave emissions from the ocean surface at multiple frequencies, calibrated to account for rain attenuation, providing real-time surface wind data along flight tracks essential for intensity determination. In modern operations, primarily conducted by NOAA in the Atlantic basin, flight-level winds are measured at approximately 10,000 ft (700 mb) using onboard sensors, then adjusted to estimate 10-meter surface winds by applying a 10% reduction factor, as surface winds are typically 90% of flight-level values over water. Dropsondes complement this by directly sampling near-surface winds, with over 350 profiles collected by 1999 to refine eyewall wind structures. Surface observations rely on mounted at 10 meters on buoys, ships, and coastal stations, capturing 1-minute sustained winds during storm passages. For instance, during Hurricane Ike's 2008 landfall, a research automated weather station deployed by the Texas Tech Hurricane Research Team near the eyewall recorded sustained winds of 74 mph, while moored buoys in the provided offshore data. Similarly, in (1992), ship and coastal anemometer readings helped map wind fields after exposure adjustments reduced variance from 40-50% to about 10%. These methods face key limitations, including sparse spatial coverage outside reconnaissance zones like the Atlantic, where global monitoring depends on fewer direct samples. Additionally, exposure errors arise in gusty conditions, as instruments on land or ships may underestimate peak sustained winds due to shielding or platform motion, necessitating post-event site validations.

Indirect Estimation Techniques

Indirect estimation techniques for maximum sustained wind in tropical cyclones rely on and modeling approaches when in-situ measurements are impractical, providing global coverage through satellite and observations. These methods infer wind speeds from patterns, reflectivity, and surface signatures, often calibrated against historical to estimate the maximum 1-minute sustained wind at 10 meters above the surface. Developed primarily in the late and refined with modern sensors, these techniques have become essential for real-time intensity assessment in data-sparse regions. The , introduced in the 1970s, uses visible and to estimate intensity via of cloud features such as curved bands and the . Developed by Vernon Dvorak, it assigns a Current Intensity (CI) number on a scale from 1.0 to 8.0 based on the storm's developmental stage and cloud organization, empirically correlated to maximum sustained winds. The basic satellite wind estimation follows Vmax⁡≈f(TCI)V_{\max} \approx f(T_{CI}), where TCIT_{CI} (often denoted as the T-number or CI) represents the pattern-based intensity, and ff is an empirical function derived from historical correlations between satellite-observed cloud patterns and verified wind speeds from and surface observations. This relation was initially formulated in 1975 and refined in 1984 through statistical analysis of over 200 cases, yielding a lookup table for conversion; for example, a CI of 4.0 corresponds to approximately 65 knots (75 mph), while a CI of 6.5 indicates 127 knots (146 mph). The table below summarizes the standard conversions for Atlantic and Northwest Pacific basins:
Current Intensity (CI)Maximum Sustained Wind (knots)Maximum Sustained Wind (mph)Central Pressure (Atlantic, mb)Central Pressure (NW Pacific, mb)
1.02529--
1.52529--
2.0303510091000
2.535401005997
3.045521000991
3.55563994984
4.06575987976
4.57789979966
5.090104970954
5.5102117960941
6.0115132948927
6.5127146935914
7.0140161921898
7.5155178906879
8.0170196890858
The derivation of f(TCI)f(T_{CI}) involves scene-type (e.g., curly-banded or eye patterns) and rules for CI evolution over 24 hours, calibrated to minimize errors against best-track data, achieving typical accuracies within 10-15 knots for well-organized storms. Limitations include underestimation in rapidly intensifying or sheared systems, but it remains the backbone for operational satellite-based intensity estimates. Radar-based methods employ ground- or ship-based to derive wind profiles by analyzing velocity azimuth displays (VAD) and dual-Doppler synthesis, capturing tangential s in the eyewall to infer maximum sustained speeds. These techniques reconstruct three-dimensional fields from scans, applying gradient wind balance to extrapolate surface s when radar altitude limits direct low-level sampling. Introduced in the 1980s for tropical cyclones, provides high-resolution (1-2 km) data up to 200-300 km range, enabling precise eyewall mapping. Since the 2010s, dual-polarization upgrades to networks like have enhanced eyewall analysis by distinguishing precipitation types and hydrometeor sizes, improving wind retrieval accuracy in rain-contaminated regions through differential reflectivity (Z_DR) and (ρ_HV) measurements. For instance, in (2017), dual-pol data revealed asymmetric raindrop size distributions in the eyewall, aiding refined estimates of peak winds exceeding 100 knots. These advancements reduce attenuation errors and better resolve convective bursts linked to intensity changes. Modern satellite advancements include microwave scatterometers like the Advanced Scatterometer (ASCAT) on satellites, operational since 2009, which measure ocean backscatter to derive surface wind vectors with 12.5-25 km resolution over swaths up to 550 km wide. ASCAT estimates winds by inverting radar cross-sections for speed and direction, capturing maximum sustained winds up to 50 knots reliably, though resolution limits underestimate peaks in intense storms; corrections via objective blending with models improve accuracy to within 5-10 knots. Complementing this, geostationary satellites such as and , launched in 2016 and 2018, use the Advanced Baseline Imager (ABI) for 2-km resolution infrared imagery and derive radius of maximum wind (RMW) and speeds through automated cloud motion vectors and ring-shaped patterns. These enable real-time RMW estimation within 10-20 km accuracy, supporting wind field derivation via parametric models. Post-2023 improvements incorporate for enhanced in data, addressing Dvorak's subjectivity. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) trained on historical imagery from geostationary s like GK2A achieve intensity errors below 10 knots by automating cloud feature extraction, outperforming traditional methods in cases. Transformer-based models, such as OWZP-Transformer introduced in 2025, further refine estimates by integrating multi-spectral data, yielding 25-38% intensity error reductions over baselines. These AI approaches, validated against best-track archives, are increasingly adopted operationally for faster, more objective processing.

