Hubbry Logo
CarjackingCarjackingMain
Open search
Carjacking
Community hub
Carjacking
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Carjacking
Carjacking
Carjacking
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
A sign warning of carjacking activities along a stretch of road in Gauteng, South Africa

Carjacking is a robbery in which a motor vehicle is taken over.[1][2] In contrast to car theft, carjacking is usually in the presence and knowledge of the victim.[2] A common crime in many places in the world, carjacking has been the subject of legislative responses, criminology studies, prevention efforts as well as being heavily dramatized in major film releases. Commercial vehicles such as trucks and armored cars containing valuable cargo are common targets of carjacking attempts. Carjacking usually involves physical violence to the victim, or using the victim as a hostage. In rare cases, carjacking may also involve sexual assault.[3]

Etymology

[edit]

The word is a portmanteau of car and hijacking. The term was coined by reporter Scott Bowles and editor E. J. Mitchell with The Detroit News in 1991.[4][5][6] The News first used the term in a report on the murder of Ruth Wahl, a 22-year-old Detroit drugstore cashier who was killed when she would not surrender her Suzuki Sidekick, and in an investigative report examining the rash of what Detroit Police call "robbery armed unlawful driving away an automobile" (in dispatch slang shortened to R.A.-YOU-Da) plaguing Detroit.[7] TV series CHiPs season 2 episode 20 airing 2/24/79 has the character Ponch, played by Erik Estrada, using the term carjacking.

Studies

[edit]

A study published in the British Journal of Criminology in 2003 found that "for all of the media attention it has received in the United States, Europe and elsewhere, carjacking remains an under-researched and poorly understood crime."[8] The authors conducted semi-structured interviews with 28 active carjackers in St. Louis, Missouri, and concluded that carjacking by their interviewees was motivated by the 'street life' emphasis on "spontaneity, hedonism, the ostentatious display of wealth, and the maintenance of honour."[8]

A study published in the Journal of Contemporary Ethnography in 2013 noted that "carjacking requires offenders to neutralize victims who are inherently mobile and who can use their vehicles as both weapons and shields." The study noted that carjackers use fear to compel compliance from victims.[9]

A 2008 paper by the Australian Institute of Criminology conceptualized carjackings as falling into four types based on method and motive: organized and instrumental, organized and acquisitive, opportunistic and instrumental, and opportunistic and acquisitive. An example of an organized and instrumental carjacking is a planned carjacking with a weapon to use the vehicle for ramming an ATM to steal cash. An example of an organized and acquisitive carjacking is a planned carjacking to sell the vehicle in a known market. An example of an opportunistic and instrumental carjacking is a carjacking without a weapon to sell "vehicle/parts with no market in mind." An example of an opportunistic and acquisitive carjacking is a carjacking without a weapon to joyride.[10]

A 2017 qualitative study published in Justice Quarterly examined auto theft and carjacking in the context of "sanction threats" that promoted fear and influenced "crime preferences" among criminals, thereby redirecting ("channeling") criminal activity. The study showed that "auto thieves are reluctant to embrace the violence of carjacking due to concerns over sanction threat severity they attributed to carjacking—both formal (higher sentences) and informal (victim resistance and retaliation). Meanwhile, the carjackers are reticent to enact auto theft because of the more uncertain and putatively greater risk of being surprised by victims, a fear that appears to overcome the enhanced long-term formal penalty of taking a vehicle by force."[11]

Prevention and response

[edit]

Common carjacking ruses include: (1) bumping the victim's vehicle from behind, and taking the car when the victim gets out of the vehicle to assess damage and exchange information; (2) staging a fake car accident, sometimes with injuries, and stealing the vehicle of a passerby who stops to assist; (3) flashing lights or waving to get the victim's attention, indicating that there is a problem with the victim's car, and then taking the car once the victim pulls over; and (4) following a victim home, blocking the victim's car in a driveway or in front of a gate.[12]

Police departments, security agencies, and auto insurers have published lists of strategies for preventing and responding to carjackings.[12][13][14] Common recommendations include:

  • Staying alert and being aware of one's surroundings[12][13]
  • Parking in well-lit areas[13][14]
  • Keeping vehicle doors locked and windows up[12][13]
  • Avoiding unfamiliar or high-crime areas[12][13]
  • Alerting police as soon as is safely possible following a carjacking[12][13]
  • Avoid isolated and less-well-trafficked parking lots, ATMs, pay phones, etc.[12][13][14]
  • When stopped in traffic, keeping some distance between the vehicle in front, so one can pull away easily if necessary.[12][13]
  • Using the vehicle to ram the car jacker to avoid being confronted in the vehicle, if confronted, it is often safer to give up the vehicle and avoid resisting[12][13]

Truck carjacking

[edit]

Commercial vehicles such as trucks and armored cars may be targets of carjacking attempts.[15] Such carjackings may be aimed at stealing cargo,[15] such as liquor, cigarettes, valuable goods, consumer electronics or even drugs.[16] In other cases, a carjacked truck may be used to commit another crime, such as robbery or a terrorist attack.[15]

Knowledge of the location of a truck carrying valuable cargo often requires inside information, and sometimes truck drivers collude with truck carjackers to facilitate the truck carjacking.[16] This crime is often perpetuated by organized crime operations or by career criminals, or by a collaboration between the two.[17] In particular, La Cosa Nostra has been known to orchestrate the carjacking of trucks (at locations such as Kennedy Airport in which a truck driver under Mafia influence allows carjackers to steal the truck).[18][19]

Incidents by country

[edit]

South Africa

[edit]

Carjacking is a significant problem in South Africa, where it is called hijacking.[20] South Africa is thought to have the highest carjacking rate in the world.[21] There were 16,000 reported carjackings in 1998.[20] The figures dropped to 12,434 reported carjackings in 2005,[20] and continued to drop until 2011 to 2012, when the number of carjackings was 9,475, a record low.[22] Subsequently, however, carjackings increased as part of an overall increase in violent organized crime, which the Institute for Security Studies attributed to poor police leadership. There were 11,221 reported carjackings in 2014. More than half of all carjackings in South Africa occurred in Gauteng province, which includes Johannesburg and Pretoria.[22]

The carjacking issue in South Africa was depicted in the 2005 film Tsotsi, which won the Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film.[22]

In the late 1990s and early 2000s, several new, unconventional anti-carjacking systems designed to harm the attacker were developed and marketed in South Africa, where carjacking had become endemic. Among these was the now defunct Blaster, a small flame-thrower that could be mounted to the underside of a vehicle.[23]

United States

[edit]

Federal Anti-Car Theft Act of 1992

[edit]
See also: Murder of Pam Basu

In 1992, Congress, in the aftermath of a spate of violent carjackings (including some in which the victims were murdered), passed the Federal Anti-Car Theft Act of 1992 (FACTA), the first federal carjacking law, making it a federal crime (punishable by 15 years to life imprisonment) to use a firearm to steal "through force or violence or intimidation" a motor vehicle that had been shipped through interstate commerce.[1][2] The 1992 Act, codified at 18 U.S.C. § 2119, took effect on October 25, 1992.[24][25] However, only a small number of federal prosecutions were imposed for carjacking the year after the act was enacted, in part because many federal carjacking cases were turned over to state prosecutions because they do not meet U.S. Department of Justice criteria.[24] The Federal Death Penalty Act, part of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, an omnibus crime bill, made sixty new federal crimes punishable by the federal death penalty; among these were the killing of a victim in the commission of carjacking.[1][25][26]

