Hubbry Logo
Berlin PalaceBerlin PalaceMain
Open search
Berlin Palace
Community hub
Berlin Palace
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Berlin Palace
Berlin Palace
Berlin Palace
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The Berlin Palace (German: Berliner Schloss),[1] formerly known as the Royal Palace (German: Königliches Schloss), is a large building adjacent to Berlin Cathedral and the Museum Island in the Mitte area of Berlin. It was the main residence of the Electors of Brandenburg, Kings of Prussia and German Emperors from 1443 to 1918. Expanded by order of Frederick I of Prussia according to plans by Andreas Schlüter from 1689 to 1713, it was thereafter considered a major work of Prussian Baroque architecture.[2] The royal palace became one of Berlin’s largest buildings and shaped the cityscape with its 60-meter-high (200 ft) dome erected in 1845.

Key Information

Used for various government functions after the abolition of the Hohenzollern monarchy in the 1918 revolution, the palace was damaged during the Allied bombing in World War II, and was razed to the ground by the East German authorities in 1950. In the 1970s, the East German authorities erected a modernist parliamentary and cultural center on the site, known as the Palace of the Republic. After German reunification in 1990, and years of debate, particularly regarding the fraught historical legacy of both buildings, the Palace of the Republic was itself demolished in 2009.

Most of the Berlin Palace's exterior was reconstructed beginning in 2013 to house the Humboldt Forum museum. The east façade of the reconstructed palace incorporates a modernist design, while the new interior combines both historicist and modernist elements. Architect Franco Stella oversaw the project and the exterior reconstruction was completed in 2020, with the last decoration being mounted in 2025.[3] The palace is now again among the largest in the world.

Overview

[edit]
The Berlin Palace (left) with the National Kaiser Wilhelm Monument to Wilhelm I (destroyed 1950), c. 1900

The palace was originally built in the 15th century, but had changed in form throughout the next few centuries. It bore features of the Baroque style; its shape, which had been finalized by the mid-18th century, is for the most part attributed to German architect Andreas Schlüter, whose first design is likely to date from 1702, even though the palace incorporated earlier parts as seen in 1688 by Nicodemus Tessin the Younger. It was the principal residence and winter residence of the Hohenzollern kings of Prussia from 1701 to 1918. After the unification of Germany in 1871, it also became the central residence for the German Emperors, who also served as the kings of Prussia. After the proclamation of the Weimar Republic in 1918, the palace became a museum. In World War II, the building was heavily damaged by Allied bombing. Although it is thought to have been repairable, the palace was demolished in 1950 by the East German authorities following much criticism. In the 1970s, the Palace of the Republic was constructed on its site. After controversial public discussions, in 2002 the Bundestag decided to demolish the Palace of the Republic in order to make place for a partial reconstruction of the Berlin Palace.

Located on Spree Island, the plans envisaged the reconstruction of three sides of the palace exterior in the original style, initially without the National Kaiser Wilhelm Monument at the west front facing the river Spree, and a modernist façade facing the other branch of the Spree. The identically reconstructed facades include various remnant sculptures and stones of the original palace. The inner courtyard facades are also modern, except three facades of the main courtyard which was originally built in 1699 (Schlüterhof). The floorplan has been designed to allow future reconstruction of notable historical rooms. Part of the building houses the Humboldt Forum museum and congress complex, and was finished in 2020.[4][5]

History

[edit]

History up to 1871

[edit]

The palace replaced an earlier fort or castle guarding the crossing of the Spree at Cölln, a neighbouring town which merged with Berlin in 1710. The castle stood on Fishers' Island, as the southern end of the Museum Island in the Spree is known. In 1443 Frederick II "Irontooth", Margrave and Prince Elector of Brandenburg, laid the foundations of Berlin's first fortification in a section of swampy wasteland north of Cölln. At the completion of the castle in 1451, Frederick moved there from the town of Brandenburg. The main role of the castle and its garrison in this period was to establish the authority of the margraves over the unruly citizens of Berlin, who were reluctant to give up their medieval privileges to a monarchy. In 1415 King Sigismund had enfeoffed the Hohenzollern princes with Brandenburg, and they were now establishing their power and withdrawing privileges which the cities had attained in the Brandenburg interregnum of 1319–1415.

The Berlin Palace (letter A) on the Memhardt-Plan, 1652

In 1454 Frederick II, after having returned via Rome from his pilgrimage to Jerusalem, made the castle chapel a parish church, richly endowing it with relics and altars.[6] Pope Nicholas V ordered Stephan Bodecker, then Prince-Bishop of Brandenburg, to consecrate the chapel to Erasmus of Formiae.[7] On 7 April 1465, at Frederick's request, Pope Paul II attributed to St Erasmus Chapel a canon law College named Stift zu Ehren Unserer Lieben Frauen, des heiligen Kreuzes, St. Petri und Pauli, St. Erasmi und St. Nicolai. This collegiate church became the nucleus of today's Evangelical Supreme Parish and Collegiate Church (Berliner Dom (Berlin Cathedral)), adjoining the site of the castle.

In 1538, the Elector Joachim II demolished the castle and engaged the master builder Caspar Theiss to build a new and grander palace in the Italian Renaissance style. After the Thirty Years War (1618–1648), Frederick William, the "Great Elector", embellished the palace further. In 1688, Nicodemus Tessin the Younger designed courtyard arcades with massive columns in front. Not much is known about the alterations of 1690–1695, when Johann Nering was the court architect. Martin Grünberg continued the alterations in 1695–1699.

In 1699, the Elector Frederick III of Brandenburg (who took the title King in Prussia in 1701, becoming Frederick I), appointed the architect Andreas Schlüter to execute a "second plan" in the Italian manner. Schlüter's first design probably dates from 1702; he planned to rebuild the palace in the Protestant Baroque style. His overall concept in the shape of a regular cube enclosing a magnificently ornamented courtyard was retained by all the building directors who succeeded him. In 1706, Schlüter was replaced by Johann Friedrich Eosander von Göthe, who designed the western extension of the palace, doubling its size. In all essentials, Schlüter's balanced, rhythmic composition of the façades was retained, but Göthe moved the main entrance to the new west wing.

Frederick William I, who became king in 1713, was interested mainly in building up Prussia as a military power, and dismissed most of the craftsmen working on the palace. As a result, Göthe's plan was only partly carried out. The palace was namely the original location for the Amber Room in the Catherine Palace of Tsarskoye Selo near Saint Petersburg, but Peter the Great of Russia admired it during a visit, and in 1716 Frederick William I presented the room to Peter as a gift.[8] Nevertheless, the exterior of the palace had come close to its final form by the mid-18th century. Interior decoration continued, engaging the talents of Georg Wenzeslaus von Knobelsdorff, Carl von Gontard and many others. The final stage was the erection of the dome in 1845, during the reign of Frederick William IV. The dome was built by Friedrich August Stüler after a design by Karl Friedrich Schinkel.

The palace was itself the epicenter of the Revolution of 1848 in Prussia. Huge crowds gathered outside the palace to present an "address to the king" containing their demands for a constitution, liberal reform and German unification. Frederick William IV emerged from the palace to accept their demands. On 18 March, a large demonstration outside the palace led to bloodshed and the outbreak of street fighting. Frederick William later reneged on his promises and reimposed an autocratic regime. From that time onwards, many Berliners and other Germans came to see the palace as a symbol of oppression and "Prussian militarism".

History during the German Empire, Weimar Republic and National Socialist Era (1871–1945)

[edit]
City model in the tourist information room next to Schlüterhof: the palace at center with the cathedral at right.

In 1871, King Wilhelm I was elevated to the status of German Emperor (Kaiser) of a united Germany, and the palace became the symbolic heart of the German Empire. The Empire was (in theory) a constitutional state, and from 1894 onwards, the new Reichstag building, the seat of the German parliament, came to not only rival, but overshadow the palace as the Empire's centre of power. In conjunction with Germany's defeat in World War I, Kaiser Wilhelm II was forced to abdicate, both as German Emperor and as King of Prussia.

In November 1918, during the immediate vacuum of power following the abdication of the Kaiser, Spartacist leader Karl Liebknecht declared a German socialist republic from a balcony of the palace. It was an attempt to steer the German revolution towards a communist Germany and stood in contrast to the proclamation of a republic that Philipp Scheidemann of the Social Democratic Party had made a few hours earlier from a balcony of the Reichstag building. The duelling proclamations underscored that the more than 400 years of royal Hohenzollern occupation of the Berlin Palace had come to an end.[9]

During the Weimar Republic, parts of the palace were turned into a museum, while other parts continued to be used for receptions and other state functions. Under Adolf Hitler's National Socialist (Nazi) Party, which laid to rest monarchist hopes of a Hohenzollern restoration, the building was mostly ignored. During World War II, the palace was twice struck by Allied bombs: on 3 and 24 February 1945. On the latter occasion, when both the air defences and fire-fighting systems of Berlin had been destroyed, the building was struck by incendiaries, lost its roof, and was largely burnt out.

  • Grand Staircase, the palace's ceremonial entrance from Schlüterhof
    Grand Staircase, the palace's ceremonial entrance from Schlüterhof
  • Knights' Hall viewed towards the Grand Staircase, c. 1900
    Knights' Hall viewed towards the Grand Staircase, c. 1900
  • Picture Gallery viewed towards the White Hall, c. 1900
    Picture Gallery viewed towards the White Hall, c. 1900
  • Emperor Wilhelm II opening the Reichstag in the White Hall of the Berlin Palace, 1888 (painting by Anton von Werner, 1893)
    Emperor Wilhelm II opening the Reichstag in the White Hall of the Berlin Palace, 1888 (painting by Anton von Werner, 1893)
  • Palace chapel under the dome, c. 1900
    Palace chapel under the dome, c. 1900
  • The palace's west and south façades seen from across the Spree in 1920
    The palace's west and south façades seen from across the Spree in 1920

Postwar debate and demolition

[edit]

The end of the war saw the palace a burned-out shell of its former glory, although the building remained structurally sound and much of its interior decoration was still preserved. It could have been restored, as many other bombed-out buildings in Central Berlin later were. The area in which it was located was within the Soviet zone, which became the German Democratic Republic. The building was used for a Soviet war movie ("the Battle of Berlin") in which the palace served as a backdrop, with live artillery shells fired at it for the realistic cinematic impact.[10]

The new socialist government declared the palace a symbol of Prussian militarism, although at that time there appeared to be no plans to destroy the building. Some parts of it were in fact repaired and used from 1945 to 1950 as an exhibition space. A secret 1950 GDR Ministry of Construction report, only rediscovered in 2016, calculated that reconstruction of the damaged Palace could be achieved for 32 million East German marks.[11] But in July 1950 Walter Ulbricht, the new General Secretary of the Central Committee of the Socialist Unity Party of Germany, announced the demolition of the palace. Despite objections, its removal commenced in September 1950, the process taking four months and consuming 19 tons of dynamite.[12]

So solid was its construction that the dome and its entire mount remained intact even after the rest of the building fell to the ground.[13] Only one section was preserved, a portal from the balcony from which Karl Liebknecht had declared the German Socialist Republic. In 1964 it was added to the State Council Building, with an altered cartouche, where it forms the main entrance. The empty space where the palace had stood was named Marx-Engels-Platz and used as a parade ground.