Variations and Influences

Global Standards for Averaging Periods

The global standards for averaging periods in measuring maximum sustained winds in tropical cyclones are primarily divided between the 1-minute averaging period used by the (NHC) for the North Atlantic and Northeast Pacific basins, and the 10-minute averaging period recommended by the (WMO) for most other regions. The U.S. standard defines sustained winds as the maximum 1-minute average at 10 meters above the surface over water, facilitating rapid assessment of storm intensity in operational by agencies like the NHC. In contrast, the WMO standard employs a 10-minute average at the same height, which smooths out short-term fluctuations and is adopted by warning centers in basins such as the North , Southwest , South Pacific, Southeast (including ), and Northwest Pacific. Despite the WMO's push for uniformity, variations persist across agencies; for instance, the reports maximum sustained winds using a 2-minute averaging period in the Northwest Pacific, while the uses a 3-minute period in the . European meteorological services, though rarely dealing with tropical cyclones, align with the WMO's 10-minute standard for wind assessments in extratropical storms, emphasizing consistency in global data exchange. These differences arise from historical national practices and operational needs, complicating direct comparisons of cyclone intensities across basins without adjustments. To address these discrepancies, WMO guidelines provide conversion factors between averaging periods, noting that 1-minute winds are approximately 7% higher than 10-minute winds under typical conditions over water, approximated by the V1min≈V10min×1.075V_{1\text{min}} \approx V_{10\text{min}} \times 1.075. This factor, derived from empirical analyses of wind profiles in , varies slightly with exposure (e.g., 1.075 for open sea conditions) and is non-linear, depending on gustiness and terrain, requiring caution in application to avoid over- or underestimation. Such conversions are essential for harmonizing datasets like the International Best Track Archive for Climate Stewardship (IBTrACS), enabling global analyses of trends. Historically, wind averaging periods were inconsistent before the , with agencies using variable durations based on local observation practices and limited standardization. The introduction of the Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Wind Scale in 1971 solidified the 1-minute standard in the U.S., reflecting advancements in aircraft reconnaissance and synoptic observations, while WMO's 10-minute convention gained traction internationally through the 1993 Global Guide to Forecasting. Ongoing WMO efforts, including sub-project reports from 2008 and 2010, promote global harmonization by refining conversion methods and encouraging agencies to report both averaging periods where possible, reducing ambiguities in cross-basin intensity comparisons and improving international forecasting coordination. These variations underscore the need for standardized protocols to enhance the accuracy of global monitoring and risk assessment.

