Hubbry Logo
1 nm process1 nm processMain
Open search
1 nm process
Community hub
1 nm process
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
1 nm process
1 nm process
1 nm process
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Semiconductor
device
fabrication
MOSFET scaling
(process nodes)
Future

In semiconductor manufacturing, the "1 nm process" represents the next significant milestone in MOSFET (metal–oxide–semiconductor field-effect transistor) scaling, succeeding the "2 nm" process node. It continues the industry trend of miniaturization in integrated circuit (IC) technology, which has been essential for improving performance, increasing transistor density, and reducing power consumption.

The term "1 nanometer" has no relation to any actual physical feature (such as gate length, metal pitch or gate pitch) of the transistors. According to the projections contained in the 2021 update of the International Roadmap for Devices and Systems published by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), a "1 nm node range label" is expected to have a contacted gate pitch of 42 nanometers and a tightest metal pitch of 16 nanometers. The first 1 nm chips are expected to be launched in 2027.[1]

History

[edit]

In 2008, transistors one atom thick and ten atoms wide were made by UK researchers. They were carved from graphene, predicted by some to one day oust silicon as the basis of future computing. Graphene is a material made from flat sheets of carbon in a honeycomb arrangement, and is a leading contender. A team at the University of Manchester, UK, used it to make some of the smallest transistors ever: devices only 1 nm across that contain just a few carbon rings.[2]

In 2016, researchers at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory created a transistor with a working 1-nanometer gate.[3][4] The field-effect transistor used MoS2 as the channel material, while a carbon nanotube was used to invert the channel. The effective channel length is approximately 1 nm. However, the drain to source pitch was much bigger, with micrometre size.

Research and technology demos

[edit]

In 2012 a single atom transistor was fabricated using a phosphorus atom bound to a silicon surface (between two significantly larger electrodes). This transistor could be said to be a 180 pm transistor (the Van der Waals radius of a phosphorus atom); though its covalent radius bound to silicon is likely smaller.[5] Making transistors smaller than this will require either using elements with smaller atomic radii, or using subatomic particles—like electrons or protons—as functional transistors.

In 2018, researchers at Karlsruhe Institute of Technology created a transistor with a working single atom gate.[6]

In July 2024, a team led by Director Jo Moon-Ho at the Center for Van der Waals Quantum Solids within the Institute for Basic Science (IBS) in Korea developed a method for the epitaxial growth of one-dimensional (1D) metallic materials with widths under 1 nm on silicon substrates. This process was used to construct a new structure for two-dimensional (2D) semiconductor logic circuits, employing these 1D metals as gate electrodes. The International Roadmap for Devices and Systems (IRDS) by the IEEE projects that semiconductor node technology may reach around 0.5 nm by 2037, with transistor gate lengths of approximately 12 nm. However, the IBS research team demonstrated that the channel width modulated by the electric field from the 1D MTB gate could be as small as 3.9 nm, surpassing these projections.[7]

In April 2025, a team at Fudan University led by professors Wenzhong Bao and Peng Zhou announced that they had successfully created a 1nm RISC-V chip using two-dimensional semiconductors.[8][9]

Beyond 1 nm

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

1 nm process

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The 1 nm process is a projected semiconductor manufacturing technology node in MOSFET scaling, succeeding the 2 nm process and aiming to achieve unprecedented , performance, and power efficiency in , as defined in the . It is characterized by a contacted gate pitch of 40 nm and a tightest metal pitch of 16 nm, utilizing lateral gate-all-around (LGAA) transistors with complementary field-effect transistor (CFET) structures for logic and , along with fine-pitch 3D integration involving two stacked tiers. Initial production of chips based on this node is anticipated around 2031, though industry projections from companies like TSMC suggest potential commercialization by 2030. Pioneering research toward realizing 1 nm-scale transistors dates back to 2008, when scientists at the developed the world's smallest transistor using graphene, measuring one atom thick and ten atoms wide, approximately 1 nm in effective scale. In 2016, researchers at demonstrated transistors with a 1 nm physical gate length, using a single-walled carbon nanotube as the gate electrode, showcasing viability for sub-1 nm operation while maintaining performance. More recently, in 2025, engineers at fabricated the world's first 1 nm-equivalent 32-bit microprocessor using two-dimensional (2D) semiconductors like molybdenum disulfide, marking a significant step toward practical 1 nm chips with enhanced computational power and energy efficiency. This node addresses key challenges in continued Moore's Law scaling, including overcoming physical limits of through 2D materials and 3D architectures, while enabling applications in , artificial intelligence, and as outlined in . Key specifications also include a gate length of 12 nm, an operating voltage of 0.60 V, and a digital block area scaling factor of 0.26 relative to 2021 baselines, promising substantial improvements in power-performance-area-cost (PPAC) metrics. Ongoing advancements in lithography, such as , and are essential to meet these targets, with research emphasizing low-budget schemes using 2D materials to equivalize 1 nm performance without full silicon CFET complexity.

