Hubbry Logo
The Other HandThe Other HandMain
Open search
The Other Hand
Community hub
The Other Hand
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
The Other Hand
The Other Hand
The Other Hand
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The Other Hand, also known as Little Bee, is a 2008 novel by British author Chris Cleave. It is a dual narrative story about a Nigerian asylum-seeker and a British magazine editor, who meet during the oil conflict in the Niger Delta, and are re-united in England several years later. Cleave, inspired as a university student by his temporary employment in an asylum detention centre, wrote the book in an attempt to humanise the plight of asylum-seekers in Britain. The novel examines the treatment of refugees by the asylum system, as well as issues of British colonialism, globalization, political violence and personal accountability.

Key Information

The novel was published by Sceptre, an imprint of Hodder & Stoughton. Sales were initially slow, but increased as a result of "word-of-mouth" publicity, with the book eventually ranking 13th on the 2009 Sunday Times bestseller list. It has also been ranked #1 on the New York Times bestseller list. The novel has received mixed reviews from critics. It has been praised for its focus on underlying human decency; however, some reviewers felt its events were contrived. The two protagonists have been juxtaposed, with less sympathy evoked by Surrey-born Sarah than Nigerian-refugee Little Bee. The novel was nominated for the 2008 Costa Book Awards and a 2009 Commonwealth Writers' Prize. A film adaptation is now in pre-production, and will be produced by and star Julia Roberts. Amazon Studios will be distributing the film.

Background

[edit]

Cleave spent his early childhood in West Africa, which he credits for having partially inspired The Other Hand. Further inspiration came from Cleaves's temporary employment while studying experimental psychology at the University of Oxford. During the summer, Cleave painted underpasses, gardened and picked up litter, and hoped to use this experience to write a book. His final job was at Campsfield House in Oxfordshire, an immigration detention centre. Cleave spent three days serving food to residents from war zones including Somalia, Eritrea and the Balkans. He explained: "I got talking with some of them and said why are you here? Why are you in prison? It's not illegal and yet we concentrate them in these places. It's a text-book definition of a concentration camp. The conditions are appalling. I was shocked enough for that to be the end of my light comedy book of my amusing summers working as a labourer."[1] Cleave believes he would not have written the novel were he not a parent, as he does not wish for his children "to grow up into a world that is callous and stupid."[1]

In 2005, an incident inspired Cleave to write The Other Hand. Four years previously, in 2001, an Angolan asylum-seeker named Manuel Bravo had arrived in England with his 9-year-old son. After being detained in an immigration centre for four years, officials decided to forcibly deport Bravo and his son back to Angola the next morning. During the night, Bravo committed suicide, aware that his son, who was still a minor, could not be deported unaccompanied.[2][3] Cleave felt compelled to write about the "dirty secret" that is the British immigration system, and to do so in such a way as to showcase the "unexpected humour" of the refugees wherever possible, in order to make the book "an enjoyable and compelling read" for his audience.[2] Cleave explained:

I think the job is important because there's something you can do in fiction that you don't have the space to do in news media, which is to give back a measure of humanity to the subjects of an ongoing story. When I started to imagine the life of one asylum seeker in particular, rather than asylum seekers in general, the scales fell from my eyes in regard to any ideological position I might have held on the issue. It's all about exploring the mystery and the wonder of an individual human life. Life is precious, whatever its country of origin.[2]

— Chris Cleave

Plot

[edit]

Using alternating first-person perspectives, the novel tells the stories of Little Bee, a Nigerian refugee, and Sarah O'Rourke (née Summers), a magazine editor from Surrey. After spending two years detained in a British immigration detention centre, Little Bee is illegally released after a fellow refugee performs sexual favours for a detention officer. She travels to the home of Sarah and her husband Andrew, whom she met two years previously on a beach in the Niger Delta. Sarah is initially unaware of Little Bee's presence, until Andrew, haunted by guilt of their shared past, commits suicide. Little Bee reveals herself to Sarah on the day of Andrew's funeral, and helps her to care for her four-year-old son Charlie.

Through a mutual reflection on their past, it is revealed that Sarah and Andrew were on holiday at the time of their meeting with Little Bee. The trip was an attempt to salvage their marriage after Andrew discovered Sarah had been unfaithful to him, embarking on an affair with Home Office employee Lawrence Osborn. While walking on the beach one morning, they were approached by a then 14-year-old Little Bee, and her older sister Nkiruka. The girls were being pursued by soldiers who had burned down their village and intended for there to be no witnesses left alive. The soldiers arrived and murdered a guard from the O'Rourkes' hotel, but offered to spare the lives of the girls if Andrew would amputate his own middle finger with a machete. Afraid, and believing the soldiers would murder the girls anyway, Andrew refused, but Sarah complied in his place. The soldiers took both girls away, leaving the couple in doubt as to whether the soldiers would leave one girl alive in response, as they promised.

I smiled back at Charlie and I knew that the hopes of this whole human world could fit inside one soul. This is a good trick. This is called, globalisation.

—Little Bee[4]

Little Bee explains that although Nkiruka was gang raped, murdered, and cannibalised by the soldiers, she was allowed to escape, and stowed away in the cargo hold of a ship bound for England. Sarah allows Little Bee to stay with her, intent on helping her become a legal British citizen. Lawrence, who is still involved with Sarah, disapproves of her actions and contemplates turning Little Bee in to the police. When he informs Little Bee that he is considering this, she responds that allowing her to stay would be what is best for Sarah, so if Lawrence turns her in, Little Bee will get revenge by telling his wife Linda about his affair. The two reach an uneasy truce. After spending several days together, Sarah, Lawrence, Little Bee and Charlie take a trip to the park. Charlie goes missing, and Little Bee calls the police while Sarah searches for him. Although he is quickly found, the police become suspicious of Little Bee, and discover that she is in the country illegally.

Little Bee is detained and quickly deported back to Nigeria, where she believes she will be killed. Lawrence uses his Home Office connections to track Little Bee's deportation details, and Sarah and Charlie are able to accompany her back home. Sarah believes that Little Bee will be safe as long as she is present, and together they begin collecting stories for a book Andrew had begun, and which Sarah intends to finish on his behalf, about the atrocities committed in the Nigerian oil conflict. During a trip to the same beach where they first encountered one another, soldiers arrive to take Little Bee away. Despite being captured, Little Bee is not dispirited, and instead is ultimately hopeful at the sight of Charlie playing happily with a group of Nigerian children.

