Hubbry Logo
Bank robberyBank robberyMain
Open search
Bank robbery
Community hub
Bank robbery
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Bank robbery
Bank robbery
Bank robbery
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
A masked man poses as a bank robber during a demonstration of a German device that protected cash and sounded an alarm during a robbery (1931).

Bank robbery is the criminal act of stealing from a bank, specifically while bank employees and customers are subjected to force, violence, or a threat of violence. This refers to robbery of a bank branch or teller, as opposed to other bank-owned property, such as a train, armored car, or (historically) stagecoach. It is a federal crime in the United States.

According to the Federal Bureau of Investigation's Uniform Crime Reporting Program, robbery is "the taking or attempting to take anything of value from the care, custody, or control of a person or persons by force or threat of force or violence or by putting the victim in fear."[1] By contrast, burglary is "unlawful entry of a structure to commit a felony or theft."

Overview

[edit]

Places

[edit]

Bank robberies occur in cities and towns. This concentration is often attributed to there being more branches in urban areas, but the number of bank robberies is higher than the number of branches. [citation needed]

This has advantages both for bank robbers and for law enforcement. In urban areas the transportation infrastructure is more highly developed, especially where banks tend to cluster near retail shopping areas and commercial districts. Such banks are highly profitable targets for robbers, who are then afforded a number of potential escape routes. Law enforcement benefit by being able to respond more quickly, and the odds of catching a bank robber on or near the scene is higher than other types of crime. This is because most bank robberies are reported very quickly while the crime is in progress; most bank robberies occur during daylight hours, have multiple witnesses and with modern technology often produce photographic images that can be distributed and used immediately to canvass the local area. Consequently, many bank robbers are caught the same day. The clearance rate for bank robbery is among the highest of all crimes, at nearly 60%.[2]

The urban location of the crime also contributes to its repeat victimization profile, a measure of how quickly a crime victim will suffer a repeat of the original crime. One study carried out by the Home Office found that in England, one third of banks at which a robbery has occurred will be robbed again within three months, while the same study found that in Tallahassee, Florida, one quarter of robbed banks will suffer repeat robbery within a week, and over half of robbed banks will be robbed again within a month.[3]

Characteristics

[edit]

The Australian Institute of Criminology analyzed trends in bank robbery over a four-year period. Of the 808 bank robbery incidents between January 1998 and May 2002 in which the number of offenders involved in the hold-up was recorded, 55% were committed by lone offenders, 25% by pairs, and 20% by three or more robbers. Unarmed offenders accounted for 28% of robberies, caused the fewest injuries to victims (one percent of all victims' injuries), were the type of robber who most often used a note to threaten bank staff (46% of all their robberies), and failed most often in their robbery attempts (33% failure). Unarmed gangs inflicted the most injuries to victims (51%) and failed the least in their robbery attempts (6% failure). Armed robbers used a disguise more often compared to unarmed robbers, with armed pairs employing disguises most often (59%).[4]

According to the Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics injuries occur in about two percent and a death occurs in less than one percent of all U.S. bank robberies.[5][6] Violent takeover bank robberies that are often portrayed in the media are rare. The majority of bank robberies taking place today are so-called "note jobs." These are usually accomplished by simply passing a written note to the teller demanding money. The idea is to attract as little attention as possible. In most cases, other customers present in the bank during a robbery are unaware of what is occurring. Standard bank policy is to avoid violence as much as possible, so they will normally hand over the money and try to obey the robber's demands. The robber usually makes away with cash, but in small amounts. According to British Bankers' Association data, in 2007 there were 106 attempted or successful robberies in Britain in which an average of 1.6 persons were involved. One third of attempts came up empty while the average haul for a successful attempt was equivalent to US$46,600. Yet 20% of the successes would later prove less than successful by virtue of the robbers being arrested.[7]

U.S. federal statute

[edit]

Under federal law, bank robbery in the United States is defined, and made illegal, primarily by the bank robbery statute in 18 U.S.C. § 2113 states.[8]

History

[edit]
Patty Hearst takes part in the April 1974 Hibernia Bank raid with other SLA members.

Early examples

[edit]

According to The New York Times and the Saturday Evening Post, the first bank robbery in the United States occurred in March 1831 (the 19th according to the Times, the 20th according to the Post). Two men, James Honeyman and William J. Murray, entered the City Bank of New York using forged keys. This allowed them to empty the vault of more than $245,000 in bank money. According to the Times, it cannot be confirmed if this was a robbery or a burglary.[9] The Post later corrected this claim upon learning of a previous 1798 robbery of $162,821 from the Bank of Pennsylvania at Carpenters' Hall.[10][11] The Carpenters' Hall theft also may not have technically been a robbery as there were no signs of force and the thief may have had a key.[12]

On September 14, 1828, five men tunneled through a sewage drain in George Street, Sydney and stole approximately £14,000 in promissory notes and coins from the vault of the Bank of Australia. It has been described as the first bank robbery in Australia and also the largest in Australian history.[13][14][15]

On December 15, 1863, Postmaster Edward Green walked into the First National Bank on Pleasant Street in Malden, Massachusetts, shot the 17-year-old bookkeeper, Frank Converse, and stole $3,000 in large bills and $2,000 in small bills. The directors of the bank offered a $6,000 reward for the arrest of the murderer.[16] This has been described as the first armed bank robbery murder in US history.[12]

On October 27, 1878, the Manhattan Savings Institution was robbed. It was the largest bank robbery in U.S. history.[17]

The heist known as the 1907 Tiflis bank robbery in June 1907 in the Russian Empire resulted in 40 deaths, 50 injuries, and the "expropriation" of 241,000 rubles (approximately 3.96 million 2018 US dollars) by Bolsheviks organized by (among others) Vladimir Lenin and Joseph Stalin.

The first bank robbery in Denmark occurred August 18, 1913 in the bank Sparekassen for København og Omegn at Østerbro in Copenhagen. Two men, Danish salesman Lindorff Larsen and a German machinist Güttig, armed with revolvers, got away with 9000 Danish kroner. Güttig was arrested August 30 and Lindorff Larsen committed suicide after having fled the police.[18]

Bank robbery on the American frontier

[edit]

Bank robbery is commonly associated with the American Old West due to a few infamous examples and portrayal in fiction. The Foundation for Economic Education (FEE) in their research, found the scene of the Western bank-robbery to be generally a myth, identifying less than 10 definite bank robberies between 1859 and 1900 across 15 frontier states.[19] Grunge.com pointed out that FEE's research was conducted before many states and the Library of Congress began publishing historical newspapers online, and while bank robberies in the Old West were still uncommon, there were many more than previously assessed.[20]

On February 13, 1866, several men believed to be members of the James-Younger Gang robbed the Clay County Savings Association in Liberty, Missouri, shooting to death an innocent street bystander, 17-year-old student George Clifford "Jolly" Wymore, and escaping with $60,000. This was the first successful daylight bank robbery during peacetime in the US.[21][22][23] Previous robberies such as from the banks in St. Albans, Vermont more than a year earlier were perpetrated by Confederate soldiers, which some historians consider to be not robberies proper but acts of war.[24]

First motorized armed robberies

[edit]
Main articles: Ordener attack and Bonnot Gang
Representation of the Ordener attack by the illegalist anarchist Bonnot Gang, one of the first motorized armed robberies in history, L'Excelsior on 22 December 1911[25]

The August 29, 1909 edition of The Rich Hill Tribune contained a front-page news story entitled "Bank Robbers in Motor Car" and according to which two robbers used a gun to rob the Valley bank of Santa Clara of $7,000. They then used a hired automobile to escape and were chased by police and a posse of citizens also in automobiles, eventually leading to their capture.[26]

On December 21, 1911, members of the illegalist anarchist group the Bonnot Gang carried out the Ordener attack, using a car to reach the courier responsible for daily bank deposits. They confronted him, shot him down, and fled with the money.[27][28] The Bonnot Gang would go on to repeat these motorized robberies in the following months.[28] These were the first motorized robberies in history and significant events in the evolution of banditry.[27][28]

Great Depression era and "Public Enemy"

[edit]

The 1920s and 1930s saw a significant increase in bank robberies in the United States. This led to the formation of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the designation "Public Enemy" for significant wanted criminals.[29] This era saw the rise of famous gangs such as the Dillinger Gang, the Barrow Gang (1932–1934), and the Barker–Karpis gang. Other famous public enemies included Pretty Boy Floyd (Public Enemy No, 1 in 1934) and Machine Gun Kelly.

First known use of camera footage to apprehend a bank robber

[edit]

In 1957, security cameras installed at St. Clair Savings and Loan in Cleveland recorded the first film footage used to apprehend and identify bank robbers. The robbery occurred on April 12, when a 24-year-old male pointed a gun at a teller while his accomplice, an 18-year-old female, stuffed over $2,000 into a bag. A third accomplice drove the getaway car. The three were captured shortly after video footage of the robbery aired on national news.[30]

Stockholm syndrome

[edit]

In 1973, four hostages were taken during the Norrmalmstorg robbery in Stockholm, Sweden. After their release, the hostages defended their captors and refused to testify against them. This led to an academic interest in a phenomenon soon after referred to as Stockholm syndrome, wherein hostages, during captivity, paradoxically form a sympathetic bond with their captors as a survival strategy.[31] Stockholm syndrome is a "contested illness" due to doubt about the legitimacy of the condition.[31]

First known use of a helicopter

[edit]

On February 16, 1984, more than $160,000 was stolen from the Merchants and Farmers Bank and Trust Co. in Leesville, Louisiana using a stolen getaway helicopter.[32]

Historical bank robbers

[edit]
Main article: List of bank robbers and robberies

George Leonidas Leslie (1842 – June 4, 1878) was involved in 80% of the bank robberies in the U.S. from 1869 to his death in 1878. He was involved in the Manhattan Savings Institution robbery.[33]

Jesse James (September 5, 1847 – April 3, 1882) was one of the most notorious bank robbers in American history.

