Hubbry Logo
Texas NavyTexas NavyMain
Open search
Texas Navy
Community hub
Texas Navy
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Texas Navy
Texas Navy
from Wikipedia

Texas Navy
Navy of the Republic of Texas
Second Texas Navy
Texas Navy Seal
Active23 March 1839 – 19 February 1846
Country Republic of Texas
AllegianceConstitution of the Republic of Texas
TypeNavy
RoleNaval warfare, logistics
Size4 schooners, 3 brigs, 1 steamship, 1 sloop-of-war
Part ofTexas Military Department
ColorsRed, white, and blue
     
Vessels
EngagementsYucatan campaign
Commanders
Notable
commanders

The Texas Navy, officially the Navy of the Republic of Texas, also known as the Second Texas Navy, was the naval warfare branch of the Texas Military Forces during the Republic of Texas.[1] It descended from the Texian Navy, which was established in November 1835 to fight for independence from Centralist Republic of Mexico in the Texas Revolution.[2] The Texas Navy, Texas Army, and Texas Militia were officially established on September 5, 1836 in Article II of the Constitution of the Republic of Texas.[3] The Texas Navy and Texas Army were merged with the United States Armed Forces on February 19, 1846 after the Republic of Texas became the 28th state of the United States.

Background

[edit]

The Texas Navy descended from the Texian Navy, which was established by the Consultation of the Republic of Texas on 25 November 1835 to aid the fight for independence from the Centralist Republic of Mexico in the Texas Revolution. It consisted of four schooners: Liberty, Independence, Invincible, and Brutus. Liberty was sold in June 1836. Independence was captured during the Battle of the Brazos River in April 1837. Invincible and Brutus were run aground at the Battle of Galveston Harbor in August 1837.

History

[edit]
The first ensign of the Republic of Texas adopted via executive order issued by President David G. Burnet on 9 April 1836

In October 1836, the Congress of the Republic of Texas passed an appropriation bill for $135,000 to expand the then Texian Navy with four additional ships. The bill was signed by President Sam Houston, but no action was taken. Following the losses of Invincible and Brutus at the Battle of Galveston Harbor, another bill was passed on 4 November 1837 of $280,000 for six ships. Samuel M. Williams was appointed commissioner of their development and awarded the contract to Frederick Dawson of Baltimore in November 1838. Williams also acquired the steam packet Charleston that November. It was renamed Zavala in honor of Lorenzo de Zavala, fitted-out, and recommissioned on 23 March 1839, officially establishing the Texas Navy.

The Texas Navy was commanded by Commodore Edwin Moore, a former lieutenant of the United States Navy. For three years the Texas Navy raided the Mexican coast and kept the Mexican fleet focused on defending its own coastline.

Battle of Campeche

[edit]

In the Naval Battle of Campeche on 16 May 1843 the Texas Navy sloop-of-war Austin and brig Wharton, supported by ships from the rebellious Mexican State of Yucatan (then the Republic of Yucatán), engaged Mexican naval vessels, including the steamships Montezuma and Guadalupe. This battle is believed to be unique, marking the only occasion in which a sailing warship engaged and fought a steam-powered warship to a draw.[4] The battle, which raged over several days, was a tactical draw, but a strategic victory for the Texan Navy, which forced the Mexicans to lift their blockade of Campeche and assured security in the meantime for the rebels in Yucatan. Other ships of the Texas Navy at the time included the brigs Potomac and Archer, the schooners San Jacinto, San Antonio and the San Bernard, and the Zavala, the first steamship-of-war in North America.[5]

Disbandment

[edit]

When Texas joined the United States in 1846, the Texas Navy was merged into the United States Navy.

Texas Marines

[edit]

The Texas Marines, officially the Marine Corps of the Republic of Texas, were the naval infantry of the Texas Navy tasked with enforcing discipline aboard ships, providing security at shore stations, sharpshooting, and naval boarding. It was officially established on 14 January 1836 and modeled after the United States Marine Corps.[6]

Land grant dispute

[edit]

Background

[edit]

Land promised in advance of military service is called a bounty,[7] which is a military tradition dating back beyond the Roman Empire, and was a well-established tradition in American military history prior to hostilities in Texas during the revolution. The founders of the Republic of Texas attempted to bolster recruitment into the armed forces through the generous inducement of land for military service. The policy in Texas was inconsistent, as not all Texas veterans were treated equally. Veterans of the Texas Navy, due to political rivalries, were excluded from taking part in the land-granting policies, or "unnecessary extravagance", as it was explained by President Sam Houston at the time of his veto.[8]

Texas passed its first bounty act on 24 November 1835, when the general council created a regular army and promised those who served in it for two years 640 acres (2.6 km2) of land.[9] After the revolution, the Texas government distributed the public lands, especially to veterans. In all, 9,874,262 acres (39,959.72 km2) was granted to veterans of the Texas army, or to Confederate soldiers in Texas.[7]: 54  Not one of those nearly 10 million acres (40,000 km2) was granted for naval service, despite the importance of naval actions in the Gulf during the revolution. "The fact remains that Texas could not have won her independence and maintained it as she did, without the navy," said Texas Navy historian Alex Dienst.[10]

It has been said that if the United States was Texas's biological parent, then shipping lanes from New Orleans were the umbilical cord that kept the rebellion alive during its embryonic months.[11] Historians point out that the Texas Navy was of vital importance to the war effort with approximately three-fourths of all troops, supplies and cash originating from the ports of New Orleans.[10] It was seen as nearly impossible for commerce to go through any other channels into Texas other than by ship due to the impractical nature of crossing Louisiana swamplands, and the "Big Thicket" of East Texas. Navy vessels protected against marauding Mexican warships looking to cut the cord that flowed to Texas through Galveston, keeping the fledgling war effort, and eventually the Republic, alive.[citation needed]

Additionally, military leaders knew the importance of the Texas coast to winning a revolution, or quashing a rebellion. In fact, Mexican General Vicente Filisola remarked, "...the posts of Texas are not sustainable, whilst a maritime force does not co-operate with the operations of the land service."[11] On the other side, Commander James Fannin, in an August 1835 letter, wrote that provisions were scarce for the Mexican army on dry land. He requested naval assistance to the army, asking: "Where is your navy?" He pointed out that if Texas ships could block access to ports, "they [the Mexicans] are ruined."[citation needed]

Dispute

[edit]