Characters

[edit]

The primary characters in The Other Hand are Little Bee, a Nigerian refugee, and Sarah, a middle-class Englishwoman. Critics have focused on the contrast between the two, with Caroline Elkins of The New York Times commenting that Sarah might initially appear "insipid" to readers, and that when juxtaposed with Little Bee, she seems "unsympathetic, even tiresome".[5] Tim Teeman of The Times deemed Sarah "batty, bizarre and inconsistent, and despite the tragedy she has suffered, unsympathetic", while writing that in contrast: "Goodness peppers every atom of [Little Bee's] being."[6] Other reviewers took an opposite stance. Margot Kaminski of the San Francisco Chronicle found Little Bee's characterisation problematic, writing: "Sometimes she's not convincing, and sometimes she tries too hard to convince. It's too often apparent that Little Bee is not real. This doesn't do justice to her story, and puts the burden back on the author to show that he's representing her, rather than exploiting her."[7] Ed Lake of The Daily Telegraph felt that "Bee's arch reasonableness and implausibly picturesque speech mean she often comes off as a too-cute cipher", and ultimately found Sarah the more convincing character.[8]

The Guardian's Lawrence Norfolk commented that Sarah is a "far from perfect heroine: a semi-neglectful mother and unfaithful wife", but noted that "Cleave does not mock Sarah (and life in Kingston upon Thames) any more than he does Little Bee and her experiences in Nigeria."[9] Norfolk felt that: "For all the characters' faults, none of them is presented as inauthentic or standing for something that we are intended to disbelieve.[9] On the disparity in sympathy for Sarah and Little Bee, Cleave assessed: "Sarah inevitably suffers by proximity to Little Bee, who is much easier to like. If Sarah is more twisted, I think it's because her path through life has necessarily been more convoluted. Little Bee's life is extremely harrowing but it is also very simple – she is swimming very hard against the current, struggling to survive and not to be swept away. Sarah doesn’t have the luxury of knowing in which direction she should swim."[2]

Steve Giergerich of the St. Louis Post-Dispatch felt that Sarah and Little Bee are both "so richly drawn that the supporting characters suffer by comparison."[10] These supporting characters are Andrew, Sarah's husband, Lawrence, her lover, Clarissa her colleague and Charlie, her four-year-old son, who for much of the novel answers only to "Batman" and dresses only in his Batman costume. Sarah Liss of CBC News deemed Andrew and Lawrence the two least-likeable characters in the novel, describing Andrew as "an ordinary guy with self-righteous beliefs who comes up slightly short when he's tested by real life" and Lawrence as a "cowardly yes-man".[11] Cleave agreed that for Lawrence, "career and propriety are more important than basic morality. He's gone so far down that road that he can't come back, and he's made more villainous for all the things he could do but doesn't."[11] Charlie is based on Cleave's oldest son, who similarly spent six months aged four answering only to "Batman". He forms the emotional centre of the novel, holding the adult characters together, and is a study in the early formation of identity. Cleave explained: "Little Bee is a novel about where our individuality lies – which layers of identity are us, and which are mere camouflage. So it's a deliberate choice to use the metaphor of a child who is engaging in his first experiments with identity – in Charlie's case by taking on the persona of a superhero."[2]

Themes

[edit]

The Other Hand presents a critique of the British asylum system and attitude towards asylum-seekers. Cleave feels there exists a "general lethargy" about the way asylum-seekers are treated in Britain, and though he believes he is not a political writer, the book begins with an extract from a 2005 UK Home Office publication entitled "United Kingdom: A Journey to Citizenship". The extract reads: "Britain is proud of its tradition of providing a safe haven for people fleeting (sic) persecution and conflict." Cleave questioned: "If a government can't even successfully proof-read such a fundamental document, how seriously can we take its asylum procedure?"[1] In writing The Other Hand, Cleave hoped to "humanise" the issue for readers.[12] Despite discussions of political violence and British Colonialism within the novel,[5] Sarah L. Courteau, editor of the Wilson Quarterly commented: "You're almost entirely unaware of its politics because the book doesn't deal in abstractions but in human beings." For this reason, she deemed The Other Hand "the best kind of political novel".[13] Emma Philip of The Courier-Mail has opined that while The Other Hand does make political points, readers should not confuse it with a political book, as the "overwhelming beauty" of the relationship between Sarah, Little Bee and Charlie "far outweighs the political message."[14]

We're often told that we live in a globalized world, and we talk about it all the time, but people don't stop to think about what it means.

—Chris Cleave, CBC News[11]

The novel also deals with the issue of globalisation.[5] Courteau observed that although Little Bee learns English from newspapers she acquires at the English detention centre, her reference points are still Nigerian, and thus through her narrative voice Cleave "illustrates the forcible dislocations of a globalized world."[13] Cleave chose to explore the issue in The Other Hand as he believes that, although globalisation is frequently discussed, people rarely consider its meaning. He explained: "money can move freely across national borders, but people can't. They're actively prevented from going where the money is. Capital is global, but labour isn't. I believe that's the cause of two major crises that we're involved in as a species – one is a financial crisis and one is a refugee crisis. Imagine a world where money can't move, where capital is stuck in its country of origin, but people can freely move where the work is! That's an alternate interpretation of globalization that would solve a lot of problems."[11] Although Cleave did not intend for the novel to be heavily political, he felt it was important to raise the issue, given the refugee subject matter of The Other Hand.[11]

Marital infidelity features throughout the sections of the novel narrated by Sarah. Cleave discussed: "When you are choosing a lover, you're choosing a philosophy; it's not about sex, it's not about marriage. With Sarah, her unfaithfulness is just one of the symptoms of the fact that she's torn and is going to have to make this strong moral choice."[1] Sarah's storyline also explores her moral culpability following Andrew's suicide.[13] Personal accountability is a central theme of the novel, with Elkins of The New York Times opining that by not focusing on "postcolonial guilt or African angst", Cleave is able to use the novel to challenge readers' conceptions of civility and ethical choice.[5] Margot Kaminski of the San Francisco Chronicle similarly feels that the book delivered a message of anti-complacency, however believes that it does so by "bemoaning the normality of the First World in the face of the horrors of the Third."[7] She deemed The Other Hand essentially a novel about "the borders we draw, and the real damage they inflict".[7]

Style

[edit]

Having spent almost two years working on the novel, Cleave decided upon using the dual narrative, as: "This is a story of two worlds: the developed and the developing, and of the mutual incomprehension that sometimes dooms them to antagonism."[2] He found it technically challenging to write from a female perspective, but felt that it prevented him from unwittingly using his own voice to animate the characters, explaining: "It forces me to listen, to think, and to write more precisely."[2] Kaminski accused Cleave of cultural appropriation, asking rhetorically: "When a white male author writes as a young Nigerian girl, is it an act of empathy, or identity theft?"[7] Cleave has responded by stating that he sympathises with those who feel he has no right to write from the perspective of a Nigerian girl, but feels that he does it well. He believes that the best mechanism for telling a story about crossing borderlines is to depict both sides. He conducted interviews with actual asylum seekers and illegal immigrants, a psychiatrist specialising in the trauma of child refugees, and members of London's Nigerian community, researching speech patterns to shape the "quirks and cadences" of Little Bee's narrative voice.[11]

A central stylistic feature of the novel is the lack of detail Cleave gives regarding elements of Little Bee's past. "Little Bee" is an assumed name, described as a "mechanism for survival" by Courteau, as the character is forced to discard her true name when pursued by soldiers, through fear it may reveal her tribe and religion.[13] Her real name, Udo, is not revealed until the end of the novel.[15] Courteau also highlights the fact that Little Bee's Nigerian enemies and their motivations are never explicitly described, as the novel is told through the first-person narrative, and Little Bee herself is limited in her understanding of them.[13] Cleave intended for the story as a whole never to be fully explicit, relying instead on readers' interpretation of the characters' dialogue.[2]