Overview

Definition and node naming

The 1 nm process is a designated node in , representing a projected advancement in MOSFET scaling rather than a literal measurement of any physical feature, such as gate length or transistor dimensions. In contemporary usage, like 1 nm serve primarily as marketing and scaling labels to indicate generational improvements in transistor density, performance, and power efficiency, without directly corresponding to actual nanoscale features on the chip. This convention aligns with the 2022 IEEE International Roadmap for Devices and Systems (), which outlines the 1 nm node with parameters including a contacted gate pitch of 40 nm and a tightest metal pitch of 16 nm. Historically, semiconductor process node names evolved from direct references to physical dimensions, such as the minimum feature size in the early days of , to more arbitrary designations beginning around the mid-2000s. For instance, in the 1990s and early 2000s, nodes like or were named based on the gate length or half-pitch of , providing a quantifiable metric for manufacturing capability. However, as scaling challenges intensified and actual feature sizes decoupled from node names for competitive reasons, the industry shifted to non-literal labels; by the 2010s, nodes such as or no longer reflected true physical scales, instead emphasizing overall process improvements and marketing appeal. This trend continues with the 1 nm node, which succeeds the 2 nm process in a similar vein—the 2 nm designation itself does not indicate features measuring exactly 2 nm, but rather a step in density scaling beyond prior generations like 3 nm. Such naming practices allow semiconductor foundries to highlight progress without being constrained by atomic-scale limitations, as 1 nm approaches the size of just a few silicon atoms, rendering literal interpretations impractical. The IRDS emphasizes that these nodes are defined by key architectural metrics rather than a single dimension, ensuring continued roadmap relevance amid physical scaling barriers.

Significance in semiconductor scaling

The 1 nm process represents a critical milestone in MOSFET scaling, extending beyond the 2 nm node to achieve substantial gains in performance, density, and power efficiency, thereby enabling more complex with reduced energy consumption. This advancement is essential for sustaining the exponential improvements in computing power that have defined the semiconductor industry for decades, as it addresses the physical limits encountered in traditional silicon-based scaling. By pushing towards atomic-scale dimensions, the 1 nm process facilitates higher transistor densities, which can lead to chips with exponentially more computational capability while maintaining or improving efficiency, crucial for . Central to its significance is the alignment with Moore's Law, which posits a doubling of on a chip approximately every two years, a trend that has driven technological progress but faces challenges from quantum effects and manufacturing constraints at sub-5 nm scales. The 1 nm process is projected to help sustain this law by introducing innovative , such as and , ensuring continued in despite from conventional methods. For instance, achieving a contacted gate pitch of 40 nm exemplifies how the node targets aggressive scaling to overcome these barriers. Economically and technologically, the 1 nm process is driven by surging demands from , , and , where enhanced density and efficiency translate to faster , longer battery life, and more energy-efficient data centers. These applications require unprecedented computational throughput, making the 1 nm node's projected substantial improvements in power-performance-area-cost (PPAC) metrics a key enabler for innovations in and . Adoption of this process could spur a multi-trillion-dollar market expansion by supporting the infrastructure for AI-driven economies and sustainable computing.

Projected specifications

The projects key architectural parameters for , including what is referred to as the 1 nm process, with a contacted gate pitch of 40 nm and a tightest metal pitch of 16 nm. These specifications represent a continuation of , enabling higher integration levels while addressing interconnect and parasitic challenges through architectures like gate-all-around (GAA) transistors and backside power delivery. Transistor density at the 1 nm node is anticipated to see substantial gains via the adoption of 3D very large-scale integration (VLSI), with routed gate density improvements projected to continue through at least 2028, potentially doubling effective function counts per unit volume compared to prior nodes. Power efficiency metrics are expected to improve modestly, with energy per switching reduced by less than 20% on a node-to-node basis on average, supported by optimizations in and supply voltage scaling. These enhancements aim to balance performance gains against rising in . Industry projections indicate varying timelines for initial commercial chips using the 1 nm process; for example, Intel targets 2027, while TSMC anticipates commercialization by 2030, aligning with the IRDS projection of around 2031 and the shift to .

