Recent from talks
Contribute something
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Amination
View on WikipediaAmination is the process by which an amine group is introduced into an organic molecule. This type of reaction is important because organonitrogen compounds are pervasive.
Reactions
[edit]Aminase enzymes
[edit]Enzymes that catalyse this reaction are termed aminases. Amination can occur in a number of ways including reaction with ammonia or another amine such as an alkylation, reductive amination and the Mannich reaction.
Acid-catalysed hydroamination
[edit]Many alkyl amines are produced industrially by the amination of alcohols using ammonia in the presence of solid acid catalysts, to dehydrate the alcohol into an alkene. Illustrative is the production of tert-butylamine:
- NH3 + CH2=C(CH3)2 → H2NC(CH3)3
The Ritter reaction of isobutene with hydrogen cyanide is not useful in this case because it produces too much waste.[1]
Electrophilic amination
[edit]Usually, the amine reacts as the nucleophile with another organic compound acting as the electrophile. This sense of reactivity may be reversed for some electron-deficient amines, including oxaziridines, hydroxylamines, oximes, and other N–O substrates. When the amine is used as an electrophile, the reaction is called electrophilic amination. Electron-rich organic substrates that may be used as nucleophiles for this process include carbanions and enolates.
Miscellaneous methods
[edit]Alpha hydroxy acids can be converted into amino acids directly using aqueous ammonia solution, hydrogen gas and a heterogeneous metallic ruthenium catalyst.[2]
Metal-catalyzed hydroamination
[edit]In hydroamination, amines add to alkenes.[3] When substituted amines add, the result is alkene carboamination.
See also
[edit]- Alkylation, the addition of an alkyl group
- Acylation, the addition of an acyl group (-C(O)R)
- Deamination
References
[edit]- ^ Eller, Karsten; Henkes, Erhard; Rossbacher, Roland; Höke, Hartmut (2000). "Amines, Aliphatic". Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH. doi:10.1002/14356007.a02_001. ISBN 3527306730.
- ^ Deng, Weiping, et al. "Catalytic amino acid production from biomass-derived intermediates." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115.20 (2018): 5093-5098. doi:10.1073/pnas.1800272115
- ^ Liangbin Huang, Matthias Arndt, Käthe Gooßen, Heinrich Heydt, and Lukas J. Gooßen "Late Transition Metal-Catalyzed Hydroamination and Hydroamidation" Chem. Rev., 2015, 115 (7), pp 2596–2697. doi:10.1021/cr300389u
Amination
View on GrokipediaHistorical Overview
The development of amination reactions dates back to the 19th century, with early methods focusing on nucleophilic substitutions and rearrangements. Notable early advancements include the Hofmann mustard oil reaction for primary amines in the 1850s and the Gabriel synthesis introduced by Siegmund Gabriel in 1887, which provided a selective route to primary alkylamines from alkyl halides.[3] The 20th century saw the rise of reductive methods and, in the 1990s, catalytic cross-coupling reactions such as the Buchwald-Hartwig amination, enabling efficient aryl C-N bond formation under milder conditions.[4] Amination reactions encompass diverse methodologies, broadly classified into nucleophilic substitutions (e.g., SN2 reactions of alkyl halides with ammonia or amines), reductive amination (involving imine or iminium ion intermediates from carbonyls and amines reduced by agents like sodium cyanoborohydride), electrophilic amination (using reagents like azides or hydroxylamine derivatives), and coupling reactions such as the Buchwald-Hartwig amination for aryl systems.[5][6][7] These methods enable the preparation of primary, secondary, and tertiary amines, with reductive amination particularly valued for its mild conditions and tolerance of functional groups, making it a cornerstone in the industrial synthesis of drugs like antidepressants and antihistamines.[8] Contemporary developments emphasize sustainable catalysis, including transition-metal-free processes, photoredox-mediated variants for selective C-H amination, and electrochemical approaches that minimize waste and enhance atom economy, addressing challenges in scalability and environmental impact.[9][10]Introduction
Definition and Scope
