Hubbry Logo
UK Border AgencyUK Border AgencyMain
Open search
UK Border Agency
Community hub
UK Border Agency
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
UK Border Agency
UK Border Agency
UK Border Agency
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

UK Border Agency
{{{logocaption}}}
AbbreviationUKBA
Agency overview
Formed1 April 2008
Preceding agencies
Dissolved1 April 2013
Superseding agencyBorder Force
UK Visas and Immigration
Immigration Enforcement
Employees23,500
Jurisdictional structure
National agency
(Operations jurisdiction)		United Kingdom
Operations jurisdictionUnited Kingdom
Legal jurisdictionUnited Kingdom
Specialist jurisdictions
Operational structure
Headquarters2 Marsham Street, London, SW1P 4DF
Sworn members10,000
Unsworn members10,000
Minister responsible
Agency executive
Parent agencyHome Office
Facilities
UKBA 42m Customs CuttersFive
PlanesYes
Detection dogsOver 100
Notables
Programme
  • To control and police immigration into the United Kingdom

The UK Border Agency (UKBA) was the border control agency of the Government of the United Kingdom and part of the Home Office that was superseded by UK Visas and Immigration, Border Force and Immigration Enforcement in April 2013.[1] It was formed as an executive agency on 1 April 2008 by a merger of the Border and Immigration Agency (BIA), UKvisas and the detection functions of HM Revenue and Customs. The decision to create a single border control organisation was taken following a Cabinet Office report.[2]

The agency's head office was 2 Marsham Street, London. Rob Whiteman became Chief Executive in September 2011. Over 23,000 staff worked for the agency, in over 130 countries. It was divided into four main operations, each under the management of a senior director: operations, immigration and settlement, international operations and visas and law enforcement.[3]

The agency came under formal criticism from the Parliamentary Ombudsman for consistently poor service, a backlog of hundreds of thousands of cases, and a large and increasing number of complaints.[4] In the first nine months of 2009–10, 97% of investigations reported by the Ombudsman resulted in a complaint against the agency being upheld.[5] The complainants were asylum, residence, or other immigration applicants.[5]

In April 2012, the border control division of the UKBA was separated from the rest of the agency as the Border Force. On 26 March 2013, following a scathing report into the agency's incompetence by the Home Affairs Select Committee,[6] it was announced by Home Secretary Theresa May that the UK Border Agency would be abolished and its work returned to the Home Office. Its executive agency status was removed[7] as of 31 March 2013[8] and the agency was split into three new organisations; UK Visas and Immigration focusing on the visa system, Immigration Enforcement focusing on immigration law enforcement and Border Force, providing immigration and customs law enforcement at ports of entry in the UK.[9][10]

Role

[edit]
Further information: Illegal immigration to the United Kingdom

The agency attained full agency status on 1 April 2009. Immigration Officers and Customs Officers retained their own powers for the enforcement and administration of the UK's borders, although management of the new organisation was integrated and progressively officers were cross trained and empowered to deal with customs and immigration matters at the border. The Borders, Citizenship and Immigration Act 2009 received Royal Assent on 21 July 2009. This allowed the concurrent exercise of customs powers by HMRC Commissioners and the Director of Border Revenue; it was the first step in overhauling immigration and customs legislation.

A UK Border Agency officer examines counterfeit football shirts upon their arrival in the United Kingdom

The UK Border Agency had a staff of 23,500 people located in over 130 countries. Overseas staff vetted visa applications and operated an intelligence and liaison network, acting as the first layer of border control for the UK. The organisation operated as the single force at the border for the UK. Local immigration teams worked within the regions of the United Kingdom, liaising with the police, HMRC, local authorities and the public.[11] In August 2009 HM Revenue and Customs transferred several thousand customs detection officers to the agency, following Parliament agreeing to give it customs control powers. The agency then began to investigate smuggling. The agency was developing a single primary border control line at the UK border combining controls of people and goods entering the country.

The agency's E-Borders programme checked travellers to and from the UK in advance of travel, using data provided by passengers via their airline or ferry operators. The organisation used automatic clearance gates at main international airports.

The agency managed the UK Government's limit on non-European economic migration to the UK. It was responsible for in-country enforcement operations, investigating organised immigration crime and to detecting immigration offenders including illegal entrants and overstayers. The body was also responsible for the deportation of foreign national criminals at the end of sentences.

The UK Border Agency's budget combined with that of the Border Force was £2.17 billion in 2011–12. Under the spending review the agency was required to cut costs by up to 23%.[12] At its peak the agency employed around 25,000 staff, but 5,000 posts were due to be cut by 2015 against the 2011–12 levels.[13]

Founding Chief Executive Lin Homer left the agency in January 2011 to become the Permanent Secretary at the Department for Transport. Deputy Chief Executive Jonathan Sedgwick was acting chief until the new CEO, Rob Whiteman, took over on 26 September 2011. Sedgwick then became director of international operations and visas.[3] In July 2011, the strategic policy functions of the agency moved to the Home Office.

Home Secretary Theresa May announced to Parliament on 26 March 2013 that the agency would be abolished due to continuing poor performance, and replaced by two new smaller organisations which would focus on the visa system and immigration law enforcement respectively. The UKBA's performance was described as "not good enough", partly blamed on the size of the organisation. A report by MPs also criticised the agency, and described it as "not fit for purpose". It was also claimed that the agency had provided inaccurate reports to the Home Affairs Select Committee over a number of years.[9] The agency was split internally on 1 April 2013, becoming a visa and immigration service and separate immigration law enforcement service.[8]

Powers

[edit]
UKBA Cutters, such as HMC Searcher, are capable of top speeds of 26 knots[14]
The UKBA often cooperated with the Police, such as at this customs raid. The officer on the left is a Police Community Support Officer (PCSO)

Staff held a mixture of powers granted to them by their status as immigration officers and customs officers.

Immigration powers

[edit]
Main article: Immigration officer

Immigration officers had the power of arrest and detention conferred on them by the Immigration Act 1971, when both at ports and inland. In practice, border force officers exercised powers under Schedule 2 of the Immigration Act 1971 and inland immigration officers under S28A-H of the Immigration Act 1971 and paragraph 17 of Schedule 2. This led to separate training for border and inland officers.

This act is applicable in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. "Designated Immigration Officers" are port immigration officers who have been trained in detention under PACE. UK Border Agency immigration officers wear a uniform with rank insignia. Enforcement immigration officers wear body armour and carry handcuffs and ASP batons.