Ned Kelly (December 1854 – 11 November 1880), Australian bushranger and folk hero, pulled off a series of bank robberies in Victoria and New South Wales.

Herman Lamm (April 19, 1890 – December 16, 1930), The first "modern" bank robber, who developed techniques of surveillance and planning, such as casing and getaway maps, used by many latter stick-up men such as John Dillinger.

Bonnie Parker and Clyde Barrow, better known as "Bonnie and Clyde" (active February 1932 – May 1934), were an American couple who went on a crime spree during the Great Depression with their associates, the Barrow Gang. They captured the public imagination with their image as a wild young couple. Along with their gang, they were credited with only ten bank robberies, often making away with as little as $80. They were eventually ambushed and killed on the roadside outside Bienville Parish, Louisiana by a posse of Texas and Louisiana lawmen.

John Dillinger (June 22, 1903 – July 22, 1934) robbed banks in the Midwestern United States. Some considered him a dangerous criminal, while others idolized him as a present-day Robin Hood. He gained this latter reputation (and the nickname "Jackrabbit") for his graceful movements during bank heists, such as leaping over the counter (a movement he supposedly copied from the movies) and many narrow getaways from police. On July 22, 1934, FBI agents cornered Dillinger in an alley outside a movie theater in Chicago, Illinois, where he was shot and killed by multiple agents.

George "Baby Face" Nelson (December 6, 1908 – November 27, 1934) was a bank robber and former associate of John Dillinger. He is notable for having killed more FBI agents in the line of duty than any other person. He was killed in a shootout known as The Battle of Barrington, outside Chicago.

Edwin Alonzo Boyd (April 2, 1914 – May 17, 2002) was a Canadian bank robber and leader of the Boyd Gang, which pulled off a string of heists, including the largest in Toronto history.

Clarence Anglin, and brother John Anglin, the infamous Alcatraz escapees, robbed a bank in Alabama.

In the early 20th century, Willie Sutton (June 30, 1901 – November 2, 1980) was asked why he robbed banks, and he was famously reported as answering: "Because that's where the money is." This is, in fact, a quote invented by the interviewer to make the story more interesting.[34] However, when asked, Sutton did write this statement and autograph it for his physician, so in a sense it is accurate.

Prevention

[edit]
Expended dye pack after a Los Angeles area Bank of America robbery, January 2, 2008. This particular pack was concealed inside a stack of twenty-dollar bills.
Bank orthotube with metal detector system to avoid unauthorized access by armed individuals in Chieti, Italy

In the 1920s, American banks added the security of alarm systems and concrete-reinforced, blast-proof vaults.[35]

Modern banks have implemented modern security measures, like motion-sensing and high resolution color security cameras, time-locked heavy vault doors, silent alarms, exploding dye packs, bait money, and GPS tracking devices. Some banks supplement this protection with armed or unarmed security guards.[36]

Today's biometric technology makes non-violent methods of gaining access, even by the most experienced safe hackers and code crackers, nearly impossible. Modern vaults and safes are also reinforced to the point that the amount of explosives needed to blow them open would likely create unwanted attention and run the risk of harming the building to the point of collapse. By their very nature, even the most impregnable vault or safe eventually needs to be able to be opened and closed by someone. To circumvent vault and safe security features, robbers often kidnap the bank manager, but that is not always a successful idea as banks have often removed the manager's ability to open the vault.

The police have new measures at their disposal to catch bank robbers, such as well-armed SWAT teams. Forensic identification techniques have also improved greatly; should a bank robber fire a gun, the police can trace the bullet to the exact firearm using ballistic fingerprinting. Martin Kemp, in a BBC documentary, once inquired on the effectiveness of an Uzi in a bank robbery, to which the firearms training instructor joked "that would be sixty-four pieces of evidence to convict you." The sawed-off shotgun, a common robbery weapon in the United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand where handguns are difficult to obtain, is easily concealable but not particularly effective.

While it is not certain that the first time someone robs a bank they will be caught, if they continue to rob banks, they will most likely be caught. Few criminals are able to make a successful living out of bank robbery over the long run. Bank robberies are still fairly common and are indeed successful, although eventually many bank robbers are found and arrested. A report by the Federal Bureau of Investigation[37] states that, among Category I serious crimes, the arrest rate for bank robbery in 2001 was second only to that of murder. Today most organized crime groups tend to make their money by other means, such as extortion, drug trafficking, gambling, prostitution, loan sharking, identity theft, or online scamming and phishing.

A further factor making bank robbery unattractive for criminals in the United States is the severity with which it is prosecuted. United States Federal Sentencing Guidelines for bank robbery gives long prison terms, which are usually further enhanced by the use or carrying of loaded firearms, prior criminal convictions, and the absence of parole from the federal prison system. As with any type of robbery, the fact that bank robbery is also inherently a violent crime typically causes corrections administrators to place imprisoned bank robbers in harsher high-security institutions.

In film

[edit]

Bank robberies are often a main plot in many heist films. Some of these films are based on the lives of historic bank robbers, such as Bonnie and Clyde (1967), Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid (1969), The Newton Boys (1998) and Public Enemies (2009) (based on the life of John Dillinger).

Dog Day Afternoon (1975), Set It Off (1996), and The Bank Job (2008) are based on actual bank robberies. Other notable but fictional examples include Point Break (1991), Heat (1995), Henry's Crime (2010), and The Town (2010). In The Town, bank robbery is described as an element of life for residents of Charlestown, a neighborhood in Boston. However, this is exaggerated and is disputed by residents of Charlestown, who describe it as outdated, as of when the film The Town was made. Up to the early 2000s, Charlestown was notorious for criminals whose specialty was robbery but also other lucrative crimes.[38]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Bank robbery

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Bank robbery is the felonious act of stealing or attempting to steal or other property belonging to or in the custody of a , federal credit union, or similar , accomplished by force and violence, , or . In jurisdictions such as the , it constitutes a serious federal punishable by up to 20 years , with enhanced penalties for involvement of weapons, , or . Although popularized in media as elaborate, team-executed operations targeting vaults, criminological analyses reveal that over 90 percent involve demands at teller counters by solitary, often undisguised offenders relying on verbal rather than physical violence or arms. Empirical data from reports indicate typical hauls under $10,000 per incident, with perpetrators frequently young, unemployed males driven by immediate financial desperation or substance dependency, resulting in high clearance rates exceeding 50 percent due to footage, dye packs, and rapid response protocols. Bank robberies peaked in the early 1990s at nearly 10,000 annually in the U.S. but have since plummeted by over 85 percent, reflecting causal factors like improved banking , alternative cyber-enabled opportunities, and deterrent effects from consistent prosecution and technological tracking. This decline underscores a shift from opportunistic physical crimes to lower-risk illicit activities, as traditional bank heists yield amid fortified defenses and forensic predictability.

Definition and Characteristics

Bank robbery is conceptually understood as a form of aggravated targeting financial institutions, where the perpetrator employs or threatens , , or against bank personnel or customers to seize or . This distinguishes it from non-violent bank burglaries, emphasizing the immediate risk to human life and the coercive element that elevates it beyond simple in criminological classifications. The act typically occurs during when vaults may be inaccessible, relying instead on direct to compel compliance, as opposed to surreptitious entry. Legally, bank robbery incorporates core elements of robbery—unlawful taking of from another's possession through or fear—but specifies financial institutions insured by federal entities or handling interstate commerce, rendering it a distinct offense in many jurisdictions. In the United States, for instance, it is codified under federal as taking or attempting to take from a by , , , or , with penalties escalating if a dangerous weapon is used or results. Attempts, conspiracies, and post-robbery possession of stolen proceeds are also prosecutable, reflecting the offense's broad scope to deter facilitation. Internationally, no unified definition exists under global , but domestic penal codes consistently frame bank within general provisions, requiring proof of via or against protected premises like banks or credit unions. Variations arise in elements such as whether implied threats suffice or if digital branches qualify, but the consensus prioritizes the of financial target and personal endangerment to justify severe sanctions, often treating it as an aggravated with sentences exceeding those for ordinary . Jurisdictions may extend liability to accessories or those receiving proceeds, aligning with causal chains of criminal .

Core Features and Risk Factors

Bank robberies typically involve an individual or group entering a and demanding cash through intimidation, often via a written note or verbal demand, with the use of a displayed in approximately 40% of cases but discharged in fewer than 1%. These crimes are characterized by their brevity, averaging less than two minutes from entry to exit, minimizing exposure to while targeting accessible cash reserves, though the average haul per incident is under $4,000 due to limited teller cash holdings and security protocols like or dye packs. Violence against victims is uncommon, occurring in about 2% of U.S. incidents, as robbers prioritize speed over confrontation to reduce apprehension risks, with over 60% of perpetrators arrested within 24 hours owing to surveillance footage, witnesses, and traceable vehicles. Key risk factors elevating the likelihood of a bank robbery include branch location and design: standalone facilities with adjacent parking lots and proximity to major roads facilitate concealment and escape, making them over three times more targeted than those in shopping centers with high foot traffic and . Repeat victimization compounds , as branches previously robbed face up to five times the of recurrence, often by opportunistic amateurs familiar with prior lapses in response protocols. Offender profiles further inform risks, with nearly 65% of federal cases involving individuals with prior convictions for robbery, , or drug offenses, indicating driven by or financial desperation rather than professional planning; demographic data from sentencing records show over 80% are male, with offenders aged 25-40 predominant, though long-term success is rare as fewer than 20% evade capture beyond a year. Security measures can modulate risks but introduce trade-offs: armed guards correlate with a fourfold increase in rates during incidents due to escalated confrontations, while passive deterrents like bulletproof enclosures and electronic reduce entry attempts by up to 50% without heightening . Economic stressors, such as localized spikes above 10%, temporally align with robbery upticks, as evidenced by quarterly FBI data linking 15-20% rises in incidents to recessionary periods, underscoring desperation as a causal driver over .

