Hubbry Logo
Pira-tapuyaPira-tapuyaMain
Open search
Pira-tapuya
Community hub
Pira-tapuya
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Pira-tapuya
Pira-tapuya
Pira-tapuya
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The Pira-tapuya, or variations like Pira-Tapuia, Piratapuyo, etc., or Tapuya (Tucano: Wa’îkɨ̃hɨ)[1] for short, are an indigenous people of the Amazon regions. They live along the Vaupés River in Colombia and in the state of Amazonas, Brazil.

Key Information

Languages

[edit]
Pira-tapuya is located in Brazil
Pira-tapuya
class=notpageimage|
Location of Teresita on the middle Papuri

0°44′13″N 69°28′04″W / 0.736873°N 69.467713°W / 0.736873; -69.467713

The Pira-tapuya call themselves Waíkana.[2] They speak the Piratapuyo language, one of the Eastern Tucanoan languages. Other ethnic groups in the region also speak Eastern Tucanoan languages apart from the Tariana people, who originally spoke an Arawakan language.[3] The lingua franca of the region is the Tucano language, which has around 20,000 speakers.[4]

Locations

[edit]

The Pira-tapuya live along the banks of the Vaupés River and its tributaries such as the Tiquié, Papurí and Querari rivers.[4] The 1,375 kilometres (854 mi) Uaupés River rises in Colombia and flows for 845 kilometres (525 mi) to the border with Brazil. For over 188 kilometres (117 mi) it forms the border between Colombia and Brazil, then for 342 kilometres (213 mi) flows through Brazil to the point where it joins the Rio Negro. The main settlements are the town of Mitú, capital of the Vaupés Department in Colombia, and Iaraueté, seat of a district in the municipality of São Gabriel da Cachoeira.[5]

The Pira-tapuya live in the middle Papuri in the vicinity of Teresita, and in the lower Uaupés. Some have migrated to other locations of Rio Negro and São Gabriel.[2] As of 2014 Siasi/Sesai estimated that there were 1,325 Pira-tapuya in Amazonas. As of 1988 there were an estimated 400 Pira-tapuya in Colombia.[3] The peoples of the region intermarry, trade, and engage in shared rituals, forming the Uaupés/Pira-Paraná socio-cultural complex.[4]

Notes

[edit]

Sources

[edit]
  • Pira-tapuya (in Portuguese), ISA: Instituto Socioambiental, retrieved 2017-03-04{{citation}}: CS1 maint: publisher location (link)


Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Pira-tapuya

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Pira-tapuya, also known as Waíkhana, Piratapuyo, or Pira-Tapuia, are an indigenous people of the northwestern , residing primarily along the middle Papurí River and lower Uaupés River in the state of Amazonas, , as well as in the Vaupés department of . They form part of a broader interethnic network of 17 groups in the Uaupés and Pira-Paraná river systems, characterized by shared linguistic, ritual, and social practices. With an estimated total of around 1,600—approximately 800 in (as of 2020) and 800 in (as of 2018)—the Pira-tapuya maintain a traditional lifestyle centered on , manioc cultivation, and gathering, while facing ongoing challenges from environmental pressures and . The Pira-tapuya speak Piratapuyo, a from the Eastern Tucanoan family, which is closely related to Guanano (sharing about 99% ) and often supplemented by Tukano as a regional for trade and interethnic communication. Their is organized into patrilineal clans with exogamous rules, emphasizing alliances through interethnic exchanges, including marriages, rituals, and commerce with neighboring groups like the Desana and Tukano. Traditionally, they inhabit communal longhouses called malocas, though many now live in smaller nuclear-family dwellings due to missionary influences and modernization; their cosmology and spiritual practices draw from Tukanoan traditions, featuring rites such as dabukuris (initiation ceremonies) and the Yuruparí flute ritual, which reinforce social hierarchies and ancestral connections. Historically, the Pira-tapuya endured slave raids in the early and subsequent interventions in the late 19th and 20th centuries, with Salesian missions in imposing cultural suppression, while Colombian Javerian adopted a more tolerant approach, allowing retention of many customs. Today, a significant portion identifies as Catholic, blending indigenous beliefs with , and they continue to advocate for territorial rights amid threats from and resource extraction in their riverine territories. Known colloquially as "fish people" for their expertise in riverine subsistence, the Pira-tapuya exemplify the resilience of Amazonian indigenous cultures within a complex socio-ecological landscape.

