Hubbry Logo
Automatic link establishmentAutomatic link establishmentMain
Open search
Automatic link establishment
Community hub
Automatic link establishment
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Automatic link establishment
Automatic link establishment
from Wikipedia

Automatic Link Establishment, commonly known as ALE, is the worldwide de facto standard for digitally initiating and sustaining HF radio communications.[1] ALE is a feature in an HF communications radio transceiver system that enables the radio station to make contact, or initiate a circuit, between itself and another HF radio station or network of stations. The purpose is to provide a reliable rapid method of calling and connecting during constantly changing HF ionospheric propagation, reception interference, and shared spectrum use of busy or congested HF channels.

Mechanism

[edit]
ATF Dingo of German Bundeswehr equipped with ALE capable HF-transceiver HRM-7000 in Afghanistan 2011

A standalone ALE radio combines an HF SSB radio transceiver with an internal microprocessor and MFSK modem. It is programmed with a unique ALE address, similar to a phone number (or on newer generations, a username). When not actively in contact with another station, the HF SSB transceiver constantly scans through a list of HF frequencies called channels, listening for any ALE signals transmitted by other radio stations. It decodes calls and soundings sent by other stations and uses the bit error rate to store a quality score for that frequency and sender-address.

To reach a specific station, the caller enters the ALE Address. On many ALE radios this is similar to dialing a phone number. The ALE controller selects the best available idle channel for that destination address. After confirming the channel is indeed idle, it then sends a brief selective calling signal identifying the intended recipient. When the distant scanning station detects ALE activity, it stops scanning and stays on that channel until it can confirm whether or not the call is for it. The two stations' ALE controllers automatically handshake to confirm that a link of sufficient quality has been established, then notify the operators that the link is up. If the callee fails to respond or the handshaking fails, the originating ALE node usually selects another frequency either at random or by making a guess of varying sophistication.

Upon successful linking, the receiving station generally emits an audible alarm and shows a visual alert to the operator, thus indicating the incoming call. It also indicates the callsign or other identifying information of the linked station, similar to Caller ID. The operator then un-mutes the radio and answers the call then can talk in a regular conversation or negotiates a data link using voice or the ALE built-in short text message format. Alternatively, digital data can be exchanged via a built-in or external modem (such as a STANAG 5066 or MIL-STD-188-110B serial tone modem) depending on needs and availability. The ALE built-in text messaging facility can be used to transfer short text messages as an "orderwire" to allow operators to coordinate external equipment such as phone patches or non-embedded digital links, or for short tactical messages.[2][3]

Common applications

[edit]

An ALE radio system enables connection for voice conversation, alerting, data exchange, texting, instant messaging, email, file transfer, image, geo-position tracking, or telemetry. With a radio operator initiating a call, the process normally takes a few minutes for the ALE to pick an HF frequency that is optimum for both sides of the communication link. It signals the operators audibly and visually on both ends, so they can begin communicating with each other immediately. In this respect, the longstanding need in HF radio for repetitive calling on pre-determined time schedules or tedious monitoring static is eliminated. It is useful as a tool for finding optimum channels to communicate between stations in real-time. In modern HF communications, ALE has largely replaced HF prediction charts, propagation beacons, chirp sounders, propagation prediction software, and traditional radio operator educated guesswork. ALE is most commonly used for hooking up operators for voice contacts on SSB (single-sideband modulation), HF internet connectivity for email, SMS phone texting or text messaging, real-time chat via HF text, Geo Position Reporting, and file transfer. High Frequency Internet Protocol or HFIP may be used with ALE for internet access via HF.

Techniques

[edit]

The essence of ALE techniques is the use of automatic channel selection, scanning receivers, selective calling, handshaking, and robust burst modems.[4] An ALE node decodes all received ALE signals heard on the channel(s) it monitors. It uses the fact that all ALE messages use forward error correction (FEC) redundancy. By noting how much error-correction occurred in each received and decoded message, an ALE node can detect the "quality" of the path between the sending station and itself. This information is coupled with the ALE address of the sending node and the channel the message was received on, and stored in the node's Link Quality Analysis (LQA) memory.[3] When a call is initiated, the LQA lookup table is searched for matches involving the target ALE address and the best historic channel is used to call the target station. This reduces the likelihood that the call has to be repeated on alternate frequencies. Once the target station has heard the call and responded, a bell or other signalling device will notify both operators that a link has been established. At this point, the operators may coordinate further communication via orderwire text messages, voice, or other means. If further digital communication is desired, it may take place via external data modems or via optional modems built into the ALE terminal.

This unusual usage of FEC redundancy is the primary innovation that differentiates ALE from previous selective calling systems which either decoded a call or failed to decode due to noise or interference. A binary outcome of "Good enough" or not gave no way of automatically choosing between two channels, both of which are currently good enough for minimum communications. The redundancy-based scoring inherent in ALE thus allows for selecting the "best" available channel and (in more advanced ALE nodes) using all decoded traffic over some time window to sort channels into a list of decreasing probability-to-contact, significantly reducing co-channel interference to other users as well as dramatically decreasing the time needed to successfully link with the target node.

Techniques used in the ALE standard include automatic signaling, automatic station identification (sounding), polling, message store-and-forward, linking protection and anti-spoofing to prevent hostile denial of service by ending the channel scanning process. Optional ALE functions include polling and the exchange of orderwire commands and messages. The orderwire message, known as AMD (Automatic Message Display), is the most commonly used text transfer method of ALE, and the only universal method that all ALE controllers have in common for displaying text.[5] It is common for vendors to offer extensions to AMD for various non-standard features, although dependency on these extensions undermines interoperability. As in all interoperability scenarios, care should be taken to determine if this is acceptable before using such extensions.

History and precedents

[edit]

ALE evolved from older HF radio selective calling technology. It combined existing channel-scanning selective calling concepts with microprocessors (enabling FEC decoding and quality scoring decisions), burst transmissions (minimizing co-channel interference), and transponding (allowing unattended operation and incoming-call signalling). Early ALE systems were developed in the late 1970s and early 1980s by several radio manufacturers.[6] The first ALE-family controller units were external rack mounted controllers connected to control military radios, and were rarely interoperable across vendors.

Various methods and proprietary digital signaling protocols were used by different manufacturers in first generation ALE, leading to incompatibility.[3] Later, a cooperative effort among manufacturers and the US government resulted in a second generation of ALE that included the features of first generation systems, while improving performance. The second generation 2G ALE system standard in 1986, MIL-STD-188-141A,[5] was adopted in FED-STD-1045[7] for US federal entities. In the 1980s, military and other entities of the US government began installing early ALE units, using ALE controller products built primarily by US companies. The primary application during the first 10 years of ALE use was government and military radio systems, and the limited customer base combined with the necessity to adhere to MILSPEC standards kept prices extremely high. Over time, demand for ALE capabilities spread and by the late 1990s, most new government HF radios purchased were designed to meet at least the minimum ALE interoperability standard, making them eligible for use with standard ALE node gear. Radios implementing at least minimum ALE node functionality as an option internal to the radio became more common and significantly more affordable. As the standards were adopted by other governments worldwide, more manufacturers produced competitively priced HF radios to meet this demand. The need to interoperate with government organizations prompted many non-government organizations (NGOs) to at least partially adopt ALE standards for communication. As non-military experience spread and prices came down, other civilian entities started using 2G ALE. By the year 2000, there were enough civilian and government organizations worldwide using ALE that it became a de facto HF interoperability standard for situations where a priori channel and address coordination is possible.

