Hubbry Logo
Windeby IWindeby IMain
Open search
Windeby I
Community hub
Windeby I
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Windeby I
Windeby I
Windeby I
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Upper body of Windeby I

Windeby I is the name given to the bog body found preserved in a peat bog near Windeby, Northern Germany, in 1952. Until recently[when?], the body was also called the Windeby Girl, since an archaeologist believed it to be the body of a 14-year-old girl, because of its slight build. Heather Gill-Robinson, a Canadian anthropologist and pathologist, used DNA testing to show the body was actually that of a sixteen-year-old boy.[1] The body has been radiocarbon-dated to between 41 BC and 118 AD.[2]

History

[edit]

The body was discovered by commercial peat cutters in 1952[3], and is on display at the Landesmuseum at the Schloß Gottorf in Schleswig, Germany. By the time the body was noticed by the peat cutters[4], and before the peat-cutting machinery could be shut down, a hand, a foot, and a leg had been severed from the body. The body had been very well preserved by the peat, and despite the damage, it is still an important archaeological discovery. Shortly after the discovery of Windeby I, another bog body (an adult male) was found nearby and dubbed Windeby II[5].

Description

[edit]

The body appears to have a half-shaven head and a woollen blindfold tied across the eyes. Recent[when?] examinations[by whom?] have however established that the hair over the half of the scalp was not shaven, but had rather decomposed due to being exposed to oxygen a little longer than the rest of the body.[citation needed] The "blindfold" is in fact a woollen band, made using the sprang technique, that was probably used to tie back the boy's shoulder-length hair and which had slipped down over his face after death.

Cause of death

[edit]

It had been written that the individual seems to have been blindfolded and may have drowned in about 20 inches of water,[6] but research by Heather Gill-Robinson has led to this theory being disputed.[7] Jarrett A. Lobell and Samir S. Patel wrote that the body "shows no signs of trauma, and evidence from the skeleton suggests the 14 year old girl [sic] may have died from repeated bouts of illness or malnutrition."[8]

Bones of Windeby I temporarily on display at Archäologisches Landesmuseum
Reconstruction process of the face, by Richard Helmer

See also

[edit]

Some notable bog bodies

[edit]

(BCE/CE dates given are radiocarbon dates.)

[edit]

Sources

[edit]
  • Gebühr, Michael (2002). Verein zur Förderung des Archäologischen Landesmuseums e.V. (ed.). Moorleichen in Schleswig-Holstein (in German). Neumünster: Wachholtz. ISBN 978-3-529-01870-1.
  • van der Sanden, Wijnand (1996). Through Nature to Eternity - The Bog Bodies of Northwest Europe. Amsterdam: Batavian Lion International. ISBN 978-90-6707-418-6.

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Windeby I

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Windeby I is a bog body discovered in 1952 by peat cutters in a mire known as the Domlandsmoor near the village of Windeby in Schleswig-Holstein, northern Germany. The remains date to the Roman Iron Age, with radiocarbon dating placing the time of death between approximately 41 BCE and 118 CE. Initially identified as the body of a 14-year-old girl due to its slender build and delicate features, subsequent analyses, including DNA testing in the mid-2000s, confirmed it as that of a 16-year-old male. The body is notable for a woolen band across the eyes, interpreted as a blindfold, and asymmetrical hair growth suggesting one side was shaved, features that fueled early theories of ritual punishment or sacrifice. The preservation is attributed to the bog's acidic, low-oxygen environment, which tanned the skin like leather while demineralizing bones and teeth. The discovery occurred when the body emerged partially during mechanical peat harvesting, prompting immediate excavation by local archaeologists. Found face down and largely naked, with remnants of woolen clothing on the lower body, the upper and head were better preserved than the legs, which had deteriorated more severely. Early examinations in the 1950s assumed a violent , possibly as punishment for an illicit affair, linking it speculatively to a nearby male bog (Windeby II), though later dating showed they were separated by centuries. Re-evaluations using CT scans, 3D imaging, and skeletal analysis by Heather Gill-Robinson in the 2000s revealed no evidence of trauma, instead pointing to natural causes such as or illness, evidenced by growth interruptions in the bones. The "blindfold" is now considered a displaced hair band affected by shrinkage, and the "shaved" hair likely resulted from post-mortem decay or excavation damage rather than deliberate alteration. Housed at the Archäologisches Landesmuseum Schloss Gottorf in Schleswig, Germany, Windeby I has been subject to ongoing interdisciplinary studies, including isotopic analysis indicating a largely vegetarian diet with low animal protein intake, consistent with a possible low social status or regional food scarcity. While early interpretations emphasized ritual violence in line with Roman-era accounts of Germanic practices, contemporary scholarship views the deposition as potentially accidental, with the bog body providing key insights into Iron Age health, diet, and preservation processes in northern European wetlands. The case exemplifies how advanced forensic techniques have reshaped understandings of bog bodies, challenging gender assumptions and sacrificial narratives.