Offices of the UK Border Agency in Sheffield

Customs powers

[edit]
Main article: Customs officer

Customs officers had wide-ranging powers of entry, search and detention. The main power was to detain anyone who had committed, or who the officer had reasonable grounds to suspect had committed, any offence under the Customs and Excise Acts.[15]

Removal of foreign nationals

[edit]

The UK Border Agency occasionally removed foreign national criminals at the end of their prison terms. Over 5000 foreign national prisoners were deported each year. The agency also removed failed asylum seekers and others illegally in the UK. A 2009 report by the National Audit Office cited lack of detention space to support the asylum process. The agency had over 3000 detention spaces in removal centres run by private contractors or the Prison Service.[16]

Immigration control

[edit]
UKBA officers staff the UK border at London Heathrow Airport's Terminal 5

Common travel area

[edit]

Immigration control within the United Kingdom is managed within a wider Common Travel Area (CTA). The CTA is an intergovernmental agreement that allows freedom of movement within an area that encompasses the UK, Isle of Man, Channel Islands (Guernsey, Jersey, Sark and Alderney) and the Republic of Ireland. Authorised entry to any of the above essentially allows entry to all the others but it is the responsibility of the person entering to ensure that they are properly documented for entry to other parts of the CTA. Despite the CTA it is still possible to be deported from the UK to the Republic of Ireland and vice versa.

Juxtaposed controls

[edit]

Entry to the UK via the Channel Tunnel from France or Belgium or by ferry through selected ports in north-east France is controlled by juxtaposed immigration controls in Britain, France, and Belgium, i.e. travellers clear UK passport control in France or Belgium and those travelling to France or Belgium clear French controls while in the UK. Belgium does not maintain controls in the UK as the first Schengen country entered is France. UK Border Agency checkpoints in France were operated at Gare de Calais-Fréthun, Gare de Lille Europe, Gare de Marne-la-Vallée–Chessy, Gare d'Avignon-Centre, Channel Tunnel, Calais ferry terminal, Dunkirk ferry terminal and Gare du Nord station, Paris. A checkpoint operated at Boulogne-sur-Mer until the port closed in August 2010. United States border preclearance is an equivalent system operated by that country's equivalent to the UKBA at some airports outside the US.

Controversies

[edit]

Student visas

[edit]

There have also been difficulties with the management of student visas under Tier 4 of the Points-Based System. The assessment of the Independent Chief Inspector, carried out between July and August 2010, found that there was an inconsistent response towards applications, with some cases given extra time to prepare and others dismissed for minor reasons.[17]

Dropped casework

[edit]

In November 2011, the Home Affairs Select Committee issued a report that found that 124,000 deportation cases had been shelved by the UKBA. The report said the cases had been dumped in a "controlled archive", a term used to try to hide the fact from authorities and auditors that it was a list of lost applicants.[18]

Border checks

[edit]

Following allegations that staff were told to relax some identity checks, in November 2011 the UK Home Office suspended: Brodie Clark, the Head of the Border Force;[19] Carole Upshall, director of the Border Force South and European Operation;[citation needed] Graham Kyle, director of operations at Heathrow Airport.[19] The Home Office is presently investigating allegations that Clark had agreed to "open up the borders" at certain times in ways ministers would "not have agreed with".[19] The BBC reported that staff may have been told not to scan biometric passports at certain times, which contain a digital image of the holder's face, which can be used to compare with the printed version and check the passport has not been forged.[19] It is also believed that "warning index checks" at Heathrow and Calais were also suspended, which would have applied strict security checks against official watchlists of terrorists, criminals, and deported illegal immigrants.[20]

After Clark refused the offer to take early retirement, he was suspended and the investigation began.[19] A two-week inquiry led by former Metropolitan Police detective Dave Wood, currently head of the agency's enforcement and crime group, sought to discover to what extent checks were scaled down, and what the security implications might have been. A second investigation, led by former MI6 official Mike Anderson, the Director General of the Home Office's strategy, immigration and international group, sought to investigate wider issues relating to the performance of UKBA regarding racism.

It was then announced on 5 November by Theresa May that an independent inquiry would also be undertaken, led by the Chief Inspector of the UK Border Agency, John Vine.[21] His report was published on 20 February 2012.[22] The Border Force became a separate organisation on 1 March 2012.[23]

2014 Sham Weddings Trial Collapse

[edit]

In October 2014, the trial of the Reverend Nathan Ntege – accused of conducting almost 500 sham marriages at a church in Thornton Heath, South London between 2007 and 2011 – collapsed after it became apparent that evidence had been tampered with, concealed, or even possibly destroyed. As immigration officers were questioned in the witness box of the Inner London Crown Court it became clear that not only had video footage gone missing but that an investigation log had been tampered with. The trial was halted by Judge Nic Madge, who said in court: "I am satisfied that officers at the heart of this prosecution have deliberately concealed important evidence and lied on oath. The bad faith and misconduct started in 2011, when two of the principal defendants were arrested, and has continued throughout the course of this trial. In my judgment, it has tainted the whole case. It has tainted the prosecution against all seven defendants. It is a case in which the prosecution should not be allowed to benefit from the serious misbehaviour of the officer in the case or the disclosure officer". The Reverend Ntege and six other defendants were formally acquitted of all 17 charges, which related to marriages of convenience in order to bypass immigration laws. Channel 4 News later reported that three immigration officers had been suspended and that the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) would be conducting an investigation. The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) said that it accepted that the handling of the case had fallen below acceptable standards and that it would conduct a full review.[24] Despite the collapse of the 2014 criminal case, in 2019 a Church of England disciplinary panel removed Ntege from his office and from the priesthood over complaints concerning marriages, their administration, and the improper retention of funds.[25]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

UK Border Agency

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The UK Border Agency (UKBA) was an executive agency of the Home Office established in April 2008 through the merger of the Border and Immigration Agency, UKvisas, and the port-of-entry functions of HM Revenue and Customs, with the primary mandate to secure the United Kingdom's borders by controlling migration, enforcing immigration laws, and processing visa and settlement applications. Intended to streamline fragmented border operations into a unified force capable of addressing rising illegal immigration and organized crime, the agency initially operated with over 25,000 staff across 135 countries but quickly encountered systemic challenges including inadequate IT systems, massive case backlogs exceeding 300,000 unresolved immigration applications, and operational inefficiencies that undermined its effectiveness. These issues, compounded by poor handling of complaints and MP correspondence as detailed in independent inspections, led to widespread criticism of incompetence and prompted its abolition in March 2013, with functions redistributed to specialized units including UK Visas and Immigration for application processing and Immigration Enforcement for criminal investigations. Despite some enforcement successes such as seizures of illicit goods and disruptions of smuggling networks, the UKBA's short tenure exemplified the difficulties of consolidating complex border responsibilities under a single oversized entity, ultimately requiring structural reform to restore control and efficiency.

