Hubbry Logo
TithingTithingMain
Open search
Tithing
Community hub
Tithing
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Tithing
Tithing
Tithing
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

A tithing or tything was a historic English legal, administrative or territorial unit, originally ten hides (and hence, one tenth of a hundred). Tithings later came to be seen as subdivisions of a manor or civil parish. The tithing's leader or spokesman was known as a tithingman.[1][2][3]

Etymology

[edit]

The noun tithing breaks down as ten + thing, which is to say, a thing (an assembly) of the households who live in an area that comprises ten hides. Comparable words are Danish herredthing for a hundred, and English husting for a single household.

Sound changes in the prehistory of English are responsible for the first part of the word looking so different from the word ten. In the West Germanic dialects which became Old English, n had a tendency to elide when positioned immediately before a th.

The noun is not to be confused with the verb to tithe, its present participle tithing, nor the act of tithing, though they partly share the same origin.

History

[edit]

The term originated in the 10th century, when a tithing meant the households in an area comprising ten hides. The heads of each of those households were referred to as tithingmen; historically they were assumed to all be males, and older than 12 (an adult, in the context of the time). Each tithingman was individually responsible for the actions and behaviour of all the members of the tithing, by a system known as frankpledge. If a person accused of a crime was not forthcoming, his tithing was fined; if he was not part of the frankpledge, the whole town was subject to the fine.[4]

Unlike areas dominated by Wessex, Kent had been settled by Jutes rather than Saxons, and retained elements of its historical identity as a separate and wealthy kingdom into the Middle Ages. While Wessex and Mercia eventually grouped their hundreds into Shires, Kent grouped hundreds into lathes. Sussex, which had also been a separate kingdom, similarly grouped its hundreds into rapes. The different choice of terminology continued to the level of the tithing; in Kent, parts of Surrey, and Sussex, the equivalent term was a borgh, borow, or borough (not to be confused with borough in its more usual sense of a chartered or privileged town);[5][6][7] their equivalent to the tithingman was therefore a borsholder, borough-holder or headborough.[8][9]

The Norman Conquest introduced the feudal system, which quickly displaced the importance of the hundred as an administrative unit. With the focus on manorial courts for administration and minor justice, tithings came to be seen as subdivisions of a manor. The later break-down of the feudal system did not detract from this, as the introduction of Justices of the Peace lead to petty sessions displacing many of the administrative and judicial functions of the manorial courts. By the Reformation, civil parishes had replaced the manor as the most important local administrative concept, and tithings came to be seen as a parish subdivision.

Frankpledge eventually evolved into both the Jury system and the petty constabulary, but tithings themselves had lost their practical significance, and fell into disuse. Despite this, active tithings continued to be found in some parts of rural England well into the 19th century, and tithings and hundreds have never been formally abolished.

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Tithing

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Tithing is a religious practice entailing the contribution of one-tenth of agricultural produce, livestock, spoils of war, or income to a , priesthood, temple, or charitable causes, with precedents in ancient Near Eastern civilizations such as and where it functioned as a form of tribute or , and later formalized as a legal requirement under the for the Israelite to sustain the Levites, national festivals, and the indigent. The earliest biblical precedent appears in Genesis 14:20, where Abraham voluntarily presented a tenth of war spoils to Melchizedek, priest-king of Salem, predating the Mosaic Law and reflecting a pre-Israelite custom of sacral offerings in the region. Under the Torah, multiple tithes were mandated—primarily the Levitical tithe allocated to non-inheriting priests (Numbers 18:21-24), a festival tithe for communal worship (Deuteronomy 14:22-27), and a triennial poor tithe (Deuteronomy 14:28-29)—effectively aggregating to approximately 20-23% of annual yield in an agrarian economy, serving both religious and social welfare functions within a unified national-religious system. In Christianity, tithing lacks explicit endorsement as a binding New Testament ordinance, with the epistles instead advocating sacrificial, proportionate, and cheerful giving motivated by grace rather than legal compulsion (2 Corinthians 9:7), though Jesus referenced the Pharisees' scrupulous tithing while critiquing their neglect of justice and mercy (Matthew 23:23). Scholarly analyses, including those from Reformed and evangelical perspectives, contend that the tithe's temple-centric rationale ceased with the destruction of the Jerusalem Temple and the advent of the new covenant, rendering it non-obligatory for believers, though some denominations continue to uphold a 10% guideline as a baseline for stewardship amid debates over prosperity teachings that causally link tithing to material blessings, often unsubstantiated by empirical outcomes or unaltered Pauline principles. Historically, post-biblical tithing evolved into monetary contributions in medieval Europe as a church tax enforced by secular authorities, contributing to Reformation-era grievances over clerical wealth accumulation, yet persisting in various Protestant and Latter-day Saint traditions as a voluntary discipline despite lacking uniform scriptural mandate.

