Hubbry Logo
List of legendary kings of BritainList of legendary kings of BritainMain
Open search
List of legendary kings of Britain
Community hub
List of legendary kings of Britain
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
List of legendary kings of Britain
List of legendary kings of Britain
from Wikipedia

Illustration of Cadwaladr Fendigaid from Geoffrey of Monmouth's Historia Regum Britanniae. Cadwaladr was also a historical king.

The following list of legendary kings of Britain (Welsh: brenin y Brythoniaid or brenin Prydain) derives predominantly from Geoffrey of Monmouth's circa 1136 work Historia Regum Britanniae ("the History of the Kings of Britain"). Geoffrey constructed a largely fictional history for the Britons (ancestors of the Welsh, the Cornish and the Bretons), partly based on the work of earlier medieval historians like Gildas, Nennius and Bede, partly from Welsh genealogies and saints' lives, partly from sources now lost and unidentifiable, and partly from his own imagination (see bibliography). Several of his kings are based on genuine historical figures, but appear in unhistorical narratives. A number of Middle Welsh versions of Geoffrey's Historia exist. All post-date Geoffrey's text, but may give us some insight into any native traditions Geoffrey may have drawn on.

Geoffrey's narrative begins with the exiled Trojan prince Brutus, after whom Britain is supposedly named, a tradition previously recorded in less elaborate form in the 9th century Historia Brittonum. Brutus is a descendant of Aeneas, the legendary Trojan ancestor of the founders of Rome, and his story is evidently related to Roman foundation legends.

The kings before Brutus come from a document purporting to trace the travels of Noah and his offspring in Europe, and once attributed to the Chaldean historian Berossus, but now considered to have been a fabrication by the 15th-century Italian monk Annio da Viterbo, who first published it. Renaissance historians like John Bale and Raphael Holinshed took the list of kings of "Celtica" given by pseudo-Berossus and made them into kings of Britain as well as Gaul. John Milton records these traditions in his History of Britain, although he gives them little credence.

Brutus of Britain (Brutus of Troy)

[edit]

Historia Brittonum, which is a history of the Celtic Britons written in north Wales in 829–30, claims that the Celtic Britons were descended from Trojans from the ancient city of Troy, who were the first to settle on the island of Britain.[1] It is also claimed in Historia Brittonum, as well as Historia Regum Britanniae by Geoffrey of Monmouth, that the first king of the Britons was Brutus of Troy and that the island of Britain was named after him.[2][3][4]

Lucius of Britain

[edit]

Lucius was a legendary 2nd-century king of the Britons traditionally credited with introducing Christianity into Britain. Lucius is first mentioned in a 6th-century version of the Liber Pontificalis, which says that he sent a letter to Pope Eleutherius asking to be made a Christian. The story became widespread after it was repeated in the 8th century by Bede in his Ecclesiastical History of the English People, who added the detail that after Eleutherius granted Lucius' request, the Britons followed their king in conversion and maintained the Christian faith until the Diocletianic Persecution of 303. Later writers expanded the legend, giving accounts of missionary activity under Lucius and attributing to him the foundation of certain churches.[5]

There is no contemporary evidence for a king of this name. In 1904 Adolf von Harnack proposed that there had been a scribal error in Liber Pontificalis with 'Britanio' being written as an erroneous expansion for 'Britio', a citadel of Edessa, present day Şanlıurfa in Turkey. The name of the king of Edessa contemporaneous with Pope Eleutherius was Lucius Aelius Aurelius Abgar VIII.[5]

Des grantz geanz

[edit]

Des grantz geanz ("Of the Great Giants"), a 14th-century Anglo-Norman poem, contains a variant story regarding Albion, the oldest recorded name for Britain, and also contains a slightly different list of kings.[6][7] The poem states that a colony of exiled Greek royals led by a queen called Albina first founded Britain but before their settlement "no one dwelt there".[8] Albina subsequently gave her name first to Britain, which was later renamed Britain after Brutus. The poem also attempts by euhemerism to rationalise the legends of giants; Albina is thus described as being "very tall", but is presented as a human queen, a descendant of a Greek king, not a mythological creature.

The Albina myth is also found in some later manuscripts of Wace's Roman de Brut (1155), attached as a prologue.[9]

Scota

[edit]

Scota, in Scottish mythology, and pseudohistory, is the name given to the mythological daughter of an Egyptian pharaoh to whom the Gaels and Scots traced their ancestry. Scota first appeared in literature from the 11th or 12th century and most modern scholars interpret the legends surrounding her to have emerged to rival Geoffrey of Monmouth's claims that the descendants of Brutus (through Albanactus) founded Scotland.[10][11] However some early Irish sources also refer to the Scota legends and not all scholars regard the legends as fabrications or as political constructions.[12] In the Scottish origin myths, Albanactus had little place and Scottish chroniclers (e.g., John of Fordun and Walter Bower) claimed that Scota was the eponymous founder of Scotland and the Scots long before Albanactus, during the time of Moses.

Monarchs derived from Geoffrey of Monmouth

[edit]

Geoffrey synchronises some of his monarchs with figures and events from the Bible, Greek, Roman and Irish legends, and recorded history. These are given in the "Synchronisation" column of the table below. Geoffrey dated Brutus' arrival in Britain (and subsequent founding of the Trojan-British monarchy) to 1115 BC.[13] Geoffrey's book was later retold by Wace (in French) and Layamon (in Middle English); the final column represents Layamon's version.