From 1973 to 1976, during the government of Erich Honecker, a large modernist building was built, the Palast der Republik (Palace of the Republic), which occupied most of the site of the former palace.

  • The Schlossplatz with the burned out palace in 1945, after the Fall of Berlin
    The Schlossplatz with the burned out palace in 1945, after the Fall of Berlin
  • The demolition of the Schlüterhof, up to this point still largely preserved, 1950
    The demolition of the Schlüterhof, up to this point still largely preserved, 1950
  • The Marx-Engels-Platz on the former ground of the palace and Schlossplatz, 1951
    The Marx-Engels-Platz on the former ground of the palace and Schlossplatz, 1951
  • The front façade of the Palast der Republik in 1986 from Unter den Linden
    The front façade of the Palast der Republik in 1986 from Unter den Linden

Reunification

[edit]
Liebknecht's balcony, one of the few preserved parts of the pre-war palace, was reused in the State Council Building (Staatsratsgebäude), now housing the European School of Management and Technology.

Shortly before German reunification in October 1990, the Palast der Republik was found to be contaminated with asbestos and was closed to the public. After reunification, the Berlin city government ordered the removal of the asbestos, a process which was completed by 2003. In November 2003, the German federal government decided to demolish the building and leave the area and the adjacent Marx-Engels Platz (renamed Schlossplatz) as parkland, pending a decision as to its future. Demolition started in February 2006 and was completed in 2009.

The demolition was lengthy because of the presence of additional asbestos, and because the palace acted as a counterbalance to the Berliner Dom, across the street, on the unstable grounds of the Museum Island.[14] East Germans resented the demolition, especially those for whom the Palace of the Republic had been a place of fond memories, or who felt a sense of dislocation in a post-Communist world.[15]

From 2008, until the commencement of construction in 2013, the large area of the original Schlossplatz became a grassed field, laid out on minimal lines, with wooden platforms. At the same time, the Berlin Monument Authority (Landesdenkmalamt) undertook extensive archaeological excavations. Parts of cellars that had been situated in the south-west corner of the former Palace were discovered and it was decided these would be preserved and made accessible to visitors as an "archaeological window".[16]

Reconstruction

[edit]
Main article: Reconstruction of the Berlin Palace

The debate

[edit]

Following reunification, a 20-year-long debate commenced as to whether the palace should be reconstructed, and whether this should be in part or whole. Pro-reconstruction lobby groups argued that the rebuilding of the palace would restore the unity and integrity of the historic centre of Berlin, which includes the Berliner Dom, the Lustgarten, and the museums of Museum Island. Opponents of the project included those who advocated the retention of the Palast der Republik on the grounds that it was itself of historical significance; those who argued that the area should become a public park; and those who believed that a new building would be a pastiche of former architectural styles, would be an unwelcome symbol of Germany's imperial past, and would be unacceptably expensive for no definite economic benefit. Opponents also argued that it would be impossible to accurately reconstruct the exterior and interiors of the building as neither detailed plans nor the necessary craft skills were available. Others disputed this, claiming that sufficient photographic documentation of both existed when the palace was converted to a museum following 1918.[citation needed]

The ideological divide was epitomized by two opposing groups. The Association for the Preservation of the Palace of the Republic (Verein zur Erhaltung des Palastes der Republik) championed a renovation of the GDR building that would incorporate a re-creation of the principal western facade of the City Palace, for a multipurpose "people's center" similar to the Centre Pompidou in Paris. The Berlin Palace Friends' Association (Förderverein Berliner Schloss) argued for the complete external reconstruction of the City Palace, as they considered it the only option that would restore the aesthetic and historic ensemble of Berlin's heart;[17] it also rejected suggestions that the proposed meticulous reconstruction would be an unauthentic "Disney" replica, as most centuries-old stone buildings are, by dint of aging and repair, at least partial reconstructions; and arguing that the allegation that the present time can only represent itself in its own architectural language, is simply ideology. The Sponsoring Association also drew attention to the observation in the Venice Charter that "historic edifices have a material age and an immaterial significance": an importance that transcends time and that, provided sufficient documentation for a truly authentic copy exists, justifies their reconstruction to preserve a vital part of urban identity and historical memory.[17]

  • The site of the palace in 2007, with the Palast der Republik being demolished and the Fernsehturm in the background
    The site of the palace in 2007, with the Palast der Republik being demolished and the Fernsehturm in the background
  • The Humboldt Box seen from the dome of Berlin Cathedral, 13 September 2011
    The Humboldt Box seen from the dome of Berlin Cathedral, 13 September 2011
  • Trial section of the reconstructed façade, 18 August 2012
    Trial section of the reconstructed façade, 18 August 2012
  • View of the reconstruction site from the Humboldt Box, 21 April 2013
    View of the reconstruction site from the Humboldt Box, 21 April 2013

Towards construction and additional reconstructions

[edit]

An important driving force behind the reconstruction was businessman Wilhelm von Boddien [de].[18][19] In 1992, he and Kathleen King von Alvensleben[20] founded, what evolved to be the Berlin City Palace Sponsoring Association – which became the most influential lobby group. The Association accumulated plans that had been believed lost, and funded a research project at Technische Universität Berlin to measure surviving photos and drawings of the palace to create precise architectural plans. In 1993, on the world's largest scaffolding assembly, it audaciously erected a trompe-l'œil mockup of two frontages of the palace façade on a 1:1 scale on plastic sheeting. Privately funded by donations and sponsorship, this coup de théâtre stood for a year and half. Showing a vision of central Berlin lost for fifty years, and how the palace could provide the missing link to the historical ensemble of the Zeughaus, the Altes Museum, and Berlin Cathedral, the spectacle brought the debate to a temporary climax in 1993–94.[21][22] While opinion continued to remain divided, the association succeeded in winning over many politicians and other key figures to its efforts.[23]

In view of the previous opposition, including high cost, and most importantly, the psychological and political objections, successive German governments had declined to commit themselves to the project. However, by 2002 and 2003, cross-party resolutions of the Bundestag reached a compromise to support at least a partial rebuilding of the palace.

In 2007, the Bundestag made a definitive decision about the reconstruction. According to this compromise, which had been drawn up by a commission, three façades of the palace would be rebuilt, but the interior would be a modern structure to serve as a cultural museum and forum. An architectural competition was held, and in 2008 the jury chose the submission by the Italian architect Franco Stella.[24] Some of the internal spaces in Stella's design follow the exact proportions of the original state rooms of the palace; this would allow for their reconstruction at a later date should this be desired. The reconstruction also reproduces the original metre-thick width of the outer walls. These have been rebuilt as a sandwiched construction as follows: an inner retaining wall of concrete, followed by a layer of insulation, and an outer wall of brick, sandstone and stucco which replicates the original. Reconstruction of the Renaissance-gabled Pharmacy Wing, which connected to the palace on the north side, would be another possible future project.

German government budget cuts delayed the construction of the "Humboldtforum", as the new palace was titled. The foundation stone was finally laid by President Joachim Gauck in a ceremony on 12 June 2013 which heralded the launch of a €590 million reconstruction project.[25]

In 2017, there was a debate whether to feature a cross on the dome of the palace, in relation to adhering to historical accuracy or secularism.[26] Afterwards, a statue of Antinous was installed on the palace façade in the Schlüterhof courtyard.[27][28] However, the cross was installed on the top of the dome on 29 May 2020.[29]

  • Reconstruction work under way, 20 April 2016
    Reconstruction work under way, 20 April 2016
  • The dome under reconstruction, 11 June 2016
    The dome under reconstruction, 11 June 2016
  • Scaffolding on the south façade, 3 November 2018
    Scaffolding on the south façade, 3 November 2018
  • The inner courtyard, 3 November 2018
    The inner courtyard, 3 November 2018
  • The dome topped by a cross, installed on 29 May 2020
    The dome topped by a cross, installed on 29 May 2020

On completion in 2020, the building housed a museum containing collections of African and other non-European art, as well as two restaurants, a theatre, a cinema, and an auditorium.[30]

In July 2022, the bronze reliefs originally made by Otto Lessing in 1897 and mounted in 1903 were reconstructed and mounted on the Eosander Portal, the originals (like many of the exterior designs), having vanished after the demolition of the City Palace. These were soon followed by the mounting of the reconstructed plaques with the words of Frederick II, Elector of Brandenburg, and Frederick I of Prussia, the first Prussian king.[31]

The surrounding area around the Berlin Palace which included the granite Adlersäule (Eagle Pillar), the bronze Rossebändiger (Horse Tamers), and the Neptunbrunnen (Neptune Fountain), collectively called the Schlossplatz, were planned to be redesigned by 2023 in a modern way, that will still be able to bring back the mentioned original items surrounding the palace if desired. These terrace designs ended up being implemented in a more modernistic design, different than the more ornate original design. In front of the Schlossplatz is planned the Denkmal für Freiheit und Einheit (Monument to Freedom and Unity).[32]

In early April 2023, the Große Wappenkartusche (Great Coat of Arms) of the Kingdom of Prussia, was mounted on the center of the Eosander Portal, marking the completion of the façade decorations on Portal III.[33] In June 2025, the last of the total 19 statues on the balustrade were installed, marking the completion of the reconstruction of the historical palace façade.[34] The palace's interior has been designed in a way that allows to rebuild Schlüter's baroque state rooms such as the Grand Staircase (Großes Treppenhaus), the Knights' Hall (Rittersaal) and the Picture Gallery (Bildergalerie) in the long term.

