Hubbry Logo
ATSC 3.0ATSC 3.0Main
Open search
ATSC 3.0
Community hub
ATSC 3.0
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
ATSC 3.0
ATSC 3.0
ATSC 3.0
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
List of digital television broadcast standards
DVB standards (countries)
ATSC standards (countries)
ISDB standards (countries)
DTMB standards (countries)
  • DTMB (terrestrial/mobile)
    • DTMB-A
  • CMMB (handheld)
  • ABS-S (satellite)
DMB standard (countries)
Codecs
Terrestrial Frequency bands
Satellite Frequency bands

ATSC 3.0 is a major version of the ATSC standards for terrestrial television broadcasting created by the Advanced Television Systems Committee (ATSC).[1][2][3]

The standards are designed to offer support for newer technologies, including High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) for video channels of up to 4K resolution (2160p) at 120 frames per second, wide color gamut, high dynamic range, Dolby AC-4 and MPEG-H 3D Audio, datacasting capabilities, and more robust mobile television support.[1][4] The capabilities have also been foreseen as a way to enable finer public alerting and targeted advertising.

The first major deployment of ATSC 3.0 occurred in South Korea in May 2017, in preparation for the 2018 Winter Olympics. In November 2017, the FCC passed rules allowing American broadcast stations to voluntarily adopt ATSC 3.0 ("Next Gen TV"), provided that full-power stations preserve the availability of their programming in their city of license via legacy ATSC signals; adoption is being steered by the broadcasting industry, without a mandatory transition as there was from analog NTSC to ATSC. Other adoptions have since occurred in Jamaica and Trinidad and Tobago (which are both transitioning from analog television), while Brazil has proposed a transition from ISDB-T International to standards derived from ATSC 3.0.

Technical details

[edit]
Further information: List of ATSC standards § ATSC 3.0

Bootstrap

[edit]

ATSC 3.0 uses a bootstrap signal which allows a receiver to discover and identify the signals that are being transmitted.[5] The bootstrap signal has a fixed configuration that can allow for new signal types to be used in the future.[5] The bootstrap signal can also carry information to wake up a receiver so that it can receive an emergency population warning.[5]

Physical layer

[edit]

ATSC 3.0 uses a highly efficient physical layer that is based on orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (OFDM) modulation with low-density parity-check code (LDPC) forward error correction (FEC).[6] With a 6 MHz channel, the bit rate can vary from 1 to 57 Mbit/s depending on the parameters that are used.[6] ATSC 3.0 is limited to 64 physical layer pipes (PLP) with a recommended 4 simultaneous PLPs per complete delivered product.[7] The PLPs in a channel may each have different robustness levels.[6] An example of how PLPs can be used would be a channel that delivers HD video over a robust PLP and enhances the video to UHD with a Scalable HEVC layer over a higher-bitrate PLP.[8]

Audio

[edit]

ATSC 3.0 supports Dolby AC-4 and MPEG-H 3D Audio.[9][10][11]

Video

[edit]

ATSC 3.0 supports three video formats: legacy SD video, interlaced HD video, and progressive video.[12] Legacy SD Video and Interlaced HD Video support frame rates up to 30 fps.[12] Legacy SD Video and Interlaced HD Video are included for compatibility with existing content and can't use HDR, HFR, or WCG.[12]

Legacy SD video

[edit]

Legacy SD video supports resolutions up to 720×480 and supports HEVC Main 10 profile at Level 3.1 Main Tier.[12]

Interlaced HD video

[edit]

Interlaced HD video supports 1080-line interlaced video with 1,920 or 1,440 pixels per line, and supports HEVC Main 10 profile at Level 4.1 Main Tier.[12]

Progressive video

[edit]

Progressive video supports resolutions up to 3840×2160 progressive scan and supports HEVC Main 10 profile at Level 5.2 Main Tier.[12] Progressive video supports frame rates up to 120 fps and the Rec. 2020 color space.[12] Progressive video supports HDR using hybrid log–gamma (HLG) and perceptual quantizer (PQ) transfer functions.[12][13]

Security

[edit]

ATSC 3.0 supports encryption of the signal to protect against intrusion and provide digital rights management (DRM). While tuner vendor Nuvyyo stated in 2017 that this was intended "to allow broadcasters to provide value-added services like on-demand and pay-per-view content on a subscription basis" via broadcast signals,[14] major U.S. broadcast groups began to encrypt their ATSC 3.0 broadcast signals in 2023.[15][16][17]

ATSC 3.0 supports digital watermarking of the audio and video signals.[18][19]

Public alerting

[edit]

A U.S.-based coalition known as the Advanced Warning and Response Network Alliance (AWARN) has advocated for the use of ATSC 3.0 features, including datacasting and digital network interoperability, in order to provide an emergency alert system with support for embedded rich media and finer geotargeting.[20][21]

In November 2021, AWARN and ATSC jointly filed comments in response to questions posed about ATSC 3.0 alerting capabilities in the FCC's Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking[22] as required by the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021.[23]

Broadcast Positioning System

[edit]

A backup to GPS called Broadcast Positioning System (BPS) has been proposed as part of ATSC 3.0, to provide location services in broadcast areas in the event of GPS failure.[24] This would use ATSC 3.0 to transmit timing signals terrestrially; the service could be deployed on existing infrastructure and would not be vulnerable to GPS jamming or spoofing.[25]

Analog audio fallback

[edit]

Unlike ATSC 1.0, ATSC 3.0 as defined makes possible the continued use of an analog audio subcarrier in addition to the digital signal—colloquially called a "Franken FM"—by narrowing the bandwidth of the channel to 5.5 MHz wide (ATSC 1.0 requires the full 6 MHz bandwidth).[26] On June 10, 2021, the FCC granted KBKF-LD in San Jose, California, a special temporary authority (STA) to transmit an analog FM audio subcarrier at 87.75 MHz, the same frequency as what would be the audio subcarrier on an NTSC analog video signal. KBKF-LD's sister station WRME-LD was granted a similar special temporary authority shortly before the end of low-power analog television on July 13, 2021. The STA has implications for the dozens of remaining analog low-power television stations on physical channel 6, which operate as FM radio stations using that NTSC subcarrier and face a July 13 deadline to convert to digital; a digital signal is not compatible with standard FM radio nor with the American digital radio standard, HD Radio. KBKF must report any interference issues to the FCC twice during the STA's term, once at 90 days and again at 180 days.[27] The initial 90-day filings demonstrated that the shared channel space was a success.[28] The FCC has proposed as of July 2023 that those operating under STA would continue to be allowed to use the analog audio service under a grandfather clause but would disallow the addition of analog audio to any other television licenses.[29]

History

[edit]

On March 26, 2013, the Advanced Television Systems Committee announced a call for proposals for the ATSC 3.0 physical layer which states that the plan is for the system to support video with a resolution of 3840×2160 at 60 fps (4K UHDTV).[30][31][32][33]

In February 2014, a channel-sharing trial began between Los Angeles television stations KLCS (a public television station that is a PBS member) and KJLA, a commercial ethnic broadcaster owned-and-operated by LATV, with support from the CTIA and approval of the Federal Communications Commission. The test involved multiplexing multiple HD and SD subchannels together, experimenting with both current MPEG-2/H.262 and MPEG-4 AVC/H.264 video codecs. Ultimately, it has been decided that H.264 would not be considered for ATSC-3.0, but rather the newer MPEG-H HEVC/H.265 codec would be used instead, with OFDM instead of 8VSB for modulation, allowing for data rates of 28 Mbit/s to 36 Mbit/s or more on a single 6 MHz channel.[34][35][36][37][38][39]

In May 2015, and continuing on for six months afterward, the temporary digital transition transmitter and antenna of Cleveland, Ohio's Fox affiliate, WJW, was used by the National Association of Broadcasters (NAB) to test the "Futurecast" ATSC 3.0 standard advanced by LG Corporation and GatesAir.[40] In September 2015 further tests in the Baltimore and Washington, D.C. area were announced by Sinclair Broadcast Group's Baltimore station, WBFF, which is also a Fox affiliate.[41] The Futurecast system had previously been tested in October 2014 during off-air hours through Madison, Wisconsin ABC affiliate WKOW.[42][43] Unlike ATSC 1.0/2.0's Distributed Transmission System's pseudo-single-frequency network operations, WI9XXT's two transmitters operate as a true Single-Frequency Network.[44]

Further tests began on January 6, 2016, of ATSC 3.0 with high dynamic range (using the Scalable HEVC video codec with HE-AAC audio) from Las Vegas independent station, KHMP-LD on UHF 18. It would later be joined in these tests by Sinclair's CW affiliate, KVCW simulcasting on a temporary test frequency (UHF 45).[45][46][47]

On January 20, 2016, a working group in South Korea led by LG Electronics and others performed the first "end-to-end" broadcast of 4K resolution programming via an ATSC 3.0 signal, using an IP transmission from the Seoul Broadcasting System's Mok-dong studio to feed a transmitter on Gwanak Mountain. The broadcaster's technical director stated that the successful test "highlights the potential for Korea's launch of terrestrial UHD TV commercial services using ATSC 3.0 in February 2017."[48][49] Following the test broadcast, South Korean broadcasters announced that they planned to launch ATSC 3.0 services in February 2017.[50]

On March 28, 2016, the bootstrap component of ATSC 3.0 (System Discovery and Signalling) was upgraded from candidate standard to finalized standard.[51]

On June 29, 2016, NBC affiliate WRAL-TV in Raleigh, North Carolina, a station known for its pioneering roles in testing the original ATSC standards, launched an experimental ATSC 3.0 channel carrying the station's programming in 1080p, as well as a 4K demo loop.[52] WRAL-EX has also carried 4K coverage of the 2016 Summer Olympics and 2018 Winter Olympics in an experimental manner.[53][54]

Comparison with 5G Broadcast

[edit]

In comparison with 5G Broadcast, the IP-based broadcasting standard based on LTE, ATSC 3.0 has been praised for significantly higher bandwidth efficiency, and the presence of a future-proofing "bootstrap" signal to enable the introduction of new physical-level modulation profiles. However, 5G Broadcast was seen as having the advantage in most other aspects of performance.[55]

Countries and territories using ATSC 3.0

[edit]

Brazil

[edit]

