Hubbry Logo
Block (district subdivision)Block (district subdivision)Main
Open search
Block (district subdivision)
Community hub
Block (district subdivision)
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Block (district subdivision)
Block (district subdivision)
Block (district subdivision)
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

A block is an administrative division of some South Asian countries.

Bhutan

[edit]
Further information: Gewogs of Bhutan

In Bhutan, a block is called a gewog. It is essentially for oil a group of villages. Gewogs are official administrative units of Bhutan. The country is composed of 205 gewogs.

Each gewog is headed by a gup or headman.

India

[edit]
Main article: Community development block
Administrative structure of India

A block is a district sub-division for the purpose of rural development department and Panchayati Raj institutes. Cities have similar arrangements under the Urban Development department. Tehsils (also called talukas) are common across urban and rural areas for the administration of land and revenue department to keep track of land ownership and levy the land tax.

For planning purpose, a district is divided into four levels:

A tehsil may consist of one or more blocks. Blocks are usually planning and development units of a district in addition to tehsils. A block represents a compact area for which effective plans are prepared and implemented through gram panchayats.

For example, Muzaffarnagar district of Uttar Pradesh has nine blocks: Muzaffarnagar, Budhana, Baghra, Shahpur, Purquazi, Charthawal, Morna, Jansath, and Khatauli.[1]

Block development officer

[edit]

The block development officer is the official in charge of a block. The officer monitors the implementation of all programmes relating to planning and development of the blocks. Coordination of development and implementation of plans in all blocks of a district is provided by a chief development officer (CDO). The BDO's office is the main operational wing of the government for the development administration as well as regulatory administration. A CD Block consists several gram panchayats in its limits. In some states the BDO functions as the secretary of the concerned Panchayat Samiti/Block Panchayat.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Block (district subdivision)

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A block, also known as a (CD block), is a rural administrative subdivision of a in , comprising multiple villages or gram panchayats and serving as the primary unit for implementing rural development programs and local under the system. Each block is headed by a Block Development (BDO), who oversees developmental activities including agriculture, health, education, and infrastructure, often coordinating with the at the block level. Introduced as part of post-independence initiatives, blocks focus on holistic rural upliftment, distinguishing them from tehsils or talukas, which primarily handle revenue collection and general administration rather than development-specific functions. This structure enables targeted resource allocation and execution of government schemes, covering populations typically ranging from 60,000 to 100,000 across 100 or more villages per block.

Overview

Definition and Scope

A block, in the context of district subdivisions, denotes a rural administrative unit below the level, primarily employed in and for coordinating development and governance activities. In , it is formally designated as a (CD block), serving as the foundational tier for implementing initiatives under the framework. This structure emerged to enable targeted planning and resource allocation for clusters of villages, distinct from urban or revenue-based subdivisions like tehsils. The scope of an Indian CD block is confined to rural territories, typically encompassing 50 to 150 villages with populations ranging from to 120,000, though variations occur based on regional densities and terrain. It functions as the operational domain for schemes in , , , and infrastructure, overseen by a and excluding urban municipal bodies. This delineation ensures focused intervention in non-urban areas, where over 60% of India's population resides, promoting decentralized execution of national programs without overlapping revenue jurisdictions. In , blocks correspond to gewogs, the primary rural subdivisions of dzongkhags (districts), numbering 205 nationwide as of recent administrative mappings. Gewogs handle local , community services, and development projects at the village cluster level, with boundaries derived from topographic surveys to facilitate precise governance. Their scope mirrors India's blocks in emphasizing rural self-reliance, integrating traditional village groups (chiwogs) for bottom-up decision-making within the national decentralization policy.