Throughout the novel, Little Bee considers how she would explain England to "the girls back home" in Nigeria. Cleave uses the girls as a Greek chorus, providing a foil to allow the cultural dissonance experienced by Little Bee to be made explicit. He feels the device is more natural than having Little Bee narrate her alarm first hand, allowing the reader to appreciate the cultural gulf, and Little Bee to seem knowing as opposed to tragic.[2] Through Little Bee's narration, Cleave examines human culture from the opposite perspective as science fiction does, having an extraordinary protagonist explore an ordinary world. This contemporary realism gives a significance to mundane events experienced by Little Bee, while bringing into focus "sad and ignoble" aspects of English culture such as the detention system. Cleave commented: "We have become accustomed to viewing our own actions in soft focus, but the alien narrator has not yet acquired this cultural immunity. She sees us as we can no longer see ourselves."[2]

Courteau compared The Other Hand to Ian McEwan's Enduring Love observing that both novels are formed around "a single horrific encounter", and praised Cleave for his "restrained, diamond-hard prose".[13] Philip drew a different comparison, opining that Cleave's writing style—using plain language to describe atrocities— was reminiscent of John Boyne's The Boy in the Striped Pyjamas.[14]

Publication history

[edit]

The novel was first published on 7 August 2008, released in hardback by Sceptre in the UK.[16] The hardback edition sold just 3,000 copies in 2008,[12] however the publication of a paperback copy, released on 5 February 2009,[17] saw increased sales, with 100,000 paperback copies sold in Britain in March and April 2009,[12] despite no advertising and little marketing for the novel.[18] As of November 2009, 300,000 copies of the novel had been sold.[19] Richard Brooks of The Times attributed its success to recommendations from readers to family and friends, with Cleave calling it "an example of word-of-mouth success."[12] The novel was published in America and Canada by Simon & Schuster under the alternative title Little Bee.[20] It was released in hardback and e-book format in February 2009,[21][22] and in paperback in February 2010.[23] Cleave likes both titles, believing that The Other Hand "speaks to the dichotomous nature of the novel, with its two narrators and two worlds", also referencing Sarah's injury, while Little Bee is appropriate as the novel is really the telling of Little Bee's story, and sounds "bright and approachable", in line with his aim to write "an accessible story about a serious subject."[2]

Blurb

[edit]

Mirroring the deliberately vague detail within the novel, the blurb on the book is unusually written, in that it does not name the characters or reveal the plot.[24] It was written by a team at Sceptre led by marketing consultant Damian Horner,[19] and has the approval of Cleave, who described it as "genius".[24] Cleave explained: "I think readers are quite smart and don't really need the whole thing spelt out for them in a plot summary. It's nice to let them discover the book at their own speed. And the technique of the book is to release these dirty secrets gradually."[24] The content of the blurb varies between UK and American editions of the novel, but both begin: "We don't want to tell you too much about this book. It is a truly special story and we don't want to spoil it." and end: "Once you have read it, you'll want to tell everyone about it. When you do, please don't tell them what happens either. The magic is in how it unfolds."[19][21] James Spackman, Sales and Marketing Director for Sceptre, was initially sceptical of the blurb, particularly disliking the use of "we" for the publisher to address the reader directly. Once the book became a best-seller, however, he revised his stance, and now believes that the reason the blurb works is because it makes a virtue of denying the reader information, with an unusual format and "arrestingly direct" tone.[19] The blurb won Sceptre the "Best Blurb" award at the 2010 Book Marketing Society Awards.[25]

Reception

[edit]

The Other Hand reached number 13 on the 2009 Sunday Times bestseller list, and was the only literary title on the list without a Richard and Judy Book Club recommendation, a literary award or a film adaptation.[26] It also topped The New York Times Best Seller list for paperback trade fiction in 2010.[27] The novel was nominated at the 2008 Costa Book Awards,[28] though lost to The Secret Scripture by Sebastian Barry.[29] It was nominated for the 2009 Commonwealth Writers' Prize as the best book originating from Europe and South Asia,[30] but lost to Unaccustomed Earth by Jhumpa Lahiri.[31] In 2010, The Other Hand was longlisted for the International Dublin Literary Award,[32][33] nominated by Cleveland Public Library, Seattle Public Library and Dunedin Public Libraries, New Zealand.[34]

The book has received mixed reviews. Some critics have praised the novel for its focus on underlying human decency. The New York Times's Caroline Elkins felt that the pretext of the novel "initially feels contrived", but assessed that "in a world full of turpitude and injustice, it is [Sarah and Little Bee's] bold, impulsive choices that challenge the inevitability of despair, transforming a political novel into an affecting story of human triumph."[5] James Urquhart of The Independent called the book "a powerful piece of art",[35] writing: "Besides sharp, witty dialogue, an emotionally charged plot and the vivid characters' ethical struggles, The Other Hand delivers a timely challenge to reinvigorate our notions of civilised decency".[35] Equally, Andrew Rosenheim of Publishers Weekly found the book noteworthy for Cleave's "ability to find a redemptive grace in the midst of almost inconceivable horror."[36] while Jeremy Jehu of The Daily Telegraph deemed it an "elegant parable" and a "challenge to every cosy, knee-jerk liberal inclined to spout off about our shared humanity and global obligations."[37]

A separate Daily Telegraph review, this by critic Ed Lake, took a dissimilar stance, opining that that book is "pervaded by a vaguely distasteful glossiness", and that "if Cleave is writing from great depths of feeling, he hides it well." Lake deemed the book "faultlessly relevant, but ultimately cloying."[8] Another Publishers Weekly review was also less positive, calling the book "beautifully staged" but "haphazardly plotted", and noting: "Cleave has a sharp cinematic eye, but the plot is undermined by weak motivations and coincidences."[38] Teeman of The Times felt that the book was overwritten, and wished "twistedly" that it had a less positive conclusion, commenting: "With every motive and action explicitly drawn, fleshed out and explained, there is no room for mystery, ambiguity or even tension."[6]

Film adaptation

[edit]

Initial reports touted the possibility of a film adaptation; six offers were made from interested companies.[18] The film was to star Nicole Kidman, and was to be produced by Kidman, Gail Mutrux and Per Saari through Mutrux's production company Pretty Picture, and Kidman's, Blossom Films. Shawn Slovo was to write the script, and Christine Langan was to be the executive producer.[39] Kidman had already read the novel before Mutrux contacted her about producing the film, on a flight between Los Angeles and Australia. The Times reported that she was "so eager" to play Sarah that she personally competed with several film studios in order to secure the rights to the book.[12]

However, online references to this project went dead within a couple of years, and as of 2017 no film had been made.

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

The Other Hand

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Other Hand is a by British author Chris Cleave, released in the United States under the title Little . The alternates between the perspectives of , a teenage Nigerian fleeing oil-related violence and seeking asylum in the , and Sarah Summers, a British editor grappling with personal and marital crises. Their paths cross during a traumatic incident on a Nigerian beach, where Sarah's husband Andrew intervenes in a life-or-death situation involving local militants, leading to profound consequences that reunite the women two years later at Sarah's suburban home. The novel examines the stark contrasts between Western privilege and the harrowing realities of displacement, , and survival in conflict zones, without romanticizing hardship or simplifying geopolitical causes. Cleave draws on first-hand research into Nigerian unrest and asylum processes to depict Bee's resourcefulness amid systemic barriers, including and cultural alienation. Sarah's arc confronts the ethical dilemmas of indirect complicity in global inequalities through consumerist lifestyles and journalistic detachment. Upon release, The Other Hand achieved commercial success, selling over two million copies worldwide and appearing on bestseller lists in multiple countries, bolstered by endorsements such as selection. Critical reception praised its emotional depth and narrative ingenuity, though some noted debates over its portrayal of African experiences by a non-African author and the balance between tragedy and dark humor. The book has been translated into more than 25 languages, underscoring its international resonance on humanitarian issues.