Discovery

Initial Find

On May 19, 1952, peat cutters engaged in routine harvesting operations at the near the village of Windeby in , , accidentally uncovered human remains. Initial exposure revealed parts of the remains, including a hand, foot, and leg that had been severed by the peat-cutting machinery, while the body itself remained partially intact with discernible hair and skin. Upon noticing the find, the peat cutters immediately halted operations and notified local authorities and archaeologists, who promptly marked the site to prevent further disturbance and prepare for systematic recovery. Nearly three weeks later, on June 9, 1952, workers discovered another set of human remains in the same , designated Windeby II, highlighting the site's potential as a repository for ancient deposits.

Excavation and Conservation

The excavation of Windeby I began immediately following its exposure on May 19, 1952, during mechanical peat cutting operations in the Domlandsmoor bog near the town of Windeby in Schleswig-Holstein, northern Germany. Local archaeologists, led by experts from the Schleswig-Holstein region, conducted a manual recovery using shovels and trowels to carefully peel away surrounding peat layers, minimizing disturbance to the fragile remains. The process revealed partial dismemberment of the body, likely caused by the initial machinery exposure, prompting on-site efforts to reassemble displaced fragments such as limbs and the head before full extraction. To preserve the waterlogged state essential for the body's integrity, the remains were lifted intact within a large block of surrounding peat, which was then wrapped in damp cloths and secured to retain moisture during handling. This peat block, containing the prone, face-down positioned body along with associated artifacts such as a woolen band around the head, was transported by truck to the Archaeologisches Landesmuseum Schloss Gottorf in Schleswig for secure storage and further processing. Early documentation included black-and-white photographs and hand-drawn sketches capturing the body's orientation and contextual details within the bog matrix. At the , initial conservation in the mid-1950s focused on stabilizing the soft tissues through chemical treatments, including the application of preservatives to prevent and bacterial decay. The skeletal elements were separated from the preserved and organs for separate study, while the brain tissue—remarkably intact—was carefully extracted, molded in a cast for record, and stored apart but not reintegrated into the remains, with its current whereabouts unknown. Artificial was later added over the abdominal and thoracic areas to support the structure during display preparation. These efforts, though limited by contemporary techniques, successfully halted immediate degradation and allowed for long-term exhibition.

Physical Description

Appearance and Preservation

The body of Windeby I exhibits the characteristic preservation of bog remains, with skin tanned to a dark brown color due to the interaction with sphagnan, a released by decaying in the environment. The hair, originally likely light in color, has turned reddish as a result of the 's acidic conditions, which chemically alter the pigmentation during the mummification process. Internal organs are partially intact, preserved by the anaerobic, low-oxygen setting of the combined with from that inhibit bacterial decay and enzymatic activity. Upon recovery, the body measured approximately 1.2 meters in , reflecting a slender build consistent with a young adolescent, though shrinkage affects precise measurements. A notable feature is a band woven using the technique, wrapped around the head to secure shoulder-length hair, which had slipped to cover the eyes post-mortem. remnants include the band and a fur cape over the shoulders. The apparent half-shaven on one side resulted from uneven post-mortem , where exposure to oxygen on the more elevated side caused , rather than any pre-death alteration. The remains suffered significant damage during discovery, with the right leg, foot, and hand severed by peat-cutting machinery prior to excavation. The remained largely intact, but skeletal material was removed during conservation efforts to stabilize the remains, and the was opened, with artificial peat applied to cover the and lower chest for . Preservation was facilitated by the bog's low pH of around 3-4, low oxygen levels, and humic acids, which together promoted formation—a waxy substance—in certain tissues, further sealing against decay. Today, the reconstructed body is exhibited at the Archaeologisches Landesmuseum Schloss Gottorf in Schleswig, , where scale models and replicas are used for public viewing to minimize exposure and prevent additional degradation of the fragile original. Initial assumptions identified the remains as those of a young girl, but later analyses confirmed a male adolescent.

