Hubbry Logo
Tanner scaleTanner scaleMain
Open search
Tanner scale
Community hub
Tanner scale
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Tanner scale
Tanner scale
Tanner scale
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Tanner scale
SynonymsTanner stages 4
PurposeDefines physical measurements of development

The Tanner scale (also known as the Tanner stages or sexual maturity rating (SMR)) is a scale of physical development as pre-pubescent children transition into adolescence, and then adulthood. The scale defines physical measurements of development based on external primary and secondary sex characteristics, such as the size of the breasts, length of the penis, volume of the testes, and growth of pubic hair. This scale was first quantified in 1969 by James Tanner, a British pediatrician, after a two-decade-long study following the physical changes in girls undergoing puberty.[1][2][3][4]

Tanner scale
Illustration for males
Illustration for females

Due to natural variation, individuals pass through the Tanner stages at different rates, depending in particular on the timing of puberty. Among researchers who study puberty, the Tanner scale is commonly considered the "gold standard" for assessing pubertal status when it is conducted by a trained medical examiner.[5] In HIV treatment, the Tanner scale is used to determine which regimen to follow for pediatric or adolescent patients on antiretroviral therapy (adult, adolescent, or pediatric guidelines).[6] The Tanner scale has also been used in forensics to determine aging, but its usage has decreased due to lack of reliability.[7]

Stages

[edit]

Adapted from Adolescent Health Care: A Practical Guide by Lawrence Neinstein.[8]

Genitals (male)

[edit]
Photos of the Tanner scale for males.
Tanner I
testicular volume less than 1.5 ml; small penis (prepubertal)
Tanner II
testicular volume between 1.6 and 6 ml; skin on scrotum thins, reddens and enlarges; penis length unchanged
Tanner III
testicular volume between 6 and 12 ml; scrotum enlarges further; penis begins to lengthen
Tanner IV
testicular volume between 12 and 20 ml; scrotum becomes larger and darkens; penis further increases in length and starts to increase in breadth
Tanner V
testicular volume greater than or equal to 20 ml; adult scrotum and penis

Breasts (female)

[edit]
Photos of the Tanner scale for females
Tanner I
no glandular tissue: areola follows the skin contours of the chest (prepubertal)
Tanner II
breast bud forms, with small area of surrounding glandular tissue; areola begins to widen
Tanner III
breast begins to become more elevated, and extends beyond the borders of the areola, which continues to widen but remains in contour with surrounding breast
Tanner IV
increased breast sizing and elevation; areola and papilla form a secondary mound projecting from the contour of the surrounding breast
Tanner V
breast reaches final adult size; areola returns to contour of the surrounding breast, with a projecting central papilla

Pubic hair (both male and female)

[edit]
The five stages of pubic hair and breast growth, on a female subject
The five stages of pubic hair and breast growth, on a female subject
Tanner I
no pubic hair at all (prepubertal)
Tanner II
small amount of long, downy hair with slight pigmentation at the base of the penis and scrotum (males) or on the labia majora (females)
Tanner III
hair becomes more coarse and curly, and begins to extend laterally
Tanner IV
adult-like hair quality, extending across pubis but sparing medial thighs
Tanner V
hair extends to medial surface of the thighs

Height

[edit]

During Tanner V, females stop growing and reach their adult height. Usually, this happens in their mid teens at 14 or 15 years for females.

Males also stop growing and reach their adult height during Tanner V; usually this happens in their late teens at 16 to 17 years, [medical citation needed] but can be a lot later, even into the early 20s.

Historical data

[edit]

In 1970, boys reached the last Tanner stage, the postpubertal stage, on average at the age of 14.9 years and girls around the age of 14 depending on social class and the particular study.[9] In the nearly fifty years since those studies, the ages at which children are beginning puberty has only declined: (as of 2018) "The age of puberty, especially female puberty, has been decreasing in western cultures for decades now [...] for example, at the turn of the 20th century, the average age for an American girl to get her period was 16 or 17. Today, that number has decreased to 12 or 13 years."[10]

Criticism

[edit]

The scale has been criticized by the pornography industry for its potential to lead to false child pornography convictions, such as in the case of pornographic actress Lupe Fuentes where in 2009 United States federal authorities used it to assert that she was not an adult despite her age. Fuentes personally appeared at the trial and provided documentation that showed that the DVDs in question were legally produced.[11][12]

Tanner, the author of the classification system, has argued that age classification using the stages of the scale misrepresents the intended use. Tanner stages do not match with chronological age, but rather maturity stages and thus are not diagnostic for age estimation.[13]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Tanner scale

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Tanner scale is a standardized five-stage system for evaluating the physical maturation of during , including and development in females and genital and development in males. Developed by British pediatrician in the and through longitudinal observations of over 200 children at the Institute of Child Health in , the scale provides objective criteria to track progression from prepubertal (stage 1) to fully mature adult form (stage 5), with stage 2 marking the onset of pubertal changes. Widely adopted in clinical practice, it enables healthcare providers to monitor normal pubertal timing—typically beginning around ages 8–13 in females and 9–14 in males—and identify deviations such as precocious or . While reliable for population-level assessment, the scale's application can involve subjective visual inspection, leading to inter-observer variability, and it does not account for ethnic or genetic differences in distribution or overall tempo of maturation.

Definition and Purpose

Overview of the Tanner Scale

The Tanner scale, formally known as the Sexual Maturity Rating (SMR), classifies the progression of during into five discrete stages, from pre-pubertal (stage 1) to fully mature adult (stage 5). Developed by British pediatrician and first published in , the scale assesses external physical markers such as in females, genital maturation in males, and growth in both sexes. These stages provide a visual and descriptive framework rather than precise measurements, enabling consistent evaluation across individuals. Tanner derived the scale from longitudinal studies conducted at the Institute of Health in , analyzing photographs and clinical data from over 200 boys and 200 girls tracked from ages 11 to 18 between the and . The resulting criteria emphasize observable changes driven by gonadal hormones, including testicular enlargement and penile growth in males, and areolar budding and glandular tissue expansion in females. staging applies universally, progressing from sparse, lightly pigmented growth to dense, adult-pattern distribution. This system standardizes pubertal assessment, which previously relied on subjective estimates. In clinical practice, the Tanner scale aids in determining pubertal timing, with typical onset around ages 8-13 for girls and 9-14 for boys based on mid-20th-century norms, though secular trends indicate earlier maturation in modern populations. It supports of deviations like (stage 2 before age 8 in girls or 9 in boys) or constitutional delay, informing interventions such as monitoring or therapy. Research applications extend to auxology and , correlating stages with growth spurts and skeletal maturation, though limitations include observer variability and applicability primarily to Caucasian populations from the original cohort.