History

Formation

The UK Border Agency (UKBA) was established on 1 April 2008 as an executive agency of the Home Office, formed by merging the Border and Immigration Agency (BIA), UK Visas, and the port detection and entry clearance functions previously handled by HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC). This restructuring centralized fragmented responsibilities for immigration control, visa issuance, and border enforcement under a single entity to streamline operations and enhance accountability. The agency's formation was underpinned by the UK Borders Act 2007, which received on 30 October 2007 and empowered expanded border policing powers, including the designation of certain immigration officers with authority equivalent to police, to address coordination failures and mounting pressures from illegal entries and asylum processing delays prior to . The merger aimed to counter threats from uncontrolled migration, , and by unifying intelligence, enforcement, and frontline controls, reducing overlaps that had hindered effective border management. Lin Homer was appointed as the inaugural Chief Executive, tasked with leading the integration of approximately 25,000 staff and implementing unified operational goals focused on securing borders while facilitating legitimate travel.

Early Operations and Expansion

Upon its establishment in April 2008, the UK Border Agency integrated over 25,000 staff from predecessor organizations to bolster enforcement capabilities, enabling a shift toward proactive, intelligence-led operations against people smuggling and organized immigration crime. This included deploying specialized teams to disrupt smuggling networks, with joint efforts alongside police leading to the dismantling of multiple organized crime groups and over 170 arrests in the initial years. The agency's strategic focus emphasized border security through enhanced detection and prevention, incorporating tools like mobile screening equipment at ports and airports to intercept illicit activities. A key component of early expansion was the advancement of the e-Borders programme, which mandated carriers to provide advance passenger information for screening against watchlists. By late 2009, the system aimed to cover 60% of international travelers, building on prior pilots that had screened tens of millions of passengers and contributed to thousands of arrests, including for terrorism-related offenses. Airlines supplied data on entrants and exits, yielding initial successes in identifying risks pre-arrival, though technical and carrier compliance challenges delayed comprehensive rollout beyond air routes. In parallel, UKBA addressed the inherited asylum legacy backlog, comprising around 450,000 pre-2007 cases, under a pledge to clear them within five years by 2011. The agency processed hundreds of thousands of these applications, reallocating resources to meet quarterly targets and reducing the older caseload through decisions granting settlement to 42% and removals for 11%, amid policy emphasis on faster resolutions to deter unfounded claims. This effort aligned with broader tightening of controls, prioritizing enforcement over indefinite delays.

Decline and Dissolution

The backlog of asylum and cases handled by the UK Border Agency escalated significantly in , reaching over 300,000 unresolved cases by the end of June, representing a 9% increase from the prior quarter and signaling systemic overload in processing capacities. This accumulation stemmed from entrenched challenges, including intricate legal frameworks derived from directives that complicated decision-making and enforcement, coupled with inadequate rates for failed applicants and offenders, which perpetuated unresolved volumes. The agency's semi-autonomous structure, intended to streamline operations when formed in , instead fostered diffused accountability, exacerbating delays as frontline enforcement struggled under policy expansions without proportional resource scaling or IT upgrades capable of managing the caseload surge. Parliamentary oversight intensified scrutiny during this period, with the House of Commons Home Affairs Committee issuing multiple reports in 2012 and 2013 that diagnosed a self-reinforcing "vicious cycle" of inefficiencies: protracted processing bred additional administrative burdens, such as unopened correspondence exceeding 100,000 items in some instances, while leadership shortcomings and outdated systems hindered resolution targets. These critiques, drawn from quarterly performance data submitted by the agency, underscored deeper structural misalignments, including cultural silos between enforcement and administrative functions that diluted operational focus and enabled backlogs to compound amid rising inflows. Independent inspections further revealed hidden archives of cases, totaling tens of thousands, that had evaded timely review, highlighting under-enforcement as a core driver rather than mere procedural lapses. On 26 March , announced the agency's dissolution in a statement to , declaring it "not good enough" and citing inherent incompetence in managing borders amid these cascading failures. The decision to reintegrate UKBA's functions—immigration operations and enforcement—directly into directorates aimed to restore ministerial oversight and disrupt the accountability vacuum that had allowed bureaucratic inertia to prevail. May emphasized that the agency's entrapment in cycles of legal complexity and lax policy adherence had undermined removals and public confidence, necessitating a return to centralized control to enforce stricter compliance without the insulating model. This restructuring, effective by summer , reflected recognition that the 2008 centralization experiment had amplified overload from policy demands exceeding adaptive capacity, prioritizing direct governance over semi-independence.

Mandate and Structure

Core Responsibilities

The UK Border Agency (UKBA) was formed on 1 April 2008 as an of the , merging the Border and Immigration Agency, UKvisas, and the detection operations of , with a statutory mandate to secure the UK's borders against unauthorized entry by regulating the arrival, stay, and departure of non-British citizens. Its core duties centered on enforcing laws to prevent illegal migration, including examining entrants at ports to verify legitimate status and deny admission to those posing risks to public safety, economic stability, or . This involved frontline controls to block irregular arrivals while enabling lawful travel, grounded in the principle of sovereign border integrity under the and subsequent legislation like the UK Borders Act 2007. UKBA's immigration responsibilities extended to adjudicating applications prior to travel, processing asylum claims from arrivals or those already in the UK, and executing removals of individuals lacking legal basis to remain, such as overstayers, failed asylum seekers, and foreign national offenders. These functions prioritized the expulsion of unauthorized migrants to deter abuse of the system and uphold enforcement of entry conditions, with decisions informed by statutory criteria assessing and obligations. The agency was required to balance claim verification against the need to minimize fiscal and social costs from prolonged unauthorized presence. In parallel, UKBA integrated customs detection duties to combat smuggling of prohibited goods, protect revenue streams from evasion, and support counter-terrorism efforts through intelligence collection at entry points. This encompassed screening cargo, vehicles, and passengers for illicit items like narcotics, weapons, or undeclared excise goods, ensuring compliance with fiscal laws while identifying threats that could undermine border sovereignty. Overall, these responsibilities emphasized proactive legitimacy checks to safeguard against economic burdens and security vulnerabilities posed by unvetted entries.