Kingdom Synchronisation Layamon's Brut
England Scotland Wales Cornwall Other Bible
Brutus I (24 years) Corineus Aeneas Silvius (1112–1081 BC) Eli (12th century BC) =
Locrinus (10 years) Albanactus Kamber Gwendolen =
Gwendolen (15 years) =
Maddan (40 years) Gwendolen Aeneas Silvius (1112–1081 BC), Homer (8th/7th century BC) Samuel Madan
Mempricius (20 years) Eurystheus Saul (r. 1049–1010 BC) Membriz
Ebraucus (40 to 60 years) David (r. 1010–970 BC) Ebrauc
Brutus II Greenshield (12 years) Brutus Greenshield
Leil (25 years) Solomon (r. 971–931 BC) Leil
Rud Hud Hudibras (39 years) Haggai, Amos, Joel, Azariah Ruhudibras
Bladud (20 years) Elijah (9th century BC) Bladud
Leir (60 years) Leir
Cordelia (5 years) Cordoille
Marganus I (north of the Humber) and Cunedagius (south of the Humber) (2 years) Morgan & Cunidagius
Cunedagius (33 years) Romulus (8th century BC) Isaiah, Hosea (8th century BC) Cunidagius
Rivallo Riwald
Gurgustius Gurgustius
Sisillius I Silvius
Jago Lago
Kimarcus Mark
Gorboduc Gorbodiago
War between Ferrex and Porrex I Ferreus & Porreus
Civil war; Britain divided under five unnamed kings
Pinner Staterius Rudaucus Cloten
Dunvallo Molmutius
Dunvallo Molmutius (40 years) Donwallo Molineus
Brennius (north of the Humber) and Belinus (south of the Humber) Sack of Rome (387 BC) Belin & Brennes
Belinus
Gurguit Barbtruc Partholón Gurguint
Guithelin Guncelin
Marcia (regent)
Sisillius II Sillius
Kinarius Rumarus
Danius Damus
Morvidus Morbidus
Gorbonianus Gorbonian
Archgallo Argal
Elidurus (5 years) Elidur
Archgallo (restored) (10 years) Argal
Elidurus (restored) Elidur
Peredurus (north of the Humber) and Ingenius (south of the Humber) (7 years) Peredur, Jugenes
Peredurus
Elidurus (restored) Elidur
A son of Gorbonianus Lador
Marganus II Morgan
Enniaunus Ænmaunus
Idvallo Iwallo
Runo Rime
Gerennus Goronces
Catellus Catulus
Millus Coillus
Porrex II Porex
Cherin =
Fulgenius Fulgenius
Edadus Aldus
Andragius Androgus
Urianus Urrian
Eliud =
Cledaucus Cledus
Clotenus Doten
Gurgintius Gurguiricius
Merianus Merian
Bledudo
Cap Cap
Oenus Oein
Sisillius III Sillius
Beldgabred Blaðgabreast
Archmail Arkinaus
Eldol Ældolf
Redon Redion
Redechius Redært
Samuil Penessil (or Samuil, followed by Penessil) Famul-Penicel
Pir Pir
Capoir Capor
Digueillus Eligille
Heli (40 years) Heli
Lud Lud
Cassibelanus Julius Caesar's invasions of Britain (55–54 BC) Cassibelaune
Tenvantius Tennancius
Cunobeline Augustus (30 BC – 14 AD) Jesus (3 BC – 33 AD) Kinbelin
Guiderius Togodumnus (d. AD 43) during Claudius's conquest of Britain Wiðer
Arvirargus Claudius (10 BC – AD 54), Vespasian (AD 9–79) Mark the Evangelist, Paul of Tarsus
(1st century AD)
Marius
Coilus
Lucius (d. AD 156) Pope Eleuterus (174–189)
Interregnum; war between Severus and Sulgenius Septimius Severus (Roman emperor 193–211)
Geta Publius Septimius Geta (Roman emperor 209–211)
Bassianus (Caracalla) Caracalla (Roman emperor 211–217)
Carausius Carausian Revolt (289–296)
Allectus Allectus assassinated Carausius in 293
Asclepiodotus (10 years) Asclepiodotus and Constantius Chlorus retook Britain in 296
Coel
Constantius (11 years) Constantius Chlorus, Roman emperor 293–306
Constantine I Constantine I, Roman emperor 306–337
Octavius
Trahern
Octavius (restored)
Maximianus (with Dionotus later as regent) Caradocus, then Dionotus Magnus Maximus, Roman usurper-emperor 383–388
Gracianus Municeps
Interregnum; end of Roman rule
Constantine II Constantine III, Roman usurper-emperor 407–411
Constans Constans II, Roman usurper-emperor 409–411
Vortigern
Vortimer Germanus of Auxerre (378–448), Battle of Aylesford (455)
Aurelius Ambrosius
Uther Pendragon
Arthur Battle of Badon (c. AD 500), St. Dubricius (c. AD 465 – c. 550)
Constantine III
Aurelius Conanus (2 years) Aurelius Caninus, 6th-century king of Gwent or Powys;
Cynan Garwyn (582–610), king of Powys
Vortiporius (4 years) Vortiporius, 6th-century king of Dyfed
Malgo Maelgwn Gwynedd, 6th-century king of Gwynedd
Keredic
Interregnum; Saxons occupy England Margaduc (Demetia) and Cadvan (Venedotia) Blederic Augustine of Canterbury (arrived in Britain in 597)
Cadvan Cadfan ap Iago, 6th/7th-century king of Gwynedd
Cadwallo Cadwallon ap Cadfan, 7th-century king of Gwynedd, d. 634
Cadwallader (d. AD 689) Cadwaladr ap Cadwallon, 7th-century king of Gwynedd

After the death of Cadwallader, the kings of the Brythons were reduced to such a small domain that they ceased to be kings of the whole Brythonic-speaking area. Two of his relatives, Yvor and Yni, led the exiles back from Brittany, but were unable to re-establish a united kingship. The Anglo-Saxon invaders ruled the south-eastern part of the island of Great Britain, which would become England, after that point in time under the Bretwaldas and later the kings of England. The heirs to the Celtic-British throne continued through the Welsh kings of Gwynedd until that line was forced to submit itself to the Plantagenets in the 13th century. Princes and lords of Gwynedd ruled until the reign of Dafydd III, who ruled from 1282 to 1283. His death marked the end of the house of Brutus. Owen Tudor, grandfather of Henry VII of England, was a maternal descendant of the kings of Gwynedd; Henry's marriage with Elizabeth of York thus signified the merging of the two royal houses (as well as the feuding houses of York and Lancaster).