Administrative Role

In and , a block functions as a key sub-district administrative unit designed to decentralize and drive by bridging -level policies with village-level execution. This structure enables localized planning, resource allocation, and oversight of developmental schemes, ensuring administration is responsive to grassroots needs while maintaining hierarchical accountability to district authorities. In , the block—commonly referred to as a —is headed by the Block Development Officer (BDO), who serves as the chief executive responsible for implementing central and state government programs in rural areas, including poverty alleviation, infrastructure development, and services. The BDO coordinates with Institutions (PRIs) at the block level, such as the , to facilitate and monitors the execution of initiatives like the National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) and projects. Additionally, the BDO manages land records for gaon sabha properties, supervises encroachment prevention, and supports welfare activities, thereby acting as a pivotal link in the district's administrative chain to promote equitable resource distribution and community empowerment. In , blocks are equivalent to gewogs, the smallest rural administrative divisions, each governed by an elected Gup (head) and supported by a Gewog Administrative Officer () who handles executive functions under the oversight of the dzongkhag (). The Gewog Tshogde, a local committee comprising elected representatives, deliberates on development priorities, approves budgets, and ensures service delivery in areas such as , and environmental conservation, fostering community-driven governance aligned with national policies like . The supervises extension staff, maintains accounts, and reports irregularities to district officials, emphasizing transparency, , and integration of traditional practices with modern administrative duties to sustain local resilience and cultural .

Historical Development

Origins and Establishment in India

The , or simply block, emerged in as a specialized rural administrative subdivision designed to facilitate coordinated development efforts following . This structure was established through the Community Development Programme (CDP), launched on October 2, 1952, by to promote integrated rural progress in , health, education, and . The programme addressed the fragmented nature of pre-existing revenue divisions like tehsils by creating blocks as functional units for extension services and planning, each typically covering 80 to 100 villages and a population of 60,000 to 70,000 residents. The CDP's inception built on recommendations from the Grow More Food Enquiry Committee, which in 1952 advocated for organized blocks to enhance food production and rural welfare amid post-partition challenges, including food shortages and uneven agricultural yields. Initial implementation involved 55 pilot projects spanning 27,388 villages and about 16 million people, with blocks serving as the core operational hubs under the oversight of Block Development Officers (BDOs). These officers, drawn from administrative services, were tasked with mobilizing local resources and implementing centrally sponsored schemes, marking a shift toward models. By the mid-1950s, the block system expanded under the National Extension Service (launched in 1953 as a preparatory phase), covering an additional 200 projects and integrating with subsequent five-year plans. This establishment laid the groundwork for block-level governance, which later aligned with reforms via the Balwant Rai Mehta Committee (1957), though the developmental focus remained distinct from revenue administration. Evaluations, such as the 1957 Team of the Programme Evaluation Organisation, noted early implementation hurdles like inadequate staffing but affirmed the block's role in fostering in rural economies.

Evolution in Bhutan

In Bhutan, the block system, locally termed gewog, represents the primary rural subdivision below the district (dzongkhag) level, functioning as a cluster of villages for administrative, developmental, and electoral purposes. Gewogs trace their origins to traditional village groupings under the dual system of governance established by Zhabdrung in the , which integrated secular and religious administration but remained largely centralized under monastic and royal authority until the mid-20th century. Formal evolution toward decentralized block-level structures accelerated with Bhutan's adoption of Five-Year Plans starting in , shifting from ad hoc feudal management to planned , though initial implementation stayed under central control from . Decentralization gained momentum in 1981 with the creation of Dzongkhag Yargay Tshogdu (DYT), district-level assemblies that devolved from the to the then-18 dzongkhags, enabling localized resource allocation for and . This laid groundwork for sub-district units, as gewogs—numbering around 200 by the late —began handling basic service delivery like and health outposts, though without elected bodies. By 1991, during the Eighth Five-Year Plan, Gewog Yargay Tshogchung (GYT) were established across all gewogs, introducing block development committees comprising a head (gup), (mangmi), and village representatives (tshogpa), tasked with formulating and executing micro-plans for poverty alleviation and community projects. This marked a causal shift toward bottom-up , reducing bureaucratic delays in rural areas comprising over 70% of Bhutan's , though executive powers remained with appointed officials until further reforms. The 2002 Gewog Yargay Tshogchung Act expanded GYT mandates, incorporating participatory budgeting and oversight of natural resource management, aligning with principles emphasizing equitable rural growth. Subsequent expansions included adding two dzongkhags (Gasa and Trashiyangtsé) in 1992, which introduced additional gewogs, bringing the total to 205 by . The of enshrined gewogs as integral to dzongkhags, mandating their role in local legislation. Culminating in the Local Government Act of 2009, which operationalized elective Gewog Tshogde as the highest decision-making bodies in each block, devolving fiscal powers like tax collection and service provision while integrating them with dungkhags (sub-districts) in 10 dzongkhags for hybrid oversight. This act addressed prior inefficiencies, such as uneven capacity in remote gewogs, by standardizing structures and enabling direct elections in , though challenges persist in fiscal autonomy due to central dependencies. Post-2009 refinements included 2011 reorganizations merging or bifurcating 11 gewogs to optimize administrative viability based on and , reducing the count slightly from 211 while enhancing service equity. Gewogs now average 230 km², subdivided into chiwogs for finer electoral units, supporting functions like veterinary extension and , with empirical data showing improved rural and rates post-. This evolution reflects pragmatic adaptation to 's rugged terrain and sparse demographics, prioritizing causal efficacy in development over uniform centralization, distinct from India's model by embedding cultural custodianship roles.

