Community hub
0 subscribers7 pages, 0 posts
Recent from talks
All channels
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Welcome to the community hub built to collect knowledge and have discussions related to Retirement age.
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Retirement age
View on Wikipediafrom Wikipedia
 | This article needs to be updated. (October 2025) |
This article lists the statutory retirement age in different countries. In some contexts, the retirement age is the age at which a person is expected or required to cease work. It is usually the age at which such a person may be entitled to receive superannuation or other government benefits, like a state pension.
History and establishment
[edit]The first recorded use of a state pension was established in the Roman Empire in 13 BC by Augustus for military veterans who had served for at least 16 years in a legion and four years in the reserves. This was later increased to 20 years in a legion and five years in the reserves.[1]
The first retirement age was set in Germany by Otto von Bismarck in 1881, originally at 70, before being reduced to 65 in 1916.[2] Following this, more countries began to adopt an official retirement age, such as Britain with the passage of the Old Age Pensions Act 1908, which set the initial retirement age at 70 before it was reduced to 65 for men and 60 for women with the passage of the National Insurance Act 1946.
The United States adopted an initial retirement age of 65, under the bill of the Social Security Act of 1935.[3] By the mid-20th century, almost all countries had adopted a retirement age.
Arguments
[edit]Policymakers usually consider the demography, fiscal cost of aging, health, life expectancy, nature of the profession, supply of labor force, and more, while taking the retirement age into account.[4] The increase in life expectancy is used in some jurisdictions as an argument to increase the age of retirement in the 21st century.[5][6]
Arguments for lower retirement ages for parents include the unpaid work of parental care.[7] Lower retirement ages for parents have been criticized for reducing the length of pension contributions, which can result in lower retirement benefits.[8]
Some countries are equalizing the retirement ages between women and men.[9] The expected years in retirement were 22.8 years for women and 18.4 years for men on average in OECD in 2022, contributed by sex differences in life expectancy.[10] The generally longer expected years in retirement result in women requiring higher pension contributions to reach the same annual pension benefits as men without redistribution.[8]
Reforms
[edit]Reforms tend to be phased in slowly when the retirement age (or pension age) is increased with grandfathering, ensuring a gradual change. One of such examples of grandfathering is the transitional pension rules, which were applied for staff aged 54 years or older, and to some extent, for all staff in place, when in 2014, the retirement age of European civil servants was increased to 66 years of age.[11]
In contrast, when the age of retirement is decreased, changes are often brought about rapidly.[12]
Retirement age by country and region
[edit]Many of the countries listed in the table below are in the process of reforming retirement ages. The actual retirement can be earlier or later than the public retirement age due to private pension plans or incentives to work longer.[13]
In some countries, one's year of birth determines their age of retirement. For example, in the United States as of 2025, while a person born before 1960 can retire with social security benefits at the age of 66, those born after 1960 must be 67, however an added increase can be obtained by retiring after 70.[14]
Denmark, whose currently age for retirees is 67, (men and women) will also be increased to 70 by 2040.
Many European Union Member States, currently imply a retirement age of 65, in the 2020s. However by 2030 this will be increased to the standard 67 years in most countries.[15]
The average of statutory retirement age in the 34 countries of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) in 2014 was males 65 years and females 63.5 years, but the tendency all over the world is to increase the retirement age.[16] This is also reflected by the findings that just over half the Asian investors surveyed region-wide said they agreed with raising the retirement age, with a quarter disagreeing and the remainder undecided.[17]
| Country | Men | Women | Year | Notes | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Albania
|
65 | 61 years 8 months | 2024 | Men: gradually rising by 1 month a year from 2033 onwards from 65 years to 67 years by 2056. Women: gradually rising by 2 months a year from 2021 onwards from 61 years to 67 years by 2056. | [18] |
 Argentina
|
65 | 60 | 2024 | [19] | |
 Armenia
|
63 | 2024 | [20] | ||
 Australia
|
67 | 2024 | In Australia the retirement age was increased to 67 years in July 2023. | [21] | |
 Austria
|
65 | 60.5 | 2024 | Women: gradually rising by 6 months per year from 2024 onwards from 60 years to 65 years by 2033. | [22][20][23] |
 Azerbaijan
|
65 | 63.5 | 2024 | Men: 65 from 2021 onwards. Women: gradually rising by 6 months per year from 2017 onwards from 60 to 65 years by 2027.[24] | [24] |
 Belarus
|
63 | 58 | 2024 | [25] | |
 Bangladesh
|
59 | 2024 | [26] | ||
 Belgium
|
65-67 | 2024 | The legal retirement age (the age at which one can retire, regardless of career length) in Belgium is 65 in 2019. In 2025 it will be 66 and in 2030 it will be 67, both for women and men. Early retirement is possible from 60 onwards with a career of at least 44 years, from 61 onwards with at least 43 years, or from 63 onwards with a career of at least 42 years. Some exceptions exist, mainly in the required number of years. A career year is considered if it contains at least 104 days (in full time equivalent). | [27][28] | |
 Bosnia and Herzegovina
|
65 | 2024 | [20] | ||
 Brazil
|
65 | 62 | 2024 | Certain individuals, such as rural workers, teachers and police officers, have a lower minimum age.
Brazil also requires workers to have contributed to social security for a minimum amount of time before they become eligible to claim benefits. To start receiving partial benefits, all private-sector workers are required have contributed for at least 20 years (for men) or 15 years (for women). Public-sector workers are required to have contributed for at least 25 years. To receive full benefits all workers must have contributed for at least 40 years (for men) or 35 years (for women). |
[29] |
 British Virgin Islands
|
65 | 2024 | [30] | ||
 Bulgaria
|
64 years 7 months | 62 years 1 month | 2024 | In Bulgaria the retirement age is to be increased gradually and reach 65 years by 2029 for men and by 2037 for women. | [31][32] |
 Cameroon
|
60 | 2024 | Since 2023 the retirement age is 60 years for all. | [33] | |
 Canada
|
65 (standard) 60 (on deduction, up to 36%) 70 (increase of up to 42%) |
2024 | The standard age to start the pension is 65. However, you can start receiving it as early as age 60 or as late as age 70. If you start receiving your pension earlier, the monthly amount you’ll receive will be smaller. If you decide to start later, you’ll receive a larger monthly amount. There’s no benefit to wait after age 70 to start receiving the pension. The maximum monthly amount you can receive is reached when you turn 70. If you start before age 65, payments will decrease by 0.6% each month (or by 7.2% per year), up to a maximum reduction of 36% if you start at age 60. If you start after age 65, payments will increase by 0.7% each month (or by 8.4% per year), up to a maximum increase of 42% if you start at age 70 (or after). | [34] | |
 Chile
|
65 | 60 | [35] | ||
 China
|
63 | 55–58 | 2024 | The new retirement age was announced on 13 September 2024 and is now 63 for men, 58 for female civil servants and 55 for female workers. It took effect on 1 January 2025. Previously, the retirement age was 60 for men, 55 for female civil servants, and 50 for female workers.[36] The 2024 change marked the first increase of the retirement age since the 1950s.[37] The retirement age will apply to men born in and after 1965, female civil servants born in and after 1970 and female workers born in or after 1975. The retirement age increase is based on the individual’s year and month of birth, as it increases by 1 month for every 4-month-block months of birth for males and female civil servants and 1 month for every 2-month-block for female workers until 2040. It is expected to be fully phased in for male workers born in September 1976, female civil servants born in September 1981 and female workers born in November 1984. The New regulation also stipulates that those affected by the change may voluntarily reduce their retirement age by up to 3 years if they have made the minimum length of pension payments, or delay their retirements by up to 3 years if permitted by the employer. The minimum pension payment period will also be increased from 15 years to 20 from 2030.[38][39] | [40] |
 Colombia
|
62 | 57 | 2024 | The reform, which will be in force from July 2025, kept the retirement age at 62 for men when they have made contributions for 1,300 weeks of work and 57 for women, though it reduced the number of weeks for women to 1,000. Women can discount 50 weeks of pension contributions from their required amount for each child, for up to three children, under the terms of the reform. | [41][7] |
 Croatia
|
65 | 63 years 6 months | 2024 | Men: 65. Women: gradually rising by 3 months per year to 65 years by 2030. | [42][43] |
 Cuba
|
65 | 60 | 2024 | Age 65 (men) or age 60 (women) with at least 30 years of employment; age 60 (men) or age 55 (women) if 75% of the insured's total employment history or the 15 years of employment immediately before retirement involved arduous or dangerous work. | [44] |
 Cyprus
|
65 | 2024 | The pensionable age is 65. It is possible to receive a pension at the age of 63 under certain conditions. Miners can receive a pension at the age of 63 provided they have worked in a mine for at least 3 years; and they are entitled to a one-month reduction in the retirement age for every 5-month period they worked in a mine on condition that they are no longer engaged in that activity. They may not, however, retire before the age of 58. Cypriot legislation does not provide for early retirement in other cases. | [20][23][45] | |
 Czech Republic
|
64 years 2 months | 2024 | By 2030 the retirement age will be 65. For women, having children reduce the retirement age depending on number of children; from 2037 the retirement age will be 65 for all, regardless of number of children. | [22][46] | |
 Denmark
|
67 | 2024 | From 2030 onwards, retirement age will be linked to life expectancy. From 2040 to 2045 the state retirement age was set to 70. | [47][48][22][23][25][49] | |
 Egypt
|
60 | 2015 | |||
 Estonia
|
64 years 9 months | 2024 | By 2027, retirement age will be linked to the average life expectancy. Having children may reduce the retirement age by 3–5 years. | [23][25][22] | |
 Finland
|
64.5–69 | 2024 | Flexible retirement age: 64–69 years, national pension 65 years. In 2030, the retirement age will be linked to life expectancy. | [23][22] | |
 France
|
64–67 | 2023 | The minimal retirement age has gradually increased from 60 to 64 years by 2023. | [20][23] | |
 Georgia
|
65 | 60 | 2011 | [20] | |
 Germany