Historical developments

Early transistor research (pre-2016)

Early research into sub-2 nm transistors prior to 2016 focused on exploring atomic-scale devices using novel materials and , laying foundational for future toward 1 nm processes. In 2008, researchers at the in the UK developed the world's smallest at the time, utilizing graphene to create a device that was one atom thick and approximately 10 atoms wide, equivalent to about in scale. This breakthrough involved etching narrow graphene ribbons into to form the transistor channel, demonstrating the potential of graphene's exceptional electrical properties for ultra-miniature electronics. The transistor operated at room temperature and exhibited switching behavior, highlighting graphene's viability as a successor to silicon in nanoscale applications. Building on such atomic manipulation, in 2012, a team from the and fabricated the first single-atom transistor using a single phosphorus atom as the active element, precisely positioned within a silicon substrate between source and drain electrodes. This device was constructed via and hydrogen-resist lithography, enabling deterministic placement of the to form a functional with measurable conductance characteristics. The transistor demonstrated on/off switching with the phosphorus atom controlling current flow, achieving performance metrics such as a peak conductance of around 0.1 microsiemens at low temperatures. These pre-2016 experiments served as seminal for atomic-scale transistors, illustrating the feasibility of engineering devices at the single-atom level and contributing to the broader trajectory of beyond conventional lithography limits.

Mid-2010s advancements

In 2016, researchers at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory developed a transistor featuring a 1 nm physical gate length, utilizing a molybdenum disulfide (MoS₂) channel material and a single-walled carbon nanotube as the gate electrode. This breakthrough demonstrated effective control over electron flow in a 1-nanometer gate, though the device's overall dimensions remained larger than the gate length, highlighting ongoing challenges in full-scale integration. The MoS₂ channel's higher electron effective mass helped mitigate quantum tunneling effects, enabling viable performance at such scales. Building on these gate efforts, in 2018, scientists at the created the world's smallest by employing a single atom as the gate in a quasi-solid-state configuration within a gel electrolyte. This device switched electrical current through the controlled repositioning of a single silver atom, operating at room temperature and demonstrating quantum electronic behavior with minimal energy consumption. The single-atom gate represented a limit of miniaturization, with the transistor's active region confined to atomic dimensions, though practical integration into circuits was still exploratory. These mid-2010s developments marked a transition from early atomic-scale concepts, such as precursor graphene-based transistors, toward more integrated prototypes that combined novel materials and precise fabrication to approach viable 1 nm-scale devices. While still experimental, they laid groundwork for advancing beyond silicon-based architectures by addressing gate and channel scaling in tandem.

Post-2020 breakthroughs

In July 2024, researchers at the Institute for Basic Science (IBS) in demonstrated a novel method for of one-dimensional (1D) metallic materials with widths under 1 nm, enabling their integration into two-dimensional (2D) semiconductor logic circuits. This breakthrough involved developing 1D metallic thin wires (MTBs) that served as gate electrodes for , achieving a 2D transistor with a 3.9 nm channel width and demonstrating superior electrostatic control compared to traditional silicon-based devices. The technique addresses key by allowing precise placement of sub-nanometer conductors on 2D materials like molybdenum disulfide (MoS₂), potentially paving the way for . This 1D MTB approach represents a significant step toward practical sub-1 nm transistor architectures. In April 2025, a team from and Shaoxin Laboratory in China announced the development of WUJI, a RISC-V microprocessor fabricated using 2D semiconductors at a 1 nm scale. The chip, based on molybdenum disulfide (MoS₂) , integrates 5,900 and successfully executed basic computational tasks, marking one of the most complex 2D semiconductor processors to date. This achievement highlights the feasibility of 2D materials for ultra-scaled integrated circuits, with the design supporting and offering potential improvements in energy efficiency over conventional silicon nodes. These advancements illustrate the rapid evolution toward functional 1 nm chip prototypes, shifting from isolated device demonstrations to capable of real-world processing.

Technical aspects

Key architectural parameters

The 1 nm process, as projected in the , specifies a contacted gate pitch of 40 nm, which represents the minimum distance between the centers of adjacent including their contacts, enabling higher while maintaining . This metric is crucial for scaling logic devices, as it directly influences the layout efficiency and overall chip area utilization in advanced nodes. Similarly, the tightest metal pitch of 16 nm defines the smallest spacing between , allowing for denser routing of signals and power within the layers to support the interconnect demands of ultra-scaled transistors. In research prototypes targeting the 1 nm node, these pitches have been demonstrated or approximated in experimental devices to validate feasibility. For instance, contacted gate pitches around 38 nm have been explored in early conceptual designs aligned with IRDS guidelines, emphasizing the need for precise lithography and etching to achieve such tight geometries without shorting. The tightest metal pitch of 16 nm in prototypes highlights challenges in scaling interconnects, where reduced pitch increases resistance and capacitance, necessitating advanced materials and processes to preserve signal integrity. Gate length approximations in research devices have approached , particularly in molybdenum disulfide (MoS₂)-based transistors, where a physical gate length of sub-1 nm was achieved using a sidewall configuration with an atomically thin channel. Earlier work demonstrated MoS₂ transistors with a 1 nm gate length employing a single-walled carbon nanotube as the , showcasing the potential for atomic-scale control in . These approximations push beyond traditional , focusing on vertical or edge-oriented structures to minimize gate length while integrating with the specified pitches. Interconnects in the 1 nm process must address pitch considerations to maximize density, as the tightest metal pitch of 16 nm enables a higher number of but amplifies like and . Density is further optimized by adopting multi-tier architectures, where interconnect pitches are scaled in conjunction with to support up to per chip, balancing area efficiency with thermal and electrical constraints. Research emphasizes hybrid bonding and to achieve these dense interconnects without compromising yield.