Prevalence and Variations

Geographic Distribution

In the United States, bank robberies are systematically tracked by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), revealing a concentration in urban areas and certain regions. In 2023, the FBI recorded 1,263 bank robberies nationwide, a continuation of the long-term decline from a peak of over 9,000 in the early 1990s. The Western region reported the highest number at 493 incidents, followed by the South (346), North Central (260), and Northeast (164). Within states, California led with 192 robberies, accounting for approximately 15% of the national total, while Illinois followed with 116; other high-incidence states included Texas (60), Florida (63), and New York (61).
RegionBank Robberies (2023)
West493
South346
North Central260
Northeast164
This distribution reflects factors such as population density, the prevalence of branch banking, and socioeconomic conditions in metropolitan areas like Los Angeles and Chicago, where serial robbers often operate across multiple institutions. Outside the United States, comparable data on bank-specific robberies is sparse and inconsistent due to differences in classification, reporting, and the integration of banking into less physical formats. In , traditional bank robberies have plummeted amid enhanced security and digital shifts; for instance, reported zero bank robberies in 2022, down from several annually a decade prior. similarly saw a decline to fewer than five incidents per year by 2022. Earlier European Banking Federation data indicated around 5,550 robberies across member countries in 2007, but recent figures suggest a sustained drop, with attacks shifting toward ATMs in nations like (461 ATM-related in 2023). In , the robbery rate per financial institution fell to 0.18 per 100 in 2024, reflecting improved countermeasures despite historically higher violence in such crimes. Globally, bank robberies appear less prevalent in regions with fewer physical branches or stricter gun controls, though general robbery rates—often including banks—are elevated in Latin American countries like (1,587 per 100,000 people in ). The lack of standardized international tracking limits precise cross-country comparisons, but points to the U.S. as hosting the majority of documented incidents, driven by its extensive branch network and federal reporting mandate.

Types of Bank Robberies

robberies constitute the most frequent type of bank robbery, wherein the perpetrator approaches a teller and passes a written demand for cash, typically alluding to a concealed without displaying one. In 2023, this accounted for 753 incidents reported to the FBI across the . These offenses are generally perpetrated by solitary individuals who avoid direct confrontation, enabling completion in under three minutes in over two-thirds of cases. Oral demand robberies involve verbal threats directed at bank employees to relinquish money, absent any written note or visible weapon. Such methods occurred in 540 instances in 2023. Like note-based approaches, they emphasize speed and minimal physical risk to the offender, often yielding modest hauls averaging around $4,000. Takeover robberies, rarer but more hazardous, feature groups of offenders seizing control of the entire branch, subduing staff and patrons through intimidation or force to access multiple vaults or tills. The FBI recorded 76 such events in 2023, frequently involving firearms and resulting in higher incidences of injury or hostage-taking. These differ from opportunistic "note jobs" by requiring coordination and escalating violence risks, though they remain atypical amid predominantly amateur-led crimes. Weapon usage overlays these categories: firearms were displayed or discharged in 230 robberies in 2023, while threats of unseen weapons featured in 539 cases. Empirical patterns from FBI data underscore that over 80% of robberies involve unarmed or non-violent , driven by the low for impulsive actors rather than professional syndicates.

United States Federal Statutes

The federal crime of bank robbery in the is codified primarily under 18 U.S.C. § 2113, part of the Federal Bank Robbery and Incidental Crimes Act, which prohibits various acts against federally insured financial institutions. Enacted on May 18, 1934, during a surge in bank failures and robberies amid the , the statute provides federal jurisdiction via the interstate commerce power, applying to institutions whose deposits are insured by the (FDIC), (NCUA), or similar federal entities. This includes national banks, member banks of the System, insured credit unions, and savings associations. Under § 2113(a), it is unlawful for any person, by force and violence or by , to take or attempt to take from the person or presence of another any property, money, or thing of value belonging to or in the custody of a covered , or to enter such an with to commit any therein, or to obtain or attempt to obtain such property by . Conviction carries a penalty of fine under Title 18 or for not more than 20 years, or both. Section 2113(b) addresses non-forcible taking and carrying away of such property ( larceny), punishable by fine or up to 10 years , or both. Enhanced penalties apply under § 2113(d) for armed bank robbery, where the offender assaults any person or puts any person's life in jeopardy by use of a dangerous weapon or device while violating subsection (a), increasing the maximum to 25 years. If a violation of subsection (a) or (d) results in death, § 2113(e) mandates punishment by death or . Subsection (c) criminalizes receiving, possessing, concealing, or disposing of stolen property, with penalties mirroring those in (b). Attempts to commit these offenses are explicitly punishable as if the acts were completed. Related provisions include § 2113(f), defining "" broadly to encompass federally insured entities and clarifying that the does not limit state prosecutions. Federal prosecutors often pair § 2113 charges with 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) for use of a during a crime of violence, adding mandatory minimum of 7 years for brandishing or 10 years consecutive for discharge. Jurisdiction requires proof of the federal insurance nexus, absent which state laws govern. Bank robbery lacks a dedicated international or unified legal framework, as it constitutes a domestic under national penal codes, typically categorized as aggravated due to the institutional target, , or weapons involved. International cooperation primarily occurs through bilateral and multilateral treaties, which list robbery as an extraditable offense provided dual criminality—meaning the act must be punishable by at least one year of in both jurisdictions—and supported by evidence. Organizations like facilitate cross-border investigations and arrests for bank robbery cases involving fleeing perpetrators, but enforcement remains jurisdiction-specific. In common law jurisdictions outside the , such as the , bank robbery falls under the , which defines as theft involving force or threats, carrying a maximum penalty of ; sentencing guidelines from the Sentencing Council emphasize custodial terms, often ranging from several years to decades depending on aggravating factors like arms or group involvement. Canada's Criminal Code sections 343 and 344 classify as stealing with violence or threats to overcome resistance, punishable by up to ; firearm use triggers mandatory minimums of four years for a first offense or seven years if restricted or prohibited weapons are involved. In , penalties vary by state: Queensland's imposes up to 14 years for basic , escalating for armed variants, while Victoria's Crimes Act sets 25 years maximum for armed . Civil law systems, exemplified by Germany, treat bank robbery under the Strafgesetzbuch (StGB) as Raub (§ 249), requiring minimum one-year imprisonment for theft with force or threats, or schwerer Raub (§ 250) with enhancements for weapons, accomplices, or significant value, mandating three to 15 years; bank targets often qualify as aggravating due to public endangerment. These approaches prioritize deterrence through severe penalties and restitution, reflecting empirical correlations between stringent sentencing and reduced incidence, though cross-national data show variations influenced by enforcement resources rather than statutory differences alone. Extradition for bank robbery succeeds in cases like those under U.S. treaties, where evidence of the offense's gravity supports requests, but refusals occur if political offense exceptions apply or statutes of limitations expire.

Sentencing and Deterrence Effects

In the United States, federal bank robbery under 18 U.S.C. § 2113 carries a maximum penalty of 20 years' imprisonment for entering a bank to commit a felony or larceny exceeding $1,000, with enhancements for aggravating factors such as the use of a dangerous weapon, which can elevate the sentence to 25 years, or result in life imprisonment if death occurs during the offense. Additional mandatory minimums apply under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) for firearms use, requiring at least 5 years consecutive to the base sentence, increasing to 7 years for brandishing or 10 years for discharging the weapon. The U.S. Sentencing Guidelines assign a base offense level of 20 for robbery, with adjustments for factors like victim restraint (+2 to +6 levels) or amount stolen, often resulting in guideline ranges of 41–51 months for lower-level offenses but extending to 15–20 years or more for armed cases with criminal history. Empirical data from the U.S. Sentencing Commission indicate that the average sentence imposed for federal robbery offenses, including bank robberies, was 111 months (approximately 9.25 years) in 2015, with offenders convicted under § 924(c) receiving an average of 177 months due to consecutive sentencing. Earlier analyses of convicted bank robbers showed median sentences of 180 months for armed offenses and 120 months for unarmed ones, with median around 72 months after accounting for good-time credits and . These lengths reflect a policy emphasis on incapacitation, as repeat offenders—common in bank robbery profiles—face upward departures, though actual has varied with changes in mandatory minimums and guideline advisory status post-Booker (2005). Regarding deterrence, empirical studies suggest that while increased sentence severity for bank robbery has some marginal effect, it is generally weaker than the deterrent impact of higher apprehension and risks. A study of Italian bank robberies from 2005–2007 estimated criminals' responsiveness to sanctions, finding that perceived jail disutility deters only low-productivity offenders, with high-expected-gain robbers showing limited sensitivity to longer terms. U.S.-focused on add-on gun sentencing enhancements isolated incarceration effects, observing a roughly 5% decline in gun-involved robberies within three years, attributing this partly to specific deterrence but noting displacement to non-gun crimes. Broader sentence enhancement laws, such as those for repeat violent felons, correlated with an 8% drop in covered crimes within three years, though causal attribution to deterrence versus incapacitation remains debated, as confounds pure severity effects. Analyses of U.S. bank robbery trends indicate that post-1990s declines—over 80% in incidence—align more with improved bank security (e.g., dye packs, ) and certainty of detection than sentencing hikes, as robbery clearance rates rose while average sentences stabilized around a . data from multiple U.S. cities tested general deterrence, finding weak evidence that publicized longer sentences reduce future incidents, with offender decisions driven more by immediate risks like armed guards (reducing targeted bank robberies by 35–40%, half displaced nearby) than prospective . This aligns with criminological consensus that elasticity of crime to punishment severity is low (around -0.1 to -0.3), implying a 10% sentence increase yields at most a 1–3% crime drop, overshadowed by perceptual biases where offenders undervalue distant penalties. International comparisons, such as stricter European penalties yielding no proportionally lower rates, reinforce that deterrence from sentencing is context-dependent and often mediated by rather than length alone.