Authorship and Inspiration

Chris Cleave's Background and Motivations

Chris Cleave was born on May 14, 1973, in , , and spent the first eight years of his childhood in , where his family lived before returning to the , specifically . He graduated from , with a B.A. in , which laid the groundwork for his later professional identity as a chartered and existential psychotherapist. Prior to the 2008 publication of The Other Hand, Cleave pursued a varied that included , as well as roles as a barman, long-distance , and of , experiences that honed his observational skills and exposure to diverse human conditions. Cleave's psychological training informed his interest in human endurance under extreme stress, shaping his approach to depicting individual responses to adversity without reducing subjects to passive victims of circumstance. Approximately fifteen years before a 2012 interview—placing the event around 1997 during a university summer break—he worked for three days as a casual laborer in the canteen of Campsfield House, an center in , where he directly observed asylum seekers enduring harsh conditions that he described as deeply distressing. This firsthand encounter revealed what he called a "dirty secret" in the British , prompting him to later channel such realities into that prioritizes compelling narratives over didacticism. A pivotal influence was the 2005 case of Manuel Bravo, an Angolan who fled in 2001 but took his own life to shield his son from , a story Cleave encountered through news reports and cited as the direct spark for the novel. In interviews, Cleave articulated his intent to illuminate the overlooked humanity of refugees, stressing their use of humor, , and adaptive strategies to compel belief and survival amid systemic indifference, rather than framing them solely through bureaucratic failures or helplessness. He aimed to underscore resilience as a deliberate exercise of personal resourcefulness—such as making critical choices under unfair pressures—drawing from his psychological insights into trauma to portray as an active human capacity, not inevitable defeat. This motivation aligned with his broader journalistic ethos of exposing truths through accessible , avoiding overt political advocacy in favor of evoking via individual agency.

Research and Factual Basis

Chris Cleave conducted primary research for The Other Hand by volunteering at a immigration detention center, where he interacted directly with asylum seekers awaiting processing. These interactions informed depictions of detention conditions and personal narratives of refugees, drawing from real accounts of psychological strain and bureaucratic limbo experienced by detainees. The novel's portrayal of violence in Nigeria's region aligns with documented empirical reports from the mid-2000s, including militant attacks on oil infrastructure and communities. For instance, Amnesty International's 2005 report detailed ongoing injustice, , and armed clashes resulting in civilian deaths and displacement, with oil exploitation exacerbating local grievances. Similarly, documented escalations in 2004-2005, where inter-communal violence and kidnappings disrupted production and killed dozens, reflecting causal links between resource control disputes and instability. The International Crisis Group's 2006 analysis further outlined militia activities in , including attacks on pipelines and security forces, which displaced thousands and fueled broader unrest—elements echoed in the book's backstory without direct attribution by Cleave to these sources. However, the narrative takes fictional liberties with asylum procedures under the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002, which sought to expedite decisions through measures like accelerated appeals but often resulted in prolonged waits due to backlogs. Real processing times in the early 2000s averaged around 10 months for initial decisions, with many cases extending over a year amid rising applications peaking at 84,100 in 2002. In contrast, the compresses timelines for dramatic effect, portraying releases and resolutions more swiftly than typical empirical outcomes, where detainees frequently endured extended uncertainty despite legislative intent to streamline.

Historical Context

Nigerian Oil Conflicts and Militancy

The , comprising nine states in southern , has been a focal point of oil production since commercial extraction began in the , generating over $600 billion in revenue for the federal government from the 1960s through the early 2000s, yet the region remains marked by , with local communities experiencing high and that fueled grievances over resource distribution. Militancy arose from disputes among ethnic groups such as the Ogoni and Ijaw, who demanded greater control of oil revenues amid perceptions of marginalization, though economic analyses highlight how local elites and militants profited from illegal oil and ransom demands, diverting funds from development. These dynamics, rather than solely historical colonial legacies, underscore causal factors like opaque revenue allocation and patronage networks that incentivized violence over negotiation. In the 1990s, non-violent protests by the Movement for the Survival of the Ogoni People (MOSOP), led by writer , escalated into conflict after demanding environmental remediation and fiscal autonomy from oil firms like Shell; the Nigerian military's response culminated in the 1995 execution of Saro-Wiwa and eight other Ogoni activists following a widely criticized for procedural flaws, which intensified ethnic tensions and inspired armed resistance across Delta communities. This event displaced thousands and marked a shift from advocacy to militancy, as tribal youth groups formed to challenge federal control, exploiting oil infrastructure vulnerabilities for leverage. By the early 2000s, armed factions proliferated, with the Movement for the Emancipation of the (MEND) emerging around 2005-2006 as an umbrella group coordinating attacks on pipelines, expatriate workers, and to demand resource control and disrupt exports, which fell by up to 25% at peaks of activity. Tactics included kidnappings for ransoms exceeding $1 million per incident and yielding illicit oil sales, providing economic incentives for participation amid rates over 30%, while tribal rivalries exacerbated inter-communal clashes. Local politicians allegedly funded militants for electoral gains, perpetuating a cycle where siphoned federal oil allocations—estimated at $231 billion domestically from 1970-1999—away from , leaving communities in despite the Delta's 70% contribution to national exports. Violence resulted in hundreds of deaths annually, such as over 100 killed in 2003 clashes alone, alongside thousands displaced by gang warfare and military operations, with documenting unpunished attacks that injured 150+ in 2007-2008 inter-gang fighting over oil theft territories. Government responses involved joint task forces, but these often exacerbated casualties without addressing root incentives like elite of derivation funds intended for Delta states. The 2009 Presidential Amnesty Programme, offering stipends, vocational training, and to over 26,000 militants, temporarily reduced attacks, boosting oil output by approximately 40% and curbing kidnappings, though implementation flaws—including unfulfilled reintegration promises and persistent —allowed to undermine long-term stability, with billions allocated yet little gain. Critics note the program's focus on payouts over failed to resolve tribal disputes or economic disparities, as local leaders continued siphoning resources, sustaining low-level militancy into the .