Effects of Surface Friction and Terrain

Over open ocean surfaces, where is minimal due to the relatively smooth water interface, maximum sustained winds at the 10-meter height represent approximately 80% of the gradient-level , resulting in winds that are about 20% lower at the surface compared to higher altitudes. This reduction arises from the balance between the , , and frictional drag in the , as parameterized in wind models. Upon landfall, the transition from oceanic to terrestrial surfaces introduces significantly higher frictional drag due to increased from , buildings, and , leading to an immediate reduction in maximum sustained winds by 8-20% within the first few kilometers inland. This initial drop is attributed to the abrupt increase in over land, which dissipates more rapidly than over water; for instance, parametric models simulate an abrupt 10% decrease in wind speeds at the coastline, with further deceleration inland. Over more complex terrains such as urban areas or mountainous regions, the reduction intensifies to 40-50% or more, as enhanced and form drag from structures and elevation gradients further slow near-surface flow; recent numerical simulations of (2019) over the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration show daytime wind speed attenuation rates up to 56.6% at low levels due to urban roughness. Studies comparing coastal and inland decay rates highlight that urban environments accelerate wind dissipation compared to rural coastal zones, with post-landfall maximum winds decreasing by over 5 m/s in built-up areas through frictional loss, as observed in idealized simulations of landfalling typhoons in . In the , the inflow —the deviation of near-surface winds from the purely tangential gradient wind direction—further modulates maximum sustained winds through a trigonometric adjustment, where the observed is reduced by a factor of cos⁡(θ)\cos(\theta), with θ\theta being the inflow relative to the gradient wind. This effect stems from Ekman layer dynamics, where frictional forces induce radial inflow, typically at an of about 20-25° in hurricanes, causing the tangential (azimuthal) component, which dominates maximum sustained wind estimates, to be the gradient speed multiplied by cos⁡(θ)\cos(\theta); for a mean inflow of -22.6°, this yields a reduction of approximately 8% in the tangential wind component. Parametric models incorporate this adjustment to convert gradient-level estimates to surface values, emphasizing its role in accurately representing frictionally altered winds without overestimating intensity. Hurricane Katrina (2005) exemplifies rapid post-landfall wind decay, with maximum sustained winds dropping from 125 mph (Category 3) at landfall to tropical storm strength (below 74 mph) within approximately 9 hours, driven by enhanced surface friction over coastal marshes and urban New Orleans, which increased drag and disrupted inflow. Diurnal variations in friction also influence maximum sustained winds, with observations from mature hurricanes showing wind speeds peaking in the early morning due to stabilized nocturnal layers that reduce vertical mixing and enhance near-surface convergence, while daytime heating increases and frictional dissipation, leading to 5-10% lower winds in the afternoon. These patterns, derived from data across multiple storms, underscore how solar-driven changes in height and stability modulate friction's impact on sustained wind profiles.

Applications

Relationship to Tropical Cyclone Intensity Scales

Maximum sustained wind serves as the primary metric for classifying the intensity of tropical cyclones across various regional scales, enabling standardized assessment of potential damage and risk communication. In the Atlantic and eastern North Pacific basins, the Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Wind Scale categorizes hurricanes into five levels based on 1-minute sustained wind speeds at 10 meters above the surface. Developed in 1971 by civil engineer Herbert Saffir and meteorologist Robert Simpson, the scale assigns Category 1 to storms with winds of 74-95 mph (64-82 knots), escalating to Category 5 for those exceeding 157 mph (137 knots), where catastrophic damage is expected. The (JTWC), responsible for monitoring tropical cyclones in multiple basins including the western North Pacific and North , also employs 1-minute averaging periods for consistency with U.S. standards, applying thresholds such as tropical depression for winds below 34 knots, tropical storm for 34-63 knots, and for 64 knots or higher. In contrast, the (IMD), which serves as the Regional Specialized Meteorological Center for the North (encompassing the and ), uses 3-minute sustained wind averages and classifies systems as cyclonic storms at 34-47 knots, severe cyclonic storms at 48-63 knots, and very severe cyclonic storms at 64 knots or more, with further subdivisions such as very severe cyclonic storms (64-89 knots) and extremely severe cyclonic storms (90 knots or more). These thresholds align with (WMO) guidelines, where tropical depressions are defined by maximum sustained winds under 34 knots, tropical storms range from 34-63 knots, and hurricanes/s begin at 64 knots, though IMD employs region-specific terminology. Despite their utility, these scales have limitations, as they focus exclusively on wind speed and overlook other hazards like and heavy rainfall, which can cause disproportionate damage. In 2012, the Saffir-Simpson scale was updated by the to rename it the Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Wind Scale, removing storm surge and flood estimates to improve public understanding and avoid misleading perceptions of overall risk. Global inconsistencies arise from varying averaging periods, with many basins outside the U.S. (e.g., the western North Pacific under the ) using 10-minute sustained winds, necessitating conversions—such as multiplying 10-minute values by approximately 1.14 to estimate 1-minute equivalents—for cross-basin comparisons. The WMO provides guidelines for these conversions to ensure in international monitoring.