Historical Evolution

Pre-20th Century Examples

One of the earliest recorded bank robberies in the United States occurred on the night of August 31 or early morning of September 1, 1798, at the Bank of Pennsylvania located in , . Perpetrators Isaac Davis, a member of the Carpenters' Company, and bank porter Thomas Cunningham exploited insider access without forced entry to steal $162,821 in cash and securities. The theft was uncovered after Davis deposited portions of the proceeds into other banks, prompting suspicion; he subsequently confessed, returned most of the funds except $2,000, and received a , while Cunningham fled. This inside job highlighted vulnerabilities in early banking security and led to the wrongful of locksmith Patrick Lyon, who later won a $12,000 civil judgment in 1805. In Britain, a significant early example took place on the night of July 13-14, 1811, targeting the Paisley Union Bank branch at 49-51 Ingram Street, , . Thieves Huffey , James Moffat (alias Mackoull), and Harry French used skeleton keys made from wax impressions to breach the premises over multiple nights, absconding with £19,753 in notes and specie. The robbery was discovered on July 15 when the manager found the safe empty; approximately £12,000 was recovered through negotiations, was arrested, and Moffat was later sentenced to death in 1820 but died by poison before execution. Equivalent to about £13 million in modern terms, this heist underscored the risks of physical key-based security in nascent joint-stock banking systems. The March 19, 1831, theft from the City Bank of New York marked another milestone, with burglars using duplicate or homemade keys to access the vault and steal $245,000 in cash and bonds, equivalent to over $7 million today. Suspected as an inside job due to the precision of the entry, the perpetrators—possibly including Edward Smith—remained at large, with much of the loot unrecovered, exposing flaws in urban bank vaults during the early republic. Mid-19th-century robberies escalated with organized gangs in the . On February 13, 1866, eight to twelve ex-Confederate guerrillas, likely led by or , conducted the first successful daytime peacetime bank robbery in U.S. history at the Clay County Savings Association in , pistol- the cashier and escaping with approximately $60,000 after killing a bystander. This event signaled the rise of post-Civil War outlaw bands exploiting weak in border regions. A failed attempt by the James-Younger Gang on September 7, 1876, at the First National Bank in , exemplified the risks of bold daylight operations. Eight members entered the bank demanding $35,000 but triggered alarms from resistant employees and armed townsfolk, leading to a that killed two gang members, three civilians, and wounded others; the robbers fled with only $26 in cash but were pursued, resulting in further captures and deaths. The raid's failure, attributed to community resistance and poor planning, contributed to the eventual dismantling of the gang and heightened national awareness of organized bank crime.

Frontier and Early Industrial Era

In the era, spanning roughly the to the 1890s, bank robberies were far rarer than popularized in later media portrayals, with historical records indicating only a handful of confirmed incidents across the western territories and states. Economic analyses of the period attribute this scarcity to several causal factors: banks typically held minimal cash reserves, as transactions often involved specie or drafts under the gold standard, reducing attractive targets; armed citizenry and private security deterred attempts; and rapid via posses led to high rates of perpetrator capture or death. Scholarly reviews of 19th-century western data across 15 states identify fewer than a dozen successful bank heists in four decades, challenging narratives of rampant . One of the earliest documented daylight, peacetime bank robberies occurred on February 13, 1866, in , when members of what became known as the James-Younger Gang raided the Clay County Savings Association, escaping with approximately $60,000 in bonds and cash—equivalent to over $1 million in modern terms—amid post-Civil War guerrilla resentments against Union-aligned institutions. The gang, led by figures like , escalated operations in subsequent years, conducting at least a dozen bank and train holdups between 1866 and 1876, including the failed September 7, 1876, attempt at the First National Bank in , where armed townsfolk killed or wounded most robbers, resulting in the capture of the Younger brothers and marking a turning point in the gang's decline. These operations relied on insider knowledge, horseback getaways, and intimidation via firearms like Colt revolvers, but success hinged on surprise and minimal resistance, with hauls often exaggerated in . Into the early industrial period around the turn of the , as railroads expanded and urban banks proliferated, robbery tactics evolved slightly with group coordination but remained infrequent for banks specifically, shifting emphasis toward trains carrying payrolls. The Dalton Gang's October 5, 1892, dual-bank assault in —targeting the C.M. Condon and First National banks—exemplifies this transition, with five outlaws killed in a against citizen posses, yielding negligible loot and underscoring the perils of daylight raids in growing towns equipped with telegraphs for swift alerts. Similarly, the , including , executed the August 13, 1896, robbery of the Bank of Montpelier in , netting about $7,000 before fleeing on horseback, one of the era's larger verified bank hauls amid increasing federal pursuit via agents like those from the Pinkerton Agency. These incidents highlight causal deterrents like improved communication and armed resistance, contributing to the era's low incidence rates before motorized vehicles altered dynamics post-1910.

20th Century Technological Shifts

The advent of the automobile in the early 20th century fundamentally altered bank robbery dynamics by enabling rapid getaways, which were previously constrained by horse-drawn transport. The first recorded use of a getaway car occurred around 1905, allowing criminals to escape local pursuits and expand their operational range across jurisdictions. This mobility surge contributed to a rise in bank heists, as vehicles facilitated transporting stolen goods and evading immediate capture, prompting law enforcement adaptations like interstate coordination. In response, banks and authorities introduced countermeasures, including the 1932 invention of the dye pack, initially termed the "Liquid Protecting Device," designed to stain stolen red upon activation outside the bank premises. By the mid-20th century, these devices, often triggered by magnetic sensors or removal from secure drawers, became standard in teller cash, rendering laundered proceeds identifiable and deterring opportunistic robbers. Dye packs proved effective in recovering funds, though sophisticated criminals sometimes detected and discarded them during flights. Surveillance technology advanced significantly post-World War II, with (CCTV) systems deployed in banks during the to record transactions and deter through visible deterrence. These early cameras, coupled with video cassette recorders by the 1970s, provided evidentiary footage that aided investigations, shifting robbery tactics toward masks and non-violent "note jobs" to obscure identities. Overall, these shifts escalated an between robbers exploiting vehicular speed and banks layering passive defenses like dye and optical monitoring, reducing success rates by the century's end.

Post-1990s Decline


In the United States, the incidence of bank robberies peaked in 1991 at 9,388 reported incidents according to FBI data. By 2021, this figure had dropped to 1,724, and further to 1,362 in 2023, marking an approximately 85% decline from the early 1990s high. This trend parallels the broader post-1990s reduction in violent crime rates but has been more pronounced for bank-specific offenses, with average loot per successful robbery also falling—from around $9,600 in the mid-2000s to $7,500 by the early 2010s. The primary driver of this decline stems from enhanced security measures implemented since the , including widespread installation of high-resolution surveillance cameras, bullet-resistant bandit barriers, electronic alarm systems, and time-delayed vaults that prevent immediate access to cash. Dye packs, which explode and stain money with indelible upon removal from the premises, have further deterred robbers by rendering proceeds unusable, as demonstrated in numerous post-robbery recoveries. These countermeasures have elevated the risk of detection and failure, with FBI clearance rates for bank robberies consistently exceeding 60% due to clear video and witness descriptions facilitating rapid arrests. Additional factors include the shift toward digital banking and electronic funds transfers, which reduced the volume of cash held in branches despite an increase in the number of outlets, diminishing the economic incentive for physical robberies. Perpetrators have increasingly turned to lower-risk alternatives such as cyber fraud, identity theft, and check fraud, which offer higher yields with minimal violence or traceability issues compared to traditional heists. Stricter federal sentencing under laws like the 1994 Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act, imposing minimum 5-20 year terms for armed bank robbery, have reinforced deterrence by raising the expected cost relative to the low average payout. This combination of technological, procedural, and legal adaptations has rendered bank robbery an increasingly unviable enterprise by the 21st century.

Incidence and Success Rates

, bank robberies peaked at 9,388 incidents in 1991 before declining sharply due to enhanced security measures, fewer physical branches, and shifts in criminal incentives toward lower-risk activities. By 2023, the FBI recorded 1,263 robberies as part of 1,362 total bank crimes (including burglaries and larcenies), marking the lowest annual figure on record and an 83% drop over the prior two decades. This trend accelerated post-, with robberies falling 85% from the early 1990s peak amid widespread adoption of , packs, and electronic tracking. Clearance rates for bank robberies remain high relative to other violent crimes, typically ranging from 55% to over 60%, reflecting federal jurisdiction, detailed witness descriptions, and forensic like fingerprints or video that facilitate arrests. In 2023, of 1,652 persons involved in bank crimes, 801 were identified by law enforcement, though full clearance data underscores that many perpetrators are apprehended post-incident rather than during the act. However, even cleared cases often yield low net gains for robbers, as approximately 80% of stolen funds go unrecovered due to , dye staining, and rapid dissipation.
YearBank Robberies (U.S.)
19919,388
2008~6,700
20231,263
These figures highlight bank robbery's diminishing viability, with incidence driven more by opportunistic, low-planning acts than sophisticated heists, and success constrained by high detection probabilities outweighing average hauls under $10,000 per incident in recent years.

Perpetrator Demographics

Bank robbery perpetrators are overwhelmingly male. In federal sentences for bank robberies during fiscal year 2021, 94.2% of offenders were male. FBI data on identified persons involved in bank crimes in 2023 similarly indicate that approximately 92% of those with known sex were male (1,291 males versus 106 females out of 1,397 identified by race and sex). Racial demographics show significant overrepresentation of Black offenders relative to their share of the U.S. population. Among federal bank robbery offenders sentenced in fiscal year 2021, 59.5% were , 18.3% , 17.1% , and 5.2% other races. FBI 2023 data on identified bank crime perpetrators align directionally, with individuals comprising about 55% (767 out of 1,397 with known race), 32% (449), and 10% (136). The average age of bank robbery offenders at federal sentencing is 40 years, higher than for other robbery subtypes like (average 32 years). This contrasts with general offenders averaging 33 years across federal cases. Most perpetrators have prior criminal histories. In 2021 federal bank cases, 86.7% of offenders had at least one prior conviction, including 66.5% with violent priors and 39.2% with prior convictions. FBI data indicate 30% of identified 2023 bank crime perpetrators had prior bank-related convictions. Education levels are low: 35.7% lacked a , 45.2% were high school graduates, 17.4% had some , and only 1.7% held a degree. Unemployment rates among bank robbers historically approach 70%, with many lacking employable skills or . Approximately 26% of identified 2023 perpetrators were narcotics users. Compared to other federal offenders, bank robbers tend to be younger, less educated, less likely to be married, and from lower-income backgrounds.

