Hubbry Logo
Al-Qadi al-Nu'manAl-Qadi al-Nu'manMain
Open search
Al-Qadi al-Nu'man
Community hub
Al-Qadi al-Nu'man
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Al-Qadi al-Nu'man
Al-Qadi al-Nu'man
Al-Qadi al-Nu'man
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
For the 8th-century Sunni jurist, see Abu Hanifa.

Key Information

Abū Ḥanīfa al-Nuʿmān ibn Muḥammad ibn Manṣūr ibn Aḥmad ibn Ḥayyūn al-Tamīmiyy (Arabic: النعمان بن محمد بن منصور بن أحمد بن حيون التميمي, generally known as al-Qāḍī al-Nu‘mān (القاضي النعمان) or as ibn Ḥayyūn (ابن حيون)[1] (died 974 CE/363 AH) was an Isma'ili jurist and the official historian of the Fatimid Caliphate. He was also called Qāḍī al-Quḍāt (قَاضِي القضاة) "Jurist of the Jurists" and Dāʻī al-Duʻāt (داعي الدعاة) "Missionary of Missionaries".

Biography

[edit]

Born in Kairouan,[2] in what is now Tunisia, al-Nu'man converted to Isma'ilism and began his career in Ifriqiya (now Tunisia, western Libya and eastern Algeria) under the first Fatimid caliph, Abdullah al-Mahdi Billah (r. 909-934 CE/297-322 AH), quickly rising to become the most prominent judge (qadi) of the Fatimid state.

His father, Muhammad ibn Mansur (d. 351 H/923 CE), had trained as a Sunni Maliki jurist in Qayrawan. Some have suggested that al-Qadi al-Numan's father converted to Isma'ili Shi'ism prior to the founding of the Fatimid Caliphate, suggesting that al-Qadi al-Nu'man was raised an Isma'ili. Ibn Taghribirdi has alternatively suggested however that al-Qadi al-Nu'man was a Hanafi prior to his own conversion to Isma'ili Shi'ism. This has largely been dismissed due to the assumption that Ibn Taghribirdi based this on the apparently erroneous idea that the Hanafi school had been pre-dominant in North Africa until al-Mu'izz ibn Badis imposed the Maliki school. However, Ibn Taghribirdi's assertion may have alternatively been based on the fact that al-Qadi al-Numan's patronymic, "Abu Hanifah," matches with the name of the eponymous founder of the Hanafi school. This may lend support to the idea that his father, Muhammad, may have converted to the Hanafi school prior to any conversion to Isma'ili Shi'ism. Regardless, al-Qadi al-Numani certainly was an Isma'ili when he entered the employ of the Fatimids at a young age.[3]

During his lifetime, al-Qadi al-Nu'man served four Fatimid Caliphs:[4]

During al-Nu'man's fifty years of service to the Fatimids, he wrote a vast number of books under the encouragement of the caliphs on history, biography, fiqh (Islamic jurisprudence) and the esoteric interpretation of the Quran. After the Fatimid conquest of Egypt and Syria, al-Nu'man left Ifriqiya and travelled to the newly founded city of Cairo, where he eventually died in 974 CE/363 AH.[4]

Under al-Mahdi began the career of Qadi al-Numan (d. 974), the founder of Ismaili law and author of its most authoritative compendium, the Kitab da'a'im al-Islam (Book of the pillars of Islam). In the absence of an Ismaili legal tradition, Qadi al-Numan relied primarily on the legal teaching of Imams Muhammad al-Baqir and Ja'far al-Sadiq, transmitted by Twelver Shii traditionists, and secondarily on Zaydi traditions.

It gives the imam authority for determining the beginning of the month without regard to the sighting of the new moon as required by all other Muslim legal schools. Since the early Fatimid period the beginning of the months was generally established in practice on the basis of astronomical calculation and thus often fell one or two days earlier than for other Muslims; this discrepancy often caused intercommunal quarrels about the beginning and end of the fasting month of Ramadan.

His works

[edit]

Al-Nu'man's work consists of over 40 treatises on fiqh, history, religious beliefs and Quranic esoteric exegesis.[4] Fuat Sezgin cites 22 works by him.[5]

Al-Nu'man's most prominent work, the Da'a'im al-Islam (Arabic: دعائم الاسلام "The Pillars of Islam"),[6] which took nearly thirty years to complete, is an exposition of Isma'ili jurisprudence.[7] This work was finally completed during the reign of the fourth caliph, al-Mu'izz li-Din Allah (r. 953-975 CE/ 341-365 AH), was accepted in its time as the official code of the Fatimid Caliphate, and serves to this day as the primary source of religious law (sharia) for some Musta'li communities, particularly Tayyibi Isma'ilis. Iran incorporated the Da'a'im al-Islam into their constitution.[8] The book consists of 32 chapters in two volumes. The first volume consists of 7 chapters discussing the Seven pillars of Ismailism. The second volume consists of 25 chapters about various topics relating to different facets of life.

Alongside his Pillars of Islam, the Foundation of Symbolic Interpretation (Asās al-Taʾwīl), is one of al-Nu’man's most celebrated works and deals with esoteric interpretation (taʾwīl). In the author's own words, “Our aim [with the Asās al-Taʾwīl] is to explain the inner dimension (bāṭin) of what we laid out in the book Daʿāʾim al-Islām, so that this book may be a source for the inner meaning (bāṭin), just as that one is for the external form (ẓāhir).[9]

Qadi al-Nu'man believed that it is important to recognize and understand the symbolism behind the stories in the Quran based on certain verses that point to an inner meaning such as: “Thus your Lord will choose you and teach you the symbolic interpretation (taʾwīl) of events (aḥadīth)” (Quran 12:21). In his work Foundation of Symbolic Interpretation (Asās al-Taʾwīl), he indicates that God made the Quran the miracle of Muhammad and its inner meaning the miracle of the Imams. Just as nobody can replicate the miracle of the Book, nobody can produce its inner meanings except for the Imams. This sacred knowledge is passed down through generations in their lineage and is entrusted to them.[9]

Another major work, the Kitab iftitah al-da‘wa wa-ibtida’ al-dawla ("The Beginning of the Mission and Establishment of the State") narrates the rise of the Fatimids. It mentions the initial stages of the Isma'ili dawah in Yemen under Ibn Hawshab. It also discusses Abu Abdallah al-Shi'i's correspondence with the Kutama Imazighen and their military expeditions, leading to the conquest of the Aghlabids, who ruled Ifriqiya. It discusses Imam al-Mahdi's emigration from Salamiyah, his captivity in Sijilmasa and eventual release, culminating in the establishment of the Fatimid state in 909. The book also gives an account of the circumstances leading to the revolt of al-Shi'i, for which it holds responsible the incitement of his elder brother Abu al-Abbas, and his later execution. It also gives a description of the Fatimid state up to the year 957, when the book was completed.

