Hubbry Logo
Thermal shockThermal shockMain
Open search
Thermal shock
Community hub
Thermal shock
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Thermal shock
Thermal shock
from Wikipedia

Thermal shock is a phenomenon characterized by a rapid change in temperature that results in a transient mechanical load on an object. The load is caused by the differential expansion of different parts of the object due to the temperature change. This differential expansion can be understood in terms of strain, rather than stress. When the strain exceeds the tensile strength of the material, it can cause cracks to form, and eventually lead to structural failure.

Methods to prevent thermal shock include:[1]

Effect on materials

[edit]

Borosilicate glass is made to withstand thermal shock better than most other glass through a combination of reduced expansion coefficient, and greater strength, though fused quartz outperforms it in both these respects. Some glass-ceramic materials (mostly in the lithium aluminosilicate (LAS) system[2]) include a controlled proportion of material with a negative expansion coefficient, so that the overall coefficient can be reduced to almost exactly zero over a reasonably wide range of temperatures.

Among the best thermomechanical materials, there are alumina, zirconia, tungsten alloys, silicon nitride, silicon carbide, boron carbide, and some stainless steels.

Reinforced carbon-carbon is extremely resistant to thermal shock, due to graphite's extremely high thermal conductivity and low expansion coefficient, the high strength of carbon fiber, and a reasonable ability to deflect cracks within the structure.

To measure thermal shock, the impulse excitation technique proved to be a useful tool. It can be used to measure Young's modulus, Shear modulus, Poisson's ratio, and damping coefficient in a non destructive way. The same test-piece can be measured after different thermal shock cycles, and this way the deterioration in physical properties can be mapped out.

Thermal shock resistance

[edit]

Thermal shock resistance measures can be used for material selection in applications subject to rapid temperature changes. A common measure of thermal shock resistance is the maximum temperature differential, , which can be sustained by the material for a given thickness.[3]

Strength-controlled thermal shock resistance

[edit]

Thermal shock resistance measures can be used for material selection in applications subject to rapid temperature changes. The maximum temperature jump, , sustainable by a material can be defined for strength-controlled models by:[4][3] where is the failure stress (which can be yield or fracture stress), is the coefficient of thermal expansion, is the Young's modulus, and is a constant depending upon the part constraint, material properties, and thickness.

where is a system constrain constant dependent upon the Poisson's ratio, , and is a non-dimensional parameter dependent upon the Biot number, .

may be approximated by: where is the thickness, is the heat transfer coefficient, and is the thermal conductivity.

Perfect heat transfer

[edit]

If perfect heat transfer () is assumed, the maximum heat transfer supported by the material is:[4][5]

  • for cold shock in plates
  • for hot shock in plates

A material index for material selection according to thermal shock resistance in the fracture stress derived perfect heat transfer case is therefore:

Poor heat transfer

[edit]

For cases with poor heat transfer (), the maximum heat differential supported by the material is:[4][5]

  • for cold shock
  • for hot shock

In the poor heat transfer case, a higher thermal conductivity is beneficial for thermal shock resistance. The material index for the poor heat transfer case is often taken as:

According to both the perfect and poor heat transfer models, larger temperature differentials can be tolerated for hot shock than for cold shock.

Fracture toughness controlled thermal shock resistance

[edit]

In addition to thermal shock resistance defined by material fracture strength, models have also been defined within the fracture mechanics framework. Lu and Fleck produced criteria for thermal shock cracking based on fracture toughness controlled cracking. The models were based on thermal shock in ceramics (generally brittle materials). Assuming an infinite plate, and mode I cracking, the crack was predicted to start from the edge for cold shock, but the center of the plate for hot shock.[4] Cases were divided into perfect, and poor heat transfer to further simplify the models.

Perfect heat transfer

[edit]

The sustainable temperature jump decreases, with increasing convective heat transfer (and therefore larger Biot number). This is represented in the model shown below for perfect heat transfer ().[4][5]

where is the mode I fracture toughness, is the Young's modulus, is the thermal expansion coefficient, and is half the thickness of the plate.