|
65 (rising to 67 by 2031) | 2025 | In Germany the retirement age is being increased and will gradually rise to 67 by 2031. | [50] | |
 Greece
|
67 | 2021 | [22] | ||
 Hong Kong
|
60–65 | 2017 | Retirement age 65. Early retirement possible between the ages of 60 and 64. Some disciplined services staff of the government have lower retirement age.[51] | [52][53][54] | |
 Hungary
|
65 | 2021 | The age was 63 in 2018, but was raised to 65 by 2022.[22] Women with 40 years of insurance can retire at any age.[55] | [22] | |
 Iceland
|
67 | 2007 | [25] | ||
 India
|
60–65 | 2014 | In the public sector, the retirement age is 60, 62 in Indian Railways, 62 for the chiefs of army/navy/air force staff (or 3 years of service whichever is earlier), 62 for high court judges, 65 for the chief of defence staff (or 3 years of service whichever is earlier), and 65 for supreme Court judges.[56] while in the private sector it depends on the individual company and the maximum being 65. | [57] | |
 Indonesia
|
58 | 2022 | In Indonesia, provisions relating to pensions are regulated in Government Regulation Number 45 of 2015 Article 15 concerning the Implementation of the Pension Guarantee Program, in PP 45/2015 the following matters are regulated:
For the first time the Retirement Age is set at 56 (fifty six years). Starting January 1, 2019, the retirement age as referred to in paragraph (1) will be 57 (fifty seven) years. The Retirement Age as referred to in paragraph (2) is further increased by 1 (one) year for every subsequent 3 (three) years until it reaches the Retirement Age of 65 (sixty five) years. By referring to the regulation, the retirement age limit in Indonesia is 58 years in 2022 and will reach the maximum retirement age limit, which is 65 years in 2043. |
[58] | |
 Iran
|
60 | 55 | 2018 | ||
 Iraq
|
60 | 2019 | [59] | ||
 Ireland
|
66 | 2021 | In Ireland the retirement age is to be increased gradually and reach 68 years by 2028.[22] | [20][23][25] | |
 Israel
|
67 | 65 | 2022 | In Israel the retirement age for women is to be increased gradually and reach 65 by 2032.[60] | [61] |
 Italy
|
62–67 | 2021 | Must have paid contributions for at least 20 years (At 67 years and 3 months). Those who have paid contributions for at least 41 years can retire at 62. Those who have paid contributions for at least 41 years and 10 months (women) or 42 years and 10 months (men) can retire regardless of age. |
[62] | |
 Japan
|
64 | 62 | 2022 | While the government is at it with early retirement prevention, the age is expected to increase gradually to 65 years of age by 2025.[63] | [22][64] |
 Kazakhstan
|
63 | 58 | 2015 | From 2017 the retirement age for women is to be increased gradually and reach 63 years in 2027[65] | |
| Kosovo | 65 | 65 | 2014 | [66] | |
 Kyrgyzstan
|
63 | 58 | 2011 | [20] | |
 Latvia
|
64 | 2021 | The age will be 65 by 2025.[22] | [22] | |
 Libya
|
65 | 60 | 2017 | [67] | |
 Liechtenstein
|
64 | 2007 | [25] | ||
 Lithuania
|
64 years 8 months | 64 years 4 months | 2024 | In Lithuania, the retirement age will be raised to 65 for both men and women by 2026.[22] | [22][68] |
 Luxembourg
|
65 | 2011 | [20] | ||
 Malaysia
|
60 | 2013 | In Malaysia, The Congress of Unions of Employees in the Public and Civil Services (Cuepacs) wants the government to consider extending the retirement age for civil servants from 60 to 62,[69] but the government has no immediate plan to extend it as the current retirement age is deemed as sufficient.[70] | [71] | |
 Malta
|
64 | 2024 | In Malta the retirement age is being increased gradually to 65 years by 2027.[22] | [22] | |
 Mauritius
|
60 | 2025 | In Mauritius the retirement age is being increased gradually to 65 years by 2034.[72] | ||
 Mexico
|
65 | 2015 | Retirement age is expected to be increased in the coming years. | ||
 Moldova
|
63 | 61 | 2024 | Women: gradually rising by 6 months per year until 63 years in 2028. | [73] |
 Montenegro
|
66 | 64 | 2022 | [20] | |
 Morocco
|
63 | 2014 | Abdelilah Benkirane increased the retirement age to 63 since 2015. | ||
 Namibia
|
60 | 2024 | The early retirement age for public employees is 55 years | [74][75] | |
 Nepal
|
65 | 2021 | |||
 Netherlands
|
67 | 2024 | 67 to be increased to 67 years 3 months in 2028. AOW (Algemene Ouderdomswet, meaning General Old Age Law) eligibility is tied to life expectancy. | [22][76] | |
 New Zealand
|
65 | 2019 | [77] | ||
 North Korea
|
60 | 55 | 1999 | [78] | |
 North Macedonia
|
64 | 62 | 2011 | [20] | |
 Norway
|
62–67 | 2024 | The general retirement age is currently set to age 67 however, given sufficient pension contributions it is possible to retire as early as at age 62. The longer an individual postpones withdrawing a pension, the greater the government pension provision becomes. | [79] | |
 Oman
|
60 | 55 | 2023 | The age is 60. | |
 Pakistan
|
60 | 2012 | [80] | ||
 Peru
|
60 | 2018 | [81] | ||
 Philippines
|
60 | 1990 | The retirement age for an employee depends on the employment contract. Upon retirement, the retired employee should be given his/her benefits according to the agreement or contract between the employer and the employee. However, if there is no existing retirement plan or agreement for the employee, he/she may retire at the age of 60, given that he/she has served the employer for 5 years, and shall be given a retirement pay of at least half a month's salary for every year of service (6 months of work given is considered as 1 whole year for the retirement pay). | [82] | |
 Poland
|
65 | 60 | 2016 | [22] | |
 Portugal
|
66.6 | 2025 | [83] | ||
 Romania
|
65 | 62 | 2023 | The age for women is being increased gradually. It will reach 63 by 2030, 64 in 2033 and 65 in 2035, and then will be linked to life expectancy. | [84] |
 Russia
|
63 | 58 | 2024 | From 2019 the retirement age for men (women) would gradually increase from 60 (55) to 65 (60) years by 2028; first it was intended to hike the age for women to 63 but later the plan was softened. | [85][86] |
 Saudi Arabia
|
60 | 2014 | In Saudi Arabia, the retirement age is based on the Hijiri (lunar) calendar. | [87] | |
 Serbia
|
65 | 63.5 | 2023 | Both men and women can retire when they reach their respective retirement age and have at least 15 years of insurance coverage. Or, have 45 years of insurance coverage regardless of age. The retirement age for women is increased by 2 months every year and it will be the same as for men, 65 in 2032. | [20] |
 Singapore
|
62–65 | 2012 | In Singapore, the Retirement Age Act (RAA) has been replaced by the Retirement and Re-employment Act (RRA) in 2012. Under the RRA, the statutory minimum retirement age is still 62, but employers are now required to offer re-employment to eligible employees who turn 62, up to the age of 65. The bill will gradually increase the retirement and re-employment ages for Singapore employees to 65 and 70 years old, respectively. By 2030, the retirement age will have been increased to 65 and the re-employment age will have been raised to 70, in a step-by-step approach. | [88][89] | |
 Slovakia
|
62 | 2017 | In Slovakia the retirement age for women depends on the number of children.[90] The retirement age will be equalized for men and women at 62 in 2017. The retirement age as of October 2022 is 63 years with the conditions.[22] | [23] | |
 Slovenia
|
65 | 2021 | [22] | ||
 South Korea
|
60 | 2016 | Employers with more than 300 employees are required to extend the retiring age to 60. From 1 January 2017, it will be mandatory for all employers nationwide.[91] | ||
 Spain
|
66.5 | 2024 | The age will be 67 by 2027.[22] | [20][23] | |
 Sri Lanka
|
55 | 2014 | [92] | ||
 Sweden
|
67 | 2024 | Early retirement possible from 64. Persons born before 1963 have various lower retirement ages. | [93][94][22] | |
 Switzerland
|
65 | 65 | 2021 | 65 for women as of January 2025. | [22] |
 Tajikistan
|
63 | 58 | 2011 | [20] | |
 Thailand
|
60 | 2015 | except a president of a university can work beyond 60 years | ||
 Trinidad and Tobago
|
60–65 | 2015 | [95] | ||
 Tunisia
|
62–65 | 2019 | |||
 Turkmenistan
|
62 | 57 | 2011 | [20] | |
 Turkey
|
60 | 58 | 2014 | Retirement age was gradually increased since the 1970s, from 44 for men and 38 for women.[96] Originally, there was no exact retirement age. Current ages will increase to 65 for both genders by 2048. Additionally, various minimum days of service is required, which is currently 7000 days. It will become 7200 days (20 years) by 2048. One is subject to the laws on the day he/she started working. | [97] |
 Ukraine
|
60 | 2021 | [20][98] | ||
 United Arab Emirates
|
65 | 2010 | In the United Arab Emirates the mandatory retirement age was raised from 60 to 65 in 2010, enabling the UAE to retain its needed expat skilled work force longer for key construction projects.[99] | ||
 United Kingdom
|
66 | 2020 |
State pension age increased to 66 in 2020, and will go up to 67 by 2028,[100] and to 68 by 2037.[101] |
||
 United States
|
(A) Earliest age is 62 (on 25 to 30% reduction) (B) Standard - 66–69 (C) Delayment in receiving benefits out until aged 70, +25% increase[14] |
2024 |
The Social Security Administration, is the Government agency responsible for social services in the United States. Pension age in the United States is determined on one's birth year, the earliest a person can retire is 62, but benefits for a single may be a 25% to 30% reduction, as the full benefit amount (100%) is for retirees the earliest is 66 for people born before 1960 or after at 67, however if a prospective retiree delays taking out Government benefits until 70, the full pension amount is increased (125%). |
[14] | |
 Uruguay
|
60–70 | 2009 | 60 years and 30 working years minimum (1995), or 65 years and 25 working years and progressive to 70 in age and 15 working years (2009). | ||
 Uzbekistan
|
60 | 55 | 2011 | [20] | |
 Venezuela
|
60 | 55 | 2015 | [102] | |
 Vietnam
|
60.5 | 55.67 | 2022 | The retirement age will gradually increase to 62 for males by 2028 and 60 for females by 2035. In 2021, the retirement age is 60.25 (age 60 and 3 months) for men and 55.33 (age 55 and 4 months) for women, the age will be increased by 3 months each year following for men and 4 months for women. | [103] |
France
[edit]In France, the maximum working age was recognized in 2009 and set at 70. Up to this age, a company wishing to retire has no choice but to dismiss its employee or negotiate with them. France is one of the few countries to have three legal ages: the minimum (64 years), the maximum (70 years), and the full retirement age (variable, maximum 67 years).
Japan
[edit]In Japan, the legal retirement age was 60 until March 31, 2013. It will gradually increase to 65 in 2025 for men, (61 in 2013, 62 in 2016, 63 in 2019, and 64 in 2022), and in 2030 for women (61 in 2018, 62 in 2021, 63 in 2024, and 64 in 2027).[104]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ Clark, R. L., Craig, L. A., & Wilson, J. W. (n.d.). A History of Public Sector Pensions in the United States. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-4011: University of Pennsylvania Press. Retrieved from https://pensionresearchcouncil.wharton.upenn.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/0-8122-3714-5-3.pdf
- ^ Social Security Administration. "Otto von Bismarck". Social Security History. Retrieved 12 September 2022.
- ^ Costa, Dora. "The Evolution of Retirement" (PDF). National Bureau of Economic Research. University of Chicago Press. p. 17. Retrieved 21 January 2023.