Despite the importance of the Texas Navy to the Texas Revolution, politics got in the way of rewarding Navy veterans with bounty land grants when President Sam Houston, against legislative support, denied land grants to navy veterans in 1842.[citation needed]

The battle for bounty lands was a political struggle that culminated six years after the revolution, but had roots that stretched back to 1835. Naval policy was another in a long line of differing views between Sam Houston and Mirabeau Lamar. Lamar preferred an aggressive naval policy that encouraged raids around the Gulf of Mexico to intimidate the enemy. Houston, on the other hand, preferred a more acquiescent naval policy that encouraged ships to stay close to shore, protecting ports for industry and commerce.[citation needed]

These disagreements led to inconsistent policies during the Republic era, as Lamar and Houston traded the presidency back and forth. Robert Potter, a Senator, and the one-time Secretary of the Navy, and Senator James Webb proposed a resolution that would allow bounty land to be granted to navy veterans on 4 November 1841. It was noted on the 18 November 1841 edition of the San Augustine Red-Lander that this "Resolution will meet with much opposition in both Houses, and a warm discussion is expected." After the resolution was passed, it was presented to President Sam Houston, who vetoed the bill on 6 January 1842.[12]

In Houston's veto message, the President paid tribute to the "exalted Gallantry and distinguished bravery" of the men who went to sea on behalf of the Republic, but he would "not sanction injudicious and unnecessary extravagance" on their behalf. Houston went on to say, "Generally, the seaman has no interest (except a transitory one) on shore." He explained that a people who made their living at sea would pay no attention to improving land granted to them. He believed that to give a land grant to a navy veteran would not benefit the country to any degree, explaining that, "The harpies that are generally found in sea-ports, and to whom seamen usually become indebted, are those only who would profit by the bounty and munificence of the Government."

Houston further explained that it was traditional that the sailor receives his pay, and also receives prize money for capturing enemy vessels. "The sailor has his bounty and prize money as incentives to enlistment and continuance in the service; none expect more," he said. "If moreover, a fleet be in the vicinity of a land army, its co-operation is always supposed, and it accordingly participates in the spoils of victory. If, on the other hand, the victory be achieved by the fleet, the reverse is the case; the Naval corps alone enjoy the entire reward of success."

Houston also claimed that "the sailors who would have claims are either dead or scattered to the winds of heaven." However, army veterans and their heirs were eligible to receive bounty land whether they lived or died. Houston continued, "If bounty land were granted, the few who survived would deem it valueless, because not one of them would be willing to penetrate the wilderness in quest of a place to locate it, some hundreds of miles beyond the frontiers; and rather than make the attempt, they would be willing to sell it for a trifle."

Infuriated by the complete disdain that the "Navy hating" President of the Republic had shown, Robert Potter re-introduced a joint resolution on 25 January 1842 that would hopefully pass over the President's veto, authorizing the Secretary of War and Navy to issue certificates of bounty land to the officers, seamen, and marines of the Navy.[13] Despite Potter's reputation as a good steward of public land and his continual support of the navy, his arguments fell upon deaf ears as he continued to push the issue, to no success.[14] The issue was tabled as President Houston ran out the clock on the bounty land for navy veterans' bill, and the issue would never be broached again.

Insignia

[edit]

Other naval forces

[edit]

Texas Marine Department

[edit]

The Texas Marine Department was a branch of the Confederate States War Department that operated in Galveston during the American Civil War. It was not a component of the Texas Military Forces, nor did it operate under the Texas Military Department chain of command. It is similar to the United States Army Department of Texas

First Naval Battalion

[edit]

In the aftermath of World War II, which saw 24 Nazi U-boats attack 70 ships in the Battle of the Gulf of Mexico, sinking 56 of them, the Adjutant General of Texas Major General Kearie Lee Berry reestablished Texas naval forces to "provide well-trained coastal and inland patrols." The initiative was authorized by the Commander-in-Chief of Texas Military Forces, Governor Beauford H. Jester, and the First Naval Battalion of the Texas State Guard was officially established on 31 October 1948. Its first and ultimately only vessel was the Sumoria, a 60-foot diesel-powered yacht commanded by Sterling Hogan.[15][16][17]

Third Texas Navy

[edit]

In the midst of the final battle of the Texas tideland dispute with the United States, "the most serious conflict of the century between the states and the federal government", the Commander-in-Chief of Texas Military Forces, Governor Price Daniel, reestablished the Texas Navy in 1958 as an additional effort of inciting public sentiment for Texas naval interests.[18][19]

He declared the "memory and heritage of the Texas Navy can be preserved best by Texas citizens who are willing to continue by every lawful means the defense of the rights and boundaries of the State." It is often referred to as the Third Texas Navy and was theoretically akin to the United States Merchant Marine. However, it did not fall under the Texas Military Department chain of command, nor have an operational charter. It primarily served as a social and ceremonial club to commemorate the history of the Texian Navy and Second Texas Navy. It was headquartered at Houston Yacht Club and held annual Admiral Balls where the governor would review the fleet at the San Jacinto Monument. The fleet primarily consisted of civilian vessels from its members with the USS Texas serving as flagship. Officers were selected on their merits and commissioned by the Governor as Admirals in the Texas Navy.[2][20]

The ceremonial flag of the Texas Navy Association

Texas Navy Association

[edit]

Although the Tideland dispute was settled on 1 June 1960, the Third Texas Navy continued to function as a social club. In 1970, its headquarters were relocated to Galveston by Governor Preston Smith. In October 1972, it was re-designated the Texas Navy Association and chartered as a nonprofit organization by Secretary of State Bob Bullock. In 1973, the Sixty-third Texas Legislature passed S.B. 94, which established the "Texas Navy Association as the official governing body of Texas Navy operations". As of 2019, the Texas Navy Association is still in operation.[21][2][20]

Maritime Regiment

[edit]

The Maritime Regiment of the Texas State Guard, also known as the Texas Maritime Regiment and TMAR, was established by the Commander-in-Chief of Texas Military Forces, Governor Rick Perry, in 2006. It is the naval militia force of Texas tasked with providing sea, littoral, and riverine operational support for homeland defense, including civil contingency, security, rescue, and disaster operations in conjunction with the United States Coast Guard, Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Texas Forest Service, and the Lower Colorado River Authority. It operates and maintains a fleet of brown-water watercraft.[22][23]

See also

[edit]

