Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Population ageing
View on Wikipedia


Population ageing is an overall change in the ages of a population. This can typically be summarised in a single parameter as an increase in the median age. Causes are a long-term decline in fertility rates and a decline in mortality rates. Most countries now have declining mortality rates and an ageing population: trends that emerged first in developed countries but are now also seen in virtually all developing countries. In most developed countries, population ageing started in the late 19th century. By the late 20th century, the world population as a whole was also ageing. The proportion of people aged 65 and above accounts for 6% of the total population.[when?] This reflects a historic overall decline in the world's average fertility rate.[2] That is the case for every country in the world except the 18 countries designated as "demographic outliers" by the United Nations.[3][failed verification] The aged population is currently at its highest level in human history.[4] The UN projects that the population will age faster in the 21st century than in the 20th.[4] The number of people aged 60 years and over has tripled since 1950; it reached 600 million in 2000 and surpassed 700 million in 2006. It is projected that the combined senior and geriatric population will reach 2.1 billion by 2050.[5][6] Countries vary significantly in terms of the degree and pace of ageing, and the UN expects populations that began ageing later will have less time to respond to its implications.[4] Policy interventions include preventative strategies that increase the size of the young, working-age population, as well as adaptive measures to make overarching systems compatible with a new demographic future.
Overview
[edit]Population ageing is a shift in the distribution of a country's population towards older ages and is usually reflected in an increase in the population's mean and median ages, a decline in the proportion of the population composed of children, and a rise in the proportion of the population composed of the elderly. Population ageing is widespread across the world and is most advanced in the most highly developed countries, but it is growing faster in less developed regions, which means that older persons will be increasingly concentrated in the less developed regions of the world.[dubious – discuss][7] The Oxford Institute of Population Ageing, however, concluded that population ageing has slowed considerably in Europe and will have the greatest future impact in Asia, especially since Asia is in stage five (very low birth rate and low death rate) of the demographic transition model.[8]
Among the countries currently classified by the United Nations as more developed (with a total population of 1.2 billion in 2005), the overall median age rose from 28 in 1950 to 40 in 2010 and is forecast to rise to 44 by 2050. The corresponding figures for the world as a whole are 24 in 1950, 29 in 2010, and 36 in 2050. For the less developed regions, the median age will go from 26 in 2010 to 35 in 2050.[9]
Population ageing arises from two, possibly related, demographic effects: increasing longevity and declining fertility. An increase in longevity raises the average age of the population by increasing the numbers of surviving older people. A decline in fertility reduces the number of babies, and as the effect continues, the numbers of younger people in general also reduce. Of the two forces, declining fertility now contributes to most of the population ageing in the world.[10] More specifically, the large decline in the overall fertility rate over the last half-century is primarily responsible for the population ageing in the world's most developed countries. Because many developing countries are going through faster fertility transitions, they will experience even faster population ageing than the currently-developed countries will.
The rate at which the population ages is likely to increase over the next three decades;[11] however, few countries know whether their older population are living the extra years of life in good or poor health.[dubious – discuss] A "compression of morbidity" would imply reduced disability in old age,[12] but an expansion would see an increase in poor health with increased longevity. Another option has been posed for a situation of "dynamic equilibrium."[13] That is crucial information for governments if the limits of lifespan continue to increase indefinitely, as some researchers believe.[14] The World Health Organization's suite of household health studies is working to provide the needed health and well-being evidence, such as the World Health Survey,[15] and the Study on Global Ageing and Adult Health (SAGE). The surveys cover 308,000 respondents aged at least 18 and 81,000 aged at least 50 from 70 countries.
The Global Ageing Survey, directed by George Leeson, explores attitudes, expectations, and behaviours towards later life and retirement. It covers 44,000 people aged 40–80 in 24 countries around the world. It has revealed that many people are now fully aware of the ageing of the world's population and its implications for their lives and those of their children and grandchildren.
Canada has the highest per capita immigration rate in the world, perhaps partly to counter population ageing. However the C. D. Howe Institute, a conservative think tank, has suggested that immigration cannot be used as a viable means to counter population ageing.[16] That conclusion is also seen in the work of other scholars. The demographers Peter McDonald and Rebecca Kippen commented, "As fertility sinks further below replacement level, increasingly higher levels of annual net migration will be required to maintain a target of even zero population growth."[17]
Around the world
[edit]
The world's older population is growing dramatically.[18] The more developed countries also have older populations as their citizens live longer. Less developed countries have much younger populations. An interactive version of the map is available here. Archived 2013-01-03 at archive.today Asia and Africa are the two regions with a significant number of countries facing population ageing. Within 20 years, many countries in those regions will face a situation of the largest population cohort being those over 65 and the average age approaching 50. In 2100, according to research led by the University of Washington, 2.4 billion people will be over the age of 65, compared with 1.7 billion under the age of 20.[19] The Oxford Institute of Population Ageing is an institution looking at global population ageing. Its research reveals that many of the views of global ageing are based on myths and that there will be considerable opportunities for the world as its population matures, as the Institute's director, Professor Sarah Harper, highlighted in her book Ageing Societies.