Definitions and Terminology

Etymology

The English term "tithe" derives from teogoþa, denoting "a tenth," with the verbal form teogothian or tēothian meaning "to take a tenth." This root reflects the numerical basis of the practice, emphasizing a literal one-tenth portion of agricultural produce, , or later income, as formalized in contexts by the early . "Tithing," as the or form referring to the act of levying or paying a , emerged in from Old English tēoþung or tēoðung, combining the concept with suffixes indicating action or collection. In religious usage, it specifically describes the obligation to contribute this tenth to support , temples, or communal welfare, distinct from secular applications like the Anglo-Saxon administrative "tithing" (a group of ten households for mutual ), though both share the etymon. The term's adoption in parallels its antecedents, such as ma'aser (tenth part), but the English crystallized during the and codification of church laws in medieval , around the 10th–11th centuries.

Core Concepts and Variations

Tithing constitutes the practice of allocating one-tenth of one's , , or increase to religious or communal purposes, a principle rooted in ancient agrarian economies where such portions supported temple personnel, festivals, and the needy. The term derives from the concept of a "tenth," reflecting a standardized proportion intended to ensure systematic provision rather than arbitrary giving. In its biblical formulation, tithing served as a divine ordinance under the Mosaic Law, mandating to set aside portions of harvests and livestock for Levites—who lacked land inheritance—and priests, as detailed in Leviticus 27:30-32 and Numbers 18:21-24. Variations in tithing practices emerge primarily from scriptural interpretations and historical adaptations across Abrahamic traditions. In , the system encompassed multiple distinct tithes: the (ma'aser rishon) of 10% given annually to Levites; a (ma'aser sheni) for personal consumption during festivals or redeemed for equivalent value; and a poor tithe (ma'aser ani) replacing the second in the third and sixth years of the cycle, totaling approximately 20-23% over seven years when accounting for priestly heave-offerings (terumah). These were agricultural obligations tied to the , ceasing with the Temple's destruction in 70 CE, though rabbinic tradition adapted principles into charitable giving (). Christian interpretations diverge significantly, with no explicit mandate for a 10% tithe on income, as the practice was covenantal to and fulfilled in Christ, shifting emphasis to voluntary, proportional giving from the heart (2 Corinthians 9:7). Some Protestant denominations, particularly in evangelical circles, advocate "storehouse tithing" based on 3:10, applying 10% of modern monetary income directly to church operations, viewing non-compliance as robbing God. Others, including Reformed theologians, regard it as an shadow superseded by grace-based generosity exceeding the tithe, without legal compulsion. These differences often hinge on whether tithing is seen as an eternal principle of or a ceremonial obsolete post-resurrection.