  • The palace with the reconstructed bronze reliefs and plaques on the portal initially designed by the architect Eosander[b]
    The palace with the reconstructed bronze reliefs and plaques on the portal initially designed by the architect Eosander[b]
  • Closeup of the Eosander portal
    Closeup of the Eosander portal
  • South and east façades of the palace, housing the Humboldt Forum
    South and east façades of the palace, housing the Humboldt Forum
  • Foyer of the Humboldt Forum
    Foyer of the Humboldt Forum
  • Schlüterhof
    Schlüterhof
  • The dome with statues, 2025
    The dome with statues, 2025
  • View from the Lustgarten to the palace with the statues on the balustrade, 2025
    View from the Lustgarten to the palace with the statues on the balustrade, 2025

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References and citations

[edit]

Bibliography

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Berlin Palace

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Berlin Palace (Berliner Schloss or Stadtschloss) was the chief residence of the Hohenzollern rulers of Brandenburg, Prussia, and the from 1451 until the monarchy's abolition in 1918, situated on the Spree Island in historic . Founded as a fortress by Elector Frederick II on 31 July 1443 to consolidate control over and , it evolved through , , and neoclassical expansions—most notably under Andreas Schlüter's designs in the 1690s–1710s—into a sprawling complex symbolizing absolutist power, with interiors like the Knights' Hall and a 60-meter dome added in 1845. Heavily damaged by Allied air raids in , the palace's ruins—despite substantial preservation of Schlüter's courtyard—were dynamited and demolished between 1950 and January 1951 by the German Democratic Republic's communist government, which viewed Prussian heritage as emblematic of and incompatible with socialist ideology, clearing the site for Marx-Engels-Platz as a proletarian forum. The location subsequently hosted the modernist Palace of the Republic (1973–1976), East Germany's parliamentary seat, until its 2006–2008 demolition amid asbestos hazards and debates over GDR legacy. Reconstruction of the palace's exterior commenced in following parliamentary approval in , yielding the Humboldt Forum's opening as a cultural venue for non-European artifacts, though the project sparked contention over historical authenticity, cost (exceeding €680 million), and the revival of monarchical symbolism in unified .

Overview

Site Location and Historical Role

The Berlin Palace, or Stadtschloss, occupied a central site on Spree Island in the Mitte district of Berlin, forming the historic core of the twin cities of Berlin and Cölln. Positioned directly along the northern and eastern banks of the Spree River, the palace complex bordered the Schlossplatz to the south and integrated elements of the medieval Cölln city wall into its structure. Its coordinates align with the former Schlossplatz at approximately 52°31′03″N 13°24′10″E, adjacent to key landmarks such as the Berlin Cathedral and the Lustgarten. Constructed initially in 1443 under Elector Frederick II of as a fortress-like residence known as Zwing , the palace served as the primary seat of the Hohenzollern dynasty for nearly five centuries. It transitioned from a defensive structure to a royal residence, becoming the permanent home of the Brandenburg electors by 1486 during the reign of Johann Cicero. The site's historical role extended through the monarchy, functioning as the main residence for the Kings in after Frederick I's coronation in 1701 and later for the German Emperors following the empire's founding in 1871. It hosted state ceremonies, imperial receptions, and symbolized Hohenzollern authority until Kaiser Wilhelm II's in 1918, after which it briefly served administrative purposes before wartime destruction.

Architectural Significance and Reconstruction Status

The Berlin Palace, known as the Stadtschloss, exemplified Northern European Baroque architecture through its reconstruction between 1698 and 1718 under the direction of architect Andreas Schlüter, commissioned by Elector Frederick III (later King Frederick I of Prussia). Schlüter's design transformed the earlier Renaissance structure into a four-wing complex with opulent facades featuring rusticated bases, pilasters, and sculpted elements that symbolized Prussian absolutism and artistic ambition. Key interior features included the Schlüterhof courtyard, the Grand Staircase (Gigantentreppe), and the Knights' Hall (Rittersaal), integrating architecture, sculpture, and painting to create ceremonial spaces of grandeur. Subsequent modifications, such as the addition of a dome in 1845 by Karl Friedrich Schinkel, enhanced its imperial profile during the Prussian and German Empire eras, positioning the palace as a central emblem of monarchical power adjacent to the Spree River and Museum Island. Its architectural significance lay in blending Italianate Baroque influences with Prussian restraint, influencing later public buildings and underscoring Berlin's emergence as a major European capital. Demolished in 1950 by the East German government to erase monarchical symbols, the site hosted the Palast der Republik until its 2008 demolition amid asbestos issues and ideological shifts post-reunification. Reconstruction began in 2013 as the , faithfully replicating the original Schlüter-designed facades using sandstone from the same Prussian quarry, while the interior accommodates modern museum spaces for non-European ethnological collections and the . The project, costing approximately €680 million, opened to the public on December 16, 2020, with the east facade featuring contemporary glass elements contrasting the historic western, southern, and northern sides. As of October 2025, the Humboldt Forum operates fully, hosting exhibitions like "Berlin Global" and cultural programs, though ancillary works such as the reconstruction of the perron (ceremonial steps) commenced in July 2025 with completion slated for mid-2027 at a cost of €6.89 million. A competition for the north gable facade's contemporary design concluded entries by December 2024, with public exhibition planned for June 2025, ensuring ongoing refinement of the hybrid historic-modern ensemble.

Original Architecture and Design

Initial Construction and Baroque Features

The Berlin Palace originated as a fortress constructed between 1443 and 1451 under Elector Frederick II of Brandenburg, known as "Irontooth," on the Spree island between the settlements of Berlin and to serve as a defensive stronghold and residence. In 1538, Elector Joachim II ordered the demolition of this medieval structure and commissioned master builder Caspar Theiss, assisted by Kunz Buntschuh, to erect a new Renaissance-style palace, which introduced Italianate elements such as symmetrical facades and a more residential layout, marking the transition from fortress to royal seat. The palace underwent a profound transformation into a Baroque masterpiece starting in 1698, when Elector Frederick III (crowned King in 1701) engaged architect Andreas Schlüter to redesign it, drawing inspiration from Versailles while incorporating Prussian restraint and sculptural emphasis. Construction extended to 1713 under Schlüter, with Johann Friedrich von Eosander completing aspects by 1718, resulting in a four-wing structure enclosing the Schlüterhof courtyard, characterized by robust sandstone facades featuring colossal pilasters, rusticated bases, and allegorical sculptures depicting virtues and historical figures crafted by Schlüter himself. Key Baroque features included the three outer facades facing the , Schlossplatz, and Spree, adorned with rhythmic window groupings, pediments, and balustrades that conveyed grandeur and symmetry, alongside the interior Schlüterhof's ornate portals and the monumental (Giant Staircase), a sweeping ceremonial ascent with sculptural supports symbolizing royal power. These elements exemplified Prussian Baroque's blend of opulence and structural solidity, using local for durability against Berlin's climate, though the central dome was absent until later additions in 1845.

Expansions and Modifications (17th-19th Centuries)

Under Elector Frederick William (the Great Elector), who ruled from 1640 to 1688, the palace underwent restorations following the devastation of the , including the addition of the Elector's Gallery, Round Chamber, Bride's Chamber, and Brunswick Gallery to accommodate expanded court functions. Major transformations began under Elector Frederick III (King Frederick I after 1701), who commissioned architect and sculptor Andreas Schlüter in 1688 to convert the structure into a residence, featuring Italian-inspired facades, the Schlüterhof courtyard with its grand staircase, and opulent state apartments. Schlüter's work, spanning to 1713, emphasized sculptural integration with architecture, but was interrupted by the 1706 collapse of the Mint Tower due to structural failure, leading to his dismissal. Johann Friedrich von Eosander then expanded the palace westward between 1706 and 1713, roughly doubling its size and adding the Eosander Gate with plans for a large dome that remained unrealized at the time. Completion occurred under Martin Heinrich Böhme from 1713 to 1716, though King Frederick William I subsequently stripped decorative elements and altered windows for a more austere appearance. In the late 18th century, under Frederick William II (1786–1797), neoclassical King's Chambers were added by architects Carl von Gontard, Friedrich Gilly, and others, introducing restrained interiors contrasting the exterior. During the reign of Frederick William IV (1840–1861), further modifications included new apartments in the Erasmus Chapel mezzanine and the Sternensaal (Star Hall), planned with input from . The most prominent 19th-century addition was the dome over the Eosander Gate, constructed from 1845 to 1853 under Friedrich August Stüler to symbolize Prussian , reaching 60 meters in height and completing the palace's .

Interior Layout and Artistic Elements

The interior layout of the Berlin Palace centered on the Schlüterhof, an inner courtyard featuring the monumental staircase designed by Andreas Schlüter between 1699 and 1706, serving as the primary ceremonial entrance to the upper floors. This masterpiece, influenced by Italian precedents including Palladio and , led to a sequence of parade rooms intended for state functions, including the Knights' Hall, Elisabethsaal, and Chamber of the Black Eagle. Further interiors encompassed the king's private chambers in neoclassical style and the White Hall for receptions, with the palace chapel situated beneath the central dome. Schlüter's artistic contributions dominated the early 18th-century interiors, characterized by elaborate work, sculptural reliefs, and allegorical decorations symbolizing power and absolutism. In the Knights' Hall (Rittersaal), completed around 1702, monumental sculptural groups above the doors depicted continents in Baroque iconography: Europe as a crowned figure leaning on a globe amid advanced weaponry, signifying dominance through science and progress; portrayed with a veiled figure and a lion-threatened woman, evoking notions of savagery and vulnerability. The hall also included a silver trumpeter's and intricate details, some of which survived damage until the 1950 demolition. The White Hall, initially conceived as a chapel by Johann Friedrich Eosander but repurposed as a festival hall by Frederick William I in 1728, featured white marble tiling and silvered ornamentation for opulent displays. Enlarged and electrified during renovations from 1892 to 1893 under Friedrich August Stüler and Ernst von Ihne, it measured 16 by 32 meters with a height of 14 meters, accommodating imperial ceremonies such as Emperor Wilhelm II's 1888 Reichstag opening. Adjacent spaces like the Picture Gallery housed art collections, connecting to the White Hall and emphasizing the palace's role as a repository of royal patronage. Private apartments reflected later stylistic shifts: Frederick William II's chambers (1787–1798), designed by Carl Gotthard Langhans, Johann Heinrich Erdmannsdorff, and Carl von Gontard, incorporated German Classicism with silk-upholstered walls, paintings, and restrained plasterwork in rooms such as the Blue French Chamber and . Frederick William IV's quarters, redesigned by from 1824 to 1826, included neoclassical elements like the Hall of Stars and Tea Salon. The , installed in the northwest corner by 1711 with amber panels crafted by Gottfried Wolffram and others under Eosander's direction, exemplified lavish imported artistry before its 1717 transfer to . The palace , located under the dome added in 1845, featured art and served religious functions for the royal family, with surviving photographic documentation capturing its pre-war opulence. Overall, the interiors blended grandeur with successive neoclassical refinements, prioritizing representational splendor through , , and symbolic motifs that underscored Hohenzollern authority.