Materials and fabrication techniques

The development of 1 nm semiconductor processes relies heavily on advanced 2D materials to overcome the limitations of traditional , enabling atomic-scale channel lengths and improved . Graphene, a single layer of carbon atoms arranged in a , has been explored for its exceptional and mechanical strength in sub-1 nm transistors. For instance, researchers have fabricated a graphene transistor with a gate length of just 0.34 nm, demonstrating potential for ultra-scaled devices by leveraging graphene's ballistic transport properties. Similarly, molybdenum disulfide (MoS₂), a transition metal dichalcogenide, offers a suitable for in 2D field-effect transistors (), as evidenced by a 1 nm gate-length MoS₂ transistor using a metallic carbon nanotube as the , which exhibited clear at room temperature. Carbon nanotubes, serving as quasi-1D channels or gates, further enhance performance in these structures due to their high current-carrying capacity and low scattering, integrating seamlessly with 2D materials in hybrid configurations. have emerged as a critical method for fabricating 1D metallic materials with dimensions under 1 nm, providing precise control over atomic arrangement on silicon substrates. This process involves the of metallic phases, such as or ribbons, to form or interconnects in ultra-miniature , achieving widths as small as 0.4 nm while maintaining structural stability. Such growth enables the creation of novel transistor architectures, like gate-all-around designs, by directly integrating these 1D metals without lithographic patterning, thus addressing scalability challenges in 1 nm nodes. Single-atom placement techniques represent the pinnacle of precision fabrication for 1 nm prototypes, involving the deterministic positioning of individual atoms to form functional . A seminal example is the single-atom transistor, where a phosphorus dopant atom is precisely placed between in an epitaxial silicon architecture, operating as a with tunable conductance at millikelvin temperatures. Fabrication challenges include maintaining atomic stability during placement—often achieved via for positioning and hydrogen resist lithography for masking—and mitigating quantum tunneling effects, which can degrade performance in these phosphorus-based devices. These methods highlight the shift toward atomically engineered gates and channels, essential for realizing the projected 40 nm contacted gate pitch in 1 nm processes.

Device performance metrics

The 1 nm process node is projected to enable significant improvements in and power efficiency through advanced architectures like complementary field-effect transistors (CFET) and backside power delivery networks (BPDN), allowing for denser integration and reduced compared to prior nodes. According to Imec's , CFET designs at the 1 nm (A10) node in 2028 will stack and p-type vertically, enhancing density by enabling more compact standard cell libraries while BPDN separates from signal interconnects, improving voltage efficiency and reducing resistance-capacitance delays for overall lower power consumption. These advancements are expected to establish a scale for unprecedented efficiency in . In prototype devices, such as the 2016 MoS₂ transistor developed at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, switching performance is highlighted by a near-ideal subthreshold swing of approximately 65 mV/decade at room temperature, enabling efficient low-voltage operation. This transistor, with a 1 nm gate length using a single-walled carbon nanotube gate, achieves an on/off current ratio of about 10⁶, demonstrating strong channel control and minimal off-state leakage, while exhibiting a drain-induced barrier lowering of 290 mV/V. Compared to silicon counterparts, the MoS₂ design reduces source-to-drain tunneling leakage by more than two orders of magnitude, contributing to enhanced power efficiency in sub-1 nm scaling. For integrated prototypes, the 2025 WUJI RISC-V chip from , featuring 5,931 MoS₂ transistors in a , operates at a frequency of 1 kHz while consuming just 0.43 mW, underscoring in 2D semiconductor-based 1 nm-scale processing. This chip achieves a of 99.77% and executes standard instructions with a complete library of 25 , validating scalable performance metrics for future dense, efficient computing. Materials like MoS₂ briefly referenced here support these metrics through their atomic-scale thickness, aiding in .