Biblical Foundations

Old Testament Mandates

In the , tithing (ma'aser in Hebrew, meaning "tenth") was mandated as a form of from agricultural and , declared holy to and integral to Israel's covenant obligations. Leviticus 27:30-33 specifies that every of seed from the ground, fruit from trees, and —counting every tenth animal passing under the without selection for quality—belongs to the Lord; redemption required adding one-fifth of the value, underscoring its sacred status. This provision applied to Israel's agrarian economy, exempting non-agricultural income explicitly but implying a principle of proportional giving from increase. Numbers 18:21-32 designates the Levites' inheritance as all tithes in , in exchange for their service, excluding them from land allotments; the Levites, in turn, were required to offer a tenth of received tithes—prioritizing the best portions—to Aaronic , with the remainder for Levitical sustenance. This system ensured cultic personnel's support without taxation, while prohibiting Levites from secular work, and reinforced hierarchical distribution within the priesthood. Deuteronomy 14:22-29 outlines an annual tithe of field yield, to be consumed in Yahweh's presence at the central sanctuary for rejoicing with family and Levites; if distance precluded transport, it could be converted to silver for equivalent purchases there. Every third year, this tithe—or an equivalent—was stored locally for Levites, resident aliens, orphans, and widows, prohibiting neglect to invoke divine blessing on Israel's endeavors. Deuteronomy 26:12-15 mandates a declaration after the third-year tithing, affirming compliance and invoking Yahweh's favor, framing it as obedience to command without withholding. These provisions balanced personal/family consumption, priestly support, and social welfare, with rabbinic traditions later interpreting the triennial tithe as additional or substitutive, potentially exceeding 10% overall annually.

New Testament Teachings on Giving

The presents giving primarily as a voluntary act motivated by , grace, and rather than a legalistic obligation like the tithe. Unlike the law's requirement of a tenth for temple support and the poor, instructions emphasize giving according to one's means and heart's decision, without specifying a fixed . This approach aligns with the new covenant's focus on internal transformation over external , as articulated in epistles addressing church practices. Jesus' teachings on giving highlight sacrificial and critique hypocritical adherence to tithing without deeper virtues. In Matthew 23:23 and Luke 11:42, rebukes for meticulously tithing herbs while neglecting justice, mercy, and faithfulness, stating they should have practiced the latter without omitting the former; however, this endorsement occurs in a context of affirming the law's before its fulfillment in his death and , not as a binding command for his followers under the . The of the 's offering in Mark 12:41-44 and Luke 21:1-4 praises a poor widow who gave two small coins—all she had—over wealthy donors giving from surplus, illustrating that true giving measures by and proportion to resources, not nominal amount. also instructs the rich young ruler in Mark 10:17-21 to sell possessions and give to the poor to gain treasure , underscoring detachment from as a discipleship requirement, though this serves as an individual call rather than universal mandate. Apostolic writings further develop giving as systematic, proportionate, and joyful support for ministry and the needy. Paul in 2 Corinthians 9:6-7 teaches that generous sowing yields generous reaping, urging believers to give as predetermined in their hearts, "not reluctantly or under compulsion," since "God loves a cheerful giver," prioritizing motivation over quota. In 1 Corinthians 16:1-2, he directs churches to set aside offerings weekly "as he may prosper," ensuring planned, income-based contributions for collection and relief of saints. Acts depicts early Christians holding possessions in common, selling property to distribute proceeds equally among believers facing need, as in Acts 2:44-45 and 4:32-37, reflecting a communal ethos of radical sharing under the Spirit's impulse, though not without exceptions like Ananias and Sapphira's deception. Hebrews 7:1-10 references Abraham's tithe to Melchizedek as typological of Christ's superior priesthood, but uses it illustratively without prescribing tithing for the church. Overall, giving principles—voluntariness, proportionality to prosperity, and aim at equality among believers (2 Corinthians 8:13-15)—contrast with compulsion, fostering liberty in while warning against and promoting eternal perspective on resources (:19-21). No explicit command for tithing appears in post-resurrection directives, with emphasis instead on exceeding legal minimums through grace-enabled liberality.