Pre-20th Century History

Origins under the Electors of Brandenburg (1443-1701)

The Berlin Palace began as a fortress erected in 1443 by Elector Frederick II of Brandenburg, known as Irontooth, on Spree Island to secure Hohenzollern dominance over the rival cities of Berlin and Cölln. The site had previously housed a Franciscan monastery, which was demolished to make way for the new structure designed as a defensive residence with thick walls and towers. This early iteration functioned primarily as a symbol of electoral power rather than a luxurious abode, reflecting the modest resources of the Margraviate of Brandenburg at the time. By 1486, the palace had evolved into the permanent seat of the electors, marking a shift from itinerant rule to a fixed capital presence in . In 1538, Elector Joachim II Hector ordered the demolition of significant portions of the medieval fortress and engaged master builder Caspar Theiss to construct a grander edifice in the style, featuring symmetrical facades, courtyards, and enhanced residential quarters. This renovation expanded the complex to approximately 60 meters in length, incorporating elements like arcaded inner courts and introducing early artistic collections under Hohenzollern patronage. The structure endured fires and conflicts, including damage during the 1539 blaze and the (1618–1648), which left it dilapidated. Elector Frederick William, the Great Elector (r. 1640–1688), oversaw thorough restorations post-war, repairing war-torn sections and adding decorative enhancements to reaffirm Brandenburg's resurgence, though without fundamental stylistic overhaul. Under his successor, Elector Frederick III (r. 1688–1701), preliminary modifications commenced around 1695, including plans by Andreas Schlüter for facade refinements, setting the stage for the palace's transformation into a royal seat upon Frederick's elevation to in 1701.

Prussian Kingdom and Royal Residence (1701-1871)

Following the coronation of Elector Frederick III as King Frederick I in Prussia on 18 January 1701 in Königsberg, the Berlin Palace was elevated to the status of principal royal residence, symbolizing the newfound sovereignty of the Prussian monarchy within the Holy Roman Empire. To reflect this prestige, Frederick I commissioned extensive renovations, transforming the existing Renaissance structure into a Baroque masterpiece under the direction of architect Andreas Schlüter, who served as chief court architect from 1699 to 1706. These works, initiated after a fire in 1698 damaged the prior building, included the iconic Schlüterhof courtyard and grand ceremonial spaces, emphasizing the palace's role as the administrative and representational heart of the kingdom. The renovations continued under Johann Eosander von Göthe from 1706 to 1713, who expanded the palace westward, roughly doubling its size and adding the Eosander Gate, though a planned large dome remained unrealized at the time. Despite financial strains from these lavish projects, the palace hosted key royal events, including Frederick I's triumphal entry into Berlin in 1701, underscoring its centrality to court life and state functions. Under Frederick William I (r. 1713–1740), the "Soldier King," the emphasis shifted toward military efficiency, with reduced ornamental excess, yet the palace retained its position as the primary urban residence for official duties. Frederick II (the Great, r. 1740–1786) preferred his Potsdam retreat at for private life but utilized the Berlin Palace for winter court activities, such as soirees and carnival balls, maintaining its representational importance amid Berlin's urban expansion. Successors Frederick William II (r. 1786–1797) and Frederick William III (r. 1797–1840) continued to reside there during key periods, including wartime councils, as the palace adapted to growing administrative needs without major structural overhauls. The most significant mid-19th-century modification occurred under Frederick William IV (r. 1840–1861), who oversaw the addition of a prominent dome over the central western portal between 1845 and 1854, crowned with a cross to assert monarchical authority in an era of rising . By 1871, under King Wilhelm I, the palace stood as the enduring seat of Prussian royalty, embodying over a century of Hohenzollern rule before the .

German Empire Era (1871-1918)

Following the on 18 January 1871, the Berlin Palace became the primary residence and symbolic center of the new imperial state, serving the emperors in their capacity as Kings of . Emperor Wilhelm I, who had been King of since 1861, utilized the palace for official duties until his death on 9 March 1888. His grandson and successor, , ascended the throne that year and maintained the palace as the imperial seat, conducting state affairs and hosting ceremonies there throughout his reign until 1918. The palace's interiors, particularly the White Hall, were venues for significant parliamentary and ceremonial events. On 25 June 1888, opened the first session of the Reichstag in the White Hall, marking an early imperial use of the space for legislative proceedings before the completion of the dedicated . Under , the palace also symbolized Germany's colonial ambitions, hosting receptions for dignitaries such as Herero leader Friedrich Maharero in 1896 and Samoan chief Lealofi in June 1911, alongside displays of colonial artifacts and gifts that underscored imperial expansion. In the prelude to , the palace's balcony served as a platform for public addresses by . On 31 July 1914, he spoke to crowds below, declaring a state of "imminent danger of war" amid escalating European tensions. The following day, 1 August 1914, he proclaimed mobilization against , emphasizing national unity with the words, "I know no parties anymore; I know only Germans," rallying support for the conflict. These events highlighted the palace's role as a focal point of imperial authority and public mobilization, though no major architectural alterations occurred during this era, preserving its Baroque structure from prior centuries.

20th Century Upheavals

Weimar Republic and Nazi Period (1918-1945)

Following the abdication of Kaiser Wilhelm II on November 9, 1918, proclaimed the Free Socialist Republic of Germany from the palace balcony, declaring it the property of the people under the protection of the Workers' and Soldiers' Council. On , 1918, clashes between the revolutionary Volksmarinedivision and government troops led to damage on the facade and instances of plundering within the building. The palace lost its role as a seat of monarchical power, entering a period of transitional use amid the political instability of the early . During the Weimar Republic, the palace transitioned into a multifunctional , housing and various cultural and scientific institutions rather than serving as a primary government seat, which shifted westward to the Wilhelmstraße. In 1920, it was allocated to the Kunstgewerbemuseum, which opened on September 1, 1921, in the Lustgarten wing, while the former imperial living quarters were converted into a accessible to the by 1926. Additional tenants included the Notgemeinschaft der deutschen Wissenschaft, the Kaiser-Wilhelm-Gesellschaft from 1922, and the Helene-Lange-Tagesheim starting in May 1928; the world's first Sportmuseum also opened on the third floor in 1925. The grounds, particularly the adjacent , hosted frequent political demonstrations and rallies by socialist and communist groups, reflecting the era's ideological divisions. Under the Nazi regime from 1933 onward, the palace's cultural and scientific functions persisted with modifications aligned to National Socialist policies, though it was largely avoided for major regime events, which favored the for parades and gatherings. In 1933, the Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst (DAAD) saw its budget increased, Jewish staff dismissed, and leadership replaced with Ewald von Massow succeeding Theodor Lewald. The der Preußischen Staatstheater opened on January 6, 1937, in the Lynar wing, funded by 44,300 Reichsmarks. Wartime activities included three open-air concerts by the in June 1941, after which the Schlossmuseum and Theatermuseum briefly closed but reopened before shutting again due to escalating bombings in 1943–1944. No prominent Nazi administrative bodies occupied the building, preserving its secondary role amid the regime's preference for new architectural symbols of power.

World War II Damage (1943-1945)

The Berlin Palace sustained escalating damage from campaigns against the city starting in 1943, though direct hits on the structure were limited until early 1945. Berlin endured over 300 air raids by and the USAAF from 1940 onward, with intensified operations following the RAF's in late 1943, which involved large-scale night bombing. However, archival records indicate the palace experienced only superficial damage from shrapnel and nearby blasts during these earlier raids, as it was not designated a high-priority target. The building's robust construction, including its thick outer walls, provided resilience against initial wave attacks. The decisive destruction occurred during two major bombing raids in February 1945. On , amid the USAAF's largest single raid on Berlin— involving more than 1,000 heavy bombers dropping high-explosive and incendiary bombs—the palace was struck directly, igniting fires that raged for several days and gutted the interiors, including valuable artworks and furnishings. The Schlüterhof and structural shell, however, survived with the outer facades largely intact, demonstrating the palace's durability despite the inferno. A follow-up raid on exacerbated the devastation, with additional incendiaries causing further collapse of roofs and upper stories, though the core framework persisted. These attacks rendered the palace a charred ruin but left its foundational elements repairable, as confirmed by post-war assessments. Amid the Soviet ground offensive in April-May 1945, the inflicted supplementary harm through artillery shelling and urban fires, but the palace's primary wartime impairment stemmed from aerial bombardment. By the war's end in , the structure stood as a hollowed-out shell, with the dome collapsed and interiors obliterated, yet the perimeter walls and key architectural features like the Schlüterhof remained standing until deliberate post-war actions. This level of damage, while severe, did not necessitate total , highlighting the targeted incendiary tactics' role in maximizing fire propagation over structural obliteration.

