Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Automatic link establishment
View on WikipediaAutomatic Link Establishment, commonly known as ALE, is the worldwide de facto standard for digitally initiating and sustaining HF radio communications.[1] ALE is a feature in an HF communications radio transceiver system that enables the radio station to make contact, or initiate a circuit, between itself and another HF radio station or network of stations. The purpose is to provide a reliable rapid method of calling and connecting during constantly changing HF ionospheric propagation, reception interference, and shared spectrum use of busy or congested HF channels.
Mechanism
[edit]
A standalone ALE radio combines an HF SSB radio transceiver with an internal microprocessor and MFSK modem. It is programmed with a unique ALE address, similar to a phone number (or on newer generations, a username). When not actively in contact with another station, the HF SSB transceiver constantly scans through a list of HF frequencies called channels, listening for any ALE signals transmitted by other radio stations. It decodes calls and soundings sent by other stations and uses the bit error rate to store a quality score for that frequency and sender-address.
To reach a specific station, the caller enters the ALE Address. On many ALE radios this is similar to dialing a phone number. The ALE controller selects the best available idle channel for that destination address. After confirming the channel is indeed idle, it then sends a brief selective calling signal identifying the intended recipient. When the distant scanning station detects ALE activity, it stops scanning and stays on that channel until it can confirm whether or not the call is for it. The two stations' ALE controllers automatically handshake to confirm that a link of sufficient quality has been established, then notify the operators that the link is up. If the callee fails to respond or the handshaking fails, the originating ALE node usually selects another frequency either at random or by making a guess of varying sophistication.
Upon successful linking, the receiving station generally emits an audible alarm and shows a visual alert to the operator, thus indicating the incoming call. It also indicates the callsign or other identifying information of the linked station, similar to Caller ID. The operator then un-mutes the radio and answers the call then can talk in a regular conversation or negotiates a data link using voice or the ALE built-in short text message format. Alternatively, digital data can be exchanged via a built-in or external modem (such as a STANAG 5066 or MIL-STD-188-110B serial tone modem) depending on needs and availability. The ALE built-in text messaging facility can be used to transfer short text messages as an "orderwire" to allow operators to coordinate external equipment such as phone patches or non-embedded digital links, or for short tactical messages.[2][3]
Common applications
[edit]An ALE radio system enables connection for voice conversation, alerting, data exchange, texting, instant messaging, email, file transfer, image, geo-position tracking, or telemetry. With a radio operator initiating a call, the process normally takes a few minutes for the ALE to pick an HF frequency that is optimum for both sides of the communication link. It signals the operators audibly and visually on both ends, so they can begin communicating with each other immediately. In this respect, the longstanding need in HF radio for repetitive calling on pre-determined time schedules or tedious monitoring static is eliminated. It is useful as a tool for finding optimum channels to communicate between stations in real-time. In modern HF communications, ALE has largely replaced HF prediction charts, propagation beacons, chirp sounders, propagation prediction software, and traditional radio operator educated guesswork. ALE is most commonly used for hooking up operators for voice contacts on SSB (single-sideband modulation), HF internet connectivity for email, SMS phone texting or text messaging, real-time chat via HF text, Geo Position Reporting, and file transfer. High Frequency Internet Protocol or HFIP may be used with ALE for internet access via HF.
Techniques
[edit]The essence of ALE techniques is the use of automatic channel selection, scanning receivers, selective calling, handshaking, and robust burst modems.[4] An ALE node decodes all received ALE signals heard on the channel(s) it monitors. It uses the fact that all ALE messages use forward error correction (FEC) redundancy. By noting how much error-correction occurred in each received and decoded message, an ALE node can detect the "quality" of the path between the sending station and itself. This information is coupled with the ALE address of the sending node and the channel the message was received on, and stored in the node's Link Quality Analysis (LQA) memory.[3] When a call is initiated, the LQA lookup table is searched for matches involving the target ALE address and the best historic channel is used to call the target station. This reduces the likelihood that the call has to be repeated on alternate frequencies. Once the target station has heard the call and responded, a bell or other signalling device will notify both operators that a link has been established. At this point, the operators may coordinate further communication via orderwire text messages, voice, or other means. If further digital communication is desired, it may take place via external data modems or via optional modems built into the ALE terminal.
This unusual usage of FEC redundancy is the primary innovation that differentiates ALE from previous selective calling systems which either decoded a call or failed to decode due to noise or interference. A binary outcome of "Good enough" or not gave no way of automatically choosing between two channels, both of which are currently good enough for minimum communications. The redundancy-based scoring inherent in ALE thus allows for selecting the "best" available channel and (in more advanced ALE nodes) using all decoded traffic over some time window to sort channels into a list of decreasing probability-to-contact, significantly reducing co-channel interference to other users as well as dramatically decreasing the time needed to successfully link with the target node.
Techniques used in the ALE standard include automatic signaling, automatic station identification (sounding), polling, message store-and-forward, linking protection and anti-spoofing to prevent hostile denial of service by ending the channel scanning process. Optional ALE functions include polling and the exchange of orderwire commands and messages. The orderwire message, known as AMD (Automatic Message Display), is the most commonly used text transfer method of ALE, and the only universal method that all ALE controllers have in common for displaying text.[5] It is common for vendors to offer extensions to AMD for various non-standard features, although dependency on these extensions undermines interoperability. As in all interoperability scenarios, care should be taken to determine if this is acceptable before using such extensions.
History and precedents
[edit]ALE evolved from older HF radio selective calling technology. It combined existing channel-scanning selective calling concepts with microprocessors (enabling FEC decoding and quality scoring decisions), burst transmissions (minimizing co-channel interference), and transponding (allowing unattended operation and incoming-call signalling). Early ALE systems were developed in the late 1970s and early 1980s by several radio manufacturers.[6] The first ALE-family controller units were external rack mounted controllers connected to control military radios, and were rarely interoperable across vendors.