Citations

[edit]
  1. ^ Daniel, James M. (15 June 2010). "TEXAS NAVY". TSHA.
  2. ^ a b c Daniel, James M. (15 June 2010). "Texas Navy". Texas State Historical Association.
  3. ^ "Constitution of the Republic of Texas (1836)". University of Texas, Tarlton Law Library. Archived from the original on 2 October 2019. Retrieved 25 October 2019.
  4. ^ "Commodore Moore and the Battle of Campeche" (PDF). Texas Navy Association. Archived from the original (PDF) on 25 April 2012.
  5. ^ "Ships of the First Texas Navy - 1836" (PDF). Texas Navy Association. Archived (PDF) from the original on 19 October 2014. Retrieved 31 July 2017.
  6. ^ Sullivan, David M. "REPUBLIC OF TEXAS MARINE CORPS". Texas State Historical Association.
  7. ^ a b Miller, Thomas Lloyd. 1972. The Public Lands of Texas: 1519–1970. Texas A&M University Press.
  8. ^ Harkins, James. 2011. The Denial of a Sailors Bounty. Saving Texas History Newsletter. Pp. 4–5. Archives and Records, Texas General Land Office
  9. ^ Gammels Laws, I, 925. The amount of land given in bounty land grants changed over the years; however, it was eventually settled that 320 acres would be given for every three months of military service, up to 1280 acres, or the equivalent of one year in service.
  10. ^ a b Dienst, Alex. 2007. The Texas Navy. Fireship Press.
  11. ^ a b Jordan, Jonathan W. 2006. Lone Star Navy: Texas, The Fight for the Gulf of Mexico, and the Shaping of the American West. Potomac Books, Inc. Washington DC.
  12. ^ Smither, Harriet (Editor). Journals of the Sixth Congress of the Republic of Texas, 1841–1842, Volume 1. 3 November 1841. Page 6.
  13. ^ Smither, Harriet (Editor). Journals of the Sixth Congress of the Republic of Texas, 1841–1842, Volume 1. 7 January 1842. Page 210.
  14. ^ Fischer, Ernest C. 2006. Robert Potter: Founder of the Texas Navy. Pelican Publishing.
  15. ^ "Texas Navy Sails Again Sunday After 103 Years". Valley Morning Star. 31 October 1948.
  16. ^ Gately, John. "The long, proud history of the Texas State Guard". Texas Military Department.
  17. ^ "Shipwrecks in the Gulf, World War II". Florida Public Archaeology Network.
  18. ^ Daniel, Price. "TIDELANDS CONTROVERSY". Texas State Historical Association.
  19. ^ "Timeline History of the Texas Navy" (PDF). Texas Navy Association.
  20. ^ a b "Texas Navy Association – Historical – General Information" (PDF). Retrieved 31 July 2017.
  21. ^ "A Brief History of the Organization of the Texas Navy Association" (PDF). Texas Navy Association.
  22. ^ "Fact Sheet, Texas Maritime Regiment" (PDF). Texas Military Department. Archived from the original (PDF) on 3 February 2016. Retrieved 29 September 2019.
  23. ^ "Texas State Guard Components". Texas Military Department.

General bibliography

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
The Texas Navy was the naval arm of the , established in November 1835 by the provisional government to safeguard vital supply lines from New Orleans and later formalized under the republic's in 1836, operating until the of Texas by the in 1846. Comprising a modest fleet of schooners and paddle-wheel steamers, it played a pivotal role in securing maritime superiority against , thereby preventing enemy reinforcements during the and protecting coastal trade routes essential to the young nation's economy. The navy underwent two primary phases: the initial force of 1836–1837, featuring captured and purchased schooners such as the , Brutus, Invincible, and , which disrupted Mexican commerce and contributed to the decisive land victory at San Jacinto by denying sea-based resupply to Santa Anna's army. A rebuilt second navy from 1839–1843, under Commodore Edwin W. Moore, included advanced vessels like the steamships Zavala, Austin, and Wharton, achieving notable successes such as the blockade of Mexican ports, the relief of the Yucatán siege in 1843 through alliance with local rebels, and innovative tactical use of exploding shells in naval combat at the Battle of Campeche. Despite these accomplishments, the Texas Navy grappled with chronic underfunding, political discord—particularly opposition from President , who prioritized land defenses—and operational losses from storms and engagements, leading to the dispersal or sale of its ships by 1843 amid fiscal crises. Its legacy endures as a testament to the republic's strategic reliance on for survival, influencing subsequent U.S. naval doctrines and commemorated today through historical associations and preserved artifacts.

Origins and Early Formation

Provisional Navy During the Revolution (1835-1836)

The Provisional Navy of Texas emerged during the early stages of the as an maritime force organized by the to counter naval superiority and secure vital supply lines from New Orleans. On November 25, 1835, the General Council authorized the purchase of four schooners and the issuance of letters of marque to privateers, marking the formal inception of naval operations. This initiative addressed the absence of a dedicated rebel fleet, relying initially on private vessels to disrupt Mexican commerce and logistics. Prior to the official purchases, privateers such as the William Robbins recaptured the American schooner Hannah Elizabeth from Mexican forces on December 19, 1835, demonstrating the provisional nature of early Texian maritime efforts. Between January and February 1836, acquired its core fleet: the (125 tons, formerly the U.S. revenue cutter Ingham), Invincible (125 tons), Brutus (125 tons), and (60 tons, formerly William Robbins). These schooners, each armed with four to six guns, were commissioned under provisional authority amid internal political disputes, including the General Council's removal of Governor Henry Smith over procurement decisions. On March 12, 1836, ad interim President appointed officers, designating Captain Charles E. Hawkins— a former U.S. Navy —as commodore due to his seniority. Hawkins commanded the Independence, while captains like William S. Brown (Liberty), William A. Hurd (Brutus), and Jeremiah Brown (Invincible) led the others. Operational activities focused on coastal defense, blockade running, and to support land forces. The conducted cruises along the Mexican coast from January to March 1836, while the , under Brown, captured the Mexican Pelicano off on March 5, 1836, seizing 300 kegs of powder critical for Texian munitions. On April 3, 1836, the Invincible intercepted the carrying , further straining Mexican supply chains ahead of the on April 21. Post-victory, the escorted wounded General to New Orleans in May 1836. These actions, though limited by the fleet's small size and lack of formal infrastructure, prevented Mexican naval interdiction of reinforcements and supplies, contributing causally to revolutionary success by maintaining open sea lanes despite the provisional government's resource constraints. The navy operated without a dedicated base until , relying on repairs and funding, which foreshadowed later organizational challenges.