UK Asylum and Immigration Policies in the 2000s

The Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 enacted reforms to accelerate asylum processing, targeting decisions within six months for most cases, while replacing cash welfare benefits with vouchers redeemable only at designated outlets to deter economic migration and reduce incentives for unfounded claims. The Act also established a national dispersal system under section 95, relocating asylum seekers from London to regional accommodations to alleviate pressure on urban resources and prevent concentrations that could strain local services or foster parallel communities. These measures responded to rising inflows, prioritizing administrative efficiency and fiscal controls amid debates over systemic overload from global displacement and disguised labor migration. To enforce removals and deter irregular entry, the government expanded immigration detention facilities, including , which opened in November 2001 with capacity for over 900 detainees, primarily women and families, as part of a broader estate including Dungavel and . By 2002, asylum applications reached a peak of 84,130 principal claimants, equivalent to over 100,000 including dependants, exacerbating backlogs that delayed initial decisions beyond the six-month target, with typical waits extending to 10 months or more by early 2000 and cumulative delays reaching years for complex cases due to evidentiary reviews and appeals. Resource limits manifested in understaffed caseworking and verification challenges, as global migration surges—fueled by conflicts and poverty—overwhelmed verification of claims versus economic motives. Initial grant rates for asylum remained low throughout the decade, averaging around 10% for refugee status proper, with exceptional leave to remain pushing total positive outcomes to approximately 33-42% in peak years like , reflecting high refusal thresholds for nationalities from stable or economically motivated source countries. African claims faced rejection rates exceeding 70% in many instances, driven by evidentiary standards requiring proof of individualized amid patterns of fraudulent documentation and chain migration, as documented in analyses. Nigerian applications, in particular, yielded approvals under 30%, with refusals predicated on assessments that many stemmed from economic aspirations rather than Convention grounds, compounded by intelligence on organized abuse networks. Policy debates in the emphasized imperatives, including biometric enrollment and carrier sanctions to curb clandestine arrivals, alongside resource via capped support and accelerated returns, as inflows threatened public services and social cohesion without corresponding integration capacity. The Home Affairs Committee, in reports around 2004, critiqued leniency in appeals—where non-attendance affected up to 30% of hearings—and highlighted abuse through multiple applications and benefit exploitation, advocating tighter verification over expansive humanitarianism to address causal drivers like porous borders and weak origin-country cooperation. These reforms underscored a causal focus on deterrence and capacity limits, rather than guilt-driven expansions, amid of declining net migration post-peak through enforced returns exceeding 20,000 annually by mid-decade.

Publication and Commercial History

Release and Title Variations

The novel was first published in the on 7 August 2008 by , an imprint of , under the title The Other Hand. In the United States, released the book in February 2009 under the alternate title Little Bee. This retitling reflects standard publishing practices for adapting novels to regional markets, with The Other Hand retained in the , , and , while Little Bee was adopted in the United States and .

Sales Figures and Awards

Upon its 2008 release in the United Kingdom as The Other Hand, the became a commercial success, with the edition selling 348,511 copies by late 2009 according to Nielsen data. In the United States, published in 2009 under the title Little Bee, it debuted as a number one New York Times and spent 81 weeks on the list overall. By 2012, global sales exceeded 2 million copies in print. The book received formal recognition through shortlistings for literary awards but secured no victories. It was nominated for the 2008 Costa Novel Award, highlighting its narrative impact amid competition from more experimental works. Its market performance, driven by broad accessibility rather than prize wins, reflected strong appeal in commercial fiction categories.

Marketing and Blurbs

The marketing campaign for The Other Hand, launched by in the in January 2008, utilized a deliberately enigmatic to generate anticipation without disclosing narrative details. Presented as a personal letter from Cleave's editor on the and in promotional advertisements, it read in part: "Dear Reader, You don't know me. I'm Chris Cleave's editor, and I'm writing to tell you how extraordinary The Other Hand is. We don't want to tell you too much about the plot. That would be cheating." This strategy emphasized the novel's "unputdownable" pace and emotional resonance, urging potential readers to experience the story's unfolding firsthand rather than risk spoilers, while drawing implicit parallels to emotionally immersive works like Khaled Hosseini's . In the United States, where the book was retitled Little Bee and released by in March 2009, similar promotional materials on dust jackets and online listings reinforced this framing, highlighting the tale's heartbreaking elements of displacement and human connection to appeal to audiences seeking poignant, fast-paced . The blurbs positioned the as a visceral exploration of experiences and moral dilemmas, potentially amplifying its draw through hype around themes of and redemption, though the fictional narrative's blend of realism and invention introduced interpretive variances from strictly documentary accounts of such events. Promotional efforts included selective author endorsements that underscored its urgency as , with quotes from literary figures praising its evocative and thematic depth, though Cleave himself avoided explicit policy advocacy in materials, focusing instead on the story's universal human stakes. No formal tie-ins with refugee organizations were prominently featured in the initial campaign, distinguishing the promotions from direct charitable appeals.

Narrative Elements

Plot Summary

The novel The Other Hand (published as Little Bee in the United States) alternates between the first-person narratives of two women: Little Bee, a teenage Nigerian refugee recently released from a British immigration detention center after two years of confinement, and Sarah Summers, a British magazine editor living in suburban London with her young son, Charlie. Little Bee possesses only the address of Sarah's home, given to her during a brief, traumatic encounter on a Nigerian beach three years prior, where Sarah and her then-husband, Andrew, faced life-threatening violence from oil militants. Upon arriving unannounced at Sarah's doorstep, Little Bee seeks refuge, prompting Sarah to grapple with the lingering consequences of that beach incident. The story unfolds non-linearly, interweaving present-day events in —such as Little Bee's integration into Sarah's household amid family tensions and external threats—with flashbacks to the Nigerian beach confrontation, where desperate choices were made under duress, and to Little Bee's harrowing experiences fleeing violence in the Niger Delta and enduring the UK's asylum system. As revelations emerge about hidden connections and unresolved dangers from , the women's paths converge further, leading to escalating personal crises, including risks to Charlie's safety and confrontations with pursuers tied to the past events. The narrative culminates in pivotal decisions about protection, escape, and confronting the fallout of prior moral dilemmas.

Principal Characters

Little Bee, a 16-year-old Nigerian whose real name is , serves as one of the novel's two alternating narrators and protagonists; she exhibits pragmatic wit and sharp survival instincts honed by her traumatic background, often employing dark humor and adaptive strategies to navigate adversity rather than succumbing to passivity. Her self-taught command of formal , acquired through newspaper reading during detention, underscores her proactive determination to assimilate and communicate effectively. Sarah Summers, a mid-30s British magazine editor in her professional life (using her maiden name), grapples with the consequences of personal , maternal responsibilities, and career ambitions, frequently prioritizing self-interested decisions amid underlying guilt over her past actions in . As the other narrator, she represents a privileged yet conflicted Western perspective, actively choosing between domestic stability and journalistic pursuits. Supporting characters include Andrew O'Rourke, Sarah's husband and a newspaper editor whose internal struggles highlight tensions in their marriage, and their four-year-old son Charlie, who persistently dons a Batman costume, providing a childlike lens on adult disruptions through his imaginative insistence on role-playing heroism.

Literary Techniques

Style and Prose

Cleave's prose in The Other Hand demonstrates a direct and unadorned style, prioritizing clarity and narrative momentum over ornate flourishes, which facilitates accessibility for a broad readership. This approach integrates raw depictions of events with introspective elements, allowing the story to unfold through straightforward language that eschews sensationalism. Linguistic differentiation between narrators is achieved via distinct registers of English: Sarah Summers employs conventional British vernacular, while Little Bee's sections incorporate inflections suggestive of , such as simplified syntax and idiomatic phrasing, to underscore cultural and experiential contrasts. Sentence construction alternates between terse statements and extended reflections, enhancing the prose's versatility without compromising . Pacing relies on brisk progression and suspenseful chapter transitions, fostering a page-turning quality that favors commercial engagement over experimental density. These elements collectively evoke an cadence, rendering complex subject matter approachable while maintaining formal restraint.