Applications in Clinical and Research Contexts

The Tanner scale is employed in clinical settings by pediatricians and endocrinologists to objectively evaluate the timing and progression of , prioritizing physiological maturity over chronological age for accurate assessment. This approach facilitates the diagnosis of disorders such as , defined as the appearance of Tanner stage 2 secondary before age 8 in females or age 9 in males, often prompting further evaluation with hormonal assays and imaging to identify underlying causes like lesions or idiopathic activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis. Conversely, is identified when there is absence of by age 13 in females or testicular volume increase beyond 4 mL by age 14 in males, guiding investigations into constitutional delay, , or chronic illnesses such as or renal disease. In routine pediatric care, serial Tanner staging during health supervision visits tracks normal progression through stages 1 to 5, aiding in the detection of variants like asymmetric development or stalled advancement, which may necessitate interventions such as gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs for precocious cases to mitigate risks of short stature or psychosocial distress. Adjusted growth charts incorporating Tanner stage-age data enhance linear growth monitoring during puberty, accounting for the growth spurt's variability across stages rather than age alone, as demonstrated in U.S. population-derived curves that improve precision in managing height velocity. Challenges in accuracy arise from subjective visual assessment, with inter-observer variability reported up to 0.5-1 stage, underscoring the need for standardized training and adjunct measures like testicular volumetry via Prader orchidometer. In research contexts, the Tanner scale functions as the gold standard for quantifying in epidemiological and longitudinal studies, enabling precise determination of milestone ages such as attainment of stage 2 for , genital, or development to analyze secular trends in puberty timing influenced by factors like , , and endocrine disruptors. Population-based cohorts, including those from low- and middle-income countries, utilize Tanner staging to estimate mean ages at onset—for instance, female stage 2 around 10.5 years and male genital stage 2 around 11.5 years—facilitating comparisons and identification of delays or accelerations linked to socioeconomic or environmental variables. Validation studies compare Tanner assessments against self-report tools like the Pubertal Development Scale, confirming moderate to high concordance (e.g., coefficients of 0.4-0.7) for tracking progression, though self-staging via realistic images shows limitations in early stages due to underestimation. These applications extend to forensic age estimation in legal contexts, where post-pubertal Tanner stages inform chronological approximations, albeit with ethical caveats regarding reliability in diverse populations.

Historical Development

James Tanner and the Original Studies

(1920–2010) was a British pediatrician and auxologist renowned for his contributions to the study of human growth and maturation. Educated at and St Thomas's Hospital Medical School, Tanner earned his medical degree in 1947 and pursued postgraduate training in , developing a focus on growth disorders during his time at the Hospital for Sick Children in Great Ormond Street. He joined the Institute of Child Health at in 1954, where he directed research on longitudinal growth studies, influencing fields from to . Tanner's work emphasized empirical measurement of physical development, including the use of serial anthropometric data and radiographs to track skeletal and somatic changes. Tanner's foundational research on derived from the Harpenden Growth Study, a longitudinal cohort initiated during at the Austrian School orphanage in , , which he assumed leadership of in 1948 alongside technician Reginald Whitehouse. The study followed approximately 200 children (later expanded) from early childhood through adulthood, involving over 20 years of serial measurements, including height, weight, skeletal age via hand-wrist X-rays, and photographic documentation of secondary sexual characteristics conducted annually or biannually. Data collection emphasized objective observation, with Tanner and collaborators like W.A. Marshall analyzing patterns of pubertal onset, progression, and completion in this predominantly white, middle-class British sample, revealing average ages for initial signs such as breast budding in girls around 10.9–11.2 years and testicular enlargement in boys around 11.6–12.0 years. The Tanner scale emerged from this dataset, formalized in Tanner's 1962 monograph Growth at Adolescence, which synthesized longitudinal and cross-sectional observations from British children to delineate five progressive stages of genital/ and growth based on visual and palpatory criteria. These stages were derived from standardized photographs and clinical exams, providing a ordinal framework for assessing maturation independent of chronological age, with stage 1 representing prepuberty and stage 5 full adult form. Tanner's approach prioritized observable morphological changes over hormonal assays, which were limited at the time, establishing a tool still used for diagnosing deviations like precocious or despite its basis in mid-20th-century European norms.

Longitudinal Data Collection and Basis

The Tanner stages were derived from the Harpenden Growth Study, a longitudinal investigation of conducted from 1949 to 1969 at the Children's Centre in . This study enrolled 701 children (419 boys and 282 girls, born between 1929 and 1965) selected for their healthy status and institutional residence, which facilitated consistent follow-up. Participants underwent measurements every three months, capturing height, weight, skeletal maturation via hand-wrist radiographs, and other physiological parameters to track growth trajectories from infancy through adulthood. A subset of approximately 228 boys and 192 girls received particularly detailed monitoring during , enabling precise documentation of pubertal sequences. Central to the data collection for pubertal staging were standardized, full-frontal and lateral photographs taken in controlled poses, with participants nude to visualize secondary sexual characteristics such as breast budding, genital enlargement, and pubic hair distribution. These photogrammetric images, combined with clinical examinations, formed the empirical basis for defining the five progressive stages, first outlined for boys in 1955 and refined in subsequent analyses. For instance, the female breast and pubic hair stages drew from observations of 192 girls, while male genital and pubic hair stages utilized data from over 200 boys, emphasizing morphological changes over chronological age. This method prioritized observable, sequential milestones, revealing that pubertal events typically unfold in a consistent order despite individual timing variations of 2–3 years. The study's longitudinal design—spanning multiple years per subject—allowed Tanner and collaborators to distinguish typical progression from anomalies, underpinning the scale's clinical utility. Data from 55 boys and 35 girls who completed full pubertal assessments informed logistic modeling of growth spurts, confirming the scale's foundation in real-time, repeated observations rather than cross-sectional snapshots. Limitations included the homogeneous, institutionalized sample, potentially underrepresenting socioeconomic or ethnic diversity prevalent today, though the stages have retained validity in broader populations due to conserved biological sequences.