Most of the developed countries now have sub-replacement fertility levels, and population growth now depends largely on immigration together with population momentum, which also arises from previous large generations now enjoying longer life expectancy.[20]
Of the roughly 150,000 people who die each day across the globe, about two thirds, 100,000 per day, die of age-related causes.[21] In industrialised nations, that proportion is much higher and reaches 90%.[21]
Economics of ageing
[edit]The economic effects of an ageing population are considerable.[22] Nowadays, more and more people are paying attention to the economic issues and social policy challenges related to the elderly population.[23] Older people have higher accumulated savings per head than younger people but spend less on consumer goods. Depending on the age ranges at which the changes occur, an ageing population may thus result in lower interest rates and the economic benefits of lower inflation. Some economists[who?] in Japan see advantages in such changes, notably the opportunity to progress automation and technological development without causing unemployment, and emphasise a shift from GDP to personal well-being.
However, population ageing also increases some categories of expenditure, including some met from public finances. The largest area of expenditure in many countries is now health care, whose cost is likely to increase dramatically as populations age. This would present governments with hard choices between higher taxes, including a possible reweighing of tax from earnings to consumption and a reduced government role in providing health care.The working population will face greater pressure, and a portion of their taxes will have to be used to pay for healthcare and pensions for the elderly.[citation needed] However, recent studies in some countries demonstrate the dramatic rising costs of health care are more attributable to rising drug and doctor costs and the higher use of diagnostic testing by all age groups, not to the ageing population that is often claimed.[24][25][26]
The second-largest expenditure of most governments is education, with expenses that tend to fall with an ageing population, especially as fewer young people would probably continue into tertiary education as they would be in demand as part of the work force.

Social security systems have also begun to experience problems. Earlier defined benefit pension systems are experiencing sustainability problems because of the increased longevity. The extension of the pension period was not paired with an extension of the active labour period or a rise in pension contributions, which has resulted in a decline of replacement ratios.
Population ageing also affects workforce. In many countries, the increase in the number of elderly people means the weakening or disappearance of the "demographic dividend", and social resources have to flow more towards elderly people in need of support.[27] The demographic dividend refers to the beneficial impact of a decline in fertility rate on a country's population age structure and economic growth.[28] The older workers would spend more time on work and human capital of an ageing workforce is low, reducing labor productivity.[29]
The expectation of continuing population ageing prompts questions about welfare states' capacity to meet the needs of the population. In the early 2000s, the World Health Organization set up guidelines to encourage "active ageing" and to help local governments address the challenges of an ageing population (Global Age-Friendly Cities) with regard to urbanization, housing, transportation, social participation, health services, etc.[30] Local governments are well positioned to meet the needs of local, smaller populations, but as their resources vary from one to another (e.g. property taxes, the existence of community organizations), the greater responsibility on local governments is likely to increase inequalities.[31][32][33] In Canada, the most fortunate and healthier elders tend to live in more prosperous cities offering a wide range of services, but the less fortunate lack access to the same level of resources.[34] Private residences for the elderly also provide many services related to health and social participation (e.g. pharmacy, group activities, and events) on site, but they are not accessible to the less fortunate.[35] Also, the environmental gerontology indicates the importance of the environment in active ageing.[36][37][38] In fact, promoting good environments (natural, built, social) in ageing can improve health and quality of life and reduce the problems of disability and dependence, and, in general, social spending and health spending.[39]
An ageing population may provide incentive for technological progress, as some hypothesise the effect of a shrinking workforce may be offset by automation and productivity gains.
Social policies and intervention
[edit]In response to the threat of the undesirable consequences associated with an ageing population, many states have adopted preventative policies and initiatives. Because the dominant causes of population ageing are decreased birth rates and increased longevity, preventative action must address these factors. Lengthened lifespans are considered a significant achievement of the modern age, so many countries are instead turning to pronatalist policies with limited success.[40][41] Other short-term solutions involve augmenting the workforce, either through increased participation rates or immigration, to be able sustain the economy and an ageing native population.[42] However, increasing workforce participation has a ceiling effect, and the efficacy of expanding immigration is subject to much debate.[43][44]
Meanwhile, countries are instead being encouraged to embrace policy that adjusts to the inevitability of demographic change by promoting and improving infrastructure for "active ageing".[45][46] Additionally, improving the productivity of the elderly has also become a method to alleviate the problem of social aging. But this first requires increasing their investment in education, and providing suitable job opportunities is equally important.[47]
Generally in West Africa and specifically in Ghana, social policy implications of demographic ageing are multidimensional (such as rural-urban distribution, gender composition, levels of literacy/illiteracy as well as their occupational histories and income security).[6] Current policies on ageing in Ghana seem to be disjointed, and ideas on documents on to improve policies in population ageing have yet to be concretely implemented,[6] perhaps partly because of many arguments that older people are only a small proportion of the population[48]
Global ageing populations seem to cause many countries to be increasing the age for old age security from 60 to 65 to decrease the cost of the scheme of the GDP.[6] Advocates for raising the retirement and pension eligibility ages hope to allocate larger payments during the years the elderly are most vulnerable and in need of assistance.[49] Evidence also suggest that as lifespans lengthen, people remain healthier into older age than in the past, indicating that they may be able to participate in the workforce longer.[50] However, even so, in industrialized countries with the greatest improvement in life expectancy, discussions about continuing to raise the eligibility age for pension benefits have intensified in order to reduce economic burden more significantly.[51]
Age discrimination can be defined as "the systematic and institutionalized denial of the rights of older people on the basis of their age by individuals, groups, organisations, and institutions."[48] Some of the abuse can be a result of ignorance, thoughtlessness, prejudice, and stereotyping. Forms of discrimination are economic accessibility, social accessibility, temporal accessibility and administrative accessibility.[52]
In most countries worldwide, particularly countries in Africa, older people are typically the poorest members of the social spectrum and live below the poverty line.