Political Debates and Establishment of the Second Navy (1836-1839)

Following declared on March 2, 1836, the Constitution of the , adopted September 5, 1836, formally established the Texas Navy alongside the army and militia in Article II, reflecting recognition of maritime vulnerabilities amid ongoing Mexican threats. However, the remnants of the provisional navy—primarily the schooners Brutus, Invincible, and —faced immediate operational challenges, including capture of the Independence by Mexican brigs on April 17, 1837, off Galveston, and wrecking of Brutus and Invincible during a raid on August 27, 1837. These losses intensified debates in the First Congress over naval reconstruction, pitting advocates for offensive and enforcement against fiscal conservatives wary of debt accumulation in a cash-strapped republic reliant on customs duties and land sales. President , serving from October 22, 1836, to December 10, 1838, pursued a defensive naval policy to avoid provoking into full-scale invasion, prioritizing diplomacy for to the over aggressive maritime expansion. In October-November 1836, appropriated $135,000 to acquire four new warships, which Houston approved on November 18 but failed to implement, later withholding subsequent funds amid broader economies. On November 4, 1837, authorized $280,000 for six additional vessels and appointed Samuel M. Williams as purchasing agent, yet Houston's administration delayed action, clashing with Navy Secretary S. Rhodes Fisher, who unilaterally ordered cruises in June 1837 that captured Mexican prizes but strained resources without federal support. Houston's opposition stemmed from causal assessments that naval adventures risked alienating potential U.S. allies and exacerbating Texas's $1.25 million public debt by 1838, favoring land-based defenses and internal stability over sea power. The 1838 presidential election crystallized these divides, with Mirabeau B. Lamar defeating Houston's preferred policies by campaigning on military assertiveness, including naval rebuilding to secure Gulf trade routes from New Orleans and deter Mexican privateers. Lamar, inaugurated December 10, 1838, shifted toward an expansive doctrine, signing a contract on November 13, 1838, with builder Frederick Dawson for six warships in Baltimore at a cost exceeding $500,000, funded via bonds and land scripts. On March 23, 1839, the Second Congress formalized the Second Texas Navy through legislation establishing its structure, commissioning the steamer Zavala that month as the inaugural vessel and appointing Edwin Ward Moore as commodore based on merit rather than patronage. Subsequent arrivals, including the schooner San Jacinto in June 1839, enabled a fleet of nine by 1840, marking the navy's transition from ad hoc remnants to a professional force oriented toward commerce protection and potential blockades. This establishment reflected empirical necessities—Texas's export economy generated 70% of revenue from Galveston ports—overriding earlier veto-like obstructions, though it ballooned debt to $10 million by 1842.

Operational History

Initial Cruises and Commerce Protection (1836-1841)

The Texas Navy's initial operations commenced with the acquisition of four schooners in January and February 1836: the 60-ton Liberty, and the 125-ton Independence, Invincible, and Brutus. These vessels, purchased primarily in New Orleans, were commissioned to disrupt Mexican supply lines along the Gulf Coast during the Texas Revolution. The Liberty, under Captain William S. Brown, undertook its first cruise from January to May 1836, capturing the Mexican merchant schooner Pelicano on March 3 with a cargo including 300 kegs of gunpowder concealed in barrels of flour and other goods, and later seizing the brig Durango in Matagorda Bay on March 22. The Independence, serving as flagship under Commodore Charles E. Hawkins, cruised between Galveston and Tampico through early March 1836, destroying numerous small Mexican craft and their onboard materials. Following Texas's declaration of independence on March 2, 1836, and victory at San Jacinto on , the schooners shifted focus to countering Mexican naval threats to ports and commerce. The Invincible assisted the blockaded Brutus at Matagorda on July 4, 1836, enabling both to capture prizes, including the American Pocket carrying contraband to Mexican forces and the Mexican brig-of-war Bravo, which was destroyed. These actions prevented Mexican forces from effectively blockading coastlines, securing vital supply routes from New Orleans. However, the fleet suffered losses: the Liberty was seized by creditors in New Orleans in June 1836, and the Independence was wrecked after engaging a superior Mexican squadron at the on April 18, 1837. By mid-1837, the remaining vessels required overhaul in U.S. ports, effectively suspending operations until the establishment of the second Texas Navy in 1839. Commerce protection remained a core mission, as Mexican warships posed ongoing risks to merchant shipping essential for Texas's economy, particularly imports of arms, ammunition, and provisions. The navy's early cruises escorted convoys and deterred predation, with captures of and contraband-laden vessels yielding prizes that bolstered Texas finances through sales. Under President Sam Houston's administration (1836–1838), fiscal constraints led to debates over naval maintenance, yet the schooners' patrols preserved access to international trade despite blockades. The second navy, initiated under President with vessels like the Zavala and Austin by 1839–1840, resumed patrols to safeguard coastal trade routes amid renewed incursions, though major expeditions overshadowed routine protection until 1841.

Major Engagements and Blockades

Following the Texas victory at San Jacinto on April 21, 1836, the Texas Navy shifted focus to offensive operations, including blockades of Mexican Gulf Coast ports to sever supply lines and capture prizes. In late April 1836, the brigs Invincible and Brutus, accompanied by the schooner Pocket, initiated a of Matamoros at the mouth, targeting Mexican attempts to reinforce their northern army with troops and munitions from . This captured several Mexican vessels and disrupted commerce, yielding prize money that partially funded naval operations, though Mexican counter-blockades soon strained Texas shipping. The navy's aggressive cruises continued into 1837, with Invincible and Brutus seizing Mexican merchant ships off and conducting raids that captured over a dozen prizes valued at approximately $200,000. However, vulnerabilities emerged; on April 13, 1837, the , carrying 14 guns and acting as , was intercepted and captured by a superior Mexican squadron near the bar while en route to with immigrants and munitions, resulting in the loss of the vessel and its crew to imprisonment. This incident highlighted the risks of operating under Mexican naval superiority, prompting a temporary withdrawal of Texas ships to New York for repairs amid a Mexican of Galveston. Revitalized by the Second Texas Navy's commissioning in 1839, operations intensified in the early 1840s through an alliance with the breakaway Republic of Yucatán, which paid $8,000 monthly for protection against Mexican forces. Texas vessels enforced blockades of Mexican-held ports like Sisal and Campeche, intercepting commerce and supporting Yucatecan rebels by capturing Mexican supply ships near the Arcas Islands. These actions peaked in the Naval Battle of Campeche, commencing April 30, 1843, when Texas schooners Austin, Wharton, and steamer John F. Perry—totaling 18 guns—engaged a Mexican fleet including two steam frigates (Moctezuma and Guadalupe, the latter an ironclad) and schooners off the Yucatán coast. The engagement proved tactically significant, as light winds neutralized Mexican steam advantages, allowing sail-powered ships to outmaneuver and damage the enemy with broadsides; Wharton inflicted heavy casualties on Moctezuma before withdrawing under fire. Renewed fighting on May 16 saw forces repel Mexican advances, capturing the Ana María and maintaining the blockade's effectiveness despite no . Mexican losses included over 100 killed or wounded, compared to minimal casualties, affirming the navy's role in contesting Gulf dominance until fleet decay and funding shortfalls ended major operations by 1843.