Challenges and innovations

Physical and quantum limits

As semiconductor devices approach the 1 nm scale, quantum tunneling emerges as a primary physical barrier, allowing electrons to pass through insulating barriers that classical physics predicts should block them, thereby increasing leakage currents and degrading transistor performance. In ultra-scaled MOSFETs below 5 nm, including projections for 1 nm nodes, this effect significantly impacts power dissipation and reliability by enabling direct source-to-drain tunneling, which reduces the subthreshold swing and switching ratios. Short-channel effects, exacerbated at atomic scales, further complicate control over the channel potential, leading to threshold voltage shifts and reduced gate efficiency as the channel length approaches the depletion width. in arise from increased , where becomes inefficient due to reduced thermal conductivity paths, potentially causing self-heating that elevates and accelerates . Electrostatic limits, meanwhile, stem from the inability to maintain sufficient over the as dimensions shrink, resulting in poor scalability of the electrostatic integrity metric and higher . These barriers collectively challenge the viability of , as demonstrated in early prototypes that encountered such constraints during operation.

Manufacturing and scalability issues

The pursuit of 1 nm semiconductor processes encounters significant lithography limitations, as current extreme ultraviolet (EUV) systems, operating at a 13.5 nm wavelength, struggle to achieve the required resolution for features below 1 nm without substantial extensions or successors. These challenges arise from fundamental interactions in EUV patterning, such as stochastic noise and line-edge roughness, which degrade pattern fidelity at atomic scales and necessitate advanced high-numerical-aperture (high-NA) EUV tools to push beyond current capabilities. Moreover, EUV lithography's inherent inefficiencies, including low source power and high defect risks from pellicle contamination, further complicate scaling to 1 nm, demanding innovations like multi-patterning or alternative wavelengths to maintain precision. These lithography barriers are exacerbated by underlying quantum limits in electron behavior at sub-1 nm dimensions, which amplify patterning errors. In atomic-scale fabrication for 1 nm nodes, yield rates remain critically low due to heightened sensitivity to defects, where even single-atom impurities or variations in material deposition can render entire devices non-functional. Fabrication processes involving techniques like scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) lithography achieve positioning accuracy within 1 nm but suffer from error rates that constrain output scale, particularly in early implementations where defect densities exceed acceptable thresholds for commercial viability. Additionally, plasma-based atomic layer processes introduce structural defects such as bowing and striations in high-aspect-ratio features, leading to yield losses that could approach 50% or more without optimized controls, as seen in nanoscale transistor arrays. These defect challenges are particularly acute in 2D material-based 1 nm devices, where atomic-thin layers amplify sensitivity to fabrication inconsistencies, resulting in significant yield challenges in prototype efforts. of 1 nm chips faces formidable cost and infrastructure barriers, with construction costs projected to exceed $20 billion per facility due to the need for specialized cleanrooms, , and advanced tooling for atomic-precision handling. Global investments are anticipated to reach one trillion dollars by 2030 for scaling infrastructure, yet barriers like talent shortages, , and pose risks to achieving widespread 1 nm production. Furthermore, the economic model for 1 nm nodes requires high yields, such as above 90%, to offset per-wafer costs projected around $40,000 to $50,000, compounded by the infrastructure overhaul needed for . These barriers highlight the need for international collaboration to mitigate geopolitical and in building the requisite high-volume production capacity.

Emerging solutions

One promising emerging solution for the 1 nm process involves the adoption of two-dimensional (2D) semiconductors, such as molybdenum disulfide (MoS₂), combined with one-dimensional (1D) metallic interconnects to enable logic circuits with sub-nanometer gate lengths. Researchers have demonstrated the growth of 1D structures alongside 2D materials on silicon substrates to fabricate transistors featuring gate electrodes under 1 nm, addressing scaling limitations in traditional silicon-based designs. This approach utilizes 1D semimetal contacts, like single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs), integrated with 2D semiconductors to form van der Waals gap-free junctions, enhancing contact performance and enabling high-density logic integration. For instance, 2D nanosheet field-effect transistors (2D-NSFETs) have been proposed as a feasible replacement for silicon-based complementary field-effect transistors (CFETs) at the 1 nm node, offering improved electrostatic control and reduced short-channel effects. A 2024 breakthrough by Korean researchers utilized ambipolar MoS₂ to create sub-nanometer-scale semiconductors, further validating this strategy for logic applications. that combine graphene with traditional silicon are also gaining traction to overcome interconnect and performance bottlenecks in . These hybrids leverage graphene's superior and mechanical properties alongside silicon's established , forming structures suitable for beyond 1 nm. For example, processes for producing graphene-silicon nanowire hybrid materials involve catalyst preparation and to create with enhanced charge transport. Graphene-on-silicon heterostructures have been developed as , providing a platform for and while maintaining compatibility with silicon processes. Additionally, hybrid graphene-silicon thin-film Schottky junctions, fabricated via wet transfer of CVD-grown graphene onto p-type silicon, demonstrate potential for high-efficiency and interconnects in ultra-scaled nodes. Advanced simulation techniques driven by artificial intelligence (AI) are emerging to achieve atomic precision in 1 nm device design and fabrication. AI-powered technology computer-aided design (TCAD) simulations model semiconductor physics and optimize device structures, accelerating the exploration of complex architectures at sub-1 nm scales. Large language models integrated with intelligent computation frameworks enable knowledge-generation-simulation loops, predicting material behaviors and refining designs for post-Moore field-effect transistors. These AI tools facilitate material screening, process optimization, and yield prediction, rewriting design rules for 1 nm chips by automating intricate optimizations that traditional methods cannot handle efficiently.