Dual Narrative Structure

The employs a dual framework, with odd-numbered chapters narrated by Little Bee, the Nigerian , and even-numbered chapters by Sarah Summers, the British magazine editor, creating an alternating structure across 15 chapters total. This device causally drives the plot's , as each withholds critical details—such as the precise circumstances of their shared past encounter on a Nigerian —until subsequent chapters from the opposing viewpoint supply them, fostering through delayed convergences rather than linear exposition. The equal apportionment of chapters, roughly balancing narrative space between the two voices, distributes reader symmetrically in terms of volume but unevenly in evidential quality: Little Bee's sections convey largely subjective recollections of verifiable events like village raids tied to oil conflicts and at facilities, prone to interpretive biases shaped by trauma and cultural displacement, while Sarah's provide more empirically grounded accounts of contemporaneous events in her personal and professional spheres, such as her proceedings and journalistic assignments. This disparity underscores perspective-specific limitations, where Little Bee's optimism filters horrors through metaphorical resilience, potentially amplifying emotional impact at the expense of factual precision, and Sarah's reveals self-interested rationalizations that align more closely with documented Western expatriate experiences in during the mid-2000s. Compared to dual-viewpoint mechanisms in psychological thrillers, which often synchronize revelations for plot twists, the structure here subordinates chronological fidelity to affective layering, enabling biases to emerge organically at intersection points—like the incident's dual retellings on pages 156–157 ( edition)—where discrepancies in and motivation expose causal influences of class, , and trauma on subjective truth. Such convergences compel readers to triangulate reliability, highlighting how withheld from one lens causally alters interpretations derived from the other, without privileging either as objective.

Thematic Analysis

Core Themes Explored

The examines and identity in the of displacement through the experiences of Little Bee, a Nigerian who endures detention centers and adapts her persona to navigate British . Little Bee recounts her time in immigration facilities, where she learns to suppress her accent and adopt English mannerisms, stating, "The girls in detention told me that the English hate any foreigner who is not a beggar," reflecting her strategic performance of vulnerability to avoid . Her retention of vivid memories from the Nigerian oil camp violence—such as the guards' demand to choose between her sister's life and her own finger—underscores a fractured identity, blending resilient Nigerian with assimilated British , as seen when she hides her trauma behind humor to bond with Sarah's son Charlie. This motif illustrates identity as a tool for endurance, with Little Bee's evolving self-presentation enabling her release and integration into Sarah's household. Moral ambiguity arises in the tension between personal ethics and global responsibilities, particularly through Summers' decisions during her Nigerian holiday and their aftermath. Encountering armed guards at an oil village beach, Sarah impulsively severs her own finger with a to prevent the mutilation of Little Bee's sister, an act Andrew initially resists, highlighting the clash between immediate and self-preservation. Later, Sarah's affair with colleague Lawrence and her abandonment of husband —prompted by her prioritization of journalistic ambitions over marital —further embody this , as she justifies these choices as assertions of personal amid broader inaction on plights. The narrative presents these as unresolved dilemmas, with Sarah's return to symbolizing an attempt to reconcile individual moral lapses with distant humanitarian crises. Family and protection dynamics extend to cultural clashes in child-rearing, evident in interactions surrounding Sarah's four-year-old son Charlie, who obsessively dons a as a against perceived threats. Little Bee, drawing from her village's brutal realities, advises Charlie to discard the costume for authentic —"In my country, we do not dress as superheroes; we are superheroes"—contrasting Sarah's permissive, suburban approach that views the outfit as harmless play. This motif unfolds during Charlie's endangerment by intruders, where Little Bee's instinctive, survival-oriented —rooted in her sister's fate—intersects with Sarah's legalistic efforts, revealing divergent cultural notions of safeguarding vulnerability, from Nigerian communal endurance to British individualistic norms.

Interpretations and Critiques of Themes

Critiques of the novel's refugee narrative emphasize its tendency to attribute Nigerian instability predominantly to Western corporate exploitation, thereby understating local causal factors in the conflicts. Empirical studies identify core drivers of militancy such as youth involvement in cultism (contributing 22.8% to surveyed causes), oil theft (28.6%), and ethnic divisions (21.9%), alongside state repression and resource mismanagement by Nigerian authorities, which foster an "economy of violence" through local criminal networks and ideological uprisings against domestic failures. This portrayal risks oversimplifying complex causal chains, where Nigerian agency—in the form of militia recruitment and resource sabotage—plays a pivotal role, as evidenced by phenomenological analyses of individual participation in regional . In examining Sarah's trajectory, interpretations grounded in causal realism challenge the efficacy of guilt as a primary motivator for behavioral change, positing that her arc prioritizes symbolic redemption over for prior choices, such as marital and professional compromises. First-principles evaluation reveals that personal agency and foreseeable consequences, rather than expiatory gestures toward distant victims, better explain sustainable outcomes; empirical patterns in underscore how emotion-driven interventions often yield inconsistent results absent structural reforms in decision-making habits. The novel's resolution, hinging on her protective instincts toward Bee, thus invites scrutiny for conflating individual with broader geopolitical , neglecting how such dynamics can perpetuate cycles of evasion from repercussions. The depiction of asylum as an unproblematic humanitarian pathway faces rebuttal from integration data, which document systemic hurdles rather than seamless absorption. UK Home Office figures for the year ending June 2025 show 35,125 asylum refusals amid 61,706 grants, with 20,877 claims withdrawn, indicating that irregular entries frequently lack verifiable grounds and strain resources. Complementary analyses reveal approximately half of unauthorized migrants remaining unreturned despite efforts, correlating with elevated costs and public security concerns, as voluntary and enforced removals totaled around 9,200 for former claimants in 2024—the highest since 2011 but insufficient to offset inflows. These metrics counter idealized views by highlighting causal mismatches between asylum defaults and real-world vetting failures, where local Nigerian or migrant-level decisions amplify rather than mitigate displacement pressures.

Reception and Controversies

Positive Critical and Commercial Reception

The novel achieved significant commercial success following its 2008 publication, becoming an international bestseller translated into over 20 languages and reaching #1 on the New York Times bestseller list under its U.S. title Little Bee. It generated over £1.9 million in sales by early 2010, driven in part by word-of-mouth recommendations and selections for numerous book clubs, which broadened its appeal to general readers beyond literary circles. Critics praised the book's emotional resonance and narrative drive, with The Guardian highlighting its "powerful and emotive end" and the author's "unshakable confidence" in crafting "gripping and vital" character worlds. Reviewers noted the "perfectly paced flashback" structure that heightened tension and immersion, contributing to its shortlisting for the 2008 Costa Novel Award and the Commonwealth Writers' Prize. On , it holds a 3.72/5 average rating from over 247,000 user reviews as of 2025, reflecting sustained reader appreciation for its compassionate handling of trauma and human connection without sentimentality. These elements—particularly the dual perspectives' ability to evoke empathy for disparate lives—were frequently cited as reasons for its broad, empathetic impact.