Ikhtilaf usul al-madhahib ("Differences Among the Schools of Law") was a refutation of Sunni principles of Islamic jurisprudence written at roughly the same time as the earliest of such works.[10] Nu'man's book borrows heavily from those of Dawud al-Zahiri, Muhammad bin Dawud al-Zahiri and al-Tabari, three Sunni authors about whom Nu'man displays complex mixed feelings. It has been noted that while Nu'man's book is famous, it was not the first Ismali refutation of Sunni juristic principles.

Al-Nu'man's other major works are the Kitab al-majalis wa’l-musayarat ("The Book of Sessions and Excursions"), in which he has entailed in detail words of Imams in majlis, or just while walking which he had taken note of, and the wisdom encased within them) and the Kitab al-himma fi adab atba‘ al-a’imma ("The Book of Etiquette Necessary for Followers of the Imams").

Further reading

[edit]

References

[edit]

Sources

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Al-Qadi al-Nu'man

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Abu Ḥanīfa al-Nuʿmān ibn Muḥammad al-Tamīmī (c. 290–363 AH / 903–974 CE), better known as al-Qāḍī al-Nuʿmān, was a preeminent Fāṭimid-Ismāʿīlī , , chief (qāḍī al-quḍāt), and (dāʿī) who played a pivotal role in codifying the legal and doctrinal framework of Ismāʿīlī Shīʿism during the early Fāṭimid Caliphate. Born into a scholarly family in Qayrawan, , he rose to prominence serving the first four Fāṭimid Caliph-Imāms—ʿAbd Allāh al-Mahdī, al-Qāʾim, al-Manṣūr, and al-Muʿizz—in administrative, judicial, and intellectual capacities for nearly five decades. His most enduring achievement was authoring Daʿāʾim al-Islām (The Pillars of Islam), a comprehensive manual that systematically drew on transmitted legal teachings (aḥādīth) from Imāms Jaʿfar al-Ṣādiq and Muḥammad al-Bāqir to establish an independent Ismāʿīlī , emphasizing the Imām's interpretive authority over ritual, ethical, and civil matters while rejecting taqlīd to earlier Sunni schools. Al-Qāḍī al-Nuʿmān's intellectual output extended beyond to include , , , and esoteric (taʾwīl), as seen in works like Iḥtiṣār al-taʾwīl and Sharḥ al-akhbār, which integrated rationalist with Imāmī to legitimize Fāṭimid rule and propagate Ismāʿīlī doctrine across the Mediterranean. His efforts transformed nascent Ismāʿīlī thought into a structured system capable of state administration, fostering judicial institutions that prioritized the Imām's living guidance over static scriptural literalism. Despite occasional tensions with rival scholars, such as over the integration of Zaydī elements into Ismāʿīlī , his corpus remains foundational for Twelver and Seven-er Ismāʿīlī communities, underscoring a pragmatic evolution from eclectic influences toward Imām-centric orthodoxy.

Biography

Early Life and Origins

Abu Hanifa al-Nu'man ibn Muhammad al-Tamimi, commonly known as al-Qadi al-Nu'man, was born circa 290 AH (903 CE) in Qayrawan, the chief urban center of in , corresponding to present-day . His full name incorporates the nisba al-Tamimi, denoting affiliation with the Arab tribe, which underscores his family's ethnic origins amid the diverse Berber and Arab populations of the region under Aghlabid rule. Al-Nu'man was raised in a scholarly ; his father, Abu Abd Allah Muhammad ibn Mansur ibn Ahmad ibn Hayyun, had transitioned from adherence to the prevalent Maliki Sunni —dominant in Ifriqiya's madrasas and courts—to Ismaili Shi'ism, likely through exposure to the burgeoning da'wa (missionary) networks in the area. This familial shift positioned the young Nu'man within an Ismaili intellectual milieu from an early age, where he pursued foundational studies in , , and exegesis, though specific mentors or curricula from this period are not well-documented. Historical accounts indicate scant further details on his siblings or extended kin, reflecting the limited biographical focus on pre-Fatimid phases in Ismaili sources.

Education and Intellectual Formation

Al-Qadi al-Nu'man, born around 290 AH/903 CE in Qayrawan, (modern ), originated from a scholarly family with roots in the Tamim tribe. His father, Abu ʿAbd Allah Muhammad b. Mansur b. Ahmad b. Hayyun, converted to Ismaili Shiʿism from Maliki Sunnism prior to 296 AH/909 CE, shaping the family's religious orientation during Nuʿman's formative years. Qayrawan, a hub of Maliki learning under Aghlabid and early Fatimid rule, provided an environment rich in and , though specific details of Nuʿman's childhood studies remain sparse. Nuʿman received an Ismaili education, likely influenced by his father's adoption of the and the burgeoning Fatimid daʿwa in following the establishment of the in 297 AH/909 CE. Some scholarly analyses posit an initial affiliation with Maliki or Hanafi traditions before full immersion in , reflecting the regional dominance of Sunni schools, though primary Ismaili accounts emphasize his early doctrinal alignment without explicit conversion narratives. By 313 AH/925 CE, at approximately age 22, he entered the service of the Fatimid Imam-caliph ʿAbd Allah al-Mahdi, marking the onset of his formal intellectual engagement with Ismaili hierarchies. His intellectual formation centered on (fiqh), , and under the direct patronage of successive Fatimid Imams—al-Mahdi (r. 297–322 AH/909–934 CE), al-Qaʾim (r. 322–334 AH/934–946 CE), (r. 334–341 AH/946–953 CE), and al-Muʿizz (r. 341–365 AH/953–975 CE)—whom he consulted extensively in composing his works. This mentorship fostered a distinctive Ismaili legal methodology prioritizing the Qurʾan, prophetic , and sayings of the Imams over analogical reasoning (), diverging from Sunni madhhabs while integrating rational (taʾwil). No individual non-Imamic teachers are prominently recorded, underscoring the Imams' role as primary intellectual authorities in his development as a and daʿi.