Involved entities

Academic and research institutions

have played a pivotal role in advancing the foundational technologies for the 1 nm process through pioneering work on novel materials and atomic-scale devices. The led early breakthroughs in graphene-based electronics, reporting the first graphene transistor in 2008, which utilized the material's atomic thinness to achieve unprecedented . This work, conducted by researchers including Andre Geim and , demonstrated the potential of graphene for creating the world's smallest transistors at the time, one atom thick and ten atoms wide. Their contributions laid groundwork for relevant to 1 nm nodes. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory advanced 2D material applications in 2016 by developing molybdenum disulfide (MoS₂) transistors with 1-nm gate lengths, employing single-walled carbon nanotubes as gate electrodes. This achievement, led by material scientists at the lab, marked a significant step toward sub-1 nm device feasibility by addressing short-channel effects in ultrathin channels. The research highlighted MoS₂'s suitability for high-performance, low-power transistors in future nodes. In 2018, the achieved a milestone in quantum electronics by creating the world's smallest transistor, a single-atom device that switches electrical current using a single atom in a . Under physicist Thomas Schimmel, the KIT team demonstrated at room temperature, enabling control essential for atomic-scale computing. This quasi-solid-state single-atom transistor underscored the potential for ultimate miniaturization in 1 nm-era devices. The Institute for Basic Science (IBS) in contributed to 1D material innovations in 2024, developing a method to grow sub-1 nm 1D metallic structures integrated into 2D semiconductors for ultrascaled transistors. Researchers at the IBS Center for Van der Waals Quantum Solids created epitaxial mirror twin boundaries to form as , enabling transistors with gates under 1 nm. This approach addresses by leveraging 1D metallic phases from 2D crystals, paving the way for beyond-Moore's Law architectures. in China reported a major integration milestone in 2025 with the development of the world's first 1-nm chip using 2D semiconductors. The , named WUJI and built with molybdenum disulfide transistors, represents one of the most complex functional circuits based on 2D materials to date. Collaborating with Shaoxin Laboratory, the Fudan team demonstrated readiness, highlighting 2D semiconductors' viability for practical 1 nm computing.

Industry projections and involvement

As of 2026, major have not yet demonstrated functional industry-scale prototypes for the 1 nm process node, with development efforts remaining in the research and early planning stages. Projections indicate that development efforts are intensifying in the mid-2020s, with targeted for the late 2020s to early 2030s, aligning with anticipated advancements in fabrication technologies and materials. Semiconductor giants such as TSMC and Intel are positioned for potential leadership in scaling to the 1 nm node, driven by their ongoing investments in sub-2 nm technologies. TSMC has reaffirmed its roadmap targeting a 1 nm process by 2030, emphasizing innovations in and to maintain market dominance. Similarly, Intel is advancing toward aggressive , with plans for its 10A (1 nm-class) node entering production in 2027. has also formed dedicated teams to accelerate 1 nm fabrication, aiming for mass production readiness by 2029. Industry projections highlight collaborative efforts between commercial entities and academic institutions to bridge research breakthroughs toward commercialization, such as TSMC's partnerships with and for 2D material integration in 1 nm designs. These alliances, exemplified by 's joint work with France's Leti and the on 1 nm technology planning, underscore a strategy of leveraging external expertise to overcome fabrication hurdles and expedite market entry.