Moreover, the growing burden of health expenditure has evolved into a social policy and cost management issue, not just a population issue.[53]
See also
[edit]- Aging
- Centre of Excellence in Population Ageing Research (CEPAR)
- Demographic transition
- Gerontology
- Human overpopulation
- Human population planning
- Political demography
- Population decline
- Senescence
- The Silver Tsunami
- Sub-replacement fertility
- List of countries and regions by population ages 65 and above
References
[edit]- ^ "Population by age group". Our World in Data. Retrieved 26 January 2025.
- ^ Uhlenberg, Peter, ed. (2009). International handbook of population aging. International handbooks of population. Dordrecht; London: Springer. ISBN 978-1-4020-8355-6. OCLC 390135418.
- ^ United Nations Development Programme (September 2005). UN Human Development Report 2005, International Cooperation at a Crossroads-Aid, Trade and Security in an Unequal World (PDF). United Nations Development Programme. ISBN 978-0-19-530511-1.
- ^ a b c World Population Ageing: 1950-2050, United Nations Population Division.
- ^ Chucks, J (July 2010). "Population Ageing in Goa: Research Gaps and the Way Forward". Journal of Aging Research. 2010 672157. doi:10.4061/2010/672157. PMC 3003962. PMID 21188229.
- ^ a b c d Issahaku, Paul; Neysmith, Sheila (2013). "Policy Implications of Population Ageing in West Africa". International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy. 33 (3/4): 186–202. doi:10.1108/01443331311308230.
- ^ United Nations. "World Population Ageing 2013" (PDF).
- ^ Shaban, Mostafa (2020). Dr. lambert academic publishing. ISBN 978-620-3-19697-9.
- ^ United Nations. "World Ageing Population 2013" (PDF).
- ^ Weil, David N., "The Economics of Population Aging" in Mark R. Rosenzweig and Oded Stark, eds., Handbook of Population and Family Economics, New York: Elsevier, 1997, 967-1014.
- ^ Lutz, W.; Sanderson, W.; Scherbov, S. (2008-02-07). "The coming acceleration of global population ageing". Nature. 451 (7179): 716–719. Bibcode:2008Natur.451..716L. doi:10.1038/nature06516. PMID 18204438. S2CID 4379499.
The median age of the world's population increases from 26.6 years in 2000 to 37.3 years in 2050 and then to 45.6 years in 2100, when it is not adjusted for longevity increase.
- ^ Fries, J. F. (1980-07-17). "Aging, Natural Death, and the Compression of Morbidity". The New England Journal of Medicine. 303 (3): 130–5. doi:10.1056/NEJM198007173030304. PMC 2567746. PMID 7383070.
the average age at first infirmity can be raised, thereby making the morbidity curve more rectangular.
- ^ Manton KG (1982). "Manton, 1982". Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 60 (2): 183–244. doi:10.2307/3349767. JSTOR 3349767. PMID 6919770. S2CID 45827427.
- ^ Oeppen, J.; Vaupel, J. W. (2002-05-10). "Broken Limits to Life Expectancy". Science. 296 (5570): 1029–31. doi:10.1126/science.1069675. PMID 12004104. S2CID 1132260.
- ^ "Current Status of the World Health Survey". who.int. 2011. Archived from the original on August 19, 2005. Retrieved 8 October 2011.
- ^ Yvan Guillemette; William Robson (September 2006). "No Elixir of Youth" (PDF). Backgrounder. 96. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2008-04-14. Retrieved 2008-05-03.
- ^ Peter McDonald; Rebecca Kippen (2000). "Population Futures for Australia and New Zealand: An Analysis of the Options" (PDF). New Zealand Population Review. 26 (2). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2008-05-27. Retrieved 2008-05-04.
- ^ "World's older population grows dramatically". National Institute on Aging. 2016-03-28. Archived from the original on April 1, 2016. Retrieved 2017-05-01.
- ^ Harvey, Fiona (2020-07-15). "World population in 2100 could be 2 billion below UN forecasts, study suggests". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2020-07-16.
- ^ "Replacement Migration: Is it A Solution to Declining and Ageing Populations?" (PDF).
- ^ a b Aubrey D.N.J, de Grey (2007). "Life Span Extension Research and Public Debate: Societal Considerations" (PDF). Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology. 1 (1, Article 5). CiteSeerX 10.1.1.395.745. doi:10.2202/1941-6008.1011. S2CID 201101995. Archived from the original (PDF) on February 12, 2019. Retrieved August 7, 2011.
- ^ Jarzebski, Marcin Pawel; Elmqvist, Thomas; Gasparatos, Alexandros; Fukushi, Kensuke; Eckersten, Sofia; Haase, Dagmar; Goodness, Julie; Khoshkar, Sara; Saito, Osamu; Takeuchi, Kazuhiko; Theorell, Töres; Dong, Nannan; Kasuga, Fumiko; Watanabe, Ryugo; Sioen, Giles Bruno; Yokohari, Makoto; Pu, Jian (2021). "Ageing and population shrinking: implications for sustainability in the urban century". npj Urban Sustainability. 1 (1): 17. Bibcode:2021npjUS...1...17J. doi:10.1038/s42949-021-00023-z.
- ^ Sanderson, Warren C.; Scherbov, Sergei (2007). "A new perspective on population aging". Demographic Research. 16 2: 27–58. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2007.16.2. ISSN 1435-9871. JSTOR 26347928.