Rise in Fatimid Service

Al-Qadi al-Nuʿmān ibn Muḥammad ibn Ḥayyūn al-Tamīmī entered Fatimid service during the imamate-caliphate of Abū Muḥammad ʿAbd Allāh al-Mahdī billāh (r. 297–322 AH/909–934 CE), joining in the later phase of his rule in after the establishment of the dynasty's authority in . His initial involvement likely stemmed from his scholarly background in Ismaili thought and , aligning with the Fatimids' need for daʿwa () and administrative expertise amid consolidation against rivals like the Aghlabids and Umayyads. He served al-Mahdī for approximately the final nine years of his reign, handling roles that positioned him within the inner circle of Ismaili leadership. Upon al-Mahdī's death in 322 AH/934 CE, al-Nuʿmān continued under his successor, Abū al-Qāsim Muḥammad al-Qāʾim bi-Amr Allāh (r. 322–334 AH/934–946 CE), maintaining his daʿī (missionary agent) status during a period of internal challenges and external threats from the Zirids and Abbasids. Shortly before al-Qāʾim's death in 334 AH/946 CE, al-Nuʿmān received his first formal judicial appointment as qāḍī, marking his transition from advisory to authoritative roles in Fatimid governance. Al-Nuʿmān's prominence accelerated under the third caliph, Abū Ṭāhir Ismāʿīl al-Manṣūr bi-Allāh (r. 334–341 AH/946–953 CE), who recognized his legal acumen by elevating him to judge of Tripoli in 334 AH/945–946 CE, a strategic post in the western provinces. His rank further increased as al-Manṣūr appointed him to oversee judicial affairs in the new capital of al-Manṣūriyya, culminating in his designation as chief qāḍī (qāḍī al-quḍāt) of the Fatimid state, a position he used to systematize Ismaili amid the dynasty's expansion. In parallel, al-Nuʿmān managed the palace library, curating doctrinal texts essential to Fatimid legitimacy claims as Shiʿi imams descended from ʿAlī ibn Abī Ṭālib. This multifaceted service under al-Manṣūr solidified his influence, enabling doctrinal innovations that reinforced the caliphate's authority over Sunni-majority regions.

Tenure as Chief Qadi

Al-Qadi al-Nu'man was appointed chief judge (qadi al-qudat) of the by Caliph in 337 AH (948 CE), a position he held continuously until his death. This elevation followed his prior service as a judge in Tripoli and the Fatimid capital of al-Mansuriyya, reflecting his growing influence in judicial and doctrinal matters. His appointment marked the institutionalization of Ismaili as the basis for Fatimid legal administration, displacing reliance on external Sunni schools like the Maliki tradition prevalent in . During his tenure, al-Nu'man oversaw all judicial proceedings across Fatimid territories, including the adjudication of civil, criminal, and religious disputes, while also managing mazalim courts for handling grievances against officials starting from 343 AH (954 CE). He simultaneously directed majalis al-hikma, weekly Friday sessions dedicated to expounding Ismaili esoteric teachings (ta'wil) to initiated adherents, thereby integrating judicial authority with da'wa propagation. Under Caliph al-Mu'izz's direct supervision, he codified in Da'a'im al-Islam, a comprehensive text compiling authoritative hadiths from the Prophet Muhammad, Imam Ali, and the Fatimid imams, which al-Mu'izz adopted as the official legal code enforceable empire-wide. This reform emphasized the imam's interpretive authority over zahir ( shari'a) and batin (esoteric meaning), rejecting uncritical adoption of non-Ismaili traditions. Al-Nu'man's tenure extended into the in 969 CE, after which he accompanied al-Mu'izz to the new capital in 362 AH (973 CE), serving as the caliph's personal chief while permitting a local Sunni , Abu Tahir Muhammad b. , to retain authority over non-Ismaili populations to maintain stability. This pragmatic approach facilitated the extension of Ismaili judicial norms amid diverse sectarian contexts, though primary enforcement remained aligned with Da'a'im al-Islam. Al-Mu'izz publicly eulogized al-Nu'man's service, declaring that anyone accomplishing a tenth of his feats would merit divine paradise, underscoring his pivotal role in fortifying Fatimid legitimacy through legal and doctrinal consolidation. He died in on 27 Jumada II 363 AH (27 March 974 CE), with al-Mu'izz leading his funeral prayers, marking the end of a 26-year chief judgeship that spanned the transition from North African consolidation to Egyptian expansion.

Final Years and Death

In the wake of the in 969 CE, al-Qadi al-Nu'man remained in until 973 CE (362 AH), when he accompanied Caliph on the migration to the newly established capital of . There, he continued his role in judicial and intellectual affairs, supporting the consolidation of Fatimid authority in the eastern provinces. Al-Nu'man died in on 27 March 974 CE (29 Jumada II 363 AH), shortly after the caliphal court's arrival. Caliph al-Mu'izz personally led the funeral prayers, reflecting the high regard in which al-Nu'man was held after over five decades of service to the Fatimid imams, beginning under around 925 CE. His sons and descendants perpetuated his scholarly legacy within Fatimid institutions.

Intellectual Contributions

Development of Ismaili Jurisprudence

Al-Qadi al-Nuʿmān (d. 363 AH/974 CE) established the foundations of Fatimid Ismaili as the chief under the Fatimid caliphs, creating a systematic legal framework distinct from Sunni and other Shiʿi schools by centering it on the infallible authority of the . Prior to his efforts, Ismaili legal thought lacked a codified , relying instead on scattered teachings and daʿwa instructions; al-Nuʿmān's works marked the emergence of a formalized that integrated rulings with esoteric taʾwīl interpretations derived from the Imams' guidance. This development served the Fatimid state's needs, legitimizing the caliph-imams' role in lawmaking and adjudication while adapting pre-existing Shiʿi traditions to Ismaili doctrine. His jurisprudential output evolved chronologically, reflecting refinements in methodology and scope. Early compositions, such as Kitāb al-Iḍāḥ ʿan al-amr al-mawḍūḥ fī sharḥ farāʾiḍ Kitāb Jaʿfar (composed circa 330s AH/940s CE), focused on explicating inheritance laws based on Jaʿfar al-Ṣādiq's teachings. Subsequent texts like al-Ikhtiṣār fī al-radd ʿalā al-aʾimma al-arbaʿa and Ikhtilāf uṣūl al-madhāhib (mid-340s AH/950s CE) engaged polemically, critiquing the four Sunni schools and Zaydi positions to assert Ismaili superiority in sources and rulings. Taʾyīd al-daʿwa, addressed to al-Mahdī, defended the daʿwa's legal positions, while his magnum opus Daʿāʾim al-Islām (finalized circa 349 AH/960 CE under al-Muʿizz's supervision) synthesized these into a comprehensive code covering the seven pillars of faith, ritual obligations, transactions, , and penal sanctions. This progression shifted from explanatory commentaries to defensive treatises and ultimately to authoritative compendia, incorporating over 700 hadiths vetted for authenticity. Al-Nuʿmān's theory privileged the —interpreted via bāṭin (esoteric) alongside ẓāhir (exoteric) dimensions—and hadiths from Muḥammad al-Bāqir and Jaʿfar al-Ṣādiq as primary sources, limiting secondary tools like qiyās () or ijimāʿ (consensus) to those sanctioned by the living . In Daʿāʾim al-Islām, he restricted jurisprudential authorities to al-Ṣādiq and his designated proxies, rejecting independent ijtihād by scholars and emphasizing the 's interpretive monopoly to prevent deviation. This imam-centric approach extended to practical rulings, such as mandating walāya (allegiance to the ) as the religion's foundation and applying taʾwīl to derive obligations like ritual purity and zakāt disbursement tied to daʿwa support. By embedding legal in Ismaili cosmology, al-Nuʿmān ensured reinforced doctrinal hierarchy, influencing Fatimid courts where he adjudicated as qāḍī al-quḍāt from 338 AH/949 CE onward.