Role in Forecasting and Warnings

Maximum sustained wind forecasts play a central role in tropical cyclone intensity prediction by leveraging empirical relationships between minimum sea level pressure (MSLP) and maximum winds, such as the Atkinson-Holliday regression, which estimates Vmax⁡=a−bln⁡(Pmin⁡)V_{\max} = a - b \ln(P_{\min}), where Vmax⁡V_{\max} is the maximum sustained wind speed and Pmin⁡P_{\min} is the central pressure, primarily calibrated for the western North Pacific but adapted for global use in operational models. These relationships inform statistical-dynamical models like the Statistical Hurricane Intensity Prediction Scheme (SHIPS), which integrate environmental predictors to forecast wind changes over lead times up to 120 hours, reducing intensity forecast errors by accounting for pressure-wind covariability. In warning issuance, forecasted maximum sustained winds determine the activation of alerts by agencies like the (NHC), where a hurricane watch is typically issued when winds exceeding 74 mph (64 knots) are possible within 48 hours, often when the cyclone is about 300 nautical miles from the coast, allowing time for preparation. A hurricane warning follows if such winds are expected within 36 hours, triggering evacuations and resource deployment based on these wind thresholds, which directly tie to the Saffir-Simpson scale for categorizing storm impacts. Modern forecasting incorporates methods to quantify uncertainty in maximum sustained wind estimates, with probabilistic approaches using (ML) models like GenCast, which generate stochastic ensembles outperforming traditional for medium-range tracks and intensities since its 2024 implementation. Advancements in the , including AI-based systems from DeepMind, have enhanced probabilistic wind forecasts by simulating multiple scenarios, improving (RI) probability estimates where winds increase by at least 35 mph in 24 hours. Historically, intensity forecasting evolved from subjective techniques before the 1990s, reliant on analyst expertise, to dynamical models like the Hurricane Analysis and Forecast System (), which replaced the HWRF in 2023 and has been upgraded to better resolve inner-core dynamics for wind predictions. Post-2023 studies have addressed RI forecasting gaps using ML-integrated data, with models like hybrid-CNN achieving up to 62% improvement in RI event detection over baseline models for 24-hour lead times, and others incorporating sea surface salinity measurements showing further enhancements for 24-72 hour leads. In public communication, NHC advisories emphasize maximum sustained winds over gusts to prevent overestimation of structural damage risks, clearly stating that gusts can reach 1.5-2 times sustained speeds but that official classifications and impact assessments rely on the 1-minute at 10 meters height. This distinction helps coastal communities focus on sustained wind-driven hazards like prolonged flooding and power outages rather than transient gust effects.