- ^ "Don't blame aging boomers | Toronto Star". Thestar.com. 2011-09-13. Retrieved 2013-03-20.
- ^ "Don't blame the elderly for health care costs". .canada.com. 2008-01-30. Archived from the original on 2014-02-19. Retrieved 2013-03-20.
- ^ "The Silver Tsunami That Isn't". Umanitoba.ca. Archived from the original on 2012-10-02. Retrieved 2013-03-20.
- ^ Bovenberg, Lans; Uhlig, Harald; Bohn, Henning; Weil, Philippe (2006-01-01). "Pension Systems and the Allocation of Macroeconomic Risk [with Comments]". NBER International Seminar on Macroeconomics. 2006 (1): 241–344. doi:10.1086/653983. ISSN 1932-8796.
- ^ Crespo Cuaresma, Jesús; Lutz, Wolfgang; Sanderson, Warren (2013-12-04). "Is the Demographic Dividend an Education Dividend?". Demography. 51 (1): 299–315. doi:10.1007/s13524-013-0245-x. ISSN 0070-3370. PMID 24302530.
- ^ White, Mercedia Stevenson; Burns, Candace; Conlon, Helen Acree (October 2018). "The Impact of an Aging Population in the Workplace". Workplace Health & Safety. 66 (10): 493–498. doi:10.1177/2165079917752191. ISSN 2165-0799. PMID 29506442. S2CID 3664469.
- ^ World Health Organization. "Global age-friendly cities: a guide" (PDF). WHO. Retrieved May 5, 2015.
- ^ Daly, M; Lewis, J (2000). "The concept of social care and the analysis of contemporary welfare states". British Journal of Sociology. 51 (2): 281–298. doi:10.1111/j.1468-4446.2000.00281.x. PMID 10905001.
- ^ Mohan, J (2003). "Geography and social policy: spatial divisions of welfare". Progress in Human Geography. 27 (3): 363–374. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.456.615. doi:10.1191/0309132503ph432pr. S2CID 54724709.
- ^ Trydegard, G-B; Thorslund, M (2001). "Inequality in the welfare state ? Local variation in care of elderly – the case of Sweden". International Journal of Social Welfare. 10 (3): 174–184. doi:10.1111/1468-2397.00170.
- ^ Rosenberg, M W (1999). "Vieillir au Canada: les collectivités riches et les collectivités pauvres en services". Horizons. 2: 18.
- ^ Aronson, J; Neysmith, S M (2001). "Manufacturing social exclusion in the home care market". Canadian Public Policy. 27 (2): 151–165. doi:10.2307/3552194. JSTOR 3552194.
- ^ Sánchez-González, Diego; Rodríguez-Rodríguez, Vicente (2016). Environmental Gerontology in Europe and Latin America. New York: Springer Publishing Company. p. 284. ISBN 978-3-319-21418-4.
- ^ Rowles, Graham D.; Bernard, Miriam (2013). Environmental Gerontology: Making Meaningful Places in Old Age. New York: Springer Publishing Company. p. 320. ISBN 978-0-8261-0813-5.
- ^ Scheidt, Rick J.; Schwarz, Benyamin (2013). Environmental Gerontology. What Now?. New York: Routledge. p. 338. ISBN 978-0-415-62616-3.
- ^ Sanchez-Gonzalez, D (2015). "The physical-social environment and aging from environmental gerontology and geography. Socio-spatial implications for Latin America". Revista de Geografía Norte Grande. 60 (1): 97–114. doi:10.4067/S0718-34022015000100006.
- ^ North, Madeleine (21 September 2023). "With life expectancy increasing, here's how 4 countries are addressing their ageing populations". World Economic Forum.
- ^ Gauthier, A.H. (2013). Family Policy and Fertility: Do Policies Make a Difference? In: Buchanan, A., Rotkirch, A. (eds) Fertility Rates and Population Decline. Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Family and Intimate Life. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137030399_16
- ^ Bloom, D. E., Canning, D., & Lubet, A. (2015). Global Population Aging: Facts, Challenges, Solutions & Perspectives. Daedalus, 144(2), 80–92. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24711220
- ^ Bermingham, J. R. (2001). Immigration: Not a Solution to Problems of Population Decline and Aging. Population and Environment, 22(4), 355–363. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1006782904046
- ^ Canales, A. C. (2024, January 29). Still more room to grow: Immigrants can reverse the U.S. population decline and its economic consequences. National Immigration Forum. https://immigrationforum.org/article/still-more-room-to-grow-immigrants-can-reverse-the-u-s-population-decline-and-its-economic-consequences/
- ^ World Health Organization. (2002). Active ageing : a policy framework. World Health Organization. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/67215
- ^ Khan, Hafiz T. A.; Addo, Kwaku Mari; Findlay, Helen (2024). "Public Health Challenges and Responses to the Growing Ageing Populations". Public Health Challenges. 3 (3) e213. doi:10.1002/puh2.213. ISSN 2769-2450.
- ^ Uhlenberg, P (1992-01-01). "Population Aging and Social Policy". Annual Review of Sociology. 18 (1): 449–474. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.18.1.449. ISSN 0360-0572. PMID 12343802.
- ^ a b Ogonda, Job (May 2006). "Age Discrimination in Africa" (PDF).
- ^ Reznik, G. L., Shoffner, D., & Weaver, D. A. (2007, April). Coping with the Demographic Challenge: Fewer Children and Living Longer. Social Security Administration. https://www.ssa.gov/policy/docs/ssb/v66n4/v66n4p37.html
- ^ Fry, Richard; Braga, Dana (2023-12-14). "1. The growth of the older workforce". Pew Research Center. Retrieved 2025-04-06.