Amination refers to a class of chemical reactions in which an amino group (-NH₂ or a substituted variant such as -NHR or -NR₂) is introduced into an organic substrate, typically resulting in the formation of amines.[11] This process fundamentally involves the creation of a carbon-nitrogen (C-N) bond, distinguishing it from related nitrogen-introduction reactions like nitration, which incorporates a nitro group (-NO₂) featuring nitrogen-oxygen (N-O) bonds rather than direct amine linkage.[12] Amination is versatile, applicable to a wide range of substrates including hydrocarbons, carbonyl compounds, and aromatic systems, and it plays a pivotal role in constructing nitrogenous frameworks essential to life sciences and industry.[13] The scope of amination extends across organic synthesis, biochemistry, and materials science, encompassing the production of primary, secondary, and tertiary amines through diverse mechanistic pathways. In organic synthesis, it enables efficient C-N bond formation using catalysts like transition metals (e.g., cobalt or rhodium), facilitating the assembly of complex molecules with high regioselectivity.[13] Biochemically, amination is integral to processes such as transamination and reductive amination, which underpin the biosynthesis and synthetic preparation of biomolecules. In materials applications, amine functionalization enhances properties like hydrophilicity and biocompatibility in polymers and resins. Common approaches, such as reductive amination, exemplify its practicality in generating these amine classes from readily available precursors.[11] Amination's general principles highlight its utility as a foundational step in building diverse product classes, including nitrogen-containing heterocycles, peptides, and alkaloids. For instance, it is employed in the asymmetric synthesis of α-amino acids, yielding compounds with exceptional enantiomeric purity (>99% ee) vital for pharmaceuticals.[14] In alkaloid synthesis, amination strategies install α-tertiary amine motifs, enabling access to natural products with therapeutic potential. Representative examples also include the formation of amines used in dyes and synthetic rubbers, as well as nucleobases like adenine, where amino groups are key to their structure and function in nucleic acids.[15]Historical Overview
The earliest advancements in amination techniques emerged in the mid-19th century, focusing on the reduction of nitro compounds to amines. In 1842, Russian chemist Nikolai Nikolaevich Zinin reported the reduction of nitrobenzene to aniline using ammonium sulfide, marking a foundational method for synthesizing aromatic amines from nitro precursors.[16] This Zinin reduction provided one of the first reliable routes to aniline, which later proved essential for dye production. Toward the end of the century, in 1881, August Wilhelm von Hofmann described the rearrangement of amides to amines with one fewer carbon atom using bromine and base, enabling the synthesis of primary amines from carboxylic acid derivatives. Shortly thereafter, in 1888, Siegmund Gabriel introduced a method for preparing primary alkylamines from alkyl halides via potassium phthalimide, offering a selective alternative that avoided over-alkylation common in direct ammonolysis.[17] The early 20th century saw the development of reductive amination as a versatile approach to amine synthesis, building on earlier formylation techniques. Wilhelm Eschweiler reported in 1905 the use of formaldehyde and formic acid to methylate amines, a process that evolved into a general reductive alkylation method. This was refined in the 1930s by Hans Thacher Clarke, who extended the reaction to efficient N-methylation of primary and secondary amines under mild conditions, facilitating the preparation of tertiary methylamines without isolation of intermediates. These innovations addressed limitations in yield and selectivity from 19th-century methods, laying groundwork for broader applications in organic synthesis. Post-World War II, the rapid growth of the pharmaceutical industry drove widespread industrial adoption of amination reactions, particularly for producing amine-based therapeutics like antibiotics and analgesics. The era's emphasis on scalable synthesis integrated methods such as nitro reductions and reductive aminations into large-scale processes, supporting the development of drugs containing critical amine functionalities.[18] By the late 20th century, catalytic cross-coupling emerged as a transformative milestone; in 1994, John F. Hartwig and Stephen L. Buchwald independently reported palladium-catalyzed amination of aryl halides with amines, enabling efficient C-N bond formation under mild conditions and revolutionizing access to arylamines. In the 2010s, biocatalytic amination gained prominence through protein engineering, offering sustainable alternatives to chemical methods. Directed evolution and rational design produced transaminases and reductive aminases capable of asymmetric amination of ketones and aldehydes, achieving high enantioselectivity in pharmaceutical intermediates.[19] These engineered enzymes, often NAD(P)H-dependent, expanded the scope to non-natural substrates, reducing reliance on harsh reagents and aligning with green chemistry principles.[20]Classification of Amination Reactions