Yucatán Expedition and Broader Campaigns (1841-1843)

In September 1841, the , engaged in a rebellion against central Mexican authority since 1840, contracted the Texas Navy for assistance in breaking Mexico's naval blockade of its ports, agreeing to pay $8,000 monthly plus a share of captured prizes. This alliance aligned with President Mirabeau B. Lamar's expansionist policies, aiming to counter Mexican threats while securing revenue for the financially strained Texas government. Commodore Edwin Ward Moore commanded the expedition, departing Galveston on December 13, 1841, with the squadron comprising the flagship Austin (a 20-gun ), Wharton (a 12-gun ), and (a ), though the latter departed New Orleans separately in September 1842 and was lost at sea en route. Upon arrival in Yucatán waters, the Texas squadron, augmented by two Yucatecan ships and five gunboats, conducted patrols to disrupt Mexican and enforce the blockade's lift, capturing several Mexican vessels and generating that supplemented Yucatán payments. Operations extended through , with Moore's forces clashing in skirmishes against Mexican steam-powered ships, demonstrating the agility of sail against emerging steam technology despite Mexico's naval modernization under French-built vessels like the paddle frigates Moctezuma and Guadalupe. These efforts temporarily secured Yucatán's coastal trade routes, but internal challenges emerged, including a on the Wharton in early over pay disputes, which Moore suppressed to maintain discipline. The campaign's climax occurred in the on April 30 and May 16, 1843, pitting Moore's squadron—primarily sail-rigged—against a superior fleet of two steam frigates, a , and supporting vessels totaling over 30 guns and advanced paddle-wheel propulsion. In the first engagement, Texas-Yucatán forces repelled advances through superior gunnery and maneuvering, avoiding capture despite being outgunned; the second phase saw the Austin and Wharton outflank steamers, inflicting damage and forcing a withdrawal without decisive losses on the Texan side. The battles highlighted tactical successes for wooden sailing ships against iron-reinforced steamers but ended inconclusively, as retained operational capacity. Broader campaigns during this period included intermittent commerce protection along the intertwined with duties, such as Moore's earlier 1841 surveys charting Texan waters for defensive purposes before redirecting to . However, by mid-1843, 's capitulation to on June 8 terminated the contract, prompting Moore to retain the squadron for prize pursuits amid disputes with incoming President Sam Houston's orders to return, effectively extending operations into revenue-generating raids rather than formal expeditions. The venture yielded approximately $100,000 in payments and prizes for but strained relations with and fueled domestic political opposition, marking the Texas Navy's most ambitious overseas engagement.

Organization and Assets

Command Structure and Leadership

The Texas Navy's command structure mirrored that of contemporary naval forces, particularly the , with a commodore serving as the senior officer responsible for operational command of the squadron at sea. Civilian oversight was provided by the secretary of the navy, appointed by the president, who handled administrative matters, , and policy. Officers were commissioned based on merit and experience, often drawing from former U.S. Navy personnel, with ranks including commodore, , lieutenant commanding, and warrant officers such as surgeons and pursers. During the provisional phase from 1835 to 1837, leadership centered on the first Texas Navy established by the General Council on November 25, 1835. Charles E. Hawkins, a former U.S. , was appointed commodore on March 12, 1836, by interim President and commanded the schooner . Following Hawkins's death in 1836, H. L. Thompson succeeded as commodore, overseeing remaining operations with captains like George W. Wheelwright on , W. A. Hurd on Brutus, W. S. Brown on Liberty, and Jeremiah Brown on Invincible. Samuel Rhoads Fisher served as secretary of the navy, coordinating with ad hoc naval agents. The second Texas Navy, reestablished from 1839 to 1843 under President , featured a more professionalized hierarchy. Edwin Ward Moore, aged 29 and a resigned U.S. , was appointed commodore in July 1839, assuming command of the squadron including Austin. Moore directed key operations, such as coastal blockades and the Yucatán expedition, with subordinate captains and s like Downing Crisp on San Bernard, Seegar on , and J. T. K. Lothrop on Wharton and Zavala. In 1843, President suspended Moore on June 1 for alleged disobedience, reflecting tensions between military autonomy and executive control, though Moore was later acquitted by . Naval commissioners, including Bryan and Samuel M. Williams, provided additional oversight during this period.