Anatomical Features

The skeletal structure of Windeby I features a slender frame, as observed in the preserved bones separated during conservation. The mandible is well-preserved, along with dentition, though the original tooth crowns were altered by bog conditions and later replicated for display purposes. Soft tissue preservation includes shriveled but largely intact covering the and limbs, with visible fingernails and follicles on the extremities. The remaining extends over the (partially obscured by a ), arms, legs, and feet, exhibiting a tanned appearance due to the bog's acidic environment. No tattoos or decorative scars are evident on the preserved surfaces. is wavy, with some follicles discernible. Cranial features include an intact cranium showing traces of from early conservation efforts. A wool band, woven using the technique, is positioned across the forehead and over one . The cavity is empty post-conservation, following the extraction of preserved tissue during initial processing, with a cut mark visible from the removal procedure. Associated skeletal elements include intact and vertebrae, visible in part through the open , with no indications of perimortem fractures on these structures.

Scientific Analysis

Chronological and Isotopic Studies

of Windeby I was conducted using (AMS) on extracts from , skin, and hair samples, as well as the associated cape. The sample (KIA-15123) yielded a conventional radiocarbon age of 1971 ± 28 BP, while hair and cape samples provided dates around 2168 ± 31 BP; the date is considered most reliable for the time of due to potential effects in bog environments. Calibrated using the IntCal20 curve, these results place the remains in a 2-sigma range of 41 BC to 118 AD, firmly within the Roman Iron Age. A 2023 study of northern European bog bodies, incorporating updated calibration methods like IntCal20 in OxCal software, analyzed a database of over 1,000 dated individuals and highlighted a peak in depositions (c. 1000 BC–AD 500), consistent with Windeby I's chronological placement. The analysis emphasized careful pretreatment (e.g., AAA and alkaline methods) to mitigate contamination from humic acids in , ensuring accurate measurements. Stable isotope analysis of preserved hair indicates a primarily vegetarian diet with limited animal protein intake, suggesting local origins in consistent with regional subsistence patterns. analysis from the surrounding layers corroborates the AD dating, showing vegetation typical of the pre-Roman to early Roman transition, while the absence of imported Roman artifacts (e.g., or metalwork) in the deposit supports an indigenous northern European context without external trade influences.

Biological and Genetic Profiling

The initial examination of Windeby I in the 1950s, conducted shortly after its discovery, assumed the individual was female based on the slender build and slight stature of the remains. This assumption persisted for decades, influencing early interpretations of the body's cultural significance. However, in 2005, Heather Gill-Robinson re-evaluated the skeletal morphology, particularly the and , and concluded that the individual was a young . Subsequent DNA analysis, detailed in Gill-Robinson's research, confirmed this by identifying XY chromosomes through testing of the gene on extracted bone samples. Age at death has been estimated at 16 to 18 years through multiple lines of osteological evidence, including the degree of epiphyseal fusion in the long bones, the stage of dental eruption, and the presence of Harris lines—dense transverse markings on the bones indicative of temporary growth interruptions due to physiological stress. Health profiling reveals signs of chronic , evidenced by low estimated body mass and thin , alongside a on one of the molars suggesting untreated . These indicators, combined with the Harris lines, point to episodes of severe stress or illness during , possibly exacerbated by dietary deficiencies confirmed through isotopic studies of showing limited protein intake. Advances in non-invasive imaging have further refined biological profiling; multislice computed tomography (MSCT) scans of the , conducted in 2005, produced detailed 3D models using Mimics software, allowing precise reconstruction without physical alteration. These models revealed extraction marks consistent with antemortem dental work but no evidence of traumatic injury to the cranium, supporting interpretations of death by natural causes rather than .

Interpretation

Cause of Death

Forensic examination of Windeby I revealed no evidence of perimortem trauma, including the absence of cut marks, fractures, or signs of ligature, indicating that death was not the result of violence. Detailed analysis of the skeletal remains further supported a natural demise, with indicators such as Harris lines on long bones suggesting periods of malnutrition and stress during the individual's life. Additionally, extensive dental pathology, including a severe abscess and infection affecting the mandible, likely contributed to systemic complications like sepsis, exacerbated by overall weakened immunity from chronic illness. These health issues align with the broader biological profile of the individual, who exhibited signs of repeated bouts of nutritional deficiency and infection leading to death. Taphonomic evidence points to deliberate but non-violent deposition in the , with the body placed face-down in a shallow pool without bindings or restraints, consistent with patterns observed in other non-violent bog interments. A 2023 study of northern European mire depositions classified Windeby I among cases lacking indicators of foul play, reinforcing interpretations of natural mortality followed by post-mortem placement. Early estimates, derived from preservation and absence of significant prior to bog submersion, suggest the body was deposited less than one year after . Initial 1950s interpretations proposed a punitive involving or blinding as punishment, based on the wool band across the head and the context. Subsequent forensic re-examination dismissed these ideas, identifying the wool band as a simple hair tie rather than a and finding no evidence of eye trauma or structural damage to the . Due to organic degradation in the acidic environment, toxicological analysis was impossible, limiting further insights into potential contributing factors like .