- ^ "Setting an Ideal Retirement Age!". Centre for Public Policy Research (CPPR). 30 March 2015. Archived from the original on 7 April 2015.
- ^ Johnston, Chris (26 May 2017). "'Keep working until you're 70'". BBC News.
- ^ "Retirement age must rise - OECD".
- ^ a b Vargas, Carlos (15 June 2024). "Colombia lawmakers approve pension reform in victory for Petro". Reuters. Retrieved 10 October 2024.
- ^ a b Jefferson, Therese (1 October 2009). "Women and Retirement Pensions: A Research Review". Feminist Economics. 15 (4): 115–145. doi:10.1080/13545700903153963. ISSN 1354-5701.
- ^ Top, Dan Cristian; Savu, Lavinia (2014). "Considerations Regarding the Equalization of the Retirement Age for Men and Women at 65 Years". SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2423443. ISSN 1556-5068.
- ^ Society at a Glance 2024: OECD Social Indicators, Expected years after labour market exit, OECD, 20 June 2024, doi:10.1787/bb2c49e5-en
- ^ Irene Souka (July 2013). "Review of the Staff Regulations" (PDF). p. 12. Archived (PDF) from the original on 19 December 2014.
- ^ Catherine Blair (8 August 2014). Securing Pension Provision: The Challenge of Reforming the Age of Entitlement. Palgrave Macmillan. p. 107. ISBN 978-1-137-45397-6. Archived from the original on 6 May 2016.
- ^ Ilmakunnas, Pekka; Ilmakunnas, Seija (2018). "Health and retirement age: Comparison of expectations and actual retirement". Scandinavian Journal of Public Health. 46 (19_suppl): 18–31. doi:10.1177/1403494817748295. ISSN 1403-4948. PMID 29471761.
- ^ a b c "Benefits Planner: Retirement | Retirement Age and Benefit Reduction". Social Security Administration.
- ^ Cite error: The named reference
et.fiwas invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Scott, John (25 June 2014). "Aging Australians Balk at World's Oldest Retirement Age". Jakarta: BeritaSatu Media Holdings. Archived from the original on 12 September 2014. Retrieved 10 March 2015.
- ^ "Asians Want To See Official Retirement Ages Rise – Manulife Survey". Hong Kong: The Manufacturers Life Insurance Company. 22 May 2014. Retrieved 10 March 2015.
- ^ "IOPS Country profile: Albania" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 15 December 2023.
- ^ "Jubilación ordinaria o prestación por Vejez". Archived from the original on 20 April 2017.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q "Old-age pension". www.zso.gov.rs. Retrieved 17 March 2023.
- ^ "Age Pension". humanservices.gov.au. Archived from the original on 26 February 2014.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x "Retirement Ages". Finnish Centre for Pensions. Retrieved 8 June 2024.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i 2009 Ageing Report: Economic and budgetary projections for the EU-27 Member States (2008–2060). Joint Report prepared by the European Commission (DG ECFIN) and the Economic Policy Committee (AWG), "2009 Ageing Report: Economic and budgetary projections for the EU-27 Member States (2008-2060)" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 20 October 2011. Retrieved 4 December 2011., p. 78.
- ^ a b "Azerbaijan increases retirement age to 65 years | Vestnik Kavkaza". vestnikkavkaza.net. Retrieved 25 October 2018.
- ^ a b c d e f Kłos B., Wiek emerytalny kobiet i mężczyzn, "infos", 7.02.2008 Archived 31 March 2010 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ "BIDA - Details". bida.gov.bd. Retrieved 10 October 2024.
- ^ "Wanneer kan ik met pensioen gaan?". Federale Pensioendienst.
- ^ "67, 68 of toch weer 65? Hoe we bekvechten over een pensioenleeftijd die we nog lang niet halen". May 2019.
- ^ "Reforma da Previdência: entenda a proposta aprovada, ponto a ponto".
- ^ "Retirement Age At 65 To Be Enforced In Public & Private Sectors". Island Sun. 17 April 2017. Archived from the original on 30 September 2017. Retrieved 30 September 2017.
- ^ "Пенсии за осигурителен стаж и възраст". www.noi.bg. Archived from the original on 31 January 2018. Retrieved 9 May 2018.
- ^ orka.sejm.gov.pl https://orka.sejm.gov.pl/WydBAS.nsf/0/D8FD27CD446CB5DDC12573E800318FA1/$file/infos_027.pdf. Retrieved 13 June 2025.
{{cite web}}: Missing or empty|title=(help) - ^ "President Paul BIYA harmonises Retirement Age of Civil Servants". www.prc.cm. Retrieved 10 October 2024.
- ^ "CPP retirement pension: When to start your pension". www.canada.ca. 15 July 2021. Retrieved 10 October 2024.
- ^ "¿El trabajador que ha cumplido la edad de 65 años si es hombre o 60 años si es mujer, está obligado a seguir cotizando en la AFP a la cual se encuentra afiliado?". dt.gob.cl. Archived from the original on 13 March 2014.
- ^ "State Council Circular on Issuing "State Council Temporary Measures on Providing for Old, Weak, Sick, and Handicapped Cadres" and "State Council Temporary Measures on Workers' Retirement, Resignation" (Chinese Text)". 11 July 2006. Archived from the original on 15 March 2016.
- ^ "我国将启动延迟退休改革_中国人大网". www.npc.gov.cn. 13 September 2024. Retrieved 13 September 2024.
- ^ "新华视点·延迟退休改革丨延迟多久、如何实施——解读延迟退休改革文件-新华网". www.news.cn. 13 September 2024. Retrieved 13 September 2024.
- ^ "Retirement age will be pushed back". china.org.cn. Archived from the original on 2 May 2012.
- ^ "受权发布｜全国人民代表大会常务委员会关于实施渐进式延迟法定退休年龄的决定-新华网". www.news.cn. 13 September 2024. Retrieved 13 September 2024.
- ^ "Pensiones - Colpensiones". mintrabajo.gov.co. Archived from the original on 3 March 2014.
- ^ "Zakon o mirovinskom osiguranju [Pension Insurance Act, unofficial website]". www.zakon.hr. Retrieved 11 October 2021.
- ^ "Croatia's Pension & Retirement System - Expat In Croatia". 20 June 2020. Retrieved 10 October 2024.
- ^ "Cuba Boosts Retirement Age as Population Goes Gray". www.banderasnews.com (in Croatian). Archived from the original on 22 November 2016. Retrieved 9 May 2018.
- ^ "Cyprus - Employment, Social Affairs & Inclusion - European Commission". ec.europa.eu. Retrieved 10 October 2024.
- ^ "Důchodová kalkulačka, věk odchodu". www.duchody-duchodci.cz. Retrieved 10 October 2024.
- ^ "Adjust your savings to match your retirement expectations". english.pfa.dk. Archived from the original on 17 August 2016. Retrieved 23 July 2016.
- ^ "Denmark has world's best pension system - The Local". thelocal.dk. 13 October 2014. Archived from the original on 16 June 2016. Retrieved 23 July 2016.
- ^ "Forhøjelse af folkepensionsalderen i 2040 sikrer velfærden". Beskæftigelsesministeriet (in Danish). 22 May 2025. Retrieved 25 May 2025.
- ^ Knight, Ben (1 August 2025). "Will Germany raise retirement age beyond 67? Ben Knight". Deutsche Welle. Retrieved 13 October 2025.
- ^ "Civil Service Bureau - Retirement". www.csb.gov.hk.
- ^ "Retirement Planning and Tips - GovHK". GovHK. Retrieved 23 September 2021.
- ^ "Commonly asked questions on retirement benefits". Civil Service Bureau of the Hong Kong SAR. Retrieved 23 September 2021.
- ^ "Cap. 57 Employment Ordinance". elegislation.gov.hk. Retrieved 23 September 2021.
- ^ "Regions - SmartExpat". www.angloinfo.com. Archived from the original on 13 December 2017. Retrieved 9 May 2018.
- ^ Pioneer, The. "Govt may increase retirement age". The Pioneer. Retrieved 17 February 2023.
- ^ Martins, Raquel (15 October 2013). "Idade da reforma passa para os 66 anos em 2014". PÚBLICO (in Portuguese). Retrieved 13 June 2025.
- ^ Heizier, Eibin (14 February 2022). Arjanto, Dwi (ed.). "Menilik Lagi Aturan Usia Pensiun di Indonesia". Tempo.co (in Indonesian).
- ^ "Iraqi gov't to lower retirement age". Iraq Business News. 24 October 2019. Retrieved 25 March 2024.
- ^ "Retirement age for women in Israel to rise to 65". Globes. 7 December 2021.
- ^ "הגיל הראשון: גיל הפרישה - 2. הגעת לגיל המזכה בקצבה | ביטוח לאומי".
- ^ "Ecco come Funziona la Quota 100 [Guida]". www.pensionioggi.it.
- ^ "Japan's elderly keep working well past retirement age". Independent.co.uk. 3 March 2016.
- ^ The Point Of The Pension Plan. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Pension Bureau. Archived 23 March 2011 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ "Egov.kz". Archived from the original on 18 December 2016. Retrieved 6 October 2016.
- ^ "LAW NO. 04/L-131 ON PENSION SCHEMES FINANCED BY THE STATE". Retrieved 24 March 2023.
- ^ "HoR increases retirement age to 70 but pension can still be claimed at 65". Libya Herald. 9 November 2017. Retrieved 9 November 2017.
- ^ Seputyte, Milda (9 June 2011). "Lithuania Raises Retirement Age to 65 to Help Narrow Budget Gap". Bloomberg. Vilnius: Bloomberg L.P. Archived from the original on 2 April 2015. Retrieved 11 March 2015.
- ^ "Cuepacs wants government to consider retirement age from 60 to 62 – Bernama - The Malaysian Insider". Archived from the original on 2 April 2015. Retrieved 23 July 2016.
- ^ "Malaysia's retirement age stays at 60 - The Rakyat Post - The Rakyat Post". The Rakyat Post. therakyatpost.com. 9 March 2015. Archived from the original on 27 May 2016. Retrieved 23 July 2016.
- ^ Cheng, Dorothy (30 June 2013). "Bosses, workers welcome retirement at 60". theSundaily. Kuala Lumpur: Sun Media Corporation Sdn. Bhd. Archived from the original on 2 April 2015. Retrieved 10 March 2015.
- ^ "Mauritius New Retirement Pension 2025-2026". 9 June 2025.
- ^ Sociale, Casa Națională de Asigurări. "Pensie pentru limită de vârstă /". cnas.md.
- ^ Pension Benefits. GIPF. Archived 8 February 2016 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved on 8 February 2016
- ^ "Govt probes early retirement age". The Namibian. 6 February 2016. Archived from the original on 13 February 2016.
- ^ "Pension arrangements in the Netherlands". Business.gov.nl. Retrieved 8 June 2024.
- ^ Ministry of Social Development. "New Zealand Superannuation". workandincome.govt.nz. Retrieved 21 August 2019.