Stages of Physical Maturation

Male Genital Development

The Tanner scale classifies male genital development into five stages based on changes in the testes, , and , reflecting gonadal maturation driven by rising and testosterone levels. Stage 1 represents prepubertal status, while stage 5 indicates morphology. Assessment relies on clinical examination, with testicular volume measured via as a key objective metric correlating with pubertal onset. During such examinations in pubertal boys, the testes typically present a smooth, even, oval-shaped surface that feels firm but not hard, free of lumps, bumps, swellings, or irregularities; asymmetry is common, with one testicle often slightly larger or hanging lower. The scrotal skin often darkens, thins, hangs lower, and may exhibit tiny bumps from hair follicles or developing pubic hair. These genital stages are accompanied by correlated pubertal developments in boys, which are not part of the core Tanner staging criteria focused on genital and pubic hair progression. Early stages (2-3) feature testicular growth, initial pubic hair, and the onset of the growth spurt. In stages 3-4, axillary hair and body odor typically appear, under the influence of adrenal and gonadal androgens. Later stages (4-5) involve continued genital maturation alongside voice deepening, increased muscle mass, and the emergence of facial hair.
  • Stage 1: Prepubertal genitalia with testicular volume less than 4 mL (long axis <2.5 cm), small indistinguishable from childhood size, and smooth scrotal skin without glandular tissue or pigmentation changes. This stage persists until puberty initiation, typically before age 9-10 in most boys.
  • Stage 2: Initial pubertal sign marked by testicular enlargement to 4-8 mL (long axis 2.5-3.3 cm), scrotal skin reddening and thinning with altered texture, and minimal or no penile growth beyond prepubertal dimensions. Spermatogenesis remains absent, though Leydig cells begin testosterone production.
  • Stage 3: Continued testicular growth to 9-12 mL (long axis 3.4-4 cm), elongation in length without significant girth increase, and further scrotal enlargement; peak height velocity often coincides with this phase.
  • Stage 4: Testicular volume expands to 12-20 mL (long axis >4 cm), broadens in diameter with development and darker scrotal pigmentation; typically occurs here, enabling .
  • Stage 5: Adult configuration with testicular volume exceeding 20 mL, full penile size (length ~13 cm stretched, circumference ~11 cm), and resembling mature texture and color; no further growth expected post-stage 5.
These stages, derived from longitudinal observations of British boys in the , provide a standardized framework but exhibit individual variation influenced by and ; delayed progression beyond age 14 warrants for . Inter-rater reliability improves with training, though subjective elements in penile assessment can introduce variability compared to volumetric measurements.

Female Breast Development

The Tanner stages (also known as Sexual Maturity Rating) for girls assess two main areas: breast development (thelarche) and pubic hair growth (pubarche), each with five stages from prepubertal (stage 1) to adult (stage 5). Hip widening is not a formal part of the Tanner scale. The Tanner stages for female breast development provide a standardized classification of pubertal maturation, based on external morphology assessed by and . Hip widening in girls occurs as a normal part of puberty due to estrogen's effects, which promote fat deposition in the hips and breasts, wider pelvis, and a more curvaceous figure (narrower waist, wider hips). This typically becomes noticeable during mid-puberty, coinciding with the growth spurt and other changes around Tanner Stages 3–4 (roughly ages 10–14), but it is not specifically staged or measured in the Tanner system. These stages were delineated from longitudinal data collected by and W.A. Marshall in a study of 192 healthy British girls born between 1933 and 1939, observed from ages 7 to 18 years, with breast changes documented photographically and classified into five progressive categories. The onset of breast development, known as , corresponds to stage 2 and typically occurs between 8 and 13 years of age, with mean ages varying by : approximately 10 years in White American girls and 8.9 years in African American girls, reflecting empirical differences in pubertal timing observed in population studies. Progression through stages generally spans 3 to 5 years, though individual variation is substantial, influenced by genetic, nutritional, and environmental factors. Stage 1 represents the prepubertal state, characterized by elevation of the papilla only, with no palpable glandular breast tissue beneath the . This stage persists until the initiation of and shows no secondary . Stage 2, the breast bud stage, marks the first pubertal sign in females, featuring elevation of the and papilla as a small mound, accompanied by enlargement of the diameter due to initial glandular tissue development. In the original cohort, this stage was attained at a mean age of 11.15 years (standard deviation 1.10 years). Palpation confirms subareolar tissue, distinguishing it from transient conditions like premature . Stage 3 involves further enlargement of and , with increased glandular tissue extending beyond the 's borders, though their contours remain indistinct and form a single slope. Mean attainment in the reference study occurred around 12.15 years, reflecting accelerated ductal and lobular proliferation driven by rising levels. Stage 4 is defined by the projection of the and papilla as a secondary mound above the level of the surrounding tissue, indicating relative in maturation as the nipple- complex advances ahead of the base. This stage typically emerges near 13.1 years on average in historical data, serving as a transitional phase before full integration. Stage 5 constitutes the mature adult form, where the papilla projects prominently, but the recedes into the general contour of , eliminating the secondary mound. Completion averages 15.3 years (range 11.8–18.9 years) in the foundational study, aligning with peak influence and full glandular maturity, though secular trends indicate earlier attainment in contemporary populations due to improved .