Organizational Framework

The UK Border Agency (UKBA) operated as an within the , reporting hierarchically to the via the and a central executive board that coordinated directorates for border operations, , and visa services. Enforcement activities were devolved to regional directorates across , , , and , enabling localized responses to illegal migration and overstays, while visa and asylum processing remained highly centralized in to streamline administrative workloads. This bifurcated model, intended to balance field-level agility with in casework, instead fostered silos that hindered cross-directorate data flow and decision-making in time-sensitive security contexts. UKBA's workforce comprised primarily civil servants in operational and administrative roles, numbering around 24,000 by 2012, with enforcement teams incorporating specialist immigration officers granted limited police-like powers but few formal police secondees. Reliance on private contractors for ancillary functions, such as detainee escorts and facility management, introduced further fragmentation, exacerbating cultural tensions between frontline enforcement personnel—accustomed to rapid, risk-based judgments—and visa processing staff focused on procedural compliance, which undermined cohesive threat assessment. Information technology systems, notably the Case Information Database (CID) established in 2002, were designed to unify case data from merged predecessor entities like the Border and Immigration Agency, yet persistent legacy incompatibilities caused frequent freezes, poor with ancillary tools, and delayed intelligence sharing across siloed units. These technical shortcomings amplified organizational divides, as evidenced by internal audits revealing duplicated efforts and unaddressed vulnerabilities in high-stakes border security, contributing to the agency's restructuring in 2013.

Enforcement Powers

The UK Border Agency (UKBA) derived its primary immigration enforcement powers from Schedule 2 of the , which authorized officers to examine arriving persons, refuse entry to those lacking valid leave or satisfying the immigration rules, and detain individuals without a warrant if there were reasonable grounds to believe they were removable or required further examination prior to departure. These provisions enabled proactive by allowing immediate refusal and removal directions for overstayers or , with officers empowered to use reasonable force where necessary to effect compliance. The Borders Act 2007 further strengthened these capabilities by designating certain immigration officers with expanded arrest powers for offenses related to or facilitation, permitting detention for up to 48 hours pending handover to police or other authorities, and streamlining forced removals by limiting appeals in cases of foreign criminals. In parallel, UKBA's Border Force division inherited and exercised customs enforcement functions at ports and airports, previously managed by (HMRC), encompassing searches of persons, vehicles, and premises for prohibited or restricted goods, seizure of such as narcotics or undeclared cash exceeding £10,000, and arrests for offenses under the Customs and Excise Management Act 1979. This concurrent jurisdiction with HMRC facilitated integrated border checks, where officers could invoke customs powers independently of assessments to interdict illicit trade flows. To support these enforcement actions, UKBA expanded its detention estate to over 3,000 places by 2012, primarily through immigration removal centres like those at and Yarl's Wood, enabling the administrative holding of deportees and failed entrants pending removal despite potential interruptions from judicial reviews invoking Article 5 of the . Such capacity underpinned assertive removal operations, though obligations imposed temporal limits on detention to prevent , requiring periodic reviews to justify continued holding against risks of absconding or non-cooperation.

Operational Mechanisms

Border Control Practices

The UK Border Agency (UKBA) implemented risk-based at ports of entry, prioritizing intelligence-led targeting to address vulnerabilities in monitoring arrivals amid high volumes of passengers. Officers at airports, seaports, and rail terminals used profiling tools to categorize travelers by risk levels, focusing examinations on those exhibiting indicators such as inconsistent , suspicious itineraries, or matches against watchlists, while expediting low-risk individuals through automated e-gates where feasible. This approach aimed to counter irregular migration and threats without universal checks, which would overwhelm resources; for instance, selective questioning and secondary inspections were triggered by analysis from the e-Borders program, which processed advance to flag potential overstayers or prohibited entrants. Biometric technologies formed a core component of UKBA's frontline verification, with fingerprints routinely collected from applicants and non-visa nationals at entry points, cross-referenced against the agency's databases to detect prior overstays or bans. Iris scans were deployed via the Iris Recognition Immigration System (IRIS) for pre-registered frequent travelers, enabling rapid automated clearance at select airports until its partial phase-out amid technical issues; these measures, integrated into the IDENT-like records system, prevented re-entry for approximately 30,000 individuals identified through matches linked to previous violations. Such enhanced causal deterrence by linking physical presence to digital trails, reducing reliance on self-reported data prone to . To preempt unauthorized arrivals, UKBA mandated carrier sanctions on airlines and transport operators, imposing fines of up to £2,000 per undocumented passenger lacking required visas or entry clearance, enforced through pre-flight checks via Advance Passenger Information () submissions. Airlines were required to transmit —including passport details and travel history—at least an hour before departure, allowing UKBA to instruct denial of boarding for high-risk cases flagged by risk engines analyzing against immigration blacklists. This externalized to carriers incentivized verification upstream, with over 1,000 penalties issued annually in peak years to curb clandestine entries, though evasion persisted via falsified documents.

Visa and Immigration Processing

The UK Border Agency (UKBA) managed the adjudication of visa applications under the (PBS), implemented in February 2008 to regulate non-European Economic Area migration through five tiers: Tier 1 for highly skilled migrants, Tier 2 for skilled workers with sponsorship, Tier 3 for low-skilled workers (largely unused), Tier 4 for students, and Tier 5 for temporary workers and visitors. Processing involved verifying points criteria such as qualifications, English language proficiency, maintenance funds, and sponsorship validity, with decisions issued from UK visa application centers abroad or UK posts. UKBA set service standards targeting 90% of non-settlement visa decisions within 15 working days and 98% within 30 working days, though these were for straightforward cases excluding complex or sponsored applications. Rising application volumes, peaking at over 2.5 million visa decisions annually by 2011, frequently overwhelmed UKBA's capacity, leading to persistent backlogs and failure to meet targets in high-volume tiers like Tier 4 student visas. This strain resulted in leniency, as evidenced by operational pressures prioritizing case throughput over rigorous verification, with internal audits revealing elevated error rates in approvals for ineligible applicants due to incomplete checks on sponsorship authenticity and funds. For instance, Tier 2 processing delays extended beyond standards, contributing to a broader immigration case backlog exceeding 300,000 by 2012, where volume-driven workflows reduced scrutiny and increased grant rates for marginally qualifying cases to alleviate queues. Asylum claim processing by UKBA followed a structured workflow under the New Asylum Model, beginning with initial screening interviews to register claims, gather , and identify vulnerable cases or fast-track eligibility, followed by substantive interviews assessing risks and appeals to the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal. Fast-track procedures applied to manifestly unfounded claims from designated safe countries or those qualifying for accelerated removal, aiming for decisions within days via detained processes, though implementation faced criticism for inadequate access and high refusal-upheld rates on . UKBA handled approximately 20,000-25,000 initial asylum decisions yearly during its tenure, but substantive backlogs grew due to complex credibility assessments and resource shortages. To address the inherited legacy asylum backlog—stemming from over 400,000 pre-2007 cases—UKBA established dedicated clearance units employing simplified protocols to expedite resolutions, reducing the oldest cases by targeted grants or administrative closures. By 2012, partial progress cleared segments of the backlog, but inspections identified accuracy errors, including wrongful grants from rushed credibility evaluations and overlooked evidence, attributed to performance pressures equating volume cleared with success metrics. These initiatives, while reducing headline figures, compromised decision quality, with error rates in legacy files exceeding 20% in sampled reviews, fostering a culture of leniency to meet arbitrary clearance targets amid sustained inflow pressures.