Implementation in India

Structure and Hierarchy

In 's rural administrative framework, the block, or (CDB), operates as a sub-district subdivision dedicated to coordinated rural development and . Established as part of the three-tier system under the 73rd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1992, the block level bridges the district and village tiers, enabling decentralized planning and implementation of government schemes. Each district typically comprises multiple blocks—ranging from 5 to 20 or more depending on population and geography—with over 6,400 such blocks nationwide as of 2021, covering approximately 97% of rural . The hierarchical structure positions the block beneath the district's Zilla Parishad (district panchayat) and above the Gram Panchayats (village councils). The serves as the elected deliberative body at the block level, comprising representatives elected from Gram Panchayats, Members of Parliament, Members of State Legislative Assemblies representing the block, and associate members such as cooperative society heads. This body approves development plans, allocates resources, and supervises execution across 50–150 Gram Panchayats per block, which collectively manage local affairs for populations of 80,000 to 120,000 on average. Administratively, the Block Development Officer (BDO), appointed by the , acts as the executive head, overseeing departments like agriculture, health, , and within the block. The BDO reports to the District Magistrate or Collector and ensures alignment with district-level directives while facilitating bottom-up inputs from Gram Panchayats. This setup promotes functional coordination, with block-level committees handling specific sectors, such as or , to address localized needs efficiently. Variations exist across states; for instance, in Assam, the intermediate tier is termed Anchalik Panchayat instead of , but the hierarchical remains consistent with national guidelines. Blocks exclude urban areas, which fall under municipal bodies, ensuring specialized focus on agrarian and rural challenges.

Block Development Officer

The Block Development Officer (BDO) functions as the chief executive and administrative head of the , the intermediate tier of India's institutions at the block level. Appointed by the , typically through recruitment via state commissions or departmental promotions, the BDO acts as the ex-officio executive officer tasked with implementing the Samiti's resolutions, development plans, and government schemes. This role ensures coordination between gram panchayats and district-level authorities, with the BDO reporting to the District Collector or equivalent rural development head. Key responsibilities include supervising the execution of rural development programs, such as antipoverty initiatives under schemes like the National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) and (NRLM), infrastructure works, and welfare services in agriculture, health, education, and sanitation. The BDO oversees extension officers from line departments, maintains block-level accounts, prepares annual plans and budgets, monitors scheme implementation, and ensures staff performance aligns with targets. Additional duties encompass land protection for gram sabhas, disaster management reporting to sub-divisional officers, and convening meetings for Gram Sabha decisions on development priorities. Eligibility for the position generally requires Indian citizenship, a from a recognized , and an age range of 21 to 32 years, with relaxations for reserved categories as per state rules; selection involves preliminary, mains, and interview stages in competitive examinations. The BDO exercises financial powers as the drawing and disbursing officer for block staff and manages grants allocated to the , emphasizing efficient resource utilization to foster decentralized rural governance.