Various methods and proprietary digital signaling protocols were used by different manufacturers in first generation ALE, leading to incompatibility.[3] Later, a cooperative effort among manufacturers and the US government resulted in a second generation of ALE that included the features of first generation systems, while improving performance. The second generation 2G ALE system standard in 1986, MIL-STD-188-141A,[5] was adopted in FED-STD-1045[7] for US federal entities. In the 1980s, military and other entities of the US government began installing early ALE units, using ALE controller products built primarily by US companies. The primary application during the first 10 years of ALE use was government and military radio systems, and the limited customer base combined with the necessity to adhere to MILSPEC standards kept prices extremely high. Over time, demand for ALE capabilities spread and by the late 1990s, most new government HF radios purchased were designed to meet at least the minimum ALE interoperability standard, making them eligible for use with standard ALE node gear. Radios implementing at least minimum ALE node functionality as an option internal to the radio became more common and significantly more affordable. As the standards were adopted by other governments worldwide, more manufacturers produced competitively priced HF radios to meet this demand. The need to interoperate with government organizations prompted many non-government organizations (NGOs) to at least partially adopt ALE standards for communication. As non-military experience spread and prices came down, other civilian entities started using 2G ALE. By the year 2000, there were enough civilian and government organizations worldwide using ALE that it became a de facto HF interoperability standard for situations where a priori channel and address coordination is possible.
In the late 1990s, a third generation 3G ALE with significantly improved capability and performance was included in MIL-STD-188-141B,[5] retaining backward compatibility with 2G ALE, and was adopted in NATO STANAG 4538. Civilian and non-government adoption rates are much lower than 2G ALE due to the extreme cost as compared to surplus or entry-level 2G gear as well as the significantly increased system and planning complexity necessary to realize the benefits inherent in the 3G specification. For many militaries, whose needs for maximized intra-organizational capability and capacity always strain existing systems, the additional cost and complexity of 3G are less problematic.
Reliability
[edit]ALE enables rapid unscheduled communication and message passing without requiring complex message centers, multiple radios and antennas, or highly trained operators. With the removal of these potential sources of failure, the tactical communication process becomes much more robust and reliable. The effects extend beyond mere force multiplication of existing communications methods; units such as helicopters, when outfitted with ALE radios, can now reliably communicate in situations where the crew are too busy to operate a traditional non-line of sight radio.[8] This ability to enable tactical communication in conditions where dedicated trained operators and hardware are inappropriate is often considered to be the true improvement offered by ALE.
ALE is a critical path toward increased interoperability between organizations. By enabling a station to participate nearly simultaneously in many different HF networks, ALE allows for convenient cross-organization message passing and monitoring without requiring dedicated separate equipment and operators for each partner organization. This dramatically reduces staffing and equipment considerations, while enabling small mobile or portable stations to participate in multiple networks and subnetworks. The result is increased resilience, decreased fragility, increased ability to communicate information effectively, and the ability to rapidly add to or replace communication points as the situation demands.
When combined with Near Vertical Incidence Skywave (NVIS) techniques and sufficient channels spread across the spectrum, an ALE node can provide greater than 95% success linking on the first call, nearly on par with SATCOM systems. This is significantly more reliable than cellphone infrastructure during disasters or wars yet is mostly immune to such considerations itself.
Standards and protocols
[edit]Global standards for ALE are based on the original US MIL-STD 188-141A[5] and FED-1045,[7] known as 2nd Generation (2G) ALE. 2G ALE uses non-synchronised scanning of channels, and it takes several seconds to half a minute to repeatedly scan through an entire list of channels looking for calls. Thus it requires sufficient duration of transmission time for calls to connect or link with another station that is unsynchronised with its calling signal. The vast majority of ALE systems in use in the world at the present time are 2G ALE.
2G technical characteristics
[edit]
The more common 2G ALE signal waveform is designed to be compatible with standard 3 kHz SSB narrowband voice channel transceivers. The modulation method is 8ary Frequency Shift Keying or 8FSK, also sometimes called Multi Frequency Shift Keying MFSK, with eight orthogonal tones between 750 and 2500 Hz.[5] Each tone is 8 ms long, resulting in a transmitted over-the-air symbol rate of 125 baud or 125 symbols per second, with a raw data rate of 375 bits per second. The ALE data is formatted in 24-bit frames, which consist of a 3-bit preamble followed by three ASCII characters, each seven bits long. The received signal is usually decoded using digital signal processing techniques that are capable of recovering the 8FSK signal at a negative decibel signal-to-noise ratio (i.e., the signal may be recovered even when it is below the noise level). The over-the-air layers of the protocol involve the use of forward error correction, redundancy, and handshaking transponding similar to those used in ARQ techniques.[9]
3G technical characteristics
[edit]Newer standards of ALE, called 3rd Generation or 3G ALE, use accurate time synchronization (via a defined time-synch protocol as well as the option of GPS-locked clocks) to achieve faster and more dependable linking. Through synchronization, the calling time to achieve a link may be reduced to less than 10 seconds. The 3G ALE modem signal also provides better robustness and can work in channel conditions that are less favorable than 2G ALE.[10] Dwell groups, limited callsigns, and shorter burst transmissions enable more rapid intervals of scanning. All stations in the same group scan and receive each channel at precisely the same time window. Although 3G ALE is more reliable and has significantly enhanced channel-time efficiency, the existence of a large installed base of 2G ALE radio systems and the wide availability of moderately priced (often military surplus) equipment, has made 2G the baseline standard for global interoperability.
Basis for HF interoperability communications
[edit]Interoperability is a critical issue for the disparate entities which use radiocommunications to fulfill the needs of organizations. Largely due to the ubiquity of 2G ALE, it became the primary method for providing interoperability on HF between governmental and non-governmental disaster relief and emergency communications entities, and amateur radio volunteers. With digital techniques increasingly employed in communications equipment, a universal digital calling standard was needed, and ALE filled the gap. Nearly every major HF radio manufacturer in the world builds ALE radios to the 2G standard to meet the high demand that new installations of HF radio systems conform to this standard protocol. Disparate entities that historically used incompatible radio methods were then able to call and converse with each other using the common 2G ALE platform. Some manufacturers and organizations[11] have used the AMD feature of ALE to expand the performance and connectivity.[12] In some cases, this has been successful, and in other cases, the use of proprietary preamble or embedded commands has led to interoperability problems.