Names and Identity

Self-Denomination and Exonyms

The Pira-tapuya people identify themselves as , a self-denomination that underscores their ethnic identity within the multilingual and multi-ethnic societies of the northwest Amazon. The term itself means "fish people" in their , reflecting their traditional riverine identity tied to economies along the upper Rio Negro and its tributaries. This name is commonly used among related Tukanoan-speaking groups and reflects their position in the broader Uaupés/Pira-Paraná socio-cultural complex. Outsiders have employed several exonyms for the group, with "Pira-tapuya" being the most prevalent, arising from and Spanish colonial documentation in the region. Variations such as Piratapuyo and Pira-Tapuia appear in ethnographic and linguistic records, often interchangeably with the primary exonym. The generic term "Tapuya" was historically applied by Europeans and coastal Tupi groups to denote various non-Tupi Amazonian , including the Pira-tapuya, portraying them as inland "others" or adversaries. Spelling and naming conventions for the Pira-tapuya have varied significantly across Brazilian and Colombian sources, influenced by phonetic transcriptions and regional orthographies. Examples include Waíkino, Waina, Uaicana, and Waikhara, which highlight the challenges of standardizing ethnonyms in colonial and early anthropological . These variations persist in modern references, though Waíkhana remains the preferred self-applied term today.

Etymology of "Tapuya"

The term "Tapuya" derives from the Tupi-Guarani language family, specifically from Old Tupi tapy'yia or similar forms, meaning "foreigner," "barbarian," or "savage." Coastal Tupi-speaking groups in used this exonym to refer to non-Tupi-speaking , particularly those inhabiting inland regions of the Amazon and eastern , whom they viewed as enemies or outsiders during intertribal conflicts. This derogatory connotation reflected the coastal Tupi perspective on linguistic and cultural differences, often applied broadly to diverse groups lacking Tupi affiliation. In the context of early European explorations, "Tapuya" became a generic label in colonial records for various non-Tupi Amazonian indigenous groups encountered by and Spanish expeditions, including the Pira-tapuya (also known as Waíkhana or Piratapuyo). For the Pira-tapuya, the combines the Tupi/Nheengatu element pira ("") with tapuya ("foreigners" or "barbarians"), conventionally translating to "fish people" as a of their self-name Waíkhana. This composite name emerged in multilingual northwest Amazonian settings, where Tupi loanwords like tapuya were calqued into other languages (e.g., Tukanoan, Arawakan) to denote ethnic groups, often appending it as a in exonyms such as "Pira-tapuya." The term's evolution in colonial texts, starting from 16th-century accounts by explorers like , perpetuated its use as a catch-all for "uncivilized" inland tribes, embedding colonial biases of otherness. In modern , "Tapuya" persists in official designations (e.g., classifications) for groups like the Pira-tapuya, though its original sense has faded, now serving as a neutral identifier in academic and legal contexts without implying savagery. This shift underscores the term's adaptation from a Tupi ethnocentric label to a broader, albeit imprecise, colonial and postcolonial for Amazonian diversity.

Geography and Population

Traditional Territories

The Pira-tapuya, also known as Waíkana, traditionally inhabited the Vaupés River basin and its tributaries, including the Tiquié, Papurí, and Querari rivers, with core areas spanning the international border between and . In Colombia, their presence extended to the Tí stream (a tributary of the upper Vaupés) and the upper Papurí, while in Brazil, communities were dispersed along the middle Papurí (particularly around Teresita) and the lower Uaupés. These territories formed part of a broader riverine shared with other Tukanoan groups, emphasizing the interconnectedness of river systems in defining ancestral domains. The ecological setting of these territories is characterized by the nutrient-poor blackwater rivers and surrounding , which profoundly influenced Pira-tapuya subsistence and mobility. This riverine-rainforest interface supported diverse aquatic and terrestrial resources, with serving as the primary economic activity due to the abundance of fish species in the Vaupés and its tributaries. and gathering of fruits complemented , while slash-and-burn agriculture focused on cultivating bitter manioc, adapted to the acidic soils and seasonal flooding patterns of the region. The Pira-tapuya integrated into the Uaupés/Pira-Paraná social complex, facilitating inter-group exchanges within this ecological zone. Pre-colonial land use revolved around communal longhouses (malocas) situated along riverbanks, enabling flexible resource exploitation tied to the hydrological cycle. Communities engaged in seasonal movements along the rivers to pursue during low-water periods when fish concentrated in deeper pools, and gathering during high-water inundations that expanded access to flooded forests. occurred in rotating swidden plots near settlements, with processing techniques like grating and pressing essential for detoxifying the bitter variety central to their diet. These patterns underscored a sustainable to the dynamic Amazonian environment, balancing river-based and forest-based livelihoods.