- ^ Lee Keum-soon; Choi Eui-chul; Lim Soon-hee; Kim Soo-am (2005). White Paper on Human Rights in North Korea, 2005 (PDF). Seoul: Korea Institute for National Unification. pp. 231, 247. ISBN 89-8479-293-4. Archived (PDF) from the original on 13 October 2018.
- ^ "Retirement pension for those born in and after 1963 - www.nav.no". NAV. Archived from the original on 24 March 2018. Retrieved 24 March 2018.
- ^ "Page Not Found". thepeninsulaqatar.com. Archived from the original on 27 April 2015.
{{cite web}}: Cite uses generic title (help) - ^ "Gobierno del Perú". GobPerú.
- ^ Philippines (1990). Labor Code of the Philippines : as amended with implementing rules and regulations. Manila: Department of Labor and Employment. Archived from the original on 17 January 2012.
- ^ "Portaria n.º 414/2023". Diário da República.
- ^ "LEGE 360 29/11/2023". Retrieved 24 June 2024.
- ^ "Russia's Putin softens pension reforms after outcry". BBC. 29 August 2018. Retrieved 30 January 2019.
- ^ "Russian Duma Moves to Hike Retirement Age Amid Popular Opposition". themoscowtimes.com. 19 July 2018.
- ^ Abdul Ghafour, P.K. (6 May 2014). "62 to be the age of retirement". Arab News. Jeddah: Saudi Research & Publishing Company. Archived from the original on 19 January 2015. Retrieved 10 March 2015.
- ^ Auto, Hermes (1 November 2021). "Retirement and re-employment ages in Singapore will be raised to 65 and 70 | The Straits Times". www.straitstimes.com.
- ^ Ministry of Manpower (25 February 2015). "Retirement and Re-employment Act". Singapore: Government of Singapore. Archived from the original on 15 March 2015. Retrieved 10 March 2015.
- ^ "Slovakia - Employment, Social Affairs & Inclusion - European Commission". ec.europa.eu. Retrieved 28 September 2022.
- ^ "한국일보 : 오피니언 : 2016 국민생활 이렇게 달라진다". hankookilbo.com. 27 December 2015. Archived from the original on 17 August 2016. Retrieved 23 July 2016.
- ^ "Pros and cons of extending the retirement age - Daily Mirror - Sri Lanka Latest Breaking News and Headline". Daily Mirror (Sri Lanka). 7 January 2014. Archived from the original on 26 February 2017. Retrieved 25 February 2017.
- ^ "Riktåldern styr när du kan ta ut allmän pension". 14 September 2023.
- ^ "Plan your pension". Pensionsmyndigheten. 27 December 2023. Retrieved 8 June 2024.
- ^ The National Insurance Board of Trinidad and Tobago "Retirement Benefit". Archived from the original on 11 July 2015. Retrieved 10 July 2015.
- ^ OECD (17 March 2011). Pensions at a Glance 2011: Retirement-income Systems in OECD and G20 Countries. OECD Pensions at a Glance. OECD. doi:10.1787/pension_glance-2011-en. ISBN 978-92-64-09523-6.
- ^ "1800, 3600 ve 4500 günden emekli olma tarihleri araştırılıyor!". takvim.com.tr (in Turkish). Retrieved 13 September 2020.
- ^ "Ukraine Needs a Smaller and More Humane State – VoxUkraine". VoxUkraine. voxukraine.org. 9 June 2015. Archived from the original on 14 May 2016. Retrieved 23 July 2016.
- ^ Limited, Expat Info Desk International. "Expat Retirement Age in UAE Raised From 60 to 65 : Expat News : Expat Info Desk". www.expatinfodesk.com. Archived from the original on 15 July 2016. Retrieved 9 May 2018.
{{cite web}}:|last=has generic name (help) - ^ "Check your State Pension age - nidirect". nidirect.gov.uk. 28 October 2015. Archived from the original on 30 March 2018. Retrieved 9 May 2018.
- ^ "Proposed new timetable for State Pension age increases". www.gov.uk. Archived from the original on 23 February 2018. Retrieved 9 May 2018.
- ^ sociales, instituto venezolano de los seguros. "Pension por Vejez - IVSS Instituto Venezolano de los Seguros Sociales - La Seguridad Social es tu Derecho". www.ivss.gov.ve. Archived from the original on 17 April 2018. Retrieved 9 May 2018.
- ^ "Bộ Luật lao động 2019 số 45/2019/QH14". thuvienphapluat.vn (in Vietnamese). Retrieved 1 March 2022.
- ^ "Japon: entrée en vigueur de la loi qui repousse l'âge de la retraite - RTBF Actus". RTBF (in French). Retrieved 24 July 2025.
Retirement age
View on Grokipediafrom Grokipedia
Retirement age denotes the statutory age at which individuals qualify for unreduced public pension or social security benefits, marking the conventional endpoint of full-time employment in many societies.[1] It serves as a policy lever balancing labor force participation, fiscal sustainability of pay-as-you-go pension systems, and demographic shifts like extended life expectancies, which have outpaced historical assumptions embedded in early 20th-century retirement frameworks.[2] Across OECD countries, statutory retirement ages averaged 64.4 years for men and 63.6 years for women as of recent data, though effective ages—reflecting actual labor exit—remain lower due to early claiming options, health factors, and incentives.[3]
These ages exhibit wide variation globally, from as low as 50 for women in some non-OECD contexts to 67 in nations like Denmark and Israel, influenced by cultural norms, economic productivity, and gender-specific provisions that are converging amid equalization efforts.[3][4] A prevailing trend involves upward adjustments in over half of OECD members, projecting averages to 66.3 years for men and 65.8 for women, driven by causal pressures from fertility declines and longevity gains—life expectancy at 65 has risen by several years since 1990—necessitating longer contribution periods to avert insolvency in defined-benefit schemes.[2][5]
Economically, elevating retirement ages expands the tax base and curtails expenditure on benefits, potentially yielding fiscal savings equivalent to multiple percentage points of GDP, while empirical studies indicate modest boosts to older-worker employment without displacing youth.[6][7] Yet controversies persist over equity: manual laborers or those with chronic conditions may face undue hardship from delayed benefits, prompting calls for occupation-adjusted thresholds, though data link later retirement to improved health outcomes via sustained activity and purpose.[8][9] Such reforms underscore tensions between individual autonomy and systemic viability, as unchecked early exits exacerbate dependency ratios in aging populations.[10]
These adjustments aim to extend working years causally linked to improved healthspans and fiscal imperatives, though empirical studies indicate statutory hikes boost older worker employment by 0.5-1 percentage point per year raised, without fully closing effective-statutory gaps.[22][14]
These patterns underscore causal links from policy-driven age increases to sustained workforce attachment, though Southern European countries show steeper post-retirement cognitive declines, suggesting cultural or occupational factors moderate outcomes.[114] Empirical quasi-experiments, such as Austria's 2000 early retirement age hike, confirm 9-11% employment gains without net health deterioration, primarily among healthier, higher-wage cohorts.[115][116]
These trends underscore a regional shift toward later retirement to mitigate pension insolvency, though implementation varies by economic structure and cultural norms around elder employment.[165]
Globally, similar pressures from United Nations estimates of the 65+ population doubling to 1.6 billion by 2050 underscore the imperative for extensions beyond OECD borders, though emerging markets may lag due to informal labor sectors and weaker enforcement, risking higher poverty rates without reforms.[179] These forecasts assume adherence to current policies, but variations could arise from productivity growth, immigration, or fiscal adjustments, with nine OECD nations already tying ages to life expectancy to mitigate demographic imbalances.[178]
Definition and Core Concepts
Statutory Retirement Age
The statutory retirement age is the legally mandated age at which individuals become eligible for full, unreduced public pension benefits from state social security or similar systems. This threshold determines the point of transition from working life to reliance on government-funded retirement income, typically after a minimum contribution period, and reflects policy balances between fiscal sustainability, labor force participation, and demographic pressures such as extended lifespans.[1][11] In pay-as-you-go pension frameworks predominant in OECD nations, it anchors the intergenerational transfer where contributions from active workers support retirees, making adjustments to this age a key lever for addressing funding shortfalls amid aging populations.[12] Unlike the effective retirement age—the observed average exit from the labor market, which averages lower due to early claiming options, health limitations, or private incentives—the statutory age functions as a policy ceiling or target, with penalties for early drawdown (often 4-8% per year) and credits for deferral.[13][14] Variations persist by gender in select countries, though equalization trends dominate; for instance, several nations historically set women's ages 5 years lower to account for family roles, but OECD data show convergence, with future averages projected at 66.3 years for men and 65.8 for women across 38 member states.[2] Occupational exceptions allow earlier retirement for hazardous roles, such as mining or heavy industry, based on years of service or health risks, as in parts of Europe where manual laborers may access benefits at 55-60 after 35-40 years of contributions.[15][16] Globally, statutory ages cluster between 60 and 67, with OECD averages at 64.4 years for men and 63.6 for women as of recent assessments, though 23 of 38 countries plan increases to offset rising dependency ratios.[3][2]| Country/Region | Statutory Age (Men/Women) | Notes on Recent/Planned Changes |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 67 (both) | Full benefits for those born 1960 or later; early at 62 with reductions.[17] |
| Denmark | 67 (both), rising to 70 by 2040 | Highest projected in Europe to sustain pensions amid longevity gains.[18][19] |
| China | Rising from 60/50 to 63/55-58 (men/women) | Gradual 15-year implementation starting January 1, 2025, for workforce extension.[20] |
| Belgium | 66 (both) in 2025, 67 by 2030 | Early options at 60-63 for long-career workers.[21] |
| OECD Average (projected) | 66.3/65.8 | Increases in 23 countries to align with life expectancy at 65.[2] |
Effective Retirement Age and Influencing Factors
The effective retirement age is defined as the average age at which workers aged 40 and older exit the labor force, calculated over a multi-year period such as five years to smooth cyclical variations.[23] This metric captures actual retirement behavior rather than legislated norms, often revealing a gap where individuals retire earlier than statutory thresholds due to available incentives or constraints. In OECD countries, the average effective retirement age for the period 2017–2022 was 64.4 years for men and 63.1 years for women across 50 nations, with variations by country reflecting policy and socioeconomic differences.[24] Empirical data indicate that effective ages have risen modestly in recent decades amid pension reforms, but remain below projected statutory increases in many cases; for instance, Japan's effective age reached approximately 69.5 years for men in 2020, driven by limited early retirement options, while Greece's hovered around 61.5 years, influenced by economic downturns and generous prior benefits.[4] Gender disparities persist, with women exiting 1–2 years earlier on average due to caregiving roles and discontinuous careers, though convergence occurs in nations with equalized pension rules. Key influencing factors include pension system parameters, which exert the strongest causal effects through financial incentives. Reforms delaying normal retirement eligibility by one year typically raise the effective age by 0.3–0.6 years, with pass-through rates of 30–70% depending on enforcement and substitution to disability or unemployment pathways; for example, phased increases in statutory ages across Europe since the 1990s correlated with a 2–3 year effective age uplift by 2020, though incomplete due to grandfathered early options.[25] [26] Health status and work ability significantly shape outcomes, with longitudinal studies showing that chronic conditions or physical job demands reduce labor participation by 10–20% among those over 60, pushing effective ages down; conversely, improved life expectancy and healthier aging cohorts have added 0.2–0.5 years to averages in high-income countries since 2000.[27] [28] Socioeconomic variables, such as higher education and white-collar occupations, correlate with later exits by 2–4 years, as these groups face lower physical strain and better access to flexible work.[29] Labor market conditions and macroeconomic pressures also play causal roles: high unemployment accelerates early exits via bridge benefits, as seen in post-2008 Europe where effective ages fell 1–2 years in affected nations, while strong demand for skilled older workers in sectors like technology sustains participation.[30] Personal financial wealth and behavioral preferences, including risk aversion to continued work, further modulate decisions, with empirical models estimating that a 10% increase in private savings delays retirement by 0.5–1 year.[31] Family responsibilities, particularly informal caregiving, disproportionately affect women, reducing their effective age by up to 1.5 years in cross-national analyses.[32] These factors interact dynamically; for instance, policy-induced delays can exacerbate health declines if jobs lack accommodations, underscoring the need for complementary measures like retraining to maximize effective age gains.[33]Linkages to Pension Eligibility and Social Insurance