In January 2022, the Fórum Sistema Brasileiro TV Digital Terrestre recommended the adoption of key ATSC 3.0 technologies as part of its "TV 3.0" standards for next-generation digital terrestrial television in Brazil, which will replace the Japanese ISDB-T International standards.[56][57] Terrestrial television has a major presence in the country, with 88% of families surveyed by the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE) stating that they receive terrestrial television at home.[58] TV Globo—Brazil's largest network—announced plans to deploy TV 3.0 nationally in time for the 2026 FIFA World Cup, and has demonstrated 8K service.[58]

Canada

[edit]

In 2022, an experimental station using ATSC 3.0 was launched in the Toronto area by Humber Polytechnic under the call sign VBA257.[59]

Jamaica

[edit]

In December 2021, the Jamaica Broadcasting Commission established that Jamaica would adopt ATSC 3.0 as part of the country's transition from analog to digital television, with the transition expected to be completed in 2023.[60] Television Jamaica concurrently joined the ATSC as its first full member from the Caribbean.[61]

On January 31, 2022, Television Jamaica launched their first ATSC 3.0 transmitter in Kingston, making Jamaica the first country in the Caribbean and the third country in the world to launch ATSC 3.0 broadcasting.[62] A second transmitter in Montego Bay was activated in July 2022.[63]

South Korea

[edit]

On July 27, 2016, South Korea's Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning officially endorsed ATSC 3.0 as the country's broadcasting standard for ultra-high-definition television.[64] On January 6, 2017, LG Electronics announced that their 2017 4K TVs sold in South Korea would include ATSC 3.0 tuners.[65]

On May 31, 2017, SBS, MBC, and KBS officially launched their full-time ATSC 3.0 services in major South Korean markets such as Seoul and Incheon. The launch had been delayed from February 2017 due to issues obtaining the required equipment.[66][67]

The transition made South Korea the first country in the world to deploy a terrestrial UHD format, and enabled 4K broadcasts of the 2018 Winter Olympics in Pyeongchang County.[68][69]

Trinidad and Tobago

[edit]

In January 2023, the Telecommunications Authority of Trinidad and Tobago (TATT) announced that Trinidad and Tobago would adopt ATSC 3.0 as part of the nation's transition from analog to digital television, with the transition expected to be completed in 2026.[70]

United States

[edit]
See also: List of ATSC 3.0 television stations in the United States

On February 2, 2017, the FCC issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to allow the deployment of ATSC 3.0 in the United States,[71] seeking comment on issues such as carriage obligations, interference, public interest obligations, simulcasting, and a tuner mandate.[72] Gary Shapiro of the Consumer Technology Association (CTA) has stated that a TV tuner mandate is not necessary and that it should be market-driven and voluntary.[73] On February 24, 2017, the FCC voted unanimously to approve two portions of the NPRM, opening the door for manufacturers to begin producing ATSC 3.0 hardware.[74]

On November 14, 2017, the Pearl consortium (comprising a number of major broadcasting conglomerates, including Cox Media Group, Graham Media Group, Hearst Television, Gray Television, Nexstar Media Group, E. W. Scripps Company, and Tegna Inc.) announced that it would use Phoenix, Arizona as a test market for an ATSC 3.0 transition in 2018.[75] Two days later, the FCC voted 3–2 in favor of an order authorizing voluntary deployments of ATSC 3.0 (referred to under the branding "Next Gen TV"); stations that choose to deploy ATSC 3.0 services must continue to maintain an ATSC 1.0-compatible signal that is "substantially similar" in programming to their ATSC 3.0 signal (besides programming that leverages ATSC 3.0 features, and advertising), and covers the station's entire community of license (the FCC stated that it would expedite approval for transitions if the loss in over-the-air coverage post-transition is 5% or less). This clause will remain in effect for at least five years; permission from the FCC must be obtained before a full-power station can shut down its ATSC signal, but low-power stations are exempt from the simulcasting requirement and are allowed to flash-cut to ATSC 3.0 if they choose.[76][77]

ATSC 1.0 signals will still be subject to mandatory carriage rules for television providers during the five-year simulcasting mandate; the FCC stated that voluntary carriage of 3.0 signals by television providers would be left to the marketplace. The order does require stations to provide sufficient on-air notice about transitions to ATSC 3.0 services.[77] The FCC will not allocate a second channel to each broadcaster to enable a gradual consumer transition. Instead, it has been suggested that multiple broadcasters in each market cooperate by locating multiple degraded ATSC 1.0 services on a single transmitter. At the same time, the broadcasters would share the remaining transmitters for ATSC 3.0 transmissions. After sufficient consumer adoption, ATSC 1.0 transmissions would be abandoned, allowing stations to return to operation on their owned transmitters. It is unclear how the complications of this approach would be overcome, especially in light of spectrum reallocation in heavily populated markets.[78]

The FCC published its final rules on ATSC 3.0 to the Federal Register on February 2, 2018, and they formally took effect 30 days afterward.[79] As the transition is voluntary, the FCC will not require ATSC 3.0 tuners to be included in new televisions, and there will not be a subsidy program for the distribution of ATSC 3.0-compatible equipment.[80] American Television Alliance (ATA)—a consortium of U.S. television providers—criticized the "voluntary" transition, inconsistencies in commitments to simulcasting arrangements for compatibility, and potential downgrades in service for ATSC 1.0 viewers, as well as how these signals will factor into retransmission consent negotiations.[81] It has been suggested that ATSC 1.0 lighthouses using MPEG-4 encoding could allow for more channels to be carried on lighthouse signals and at up to 1080p resolution, while maintaining a level of backward compatibility with existing televisions and tuners. However, not all televisions and decoder boxes—particularly earlier models—support MPEG-4 video on ATSC 1.0 signals.[82][83]

"NextGen TV" brand logo used on ATSC 3.0 compatible products sold in the United States

As part of the ATSC 3.0 trials by Pearl, Univision's KFPH-CD in Phoenix was converted to an ATSC 3.0 station on April 9, 2018, which will be shared by Univision and several other broadcasters. Univision and Sinclair Broadcast Group were also planning a trial in Dallas, which would utilize spectrum vacated by KSTR-DT and KTXD-TV to test ATSC 3.0 transmission using a single-frequency network.[84][85] On September 26, 2019, the CTA announced that it would use the certification mark "NextGen TV" (stylized "NEXTGEN TV") to promote equipment that is compliant with the ATSC 3.0 standard.[86][87] The major network affiliates in Las Vegas became the first to launch permanent ATSC 3.0 signals on May 26, 2020.[88]

Due to the nature of FCC regulatory requirements, early ATSC 3.0 "lighthouse" stations involved sharing agreements with major station ownership groups such as Nexstar, Sinclair, Scripps, and Tegna, and did not engage public television stations and independent broadcasters. For example, the Buffalo launch of ATSC 3.0 left out PBS member station WNED-TV and independent station WBBZ-TV.[89] In December 2021, Pearl TV would partner with a public television station as host for the first time, announcing a partnership with the historically black Howard University in Washington, D.C. and its PBS station WHUT-TV; the university had worked with the NAB on seminars discussing ATSC 3.0, and the university had been developing ATSC 3.0-based distance learning platforms using its datacasting functionality.[90][91]

Consumer adoption of ATSC 3.0 has been slow, hindered primarily by many television manufacturers reserving built-in ATSC 3.0 tuners for high-end models (if at all), lukewarm interest in ATSC 3.0's interactive capabilities, and greater interest among consumers in streaming platforms offering equivalent functionality.[92] Nevertheless, in February 2025 the NAB filed a petition with the FCC proposing a two-stage mandatory transition, beginning with most stations within the top 55 media markets in February 2028, and the remainder by February 2030. The NAB estimated that service was now available to approximately 75% of the U.S. population across over 80 media markets, and that ATSC 3.0 tuners were available in 10% of the new TVs shipped in 2024.[93]

CTA CEO Gary Shapiro criticized the proposal, stating that a mandatory transition would "impose [a] large percentage increase in costs at a time when the TV set has proved to be the rare deflationary product."[93] The digital rights advocacy group Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) also opposed the proposal, arguing that ATSC 3.0's encryption and DRM functions made it "a transition from the century-old system of universally accessible programming to a privately controlled web of proprietary technological restrictions."[94] By September 2025, other groups, associations, companies and organizations: NCTA, Public Knowledge, America Television Alliance, Consumer Reports (CR), Access Humboldt, Media Council Hawaii, Low Power Television (LPTV) Broadcasters Association, America's Communications Association (ACA) Connects, Open Technology Institute (OTI) of New America, Americans for Tax Reform (ATR), Digital Liberty, The Innovation Economy Alliance, Citizens Against Government Waste (CAGW), Taxpayers Protection Alliance (TPA), Weigel Broadcasting and Venture Technologies filed comments urging the FCC to not allow NAB's proposal for a nationwide mandate, arguing that market forces should determine the standard's future rather than government intervention, with NCTA claiming the transition "would be unjustified and ill-advised" in the deregulation goals of the Trump administration, violating the First and Fifth amendments,[citation needed] and LPTV president/founder Frank Copsidas criticized the proposal as "crony capitalism at its worst".[citation needed] In direct contrast with the FCC, President Donald Trump opposed lifting broadcast ownership cap, claiming its "A VIRTUAL ARM OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY" and that it would allow "Radical Left Networks" to "enlarge".[citation needed]

[edit]

Privacy

[edit]

U.S. consumer advocates have noted the opportunity which ATSC 3.0 provides to advertisers to run targeted advertising. The targeted ads would allow advertisers to track viewer ratings more directly rather than indirectly by companies such as Nielsen Media Research. The FCC is expected to defer the decision on targeted ads to be in accordance with Federal Trade Commission's guidelines on privacy.[95]

DRM

[edit]

The ability to encrypt over-the-air signals has faced criticism for contradicting the concept of free-to-air television, and potentially hindering digital video recorders and place shifting products via restrictions imposed by broadcasters.[15][16][17]

Patent litigation

[edit]

In October 2023, LG Electronics announced that it would no longer include ATSC 3.0 tuners in its U.S. products beginning in the 2024 model year, after the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas ruled that the company had violated patents owned by Constellation Design, Inc. (which is not a member of ATSC) related to non-uniform constellation (NUC) techniques used by the standard, and was ordered to pay $1.68 million in damages. The ATSC stated that the impact of the situation was "likely very limited".[96]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