Current Distribution and Numbers

The Pira-tapuya population is estimated at approximately 756 individuals in , according to data from the Secretaria Especial de Saúde Indígena (Siasi/Sesai) as of 2020. In , the 2018 national recorded 1,088 people self-identifying as Piratapuyo. These figures reflect a small but stable ethnic group tied to their traditional riverine territories along the upper Rio Negro basin. Contemporary Pira-tapuya settlements are concentrated in the area of the Colombian Vaupés department, particularly along the Uaupés, Apaporis, and Pira-Paraná river basins. In Brazil's Amazonas state, key locations include the middle Papurí River near Teresita, the lower Uaupés, Iaraueté district, and São Gabriel da Cachoeira municipality. Some communities have dispersed to urban areas along the Rio Negro, including the city of São Gabriel da Cachoeira, due to post-20th century migration patterns. Distribution is shaped by government-designated indigenous reservations, such as the Alto Rio Negro Indigenous Territory in , which encompass multi-ethnic villages fostering inter-community interactions. Urban migration trends since the mid-20th century have drawn families to regional centers for education, healthcare, and economic opportunities, leading to mixed Pira-tapuya households in non-traditional settings while maintaining ties to rural bases.

Language

Classification and Dialects

The Piratapuyo belongs to the Eastern Tucanoan branch (Northern subgroup) of the Tucanoan . It is closely related to Guanano (also known as Wanano), with lexical similarities reaching 99%, which has led some linguists to classify them as mutually intelligible dialects of a single ; nevertheless, the languages are treated as distinct owing to ethnic separations and prohibitions on intermarriage between the groups. Dialectal variation occurs between the forms spoken in and , featuring minor phonological distinctions such as differences in vowel and aspiration patterns. Piratapuyo lacks a fully standardized , although initiatives have advanced through efforts like the 1991 translation of the , which employs a practical based on Spanish and conventions.

Speakers and Vitality

The Piratapuyo language is spoken by approximately 2,400 people as of the , primarily in the border region between and along the upper Rio Negro and Vaupés River basins. Recent assessments indicate a stable but aging speaker base, with most fluent speakers being middle-aged or older, though the total ethnic population of the Pira-tapuya (also known as Waíkana) is reported at around 2,400 individuals across both countries. The language's vitality is classified as severely endangered by , reflecting limited intergenerational transmission despite ongoing use within communities. First-language acquisition persists among children in traditional settings, but it faces significant pressure from dominant languages such as in , Spanish in , and the regional lingua franca , leading to a gradual shift away from exclusive Piratapuyo use in daily life. In the multilingual Vaupés linguistic area, Piratapuyo serves primarily as an ethnic identifier and is used in intimate and ceremonial contexts, while Tucano functions for interethnic , rituals, and broader social interactions, with many in the exhibiting bilingual proficiency in it. National languages like and Spanish are essential for formal , administration, and external communication, contributing to a typical trilingual or multilingual profile among Pira-tapuya individuals. Recent linguistic documentation efforts, including grants for recording and analysis by researchers like Kristine Stenzel, aim to support preservation into the .