Functions in Rural Governance and Development

The , functioning at the block level as the primary institutional mechanism for rural , coordinates and executes development initiatives to address local needs in , , and . Block-level bodies prepare comprehensive development plans that integrate economic priorities, such as promoting small-scale industries and rural cooperatives, with objectives, including targeted welfare for marginalized communities. The Block Development Officer (BDO), serving as the executive head, ensures administrative coordination across departments to implement these plans efficiently. Key functions encompass the supervision and execution of sector-specific schemes. In agriculture and allied sectors, blocks oversee programs for crop improvement, , fisheries, and social forestry, allocating resources to enhance productivity and livelihoods. Public health initiatives include drives, facilities, and supply management, while education efforts involve maintaining rural schools and promoting . Infrastructure development covers maintenance, systems, and public assets like community halls, directly supporting rural connectivity and economic activity. Blocks also play a pivotal role in poverty alleviation and generation through schemes like those under the National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), ensuring wage employment and asset creation in villages. involves preparing annual budgets, collecting local revenues such as taxes and fees, and disbursing funds transparently, with mandatory audits to prevent mismanagement. Supervision of Gram Panchayats ensures alignment with block-level policies, fostering decentralized decision-making while maintaining oversight on scheme implementation.
  • Economic Development: Promotion of rural industries, cooperatives, and market linkages to boost local economies.
  • Social Welfare: Distribution of essential commodities via public systems and support for vulnerable groups through targeted programs.
  • Community Engagement: Encouraging to identify priorities and resolve local disputes, enhancing governance legitimacy.
These functions collectively aim to reduce regional disparities and build resilient rural economies, though effectiveness varies by state due to differences in and administrative capacity.

Implementation in Bhutan

Structure and Integration with Gewogs

In Bhutan, blocks function as gewogs, the fundamental rural administrative subdivisions beneath dzongkhags (districts), comprising groups of villages and serving as the primary interface for local governance and development. As of May 2025, Bhutan maintains 205 gewogs across its 20 dzongkhags, with some gewogs falling under intermediate dungkhags (subdistricts) and others reporting directly to dzongkhags. Each gewog is further divided into chiwogs, smaller subunits typically numbering 5 to 11 per gewog, which handle electoral and basic developmental tasks at the village cluster level. The governing body of a gewog, known as the Gewog Tshogde or Gewog Council, integrates elected local leadership with appointed oversight to ensure cohesive administration. It comprises a Gup (elected head), a Mangmi (elected deputy), and 5 to 8 Tshogpas (elected village representatives), all selected through elections held every five years. A Gewog Administrative Officer (GAO), appointed by the central Royal Civil Service Commission under the Ministry of Home and Cultural Affairs, supports the council in executive functions, policy implementation, and record-keeping, bridging local decisions with national directives. This structure fosters decentralized decision-making while aligning gewogs with dzongkhag-level planning, where district administrations provide guidance on resource allocation and oversight of gewog activities. Integration of gewogs into the broader district framework emphasizes coordinated and service delivery, with gewogs executing dzongkhag tshogdu () resolutions on issues like infrastructure, agriculture, and community welfare. Gewogs promote area-based planning, mobilizing local resources for self-help initiatives and reporting progress upward to ensure national priorities, such as metrics, are localized without overriding elected autonomy. In dungkhag-administered areas, gewogs operate under executives, enhancing administrative efficiency in remote or larger dzongkhags, though direct dzongkhag subordination prevails in most cases to minimize bureaucratic layers. This hierarchical yet participatory model, formalized post-2008 , balances central control with local input, as evidenced by gewog councils' roles in budgeting and .