ATSC 3.0

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
ATSC 3.0, commercially branded as NextGen TV, is a suite of broadcasting standards developed by the Advanced Television Systems Committee (ATSC) to enable transmission of ultra-high-definition (UHD) video, (HDR) imaging, wide color gamut, immersive audio, and interactive datacasting services over the airwaves. Unlike its predecessor ATSC 1.0, the system is not backward compatible, necessitating simulcasting during transitional phases and new receiver equipment for viewers. The standards leverage (OFDM) for robust signal transmission, supporting fixed, mobile, and handheld reception, while incorporating (IP) transport for hybrid broadcast-broadband delivery. Developed over more than a decade by the ATSC, with the core system standard A/300 finalized in 2017 and updated periodically, ATSC 3.0 aims to revitalize free over-the-air broadcasting by competing with streaming services through enhanced quality and features like , emergency alerting, and potential models. Deployment began voluntarily in the United States in 2018 following FCC authorization, with signals now available in over 75 markets covering more than 70% of households as of , though full nationwide coverage remains limited. has been hampered by the scarcity of integrated tuners in consumer televisions—primarily offered as add-on devices—and regulatory requirements for simulcasting ATSC 1.0 signals, prompting recent FCC proposals to phase out such mandates by 2028-2030 to accelerate the transition. Significant achievements include demonstrations of 4K HDR broadcasts and datacasting applications, positioning ATSC 3.0 as a resilient, spectrum-efficient alternative to internet-dependent streaming amid growing concerns over bandwidth congestion and cybersecurity vulnerabilities in online delivery. However, controversies persist, particularly around the implementation of (DRM) protocols, which critics argue could restrict recording capabilities, impose proprietary fees on broadcasters, and exacerbate costs for low-power stations, potentially forcing closures without federal support. advocacy groups have opposed mandatory tuner requirements, citing insufficient market demand and risks of obsolescing existing , while small broadcasters decry the financial burdens of upgrades amid voluntary rollout uncertainties. These tensions underscore the challenges of modernizing broadcast infrastructure without alienating legacy users or imposing undue economic strain.

Overview

Core Purpose and Improvements over ATSC 1.0

ATSC 3.0, branded as NextGen TV, constitutes the next-generation suite of standards for , developed to supersede ATSC 1.0 by addressing limitations in video resolution, transmission efficiency, and service capabilities amid evolving consumer demands for higher-quality content and interactivity. Its core purpose centers on revitalizing free over-the-air (OTA) local television as a resilient platform for delivering enhanced audiovisual experiences, emergency communications, and data services, while integrating with IP networks to support hybrid broadcast-broadband models without mandating a spectrum reallocation. This standard, finalized by the Advanced Television Systems Committee in , enables broadcasters to compete with streaming services through voluntary adoption, preserving access to local news and public interest programming. Key improvements in video quality include support for 4K Ultra High Definition (UHD) resolution—offering four times the pixel count of ATSC 1.0's 1080i/720p high-definition broadcasts—alongside High Dynamic Range (HDR) for expanded contrast ratios up to 1,000,000:1 and Wide Color Gamut (WCG) standards like BT.2020 for more lifelike colors, enabled by High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) compression that achieves up to 50% greater efficiency than ATSC 1.0's MPEG-2 or AVC. Audio advancements shift from ATSC 1.0's Dolby Digital surround sound to object-based immersive formats such as Dolby AC-4 or MPEG-H, allowing personalized soundscapes, dialogue enhancement, and accessibility features like clear audio separation even during signal degradation. Transmission enhancements leverage (OFDM) modulation with layered division multiplexing, providing superior robustness for mobile and indoor reception compared to ATSC 1.0's single-carrier , which struggles with multipath interference and Doppler shifts. This results in improved spectrum efficiency, potentially doubling capacity for additional services like datacasting or via IP packets, while enabling advanced emergency alerting with geo-targeted, video-rich alerts resilient to video outages. Unlike ATSC 1.0's fixed, one-way model, ATSC 3.0's IP-centric architecture facilitates interactivity, such as pausing live TV or hyper-local content insertion, fostering new revenue streams without compromising the standard's OTA core.

Key Technical Advancements

ATSC 3.0 introduces ultra-high-definition (UHD) video support up to (2160p) using (HEVC, or H.265), which provides significantly greater compression efficiency than the codec limited to in ATSC 1.0, allowing broadcasters to deliver higher-quality imagery within constrained spectrum bandwidths. This advancement also enables (HDR) and wide color gamut (WCG) technologies, enhancing contrast, brightness, and color accuracy for more realistic visuals on compatible displays. Audio systems in ATSC 3.0 represent a leap forward with support for immersive, object-based formats such as and , capable of delivering up to 7.1.4-channel configurations including height channels for overhead sound, surpassing the of ATSC 1.0. These codecs incorporate features like dialogue enhancement and personalized audio streams, improving clarity and adaptability for diverse listening environments without requiring additional bandwidth. Transmission efficiency is bolstered by the adoption of (OFDM) modulation and low-density parity-check (LDPC) , which offer superior resistance to multipath interference and Doppler shifts compared to ATSC 1.0's single-carrier , thereby enabling robust fixed and mobile reception even at high speeds. The includes a bootstrap signal for rapid signal acquisition and compatibility signaling, facilitating layered transmission modes that optimize data rates up to 57 Mbps in a 6 MHz channel. The standard shifts to Internet Protocol (IP)-based transport using protocols like ROUTE (Real-time Object delivery over Unidirectional Transport) and (Dynamic Adaptive Streaming over HTTP), enabling seamless integration of over-the-air broadcasts with broadband-delivered content for hybrid services such as video-on-demand, , and . This IP foundation supports advanced emergency alerting with geo-targeting and capabilities, as well as datacasting for non-video data like software updates or IP data services, expanding broadcast utility beyond traditional programming. Security enhancements, including public-private key encryption and watermarking, protect content from unauthorized redistribution while allowing models.

Technical Specifications

Bootstrap and Physical Layer

The bootstrap signal in ATSC 3.0 serves as a fixed to the broadcast , enabling receivers to detect, synchronize, and identify the signal format regardless of varying configurations. It operates with a constant bandwidth of 4.5 MHz and a sampling rate of 6.144 Msps, ensuring compatibility across different channel bandwidths up to 6 MHz or wider via channel bonding. This includes predefined symbols for timing recovery, frequency offset correction, and transmission of essential signaling data, such as the protocol version and frame details, facilitating robust signal acquisition even at low signal-to-noise ratios. Defined in ATSC standard A/321, the bootstrap precedes the low-density parity-check (LDPC) (FEC) frames and supports by conveying parameters like the delivery system type and basic signaling for subsequent layers. Its fixed contrasts with the flexible main , allowing tuners to distinguish ATSC 3.0 from legacy ATSC 1.0 signals without prior of modulation or coding schemes. The physical layer (PHY) of ATSC 3.0, specified in standard A/322, employs orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (OFDM) modulation to divide the 6 MHz channel into thousands of closely spaced subcarriers, enhancing spectral efficiency and resistance to multipath interference compared to the single-carrier vestigial sideband (VSB) of ATSC 1.0. It supports variable FFT sizes (8K, 16K, or 32K points), guard intervals (from 1/192 to 1/48 of symbol duration), and pilot patterns (up to 16 types) for optimized performance in fixed, mobile, or single-frequency network (SFN) scenarios. Forward error correction combines Bose-Chaudhuri-Hocquenghem (BCH) outer codes with LDPC inner codes, offering 12 code rates from 2/15 to 13/15, while modulation schemes range from QPSK to 4096-QAM across 6 orders, enabling data rates up to approximately 57 Mbps in a single 6 MHz channel under ideal conditions. Multiple pipes (PLPs) allow partitioning of the waveform for diverse services, such as robust low-rate mobile streams alongside high-throughput fixed reception, with support for channel bonding to aggregate bandwidth beyond 6 MHz. Time interleaving options, including convolutional and cell-based variants up to 250 ms, further mitigate in mobile environments. These features, approved in September 2016, prioritize flexibility for broadcasters to tailor transmission to coverage needs and content demands.

Video Encoding and Formats

ATSC 3.0 employs (HEVC, also known as H.265) as its core video compression standard, detailed in ATSC A/341, which defines constraints for HEVC bitstreams to ensure compatibility and performance within the broadcast system. This codec provides approximately 50% greater compression efficiency compared to the used in ATSC 1.0, enabling higher quality video at lower bitrates or more content within the same bandwidth. HEVC supports formats, with maximum resolutions of 3840 × 2160 pixels (4K UHD) at frame rates up to 120 Hz, 10-bit per channel , and wide color gamut via Rec. BT.2020 primaries. High Dynamic Range (HDR) is facilitated through profiles such as Hybrid Log-Gamma (HLG) for live broadcasts and static metadata methods like , with dynamic metadata support via SMPTE ST 2094-10 () or for enhanced contrast and color volume. The standard mandates Main 10 profile conformance for HDR content, allowing peak luminance up to 10,000 cd/m² while maintaining with standard dynamic range displays through . Scalable extensions of HEVC (SHVC) are permitted for layered encoding, supporting spatial factors of 1.5×, 2×, or 3× for hybrid broadcast-broadband delivery. In July 2025, ATSC approved A/345, incorporating (VVC, H.266) as an optional codec to achieve up to 30-50% additional efficiency over HEVC, particularly for 4K and 8K content, with features like improved intra prediction and adaptive loop filtering. VVC maintains compatibility with ATSC 3.0's IP-based transport and signaling, using SEI messages for metadata, but its deployment remains nascent as of late 2025 due to encoder/decoder hardware maturation. Both codecs operate within bitrates typically ranging from 10-25 Mbps for 4K HDR signals, depending on content complexity and modulation scheme. Video streams are encapsulated in (ISOBMFF) fragments for IP multicast delivery over ROUTE or MMTP protocols.