Key Doctrinal Innovations

Al-Qadi al-Nu'man systematized Ismaili by centering the living as the ultimate authority for legal interpretation and validation, distinguishing it from Sunni and other Shi'i schools that relied more heavily on independent scholarly consensus or . In his foundational text Da'a'im al-Islam, composed around 349 AH/960 CE under the direct commission of -Caliph al-Mu'izz, he codified the as the Qur'an, the Prophet's sunna, and the teachings of the Imams, explicitly rejecting ra'y (personal opinion) and (analogical reasoning) as invalid without the 's endorsement. For unresolved matters, referral to the was mandated, embedding the doctrine of as the interpretive nexus between (zahiri) and esoteric (batini) dimensions of the . This innovation elevated the 's role beyond mere guidance to active legislative supremacy, ensuring doctrinal cohesion within the Fatimid Ismaili community. A hallmark of al-Nu'man's doctrinal framework was the incorporation of ta'wil (esoteric ) into , allowing for layered interpretations of Qur'anic verses and prophetic traditions that aligned legal rulings with Ismaili cosmology and the Imam's spiritual . Unlike Twelver Shi'i jurisprudence, which permitted temporary (mut'a), or Sunni schools emphasizing fixed methodologies, al-Nu'man prohibited mut'a and advocated a lunar-solar for determining , reflecting Fatimid calendrical reforms. His early works, such as Kitab al-Izah (an extensive compilation of traditions spanning 3,000 folios), evolved into refined treatises like Kitab al-Iqtisar, where he critiqued rival madhhabs—particularly in usul al-madhahib—for deviating from Imami primacy, adapting elements of Zahiri literalism while subordinating them to ta'wil. This progression marked a shift from mere collection of to a formalized, Imam-validated system that integrated and law. Al-Nu'man further innovated by restructuring the pillars of Islam to include walaya (allegiance to the Imam) as a sixth pillar, positioning it as essential for true faith and legal validity, alongside elevating tahara (ritual purity) to independent status. This doctrinal emphasis on walaya underscored causal realism in Ismaili thought, wherein obedience to the Imam ensures access to salvific knowledge, countering speculative theology (nazar) influenced by Mu'tazili rationalism. Through his tenure as chief judge from 337 AH/948 CE and conductor of majalis al-hikma (sessions of wisdom) authorized by al-Mu'izz, al-Nu'man operationalized these principles, resolving legal ambiguities via direct Imamic reference and fostering a jurisprudence that privileged empirical alignment with the Imam's living guidance over static textualism.

Historical and Philosophical Writings

Al-Qadi al-Nu'man's principal historical work, Iftitāḥ al-daʿwa (The Commencement of the Mission), provides a chronological account of the Ismaili da'wa's development from the era of concealment under the pre-Fatimid imams through the establishment of the in . Composed likely in the 340s AH/950s CE during the reign of Caliph al-Muʿizz (r. 341–365 AH/953–975 CE), the text details activities in , the migration to , and military conquests culminating in the Fatimid state's founding in 297 AH/909 CE. It draws on internal Ismaili traditions and eyewitness reports to legitimize the dynasty's claims to and , serving as the earliest comprehensive for these events. The work emphasizes causal sequences in the da'wa's success, attributing it to strategic propagation by daʿis (missionaries) and divine sanction via the imams, while critiquing rival Shiʿi and Sunni s. Al-Nu'man also authored Sharḥ al-akhbār, a commentary employing historical and methods to analyze prophetic traditions and early Islamic events, integrating them with Fatimid doctrinal priorities. These texts reflect his role as official historian, commissioned to preserve and interpret the movement's origins amid political consolidation. In philosophical contributions, al-Nu'man's writings on taʾwīl (esoteric exegesis) explore metaphysical dimensions of , prioritizing bāṭin (inner meaning) over ẓāhir (literal). His Asās al-taʾwīl (The Foundations of Esoteric Interpretation) offers an allegorical analysis of the Prophet Muhammad's miʿrāj (nocturnal ascent), framing it within Ismaili cosmology as a progression through intellectual hierarchies and cycles of . Likely written post-349 AH/960 CE, it aligns Qurʾanic symbols with Neoplatonically influenced concepts of emanation and , underscoring the imam's interpretive authority. Related texts, such as Taʾwīl al-daʿāʾim and Nahj al-sabīl ilā maʿrifat ʿilm al-taʾwīl, extend this approach to doctrinal and legal synthesis, interpreting ritual obligations philosophically as stages of spiritual ascent. These works, totaling among over fifty attributed titles, integrate historical events with philosophical , positing through divine manifesting in the imamate's guidance. While rooted in Ismaili esotericism, they engage rationalist methods to counter literalist interpretations prevalent in contemporaneous Sunni .