  • for cold shock
  • for hot shock

A material index for material selection in the fracture mechanics derived perfect heat transfer case is therefore:

Poor heat transfer

[edit]

For cases with poor heat transfer, the Biot number is an important factor in the sustainable temperature jump.[4][5]

Critically, for poor heat transfer cases, materials with higher thermal conductivity, k, have higher thermal shock resistance. As a result, a commonly chosen material index for thermal shock resistance in the poor heat transfer case is:

Kingery thermal shock methods

[edit]

The temperature difference to initiate fracture has been described by William David Kingery to be:[6][7] where is a shape factor, is the fracture stress, is the thermal conductivity, is the Young's modulus, is the coefficient of thermal expansion, is the heat transfer coefficient, and is a fracture resistance parameter. The fracture resistance parameter is a common metric used to define the thermal shock tolerance of materials.[1]

The formulas were derived for ceramic materials, and make the assumptions of a homogeneous body with material properties independent of temperature, but can be well applied to other brittle materials.[7]

Testing

[edit]

Thermal shock testing exposes products to alternating low and high temperatures to accelerate failures caused by temperature cycles or thermal shocks during normal use. The transition between temperature extremes occurs very rapidly, greater than 15 °C per minute.

Equipment with single or multiple chambers is typically used to perform thermal shock testing. When using single chamber thermal shock equipment, the products remain in one chamber and the chamber air temperature is rapidly cooled and heated. Some equipment uses separate hot and cold chambers with an elevator mechanism that transports the products between two or more chambers.

Glass containers can be sensitive to sudden changes in temperature. One method of testing involves rapid movement from cold to hot water baths, and back.[8]

Examples of thermal shock failure

[edit]
  • Hard rocks containing ore veins such as quartzite were formerly broken down using fire-setting, which involved heating the rock face with a wood fire, then quenching with water to induce crack growth. It is described by Diodorus Siculus in Egyptian gold mines, Pliny the Elder, and Georg Agricola.[9]
  • Ice cubes placed in a glass of warm water crack by thermal shock as the exterior surface increases in temperature much faster than the interior. The outer layer expands as it warms, while the interior remains largely unchanged. This rapid change in volume between different layers creates stresses in the ice that build until the force exceeds the strength of the ice, and a crack forms, sometimes with enough force to shoot ice shards out of the container.[10]
  • Incandescent bulbs that have been running for a while have a very hot surface. Splashing cold water on them can cause the glass to shatter due to thermal shock, and the bulb to implode.[11]
  • An antique cast iron cookstove is a simple iron box on legs, with a cast iron top. A wood or coal fire is built inside the box and food is cooked on the top outer surface of the box, like a griddle. If a fire is built too hot, and then the stove is cooled by pouring water on the top surface, it will crack due to thermal shock.
  • The strong gradient of temperature (due to the dousing of a fire with water) is believed to have caused the breakage of the third Tsar Bell.[12]
  • Thermal shock is a primary contributor to head gasket failure in internal combustion engines.[13]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Thermal shock is a in where rapid and nonuniform temperature changes induce transient thermal stresses, leading to differential expansion or contraction that can cause cracking, fracturing, or , particularly in brittle materials such as ceramics, , and certain metals. This occurs due to thermal gradients within the material, where surface layers heat or cool faster than the interior, generating tensile or compressive stresses that exceed the material's strength if not properly managed. The primary causes of thermal shock include sudden exposure to extreme heat fluxes, such as in processes or , and rapid cooling events like immersion in cold fluids. In engineering contexts, it is exacerbated by constrained geometries that prevent free expansion, as seen in pressure vessels during pressurized thermal shock events, where overcooling combines with to amplify risks. The underlying mechanism involves thermal strain, quantified as ΔL/L=αΔT\Delta L / L = \alpha \Delta T, where α\alpha is the coefficient of thermal expansion and ΔT\Delta T is the change, which in turn produces stress σ=EαΔT\sigma = E \alpha \Delta T under elastic conditions, with EE as the modulus of elasticity. Effects of thermal shock are most pronounced in applications requiring thermal cycling, such as components, cookware, and linings, where repeated exposure can lead to , reduced , and progressive strength loss—up to 40% after cycles at extreme ΔT\Delta T values like 1900°C. In brittle materials, it often results in surface cracks propagating inward, shortening service life and necessitating design considerations for durability. Thermal shock resistance is a critical property, evaluated through parameters like R=σf/(Eα)R = \sigma_f / (E \alpha), where σf\sigma_f is , or more advanced metrics incorporating KcK_c to predict safe temperature differentials. Materials with high thermal conductivity, low , and high toughness—such as or zirconia ceramics—exhibit superior resistance, enabling their use in demanding environments like rocket nozzles or high-temperature furnaces. strategies include gradual temperature transitions, compositional grading, and testing protocols like water quenching to assess performance.