Economic Incentives and Outcomes

Bank robberies are often motivated by the prospect of rapid financial gain with minimal preparation, appealing to individuals facing immediate economic pressures or lacking legitimate high-yield opportunities. However, empirical data reveals that the expected economic returns are substantially lower than popularly perceived, with average hauls failing to justify the risks involved. In the United States, the average loss per bank robbery offense was $4,213 in 2019, reflecting the limited cash holdings in branches due to electronic transfers and just-in-time inventory practices. This figure underscores a core incentive mismatch: perpetrators target banks for their symbolic wealth, yet actual accessible funds remain constrained, often supplemented by dye packs or tracking devices that render portions unusable. Outcomes further diminish profitability, as success rates are low and apprehension frequent. Approximately one-third of bank robberies yield no monetary gain for participants, while around 20% result in immediate capture, leading to average per-person returns of about £12,700 in analyzed cases, adjusted for failures. In the , FBI data indicates that while robberies have declined 85% from peaks, the persistent low average take—around $4,200 in recent years—combined with high clearance rates and sentences averaging over a , yields a negative net economic value when factoring in foregone wages and incarceration costs. Economic models of suggest robbers undervalue these risks, selecting targets based on perceived ease rather than rational , often escalating to firearms for marginal gains of €1,400 per additional minute inside, yet most operations conclude in under three minutes to evade response. Broader causal analysis points to deterrence through enhanced security and alternative crimes offering superior risk-reward profiles, such as , eroding bank robbery's viability. Studies confirm that while correlates weakly with higher per-robbery rewards via use, overall incentives wane as banks minimize cash exposure, rendering the crime economically irrational for most actors beyond short-term desperation. Thus, outcomes predominantly manifest as personal financial ruin for perpetrators, with recovered funds minimal—around 20% of stolen amounts—and systemic costs borne by rather than direct economic windfalls.

Methods and Execution

Planning Stages

Bank robbery planning, to the extent it occurs, generally involves target selection, , and basic logistical arrangements, though reveals that most incidents feature minimal preparation due to the opportunistic nature of the crime. Analysis of U.S. bank data indicates that nearly 80% are perpetrated by lone amateurs, often first-time offenders lacking prior experience in such crimes, who rely on simple tactics like passing demand notes to tellers without weapons or disguises in over 60% of cases. This limited planning contributes to low failure rates, with only about 10% of attempts thwarted, as standardized bank layouts and teller compliance reduce the need for complex schemes. Target selection prioritizes perceived vulnerabilities, such as branches with unobstructed escape routes, high cash holdings, and suboptimal , often during opening hours when fewer customers and staff are present to complicate execution. Robbers assess factors like street visibility and proximity to alleys or parking for quick egress, favoring institutions where rapid confrontation can yield compliance without prolonged engagement. Reconnaissance, commonly termed "casing," entails repeated visits to observe operational routines, including opening and closing procedures, employee behaviors, camera placements, and teller access to drawers. This phase allows evaluation of potential resistance points, such as dye packs or alarms, and identification of peak vulnerability windows, like mid-morning shifts when is replenished but defenses are routine. Professional groups, comprising a minority of cases, may extend casing to map internal layouts and staff patterns, though data from FBI-contributed statistics underscore that such deliberate is atypical among the predominantly impulsive actors. Logistical preparation includes procuring disguises (e.g., hats, masks), vehicles for getaway, and occasionally firearms or notes scripted for , alongside rudimentary escape route plotting to evade immediate pursuit. Timing aligns with execution demands for surprise, frequently Fridays between 9 and 11 a.m., when is higher but alertness may wane. Repeat offenders or teams invest more in , but overall, the brevity of —often spanning days rather than weeks—reflects causal incentives: high perceived rewards against swift detection risks, with arrests following most incidents via or witness descriptions.

Tactical Approaches

The predominant tactical approaches in bank robberies emphasize speed and minimal confrontation to reduce detection risk and escape time, with most incidents lasting under five minutes. According to (FBI) data, verbal demands and note-passing constitute the majority of cases, often avoiding overt violence while implying threats to compel tellers to hand over cash from accessible drawers. These methods exploit the isolation of teller stations and the on employees to prioritize safety over resistance, typically yielding an average haul of around $4,200 per robbery based on aggregated FBI statistics. Note-passing involves the robber presenting a pre-written to a teller, frequently referencing a concealed or to deter alarms or pursuit without physical escalation. This tactic, classified as unarmed under federal guidelines, relies on psychological and is executed solo in most instances, allowing rapid exit post-compliance. Verbal demand tactics similarly use direct oral instructions to a teller, sometimes paired with gestures simulating a , prioritizing branches with high foot traffic for quick blending into crowds afterward. Armed executions display or brandish firearms, knives, or simulated weapons to enforce obedience, increasing compliance rates but elevating perpetrator injury or apprehension risks during flight. FBI records indicate weapons appear in a substantial portion of robberies, though actual discharge remains rare due to the emphasis on deterrence over lethal force. Takeover approaches, involving control of multiple staff and customers via threats or barriers, represent a minority of incidents but demand coordinated teams and extended durations, often targeting vaults for higher yields at greater evidentiary cost. Less frequent variants include "" tactics, ambushing arriving employees before branch opening to access unsecured cash reserves with reduced witness exposure. These methods underscore empirical patterns where solo, opportunistic entries outperform elaborate schemes in frequency and evasion success, as evidenced by law enforcement analyses of cleared cases.

Technological Adaptations and Countermeasures

Banks employ advanced technologies, including high-resolution cameras equipped with facial recognition and AI-driven analytics, to monitor branches and ATMs in real time, deterring potential robbers and facilitating post-incident identification. These systems have contributed to a decline in bank robberies, with visible cameras alone reducing risks by up to 300% in monitored locations compared to unsecured ones. Dye packs, embedded in cash bundles and designed to explode via radio signal or upon exiting the bank, release indelible and to stain bills and perpetrators, rendering stolen funds unusable and aiding apprehension. A survey of financial institutions found these devices activated successfully in over 98% of robbery attempts, significantly recovering assets and deterring future crimes by complicating . Some banks have begun supplementing or replacing dye packs with GPS trackers in , enabling real-time location of fleeing robbers via signals, as demonstrated in cases where devices led to rapid arrests. Physical barriers such as bandit or bullet-resistant glass partitions between tellers and customers, combined with time-delayed vaults and silent alarms linked to , minimize direct confrontation and delay access to funds. Robbers have adapted technologically in limited ways, such as employing signal jammers to disrupt wireless alarms or cameras during , though empirical indicates most physical heists rely on low-tech methods like disguises and note-passing to evade voice and facial capture. The low average haul of approximately $4,000 per U.S. bank robbery underscores the diminished economic incentive amid these layered defenses.

Prevention Strategies

Physical and Technological Security

Physical security measures in banks include bullet-resistant barriers at teller stations, which deter armed robberies by limiting direct access to employees and cash drawers. These barriers, often Level 1 ballistic glass or baffle systems, have been shown to reduce robbery incidents by preventing assailants from reaching over counters or firing effectively at staff. The Bank Protection Act of 1968 mandates financial institutions to implement safeguards such as vaults or safes for cash protection and adequate lighting to illuminate entrances and vaults during non-business hours, contributing to a decline in robberies from approximately 4,400 in 2016 to 1,362 reported incidents in 2023. High teller counters and mantraps—entry vestibules with interlocking doors—further restrict unauthorized access, forcing potential robbers to expose themselves to before entering secure areas. Security personnel, including armed guards, provide visible deterrence, while policies prohibiting face-obscuring items like masks or hats enhance identification during attempts. Technological countermeasures encompass comprehensive video systems recording all customer areas, required under federal regulations to capture clear images for post-incident investigation and deterrence. Silent alarms and buttons allow tellers to alert discreetly, with studies indicating that over 25% of U.S. bank attempts fail due in part to rapid response enabled by such systems. packs, bundles that explode with indelible and irritants upon removal from the premises, render stolen cash unusable and aid in perpetrator apprehension, as demonstrated in numerous cases. Advanced integrations include GPS trackers embedded in cash stacks and access control systems with biometric or keycard entry for vaults, minimizing insider threats and enabling real-time tracking of pilfered funds. Intrusion detection sensors on vaults and doors trigger immediate alerts, while the FBI's SafeCatch program promotes standardized protocols like these to suppress robbery opportunities through proactive hardening. Empirical data from the American Bankers Association supports that layered physical and technological defenses correlate with lower victimization rates, emphasizing continuous assessment and updates to counter evolving tactics.