Forgeries

[edit]

Pseudo-Berossus

[edit]

Annius of Viterbo in 1498 claimed to have found ancient fragments from Berossus detailing the earliest settlement of 'Celtica', including the British Isles, by Samothes, a son of Japheth, son of Noah, after the Great Flood. These fragments were later revealed to have been forged by Annius himself, and are now known as "Pseudo-Berossus". The fragments can be found in Asher (1993) and include a king list. Before being revealed as a hoax, the list found its way into John Bale's Illustrium majoris Britanniae scriptorum (1548), John Caius' Historia Cantabrigiensis Academiae (1574), William Harrison's Description of England (1577), Holinshed's Chronicles (1587) and Anthony Munday's A briefe chronicle (1611).[14]

Iolo Morganwg's Welsh Kings

[edit]

Iolo Morganwg, between 1801 and 1807, published a series of Welsh Triads he claimed to have discovered in manuscript form, with the help of the antiquarian William Owen Pughe. These were later revealed to be a mixture of forgeries by Morganwg and Williams' alterations to authentic triads.[15][16] Exactly how much "authentic" content there is of Morganwg's published work remains disputed by scholars today. Morganwg's triads describe the earliest occupation of Britain (Prydain) and contain a pseudo-historical reign of kings, beginning with Hu Gadarn, the "Plough King".[17]

Hu Gadarn is described by Morganwg in his triads as being the earliest inhabitant of Britain having travelled from the "Summerland, called Deffrobani, where Constantinople now stands" in 1788 BC.[18] He is credited as having founded the first civilisation in Britain and introduced agriculture. Morganwg's Barddas (1862, p. 348) further states that this king is descended from Hu, but that, after a huge flood (see Afanc), only two people, Dwyfan and Dwyfach, survived from whom the later inhabitants of Britain descended. The Welsh clergyman Edward Davies included this myth in his Celtic Researches on the Origin, Traditions and Languages of the Ancient Britons (1804):

First, the bursting of the lake of waters, and the overwhelming of the face of all lands, so that all mankind drowned, excepting Dwyvan and Dwyvach, who escaped in a naked vessel and from then the Island of Britain was re-peopled.

Several 19th-century Christian authors—for example, Henry Hoyle Howorth[19]—interpreted this myth to be evidence for the Biblical flood of Noah, yet in Morganwg's chronology Dwyfan and Dwyfach are dated to the 18th or 17th century BC, which does not fit the Biblical estimate for the Noachian deluge.[20]

Tea Tephi

[edit]

Tea Tephi is a legendary princess found described in British Israelite literature from the 19th century.[21][22] Revd F. R. A. Glover, M.A., of London in 1861 published England, the Remnant of Judah, and the Israel of Ephraim in which he claimed Tea Tephi was one of Zedekiah's daughters. Since King Zedekiah of Judah had all his sons killed during the Babylonian Captivity, no male successors could continue the throne of King David, but, as Glover noted, Zedekiah had daughters who escaped death (Jeremiah 43:6). Glover believed that Tea Tephi was a surviving Judahite princess who had escaped and travelled to Ireland, and who married a local High King of Ireland in the 6th century BC who subsequently became blood linked to the British monarchy.[23] This theory was later expanded upon by Rev. A.B. Grimaldi, who published in 1877 a successful chart entitled Pedigree of Queen Victoria from the Bible Kings and later by W.M.H. Milner in his booklet The Royal House of Britain an Enduring Dynasty' (1902, revised 1909). Charles Fox Parham also authored an article tracing Queen Victoria's lineage back to King David (through Tea Tephi) entitled Queen Victoria: Heir to King David's Royal Throne.[24]

The Tea Tephi-British monarchy link is also found in J. H. Allen's Judah's Sceptre and Joseph's Birthright (1902, p. 251). A central tenet of British Israelism is that the British monarchy is from the Davidic line and the legend of Tea Tephi from the 19th century attempted to legitimise this claim. Tea Tephi, however, has never been traced to an extant Irish source before the 19th century and critics assert she was purely a British Israelite invention.[25] A collection of alleged bardic traditions and Irish manuscripts which detail Tea Tephi were published by J. A. Goodchild in 1897 as The Book of Tephi. the work is, however, considered pseudo-historical or a forgery.