In the late 1990s, a third generation 3G ALE with significantly improved capability and performance was included in MIL-STD-188-141B,[5] retaining backward compatibility with 2G ALE, and was adopted in NATO STANAG 4538. Civilian and non-government adoption rates are much lower than 2G ALE due to the extreme cost as compared to surplus or entry-level 2G gear as well as the significantly increased system and planning complexity necessary to realize the benefits inherent in the 3G specification. For many militaries, whose needs for maximized intra-organizational capability and capacity always strain existing systems, the additional cost and complexity of 3G are less problematic.

Reliability

[edit]

ALE enables rapid unscheduled communication and message passing without requiring complex message centers, multiple radios and antennas, or highly trained operators. With the removal of these potential sources of failure, the tactical communication process becomes much more robust and reliable. The effects extend beyond mere force multiplication of existing communications methods; units such as helicopters, when outfitted with ALE radios, can now reliably communicate in situations where the crew are too busy to operate a traditional non-line of sight radio.[8] This ability to enable tactical communication in conditions where dedicated trained operators and hardware are inappropriate is often considered to be the true improvement offered by ALE.

ALE is a critical path toward increased interoperability between organizations. By enabling a station to participate nearly simultaneously in many different HF networks, ALE allows for convenient cross-organization message passing and monitoring without requiring dedicated separate equipment and operators for each partner organization. This dramatically reduces staffing and equipment considerations, while enabling small mobile or portable stations to participate in multiple networks and subnetworks. The result is increased resilience, decreased fragility, increased ability to communicate information effectively, and the ability to rapidly add to or replace communication points as the situation demands.

When combined with Near Vertical Incidence Skywave (NVIS) techniques and sufficient channels spread across the spectrum, an ALE node can provide greater than 95% success linking on the first call, nearly on par with SATCOM systems. This is significantly more reliable than cellphone infrastructure during disasters or wars yet is mostly immune to such considerations itself.

Standards and protocols

[edit]

Global standards for ALE are based on the original US MIL-STD 188-141A[5] and FED-1045,[7] known as 2nd Generation (2G) ALE. 2G ALE uses non-synchronised scanning of channels, and it takes several seconds to half a minute to repeatedly scan through an entire list of channels looking for calls. Thus it requires sufficient duration of transmission time for calls to connect or link with another station that is unsynchronised with its calling signal. The vast majority of ALE systems in use in the world at the present time are 2G ALE.

2G technical characteristics

[edit]
2G ALE Signal

The more common 2G ALE signal waveform is designed to be compatible with standard 3 kHz SSB narrowband voice channel transceivers. The modulation method is 8ary Frequency Shift Keying or 8FSK, also sometimes called Multi Frequency Shift Keying MFSK, with eight orthogonal tones between 750 and 2500 Hz.[5] Each tone is 8 ms long, resulting in a transmitted over-the-air symbol rate of 125 baud or 125 symbols per second, with a raw data rate of 375 bits per second. The ALE data is formatted in 24-bit frames, which consist of a 3-bit preamble followed by three ASCII characters, each seven bits long. The received signal is usually decoded using digital signal processing techniques that are capable of recovering the 8FSK signal at a negative decibel signal-to-noise ratio (i.e., the signal may be recovered even when it is below the noise level). The over-the-air layers of the protocol involve the use of forward error correction, redundancy, and handshaking transponding similar to those used in ARQ techniques.[9]

3G technical characteristics

[edit]

Newer standards of ALE, called 3rd Generation or 3G ALE, use accurate time synchronization (via a defined time-synch protocol as well as the option of GPS-locked clocks) to achieve faster and more dependable linking. Through synchronization, the calling time to achieve a link may be reduced to less than 10 seconds. The 3G ALE modem signal also provides better robustness and can work in channel conditions that are less favorable than 2G ALE.[10] Dwell groups, limited callsigns, and shorter burst transmissions enable more rapid intervals of scanning. All stations in the same group scan and receive each channel at precisely the same time window. Although 3G ALE is more reliable and has significantly enhanced channel-time efficiency, the existence of a large installed base of 2G ALE radio systems and the wide availability of moderately priced (often military surplus) equipment, has made 2G the baseline standard for global interoperability.

Basis for HF interoperability communications

[edit]

Interoperability is a critical issue for the disparate entities which use radiocommunications to fulfill the needs of organizations. Largely due to the ubiquity of 2G ALE, it became the primary method for providing interoperability on HF between governmental and non-governmental disaster relief and emergency communications entities, and amateur radio volunteers. With digital techniques increasingly employed in communications equipment, a universal digital calling standard was needed, and ALE filled the gap. Nearly every major HF radio manufacturer in the world builds ALE radios to the 2G standard to meet the high demand that new installations of HF radio systems conform to this standard protocol. Disparate entities that historically used incompatible radio methods were then able to call and converse with each other using the common 2G ALE platform. Some manufacturers and organizations[11] have used the AMD feature of ALE to expand the performance and connectivity.[12] In some cases, this has been successful, and in other cases, the use of proprietary preamble or embedded commands has led to interoperability problems.

Tactical communication and resource management

[edit]

ALE serves as a convenient method of beyond line of sight communication. Originally developed to support military requirements, ALE is useful to many organizations who find themselves managing widely located units. United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement and United States Coast Guard are two members of the Customs Over the Horizon Enforcement Network (COTHEN), a MIL-STD 188-141A ALE network.[13] All U.S. armed forces operate multiple similar networks. Similarly, shortwave utility listeners have documented frequency and callsign lists for many nations' military and guard units, as well as networks operated by oil exploration and production companies and public utilities in many countries.

Emergency / disaster relief or extraordinary situation response communications

[edit]

ALE radio communication systems for both HF regional area networks and HF interoperability communications are in service among emergency and disaster relief agencies as well as military and guard forces. Extraordinary response agencies and organizations use ALE to respond to situations in the world where conventional communications may have been temporarily overloaded or damaged. In many cases, it is in place as alternative back-channel for organizations that may have to respond to situations or scenarios involving the loss of conventional communications. Earthquakes, storms, volcanic eruptions, and power or communication infrastructure failures are typical situations in which organizations may deem ALE necessary to operations. ALE networks are common among organizations engaged in extraordinary situation response such as: natural and man-made disasters, transportation, power, or telecommunication network failures, war, peacekeeping, or stability operations. Organizations known to use ALE for Emergency management, disaster relief, ordinary communication or extraordinary situation response include: Red Cross, FEMA, Disaster Medical Assistance Teams, NATO, Federal Bureau of Investigation, United Nations, AT&T, Civil Air Patrol, SHARES, State of California Emergency Management Agency (CalEMA), other US States' Offices of Emergency Services or Emergency Management Agencies, and Amateur Radio Emergency Service (ARES).[11]

International HF telecommunications for disaster relief

[edit]

The International Telecommunication Union (ITU), in response to the need for interoperation in international disaster response spurred largely by humanitarian relief, included ALE in its Telecommunications for Disaster Relief recommendations.[4] The increasing need for instant connectivity for logistical and tactical disaster relief response communications, such as the 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake tsunami led to ITU actions of encouragement to countries around the world toward loosening restrictions on such communications and equipment border transit during catastrophic disasters. The IARU Global Amateur Radio Emergency Communications Conferences (GAREC) and IARU Global Simulated Emergency Tests have included ALE.[14]

Use in amateur radio

[edit]