Pubic Hair Development in Both Sexes

Pubic development follows an identical five-stage progression in both males and females according to the Tanner scale, primarily driven by adrenal androgens during followed by gonadal androgens. Stage 1 represents the prepubertal state with no visible . In stage 2, sparse, lightly pigmented, straight or slightly curled downy emerges at the base of the in males or along the in females, typically appearing between ages 10 and 13 in girls and 10 to 14 in boys. Stage 3 features darker, coarser, curlier that spreads sparsely over the . By stage 4, the is adult in type, , and curliness but covers a smaller area than in s, forming a triangle over the pubic region without extending to the thighs. Stage 5 is characterized by adult quantity and type of spreading to the medial thighs.
Tanner StageDescription of Pubic Hair
1None; prepubertal
2Sparse, lightly pigmented, straight or slightly curled, along or base of
3Darker, coarser, curlier; spreads over
4Adult type but area smaller than adults; inverse triangle
5Adult type and quantity; spreads to medial thighs
Although the staging criteria are the same across sexes, the timing relative to other pubertal changes may differ: in females, often develops after budding (), while in males it coincides more closely with genital growth. Isolated early (premature ) can occur due to adrenal excess without central hypothalamic-pituitary activation, necessitating evaluation to distinguish from true . Completion of stage 5 typically occurs by ages 14 to 17, though secular trends show earlier onset in modern populations compared to Tanner's original British cohort data.

Integration with Testicular Volume and Auxology

Testicular , typically measured using a Prader or ultrasonography, provides a quantitative complement to the qualitative visual assessment of Tanner genital stages in males, enabling more precise tracking of pubertal onset and progression. Prepubertal testicular is generally less than 4 mL, with stage 2 marking the onset of at 4–8 mL, stage 3 at 9–12 mL, stage 4 at 12–20 mL, and stage 5 exceeding 20 mL in adulthood. Recent analyses indicate that a of 3 mL may serve as a more reliable early indicator of pubertal than the traditional 4 mL threshold, correlating with initial gonadal prior to substantial genital enlargement. Studies confirm a progressive increase in aligning with advancing Tanner stages, though variability exists, with minimal differences observed between stages 1 and 2 in some cohorts. This integration enhances clinical utility, as testicular volume often precedes visible penile or scrotal changes and predicts subsequent pubertal milestones, including fertility potential and hormonal surges. In populations with unilateral conditions like , affected volumes align with late pubertal norms (around 12–13 mL), underscoring volume's role in asymmetry assessment. In auxology, the science of human growth, Tanner staging synchronizes with anthropometric trajectories to delineate maturation tempo and growth spurts. Peak velocity in boys, averaging 9.5–10.3 cm/year, typically occurs during genital stages 3–4, preceding full skeletal maturity. Tanner-adjusted curves account for pubertal timing variations, reducing misclassification of short or tall stature by incorporating stage-specific norms rather than chronological age alone. Longitudinal auxological data from studies like those by Tanner reveal that advanced stages correlate with accelerated linear growth and shifts, with early maturers showing heightened velocity earlier. This combined approach facilitates early detection of discrepancies, such as delayed progression linking to endocrine disruptions, informing interventions without overreliance on isolated metrics.

Growth Patterns

Pubertal Height Velocity

Pubertal height velocity refers to the accelerated linear growth rate during , which correlates closely with advancement through Tanner stages and is driven by gonadal steroid hormones influencing activity. In females, the peak height velocity typically occurs between stages 2 and 3, coinciding with the early phase of the growth spurt that begins around the onset of . This peak averages 8.3 to 9.8 cm per year, with the total pubertal height gain contributing approximately 20-25 cm overall. In males, peak height velocity is delayed relative to females and aligns with genital development stages 3 to 4, often preceding full maturation of secondary sexual characteristics. The average peak rate reaches 9.5 to 11.3 cm per year, enabling a greater total pubertal increment of about 25-28 cm compared to females. This sex difference in timing and magnitude reflects the later pubertal onset in males, with the growth spurt extending over a longer period and correlating with rising testosterone levels that amplify skeletal growth before epiphyseal fusion. The relationship between Tanner stages and height velocity underscores the scale's utility in auxological assessments, as deviations in growth timing relative to pubertal markers can signal endocrine disorders such as precocious or . Longitudinal studies confirm that age at peak height velocity predicts progression through Tanner stages, with earlier peaks associated with advanced maturation but potentially reduced final height due to earlier cessation of growth. Prepubertal velocities average 5-6 cm/year, accelerating post-Tanner stage 2 in both sexes before decelerating toward stage 5, when growth plates close. The onset of puberty in girls, defined by Tanner breast stage 2 (thelarche), typically occurs between 8 and 13 years of age, with mean ages of 10 years among White Americans and 8.9 years among African Americans. Pubic hair stage 2 (pubarche) follows 1 to 1.5 years after thelarche on average. Menarche, often aligning with breast stages 3 to 4, has a mean age of 12.5 years, approximately 2.5 years post-thelarche (extending to about 3 years in African American girls). Progression to breast stage 5 generally completes within 3 to 5 years of onset, by ages 13 to 18. In boys, genital stage 2—marked by testicular enlargement to ≥4 mL volume—begins between 9 and 14 years, with median entry into stage 2 at 12.2 years in non-Hispanic White populations and means around 11.6 years in broader cohorts. Pubic hair stage 2 appears around age 12.6 years on average, with full maturation (stage 5) by 15 to 19 years. Secular trends document a shift toward earlier pubertal onset, particularly evident in girls' . A global of studies from 1977 to 2013 reported a decrease of 0.24 years (nearly 3 months) per decade in age at Tanner breast stage 2, with (P=0.02), and earlier ages in U.S. cohorts (8.8–10.3 years) versus African ones (10.1–13.2 years). This pattern aligns with observations of advancing and development in various populations, potentially linked to improved nutrition and rising , though causal mechanisms remain under investigation. For boys, is sparser and inconsistent due to variability in genital staging methods; U.S. data spanning 1940–1994 indicate insufficient grounds for confirming a secular decline. However, longitudinal Swedish cohorts born 1947–1996 show earlier peak height velocity (a proxy for pubertal timing) by about 4.1 months per decade, partially explained by increasing childhood BMI but with residual unexplained acceleration. These trends underscore the need for updated, standardized longitudinal monitoring to distinguish environmental influences from methodological artifacts.