In social insurance systems, the statutory retirement age typically delineates the threshold for full eligibility to public old-age pensions, which are funded primarily through compulsory contributions from workers' earnings during their productive years. These benefits represent earned entitlements based on lifetime contributions, with the eligibility age ensuring that payouts commence only after a standard career length, often 35-45 years, to maintain actuarial balance. For instance, in the United States Social Security system, the full retirement age stands at 67 for individuals born in 1960 or later, marking the point of unreduced retired-worker benefits; claiming at age 62, the earliest option, imposes a 30% permanent reduction to account for the extended payout duration relative to contributions.[17][11] Similar structures prevail in many Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries, where statutory ages average 64.4 years for men and 63.6 years for women, serving as the baseline for accessing earnings-related pensions without penalty.[3] Early retirement provisions, available in most systems from ages 60-63, link directly to reduced benefit levels calibrated actuarially to reflect fewer contribution years and longer receipt periods, thereby discouraging premature workforce exit. Deferral beyond the statutory age often yields benefit accruals, such as delayed retirement credits—in the U.S. Social Security system, these increase benefits by two-thirds of one percent per month (equivalent to 8% per full year) beyond full retirement age, up to age 70, after which no further credits accrue; for an FRA of 67, this results in 108% of the primary insurance amount at age 68, 116% at 69, and 124% at 70—[34] to incentivize prolonged labor participation and offset fiscal costs in pay-as-you-go (PAYG) frameworks, where current workers' payroll taxes finance contemporaneous retirees.[35][36] This design embeds causal incentives: lower eligibility ages amplify payout liabilities amid rising life expectancies, straining system solvency, as evidenced by reforms worldwide that elevate ages to preserve replacement rates—projected at 53% of pre-retirement earnings on average for OECD full-career workers retiring around age 65.5.[37] Inadequate alignment between eligibility thresholds and demographic realities, such as dependency ratios, has prompted parametric adjustments, including automatic indexing to longevity gains in countries like Denmark and the Netherlands.[38] The interplay extends to minimum qualifying periods, typically requiring 10-40 years of contributions for any pension accrual, which intersect with retirement age to gatekeep access and mitigate moral hazard in social insurance. For example, reforms in response to aging populations have tightened early pathways—such as disability or partial pensions—while raising standard ages to 67-70 by mid-century in several European nations, directly curbing expenditure growth in PAYG models vulnerable to fertility declines and workforce shrinkage.[39][40] Empirical analyses confirm that such linkages bolster incentives for extended working lives, with one-year increments in eligibility ages correlating to deferred claiming and higher effective labor force participation among older cohorts, though outcomes vary by health and labor market rigidity.[41] Overall, these mechanisms underscore retirement age as a pivotal lever for equilibrating contributions, benefits, and intergenerational equity in public pension architectures.Historical Development
Origins in Industrializing Nations (19th Century)
The concept of a statutory retirement age emerged amid the social upheavals of industrialization in Europe, where rapid urbanization and factory labor displaced traditional agrarian family support systems for the elderly, leading to widespread destitution among aged workers unable to continue physically demanding jobs. Prior to these developments, retirement was not formalized; individuals typically labored until incapacity or death, relying on familial or charitable aid in pre-industrial societies. In industrializing nations like Germany, the concentration of proletarian workers in urban centers amplified demands for state intervention to mitigate old-age poverty and preempt socialist agitation, marking the causal shift from informal to institutionalized retirement provisions.[42][43] Germany pioneered the world's first national old-age pension system in 1889 under Chancellor Otto von Bismarck, establishing a statutory eligibility age of 70 for benefits funded by worker and employer contributions alongside state subsidies. This followed earlier Bismarck reforms, including health insurance in 1883 and accident insurance in 1884, as part of a strategic conservative response to unify workers under the monarchy and undermine Marxist appeals by addressing industrial vulnerabilities. The 70-year threshold was pragmatically selected given prevailing life expectancies—at birth around 40 years in the 1880s, though higher for those surviving to adulthood—ensuring minimal initial fiscal burden while signaling state paternalism; benefits commenced in 1891 for those with sufficient contribution years, typically requiring 30 years of employment.[44][45][46] In the United Kingdom, industrialization from the 1830s onward exposed elderly laborers to pauperism under the Poor Laws, but no statutory retirement age materialized in the 19th century; instead, ad hoc relief via workhouses prevailed, with private or occupational schemes limited to select civil servants or firms, covering under 1% of workers by 1891. France similarly lacked a general old-age pension until the 20th century, though civil service pensions dated to the 18th century and naval provisions from the 17th, reflecting fragmented responses to industrial strains rather than a unified retirement framework. These early German innovations influenced subsequent European models by demonstrating contributory insurance as a tool for social stability, though adoption lagged due to fiscal conservatism and varying demographic pressures in other nations.[47][48][49]Expansion and Standardization (Early to Mid-20th Century)
In the early 20th century, European nations built upon late-19th-century precedents like Germany's 1889 pension system by expanding coverage and adjusting eligibility ages to address industrial workforce aging and social pressures. Germany lowered its statutory retirement age from 70 to 65 in 1916, during World War I, to provide earlier support for aging workers while maintaining system solvency given prevailing life expectancies.[44][50] This adjustment reflected causal pressures from wartime labor shortages and demographic realities, where few reached 70, making the prior threshold ineffective for broad relief.[51] The United Kingdom advanced pension expansion with the Old Age Pensions Act of 1908, offering non-contributory benefits of five shillings weekly to needy individuals aged 70 and over, financed by general taxation and covering about 500,000 recipients initially.[52] This was followed by the Widows', Orphans' and Old Age Contributory Pensions Act of 1925, which introduced insurance-based pensions accessible from age 65 for contributors, extending coverage to over 2 million by the 1930s and shifting toward mandatory contributions for sustainability.[53][54] These reforms standardized retirement transitions for industrial workers, prioritizing fiscal viability over universal early access. In the United States, state-level old-age pension laws proliferated from 1923 onward, with 30 states enacting programs by 1935, most tying eligibility to age 65 to align with emerging actuarial data on worker longevity and disability onset.[55][56] The federal Social Security Act, signed in 1935, formalized a national contributory system with retirement benefits starting at age 65, initially covering about 60% of the workforce and funded by payroll taxes, marking a pivot from poor relief to earned insurance.[57][11] This age was selected based on life expectancy estimates—around 61 years at birth but with survivors to 65 expecting another 13 years—ensuring pay-as-you-go funding without immediate insolvency.[56] By the mid-20th century, particularly post-1945 in Western Europe and North America, age 65 achieved de facto standardization as the statutory threshold for pension eligibility in industrialized economies, influenced by U.S. and German models and reflecting empirical alignments between workforce exit, health declines post-60, and pension affordability amid rising elderly populations.[56][58] Countries like the UK aligned women's pension age to 60 by 1940 while retaining 65 for men, embedding retirement as a normative life stage tied to social insurance rather than ad hoc charity.[54] This era's expansions covered millions but sowed seeds of later fiscal strain, as initial designs assumed static demographics.[59]Post-1970s Reforms Amid Demographic Shifts
Beginning in the late 1970s and accelerating through the 1980s and beyond, many developed nations confronted the fiscal pressures of aging populations, characterized by life expectancy at age 65 rising by an average of 4.7 years across OECD countries to 19.1 years between 1970 and 2021, alongside fertility declines that elevated old-age dependency ratios.[60] These shifts strained pay-as-you-go pension systems, where current workers fund retirees, prompting reforms primarily focused on gradually increasing statutory retirement ages to extend contribution periods and shorten benefit durations.[61] By design, such measures aimed to align pension eligibility more closely with improved health spans and labor productivity in later life, though implementation varied by country and often faced political resistance due to entrenched expectations of early retirement. In the United States, the Social Security Amendments of 1983 marked a pivotal response, legislating a phased increase in the full retirement age (FRA) from 65 to 67 for individuals born after 1959, with the transition beginning for those born in 1938 and completing by 2027.[62] This adjustment, motivated by projections of demographic imbalances and trust fund depletion, extended the FRA in two-month increments per birth year—reaching 66 for those born 1943-1954, then incrementally to 67—effectively reducing lifetime benefits relative to pre-reform cohorts while encouraging deferred claiming.[63] Similar parametric reforms proliferated in Europe; Germany's 2007 pension reform scheduled a gradual rise in the standard retirement age from 65 to 67 by 2031, tied to birth cohorts to mitigate abrupt shocks, amid forecasts of shrinking working-age populations.[64] The United Kingdom followed suit, equalizing the state pension age at 65 by 2018, advancing it to 66 by 2020 and 67 by 2028, with plans for 68 between 2044 and 2046, explicitly linked to life expectancy gains exceeding prior assumptions.[65] France, after a 1982 reduction to 60 that exacerbated system deficits, reversed course with a 2010 reform raising the minimum age to 62 by 2018 and the full pension age to 67, further extended to 64 in 2023 despite widespread protests, reflecting iterative efforts to curb contribution shortfalls.[66] Japan, confronting one of the world's most acute demographic challenges with its old-age dependency ratio projected to reach over 50% by 2050, incrementally raised the pension eligibility age for the Employees' Pension Insurance from 60 to 65 between 2001 and 2025, alongside incentives for voluntary deferral up to 70.[67] These reforms, embedded in broader 2004 and 2012 pension acts, sought to offset a contracting workforce by prolonging insured employment, with empirical analyses indicating positive effects on labor force participation among older cohorts without fully displacing younger workers.[68] Across OECD nations, statutory ages have trended upward, with planned increases in 23 of 38 countries projecting averages of 66.3 years for men and 65.8 for women by mid-century, often indexed to longevity metrics to sustain system viability amid persistent fertility below replacement levels. While such adjustments have demonstrably improved fiscal balances—reducing projected pension expenditures as a share of GDP in reformed systems—they have not universally translated to higher effective retirement ages, as early withdrawal options and health disparities persist.[14]Underlying Demographic and Economic Drivers