Amateur radio operators began sporadic ALE operation on a limited basis in the early to mid-1990s,[3] with commercial ALE radios and ALE controllers. In 2000, the first widely available software ALE controller for the Personal Computer, PCALE, became available, and hams started to set up stations based on it. In 2001, the first organized and coordinated global ALE nets for International Amateur Radio began. In August 2005, ham radio operators supporting communications for emergency Red Cross shelters used ALE for Disaster Relief operations during the Hurricane Katrina disaster.[11] After the event, hams developed more permanent ALE emergency/disaster relief networks, including internet connectivity, with a focus on interoperation between organizations. The amateur radio HFLink Automatic Link Establishment system uses an open net protocol to enable all amateur radio operators and amateur radio nets worldwide to participate in ALE and share the same ALE channels legally and interoperably. Amateur radio operators may use it to call each other for voice or data communications.[2]

Amateur radio interoperability adaptations

[edit]

Amateur radio operators commonly provide local, regional, national, and international emergency / disaster relief communications.[14] The need for interoperability on HF led to the adoption of ALE open networks by hams. Amateur radio adapted 2G ALE techniques, by using the common denominators of the 2G ALE protocol, with a limited subset of features found in the majority of all ALE radios and controllers. Each amateur radio ALE station uses the operator's call sign as the address, also known as the ALE Address, in the ALE radio controller.[2] The lowest common denominator technique enables any manufacturer's ALE radios or software to be used for HF interoperability communications and networking. Known as Ham-Friendly ALE, the amateur radio ALE standard is used to establish radio communications, through a combination of active ALE on internationally recognized automatic data frequencies, and passive ALE scanning on voice channels. In this technique, active ALE frequencies include pseudorandom periodic polite station identification, while passive ALE frequencies are silently scanned for selective calling. ALE systems include Listen Before Transmit as a standard function, and in most cases this feature provides better busy channel detection of voice and data signals than the human ear. Ham-Friendly ALE technique is also known as 2.5G ALE, because it maintains 2G ALE compatibility while employing some of the adaptive channel management features of 3G ALE, but without the accurate GPS time synchronization of 3G ALE.

Disaster relief HF network

[edit]

Hot standby ALE nets are in constant operation 24/7/365 for International Emergency and Disaster Relief communications. The Ham Radio Global ALE High Frequency Network, which began service in June 2007, is the world's largest intentionally open ALE network. It is a free open network staffed by volunteers, and used by amateur radio operators supporting disaster relief organizations.[14]

International coordination

[edit]

International amateur radio ALE High Frequency channels are frequency coordinated with all Regions of the International Amateur Radio Union (IARU entity of ITU),[11] for international, regional, national, and local use in the Amateur Radio Service. All Amateur Radio ALE channels use "USB" Upper Sideband standard. Different rules, regulations, and bandplans of the region and local country of operation apply to use of various channels. Some channels may not be available in every country. Primary or global channels are in common with most countries and regions.[15]

International channels

[edit]

This listing is current as of February 2020.[14]

Frequency kHz Mode ALE or Selcall Channel Number Channel Label North America Net Europe Net UK Net Japan Net Australia- NZ Net ITU Region 1 Net ITU Region 2 Net ITU Region 3 Net Preamble Time (seconds)
00473.0 USB SEL 00A 00ASEL HFS HFS HFS HFS HFS HFS HFS HFS 15.0
00475.5 USB ALE 00B 00BALE HFL HFL HFL HFL HFL HFL HFL HFL 15.0
01838.0 USB SEL 01A 01ASEL HFR HFR HFS HFS HFR HFR HFR 15.0
01843.0 USB ALE 01B 01BALE HFN HFL HFL HFL HFL HFL HFL 15.0
01908.0 USB SEL 01C 01CSEL HFS HFS 15.0
01909.0 USB ALE 01D 01DALE HFL HFL 15.0
01990.0 USB SEL 01E 01ESEL HFS HFS HFS HFS 15.0
01996.0 USB ALE 01F 01FALE HFL HFN HFL 15.0
03527.0 USB ALE 03A 03AALE HFN 15.0
03529.0 USB SEL 03B 03BSEL HFR 15.0
03590.0 USB SEL 03C 03CSEL HFR HFR HFR HFR HFR HFR HFR 15.0
03596.0 USB ALE 03D 03DALE HFN HFN HFN HFN HFN HFN HFN 15.0
03600.5 USB ALE 03E 03EALE HFL HFL HFL 15.0
03605.0 USB SEL 03F 03FSEL HFS HFS HFS 15.0
03710.0 USB SEL 03G 03GSEL HFX HFX HFX 15.0
03791.0 USB ALE 03H 03HALE HFL HFL HFL HFL 15.0
03795.0 USB SEL 03I 03ISEL HFS HFS HFS HFS HFS 15.0
03845.0 USB SEL 03J 03JSEL HFS 15.0
03995.0 USB SEL 03K 03KSEL HFS 15.0
03996.0 USB ALE 03L 03LALE HFL 15.0
05102.0 USB SEL 05A 05ASEL HFX 15.0
05346.5 USB SEL 05B 05BSEL HFR 15.0
05354.5 USB ALE 05C 05CALE HFL HFL HFL HFL HFL 15.0
05355.0 USB SEL 05D 05DSEL HFR HFR HFR HFR HFR 15.0
05357.0 USB ALE 05E 05EALE HFL HFL HFL HFL HFL 15.0
05363.0 USB SEL 05F 05FSEL HFS HFS HFS HFS 15.0
05371.5 USB ALE 05G 05GALE HFL HFL 15.0
05403.5 USB SEL 05H 05HSEL HFS HFS 15.0
07044.0 USB SEL 07A 07ASEL HFR HFR HFR HFR HFR HFR HFR 15.0
07049.5 USB ALE 07B 07BALE HFL HFL HFL HFL HFL 15.0
07100.0 USB SEL 07C 07CSEL HFR 15.0
07102.0 USB ALE 07D 07DALE HFN HFN HFN HFN HFN HFN HFN HFN 15.0
07185.0 USB ALE 07E 07EALE HFL HFL HFL HFL HFL HFL HFL 15.0
07195.0 USB SEL 07F 07FSEL HFS HFS HFS HFS HFS HFS HFS HFS 15.0
07291.0 USB SEL 07G 07GSEL HFS 15.0
07296.0 USB ALE 07H 07HALE HFL 15.0
10126.0 USB SEL 10A 10ASEL HFS HFS HFS 15.0
10131.0 USB ALE 10B 10BALE HFL HFL HFL 15.0
10144.0 USB SEL 10C 10CSEL HFR HFR HFR HFR HFR HFR HFR HFR 15.0
10145.5 USB ALE 10D 10DALE HFN HFN HFN HFN HFN HFN HFN HFN 15.0
14094.0 USB SEL 14A 14ASEL HFR HFR HFR HFR HFR HFR HFR HFR 15.0
14109.0 USB ALE 14B 14BALE HFN HFN HFN HFN HFN HFN HFN HFN 15.0
14122.0 USB SEL 14C 14CSEL HFX HFX HFX 15.0
14343.0 USB SEL 14D 14DSEL HFS HFS HFS HFS HFS HFS HFS HFS 15.0
14346.0 USB ALE 14E 14EALE HFL HFL HFL HFL HFL HFL HFL HFL 15.0
18106.0 USB ALE 18A 18AALE HFN HFN HFN HFN HFN HFN HFN HFN 15.0
18107.0 USB SEL 18B 18BSEL HFR HFR HFR HFR HFR HFR HFR HFR 15.0
18113.0 USB SEL 18C 18CSEL HFX HFX HFX 15.0
18117.5 USB ALE 18D 18DALE HFL HFL HFL HFL HFL HFL HFL HFL 15.0
18163.0 USB SEL 18E 18ESEL HFS HFS HFS HFS HFS HFS HFS HFS 15.0
21094.0 USB SEL 21A 21ASEL HFR HFR HFR HFR HFR HFR HFR HFR 15.0
21096.0 USB ALE 21B 21BALE HFN HFN HFN HFN HFN HFN HFN HFN 15.0
21228.0 USB SEL 21C 21CSEL HFX HFX HFX 15.0
21427.0 USB SEL 21D 21DSEL HFS HFS HFS HFS HFS HFS HFS HFS 15.0
21432.5 USB ALE 21E 21EALE HFL HFL HFL HFL HFL HFL HFL HFL 15.0
24924.0 USB SEL 24A 24ASEL HFR HFR HFR HFR HFR HFR HFR HFR 15.0
24926.0 USB ALE 24B 24BALE HFN HFN HFN HFN HFN HFN HFN HFN 15.0
24932.0 USB ALE 24C 24CALE HFL HFL HFL HFL HFL HFL HFL HFL 15.0
24977.0 USB SEL 24D 24DSEL HFS HFS HFS HFS HFS HFS HFS HFS 15.0
28143.0 USB SEL 28A 28ASEL HFR HFR HFR HFR HFR HFR HFR HFR 15.0
28146.0 USB ALE 28B 28BALE HFN HFN HFN HFN HFN HFN HFN HFN 15.0
28305.0 USB SEL 28C 28CSEL HFS HFS HFS HFS HFS HFS HFS HFS 15.0
28312.5 USB ALE 28D 28DALE HFL HFL HFL HFL HFL HFL HFL HFL 15.0
29520.0 FM SEL 29A 29ASEL HFM HFM HFM HFM HFM HFM HFM HFM 6.0