International Cooperation and Controls

The UK Border Agency managed the UK's participation in the (CTA), a longstanding open-border arrangement with , the Isle of Man, and the originating in 1923, which dispensed with routine checks at land, sea, and air crossings between these jurisdictions. Controls instead depended on reciprocal sharing, joint operations with Irish counterparts, and risk-based inland to address potential abuse by irregular migrants, such as those gaining entry to without clearance before onward travel to . A 2011 independent inspection of UKBA operations in and identified strengths in disruption tactics but criticized inconsistent flows and limited proactive checks, noting documented instances of overstayers and undocumented entrants exploiting CTA routes due to the absence of physical barriers. Complementing domestic efforts, UKBA implemented juxtaposed controls under bilateral agreements, including the 2003 Le Touquet Treaty with France, enabling UK officers to perform immigration, passport, and customs examinations at overseas sites such as Eurostar terminals in Brussels and Paris, and ferry and Channel Tunnel facilities in Calais, Dunkirk, and Coquelles. These extraterritorial checks intercepted unauthorized passengers before embarkation, with UKBA reporting thousands of refusals annually; however, a 2013 inspection revealed systemic weaknesses, including porous French perimeter security allowing stowaways to breach sites undetected and overburdened staffing that hampered thorough searches, resulting in persistent clandestine arrivals at UK borders. Such dependencies on host-nation cooperation introduced causal vulnerabilities, as lapses in French enforcement—exacerbated by migrant camps near Calais—frequently undermined the preventive intent, with data showing elevated detection rates only partially offsetting undetected entries. Under the EU's , UKBA coordinated asylum responsibility determinations and transfer requests to other member states for claimants deemed to have entered via those territories first, issuing over 5,000 outgoing requests in 2012 alone. Yet, efficacy remained low, with transfer rates averaging 20-30% of accepted requests between 2008 and 2013, hampered by recipient states' frequent non-compliance, successful appeals citing reception condition risks, and absconding—factors UKBA attributed to overloaded systems in frontline countries like and . This framework, while theoretically streamlining claims processing, often failed to deter secondary movements to the , as non-cooperative states declined take-backs and judicial interventions prolonged stays, illustrating trade-offs where supranational rules constrained unilateral returns despite bilateral data-sharing supplements.

Performance Metrics

Achievements in Enforcement

The UK Border Agency executed approximately 52,000 enforced removals during the 2011-12 financial year, targeting offenders, failed asylum seekers, and port refusals. Among these, around 4,500 involved offenders subject to automatic under section 32 of the Borders Act 2007, which required the Secretary of State to issue orders for non-British citizens convicted of offences carrying sentences of 12 months or more, barring specified exceptions related to or public good. Intelligence-driven enforcement disrupted 74 groups and resulted in over 2,700 arrests at borders, curtailing and trafficking networks. The agency's e-Borders system screened passengers against databases, detecting 2,800 criminals—including 276 potentially violent offenders—in the preceding year and preventing around 9,000 incorrectly documented travelers from boarding flights. Biometric enrollment initiatives under UKBA identified individuals linked to terrorist activities, enabling exclusions from entry and bolstering post-7 July 2005 security protocols through watchlist integrations. These measures exported controls upstream, mitigating risks from high-threat passengers prior to arrival.

Quantitative Impacts on Immigration Flows

During its operational period from 2008 to 2013, the UK Border Agency (UKBA) oversaw enforcement actions that included annual enforced removals averaging approximately 11,000 individuals, primarily failed asylum seekers and visa overstayers, while voluntary returns added around 15,000 more, yielding total returns of about 26,000 per year by 2012. These figures represented a modest offset against net long-term migration, which peaked at 252,000 for the year ending June 2010 and averaged over 200,000 annually during the UKBA era, driven largely by non-EU inflows exceeding 200,000 yearly alongside emigration of around 300,000-350,000. Visa grants contributed substantially to inflows, with entry clearance visas issued totaling over 2 million annually by 2010, though many were short-term; long-term work and study visas alone numbered around 150,000-200,000 non-EU grants per year, underscoring limited containment of legal migration volumes despite processing backlogs exceeding 100,000 cases at times.
Year Ending JuneNet Long-Term Migration (thousands)Enforced Removals (approx.)
200816310,000
200919811,000
201025212,000
201120511,500
201217712,000
201321211,000
Data aggregated from estimates and returns statistics; removals reflect enforced actions only, excluding voluntary departures. UKBA's asylum processing yielded declining initial grant rates, from 28% in to 24% by 2011, with absolute grants falling to under 5,000 annually by 2012 amid applications stabilizing at 20,000-25,000, attributable to enhanced credibility interviews and evidence requirements rather than volume reductions alone. Clandestine entry detections, particularly lorry stowaways, showed variability but overall stabilization post-2008, with annual detections dropping from around 9,000 in 2009 to approximately 6,000 by 2013, linked to intensified carrier liability fines and intelligence-sharing with EU ports, though undetected entries likely persisted at comparable scales. These metrics indicate UKBA's enforcement marginally curbed irregular flows but exerted negligible downward pressure on net migration aggregates, which were predominantly shaped by policy-driven legal entries and economic pull factors.