History

Pre-Colonial Society

The pre-colonial economy of the Pira-tapuya, also known as Waíkhana, centered on a combination of slash-and-burn agriculture, fishing, , and gathering, adapted to the riverine s of the upper Rio Negro basin. Bitter manioc served as the staple crop, cultivated through techniques that involved clearing plots with fire and rotating fields to maintain , supplemented by fruits, tubers, and other wild . Fishing predominated as the primary protein source, employing bows, arrows, weirs, and poisons in the Uaupés and Papurí rivers, while targeted such as tapirs, monkeys, and birds using blowguns and spears, and gathering focused on resources like palms and . Settlement patterns consisted of dispersed villages composed of large communal longhouses, or malocas, situated along riverbanks for access to water and resources. These rectangular, gabled-roof structures housed extended patrilineal clans, with each maloca serving as a self-contained unit for residence, labor organization, and social activities; clans coordinated agricultural work, fishing expeditions, and maintenance, with residence determined by patrilineal descent. Villages typically numbered a few dozen to several hundred inhabitants, reflecting the clan's size and hierarchical ranking, where higher-status clans assumed leadership in decision-making and resource allocation. Inter-group relations within the pre-colonial Uaupés ethnic complex, encompassing 17 interrelated Tukanoan-speaking peoples, were sustained through marriages and extensive networks that predated European contact. Linguistic exogamy required individuals to marry outside their patrilineal and language group, forging alliances across the approximately 150,000 km² region and distributing spouses, kin ties, and obligations among groups like the Desana, Tukano, and Barasana. involved specialized goods—such as intricately decorated baskets, canoes, and ceremonial stools—exchanged via informal gifting, feasts, and contractual obligations, reinforcing social interdependence and identity through material symbols of affiliation. These networks emphasized relational ties over geographic proximity, integrating the Pira-tapuya into a broader system of mutual support and shared cosmology.

European Contact and the Naming of the Amazon

European contact with the Pira-tapuya began in the 17th and 18th centuries through exploratory missions and slave raids in the upper Rio Negro region. Jesuit records from the 17th century describe initial incursions into the Vaupés and upper Rio Negro areas, portraying the Pira-tapuya as resilient riverine people skilled in warfare and navigation. In the first half of the 18th century, massive Portuguese slave raids targeted indigenous groups in the region, including the Pira-tapuya, leading to significant population declines and social disruptions. From the 17th to 19th centuries, European missionary activities began to penetrate Pira-tapuya territories, particularly in the Colombia-Brazil border areas of the Vaupés River basin. In Colombia, the Javerian missions, established in the early 20th century but building on prior exploratory efforts, adopted a relatively tolerant approach, allowing some preservation of indigenous customs such as traditional leadership and ritual practices while promoting Christianity. These missions, alongside earlier Franciscan incursions from the late 19th century, aimed at evangelization but often resulted in cultural disruptions, including the relocation of communities and introduction of new economic dependencies. The late 19th and early 20th-century rubber boom exacerbated these impacts, as merchants and extractors exploited Pira-tapuya labor in the upper Rio Negro and Vaupés regions through debt peonage and forced collection. This period, peaking around 1870–1920, led to severe population declines among the Pira-tapuya due to epidemics, violence, and harsh working conditions, reducing their numbers dramatically from pre-contact estimates. Jesuit and Franciscan records from the era document these transformations, noting the Pira-tapuya's adaptation to trade networks while suffering from introduced diseases like and .

Culture

Social Structure and Kinship

The Pira-tapuya society is organized around patrilineal exogamous , where descent is traced through the male line, and individuals belong to their father's , adopting its and identity. These are ranked hierarchically based on mythical from the Anaconda ancestor, with higher-ranking positioned as "elder brothers" to foster alliances through inter- marriages in the broader Uaupés linguistic and cultural complex. is strictly enforced, requiring marriages outside one's own to strengthen social and economic ties among Eastern Tukanoan groups. Gender roles among the Pira-tapuya exhibit complementary divisions of labor, with men primarily responsible for , , and constructing houses and canoes, while women focus on , manioc processing, child-rearing, household management, and crafting . Women are also regarded as possessing innate shamanic abilities tied to and natural processes, contrasting with men's acquired expertise. Historical accounts from the document Pira-tapuya women participating actively in warfare alongside men during encounters with European explorers. Leadership in Pira-tapuya communities is informal and decentralized, lacking centralized chiefs, with decisions guided by respected elders, shamans, and charismatic individuals from higher-ranking clans who organize collective activities and s. Shamans play a key role in and spiritual guidance, using to address illnesses attributed to sorcery, while elders draw on knowledge to mediate affairs. Clans' hierarchical structure influences participation, where higher-ranking members often lead ceremonial events.