Throughout 1993, articles about carjackings appeared at the rate of more than one a week in newspapers throughout the country.[27] The November 29, 1992, killing of two Osceola County, Florida, men by carjackers using a stolen 9 mm pistol resulted in the first federal prosecution of a fatal carjacking.[28]

Prevalence and statistical analysis

[edit]

According to the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) conducted by the U.S. Department of Justice's Bureau of Justice Statistics, from 1993 to 2002, some 38,000 carjackings occurred annually.[29] According to the survey, over this time period men were more often victims than women, blacks more than whites, and Hispanics more than non-Hispanics.[29] 56% of carjackers were identified by victims as black, 21% white, 16% Asian or Native American, and 7% mixed race or unknown.[29] Some 93% of carjackings occurred in urban areas.[29][30]

There were multiple carjackers in 56% of incidents, and the carjacker or carjackers were identified as male in 93% of incidents. A weapon was used in 74% of carjacking victimization: firearms in 45%, knives in 11%, and other weapons in 18%. Victims were injured in about 32% of completed carjackings and about 17% of attempted carjackings. Serious injuries, such as gunshot or knife wounds, broken bones, or internal injuries occurred in about 9% of incidents. About 14 murders a year involved car theft, but not all of these were carjackings. Some 68% of carjackings occurred at nighttime hours (6 p.m. to 6 a.m.). Some 98% of completed carjackings and 77% of attempted carjackings were reported to police. About 44% of carjacking incidents occurred in an open area (e.g., on the street or near public transportation) while 24% occurred in parking lots or garages or near commercial places (e.g., stores, gas stations, office buildings, restaurants/bars).[29]

According to the NCVS, from 1992 and 1996, about 49,000 completed or attempted nonfatal carjackings took place each year in the United States. The carjacking was successful in about half of the incidents. Data on fatal carjackings are not available; "about 27 homicides by strangers each year involved automobile theft," but not all of these were carjackings.[31]

In particular cities

[edit]

Carjackings were common in Newark, New Jersey, in the 1990s, and a wave of carjackings took place again in 2010.[32] There were 288 carjackings in the city in 2010 (a 70% increase from the previous year), and Essex County (which includes Newark) had 69 in December 2010 alone.[32] The Associated Press reported that "unlike previous carjackings, in which thieves would strip vehicles for parts or sell them in other states, the recent wave perplexed law enforcement officials because almost all appeared to be done by thrill-seeking young men who would steal the cars for a few hours, drive them around and then abandon them."[32] After federal, state, and law enforcement agencies formed a task force, 42 suspects were charged, and carjackings dropped dramatically.[32] However, national media attention on carjackings in Essex County returned in December 2013, when a Hoboken lawyer was murdered at The Mall at Short Hills in Millburn, New Jersey, while defending his wife from four assailants,[33][34][35] who were all later convicted of the crime.[36]

For several years (but no longer), the major U.S. city with the highest rates of carjacking was Detroit.[37] In 2008, Detroit had 1,231 carjackings, more than three a day.[37] By 2013, that number had fallen to 701, but this was still the highest known number of carjackings for any major city in the country.[37] The significant decrease in carjackings was credited to a coordinated effort by the Detroit Police Department, the FBI, and the local federal prosecutor's office.[37] Serial carjackers were targeted for federal prosecutions and longer sentences, and in 2009 the Detroit Police Department centralized all carjacking investigations and developed a suspect profiling system.[37] Through mid-November 2014, Detroit had 486 carjackings, down 31% from the year before, but this was still three times more than the carjackings experienced by New York City (which has ten times Detroit's population) in all of 2013.[37] Even James Craig, chief of police of the Detroit Police Department, was the victim of an attempted carjacking while he was in his police cruiser.[37]

A 2017 study used "Risk Terrain Modeling" analysis to identify spatial indicators of carjacking risk in Detroit. The analysis identified six factors that "were influential in the best fitting model: proximity to service stations; convenience/grocery/liquor stores; bus stops; residential and commercial demolitions; and areas with high concentrations of drug arrests and restaurants." The study found that certain locations in Detroit "had an expected rate of carjacking that was 278 times higher than other locations."[38]

As of 2021, the American city with the highest number of carjackings is Chicago. Chicago began experiencing a surge in carjackings after 2019, and at least 1,415 such crimes took place in the city in 2020.[39] According to the Chicago Police Department, carjackers are using face masks that are widely worn due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic to effectively blend in with the public and conceal their identity. 2021 saw a further increase to a 20-year high of over 1,800 carjackings.[40] On January 27, 2021, Mayor Lori Lightfoot described the worsening wave of carjackings as being 'top of mind,' and added 40 police officers to the CPD carjacking unit.[41]

Many other cities have seen a similar increase in carjackings since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Over 500 carjackings were recorded in New York City in 2021, compared to 328 in 2020 and 132 in 2019. Likewise, the police department of Philadelphia reported over 800 in 2021, compared to 170 in 2015. 281 carjackings occurred in New Orleans in 2021 while 105 occurred there in 2018,[40] while Oakland reported 301 carjackings in 2020 and 521 carjackings in 2021.[42]

State law

[edit]

Some states have a specific carjacking statute. Other states do not have a specific carjacking law, and prosecute carjackers under the general robbery statute.[43]

The law of some states, such as Louisiana, explicitly lists a killing in the course of defending oneself against forcible entry of an occupied motor vehicle as a justifiable homicide.[1][44][45]

United Kingdom

[edit]

Carjacking is an uncommon crime in Britain, making up about 1% of all vehicle thefts.[10]

Australia

[edit]

Australia does not specifically record the number of carjackings; such crimes are variously recorded as assault, robbery, motor vehicle theft, and some combination. However, a 2008 paper by the Australian Institute of Criminology, analyzing police and insurance records, suggested that fewer than 300 carjackings occur annually in Australia (about 0.5% of all theft incidents in the country).[10] The paper noted that the low incidence of carjacking compared to the United States is attributable to the low rate of firearm-related crime in Australia and the fact that the "broader socioeconomic picture of Australian society is one of relative good health in terms of wealth distribution and social cohesion" providing little motivation for victimization that is "both personal and violent."[10] The paper notes that although carjacking was rare, isolated hot spots do arise occasionally, and that since the late 1990s, "Sydney has experienced a number of carjacking clusters ... each lasting around three to six months and occurring in different locations including the eastern suburbs, the inner city and the south-west."[10]

Philippines

[edit]

The Philippine National Police keeps a record on the number of incidents of index crimes in the Philippines including carjacking.[46][47] The act of carnapping, as it is known in the country, is penalized under the Anti-Carnapping Act of 2016.[48]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Carjacking

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Carjacking is the unlawful of a from its occupant or immediate presence through , , or , typically distinguishing it from non-confrontational by the direct threat or infliction of harm. In the United States, it constitutes a federal offense under 18 U.S.C. § 2119 when committed with a against a vehicle transported in interstate , punishable by up to 15 years or life if serious injury or death results. Prevalence of carjacking remains low relative to overall , with nonfatal victimization rates in the U.S. ranging from 0.09 to 0.15 per 1,000 persons annually between 2012 and 2021. However, rates surged in urban areas post-2019, rising 93% on average across a sample of 10 cities by 2023 to 37.9 incidents per 100,000 residents, before declining to 6.6 per 100,000 nationally in 2023 and further dropping 26% in early 2024. These incidents are predominantly crimes of opportunity, often occurring at gunpoint in high-traffic locations like gas stations or intersections, with firearms used in 38% of nonfatal cases. Key characteristics include the involvement of young offenders, many under 18, and a pattern of escalation tied to broader trends rather than organized vehicle export rings. Prevention strategies emphasize in vulnerable settings, though empirical data underscores the role of swift responses in curbing spikes, as seen in targeted operations reducing incidents by over 70% in some jurisdictions. Despite declines, carjacking's inherent —frequently resulting in or resistance—highlights its status as a hybrid offense demanding rigorous deterrence over passive measures alone.