- ^ Rowland, D. T. (2012). Population aging: the transformation of societies. International perspectives on aging. Dordrecht; New York: Springer. ISBN 978-94-007-4049-5.
- ^ Gerlock, Edward (May 2006). "Discrimination of Older People in Asia" (PDF).
- ^ Getzen, T. E. (1992-05-01). "Population Aging and the Growth of Health Expenditures". Journal of Gerontology. 47 (3): S98 – S104. doi:10.1093/geronj/47.3.s98. ISSN 0022-1422. PMID 1573213.
Additional references
[edit]- Gavrilov L.A., Heuveline P. Aging of Population. In: Paul Demeny and Geoffrey McNicoll (Eds.) The Encyclopedia of population. New York, Macmillan Reference USA, 2003, vol.1, 32–37.
- United Nations, World Population Prospects: The 2004 Revision Population Database, Population Division, 2004.
- Gavrilova N.S., Gavrilov L.A. Aging Populations: Russia/Eastern Europe. In: P. Uhlenberg (Editor), International Handbook of the Demography of Aging, New York: Springer-Verlag, 2009, pp. 113–131.
- Jackson R., Howe N. The Greying of the Great Powers, Washington: Center for Strategic and International Studies, 2008 Major Findings Archived 2009-04-17 at the Wayback Machine
- Goldstone, J. A., Grinin, L., and; Korotayev, A. Research into Global Ageing and its Consequences / History & Mathematics: Political Demography & Global Ageing. Volgograd, Uchitel Publishing House, 2016.
External links
[edit]- HelpAge International and UNFPA: Ageing in the 21st Century - A Celebration and A Challenge report (2012)
- Global AgeWatch - website providing latest data, trends and response to global population ageing
- AARP International: The Journal - a quarterly international policy publication on global aging (2010)
- Deloitte study (2007) - Serving the Aging Citizen Archived 2008-10-13 at the Wayback Machine
- CoViVE Consortium Population Ageing in Flanders and Europe
- UN Programme on Ageing
- Oxford Institute of Population Ageing Archived 2021-02-05 at the Wayback Machine
- Human Development Trends 2005 Presentation on UN Human Development Report 2005 Archived 2008-09-23 at the Wayback Machine
- David N. Weil (2006). "Population Aging" (PDF). (59.8 KB)
- Jill Curnow. 2000. Myths and the fear of an ageing population Archived 2008-10-31 at the Wayback Machine (65.6 KB)
- Judith Healy (2004). "The benefit of an ageing population" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2018-05-15. Retrieved 2006-11-06. (215 KB)
- Aging Population and Its Potential Impacts Archived 2016-08-21 at the Wayback Machine
- Population Aging and Public Infrastructure in Developed Countries
- Projections of the Senior Population in the United States
- Centre of Excellence in Population Ageing Research website
Population ageing
View on GrokipediaPopulation ageing denotes the progressive increase in the median age of a population, manifested as a rising proportion of individuals aged 65 and older relative to younger cohorts, resulting from fertility rates persistently below the replacement level of approximately 2.1 children per woman and concomitant extensions in average lifespan through medical and public health advancements.[1][2] This demographic shift, an outcome of the broader demographic transition from high birth and death rates to low ones, has accelerated globally since the mid-20th century, with the share of the world population over age 60 nearly doubling from 12% in 2015 to a projected 22% by 2050.[3][2] The phenomenon's scope is uneven, with advanced economies like Japan and much of Europe experiencing median ages exceeding 45 years and elderly dependency ratios surpassing 50 dependents per 100 working-age adults, while low- and middle-income countries, previously youthful, now face rapid ageing, hosting 80% of the world's older population by 2050.[3][2] Causally, sub-replacement fertility—often below 1.5 in industrialized nations—coupled with longevity gains of over two decades since 1950, contracts the base of the population pyramid, elevating the old-age dependency ratio and straining fiscal systems reliant on intergenerational transfers for pensions and healthcare.[1][4] Empirically, a 10% rise in the population share aged 60 and above correlates with a 5.7% decline in GDP per capita, underscoring productivity losses from shrinking labor forces and heightened public expenditures that could crowd out investment absent productivity-enhancing reforms.[5][6] Key controversies center on policy responses' efficacy, with empirical evidence indicating that delayed retirement and technological augmentation can mitigate but not fully reverse growth deceleration, while reliance on immigration yields mixed outcomes due to skill mismatches and integration challenges in absorbing sufficient numbers to offset native cohort declines.[6][7] Despite optimistic narratives in some academic quarters emphasizing "silver economy" opportunities, causal analyses reveal persistent macroeconomic headwinds, including reduced savings rates and amplified business cycle volatility in ageing societies, necessitating structural adjustments beyond mere demographic denial.[8][9] By 2100, the global count of those over 65 is forecasted to approach 2.5 billion, compelling reevaluation of welfare models predicated on youthful demographics.[10][2]
Definitions and Measurement
Core Concepts and Metrics
Population ageing refers to the process by which the proportion of older individuals—typically those aged 65 years and over—in a given population increases over time, often accompanied by a shrinking share of the working-age population. This shift alters the age structure, with implications for societal support systems, as fewer workers support more retirees. The phenomenon is driven fundamentally by demographic transitions involving fertility rates below replacement levels and extended longevity, rather than episodic events.[11] Central to quantifying population ageing are several standardized metrics derived from age-sex distributions in census or projection data. The old-age dependency ratio (OADR) measures the number of individuals aged 65 and over per 100 persons of working age, conventionally defined as ages 20 to 64 to exclude younger students from the labor force denominator. This ratio highlights the potential economic burden on workers, though it assumes uniform productivity and dependency across ages, which may not align with actual labor participation or health variations.[11][12] The total age dependency ratio extends this by including youth dependents (ages 0-14 or 0-19), calculated as the sum of young and old dependents per 100 working-age individuals (typically 15-64), providing a broader view of non-working population pressures.[13][14] Additional core indicators include the share of the population aged 65 and over, expressed as a percentage of the total, which directly captures the elderly's demographic weight and is widely tracked for cross-country comparisons. The median age, the point at which half the population is below and half above, reflects overall ageing; rising values indicate maturation, with global medians projected to increase from around 30 years in 2020 toward 40 by mid-century in many scenarios. These metrics, while useful, rely on arbitrary age thresholds like 65, which may overlook health-adjusted dependency or cultural differences in retirement norms, prompting refinements such as prospective old-age dependency ratios that account for future cohort ageing.[15][16][17]Historical Emergence