Communist Demolition and Replacement

Ideological Demolition Decision (1945-1950)

Following the end of World War II in May 1945, the Berlin Palace sustained severe damage from Allied air raids, particularly the intense bombing on February 3, 1945, which gutted interiors and collapsed sections of the roof and upper stories, yet left substantial structural elements, including the Schlüterhof courtyard, largely intact and potentially repairable. Located in the Soviet occupation sector of Berlin, the ruins fell under the administrative control of the emerging German Democratic Republic (GDR) authorities by 1949, who prioritized reshaping the urban landscape to align with Marxist-Leninist ideology. The demolition decision stemmed from the Socialist Unity Party (SED)'s deliberate campaign to eradicate symbols of Prussian militarism, feudalism, and imperial legacy, viewing the palace as an embodiment of class oppression and reactionism incompatible with socialist progress. SED General Secretary Walter Ulbricht explicitly framed the structure as a "reactionary palace" warranting removal to facilitate a proletarian public square, reflecting Stalinist cultural policies aimed at historical rupture rather than preservation. Despite architectural assessments indicating feasibility for restoration—given the preserved Baroque facades and load-bearing walls—the ideological imperative overrode pragmatic considerations, with the SED leadership dismissing repair costs as secondary to symbolic purification. This approach mirrored broader GDR efforts to impose a narrative of antifascist renewal, sidelining the palace's pre-Prussian origins and cultural value in favor of ideological conformity. On September 7, 1950, the city council, under direction, authorized the , initiating explosive charges on the remaining ruins to accelerate clearance for what would become Marx-Engels-Platz. Work proceeded through late 1950 into early 1951, employing manual labor and to raze the site despite protests from preservationists who highlighted the building's salvageable state and historical significance. The action underscored the GDR's causal prioritization of over empirical architectural viability, effectively erasing a 500-year-old to construct a for communist .

Construction of the Palace of the Republic (1969-1976)

The Palast der Republik was constructed between 1973 and 1976 on the site previously occupied by the demolished Berlin City Palace, serving as the new seat of the East German parliament, the , and a multifunctional cultural center intended to embody the German Democratic Republic's (GDR) vision of socialist modernity and . The project reflected the GDR leadership's aim to project an image of international competitiveness and unity between state and citizens, deliberately supplanting the site's historical association with Prussian monarchy. occurred with the laying of the foundation stone on November 2, 1973, followed by a rapid build phase that culminated in the topping-out ceremony on November 18, 1974. Designed by a collective of architects led by Heinz Graffunder, with contributions from Wolf-Rüdiger Eisentraut, Manfred Prasser, Heinz Aust, Karl-Ernst Swora, and Günter Kunert, the structure adopted a linear, elongated form reminiscent of mid-20th-century Western commercial , such as American malls and towers, while incorporating subtle neoclassical echoes like cladding to evoke grandeur without overt historical revivalism. The building featured a clad in bronze-tinted reflective glass panels for its facade—creating a shimmering, modern aesthetic—and strips of white , spanning approximately 15,300 square meters with facilities including the parliamentary chamber, a hall, theater, gallery, 13 restaurants, a , and two discotheques. Construction costs totaled around 500 million East German marks, underscoring the regime's prioritization of prestige projects amid economic constraints. The palace officially opened on April 23, 1976, with public access beginning two days later on April 25, marking a key achievement in Erich Honecker's era of "consumer " that sought to bolster legitimacy through accessible and representational spaces. Despite its symbolic intent as a "people's palace," the design's transparent glass exterior ironically contrasted with the GDR's opaque political system, where the functioned primarily as a rubber-stamp body for SED (Socialist Unity Party) directives.

Use and Closure of the Palast der Republik (1976-1990)

The Palast der Republik functioned primarily as the seat of the , the unicameral parliament of the German Democratic Republic (GDR), hosting its plenary sessions from the building's completion in 1976 until 1990. The main chamber accommodated 540 delegates with an additional 240 seats on a balcony for spectators, and sessions occurred up to four times annually. Beyond parliamentary duties, the structure served as a multifunctional cultural venue, featuring two large auditoriums for concerts and shows, art galleries, restaurants, and a . Over 90 percent of events held there from 1976 to 1990 consisted of cultural programs rather than political activities, reflecting its design orientation toward public accessibility under GDR ideology. Key political events underscored its parliamentary role, including the 9th Congress of the Socialist Unity Party () in May 1976 shortly after opening and the first free elections to the on March 18, 1990. The building symbolized state power while providing amenities like cafeterias and spaces to foster citizen , though attendance at non-cultural events remained limited due to the controlled nature of GDR politics. Closure occurred rapidly amid the collapse of the GDR regime. On August 23, 1990, the voted in the Palast der Republik to accede to the effective October 3, marking the structure's final major legislative act. Less than a month later, on September 19, 1990, the building was shuttered after revelations of extensive contamination—exceeding 5,000 tonnes throughout its materials—prompted health and safety concerns, with 1,700 employees refusing to continue working there. This decision, made by the outgoing aware of the hazard, vacated the site ahead of reunification, halting all operations despite its brief 14-year service.

Post-Reunification Debates

Initial Reconstruction Proposals (1990-2003)

Following in 1990, the site of the former Berlin Palace—then occupied by the asbestos-contaminated Palast der Republik, closed in November of that year—sparked competing visions for redevelopment amid broader efforts to redefine Berlin's urban and symbolic landscape. Advocates for historical restoration argued that reinstating the Stadtschloss would restore visual continuity to the ensemble and address the abrupt void left by the palace's demolition in 1950 under East German authorities, who viewed it as a Prussian-imperial relic. Opponents countered that such efforts prioritized monarchical nostalgia over the site's layered 20th-century history, including the Palast as a functional and cultural venue representing East German statehood. In 1992, Hamburg-based industrialist Wilhelm von Boddien established the Förderverein Berliner Schloss e.V., a nonprofit association dedicated to promoting reconstruction through , exhibitions, and public advocacy, emphasizing the palace's role in Prussian without endorsing Hohenzollern restoration. The group commissioned studies and models highlighting the palace's architectural integration with adjacent landmarks like the , arguing that alternatives risked aesthetic discord in the historic core. A key initiative unfolded in late 1993, when von Boddien collaborated with French artist Catherine Feff to erect a temporary 1:1-scale facade simulation of the palace's Schlüter west front on the Schlossplatz, constructed from painted tarpaulins over scaffolding at a cost of approximately 300,000 Deutsche Marks funded privately. Displayed until 1994, this installation aimed to counter abstract debates by providing tangible visualization, drawing over 100,000 visitors and shifting toward reconstruction, though critics dismissed it as manipulative spectacle favoring elite interests. Parallel proposals included modernist alternatives, such as the 1993 "Forum of " concept by architects Bolles + Wilson, which envisioned a contemporary plaza with water features and partial Palast integration to symbolize democratic renewal rather than historical . Government-led efforts, including Senate-commissioned reports in the mid-1990s, weighed these against preservationist calls to adapt the Palast der Republik, citing its 1976 completion as a rare example of East German prefabricated . By 2002, amid ongoing contention, the approved a resolution for partial facade reconstruction in the original style, funded initially through federal and private contributions totaling around 50 million euros for planning, though full consensus on and scope remained elusive until 2003.

Public Referendum and Political Decision (2003)

In the lead-up to the 2003 political resolution, public discourse on the site's future intensified, featuring citizen initiatives and opinion surveys that underscored polarized views. Advocates for preserving the Palast der Republik, particularly among former East German residents, emphasized its role as a symbol of GDR-era parliamentary and cultural venue, with informal polls indicating substantial support—up to two-thirds in some assessments—for retention over reconstruction. Opponents, including historical preservation groups like the Förderverein Berliner Schloss, argued that the modernist structure disrupted Berlin's pre-war urban fabric and lacked architectural merit warranting protection, prioritizing instead the restoration of the Stadtschloss to anchor non-European ethnographic collections in a historically resonant setting. Despite this public contention, the German affirmed the reconstruction path on November 13, 2003, endorsing of the Palast der Republik by a near-unanimous margin: all four major parliamentary groups (, SPD, FDP, and Greens) voted in favor, opposed only by two PDS (Party of Democratic Socialism) members representing residual GDR nostalgia. This built on the July 4, 2002, foundational resolution allocating approximately €590 million in public funds for the project, contingent on private donations covering facade replicas. The vote reflected a cross-party consensus prioritizing causal continuity with Prussian-era and cultural utility over modernist remnants, dismissing preservation alternatives as incompatible with the site's high-visibility role in reunified Berlin's core. remediation, completed earlier in 2003 at a cost exceeding €12 million, had already rendered the Palast structurally hollow, facilitating the shift to preparatory bids. The decision marginalized minority preservation efforts, including legal challenges and protests, which cited the Palast's 1990s temporary uses—like concerts and exhibitions—as evidence of viable potential. Political leaders, however, invoked empirical assessments from expert commissions favoring reconstruction for its potential to draw 2-4 million annual visitors, outweighing the Palast's estimated €300-500 million retrofit costs amid ongoing liabilities. This resolution paved the way for site clearance starting in , embedding the Humboldt Forum's mandate within a framework of historical restitution rather than GDR commemoration.

Criticisms of Alternative Preservation Efforts

Proponents of reconstructing the Berlin Palace argued that efforts to preserve the Palace of the (PdR) were impractical due to extensive contamination discovered upon reunification, which necessitated closure in September 1990 and rendered the building unusable without massive remediation. Estimates for removal alone ranged from 400 to 600 million euros, with critics noting that full renovation could exceed the costs of and palace reconstruction, as the process would involve gutting interiors and addressing structural fireproofing flaws inherent to the design. These financial burdens were compounded by ongoing issues in a post-reunification fiscal environment strained by broader demands. Alternative preservation proposals were further criticized for overlooking the PdR's ideological associations with the German Democratic Republic (GDR) regime, including its role as a venue for state propaganda and confirmed installation of approximately 8,000 listening devices by the for during events. Advocates for contended that retaining the structure would perpetuate a symbol of authoritarian rule rather than fostering a unified , especially given the original Palace's in 1950 explicitly as an act of ideological rejection of Prussian by communist authorities. This view gained traction in public discourse, reflected in a 2000 citizen initiative and subsequent debates, where preserving the PdR was seen as prioritizing a 30-year-old edifice over centuries of pre-communist heritage. Architecturally, critics highlighted the PdR's modernist Brutalist style—characterized by its repetitive glass facades and steel frame—as discordant with the historic ensemble, including the directly adjacent, potentially disrupting visual and spatial continuity in the Spreeinsel urban core. Proposals to integrate or adapt the PdR, such as partial retention or hybrid designs floated in competitions, were faulted for compromising authenticity and failing to restore the site's pre-1945 symmetry, which had defined Berlin's royal and imperial representational axis. These efforts were ultimately sidelined by the 2003 Bundestag decision favoring reconstruction, informed by public sentiment where a significant opposed PdR preservation in advisory polls, prioritizing historical fidelity over modernist retention.