Rising Life Expectancy and Healthspan Trends
Global life expectancy at birth rose from 66.8 years in 2000 to 73.1 years in 2019, driven by advances in public health, vaccination, and medical treatments reducing mortality from infectious diseases and improving chronic disease management.[69] [70] Post-pandemic recovery further elevated the figure to 73.2 years in 2023, with projections indicating an additional 4.9 years for males and 4.2 years for females by 2050 from 2022 levels, primarily due to declining cardiovascular and cancer mortality.[71] [72] These gains reflect causal factors such as improved sanitation, nutrition, and healthcare access, extending average survival across populations. In OECD countries, where retirement systems face acute pressures from aging demographics, life expectancy at age 65 averaged 19.5 additional years in 2021, up from prior decades due to sustained reductions in age-specific mortality rates.[73] [74] This metric is particularly relevant for pension sustainability, as it indicates that individuals reaching typical retirement ages (e.g., 65) can expect nearly two more decades of life, compared to about 13 years in the mid-20th century, necessitating adjustments to contribution periods and benefit durations to maintain fiscal balance.[70] Healthspan, measured as healthy life expectancy (HALE) or disability-free years, has paralleled lifespan extensions but with a persistent gap; globally, individuals spent an average of 9.6 years in poor health in 2019, a 13% increase from 2000 despite overall HALE gains of over 6 years since then.[69] [75] In developed nations, disability-free life expectancy at age 65 has risen—for instance, by 2.1 years for men in Switzerland from 2007 to 2017—attributable to better management of conditions like cardiovascular disease and reduced incidence of severe disabilities from accidents or infections.[76] [77] However, the proportion of remaining life free from disability has declined in some cohorts (e.g., from 79.7% to 74.2% for men in certain Western Pacific studies), as survival with chronic conditions improves without fully eliminating morbidity, underscoring that while older adults are healthier than previous generations at equivalent ages, late-life multimorbidity remains a challenge.[78] [79]Fertility Declines and Dependency Ratios
Fertility rates worldwide have declined sharply over recent decades, with the global total fertility rate (TFR) falling to 2.25 live births per woman as of 2024, down from over 5 in the 1960s and projected to drop below the replacement level of 2.1 by around 2050.[80] [81] In developed nations, TFRs are often below 1.5, such as 1.3 in the European Union and 1.2 in South Korea, exacerbating cohort imbalances where successive generations are smaller than preceding ones.[82] This sustained sub-replacement fertility, driven by factors including women's increased education and labor participation, urbanization, and economic costs of child-rearing, results in a shrinking base of future workers relative to the aging population.[83] The old-age dependency ratio, defined as the number of individuals aged 65 and over per 100 persons of working age (typically 15-64), has risen as a direct consequence, measuring the burden on the productive population to support retirees through taxes and contributions. Globally, this ratio stood at approximately 14 in 2020 and is projected by the United Nations to reach 24 by 2050, more than doubling in regions like Europe (from 31 to 52) and North America (from 28 to 44).[84] In high-fertility regions like sub-Saharan Africa, the ratio remains low at around 5 but is expected to climb as those populations age, though more gradually due to persistently higher TFRs near 4.1 in 2024.[85] These shifts strain pay-as-you-go (PAYG) pension systems, where current workers' contributions fund current retirees, as fewer contributors support a growing number of beneficiaries, potentially leading to deficits unless contribution rates rise, benefits are cut, or the retirement age is increased to extend working years and shorten payout periods.[83] [86] Empirical analyses indicate that a one-child drop in TFR correlates with heightened fiscal pressure on public pensions, prompting reforms like those in Japan (where the ratio exceeds 50) and Italy, where delayed retirement helps mitigate insolvency risks without proportional tax hikes.[87] Cross-country comparisons from the OECD show that nations with steeper fertility declines since 1970, such as Germany and Spain, have implemented retirement age increases to 67 or higher, aligning dependency burdens with longer lifespans and preserving system viability.[88] Without such adjustments, projections suggest pension spending could consume 10-15% of GDP in advanced economies by mid-century, underscoring fertility's causal role in necessitating policy responses beyond mere longevity gains.[89]Strain on Pay-As-You-Go Pension Systems
Pay-as-you-go (PAYG) pension systems, which fund current retirees' benefits primarily through mandatory contributions from the active workforce, face inherent vulnerabilities to demographic imbalances. These systems presuppose a demographic equilibrium where the ratio of contributors to beneficiaries remains stable or expands, allowing revenues to match or exceed payouts without accumulating unfunded liabilities. However, sustained declines in fertility rates below replacement levels—averaging 1.5 children per woman in OECD countries as of 2023—combined with post-World War II baby booms entering retirement, have eroded this foundation, leading to a shrinking contributor base relative to beneficiaries.[90] The old-age dependency ratio (OADR), measuring individuals aged 65 and older per 100 working-age persons (aged 20-64), quantifies this pressure. Across the OECD, the OADR rose from 19% in 1980 to 31% in 2023 and is forecasted to climb to 52% by 2060, effectively doubling the per-worker support burden.[90] In the European Union, it stood at 36% in 2022 and is projected to reach 55% by 2050, with further increases to 65% by 2100 under baseline assumptions.[91] For the euro area specifically, the OADR is expected to surge by over 20 percentage points to nearly 54% by 2070, amplifying fiscal demands on PAYG schemes that lack pre-funded assets to buffer such shifts.[92] These trends translate to higher contribution rates—potentially exceeding 25% of wages in some systems—or benefit cuts, as revenues fail to cover escalating payouts without policy interventions like raising the retirement age.[93] Rising life expectancy exacerbates the strain by extending the duration of benefit payments; for instance, average post-retirement life expectancy in OECD nations has increased by over five years since 2000, adding years of payouts per retiree without corresponding workforce growth.[88] This dynamic generates implicit pension debt—unfunded obligations estimated in trillions of euros for Europe alone—constraining public budgets and crowding out investments in infrastructure or education.[94] Empirical analyses confirm that higher OADRs correlate with elevated pension expenditures as a share of GDP, often prompting solvency crises absent reforms; for example, pre-reform projections in several EU states indicated deficits equivalent to 5-10% of GDP by mid-century.[95] While productivity gains or immigration could theoretically offset some pressure, historical data show these insufficient against fertility-driven workforce contraction, underscoring PAYG's reliance on demographic stability for long-term viability.[96]Key Arguments and Empirical Evidence
Rationale for Raising Retirement Age: Fiscal and Productivity Gains
Raising the retirement age addresses fiscal pressures in pay-as-you-go (PAYG) pension systems, where current workers' contributions fund retirees' benefits, by extending the contribution period and shortening the benefit payout duration amid rising life expectancies.[38] In advanced economies, demographic shifts have increased old-age dependency ratios, with fewer workers supporting more retirees; for instance, the IMF notes that a shrinking labor force exacerbates this strain, projecting that without adjustments like higher retirement ages, pension expenditures could consume up to 10% of GDP in some OECD countries by 2050.[97] Empirical models from the OECD indicate that increasing the normal retirement age boosts employment among older workers, thereby enhancing revenue inflows and reducing net fiscal outlays, with simulations showing employment gains up to twice those from prior macro models.[22] This reform yields measurable savings in public pension spending; for example, a one-year increase in retirement age can lower lifetime pension costs per individual by approximately 5-10% in PAYG frameworks, depending on actuarial assumptions, as workers contribute longer without proportionally extending benefits.[25] Cross-country evidence supports this: reforms in nations like Denmark, which indexed retirement ages to life expectancy, have stabilized pension solvency ratios, averting projected deficits equivalent to 2-3% of GDP annually.[39] Such measures counteract the fiscal drag from longevity gains, where post-1950 life expectancy at age 65 has risen by 4-6 years in OECD states, decoupling retirement from outdated industrial-era norms.[38] On productivity, extending working lives preserves accumulated human capital, including firm-specific knowledge and skills honed over decades, mitigating losses from early exits that disrupt organizational continuity.[98] Studies find that higher shares of workers aged 63-67 correlate with modest positive effects on labor productivity, as older employees often exhibit lower turnover and higher reliability, offsetting any age-related declines through experience.[99] Macroeconomic modeling further links retirement age hikes to elevated growth rates; a one-year increase can raise equilibrium output by 0.5-1% via expanded labor supply, particularly in knowledge-intensive sectors where seniority yields compounding returns.[100] While evidence on individual age-productivity profiles varies, aggregate gains emerge from incentivizing human capital investments, such as training, as workers anticipate longer careers.[101]Counterarguments: Health, Inequality, and Incentive Effects
Critics argue that uniformly raising the retirement age overlooks heterogeneous health declines across occupations, particularly imposing undue strain on individuals in manual or physically demanding roles where cumulative wear accelerates disability and morbidity. Empirical analysis of a policy increasing the retirement age in Austria found that it led to deteriorations in self-reported health, with rises in mental health issues, musculoskeletal disorders, and obesity rates, without corresponding gains in overall physical health metrics.[33] Similarly, evidence from Norway's removal of early retirement pathways for public sector workers indicated that delaying retirement elevated mortality risks, especially among those aged 60-69 in low-skilled, physically taxing jobs, with hazard ratios suggesting up to a 10-15% higher death probability for such cohorts.[102] These findings underscore a causal link wherein forced prolongation of work exacerbates health burdens for subsets of the workforce unable to transition to less strenuous roles, potentially offsetting aggregate productivity benefits through heightened absenteeism and medical costs. On inequality, elevating the retirement age amplifies disparities in lifetime pension returns due to persistent gradients in life expectancy by socioeconomic status, education, and occupation, where lower-income groups contribute contributions over more working years but collect benefits for shorter durations. A model incorporating U.S. mortality differentials projected that a one-year hike in retirement age would widen the Gini coefficient for lifetime pensions by 3.2% among men and 2.6% among women, as disadvantaged cohorts—facing 5-10 year shorter lifespans—bear disproportionate net losses.[103] Italian administrative data from a 2011 reform similarly revealed heterogeneous impacts, with blue-collar and less-educated workers experiencing amplified income drops and delayed benefit access, exacerbating old-age poverty rates by up to 5 percentage points relative to white-collar peers.[104] Such effects stem from causal realities of occupational hazards and access to healthcare, rendering pay-as-you-go systems regressive when ages are not actuarially adjusted for cohort-specific longevity. Regarding incentive effects, mandating later retirement can distort labor market signals by subsidizing retention of lower-productivity older workers, potentially crowding out younger entrants and dampening overall efficiency. Quasi-experimental evidence from reforms in multiple OECD countries shows that while older labor participation rises by 2-5 percentage points, youth employment in affected sectors declines commensurately, with elasticity estimates indicating one additional older worker retained correlates to 0.2-0.5 fewer hires among under-30s due to limited substitutability in skill-specific roles.[105] Furthermore, anticipated delays reduce household incentives for precautionary savings, as Dutch data post-early retirement age hikes revealed a 10-15% drop in voluntary retirement contributions among near-retirees, shifting reliance toward state provisions and eroding private capital accumulation.[8] These distortions arise from misaligned incentives ignoring individual productivity trajectories, fostering inefficiencies where marginal returns to extended work fall below opportunity costs for both workers and firms.Data from Longitudinal Studies and Cross-Country Comparisons