Major Works

Al-Qadi al-Nu'man's Da'a'im al-Islam (The Pillars of ), completed around 349 AH/960 CE under the supervision of Fatimid Caliph [al-Mu'izz li-Din Allah](/page/Al-Mu'izz_li-Din Allah), serves as the cornerstone of Ismaili jurisprudence, systematically codifying legal rulings derived primarily from the Qur'an, the sunna of the Prophet Muhammad, and the teachings of Imams and . The text is structured around the five pillars of —shahada, salat, zakat, sawm, and hajj—followed by detailed expositions on permissible and impermissible acts, inheritance, contracts, , and penal codes, emphasizing ta'wil (esoteric interpretation) to align exoteric rulings with batini (inner) meanings. This work marked a deliberate effort to establish an independent Ismaili legal school, diverging from Sunni and Twelver Shi'i madhhabs by prioritizing imam-centric authority over consensus or analogy. Earlier versions of Da'a'im al-Islam evolved through revisions: an initial draft under Imam al-Mahdi (r. 297–322 AH/909–934 CE), expansions during al-Qa'im's reign (322–346 AH/934–953 CE), and further refinements under (346–353 AH/953–960 CE), culminating in the authoritative edition endorsed by al-Mu'izz as the official Fatimid legal code. Al-Nu'man explicitly instructed jurists to derive rulings first from the Qur'an, then prophetic traditions, and finally imam-approved precedents, rejecting ijma' (consensus) among non-Ismailis as a valid source. The text's compilation drew on over 40 collections and earlier Ismaili treatises, though al-Nu'man critiqued reliance on non-Imami sources, aiming for doctrinal purity amid Fatimid . Complementing Da'a'im al-Islam, al-Nu'man's Minhaj al-fara'id (The Path of Shares), composed circa 350 AH/961 CE, provides a specialized treatise on , delineating shares for heirs based on Qur'anic verses (e.g., surat al-Nisa') interpreted through Ismaili esoteric lenses, including provisions for female relatives and imam-designated distributions uncommon in other schools. This work, preserved in Yemenite Tayyibi Ismaili manuscripts, underscores al-Nu'man's methodical approach to furud (obligatory shares), resolving apparent contradictions in scriptural texts via imam-guided . Together, these texts formalized Ismaili as a cohesive system, influencing judicial practice in Fatimid courts and later Bohra communities, where Da'a'im remains a primary reference despite partial supplanting by later compendia like al-Mu'tamad fi'l-furu'.

Exegetical and Theological Compositions

Al-Qadi al-Nu'man produced several compositions dedicated to Quranic exegesis (ta'wil) and Ismaili theological doctrines, emphasizing the esoteric (batin) dimensions of revelation over literal (zahir) interpretations. His most prominent exegetical work, Asas al-Ta'wil (The Foundations of Esoteric Interpretation), composed around the mid-10th century, systematically applies Ismaili hermeneutics to Quranic narratives, portraying them as symbolic representations of spiritual realities, cosmic cycles, and the hierarchical structure of divine knowledge mediated through the Imam. In this text, al-Nu'man interprets stories such as that of Job as allegories for the soul's trials in acquiring gnosis (ma'rifa), where physical afflictions symbolize inner purification and proximity to divine intellect. The work advances a tiered wherein Quranic events reflect Ismaili cycles of prophethood and , with figures like prophets embodying universal intellects (uqud al-aql) and historical occurrences signifying eternal truths rather than mere —a method termed "hierohistory" by later analysts. For example, al-Nu'man's of Jesus's birth reframes miraculous elements as manifestations of the Imam's (nur) descending through spiritual hierarchies, integrating Neoplatonic influences with Shi'i imamology to underscore the Imam's role as the living interpreter of . This approach prioritizes causal chains from divine command to human cognition, critiquing readings for obscuring salvific accessible only via the Imam's guidance. Theologically, al-Nu'man delineated distinctions central to Ismaili creed, such as between outward submission (islam)—encompassing ritual observance—and inner faith (iman), which demands esoteric comprehension and allegiance (walaya) to the Imam as the locus of divine authority. These ideas appear in treatises reinforcing Ismaili soteriology, where salvation hinges on recognizing the Imam's perpetual interpretive function, drawing from traditions attributed to Imams Ja'far al-Sadiq and Muhammad al-Baqir while adapting them to Fatimid universalism. His compositions thus served didactic purposes within the da'wa (missionary) apparatus, training adherents in allegorical methods to navigate apparent scriptural contradictions through principled esoteric resolution.

Chronology and Evolution of Writings

Al-Qāḍī al-Nuʿmān's literary output, comprising over fifty titles across , , , and , spanned roughly from the early 320s AH/930s CE until shortly before his death in 363 AH/974 CE, with the chronology reconstructed primarily from internal references in his extant works and Fatimid-era attestations. His early compositions, predating his formal appointment as chief in 337 AH/948 CE under Caliph al-Muʿizz, focused on foundational Ismaili doctrines and included polemical texts like Kitāb al-iḥtijāj ʿalā man qāla bi-khalq al-Qurʾān (Book of Disputation Against Those Who Say the Qurʾan Is Created), composed around 320 AH/932 CE, which defended the uncreated nature of the Qurʾan drawing on Twelver Shiʿi and Muʿtazili arguments. These initial efforts reflect an eclectic approach, incorporating non-Ismaili collections to establish doctrinal legitimacy amid competition with Sunni and other Shiʿi schools. During his tenure as chief qadi (337–346 AH/948–957 CE), al-Nuʿmān's writings evolved toward systematic jurisprudence, producing a series of progressively refined fiqh texts that prioritized the imam's interpretive authority (walāya) over transmitted reports (khabar). His earliest legal work, al-Urwa fī l-fiqh (The Arm in Jurisprudence), likely drafted in the 330s AH/940s CE, relied heavily on Imami Shiʿi sources for inheritance and ritual laws, marking a transitional phase from ad hoc rulings to codified norms. This was followed by al-Muqtaḍab min kitāb al-iḍāḥ (Excerpts from the Book of Elucidation) around 339 AH/950 CE, which began emphasizing esoteric interpretation (taʾwīl) of Qurʾanic verses, reducing dependence on external hadith while integrating Ismaili hierarchies of knowledge. By contrast, Ikhtilāf uṣūl al-madhāhib (Differences in the Principles of the Schools), completed circa 339–340 AH/950–951 CE, systematically critiqued Sunni madhhabs (e.g., Hanafi, Maliki) and Zaydi positions, advocating exclusive adherence to Fatimid imams as the sole source of valid rulings, thus institutionalizing Ismaili fiqh as independent. The culmination of this evolution appeared in his magnum opus, Daʾāʾim al-Islām (Pillars of ), finalized in Muḥarram 346 AH/January 957 CE under direct imperial oversight, which synthesized prior works into a comprehensive code of seven pillars, foregrounding walāya as foundational and minimizing anecdotal in favor of rational and allegorical proofs. Post-Daʾāʾim compositions, such as Taʾwīl al-daʿāʾim (Esoteric Interpretation of the Pillars) in the 350s AH/960s CE and al-Majālīs wa l-musāyara (Sessions and Discourses), a collection of court sermons from 350–362 AH/961–973 CE, further deepened esoteric dimensions, applying taʾwīl to legal precepts and historical narratives to align them with cyclical prophetic cycles. This progression—from source-dependent to imam-centric esotericism—mirrors al-Nuʿmān's adaptation to Fatimid , shifting from defensive consolidation against rivals to authoritative codification for institutional use, though later works faced internal scrutiny for perceived over-reliance on non-Ismaili precedents.