Audio Systems

ATSC 3.0 audio systems are defined by the A/342 standard, which establishes a common framework for audio delivery while supporting multiple codecs to enable immersive, object-based, and personalized sound experiences. This standard, finalized in 2017, allows broadcasters to transmit high-quality audio streams that exceed the capabilities of ATSC 1.0's (AC-3), incorporating features such as up to 7.1.4-channel configurations for height-enabled . The system leverages IP-based transport for flexibility, enabling multiple audio services per broadcast channel, including primary program audio, secondary languages, and accessibility tracks. The primary codecs supported are Dolby AC-4 (specified in A/342 Part 2) and the MPEG-H TV Audio System (specified in A/342 Part 3). AC-4, developed by Dolby Laboratories, compresses audio efficiently for broadcast while supporting immersive formats like Dolby Atmos, object metadata for dynamic sound placement, and personalization options such as dialogue enhancement (e.g., Voice Plus mode, which boosts speech clarity without affecting overall levels). It also maintains consistent loudness across channels via built-in normalization tools, reducing manual adjustments for viewers. MPEG-H, developed by Fraunhofer IIS and others, similarly enables 3D audio with up to 64 channels, binaural rendering for headphones, and user-customizable mixes (e.g., adjusting music, effects, or dialogue independently). These codecs facilitate advanced features like audio , where receivers decode metadata to adapt output to user preferences or device capabilities, such as generating virtual surround from sources or supporting hearing-impaired modes with speech intelligibility. Broadcasters can embed watermarks (per A/341 ) for identification and , optionally transmitted in the audio stream for tracking or purposes. Deployment as of 2025 includes AC-4 in U.S. NextGen TV stations for live events and sports, leveraging its low-latency encoding (under 100 ms for some configurations) to align with video streams. Both codecs ensure scalability, with bitrates adjustable from 96 kbps for basic to over 1 Mbps for full immersive setups, optimizing spectrum efficiency in the 6 MHz channel bandwidth.

Security and Content Protection

ATSC 3.0 implements robust security mechanisms to safeguard broadcast signals against tampering, unauthorized interception, and , as outlined in ATSC standard A/360, which addresses transport protection, cryptographic signing, certificate management, and content protection. These features enable broadcasters to deliver high-value content, such as 4K ultra-high-definition video with , while mitigating risks absent in the unencrypted ATSC 1.0 standard. Transport protection employs to secure data streams, ensuring confidentiality during over-the-air transmission, while cryptographic signing verifies signal authenticity and integrity, preventing insertion of malicious content. Content protection in ATSC 3.0 relies on (DRM) systems certified by the ATSC 3.0 Security Authority (A3SA), an organization formed by broadcasters and content providers to operationalize these protections. DRM-encrypted services use the Common Encryption (CENC) standard with the AES-128 algorithm in CBC mode for video and audio streams, allowing selective encryption of premium content while permitting unencrypted base services. Device authentication occurs via digital certificates and public-key infrastructure, requiring receivers to prove compliance with A3SA specifications before decryption keys are released, thus restricting access to authorized hardware. Standard A/361 provides recommended operational parameters for non-DRM security elements, such as key derivation and signaling, to ensure interoperability across compliant devices. The A3SA manages certification processes, funding for security infrastructure, and compliance enforcement, certifying devices like televisions and gateways that support DRM modules such as Google Widevine or equivalent systems adapted for broadcast. As of , approximately 24% of ATSC 3.0 stations transmit encrypted streams, up from 16% earlier that year, enabling targeted protection for enhanced features but excluding non-certified tuners and DVRs from access. Manufacturers like SiliconDust have criticized A3SA requirements, arguing they impose proprietary re-encryption mandates (e.g., DTCP-IP) that limit competition and hinder over-the-air recording on uncertified devices, prompting FCC filings to relax DRM rules. Broadcasters counter that such protections are essential for sustaining investment in advanced content, as unencrypted high-resolution broadcasts risk widespread unauthorized redistribution. has challenged A3SA's authority in 2025, contending it enables potential revocation of non-compliant receivers, potentially undermining free TV access.

Advanced Features

ATSC 3.0 introduces IP-based transport as a foundational advanced capability, shifting from the MPEG-2 transport streams of prior standards to native encapsulation for all services, including video, audio, and data. This enables hybrid broadcast-broadband architectures where over-the-air signals integrate seamlessly with internet-delivered content, supporting features like video-on-demand supplementation and synchronized companion applications. The standard's interactivity and personalization features leverage the IP transport and optional broadband return paths to deliver user-specific experiences, such as targeted advertising, customizable audio streams, and on-demand access to program segments. Broadcasters can transmit metadata-rich content that triggers receiver-side processing for hyper-localized services, including weather alerts tailored to viewer location or interactive polls integrated with mobile apps. Datacasting represents a significant expansion beyond traditional audiovisual broadcasting, allowing the transmission of arbitrary IP data packets within the 6 MHz channel bandwidth for non-video applications. This includes high-volume data delivery for , software updates to connected devices, IoT multicast distribution, and data dissemination, with capacities potentially exceeding 20 Mbps for data services alone depending on configuration. Advanced Emergency Information (AEI) enhances public alerting through multimedia-rich notifications, supporting video clips, interactive maps, and device-specific adaptations like haptic feedback or voice descriptions for . Unlike legacy systems limited to text crawls, AEI uses the IP framework to geo-target alerts with granular precision and integrate real-time updates from sources like FEMA's IPAWS, demonstrated in closed-circuit tests as of June 2024.

Development History

Early Standardization Efforts

The Advanced Television Systems Committee (ATSC) initiated early efforts to develop a successor to the ATSC 1.0 standard in response to its limitations in supporting ultra-high-definition video, mobile reception, and internet-protocol integration following the U.S. digital transition in 2009. Discussions on next-generation began informally around 2010, with ATSC forming a planning team to conceptualize enhancements for over-the-air television. On September 6, 2011, ATSC officially announced the creation of Technology Group 3 (TG3), its dedicated body for exploring and standardizing a next-generation system, following recommendations from the ATSC in July 2011 and formal adoption by members on September 2, 2011. TG3's initial mandate focused on assessing technical proposals for advanced features, including improved efficiency, interactivity, and compatibility with emerging technologies, while maintaining considerations for existing infrastructure. TG3 commenced substantive work in 2012, prioritizing system requirements definition and solicitation of input from industry stakeholders. By early , the group issued a call for proposals specifically targeting the protocol, inviting submissions for technologies enabling higher data rates, robust mobile performance, and support for 4K/8K resolutions. This phase involved collaboration among broadcasters, equipment manufacturers, and researchers, with evaluations emphasizing empirical testing of modulation schemes like (OFDM) variants for superior signal reliability. These efforts laid the groundwork for subsequent specialist subgroups addressing layers such as video coding, audio, and security, culminating in candidate standards by mid-decade.

Approval and Initial Rollout Milestones

The Advanced Television Systems Committee (ATSC) approved the ATSC 3.0 standard on September 8, 2016, marking a critical step in finalizing the transmission protocol after years of development that began in 2013. This approval followed the earlier candidate standard phase for the in September 2015 and the bootstrap signaling component's finalization in March 2016. On November 16, 2017, the (FCC) voted 3-2 to authorize voluntary use of the ATSC 3.0 standard, enabling broadcasters to deploy it on a market-driven basis without mandatory simulcasting requirements beyond local service obligations. This decision, formalized in an order released shortly thereafter, permitted stations to transmit ATSC 3.0 signals while maintaining ATSC 1.0 compatibility through hosting arrangements with other licensees. The ATSC subsequently approved the overarching A/300 system standard on September 17, 2019, consolidating the full suite of specifications for deployment. Initial U.S. rollouts commenced with experimental and temporary signals in select markets starting in 2018, but the first permanent ATSC 3.0 broadcast occurred on May 26, 2020, when Sinclair Broadcast Group's KVCW in Las Vegas launched a full-time signal. By April 2020, additional markets like Portland, Oregon, prepared launches through partnerships such as Meredith and Nexstar. Industry projections anticipated deployments in up to 40 markets by the end of 2020, focusing on major metropolitan areas to test infrastructure and consumer reception. These early efforts emphasized voluntary adoption, with the FCC beginning to accept formal applications for ATSC 3.0 operations in 2019.

Global Deployment and Adoption

United States Implementation

The (FCC) authorized voluntary deployment of ATSC 3.0 on November 16, 2017, permitting full-power and Class A television stations to transmit the standard while maintaining of ATSC 1.0 signals to ensure viewer access. Initial over-the-air broadcasts began in select markets in 2018, with early adopters including stations in and conducting trials under FCC waivers. Deployment has proceeded on a market-by-market basis through voluntary agreements among broadcasters, often led by groups like Pearl TV and , which have hosted signals for multiple affiliates. As of January 2025, ATSC 3.0 signals reach approximately 76% of U.S. households across over 80 designated market areas (DMAs), with more than 200 local services offering enhanced features such as High Dynamic Range (HDR) video. Broadcasters transmit ATSC 3.0 via host stations, where non-host affiliates share spectrum under FCC-approved arrangements, enabling wider coverage without immediate infrastructure overhauls. The FCC requires ongoing ATSC 1.0 simulcast for full-power stations, which has constrained full utilization of ATSC 3.0's advanced capabilities like higher data rates and mobile reception due to shared channel capacity. In September 2025, the FCC streamlined application processing for ATSC 3.0 deployments and reaffirmed support for the standard, while in October 2025, it advanced proposals to phase out ATSC 1.0 simulcast requirements. The National Association of Broadcasters (NAB) petitioned for a structured transition, proposing mandatory ATSC 3.0 tuners in new televisions by February 2028 in major markets and full ATSC 1.0 sunset by 2030, aiming to accelerate consumer adoption amid growing availability of compatible devices from manufacturers like Sony, Samsung, and RCA. As of mid-2025, over 75 NextGen TV receiver models were available at retail, with projections for more than 100 by year-end, though tuner integration in low-cost sets remains limited. Low-power TV and translator stations may deploy ATSC 3.0 without simulcast, facilitating experimental uses in underserved areas.