Definition and Terminology

Definition

Carjacking is the unlawful of a from its owner, operator, or another person in immediate possession, accomplished through , , or while the victim is present. This requires the perpetrator's direct confrontation with the victim, distinguishing carjacking from conventional , which typically involves no victim interaction or of . Under U.S. , codified in 18 U.S.C. § 2119, constitutes taking a transported, shipped, or received in interstate or foreign from the person or presence of another, by means of and or , with the intent to cause or serious bodily . State statutes mirror this framework, often elevating the offense to aggravated robbery when weapons or additional are involved; for instance, defines it as the intentional taking of a in the owner's presence or immediate control. The presence of the victim heightens risks, as offenders may use firearms, physical , or threats to compel compliance, potentially resulting in or during the incident. Internationally, definitions align closely but vary by jurisdiction; in contexts outside the U.S., the term may encompass similar vehicle hijackings under or armed laws, emphasizing the coercive element over stealthy appropriation. Empirical analyses classify carjacking as a subset of offenses, with offender-victim dynamics centered on stranger-perpetrated force rather than opportunistic .

Etymology and Variations

The term "carjacking" originated as a portmanteau of "car" and "hijacking," referring to the forcible seizure of a vehicle from its operator or occupants through threat or violence, distinct from unattended auto theft. The earliest documented use appears in a 1970 edition of the Times of India, predating widespread adoption in English-language media. In the United States, the term gained prominence following its introduction in a 1991 article in by reporter Scott Bowles, amid rising reports of violent vehicle seizures in urban areas like , which prompted national media coverage and legislative responses. This usage built on the "hijack" root, historically linked to on public ways (" jacking"), adapted here to specify automotive targets. Terminological variations exist primarily in legal classifications rather than everyday language. Some U.S. jurisdictions, such as , designate it as "vehicular hijacking," emphasizing the hijacking element, while New York, , and Washington categorize it under broader "" statutes without a distinct "carjacking" offense. Internationally, equivalents include "carnapping" in the for armed vehicle , though this may encompass non-violent thefts, and "auto-jacking" in informal British usage, but "carjacking" has become the global standard in English for incidents involving direct confrontation with the driver. Related but distinct terms include "joyriding" or "unauthorized taking of a " (e.g., TWOC in law), which typically lack the element of force or victim presence, and "," a general for larceny without specifying confrontation. These distinctions underscore carjacking's focus on interpersonal , as opposed to opportunistic , influencing both statistical reporting and prosecutorial approaches.

Historical Development

Origins and Early Incidents

The practice of forcibly seizing a from its occupant at gunpoint or by threat of violence, now termed carjacking, has precedents in early 20th-century American crime, such as the activities of outlaws like , who routinely commandeered automobiles during bank robberies and escapes in . These acts differed from simple auto theft by involving direct confrontation with the driver, often to facilitate further crimes or evade pursuit, but lacked the systematic urban pattern that later defined the offense. Sporadic incidents continued through the mid-20th century, typically classified under armed robbery statutes rather than as a distinct category, with offenders motivated by immediate needs like escape or resale of the vehicle. However, carjacking emerged as a recognizable in the late and early amid rising urban rates, particularly in economically distressed cities where illegal drug markets incentivized quick, high-risk thefts for parts, joyrides, or export. became an early epicenter, reporting a surge in such attacks during the summer of 1991, often perpetrated by groups of young males targeting occupied vehicles in high-traffic areas like gas stations and intersections. The term "carjacking"—a portmanteau of "" and "hijacking"—was coined in August 1991 by Detroit News crime reporter Scott Bowles to describe the fatal shooting of 22-year-old cashier Ruth Wahl, who resisted two assailants attempting to steal her vehicle outside a drugstore on August 20, 1991. This case exemplified early patterns: opportunistic strikes by minimally armed perpetrators seeking vehicles for short-term use, with victims frequently injured or killed in resistance. By late 1991, similar reports proliferated in other cities, prompting media attention and contributing to the passage of the federal Anti Car Theft Act of 1992, which criminalized interstate carjacking resulting in death or injury. estimates indicate around 6,000 to 8,000 annual carjackings nationwide by 1992, though underreporting likely inflated true figures, as many incidents were logged merely as robberies.

Rise in the 1990s and Policy Context

Carjacking incidents surged in the early 1990s amid a broader wave of urban violent crime in the United States, with the term gaining widespread media attention following high-profile cases in cities like Washington, D.C., and Los Angeles. Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) data from the National Crime Victimization Survey indicated an average of 49,000 completed or attempted nonfatal carjackings annually between 1992 and 1996, corresponding to a victimization rate of 2.5 per 10,000 persons aged 12 or older. This marked a notable increase in reported violent vehicle thefts compared to prior decades, when such acts were often subsumed under general robbery or auto theft categories without distinct tracking; the phenomenon was linked empirically to the crack cocaine epidemic, which fueled youth gang activity and opportunistic armed robberies in high-crime urban areas, as well as early advancements in vehicle immobilizers that deterred nonviolent thefts of unoccupied cars. Victimization rates remained elevated in the mid-1990s, averaging 2.1 per 10,000 persons from 1993 to 1997—about 60% higher than the 1.3 rate observed from 1998 to 2002—before declining alongside overall crime trends. Approximately 45% of these early incidents resulted in the vehicle being taken, with 74% involving weapons, predominantly firearms, and occurring overwhelmingly in urban or suburban settings. Offenders were typically young males operating in groups, reflecting patterns in stranger-directed robberies during the period's crime peak around 1991–1992. While carjackings represented a small fraction (less than 3%) of the roughly 1.6 million annual motor vehicle thefts at the time, their violent nature—yielding an estimated 27 related stranger homicides per year—amplified public and policy concern. The policy response emphasized enhanced penalties and federal intervention to address the perceived epidemic. The Anti-Car Theft Act of 1992 (P.L. 102-519) expanded federal authority over interstate vehicle theft, explicitly calling for cooperation to prevent and establishing mechanisms like the National Motor Vehicle Title Information System to curb trafficking of stolen parts and vehicles. This legislation facilitated federal prosecutions, with U.S. attorneys filing an average of 229 carjacking cases annually from 1992 to 1996 under emerging statutes like 18 U.S.C. § 2119, which imposed mandatory minimum sentences of 15 years for offenses involving serious injury or death. States followed suit, enacting specific anti-carjacking laws with aggravated penalties for armed takings, contributing to a deterrence framework amid the era's "tough on crime" shift, including increased incarceration and targeted policing that later correlated with the offense's decline.