Historical Development

Ancient Near Eastern and Pre-Biblical Origins

Practices akin to tithing, involving the payment of a tenth of agricultural produce, , or other to deities, temples, or rulers, are attested in ancient Near Eastern civilizations predating the composition of biblical texts. These offerings served both sacral and administrative functions, often blending religious devotion with royal taxation to support temple economies and elite intermediaries between humans and gods. Evidence derives primarily from administrative records, which document systematic collections rather than sporadic voluntary gifts. In Mesopotamian societies, including Sumerian city-states, the earliest references to such tenth-payments appear in texts from the Third Dynasty of around 2000 BCE, where approximately 90% of surviving documents on the topic originate from this period. The Akkadian term ešrētu denoted a one-tenth levy, payable to local rulers or temples, reflecting a standardized on income or harvest yields that predates Israelite mandates by centuries. Babylonian, Assyrian, and earlier Sumerian records similarly indicate that free citizens contributed a tenth of their produce or earnings to divine institutions, with temples maintaining warehouses for storage and redistribution. Ugaritic texts from the 14th–13th centuries BCE provide detailed evidence of grain tithes paid by village communities to royal authorities, functioning as a compulsory rather than purely religious . These records, including those specifying tithes to both the king and gods, parallel later biblical formulations but emphasize fiscal support for the palace and cultic personnel over communal feasting. Among the , tithes manifested as exacted from states to suzerain kings, underscoring a political dimension where the tenth served to affirm hierarchical allegiance and fund imperial temples. Egyptian sources corroborate similar levies on harvests to honor gods and pharaohs, integrating the practice into broader systems of divine kingship and temple sustenance across the region.

Post-Biblical Evolution in Judaism and Early Christianity

In , following the compilation of the around 200 CE, tithing laws for agricultural produce were systematically codified to ensure compliance with biblical mandates within the , including the separation of terumah (a portion for , typically 1/40 to 1/60 of the yield) and various ma'aserot such as (first tithe for Levites) and (second tithe consumed in or redeemed for monetary value). Tractates like Terumot and Ma'asrot in the prescribed precise procedures, such as liberal givers allocating 1/30 for terumah per the School of , while prohibiting consumption of untithed produce (tevel). After the Second Temple's destruction in 70 CE, these practices adapted amid ritual impurity concerns: terumah separation largely ceased due to priests' disputed purity, ma'aser sheni redemption involved dedicating a that was then discarded rather than spent in , and ma'aser rishon could be consumed by non-Levites if lineage verification failed. The (c. 400 CE) and Babylonian Talmud (c. 500 CE) further debated tithing's applicability, affirming its biblical status only under full national settlement in but extending rabbinic oversight to supervised produce in ; outside , agricultural tithing did not apply to local goods. A related custom, ma'aser kesafim—allocating 10% of monetary profits, gifts, or inheritances to charity—emerged as a rabbinic enactment rather than , traced to Talmudic references like 9a and patriarchal precedents, serving as a voluntary extension for urbanized or . In , tithing did not carry mandatory force during the apostolic era (c. 30–100 CE), where communal sharing of resources prevailed without fixed percentages, as described in Acts 4:32–35, emphasizing voluntary distribution to meet needs among believers. like (c. 130–202 CE) contrasted Jewish tithing as a constrained legal obligation with Christian liberty to freely share all possessions with the poor, urging believers to exceed the through generous almsgiving rather than adhere to it minimally. Similarly, (c. 150–215 CE) viewed tithes as instructive for piety and detachment from greed but framed Christian giving as unbound by such quotas, prioritizing holistic stewardship. By the third and fourth centuries, figures like (c. 155–240 CE) and (c. 185–254 CE) stressed almsgiving as an antidote to avarice and a path to spiritual purity, without prescribing tithing as a rule; advocated despising hoarded wealth in favor of patient endurance through charity, while linked alms to without referencing tithes. (c. 349–407 CE) later exhorted exceeding Jewish tithes under the , citing risks of divine disfavor for lesser giving amid orphans' and widows' needs. Tithing's institutionalization accelerated in the sixth century, with the Synod of Mâcon (585 CE) incorporating it into as an expected church support mechanism, marking a shift from purely voluntary practices to formalized obligations influenced by parallelism.