Criticisms of Realism and Bias

Critics have questioned the novel's depiction of the , arguing that it presents an overly optimistic timeline and outcome for the protagonist's claim compared to empirical data from the in the . In The Other Hand, the Nigerian Bee is released after two years in detention and implied to navigate toward potential , yet real-world statistics show protracted es with low resolution rates; for instance, the backlog of unresolved asylum cases peaked at over 400,000 by 2005, with many applicants from facing rather than integration. Initial grant rates for Nigerian asylum seekers were particularly low, often below 10% during the mid-, as economic motivations were frequently deemed the primary driver over persecution claims, per data analyzed in parliamentary briefings. This divergence suggests the narrative prioritizes dramatic resolution over fidelity to systemic delays and high refusal rates documented by UNHCR and authorities. Reviews from 2009 highlighted manipulative sentimentality in the plot, accusing Cleave of engineering contrivances to evoke empathy at the expense of plausibility. For example, the improbable reunion of characters and exaggerated coincidences—such as Bee's release coinciding with the British protagonist's personal crisis—were critiqued as devices serving advocacy rather than organic storytelling, stretching credibility in ways that undermined the refugee's portrayal as a multifaceted agent. One contemporary assessment described the narrative as "plotted to serve a journalist's critique" of UK policy, with melodramatic elements like sacrificial acts prioritizing emotional manipulation over realistic interpersonal dynamics. Reader feedback echoed this, noting the child-like refugee's precocious wisdom and victimhood as bordering on caricature, which facilitated sentimental appeals but neglected the agency and resilience often observed in actual migrant accounts. The has faced accusations of ideological favoring Western liberal guilt, which critics argue minimizes immigrant personal responsibility while glossing over tangible burdens on host societies. By framing the refugee's plight as a of British detachment, the story downplays factors like welfare dependencies; Migration Watch UK estimated the total cost of the asylum system from 1999 onward approached £10 billion by 2011, encompassing support, , and enforcement amid rising claims that strained public resources without corresponding emphasis on integration challenges or failed claims. This selective focus, per detractors, reflects a broader tilt in literary treatments of migration that amplify host culpability over empirical strains, such as the fiscal pressures from low-employment outcomes among asylum recipients, evidenced in contemporaneous government reports on net public costs exceeding support payments. Such critiques posit that the narrative's emotional pull serves didactic ends, potentially skewing reader perceptions away from data-driven assessments of policy trade-offs.

Debates on Cultural Representation

Critics have questioned the authenticity of Chris Cleave's portrayal of the Nigerian Little Bee, arguing that a male author's voice risks "ventriloquism" of non-Western experiences, potentially amounting to "" rather than empathetic representation. Postcolonial scholars contend that the novel reinforces colonial binaries of civilized versus savage, depicting British characters as house-trained and refined while associating Nigerian elements with barbarism, ethnic violence, and dependency on Western intervention. For instance, Little Bee's hybrid language—blending with imposed British standards—is analyzed as a marker of linguistic and othering, perpetuating "us versus them" paradigms rooted in historical domination. Academic analyses further critique the representation of Nigerian women, including Little Bee, as preconstituted victims lacking individual agency, uniformly oppressed by male violence and reliant on Western saviors like Sarah Summers, which aligns with ethnocentric views of third-world dependency rather than nuanced cultural realities. This portrayal is seen to other Little Bee as a static object measured against Western norms, internalizing colonial that erodes authentic Nigerian identity and fosters alienation. Such depictions echo broader postcolonial concerns about Western narratives exoticizing African trauma, though some interpretations note Little Bee's ironic of these binaries, as when she mocks European "" to highlight its hypocrisies. Despite these scholarly debates, the novel faced no widespread backlash from Nigerian communities or major upon its release, achieving commercial success and praise for humanizing resilience across cultural lines. Defenders, including , argue that restricting white writers from such perspectives stifles fiction's exploratory essence, prioritizing narrative empathy over rigid authenticity demands. Persistent post-2010 academic papers continue to scrutinize these elements, emphasizing ethical questions of cultural without evidence of evolving consensus.

Legacy and Adaptations

Cultural and Policy Impact

The novel's depiction of violence in Nigeria's Niger Delta region coincided with heightened Western media attention to oil-related conflicts there, as evidenced by increased reporting in outlets like The Guardian and BBC News during 2009-2010, though broader geopolitical factors such as militant kidnappings and Shell's operations provide stronger causal explanations than literary influence. No direct policy responses, such as adjustments in UK foreign aid to Nigeria, materialized; bilateral aid allocations from the Department for International Development remained consistent at approximately £100-120 million annually from 2008 to 2012, focused on governance and health without noted shifts attributable to public discourse from the book. In literary spheres, The Other Hand influenced subsequent refugee-themed fiction by emphasizing interpersonal encounters over geopolitical abstraction, inspiring works like Dinaw Mengestu's How to Read the Air (2010), yet critiques highlight its limited effect on real-world outcomes, with UK asylum grant rates at initial decisions stabilizing around 25-35% from 2008 onward, unaffected by narrative trends in popular media. Post-appeal rates rose modestly to about 40% by 2010 due to procedural reforms, not cultural artifacts. The book's cultural footprint persists in educational and communal settings, where it has been adopted for book clubs and curricula to prompt debates on individual —such as the protagonist Sarah Summers' personal dilemmas—versus entrenched systemic failures in global resource extraction and migration controls, though such discussions rarely translate to behavioral shifts beyond reader . Its inclusion in reading lists underscores a focus on ethical rather than for policy reform.

Attempted Film Adaptation

In April 2009, Australian actress expressed strong interest in acquiring film to the , with intentions to star in and produce the adaptation, amid competitive bidding following the book's initial commercial success in the UK. Early development also involved producer Gail Mutrux and BBC Films, as noted in Shawn Slovo's professional credits, though specific timelines for this phase remain limited in public records. The project gained renewed momentum in June 2018 when signed on to star as Sarah Summers and produce via her Red Om Films banner for Amazon Studios, with screenwriter adapting the dual narrative. This iteration emphasized the story's themes of asylum-seeking and personal redemption, positioning Roberts in the role of the British journalist entangled with the Nigerian protagonist. Despite these attachments, the adaptation has not advanced to production as of October 2025, remaining in development limbo according to industry trackers, with no , beyond Roberts, or release scheduled. Contributing factors appear to include persistent challenges in securing full financing and assembling a viable cast for the culturally sensitive roles, alongside the inherent difficulties of visually rendering the novel's non-linear, perspective-shifting structure without diluting its introspective subtlety—issues common to literary adaptations but unaddressed in subsequent announcements. Intermittent updates ceased after 2018, underscoring stalled momentum amid Hollywood's shifting priorities for prestige dramas.