Administrative Functions

In Bhutan, gewogs function as the primary rural administrative subdivisions, equivalent to blocks, responsible for localized and service delivery beneath (dzongkhag) level. As of 2024, there are 205 gewogs nationwide, each comprising multiple villages or chiwogs and tasked with implementing national policies at the level through authority. The Gewog Tshogde, the elected local council comprising a Gup (head), Mangmi (), and Tshogpas (chiwog representatives), serves as the principal decision-making body, focusing on and execution of initiatives. Core administrative functions encompass formulating and prioritizing annual and five-year development plans, including maintenance such as roads, bridges, and systems, as well as supporting services, management, and community . Gewogs also oversee and safety measures, such as coordinating basic healthcare outreach and disaster preparedness at the village level, while facilitating the delivery of education and veterinary services in alignment with central directives. Local resource regulation falls under their purview, including oversight of grazing lands and minor environmental conservation efforts to promote sustainable land use. Taxation and revenue collection represent another key responsibility, with gewogs empowered to levy fees on , , and local entertainments to fund projects, though subject to national fiscal guidelines. The Gewog Administrative Officer () provides executive support, managing for local staff, monitoring implementation of programs like the Gewog Development Grant, and ensuring compliance with and transparency standards. Dispute resolution at the level, including minor civil matters, is handled informally by the Gup, escalating complex cases to higher authorities, thereby fostering and ownership in rural administration. These functions underscore gewogs' role in bridging central policies with local needs, though capacity constraints in remote areas occasionally limit efficacy, as noted in government capacity-building efforts.

Comparative Aspects

Similarities and Differences Across Contexts

Both the Indian and the Bhutanese gewog function as intermediate administrative subdivisions between level and villages or chiwogs, primarily serving rural areas to coordinate local and development initiatives. In each context, these units group multiple villages—typically 50 to 100 in Indian blocks and smaller clusters in Bhutanese gewogs—facilitating the of national and schemes, such as infrastructure projects, agricultural support, and community welfare programs. This structure promotes decentralized planning, where local needs inform resource allocation, though execution remains tied to higher-level directives from authorities. Key similarities include their roles in fostering participatory rural development and serving as conduits for government schemes. In , blocks oversee programs under the system, including poverty alleviation and sanitation drives, while Bhutanese gewogs handle analogous tasks like budget execution for local infrastructure and environmental conservation, often aligned with national priorities such as metrics. Both emphasize coordination among extension officers in sectors like , , and , ensuring schemes reach levels without direct central . As of 2024, Bhutan's 205 gewogs cover rural constituencies nationwide, mirroring how Indian blocks—numbering over 6,000—span most states' rural districts, adapting to geographic and demographic variations. Differences arise in leadership, electoral integration, and operational scale, reflecting distinct governance traditions. Indian blocks are headed by an appointed Block Development (BDO), a civil servant responsible for administrative oversight, scheme implementation, and acting as secretary to the elected , emphasizing bureaucratic efficiency in a federal democracy. In contrast, Bhutanese gewogs feature an elected Gup as head of the Gewog Tshogde (committee), supported by a civil servant Gewog Administrative for technical execution, prioritizing local democratic input post-2008 constitutional reforms and the 2009 Local Government Act. This elected model in Bhutan fosters community-driven decisions on budgets and festivals, whereas Indian BDOs focus more on and coordination. Scale and contextual adaptations further diverge due to national sizes and histories. India's blocks, rooted in the 1952 Community Development Programme, handle larger populations and diverse schemes across 28 states, often integrating with Mandal Praja Parishads in southern states like . Bhutan's gewogs, evolved from traditional village clusters under 20 dzongkhags, remain smaller and more uniform, with functions tailored to mountainous terrain, including chiwog-level precincts for finer electoral and service delivery, as per the Local Governance Act. While both promote self-reliance, Bhutan's system incorporates holistic well-being assessments, differing from India's metric-driven targets under plans like the Five-Year Plans.