Post-2020 Surge and Decline

Carjacking incidents in the United States surged beginning in 2020, coinciding with the and disruptions to urban policing and social structures. In a sample of 10 major cities tracked by the Council on Criminal Justice, carjacking rates rose 93% from 2019 to 2023, with an initial 30% increase from 2019 to 2020 followed by further escalations through 2022. Cities like experienced a sharp uptick, with nearly half of 2020 carjacking arrestees under age 18, while saw cases climb from 224 in 2019 to 409 in 2020; Washington, D.C., reported 426 carjackings in 2021 alone. This national pattern reflected broader trends, though carjackings—defined as robberies involving vehicle theft—outpaced general increases in affected areas. The peak occurred around 2022–2023, after which declines emerged amid policy shifts, enhanced enforcement, and improved vehicle measures. FBI data indicated a national carjacking rate drop from 7.5 incidents per 100,000 people in to 6.6 in 2023. In the Council on Criminal Justice's city sample, the average 2024 carjacking rate fell 32% from 2023 levels, with a 27% overall decline across tracked jurisdictions including drops in 19 of them. Early 2024 data showed a 26% reduction in the first half compared to 2023, continuing into 2025 with a 24% year-over-year drop in the first half, including steeper monthly declines like 54% in . Specific locales highlighted the reversal's scale. In , carjackings plummeted 87% during a 2025 federal enforcement surge under the Trump administration, recording only four incidents in a period that saw 31 the prior year. Chicago's carjackings decreased 29.3% from 2021 to 2023, with further reductions aligning with national trends into 2025. These declines paralleled broader reductions in vehicle-related crimes, including a 17% national drop in thefts in 2024 after years of increases, attributed to automaker anti-theft updates and targeted policing. Despite remaining elevated above pre-2020 baselines in some areas, the post-peak trajectory suggests responsiveness to deterrence-focused interventions over permissive policies prevalent during the surge.

Causes and Motivations

Empirical Drivers

Carjacking rates in a sample of 10 U.S. cities rose 93% from 2019 to 2023, coinciding with the pandemic's disruptions, including school closures that increased unsupervised time for juveniles, and social unrest following the killing, which correlated with localized spikes of 135% to 301% in 2020. These events facilitated opportunistic crimes by altering routines, such as heightened presence of delivery drivers as targets. Advancements in vehicle anti-theft technologies, including immobilizers, GPS trackers, and keyless entry systems, have reduced non-violent auto thefts, pushing offenders toward carjacking to forcibly access vehicles and evade recovery. FBI data indicate that nearly 90% of reported carjackings from 2019 to 2023 involved weapons, reflecting the need to overcome these security measures through . Juvenile justice reforms have diminished accountability for young offenders, who perpetrate over 50% of armed carjackings in areas like , often driven by thrill-seeking, , or validation rather than pure economic gain. Policies such as Maryland's 2022 Child Interrogation Protection Act, which mandates attorney presence before questioning minors, and D.C.'s Youth Rehabilitation Act, limiting mandatory minimums, have hampered investigations and prosecutions, with only 12 of 182 D.C. carjacking arrests in 2023 qualifying for enhanced penalties. Chronic school absenteeism, reaching 89.3% at certain D.C. high schools in 2022-2023, correlates with elevated and involvement in such crimes. Understaffing in police departments, exacerbated by post-2020 hiring challenges and reduced proactive , has lowered clearance rates and deterrence, contributing to sustained elevations in carjacking alongside a 105% rise in thefts over the same period. While adult offenders more frequently cite profit motives, such as black-market parts sales or vehicle export, empirical patterns emphasize situational opportunities over entrenched socioeconomic deprivation as primary drivers.

Offender Profiles and Demographics

Carjacking offenders are predominantly male, with analyses of U.S. incident reports from 2018 to 2022 showing that approximately 85% of identified perpetrators were male, a proportion that remained stable over the period. Racial demographics reveal significant disparities in offender involvement, particularly in the United States. Victim perceptions from National Crime Victimization Survey data in the early 1990s identified 56% of offenders as Black, 21% as White, 16% as other races (such as Asian or Native American), and 5% involving multiple races, with 8% unidentified; females accounted for about 3% of incidents. More recent per capita offending rates from 2022 data confirm disproportionate Black involvement, at 88.6 per 100,000 population for Black individuals versus 10.9 for White individuals, with other races comprising 2% or less and race unknown in about 25% of cases; Black offending rates rose 51% from 2018 levels, compared to 41% for Whites.
Race/EthnicityOffending Rate per 100,000 (2022)Change from 2018
Black88.6 +51%
White10.9 +41%
Age profiles indicate a concentration among , with juveniles playing a prominent role. Juvenile carjacking offending rates in the U.S. climbed 59% from 2018 to 2022, reaching 19.8 per 100,000—similar to adult rates of 18.6 per 100,000, unlike the higher adult dominance in related crimes like . In high-incidence areas, juveniles comprised 66% of arrests in , since 2020 and 76% (139 of 182 arrests) in 2023 alone, with some perpetrators as young as 10 to 12 in cities including and ; average offender ages in other jurisdictions, such as Arlington, , hovered around 19 to 20. Many operate in groups blending juveniles and young adults, often with prior arrests for auto theft or violent felonies, suggesting escalation from lower-level crimes rather than isolated first offenses. Internationally, offender patterns align with U.S. trends in documented cases, featuring young males from urban underclass communities, though comprehensive demographic data remains limited outside North America; in South Africa, a carjacking hotspot, perpetrators are typically adolescent or young adult males associated with township gangs.

Methods and Tactics

Common Techniques

Carjackings commonly employ sudden, opportunistic tactics that exploit victim vulnerability, often involving threats of violence to compel compliance and minimize resistance. Offenders frequently use firearms or other weapons, with data from multiple U.S. jurisdictions indicating that nearly 90% of incidents involve guns, enabling rapid control through intimidation rather than prolonged struggle. These methods prioritize speed and surprise, as hesitation can lead to intervention by bystanders or law enforcement, aligning with the crime's classification as a hybrid of robbery and theft executed in the victim's presence. A prevalent technique is the direct armed approach, where offenders target drivers stopped at traffic lights, intersections, or in lots, smashing windows or pulling doors to demand keys or immediate exit. This "blitz" method often involves groups of two or more assailants, who surround the vehicle to prevent escape, with one wielding a while others secure the ; such tactics are documented in urban hotspots like gas stations and centers, where victims are distracted, such as by using their phones. In areas, including residential complexes and retail lots, attackers wait for victims entering or exiting vehicles, capitalizing on transitional moments when doors are unlocked. Deceptive schemes constitute another core approach, designed to lure victims into stopping without immediate suspicion of . The "bump" tactic entails rear-ending the target's to simulate an , prompting the driver to exit for inspection, at which point armed offenders emerge from a secondary to seize control. Similarly, perpetrators may pose as stranded motorists or "Good Samaritans" needing assistance, such as feigning trouble or pointing to a flat tire, only to the responding driver. Less common but reported variants include impersonating police officers via flashing lights or uniforms to halt traffic. These ruses exploit social norms of helpfulness or legal compliance, though reports emphasize their infrequency compared to overt force in high-volume areas. Group dynamics enhance efficacy across techniques, with juvenile offenders—often comprising over 50% of perpetrators in cities like —coordinating roles for reconnaissance, distraction, and execution, sometimes amplified by livestreaming for notoriety. Weapons beyond guns, such as knives, serve in about 10-25% of cases to threaten without firing, preserving stealth, while vehicles are typically abandoned shortly after for resale of parts or use in further crimes. Empirical patterns from police analyses underscore urban night-time prevalence, with most incidents lasting under a minute to evade detection.