International Adoptions and Trials

adopted ATSC 3.0 as its terrestrial broadcasting standard in 2017, achieving approximately 80% national coverage by 2025 through extensive deployments led by public broadcaster KBS and private networks. The standard enables advanced features like 4K UHD transmission and interactive services, with ongoing innovations in mobile reception and IP integration. Jamaica officially adopted ATSC 3.0 in 2018, marking one of the earliest international implementations outside , with state broadcaster CVM Television deploying services in urban areas including Kingston. This rollout supports enhanced video quality and datacasting for emergency alerts, though nationwide coverage remains limited due to infrastructure constraints. initiated a transition to ATSC 3.0 in 2025 under the Telecommunications Authority, with full implementation targeted for 2026 to replace ISDB-T systems and improve spectrum efficiency for HD and future-proof services. followed with formal adoption of the ATSC 3.0-based DTV+ standard in August 2025, approved by the SBTVD Forum, enabling commercial launches ahead of the through integration with existing ISDB-T infrastructure for hybrid broadcasting. Ongoing trials include evaluations in , where broadcasters and regulators assessed ATSC 3.0 compatibility with existing ATSC 1.0 networks for potential voluntary upgrades focused on localized content and mobile delivery. conducted field tests emphasizing spectrum sharing and datacasting applications, while explored ATSC 3.0 for urban DTH enhancements amid competition from DVB-T2. These efforts reflect ATSC's push via approvals to adapt the standard for diverse regulatory environments, though full adoptions hinge on national policy alignments.

Barriers to Widespread Use

The adoption of ATSC 3.0 has been impeded by substantial financial burdens on broadcasters, particularly smaller stations and low-power television (LPTV) operators, where basic implementation costs can exceed $300,000 per site due to required hardware, certification processes, and licensing fees. Multichannel video programming distributors (MVPDs) such as face additional expenses estimated at approximately $8,000 per feed for ATSC 3.0 compatibility, regardless of whether stations fully transition, further straining resources and discouraging investment. These costs, combined with the need for upgrades like spectrum-efficient transmission , have slowed deployments beyond major markets, with critics arguing that they threaten the viability of free over-the-air television for resource-limited entities. ATSC 3.0's lack of with existing ATSC 1.0 receivers necessitates new consumer hardware, such as updated televisions or external tuners, which has resulted in low household penetration rates despite voluntary deployments in over 75 U.S. markets by early 2025. (FCC) rules mandate simultaneous simulcasting of ATSC 1.0 signals alongside ATSC 3.0, requiring broadcasters to maintain dual transmission systems that duplicate operational expenses and spectrum usage without a firm sunset date for legacy signals, thereby prolonging the transition period and limiting incentives for full adoption. This hybrid approach, intended to protect existing viewers, has been cited as a resource drain that stifles innovation and broader rollout. Digital rights management (DRM) and content protection features in ATSC 3.0 introduce encryption that can restrict recording and playback on non-certified devices, raising concerns among consumer advocates about barriers to unrestricted access to free broadcast content, unlike the open standards of ATSC 1.0. Regulatory uncertainties, including ongoing FCC proceedings on tuner mandates and opposition to forced transitions from groups highlighting insufficient market penetration (with ATSC 3.0 available to only about 75% of U.S. households as of mid-2025), compound these issues by delaying policy clarity needed for scaled investment. Limited consumer awareness and the prioritization of streaming services over broadcast upgrades have further hindered device sales, with industry reports noting that widespread acceptance hinges on achieving critical mass in enabled receivers, a threshold not yet met.

Comparative Analysis

Performance Versus ATSC 1.0

ATSC 3.0 provides substantial enhancements in video and audio capabilities over ATSC 1.0, primarily through adoption of (HEVC) instead of , enabling support for 4K Ultra HD resolution (up to 3840×2160 pixels), (HDR), wide color gamut (WCG), and frame rates up to 120 fps, compared to ATSC 1.0's maximum of 1080i or HD. This allows for sharper imagery and more immersive experiences, with HEVC achieving approximately 50% better compression efficiency than at equivalent quality levels. In terms of transmission performance, ATSC 3.0 employs (OFDM) modulation with configurable (FFT) sizes (e.g., 8k, 16k, or 32k modes), replacing ATSC 1.0's single-carrier , which improves resilience to multipath interference, Doppler shifts, and (SFN) deployments. in ATSC 3.0 utilizes low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes combined with Bose-Chaudhuri-Hocquenghem (BCH) codes, offering greater flexibility to trade data rate for robustness—enabling reception at signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) as low as 5-6 dB in robust modes versus ATSC 1.0's fixed threshold around 15 dB—while supporting layered transmission for simultaneous fixed and mobile services. Data throughput in a standard 6 MHz channel reaches approximately 57 Mbps gross in high-efficiency ATSC 3.0 modes, exceeding ATSC 1.0's fixed 19.39 Mbps, though net varies with levels and allows for IP-based datacasting or hybrid broadcast-broadband delivery. Field tests, such as those conducted by the (NAB) in high-VHF bands, demonstrate ATSC 3.0's superior indoor and portable reception, with measurable gains in signal quality under interference compared to ATSC 1.0, attributed to OFDM's multicarrier structure.
AspectATSC 1.0ATSC 3.0
Modulation (single-carrier)OFDM (multi-carrier, configurable FFT)
Video CodecHEVC (H.265), with optional support
Max Resolution1920×1080i or 1280×720p3840×2160 (4K UHD), HDR/WCG
Channel BitrateFixed 19.39 MbpsVariable, up to ~57 Mbps gross
Error CorrectionReed-Solomon + trellis codingLDPC + BCH, tunable robustness
Reception RobustnessSusceptible to multipathImproved for mobile/indoor via OFDM

Versus 5G Broadcast

ATSC 3.0 and Broadcast represent competing approaches to IP-based broadcasting, with ATSC 3.0 optimized for delivery over dedicated UHF/VHF spectrum and 5G Broadcast leveraging cellular infrastructure for content to mobile devices. ATSC 3.0 employs (OFDM) with advanced bit-interleaved coded modulation (BICM) and time interleaving, enabling robust performance in fixed, portable, and mobile reception scenarios, while 5G Broadcast, standardized under Release 17, uses similar OFDM but with physical channels (PMCH) that integrate into cellular networks. Empirical evaluations, including and field tests conducted as of November 2024, demonstrate ATSC 3.0's superiority in reliability due to its enhanced and interleaving depth, achieving higher signal-to-noise ratios under equivalent conditions. In terms of , ATSC 3.0 delivers greater throughput per megahertz, with tests showing it outperforms Broadcast in both fixed indoor and high-speed mobile environments, particularly at data rates of 5–15 Mbps where 's PMCH often fails decoding. For instance, within an 8 MHz channel, ATSC 3.0 utilizes 7.78 MHz of useful bandwidth compared to Broadcast's 7.2 MHz, contributing to its edge in high-order modulation scenarios requiring elevated data rates. This efficiency stems from ATSC 3.0's tailored optimizations for broadcast-only transmission, avoiding the overhead of 's hybrid unicast-broadcast , which prioritizes compatibility with cellular handovers. However, Broadcast benefits from native integration with existing smartphones, eliminating the need for dedicated tuners required in ATSC 3.0 receivers, thus facilitating broader mobile adoption without hardware modifications. Operationally, ATSC 3.0 enables broadcasters to maintain spectrum autonomy on licensed TV bands, supporting features like 4K video, HDR, and targeted datacasting without reliance on cellular carriers, whereas 5G Broadcast mandates partnerships with telecom operators for spectrum access and infrastructure, potentially increasing costs and dependencies. Field trials as of March 2025 confirm ATSC 3.0's higher resilience in urban and vehicular settings, with lower required received power for equivalent quality, though 5G Broadcast's evolving standards, such as extended interleaving up to 512 ms in Release 18, aim to close gaps in mobile robustness. Proponents of 5G Broadcast argue it complements ATSC 3.0 by extending reach via cellular networks for events like sports, but independent analyses emphasize ATSC 3.0's standalone viability for primary TV service, avoiding the fragmentation risks of carrier-mediated delivery.
AspectATSC 3.0 Advantage5G Broadcast Advantage
Spectral EfficiencyHigher throughput (e.g., superior at 5–15 Mbps); 7.78 MHz useful BW in 8 MHz channelIntegrated with for flexible allocation
Error CorrectionAdvanced BICM and time interleaving for better SNR and mobile performanceEvolving with longer interleaving (up to 512 ms)
Device CompatibilityRequires dedicated tunerNative to smartphones, no extra hardware
Infrastructure ControlIndependent broadcaster operation on TV spectrumLeverages cellular towers but depends on telecom partners
Overall, while Broadcast offers seamless mobile extensibility, ATSC 3.0's design prioritizes efficient, resilient one-to-many delivery, substantiated by peer-reviewed evaluations favoring its technical metrics for core broadcasting needs.

Versus Other Standards like

ATSC 3.0 and DVB-T2 both employ (OFDM) with low-density parity-check (LDPC) , enabling high-capacity broadcasting with support for high-efficiency video coding (HEVC) to deliver ultra-high-definition (UHD) content, (HDR), and wide color gamut (WCG). However, ATSC 3.0 incorporates higher-order modulation schemes, reaching up to 4096 (QAM), compared to DVB-T2's maximum of 256 QAM, allowing for potentially greater in fixed reception scenarios at the cost of requiring stronger signal-to-noise ratios.
ParameterATSC 3.0DVB-T2
Modulation OptionsQPSK to 4096 QAM, non-uniform constellationsQPSK to 256 QAM, rotated constellations
FFT Sizes8K to 32K1K to 32K
Max Data Rate (6 MHz)Up to 57 MbpsUp to 38 Mbps
SNR Range-6.2 dB to +32 dB+1 dB to +22 dB
Transport ProtocolIP-based (ALP encapsulation)
This table highlights ATSC 3.0's broader modulation and coding (MODCOD) flexibility, including lower-rate options like robust QPSK for mobile devices, which extends its operational (SNR) range for improved performance in challenging environments. , while offering (TDM) for multiple physical layer pipes (PLPs), lacks ATSC 3.0's native support for layer division multiplexing (LDM), which superimposes a robust lower-layer signal (e.g., for mobile) beneath a higher-capacity upper layer without spectrum expansion, and channel bonding across multiple RF channels for aggregated bandwidth. ATSC 3.0's IP-centric enables seamless integration with for hybrid services, such as and interactivity via HTML5 applications, contrasting with DVB-T2's reliance on transport streams (TS) optimized for hybrid broadcast- TV (HbbTV). Content protection differs markedly: ATSC 3.0 mandates (DRM) using MPEG common encryption for premium features like 4K UHD, potentially limiting , whereas DVB-T2 supports flexible systems integrated into its established pay-TV ecosystem. In terms of deployment maturity, , standardized in 2008 and deployed since 2009, serves over 3.5 billion viewers across , , , and , benefiting from a proven and lower-cost equipment compatible with H.264/AVC alongside HEVC. ATSC 3.0, finalized in stages from 2016 onward, remains primarily in U.S. rollout as of 2025, with limited international trials, facing higher initial complexity from features like multiple-input multiple-output () and LDM that have seen minimal commercial adoption due to cost. Empirical gains in ATSC 3.0 are marginal in practice, often offset by its U.S.-specific 6 MHz channel bandwidth versus DVB-T2's typical 8 MHz, though ATSC 3.0's wider SNR tolerance supports better indoor and mobile reception in simulations.