Impact on Decentralized Governance

The block-level subdivision, known as the panchayat samiti in India's Panchayati Raj system, serves as an intermediary tier that coordinates rural development activities between gram panchayats and district zila parishads, thereby facilitating decentralized planning and execution of schemes under the 73rd Constitutional Amendment of 1992, which devolved 29 subjects including agriculture and minor irrigation to local bodies. This structure has enabled block-level bodies to prepare integrated development plans, allocate resources for local infrastructure like roads and water supply, and monitor scheme implementation, leading to measurable improvements in rural service delivery; for instance, post-amendment data from states like Kerala and Karnataka show increased local expenditure autonomy in blocks, though limited taxing powers restrict full fiscal independence, often rendering them dependent on state grants. Empirical studies indicate that this decentralization enhances accountability through elected representatives but faces challenges from bureaucratic interference and uneven capacity across India's approximately 6,000 blocks, resulting in suboptimal outcomes in resource-poor regions where central schemes overshadow local priorities. In , the gewog—functioning as the block equivalent under dzongkhags—represents the lowest elected administrative unit, with 205 gewogs empowered by the 2008 Constitution and Local Government Act of 2009 to manage local resources, levy taxes on land and , and formulate five-year plans tailored to needs, thereby devolving from the center to promote participatory . Gewog tshogdes, comprising elected gups and members, handle , safety, and environmental regulation, fostering causal links to improved local responsiveness; since the establishment of Gewog Yargay Tshogchungs in 1991 and full elections in 2011, this has correlated with higher involvement in , as evidenced by increased local revenue collection and project approvals at the gewog level, though central oversight via appointed dzongdags limits complete . here integrates traditional village structures with modern administration, yielding efficiency gains in service provision but straining under-resourced gewogs reliant on national budgets for major . Comparatively, block-level units in both nations advance decentralized by reducing hierarchical distances, enabling context-specific policies that align incentives for local officials with community outcomes, as seen in enhanced grassroots participation and targeted development in ’s block samitis and Bhutan’s gewogs. However, 's model emphasizes bureaucratic coordination within a federal framework, yielding broader scale but persistent state-level dominance over funds—evident in blocks' role as implementers rather than initiators—while Bhutan's gewog system prioritizes elected in smaller units, achieving deeper cultural integration but vulnerability to national fiscal constraints. Across contexts, these subdivisions have empirically boosted democratic deepening, with 's third-tier institutions holding over 3 million elected representatives since and Bhutan's local elections empowering 1,044 gewog officials by 2011, yet both grapple with capacity deficits and , underscoring that true requires sustained fiscal transfers and training to realize efficiency gains without reverting to centralism.