Longitudinal studies have yielded mixed evidence on the health impacts of retirement timing. A systematic review of 22 high-quality longitudinal studies found strong evidence that retirement is associated with improved overall health, including reductions in stress and better self-reported well-being, though effects vary by pre-retirement health status.[106] In contrast, a 2025 analysis of 12 longitudinal studies reported consistent declines in physical function post-retirement, with increased prevalence of diseases, higher all-cause mortality, and accelerated cognitive decline, particularly among those retiring involuntarily or in poorer health.[107] The U.S. Health and Retirement Study (HRS), tracking over 20,000 individuals biennially since 1992, indicates that retirement often correlates with short-term mental health gains but longer-term rises in functional limitations and chronic conditions like obesity and musculoskeletal issues.[108][109] On mortality, meta-analyses of longitudinal data suggest that delaying retirement beyond typical ages reduces all-cause mortality risk. A 2020 review of cohort studies across multiple countries found that early retirement (before age 62) is linked to a 20-30% higher mortality hazard compared to continued employment, with on-time retirement showing neutral or slightly protective effects; working longer appears to foster social engagement and physical activity, countering sedentary decline.[110][111] However, these associations are confounded by selection bias, as healthier individuals self-select into later retirement; instrumental variable approaches using policy changes, such as in the Netherlands, estimate causal reductions in cardiovascular disease risk from prolonged work, though mental health costs rise for low-skill workers.[112][33] Cross-country comparisons highlight how retirement age policies influence employment and fiscal outcomes amid aging populations. OECD data from 2021 across 38 member countries show that nations with higher effective retirement ages (e.g., Denmark at 66.6 years, Japan at 68.2) exhibit 5-10% higher labor force participation rates for ages 55-64 compared to those with lower thresholds (e.g., France at 62.6), correlating with lower old-age dependency ratios and improved pension solvency.[13] Raising statutory retirement ages by one year, as modeled in recent OECD simulations, boosts employment rates for 55-74-year-olds by 2-4 percentage points, with stronger effects in high-income countries due to better health infrastructure supporting extended work.[22] In pay-as-you-go systems, countries like Sweden and the Netherlands, which indexed retirement ages to life expectancy gains (reaching 67 by 2026), report 15-20% reductions in projected pension deficits by 2050 versus non-reformers like Italy, where static ages exacerbate intergenerational transfers.[7][30]| Country Group | Avg. Effective Retirement Age (2020) | 55-64 Employment Rate (%) | Projected Pension Gap (% GDP, 2050) |
|---|---|---|---|
| High-Age (e.g., Japan, Denmark) | 67-68 | 65-70 | -2 to +1 |
| OECD Average | 64.5 | 60 | +3-5 |
| Low-Age (e.g., France, Greece) | 62-63 | 50-55 | +6-10 |
Major Policy Reforms and Controversies
European Reforms and Public Backlash (e.g., France 2023)
In early 2023, the French government under President Emmanuel Macron proposed a pension reform to raise the statutory retirement age from 62 to 64 by 2030, while increasing the minimum contribution period from 172 to 173 quarters for full pension eligibility.[117] This measure aimed to address a projected deficit in the pay-as-you-go system, exacerbated by low birth rates and rising life expectancy, with the pension budget consuming about 14% of GDP.[117] Labor unions, including the CGT and CFDT, mobilized against the changes, arguing they disproportionately burdened manual workers with physically demanding jobs who faced health declines before age 64.[118] Protests erupted in January 2023, escalating into widespread strikes that paralyzed public transport, refineries, and schools, with over 1 million participants reported on peak days such as March 23 and June 6.[119] Demonstrations featured clashes with police, bonfires blocking roads, and symbolic actions like garbage accumulation in Paris streets, reflecting deep cultural attachment to early retirement as a post-war social contract.[120] The government bypassed parliamentary debate by invoking Article 49.3 of the constitution on March 16, enacting the law on April 15 despite a failed no-confidence vote, which deepened public distrust and contributed to Macron's approval rating dropping below 30%.[121] Empirical analyses post-reform indicated potential long-term fiscal savings of €10-20 billion annually by 2030, but short-term backlash highlighted incentive distortions, as workers anticipated delayed retirement without commensurate healthspan gains for all cohorts.[117] Similar resistance marked reforms elsewhere in Europe during the 2020s. In Italy, the 2011 increase to 67 faced ongoing union-led strikes, though Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni's 2023-2024 adjustments preserved the age while tweaking quotas, avoiding mass unrest by prioritizing flexibility for strenuous occupations.[122] Greece's post-2010 hikes to 67, sustained amid fiscal austerity, provoked repeated demonstrations but stabilized public debt ratios from 180% of GDP in 2014 to under 160% by 2023.[122] Denmark's May 2025 parliamentary approval of a phased rise from 67 to 70 by 2040 drew opposition criticism over intergenerational equity but passed without nationwide strikes, bolstered by high trust in institutions and supplementary private savings schemes covering 80% of workers.[123] These cases underscore a pattern where public backlash correlates with reliance on state-funded pensions and perceived violations of earned expectations, often forcing governments to phase in changes gradually or pair them with compensatory measures like hardship exemptions.[124] Ongoing French debates, including 2025 proposals to suspend the 64 age until 2028, illustrate persistent political costs, as reversals risk amplifying deficits projected to reach 0.7% of GDP by 2030 without reforms.[125][126]Increases in High-Aging Societies (e.g., Japan and Denmark to 70)
High-aging societies such as Japan and Denmark, characterized by low fertility rates and extended life expectancies, have implemented reforms to elevate effective retirement ages toward 70, addressing labor shortages and pension system solvency. Japan's population over age 65 exceeds 29% as of 2023, while Denmark's dependency ratio is projected to rise sharply due to fertility below replacement levels. These policies reflect causal pressures from shrinking workforces unable to support growing retiree cohorts under pay-as-you-go systems.[127] In Denmark, parliament adopted a bill on May 22, 2025, raising the statutory pension age from the current 67 to 68 by 2030, 69 by 2035, and 70 by 2040 for individuals born after December 31, 1970, marking Europe's highest such threshold.[18] [128] This adjustment ties eligibility to life expectancy gains, with Danish life expectancy at birth reaching 81.4 years in 2023, necessitating longer contributions to maintain welfare state funding amid a projected old-age dependency ratio of 45% by 2050.[19] The reform, supported across parties including the Social Democrats, aims to ensure fiscal balance without altering benefit levels, though public surveys indicate reluctance among mid-career workers facing extended labor participation.[129] Japan has pursued a non-mandatory approach, revising the Act on Stabilization of Employment for Elderly Persons in 2021 to allow companies to extend mandatory retirement ages up to 70 from the prior limit of 65, provided employee consent.[130] The government targets 70% of firms offering continued employment opportunities to age 70 by 2025, responding to a super-aged society where 5.4 million individuals over 70 were employed in 2023, a 70% rise since 2014.[131] Statutory pension eligibility remains at 65, with deferral options to 75 yielding benefit increases of 8.4% annually, incentivizing delayed claims amid public pension expenditures straining national budgets.[132] Corporate adopters, such as Meiji Yasuda Life Insurance planning extension to 70 from 2027, cite acute labor shortages in sectors like insurance and manufacturing.[133] These measures have boosted elderly labor participation to over 25% for ages 65-69, mitigating dependency ratios without coercive statutory hikes.[134] Both nations' strategies underscore empirical necessities: Denmark's parametric adjustment directly links age to longevity metrics, while Japan's flexible extensions leverage private sector incentives, yielding higher workforce retention without uniform mandates. Longitudinal data from OECD comparisons indicate such reforms enhance productivity and reduce fiscal deficits, though success hinges on healthspan improvements enabling sustained work.[39]North American Adjustments and Private Sector Dynamics
In the United States, the full retirement age (FRA) for Social Security old-age benefits was legislated to rise gradually from 65 to 67 for workers born in 1960 or later, under the Social Security Amendments of 1983, reflecting actuarial adjustments for improved life expectancies and program solvency.[135] Individuals born before 1943 retain an FRA of 65, with phased increases of two months per year for subsequent cohorts up to 67, while benefits can commence at age 62 with a reduction of up to 30% or be deferred to age 70 for delayed retirement credits accruing 8% annually.[17] This adjustment has effectively encouraged later claiming, though the average effective retirement age is around 62 overall, with men typically at 64-65 and women at 62-63, as actual labor force exit often precedes FRA due to private savings shortfalls.[136] Canada's Canada Pension Plan (CPP) maintains a standard retirement age of 65 for unreduced benefits, with provisions for early receipt at age 60 (permanently reduced by 0.6% per month) or deferral to age 70 (increased by 0.7% per month), unchanged since the program's 1966 inception despite demographic strains from low fertility and aging populations.[137] Old Age Security (OAS), a universal supplement, also starts at 65, subject to income-tested clawbacks, with no formal age hike implemented, though policy analyses have proposed raising it to 67 to mitigate fiscal pressures projected to double dependency ratios by 2040.[138] Actual retirement timing varies, with private sector employees averaging 65.1 years in 2023, up from prior decades, driven by inadequate personal savings amid rising costs.[139] Private sector dynamics in North America have pivoted decisively from defined benefit (DB) pensions—prevalent until the 1980s, often tying benefits to fixed retirement ages around 62-65—to defined contribution (DC) plans like U.S. 401(k)s and Canadian Registered Pension Plans (RPPs), now holding over 60% of U.S. retirement assets and emphasizing individual accumulation over employer guarantees.[140] This shift, accelerated by ERISA reforms in 1974 and subsequent corporate cost controls, decouples retirement from employer mandates, fostering flexibility but heightening personal risk; workers must self-assess savings adequacy, often extending careers into the late 60s if DC balances fall short of replacement income targets (typically 70-80% of pre-retirement earnings).[58] In the U.S., DC participation covers 68 million workers, yet median balances for those nearing retirement hover at $88,400, insufficient for many without prolonged employment.[141] Canadian private RPPs show similar patterns, with self-employed individuals retiring latest at 66.8 years on average, as DC structures incentivize delayed exits to compound returns amid volatile markets and longevity exceeding actuarial assumptions.[139] Empirical trends indicate this evolution has raised effective retirement ages by 1-2 years since 2000, though inequality persists, with lower-wage private workers facing health-driven early exits despite policy nudges for deferral.[142]Global Variations and Regional Patterns