Medieval and Reformation Periods

In the medieval , tithing was established as a compulsory obligation by the 6th century, with the in 567 issuing the first recorded legislation mandating it as a divine precept inherited from law to support and church needs. The Third Council of in 585 reinforced this requirement across Frankish territories, viewing non-payment as a grave sin equivalent to . By the late , civil enforcement supplemented through Charlemagne's capitularies, which imposed secular penalties for evasion, integrating tithing into feudal obligations where lords collected and remitted portions to recipients. Tithes typically comprised 10% of annual produce or earnings, categorized as predial (great tithes from immovables like , hay, and wood), mixed (small tithes from land-nurtured goods such as , , and foals), and personal (from personal labor or trades like and milling). In , pre-Norman laws under kings like and recognized tithes as customary, with the Statute of Westminster in 1285 affirming their legal status and directing payments primarily to rectors, who allocated one-fourth to church repairs, one-fourth to the poor, and the rest for personal maintenance. Enforcement involved both spiritual sanctions, such as , and temporal measures like of goods, though evasion persisted due to economic hardships and disputes over valuation, fostering among peasants who bore the brunt amid clerical wealth accumulation. The Protestant Reformation marked a theological pivot away from tithing as mandatory divine law, with dismissing it in works like "How Christians Should Regard " (1525) as a non-binding ordinance superseded by principles of voluntary generosity. , while citing 3 to affirm tithing's exemplary role in acknowledging God's sovereignty over possessions, subordinated it to proportionate, cheerful giving under grace rather than coercion, as outlined in his commentaries and practices where church support derived from state subsidies and free contributions. Practically, however, tithes endured as fiscal mechanisms in many Protestant regions; in Lutheran , they transitioned into state-enforced church taxes, while in Anglican England, they remained legally obligatory post-1534 break with , funding parochial until commuted to rent-charges in 1836 amid agrarian reforms. This retention reflected pragmatic needs for ecclesiastical maintenance in established churches, diverging from reformers' ideals of non-compulsory and highlighting tensions between doctrinal purity and institutional continuity.

Modern Institutionalization (19th-21st Centuries)

In the , the institutionalization of tithing in shifted markedly due to the disestablishment of state-supported churches and the rise of voluntary congregational funding. In , the Tithe Commutation Act of 1836 replaced traditional in-kind tithes with fixed monetary rentcharges based on average grain prices, facilitating more predictable revenue for the while reducing agrarian conflicts, though compulsory elements persisted until the Tithe Act of 1925 fully abolished them. In the United States, following the early 19th-century , Protestant denominations increasingly promoted tithing as a biblical standard for self-sustaining ministries, embedding collections for "tithes and offerings" into regular worship services amid revivalist movements. Restorationist groups formalized tithing as a doctrinal requirement during this period. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints received a on July 8, 1838, defining tithing as an initial surplus offering of followed by one-tenth of annual "interest" (interpreted as income or increase), which became central to church finances and eligibility for temple ordinances by the late . Similarly, Seventh-day Adventists adopted "systematic benevolence" in 1859, evolving by the 1870s into a tithing system of one-tenth of income to support ministers, formalized as a core practice though not initially a fellowship test until the 20th century. In the 20th and 21st centuries, evangelical and Pentecostal traditions amplified tithing's institutional role through teaching and media, viewing it as a principle yielding divine blessings, with churches allocating funds for operations, missions, and salaries. In , tithing retained an agricultural focus without broad institutional revival outside ; post-1948, under the Chief Rabbinate requires Jewish farmers to separate terumah (priestly gifts) and ma'aser (tithes) from produce like grains and fruits grown in designated areas, sold or discarded ritually to comply with , though exemptions apply to non-observant or imported goods. This practice supports symbolic rabbinic allocations rather than literal Levitical needs, contrasting with Christianity's monetary adaptation.