Rituals and Mythology

The Pira-tapuya engage in a range of ceremonial practices that reinforce social bonds and spiritual connections within the broader Tukanoan cultural complex of the Upper Rio Negro region. Central to these are the dabukuris, inter-community feasts characterized by ritual exchanges of goods such as stools, canoes, and foodstuffs, accompanied by dances, the consumption of cashirí (fermented manioc beverage), and performances that symbolize and reciprocity among exogamous clans. These events, often hosted by one group for allied phratries, facilitate the circulation of material and symbolic resources, underscoring the multi-ethnic harmony essential to Pira-tapuya identity. Another key ritual is the Yuruparí, a men-only ceremony involving sacred palm-wood flutes and trumpets, which serves as both an annual rite marking the new year and a mechanism for male initiation and group cohesion. Restricted to initiated men, the Yuruparí includes chants, blowing for purification, and the playing of instruments believed to embody ancestral spirits, with women and uninitiated boys excluded to maintain ritual secrecy and power. Youth initiation rites, integrated into these ceremonies, subject adolescent boys to , ingestion, whipping, and exposure to the flutes, symbolizing a symbolic and rebirth into manhood while imparting sacred knowledge. Shamans, known as yai or kumu, lead these practices using , , and to mediate between the human world and spirits, often invoking healing and protection. In Pira-tapuya mythology, origin narratives center on an ancestral Anaconda that traversed the Rio Negro and Uaupés rivers, carrying the spirits of human forebears in its body before depositing them at sacred sites such as the Ipanoré rapids, where they transformed into distinct ethnic groups. Each Pira-tapuya subgroup traces its lineage to a specific Anaconda tied to riverine territories, languages, and identities, emphasizing multi-ethnic origins and the interconnectedness of Tukanoan peoples. These stories share cosmologies with neighboring groups, portraying a three-tiered —sky, , and —where humans must maintain balance with through proper conduct, as disruptions lead to illness or misfortune. features prominently, with souls returning to ancestral origin points for rebirth, often named after deceased paternal kin to perpetuate lineage continuity. Ceremonial material culture enhances these rituals, with red paints derived from carayurú applied during dabukuris and initiations for decoration and spiritual protection. Basketry, woven by women, serves as ritual containers for offerings, while specialists from allied Tukanoan groups contribute ornaments and , reinforcing inter-phratry ties.

Contemporary Situation

Cultural Preservation

In recent decades, Pira-tapuya communities have established indigenous schools in several villages along the Vaupés River, such as São Francisco, Aracu Porto, and São Gabriel do Papurí, where local teachers incorporate Piratapuyo language instruction through primers, early reading materials, and pedagogical grammars developed in collaboration with linguists. These efforts, supported by organizations like the Cabeceras Aid Project, aim to foster that integrates cultural knowledge alongside standard curricula. Cultural festivals, including the traditional dabukuri interethnic gatherings and cashirí ceremonies, continue to be held in Pira-tapuya reservations, blending ancestral rituals with contemporary elements to reinforce social bonds and transmit traditions among youth. Collaborations with NGOs have bolstered these initiatives; for instance, the Endangered Languages Documentation Programme (ELDP) funded a project from 2007 to document the Wa'ikhana (Piratapuyo) language, involving community members in recording oral narratives and linguistic resources to aid preservation. Similarly, the Instituto Socioambiental (ISA) partnered with the Federação das Organizações Indígenas do Rio Negro (FOIRN) to publish collections of Pira-tapuya myths in the , preserving oral histories for future generations. Elders play a central role in revitalization, serving as kumus (ritual specialists) who guide the transmission of myths, , and practices during community events, ensuring continuity amid linguistic shifts. Emerging forms of indigenous expression, such as , have gained prominence; Sioduhi Waíkhᵾn, a Pira-tapuya artist from the Alto Rio Negro, founded Sioduhi Studio in the to promote Amazonian crafts through sustainable garments inspired by ancestral patterns, highlighting cultural resilience on global platforms. Since the 1980s, Pira-tapuya have been safeguarded under Brazil's policies, which recognize indigenous territories and support ethno-education programs, while Colombia's 1991 and indigenous resguardo laws have granted for cultural practices in Vaupés communities. These legal frameworks have enabled proactive documentation and festival protections, contributing to the vitality of Pira-tapuya identity.