Europe and OECD Averages
Across OECD countries, the average statutory normal retirement age stood at 64.4 years for men and 63.6 years for women as of 2022, reflecting a mix of fixed ages and formulas linked to life expectancy in countries like Denmark and the Netherlands.[143] These figures incorporate recent reforms, with 23 of 38 OECD members scheduling increases, projecting averages of 66.3 years for men and 65.8 years for women for cohorts entering the labor market around 2020.[2] Effective retirement ages, measured as the average age of labor market withdrawal, tend to lag statutory thresholds due to early retirement incentives, disability claims, and workforce participation gaps, though OECD-wide data show gradual alignment through policy adjustments.[13] In the European Union, statutory retirement ages average 64.9 years for men as of late 2024, with women's averages slightly lower at around 64.5 years amid converging gender parity reforms.[144] [145] Effective retirement ages remain lower, averaging 61.3 years EU-wide in 2023, up from 59.2 years in 2012, driven by phased increases in countries like France (to 64 by 2030) and Italy (to 67).[146] Variations persist, with Nordic nations such as Denmark achieving effective exits near 65.7 years through flexible labor markets and high older-worker employment, while southern EU states like Slovenia lag at 58.3 years owing to generous early pathways and weaker incentives to extend working lives.[146] Projections indicate EU effective ages approaching 67 by 2060, contingent on sustained reforms addressing fiscal pressures from aging demographics.[147] OECD averages exceed EU figures due to higher thresholds in non-European members like Australia (67) and the United States (67), pulling the overall effective labor market exit age toward 64 years for recent cohorts.[39] Empirical cross-country analyses link these averages to dependency ratios, with Europe's higher old-age dependency (projected at 50% by 2050) necessitating faster statutory hikes than in less-aged OECD peers.[22] Despite upward trends, effective ages in both regions fall short of life expectancies (around 80-82 years), underscoring pay-as-you-go system strains where worker-to-retiree ratios have declined from 4:1 in 1960 to near 2:1 today.[2]Asia-Pacific Trends
In the Asia-Pacific region, retirement ages vary widely but are generally lower than OECD averages, averaging 59.1 years for men and 57.3 years for women in 2022 across surveyed Asian economies, reflecting diverse demographic pressures and pension system designs.[3] Rapid population aging, driven by low fertility rates and rising life expectancies, has prompted reforms to extend working lives and alleviate fiscal strains on public pensions, with countries like Japan and China implementing or planning gradual increases to sustain solvency amid shrinking worker-to-retiree ratios.[148] [149] Japan has advanced furthest in aligning retirement with longevity, with the statutory pension age for men reaching 65 by April 2025 through incremental annual adjustments starting in 2013.[150] Mandatory company retirement ages, often set at 60, must now extend employment opportunities to age 65 for willing workers, supported by subsidies for employers raising limits to 65 or abolishing them entirely, as part of broader efforts to combat labor shortages in a society where over 29% of the population is aged 65 or older.[151] [152] Discussions continue on voluntary extensions to 70, incentivized by tax breaks, though effective retirement remains around 69 due to continued workforce participation.[153] China initiated its first statutory retirement age adjustment in over 70 years effective January 1, 2025, gradually raising ages over 15 years to 63 for men, 58 for female blue-collar workers (from 50), and 58 for female white-collar workers (from 55), amid projections of pension fund depletion by 2035 without intervention.[154] [155] The reform, implemented via a flexible three-month annual increment for most, aims to balance gender disparities and fiscal sustainability but faces resistance over job displacement risks for youth in a high-unemployment context.[156] [157] Women retired at earlier ages of 50-55 frequently report feelings of loneliness due to empty-nest syndrome and distant children, confusion and malaise from loss of work structure and purpose, and anxiety over health, finances, pension adequacy, and future care needs, as commonly discussed on social platforms like Xiaohongshu and Weibo; while positive adaptations include square dancing, volunteering, grandparenting, or part-time work, negative emotions remain prevalent in China's aging society. There is no widespread retirement at age 61 currently, but these experiences among existing retirees influence expectations for future generations under the ongoing reforms. South Korea maintains a mandatory retirement age of 60 in most sectors, with public pension eligibility starting at 62 and rising to 65 by 2033, though the National Human Rights Commission recommended elevation to 65 in 2025 to protect elderly income amid one of the world's lowest birth rates.[158] [159] Early retirement penalties are set to increase, reducing benefits by 6% per year below normal age, as part of reforms addressing a pension gap where coverage lags OECD norms.[160] Australia lacks a mandatory retirement age but ties Age Pension eligibility to 67, achieved via phased increases completing in July 2023, with actual exit from full-time work averaging 64.2 years for men and 62.4 for women, influenced by superannuation access from preservation age 60.[161] [162] Proposals for further hikes to 70 or occupation-specific adjustments highlight tensions between manual labor demands and fiscal needs, as the old-age dependency ratio climbs.[163]| Country | Current Normal Retirement Age (Men/Women) | Planned Changes |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 65 / 65 | Extensions to 70 encouraged |
| China | 60 / 50-55 | To 63/55-58 over 15 years from 2025 |
| South Korea | 60 / 60 | Pension to 65 by 2033; mandatory to 65 proposed |
| Australia | No mandatory; Pension 67 | Occupation-based reforms discussed |
Americas and Emerging Markets
In North America, retirement systems emphasize flexibility over strict statutory ages. In the United States, the full retirement age for Social Security benefits is 67 for individuals born in 1960 or later, with early claiming possible from age 62 at reduced benefits and delayed claiming up to 70 for increased payments; the effective labor market exit age averages around 65.[166][135] In Canada, there is no mandatory retirement age, but the Canada Pension Plan (CPP) provides standard benefits at 65, with options to start as early as 60 (with reductions up to 36%) or defer to 70 for higher payments; Old Age Security (OAS) eligibility begins at 65 regardless of work history.[167] These structures reflect actuarial adjustments tied to life expectancy and workforce participation, though fiscal pressures from aging populations have prompted discussions on further increases, with U.S. projections indicating potential rises to maintain solvency amid dependency ratios exceeding 30% by 2035.[2] Latin American countries, many classified as emerging markets, feature statutory retirement ages typically lower for women, reflecting historical gender norms but contributing to pay-as-you-go pension strains given low formal employment rates (often below 50%) and informal sectors dominating up to 60% of the workforce. Brazil's 2019 reform established ages of 65 for men and 62 for women, requiring 20 years of contributions for men and 15 for women, aimed at curbing deficits projected to reach 2% of GDP annually without adjustment; further hikes may be needed, with models suggesting 72 by 2040 to stabilize elderly dependency.[168][169] Argentina maintains 65 for men and 60 for women, with 30 years of contributions required, though recent fiscal austerity under President Milei has resisted extensions of voluntary early retirements expiring in March 2025, prioritizing deficit reduction over expanded access amid inflation eroding pension values by over 50% in real terms since 2019.[170][171] Chile's system sets 65 for men and 60 for women in its defined-contribution framework, with 2025 reforms enhancing employer contributions to 14% (from 10%) and boosting universal pensions for those over 65, but preserving ages due to political backlash against hikes despite coverage gaps leaving 40% of elderly without adequate benefits.[172][173] Mexico's Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (IMSS) targets 65, but a July 2025 reform lowers thresholds for some public workers to 53 for women and 55 for men with sufficient weeks, alongside a universal pension at 65, exacerbating fiscal burdens as contribution density remains below 30% and life expectancy rises to 75.[174][175] Recent Latin American reforms highlight tensions between sustainability and coverage: Brazil and Chile's parametric adjustments (e.g., age equalization and contribution hikes) have improved funding ratios from 0.7 to over 1.0 in targeted systems, per Inter-American Development Bank analyses, while politically driven expansions in Mexico risk accelerating insolvency in underfunded schemes.[176] Emerging markets outside the Americas, such as India and South Africa, lack uniform statutory ages—India's government sector retires at 60 with private variation, and South Africa's defaults to 60-65 per fund rules—but face similar demographic pressures, with India's pension coverage under 10% for informal workers prompting voluntary schemes rather than age mandates.[144]| Country | Statutory Age (Men/Women) | Key Notes |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 67/67 | Full Social Security; flexible claiming[166] |
| Canada | 65/65 (CPP standard) | Deferral options; no mandatory age[167] |
| Brazil | 65/62 | 2019 reform; 15-20 years contributions[168] |
| Argentina | 65/60 | 30 years contributions required[170] |
| Chile | 65/60 | Defined-contribution; 2025 contribution rise[173] |
| Mexico | 65/65 (IMSS target) | Universal at 65; recent public sector lowers[175] |
Projections and Policy Alternatives
Forecasted Age Increases to Mid-Century
Projections from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) indicate that normal retirement ages will rise in 23 of 38 member countries, driven by demographic shifts including a projected increase in the share of the population aged 65 and over from 18% in 2022 to 27% by 2050, alongside life expectancy gains of approximately 4.9 years for men and 4.4 years for women at age 65 by 2065.[2] This adjustment aims to align retirement durations with extended lifespans, as post-retirement life expectancy is forecasted to reach 20.3 years for men and 24.6 years for women by 2050 in many jurisdictions, necessitating longer contributions to maintain fiscal solvency in public pension systems.[177] Across OECD countries, the average normal retirement age for individuals entering the labor market in 2022 is projected to reach 66.3 years for men and 65.8 years for women by around 2066, reflecting an overall increase of about two years from 2023 levels based on legislated reforms.[2][178] In Europe, these trends are pronounced, with the EU average retirement age expected to climb toward 67 by 2060, and several nations incorporating automatic indexation to life expectancy gains—such as Denmark (projected to 74 years), Estonia (71 years), Italy (71 years), the Netherlands (70 years), and Sweden (70 years).[147][2] Exceptions persist in countries like Colombia, Luxembourg, and Slovenia, where ages remain at 62 years without planned hikes, potentially straining systems amid rising old-age dependency ratios projected to hit 53.8 by 2052.[2]| Country/Region | Current Normal Retirement Age (2022) | Projected Age (Mid-2060s) | Mechanism |
|---|---|---|---|
| OECD Average (Men) | 64.4 years | 66.3 years | Legislated increases and life expectancy links in 23 countries[2] |
| OECD Average (Women) | 63.6 years | 65.8 years | Gradual equalization and extensions[2] |
| Denmark | 67 years | 74 years | Full linkage to life expectancy gains[2] |
| Italy | 64 years | 71 years | Legislated for future cohorts[2] |
| EU Average | ~65 years | ~67 years (by 2060) | Policy reforms amid aging[147] |