Assessment Methods

Clinical Examination Protocols

Clinical examination of Tanner stages requires a trained healthcare professional, such as a pediatrician or endocrinologist, to visually inspect and, where necessary, palpate secondary in a private setting with obtained from the patient and guardian. A chaperone, preferably of the same as the patient, is recommended to ensure comfort and ethical standards, particularly for examinations involving genital or exposure. Staging is typically documented at routine health supervision visits from ages 7 to 16, with more frequent assessments for suspected precocious or . For females, is evaluated by having the patient remove upper clothing, followed by of areolar changes and contour, with to confirm the presence of glandular tissue beneath the in early stages (e.g., stage 2 breast bud). Pubic hair staging relies on visual assessment of distribution and coarseness, requiring temporary displacement or removal of lower garments while minimizing exposure. ![Female breasts five Tanner stages.jpg][center] In males, genital staging involves exposure of the genitalia for visual evaluation of penile and , scrotal texture and rugation, and testicular descent and enlargement, often supplemented by Prader measurement of testicular volume (e.g., stage 2: 4-8 mL). is assessed visually as in females. is limited to confirming testicular position and size but avoided for the to respect patient dignity. Examiners must undergo standardized training, such as field sessions with pediatric endocrinologists or online modules, to enhance inter-observer consistency, as variability can arise from subjective interpretation despite objective criteria. Ethnic and body habitus variations should inform assessments to avoid misclassification. Documentation includes stage assignments for breasts/genitals (G/B) and (PH), tracked longitudinally against normative data.

Self-Assessment Techniques and Their Limitations

Self-assessment techniques for Tanner stages typically involve adolescents or parents using standardized diagrams, such as line drawings of genital, , or development, to select the stage most closely matching their physical appearance. These methods, often employed in epidemiological research to enable large-scale without clinical exams, include the Pubertal Development Scale (PDS), a questionnaire assessing items like growth, voice deepening (in males), or (in females) on Likert scales.30885-7/fulltext) More recent approaches incorporate realistic color images (RCIs) of pubertal stages, which participants match against their own development via self-report. Studies indicate moderate reliability for broad categorizations, such as distinguishing prepubertal (Tanner stage 1) from pubertal states (stages 2–5), with weighted values around 0.5–0.7 in some cohorts, but precision declines for intermediate stages (2–4). For instance, a 2015 study of 204 children aged 10–15 found self-assessment agreement with staging at 59% for and 49% for /genital development, with overestimation common in early and underestimation in later stages. The PDS correlates moderately with Tanner stages (Spearman rho 0.6–0.8), supporting its use for tracking pubertal timing in population studies, though reports often align better than self-reports in younger adolescents.30885-7/fulltext) A 2024 validation of RCIs in 1,128 Chinese youth showed higher coefficients (0.75–0.85) compared to PDS (0.4–0.6), suggesting visual aids improve consistency, particularly for assessment. Limitations stem primarily from subjective interpretation and anatomical challenges: self-viewing of breasts or genitals is imprecise due to body positioning and lack of mirrors, leading to errors exceeding 20–30% in genital staging.00565-3/fulltext) Accuracy is lowest for transitional stages, where subtle changes (e.g., testicular enlargement in stage 2 males) are hard to discern without , and web-based tools underperform in children under 10, with agreement dropping below 40%. Factors like distortion, cultural inhibiting detailed inspection, and reliance on abstract line drawings (versus RCIs) exacerbate discrepancies, rendering unreliable as a clinical diagnostic substitute. Maternal assessments outperform self-reports in pre-adolescents but converge with age, highlighting developmental immaturity in self-judgment. Overall, while useful for research proxies, these techniques yield values below 0.6 for precise staging, necessitating verification for medical applications.

Empirical Validation

Inter-Observer Reliability Studies

Studies evaluating inter-observer reliability of Tanner staging among clinicians have generally reported moderate to substantial agreement, though variability exists across developmental markers and populations. For genital development and , Slora et al. (2009) assessed 79 boys aged 8-14 years using paired pediatric practitioners who independently applied Tanner scales during physical examinations; intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.61 to 0.94 (all p < 0.001), with weighted kappa values for detecting pubertal initiation between 0.49 and 0.79, indicating reliable staging of key pubertal markers despite some subjectivity in finer distinctions. In a multi-center study of adolescents, Espeland et al. (1990) examined Tanner stage assessments across sites, finding consistent reliability for both pubic hair and secondary sexual characteristics, supporting the scale's utility in research settings where standardized training minimizes discrepancies, though exact kappa values were not detailed in summaries. For girls, direct inter-observer studies are sparser, but clinical comparisons show higher agreement for (often >80% exact match) than due to the latter's challenges from overlying and subtle glandular changes. In one validation effort, two physicians achieved 76% agreement on staging in adolescent females, highlighting moderate reliability but underscoring limitations in obese subjects where is confounded.00110-4/fulltext) Pubic hair staging consistently demonstrates superior inter-observer concordance across sexes, attributed to its objective reliance on hair distribution patterns rather than tissue contour.
StudyPopulationMarkers AssessedKey Reliability Metric
Slora et al. (2009)Boys (n=79, ages 8-14)Genital, Kappa 0.49-0.79 for initiation; ICC 0.61-0.94
Espeland et al. (1990)Adolescents (multi-center), breasts/genitalsConsistent across sites (kappa not specified)
Duke et al. (1998)Girls (n=25)76% agreement between physicians
These findings affirm the Tanner scale's practical reliability under controlled conditions but reveal opportunities for enhancement, such as adjunctive for breast staging, which yields higher values (e.g., 0.84).