Behavioral and Policy Deterrents

Federal policies deterring bank in the center on its treatment as a non-discretionary federal crime under 18 U.S.C. § 2113, established in to facilitate nationwide and swift prosecution. Penalties include fines, up to 20 years for unarmed , and up to 25 years or life for armed or repeat offenses, with nationwide average around 11 years. High clearance rates, consistently 55-60% according to federal data—far exceeding the 30.5% for robberies overall—bolster deterrence by elevating the certainty of apprehension and over mere severity of . This framework correlates with an 85% decline in reported bank robberies since the peak of approximately 9,000 incidents, though causal attribution must account for confounding factors like reduced cash holdings in branches. Empirical assessments of policy-driven deterrence yield mixed results. General posits that combining punishment severity with high detection probability discourages rational actors, and bank robbery's profile—low yields averaging under $4,000 per incident post-inflation—amplifies this when paired with federal resources for investigation. Sentence enhancements for certain felonies have reduced covered crimes by an estimated 8% within three years in some analyses, yet robbery-specific studies from multiple U.S. cities find no significant general deterrent effect from lengthier sentences alone. Critics argue that inconsistent application or low perceived risks undermine harsh penalties, though federal consistency in bank cases mitigates this compared to state-level variability. Behavioral deterrents emphasize employee training to disrupt robbery dynamics without escalating violence. Protocols instruct tellers to comply verbally while activating silent alarms immediately, minimizing transaction time to under two minutes on average and facilitating rapid law enforcement response. FBI programs like SafeCatch equip staff to identify pre-robbery indicators—such as loitering males casing branches—and intervene passively, e.g., by engaging suspects in conversation to deter initiation. Additional measures include policies barring hats, sunglasses, or large bags inside branches and stationing greeters to monitor entries, aiming to heighten perceived scrutiny. While offender interviews indicate limited pre-planning consideration of such tactics, the cumulative effect raises execution risks, contributing to failed attempts exceeding 25% in recent U.S. data; however, rigorous causal studies linking training directly to incidence reductions are scarce, with evidence largely observational from industry reports.

Law Enforcement Interventions

Law enforcement interventions in bank robberies typically begin with rapid local police response to silent alarms or 911 calls from bank employees, prioritizing perimeter establishment, evacuation of non-involved personnel, and scene preservation to minimize risks to hostages or bystanders. , bank robbery constitutes a federal offense under FBI jurisdiction since the Federal Bank Robbery and Incidental Crimes Act of 1934, prompting federal agents to assume lead investigative roles, particularly for interstate or organized elements, while coordinating with local agencies. This division ensures specialized resources, such as forensic analysis of surveillance footage—activated in over 95% of 2023 incidents—and tracking of or dye packs, which facilitate suspect identification. For non-violent "note jobs," comprising the majority of cases where perpetrators act alone without weapons, interventions emphasize post-robbery pursuit over confrontation, leveraging high-quality video evidence and witness descriptions to generate leads. The FBI's Operation SafeCatch initiative, launched in the early , promotes proactive deterrence through rapid case clearance and public dissemination of suspect images, contributing to consistent national clearance rates of 55-60% for bank robberies. In 2023, of 1,263 reported robberies involving 1,652 suspects, 801 individuals were identified, underscoring the efficacy of evidentiary tools like alarms (activated in 78% of cases) despite challenges from fleeing perpetrators. Armed or hostage scenarios, occurring in fewer than 5% of incidents (e.g., 8 hostages and 54 violent acts in 2023), trigger escalated tactical measures including deployment of crisis negotiation teams to de-escalate via communication and, if necessary, FBI Hostage Rescue Team or local SWAT units for containment and resolution. These units employ dynamic entry tactics only as a last resort, informed by behavioral analysis and real-time intelligence, reflecting a causal emphasis on minimizing casualties given that robbers face elevated risks of injury or death during commission. Inter-agency protocols, such as those under the FBI's Critical Incident Response Group, integrate bomb technicians and tactical aviation for comprehensive threat neutralization, though such interventions remain rare due to the low yield and high federal sentencing penalties deterring escalation. Overall, these layered responses have correlated with an 83% decline in U.S. bank robberies from 7,556 in 2004 to 1,263 in 2023, driven by improved solvability rather than prevention alone.

Notable Incidents and Figures

Iconic Historical Cases

One of the earliest documented bank robberies in history took place on February 13, 1866, when approximately twelve armed men targeted the Clay County Savings Association in . The perpetrators pistol-whipped the cashier, seized around $60,000 in cash, gold, and bonds from the vault, and fled on horseback amid snowy conditions, marking the first successful daytime robbery of an operating bank during peacetime. The crime was attributed to former Confederate guerrillas, including associates of and , though Jesse later denied direct involvement; no arrests were made immediately, and the event set a for organized postwar in . A decade later, on , 1876, the James-Younger gang attempted to rob the First National Bank in , in a bold midday operation involving eight members who scouted the town beforehand. Three entered the bank demanding access to the vault, but cashier resisted by refusing to open the safe without the expiring, prompting armed local citizens to initiate a from nearby buildings and streets. The confrontation killed two gang members and two civilians, wounded others including the captured Younger brothers (Cole, Jim, and Bob), and yielded only about $26,000 in notes and specie; Jesse and escaped but the raid fractured the gang, leading to increased pressure and the Youngers' lengthy imprisonments. In the early 1930s, John Dillinger's gang executed multiple high-profile bank heists amid the , including the October 23, 1933, robbery of the Central National Bank in , where they escaped with $75,000 after firing warning shots and binding employees. Dillinger, who led a spree robbing at least a dozen banks between 1933 and 1934, employed tactics like rapid getaways in stolen vehicles and disguises, amassing significant sums while evading capture temporarily; this Greencastle job exemplified his operational efficiency, though it contributed to his FBI "Public Enemy Number One" status and eventual 1934 death in a shootout.

Modern and Recent Examples

The 2005 Banco Central burglary in , , stands as one of the largest non-violent bank heists of the , involving a criminal group that rented a nearby property under the guise of a business and excavated an 80-meter over three months to access the bank's underground vault. On the weekend of August 6-7, the perpetrators breached the vault, extracting approximately 164 million Brazilian reais (equivalent to roughly $70 million USD at contemporaneous exchange rates) in untraceable bundled currency weighing over 3 tons, without triggering alarms or encountering guards. The theft was undetected until Monday morning, when bank officials discovered the breach; subsequent investigations led to the arrest of several suspects and partial recovery of funds, though the majority of the haul dispersed via networks. In a contrasting example of an inside job, the July 11, 2007, robbery at Investment Bank in , , resulted in the theft of $282 million in cash—recognized as the largest bank robbery by monetary value—perpetrated by three bank guards who exploited overnight access to the vaults amid post-invasion instability. The guards reportedly subdued colleagues, loaded the money into vehicles, and fled, with the crime uncovered mid-week when staff noticed discrepancies; investigations implicated bank insiders, but recovery efforts yielded minimal returns due to regional chaos and lack of forensic leads. The February 28, 1997, exemplified high-risk armed bank robbery tactics in the United States, as perpetrators Larry Phillips Jr. and Emil Mătăsăreanu, clad in and wielding modified variants and AR-15 rifles, targeted a branch, seizing an initial $1.17 million before initiating a 44-minute firefight with officers. Over 2,000 rounds were exchanged, wounding 20 individuals including 12 officers, and both robbers were killed; the incident exposed gaps in standard police weaponry against heavily equipped criminals, prompting reforms in armaments and patrol rifles nationwide. More recent incidents reflect adaptations to enhanced security, such as the March 2024 at a storage facility linked to banks in Sylmar, , where thieves accessed the roof, disabled surveillance, and extracted up to $30 million in bills over hours without firearms or confrontation—demonstrating a shift toward stealth over violence in targeting aggregated deposits. No arrests have been reported, underscoring persistent challenges in securing non-branch vaults despite dye packs, GPS trackers, and electronic monitoring.

Sociological and Psychological Dimensions

Offender Motivations and Profiles

Bank robbery offenders are predominantly male, with federal data indicating that approximately 96% of identified perpetrators in urban robberies are men. This disparity aligns with broader patterns in violent crimes, where males commit the vast majority due to factors such as physical tolerance and in high-crime environments. Offenders are typically young adults, with 71% falling between ages 16 and 30 in profiled cases, though more recent sentencing data from the U.S. Sentencing Commission reports an average age of 40 for bank robbery convictions, reflecting a mix of novice and experienced criminals. Demographically, studies from the onward show a shift toward higher proportions of unmarried, poorly educated individuals from disadvantaged backgrounds, with historical FBI-linked profiles noting 58% under age 26 and significant overrepresentation of Black males (around 61%). The primary motivation for most bank robbers is financial gain driven by acute economic desperation, including , mounting , or inability to meet , as evidenced by criminological interviews and offender self-reports. Drug addiction frequently exacerbates this, with cited as a catalyst in a substantial subset of cases, where robbers fund habits through quick, high-yield crimes rather than sustained . Peer influence within street culture or criminal networks also plays a role, normalizing as a viable option amid limited legitimate opportunities, though thrill-seeking or status elevation motivates a smaller fraction, often among less experienced offenders. Profiles reveal extensive prior criminal histories among offenders, with U.S. Sentencing Commission analysis showing robbery convicts possess more serious and numerous priors than other violent criminals, including only 26.5% being first-time federal offenders. Repeat victimization patterns indicate habitual behavior, as many target banks multiple times, contributing to high rates for violent property crimes exceeding 60% within years of release. These traits underscore a causal link between entrenched criminal careers, socioeconomic marginalization, and rational choice under perceived low risk, rather than isolated impulses.

Victim and Societal Impacts

Bank robbery victims, predominantly bank employees but occasionally customers, experience both immediate physical harm and long-term . Physical occur in a minority of incidents, often from assaults or accidental discharges during confrontations, with fatalities rare but possible when weapons are displayed or used; FBI data indicates that while most robberies are non-violent "note jobs," the presence of firearms in approximately 40-50% of cases heightens injury risk to bystanders. Psychological effects are more pervasive, with studies showing acute stress disorder (ASD) in up to 38% of exposed employees and (PTSD) in 15%, particularly among those in close proximity to the perpetrator, where perceived life threat strongly predicts symptom severity. Factors exacerbating trauma include the suddenness of the event, verbal threats, and visibility, leading to symptoms like , anxiety, and depression that persist for months or years, impairing work performance and requiring clinical intervention. One of bank employees found that 14.5% met ASD criteria and 6.8% PTSD criteria post-robbery, with lower pre-event self-confidence and higher peri-traumatic anxiety as key vulnerability factors. Victims present during the robbery report elevated distress compared to absent staff, underscoring the event's direct interpersonal terror. Societally, bank robberies impose economic burdens beyond direct theft, averaging $4,213 in losses per incident for banks—the highest among robbery targets—encompassing cash, recovery efforts, and forensic investigations, though much is mitigated by insurance and federal reimbursement. Broader per-robbery societal costs, including tangible medical and productivity losses plus intangible pain and fear, total approximately $219,286 (in 2000 dollars, adjusted for inflation in subsequent estimates), aggregating to hundreds of millions annually across incidents. These externalities drive heightened security expenditures—such as dye packs, surveillance, and armed guards—which banks pass to consumers via fees, while traumatized employees contribute to absenteeism and turnover, straining workplace stability. On a macro level, persistent bank robberies, though declining 85% since peaks due to countermeasures and cashless trends, erode public confidence in financial institutions and amplify general fear of , influencing policy toward stricter sentencing and without proportionally reducing overall externalities. Empirical analyses confirm that 's societal toll, including victim compensation and justice system overhead, outweighs perpetrators' modest gains (often under $8,000 per heist), justifying deterrence investments.