Frequency table notes: Automatic Link Establishment ALE channel frequencies in the Amateur Radio Service are internationally coordinated with selective calling Selcall channels for interoperability purposes. Net is the ALE net address or Selcall net name.

Standard configurations

[edit]
Note Configuration Standard
1 ALE System MIL-STD 188-141B; FED-1045 (8FSK, 2 kHz bandwidth)[5]
2 Transmission duration Calling optimum 15 seconds; or preamble 15 seconds.
3 Scan rate 1, 2, or 5 channels per second. Minimum dwell time 120 milliseconds per channel for ALE and 300 milliseconds for selcall.
4 Sounding Interval 60 Minutes or more (for same channel)
5 Audio Centre Frequency 1625 Hz for digital mode text and data
6 Messaging standard AMD (Automatic Message Display) Universal short texting[5]
7 Sounding Type TWS Sounding (This Was Sound)[5]
8 Tune Time 3000 milliseconds or approximately 3 seconds[5]

International nets

[edit]
NET Protocol Content Status Sounding Net Slots Purpose
HFL ALE Voice Open Manual 3 Normal communications and emergency
HFN ALE Texting Open Auto 1 hour 3 Normal communications
HFR Selcall Texting Open Auto 1 hour 1 Normal communications
HFS Selcall Voice Open Manual 1 Normal communications and emergency
HFM Selcall Texting or Voice Open Manual 1 Normal communications
HFX ALE or Selcall Texting or Voice Open Manual 1 Inactive or auxiliary frequencies

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Automatic Link Establishment (ALE) is a standardized suite of protocols and techniques for high-frequency (HF) radio systems that enables stations to automatically detect optimal transmission frequencies, initiate contact, and establish reliable communication links without manual operator intervention, adapting to variable ionospheric propagation conditions in the 2–30 MHz band. Developed primarily for applications, ALE has evolved into a worldwide standard for digitally initiating and sustaining HF single-sideband (SSB) communications, supporting point-to-point, net, and group calls through automated scanning, selective signaling, and link quality assessment. The core mechanism of ALE involves continuous channel scanning at rates of 2–5 channels per second across predefined frequency sets, during which stations transmit short digital sounding signals to probe propagation paths. These signals allow receiving stations to perform Link Quality Analysis (LQA), evaluating metrics such as (BER), signal-to-noise-and-distortion ratio (SINAD), and multipath effects to assign quality scores (0–30) to potential channels. Upon detecting a call—initiated via a three-way handshake protocol using 8-ary (FSK) modulation at 375 bits per second—the stations negotiate the best channel, switch to it, and transition to voice or data modes, ensuring robust connectivity even in dynamic environments. Standardized under MIL-STD-188-141 (with revisions A through D) and NATO STANAG 4538 for third-generation implementations, ALE incorporates (FEC) via Golay codes, interleaving for redundancy, and optional linking protection against jamming or eavesdropping. It supports advanced features like Automatic Message Display () for short text exchanges at up to 100 words per minute, store-and-forward messaging, and integration with frequency-hopping for anti-jam operations, making it essential for tactical military networks, emergency response, maritime, and operations. By eliminating the need for propagation forecasts or skilled frequency selection, ALE significantly enhances the reliability and efficiency of HF communications in scenarios where or VHF/UHF links are unavailable.

Introduction

Definition and purpose

Automatic Link Establishment (ALE) is a digital protocol suite that enables high- (HF) radio stations to automatically select the most suitable operating frequency and establish a communication link between stations without requiring manual operator intervention. This system operates under processor control, utilizing predefined protocols to manage the linking process autonomously. The primary purpose of ALE is to address the inherent variability of HF radio propagation, which is heavily influenced by fluctuating ionospheric conditions such as solar activity, time of day, and geomagnetic disturbances that can render certain unusable or degrade signal quality. By automating assessment through periodic sounding signals and link quality analysis, ALE ensures rapid adaptation to these dynamic channel conditions, facilitating reliable communications in environments where manual tuning would be impractical or error-prone. Core benefits of ALE include significantly reduced operator workload, as it eliminates the need for skilled personnel to manually select and switch frequencies during operations. It also achieves faster connection times, typically ranging from 2 to 10 seconds in advanced systems, compared to manual methods that can take minutes. Additionally, ALE enhances efficiency by optimizing usage in real-time and minimizing interference through targeted transmissions on viable channels.

Role in HF radio communications

In high-frequency (HF) radio communications, which operate within the 3-30 MHz band, signals predominantly rely on skywave propagation, where radio waves reflect off the ionosphere to enable long-distance transmission beyond line-of-sight limitations. This propagation mode introduces inherent uncertainties due to ionospheric variations influenced by time of day, season, solar activity, and geomagnetic conditions, which can unpredictably alter the maximum usable frequency (MUF) and lowest usable frequency (LUF). ALE addresses these challenges by dynamically assessing and selecting frequencies closest to the MUF, thereby optimizing link reliability in variable conditions. Furthermore, ALE mitigates multipath fading—arising from multiple ionospheric reflections that cause signal interference and delay spread—and the high levels of atmospheric and man-made noise typical in HF environments, through techniques like real-time channel evaluation and adaptive frequency selection. ALE integrates as a protocol layer atop existing HF modes, such as single-sideband (SSB) voice, continuous wave (), and data services including and , without requiring modifications to the underlying modulation schemes. It facilitates this by automating the scanning of predefined frequency pools—typically 10 to 20 channels—and conducting periodic sounding signals to probe channel quality via metrics like (SNR) and (BER). This layered approach ensures that once a suitable channel is identified, the system seamlessly switches to support the intended communication mode, enhancing operational efficiency in networks where manual frequency management would be impractical. Effective ALE deployment necessitates transceivers with integrated (DSP) hardware to manage the protocol's complex waveforms, error correction, and rapid scanning rates of 2-5 channels per second. These DSP capabilities enable the decoding of ALE-specific signals for link quality analysis (LQA) and handshaking, while ensuring compliance with interoperability standards that govern frequency agility and synchronization.