Longitudinal Validation Against Hormonal and Genetic Markers

Longitudinal studies have demonstrated consistent correlations between Tanner stage progression and elevations in key pubertal hormones, such as gonadotropins (LH and FSH) and sex steroids (testosterone in males, in females). For instance, in a cohort of 559 Danish children followed from ages 9 to 12 years, baseline FSH levels at age 9 predicted Tanner stages of genital development and in boys at age 12, with Spearman's rho coefficients ranging from 0.25 to 0.42 for associations with subsequent testosterone, LH, and inhibin B levels. Similarly, a longitudinal analysis of adolescents showed that self-rated Tanner stages positively associated with serum testosterone and trajectories, with standardized beta coefficients of 0.20-0.35 after adjusting for age and , indicating that phenotypic staging tracks underlying gonadal activation over time. These findings affirm the scale's utility in reflecting hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis maturation, though correlations weaken in early stages (Tanner 1-2) where hormonal surges precede visible changes. Validation against genetic markers is less direct but supports Tanner staging as a reliable phenotypic proxy for polygenic influences on pubertal timing. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified loci near genes like MKRN3 and LIN28B that influence age at Tanner stage 2 attainment, with estimates for pubic hair and genital stages around 50-60% in twin studies, aligning staging with genetic variance in onset. In longitudinal cohorts integrating GWAS data, variants associated with (e.g., IGSF10 locus) corresponded to protracted advancement through Tanner stages, with odds ratios of 1.5-2.0 for stage discordance per , though environmental factors like modulate expression. Such genetic correlations validate the scale's biological grounding but highlight limitations, as epigenetic and gene-environment interactions introduce variability not captured by staging alone. Overall, while hormonal markers provide stronger temporal alignment in longitudinal designs, genetic evidence reinforces Tanner stages as heritable traits rather than purely observer-dependent assessments.

Applications and Impacts

Pediatric Endocrinology and Monitoring

The provides pediatric with a standardized framework for evaluating the onset and progression of through assessment of secondary , enabling timely identification of deviations from normative patterns. Clinicians perform serial Tanner staging during routine examinations to track advancement from stage 1 (prepubertal) to stage 5 (adult), correlating physical changes with underlying gonadal maturation driven by hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis activation. This monitoring is essential for distinguishing physiological variation from pathological conditions, as progression typically spans 2 to 5 years, with () in females and genital growth in males marking initial pubertal events. In cases of precocious puberty, defined as attainment of Tanner stage 2 before age 8 in females or age 9 in males, the scale facilitates diagnosis by quantifying early secondary characteristics such as () or breast budding, prompting further hormonal evaluation including , , and sex steroid levels. For delayed puberty, absence of Tanner stage 2 breast development by age 13 in females or genital stage 2 by age 14 in males indicates potential or constitutional delay, guiding interventions like recombinant therapy; concerns about penile development at age 14 should prompt consultation with a pediatrician or endocrinologist for Tanner staging assessment, as further growth often continues into the late teens even in delayed cases. Longitudinal Tanner assessments, often combined with radiography and auxological measurements, allow endocrinologists to monitor therapeutic responses, such as suppression of stage advancement with GnRH analogs in precocious cases or induction of progression in delayed puberty. Tanner staging integrates into broader pediatric endocrine protocols, including annual evaluations for at-risk populations like those with chronic illnesses or genetic syndromes, to predict final height potential and mitigate impacts of asynchronous development. Empirical data from cohort studies validate its utility in correlating stage-specific growth velocities with peak height gains, occurring around stages 2-3, aiding in personalized management plans. While subjective elements in staging necessitate trained observer consistency, its widespread adoption underscores its role in evidence-based monitoring, supported by longitudinal validations against biochemical markers of . The Tanner scale, which categorizes pubertal development into five stages based on secondary such as distribution and genital or maturation, has been employed in forensic age estimation to assess biological maturity in individuals of disputed age, particularly in asylum or proceedings. This application aims to determine whether an individual is below the age of 18, as chronological age thresholds influence legal protections, criminal , and eligibility for juvenile rather than adult processing. However, the scale evaluates maturational status rather than precise chronological age, with assessments typically involving or of external features, often combined with radiological methods like hand-wrist X-rays for skeletal maturity. In practice, such evaluations occur in multidisciplinary forensic settings, where multiple examiners may participate to mitigate subjectivity, though remains challenged by inconsistent protocols and observer variability. Empirical studies indicate substantial limitations in the Tanner scale's forensic utility, primarily due to individual variability in pubertal timing influenced by genetic, ethnic, nutritional, and socioeconomic factors, which can span several years around the mean age of attainment for each stage. For instance, attainment of later stages (e.g., stage 5, indicating full maturity) typically occurs between ages 14 and 18, but post-pubertal individuals may exhibit completed development while still being chronological minors, leading to potential overestimation of age. Systematic reviews find no robust evidence supporting its accuracy for chronological estimation, with high inter-evaluator disagreement in visual assessments, particularly from photographs or in advanced stages, rendering it unreliable for distinguishing minors from young adults. Ethical concerns further complicate its application, as physical examinations can be intrusive, prompting refusals in up to 1% of cases among asylum-seeking minors, and raising questions about proportionality given the method's limited evidentiary value. Forensic guidelines, such as those from the German AGFAD working group, thus advise against routine use, prioritizing non-invasive alternatives or holistic assessments to avoid erroneous declarations of adulthood. In legal contexts, particularly within European asylum systems, Tanner-based evaluations have informed age disputes for unaccompanied migrant minors, where being classified as 18 or older forfeits child-specific safeguards like non-adversarial proceedings and rights. For example, in the UK, biological maturity assessments, including markers, have been proposed under frameworks like the Nationality and Borders Act, but critiques highlight their wide margins of error—potentially ±2 years or more—and unsuitability for most cases, as completion precedes age 18 in the majority of individuals. Swedish authorities, per SBU reviews, similarly deem secondary sexual characteristic assessments unreliable for precise legal determinations, favoring evaluations amid evidentiary gaps. Judicial reliance on such methods often incorporates a "benefit of the doubt" principle to err against overestimation, reflecting causal uncertainties in maturation as a proxy for age, though this has sparked debates on incentivizing age in high-stakes migration claims. Overall, while the Tanner scale contributes to detecting pathological delays in development within forensic reports, its standalone or primary role in legal rulings is increasingly discouraged by empirical shortcomings and ethical trade-offs.