Psychological Phenomena

Exposure to bank robbery has been linked to acute and long-term among victims, particularly bank employees present during the incident. A of Norwegian bank employees exposed to robbery found elevated levels of general traumatization, , and psychological distress in the immediate aftermath, with those directly confronting robbers experiencing more severe symptoms compared to absent colleagues. Similarly, a Danish national study reported a prevalence of acute stress disorder (ASD) among 458 exposed bank workers and (PTSD) in 378 followed longitudinally, indicating robbery as a potentially traumatizing event with persistent effects. These outcomes align with predictors of trauma such as pre-existing anxiety, low self-confidence, and peri-traumatic factors like perceived duration. In hostage-taking scenarios during bank robberies, —a psychological response involving emotional bonding with captors—can emerge as a survival mechanism. Named after the 1973 in , where four hostages held for six days later refused to testify against the robbers and raised funds for their defense, the phenomenon reflects captives' adaptation to prolonged threat by perceiving captors as protectors against external dangers like police intervention. Experts characterize it not as a formal disorder but as a strategy to reduce and fear, observed in subsequent hostage crises though not universally. This response may mitigate immediate terror but complicates post-event recovery, as seen in victims' reluctance to cooperate with authorities. Among offenders, bank robbery often reveals underlying psychological defenses rather than calculated rationality alone. Psychiatric examination of convicted robbers identifies unconscious motives, including regression to dependent states and projection of internal aggressions onto the bank as a symbolic figure, demythologizing the act as impulsive defiance against perceived societal deprivation rather than bold enterprise. Empirical profiles from offender interviews highlight influences like and immediate financial desperation overriding , with decisions under adrenaline-fueled stress impairing foresight and escalating errors such as prolonged stays or unnecessary . These patterns underscore how acute narrows focus, prioritizing short-term gain over detection probabilities, as corroborated in analyses of robbery motivations.

Cultural and Media Depictions

Representations in Film and Literature

Bank robberies frequently appear in literature as metaphors for ambition, betrayal, and the fragility of criminal enterprise. Jim Thompson's The Getaway (1958) exemplifies this, chronicling a bank's robbery by a hardened criminal duo whose escape devolves into and , underscoring the causal chain from meticulous preparation to inevitable self-destruction driven by greed and distrust. Similarly, Richard Stark's Parker series, beginning with The Hunter (1962), portrays a stoic professional thief executing heists with cold efficiency, emphasizing strategic planning over emotional motive while revealing the high probability of complications from human error or response. In film, representations often amplify dramatic tension through stylized action and character archetypes, diverging from empirical robbery data where most attempts fail due to poor execution or rapid detection. Sidney Lumet's Dog Day Afternoon (1975) draws from the real 1972 Brooklyn heist by John Wojtowicz, depicting a desperate for spousal ransom that escalates into a standoff, prioritizing psychological realism and media frenzy over glorification. Michael Mann's Heat (1995) features a armored bank by a disciplined crew, culminating in a prolonged that has shaped public imagery of tactical robberies, though real incidents rarely involve such firepower or evasion success rates exceeding 10-20% per FBI statistics. Later entries like Ben Affleck's The Town (2010) explore community ties among Boston robbers targeting banks, blending heist mechanics with socioeconomic rationales but critiquing the cycle of evidenced in offender profiles. These depictions commonly employ a narrative arc of team assembly, , execution, and , as analyzed in over 70 films spanning 1904-2017, where cinematic heists succeed via ingenuity far more often than in reality, fostering a perceptual toward romanticized criminal prowess. Early 20th-century portrayals, including sensationalism and like (1967), influenced actual bank architecture toward fortified designs with bandit barriers, illustrating media's causal role in security evolution rather than mere reflection. Such works rarely align with data showing most bank crimes as opportunistic lone acts yielding under $10,000, instead privileging ensemble spectacles that prioritize entertainment over the mundane failures comprising 90% of cases.

Influence on Public Perception

Media coverage of bank robberies, often emphasizing dramatic elements such as weapons or escapes, amplifies apprehension despite their relative rarity and low violence levels. In the United States, the FBI documented 1,362 bank robberies in 2023, the lowest annual figure on record and an 85% decline from the peak of over 9,000 incidents, with bank targets comprising only about 2% of all robberies. Such events typically involve minimal physical harm—most are "note jobs" without weapons displayed—but news outlets prioritize sensational cases, leading to an inflated sense of prevalence and risk that extends to community-wide beyond direct victims. This distortion aligns with broader patterns where media emphasis on vivid crimes elevates threat over empirical incidence. Cultural portrayals further shape perceptions by romanticizing robbers as resourceful rebels against opaque financial systems, fostering fascination or even sympathy in segments of the public skeptical of banking institutions. Films and literature frequently depict heists as clever exploits yielding substantial hauls, overshadowing realities like high clearance rates (often over 50%) and average takes under $4,000, which underscore the crime's inefficiency and risks to perpetrators. This narrative persists despite evidence that robberies impose hidden costs, including heightened security expenses passed to consumers and for employees, even in non-violent encounters. Social media platforms exacerbate polarized views, with user discussions often intensifying demands for harsher penalties following high-profile cases, as observed in analyses of activity in regions like where online commentary correlates with tougher stances on offenders. Conversely, mainstream depictions rarely highlight systemic factors like economic desperation driving many amateur attempts, which constitute the majority and fail frequently, reinforcing a of robberies as impulsive rather than sophisticated endeavors. Overall, while actual victimization remains low—far below everyday risks like traffic accidents—the confluence of and cultural tropes sustains a of robberies as emblematic of broader criminal audacity, influencing attitudes toward financial and efficacy.