Tactical communication and resource management
[edit]ALE serves as a convenient method of beyond line of sight communication. Originally developed to support military requirements, ALE is useful to many organizations who find themselves managing widely located units. United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement and United States Coast Guard are two members of the Customs Over the Horizon Enforcement Network (COTHEN), a MIL-STD 188-141A ALE network.[13] All U.S. armed forces operate multiple similar networks. Similarly, shortwave utility listeners have documented frequency and callsign lists for many nations' military and guard units, as well as networks operated by oil exploration and production companies and public utilities in many countries.
Emergency / disaster relief or extraordinary situation response communications
[edit]ALE radio communication systems for both HF regional area networks and HF interoperability communications are in service among emergency and disaster relief agencies as well as military and guard forces. Extraordinary response agencies and organizations use ALE to respond to situations in the world where conventional communications may have been temporarily overloaded or damaged. In many cases, it is in place as alternative back-channel for organizations that may have to respond to situations or scenarios involving the loss of conventional communications. Earthquakes, storms, volcanic eruptions, and power or communication infrastructure failures are typical situations in which organizations may deem ALE necessary to operations. ALE networks are common among organizations engaged in extraordinary situation response such as: natural and man-made disasters, transportation, power, or telecommunication network failures, war, peacekeeping, or stability operations. Organizations known to use ALE for Emergency management, disaster relief, ordinary communication or extraordinary situation response include: Red Cross, FEMA, Disaster Medical Assistance Teams, NATO, Federal Bureau of Investigation, United Nations, AT&T, Civil Air Patrol, SHARES, State of California Emergency Management Agency (CalEMA), other US States' Offices of Emergency Services or Emergency Management Agencies, and Amateur Radio Emergency Service (ARES).[11]
International HF telecommunications for disaster relief
[edit]The International Telecommunication Union (ITU), in response to the need for interoperation in international disaster response spurred largely by humanitarian relief, included ALE in its Telecommunications for Disaster Relief recommendations.[4] The increasing need for instant connectivity for logistical and tactical disaster relief response communications, such as the 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake tsunami led to ITU actions of encouragement to countries around the world toward loosening restrictions on such communications and equipment border transit during catastrophic disasters. The IARU Global Amateur Radio Emergency Communications Conferences (GAREC) and IARU Global Simulated Emergency Tests have included ALE.[14]
Use in amateur radio
[edit]Amateur radio operators began sporadic ALE operation on a limited basis in the early to mid-1990s,[3] with commercial ALE radios and ALE controllers. In 2000, the first widely available software ALE controller for the Personal Computer, PCALE, became available, and hams started to set up stations based on it. In 2001, the first organized and coordinated global ALE nets for International Amateur Radio began. In August 2005, ham radio operators supporting communications for emergency Red Cross shelters used ALE for Disaster Relief operations during the Hurricane Katrina disaster.[11] After the event, hams developed more permanent ALE emergency/disaster relief networks, including internet connectivity, with a focus on interoperation between organizations. The amateur radio HFLink Automatic Link Establishment system uses an open net protocol to enable all amateur radio operators and amateur radio nets worldwide to participate in ALE and share the same ALE channels legally and interoperably. Amateur radio operators may use it to call each other for voice or data communications.[2]
Amateur radio interoperability adaptations
[edit]Amateur radio operators commonly provide local, regional, national, and international emergency / disaster relief communications.[14] The need for interoperability on HF led to the adoption of ALE open networks by hams. Amateur radio adapted 2G ALE techniques, by using the common denominators of the 2G ALE protocol, with a limited subset of features found in the majority of all ALE radios and controllers. Each amateur radio ALE station uses the operator's call sign as the address, also known as the ALE Address, in the ALE radio controller.[2] The lowest common denominator technique enables any manufacturer's ALE radios or software to be used for HF interoperability communications and networking. Known as Ham-Friendly ALE, the amateur radio ALE standard is used to establish radio communications, through a combination of active ALE on internationally recognized automatic data frequencies, and passive ALE scanning on voice channels. In this technique, active ALE frequencies include pseudorandom periodic polite station identification, while passive ALE frequencies are silently scanned for selective calling. ALE systems include Listen Before Transmit as a standard function, and in most cases this feature provides better busy channel detection of voice and data signals than the human ear. Ham-Friendly ALE technique is also known as 2.5G ALE, because it maintains 2G ALE compatibility while employing some of the adaptive channel management features of 3G ALE, but without the accurate GPS time synchronization of 3G ALE.