Socioeconomic Challenges

The Pira-tapuya people in the Vaupés basin confront severe environmental threats from driven by and agricultural encroachment, which has reduced and disrupted traditional resource gathering and practices. activities, particularly illegal , further invade their territories, contaminating waterways with mercury and limiting access to clean water and vital for subsistence. exacerbates these pressures through altered river flows and increased flooding in the Amazon's tributaries, hindering transportation, , and seasonal migrations that underpin their livelihoods. Limited access to healthcare services in remote areas compounds health vulnerabilities, with higher incidences of , , and infectious diseases due to understaffed facilities and supply shortages reported in the 2020s. Socioeconomic factors intensify these challenges, as poverty rates in indigenous areas of Amazonas state remain high, affecting approximately 70% of residents below the line in the 2020s, far exceeding national averages and limiting access to . Urban migration to centers like São Gabriel da Cachoeira for and opportunities has surged, leading to cultural dilution as families detach from traditional networks and land-based economies. In response, the Pira-tapuya participate in regional advocacy through organizations like the Federation of Indigenous Organizations of the Rio Negro (FOIRN), pushing for land demarcation and against ongoing encroachments in broader Amazon movements. These initiatives address lingering effects of post-rubber era displacements in the early , when exploitation and missionary interventions fragmented communities and forced relocations from ancestral malocas to linear villages.

References

  1. https://pib.socioambiental.org/en/Povo:Pira-tapuya
  2. https://pib.socioambiental.org/pt/Povo:Pira-tapuya
  3. https://www.onic.org.co/pueblos/1135-piratapuyo
  4. https://dice.missouri.edu/assets/docs/tukano/Piratapuyo.pdf
  5. https://joshuaproject.net/people_groups/14404/CO
  6. http://www.native-languages.org/piratapuyo.htm
  7. https://amerindias.github.io/referencias/camgro12southamerica.pdf
  8. https://joshuaproject.net/people_groups/14404/BR
  9. https://www.redalyc.org/journal/833/83378953004/html/
  10. https://mads.si.edu/mads/id/NMNH-NAASubjectGuide_Brazil_2024
  11. http://etnolinguistica.wdfiles.com/local--files/artigo:ribeiro-2009/ribeiro_2009_tapuya.pdf
  12. https://www.native-languages.org/baniwa.htm
  13. https://pure.mpg.de/rest/items/item_1212583/component/file_1843964/content
  14. https://www.dane.gov.co/files/investigaciones/boletines/grupos-etnicos/presentacion-grupos-etnicos-2019.pdf
  15. https://glottolog.org/resource/languoid/id/east2698
  16. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdfplus/10.1086/466485
  17. https://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2011/apr/15/language-extinct-endangered
  18. https://endangeredlanguages.com/elp-context/context-3034-wanano-source-atlas-worlds-languages-danger
  19. http://etnolinguistica.wdfiles.com/local--files/biblio%253Aepps-stenzel-2013/epps_stenzel_2013_upper_rio_negro.pdf
  20. https://apps.neh.gov/publicquery/default.aspx?q=1&a=0&n=0&o=0&ot=0&k=0&f=0&s=0&cd=0&p=1&pv=238&d=0&at=0&y=1&yf=2018&yt=2023&prd=0&cov=0&prz=0&wp=0&ob=year&or=DESC
  21. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/4069/406941915018.pdf
  22. https://acervo.socioambiental.org/sites/default/files/documents/0AL00059.pdf
  23. https://memoriahistoricapolicial.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Mitu-la-noche-de-los-jaguares.pdf
  24. https://acervo.socioambiental.org/sites/default/files/documents/wnl00001.pdf
  25. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Francisco-de-Orellana
  26. https://pib.socioambiental.org/en/Povo:Tukano
  27. https://www.cabeceras.org/cabeceras_kotiria_waikhana.htm
  28. https://www.eldp.net/en/our%2Bprojects/galleries/gal-12/
  29. https://www.vogue.com/article/vb100-spotlight-on-sioduhi-waikhn-designer-and-founder-of-sioduhi-studio
  30. https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/2003-017.pdf
  31. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099030504222512735/pdf/IDU-bcf13731-4cd1-401a-bda5-a706214d6285.pdf
  32. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/entities/publication/bc2f55a1-7d90-4c98-be34-e1fbb3eaff7c
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.