Fundamentals

Definition and Causes

Thermal shock refers to the mechanical stresses induced in a by rapid and nonuniform changes, which can lead to cracking or without any external mechanical loading. These stresses arise from transient thermal gradients that cause differential expansion or contraction within the , particularly in brittle substances like ceramics and . The primary causes of thermal shock involve sudden heating or cooling scenarios that establish steep gradients. For instance, a hot metal or component in creates rapid cooling on the surface while the interior remains hot, leading to tensile stresses on the exterior and compressive stresses internally. Similarly, immersing a in a hot , such as during certain processes, induces the opposite effect with surface compression and internal tension. These gradients drive differential , where regions at different temperatures expand or contract unequally, generating internal stresses that may exceed the material's strength. At its core, thermal shock stems from the prerequisite physics of , quantified by the linear thermal expansion coefficient α, which measures a material's fractional change in length per unit temperature change. The resulting thermal strain ε is expressed as ε = α , where is the temperature difference; this unconstrained strain becomes problematic when the material's geometry or surroundings prevent free expansion, converting it into stress. Materials with high α, such as certain metals and , are particularly susceptible.

Basic Mechanisms

Thermal shock arises from rapid temperature changes that induce internal stresses through a sequence of physical processes. Initially, exposure to a sudden shift—such as quenching in a cooler fluid or sudden heating—triggers across the material's surface via , , or , establishing nonuniform distributions within the body. These gradients develop because the material's internal thermal cannot instantaneously equalize the , leading to hotter or cooler regions expanding or contracting at different rates according to the linear coefficient α. The differential expansion creates incompatible strains, necessitating mechanical strains to maintain geometric compatibility, which in turn generate thermal stresses: typically tensile stresses on the cooler or less-heated surfaces and compressive stresses on the opposite sides. If these stresses surpass the material's tensile strength, crack initiation occurs at vulnerable sites, followed by under the sustained until failure. The severity of temperature gradients is governed by the modes of heat transfer and the material's properties. Conduction dominates internally, transferring heat through atomic vibrations, while and primarily affect the surface boundary conditions. The , defined as Bi=hLkBi = \frac{h L}{k}, where hh is the , LL is the (e.g., half-thickness for slabs), and kk is the thermal conductivity, quantifies the relative resistance to conduction within the material versus convection at the surface. A high (Bi > 0.1) indicates significant internal gradients and pronounced thermal shock risk, as surface temperatures change rapidly while the interior lags; conversely, low Bi values suggest nearly uniform temperatures and minimal stress. Thermal stresses can be estimated from basic thermoelastic principles. For a fully constrained under uniform change ΔT, the free strain is ϵth=αΔT\epsilon_{th} = \alpha \Delta T. To ensure strain compatibility in a restrained configuration, a mechanical strain ϵm=ϵth\epsilon_m = -\epsilon_{th} counteracts it, yielding uniaxial stress σ=Eϵm=EαΔT\sigma = E \epsilon_m = -E \alpha \Delta T, where E is . In three-dimensional cases, such as biaxial constraint common in thermal shock (e.g., surface layers), Poisson's effects modify this to σ=EαΔT1ν\sigma = \frac{E \alpha \Delta T}{1 - \nu}, where ν is , accounting for lateral strain constraints. This formula, derived from equilibrium and compatibility in , applies to the maximum surface stress in quenching scenarios. Geometry significantly influences stress distribution by altering gradient profiles and constraint levels. In thin plates or films (small L), heat penetrates uniformly, minimizing differentials and stresses, as seen in low-Bi regimes. Conversely, thick blocks or cylinders exhibit steep gradients, with surface layers experiencing high tensile stresses during cooling due to restrained contraction against the warmer core, amplifying crack risks. For instance, in cylindrical vessels, radial variations lead to hoop and axial stresses that scale with wall thickness.

Effects on Materials

Types of Damage

Thermal shock induces several primary types of physical in materials, categorized by their outcomes. Surface cracking, often manifesting as spalling, occurs when rapid cooling or heating generates tensile stresses on the exposed surface, causing the detachment and flaking of outer layers. Bulk involves the extension of cracks through the material's interior, leading to complete structural disintegration. In composite materials, represents a distinct damage mode, where interfacial separation between layers arises from mismatched thermal expansions under sudden temperature gradients. Brittle responses to thermal shock are characterized by sudden snapping with little to no deformation, resulting in rapid, , whereas ductile responses involve gradual deformation and energy absorption prior to . The progression of thermal shock damage follows distinct stages, beginning with crack initiation at stress concentration points such as surface flaws or preexisting defects, where localized tensile stresses exceed the material's strength (typically when stresses reach 50-70% of ). Cracks then propagate along planes of weakness, such as grain boundaries or interfaces, under the influence of sustained thermal gradients, with growth rates accelerating under high dT/dt. This leads to ultimate failure modes, including shattering or fragmentation, as interconnected cracks destabilize the structure. These stages stem from mechanisms that produce differential strains during rapid heating or cooling. Factors that accelerate thermal shock damage include the rate of temperature change (dT/dt), the overall temperature differential (), and environmental conditions like moisture presence, which promotes crack growth through steam pressure buildup. Elevated dT/dt intensifies transient stresses, hastening initiation and propagation, while larger amplifies the magnitude of induced strains. Moisture, in particular, facilitates explosive progression in scenarios involving vaporization, exacerbating surface and subsurface damage. Microscopically, thermal shock damage originates from the of microcracks due to localized stresses, followed by their coalescence into larger macro-fractures that compromise . In ceramics, these microcracks may propagate via intergranular paths along grain boundaries, especially in coarse-grained structures with weak interphase phases, or transgranular paths cleaving through s, as seen in fine-grained or single-crystal variants. Intergranular modes often dominate under high-temperature or slow-growth conditions, while transgranular paths prevail in rapid, cleavage-dominated failures, with coalescence driven by repeated loading or microstructural defects.