Disaster relief HF network
[edit]Hot standby ALE nets are in constant operation 24/7/365 for International Emergency and Disaster Relief communications. The Ham Radio Global ALE High Frequency Network, which began service in June 2007, is the world's largest intentionally open ALE network. It is a free open network staffed by volunteers, and used by amateur radio operators supporting disaster relief organizations.[14]
International coordination
[edit]International amateur radio ALE High Frequency channels are frequency coordinated with all Regions of the International Amateur Radio Union (IARU entity of ITU),[11] for international, regional, national, and local use in the Amateur Radio Service. All Amateur Radio ALE channels use "USB" Upper Sideband standard. Different rules, regulations, and bandplans of the region and local country of operation apply to use of various channels. Some channels may not be available in every country. Primary or global channels are in common with most countries and regions.[15]
International channels
[edit]This listing is current as of February 2020.[14]
| Frequency kHz | Mode | ALE or Selcall | Channel Number | Channel Label | North America Net | Europe Net | UK Net | Japan Net | Australia- NZ Net | ITU Region 1 Net | ITU Region 2 Net | ITU Region 3 Net | Preamble Time (seconds) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 00473.0 | USB | SEL | 00A | 00ASEL | HFS | HFS | HFS | HFS | HFS | HFS | HFS | HFS | 15.0 |
| 00475.5 | USB | ALE | 00B | 00BALE | HFL | HFL | HFL | HFL | HFL | HFL | HFL | HFL | 15.0 |
| 01838.0 | USB | SEL | 01A | 01ASEL | HFR | HFR | HFS | HFS | HFR | HFR | HFR | 15.0 | |
| 01843.0 | USB | ALE | 01B | 01BALE | HFN | HFL | HFL | HFL | HFL | HFL | HFL | 15.0 | |
| 01908.0 | USB | SEL | 01C | 01CSEL | HFS | HFS | 15.0 | ||||||
| 01909.0 | USB | ALE | 01D | 01DALE | HFL | HFL | 15.0 | ||||||
| 01990.0 | USB | SEL | 01E | 01ESEL | HFS | HFS | HFS | HFS | 15.0 | ||||
| 01996.0 | USB | ALE | 01F | 01FALE | HFL | HFN | HFL | 15.0 | |||||
| 03527.0 | USB | ALE | 03A | 03AALE | HFN | 15.0 | |||||||
| 03529.0 | USB | SEL | 03B | 03BSEL | HFR | 15.0 | |||||||
| 03590.0 | USB | SEL | 03C | 03CSEL | HFR | HFR | HFR | HFR | HFR | HFR | HFR | 15.0 | |
| 03596.0 | USB | ALE | 03D | 03DALE | HFN | HFN | HFN | HFN | HFN | HFN | HFN | 15.0 | |
| 03600.5 | USB | ALE | 03E | 03EALE | HFL | HFL | HFL | 15.0 | |||||
| 03605.0 | USB | SEL | 03F | 03FSEL | HFS | HFS | HFS | 15.0 | |||||
| 03710.0 | USB | SEL | 03G | 03GSEL | HFX | HFX | HFX | 15.0 | |||||
| 03791.0 | USB | ALE | 03H | 03HALE | HFL | HFL | HFL | HFL | 15.0 | ||||
| 03795.0 | USB | SEL | 03I | 03ISEL | HFS | HFS | HFS | HFS | HFS | 15.0 | |||
| 03845.0 | USB | SEL | 03J | 03JSEL | HFS | 15.0 | |||||||
| 03995.0 | USB | SEL | 03K | 03KSEL | HFS | 15.0 | |||||||
| 03996.0 | USB | ALE | 03L | 03LALE | HFL | 15.0 | |||||||
| 05102.0 | USB | SEL | 05A | 05ASEL | HFX | 15.0 | |||||||
| 05346.5 | USB | SEL | 05B | 05BSEL | HFR | 15.0 | |||||||
| 05354.5 | USB | ALE | 05C | 05CALE | HFL | HFL | HFL | HFL | HFL | 15.0 | |||
| 05355.0 | USB | SEL | 05D | 05DSEL | HFR | HFR | HFR | HFR | HFR | 15.0 | |||
| 05357.0 | USB | ALE | 05E | 05EALE | HFL | HFL | HFL | HFL | HFL | 15.0 | |||
| 05363.0 | USB | SEL | 05F | 05FSEL | HFS | HFS | HFS | HFS | 15.0 | ||||
| 05371.5 | USB | ALE | 05G | 05GALE | HFL | HFL | 15.0 | ||||||
| 05403.5 | USB | SEL | 05H | 05HSEL | HFS | HFS | 15.0 | ||||||
| 07044.0 | USB | SEL | 07A | 07ASEL | HFR | HFR | HFR | HFR | HFR | HFR | HFR | 15.0 | |
| 07049.5 | USB | ALE | 07B | 07BALE | HFL | HFL | HFL | HFL | HFL | 15.0 | |||
| 07100.0 | USB | SEL | 07C | 07CSEL | HFR | 15.0 | |||||||
| 07102.0 | USB | ALE | 07D | 07DALE | HFN | HFN | HFN | HFN | HFN | HFN | HFN | HFN | 15.0 |
| 07185.0 | USB | ALE | 07E | 07EALE | HFL | HFL | HFL | HFL | HFL | HFL | HFL | 15.0 | |
| 07195.0 | USB | SEL | 07F | 07FSEL | HFS | HFS | HFS | HFS | HFS | HFS | HFS | HFS | 15.0 |
| 07291.0 | USB | SEL | 07G | 07GSEL | HFS | 15.0 | |||||||
| 07296.0 | USB | ALE | 07H | 07HALE | HFL | 15.0 | |||||||
| 10126.0 | USB | SEL | 10A | 10ASEL | HFS | HFS | HFS | 15.0 | |||||
| 10131.0 | USB | ALE | 10B | 10BALE | HFL | HFL | HFL | 15.0 | |||||
| 10144.0 | USB | SEL | 10C | 10CSEL | HFR | HFR | HFR | HFR | HFR | HFR | HFR | HFR | 15.0 |
| 10145.5 | USB | ALE | 10D | 10DALE | HFN | HFN | HFN | HFN | HFN | HFN | HFN | HFN | 15.0 |
| 14094.0 | USB | SEL | 14A | 14ASEL | HFR | HFR | HFR | HFR | HFR | HFR | HFR | HFR | 15.0 |
| 14109.0 | USB | ALE | 14B | 14BALE | HFN | HFN | HFN | HFN | HFN | HFN | HFN | HFN | 15.0 |
| 14122.0 | USB | SEL | 14C | 14CSEL | HFX | HFX | HFX | 15.0 | |||||
| 14343.0 | USB | SEL | 14D | 14DSEL | HFS | HFS | HFS | HFS | HFS | HFS | HFS | HFS | 15.0 |
| 14346.0 | USB | ALE | 14E | 14EALE | HFL | HFL | HFL | HFL | HFL | HFL | HFL | HFL | 15.0 |