There is though a queen called Tea in Irish mythology who appears in the Annals of the Kingdom of Ireland.[26] She is described as the wife of Érimón a Míl Espáine (Milesian) and dated to 1700 BC (Geoffrey Keating: 1287 BC). These dates are inconsistent with the British Israelite literature which dates Tea Tephi to the 6th century BC, but later British Israelites, such as Herman Hoeh (Compendium of World History, 1970), claimed that the Milesian Royal House (including Tea) was from an earlier blood descendant of the Davidic Line who entered Britain around 1000 BC (citing Ruaidhrí Ó Flaithbheartaigh's reduced chronology).[27] Linked to Glover's original claims of Tea Tephi, are Grimaldi and Milner's theory that Jeremiah himself in the company of his scribe Baruch ben Neriah travelled to Ireland with Tea Tephi and that they are found described in Irish folklore and old Irish manuscripts. Some British Israelites identify Baruch ben Neriah with a figure called Simon Berac or Berak in Irish myth, while Jeremiah with Ollom Fotla (or Ollam, Ollamh Fodhla).[28] However, like Tea Tephi, there has long been controversy about these identifications, mainly because of conflicting or inconsistent dates. In 2001, the British-Israel-World Federation wrote an article claiming they no longer subscribed to these two identifications, but still strongly stick to the belief that the British monarchy is of Judahite origin.[25][29] In an earlier publication in 1982, Covenant Publishing Co. admitted that Tea Tephi could not be traced in Irish literature or myth and may have been fabricated by Glover, but they clarified they still believed in the Milesian Royal House-Davidic Line bloodline connection (popularised by Hoeh).[30] Herbert Armstrong (1986) also took up this legendary connection.[31]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Sources

[edit]

Bibliography

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
The list of legendary kings of Britain refers to a sequence of mythical rulers chronicled in medieval texts, tracing an imagined monarchy from the arrival of Brutus—purportedly a great-grandson of the Trojan hero Aeneas who founded the island's name and realm after the fall of Troy—to the era preceding the Anglo-Saxon conquests around the 7th century. This lineage, spanning over two hundred figures, is predominantly derived from Geoffrey of Monmouth's Historia Regum Britanniae (c. 1136), a pseudo-historical work that weaves folklore, classical allusions, and invention into a narrative of British antiquity. Prominent among them are King Lear, whose tale of divided kingdoms inspired later literature; Cymbeline, a pre-Roman ruler romanticized in Shakespeare; and Arthur, the warrior-king associated with Camelot and resistance against invaders, though none possess verifiable historical evidence and are regarded by scholars as fictional constructs designed to affirm Norman-era claims to sovereignty and cultural prestige. The tradition's influence persisted in chronicles and genealogies, yet its lack of corroboration from archaeological or contemporary records underscores its role as myth rather than empirical history.

Foundational Trojan and Prehistoric Myths

Brutus of Britain (Brutus of Troy)

Brutus of Troy, also known as Brute or Brut, is a mythical figure central to medieval British origin legends, depicted as the eponymous founder of Britain and its first king. According to the narrative, he was the great-grandson of Aeneas, the Trojan prince who escaped the fall of Troy and became the legendary progenitor of Rome as described in Virgil's Aeneid. Brutus's story posits a parallel foundation myth for Britain, linking its inhabitants to the heroic Trojan lineage to elevate their status amid Norman conquest and cultural assimilation pressures in the 12th century. The legend originates primarily from Geoffrey of Monmouth's Historia Regum Britanniae, composed around 1136, which presents Brutus as a warrior exiled after accidentally killing his father during a hunt in Italy. Guided by an oracle of the goddess Diana, who prophesied that he would rule a distant western island once inhabited by giants, Brutus leads a fleet of Trojan exiles across Europe, subdues the giant Gogmagog and his kin upon landing in Britain (then called Albion), and establishes the city of Troynovant, later identified with London. He divides the island among his three sons—Locrinus, Camber, and Albanactus—originating the names England (Loegres), Wales, and Scotland (Albania), and names the land Britain after himself. This chronicle draws on earlier Welsh traditions and classical models but fabricates a continuous royal genealogy from Trojan times to contemporary rulers like Arthur, serving propagandistic ends to legitimize British monarchy and independence from Roman or Anglo-Saxon narratives. No empirical evidence supports Brutus's existence or the Trojan migration to Britain; archaeological records, classical histories by authors like Tacitus or Ptolemy, and early British sources such as Gildas's De Excidio et Conquestu Britanniae (c. 540) make no mention of such events or figures. Historians classify the tale as pseudohistory, invented in the early Middle Ages to forge a prestigious ethnic identity for the Britons by borrowing from Greco-Roman mythology, amid efforts to counter Anglo-Saxon dominance and assert cultural continuity with antiquity. Geoffrey's work, while influential, is critiqued for blending folklore with deliberate anachronisms, lacking verifiable sources beyond vague references to an alleged "British book" now considered fictitious. The myth persisted in later chronicles, such as those by Holinshed and Milton, shaping Tudor-era national identity and even inspiring place-name etymologies like the River Brent, though modern linguistics debunks these as folk etymologies unrelated to Trojan roots. Despite its ahistorical nature, the legend underscores medieval causal dynamics: rulers and chroniclers crafted origin stories to foster unity and prestige, prioritizing narrative utility over factual accuracy in an era with limited historical documentation.