Cultural and Archaeological Context

Windeby I, discovered in a near Windeby in , , forms part of a broader tradition of human depositions in northern European wetlands spanning over 7,000 years, with more than 1,000 remains identified across approximately 250 sites. These bog finds, peaking between 1000 B.C. and A.D. 1500, are frequently interpreted as offerings to deities or other entities, with bogs viewed as liminal spaces serving as portals between the human and divine realms. The of Windeby I aligns with patterns observed in non-punitive rites, where bodies were placed face-down to facilitate integration with the bog's transformative properties rather than as markers of disgrace. In the local context of , Windeby I is associated with the , an early Germanic society characterized by settled farming communities and emerging social hierarchies from around 600 B.C. to A.D. 1. This region’s bogs likely functioned as communal or familial deposition sites, reflecting practices where communities interred the deceased in wetlands to honor or memorialize them within a rich in symbolic meaning. Such placements underscore the bog's role as a sacred boundary, distinct from dry-land cremations typical of the period. Interpretations of associated artifacts with Windeby I emphasize practical and post-mortem adjustments over punitive symbolism. The wool band around the head is now regarded as a simple restraint for binding hair, which had slipped down over the eyes after death, rather than a blindfold indicative of execution. Similarly, the apparent half-shaven head results from natural decomposition processes in the bog environment or minor excavation disturbances, not deliberate ritual marking. Archaeologically, Windeby I contributes to reevaluating the dominant narrative of violent for all bog bodies, as a 2023 comprehensive of northern European mires reveals that only about 45 of 57 well-preserved cases show evidence of violence, with many others, including potential examples like Windeby I, representing natural death depositions. This shifts focus toward diverse motivations, such as memorialization or accidental inclusion in offerings, challenging earlier assumptions rooted in limited samples. On a broader scale, Windeby I enhances understanding of marginal individuals—such as youths—in prehistoric societies, where bog depositions may have served to integrate vulnerable members into the spiritual landscape. Comparisons to Windeby II, another body from the same but dated roughly 300 years earlier to the B.C., illustrate repeated use of the site for depositions, possibly indicating a localized tradition of significance despite temporal separation. Windeby I's placement in the Roman (circa A.D. 1–400) further contextualizes these practices amid increasing Roman influences in .

References

  1. https://www.academia.edu/80685786/The_Iron_Age_bog_bodies_of_the_Archaeologisches_Landesmuseum_Schloss_Gottorf_Schleswig_Germany
  2. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/premium/article/bog-bodies-northern-europe
  3. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/09/070908095852.htm
  4. https://archive.archaeology.org/1005/bogbodies/windeby_weerdinge.html
  5. https://www.newswise.com/articles/bog-mummies-yield-secrets-profs-research-in-national-geographic
  6. https://www.penn.museum/sites/expedition/preserved-in-peat/
  7. https://search.proquest.com/openview/b7bc00036b32f3195768d40e00460944/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750
  8. https://www.pagepressjournals.org/index.php/jbr/article/download/10090/9530
  9. https://www.oup.com.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0029/104978/SEC_ANTIQUITY_CH6_PPS_SECURE.pdf
  10. https://blog.susnano.wisc.edu/2018/10/31/bog-bodies/
  11. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/europe-bog-bodies-reveal-secrets-180962770/
  12. https://en.natmus.dk/historical-knowledge/denmark/prehistoric-period-until-1050-ad/the-early-iron-age/the-woman-from-huldremose/the-chemistry-of-the-bog-bodies/
  13. https://www.penn.museum/documents/publications/expedition/58-2/preserved_peat.pdf
  14. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0305440303001444
  15. https://doi.org/10.1017/RDC.2020.41
  16. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/antiquity/article/bogs-bones-and-bodies-the-deposition-of-human-remains-in-northern-european-mires-9000-bcad-1900/B90A16A211894CB87906A7BCFC0B2FC7
  17. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/30494918_Dating_bog_bodies_by_means_of_14C-AMS
  18. https://mspace.lib.umanitoba.ca/handle/1993/20204
  19. https://www.pagepressjournals.org/jbr/article/view/10090
  20. https://mspace.lib.umanitoba.ca/bitstream/handle/1993/20204/Gill-Robinson_The_Iron.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  21. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/30/science/archaeology-bogs-mummies.html
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.