| 18106.0 | USB | ALE | 18A | 18AALE | HFN | HFN | HFN | HFN | HFN | HFN | HFN | HFN | 15.0 |
| 18107.0 | USB | SEL | 18B | 18BSEL | HFR | HFR | HFR | HFR | HFR | HFR | HFR | HFR | 15.0 |
| 18113.0 | USB | SEL | 18C | 18CSEL | HFX | HFX | HFX | 15.0 | |||||
| 18117.5 | USB | ALE | 18D | 18DALE | HFL | HFL | HFL | HFL | HFL | HFL | HFL | HFL | 15.0 |
| 18163.0 | USB | SEL | 18E | 18ESEL | HFS | HFS | HFS | HFS | HFS | HFS | HFS | HFS | 15.0 |
| 21094.0 | USB | SEL | 21A | 21ASEL | HFR | HFR | HFR | HFR | HFR | HFR | HFR | HFR | 15.0 |
| 21096.0 | USB | ALE | 21B | 21BALE | HFN | HFN | HFN | HFN | HFN | HFN | HFN | HFN | 15.0 |
| 21228.0 | USB | SEL | 21C | 21CSEL | HFX | HFX | HFX | 15.0 | |||||
| 21427.0 | USB | SEL | 21D | 21DSEL | HFS | HFS | HFS | HFS | HFS | HFS | HFS | HFS | 15.0 |
| 21432.5 | USB | ALE | 21E | 21EALE | HFL | HFL | HFL | HFL | HFL | HFL | HFL | HFL | 15.0 |
| 24924.0 | USB | SEL | 24A | 24ASEL | HFR | HFR | HFR | HFR | HFR | HFR | HFR | HFR | 15.0 |
| 24926.0 | USB | ALE | 24B | 24BALE | HFN | HFN | HFN | HFN | HFN | HFN | HFN | HFN | 15.0 |
| 24932.0 | USB | ALE | 24C | 24CALE | HFL | HFL | HFL | HFL | HFL | HFL | HFL | HFL | 15.0 |
| 24977.0 | USB | SEL | 24D | 24DSEL | HFS | HFS | HFS | HFS | HFS | HFS | HFS | HFS | 15.0 |
| 28143.0 | USB | SEL | 28A | 28ASEL | HFR | HFR | HFR | HFR | HFR | HFR | HFR | HFR | 15.0 |
| 28146.0 | USB | ALE | 28B | 28BALE | HFN | HFN | HFN | HFN | HFN | HFN | HFN | HFN | 15.0 |
| 28305.0 | USB | SEL | 28C | 28CSEL | HFS | HFS | HFS | HFS | HFS | HFS | HFS | HFS | 15.0 |
| 28312.5 | USB | ALE | 28D | 28DALE | HFL | HFL | HFL | HFL | HFL | HFL | HFL | HFL | 15.0 |
| 29520.0 | FM | SEL | 29A | 29ASEL | HFM | HFM | HFM | HFM | HFM | HFM | HFM | HFM | 6.0 |
Frequency table notes: Automatic Link Establishment ALE channel frequencies in the Amateur Radio Service are internationally coordinated with selective calling Selcall channels for interoperability purposes. Net is the ALE net address or Selcall net name.
Standard configurations
[edit]| Note | Configuration | Standard |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | ALE System | MIL-STD 188-141B; FED-1045 (8FSK, 2 kHz bandwidth)[5] |
| 2 | Transmission duration | Calling optimum 15 seconds; or preamble 15 seconds. |
| 3 | Scan rate | 1, 2, or 5 channels per second. Minimum dwell time 120 milliseconds per channel for ALE and 300 milliseconds for selcall. |
| 4 | Sounding Interval | 60 Minutes or more (for same channel) |
| 5 | Audio Centre Frequency | 1625 Hz for digital mode text and data |
| 6 | Messaging standard | AMD (Automatic Message Display) Universal short texting[5] |
| 7 | Sounding Type | TWS Sounding (This Was Sound)[5] |
| 8 | Tune Time | 3000 milliseconds or approximately 3 seconds[5] |
International nets
[edit]| NET | Protocol | Content | Status | Sounding | Net Slots | Purpose |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HFL | ALE | Voice | Open | Manual | 3 | Normal communications and emergency |
| HFN | ALE | Texting | Open | Auto 1 hour | 3 | Normal communications |
| HFR | Selcall | Texting | Open | Auto 1 hour | 1 | Normal communications |
| HFS | Selcall | Voice | Open | Manual | 1 | Normal communications and emergency |
| HFM | Selcall | Texting or Voice | Open | Manual | 1 | Normal communications |
| HFX | ALE or Selcall | Texting or Voice | Open | Manual | 1 | Inactive or auxiliary frequencies |
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ Telecom Bureau, ITU-D/SG (2000-12-14). "Frequency Agile Systems in the MF/HF Bands" (doc). International Telecommunication Union.
- ^ a b c Crystal, B. (2008-03-31). "ARRL We Do That: What Is ALE?". ARRL, National Association for Amateur Radio. Archived from the original on 2010-03-17. Retrieved 2008-09-06.
- ^ a b c d Menold, Ronald E., AD4TB (February 1995). "ALE--The Coming of Automatic Link Establishment" (PDF). ARRL, QST Volume 79, Number 2. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2022-10-09.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) - ^ a b "ITU ALE Handbook" (PDF). International Telecommunication Union ITU. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2019-08-19. Retrieved 2008-09-05.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i "MIL-STD 188-141B" (PDF). US Government. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2008-08-07. Retrieved 2008-09-05.
- ^ Adair, R.; Peach, D. (January 1990). "ALE--The Coming of Automatic Link Establishment" (PDF). ARRL, QEX, 1990-JAN, Reprint of NTIA ITS. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2022-10-09.
- ^ a b "Federal Standard 1045A". US Government.
- ^ Fiedler, D (1994). "Automated HF communications for nap-of-the-earth flying" (PDF). United States Army. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2022-10-09.