Giants and Early Inhabitants of Albion

In Geoffrey of Monmouth's Historia Regum Britanniae (c. 1136), the island known as Albion is depicted as inhabited solely by a race of giants prior to the Trojan exile Brutus's arrival circa 1100 BC; these beings are portrayed as the sole pre-humanoid occupants, whom Brutus's forces systematically subdued to claim the land. Corineus, Brutus's companion famed for his wrestling prowess, is credited with vanquishing the most formidable of these giants, including Gogmagog, whose defeat symbolized the Trojans' dominance over the island's monstrous prior rulers. This narrative frames the giants not as organized kings but as brutish remnants of a primordial era, cleared to enable the foundation of Britain's legendary dynasty. The etymology of "Albion" features in variant traditions linking it to a eponymous giant king, described as the fourth son of Neptune (Poseidon), who purportedly conquered and named the island after himself around 44 years before being slain by Hercules. This account, echoed in 16th-century chronicler Raphael Holinshed's Chronicles and John Milton's History of Britain (1670), posits Albion as a singular ruler whose domain preceded the giant horde, though Geoffrey omits this figure, focusing instead on the collective giant population without royal hierarchy. An alternative medieval legend, preserved in the 14th-century Anglo-Norman poem Des Grantz Geanz ("Of the Great Giants"), traces the giants' origin to 50 princesses exiled from Syria under their leader Albina, who landed on the island circa 1360 BC—260 years before Brutus—and interbred with demonic spirits or incubi, spawning the giant lineage that terrorized the land until the Trojans' intervention. This matrilineal myth, distinct from Geoffrey's Trojan-centric framework, emphasizes incestuous and supernatural causation for the giants' emergence, portraying them as a cursed, fertile progeny rather than indigenous primordials. Such accounts, while influential in shaping pseudohistorical views of pre-Roman Britain, lack archaeological corroboration and reflect medieval interpolations blending biblical antediluvian motifs with local folklore. In medieval Irish and Scottish pseudohistorical accounts, Scota is portrayed as the daughter of an unnamed Egyptian pharaoh, serving as the eponymous matriarch from whom the Gaels and Scots derived their name. According to these traditions, she wed Gaythelos (also spelled Gathelus or Goídel Glas), a prince variously identified as the son of a Greek king, a Scythian chieftain, or a contemporary of Moses, around the 16th or 15th century BCE. Fleeing Egypt due to divine plagues or the post-Babel linguistic chaos, the couple navigated to Iberia, where their progeny flourished before subgroups sailed to Ireland circa 1000 BCE, dubbing it Scotia Minor, and later to the northern British mainland around 300 BCE, establishing Scotia Major amid conflicts with indigenous Picts and Britons. The narrative first emerges in the 12th-century Irish Lebor na hUidre and Book of Leinster, which link Scota to the Milesian invasion of Ireland, but gains fuller elaboration in Scottish vernacular chronicles. John of Fordun's Chronica Gentis Scotorum, compiled between 1360 and 1370, integrates the tale into a Gaelic timeline descending from Noah via Egyptian exile, while Walter Bower's Scotichronicon (completed 1440s) expands it with details of Scota's royal lineage and the transport of the Stone of Destiny from Egypt to Scotland via Ireland. These texts, drawing on earlier Latin annals and oral traditions, aimed to embed Scottish origins within Euclidean biblical history, positing the Gaels as a chosen lineage predating Semitic peoples. Within the broader framework of British legendary kingships, the Scota myth furnished Scottish rulers with an alternative genesis to the Trojan Brutus lineage chronicled by , asserting Egyptian antiquity over Anatolian refugees to claim insular precedence. Chroniclers like Bower depicted Scota's descendants—through figures such as Mil Espáine in Ireland and —as progenitors of kings who subdued realms by the 9th century CE, exemplified by MacAlpin's unification of and Scots in 843, forming the Kingdom of Alba that encroached on Brittonic territories. This pseudogenealogy bolstered medieval Scottish assertions of sovereignty amid Wars of Independence, portraying Gaelic monarchs as heirs to pharaonic legitimacy rather than subordinate to Brutus's Britons, though no empirical Egyptian records or genetic markers substantiate the migration.

Early Christian and Roman-Influenced Legends

Lucius of Britain

is a legendary figure depicted in early medieval sources as a 2nd-century king of the Britons who sought to establish in his by corresponding with Eleutherus (r. 174–189 AD). According to Bede's Ecclesiastical History of the English People (completed 731 AD), Lucius sent letters to Eleutherus requesting instruction "to reduce the nation into the form of the Christian faith," prompting the pope to send missionaries, including bishops Fugatianus and Damiani, who purportedly succeeded in converting Britain wholesale. Bede's account implies this event occurred around 180 AD, predating widespread Roman imperial tolerance of Christianity under Constantine. Earlier patristic evidence supports the presence of Christianity in Britain by the late 2nd century but omits any named king. Tertullian (c. 200 AD), in Adversus Judaeos, asserted that "regions of Britain inaccessible to the Romans were made subject to Christ," while Origen (c. 248 AD) similarly noted Christian adherence in remote British territories. These references align temporally with Eleutherus's pontificate but provide no details of royal initiative or papal correspondence, suggesting Bede interpolated or drew from unverified traditions. The name "Lucius" itself appears absent from these antique sources, possibly deriving from later conflations with British place names like Luguvalium (modern Carlisle) or a misattributed saintly figure, such as the Irish-Scottish Lucius of Coire (d. c. 700s), whose vita may have influenced continental hagiographies. Scholarly analysis regards the Lucius narrative as pseudohistorical, lacking corroboration in Roman records, papal catalogs like the Liber Pontificalis, or British archaeology from the period, which shows only sporadic Christian artifacts post-200 AD. Bede's unnamed source—potentially a lost 6th- or 7th-century chronicle—likely embellished Tertullian's vague claims to assert apostolic continuity for the British church amid Anglo-Saxon rivalries. Later medieval chroniclers, including the 9th-century Historia Brittonum, amplified the tale without new evidence, embedding it in origin myths that prioritized ecclesiastical prestige over empirical verification. No verifiable royal Lucius appears in prosopographies of Romano-British elites, and the story's causal role in Britain's Christianization contradicts gradual, bottom-up conversion patterns inferred from epigraphic and numismatic data.