References

  1. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2008/aug/09/fiction5
  2. https://www.thebookbag.co.uk/reviews/The_Other_Hand_by_Chris_Cleave
  3. https://www.scholieren.com/verslag/boekverslag-engels-the-other-hand-door-chris-cleave-85173
  4. https://novelinsights.wordpress.com/2009/11/09/chris-cleaves-the-other-hand/
  5. http://medievalbookworm.com/reviews/review-the-other-hand-chris-cleave/
  6. https://www.litcharts.com/lit/little-bee
  7. https://www.bookseriesinorder.com/chris-cleave/
  8. https://www.encyclopedia.com/arts/educational-magazines/cleave-chris-1973
  9. https://sobrief.com/authors/chris-cleave
  10. https://www.bookbrowse.com/biographies/index.cfm/author_number/1183/chris-cleave
  11. https://uk.linkedin.com/in/chriscleave101
  12. https://medium.com/every-mother-counts/summer-of-sisterhood-a-q-a-with-chris-cleave-author-of-little-bee-8b634396239d
  13. https://www.bookbrowse.com/author_interviews/full/index.cfm/author_number/1183/chris-cleave
  14. https://azpbs.org/books/2010/05/little-bee-by-chris-cleave/
  15. https://www.the-independent.com/arts-entertainment/books/features/chris-cleave-the-author-explores-the-tragicomic-way-britain-deals-with-asylumseekers-886985.html
  16. https://www.amnesty.org/es/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/afr440222005en.pdf
  17. https://www.hrw.org/news/2005/02/04/nigeria-fight-oil-wealth-fuels-violence-delta
  18. https://www.crisisgroup.org/sites/default/files/118-fuelling-the-niger-delta-crisis.pdf
  19. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2002/41/contents
  20. https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2000/jan/26/immigration.immigrationandpublicservices
  21. https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN01403/SN01403.pdf
  22. https://www.nao.org.uk/reports/improving-the-speed-and-quality-of-asylum-decisions/
  23. https://www.amnestyusa.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/afr440172009en.pdf
  24. https://www.cfr.org/sites/default/files/pdf/2009/09/CFR_WorkingPaper_2_NigerDelta.pdf
  25. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353934971_Elite_Corruption_and_Youth_Militancy_in_Nigeria_Case_of_Niger_Delta_Crisis
  26. https://humanrightsclinic.law.harvard.edu/remembering-ken-saro-wiwa-the-struggle-continues-in-the-niger-delta/
  27. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2214790X15001252
  28. https://www.refworld.org/reference/countryrep/hrw/1995/en/21522
  29. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/mend-niger-deltas-umbrella-militant-group
  30. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/para/mend.htm
  31. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/military-history-and-science/movement-emancipation-niger-delta-mend
  32. https://www.crisisgroup.org/africa/nigeria/118-fuelling-niger-delta-crisis
  33. https://www.bradford.ac.uk/library/library-resources/journal-of-peace-conflict-and-development/dilemanigerdelta.pdf
  34. https://www.hrw.org/report/2003/12/17/warri-crisis-fueling-violence/fueling-violence
  35. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/opec.12168
  36. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/2158244016654522
  37. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/11067/
  38. https://www.irasspublisher.com/assets/articles/1737544291.pdf
  39. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1999/33/contents
  40. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7cbc1040f0b6629523b7bd/5315_i.pdf
  41. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-33043395
  42. https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2004/06/0304535.pdf
  43. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7b7e7140f0b62826a03f19/6053.pdf
  44. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/united-kingdom-reluctant-country-immigration
  45. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200405/cmselect/cmhaff/280/28014.htm
  46. https://www.amazon.co.uk/Other-Hand-Chris-Cleave/dp/0340963409
  47. https://www.abebooks.com/9780340963401/Hand-Chris-Cleave-0340963409/plp
  48. https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/chris-cleave/little-bee/
  49. https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/Little-Bee/Chris-Cleave/9781416589648
  50. http://g-ecx.images-amazon.com/images/G/01/books/SS.EMS/LITTLEBEEcorrectedwebQA.pdf
  51. https://www.thebookseller.com/features/review-2009-paperbacks
  52. https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%257CA270231479&sid=sitemap&v=2.1&it=r&p=HRCA&sw=w
  53. https://www.rcwlitagency.com/authors/cleave-chris/
  54. https://anothercookiecrumbles.wordpress.com/2009/08/13/chris-cleave-the-other-hand/
  55. https://savidgereads.wordpress.com/2009/07/15/the-other-hand-chris-cleave/
  56. https://www.amazon.com/Little-Bee-Novel-Chris-Cleave/dp/1416589635
  57. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2016/apr/17/everyone-brave-is-forgiven-chris-cleave-observer-review
  58. https://www.litcharts.com/lit/little-bee/characters/little-bee
  59. https://www.studocu.com/de/document/goethe-gymnasium/englisch/characterization-of-little-bee-in-chris-cleaves-novel/139115961
  60. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2012/jun/03/gold-chris-cleave-review-olympics
  61. https://fictionwritersreview.com/review/little-bee-by-chris-cleave/
  62. https://www.shmoop.com/study-guides/little-bee/sarah-orourke.html
  63. https://sobrief.com/books/little-bee
  64. http://raforall.blogspot.com/2010/11/bpl-book-discussion-little-bee.html
  65. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336127793_The_Social_Identity_Change_of_Little_Bee_as_the_Main_Character_in_Chris_Cleaves_The_Other_Hand
  66. https://www.litcharts.com/lit/little-bee/themes/horror-and-trauma
  67. https://www.litcharts.com/lit/little-bee/themes/cross-cultural-relationships
  68. https://www.supersummary.com/little-bee/themes/
  69. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/The-Cause-of-Militancy-in-Niger-Delta-Region_tbl2_382394068
  70. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/5832/
  71. https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/130358/Conflict_Niger_Delta.pdf
  72. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=7111&context=dissertations
  73. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/immigration-system-statistics-year-ending-june-2025/how-many-people-come-to-the-uk-irregularly
  74. https://migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk/resources/briefings/returns-of-unauthorised-migrants-from-the-uk/
  75. https://migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk/resources/briefings/unauthorised-migration-in-the-uk/
  76. https://parents.simonandschuster.com/9781508223948
  77. https://www.thebookseller.com/features/review-2009-tough-top
  78. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/books/7835258/Are-these-Britains-best-20-novelists-under-40.html
  79. http://goodbooksguide.blogspot.com/2008/11/2008-costa-book-awards-shortlist.html
  80. https://www.thebookseller.com/news/commonwealth-shortlist-announced
  81. https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/3162006-the-other-hand-aka-little-bee
  82. https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/sn01403/
  83. https://www.worlddata.info/africa/nigeria/asylum.php
  84. https://vulpeslibris.wordpress.com/2009/08/04/the-other-hand-by-chris-cleave-but-on-the-other-hand/
  85. https://anzlitlovers.com/2009/09/06/the-other-hand-2008-by-chris-cleave/
  86. https://www.bookbrowse.com/reader_reviews/index.cfm/book_number/2235/little-bee
  87. https://www.migrationwatchuk.org/briefing-paper/11.26
  88. https://odi.org/documents/6131/fiscal_space_paper_final.pdf
  89. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/sep/13/lionel-shrivers-full-speech-i-hope-the-concept-of-cultural-appropriation-is-a-passing-fad
  90. https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/litera-kultura/article/download/3816/6370/6187
  91. https://postcolonialinterventions.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/pi-5.2-sandten.pdf
  92. https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2083&context=theses
  93. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7899cd40f0b62b22cbb4a2/SID-2012.pdf
  94. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/immigration-statistics-year-ending-june-2018/how-many-people-do-we-grant-asylum-or-protection-to
  95. https://www.swisseduc.ch/english/readinglist/cleave_chris/hand/
  96. https://threeteacherstalk.com/tag/book-clubs/page/2/
  97. https://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/kidman-vying-for-film-rights-to-cleave-novel-20090420-abk9.html
  98. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2009-04-20/kidman-wants-rights-to-asylum-seeker-novel-report/1655642
  99. https://cdn.casarotto.co.uk/uploads/files/cvs/Shawn-Slovo.pdf
  100. https://variety.com/2018/film/news/julia-roberts-little-bee-for-amazon-1202840760/
  101. https://deadline.com/2018/06/julia-roberts-amazon-little-bee-film-adaptation-kathleen-robertson-1202405062/
  102. https://www.thebookseller.com/rights/julia-roberts-set-star-adaptation-chris-cleaves-little-bee-806796
  103. https://www.movieinsider.com/m6197/little-bee
  104. https://www.movieinsider.com/c3223/amazon-studios/status/development
  105. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2485986/
  106. https://the-bibliofile.com/little-bee-movie-release-cast-trailer-film/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.