Controversies and Criticisms

DRM and Access Restrictions

ATSC 3.0 incorporates (DRM) through the A3SA (ATSC 3.0 Security Authority) framework, which mandates certification of receivers and enables selective encryption of broadcast signals to protect content from unauthorized redistribution. The A3SA, formed by major broadcast networks, utilizes DRM technology to enforce rules such as content expiration, limited copies, and device-specific decryption keys, ensuring that only approved hardware—typically integrated TV tuners—can fully access encrypted streams. This system builds on ATSC standard A/360, which supports secure signaling and TLS-encrypted bootstrap for service protection, allowing broadcasters to "sign" transmissions for authenticity while restricting playback on uncertified devices like external DVRs or network tuners. Access restrictions under ATSC 3.0 DRM permit broadcasters to implement tuner gating and authentication requirements, potentially disabling reception on non-compliant hardware or limiting features such as time-shifted viewing and fair-use recording. For instance, encrypted signals using AC-4 audio and video codecs require A3SA-certified decryption, which excludes many third-party devices, including popular models from SiliconDust (HDHomeRun), as the authority has refused certification for gateway devices that could enable broader home network distribution. The February 2024 A3SA DRM specification explicitly prohibits unlimited copies without expiration and mandates obedience to broadcaster-defined "broadcast flags," reviving mechanisms similar to those struck down in prior court rulings for overreach. These features have sparked significant controversy, with critics arguing that DRM undermines the free, over-the-air nature of broadcast television by enabling de facto paywalls and technological barriers to legal uses like archiving local news. Consumer advocates and device manufacturers, including SiliconDust, have filed comments with the FCC highlighting how A3SA rules favor integrated TV sets from select manufacturers, stifling innovation and raising costs for alternatives, with thousands of consumers reporting frustration over inaccessible signals on existing equipment. Smaller broadcasters, such as Weigel Broadcasting, oppose mandatory encryption, contending it renders signals "unwatchable" on non-TV devices and conflicts with ATSC 1.0 compatibility requirements during the voluntary transition. In response, the FCC's October 7, 2025, fact sheet authorizes permissive encryption for ATSC 3.0 but emphasizes tuner labeling, interface standards, and consumer protections to mitigate restrictions, while opening a comment period on whether to eliminate or modify A3SA-enforced DRM for non-premium content. Proponents, including major networks via A3SA, defend DRM as essential for advanced features like and IP integration without , though of widespread unauthorized redistribution remains limited, and the framework's bias toward broadcaster control has drawn accusations of anti-competitive exclusion of independent hardware. As of late 2025, adoption of encrypted ATSC 3.0 signals varies by market, with stations like in Dayton facing viewer backlash for DRM implementation that hampers recording and multi-device access.

Patent and Licensing Disputes

In December 2021, Constellation Designs, LLC filed a lawsuit against Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of , alleging infringement of patents related to non-uniform constellation () technology essential to the transmission in ATSC 3.0. A jury found in favor of Constellation in July 2023, awarding $1.684 million in damages for past sales of infringing ATSC 3.0-enabled televisions and ordering royalties of $6.75 per unit for future infringing products. LG suspended inclusion of ATSC 3.0 tuners in its 2024 U.S. television lineup in September 2023, citing the verdict's implications for ongoing licensing costs and potential liability, which it argued threatened the viability of NextGen TV deployment. LG appealed the decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in May 2023, contending the damages were excessive relative to the patents' contribution to the standard. The dispute raised alarms among broadcasters, with Pearl TV filing an amicus brief in August 2024 warning that the verdict could destabilize ATSC 3.0 patent pools by encouraging holdout strategies from non-pool licensors and deterring manufacturers like and from continuing support, potentially rendering the standard's market transition unfeasible. To mitigate such bilateral litigation, ATSC 3.0 relies on collective licensing through pools like Via Licensing Alliance, which as of March 2024 includes 17 licensors offering standard-essential patents (SEPs) at aggregated rates, and Avanci Broadcast, facilitating one-stop licensing for implementers. However, the declined to impose mandatory reasonable-and-non-discriminatory (RAND) terms in its 2020 authorization of ATSC 3.0, leaving pools voluntary and exposing the ecosystem to disputes outside pooled SEPs.

Privacy and Data Concerns

ATSC 3.0 introduces capabilities for addressable through an optional return path, allowing compatible receivers to transmit viewer back to broadcasters for personalized ad targeting, which raises concerns about unauthorized collection of viewing habits, device identifiers, and potentially geolocation information. This mechanism, absent in prior over-the-air standards, enables broadcasters to aggregate detailed audience metrics similar to those used in streaming services, potentially without granular user consent beyond basic provisions. Critics, including digital rights organizations, argue that the architecture facilitates a shift toward data-driven in free broadcast television, where receivers connected to the could default to sharing data unless explicitly configured otherwise, increasing risks of profiling and secondary data sales. FCC Commissioner Geoffrey Starks highlighted these risks in 2020, cautioning that enthusiasm for technical advancements must not overlook data and implications, such as vulnerabilities in data transmission or inadequate safeguards against breaches. Proponents counter that is voluntary, tied to enhanced features like interactive services, and subject to existing federal privacy guidelines, though enforcement relies on self-regulation by the ATSC 3.0 Security Authority rather than mandatory FCC rules. Early demonstrations of addressable ads, as in pilots since 2017, have shown broadcasters accessing household-level viewing data to insert tailored commercials, prompting watchdog groups to question compliance with standards on notice and choice, especially for non-internet-connected households inadvertently affected via aggregated metrics. As of 2025, while adoption remains limited and mechanisms are specified in the standard, ongoing FCC proceedings continue to scrutinize whether these features undermine the public-interest mandate of over-the-air broadcasting by prioritizing commercial data harvesting over viewer anonymity.

Economic and Adoption Challenges

The transition to ATSC 3.0 has imposed substantial financial burdens on broadcasters, with upgrade costs for transmitters and equipment ranging from approximately $300,000 for basic modifications to over $1 million for full implementations including advanced features like higher power or mobile support, depending on station size and market demands. These expenses are compounded by the need for ongoing simulcasting of ATSC 1.0 signals, as mandated by the FCC until at least 2027 in many cases, which limits spectrum efficiency and delays potential revenue from enhanced services like targeted advertising or datacasting. Smaller and public broadcasters, in particular, face disproportionate challenges, as federal funding for the shift remains limited, leading to uneven deployment where only larger commercial stations in top markets prioritize upgrades. Consumer adoption lags significantly due to the higher cost of ATSC 3.0-compatible devices, with integrated TV tuners adding an estimated $80–$100 to expenses, deterring widespread inclusion by set manufacturers amid declining over-the-air viewership. External receivers or set-top boxes, essential for legacy TVs, retail for $200 or more, further reducing appeal in a market dominated by streaming subscriptions that offer similar 4K and interactive features without hardware upgrades. As of mid-2025, while ATSC 3.0 signals reach over 75% of U.S. households via participating stations in 60+ markets, actual receiver penetration remains below 5% of TV-owning homes, hampered by low awareness and the absence of mandates for enhanced content. Multichannel video programming distributors (MVPDs) encounter parallel economic hurdles, including integration costs of up to $8,000 per feed for ATSC 3.0 compatibility, which has slowed carriage negotiations and limited distribution beyond basic OTA signals. The voluntary nature of the FCC's framework exacerbates these issues, as broadcasters hesitate to invest without assured returns, while consumer groups argue that mandating tuners would inflate device prices without proportional benefits, given trends reducing broadcast relevance. Overall, the lack of a firm sunset date for ATSC 1.0 has prolonged market uncertainty, stalling that could lower costs and accelerate adoption.

Empirical Performance and Impact

Field Tests and Efficiency Data

Field tests of ATSC 3.0 have demonstrated enhanced reception robustness and coverage compared to ATSC 1.0, particularly through (SFN) configurations and layered division multiplexing (LDM). In 2021 Phoenix trials conducted by Pearl TV and others using two transmitters on channel 27 (KASW-TV primary site 8 miles south of Phoenix and a secondary at Shaw Butte 18 miles away), error-free reception was achieved in approximately 80% of 40 test locations within the SFN overlap area, with marked improvements in signal level, service margin, and across nearly all sites. These tests highlighted SFN's ability to fill reception gaps and boost overall coverage without additional . Earlier field tests in verified simultaneous transmission of 4K Ultra HD content alongside two robust mobile TV streams within a single 6 MHz channel, with improved signal acquisition for mobile reception in vehicles traveling at high speeds through urban, suburban, and rural areas up to 50 miles from the transmitter. Over 75,000 data points were collected, showing enhanced indoor penetration and wider coverage than prior tests, alongside a 30% increase in data throughput. Efficiency metrics indicate ATSC 3.0 achieves approximately 30% higher than ATSC 1.0 for equivalent coverage areas, enabling greater data rates per Hz or improved robustness at the same bitrate. On-channel implementations in tests yielded up to 233% coverage expansion (from 3 to 10 points) with received signal strength gains of 45 dB and stability within 0.5 dB of input signals. Mobile performance evaluations over typical urban channels (e.g., TU-6 at 40 km/h) showed 8-10 dB gains in block error rate thresholds at 5-15 Mbps compared to broadcast alternatives, attributed to optimized bit-interleaved coding and time interleaving. Practical throughputs in 6 MHz channels range from 1 Mbps in ultra-robust modes to over 30 Mbps in high-capacity configurations, approaching 5-10 bps/Hz depending on modulation, coding, and schemes.