Material-Specific Responses

Ceramics and exhibit high sensitivity to thermal shock due to their inherent brittleness and low , often resulting in catastrophic from rapid changes that induce surface tensile stresses exceeding the material's strength. For instance, hot in cold water can cause instantaneous cracking as the exterior contracts faster than the interior, generating surface tensile stresses that initiate and propagate flaws from the surface, while the interior experiences compression. This vulnerability is exacerbated by their relatively low thermal conductivity, which promotes steep gradients. Metals and alloys generally demonstrate greater resilience to thermal shock compared to ceramics, owing to their higher and ability to accommodate stresses through deformation rather than immediate cracking. However, rapid cooling can still induce warping or residual stresses. In applications like turbine blades, repeated thermal cycling may lead to , but the high thermal conductivity of metals helps mitigate severe gradients. Polymers and composites suffer from thermal shock primarily due to their low thermal conductivity, which creates significant internal temperature gradients and differential expansion between matrix and reinforcements. This often results in matrix cracking or , especially in fiber-reinforced composites where interfacial stresses cause debonding between fibers and matrix. For example, exposure to sudden can warp thin polymer sheets, while cryogenic shocks may embrittle the material, reducing its impact resistance. While the focus remains on engineered materials, biological tissues illustrate thermal shock effects through phenomena like , where rapid freezing forms ice crystals that mechanically disrupt cell membranes and cause vascular damage.
Material ClassThermal Expansion Coefficient (α, ×10⁻⁶ K⁻¹)Thermal Conductivity (k, W/m·K)Typical Failure ΔT (°C)
Ceramics5–101–5100–200
Metals10–2020–400>500
Polymers50–1000.1–0.550–100
These values represent approximate ranges for common materials and highlight why ceramics have low shock tolerance due to moderate expansion and poor conductivity, while metals benefit from rapid heat dissipation.

Thermal Shock Resistance

Key Influencing Factors

The vulnerability of a material to thermal shock is primarily determined by its inherent properties and the conditions of the thermal environment. Key material properties include the coefficient of thermal expansion (α), which governs the magnitude of strain induced by temperature changes; thermal conductivity (k), which influences the rate of heat diffusion and thus the temperature gradients within the material; tensile strength (σ_f), which resists the onset of cracking under induced stresses; and fracture toughness (K_IC), which controls the material's ability to arrest crack propagation once initiated. Environmental factors play a critical role in exacerbating or mitigating these effects. The heating or cooling rate directly impacts the severity of gradients, with faster rates leading to steeper gradients and higher stresses. The quenching medium—such as air versus liquids like —alters the (h), where liquids promote rapid surface cooling and intensified shock compared to gaseous media. Additionally, the size and of the component affect stress buildup, as larger or more complex shapes experience greater internal gradients due to slower heat conduction relative to surface heat loss, often quantified by the (Bi = hL/k, where L is a ). These factors interact synergistically to determine overall susceptibility. For instance, a low thermal conductivity (k) combined with a high thermal expansion coefficient (α) amplifies temperature gradients and the resulting thermal stresses (σ_th ≈ E α ΔT, where E is the and ΔT is the gradient), increasing the risk of failure. A basic figure of merit for thermal shock resistance, known as the Hasselman parameter R, captures this interplay for crack initiation under rapid surface heating: R=σf(1ν)EαR = \frac{\sigma_f (1 - \nu)}{E \alpha} where ν is Poisson's ratio; higher R values indicate better resistance by balancing strength against stress-inducing properties. Recent modeling advances since 2000 have highlighted the role of microstructure in modulating these factors, particularly in ceramics. Porosity, for example, reduces the effective thermal expansion coefficient (α_eff) by allowing local stress relaxation around voids, which can enhance resistance up to a threshold beyond which mechanical integrity degrades; this effect has been demonstrated in finite element simulations of porous alumina and mullite composites.