Future outlook

Timeline and commercialization

The development timeline for the 1 nm process, as projected in the , envisions a progression from ongoing research phases to the initial production of chips around 2031. According to definitions, the 1 nm node is characterized by a contacted gate pitch of 40 nm and a tightest metal pitch of 16 nm, marking a significant advancement in beyond the 2 nm node. This roadmap outlines a multi-year trajectory involving intensive in materials like 2D semiconductors to overcome physical scaling limits, with high-volume manufacturing expected to follow . A key milestone in this timeline is the demonstration of early prototypes, such as the 32-bit RISC-V microprocessor developed by Fudan University in 2025, which utilizes monolayer molybdenum disulfide (MoS₂) transistors at a 1 nm-equivalent scale using 2D materials. This chip, named WUJI, represents one of the most complex functional circuits based on 2D semiconductors to date and is slated for pilot-scale production, bridging the gap between laboratory research and practical implementation. Subsequent stages include process optimization and integration testing from 2025 to 2026, leading to risk production in 2027, as aligned with industry projections from leading foundries. Commercialization of 1 nm technology is anticipated to accelerate through the , with companies like Intel targeting production of their 10A (equivalent to 1 nm) process node in late 2027, potentially enabling trillion-transistor chips. 's plans for a 1.4 nm process (closely related to 1 nm scaling) have been delayed to 2029, while TSMC aims for 1 nm mass production around , reflecting a from pilot to . Factors influencing delays or accelerations in this timeline include advancements in , such as , and for novel materials like 2D semiconductors, which could expedite progress if are resolved ahead of schedule. Conversely, potential delays may arise from quantum tunneling effects and fabrication yield issues at such extreme scales, necessitating iterative innovations in . , including those with research institutions, are projected to play a pivotal role in mitigating these risks and aligning with the projected timelines.

Potential applications and impacts

The 1 nm semiconductor process is anticipated to enable significant advancements in AI accelerators by allowing for unprecedented , which could lead to chips capable of handling complex with reduced and power usage. For instance, the integration of 1 nm nodes in AI hardware could facilitate in , enhancing applications such as and . This scaling is expected to support the development of more efficient tensor processing units (TPUs) and graphics processing units (GPUs) tailored for machine learning workloads, potentially revolutionizing fields like through faster . In quantum computing interfaces, the 1 nm process could serve as a classical control layer for , enabling hybrid systems where ultra-dense logic circuits interface with superconducting or trapped-ion quantum processors to manage error correction and more effectively. Research indicates that such would allow for compact cryogenic electronics, reducing the footprint of quantum computers and making them more viable for practical deployment in research and industry. Additionally, the process's potential for could bridge the gap between classical and quantum domains, supporting scalable quantum algorithms for optimization problems in logistics and . For ultra-efficient mobile system-on-chips (SoCs), the 1 nm node promises to deliver chips with enhanced battery life and performance, suitable for next-generation smartphones, , and . This could result in SoCs that support advanced features like on-device AI inference without compromising portability, thereby expanding capabilities in augmented reality and . The high density and efficiency gains may also enable more affordable high-performance computing in emerging markets, democratizing access to advanced mobile technologies. On a broader scale, the adoption of 1 nm processes is projected to substantially lower energy consumption in data centers by enabling servers with higher computational throughput , potentially reducing the global of cloud computing. Such efficiency improvements could align with amid rising demand for digital services. Furthermore, by making more energy-efficient and cost-effective, 1 nm technology could enhance , particularly in underserved regions, fostering innovations in education, telemedicine, and remote work. Ethical considerations surrounding the 1 nm process include the potential increase in due to rapid scaling and obsolescence cycles in consumer electronics, which could exacerbate environmental challenges if not managed through robust . Experts highlight the need for to mitigate the ecological impact of discarded 1 nm-based devices, emphasizing to minimize toxic material proliferation. Additionally, the accelerated pace of technological advancement raises concerns about digital divides, where unequal access to 1 nm-enabled devices might widen socioeconomic disparities, necessitating policies for equitable distribution.