Historical Development

Early precedents and precursors

Prior to the development of Automatic Link Establishment (ALE), high-frequency (HF) radio communications during the era predominantly relied on manual frequency selection by trained operators. These operators used personal experience, propagation charts, and logbooks to choose frequencies based on ionospheric conditions, which varied due to solar activity and time of day. In military applications, such as U.S. forces in remote or polar regions, this process involved monitoring multiple channels and adjusting during blackouts, often coordinating via voice or auxiliary systems like satellite links. For instance, the U.S. Program employed manual selection on fixed frequencies (e.g., US-18 and US-19) until the mid-1990s, highlighting the labor-intensive nature of ensuring reliable links amid spectrum limitations and jamming threats. Key precursors emerged in the through U.S. military and civilian efforts to automate aspects of management via ionospheric tools. The Ionospheric Communications Analysis and (IONCAP) program, developed by the (NTIA) in the late 1960s and refined through the , used empirical models and numerical coefficients to forecast HF propagation parameters like maximum usable frequency (MUF). This tool assisted operators in pre-selecting channels, reducing trial-and-error in networks. An extension, ICEPAC (Ionospheric Communications Enhanced Profile Analysis and Circuit ), introduced in the , improved predictions for polar and mid-latitude paths by incorporating profiles and accounting for deviative losses, laying groundwork for real-time adaptive systems. Influential events in the early 1980s, driven by increasing spectrum congestion in operations, spurred trials for automated HF linking. Proprietary systems from manufacturers like Harris (AUTOLINK) and Sunair (SCANCALL) were tested, featuring channel scanning and link quality analysis to select optimal frequencies dynamically. -aligned trials, such as the 1988-1989 Trans-Auroral Tests in , evaluated these in harsh environments, achieving better connectivity than manual methods with lower power requirements. These efforts, amid growing demands for during escalations, directly influenced the 1988 completion of ALE standards like MIL-STD-188-141A, addressing congestion from proliferating HF users.

Evolution from 1G to 3G ALE

The first generation () of Automatic Link Establishment (ALE) emerged in the 1980s and 1990s as a foundational technology for automating HF radio links, primarily defined by FED-STD-1045 (initially issued in 1990 and updated as FED-STD-1045A in 1993). This standard focused on basic functions such as frequency scanning, selective calling, link quality analysis (LQA) using (BER) and signal-to-noise-and-distortion (SINAD) metrics, and simple sounding to assess channel availability without operator intervention. It enabled stations to automatically select and establish links on the best available HF channel, supporting individual, group, and net calls while incorporating rudimentary error control via cyclic redundancy checks (CRC) and Golay forward error correction (FEC). Accompanying standards like FED-STD-1046 provided guidelines for ALE waveforms and protocols, ensuring compatibility across federal HF systems. The transition to second-generation (2G) ALE in the 1990s and 2000s marked a significant advancement, standardized under MIL-STD-188-141A (1988) and refined in MIL-STD-188-141B (1999), with FED-STD-1045B serving as its civilian counterpart. These iterations introduced faster protocols using 8-tone minimum-shift keying (MFSK) modulation at 125 symbols per second, achieving data rates up to 375 bits per second, compared to the slower tones of 1G systems. Key enhancements included improved error correction through Golay encoding and interleaving on 24-bit frames, as well as mandatory Automatic Message Display (AMD) modes for quicker text messaging with automatic repeat request (ARQ). Linking protection levels (AL-0 to AL-4) were added for security, with variable protection intervals to balance speed and robustness. A major milestone was the U.S. Department of Defense's (DoD) adoption of 2G ALE in 1997, mandating its use for interoperability in new HF systems and major upgrades, which accelerated global standardization efforts aligned with NATO STANAG 4203. Third-generation (3G) ALE, developed in the 2010s, built on these foundations with enhanced capabilities outlined in MIL-STD-188-141C (published December 2011, with Change 1 in 2012) and its Appendix C, also harmonized with STANAG 4538. This version incorporated wider bandwidth support up to 24 kHz for wideband HF (WBHF) operations (N x 3 kHz, where N=1 to 8) and adaptive modulation schemes, such as 8-ary (FSK) with rates from 50 to 9600 bits per second based on (SNR). Improvements included time-synchronized scanning with shorter dwell times (e.g., 4 seconds per channel in synchronous mode), advanced quick call (AQC-ALE) for reduced address lengths (up to 6 characters), and protocols like high-rate (HDL) with ARQ for reliable packet transfer in larger networks. The 2012 standardization finalized these features under DoD custodianship (project TCSS-2012-002), enabling order-of-magnitude gains in linking speed and scalability while maintaining with systems. A later revision, MIL-STD-188-141D (2017), further refined these capabilities for enhanced performance in modern tactical environments.

Technical Mechanism

The link establishment process in Automatic Link Establishment (ALE) enables high-frequency (HF) radio stations to automatically select and connect on the optimal channel without operator intervention, relying on a coordinated sequence of signaling and assessment phases. This workflow begins with periodic transmissions to probe channel conditions and progresses through detection, evaluation, and mutual confirmation, ensuring robust links under varying propagation environments. The process is governed by standardized protocols that emphasize rapid setup, typically completing in seconds to minutes depending on network configuration. The initial phase involves periodic sounding, where each station transmits short test signals across a predefined set of channels to announce its availability and allow remote assessment of signal quality. These soundings occur at configurable intervals, such as every 30 to , and consist of encoded frames including station addresses and preambles like "THIS IS" (TIS) for acceptance or "THAT WAS" (TWAS) for rejection. Sounding duration scales with the number of channels, typically around 0.784 seconds per channel, enabling other stations to measure reception without dedicating the full scan cycle. This unilateral broadcast helps build a shared understanding of conditions across the network. During the scanning phase, stations continuously cycle through their programmed channel lists, listening for incoming soundings or calls while pausing transmission to avoid interference. Scanning rates typically range from 2 to 5 channels per second, with dwell times of 200 to 500 milliseconds per channel, completing a full cycle in as little as 2 seconds for 10 channels or up to 50 seconds for larger sets. Upon detecting a valid signal, the receiver performs Link Quality Analysis (LQA) by evaluating metrics such as signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), signal-to-noise and distortion ratio (SINAD), bit error rate (BER), and optional multipath delay. LQA scores, ranging from 0 (unusable, e.g., SNR ≤ -6 dB) to 255 (excellent, e.g., SNR > 21 dB for good voice quality), are computed and stored in a matrix updated with each reception, prioritizing channels with scores above configurable thresholds like 50 for initiation. These scores guide frequency selection, with higher values indicating reliable throughput for voice or data. Handshake initiation follows when a calling station selects the best channel based on its LQA matrix and transmits an ALE call frame addressed to the target using specific codes, such as 3- to 15-character selective call identifiers for individual, group, or net calls. This frame, encoded in multi- shift keying (MFSK) at rates like 375 bits per second, includes the source ("THIS IS") and destination ("TO") addresses, prompting the target to respond if its LQA score for the caller meets the threshold. The process employs a three-way exchange: the call (up to 9-14 seconds window), a response from the target on a potentially different , and an acknowledgment from the caller to confirm mutual detection. This phase embeds selection commands if needed, ensuring both stations align on the optimal channel. Link confirmation occurs upon successful acknowledgment, transitioning both stations to a linked state where they cease scanning and prepare for traffic. The acknowledging frame verifies synchronization and quality, often including pseudo-BER data for final validation, after which the link supports voice via single-sideband (SSB) or data transfer using modulation schemes like (FSK) or (PSK). Establishment times vary, with scanning calls extending beyond one scan cycle if necessary, but typically achieve full-duplex operation within 5-10 seconds in favorable conditions. Fallback mechanisms ensure reliability by retrying the on the next highest LQA-ranked channel if no response is received within the timeout (e.g., after one or more scan periods), or escalating to additional attempts with varied encoding blocks for correction. Persistent failures prompt a switch to manual linking mode, where operators intervene to select frequencies directly, or invocation of relay stations via group call protocols. These retries incorporate (ARQ) elements, retransmitting frames up to a predefined limit before aborting, minimizing in dynamic HF environments.