- ^ Klingenfuss, J. (2003). Radio Data Code Manual (17th ed.). Klingenfuss Publications. pp. 72–78. ISBN 3-924509-56-5.
- ^ Johnson, E. (2008-08-17). "Simulation Results for Third-Generation HF Automatic Link Establishment" (PDF). New Mexico State University. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2008-05-16. Retrieved 2008-09-06.
- ^ a b c d Crystal, B.; Barrow, A. (2007-08-17). "ALE for Emergency / Disaster Relief Communications". International Amateur Radio Union IARU.
- ^ "Codan Automatic Link Management CALM". Codan. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2008-03-05. Retrieved 2008-03-02.
- ^ "COTHEN - The RadioReference Wiki".
- ^ a b c d IARU (2007-08-17). "ALE for Emergency Disaster Relief Communications" (PDF). International Amateur Radio Union IARU. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2009-01-14. Retrieved 2008-09-07.
- ^ ARRL (2005-08-01). "ARRL Technical Information Service page:ARRLWeb: ALE (Automatic Link Establishment)". ARRL, National Association for Amateur Radio.
- ITU Telecom Bureau (2000-12-14). "Frequency Agile Systems in the MF/HF Bands" (doc). ITU.
- Klingenfuss, J. (2003). Radio Data Code Manual (17th ed.). Klingenfuss Publications. pp. 72–78. ISBN 3-924509-56-5.
- "MIL-STD-188-141B" (PDF). USA Department of Defense. 1999. Retrieved 2008-01-06.
- "MIL-STD 188-141B" (PDF). US Government. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2008-08-07. Retrieved 2008-09-05.
- "ITU ALE Handbook" (PDF). International Telecommunication Union ITU. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2019-08-19. Retrieved 2008-09-05.
- "Codan Automatic Link Management CALM". Codan. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2008-03-05. Retrieved 2008-03-02.
- Crystal, B.; Barrow, A. (2007-08-17). "ALE for Emergency / Disaster Relief Communications". International Amateur Radio Union IARU.
- "FCC Petition RM-11392" (DOC). US Government Federal Communications Commission FCC.
- IARU (2007-08-17). "ALE for Emergency Disaster Relief Communications" (PDF). International Amateur Radio Union IARU. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2009-01-14. Retrieved 2008-09-07.
- "FCC DA 08-1082" (PDF). US Government Federal Communications Commission FCC. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-10-25. Retrieved 2008-09-20.
- "MIL STD 188-141A / MIL STD 188-141B 2G ALE Audio Samples".[permanent dead link]
Automatic link establishment
View on GrokipediaIntroduction
Definition and purpose
Automatic Link Establishment (ALE) is a digital protocol suite that enables high-frequency (HF) radio stations to automatically select the most suitable operating frequency and establish a communication link between stations without requiring manual operator intervention.[4] This system operates under processor control, utilizing predefined protocols to manage the linking process autonomously.[5] The primary purpose of ALE is to address the inherent variability of HF radio propagation, which is heavily influenced by fluctuating ionospheric conditions such as solar activity, time of day, and geomagnetic disturbances that can render certain frequencies unusable or degrade signal quality.[5] By automating frequency assessment through periodic sounding signals and link quality analysis, ALE ensures rapid adaptation to these dynamic channel conditions, facilitating reliable communications in environments where manual tuning would be impractical or error-prone.[4] Core benefits of ALE include significantly reduced operator workload, as it eliminates the need for skilled personnel to manually select and switch frequencies during operations.[4] It also achieves faster connection times, typically ranging from 2 to 10 seconds in advanced systems, compared to manual methods that can take minutes.[6] Additionally, ALE enhances spectrum efficiency by optimizing frequency usage in real-time and minimizing interference through targeted transmissions on viable channels.Role in HF radio communications
In high-frequency (HF) radio communications, which operate within the 3-30 MHz band, signals predominantly rely on skywave propagation, where radio waves reflect off the ionosphere to enable long-distance transmission beyond line-of-sight limitations.[7] This propagation mode introduces inherent uncertainties due to ionospheric variations influenced by time of day, season, solar activity, and geomagnetic conditions, which can unpredictably alter the maximum usable frequency (MUF) and lowest usable frequency (LUF).[8] ALE addresses these challenges by dynamically assessing and selecting frequencies closest to the MUF, thereby optimizing link reliability in variable conditions.[7] Furthermore, ALE mitigates multipath fading—arising from multiple ionospheric reflections that cause signal interference and delay spread—and the high levels of atmospheric and man-made noise typical in HF environments, through techniques like real-time channel evaluation and adaptive frequency selection.[8] ALE integrates as a protocol layer atop existing HF modes, such as single-sideband (SSB) voice, continuous wave (CW), and data services including text messaging and file transfer, without requiring modifications to the underlying modulation schemes.[3] It facilitates this by automating the scanning of predefined frequency pools—typically 10 to 20 channels—and conducting periodic sounding signals to probe channel quality via metrics like signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and bit error rate (BER).[7] This layered approach ensures that once a suitable channel is identified, the system seamlessly switches to support the intended communication mode, enhancing operational efficiency in networks where manual frequency management would be impractical.[8] Effective ALE deployment necessitates transceivers with integrated digital signal processing (DSP) hardware to manage the protocol's complex waveforms, error correction, and rapid scanning rates of 2-5 channels per second.[8] These DSP capabilities enable the decoding of ALE-specific signals for link quality analysis (LQA) and handshaking, while ensuring compliance with interoperability standards that govern frequency agility and synchronization.[3]Historical Development
Early precedents and precursors