Criticisms and Controversies

Operational Inefficiencies

The UK Border Agency (UKBA) encountered substantial systemic bottlenecks in processing applications, culminating in massive case backlogs that hindered timely and decision-making. By July , the agency had amassed 276,460 unresolved and asylum cases, including legacy files from prior unresolved claims, with the total disputed caseload reaching 312,726 by September of that year. These delays stemmed from resource misallocation, such as the failure to open over 100,000 pieces of incoming correspondence at one point in late , alongside an over-dependence on protracted mechanisms that prolonged case lifecycles without commensurate staffing or procedural reforms. Such inefficiencies not only deferred removals but also created incentives for marginal or fraudulent submissions, as applicants exploited extended timelines to remain in the UK pending outcomes. IT infrastructure shortcomings further compounded operational paralysis, with systems like the e-Borders program—designed for automated traveler tracking and biometric integration—delivering persistent failures. Launched under UKBA oversight, the initiative faced contractual breakdowns, including the 2010 termination of a key deal with Systems for missing milestones, leading to fragmented and reliance on manual verification processes. By 2015, expenditures exceeded £830 million without achieving full functionality, resulting in data silos, elevated error rates in biometric cross-matching, and duplicated efforts across siloed teams. These technical deficits eroded enforcement efficacy, as incomplete passenger data hindered risk assessments and contributed to unchecked entries. Detention management revealed additional causal weaknesses in post-release oversight, where inadequate tracking protocols for individuals bailed pending appeals fostered high absconding risks. UKBA's controlled archives held nearly 95,000 cases by mid-2012, many involving detainees released into the without robust electronic monitoring or follow-up, amplifying losses to follow-up and straining re-detection resources. This misallocation prioritized over precision, perpetuating cycles of inefficiency wherein appeals overwhelmed capacity, diverting personnel from frontline controls to administrative remediation rather than preventive measures.

Major Scandals and Failures

In 2012, undercover investigations by the UK Border Agency revealed extensive abuse of the student visa system through bogus colleges that issued fraudulent enrollment confirmations to enable and overstaying, with operations targeting private providers suspected of facilitating immigration scams. These probes identified numerous such institutions, prompting the revocation of sponsoring licenses for hundreds of colleges and the curtailment of visas for thousands of implicated students, including a high-profile case in 2012 where Metropolitan University's license was revoked, affecting over 2,000 international students due to failures in monitoring attendance and genuine study intentions. The scandal highlighted systemic vetting lapses, as tip-offs about suspicious students were often ignored, allowing potentially thousands to remain unlawfully. A separate failure emerged in July 2012 when parliamentary scrutiny uncovered the Border Agency's "migration refusal pool," comprising approximately 150,000 to 174,000 refused asylum and leave extension cases where the agency lacked data on whether individuals had departed the , effectively abandoning enforcement and permitting potential overstayers—including those with criminal records—to evade removal. chief inspector of borders and condemned this backlog, noting that around 40% of cases had not even received formal refusal notices, undermining accountability and contributing to uncontrolled inflows. In response, the agency outsourced tracking to in September 2012, but the incident exposed chronic case management breakdowns, with the Home Affairs Committee expressing disturbance over the untracked pool's scale. Echoing prior vetting deficiencies, a landmark sham marriage prosecution collapsed on October 23, 2014, when Southwark Crown Court halted the trial of Reverend Nathan Ntege, accused of orchestrating hundreds of fraudulent ceremonies for visa purposes, after Judge Nicholas Loraine-Smith ruled that UK Visas and Immigration officers—successors to UK Border Agency functions—had lied under oath and deliberately withheld critical evidence, including interview records. Three officers were suspended, and a parallel case involving an imam accused of nearly 600 sham unions similarly failed due to Home Office disclosure failures, revealing entrenched corruption risks in marriage certification processes inherited from UK Border Agency oversight lapses. These events underscored breakdowns in evidentiary integrity and operational controls that enabled widespread circumvention of entry rules.

Policy and Resource Debates

Critics from left-leaning perspectives have argued that the Border Agency's operational shortcomings stemmed primarily from austerity-driven resource cuts following the 2010 , which necessitated staff reductions of approximately 1,900 positions in 2010-11 alongside broader efficiency demands. These constraints, they contend, hampered case processing and enforcement amid rising caseloads. However, data indicate the agency retained over 21,000 staff and allocated £2.2 billion in combined expenditure with for 2011-12, underscoring that persistent backlogs—reaching 500,000 cases by 2013—arose not from absolute under-resourcing but from low productivity amid intricate procedural rules and high inbound volumes. Right-leaning analyses counter that foundational policy leniency predating UKBA's 2008 formation generated overwhelming immigration pressures, with net migration escalating from 48,000 in 1997 to 140,000 by 1998 under the Blair government and remaining elevated thereafter due to measures like enlargement without transitional controls and implicit amnesties via backlog tolerances. These inflows, compounded by free movement rules limiting sovereign enforcement, created structural overload that no agency staffing level could sustainably address without policy overhaul; UKBA inherited and amplified this legacy, as evidenced by stalled deportation targets despite mandated removals under the UK Borders Act 2007. Post-Brexit reforms, restoring full sovereignty, have been cited as validation that prior supranational constraints, rather than mere funding shortfalls, undermined efficacy. From an empirical standpoint, UKBA's mandates embodied inherent tensions between security-driven enforcement and human rights imperatives, such as and Article 8 family life protections under the , which fueled protracted appeals and low removal rates—often below 50% of targets—for foreign national offenders. noted vacuums, including inaction on 14,000 reconsideration requests due to undefined procedures, eroding operational resolve and perpetuating inefficiencies independent of resource fluctuations. This causal friction, rather than isolated underfunding, better explains systemic failures, as subsequent agency restructurings prioritized streamlined rules over expanded budgets.

Legacy and Reforms

Dissolution and Restructuring

On 26 March 2013, Home Secretary Theresa May announced the abolition of the UK Border Agency (UKBA) and its reintegration into the Home Office to address chronic operational failures and restore direct ministerial oversight. The decision followed parliamentary scrutiny highlighting the agency's inability to manage backlogs and enforce policies effectively, with May stating that UKBA was trapped in "a vicious cycle of complex law and poor enforcement of its own policies," necessitating an immediate leadership overhaul including the dismissal of the chief executive. The restructuring divided UKBA's functions into three distinct Home Office directorates: UK Visas and Immigration, responsible for visa processing and asylum decisions; Immigration Enforcement, focused on interior removals, compliance, and tackling illegal working; and Border Force, handling border controls at ports and airports, which had been operationally separated from UKBA a year earlier in March 2012 but was formally aligned under the new framework. This separation aimed to eliminate diffused accountability within the agency and enable specialized management under ministerial direction, with each directorate reporting directly to the Home Secretary. During the transition, existing case backlogs—numbering over 150,000 unresolved asylum and applications as of early 2013—were transferred to the new entities, accompanied by commitments to accelerate clearances through streamlined processes and enhanced performance targets. The reforms took effect progressively from April 2013, with full operational dissolution of UKBA by summer, marking a deliberate effort to dismantle the agency's insulated structure and impose tighter central control to break patterns of inefficiency.