Technological Adaptations

Carjackers have increasingly exploited vulnerabilities in keyless entry and ignition systems through relay attacks, which amplify and retransmit radio signals from a vehicle's key fob to deceive the car into unlocking and starting remotely. This method typically requires two offenders: one near the target vehicle with a receiver device, and another closer to the owner holding a transmitter that relays the fob's low-frequency signal over distances up to several hundred meters using commercially available radio equipment. Such tactics emerged prominently in the alongside the proliferation of passive keyless systems in over 90% of new vehicles by , enabling quicker, less confrontational seizures when owners are nearby, though direct force remains common in verified carjacking incidents. To evade post-theft tracking, perpetrators deploy portable GPS and jammers that broadcast interfering signals on and cellular bands, disrupting devices and rendering stolen vehicles unlocatable for hours or days. These battery-powered units, often sourced from online markets or illicit networks, operate within a 10-50 meter radius and have been documented in hijacking operations where offenders prioritize disabling factory-installed trackers before fleeing. In high-incidence areas, jamming complements traditional tactics by buying time for disassembly or export, with recovery rates dropping below 20% in jammed cases according to fleet analyses. Less frequently, advanced groups employ software-based intrusions, such as exploiting onboard diagnostic ports or vulnerabilities via tools like diagnostic scanners to bypass immobilizers after initial forcible entry. However, these require technical expertise and are rarer in opportunistic carjackings compared to or jamming methods, as evidenced by law enforcement seizures of such devices primarily in organized rings rather than street-level incidents.

Prevalence and Statistics

Global Overview

Carjacking, defined as the theft of a from its occupant through force or threat, exhibits significant variation in prevalence across regions due to differences in rates, socioeconomic factors, and efficacy. Comprehensive global statistics are constrained by inconsistent definitions and underreporting, with international bodies like the Office on Drugs and Crime primarily tracking broader rather than violent carjackings specifically. Available data highlight hotspots in and , where carjacking often links to and economic desperation, contrasting with lower incidences in , , and parts of . South Africa records among the world's highest carjacking rates, with fiscal year 2023 marking the peak in reported incidents according to aggregated police data, exceeding prior years amid rising violent robberies. Estimates place annual hijackings at over 20,000 cases, concentrated in urban areas like Gauteng province, where syndicates target vehicles for resale or parts. Victim surveys indicate an 18.5% increase in hijackings from 2023/24 to 2024/25, underscoring persistent challenges in high-crime environments with limited deterrence. In , reported 373,225 vehicle thefts and robberies in 2022, an 8% rise from 2021, with carjackings comprising a substantial subset in cities plagued by activity. Auto theft rates stood at 102.2 per 100,000 vehicles in 2024, reflecting ongoing vulnerability despite declines in some metrics. Other nations like and exhibit similar patterns, though precise carjacking figures remain elusive due to institutional instability. Developed regions report far lower rates; estimates around 300 carjackings annually, or 0.15 per 10,000 population, amid broader increases but minimal violent confrontations. European countries experience sporadic incidents, often tied to opportunistic rather than syndicates, with rates under 50 per 100,000 contrasting sharply with global hotspots. In the United States, urban carjacking rates averaged 37.9 per 100,000 in 2023 across sampled cities, elevated post-2020 but below African benchmarks. Carjacking victimization rates in the , as measured by the ' (NCVS), peaked in the mid- before declining substantially. The rate stood at 0.53 per 1,000 persons aged 16 or older in 1995 (based on 3-year moving averages) and fell 78% by 2021, remaining low and stable at 0.09 to 0.15 per 1,000 over the 2012–2021 period. This long-term downward trend aligns with broader reductions in during the late and , though NCVS data rely on self-reported victimizations and may undercount incidents not reported to police or fitting narrower survey definitions. Police-reported data from the FBI's National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) reveal a post-2020 surge in documented carjacking incidents, contrasting with NCVS stability. In a sample of 10 major cities tracked by the , carjacking rates rose 93% from 2019 to 2023, increasing from an average of 20.1 per 100,000 residents (using 2018 baseline data) to 37.9 per 100,000. Nationally, FBI NIBRS data showed a rate of 7.5 carjackings per 100,000 people in 2022, declining to 6.6 per 100,000 in 2023—a 12% drop—covering reports from over 14,000 agencies representing 278 million people. This urban concentration in reported incidents highlights potential discrepancies between victimization surveys and records, possibly due to improved reporting, definitional variations, or heightened enforcement focus in high-crime areas. Preliminary data for 2024 indicate a reversal of the post-2020 uptick, with carjacking rates in sampled cities averaging 26% lower in the first half of the year compared to the same period in 2023. Such fluctuations underscore the limitations of short-term trends, as carjacking constitutes a small fraction of overall —far below or aggravated rates—but remains elevated in select metropolitan areas like , where incidents exceeded 900 annually in peak recent years. Overall, while national victimization metrics suggest rarity (under 0.2% of households affected annually in recent NCVS estimates), reported spikes correlate with broader increases of 105% in the same city sample from 2019 to 2023.

High-Incidence Regions

South Africa records some of the world's highest carjacking rates, with Gauteng province serving as the primary hotspot. In the first quarter of 2025, Gauteng accounted for 2,488 reported hijackings, representing 55% of the national total. During the third quarter of 2023/2024, the province saw 3,010 incidents, comprising 50.4% of all carjackings in the country. According to vehicle recovery firm Tracker, hijackings constituted 56% of all vehicle crime incidents nationwide from July to December 2024. In the United States, urban centers demonstrate elevated carjacking incidences relative to national averages, though comprehensive per-country comparisons remain limited by varying definitions and reporting standards. In 2023, the District of Columbia, Baltimore, and Memphis registered the highest rates per 100,000 residents among tracked cities. Across a sample of 10 major U.S. cities, carjacking rates rose 93% from 2019 to 2023, reaching an average of 37.9 per 100,000 population. Baltimore, for instance, experienced an 80% increase by 2022 compared to 2018 levels. While preliminary 2024 data indicate a decline from 2023 peaks in some areas, rates remained approximately 25% above 2019 baselines in the sampled cities. Other regions with notable vehicle-related violent theft include parts of , where reported an auto theft rate of 102.2 per 100,000 vehicles in 2024, encompassing carjackings amid broader trends. also features high overall indices, correlating with elevated risks of carjacking, though precise disaggregated are scarce due to underreporting and institutional challenges. These patterns underscore concentrations in economically strained urban environments with weak enforcement, as evidenced by police and recovery firm data rather than potentially biased academic aggregates.