Reconstruction Process

Planning and Funding (2003-2013)

Following the Bundestag's June 30, 2003, vote to demolish the Palast der Republik and reconstruct the Berlin Palace as a cultural venue housing the , planning commenced under the oversight of the and involved architectural competitions for facade reconstruction and interior design. The decision prioritized historical fidelity for the exterior while allocating interior spaces for museum functions, with initial estimates projecting completion by 2013 at around €590 million, though delays in funding approvals extended the timeline. Architectural planning advanced through a 2007 competition won by Franco Stella, who proposed reconstructing the Baroque facades using original Schlüter designs where possible, supplemented by modern reinforcements for earthquake resistance and energy efficiency. The Berlin Palace-Humboldt Forum Foundation, established in 2009, coordinated these efforts, integrating ethnographic and art collections from the Ethnological Museum and the Museum of Asian Art. Trial facade sections were tested in 2012 to validate sandstone sourcing and carving techniques, confirming feasibility for the €80 million donor-funded exterior work. Funding derived from a public-private model, with the federal government pledging up to €552 million in November 2007 for the core structure, capped to mitigate overruns amid 's debt. The state of contributed €32 million in April 2007 despite its €61.6 billion liabilities, while a stock corporation model allocated €280 million from institutional investors and €80 million from small shareholders. The Förderverein Berliner Schloss, active since 1992, secured private donations specifically for facades, raising initial pledges toward €105 million by emphasizing citizen involvement; by 2011, the Bundestag's budget committee approved €595 million total for the core, enabling site preparation. These commitments resolved earlier uncertainties, including 2005 construction cost assessments, paving the way for in 2013 despite criticisms of cost inflation from initial partial-reconstruction proposals.

Construction Phases and Architectural Fidelity (2013-2020)

Construction of the reconstructed Berlin Palace commenced on June 12, 2013, marked by the ceremonial laying of the by 's and other officials. Under Italian architect Franco Stella's direction, the initial phase focused on erecting the structural framework, including the four-wing layout echoing the original 17th-18th century design by Andreas Schlüter. This involved deep foundation work to support the massive facades, with the building's footprint precisely matching historical records spanning 1443 to its demolition in 1950. The core emphasis on architectural fidelity centered on the exterior, where three facades—the north, south, and west—were rebuilt to replicate Schlüter's Baroque originals using historical plans, photographs, and surviving fragments. Artisans crafted over 22,000 sandstone elements and 2,800 sculpted figures, ensuring dimensional accuracy down to the stereometry and ornamental details like the grand portal and equestrian statues. The east facade, facing the Spree River, adopted a new, simplified design by Stella to integrate modern functionality while respecting the site's urban context. Interior spaces diverged from historical precedent, incorporating contemporary steel-and-glass structures for exhibition halls, prioritizing seismic safety, climate control, and accessibility over exact replication. By mid-2016, the main structure and dome—modeled after Karl Friedrich Schinkel's 1845 addition—were advancing, with scaffolding enveloping the rising facades. Progress accelerated through 2018, as sculptural work on the Schlüterhof courtyard and south facade neared completion, though delays from technical challenges and funding pushed the timeline. The exterior shell reached substantial completion in December 2020, at a cost exceeding 680 million euros for the facade and structure alone, fulfilling the Bundestag's 2002 mandate for partial historical reconstruction. This phase restored the palace's silhouette to its pre-World War II appearance, aiding the Lustgarten's urban harmony without endorsing full historical illusionism.

Completion, Opening, and Ongoing Works (2020-2025)

The reconstruction of the Berlin Palace's exterior was completed in 2020, marking the end of the primary construction phase that began in 2013. The Humboldt Forum, housed within the palace, initiated its phased opening on December 17, 2020, though full public access was delayed due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The official opening of exhibitions and facilities occurred in July 2021, allowing visitors to experience the integrated museums and cultural spaces. Post-opening, ongoing works focused on final decorative elements to enhance historical fidelity. By mid-2025, the installation of 19 -style sculptures on the balustrade completed the facade's sculptural program. Reconstruction of specific features, such as Portal V, continued into 2025, incorporating salvaged or replicated historical components. These efforts ensured progressive refinement of the palace's aesthetics while maintaining operational functionality for exhibitions. In 2024, the Humboldt Forum recorded 785,000 visits, reflecting sustained public engagement amid these completions. Preparations for 2025 included programming expansions and a new uniform pricing model effective October 3, signaling operational maturity.

Current Function as Humboldt Forum

Exhibition Mandate and Collections

The Humboldt Forum's exhibition mandate, as defined by the Stiftung Humboldt Forum im Berliner Schloss, emphasizes presenting global cultural heritage to foster international dialogue, education, and tolerance, with a focus on non-European civilizations through permanent and temporary displays. This includes promoting critical reflection on the provenance and historical contexts of artifacts, often framed around themes of decolonization and cross-cultural exchange, while integrating digital and experimental formats via the Humboldt Lab for contemporary interpretations. The upper floors host the core permanent exhibition "Ethnological Collections and Asian Art," spanning approximately 15,000 square meters and showcasing select items from vast holdings acquired primarily between the 19th and early 20th centuries. Lower levels feature "BERLIN GLOBAL," an interactive installation by the Stadtmuseum Berlin exploring the city's historical entanglements with Africa, Asia, and the Americas through multimedia narratives. The Ethnological Museum's collections form a cornerstone, comprising over 500,000 objects from , , the , and parts of , with permanent displays highlighting artifacts, everyday tools, and architectural models such as Polynesian canoes, African masks, and to illustrate societal structures and artistic traditions across millennia. Only a fraction—around 1-2% of the total—is exhibited at any time, selected for thematic coherence rather than comprehensive representation, with provenance details provided via labels and digital aids to address acquisition histories tied to European expeditions. The Museum of Asian Art contributes approximately 20,000 artifacts focused on South, Southeast, East, and Central Asian cultures, including Buddhist sculptures from (dating to the 2nd-5th centuries CE), Chinese imperial porcelain from the (1368-1644), and Japanese screens from the (1603-1868), arranged to trace influences like exchanges. Temporary s, such as those on Khmer temple art or Korean ceramics, rotate every 1-2 years to complement these, drawing from the same reservoirs while incorporating loans and contemporary artist responses. Humboldt Lab, an experimental space, integrates digital reconstructions and participatory installations with the collections, such as virtual explorations of Pacific navigation or AI-assisted analyses of data, aiming to bridge historical objects with modern global issues like migration and impacts on indigenous practices. Overall, the mandate prioritizes accessibility via free entry to permanent collections since partial openings in 2020-2021, though full implementation faced delays until 2021 due to restrictions, with visitor numbers reaching over 1 million annually by 2023.

Visitor Experience and Programming

The Humboldt Forum operates from 10:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. on Mondays and Wednesday through Sunday, remaining closed on Tuesdays. Admission requires timed tickets, with a single day pass costing 14 euros for adults and 7 euros for reduced rates (including free entry for visitors under 18) granting access to five exhibitions as of October 3, 2025: the permanent Ethnological Collections and Asian Art displays, the interactive "BERLIN GLOBAL" exhibit on Berlin's worldwide ties, the "" temporary show running through July 12, 2026, and related presentations at the Knoblauchhaus Museum. Two-day passes are available for 18 euros (9 euros reduced), while group tickets for up to five adults plus children cost 50 euros. Programming emphasizes intercultural dialogue through permanent collections spanning non-European and Asian art, alongside temporary exhibits like "," which explores structures across societies via objects, interventions, and . "BERLIN GLOBAL" provides hands-on interactive stations tracing Berlin's historical , migration, and cultural exchanges, encouraging visitor participation in mapping global networks. Educational offerings include guided overview tours for newcomers (60 minutes, 9 euros per person from October 2025), available in English and German on select days, as well as specialized lectures, performances, and family-oriented workshops. Visitors navigate recreated baroque interiors, including the Schlüterhof and grand staircases, blending historic architectural fidelity with modern spaces for an immersive experience. Free public areas such as the Humboldt Laboratory and castle cellar offer introductory encounters with research processes, while the roof terrace provides panoramic city views for an additional 3 euros (1.50 euros reduced). Multimedia audio guides, priced at 3 euros, support self-guided exploration in multiple languages. Accessibility accommodations include 50% ticket discounts for disabled visitors and free companion entry for those with severe disabilities (marked "B" on ID). Special events enhance programming, such as the October 2, 2025, launch of "Family Matters" with previews, talks, and live music, and the 2025 Global Cultural Assembly convening 80 international delegates for discussions on cross-cultural collaboration.

Operational Challenges and Recent Updates

Since its opening in December 2020, the Humboldt Forum has encountered operational hurdles related to security and facility maintenance. In September 2025, following two knife attacks near the site that resulted in one death and multiple injuries, the institution implemented enhanced security measures, including increased personnel and surveillance to protect visitors and cultural assets. Routine maintenance has periodically disrupted access, such as scheduled work in the Berlin Global exhibition from May 19 to 21, 2025, which temporarily closed sections to the public. Earlier concerns in 2021 highlighted risks to operations from inadequate guarantees for secure handling of artifacts and visitor safety, prompting union criticisms of the foundation's preparedness. Financial sustainability has emerged as a key challenge, addressed through a shift in admission effective , 2025. Previously offering broad free access, the forum introduced a €14 single ticket covering core exhibitions from the Ethnological , Museum of Asian Art, and Global, replacing differentiated fees to generate for ongoing operations amid rising costs. This change aims to balance public access with fiscal needs, though it has drawn attention to the institution's dependence on ticket sales and subsidies post-construction. Recent updates reflect efforts to boost engagement and adapt programming. In 2024, the forum recorded approximately 785,000 visits to exhibitions and educational programs, contributing to a total of over 3.3 million building entries, with more than 1.66 million from August to December alone, marking a recovery from lows. The 2025 program emphasizes family-oriented themes, including exhibitions like "Being Related: Shared Language, Shared Knowledge?" and on intergenerational ties, alongside temporary shows such as "Loot: 10 Stories" (March 2024–January 2025) exploring artifact across historical eras. These initiatives, coupled with events referencing the former Palace of the Republic, underscore the forum's evolving role in dialoguing with Berlin's layered history.