Ships and Naval Capabilities

The Texas Navy's fleet was modest in size and composition, emphasizing fast schooners suited for coastal raiding and commerce protection rather than sustained fleet actions against Mexico's more powerful navy. During the revolutionary period (1835–1837), the provisional navy acquired four schooners in New Orleans: Liberty (60 tons, purchased January 1836), Invincible (125 tons, January 1836), Independence (125 tons, ex-U.S. revenue cutter, January 1836), and Brutus (125 tons, January 1836). These vessels were lightly armed with small-caliber guns, typically 4–6 pieces ranging from 6- to 18-pounders, and crewed by 40–60 sailors each, enabling quick strikes on Mexican supply lines but vulnerable to superior firepower. Liberty was sold in July 1836 for repairs, Independence captured in April 1837, Invincible wrecked in August 1837, and Brutus lost in a storm in October 1837, effectively disbanding the first navy. The second navy, established in 1839, expanded to a peak of about 10 vessels through purchases and construction in , including six new schooners, two , a , and a steamer. Key acquisitions included the brig Potomac (early 1838, used stationary as a receiving ship), steamer Zavala (purchased November 1838, commissioned March 1839 with defensive armaments but no offensive guns initially), and schooners San Jacinto (170 tons, June 1839), San Antonio (170 tons, August 1839), and San Bernard (170 tons, September 1839). Wharton (400 tons, October 1839) and Archer (400 tons, April 1840), along with flagship Austin (600 tons, December 1839, armed with 16 × 24-pounders and 2 × 18-pounders), formed the core fighting force. These ships averaged 150–200 tons, with armaments of 8–12 guns (mostly 18- to 32-pounders), speeds of 8–12 knots under sail, and crews of 80–120, prioritizing maneuverability for blockades and reconnaissance over heavy combat.
Ship TypeVessel NameTonnageAcquisition/ArrivalArmament (Typical)Fate
SchoonerSan Jacinto170June 18398–10 guns (18–24 pdrs)Wrecked October 1840
SchoonerSan Antonio170August 18398–10 guns (18–24 pdrs)Lost September 1842 (storm)
SchoonerSan Bernard170September 18398–10 guns (18–24 pdrs)Transferred to U.S. Navy 1846
BrigWharton400October 183910–12 guns (24 pdrs)Transferred to U.S. Navy 1846 (condemned unfit)
Sloop-of-WarAustin600December 183916 × 24 pdrs, 2 × 18 pdrsTransferred to U.S. Navy 1846 (condemned unfit)
BrigArcher400April 184010–12 guns (24 pdrs)Active until 1843; transferred 1846
SteamerZavala~300November 1838Defensive guns onlyGrounded and scrapped 1844
Naval capabilities were constrained by funding shortages, frequent losses to hurricanes (e.g., San Jacinto, ), and Mexico's larger fleet, limiting operations to hit-and-run tactics, coastal surveys (1841), and support for allies like . The Zavala introduced steam propulsion for faster inland transport but proved unreliable in open seas. By 1843, inactivity due to debts led to decommissioning, with surviving vessels transferred to the U.S. Navy in 1846, where most were deemed unseaworthy. Despite limitations, the fleet secured Texas's maritime independence by disrupting Mexican commerce and enabling supply flows critical to the revolution.

Insignia and Uniforms

The Texas Navy's insignia and uniforms were primarily modeled on contemporary regulations, adapted to the Republic's limited resources and incorporating distinctive Texas symbols such as the lone star. Formal uniform prescriptions were established by an act of the Texas Congress on December 22, 1838, mandating dark blue woolen cloth for officers' frock coats, white linen or duck trousers for full dress, and -embroidered devices for rank and specialty. Epaulettes served as primary rank indicators for senior officers: the commodore wore two s each bearing a anchor entwined with two silver stars, while displayed a single epaulette with one star and . Lieutenants and commanders used varying numbers of stars and bars on epaulettes or cuffs. Warrant and petty officers employed specialized collar and insignia to denote roles, including crossed cannons for gunners, anchors for boatswains, axes for carpenters, and fouled anchors for sailing masters, often rendered in gold embroidery on blue collars or sleeves. Surgeons featured symbols, pursers scales, and engineers chevrons or flames. Full dress coats featured nine gold buttons per , with standing collars embroidered in gold lace proportional to rank—three-quarters of an inch wide for captains and narrower for juniors. Summer undress variants substituted lighter fabrics and omitted heavy epaulettes, favoring flat shoulder straps with rank devices. Midshipmen wore simplified blue jackets with white trousers and plain straw hats or garrison caps. Enlisted personnel's attire was less regulated, consisting of blue jackets, , and wide-leg summer , supplemented by foul-weather gear like oilskins and sou'westers. A distinctive , noted in contemporary accounts, often distinguished Texas sailors. Compliance varied due to chronic funding shortages and operational demands, leading many to equip themselves with private purchases or captured naval items; by , only about half the fleet's crews reportedly wore prescribed uniforms.

Personnel and Auxiliary Forces

Officers, Sailors, and Recruitment

The officer corps of the consisted primarily of experienced mariners recruited from the , many of whom were former officers in the Navy or captains seeking adventure and higher prospects during peacetime stagnation in the U.S. service. Appointments were made by the Republic's secretary of the navy or president, with confirmation for senior ranks, emphasizing naval expertise over political loyalty. The highest rank was commodore, equivalent to a , followed by (commanding larger vessels), , , passed , and for junior officers; warrant officers included specialized roles such as sailing master, , , , gunner, , carpenter, and sail maker. Notable officers included Edwin Ward Moore, appointed commodore in 1839 after 14 years in the U.S. Navy and leading the second Texas Navy until 1843; Charles E. Hawkins, senior captain and acting commodore who commanded the flagship until his death in 1836; and George W. Wheelwright, who succeeded Hawkins on before its capture in 1837. Sailors and enlisted personnel were drawn largely from American ports, particularly New Orleans and , comprising adventurers, merchant seamen, and filibusters motivated by the promise of action against rather than ideological commitment to independence. Crew composition reflected this transience, with diverse nationalities including Englishmen and Europeans, but dominated by U.S. volunteers who enlisted for short terms on individual ships rather than a standing force. Typical crews numbered 50 to 100 per or , though undermanning was common, as seen in the Independence's engagement in 1837 where insufficient hands hampered effectiveness. Discipline issues arose from this makeup, culminating in events like the aboard San Antonio on February 11, 1842, where crew members, led by a marine , killed an and injured others before U.S. authorities intervened, resulting in four executions in April 1843. Recruitment proved persistently challenging, reliant on agents in U.S. cities to enlist men via promises of wages—$25 monthly for able seamen and $40 for petty officers—but chronic funding shortages under presidents like delayed pay, fostering desertions and reluctance to ship out. Commodore Moore personally raised $35,000 in New Orleans for repairs and partial back pay to retain crews, yet ships like the steamer Potomac served mainly as receiving vessels at Galveston with minimal enlistments due to these fiscal constraints. The second navy, authorized in 1839, prioritized skilled naval officers over merchant sailors for its Baltimore-built vessels, but overall manpower deficits forced reliance on militia-like detachments for some operations, exacerbating operational risks. By 1843, unpaid sailors were discharged without compensation upon disbandment, underscoring the navy's dependence on voluntary service amid economic instability.