United States Federal and State Laws

At the federal level, carjacking is criminalized under 18 U.S.C. § 2119, which prohibits taking a transported, shipped, or received in interstate or foreign from another person by force, violence, intimidation, or instilling fear of or serious bodily harm, with intent to cause or serious harm. This statute was enacted as part of the Anti Car Theft Act of 1992, signed into law on October 25, 1992, in response to rising vehicle thefts and violent seizures during the late and early . Conviction carries a maximum penalty of 15 years imprisonment and fines up to $250,000; if serious bodily injury occurs, the maximum rises to 25 years; and if results, the sentence may be or any term of years. Federal jurisdiction applies broadly due to the interstate requirement, which covers nearly all modern vehicles, allowing prosecution even when state authorities defer. All U.S. states criminalize carjacking, typically classifying it as a akin to , with penalties varying by , presence of weapons, to victims, and offender history. State statutes often impose prison terms ranging from 10 to 30 years, with enhancements for or great bodily ; for instance, § 215 defines carjacking as a punishable by 3 to 9 years in state prison, increasing to 5 to 15 years if committed with a . In , carjacking falls under statutes (Penal Code § 29.03), carrying 5 to 99 years or life if a is used, reflecting the state's emphasis on severe deterrence for violent crimes. New York treats carjacking as first-degree (Penal Law § 160.15) when a is displayed, mandating a minimum of 5 years and up to 25 years , with mandatory minimums for repeat offenders. State laws differ in elements required for conviction; some, like (Statute § 812.133), explicitly define carjacking as taking a with intent to temporarily or permanently deprive, punishing it as a first-degree with up to 30 years or life if a causes serious . Others integrate it into broader frameworks without a distinct "carjacking" label, leading to penalties influenced by vehicle-specific aggravating factors. These variations stem from state legislative responses to local crime patterns, with providing a uniform baseline for interstate cases or when state prosecutions are inadequate.

International Approaches

In , carjacking is prosecuted under as theft of a involving or threats, with maximum penalties increased from 10 to 14 years' imprisonment via Bill C-69, enacted to address rising auto theft organized by criminal networks. The federal National Action Plan on Combatting Auto Theft, launched in 2024, emphasizes prosecuting such offenses alongside disrupting transnational theft rings exporting stolen vehicles. Australia addresses carjacking through state-specific statutes, such as Victoria's Crimes Act 1958, where section 79 defines it as seizing a by or , carrying a maximum of 15 years' imprisonment; aggravated forms, involving weapons or injury, escalate to life imprisonment under section 79A. The 2016 Crimes Amendment (Carjacking and ) Act introduced these targeted provisions to deter opportunistic and organized vehicle hijackings prevalent in urban areas. In the , carjacking lacks a distinct statutory offense and is charged under the as or aggravated vehicle-taking, with maximum sentences of for causing serious harm, though typical custodial terms range from 3 to 7 years based on sentencing guidelines. Aggravated theft from vehicles, including use of weapons, follows structured culpability and harm assessments, but enforcement relies on broader frameworks without mandatory minimums. South Africa's legal response classifies carjacking—locally termed hijacking—as under , with penalties up to 15 years' per the Criminal Procedure Act, and stringent restrictions under the Criminal Law Amendment Act to curb amid the world's highest reported rates. However, conviction rates remain low at approximately 2.3%, attributable to evidentiary challenges and systemic prosecutorial inefficiencies rather than lenient statutes. Across the , no harmonized directive exists for carjacking, deferring to national robbery laws; for instance, treats it as vol qualifié (aggravated ) under the Penal Code, punishable by 7 to 20 years' imprisonment depending on violence or organization, with cross-border cooperation via targeting theft export rings but not standardizing penalties.

Prevention and Response

Individual and Vehicle Security

Individual security measures emphasize and proactive behaviors to minimize vulnerability during entry, exit, or operation of a . Drivers are advised to maintain constant vigilance of their surroundings, particularly in high-risk areas such as unattended parking lots, gas stations, or intersections where slowing or stopping occurs, as carjackers often target moments of distraction. Locking doors immediately upon entry, even before inserting keys, and keeping windows up while driving prevents opportunistic access by assailants approaching on foot or by . If a suspicious individual approaches, drivers should accelerate away safely rather than engaging, and in scenarios—common ruses—remain inside with doors locked, windows up, and drive to a or public area without exiting. Planning routes to avoid known high-crime zones and parking in well-lit, populated areas further reduces exposure, as empirical patterns show carjackings cluster in poorly surveilled urban hotspots. Vehicle security focuses on physical and technological barriers that deter or delay attempts, which overlap with carjacking prevention by complicating rapid acquisition. Visible deterrents such as locks (e.g., The Club) signal resistance to thieves and have been noted enforcement as effective in discouraging opportunistic crimes, with police reports indicating they prompt thieves to target unsecured alternatives. Audible alarms and visible alerts draw attention to unauthorized entry attempts, potentially invoking bystander intervention or rapid response. Electronic immobilizers, standard in many modern , prevent starting without the correct transponder key and demonstrate high effectiveness against , with studies attributing their widespread adoption to significant declines in motor rates post-1990s implementation. GPS tracking devices enable post- recovery and may deter perpetrators aware of real-time monitoring risks, though their preventive impact relies on offender perception of traceability. Regular ensures functional locks and alarms, while removing valuables from sight eliminates secondary incentives that could escalate to . These measures, grounded in guidelines and reduction data, prioritize low-cost, high-visibility tactics over reliance on unproven or reactive defenses.

Systemic Enforcement Strategies

Law enforcement agencies have increasingly adopted specialized task forces to address carjacking through coordinated investigations, sharing, and focused prosecutions. These multi-jurisdictional units, often involving federal agencies like the FBI and ATF alongside local police, target high-volume areas and repeat offenders to disrupt networks. For instance, the U.S. Department of Justice expanded carjacking task forces to 18 districts by 2024, prioritizing regions with elevated rates such as , , and , where prior implementations correlated with declines including a 29% drop in from 2021 to 2023 and a 31% reduction in from 2022 to 2023. Data-driven tracking of carjacking incidents enables identification of hotspots, offender patterns, and , informing resource allocation. Agencies are recommended to maintain granular records on variables like location, time, weapon use, and vehicle types, using systems such as the National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) for accurate classification. Washington, D.C.'s Metropolitan Police Department dashboard, tracking monthly carjackings since 2018, has facilitated operations like ATLAS, contributing to a 28% decrease in armed carjackings in compared to 2023. Hot-spot policing, deploying patrols to high-risk zones derived from this data, complements these efforts by increasing deterrence and apprehension rates without broad-area saturation. Targeting recidivists forms a core component, as many carjackers exhibit prior offenses, with strategies emphasizing swift federal prosecutions under enhanced sentencing guidelines. Chicago's Vehicular Hijacking Task Force achieved a 29.3% reduction from 2021 to 2023 by prioritizing such individuals, while New Orleans saw a 43.6% drop in 2023 through similar focus on persistent groups. Inter-agency collaboration, including license plate readers and aerial , amplifies these outcomes by tracing stolen vehicles across jurisdictions.