Controversies and Viewpoints

Authenticity and "Fakery" Claims

Critics of the Berlin Palace reconstruction have frequently characterized it as inauthentic or a form of "fakery," arguing that the absence of original materials renders the structure a mere rather than a genuine historical . The palace's complete by the East German in 1950 left no substantive fabric for preservation, compelling architects to rely on archival plans, photographs, and limited surviving fragments for replication. This approach has drawn comparisons to theme park architecture, with detractors decrying it as a "fake palace" or "" that prioritizes nostalgic illusion over architectural integrity. Such claims often stem from adherence to international heritage standards like the , which discourages hypothetical reconstructions of destroyed monuments unless supported by extensive evidence, viewing them as potentially misleading to the public about historical continuity. In the case, opponents, including some academics and left-leaning cultural figures, contend that the replica erases traces of 20th-century history—such as the site's use as Marx-Engels-Platz and the Palast der Republik—favoring a selective revival of Prussian imperial symbolism. This perspective reflects broader ideological tensions, where criticism of the project correlates with aversion to monarchical heritage, as evidenced by protests from groups favoring modernist or GDR-era commemorations. Defenders emphasize the project's fidelity to documented historical designs, particularly the Schlüter-era facades from 1698–1706 and later additions, achieved through precise 1:1 scaling and use of regional akin to the original. While interiors incorporate modern framing and climate-controlled spaces for functions, exteriors replicate ornamental details down to work and placements derived from pre-war records. The reconstruction aligns with Germany's precedent for rebuilding war-damaged structures, such as Dresden's Frauenkirche, where empirical reconstruction restores urban legibility and cultural memory without claiming material authenticity. Debates over specific elements underscore authenticity tensions; for instance, the dome's golden cross, historically added in 1845 atop a structure symbolizing Hohenzollern rule, sparked controversy during installation in May 2020. Critics, including Berlin's former culture senator Klaus Lederer of Die Linke, opposed it as an anachronistic religious imposition in a secular museum context, prioritizing contemporary values over strict historical replication. Proponents, however, insisted on its inclusion to honor the palace's documented 19th-century configuration, rejecting alterations that would further deviate from source evidence. This episode illustrates how authenticity claims often intertwine factual reconstruction with interpretive choices, where deviations for modern utility—such as asbestos-free materials or energy-efficient glazing—inevitably invite charges of compromise.

Symbolic and Ideological Interpretations

The reconstruction of the Berlin Palace has been interpreted as a deliberate reclamation of Prussian monarchical heritage, symbolizing cultural continuity and national pride in the face of East German communist iconoclasm, which demolished the original structure in 1950 to eradicate perceived symbols of feudal militarism. Proponents, including conservative historians and lobby groups, argue that restoring the Baroque facade revives a pre-Weimar and pre-GDR architectural legacy tied to Hohenzollern rulers from 1443 to 1918, countering the ideological void left by the Palast der Republik's demolition in 2008. This view posits the palace as a "national house" fostering German identity without endorsing past authoritarianism, emphasizing its historical role as a public venue for art and ceremony rather than solely repression. Critics from postcolonial and left-leaning perspectives contend that the palace's revival embeds colonial and imperial ideologies, particularly as the houses non-European ethnographic collections in a structure evoking 19th-century European dominance, thereby perpetuating a Eurocentric narrative of cultural supremacy. Activists have highlighted provenance issues with artifacts acquired during German colonial expansion, interpreting the site's central placement on as a symbolic reassertion of metropolitan power over peripheral cultures, despite official claims of . Such interpretations often frame the project as aligned with a conservative resurgence, evidenced by funding from right-leaning donors and the retention of Christian elements like the cupola cross and biblical inscriptions, which some see as imposing religious in a secular, multicultural . The inclusion of these religious motifs, added historically under Frederick William IV in the 1840s to sacralize monarchical authority, has reignited debates over ideological imposition, with detractors arguing they clash with the forum's purported cosmopolitan mandate and evoke Prussian Protestantism's role in unifying under Bismarck. Supporters counter that such features authentically replicate the original's symbolism of divine-right rule, rejecting calls for removal as concessions to secularist or decolonial pressures that prioritize ideological purity over historical fidelity. These polarized readings underscore broader tensions in post-reunification , where the palace serves as a proxy for reconciling authoritarian legacies with democratic pluralism, often amplified by media outlets reflecting institutional biases toward critiquing national symbols.

Economic Costs Versus Cultural Benefits

The reconstruction of the Berlin Palace as the Humboldt Forum incurred total construction costs of approximately €677 million, with the core structure amounting to €590 million and an additional €80 million for the historic facades funded through private donations. These expenses exceeded initial estimates, rising from €552 million planned in 2012 to over €590 million by that year's end, amid delays and scope adjustments that postponed the opening from 2019 to 2020. Funding primarily derived from federal sources via the German Bundestag, supplemented by state contributions and targeted donations, reflecting a public-private model where taxpayer funds covered the bulk of the expenditure. Annual operating costs are estimated at €50 million, placing ongoing financial strain on public budgets. Proponents argue that these investments yield cultural benefits through enhanced global engagement and revenue. The housed non-European collections previously dispersed across Berlin's museums, fostering intercultural and public access to artifacts from , , and beyond under one roof. In its first full year of operation post-2021 partial opening, it attracted 1.7 million visitors in 2023, rising to 785,000 exhibition visits in 2024 alongside broader site attendance exceeding 3 million when including events and markets. This influx contributes to Berlin's , where cultural sites drive visitor spending—congress participants alone average €350 daily—positioning the Forum as a draw comparable to established landmarks like the . Critics, including local observers and fiscal watchdogs, contend that the economic returns fail to offset the outlays, citing overruns and opportunity costs for alternative public investments amid Berlin's budget constraints. While visitor figures demonstrate appeal, quantifiable net benefits remain elusive without comprehensive impact studies, and high operating expenses risk subsidizing attendance that may not sustain long-term through tickets (now €14 for full access) or ancillary sales. The project's federal dominance in funding underscores a national prioritization of symbolic reconstruction over localized fiscal prudence, with debates persisting on whether cultural prestige justifies diverting resources from pressing needs. Empirical assessments favor cautious optimism: the Forum bolsters Berlin's status as a cultural hub, yet its €680 million price tag—equivalent to multiple regional hospitals—invites scrutiny absent evidence of disproportionate economic multipliers beyond spillovers.