Population ageing first manifested in Europe during the demographic transition of the 19th century, when mortality rates declined due to advances in public health, sanitation, and nutrition, outpacing initial fertility reductions and shifting age structures toward older cohorts.[18] This transition, characterized by falling death rates followed by fertility declines, marked the onset of sustained increases in the elderly share of populations in industrialized nations.[19] France led this pattern, with marital fertility beginning a secular decline around 1800—approximately 70 years ahead of most other European countries—resulting from factors including partible inheritance practices, cultural shifts toward smaller families, and early adoption of family limitation methods like coitus interruptus.[20][21] In France, the total fertility rate dropped from over 4.5 children per woman in the late 18th century to below 3 by the 1870s, while life expectancy at birth rose from about 28 years in 1800 to 37 by 1850, fostering a gradual ageing of the population structure.[22] Similar dynamics emerged elsewhere in Western Europe by mid-century: in England, the proportion of the population aged 60 and over hovered around 6% throughout much of the 19th century, low by modern standards but indicative of an emerging trend amid stabilizing mortality.[23] Sweden, with reliable historical records, saw the share aged 65+ increase modestly from roughly 5% in 1850 to 7% by 1900, reflecting broader Scandinavian patterns of mortality compression at older ages.[18] These early shifts were regionally contained, as Eastern and Southern Europe lagged, with fertility declines not widespread until the early 20th century; for instance, in Russia, mean age at first birth remained below 23 as late as 1990 in some areas, delaying ageing.[24] Globally, population ageing remained negligible until the 20th century, with the proportion aged 65+ under 5% worldwide before 1950, as developing regions experienced high fertility and mortality without the sequential declines seen in Europe.[25] The phenomenon's recognition as a policy concern crystallized in the late 19th century, exemplified by Germany's 1889 introduction of the world's first modern public pension system, initially for those aged 70, signaling awareness of growing elderly dependency amid industrial urbanization.[26] By the interwar period, European countries like Italy and Germany exhibited median ages exceeding 30 years, setting the stage for accelerated global ageing post-1945.[27]Primary Causes
Fertility Decline and Its Drivers
Global total fertility rates (TFR), measured as live births per woman, have declined sharply since the mid-20th century, falling from approximately 5 births per woman in 1950 to 2.3 in 2021, with projections indicating further decreases to around 2.1 by 2050.[28] [29] This drop has pushed TFR below the replacement level of 2.1—required for population stability absent migration—in over 100 countries by 2021, including most of Europe, East Asia, and North America, where rates often hover between 1.3 and 1.8.[30] In high-income nations, this sub-replacement fertility contributes directly to population ageing by reducing the cohort of young entrants relative to older dependents.[31] A primary driver is the rise in female education and labor force participation, which increases the opportunity costs of childbearing and leads women to delay or forgo children in favor of career advancement. Peer-reviewed analyses link each additional year of female schooling to a reduction in TFR by 0.1 to 0.3 births per woman, as educated women prioritize professional roles amid stagnant wages for family-sized households.[32] [33] Urbanization exacerbates this by raising housing and childcare expenses, with studies showing that in cities, the effective cost of raising a child to age 18 can exceed 20-30% of household income in developed economies, deterring larger families.[34] Economic models further reveal that while micro-level income gains correlate with higher fertility, aggregate growth in wealthy nations fails to reverse declines due to these fixed costs and dual-income necessities.[35] Cultural and normative shifts also play a causal role, as secularization and individualism erode traditional emphases on early marriage and pronatalism, replacing them with preferences for personal fulfillment and smaller families. In developed countries, surveys indicate that values prioritizing self-actualization over reproduction have spread via mass media and delayed partnering, with average age at first birth rising from 25 in 1970 to over 30 by 2020 in OECD nations, compressing the reproductive window and amplifying infertility risks.[33] [36] Contraceptive access, while enabling choice, has institutionalized low-fertility norms, with usage rates exceeding 70% in Europe correlating to TFRs under 1.6; however, this factor alone does not explain persistence in contexts of free or subsidized family planning, pointing to deeper ideational changes.[32] Cross-national evidence suggests that rigid gender norms, when unmet by supportive policies like paternal leave, compound these effects, as women bear disproportionate childcare burdens amid career pressures.[37] Empirical studies caution against overemphasizing economics, as fertility has fallen even in prosperous welfare states with generous child benefits, implying that non-material factors—like declining marriage rates and rising childlessness (now 15-20% in cohorts born post-1970 in Italy and Germany)—stem from evolving social prestige away from parenthood.[38] In East Asia, where TFRs dipped below 1.0 (e.g., South Korea at 0.78 in 2023), cultural legacies of intense education competition and workaholism intersect with economic pressures, yielding "lowest-low" fertility despite government incentives.[39] Overall, these drivers interact in a feedback loop: initial declines from development accelerate via policy inertia and cultural adaptation, rendering reversal challenging without addressing root causal incentives.[40]Gains in Life Expectancy