Viewer and Broadcaster Reception

As of January 2025, ATSC 3.0 signals reached approximately 76% of U.S. television households across 80 markets via 103 transmitters offering 437 program services, yet broadcaster groups such as Pearl TV have voiced frustration over lagging consumer device adoption, which they argue undermines the standard's potential for enhanced interactivity and revenue streams like targeted advertising. Industry analyses highlight broadcasters' mixed reception: while praising ATSC 3.0's superior compression efficiency and mobile reception capabilities for enabling features like IP datacasting, many cite high transition costs—estimated in the millions per station for equipment upgrades—and the need for dual ATSC 1.0/3.0 simulcasting as deterrents to full commitment. Public broadcasters, in particular, have adopted cautiously, with only select markets experimenting due to budget constraints and uncertain return on investment absent widespread viewer uptake. Viewer reception has been constrained by low equipment penetration, with estimates indicating just 10-13% of televisions sold in 2024 featured built-in ATSC 3.0 tuners, far below projections for mass and requiring separate converters costing $100-200 for legacy sets. Among early adopters, feedback emphasizes tangible benefits including 4K HDR video, immersive audio, and improved signal reliability in multipath environments, which reduces dropouts compared to ATSC 1.0's more fragile modulation. Independent reviews of ATSC 3.0-enabled televisions note added value from integrated DVR functionality and access to supplementary channels, though these gains are offset by limited content availability and compatibility issues with existing antennas or networks. Broader surveys reflect viewer skepticism stemming from insufficient , perceived overlap with streaming services, and concerns over potential DRM-enforced restrictions on recording or mobile use, contributing to rates below 5% in covered markets as of mid-2025.

Long-Term Societal Effects

ATSC 3.0's advanced emergency alerting capabilities, leveraging IP-based transmission for , interactive maps, and multilingual audio tracks, enable more effective dissemination of life-saving information during disasters, independent of or cellular networks. This contrasts with legacy ATSC 1.0 systems limited to text crawls, potentially reducing response times and casualties in widespread outages, as demonstrated in simulations and early deployments where datacasting delivered real-time evacuation routes and live feeds to over-the-air receivers. In education, ATSC 3.0 facilitates datacasting of remote learning materials to households lacking , addressing the "educational gap" affecting millions in rural and low-income areas. broadcasters in states like have used this to deliver curriculum-aligned content via OTA signals since 2021, ensuring equitable access without data caps or subscriptions, which early pilots show sustains student engagement during disruptions like the period. A analysis estimates this could serve up to 15 million unconnected students nationwide if scaled, promoting long-term literacy and skill equity by bypassing infrastructure dependencies. By supporting uncompressed 4K/8K video and targeted datacasting over free OTA spectrum, ATSC 3.0 preserves universal access to and public service announcements, countering the fragmentation from subscription-based streaming models. This sustains in an era of declining traditional viewership, with efficiency allowing simultaneous delivery of personalized content and civic data—such as school closures or info—to diverse demographics, fostering informed societies less reliant on algorithm-driven platforms. Long-term, widespread adoption could mitigate digital divides by embedding robust, resilient broadcast , enabling hybrid broadcast-broadband services that enhance resilience against cyber threats or grid failures, though realization depends on tuner mandates and policy stability as of 2025. Industry projections indicate potential for expanded public datacasting, including non-EAS alerts, to integrate with IoT devices for automated responses, ultimately bolstering societal preparedness.