References

  1. https://irds.ieee.org/images/files/pdf/2022/2022IRDS_ES.pdf
  2. https://www.ednasia.com/tsmc-on-track-to-1-nm-node-by-2030/
  3. https://www.manchester.ac.uk/about/news/graphene-used-to-create-worlds-smallest-transistor/
  4. https://newscenter.lbl.gov/2016/10/06/smallest-transistor-1-nm-gate/
  5. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aah4698
  6. https://phys.org/news/2025-04-bit-risc-processor-molybdenum-disulfide.html
  7. https://www.fudan.edu.cn/en/2025/0405/c344a144825/page.htm
  8. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11920538/
  9. https://spectrum.ieee.org/a-better-way-to-measure-progress-in-semiconductors
  10. https://chipinsights.net/p/demystifying-the-semiconductor-process
  11. https://www.extremetech.com/computing/296154-how-are-process-nodes-defined
  12. https://irds.ieee.org/images/files/pdf/2021/2021IRDS_MM.pdf
  13. https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/intel-puts-1nm-process-10a-on-the-roadmap-for-2027-aiming-for-fully-ai-automated-factories-with-cobots
  14. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22343383/
  15. https://physicsworld.com/a/graphene-transistors-cut-from-ribbons-into-dots/
  16. https://www.manchester.ac.uk/about/news/new-graphene-transistor-promises-life-after-death-of-silicon-chip/
  17. https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1853&context=nanopub
  18. https://spectrum.ieee.org/a-singleatom-transistor
  19. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/02/120219191244.htm
  20. https://foundry.lbl.gov/2016/10/16/mos2-transistors-with-1-nanometer-gate-lengths/
  21. https://www.kit.edu/kit/english/pi_2018_097_smallest-transistor-worldwide-switches-current-with-a-single-atom-in-solid-electrolyte.php
  22. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/08/180816101939.htm
  23. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/adma.201801225
  24. https://www.ibs.re.kr/cop/bbs/BBSMSTR_000000000738/selectBoardArticle.do?nttId=24873&pageIndex=1&searchCnd=&searchWrd=
  25. https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/semiconductors/researchers-grow-sub-nanometer-size-transistors-new-1d-mtb-transistors-jump-ahead-of-the-ieee-2037-roadmap
  26. https://www.eenewseurope.com/en/researchers-grow-1d-sub-1nm-transistor/
  27. https://www.semiconductor-today.com/news_items/2025/apr/fudan-170425.shtml
  28. https://www.scmp.com/news/china/science/article/3305185/worlds-first-1-nanometre-risc-v-chip-made-china-2d-materials
  29. https://irds.ieee.org/images/files/pdf/2020/2020IRDS_ES.pdf
  30. https://semiengineering.com/interconnects-approach-tipping-point/
  31. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-04323-3
  32. https://e3s-center.berkeley.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/2016_MoS2-Transistors-with-1-Nanometer-Gate-Lengths.pdf
  33. https://www.imec-int.com/en/articles/view-logic-technology-roadmap
  34. https://www.311institute.com/imec-reveals-first-sub-1nm-transistor-roadmap/
  35. https://news.pcim.mesago.com/tiny-titans-unveiling-the-power-of-2nm-and-1nm-chips-a-04bb3294b2c32f55d40de9b468a1e533/
  36. https://en.eeworld.com.cn/mp/Icbank/a397709.jspx
  37. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41565-024-01633-1
  38. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/apl/article/113/18/183507/1022107/Physical-insights-into-the-operation-of-a-1-nm
  39. https://www.physicsjournal.in/archives/2024/vol6issue1/PartB/7-1-47-600.pdf
  40. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589004222014328
  41. https://advanced.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/adfm.202402474
  42. https://www.cell.com/iscience/fulltext/S2589-0042(22)01432-8
  43. https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/conference-proceedings-of-spie/13273/1327318/The-challenges-and-limits-to-patterning-using-EUV-lithography/10.1117/12.3029169.full
  44. https://www.mckinsey-electronics.com/post/10-hidden-challenges-of-extreme-ultraviolet-euv-lithography-that-no-one-talks-about
  45. https://eureka.patsnap.com/article/the-road-to-sub-1nm-lithography-after-euv
  46. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590007218300108
  47. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.16.054037
  48. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12541-025-01337-z
  49. https://www.construction-physics.com/p/how-to-build-a-20-billion-semiconductor
  50. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/semiconductors/our-insights/semiconductors-have-a-big-opportunity-but-barriers-to-scale-remain
  51. https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/semiconductors/tsmc-could-charge-up-to-usd45-000-for-1-6nm-wafers-rumors-allege-a-50-percent-increase-in-pricing-over-prior-gen-wafers
  52. https://www.nationalacademies.org/read/27624/chapter/5
  53. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/04/080417142452.htm
  54. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27846499/
  55. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38961247/
  56. https://spectrum.ieee.org/2d-semiconductors
  57. https://www.edn.com/tsmc-reaffirms-path-to-1-nm-node-by-2030-on-track/
  58. https://www.tweaktown.com/news/104527/samsung-forms-1nm-development-team-dream-semiconductor-process-aims-mass-production-in-2029/index.html
  59. https://www.techpowerup.com/319704/intel-10a-1-nm-class-node-to-enter-mass-production-in-2027
  60. https://fpt-semiconductor.com/tsmc-1nm_process/
  61. https://sourceability.com/post/rapidus-and-university-of-tokyo-partner-with-leti-to-plan-1nm-chip-tech
  62. https://www.design-reuse.com/news/202528986-samsung-delays-1-4nm-node-doubles-down-on-2nm-process-enhancement/
  63. https://www.all-about-industries.com/samsung-peilt-1-nanometer-manufacturing-process-for-2029-an-a-84ee11aac55337b2ac7ea5bd5d0941c6/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.