References

  1. https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/tcfaq/tcfaqD.html
  2. https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/aboutgloss.shtml
  3. https://cyclone.wmo.int/pdf/Glossary.pdf
  4. https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/aboutsshws.php
  5. https://www.weather.gov/mob/tropical_definitions
  6. https://wmo.int/content/classification-of-tropical-cyclones
  7. https://www.noaa.gov/jetstream/tropical/tropical-cyclone-introduction/tropical-cyclone-classification
  8. https://cyclone.wmo.int/pdf/Chapter-Eleven.pdf
  9. https://www.noaa.gov/jetstream/tropical/tropical-cyclone-introduction/tropical-cyclone-structure
  10. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/wefo/30/1/waf-d-13-00125_1.xml
  11. https://www.bluehill.org/climate/201309_NE_Tropical_Cyclones.pdf
  12. https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/hurdat/august01/rpibook-jan03.htm
  13. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Bin-averaged-radius-of-maximum-wind-RMW-as-a-function-of-maximum-10-m-wind-speed-V-max_fig3_348562521
  14. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/atsc/78/11/JAS-D-21-0129.1.xml
  15. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2020JD034434
  16. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/wefo/26/6/waf-d-11-00001_1.xml
  17. https://nhess.copernicus.org/preprints/nhess-2019-119/nhess-2019-119-manuscript-version3.pdf
  18. https://www.noaa.gov/hurricane-aircraft-reconnaissance
  19. https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/aboutwindprofile.shtml
  20. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/bams/80/3/1520-0477_1999_080_0407_tngd_2_0_co_2.xml
  21. https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/about_hrd/HRD-P3_sfmr.html
  22. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0167610590903224
  23. https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/Powell/Hwind/
  24. https://www.weather.gov/hgx/projects_ike08_wind_analysis
  25. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/mwre/103/5/1520-0493_1975_103_0420_tciaaf_2_0_co_2.xml
  26. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/bams/87/9/bams-87-9-1195.xml
  27. https://www.ospo.noaa.gov/products/ocean/tropical/CI-chart.html
  28. https://severeweather.wmo.int/TCFW/RAIV_Workshop2016/08_DvorakTechnique_JackBeven.pdf
  29. https://www.jma.go.jp/jma/jma-eng/jma-center/rsmc-hp-pub-eg/techrev/text18-2.pdf
  30. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/mwre/150/9/MWR-D-21-0223.1.xml
  31. https://tropical.colostate.edu/Publications/papers/Feng_Bell_2018.pdf
  32. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/mwre/149/1/mwr-d-20-0111.1.pdf
  33. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2225603221000266
  34. https://www.ospo.noaa.gov/products/atmosphere/ascat/winds.html
  35. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/mwre/149/6/MWR-D-19-0298.1.xml
  36. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/earth-science/articles/10.3389/feart.2023.1285138/full
  37. https://www.nature.com/articles/s44387-025-00037-3
  38. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/16/1/77
  39. http://www.weatherclasses.com/uploads/1/3/1/3/131359169/wmo_wind_conversions_hurricanes.pdf
  40. http://www.systemsengineeringaustralia.com.au/download/WMO_TC_Wind_Averaging_27_Aug_2010.pdf
  41. https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/sites/default/files/2021-07/IBTrACS_version4_Technical_Details.pdf
  42. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/mwre/152/1/MWR-D-23-0063.1.xml
  43. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/wefo/38/9/WAF-D-23-0028.1.xml
  44. https://www.wunderground.com/cat6/hurricane-winds-landfall-why-it-they-seem-fall-short
  45. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2024JD042648
  46. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2024JD040915
  47. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/mwre/140/11/mwr-d-11-00339.1.xml
  48. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/bams/104/7/BAMS-D-21-0240.1.xml
  49. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2019GL086206
  50. https://www.noaa.gov/education/resource-collections/weather-atmosphere/hurricanes
  51. https://www.metoc.navy.mil/jtwc/jtwc.html
  52. https://rsmcnewdelhi.imd.gov.in/images/pdf/faq.pdf
  53. https://rsmcnewdelhi.imd.gov.in/images/pdf/terminology.pdf
  54. https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pdf/sshws_2012rev.pdf
  55. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212094721000335
  56. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/mwre/105/4/1520-0493_1977_105_0421_tcmslp_2_0_co_2.xml
  57. https://rammb2.cira.colostate.edu/research/tropical-cyclones/ships/
  58. https://www.weather.gov/lwx/warningsdefined
  59. https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/watch-warning.html
  60. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11666454/
  61. https://deepmind.google/blog/how-were-supporting-better-tropical-cyclone-prediction-with-ai/
  62. https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/developments-in-hurricane-model-contributed-to-its-lasting-legacy/
  63. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/bams/105/6/BAMS-D-23-0139.1.xml
  64. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/adac7f
  65. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589004224011271
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.