Prior to the development of Automatic Link Establishment (ALE), high-frequency (HF) radio communications during the Cold War era predominantly relied on manual frequency selection by trained operators. These operators used personal experience, propagation charts, and logbooks to choose frequencies based on ionospheric conditions, which varied due to solar activity and time of day. In military applications, such as U.S. forces in remote or polar regions, this process involved monitoring multiple channels and adjusting during blackouts, often coordinating via voice or auxiliary systems like satellite links. For instance, the U.S. Antarctic Program employed manual selection on fixed frequencies (e.g., US-18 and US-19) until the mid-1990s, highlighting the labor-intensive nature of ensuring reliable links amid spectrum limitations and jamming threats.[9][10] Key precursors emerged in the 1970s through U.S. military and civilian efforts to automate aspects of frequency management via ionospheric prediction tools. The Ionospheric Communications Analysis and Prediction (IONCAP) program, developed by the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) in the late 1960s and refined through the 1970s, used empirical models and numerical coefficients to forecast HF propagation parameters like maximum usable frequency (MUF). This tool assisted operators in pre-selecting channels, reducing trial-and-error in networks. An extension, ICEPAC (Ionospheric Communications Enhanced Profile Analysis and Circuit prediction), introduced in the 1970s, improved predictions for polar and mid-latitude paths by incorporating electron density profiles and accounting for deviative losses, laying groundwork for real-time adaptive systems.[11][9] Influential events in the early 1980s, driven by increasing spectrum congestion in NATO operations, spurred trials for automated HF linking. Proprietary systems from manufacturers like Harris (AUTOLINK) and Sunair (SCANCALL) were tested, featuring channel scanning and link quality analysis to select optimal frequencies dynamically. NATO-aligned trials, such as the 1988-1989 Trans-Auroral Tests in Norway, evaluated these in harsh environments, achieving better connectivity than manual methods with lower power requirements. These efforts, amid growing demands for interoperability during Cold War escalations, directly influenced the 1988 completion of ALE standards like MIL-STD-188-141A, addressing congestion from proliferating HF users.[9][10][12]Evolution from 1G to 3G ALE
The first generation (1G) of Automatic Link Establishment (ALE) emerged in the 1980s and 1990s as a foundational technology for automating HF radio links, primarily defined by FED-STD-1045 (initially issued in 1990 and updated as FED-STD-1045A in 1993). This standard focused on basic functions such as frequency scanning, selective calling, link quality analysis (LQA) using bit error rate (BER) and signal-to-noise-and-distortion (SINAD) metrics, and simple sounding to assess channel availability without operator intervention. It enabled stations to automatically select and establish links on the best available HF channel, supporting individual, group, and net calls while incorporating rudimentary error control via cyclic redundancy checks (CRC) and Golay forward error correction (FEC). Accompanying standards like FED-STD-1046 provided interoperability guidelines for ALE waveforms and protocols, ensuring compatibility across federal HF systems.[13] The transition to second-generation (2G) ALE in the 1990s and 2000s marked a significant advancement, standardized under MIL-STD-188-141A (1988) and refined in MIL-STD-188-141B (1999), with FED-STD-1045B serving as its civilian counterpart. These iterations introduced faster protocols using 8-tone minimum-shift keying (MFSK) modulation at 125 symbols per second, achieving data rates up to 375 bits per second, compared to the slower tones of 1G systems. Key enhancements included improved error correction through Golay encoding and interleaving on 24-bit frames, as well as mandatory Automatic Message Display (AMD) modes for quicker text messaging with automatic repeat request (ARQ). Linking protection levels (AL-0 to AL-4) were added for security, with variable protection intervals to balance speed and robustness. A major milestone was the U.S. Department of Defense's (DoD) adoption of 2G ALE in 1997, mandating its use for interoperability in new HF systems and major upgrades, which accelerated global standardization efforts aligned with NATO STANAG 4203.[14][1][15] Third-generation (3G) ALE, developed in the 2010s, built on these foundations with enhanced capabilities outlined in MIL-STD-188-141C (published December 2011, with Change 1 in 2012) and its Appendix C, also harmonized with STANAG 4538. This version incorporated wider bandwidth support up to 24 kHz for wideband HF (WBHF) operations (N x 3 kHz, where N=1 to 8) and adaptive modulation schemes, such as 8-ary frequency-shift keying (FSK) with rates from 50 to 9600 bits per second based on signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Improvements included time-synchronized scanning with shorter dwell times (e.g., 4 seconds per channel in synchronous mode), advanced quick call (AQC-ALE) for reduced address lengths (up to 6 characters), and protocols like high-rate data link (HDL) with ARQ for reliable packet transfer in larger networks. The 2012 standardization finalized these features under DoD custodianship (project TCSS-2012-002), enabling order-of-magnitude gains in linking speed and scalability while maintaining backward compatibility with 2G systems. A later revision, MIL-STD-188-141D (2017), further refined these capabilities for enhanced performance in modern tactical environments.[16][15][17]Technical Mechanism
Link establishment process
The link establishment process in Automatic Link Establishment (ALE) enables high-frequency (HF) radio stations to automatically select and connect on the optimal channel without operator intervention, relying on a coordinated sequence of signaling and assessment phases. This workflow begins with periodic transmissions to probe channel conditions and progresses through detection, evaluation, and mutual confirmation, ensuring robust links under varying propagation environments. The process is governed by standardized protocols that emphasize rapid setup, typically completing in seconds to minutes depending on network configuration.[1] The initial phase involves periodic sounding, where each station transmits short test signals across a predefined set of channels to announce its availability and allow remote assessment of signal quality. These soundings occur at configurable intervals, such as every 30 to 60 minutes, and consist of encoded frames including station addresses and preambles like "THIS IS" (TIS) for acceptance or "THAT WAS" (TWAS) for rejection. Sounding duration scales with the number of channels, typically around 0.784 seconds per channel, enabling other stations to measure reception without dedicating the full scan cycle. This unilateral broadcast helps build a shared understanding of propagation conditions across the network.