Influence on Successor Agencies

, established as a distinct operational command in 2012 and fully separated from UKBA structures by 2013, inherited frontline port and airport control responsibilities with greater operational autonomy to address UKBA's coordination failures between enforcement and policy. This shift aimed to prioritize border security threats, yet legacy challenges from the e-Borders programme—intended to track travelers digitally but abandoned in 2010 after £830 million in costs and repeated delays—persisted into successor digital initiatives like the Border Systems Programme and Digital Services at the Border. By March 2019, these efforts had failed to deliver core functionalities, incurring additional hundreds of millions in expenditures without achieving automated traveler monitoring, underscoring enduring IT integration issues that UKBA's dissolution did not resolve. Immigration Enforcement, formed in 2013 to consolidate inland enforcement from UKBA's fragmented operations, emphasized voluntary and enforced returns, achieving peaks around 26,000 enforced returns in the year ending 2013 before a decline. Post-restructuring, success rates at first attempt reached 80% in 2014, reflecting targeted reforms in detention and removal logistics. However, recurring backlogs emerged, with enforced return attempt cancellations rising from 11% in 2013 to 52% by 2019 due to logistical barriers, legal appeals, and foreign cooperation gaps, indicating that structural inefficiencies in case management carried over despite the agency's narrower mandate. UK Visas and Immigration (UKVI), tasked with visa adjudication and compliance checks after absorbing UKBA's application processing in 2013, implemented streamlining measures that reduced standard visit visa targets from six weeks to three weeks by late 2013. Average processing for certain long-residency applications fell to around 48 days by 2014, aided by backlog clearance priorities and digital submissions. Despite these gains, vulnerabilities to persisted, with ongoing advisories highlighting in applications—such as misrepresented qualifications and sham marriages—exploiting inconsistent verification, as evidenced by parliamentary scrutiny of systemic gaps inherited from UKBA's overwhelmed pools of over 450,000 legacy cases.

Broader Implications for UK Sovereignty

The Border Agency's operational challenges during its tenure from 2008 to 2013 highlighted fundamental constraints on sovereignty imposed by free movement rules, which granted automatic to citizens to live and work in the without visa requirements or border checks for intra- travel. Despite UKBA's mandate to enforce immigration laws, net long-term migration averaged approximately 200,000 annually in the preceding Labour years and remained elevated, reaching peaks that strained public resources and infrastructure, as nationals comprised a significant portion of inflows beyond national control. This structural limitation—rooted in supranational commitments rather than alone—exemplified causal disconnects in enforcement efficacy, where agency efforts could not override treaty obligations, contributing to perceptions of diminished . Public disillusionment with these dynamics amplified demands for restored border autonomy, as evidenced by UKBA's high-profile failures, including systemic errors in processing and enforcement that eroded trust in the immigration apparatus. Surveys and political discourse in the ensuing years linked uncontrolled inflows to fiscal pressures, with net migration adding substantial amid shortages and NHS overloads, fostering a backlash that propelled as a central theme in 2016. Brexiteers framed regaining "control of borders" as essential to , directly addressing pre-Brexit incapacities like those under UKBA, where rules precluded points-based vetting for economic migrants from the bloc. The agency's 2013 dissolution underscored the inadequacy of bureaucratic expansion without policy , paving the way for post-Brexit reforms that ended free movement and introduced a skills-based model in 2021, enabling targeted decoupled from EU constraints. Empirically, this shift correlated with a fivefold increase in refusals of EU citizens at borders by 2023, demonstrating restored leverage over entry decisions and mitigating strains from prior unchecked volumes. UKBA's legacy thus informed a broader recalibration toward prioritizing causal mechanisms—such as visa caps and priorities—over supranational deference, affirming that true requires disentangling from external legal hierarchies to align migration with domestic capacities.