Geoffrey of Monmouth's Historia Regum Britanniae

Sources, Composition, and Historical Context

![Manuscript page from Geoffrey of Monmouth's Historia Regum Britanniae][float-right] Geoffrey of Monmouth, a cleric of probable Welsh or Breton origin active in and later , composed the in Latin around 1136 to 1138 during the civil war known as between and . The work, originally titled De gestis Britonum, presents a chronological narrative of British rulers from the Trojan exile Brutus founding the island's dynasty circa 1100 BCE to the Saxon invasions culminating in the death of Cadwallader around 689 CE. Geoffrey dedicated the text to Robert, Earl of Gloucester (Matilda's half-brother), and possibly Walran, suggesting patronage ties that may have influenced its pro-Brittonic emphasis. Geoffrey prefaced the Historia by claiming to translate and expand upon a "very ancient book in the British tongue" entrusted to him by Walter, Archdeacon of Oxford, supplemented by unnamed ancient British writers. He also acknowledged drawing from recognized historians like Bede and Gildas, but scholarly analysis reveals the purported ancient source as likely fictitious, with the bulk of the content comprising inventive elaborations on sparse Welsh oral traditions, classical myths, and contemporary political motifs rather than verifiable records. No empirical evidence supports the pre-Roman chronologies or events detailed, and comparisons with archaeological and documentary sources confirm wholesale fabrication for much of the narrative. In the historical context of 12th-century Britain, post-Norman Conquest, the Historia served to elevate Celtic British ancestry—linking it to Trojan origins—to counter Anglo-Saxon historiographical dominance and bolster Welsh resistance narratives amid Norman assimilation pressures. Completed amid dynastic strife, it aligned with Angevin interests by glorifying a unified British past, influencing subsequent medieval chronicles despite early contemporaries like William of Newburgh denouncing it as deliberate mendacity devoid of truth. Modern scholarship, drawing on textual criticism and absence of corroborating evidence, concurs that while it preserves fragmented authentic traditions (e.g., dim echoes of Arthurian figures), the work functions primarily as pseudohistorical propaganda, its causal origins rooted in ethnic mythmaking rather than historical reportage.

Prominent Kings in Geoffrey's Chronicle

![Manuscript page from Historia Regum Britanniae][float-right] Geoffrey of Monmouth's Historia Regum Britanniae narrates the reigns of over ninety kings after Brutus, portraying a continuous lineage of British rulers marked by wars, treacheries, and conquests, though the accounts are largely fictional inventions blending sparse historical allusions with myth. Prominent among them is Leir, who ruled for sixty years, built the city of Kaerleir (later Leicester), and divided his kingdom among his three daughters—Gonorilla, Regau, and Cordeilla—based on their professed devotion; he banished the truthful Cordeilla, was subsequently ousted by his sons-in-law, but regained the throne with her aid before dying after three years of restored rule. In the Roman-influenced era, Cymbeline (Kymbelinus), son of Tenuantius and foster-son of Augustus Caesar, reigned ten years as a tributary king noted for his soldiery, fathering Guiderius and Arviragus amid tensions with Rome. Earlier, Cassibellaun ruled seven years, defeating Julius Caesar twice before his death and burial at York. Post-Roman kings include the treacherous Vortigern, who usurped the throne by assassinating Constans, invited Saxon mercenaries led by Hengist and Horsa, married their kin Rowena, and met his end burned in a tower by Aurelius Ambrosius's forces. Uther Pendragon, brother of Aurelius and father of Arthur, succeeded after defeating Saxons in campaigns aided by Merlin's arts, including a deceptive union with Igerna to conceive Arthur, but died of poison after victories at Verulam and elsewhere. Arthur emerges as the chronicle's central figure, son of Uther conceived through Merlin's magic, crowned at age fifteen, who vanquished Saxons at York, subdued Ireland, Iceland, Norway, and parts of Gaul and Spain—including slaying a giant—repelled Roman demands under Lucius Tiberius, enjoyed twelve years of peace in Britain, and was mortally wounded by his nephew Modred in 542 AD at Camlann, bequeathing the crown to Constantine before being borne to Avallon. Later rulers like Cadwalla, who expelled Saxons over forty-eight years until 689 AD, and Cadwallader, who fled pestilence and died in Rome that year, conclude the British line amid Saxon ascendancy.

Pseudohistorical Forgeries and Expansions

Pseudo-Berossus and Ancient Forgeries

In the late , the Italian Dominican friar Giovanni Nanni, known as Annius of (c. 1432–), fabricated a series of ancient texts under the of , a purported Chaldean from the BCE, to construct a pseudohistorical narrative of early European peoples. These forgeries, published in 1498 as part of Antiquitatum variarum volumina XVII, claimed to draw from lost Babylonian chronicles and detailed the postdiluvian migrations of Noah's descendants, including the settlement of "Celtica"—encompassing Gaul and Britain (then called Albion). Annius positioned Samothes, identified as a son of Japheth and also called Dis or Zeus, as the first king of the Celts, who allegedly arrived in western Europe around 2200 BCE and established monarchy in Britain by subduing giants and indigenous tribes. The Pseudo-Berossus chronicle enumerated a sequence of early Celtic kings purportedly ruling over Britain and Gaul, including Magus (c. 2150 BCE), credited with inventing druidic rites and magic; Sarmatus (c. 2100 BCE), founder of the Sarmatians; and subsequent figures like Bolgus (c. 1550 BCE), ancestor of the Boii and other tribes. These rulers were depicted as civilizers who introduced agriculture, laws, and religion, framing Britain as an ancient cradle of sovereignty predating Trojan myths like those in Geoffrey of Monmouth's work. Annius integrated these inventions with biblical genealogy to legitimize non-Roman European antiquity, but the texts lacked corroboration from genuine ancient sources such as genuine Berossus fragments preserved by Josephus or Eusebius. Annius's forgeries gained traction among antiquarians seeking to elevate Celtic origins against classical Roman narratives, influencing British scholars like and later figures in the 16th–17th centuries who cited them to assert Britain's pre-Christian imperial lineage. However, by the mid-16th century, humanists such as and exposed inconsistencies, including anachronistic Latin phrasing, fabricated etymologies (e.g., linking "Celtica" to Chaldean unsupported by linguistics), and contradictions with verified histories like those of . Modern confirms the entire corpus as Annius's , motivated by promoting his native Viterbo's Etruscan heritage while extending it to broader Eurocentric myths; no archaeological or textual evidence supports the named kings or timelines. Despite debunking, echoes persisted in pseudohistorical works until the Enlightenment, underscoring how forgeries filled evidentiary voids in pre-Roman Britain with fabricated royal pedigrees.