References

  1. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2113
  2. https://www.justice.gov/archives/jm/criminal-resource-manual-1349-bank-robbery-general-overview
  3. https://oxfordre.com/criminology/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264079.001.0001/acrefore-9780190264079-e-19
  4. https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/violent-crime/bank-robbery
  5. https://www.investopedia.com/death-of-the-bank-heist-11740857
  6. https://popcenter.asu.edu/content/bank-robbery-0
  7. https://lps.com.sg/blog/understanding-the-concept-of-bank-robbery/
  8. https://www.lexisnexis.co.uk/legal/glossary/robbery
  9. https://legal-resources.uslegalforms.com/b/bank-robbery
  10. https://www.asisonline.org/security-management-magazine/articles/2024/09/banks/robbery-data-infographic/
  11. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/bank-robbery-high-risk-low-pay-and-lethal
  12. https://www.gao.gov/assets/106869.pdf
  13. https://revealnews.org/article/fbi-bank-robbery-data-shows-armed-guards-increase-risk-of-violence/
  14. https://www.asisonline.org/security-management-magazine/articles/2024/09/banks/robbery-deterrence/
  15. https://www.ussc.gov/research/research-reports/federal-robbery-prevalence-trends-and-factors-sentencing
  16. https://www.fbi.gov/file-repository/bank-crime-statistics-2023-091724.pdf
  17. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1052821/number-of-bank-robberies-in-denmark/
  18. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1177554/number-of-bank-robberies-in-sweden/
  19. https://www.ebf.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/D2283_-16th_European_Report_Bank_Robberies_-_Exec_Summary-2008-01780-01-E.pdf
  20. https://www.statista.com/statistics/870010/robbery-rate-financial-institutions-brazil/
  21. https://www.theglobaleconomy.com/rankings/robery/
  22. https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/violent-crime/bank-robbery/bank-crime-reports
  23. https://circuit-magazine.com/the-anatomy-of-a-bank-robbery/
  24. https://www.dispatch.com/story/news/crime/2013/02/17/rare-takeover-bank-robbers-worry/23708967007/
  25. https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title18-section2113&num=0&edition=prelim
  26. https://www.unodc.org/pdf/model_treaty_extradition_revised_manual.pdf
  27. https://www.arnoldporter.com/-/media/files/perspectives/publications/2019/08/gir-know-how-extradition-us.pdf
  28. https://www.justice.gov/criminal/criminal-oia/frequently-asked-questions-regarding-extradition
  29. https://www.vaia.com/en-us/explanations/law/uk-criminal-law/bank-robbery/
  30. https://sentencingcouncil.org.uk/media/xlbb3nml/web_robbery-guidelines.pdf
  31. https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-46/section-343.html
  32. https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-46/section-344.html
  33. https://www5.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/qld/consol_act/cc189994/s411.html
  34. https://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/vic/consol_act/ca195882/s75a.html
  35. https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/stgb/__249.html
  36. https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/stgb/__250.html
  37. https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/ifc.pdf
  38. https://www.congress.gov/104/crpt/erpt2/CRPT-104erpt2.pdf
  39. https://guidelines.ussc.gov/apex/r/ussc_apex/guidelinesapp/guidelines?APP_GL_ID=%25C2%25A72B3.1
  40. https://www.ussc.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/research-and-publications/quick-facts/Robbery_FY15.pdf
  41. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/bank-robbery-sentences-imposedtime-served-offenders-convicted-bank
  42. https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/Digitization/102193NCJRS.pdf
  43. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00181-019-01758-6
  44. https://www.carloalberto.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/no.220.pdf
  45. https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1360&context=faculty_scholarship
  46. https://www.nber.org/digest/oct98/sentence-enhancements-reduce-crime
  47. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/imprisonment-bank-robbers-issue-deterrence
  48. https://scholarship.law.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3774&context=lawreview
  49. https://direct.mit.edu/rest/article/103/3/547/97639/The-Race-Between-Deterrence-and-Displacement
  50. https://conference.iza.org/conference_files/riskonomics2011/mastrobuoni_g3754.pdf
  51. https://open.clemson.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2993&context=all_theses
  52. https://www.carpentershall.org/americas-first-bank-robbery
  53. https://www.policemuseum.org.uk/crime-casebook/interesting-cases/robbery-of-the-paisley-union-bank-1811/
  54. https://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/2013/03/first-bank-robbery-in-united-states/
  55. https://americasbesthistory.com/abhtimeline1831m.html
  56. https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/james-robberies/
  57. https://missourilife.com/february-13-1866-2/
  58. https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/september-7/minnesotans-nearly-wipeout-the-james-younger-gang
  59. https://libguides.mnhs.org/northfieldraid
  60. https://fee.org/articles/the-non-existent-frontier-bank-robbery/
  61. https://www.hhhistory.com/2018/01/how-often-did-banks-really-get-robbed.html
  62. https://www.insp.com/blog/most-notorious-heists-of-the-wild-west/
  63. http://www.cowboyway.com/What/WildWestRobberies.htm
  64. https://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/world-records/645831-first-recorded-use-of-a-getaway-car
  65. https://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/how-100-year-old-car-theft-law-led-to-modern-fbi-103119
  66. https://microkhan.com/2021/10/27/origins-of-the-dye-pack/
  67. https://www.cctvsecuritypros.com/blog/cctv-history-of-cctv-cameras-past-to-present-/
  68. https://ecam.com/security-blog/the-evolution-of-video-surveillance
  69. https://www.asisonline.org/security-management-magazine/articles/2024/09/banks/1930s-robbery-investigations/
  70. https://theconversation.com/bandits-are-losing-interest-in-robbing-banks-as-some-crimes-no-longer-pay-190520
  71. https://nypost.com/2022/10/12/why-bank-robbing-has-gone-out-of-style/
  72. https://jasher.substack.com/p/the-disappearing-american-bank-robbery
  73. https://crimereads.com/the-rise-and-fall-of-the-bank-robbery-capital-of-the-world/
  74. https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/a-quintessentially-american-crime-on-the-decline--robbing-banks-doesnt-pay-as-it-used-to/2016/09/29/4f54a0a6-e7e9-437c-b484-151a337b0e0a_story.html
  75. https://npr.org/2013/02/06/171310933/bank-robberies-on-the-decline-as-risk-outweighs-the-rewards
  76. https://abcnews.go.com/Business/study-crime-pay/story?id=16629657
  77. https://www.ussc.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/research-and-publications/research-publications/2022/20220818_Robbery.pdf
  78. https://www.ussc.gov/research/quick-facts/robbery-offenses
  79. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/losers-game-sociological-profile-500-armed-bank-robbers
  80. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/federal-statistics-bulletin-bank-robbery
  81. https://rss.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1740-9713.2012.00570.x
  82. http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdfplus/10.1086/467508
  83. https://qz.com/994719/how-to-rob-a-bank-according-to-economists-who-analyzed-bank-heists-in-italy
  84. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949791425000156
  85. https://www.alliedsolutions.net/siteassets/resources/pdfs/robbery-risk-checklist.pdf?la=en&hash=ED1D0B2D313AD3FE09C26F73611A0A6AB8BE2C65
  86. https://www.facebook.com/100075851238976/posts/bank-robbers-apparently-prefer-a-specific-schedule-statistics-show-that-friday-m/738938741977827/
  87. https://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/2010/february/robberies_022310
  88. https://www.berkshireeagle.com/news/local/note-passing-becomes-a-common-tactic-in-bank-robberies/article_0a8530b9-e4a8-53ab-bc88-81aa3efb4bba.html
  89. https://www.news-herald.com/2012/06/03/bank-robberies-come-with-big-payoffs-big-consequences-with-map-list/
  90. https://mammothsecurity.com/blog/bank-robberies
  91. https://info.verkada.com/industry-solutions/surveillance-for-banks/
  92. https://www.adt.com/resources/do-surveillance-cameras-statistically-reduce-crime
  93. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/survey-relative-effectiveness-tear-gasdye-pac-devices-financial
  94. https://www.asteetrace.org/bank
  95. https://www.liveviewgps.com/blog/banks-switching-dye-packs-gps-tracking-devices-thwart-robbery/
  96. https://www.liveviewgps.com/blog/12-security-measures-banks-use-to-combat-robbery/
  97. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2025/03/21/robbers-are-hitting-these-stores-more-than-banks-can-they-be-stopped/79127343007/
  98. https://www.tssbulletproof.com/blog/building-security-upgrades-banks
  99. https://www.defenselite.com/blog/why-every-bank-needs-bullet-resistant-transaction-windows/
  100. https://occ.gov/static/ots/exam-handbook/ots-exam-handbook-1405.pdf
  101. https://www.aba.com/banking-topics/risk-management/physical-security
  102. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-12/chapter-II/subchapter-A/part-208/subpart-F/section-208.61
  103. https://www.tssbulletproof.com/blog/taking-a-systems-approach-to-bank-security
  104. https://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/2009/august/safecatch_080609
  105. https://www.fbi.gov/file-repository/reports-and-publications/bank-crime-statistics-2023-091724.pdf/view
  106. https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6101&context=jclc
  107. https://publicdefenders.us/blogs/qqtoughqq-sentences-wonqt-deter-crime/
  108. https://www.cartercountymosheriff.org/plugins/show_image.php?id=17
  109. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/bank-robbery-perspective-bank-robber-motivating-factors-robbery
  110. https://thefinancialbrand.com/news/banking-branch-transformation/fbi-safecatch-7223
  111. https://www.bankinfosecurity.com/interviews/safecatch-how-to-deter-bank-robberies-interview-fbi-special-agent-i-324
  112. https://www.fbi.gov/how-we-investigate/tactics
  113. https://www.nj.com/news/2025/05/the-crime-of-bank-robbery-is-almost-a-thing-of-the-past-heres-why.html
  114. https://civilwaronthewesternborder.org/timeline/first-daytime-bank-robbery-us-history
  115. https://www.occ.gov/about/who-we-are/history/history-of-the-occ/1866-1913/1866-1913-attack-on-northfield-national-bank.html
  116. https://mndigital.org/projects/primary-source-sets/northfield-bank-raid-1876
  117. https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/dillinger-john-dillinger-timeline/
  118. https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/dillinger-crime-spree/
  119. https://www.fbi.gov/history/famous-cases/john-dillinger
  120. https://www.history.com/articles/daring-bank-robbery-heists
  121. https://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/world-records/greatest-robbery-of-a-bank
  122. https://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/12/world/middleeast/12iraq.html
  123. https://abc7.com/post/north-hollywood-bank-robbery-shootout-1997-la-true-crime/11550573/
  124. https://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/local/from-the-archives-the-1997-north-hollywood-shootout/3103942/
  125. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/apr/20/los-angeles-heist-burglary-cash-robbery-no-leads
  126. https://www.asisonline.org/security-management-magazine/articles/2024/09/banks/historical-heists/
  127. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/armed-urban-bank-robber-profile
  128. https://research.library.fordham.edu/dissertations/AAI8219245/
  129. https://www.michaelaustinstewart.com/blog/2023/09/4-reasons-people-rob-banks/
  130. https://www.stunster.com/blog/understanding-the-psychology-of-robbers-what-motivates-them/
  131. https://seacrestrecoverycenteroh.com/addressing-the-desperate-measures-of-theft-to-sustain-addiction/
  132. https://nij.ojp.gov/library/publications/stick-street-culture-and-offender-motivation
  133. https://www.ussc.gov/research/research-reports/recidivism-among-federal-violent-offenders
  134. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S016517811731836X
  135. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4605248/
  136. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24846493/
  137. https://novapublishers.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Who-Develops-Posttraumatic-Stress-Symptoms-Following-a-Bank-Robbery.pdf
  138. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0887618514000528
  139. https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2019/crime-in-the-u.s.-2019/topic-pages/robbery
  140. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2835847/
  141. https://www.philadelphiafed.org/-/media/frbp/assets/economy/articles/business-review/1976/br76soth.pdf
  142. https://portal.findresearcher.sdu.dk/en/publications/a-national-study-of-the-psychological-impact-of-bank-robbery-with-2/
  143. https://apnews.com/article/stockholm-syndrome-history-origin-023ddcd3a14ac00a0ba88feb838574b3
  144. https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20240815-stockholm-syndrome-and-the-art-of-hostage-negotiation
  145. https://psychiatryonline.org/doi/10.1176/ajp.135.11.1377
  146. https://electricliterature.com/?p=255112
  147. https://www.bookbub.com/blog/thrilling-heist-books
  148. https://film-cred.com/dog-day-afternoon-al-pacino-lgbt/
  149. https://www.imdb.com/list/ls094245851/
  150. https://www.netflix.com/tudum/articles/best-bank-robbery-heist-movies-netflix
  151. https://www.vanityfair.com/video/watch/breaking-down-74-bank-robbery-movies-since-1904
  152. https://oxfordre.com/criminology/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264079.001.0001/acrefore-9780190264079-e-19
  153. https://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter/ric/ric.php?page=detail&id=COPS-P119
  154. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/law/bank-robbery
  155. https://criminal.laws.com/robbery/bank-robbery/impact-on-society
  156. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342883382_Twitter_Use_and_its_Impact_on_Public_Attitudes_Toward_Bank_Robberies_in_Jordan
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.