Criticisms and Policy Debates

Failures of Lenient Policies

In jurisdictions implementing reforms and reduced penalties for violent offenses, carjacking incidents have surged, often attributed by law enforcement to diminished deterrence and high among released offenders. For instance, zero-bail policies in , resulted in a 200% increase in violent crimes by arrestees released without financial incentives to appear in court, with an average rate of 78% over 18 months compared to lower rates under traditional systems. Similarly, New York's 2019 reform correlated with statistically significant rises in rates, a category encompassing carjackings, alongside increases in murders and larcenies. Washington, D.C., exemplifies these shortcomings, where carjackings escalated 571% from 2019 to 2023, driven largely by juvenile offenders who comprised over 75% of the 182 arrests in 2023. The District's Youth Rehabilitation Act permits probation for offenders under 25 irrespective of crime gravity, limiting access to mandatory minimum sentences—only 12 such cases qualified in 2023—and overcrowded facilities restrict secure detention, enabling rapid release of repeat perpetrators. Local officials, including the mayor, have criticized judges for excessive leniency toward recidivists, fostering a cycle where arrested juveniles reoffend shortly after, as evidenced by multiple arrests for the same individuals in armed carjacking sprees. Post-2020 reforms, including curtailed juvenile interrogations and overnight holds, further exacerbated this by impeding investigations and immediate accountability. In , carjackings climbed to 937 incidents between 2014 and 2017 before peaking higher amid progressive prosecutorial approaches under State's Attorney , who has faced accusations of inadequate charging for repeat despite a stated 90% adult prosecution rate. Cases like small groups accounting for dozens of carjackings in —where six suspects, including juveniles, were linked to 36 incidents—highlight how lenient handling permits prolific , with clearance rates as low as 6% in allowing perpetrators to evade consequences. Efforts to reverse trends, such as targeting repeat offenders in New Orleans, yielded a 43.6% carjacking drop from 2022 to 2023, underscoring that stricter enforcement disrupts these patterns where softer policies fail.

Reporting and Demographic Oversights

National crime victimization surveys conducted by the (BJS) reveal that victims identified 56% of carjacking offenders as and 21% as white in incidents from the (NCVS) data. These figures indicate a substantial overrepresentation of black offenders relative to their 13.6% share of the U.S. as of 2023. In 8% of cases, victims could not identify the offender's race, and multiple offenders of mixed races accounted for 6%. More recent BJS analyses of carjacking victimization from 1995 to 2021, however, omit offender race and details, focusing instead on victim profiles, use, and incident circumstances. This omission restricts updated empirical assessment of demographic patterns, despite consistent NCVS for capturing victim-perceived offender characteristics in other violent crimes. Critics contend such gaps in federal reporting, combined with inconsistent local classification of carjackings versus general robberies, obscure causal linkages to socioeconomic and cultural factors in high-risk urban demographics. Arrest data from major cities further highlight demographic concentrations, particularly among juveniles. In , juveniles under 18 comprised 76% of 182 carjacking arrests in 2023 (139 cases), with most adult offenders also under 24. Similar patterns prevail in , where youth drove the 2020 surge, and , with juveniles responsible for about 50% of incidents. Mainstream media and policy discussions frequently underemphasize these age and implied ethnic profiles—predominant in majority-black urban areas—prioritizing aggregate trends over targeted risk factors like group offending by armed teens. Inconsistent reporting across jurisdictions exacerbates these oversights, as many agencies do not disaggregate carjackings in uniform crime reports, leading to unreliable national estimates and hindering evidence-based prevention in affected communities. For instance, cross-jurisdictional pursuits in the D.C.-Maryland-Virginia area reveal repeat juvenile offenders operating across lines, yet fragmented data collection impedes systemic tracking. This selective emphasis on overall incidence rather than perpetrator profiles may perpetuate ineffective policies disconnected from empirical realities.

Specialized Forms

Commercial and Truck Carjacking

![Hijacking hotspot on R511 highway in Gauteng, South Africa][float-right]
Commercial and truck carjacking involves the forcible seizure of cargo-laden vehicles from drivers, often targeting high-value goods in transit and disrupting supply chains. Unlike standard carjackings focused on personal vehicles, these incidents prioritize cargo theft, with perpetrators using violence or threats to control the driver and access loads such as electronics, pharmaceuticals, or food products. Hijackings account for 21% of global cargo theft incidents, frequently occurring in Latin America and Africa where weak enforcement enables organized networks. In , truck hijackings reached 1,976 cases in the 2023/24 fiscal year according to data, averaging about 5 per day and reflecting a sustained rise from prior years. These crimes concentrate on major highways like the N3 and in province, where syndicates employ spotters, fake checkpoints, and armed ambushes to halt trucks. Perpetrators often force drivers to remote locations for unloading cargo before abandoning the vehicle, contributing to annual economic losses exceeding billions of rands in stolen goods and logistics delays. Mexico leads globally in cargo truck hijackings, with over 1,000 reported incidents in 2023, primarily in industrial zones near , Guadalajara, and border regions, driven by involvement seeking fuels, auto parts, and consumer goods. Common methods include "bump and run" tactics—ramming trucks to simulate accidents—or establishing illegal roadblocks with armed groups to board and seize control. Such hijackings have escalated 3% from 2022 levels, exacerbating vulnerabilities and prompting armed escorts for high-risk routes. Emerging hotspots like report worsening trends, with hijackings surpassing rates in many nations due to organized theft rings targeting fruit exports and metals, often using insider information for precise strikes. , commercial truck carjackings remain less prevalent than opportunistic cargo thefts at rest stops, though isolated violent incidents, such as armed takeovers of semi-trucks, highlight vulnerabilities in long-haul . Overall, these crimes impose cascading effects, including driver fatalities, insurance premium hikes, and rerouting that inflates global freight costs.