References

  1. https://www.atsc.org/nextgen-tv/
  2. https://www.atsc.org/atsc-documents/a3002019-atsc-3-0-system/
  3. https://www.atsc.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/A300-2024-04-ATSC-3-System-Standard.pdf
  4. https://www.nab.org/innovation/nextgentv.asp
  5. https://www.atsc.org/news/new-nextgen-tv-receivers-expanded-services-launched-at-ces-2025-to-spur-deeper-adoption-of-next-generation-television-broadcasting/
  6. https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-415053A1.pdf
  7. https://www.advanced-television.com/2025/10/09/fcc-wants-progress-on-atsc-3-0-tv/
  8. https://www.antennaland.com/nextgen-tv-mandate-drm-controversy/
  9. https://www.tvtechnology.com/news/lptv-broadcasters-costs-of-atsc-3-0-transition-could-force-many-stations-out-of-business
  10. https://www.newscaststudio.com/2025/09/04/consumer-groups-oppose-nabs-push-for-mandatory-atsc-3-0-transition/
  11. https://www.tvtechnology.com/opinion/atsc-3-0-i-cant-imagine-anyone-defending-our-current-adoption-strategy
  12. https://www.atsc.org/atsc-documents/type/3-0-standards/
  13. https://www.atsc.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/ATSC-White-Paper-US-ATSC3-Transition-2025-02-28.pdf
  14. https://www.atsc.org/news/why-atsc-3-0-opportunity/
  15. https://www.atsc.org/news/united-states-proposes-atsc-3-0-as-international-digital-broadcast-standard/
  16. https://www.atsc.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Hitachi-Kokusai-Electric-Comark-LLC-ATSC-3.0-Overview-3-2017-1.pdf
  17. https://www.atsc.org/news/getting-from-here-to-atsc-3-0-next-gen-standard-changes-everything/
  18. https://www.nexttv.com/news/atsc-3-0-nextgen-tv
  19. https://www.oxagile.com/article/what-is-atsc-3-0-technology/
  20. https://zapperbox.com/blogs/blog/atsc-3-0-vs-atsc-1-0
  21. https://www.oxagile.com/article/atsc-3-0-features/
  22. https://www.atsc.org/atsc-documents/a3212016-system-discovery-signaling/
  23. https://www.tvtechnology.com/opinions/the-atsc-30-physical-layerbootstrap-basics
  24. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/System-Discovery-and-Signaling-Transmission-Using-He-Shelby/6dce0b887bc1384f82ded57a98df5dfcde43d55a
  25. https://www.tvtechnology.com/opinion/heres-to-the-atsc-30-bootstrap
  26. https://www.atsc.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/A322-2021-Physical-Layer-Protocol.pdf
  27. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/290472101_An_Overview_of_the_ATSC_30_Physical_Layer_Specification
  28. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7383281/
  29. https://www.atsc.org/news/atsc-3-0-physical-layer-standard-approved/
  30. https://www.atsc.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/A327-2023-03-Physical-Layer-RP.pdf
  31. https://www.atsc.org/news/atsc-members-approve-atsc-3-0-physical-layer-standard/
  32. https://www.atsc.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/A341-2023-03-Video-HEVC.pdf
  33. https://www.atsc.org/news/atsc-expanding-video-compression-options-for-atsc-3-0/
  34. https://www.atsc.org/atsc-documents/a-345-vvc-video/
  35. https://www.atsc.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/A345-2025-07-VVC-Video.pdf
  36. https://www.atsc.org/atsc-documents/a342-part-12017-audio-common-elements/
  37. https://www.radioworld.com/columns-and-views/guest-commentaries/atsc-3-0-audio-services-the-how-and-why
  38. https://professional.dolby.com/siteassets/tv/home/dolby-vision/dolby_atsc3_hdbk_digi_v04_share.pdf
  39. https://www.ittiam.com/moving-towards-atsc-3-0-nextgen-tv-with-ittiam-multimedia-software-offerings/
  40. https://www.crutchfield.com/learn/atsc-3-0-faq.html
  41. https://blog.byjasco.com/nextgen-tv-is-here-get-ready-for-its-best-features
  42. https://success.telosalliance.com/atsc-3.0
  43. https://bts.ieee.org/news/121-next-gen-tv-promises-immersive%2C-personalized-audio-atsc-3-0-sets-the-stage-for-future-proof-sound-technology.html
  44. https://www.ecoustics.com/news/nextgen-tv-expands-free-over-the-air/
  45. https://kstp.com/watch-nextgen-tv/
  46. https://www.atsc.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/A360-2024-04-Security.pdf
  47. https://a3sa.com/atsc-security-standard/
  48. https://a3sa.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/A-Short-Introduction-to-ATSC-3-Security-Systems-for-Broadcasters-2022.03.24.pdf
  49. https://a3sa.com/
  50. https://www.atsc.org/atsc-documents/a-3612019-security-and-content-protection/
  51. https://www.techhive.com/article/2250871/drm-remains-a-stumbling-block-for-dvrs-embracing-atsc-3-0.html
  52. https://www.tvtechnology.com/news/silicondust-urges-fcc-to-do-away-with-drm-rules-for-atsc-3-0-programming
  53. https://www.newscaststudio.com/2025/09/04/weigel-broadcasting-challenges-atsc-3-0-security-authoritys-control-over-nextgen-tv/
  54. https://www.consumerreports.org/electronics/emerging-technology/nextgen-tv-atsc-3-what-to-know-a7427792466/
  55. https://www.atsc.org/atsc-documents/atsc-3-0-advanced-emergency-information-system-implementation-guide/
  56. https://www.atsc.org/news/nvisa-and-atsc-deploy-next-generation-atsc-3-0-warning-system-at-fema-ipaws-technical-support-services-facility/
  57. https://www.atsc.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/AEA-IT-024r32-Advanced-Emergency-Information-Implementation-Guide.pdf
  58. https://nabpilot.org/projects/atsc-3-0/
  59. https://www.atsc.org/news/new-atsc-technology-group-to-explore-next-generation-broadcasting/
  60. https://www.atsc.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/A300-2025-07-ATSC-3-System-Standard.pdf
  61. https://www.atsc.org/news/tg3-progress-report-atsc-3-0-work-under-way/
  62. https://www.tvyvideo.com/en/more-in-depth/technology/18971-the-atsc-evolution-and-destiny.html
  63. https://www.atsc.org/news/tg3-approves-atsc-3-0-physical-layer-candidate-standard/
  64. https://news.samsung.com/us/atsc-3-0-physical-layer-candidate-standard-approved/
  65. https://www.tablotv.com/blog/what-cord-cutters-need-know-about-atsc-3-part-2/
  66. https://www.wiley.law/alert-Media_Alert-FCC_Authorizes_Voluntary_Transition_to_ATSC_3point0
  67. https://www.atsc.org/news/sinclair-to-launch-first-atsc-3-0-station-in-las-vegas-on-may-26/
  68. https://www.tvtechnology.com/news/meredith-nexstar-plan-atsc-30-rollout-in-portland
  69. https://www.tvtechnology.com/atsc3/atsc-3-0-to-be-deployed-in-40-u-s-markets-by-end-of-year
  70. https://www.tvtechnology.com/news/atsc-30-deployments-where-and-when-will-nextgen-tv-be-available
  71. https://www.atsc.org/nextgen-tv/deployments/
  72. https://www.newscaststudio.com/2025/01/06/ces-2025-broadcasters-report-76-of-u-s-households-now-within-nextgen-tv-range/
  73. https://www.antennaland.com/weigel-broadcasting-fight-for-free-atsc-3-0-tv/
  74. https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-takes-steps-support-next-gen-tv-deployment
  75. https://www.newscaststudio.com/2025/02/26/nab-proposes-2028-atsc-3-0-deadline-for-major-markets-full-transition-by-2030/
  76. https://www.wiley.law/alert-FCC-Seeks-Comment-on-Next-Gen-TV-Transition
  77. https://www.atsc.org/news/atsc-strengthens-influence-with-growing-international-engagements/
  78. https://www.tvtechnology.com/news/where-in-the-world-is-atsc-30
  79. https://www.broadbandtvnews.com/2025/08/28/brazil-adopts-atsc-3-0-based-dtv-system/
  80. https://www.atsc.org/news/brazil-officially-adopts-atsc-3-0-technologies-for-its-next-generation-television-system/
  81. https://www.tvtechnology.com/news/atscs-new-vp-of-standards-development-touts-3-0s-global-potential
  82. https://www.drm.org/digital-radio-mondiale-drm-and-atsc-the-broadcast-standards-association-sign-mutual-partnership-agreement/
  83. https://www.broadbandtvnews.com/2025/10/21/atsc-makes-international-pitch-with-itu-approvals-and-americas-outreach/
  84. https://www.newscaststudio.com/2025/08/25/small-broadcasters-warn-fcc-that-atsc-3-0-costs-threaten-free-tv-access/
  85. https://www.advanced-television.com/2025/08/18/ata-adopting-atsc-3-0-is-too-expensive/
  86. https://www.broadcastingalliance.org/the-clear-path-forward-for-lptv-and-broadcasting/
  87. https://www.nab.org/advocacy/issue.asp?id=4014&issueid=1091
  88. https://cordcuttersnews.com/antenna-man-and-lon-tv-meet-with-fcc-to-challenge-atsc-3-0-transition-over-drm-concerns/
  89. https://www.newscaststudio.com/2025/07/15/coalition-of-conservative-groups-challenges-nabs-push-for-atsc-3-0-mandate/
  90. https://markets.financialcontent.com/lightport.lightport5/article/marketminute-2025-10-9-nab-hails-fccs-nextgen-tv-draft-rules-a-new-era-for-broadcast-television-dawns
  91. https://www.tvrev.com/news/broadcast-battle-5g-challenging-atsc-30s-dominance
  92. https://www.tvtechnology.com/opinion/atsc-30-three-ways-to-improve-reception
  93. https://www.tvtechnology.com/opinion/get-ready-for-atsc-30-but-dont-ignore-10
  94. https://www.gatesair.com/documents/papers/Rossiter_-_Implications_and_Optimization_of_Coverage_and_Payload_for_ATSC_3.0.pdf
  95. https://mswdtv.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/NAB-ATSC3-Field-Test-Report-10-25-16-COMPLETE-FINAL.pdf
  96. https://www.gatesair.com/documents/160109-IEEE-BTS-Winter2015-Cleveland-ATSC-3.0-Testing.pdf
  97. https://www.atsc.org/news/decoding-the-mobile-broadcasting-landscape-separating-fact-from-fiction/
  98. https://www.tvtechnology.com/features/what-is-5g-broadcast
  99. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10763425/
  100. https://www.mapyourshow.com/mys_shared/nab23/handouts/Evaluation_of_ATSC_3.0_and_3GPP_Rel-17_5G_Broadcasting_Systems_for_Mobile_Handheld_Applications.pdf
  101. https://www.tvtechnology.com/opinion/sinclair-dont-fall-for-the-hype-on-5g-broadcast
  102. https://www.tvtechnology.com/opinion/point-5g-broadcast-connects-stations-to-the-mobile-future
  103. https://enterpriseefiling.fcc.gov/dataentry/api/download/attachment/25076f918d319cb3018d5ab72d4c58f9
  104. https://dvb.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/2024-NAB-Show_BEIT-Conference_DVB_IP-Based-Broadcast-meets-5G_Final.pdf
  105. https://www.qualcomm.com/news/onq/2023/12/5g-broadcast-what-can-consumers-expect
  106. https://tvnewscheck.com/tech/article/why-atsc-3-0-not-5g-broadcast-is-the-best-path-forward/
  107. https://5gbc.tv/newsletters/blog-post-title-two-jw3ca-wxshr
  108. https://freecast.com/blog/broadcast-and-broadband-are-converging
  109. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10608271/
  110. https://www.tvtechnology.com/opinions/how-dvb-t2-and-atsc-3-0-stack-up-technical-benefits-limitations-and-real-world-deployments
  111. https://www.rfwireless-world.com/tutorials/dvb-t2-vs-atsc-3-comparison
  112. https://www.progira.com/atsc-3-0-versus-dvb-t2/
  113. https://www.atsc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/A360-2018-Security.pdf
  114. https://peakthree.io/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Peak3-ATSC-3.0-Security-Whitepaper_Final.pdf
  115. https://www.tvtechnology.com/news/silicondust-identifies-atsc-3-0-security-authority-as-drm-culprit-in-fcc-comments
  116. https://www.antennaland.com/fcc-to-weigh-drm-for-atsc-3-0-amid-widespread-consumer-frustration/
  117. https://a3sa.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Security-Systems-for-NextGen-TV-Broadcasts-Executive-Summary-2022.03.24.pdf
  118. https://communicationsdaily.com/article/2025/07/23/silicondust-calls-on-fcc-to-scrutinize-atsc-30-security-requirements-2507220075?BC=bc_68806e4ea32bf
  119. https://filehandler.lbr.cloud/files/alm/1I5-nhg3MMcR8peqIEei8XVM5kNpwVHOc.pdf
  120. https://www.tvtechnology.com/news/atsc-president-speaks-out-on-patent-issue-nextgen-tv-deployments
  121. https://caldwellcc.com/case/constellation-designs-v-lg-electronics/
  122. https://www.tvtechnology.com/news/nextgen-tv-advocates-express-deep-concern-over-future-of-atsc-3-0-products
  123. https://fedcircuitblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Amicus-Pearl.pdf
  124. https://www.via-la.com/licensing-2/atsc-3-0/
  125. https://www.avanci.com/broadcast/
  126. https://www.newamerica.org/oti/reports/tv-royalty/the-fccs-failure-to-adopt-a-rand-licensing-requirement-is-a-gift-for-sinclair-that-breaks-with-decades-of-precedent/
  127. https://www.eff.org/files/2025/05/07/pk_et_al_nab_atsc3_petition_comments.pdf
  128. https://www.tvtechnology.com/atsc3/starks-warns-of-potential-privacy-data-issues-with-atsc-3-0
  129. https://www.tvtechnology.com/news/how-will-atsc-30-transform-tv-advertising
  130. https://www.denver7.com/money/consumer/next-generation-tvs-could-come-soon-should-you-be-concerned-about-your-privacy
  131. https://www.smpte.org/blog/rewriting-the-broadcasting-rulebook-with-nextgen-tvs-targeted-advertising
  132. https://www.kdsj980.com/2025/08/18/another-funding-challenge-sdpb-faces-costly-decision-on-nextgen-tv-upgrade/
  133. https://www.newscaststudio.com/2025/10/07/fcc-nextgen-tv-atsc-3-transition-notice-proposed-rulemaking/
  134. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/15274764251365127
  135. https://www.antennaland.com/two-groups-tell-fcc-atsc-3-0-plan-will-harm-consumers/
  136. https://www.reddit.com/r/hdhomerun/comments/1j0azu4/with_the_nab_proposing_atsc_30_deadline_in_3/
  137. https://www.tvtechnology.com/news/50-state-broadcasting-associations-pass-resolution-supporting-atsc-sunset
  138. https://www.watchnextgentv.com/
  139. https://www.ipi.org/ipi_issues/detail/in-opposition-to-fcc-forced-atsc-30-standards
  140. https://tvnewscheck.com/regulation/article/price-fcc-must-mandate-a-2028-nextgen-tv-transition/
  141. https://www.wiley.law/alert-FCC-Tees-Up-Next-Gen-TV-Transition-for-October-Open-Meeting
  142. https://www.atsc.org/news/latest-phoenix-field-testing-highlights-ability-of-nextgen-tv-single-frequency-network-transmissions-to-fill-holes-in-reception-boost-coverage-open-door-for-future-opportunities/
  143. https://www.thebroadcastbridge.com/content/entry/3263/atsc-3.0-next-gen-tv-field-tests-show-positive-results
  144. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.4218/etrij.2021-0194
  145. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279181450_Modulation_and_coding_for_ATSC_30
  146. https://www.newscaststudio.com/2025/07/15/pearl-tv-pushes-fcc-for-firm-nextgen-tv-transition-timeline-as-device-adoption-lags/
  147. https://lakewoodadvisors.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/2025-USA-Broadcasting-Trends_V2.pdf
  148. https://www.antennaland.com/nextgen-tv-mandate-hidden-tax-venture/
  149. https://www.tvtechnology.com/features/atsc-3-0-advances-on-multiple-fronts-in-2024
  150. https://radiodiscussions.com/threads/nextgen-tv-atsc-3-0-power-question.773953/
  151. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qjBZfzbIUJQ
  152. https://cordcutterweekly.com/2025/10/10/broadcasters-bungled-nextgen-tv/
  153. https://www.newscaststudio.com/2025/03/11/industry-insights-nextgen-tv-atsc/
  154. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/bams/106/8/BAMS-D-24-0162.1.xml
  155. https://www.tvtechnology.com/news/atsc-explains-advantages-of-nextgen-tv-eas-features-in-fcc-filing
  156. https://www.atsc.org/news/special-report-re-imagining-emergency-alerting-with-atsc-3-0/
  157. https://bento.pbs.org/prod/filer_public/pbsnc-redesign-phase-1/services/next-gen-tv/409827d448_The-Educational-Broadband-Gap-A-Whitepaper-on-Utilizing-ATSC-3.0NextGenTV-to-Address-Remote-Learning.pdf
  158. https://www.atsc.org/news/indiana-public-broadcasters-using-datacasting-to-keep-kids-on-track/
  159. https://www.tvrev.com/news/nextgen-tv-needs-a-civic-bargain
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.