Strength-Controlled Resistance

In the strength-controlled regime of thermal shock resistance, failure occurs when the induced thermal stresses reach the material's tensile strength σf\sigma_f before significant crack propagation can take place, typically involving small flaws or microcracks that do not extend extensively. This regime is prevalent in scenarios of rapid but relatively uniform heating or cooling, where the Biot number Bi (defined as Bi=hL/k\text{Bi} = h L / k, with hh the heat transfer coefficient, LL the characteristic length, and kk the thermal conductivity) is low, leading to minimal temperature gradients across the material. For low Biot number conditions (Bi ≪ 1), where internal conduction dominates and the temperature distribution remains nearly throughout the body, the material experiences a uniform temperature change ΔT\Delta T, and thermal stresses arise primarily from external mechanical constraints preventing free expansion, such as in a large body where the surface is restrained by the bulk interior. The maximum stress σmax\sigma_{\max} is derived from linear thermoelasticity theory under plane strain conditions: the total strain ϵ=0=αΔT+σE/(1ν)\epsilon = 0 = \alpha \Delta T + \frac{\sigma}{E/(1-\nu)}, where α\alpha is the coefficient of thermal expansion, EE is , and ν\nu is , yielding σmax=EαΔT1ν\sigma_{\max} = \frac{E \alpha \Delta T}{1 - \nu}. This expression assumes isotropic behavior and small deformations, with the biaxial constraint factor 1/(1ν)1/(1-\nu) accounting for lateral effects in a plate-like geometry. The critical temperature difference for failure is then ΔTc=σf(1ν)Eα\Delta T_c = \frac{\sigma_f (1 - \nu)}{E \alpha}, defining the resistance parameter R=σf(1ν)EαR' = \frac{\sigma_f (1 - \nu)}{E \alpha}. In contrast, for high (Bi ≫ 1), steep temperature gradients develop near the surface due to rapid surface cooling or heating compared to internal conduction, dominating the stress field. The maximum tensile stress at the surface approximates σmaxEαΔT2(1ν)\sigma_{\max} \approx \frac{E \alpha \Delta T}{2(1 - \nu)}, derived from the initial transient response in a semi-infinite body or thin plate under sudden exposure: at the instant of shock, the surface temperature shifts by ΔT\Delta T, but the adjacent material resists contraction, leading to a stress balance where the effective constraint yields a factor of 1/2 from integrating the thermal strain over the gradient zone using Duhamel's theorem in thermoelasticity. This approximation neglects Poisson effects for simplicity in high-gradient limits but incorporates them fully as shown. The corresponding resistance parameter adjusts for heat transfer limitations as R=kσf(1ν)EαhR'' = \frac{k \sigma_f (1 - \nu)}{E \alpha h}, where the critical ΔTc=R/L\Delta T_c = R'' / L, emphasizing the role of conductivity kk in mitigating gradients. Derivations for both cases stem from the coupled heat conduction and elasticity equations. The temperature field T(x,t)T(x,t) solves the diffusion equation Tt=κ2Tx2\frac{\partial T}{\partial t} = \kappa \frac{\partial^2 T}{\partial x^2} (with diffusivity κ=k/(ρcp)\kappa = k / (\rho c_p)), subject to boundary conditions of convective flux kTx=h(TTf)-k \frac{\partial T}{\partial x} = h (T - T_f) at the surface. Stresses follow from σxx=E1ν[ϵxx+ν(ϵyy+ϵzz)(1+ν)α(TT0)]\sigma_{xx} = \frac{E}{1 - \nu} \left[ \epsilon_{xx} + \nu (\epsilon_{yy} + \epsilon_{zz}) - (1 + \nu) \alpha (T - T_0) \right], with compatibility ensuring zero net force in free bodies. For Bi1\text{Bi} \ll 1, series solutions yield uniform TTf+(T0Tf)e(hA/(ρcpV))tT \approx T_f + (T_0 - T_f) e^{-(h A / (\rho c_p V)) t}, leading to constrained stress buildup. For Bi1\text{Bi} \gg 1, the surface T(0,t)TfT(0,t) \approx T_f for t>0t > 0, and the error function solution T(x,t)=Tf+(T0Tf)\erf(x/4κt)T(x,t) = T_f + (T_0 - T_f) \erf(x / \sqrt{4 \kappa t})
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.