Criticisms and Limitations

Subjectivity and Diagnostic Challenges

The Tanner scale relies on and of secondary sexual characteristics, such as distribution, breast mound formation, and genital size, which inherently involve subjective interpretation by the examiner. This process can be influenced by factors including lighting conditions, patient positioning, body habitus, and the clinician's experience, leading to potential inconsistencies in stage assignment. Inter-observer reliability studies demonstrate variable agreement levels, often quantified using or coefficients. In a study of boys aged 8-14 years, paired practitioners achieved intraclass correlations of 0.61 to 0.94 for pubertal markers like , genitalia, and testicular volume, with values of 0.49 to 0.79 for detecting pubertal initiation signs. However, agreement tends to be lower for non-specialist examiners; for instance, orthopedic surgeons assessing adolescent patients showed substantial intra- and inter-observer variability, highlighting the role of training in mitigating subjectivity. Diagnostic challenges are pronounced in obese adolescents, where excess obscures landmarks and complicates differentiation between fat deposition (lipomastia) and true glandular development. In overweight or obese girls, Tanner breast staging often overestimates maturity compared to , with agreement dropping to 73.4% concordance versus 81.6% in normal-weight peers ( 0.85 versus 0.88). Clinicians must palpate for firm glandular tissue beneath softer fat to avoid misclassification, and additional signs like growth velocity or hormone assays may be required for confirmation, particularly in early where cues are subtle. Ethnic variations in hair texture or can further confound assessments, underscoring the need for standardized protocols and experienced pediatric endocrinologists. The Tanner scale has been applied in forensic contexts to estimate chronological age, particularly in cases involving alleged , where staging of secondary sexual characteristics from images aims to determine if depicted individuals are minors. However, scientific reviews have highlighted significant inaccuracies, especially for postpubescent subjects, as the scale's stages overlap broadly across age ranges and are influenced by factors like , , and genetics, rendering precise age predictions unreliable. , the scale's developer, explicitly criticized its adaptation for chronological age estimation, emphasizing that it was designed solely for assessing maturational status relative to peers, not absolute age. Courts have occasionally admitted Tanner-based expert testimony under standards like Daubert, but critics argue this risks erroneous classifications, potentially leading to wrongful convictions or acquittals in child exploitation prosecutions, with the method's inter-observer variability and lack of validation for diverse populations exacerbating errors. In investigations and dependency proceedings, Tanner staging of genital or breast development has been used to infer victim age or , but this application invites misinterpretation, as adult-like stages can occur in adolescents while in others may mimic prepubescence, potentially biasing substantiation of abuse claims or custody decisions. Forensic guidelines have increasingly deprecated its standalone use, favoring multimodal assessments including skeletal over visual staging due to the latter's subjective elements and poor predictive power beyond population averages. Ethically, the scale informs decisions on puberty suppression in adolescents with , with protocols typically initiating blockers at Tanner stage 2 (onset of ) to pause development and alleviate distress. Yet, this raises concerns, as youth at early Tanner stages exhibit brain maturation levels akin to those incapable of fully weighing irreversible effects like , bone density loss, or halted endogenous , with empirical data showing high desistance rates from post- (up to 80-90% in some cohorts). Proponents argue blockers provide necessary time for decision-making, but detractors, citing low-quality evidence from non-randomized studies and ethical analyses, contend that intervening at immature stages violates principles of non-maleficence, given uncertain long-term benefits and risks of iatrogenic harm. Regulatory shifts, such as the UK's 2024 restrictions on blockers outside trials following systematic reviews, underscore these tensions, prioritizing caution amid biased advocacy in some that downplays harms.

Empirical Critiques and Proposed Refinements

Empirical evaluations of the Tanner scale have revealed substantial inaccuracies in , particularly for intermediate stages. A study of 169 adolescent girls reported low agreement between self-rated and clinician-assessed Tanner stages, with self-staging proving unreliable overall and especially prone to errors in early and mid-puberty, independent of age effects. Similarly, a and of self-assessment methods found highest accuracy only for prepubertal (stage 1) and mature (stage 5) classifications, with intermediate stages showing frequent misclassifications when compared to clinical exams. These discrepancies are exacerbated in obese individuals, where body habitus obscures visual cues, leading to under- or overestimation. The scale's foundational data, collected from a non-representative British sample of 710 mostly white, institutionalized children from lower socioeconomic backgrounds, limits its generalizability. This cohort exhibited delayed relative to broader populations, and the absence of diverse ethnic representation fails to capture variations in pubertal timing across groups. Secular trends further undermine applicability: meta-analyses indicate () has advanced by approximately 3 months per decade since 1977, rendering original stage-age associations outdated for contemporary assessments. Validation against hormonal markers, such as gonadal steroids, shows partial but imperfect correlations, with Tanner stages sometimes lagging or preceding biochemical puberty onset. Refinements address these issues through enhanced tools for non-clinical settings. Realistic color images (RCIs) for self-staging yield high reliability, with a 2024 validation in 1,200 Chinese adolescents reporting kappa coefficients exceeding 0.70 for agreement with clinician ratings across breast, genital, and pubic hair stages. The Pubertal Development Scale (PDS), a self-report questionnaire aggregating growth, voice changes, and secondary characteristics, demonstrates moderate-to-high correlation with Tanner staging (r=0.6-0.8) while offering greater feasibility and reduced observer bias in research cohorts.30885-7/fulltext) Additional proposals include stage-age adjusted growth curves to better integrate Tanner metrics with linear growth velocity, as developed in 2020 U.S. pediatric data for improved monitoring of pubertal tempo. Grouping stages into broader categories (pre-, mid-, post-pubertal) during self-assessment also mitigates errors in granular staging.