Reception and Influence

Impact within Ismaili Communities

Al-Qadi al-Nu'man's codification of Ismaili , particularly through Da'a'im al-Islam (completed around 950 CE under the supervision of Imam-Caliph al-Mu'izz), established a comprehensive legal framework centered on the authority of the Ismaili Imams and hadiths attributed to and , which became the official law of the Fatimid empire applicable to all Muslim subjects regardless of sect. This system integrated esoteric (batin) interpretations with exoteric (zahir) practices, reinforcing communal cohesion by aligning daily rituals, such as and , with the of Imamic guidance, thereby legitimizing Fatimid rule as a universal Shi'i . Within the Fatimid Ismaili community, al-Nu'man's role extended beyond jurisprudence to public instruction; as chief judge from 948 CE, he led Majalis al-Hikma (sessions of wisdom) following Friday prayers, disseminating Ismaili teachings to both adherents and non-Ismailis, which fostered intellectual engagement and da'wa (missionary) activities essential for community expansion across North Africa and beyond. His efforts under four successive Imams—al-Mahdi, al-Qa'im, al-Mansur, and al-Mu'izz—solidified a distinct Ismaili fiqh that prioritized Imamic authority over independent reasoning (ijtihad), distinguishing it from Sunni and Twelver traditions and enabling the community's governance during the caliphate's peak from 909 to 969 CE. Post-Fatimid schisms amplified his legacy in branch communities; in the Musta'li-Tayyibi line, particularly among Dawoodi Bohras, Da'a'im al-Islam endures as the binding foundational text for fiqh, guiding rituals, inheritance, and ethical conduct without significant subsequent revisions, preserving al-Nu'man's emphasis on Imamic delegation through da'is (missionaries). In contrast, Nizari Ismaili developments post-1095 CE shifted toward more interpretive flexibility under later Imams, yet al-Nu'man's early doctrinal innovations in ta'wil (esoteric exegesis) continued to underpin communal identity and resilience amid persecution. His writings thus provided a stable intellectual core that sustained Ismaili cohesion across diaspora networks in Yemen, India, and Syria for centuries.

Engagement with Other Islamic Traditions

Al-Qadi al-Nu'man engaged with Sunni Islamic traditions chiefly through polemical refutations aimed at establishing the superiority of Ismaili . In his work Ikhtilāf uṣūl al-madhāhib (Disagreements on the Principles of the Legal Schools), composed around 950 CE, he critiqued the foundational methodologies of the four Sunni schools—Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi'i, and Hanbali—arguing that their reliance on ra'y (personal ) and qiyās (analogy) represented deviations from the authoritative transmissions of the Prophet Muhammad and the Imams, particularly . He highlighted internal contradictions among Sunni jurists, such as disputes over the and interpretive methods, to demonstrate that only the continuous guidance of the Ismaili Imams provided unified and authentic rulings. Given the Fatimids' rule in , where the predominated, al-Nu'man directed specific refutations against Maliki scholars, including Muhammad b. Ahmad al-'Utaqi and others, accusing them of fabricating traditions and ignoring Imam-centric authority. This engagement was not mere opposition but strategic incorporation: while rejecting Sunni usul, he adapted structural elements from Sunni texts into Ismaili works like Da'a'im al-Islām (The Pillars of Islam, completed 939 CE), filling them with selectively drawn from pre-Ismaili Shi'i sources attributed to Imams up to , but reinterpreted esoterically to affirm Fatimid legitimacy. Al-Nu'man also differentiated Ismaili doctrine from other Shi'i traditions, particularly Twelver (Imami) Shi'ism, by defending the 's succession through rather than in historical and theological treatises such as Iftitāḥ al-Da'wa (The Commencement of the Mission, ca. 940s CE). He contended that Twelver claims lacked the manifest, continuous required for authoritative ta'wil (esoteric interpretation), positioning as the true continuation of Ja'far al-Sadiq's legacy against both doctrines and Zaydi . This selective engagement with shared Shi'i heritage—using common corpora while subordinating them to Ismaili hierarchy—underscored his broader project of synthesizing and supplanting rival traditions under Fatimid auspices.

Scholarly Evaluations

Modern scholars regard al-Qāḍī al-Nuʿmān (d. 363/974) as the foundational figure in the development of Ismaili jurisprudence, credited with systematizing a legal framework that prioritizes the interpretive authority of the Ismaili imams over the traditions of the Prophet's companions, thereby distinguishing it sharply from Sunni madhhabs. His magnum opus, Daʿāʾim al-Islām, completed around 346/957 under the supervision of Imam-Caliph al-Muʿizz, is evaluated as a comprehensive codification of Fatimid law, integrating Qurʾanic exegesis, prophetic sunnah, and imamic pronouncements as primary sources while subordinating ijmaʿ and qiyās to avoid emulation of non-Ismaili precedents. Heinz Halm, in his analysis of Fatimid intellectual history, praises al-Nuʿmān's efforts as pivotal in transitioning Ismaili daʿwa from missionary propagation to state-enforced jurisprudence, enabling the regime's legal consolidation in North Africa and Egypt by 969 CE. Paul E. Walker, a leading specialist in Ismaili studies, underscores al-Nuʿmān's innovative use of taʾwīl (esoteric interpretation) in legal , arguing that it allowed for a hierarchical reading of sharīʿa—zāhir () rules for the masses and bāṭin (esoteric) meanings reserved for initiates—thus accommodating the Fatimids' dual public-private doctrinal structure. Walker notes, however, ambiguities in al-Nuʿmān's definition of , which sometimes conflates prophetic with imamic guidance, potentially reflecting the evolving nature of Ismaili sources amid limited access to verified traditions before the Fatimid conquests. Ismail K. Poonawala's chronological reconstruction of over fifty works reveals a progression from polemical tracts against rival sects in the 320s/930s to more refined juridical texts post-340/950, suggesting al-Nuʿmān adapted his methodology under caliphal oversight, though this evolution has prompted debates on doctrinal consistency. Critiques in focus less on outright rejection—given the niche and historically marginalized status of Ismaili texts—and more on contextual limitations. Some analysts, including re-examinations of his , challenge the long-held view that al-Nuʿmān converted from Maliki or Hanafi affiliation, proposing instead that his writings exhibit innate Ismaili inclinations from , potentially overstated by Sunni chroniclers to discredit Fatimid legitimacy. Orthodox objections, echoed in modern Twelver Shiʿi , occasionally claim al-Nuʿmān's imām-centric aligns more with Twelver principles under than explicit , though this is dismissed by mainstream researchers as anachronistic projection lacking textual evidence. Overall, evaluations affirm his enduring influence on Tayyibī and Nizārī branches, where Daʿāʾim remains authoritative, but highlight the challenge of reconciling its esoteric layers with empirical legal application in diverse historical contexts.