Iolo Morganwg's Welsh Traditions

Iolo Morganwg, the bardic pseudonym of Edward Williams (1747–1826), produced forged Welsh triads published between 1801 and 1807 in the Myvyrian Archaiology of Wales, which he claimed derived from ancient manuscripts but were largely his own compositions designed to fabricate a continuous bardic tradition. These triads construct a pseudohistorical sequence of early kings ruling Prydain (Britain), emphasizing druidic oversight and cultural origins independent of Roman or later influences. The narrative begins with Hu Gadarn ("Hu the Mighty"), a mythical culture hero who, after a flood, led survivors in coracles to Britain, domesticated wild oxen for plough agriculture, and instituted the first orderly kingship as a peaceful, ox-yoked sovereign under druidic law. Subsequent rulers in this invented lineage, drawn from Iolo's triads and elaborated in his forged manuscripts compiled as Barddas (published 1862), include figures like Gorwg ap Eirchion, described two generations after Hu as a wise, religious king proficient in bardic arts who codified early legal and poetic systems. Barddas further posits kings such as Lles ap Coel as the inaugural "Baptismal King" of Britain, linking pre-Christian druidism to ritual immersions and monarchical authority in a fabricated metaphysical framework. These traditions portray a lineage of twenty or more early sovereigns, from flood-era migrants to druid-advised rulers, culminating in ties to Arthurian and post-Roman figures, but devoid of corroboration from genuine medieval sources like the Brut y Tywysogion or archaeological evidence of such agricultural or flood myths predating the 18th century. Iolo's forgeries, motivated by Romantic nationalism to elevate Welsh antiquity amid English cultural dominance, interweave pseudo-druidic philosophy with regal genealogies, inventing elements like the Coelbren alphabet to authenticate them; 20th-century philological analysis, including comparisons of ink, paper, and linguistic anachronisms in his manuscripts, confirms their modern origin and rejection by scholars as historical evidence. While Iolo transcribed some authentic fragments, his additions systematically inflate bardic prestige, fabricating kings to assert Welsh primacy in European lore without empirical support from linguistics, genetics, or contemporary records, rendering these traditions causal artifacts of 19th-century antiquarianism rather than preserved oral history.

Tea Tephi and Irish-British Syncretisms

The legend of Tea Tephi emerged within British-Israelite traditions as a purported daughter of Zedekiah, the last king of Judah, who, following the Babylonian conquest of Jerusalem in 586 BCE, fled to Ireland accompanied by the prophet Jeremiah. According to this narrative, Tea Tephi married Eochaid (or Heremon), a Milesian king of Ireland around 580 BCE, thereby transplanting the Davidic royal line to the British Isles and establishing the Stone of Lia Fáil (later the Stone of Scone) at Tara as a coronation seat. Proponents claim she brought Hebrew artifacts, including the Ark of the Covenant and David's harp, symbolizing the transfer of Judah's covenant blessings to Ireland's monarchy, which allegedly migrated to Scotland and England by the 5th century CE. This figure syncretizes pre-existing Irish mythological elements with biblical history, reinterpreting the native queen Tea—mentioned in the Annals of the Four Masters as the wife of Heremon, a Milesian invader from Spain or Egypt circa 1699 BCE in traditional chronology—from an indigenous or eastern Mediterranean origin into a Hebrew princess to affirm Israelite descent for Celtic peoples.%20Tephi/Who%20Was%20Tea%20Tephi%20according%20to%20BI%20(other%20views)-%20Yair%20Davidiy.pdf) Irish pseudo-histories, such as those in the Lebor Gabála Érenn (Book of Invasions, compiled 11th–12th centuries CE), describe Milesian settlers under Heremon founding Tara's kingship, but without Jewish ties; British-Israelite writers from the 1870s onward, including J. H. Allen in Judah's Sceptre and Joseph's Birthright (1902), retrofitted Tea Tephi to bridge Judah's fall with Ireland's royal continuity, positing her as "Tamar Tephi" (palm of beauty) to evoke biblical restoration prophecies like Jeremiah 33:17. No contemporary archaeological, epigraphic, or textual evidence from the 6th century BCE supports Tea Tephi's existence or a Judahite migration to Ireland; Babylonian records confirm Zedekiah's daughters were taken to Babylon, not Egypt or westward, and Irish king lists in medieval manuscripts reflect euhemerized myth rather than historical migration patterns verifiable by linguistics or genetics. Scholarly analysis attributes the legend's fabrication to 19th-century Anglo-Israelite apologetics, which sought to validate British imperial exceptionalism by genealogically linking the monarchy to ancient Israel amid rising Darwinism and biblical criticism, often conflating disparate folklore without primary sourcing. Even within British-Israelite circles, later revisions abandoned the Judahite identification, reverting Tea to a Scota-like Egyptian figure, underscoring the narrative's speculative reconstruction over empirical foundations. Such syncretisms extended Irish-British royal myths by portraying Tara's high kings as precursors to Westminster's throne, influencing 20th-century nationalist ideologies that emphasized a shared "lost tribes" heritage, though genetic studies of Y-chromosome haplogroups in Ireland (predominantly R1b, absent Semitic markers) and absence of Hebrew loanwords in Old Irish refute Israelite admixture claims. The Book of Tephi, a purported 19th-century forgery attributed to her, further exemplifies pseudohistorical expansion, blending Druidic inauguration rites with Mosaic law to fabricate a theocratic origin for Celtic sovereignty.