References

  1. https://www.justice.gov/archives/jm/criminal-resource-manual-1111-elements-carjacking
  2. https://www.justice.gov/archives/jm/criminal-resource-manual-1110-carjacking-statute
  3. https://bjs.ojp.gov/carjacking-victimization-1995-2021
  4. https://counciloncj.org/trends-in-carjacking-what-you-need-to-know/
  5. https://www.fbi.gov/news/press-releases/fbi-releases-motor-vehicle-theft-2019-2023
  6. https://www.policeforum.org/assets/Carjacking.pdf
  7. https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/fact-sheet-year-year-carjacking-trends-month-june
  8. https://bjs.ojp.gov/library/publications/carjackings-united-states-1992-96
  9. https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/transnational-organized-crime/motor-vehicle-theft
  10. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2119
  11. https://legis.la.gov/Legis/Law.aspx?d=78599
  12. https://www.oed.com/dictionary/carjacking_n
  13. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/carjacking
  14. https://www.freep.com/story/opinion/columnists/stephen-henderson/2016/12/02/created-equal-origins-word-carjacking/94730874/
  15. https://www.jalopnik.com/carjacking-history-of-the-term-detroit-1850041056/
  16. https://onelook.com/?loc=olthes4&w=carjacking
  17. https://www.wordhippo.com/what-is/another-word-for/carjacking.html
  18. https://www.nytimes.com/1992/12/09/us/carjacking-new-name-for-old-crime.html
  19. https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-criminol-030421-042141
  20. https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/cus96.pdf
  21. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1993-02-14-mn-441-story.html
  22. https://jalopnik.com/carjacking-history-of-the-term-detroit-1850041056
  23. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2024/11/carjacking-crime-police-dc-maryland/679951/
  24. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/law/motor-vehicle-theft
  25. https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/c02.pdf
  26. https://www.sfgate.com/crime/article/Carjacking-Rate-Surprisingly-High-But-deaths-2943237.php
  27. https://bja.ojp.gov/sites/g/files/xyckuh186/files/media/document/anti_car_theft_act.pdf
  28. https://www.naaa.com/NAAA_Legislative/HistoryOfAutoTheft.html
  29. https://scholarship.richmond.edu/lawreview/vol28/iss2/5/
  30. https://counciloncj.org/crime-trends-in-u-s-cities-year-end-2024-update/
  31. https://www.cnn.com/2022/01/23/us/carjackings-rise-major-cities-pandemic
  32. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/carjacked-capital-crime-pandemic-still-roiling-dc-rcna224655
  33. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/01/us/car-theft-teens-pandemic.html
  34. https://jasher.substack.com/p/vehicle-based-crime-plunged-in-2024
  35. https://www.npr.org/2024/12/20/nx-s1-5230782/early-data-suggest-carjackings-and-car-thefts-fell-in-2024
  36. https://counciloncj.org/crime-trends-in-u-s-cities-mid-year-2025-update/
  37. https://nypost.com/2025/08/27/us-news/carjackings-plummet-87-in-the-nations-capital-during-trumps-crime-crackdown/
  38. https://www.autoblog.com/news/car-theft-decline-usa-trends-2024
  39. https://www.reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/comments/1lts9ml/carjackings_a_plunging_in_2025/
  40. https://static.prisonpolicy.org/scans/bjs/c02.pdf
  41. https://popcenter.asu.edu/content/carjacking
  42. https://www.tamuct.edu/university-police/staying-safe-on-campus/preventing-carjacking/
  43. https://www.hanover.com/businesses/business-customer-resources/hanover-risk-solutions/carjacking-dont-be-victim
  44. https://leasing.com/guides/relay-car-theft-what-is-it-and-how-can-you-avoid-it/
  45. https://www.compustar.com/blog/how-to-prevent-key-hacks-and-relay-attacks/
  46. https://vicone.com/blog/from-key-fob-to-uwb-how-hackers-hijack-vehicle-entry-systems
  47. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/cars-hacked-stolen-keyless-vehicle-thefts/
  48. https://www.cartrackme.com/blog-posts/signal-jamming-detection-cartracks-advanced-technology-has-got-you-covered
  49. https://avlview.com/gps-tracking-blog/7-ways-drivers-block-cheat-vehicle-trackers/
  50. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/may/26/high-tech-thieves-jamming-technology-steal-car
  51. https://www.invoxia.com/blog/gpstrackers/thieves-techniques-to-steal-cars-how-to-protect-yourself/
  52. https://tcm-sec.com/intro-to-car-hacking-replay-attacks/
  53. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1006796/number-carjackings-south-africa/
  54. https://interlira-reports.com/featured/vehicle-theft-and-robbery-in-brazil-a-growing-concern/04/07/2024/
  55. https://www.statista.com/statistics/870647/auto-theft-rate-brazil/
  56. https://www.aic.gov.au/publications/tandi/tandi351
  57. https://businesstech.co.za/news/motoring/825573/the-suburb-with-the-most-reported-hijackings-in-south-africa/
  58. https://businesstech.co.za/news/lifestyle/786050/new-hijacking-trend-hitting-south-africas-wealthiest-province/
  59. https://www.tracker.co.za/news/news-room/your-vehicle-is-more-likely-to-be-hijacked-than-stolen
  60. https://stateline.org/2024/02/09/car-thefts-and-carjackings-are-up-unreliable-data-makes-it-hard-to-pinpoint-why/
  61. https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/crime-rate-by-country
  62. https://www.congress.gov/bill/102nd-congress/house-bill/4542
  63. https://www.justice.gov/archives/usam/criminal-resource-manual-1307-18-usc-2119-carjacking
  64. https://www.criminaldefenselawyer.com/resources/carjacking-laws-and-penalties.html
  65. https://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0800-0899/0812/Sections/0812.133.html
  66. https://www.justice.gov/archives/jm/criminal-resource-manual-113-carjacking-crimes
  67. https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/cntrng-crm/autothft-cntrvhcls/ctn-pln-en.aspx
  68. https://www.canada.ca/en/public-safety-canada/news/2024/05/government-of-canada-unveils-national-action-plan-on-combatting-auto-theft.html
  69. https://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/vic/consol_act/ca195882/s79.html
  70. https://www.legislation.vic.gov.au/as-made/acts/crimes-amendment-carjacking-and-home-invasion-act-2016
  71. https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/theft-act-offences
  72. https://sentencingcouncil.org.uk/guidelines/theft-general/
  73. https://www.saps.gov.za/newsroom/msspeechdetail.php?nid=44306
  74. https://www.thesouthafrican.com/news/hijackers-conviction-rate-south-africa-low/
  75. https://www.eurojust.europa.eu/news/coordinated-action-arrest-gang-members-stealing-over-one-hundred-luxury-cars-across-europe
  76. https://mpdc.dc.gov/release/mpd-reminds-public-safety-tips-avoid-carjackings
  77. https://www.aus.com/security-resources/carjacking-prevention
  78. https://www.nhtsa.gov/vehicle-safety/vehicle-theft-prevention
  79. https://federal-criminal.com/violent-crimes/armed-carjacking-prevention-security-guidelines/
  80. https://pompepperspray.com/blogs/blog/how-to-secure-your-vehicle-to-prevent-carjacking
  81. https://www.consumerreports.org/money/theft/how-to-keep-your-car-from-getting-stolen-car-theft-a2434454434/
  82. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/239771148_The_effectiveness_of_car_security_devices_and_their_role_in_the_crime_drop
  83. https://www.quora.com/How-effective-are-electronic-immobilizers-in-preventing-car-theft
  84. https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/pr/justice-department-launches-carjacking-task-forces-targeted-areas-across-country
  85. https://yoloda.org/zero-bail-case-study-zero-bail-policies-increased-crime-in-every-category/
  86. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/07418825.2023.2209145
  87. https://www.fox5dc.com/news/dc-council-members-question-catch-and-release-as-juvenile-crime-causes-chaos-across-dc
  88. https://www.civicfed.org/civic-federation/blog/carjacking-incidents-city-chicago
  89. https://news.wttw.com/2021/10/13/cook-county-reports-carjackings-nearly-doubled-year
  90. https://bjs.ojp.gov/data-collection/ncvs
  91. https://www.munichre.com/specialty/global-markets-uk/en/insights/cargo-and-freight/cargo-theft-tactics-and-trends-report-2025.html
  92. https://thehustle.co/originals/the-newest-threat-to-the-global-supply-chain-hijackers
  93. https://africacheck.org/infofinder/explore-facts/how-many-hijackings-occur-south-africa-each-year
  94. https://www.cartrack.co.za/blog/truck-hijacking-see-the-latest-stats-and-prevention-tactics
  95. https://www.forbes.com/sites/nathanielparishflannery/2024/02/19/cargo-truck-hijacking-is-a-major-problem-in-mexico/
  96. https://interstatemc.com/2023/12/01/how-to-reduce-the-risk-of-carjackings-in-the-trucking-industry/
  97. https://www.cvpsd.org/post/safeguarding-against-carjacking-kidnapping-and-robbery-on-the-road-strategies-and-examples
  98. https://www.forbes.com/sites/nathanielparishflannery/2024/10/18/cargo-truck-hijacking-is-a-worsening-risk-in-chile/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.