Controversies and Critiques

Reliance on Non-Ismaili Sources

Al-Qadi al-Nu'man's development of Ismaili , most notably in Da'a'im al-Islam (composed circa 339–346 AH/950–957 CE), depended heavily on transmitted teachings from the Prophet Muhammad and early Shi'i Imams, particularly (d. 114/732) and (d. 148/765), due to the absence of a prior, distinctly codified Ismaili legal corpus. These sources, forming the core of Ja'fari shared across Shi'i branches, provided the foundational hadiths and rulings for (ibadat) and social (mu'amalat) laws, adapted by al-Nu'man to incorporate Ismaili doctrinal emphases such as the seven pillars of faith, including walaya (allegiance to the ). This methodological choice invited critiques from Sunni polemicists, who dismissed Ismaili law as derivative of broader Shi'i traditions deemed unreliable or innovative (bid'a), arguing that al-Nu'man's selective use of pre-seventh Imam materials ignored Sunni canonical collections like those of al-Bukhari and Muslim while privileging narrations vulnerable to sectarian fabrication. Within Shi'i contexts, some Twelver scholars, including Muhammad Baqir al-Majlisi (d. 1110/1699), misinterpreted this reliance as evidence of al-Nu'man's alignment with Imami (Twelver) thought, overlooking his explicit Ismaili imamate doctrines and post-Ja'fari esoteric interpretations. Such attributions reflect Twelver efforts to claim shared heritage but highlight how al-Nu'man's framework blurred lines between exoteric legal norms and Ismaili-specific ta'wil (esoteric exegesis), potentially diluting the latter's distinctiveness. Internally among later Ismaili thinkers, the emphasis on early Imam traditions—without extensive direct attributions to seventh Imam Ismail b. Ja'far or subsequent hidden Imams—prompted questions about the integration of post-occultation guidance, as Da'a'im prioritizes verifiable chains (isnad) from accessible Ja'fari-era compilations over unpublished da'wa transmissions. This pragmatic adaptation enabled state-level implementation under the Fatimids but fueled scholarly debates on whether it sufficiently insulated from external influences, given Ja'fari sources' into Twelver post-al-Sadiq. Modern analyses, drawing from studies, affirm the approach's necessity for Fatimid legitimacy amid diverse subject populations but note its exposure to critiques of insufficient esoteric innovation. Sunni sources, often polemical, exaggerate this as wholesale borrowing to undermine Ismaili claims, while Twelver interpretations selectively ignore doctrinal divergences like the rejection of Musa al-Kazim's .

Esoteric Interpretations and Orthodox Objections

Al-Qadi al-Nuʿmān's esoteric contributions centered on taʾwīl, the allegorical exegesis of Qurʾānic texts and prophetic narratives, positing that exoteric (ẓāhir) rulings possess inner (bāṭin) spiritual significances accessible through the guidance of the imam. In Asās al-taʾwīl (composed circa 950–960 CE), he applied this hermeneutic to stories of prophets, interpreting the afflictions of Job as a paradigm for the soul's purification and ascent to divine wisdom, thereby linking scriptural events to Ismaili notions of cosmic cycles and intellectual enlightenment. Similarly, Taʾwīl al-daʿāʾim (late 10th century), drawn from his authorized lectures in Fatimid majālis al-ḥikma, unpacked the esoteric dimensions of Islam's pillars, such as equating the ram's substitution for Ishmael in Id al-Adḥā with the triumph of spiritual sacrifice over literal rite. These interpretations reinforced Ismaili doctrine by subordinating apparent law to the imam's interpretive authority, arguing that taʾwīl fulfills rather than abrogates the ẓāhir, with ultimate truth veiled from the uninitiated to prevent misappropriation. Al-Nuʿmān maintained this balance in juridical texts like Daʿāʾim al-Islām (compiled 950 CE), where esoteric insights informed but did not override legal prescriptions. Sunni scholars, viewing Ismaili taʾwīl as emblematic of batīniyya , objected that it elevated elite over universal scriptural literalism, potentially eroding the Sharīʿa's binding force by rendering obligations symbolic and imam-dependent. Critics contended such methods justified antinomian tendencies, concealing deviations under allegory and prioritizing taʿlīm (imamic instruction) above prophetic and consensus (ijmāʿ). Abu Ḥāmid al-Ghazālī (d. 1111 CE), in Fadāʾiḥ al-bāṭiniyya wa fuḍūḥ al-mulḥida (c. 1095 CE), exemplified this critique by denouncing Ismaili esotericism for fostering deception and subversion, asserting that true interpretation adheres to apparent meanings verifiable by reason and tradition, not secretive hierarchies that undermine communal . While al-Ghazālī's targeted Nizārī Ismailis postdating al-Nuʿmān, it encapsulated broader orthodox Sunni rejection of Fatimid-style taʾwīl as elitist innovation threatening doctrinal stability. Al-Nuʿmān anticipated such charges by insisting taʾwīl harmonizes layers of meaning, yet detractors like al-Ghazālī—whose works, though rhetorically charged, drew from direct encounters with daʿwa agents—persisted in portraying it as a for .

Internal Fatimid Debates

During the Fatimid era, particularly under Caliph al-Mu'izz li-Din Allah (r. 953–975 CE), the court in al-Mansuriyya fostered intellectual and theological discussions among da'is and scholars, with al-Qadi al-Nu'man playing a central role as chief judge and jurist. These sessions, often following Friday prayers, involved debates on Ismaili doctrine, including the interplay between exoteric (zahir) legal rulings and esoteric (batin) interpretations, as al-Nu'man expounded in his majalis al-hikma—weekly "sessions of wisdom" held Thursdays in the palace for initiated Ismailis. Al-Mu'izz actively participated, posing questions and engaging participants to refine teachings, as recorded by al-Nu'man in works like Kitab al-Majalis wa'l-Musayarāt, which document dialogues emphasizing the imam's interpretive authority. Al-Nu'man defended the necessity of the living imam's guidance over literalist reliance on the Qur'an alone, arguing in his compositions that true understanding required the imam's ta'wil to unlock spiritual meanings, countering any tendencies toward scriptural sufficiency that could undermine hierarchical da'wa structures. This stance addressed potential internal divergences, such as overemphasis on esoteric at the expense of practical , ensuring doctrinal unity as the Fatimids transitioned from to state. His Da'a'im al-Islam (ca. 349/960 CE), presented amid such discussions, integrated prophetic traditions with imamic directives, balancing accessibility for converts with Ismaili exclusivity. These debates reinforced al-Nu'man's position that jurisprudence derived ultimately from the , not autonomous juristic , distinguishing Fatimid from Sunni madhhabs while accommodating Berber customs for political stability. Al-Mu'izz's endorsement, including public praise of al-Nu'man's contributions, resolved tensions, affirming the complementary nature of zahir and batin as al-Nu'man articulated in treatises like Asas al-Ta'wil. No major schisms emerged from these exchanges, which instead solidified the caliphate's intellectual framework before the conquest of in 969 CE.