Signal protocols and formats

Automatic Link Establishment (ALE) employs a layered protocol architecture to facilitate reliable communication over high-frequency (HF) radio channels, primarily operating at the data link and physical layers of the OSI model. The data link layer handles addressing, control signaling, forward error correction (FEC), and link protection, including sublayers for ALE-specific functions such as selective calling and handshaking, as well as optional encryption mechanisms like the Lattice Algorithm with 56-bit keys. The physical layer manages modulation and transmission, ensuring compatibility with single-sideband (SSB) HF transceivers across the 1.6–30 MHz band. In second-generation (2G) ALE, as defined in MIL-STD-188-141B Appendix A and FED-STD-1045, the utilizes 8-ary (8-FSK) modulation at 375 bits per second (bps), with eight tones spaced 250 Hz apart across a 750–2500 Hz range, enabling phase-continuous transitions and a word duration of approximately 131 ms. This modulation supports triple-redundant 24-bit words, each comprising a 3-bit (e.g., TO for transmission onset, TIS for "this is") followed by three 7-bit ASCII fields for addressing and data, with Golay (24,12) block coding and interleaving for error resilience. For third-generation (3G) ALE, outlined in MIL-STD-188-141B Appendix C and STANAG 4538, the shifts to more robust burst waveforms, including 8-ary (8-PSK) serial tone modulation at 2400 symbols per second on an 1800 Hz carrier, using pseudo-noise (PN) spreading with 832 tribit sequences to map phase shifts, alongside support for higher-rate modes up to 4800 bps via bandwidth BW2. Key signal formats in ALE include sounding packets, which are short, unilateral bursts transmitting the station's identifier (e.g., a 1–6 character ASCII padded with "@" symbols) to enable link quality analysis (LQA) by receiving stations, typically lasting at least 784 ms with preambles like or TWAS and repeated at configurable intervals for channel assessment. Link requests initiate connections through a three-way : the calling station sends a frame with a TO preamble, command word (CMD=110), and fields for the called and calling parties, followed by the called station's response and acknowledgment, all encoded in 3-word frames supporting up to 15 characters and frequency selection commands. Status messages, such as LE_Notification protocol data units (PDUs), provide periodic updates on station availability or link conditions, embedded within calls using 11-bit addressing and priority indicators for , , or broadcast scenarios. Bandwidth usage in ALE is optimized for HF constraints, with 2G implementations typically occupying about 1 kHz of audio bandwidth within a 3 kHz RF channel to fit standard SSB filters, achieved through the compact 8-FSK tone set. In contrast, 3G ALE expands to up to 3 kHz bandwidth using scalable burst waveforms (e.g., BW0 for initial handshakes at 613 ms duration), incorporating elements like PN sequences for improved robustness in noisy environments, though without primary reliance on (OFDM).
Aspect2G ALE (MIL-STD-188-141B App. A)3G ALE (MIL-STD-188-141B App. C)
Modulation8-FSK, 375 bps, 250 Hz tone spacing8-PSK serial tone, 2400 sym/s, PN spreading
Key PDU/Word Format24-bit words (preamble + ASCII fields), Golay FECBurst PDUs (e.g., LE_Call: 11-bit address, call type)
Sounding Duration≥784 ms, TIS/TWAS preamblesIntegrated synchronous probes, configurable retries
Link Request3-way , CMD=110 framesProbe-handshake, prioritized slots (e.g., Flash)
Bandwidth (Audio)~1 kHz~3 kHz, scalable BW0–BW4

Standards and Protocols

MIL-STD-188-141 series overview

The MIL-STD-188-141 series comprises a progression of U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) interface standards that define and performance requirements for automatic link establishment (ALE) in medium and (MF/HF) radio equipment. The series originated with MIL-STD-188-141A in 1988, establishing second-generation (2G) ALE protocols for automated channel selection and link setup in HF systems. This initial standard focused on fundamental signaling to enable reliable connections without manual operator intervention, laying the groundwork for subsequent enhancements. MIL-STD-188-141A, released in 1988, established second-generation () ALE with robust waveforms, error correction, and linking protocols. MIL-STD-188-141B (1999) enhanced these features for better performance in dynamic environments. The 2000s saw MIL-STD-188-141B (ratified in 1999) as an enhanced iteration, adding appendices for advanced features like third-generation elements while maintaining . By the , MIL-STD-188-141C (2011) fully integrated third-generation () ALE, emphasizing robust data messaging and network efficiency. The latest revision, MIL-STD-188-141D (2017), introduces fourth-generation () ALE with capabilities for enhanced data throughput and . These standards ensure among U.S. HF radios and extend to and allied forces through aligned protocols, supporting network topologies such as point-to-point links for direct communications and configurations for centralized coordination. MIL-STD-188-141 has been mandatory for new DoD HF systems to promote seamless integration across tactical and strategic operations. Its frameworks have influenced international standards, including 's STANAG 4538 for ALE, facilitating global allied HF .

2G and 3G technical specifications

Second-generation (2G) Automatic Link Establishment (ALE), as defined in MIL-STD-188-141B Appendix A, employs a with a 125 Hz bandwidth to facilitate efficient scanning across multiple HF channels. This limited bandwidth supports the use of eight orthogonal tones spaced at 125 Hz intervals, enabling low-overhead signaling in noisy environments. The modulation scheme for 2G ALE is 8-ary (FSK), where each symbol represents three bits transmitted at a rate of 125 symbols per second. Sounding cycles, which periodically transmit station identification signals for link assessment, operate on a standard duration of 2.25 seconds per channel to balance scan speed and detection reliability. Link Quality Analysis (LQA) in ALE evaluates channel performance primarily through (SNR) thresholds, classifying a link as good when SNR exceeds 10 dB, which supports reliable voice and low-rate data transmission with bit error rates below 0.02129. Third-generation () ALE, outlined in MIL-STD-188-141C Appendix C and aligned with STANAG 4538, expands capabilities with a bandwidth of up to 3 kHz, allowing for wider signal structures that accommodate higher data rates over HF channels. Adaptive modulation schemes range from quadrature (QPSK) for robust low-SNR conditions to 64-quadrature (64QAM) for high-throughput scenarios, dynamically adjusting based on channel quality. Linking times in 3G ALE are significantly reduced, achieving establishment under 2 seconds via Adaptive Communications Control (AQC) protocols, compared to longer sequences in prior generations. This generation also integrates support for (IP) data transmission over HF, enabling structured messaging and high-speed modes like Data Block Mode (DBM) with capacities up to 261,644 bits per transfer, facilitated by and interleaving. Key differences between and ALE include enhanced multipath handling through channel equalization techniques, which mitigate effects more effectively than the simpler FSK in , and reduced false detections via improved synchronization and address detection protocols. These advancements enable ALE to operate more reliably in dynamic HF propagation conditions while maintaining with systems. Fourth-generation (4G) ALE, as defined in MIL-STD-188-141D Appendix D, supports wideband operations with bandwidths up to 6 kHz, incorporating (OFDM) and (MIMO) techniques for data rates up to 100 kbps in favorable conditions, enhancing capacity for and IP-based applications.