[1][8] During the scanning phase, stations continuously cycle through their programmed channel lists, listening for incoming soundings or calls while pausing transmission to avoid interference. Scanning rates typically range from 2 to 5 channels per second, with dwell times of 200 to 500 milliseconds per channel, completing a full cycle in as little as 2 seconds for 10 channels or up to 50 seconds for larger sets. Upon detecting a valid signal, the receiver performs Link Quality Analysis (LQA) by evaluating metrics such as signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), signal-to-noise and distortion ratio (SINAD), bit error rate (BER), and optional multipath delay. LQA scores, ranging from 0 (unusable, e.g., SNR ≤ -6 dB) to 255 (excellent, e.g., SNR > 21 dB for good voice quality), are computed and stored in a matrix updated with each reception, prioritizing channels with scores above configurable thresholds like 50 for initiation. These scores guide frequency selection, with higher values indicating reliable throughput for voice or data.[1][18][8] Handshake initiation follows when a calling station selects the best channel based on its LQA matrix and transmits an ALE call frame addressed to the target using specific codes, such as 3- to 15-character selective call identifiers for individual, group, or net calls. This frame, encoded in multi-frequency shift keying (MFSK) at rates like 375 bits per second, includes the source ("THIS IS") and destination ("TO") addresses, prompting the target to respond if its LQA score for the caller meets the threshold. The process employs a three-way exchange: the call (up to 9-14 seconds window), a response from the target on a potentially different frequency, and an acknowledgment from the caller to confirm mutual detection. This phase embeds frequency selection commands if needed, ensuring both stations align on the optimal channel.[1][14][18] Link confirmation occurs upon successful acknowledgment, transitioning both stations to a linked state where they cease scanning and prepare for traffic. The acknowledging frame verifies synchronization and quality, often including pseudo-BER data for final validation, after which the link supports voice via single-sideband (SSB) or data transfer using modulation schemes like frequency-shift keying (FSK) or phase-shift keying (PSK). Establishment times vary, with scanning calls extending beyond one scan cycle if necessary, but typically achieve full-duplex operation within 5-10 seconds in favorable conditions.[1][14] Fallback mechanisms ensure reliability by retrying the handshake on the next highest LQA-ranked channel if no response is received within the timeout (e.g., after one or more scan periods), or escalating to additional attempts with varied encoding blocks for error correction. Persistent failures prompt a switch to manual linking mode, where operators intervene to select frequencies directly, or invocation of relay stations via group call protocols. These retries incorporate automatic repeat request (ARQ) elements, retransmitting frames up to a predefined limit before aborting, minimizing downtime in dynamic HF environments.[1][18][8]Signal protocols and formats
Automatic Link Establishment (ALE) employs a layered protocol architecture to facilitate reliable communication over high-frequency (HF) radio channels, primarily operating at the data link and physical layers of the OSI model. The data link layer handles addressing, control signaling, forward error correction (FEC), and link protection, including sublayers for ALE-specific functions such as selective calling and handshaking, as well as optional encryption mechanisms like the Lattice Algorithm with 56-bit keys.[1] The physical layer manages modulation and transmission, ensuring compatibility with single-sideband (SSB) HF transceivers across the 1.6–30 MHz band.[8] In second-generation (2G) ALE, as defined in MIL-STD-188-141B Appendix A and FED-STD-1045, the physical layer utilizes 8-ary frequency-shift keying (8-FSK) modulation at 375 bits per second (bps), with eight tones spaced 250 Hz apart across a 750–2500 Hz range, enabling phase-continuous transitions and a word duration of approximately 131 ms.[1] This modulation supports triple-redundant 24-bit words, each comprising a 3-bit preamble (e.g., TO for transmission onset, TIS for "this is") followed by three 7-bit ASCII fields for addressing and data, with Golay (24,12) block coding and interleaving for error resilience.[8] For third-generation (3G) ALE, outlined in MIL-STD-188-141B Appendix C and STANAG 4538, the physical layer shifts to more robust burst waveforms, including 8-ary phase-shift keying (8-PSK) serial tone modulation at 2400 symbols per second on an 1800 Hz carrier, using pseudo-noise (PN) spreading with 832 tribit sequences to map phase shifts, alongside support for higher-rate modes up to 4800 bps via bandwidth BW2.[1] Key signal formats in ALE include sounding packets, which are short, unilateral bursts transmitting the station's identifier (e.g., a 1–6 character ASCII address padded with "@" symbols) to enable link quality analysis (LQA) by receiving stations, typically lasting at least 784 ms with preambles like TIS or TWAS and repeated at configurable intervals for channel assessment.[1] Link requests initiate connections through a three-way handshake: the calling station sends a frame with a TO preamble, command word (CMD=110), and address fields for the called and calling parties, followed by the called station's response and acknowledgment, all encoded in 3-word frames supporting up to 15 characters and frequency selection commands.[8] Status messages, such as 3G LE_Notification protocol data units (PDUs), provide periodic updates on station availability or link conditions, embedded within calls using 11-bit addressing and priority indicators for unicast, multicast, or broadcast scenarios.[1] Bandwidth usage in ALE is optimized for HF constraints, with 2G implementations typically occupying about 1 kHz of audio bandwidth within a 3 kHz RF channel to fit standard SSB filters, achieved through the compact 8-FSK tone set.[1] In contrast, 3G ALE expands to up to 3 kHz bandwidth using scalable burst waveforms (e.g., BW0 for initial handshakes at 613 ms duration), incorporating elements like PN sequences for improved robustness in noisy environments, though without primary reliance on orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (OFDM).[8]| Aspect | 2G ALE (MIL-STD-188-141B App. A) | 3G ALE (MIL-STD-188-141B App. C) |
|---|---|---|
| Modulation | 8-FSK, 375 bps, 250 Hz tone spacing | 8-PSK serial tone, 2400 sym/s, PN spreading |
| Key PDU/Word Format | 24-bit words (preamble + ASCII fields), Golay FEC | Burst PDUs (e.g., LE_Call: 11-bit address, call type) |
| Sounding Duration | ≥784 ms, TIS/TWAS preambles | Integrated synchronous probes, configurable retries |
| Link Request | 3-way handshake, CMD=110 frames | Probe-handshake, prioritized slots (e.g., Flash) |
| Bandwidth (Audio) | ~1 kHz | ~3 kHz, scalable BW0–BW4 |