Historicity, Scholarly Critique, and Cultural Legacy

Assessment of Empirical Evidence and Causal Origins

The purported reigns of legendary British kings, spanning from mythical founders like Brutus of Troy to figures such as King Lear and Cymbeline, find no support in empirical records predating the medieval period. Roman accounts from the 1st to 2nd centuries CE, including those by Tacitus in Agricola (c. 98 CE) and Ptolemy's Geography (c. 150 CE), depict pre-Roman Britain as a mosaic of warring tribes and chieftains—such as the Catuvellauni or Iceni—without mention of unified monarchs or Trojan migrations. Archaeological surveys of Iron Age sites, including over 2,000 hillforts mapped by the Ordnance Survey since the 19th century, reveal decentralized settlements with evidence of trade and conflict but no centralized royal infrastructure, inscriptions, or regalia consistent with the grand dynasties described in later chronicles. Sub-Roman and early medieval evidence similarly undermines claims for post-withdrawal kings like Arthur or Lucius. While excavations at sites such as Tintagel Castle in Cornwall have uncovered 5th–6th century Mediterranean imports suggesting elite activity, these artifacts—pottery and glass dated via radiocarbon and stylistic analysis—indicate localized power centers rather than the pan-British empire of legend, with no epigraphic or numismatic ties to named rulers. Contemporary sources like Gildas's De Excidio et Conquestu Britanniae (c. 540 CE) lament British disunity against Saxon incursions without referencing heroic monarchs, and the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle (compiled from the 9th century) attributes land cessions to tribal leaders, not legendary kings. Scholarly analysis classifies these narratives as pseudohistory, with Geoffrey of Monmouth's Historia Regum Britanniae (c. 1136) identified as the primary synthesizer of unverified Welsh oral tales and inventions, diverging from 12th-century historiographical standards that prioritized verifiable annals. Causal origins lie in 12th-century political incentives to fabricate a prestigious antiquity for the Britons (Celtic descendants) amid Norman dominance. Geoffrey, a cleric possibly of Welsh extraction writing under Angevin patronage, constructed a Trojan-Brutus lineage to mirror Virgil's Aeneid, granting Britain a heroic pedigree rivaling Rome's and countering Anglo-Saxon origin myths in Bede's Ecclesiastical History (731 CE). This served to bolster insular identity and potential resistance narratives, as evidenced by dedications to figures like Robert of Gloucester, who sought legitimacy through exaggerated British precedents. Subsequent forgeries, such as the 15th-century Pseudo-Berossus annals, amplified these for Tudor-era nationalist agendas, embedding invented kings into genealogies to justify monarchical continuity despite the absence of pre-medieval attestation. Such constructions reflect euhemerism—rationalizing myths as distorted history—driven by the need for causal continuity in fractured polities, rather than empirical fidelity.

Influence on British Identity and Nationalist Narratives

Geoffrey of Monmouth's Historia Regum Britanniae, completed around 1136, profoundly shaped early perceptions of British identity by fabricating a grand narrative of kings from Brutus of Troy to Cadwallader, portraying the Britons as heirs to an ancient, heroic civilization that resisted Roman, Saxon, and internal threats. This pseudohistorical chronicle filled perceived gaps in Britain's pre-Saxon past, fostering a sense of national continuity and pride amid 12th-century political fragmentation under Norman rule, where it served to elevate native British legitimacy over Anglo-Saxon or continental claims. In the Tudor era, monarchs instrumentalized these legends to consolidate power and forge a unified realm. Henry VII, ascending in 1485, invoked descent from Arthur to link his Welsh Lancastrian lineage to Britain's mythic golden age, sponsoring pageants and genealogies that equated Tudor rule with restored ancient sovereignty; this narrative extended to Henry VIII, who in 1501 hosted tournaments evoking Arthur's Round Table and later, in the 1530s, promoted the exhumation of purported Arthurian remains at Glastonbury Abbey to underscore English imperial destiny. Such appropriations reinforced a centralized British identity, blending Welsh, English, and imperial elements against continental rivals. The 19th-century Arthurian revival, epitomized by Alfred Tennyson's Idylls of the King (1859–1885), embedded these legendary kings in Victorian nationalist discourse, recasting Arthur as a chivalric archetype of moral order, Christian virtue, and imperial mission amid industrialization and empire expansion. This literary resurgence aligned with archaeological pursuits, such as excavations at Tintagel Castle from 1860 onward, which, despite yielding no direct Arthurian evidence, were framed in popular media to affirm Britain's exceptional civilizational roots and justify dominion over "lesser" peoples. Pseudohistorical expansions, like those in Iolo Morganwg's forgeries or syncretic tales of Tea , sporadically fueled fringe nationalist narratives by Irish, Welsh, or biblical threads into Britain's royal , appealing to peripheral identities seeking validation against English dominance; however, mainstream influence waned post-Enlightenment , with modern invocations—such as Arthurian symbolism in Brexit-era —remaining marginal and unsubstantiated by empirical .

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.