Professional Applications

Military and tactical communications

In military and , Automatic Link Establishment (ALE) plays a critical role in enabling reliable over-the-horizon high-frequency (HF) links for , particularly in environments where or line-of-sight systems may be unavailable or jammed. ALE automates the process of scanning predefined frequency channels to assess conditions and establish the optimal link, allowing mobile units to enter or exit networks dynamically without manual intervention. For instance, in the U.S. Army, ALE integrates with the Single Channel Ground and Airborne Radio System () to extend beyond-line-of-sight (BLOS) communications, enabling tactical units to relay voice and data over hundreds of miles by bridging VHF short-range networks with HF long-haul capabilities. This integration supports automatic net entry through address-based calling and exit via disconnect signals, ensuring seamless connectivity for maneuvering forces. Resource management in tactical ALE operations emphasizes efficient spectrum utilization and resilience against electronic warfare threats. Systems employ dynamic channel selection synchronized via GPS time references, combined with Electronic Counter-Countermeasures (ECCM) protocols, to evade jamming by switching to viable channels while maintaining link quality. Channel loading is assessed through Link Quality Analysis (LQA), which generates a matrix scoring channels from 0 to 100 based on signal-to-noise ratio and error rates, informing bandwidth allocation decisions for voice, data, or IP traffic. Optimal channel plans typically include 10-12 frequencies to balance coverage and minimize interference, with Joint Restricted Frequency List (JRFL) coordination preventing friendly emissions from disrupting operations. These features allow commanders to allocate resources dynamically, prioritizing high-priority traffic in contested environments. ALE's has been demonstrated in multinational exercises, enhancing coalition operations. This tactical application underscores ALE's value in scenarios, where it supports automated linking for up to hundreds of stations while adapting to varying and threat conditions.

Emergency and disaster relief operations

Automatic Link Establishment (ALE) is particularly valuable in emergency and disaster relief operations due to its ability to enable rapid deployment of high-frequency (HF) radio communications in environments lacking conventional infrastructure, such as after natural disasters that destroy cellular towers, power grids, and wired networks. ALE automates the selection of optimal frequencies based on real-time ionospheric conditions, allowing responders to establish reliable links quickly without manual tuning or specialized expertise, thereby minimizing setup time to minutes rather than hours. This capability supports the coordination of remote field teams with command centers, even in remote or rugged terrain where satellite coverage may be intermittent or overloaded. For instance, hybrid systems combining HF ALE with satellite terminals have been employed to bridge gaps in coverage, providing seamless voice and data transfer for logistics and situational awareness in post-disaster scenarios like hurricanes. A notable is the , where a magnitude 7.0 event devastated and surrounding areas, collapsing telecommunications infrastructure and hindering international aid coordination. In response, an international HF ALE network was activated by communicators to relay vital messages, including damage assessments and supply requests, between affected sites and external relief agencies; this effort complemented operations by providing an alternative channel when primary systems failed, facilitating the mobilization of over 1,000 international responders. ALE's automated linking ensured connections across the region despite variable propagation, supporting the delivery of food, water, and medical aid to more than 1.5 million displaced people. Similarly, during the 2023 Turkey-Syria earthquakes, which registered magnitudes of 7.8 and 7.5 and affected over 50,000 fatalities, the (ITU) coordinated HF emergency networks to restore communications in collapsed urban areas. These networks enabled rapid information exchange among rescue teams, local authorities, and international partners like the Emergency Telecommunications Cluster; this setup was crucial for prioritizing resource allocation in the initial 72-hour "golden window" for survivor rescue. In extraordinary situations such as search-and-rescue missions, ALE enhances by incorporating priority queuing mechanisms for voice traffic, where distress or immediate calls are assigned higher precedence over routine transmissions, reducing latency and ensuring critical messages—like location coordinates from beacons—are handled first. This feature, defined in ALE protocols, allows systems to interrupt ongoing links if a higher-priority signal is detected, which proved essential in scenarios with high channel congestion, such as urban disaster zones with multiple simultaneous calls for assistance.

Amateur Radio Applications

Adaptations for amateur use

Amateur radio operators have adapted Automatic Link Establishment (ALE) technology for hobbyist use through implementations that enable digital HF communications while adhering to regulatory constraints. One prominent example is PC-ALE, a Windows-based ALE controller developed by Charles Brain (G4GUO) and supported by the HFLINK community, which facilitates scanning, sounding, calling, and data modes like and ARQ using standard HF transceivers connected via interfaces. This software operates under the open ALE protocol suitable for non-commercial applications, avoiding classified military extensions found in professional systems. Hardware integration for amateur ALE typically involves affordable commercial transceivers interfaced with a , bypassing the need for specialized military-grade equipment. For instance, the , a popular entry-level HF , connects seamlessly to ALE software like PC-ALE or ION2G via USB for control and audio input/output, allowing automated selection and link assessment without physical modifications to the radio. Such setups emphasize cost-effective components, with operators using external sound interfaces or direct USB audio to transmit ALE waveforms while maintaining compatibility with amateur band plans. Legal adaptations ensure ALE operations comply with FCC Part 97 rules, which govern amateur radio service and impose band-specific transmitter power limits to prevent interference. Maximum power is capped at 1.5 kW peak envelope power (PEP) across most HF bands, though lower limits apply on certain segments like 60 meters (100 W PEP effective radiated power). During ALE soundings, stations must transmit their assigned call sign for identification at least every 10 minutes or at the end of each transmission, often integrated into the ALE frame using tools like TWS (Time Weather Station) sounding to meet §97.119 requirements. Additionally, soundings are restricted to designated pilot channels to minimize disruption, with a recommended maximum of two per hour per band, and operators are advised to use the minimum necessary power while monitoring for channel activity.

Networks and international coordination

Organized networks utilizing Automatic Link Establishment (ALE) facilitate global connectivity and interoperability among operators, with the HFLINK serving as the primary global ALE net since its inception in 2001. This open network enables licensed operators worldwide to establish HF links for voice, data, and messaging, operating through groups that support both general communications and specialized applications. HFLINK coordinates pilot stations equipped with scanning ALE transceivers and multiband antennas, maintaining constant availability for link establishment across international boundaries. A key component within the ALE ecosystem is the HFN ( Network), an ALE-based system dedicated to and emergency communications. HFN supports digital between user stations and gateways, providing resilient connectivity when conventional infrastructure fails, such as during or humanitarian crises. This network emphasizes rapid link setup and data , allowing amateur operators to assist in relief efforts by integrating with broader emergency communication frameworks. Coordination among these networks relies on scheduled operations primarily on the 40-meter (7 MHz) and 20-meter (14 MHz) bands, where stations engage in periodic sounding transmissions to probe channel availability. Sounding cycles are synchronized using (UTC), with stations typically transmitting identification signals approximately every 60 minutes to align global participation and optimize link detection across time zones. This UTC-based synchronization ensures efficient scanning and reduces unnecessary transmissions, enhancing network reliability for both routine and sessions. On the international level, amateur ALE networks collaborate with the (IARU) to harmonize frequency usage, incorporating regional band plans that allocate specific ALE channels while accommodating shared spectrum with government and military users. This coordination prevents interference and promotes equitable access, as ALE channels are selected to align with IARU guidelines across Regions 1, 2, and 3, fostering seamless cross-border operations.