Global life expectancy at birth has risen substantially over the past century, from approximately 32 years in 1900 to 73.3 years in 2024, primarily due to declines in mortality rates across all age groups.[41] [42] These gains have shifted population age structures toward older demographics, as fewer deaths at younger ages allow larger cohorts to survive into advanced years, amplifying the ageing effect alongside fertility declines.[43] [44] Early 20th-century advances, including the acceptance of germ theory, improved sanitation, and hygiene practices, dramatically reduced infectious disease mortality, which accounted for the leading causes of death in 1900 such as pneumonia, tuberculosis, and gastrointestinal infections.[45] [46] Public health measures like vaccination programs—eliminating or controlling diseases such as smallpox, polio, and measles—further lowered child and infant mortality rates, with global under-5 mortality dropping 59% from 93 deaths per 1,000 live births in 1990 to 37 in 2023.[47] [48] Antibiotics, introduced mid-century, and better nutrition contributed to post-World War II surges, enabling survival from previously fatal infections and chronic conditions.[49] In high-income countries, life expectancy gains have increasingly occurred at older ages due to cardiovascular treatments, cancer therapies, and reduced tobacco use, extending average lifespans by over 30 years since 1900 in places like the United States, where it rose from 51 years to about 79 years by 2020.[50] [51] Globally, life expectancy increased by more than 6 years from 66.8 in 2000 to 73.1 in 2019, though the COVID-19 pandemic temporarily reversed some progress by erasing gains equivalent to a decade in certain metrics.[51] [52] These extensions disproportionately affect the elderly proportion, with the share of people aged 65 and older projected to rise from 10% in 2022 to 16% by 2050 worldwide, as surviving cohorts accumulate in higher age brackets.[53] Recent trends show slowing gains in some regions due to persistent non-communicable diseases like heart disease and cancer, yet biomedical progress—such as statins, organ transplants, and early detection—continues to push boundaries, particularly in developed nations where healthy life expectancy has paralleled overall increases.[54] [51] In developing regions, catch-up effects from imported medical technologies and public health infrastructure have accelerated ageing, with life expectancy rising 8.4 years since 1995, leading to rapid expansions in the over-60 population from 1 billion in 2020 to a projected 1.4 billion by 2030.[42] [43] This dynamic underscores how life expectancy extensions, while a marker of human progress, structurally entrench population ageing by sustaining larger elderly fractions relative to younger ones.[44]Role of Migration
International migration influences population ageing by altering age structures through the selective movement of cohorts, predominantly younger adults entering high-income, ageing destinations from lower-income regions. Net inflows of migrants, who are typically aged 20-40 at arrival, expand the working-age population (15-64 years), thereby reducing the old-age dependency ratio—the proportion of individuals aged 65+ relative to those of working age—in the short to medium term. This effect is most pronounced in developed economies with sub-replacement fertility and established pension systems, where immigration has offset approximately 20-50% of projected declines in the support ratio between 2000 and 2020, depending on policy-driven intake levels.[55][56] In nations pursuing selective immigration policies, such as Canada, Australia, and Germany, sustained net migration of 200,000-400,000 annually has lowered median ages by 1-2 years over recent decades and supported labor force growth amid native ageing. For example, U.S. Census projections indicate that without post-2020 immigration levels, the native-born population would contract by 2060, with immigrants and their descendants comprising over 80% of net population gains, thereby stabilizing the share of those under 65 at around 60% through 2040. Similarly, European Union data show that net migration inflows of about 1-1.5 million per year since 2010 have prevented sharper rises in the 65+ proportion, which would otherwise exceed 25% by 2030 under zero-migration scenarios.[57][58][59] Despite these benefits, migration's capacity to counteract ageing is inherently limited by scale, demographics, and long-term dynamics. United Nations analyses, including the 2001 Replacement Migration report, demonstrate that offsetting declines in potential support ratios—historically around 4-5 workers per retiree in OECD countries—would require annual net inflows exceeding 1 million for Europe alone through 2050, rising to 13 million globally by century's end to maintain 1995 ratios, volumes far beyond political feasibility or absorptive capacity. Empirical studies confirm that even high-immigration regimes yield only marginal shifts in age pyramids; for instance, second-generation immigrants exhibit fertility convergence to host-country norms (often below replacement), and ageing migrant stocks eventually increase dependency burdens after 20-30 years. Emigration from developing Asia and Africa, conversely, accelerates ageing in origin countries by depleting youth cohorts, as seen in nations like the Philippines and Mexico, where net outflows have raised median ages by 2-3 years since 1990.[60][61][62] Projections from the UN World Population Prospects incorporate moderate migration assumptions (net 2-3 million globally annually), under which ageing proceeds unabated in low-fertility regions, with the 65+ share reaching 25% in Europe and North America by 2050 regardless. While migration bolsters fiscal sustainability by contributing to GDP growth via prime-age labor—estimated at 0.5-1% annual uplift in advanced economies—it does not address root causes like fertility stagnation and cannot indefinitely sustain inverted pyramids without complementary policies on productivity or retirement ages.[63][64][65]Global Trends and Variations