References

  1. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200809/cmselect/cmwelaf/601/601we35.htm
  2. https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/10201-001.-Executive-Summary.pdf
  3. https://www.rusi.org/publication/uk-announces-new-border-arrangements
  4. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2008/apr/03/immigrationpolicy.immigration
  5. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201314/cmselect/cmhaff/782/782.pdf
  6. https://policyexchange.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/The-Border-Audit.pdf
  7. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a80272bed915d74e622cc79/Lessons-to-learn_The-UK-Border-Agencys-handling-of-complaints-and-MPs-correspondence_2010.pdf
  8. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-border-agency-to-split-into-two-new-groups
  9. https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Reforming-the-UK-border-and-immigration-system.pdf
  10. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/weird-and-wonderful-finds-by-uk-border-agency
  11. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a80d19be5274a2e8ab52577/ukba-and-border-force.pdf
  12. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7c7e4f40f0b62aff6c20fc/7396.pdf
  13. https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/home-secretary-uk-border-agency-oral-statement
  14. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2007/30/contents
  15. https://www.ein.org.uk/blog/policy-and-legislative-changes-affecting-migration-uk-timeline-1983-2024
  16. https://www.statewatch.org/media/documents/news/2008/aug/uk-border-agency-rep.pdf
  17. https://www.internationalairportreview.com/article/270/a-visibly-strong-force-at-the-uk-border-uk-border-agency-a-year-of-achievement-and-strategic-objectives/
  18. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200708/cmselect/cmfaff/memo/annual/m22902.htm
  19. https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2020-09/27._united_kingdom_national_report_for_annual_policy_report_2008_final_version_nov_09_en.pdf
  20. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/fighting-illegal-immigration-at-the-frontline
  21. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200910/cmselect/cmhaff/170/17004.htm
  22. https://www.statewatch.org/media/documents/news/2009/dec/uk-e-borders-hasc-report.pdf
  23. https://counterterrorbusiness.com/features/securing-border
  24. https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/E-borders-and-successor-programmes.pdf
  25. https://www.migrationwatchuk.org/briefing-paper/11.26
  26. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201012/cmselect/cmhaff/929/929.pdf
  27. https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2012/nov/09/uk-border-agency-backlog-mps
  28. https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/mar/26/uk-border-agency-broken-up
  29. https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2012/nov/22/border-agency-asylum-claims-backlog
  30. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201213/cmselect/cmhaff/792/792.pdf
  31. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-21941395
  32. https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/1213467.pdf
  33. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2007/30
  34. https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/The-Border-force-securing-the-border.pdf
  35. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7c10f4e5274a7202e19567/ci-visasections-africa.pdf
  36. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201314/cmselect/cmhaff/486/486.pdf
  37. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201314/cmselect/cmhaff/616/616.pdf
  38. https://www.theguardian.com/public-leaders-network/2012/feb/21/uk-border-agency-split-ukba
  39. https://www.nao.org.uk/reports/reforming-uk-border-immigration-system-2/
  40. https://www.theregister.com/2023/09/06/home_office_assylum_system_replacement_deadline_missed/
  41. https://www.computerweekly.com/news/2240180259/Home-Office-needs-to-boost-capability-to-fix-UKBA-IT
  42. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7ca97de5274a2f304ef4de/8591.pdf
  43. https://www.crimeandjustice.org.uk/sites/default/files/PSJ%2520205%252C%2520Child%2520detention.pdf
  44. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/powers-and-operational-procedure/enforcement-planning-assessments-accessible
  45. https://hodigital.blog.gov.uk/2022/01/31/analysing-data-to-identify-risks-at-the-uk-border/
  46. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0969476509700761
  47. https://www.cnet.com/news/privacy/fingerprints-iris-scans-to-tighten-u-k-borders/
  48. https://www.gov.uk/guidance/clandestine-entrant-civil-penalty-scheme
  49. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a74cfe4ed915d3c7d528266/CarrierInformation.pdf
  50. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3402/egp.v7.24736
  51. https://www.pinsentmasons.com/out-law/guides/immigration-the-points-based-system
  52. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7acab8e5274a34770e727d/occ91.pdf
  53. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201213/cmselect/cmhaff/603/60309.htm
  54. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7c5a4240f0b660183b6ca7/detained-fast-track.pdf
  55. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a80ceab40f0b62305b8d418/UK-Border-Agencys-handling-of-legacy-asylum-and-migration-cases-22.11.2012.pdf
  56. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/inspection-report-of-the-common-travel-area-in-scotland-and-northern-ireland-may-2011
  57. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-border-agency-assess-common-travel-area
  58. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7caa31e5274a38e5755fdb/cta1.pdf
  59. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a8187c8ed915d74e6232c40/An-Inspection-of-Juxtaposed-Controls_Aug_2013.pdf
  60. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2011/1786/made
  61. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2013/aug/08/theresa-may-border-controls-report
  62. https://www.unhcr.org/uk/sites/uk/files/legacy-pdf/5bd1bdfe4.pdf
  63. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/oct/07/uk-migration-crisis-southern-europe
  64. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre?i=001-90500
  65. https://asylumineurope.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/report-download_uk_report_-_first_update.pdf
  66. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7ce151e5274a2c9a484ade/annual-report-11-12.pdf
  67. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2007/30/section/32
  68. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/e-borders-snares-2-800-criminals-at-the-border
  69. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/biometric-information/biometric-information-enrolment-accessible
  70. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a818f73e5274a2e87dbe483/An-Inspection-of-eborders_Oct_2013.pdf
  71. https://migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk/resources/briefings/returns-of-unauthorised-migrants-from-the-uk/
  72. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/internationalmigration/articles/internationalmigrationarecenthistory/2015-01-15
  73. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/immigration-statistics-october-to-december-2012/immigration-statistics-october-to-december-2012
  74. https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN01403/SN01403.pdf
  75. https://www.migrationwatchuk.org/briefing-paper/502/illegal-clandestine-arrivals-by-lorry
  76. https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN06077/SN06077.pdf
  77. https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2012/jul/23/mps-border-agency-backlog
  78. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-21920116
  79. https://www.itv.com/news/story/2012-11-22/uk-border-agency-immigration-home-secretary-theresa-may-chief-inspector-borders-john-vine/
  80. https://committees.parliament.uk/work/4307/eborders-inquiry/
  81. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-34988913
  82. https://committees.parliament.uk/work/3140/the-work-of-the-uk-border-agency/news/179798/border-agencys-backlog-spiralling-out-of-control/
  83. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-19425955
  84. https://www.theguardian.com/education/2012/aug/30/london-metropolitan-university-international-students
  85. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-20536551
  86. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/immigration/9376048/UK-Border-Agency-failing-to-deal-with-150000-illegal-migrants-says-watchdog.html
  87. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201213/cmselect/cmhaff/603/603.pdf
  88. https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2012/jul/05/migrants-denied-uk-stay-missing
  89. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-19637409
  90. https://www.parliament.uk/external/committees/committee-news-pre-oct-2020/2012/july/120723-UKBA-Rpt-published/
  91. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-29745433
  92. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2805277/Vicar-accused-operating-conveyor-belt-sham-marriages-walks-free-court-trial-collapses-judge-accuses-officials-hiding-evidence-lying-oath.html
  93. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/cps-to-launch-review-after-shambolic-fake-marriage-case-collapses-9814692.html
  94. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/immigration/11195771/Imams-sham-marriage-trial-collapses-after-Home-Office-blunder.html
  95. https://www.channel4.com/news/trial-collapses-after-immigration-officials-lie-under-oath
  96. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7ce3e140f0b6629523c6c5/annual-report-10-11.pdf
  97. https://news.sky.com/story/uk-immigration-backlog-37-years-long-10440356
  98. https://www.migrationwatchuk.org/briefing-paper/355
  99. https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2013-03-26/debates/13032655000006/UKBorderAgency
  100. https://freemovement.org.uk/what-is-the-law-on-the-deportation-of-non-eu-foreign-criminals-and-their-human-rights/
  101. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-21170495
  102. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6821aec3f16c0654b19060ac/restoring-control-over-the-immigration-system-white-paper.pdf
  103. https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/sn06719/
  104. https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/The-performance-of-the-Home-Office-2013-14.pdf
  105. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/62d7d054d3bf7f2865c6fe49/BF_Independent_Review_v2_FINAL_WEB__002___002_.pdf
  106. https://www.nao.org.uk/reports/digital-services-at-the-border/
  107. https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Immigration-enforcement.pdf
  108. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-improvements-are-introduced-to-the-visa-service-in-russia
  109. https://immigrationandvisasolicitors.co.uk/uk-immigration-uk-visa-application-processing-times/
  110. https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/76804/pdf/
  111. https://migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk/resources/briefings/eu-migration-to-and-from-the-uk/
  112. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-21940901
  113. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/nov/15/how-immigration-became-britains-most-toxic-political-issue
  114. https://ukandeu.ac.uk/sovereignty-and-brexit-control-of-what-exactly/
  115. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5bfe7d6c40f0b65b14fc6631/28_November_EU_Exit_-_Taking_back_control_of_our_borders__money_and_laws_while_protecting_our_economy__security_and_Union__1_.pdf
  116. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/nov/25/fivefold-rise-number-eu-citizens-refused-entry-uk-since-brexit
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.