Texas Marines and Ground Support

The Marine Corps served as the infantry component of the Texas Navy, primarily tasked with enforcing discipline aboard ships, providing security for shore stations, and conducting amphibious operations such as boarding actions and landing parties to support naval objectives like commerce interdiction and coastal raids. Officially authorized on January 14, 1836, the corps lacked a formal and was led by officers including Fenton Mercer Gibson and Francis Ward, with over 350 men serving across its existence and at least 18 officers commissioned. Marines acted as sharpshooters during engagements and formed the core of ground forces for expeditions, enabling the navy to project power inland during campaigns against Mexican forces. In early operations, Texas Marines demonstrated their ground support role during the March 3, 1836, engagement between the schooner Liberty and the Mexican brig Pelicano, where they joined boarding parties to overwhelm the enemy vessel off the Yucatán coast, securing a key victory that disrupted Mexican supply lines. During the 1837 Yucatán expedition, shore parties from the Brutus and Invincible—comprising naval personnel including marines—landed to conduct raids, burning two villages in retaliation for a Mexican cavalry attack and attempting to extract tribute from Campeche, though the $25,000 demand went unmet. Similarly, on November 20, 1840, up the Tabasco River, combined forces from the Zavala, Austin, and San Bernard—augmented by 150 Yucatecan allies and supported by marine detachments—advanced 70 miles inland to compel the surrender of San Juan Bautista, yielding $25,000 in tribute and exemplifying coordinated naval-ground operations. The corps faced significant challenges, including funding shortages that led to its initial disbandment by 1837 and a notable on February 11, 1842, aboard the in New Orleans, where and sailors killed an officer and assaulted others, prompting U.S. intervention to restore order; four were subsequently hanged following a on April 26, 1843. Despite these issues, contributed to broader by securing beachheads and enforcing blockades, though their ground roles were limited by the navy's small scale and reliance on forces. The corps was formally discharged on February 24, 1844, amid political disputes and the navy's decline.

Controversies and Internal Challenges

Political Opposition from Sam Houston

Sam Houston, during his first term as president of the Republic of Texas from 1836 to 1838, prioritized fiscal austerity amid the republic's severe debt, estimated at over $1.25 million by 1838, much of which stemmed from military expenditures including the established in 1835–1836. He viewed the maintenance of a standing as an unsustainable luxury, advocating instead for reliance on coastal fortifications, , and ranger companies for defense while pursuing and to the to alleviate financial pressures. This stance led him to support efforts to sell naval vessels, such as appointing a commission in 1838 to auction ships like the and to generate revenue, though sales were limited due to legal and operational hurdles. In his second term from 1841 to 1844, Houston's opposition intensified amid renewed Mexican threats and his annexation-focused foreign policy, which required avoiding provocations that could derail U.S. recognition. He clashed with Texas Navy commander Commodore Edwin Ward Moore, who pursued independent operations including support for Yucatán rebels against Mexico in 1841–1843, actions Houston deemed unauthorized adventurism that risked broader war and naval resources. On July 19, 1843, Houston formally relieved Moore of command, citing insubordination and misuse of funds, and issued a proclamation branding the navy as pirates operating without authority, urging foreign powers to seize their vessels and return them to Galveston. This decree, coupled with withholding pay and supplies, stranded much of the fleet in Yucatán ports, effectively paralyzing operations. Houston's policies reflected a broader strategic calculus favoring land-based forces over naval projection, as he argued that distant cruises exposed the coast to undefended raids while draining scarce funds—naval costs alone exceeded $500,000 annually by 1842, against total revenues under $200,000. Critics, including Moore and pro-navy legislators, accused Houston of political favoritism, noting his reluctance stemmed partly from rivalries with naval officers aligned with his successor , who had expanded the fleet. Nonetheless, Houston's measures contributed to the navy's de facto dissolution by late 1843, with ships rotting or captured, paving the way for U.S. absorption upon in 1845–1846 without a functional Texas fleet.

Land Grant Disputes and Veteran Compensation

The Congress passed resolutions promising bounty land grants to veterans of the first Texas Navy (1835–1837) as compensation for their service in securing maritime independence from , with typical awards ranging from 320 to 1,280 acres depending on rank and duration of service. These grants aligned with broader military bounty policies enacted in 1835 and expanded in subsequent acts, which allocated lands to reward participants in the revolution. Following his re-election in December 1841, President vetoed the resolution authorizing these land bounties for first veterans, overriding legislative intent amid his broader fiscal retrenchment efforts and longstanding opposition to naval expenditures, which he viewed as unsustainable given the republic's exceeding $10 million by 1842. argued that dispersing veterans via land grants would scatter experienced sailors without rebuilding naval capacity, prioritizing land-based defenses and diplomacy over ; this stance contributed to withholding approximately $20,000 in payroll, prompting mass officer resignations on May 7, 1842. The veto exacerbated internal challenges, as Commodore Edwin W. Moore's squadron faced unpaid crews and accusations of piracy during operations, further straining veteran claims. Disputes persisted into the annexation era, with affected sailors petitioning for redress through courts of claims established by Congress in 1841, though many warrants were delayed or contested due to verification of service records amid incomplete muster rolls. After Texas joined the United States in 1845, the state assumed republic-era land obligations, issuing bounty warrants from federal and state lands; however, federal legislation in 1855 provided surviving Texas Navy officers with five years' back pay as partial compensation for unfulfilled service contracts at annexation. Additional claims were settled by 1857, recognizing the navy's role despite political neglect, though some veterans or heirs pursued litigation into the 1860s for unlocated or disputed surveys.

Disbandment and Transition

Effects of Annexation to the (1846)

The annexation of the by the , formalized on December 29, 1845, with admitted as the 28th state, precipitated the immediate cessation of the Texas Navy's independent operations. Under the terms of the for passed by the U.S. Congress on March 1, 1845, and ratified by on June 23, 1845, the republic ceded its public property, including naval assets such as ships, fortifications, and navy yards, to federal control. This transfer effectively disbanded the Texas Navy by mid-1846, as its vessels were handed over to the U.S. Navy amid the outbreak of the Mexican-American War. The four principal surviving ships of the Texas Navy—the brigs Austin and Wharton, and the schooners San Antonio and San Jacinto—were formally transferred to U.S. Navy custody in June 1846, primarily at Galveston and Velasco. These vessels, already in dilapidated condition due to chronic underfunding and neglect during the republic's final years, saw limited service under American command; for instance, the Wharton was decommissioned and sold for scrap shortly after handover on May 11, 1846, while the Austin was wrecked off the Texas coast in 1848 during a storm. The U.S. Navy repurposed some for blockade duties in the Gulf of Mexico against Mexico, but the fleet's obsolescence limited its strategic value, reflecting the Texas Navy's prior emphasis on coastal raiding over sustained blue-water capability. Texas Navy officers, numbering around 20 senior ranks, sought integration into the U.S. to preserve their expertise, but federal regulations prohibited direct commission transfers, requiring individual applications and examinations that most failed to secure. Enlisted sailors faced similar barriers, though some likely enlisted in the U.S. voluntarily, contributing informally to early efforts; no systematic absorption occurred, leading to the loss of institutional knowledge. Financially, the U.S. assumed certain Texas public debts but not specific naval obligations, leaving unpaid veteran claims unresolved until later state-level settlements, exacerbating grievances over land grants and back pay. Operationally, annexation shifted Texas maritime defense from a precarious, resource-starved entity to U.S. oversight, enabling a more robust Gulf blockade that supported Army advances in the Mexican-American War (1846–1848). However, the Texas Navy's dissolution underscored the republic's fiscal insolvency, with its $1.2 million in accumulated debts (as of 1845) highlighting systemic mismanagement rather than inherent naval incompetence. This transition marked the end of Texas's brief experiment in independent naval power, subordinating regional interests to national priorities.