References

  1. https://www.iis.ac.uk/scholarly-contributions/al-numan-al-qadi-d-363-ah-974-ce/
  2. https://www.iis.ac.uk/scholarly-contributions/ismaili-jurisprudence/
  3. https://nes.princeton.edu/publications/between-revolution-and-state-path-fatimid-statehood-qadi-al-numan-and-construction
  4. https://www.jstor.org/stable/613800
  5. https://www.iis.ac.uk/news/2007/march/new-iis-publication-on-the-rise-of-the-fatimid-state/
  6. https://www.ismaili.net/hero/hero8.html
  7. https://www.academia.edu/126408034/_al_Qadi_al_Numan_
  8. https://ismailimail.blog/2007/11/18/al-qadi-al-nu%25E2%2580%2598man-ismaili-jurist-and-theologian-of-the-fatimid-era/
  9. https://ismailimail.blog/2022/09/14/imam-al-muizz-eulogised-qadi-al-numans-illustrious-contribution-to-the-fatimids/
  10. https://www.islamawareness.net/Deviant/Ismailis/ismailis.html
  11. https://prezi.com/9tbhlgtzrjsw/al-qadi-al-numan/
  12. https://www.encyclopedia.com/environment/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/qadi-al-numan
  13. http://security.cc.columbia.edu/itc/history/conant/daftary.pdf
  14. https://www.iis.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/the-sources-of-ismaili-law_ac_26-01-12-240758534.pdf
  15. https://www.academia.edu/92312568/The_Chronology_of_al_Q%25C4%2581%25E1%25B8%258D%25C4%25AB_l_Nu%25CA%25BFm%25C4%2581n_s_Works
  16. https://www.academia.edu/77728303/The_Evolution_of_al_Qa_d_i_al_Nu%25CA%25BFma_n_s_Theory_of_Ismaili_Jurisprudence_as_Reflected_in_the_Chronology_of_his_Works_on_Jurisprudence
  17. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26569061
  18. https://www.iis.ac.uk/scholarly-contributions/the-sources-of-ismaili-law/
  19. https://simerg.com/about/an-interview-with-dr-devin-stewart-of-emory-college-on-translating-the-fatimid-ismaili-jurist-al-qa%E1%B8%8Di-al-nu%CA%BFman/
  20. https://academic.oup.com/jis/article/15/2/211/818764
  21. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265833188_The_Early_History_of_Ismaili_Jurisprudence_Law_under_the_Fatimids_edited_and_translated_by_Agostino_Cilardo_review
  22. https://www.iis.ac.uk/news/2013/january/publication-of-al-qadi-al-numans-minhaj-al-faraid/
  23. https://www.academia.edu/37219507/al_Qadi_al_Nu_man_The_Story_of_Job_The_Foundation_of_Spiritual_Hermeneutics_Asas_al_Ta_wil_
  24. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337542203_Hierohistory_in_Qadi_l-Numan%27s_Foundation_of_Symbolic_Interpretation_Asas_al-Tawil_the_Birth_of_Jesus
  25. https://www.iis.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/al-qadi-al-nu-man-farhad-daftary-01-12-10_final-344611624.pdf
  26. https://www.iis.ac.uk/publications-listing/the-early-history-of-ismaili-jurisprudence/
  27. http://www.amaana.org/Ismailidawa.htm
  28. https://www.iis.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/a-short-history-of-the-ismailis-reading-guide.pdf
  29. https://ijlmh.com/wp-content/uploads/Constitutionality-of-Female-Genital-Mutilation-in-India.pdf
  30. https://www.bloomsbury.com/in/early-history-of-ismaili-jurisprudence-9781786734600/
  31. https://www.iis.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/nanji_ismailism-734160056.pdf
  32. https://nyupress.org/9781479808076/disagreements-of-the-jurists/
  33. https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/B837E5DC045EA787232F750F8B9667F1/S0041977X00143198a.pdf/lokhandwalla_s_t_ed_kitabikhtilaf_usuli_lmadhahib_of_qadi_numan_b_muhammad_xiv_140_262_x_pp_simla_indian_institute_of_advanced_study_1972_rs_45.pdf
  34. https://www.ajis.org/index.php/ajiss/article/download/791/121/973
  35. https://www.academia.edu/39879404/The_Meaning_of_Sunnah_According_to_The_Ismaili_Scholar_al_Qadi_al_Numan_d_363_AH_974_CE
  36. https://www.iis.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/revised_copy_of_intellectual_life_in_fatimid_times.pdf
  37. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/25831167.pdf
  38. https://www.academia.edu/92312568/The_Chronology_of_al_Q%C4%81%E1%B8%8D%C4%AB_l_Nu%CA%BFm%C4%81n_s_Works
  39. https://academic.oup.com/book/45757/chapter/398684879
  40. https://www.academia.edu/77728303/The_Evolution_of_al_Qa_d_i_al_Nu%CA%BFma_n_s_Theory_of_Ismaili_Jurisprudence_as_Reflected_in_the_Chronology_of_his_Works_on_Jurisprudence
  41. https://www.shiachat.com/forum/topic/234985693-interesting-hadith-from-ismaili-collection/
  42. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371503464_al-Qadi_al-Nu%27man_The_Story_of_Job_The_Foundation_of_Spiritual_Hermeneutics_Asas_al-Ta%27wil
  43. https://www.ismailignosis.com/p/ismaili-interpretation-tawil-of-id
  44. https://www.amaana.org/ismaili/2013/02/ismaili-interpretation-of-the-fall-of-adam/
  45. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305809587_Al-Ghazali_and_the_Ismailis_A_Debate_on_Reason_and_Authority_in_Medieval_Islam
  46. http://kopidankitab.blogspot.com/2013/07/al-imam-al-ghazalis-efforts-in.html
  47. https://www.ismailistudies.blog/p/al-ghazali-as-a-key-historical-witness
  48. https://nimirasblog.wordpress.com/2022/05/18/fatimid-court-engendered-lively-theological-and-intellectual-debates/
  49. https://www.ismailignosis.com/p/is-the-quran-truly-the-guide-or-is
  50. https://www.iis.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/between_revolution_and_state.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.