References

  1. https://www.gktoday.in/community-development-programme/
  2. https://rangde.in/blog/understanding-india-s-rural-governance-structure
  3. https://megcnrd.gov.in/orgblock.htm
  4. https://thecontentauthority.com/blog/block-vs-tehsil
  5. https://brainly.in/question/44195708
  6. https://censusindia.gov.in/nada/index.php/catalog/1062/download/3262/DH_2011_0808_PART_A_DCHB_DHAULPUR.pdf
  7. https://www.viewvillage.in/tehsil-block/shabad-4542
  8. https://mospi.gov.in/92-population-and-basic-statistics-local-level
  9. https://censusindia.gov.in/nada/index.php/catalog/212/download/498/DH_2011_1816_PART_A_DCHB_DIMA_HASAO.pdf
  10. https://nsdi.systems.gov.bt/data/Boundaries
  11. https://dagana.gov.bt/tsendagang-gewog/
  12. https://dmsouth.delhi.gov.in/administrative-setup/
  13. https://zpgondia.gov.in/en/panchayat-samiti-gondia/
  14. https://mahendragarh.gov.in/district-development-panchayat-officer/
  15. https://www.dlgdm.gov.bt/dlg-faq
  16. https://rcsc.gov.bt/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Gewog-Admin.-Officer-I.doc
  17. https://triumphias.com/blog/rural-development-after-independence-2/
  18. https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP79S00427A000500060002-7.pdf
  19. https://www.newindianexpress.com/opinions/2011/Sep/12/administering-rural-areas-290244.html
  20. https://triumphias.com/blog/community-development-planning-in-india/
  21. https://countrystudies.us/bhutan/46.htm
  22. https://hdr.undp.org/system/files/documents/nhdr-2019ii.pdf
  23. https://www.nab.gov.bt/dz/page/history-of-national-assembly
  24. http://archives.kdischool.ac.kr/bitstream/11125/30199/1/%2528An%2529%2520Evaluation%2520of%2520decentralization%2520system%2520in%2520Bhutan.pdf
  25. https://statoids.com/ubt.html
  26. https://www.constituteproject.org/constitution/Bhutan_2008
  27. https://www.dailybhutan.com/article/what-are-the-different-local-governments-in-bhutan
  28. https://decentralization.net/countries/bhutan/
  29. https://local-government-history.fandom.com/wiki/Gewogs_of_Bhutan
  30. https://byjus.com/free-ias-prep/panchayati-raj/
  31. https://www.gktoday.in/administrative-territorial-entities/
  32. https://sleepyclasses.com/panchayati-raj-system/
  33. https://pubadmin.institute/administrative-system-at-state-and-district-levels
  34. https://pnrd.assam.gov.in/information-services/panchayati-raj-0
  35. http://arshablock.in/panchayat-samity.php
  36. https://rtiodisha.gov.in/Pages/printAllManual/office_id:1958/lang
  37. https://dmsouth.delhi.gov.in/bdosouth/
  38. http://www.wbdmd.gov.in/Pages/Roles.aspx/knowledge_management.aspx
  39. https://rd.nagaland.gov.in/Organizational-Structure
  40. https://www.tnrd.tn.gov.in/Establishment/linkfiles/go_rd_587_84_pg025.pdf
  41. https://panchayat.tripura.gov.in/sites/default/files/2024-09/PSBACZP.pdf
  42. https://zpgondia.gov.in/en/panchayat-samiti-amgaon/
  43. https://zpraigad.gov.in/en/panchayat-samiti-khalapur/
  44. https://www.indiacode.nic.in/show-data?actid=AC_JK_69_644_00003_00003_1613634653847&orderno=38
  45. https://www.facebook.com/Kuensel/posts/meet-the-press-updatewe-have-18-gewogs-without-gewog-administrative-officers-gao/1091899032973466/
  46. https://samtse.gov.bt/pages/civil/tendruk-tendu-gewog/
  47. https://rcsc.gov.bt/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Gewog-Administrative-Officer.pdf
  48. https://www.sng-wofi.org/country_profiles/bhutan.html
  49. https://www.dlgdm.gov.bt/storage/upload-documents/2022/1/12/fJklmFFCVV.pdf
  50. https://www.visitbhutan.com/page.php?id=54
  51. https://oag.gov.bt/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Local-Governance-Act-2007-English.pdf
  52. https://mof.gov.bt/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Guidelines-for-implementation-of-the-Gewog-Development-Grant-ENG.pdf
  53. https://www.acc.org.bt/strengthening-the-role-of-gewog-administrative-officers-for-effective-implementation-of-12th-five-year-plan/
  54. https://gofordigitalindia.medium.com/unveiling-the-role-and-significance-of-block-development-officer-7c8a34d2a547
  55. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1962/03/village-india/658294/
  56. https://tarunias.com/exams/upsc-blog/bdo-full-form-role-salary-how-to-become-a-bdo/
  57. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/what-bdo-who-block-development-officer-apsole-com-efz5c
  58. https://spmiasacademy.com/difference-between-ias-pcs-bdo-and-other-administrative-posts/
  59. https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-duties-and-powers-of-block-development-officers
  60. http://drukjournal.bt/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/The-Experience-of-a-Gewog-Administration-Officer-Damcho.pdf
  61. http://eagri.org/eagri50/AEXT191/lec06.pdf
  62. https://blogs.worldbank.org/en/endpovertyinsouthasia/how-can-poverty-mapping-support-development-bhutan
  63. https://www.csrxchange.gov.in/upload/doc/cc0e2feb1ea7117760e460e3fb411c96.pdf
  64. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/entities/publication/28b3e4ad-b829-5202-980a-a14ac9f74c12
  65. https://www.orfonline.org/expert-speak/decentralisation-75-how-the-third-tier-institutions-have-deepened-indias-democracy
  66. https://dorjipenjore.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/decentralisation-in-bhutan-is-it-born-and-nurtured-in-the-22right-cradle22.pdf
  67. https://www.helvetas.org/en/bhutan/what-we-do/how-we-work/our-projects/Asia/Bhutan/bhutan-decentralization-and-local-governance
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.