By Reaction Mechanism
Amination reactions are broadly classified by their underlying reaction mechanisms, which dictate the mode of nitrogen-carbon bond formation, reactivity profiles, and compatibility with diverse substrates. This classification emphasizes the electronic nature of the key intermediates and transition states, distinguishing pathways where nitrogen acts as a nucleophile, electrophile, or part of a reductive or radical process, with pericyclic routes being less prevalent. Such categorization aids in selecting appropriate conditions for synthetic applications, as each mechanism offers unique advantages in terms of efficiency and selectivity.[21] Nucleophilic mechanisms involve the direct attack of an amine nucleophile or ammonia on an electrophilic carbon center, often proceeding through an SN2 displacement on alkyl halides or similar leaving group-bearing substrates. This pathway is characterized by inversion of configuration at the carbon and is most effective for unhindered primary and secondary electrophiles, though it can extend to allylic or benzylic systems under milder conditions. The mechanism relies on the nucleophilicity of the nitrogen species and the electrophilicity of the carbon, typically requiring polar aprotic solvents to enhance rates. Seminal studies highlight its utility in classical amine synthesis, with activation barriers around 20-25 kcal/mol for simple SN2 processes. Electrophilic mechanisms introduce the amino group via an electrophilic nitrogen source, such as azides, hydroxylamine derivatives, or nitrenoids, which react with nucleophilic carbon centers like enolates or organometallics. In these processes, the nitrogen acts as the electrophile, often facilitated by transition metal catalysts that generate reactive intermediates like metal-bound nitrenes. This approach is particularly valuable for α-amination of carbonyl compounds or C-H functionalization, where the electrophilic nitrogen transfers directly to electron-rich sites. Reviews underscore its orthogonality to nucleophilic routes, enabling access to motifs challenging via traditional methods, with high functional group tolerance in modern variants.[22][21] Reductive mechanisms center on the formation of imine or enamine intermediates from carbonyl compounds and amines, followed by reduction to the corresponding amine product. This two-step process, often one-pot, leverages hydride donors like sodium cyanoborohydride or catalytic hydrogenation to convert the C=N bond to C-NH. The imine formation is nucleophilic addition, while the reduction step avoids over-reduction of the carbonyl. Widely adopted for its versatility in synthesizing secondary and tertiary amines, this mechanism exhibits moderate activation energies for the reductive phase under catalytic conditions and excellent stereoselectivity when chiral reductants are employed. Enzymatic variants briefly parallel this pathway but are covered elsewhere.[23][24] Radical and pericyclic mechanisms represent rarer classes for amination, offering orthogonal selectivity for complex syntheses. Radical pathways involve nitrogen-centered radicals generated from precursors like N-haloamides or azides, which add to unsaturated systems or abstract hydrogen in C-H aminations, often under photochemical or metal-catalyzed initiation. These exhibit low activation barriers due to the reactivity of radicals, enabling mild conditions and broad functional group tolerance, though stereocontrol remains challenging without directing groups. Pericyclic mechanisms, such as aza-Diels-Alder cycloadditions, proceed concertedly through cyclic transition states to incorporate nitrogen into heterocycles, providing inherent stereoselectivity via endo/exo preferences but limited to specific diene-dienophile pairs.[25][26][27]| Mechanism | Activation Energy (qualitative) | Stereoselectivity | Functional Group Tolerance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nucleophilic | Medium | Substrate-dependent (inversion in SN2) | Moderate; sensitive to basic conditions |