Patterns in Developed Nations
In developed nations, population ageing is characterized by a rapidly increasing share of individuals aged 65 and older, driven by persistently low fertility rates and extended life expectancies. As of 2023, Japan leads with 29.6% of its population in this age group, followed closely by Italy at 24.2% and Portugal at 24.1%.[66] Germany reports approximately 22.5%, while the United Kingdom and United States hover around 19% and 17%, respectively—still markedly higher than the global average of 10%.[67] These figures reflect a broader trend in OECD countries, where the median age exceeds 40 years, contrasting sharply with younger profiles in developing regions.[68] Fertility rates in these nations average below 1.5 births per woman, far under the 2.1 replacement level needed for population stability absent migration.[69] In the European Union, the total fertility rate reached 1.38 in 2023, with Malta at a low of 1.06 and Bulgaria highest at 1.81.[70] Japan's rate stands at 1.26, compounding its demographic challenges.[71] Concurrently, life expectancies surpass 80 years on average across OECD members, with Japan at 85 and South Korea at 84.5 as of recent estimates.[72] This combination yields inverted age structures, where working-age cohorts (15-64) shrink relative to dependents, elevating old-age dependency ratios to 30-35 per 100 workers in many cases.[73] Historically, these patterns emerged post-1960s, following baby booms that temporarily bolstered youth cohorts, only for fertility to plummet amid urbanization, women's workforce participation, and delayed childbearing—average maternal age now exceeds 30 in the EU.[70] By 2020, the proportion aged 65+ in more developed regions per UN classifications had doubled from 1950 levels, reaching over 20%.[2] Immigration partially offsets declines in some nations like the US and UK, sustaining modest population growth, but net effects remain ageing-oriented due to migrants' eventual ageing and low native birth rates.[67] Projections indicate acceleration: by 2050, Japan and Italy could see 35-40% elderly shares, with EU dependency ratios climbing to 50.[74] Regional variations persist; Nordic countries like Sweden exhibit milder ageing via pronatalist policies yielding fertility near 1.7, whereas Southern and Eastern Europe face steeper declines absent robust immigration.[70] These dynamics underscore causal links between sustained sub-replacement fertility—rooted in economic pressures and cultural shifts—and biomedical advances prolonging lifespans, yielding populations top-heavy with retirees.[39]Dynamics in Developing Regions
In developing regions, encompassing low- and middle-income countries, population ageing proceeds more gradually than in high-income nations, with median ages typically ranging from 19 to 21 years in lower-middle-income groups as of recent estimates, reflecting persistent youth bulges from historically high fertility rates.[75] However, the share of the population aged 65 and over has begun rising, albeit from a low base, increasing by approximately 1.5 percentage points in lower-middle-income countries over recent decades compared to over 7 points in high-income counterparts.[76] This shift stems from sustained fertility declines and health improvements, though the absolute number of elderly individuals remains small relative to working-age cohorts, creating a temporary demographic dividend that many governments seek to leverage for economic growth.[77] Fertility rates in these regions have fallen sharply since the mid-20th century, from averages exceeding 5 children per woman in 1950 to around 2.3 globally by 2023, with developing areas driving much of the recent deceleration due to urbanization, expanded female education, and access to contraception.[39] In Latin America and parts of Asia, total fertility rates have dipped below replacement level (2.1), accelerating ageing; for instance, projections indicate stabilization at about 1.75 in Latin America by mid-century.[78] Sub-Saharan Africa exhibits slower declines, with rates still above 4 in many countries, delaying widespread ageing but risking future abrupt shifts if trends mirror Asia's experience.[79] These reductions, often policy-induced via family planning programs, contrast with developed nations' earlier transitions but amplify ageing pressures amid limited social safety nets. Life expectancy gains have been pronounced in developing regions, contributing to ageing by enlarging older cohorts; global averages rose from 66.8 years in 2000 to 73.1 in 2019, with low- and middle-income countries capturing much of the progress through reductions in infant mortality, infectious diseases, and improved nutrition.[51] Projections anticipate further increases of 4-5 years by 2050, driven by ongoing epidemiological transitions away from communicable diseases, though unevenly distributed—faster in Asia and Latin America than in Africa due to infrastructure gaps.[80] Unlike developed countries, where gains now focus on chronic diseases, developing regions' advancements primarily extend prime adult lifespans, compressing morbidity but straining informal family-based elder care systems.[3] Regional variations underscore heterogeneous dynamics: East Asia's rapid ageing mirrors developed patterns, with countries like China facing inverted pyramids from one-child policies, while South Asia and Latin America experience moderate shifts amid middle-income growth.[81] In contrast, Africa's youthful profile (median ages under 20) buffers immediate ageing, but fertility momentum and HIV/AIDS reversals signal future surges.[28] Overall, by 2050, developing regions will host 80% of the world's over-60 population, up from current shares, with the elderly count surging over 250% since 2010—far outpacing the 71% rise in developed areas—posing challenges for urbanization and pension systems ill-prepared for scale.[3][82] ![Population by broad age group projected to 2100, OWID][center]This projection illustrates the impending shift toward older age structures in developing regions, where working-age groups will peak before declining relative to elders by mid-century.[75]