References

  1. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470280/
  2. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK551691/
  3. https://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/74802/1/Tanner_scale_history_sexualitiesfinal.pdf
  4. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK279024/
  5. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/pediatrics/articles/10.3389/fped.2019.00147/full
  6. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/tanner-scale
  7. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/body/puberty
  8. https://publications.aap.org/pediatricsinreview/article/37/7/292/34997/Pubertal-Development
  9. https://academic.oup.com/jes/article/4/9/bvaa098/5873251
  10. https://www.contemporarypediatrics.com/view/weighing-the-accuracy-of-tanner-staging
  11. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ppe.12507
  12. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2161831322003192
  13. https://www.jahonline.org/article/S1054-139X%2819%2930885-7/fulltext
  14. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11286552/
  15. https://andespediatrica.cl/index.php/rchped/article/download/3374/3631
  16. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3109/03014460.2011.568738
  17. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2010/oct/14/james-tanner-obituary
  18. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781118584538.ieba0479
  19. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7391859/
  20. https://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/24/science/24tanner.html
  21. https://www.utmb.edu/pedi_ed/CoreV2/Adolescent/Adolescent3.html
  22. https://datacatalogue.ukdataservice.ac.uk/studies/study/9330?id=9330
  23. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1275435/
  24. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpem-2019-0501/html
  25. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK280/
  26. https://www.nhs.uk/tests-and-treatments/how-to-check-your-testicles/
  27. https://www.healthychildren.org/English/ages-stages/gradeschool/puberty/Pages/Physical-Development-Boys-What-to-Expect.aspx
  28. https://www.endocrine.org/journals/endocrine-reviews/normal-and-premature-adrenarche
  29. https://www.bannerhealth.com/services/pediatrics/wellness/puberty
  30. https://www.healthychildren.org/English/ages-stages/gradeschool/puberty/Pages/Physical-Development-Girls-What-to-Expect.aspx
  31. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/5785179/
  32. https://adc.bmj.com/content/archdischild/44/235/291.full.pdf
  33. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK534827/
  34. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37410401/
  35. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361931208_Tanner_Stages_and_Pubertal_Development
  36. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36315874/
  37. https://ijpeonline.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13633-017-0046-x
  38. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9000982/
  39. https://www.jahonline.org/article/S1054-139X%2802%2900485-8/fulltext
  40. https://fpnotebook.com/Endo/Exam/MlTnrStg.htm
  41. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022347685805011
  42. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3514046/
  43. https://www.pedscases.com/sites/default/files/Normal%2520Puberty%2520Note.pdf
  44. https://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article/102/Supplement_3/507/28134/Growth-and-Normal-Puberty
  45. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4677560/
  46. https://www.droracle.ai/articles/303444/what-is-normal-tanner-stage-13-year-old-male
  47. https://www.nature.com/articles/s43856-024-00580-1
  48. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7042934/
  49. https://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article/121/Supplement_3/S172/29254/Examination-of-US-Puberty-Timing-Data-from-1940-to
  50. https://pure.psu.edu/en/publications/age-of-puberty-data-from-the-united-states-of-america-2/
  51. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/2738259
  52. https://adc.bmj.com/content/108/1/31
  53. https://www.rch.org.au/clinicalguide/guideline_index/engaging_with_and_assessing_the_adolescent_patient/
  54. https://eqipp.aap.org/File%2520Library/Courses/Growth/PDFs/BrightFuturePhysicalExamination79_85.pdf
  55. https://consultqd.clevelandclinic.org/pediatric-and-adolescent-gynecology-what-primary-care-pediatricians-need-to-know
  56. https://publications.aap.org/books/chapter-pdf/1203020/aap_9781581105735-assessment_sub09.pdf
  57. https://bio-protocol.org/exchange/minidetail?id=8087188&type=30
  58. https://www.safeta.org/page/kidsappendix1/
  59. https://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article/135/1/86/52856/Validity-of-Self-Assessment-of-Pubertal-Maturation
  60. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39081927/
  61. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ped4.12050
  62. https://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article/138/1/e20154571/52588/Comparison-of-Clinical-Maternal-and-Self-Pubertal
  63. https://www.[researchgate](/page/ResearchGate).net/publication/7172021_Accuracy_of_Pubertal_Tanner_Staging_Self-Reporting
  64. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19554802/
  65. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ajhb.1310020506
  66. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7275631/
  67. https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article/98/3/E518/2536957
  68. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666497621000485
  69. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-56191-4
  70. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-35742-z
  71. https://www.aafp.org/pubs/afp/issues/2017/1101/p590.html
  72. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7426000/
  73. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4760148/
  74. https://www.medizin.uni-muenster.de/fileadmin/einrichtung/agfad/presentations/use_of_tanner_stages_in_forensic_age_estimation.pdf
  75. https://www.sbu.se/contentassets/d3aa8b5432e549a8be69362f0e2ae23d/non-radiological-methods-for-age-assessment.pdf
  76. https://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?pid=S2452-60532021000300470&script=sci_arttext&tlng=en
  77. https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/POST-PN-0666/POST-PN-0666.pdf
  78. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23439412/
  79. https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article/105/5/1599/5788212
  80. https://www.contemporaryobgyn.net/view/weighing-the-accuracy-of-tanner-staging
  81. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230825633_Inaccuracy_of_age_assessment_from_images_of_postpubescent_subjects_in_cases_of_alleged_child_pornography
  82. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34479256/
  83. https://www.casemine.com/commentary/us/reliability-of-tanner-scale-analysis-in-child-pornography-cases:-a-daubert-standard-application/view
  84. https://www.cacilawyer.com/the-problem-with-tanner-puberty-stages-in-child-abuse-cases.html
  85. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7656150/
  86. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/20502877.2022.2088048
  87. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6806792/
  88. https://jme.bmj.com/content/early/2025/07/03/jme-2024-110613
  89. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16607921/
  90. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339975590_Can_we_rely_on_adolescents_to_self-assess_puberty_stage_A_systematic_review_and_meta-analysis
  91. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Accuracy-of-Pubertal-Tanner-Staging-Self-Reporting-Desmangles-Lappe/ea8e8b9e31cfdf8e3d7be0ca440844c1eed99431
  92. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/2760573
  93. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9195346/
  94. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/pediatrics/articles/10.3389/fped.2024.1380934/full
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.