| Electrophilic | Medium to high | Good with chiral ligands | High; tolerant of metals and heterocycles |
| Reductive | Low to medium | Excellent with asymmetric catalysts | High; compatible with carbonyls and alcohols |
| Radical | Low | Variable; improving with photoredox | Very high; mild conditions for sensitive groups |
| Pericyclic | Low (concerted) | Inherent (suprafacial, endo rule) | Moderate; limited by diene stability |
By Substrate Type
Amination reactions can be classified based on the starting organic substrate, which influences the reaction compatibility, functional group tolerance, and overall selectivity in forming C–N bonds. This approach highlights how substrate structure dictates the choice of method, with each type offering distinct advantages in terms of accessibility and mildness, though often requiring specific conditions to avoid side reactions.[28] Carbonyl substrates, such as aldehydes and ketones, are among the most versatile for amination, primarily through imine or enamine formation followed by reduction, as seen in reductive amination processes. These reactions proceed under relatively mild conditions, accommodating a wide range of primary and secondary amines, and are particularly effective for synthesizing secondary and tertiary amines with good chemoselectivity. However, selectivity can diminish with sterically hindered carbonyls or amines, leading to over-reduction or imine hydrolysis. A seminal example is the asymmetric reductive amination developed by Merck for sitagliptin synthesis, achieving 98% yield and 95% enantiomeric excess using a Rh catalyst.[28] Alkyl and aryl halides serve as electrophilic substrates in nucleophilic substitution reactions for amination, enabling the formation of primary amines while minimizing over-alkylation. The Gabriel synthesis, utilizing potassium phthalimide as a nucleophile, exemplifies this approach for primary alkyl halides, offering high selectivity for primary amines and tolerance to basic conditions, though it requires subsequent hydrolysis and is limited to non-hindered halides. Aryl halides, often less reactive, benefit from transition metal catalysis like Pd or Cu systems to enhance coupling efficiency with amines. These methods are straightforward but suffer from low atom economy due to byproduct formation and challenges in separating polyalkylated products.[28][29] Alkenes and alkynes undergo amination via addition reactions, such as hydroamination, which directly installs the amine group across the unsaturated bond in an atom-economical manner. These substrates typically require transition metal catalysts (e.g., Rh or Pd) to overcome high activation barriers, with selectivity favoring Markovnikov addition and up to 99% enantiomeric excess in asymmetric variants. Unactivated alkenes pose challenges in regioselectivity, often necessitating directing groups or specialized ligands, but this class excels for constructing allylic or propargylic amines. Seminal contributions include Hartwig's Rh-catalyzed intermolecular hydroamination of alkenes reported in 2003, demonstrating broad substrate scope.[28] Nitro compounds and nitriles are reduced to amines, providing a robust route from readily available precursors, with nitroarenes showing excellent functional group tolerance under catalytic hydrogenation or metal-mediated conditions. Reduction of nitriles yields primary amines selectively, often using heterogeneous catalysts like Raney nickel, though aliphatic nitriles can lead to lower yields due to oligomerization. This substrate class is advantageous for large-scale production but may involve harsher reducing agents. A notable advance is Baran's 2015 Fe-catalyzed hydroamination of nitroarenes, achieving high yields for hindered anilines via radical pathways.[28]| Substrate Type | Key Methods | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carbonyl compounds | Reductive amination | Mild conditions, broad amine scope | Poor selectivity with hindered substrates |
| Alkyl/aryl halides | Nucleophilic substitution (e.g., Gabriel) | High primary amine selectivity | Over-alkylation, low atom economy |
| Alkenes/alkynes | Hydroamination | Atom-economical, direct C–N formation | Requires catalysts, regioselectivity issues |
| Nitro/nitriles | Reduction | Excellent tolerance, scalable | Potential oligomerization, harsh reductants |