Interoperability Features

Frequency planning and channel selection

In Automatic Link Establishment (ALE) systems for high-frequency (HF) radio communications, frequency planning involves the creation of predefined channel pools to ensure reliable link formation across varying ionospheric conditions. These pools typically consist of 6-10 frequencies per band within the 2-30 MHz range, selected to cover diurnal and seasonal propagation variations while minimizing overlap with other users. Such planning emphasizes avoidance of interference by incorporating ionospheric predictions, which model parameters like the maximum usable frequency (MUF) and frequency of optimum traffic (FOT) to identify viable channels below the MUF, using the FOT as the optimum frequency (typically 85% of MUF) for reliable propagation on about 90% of days, with additional lower frequencies for redundancy during poor conditions. Channel selection algorithms in ALE operate automatically by scanning these predefined pools and evaluating options in real time using link quality analysis (LQA) to rank frequencies based on (SNR) or (BER). The system prioritizes the highest-quality channel for transmission, with scanning rates of 2-5 channels per second to balance speed and accuracy, and stores results in for up to 100 channels per set. In crowded spectra, manual overrides allow operators to intervene by halting scans, selecting specific frequencies, or adjusting power levels to accommodate real-time interference or regulatory constraints. Software tools like VOACAP play a central role in predictive planning for interoperable ALE setups, enabling users to simulate HF propagation using ionospheric models such as CCIR coefficients to forecast optimal frequency sets for specific paths and times. These predictions align with standards like F.520 for channel simulation, ensuring compatibility in diverse operational environments. Interoperability in ALE is achieved through standardized protocols in MIL-STD-188-141 and STANAG 4538, allowing mixed / networks to share channel sets and LQA data.

Global relief telecommunications standards

The (ITU) has established key recommendations for high-frequency (HF) communications in disaster relief to ensure global interoperability and reliable emergency broadcasting. Recommendation ITU-R BS.2107 designates specific International Radio for Disaster Relief (IRDR) frequencies in the HF bands for 24/7 emergency use, allowing broadcasters and relief organizations to transmit public warnings and coordination messages without interference. These frequencies are allocated on a first-come, first-served basis and must be coordinated through the ITU's High Frequency Coordination Conference (HFCC) database, promoting standardized access for humanitarian operations worldwide. Representative IRDR frequencies include 5.910 MHz (Band 6), 7.400 MHz (Band 7), and 11.840 MHz (Band 11), which support voice and data transmissions essential for disaster management. These allocations align with broader provisions for distress and safety communications, emphasizing protection from harmful interference to facilitate rapid response in affected regions. The Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) incorporates these ITU standards into its operational frameworks for HF interoperability during humanitarian crises. Through the Global Emergency Telecommunications Cluster (ETC)—co-led by OCHA and the —the guidelines prioritize shared HF radio systems to bridge communication gaps when terrestrial and satellite infrastructure fails. STANAG 5066 provides a layered profile for error-free data transfer over HF links, complementing 3G ALE's adaptive sounding to optimize throughput in variable propagation conditions typical of disaster zones. This supports efficient, low-bandwidth applications such as text messaging and file sharing among international responders.

Performance and Advancements

Reliability factors and metrics

Automatic link establishment (ALE) systems in high-frequency (HF) radio communications face several key reliability factors that influence their performance in dynamic environments. Ionospheric variability is a primary challenge, as fluctuations in electron density due to diurnal cycles, seasonal changes, geomagnetic storms, and solar activity cause signal fading, multipath propagation, and shifts in the maximum usable frequency (MUF) and lowest usable frequency (LUF). These variations occur across timescales from milliseconds (multipath dispersion) to years (11-year solar cycle), leading to Doppler spreading, time dispersion up to 8 ms, and absorption that degrades signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Interference from man-made sources (e.g., power lines, urban noise), atmospheric and galactic noise, and channel congestion further complicates reliable linking by reducing SNR and introducing intersymbol interference. Hardware limitations, such as antenna efficiency, transceiver power output (typically 100-200 W), frequency stability (1 part in 10^6), and environmental tolerances (-30°C to +50°C), also impact performance by affecting signal strength, tuning speed, and overall system robustness. To quantify ALE reliability, several metrics are employed, with second-generation () ALE standards providing benchmarks for evaluation. Link success rate, the probability of establishing a connection on the initial or subsequent attempts, achieves greater than 90% under nominal conditions in ALE, such as ≥95% at 2.5 dB SNR in Gaussian noise channels and ≥85% at +6 dB in modified CCIR good/poor channels. Mean time to establish (MTTE), measuring the duration from call initiation to handshake completion, is typically under 5 seconds for optimized scans (e.g., 2-5 channels per second with 200-500 ms dwell times), though it can extend to 9-14 seconds in multi-channel scenarios depending on delays (up to 70 ms) and retries. Bit error rate (), indicating channel quality via erroneous bits per total bits, targets values below 10^{-4} in operational links, often assessed alongside signal-to-noise-and-distortion (SINAD) and multipath metrics in link quality analysis (LQA). Mitigation strategies enhance these metrics by addressing fading and variability. Diversity reception, using multiple antennas or frequencies, improves link success by exploiting spatial or frequency selectivity to counter multipath and ionospheric effects, achieving up to 90% reliability with six diverse channels at 50% channel quality. Error-correcting codes, such as Golay codes with triple redundancy and interleaving in 2G ALE protocols, reduce BER by correcting burst errors from fading, enabling robust data transfer even in poor SNR conditions. These techniques, combined with adaptive sounding and LQA-based frequency selection, ensure high overall reliability without requiring manual intervention. Recent innovations, such as wideband ALE, build on these foundations to further optimize metrics in contested environments.

Recent innovations post-2020

In 2024, KNL Networks introduced a significant advancement in Automatic Link Establishment (ALE) technology with their CNHF system, capable of establishing HF radio links in just 0.5 seconds without requiring GPS or time . This innovation leverages technology and cognitive networking to simultaneously monitor over 4,000 channels, enabling rapid, interference-free connections in GPS-denied environments such as jammed or contested areas. By eliminating dependencies on external timing sources, the system enhances operational resilience for military and tactical applications, reducing link setup times dramatically compared to traditional ALE methods that rely on synchronized sounding. Extensions to 3G ALE standards have focused on integrating HF systems with modern IP-based networks, as outlined in Isode's ongoing HF vision for IP-native communications. This approach uses STANAG 5066 protocols to enable seamless data transfer over HF, supporting hybrid architectures that bridge legacy HF with IP services like and tactical applications without ALE handling selection directly. For instance, Isode's Icon-5066 implementation facilitates and crypto over HF, allowing ALE to coexist with higher-layer IP optimizations for improved throughput in bandwidth-constrained scenarios. Emerging trends in ALE post-2020 include the application of for predictive and link quality analysis (LQA) optimization. Additionally, efforts toward quantum-resistant are advancing secure linking in HF systems, with the (ITU) developing standards for to protect against future quantum threats in radio communications as of late 2024. These developments build on reliability metrics like link success rates, aiming for robust performance in evolving threat landscapes.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.