References

  1. https://www.berlin.de/en/attractions-and-sights/3561341-3104052-berlin-palace.en.html
  2. https://berliner-schloss.de/en/palace-history/short-architectural-history/
  3. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-06-12/berlin-palace-rebuilding-begins-63-years-after-explosion
  4. https://smarthistory.org/palast-der-republik/
  5. https://www.humboldtforum.org/en/building-site/reconstruction/
  6. https://berliner-schloss.de/en/news/berlin-palace-is-being-rebuilt-in-its-former-glory/
  7. https://www.berlin.de/en/history/8477039-8619314-the-electors-residence.en.html
  8. https://www.berlin-welcomecard.de/en/berlin-palace
  9. https://www.globalconstructionreview.com/berliner-schloss-back-demolished-15th-century-prus/
  10. https://www.humboldtforum.org/en/building-site/
  11. https://www.cyrilzammit.com/design-diary/the-humboldt-forum-in-berlin-part-1-history-and-architecture
  12. https://www.smb.museum/en/exhibitions/detail/schloss-bau-meister-andreas-schlueter-and-baroque-berlin/
  13. https://berliner-schloss.de/en/palace-history/interiors-of-the-palace-general-views-amber-room/
  14. https://apollo-magazine.com/whats-the-point-of-rebuilding-germanys-palaces/
  15. https://www.humboldtforum.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/20201202_HF-Architectural-Backgrounder.pdf
  16. https://www.berlinunwrapped.com/2014/05/26/schluters-beautiful-baroque-berlin/
  17. https://archaeology-travel.com/germany/berlin/humboldt-forum-berlin-palace/
  18. https://www.humboldtforum.org/en/
  19. https://www.berlin.de/en/news/9803659-5559700-groundbreaking-ceremony-perron-to-be-bui.en.html
  20. https://www.bbr.bund.de/BBR/EN/competitions/art-in-architecture/berlin/humboldt-forum-facade/process.html
  21. https://www.unofficialroyalty.com/the-berlin-city-palace-berliner-stadtschloss/
  22. https://www.humboldtforum.org/en/magazine/article/symbolism-politics/
  23. https://www.humboldtforum.org/en/magazine/article/der-kaiser-das-berliner-schloss-und-der-deutsche-kolonialismus/
  24. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/72843452.pdf
  25. https://www.abandonedspaces.com/mansion/berlin-city-palace.html
  26. http://altehauptstadt.blogspot.com/2011/08/back-to-life-stadtschloss.html
  27. https://www.berlin.de/en/history/8477225-8619314-the-royal-capital.en.html
  28. https://www.berlinlayers.com/blog/the-berliner-schloss
  29. https://germanhistorydocs.org/en/forging-an-empire-bismarckian-germany-1866-1890/anton-von-werner-the-opening-of-the-reichstag-in-the-white-room-of-the-berlin-palace-by-wilhelm-ii-on-june-25-1888-die-eroeffnung-des-reichstages-im-weissen-saal-des-berliner-schlosses-durch-wilhelm-ii-am-25-juni-1888-1893
  30. https://net.lib.byu.edu/~rdh7/wwi/1914/willytalk.html.bak
  31. https://germanhistorydocs.org/en/wilhelmine-germany-and-the-first-world-war-1890-1918/the-kaiser-speaks-from-the-balcony-of-the-royal-palace-august-1-1914
  32. https://www.tagesspiegel.de/berlin/des-kaisers-nachmieter-5471341.html
  33. https://www.bpb.de/kurz-knapp/hintergrund-aktuell/211639/1950-das-berliner-stadtschloss-wird-gesprengt/
  34. https://www.tracesofevil.com/search/label/Stadtschloss
  35. https://berliner-schloss.de/das-historische-schloss/baugeschichte/
  36. https://taz.de/Autor-ueber-das-Berliner-Schloss/%215782539/
  37. https://www.nationalww2museum.org/war/articles/bombing-berlin-biggest-wartime-raid-hitlers-capital
  38. https://berliner-schloss.de/en/palace-history/war-destruction-and-demolition/
  39. https://www.deutschlandmuseum.de/en/history/calendar/1950-09-07-bye-bye-berlin-palace/
  40. https://www.dekolonialestadtfuehrung.de/en/2025/02/berlin-city-palace-a-history-from-1918-to-1950/
  41. https://newcriterion.com/article/restoration-drama/
  42. https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2009/01/berl-j22.html
  43. https://www.ddr-museum.de/en/blog/2023/the-palace-of-the-republic-between-splendour-and-controversy
  44. https://www.orte-der-einheit.de/en/palace-of-the-republic/
  45. https://beyondberlin.substack.com/p/the-humboldt-forum-palast-der-republik-paradoxes
  46. https://www.dw.com/en/berlin-resurrects-its-controversial-palace-of-the-republic/a-47806839
  47. https://failedarchitecture.com/berlins-palast-der-republik/
  48. https://www.the-berlin-wall.com/videos/9th-sed-conference-1976-825/
  49. https://www.the-berliner.com/berlin/history-palast-der-republik-humboldt-forum-construction-asbestos-museum-east-germany/
  50. https://digitalcosmonaut.com/the-last-piece-of-the-palast-der-republik/
  51. https://www.dw.com/en/the-return-of-berlins-city-palace/g-16870945
  52. https://www.humboldtforum.org/en/magazine/article/a-symbol-of-reconcilation/
  53. https://www.kpm-berlin.com/en/blogs/news/woltmann-meets-wilhelm-von-boddien
  54. https://berliner-schloss.de/en/introduction-to-the-foerderverein/organization-executive-board-address-accounts-great-britain/
  55. https://www.humboldtforum.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/HF_Architekturdossier_240516_EN.pdf
  56. https://www.alamy.com/date-of-recording-01101993-mock-up-of-the-former-city-palace-on-the-schlossplatz-in-berlin-a-facade-imitation-of-the-former-hohenzollern-palace-in-original-size-according-to-a-design-by-the-parisian-poster-artist-catherine-feff-made-of-painted-tarpaulins-on-the-site-of-the-historical-building-demolished-by-the-sed-regime-in-1950-automated-translation-image426294064.html
  57. https://www.the-berliner.com/berlin/the-palace-simulation-how-a-pr-stunt-changed-the-face-of-berlin/
  58. https://bolles-wilson.com/study/forum-of-water-1993/
  59. https://architectureinberlin.wordpress.com/tag/palast-der-republik/
  60. https://berliner-schloss.de/die-schlossdebatte/der-grundsatzbeschluss-des-bundestags-2002/
  61. https://berliner-schloss.de/die-schlossdebatte/bestaetigung-des-bundestagsbeschlusses-2003/
  62. https://www.bundestag.de/dokumente/textarchiv/2002-07-04-stadtschloss-901338
  63. https://www.spiegel.de/kultur/gesellschaft/palast-der-republik-bundestag-macht-weg-fuer-abriss-frei-a-396180.html
  64. http://www.urbancatalyst.net/downloads/2004_UC_pdr.pdf
  65. http://www.icwa.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/JW-13.pdf
  66. https://architecturehereandthere.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/fates-of-four-of-berlin_s-iconic-buildings-copy.pdf
  67. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02665430701379118
  68. https://spbstu.ru/upload/news/conf/castle_palace_2007.pdf
  69. https://direct.mit.edu/ecps/article/4/3/306/126065/Berlin-s-Stadtschloss-Humboldtforum-and-the
  70. https://www.artforum.com/news/lawmakers-back-berlins-schloss-but-cap-funding-186723/
  71. https://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/the-world-from-berlin-berlin-gets-green-light-for-retro-city-palace-a-479088.html
  72. https://berliner-schloss.de/en/new-palace/financing-of-the-humboldt-forum/
  73. https://berliner-schloss.de/en/introduction-to-the-foerderverein/
  74. https://www.the-berliner.com/berlin/dreaming-of-prussia/
  75. https://www.archdaily.com/955231/humboldt-forum-franco-stella
  76. https://www.designboom.com/architecture/humboldt-forum-franco-stella-berlin-palace-baroque-facades-12-18-2020/
  77. https://www.surfacemag.com/articles/berlin-humboldt-forum-benin-bronzes/
  78. https://www.francostella.eu/berlin-palace-humboldt-forum.html
  79. https://www.humboldtforum.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/HF_Press-Kit-Architecture.pdf
  80. https://www.smb.museum/en/whats-new/detail/humboldt-forum-to-open-on-17-december-2020/
  81. https://www.humboldtforum.org/en/programm/termin/conference-symposium/barock-modern-nachhaltig-145694/
  82. https://www.reddit.com/r/ArchitecturalRevival/comments/1jeja5f/current_progress_on_reconstruction_of_portal_v_at/
  83. https://www.tripadvisor.com/ShowUserReviews-g187323-d291467-r801039433-Stadtschloss_Berlin-Berlin.html
  84. https://www.humboldtforum.org/en/presse/mitteilungen/a-strong-year-for-humboldt-forum-visitor-numbers-in-2024-2025-programme-focus-family-matters/
  85. https://www.smb.museum/en/whats-new/detail/new-price-structure-at-the-humboldt-forum-starting-on-3-october-2025-also-valid-for-ethnologisches-museum-and-museum-fuer-asiatische-kunst-offers/
  86. https://www.humboldtforum.org/en/about/mutual-understanding-and-goals/
  87. https://blooloop.com/innovation-awards/2022/project/humboldt-forum/
  88. https://www.stadtmuseum.de/en/museum/berlin-exhibition-at-the-humboldt-forum
  89. https://www.humboldtforum.org/en/programm/dauerangebot/exhibition/ethnological-collection-and-asian-art-52038/
  90. https://www.smb.museum/en/exhibitions/detail/ethnological-collections-and-asian-art/
  91. https://www.visitberlin.de/en/asian-art-museum-humboldt-forum
  92. https://www.smb.museum/en/museums-institutions/humboldt-forum/exhibitions/current/
  93. https://www.humboldtforum.org/en/admission-tickets/
  94. https://www.humboldtforum.org/en/programme-2/
  95. https://www.kulturtechnik.hu-berlin.de/en/exhibition-family-matters
  96. https://www.humboldtforum.org/en/programm/dauerangebot/exhibition/berlin-global-16471/
  97. https://www.visitberlin.de/en/event/humboldt-forum-newbies-german
  98. https://www.humboldtforum.org/en/offers/genre/guided-tour/
  99. https://www.visitberlin.de/en/event/opening-exhibition-family-matters
  100. https://www.museumsportal-berlin.de/en/events/global-cultural-assembly-2025/
  101. https://www.artnews.com/art-news/news/humboldt-forum-security-after-knife-attacks-1234752361/
  102. https://www.humboldtforum.org/en/visit/wartungsarbeiten/
  103. https://www.dw.com/en/berlins-humboldt-forum-faces-new-criticism/a-57728138
  104. https://www.finestresullarte.info/en/news/berlin-humboldt-forum-says-no-more-to-most-freebies-going-from-0-to-14-euros
  105. https://www.humboldtforum.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/20250130_PR_Humboldt-Forum-Visitor-Numbers.pdf
  106. https://www.artatberlin.com/en/news-temporary-exhibition-loot-10-stories-humboldt-forum-22-03-2024-26-01-2025/
  107. https://deeds.news/2024/03/pre-program-in-march-and-april-blown-away-the-palace-of-the-republic-humboldt-forum-17-05-2024-16-02-2025/?lang=en
  108. https://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/01/arts/design/01abroad.html
  109. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/250062106_Berlin%27s_Architectural_Citations_Reconstruction_Simulation_and_the_Problem_of_Historical_Authenticity
  110. https://www.the-independent.com/independentpremium/long-reads/berliner-schloss-reconstruction-berlin-germany-b1966665.html
  111. https://www.reddit.com/r/AskAGerman/comments/ramag4/ive_heard_the_reconstruction_of_the_berlin_palace/
  112. https://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/baroque-hits-back-germany-rebuilds-its-imperial-palaces-a-478279.html
  113. https://www.dw.com/en/cross-causes-controversy-atop-reconstructed-berlin-palace/a-53614166
  114. https://www.the-berliner.com/politics/seymour-gris-no-cross-on-the-schloss-please-a-banana-inste/
  115. https://www.dw.com/en/berlin-squabbles-over-cross-on-city-palace-reconstruction/a-38924363
  116. https://www.e-flux.com/architecture/monument/372745/building-a-national-house
  117. https://www.africanews.com/2020/12/22/german-new-museum-ignites-colonial-controversy
  118. https://www.humboldtforum.org/en/colonialism-and-coloniality/
  119. https://www.dekolonialestadtfuehrung.de/en/2024/08/right-wing-infiltration-and-colonial-tradition-of-the-humboldt-forum/
  120. https://evangelicalfocus.com/cities/19369/possible-removal-of-biblical-inscription-and-cross-from-berlin-palace-causes-controversy
  121. https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2021/sep/09/berlin-museum-humboldt-forum
  122. https://www.berlin-info.com/en/humboldt-forum/
  123. https://www.reuters.com/article/lifestyle/berlin-rebuilds-baroque-palace-despite-cost-concerns-idUSBRE88B0U3/
  124. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/jun/16/berliners-wary-600m-super-museum-latest-project-overrun-humboldt-forum
  125. https://www.ribaj.com/buildings/franco-stella-architect-humboldt-forum-reconstructed-baroque-palace-enthological-asian-art-museum-berlin-germany-dream-big
  126. https://www.preussischer-kulturbesitz.de/fileadmin/user_upload_SPK/documents/mediathek/humboldt-forum/rp/brochure_Humboldt-Forum_to-be-in-touch-with-as-much-of-the-world-as-possible.pdf
  127. https://www.humboldtforum.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/20240118_PR_Programme_2024.pdf
  128. https://about.visitberlin.de/en/economic-factor-berlin-tourism-and-convention-industry
  129. https://www.theartnewspaper.com/2022/09/19/berlins-controversial-humboldt-forum-is-finally-complete
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.