Absorption into the U.S. Navy

Following the of annexation terms by the Texas Congress on June 23, 1845, and Texas's formal admission to the on December 29, 1845, the ceded its entire —including ships, fortifications, and naval establishments—to the federal government as a condition of the agreement. This transfer placed the U.S. in charge of Texas's coastal defense, aligning with the broader assumption of the Republic's military obligations amid rising tensions with . The primary vessels transferred were the brigs Austin, Wharton, Archer, and San Bernard, delivered to U.S. representatives in Galveston Harbor, with formal handover occurring in late 1845 or June 1846 depending on documentation. These ships, long plagued by maintenance shortfalls and inactivity since the 1843 Battle of Campeche, proved largely unseaworthy upon inspection; most were decommissioned and scrapped by 1848, though Austin was briefly commissioned as USS Austin on May 11, 1846, for limited service in the Mexican-American War before similar disposal. Texas Navy officers, led by figures like Commodore Edwin W. Moore, sought seamless integration into the U.S. Navy with preservation of rank and seniority, petitioning for appointments to leverage their experience against . U.S. naval commanders resisted, citing risks to established hierarchies and limited billets, resulting in no wholesale absorption of the officer corps. Instead, authorized for five years as interim relief, with unresolved claims—including back wages and —finally settled for survivors in via legislative appropriation. Individual transitions occurred sporadically; for instance, Edwin F. Gray enrolled at the U.S. Naval in 1846 and served until 1857. Enlisted personnel faced discharge without immediate pay but likely reenlisted in the expanding U.S. Navy, contributing manpower to wartime needs in the . This partial assimilation marked the effective end of the Texas Navy as an independent force, with its assets and redirected to federal service amid the Republic's dissolution.

Legacy and Modern Recognition

Strategic Impact on Texas Independence

The Navy played a pivotal role in securing Texas independence by contesting Mexican naval superiority in the , thereby safeguarding coastal trade routes essential for the fledgling republic's economic survival and military logistics. Despite Mexico's larger and better-equipped fleet, Texian schooners like the and Invincible conducted commerce raiding operations that captured Mexican merchant vessels, such as the Pelicano on , 1836, by the , disrupting enemy supply lines and generating revenue through prize sales that funded further naval operations. These actions prevented Mexico from imposing an effective on Texas ports, allowing the export of —Texas's primary commodity—and the import of arms and supplies critical to sustaining the revolution post-San Jacinto. By maintaining an offensive posture, the Texas Navy kept Mexican forces defensively oriented, deterring amphibious invasions and amphibious reinforcements that could have reversed Texian gains on land. From April 1836, vessels like the Invincible engaged and captured Mexican ships such as the Pocket, while convoying merchant fleets to protect trade, which comprised over 80% of Texas's external commerce reliant on maritime access. This naval harassment extended into 1837, when Texian blockades targeted Mexican Atlantic ports, compelling Mexico to allocate resources to its own coastal defenses rather than mounting a concentrated reconquest of Texas. The navy's persistence ensured that Mexico could not leverage its naval advantage to strangle Texas economically, a factor historians attribute to the republic's ability to maintain sovereignty until annexation. The later Yucatán Campaign from 1841 to 1843 amplified these effects through an opportunistic with Yucatecan rebels against central Mexican authority. Texas naval forces, under Commodore Edwin W. Moore, intervened to lift the Mexican blockade of ports, culminating in the on April 30 and May 16, 1843, where Texian sailing schooners outmaneuvered and defeated Mexican steam-powered warships, including the capture or destruction of several vessels. This engagement forced Mexico to suspend operations against and redirect its fleet, diverting attention and resources from potential threats to and complicating centralized efforts to subdue the northern frontier. By exploiting Mexico's overextension across multiple rebellions, the Texas Navy indirectly bolstered Texian security, contributing to international recognition of Texas and forestalling renewed invasion attempts until after in 1845.

Commemorative Efforts and Third Texas Navy

The Third Texas Navy was established on April 21, 1958, by Governor Price Daniel as a patriotic organization and component of Texas civil defense, aimed at preserving the history of the original Texas Navy. Its headquarters were reestablished in Galveston, the original base of the Republic-era navy, by Governor Preston Smith in January 1970 to emphasize historical continuity and coastal heritage. In 1972, the organization was renamed the Texas Navy Association and restructured as a non-profit entity dedicated to commemorating naval contributions to Texas independence. The Texas Navy Association maintains an active role in historical preservation through educational programs, veteran grave markings, and public events that highlight the 1835–1846 Texas Navy's strategic role in securing independence from . Membership is honorary and open to those supporting its mission, with activities including the maintenance of commemorative flags and insignia that replicate Republic-era designs for ceremonial use. The association collaborates with maritime museums and historical societies to fund markers for sailors' graves and promote awareness of naval engagements like the capture of Mexican vessels. Texian Navy Day, proclaimed by the in 2005 and observed annually on the third Saturday in , serves as a statewide commemorative effort honoring the Texas Navy's blockade-breaking operations and coastal protection during the revolution. Events include reenactments, lectures, and flag-raising ceremonies organized by groups such as the Sons of the Republic of Texas and the Texas Historical Commission, emphasizing empirical accounts of naval victories that prevented Mexican reinforcements. These initiatives counter historical neglect post-annexation by focusing on primary records of the navy's limited but decisive fleet actions.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.