Tithing in Judaism

Scriptural and Rabbinic Basis

In the Torah, tithing, known as ma'aser, is mandated primarily for agricultural produce grown in the Land of Israel, serving to support the Levites, foster communal rejoicing in Jerusalem, and aid the needy. The commandments appear in Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy, with the first explicit allocation to the Levites following the Korach rebellion, as stated in Numbers 18:21: "To the children of Levi, behold I have given all the tithes in Israel as an inheritance for the work which they perform, the work of the Tent of Meeting." These tithes apply biblically to grain, wine, and oil, though rabbinic extension covers other fruits and vegetables. The system begins with terumah, a priestly portion separated first from the crop, followed by the tithes proper. Leviticus 27:30-33 declares, "A tithe of everything from the land, whether of the seed of the land or of the fruit of the trees, is the Lord's; it is holy to the Lord," establishing the sanctity of the tithe from land produce and livestock. After terumah, Ma'aser Rishon (first tithe) requires one-tenth of the remaining produce to be given to the Levites, who lack territorial inheritance and perform Temple service; the Levites then allocate one-tenth of this (terumat ma'aser) to the priests. Numbers 18:24 specifies this as their inheritance in lieu of land. Ma'aser Sheni (), taken from the residue after Ma'aser Rishon, comprises another tenth in the first, second, fourth, and fifth years of the cycle, to be consumed by the owner and family in for ritual rejoicing, promoting spiritual connection to the Temple. Deuteronomy 14:22-27 commands: "You shall all the yield of your seed... and you shall eat before the your ... that you may learn to fear the your always." If transport is impractical, it may be redeemed for coinage, adding 20% value, to purchase food and drink in the holy city. In the third and sixth years, Ma'aser Ani (poor tithe) replaces Ma'aser Sheni, directing the tenth to s, strangers, orphans, and widows within local settlements to ensure their sustenance. Deuteronomy 14:28-29 instructs: "At the end of every three years... you shall bring forth all the tithe of your yield... and the ... and the stranger, the fatherless, and the widow... shall come and eat and be satisfied." No tithes apply in the seventh year, when fields lie and produce is ownerless. Rabbinic literature, particularly the Mishnah tractates Ma'aserot and Ma'aser Sheni, codifies these biblical laws, specifying liable produce (e.g., from the stage of edibility), separation procedures, and prohibitions against consuming tevel (untithed items). Ma'aserot details tithing triggers, such as for grains by and fruits by Tu B'Shvat, while Ma'aser Sheni governs redemption and consumption rules, including biur ma'asrot—ceremonial disposal of undistributed tithes in the fourth and seventh years post-Passover. The further interprets ambiguities, such as extending obligations rabbinically beyond biblical grains, wine, and oil, but ties full applicability to Jewish-majority settlement in . These enactments emphasize precise ritual purity and communal equity, rendering untithed produce biblically forbidden for benefit.

Historical and Contemporary Practices

In the rabbinic period following the Second Temple's destruction in 70 CE, tithing practices were codified in the , including tractates such as Terumot and Ma'aserot, which detailed the separation of terumah for priests and ma'aser rishon for from agricultural produce like grain, wine, oil, fruits, and vegetables grown in the . During the Second Temple era, tithes were often centralized in under figures like and , with evidence of enforcement extending to diaspora communities in places like and , where proceeds were sometimes sent to the Temple. Post-Temple, the obligation to separate ma'aser sheni (, for consumption in in years 1, 2, 4, and 5 of the sabbatical cycle) was adapted by redeeming it with a , which was then discarded rather than consumed, while ma'aser rishon separation persisted but distribution to became debated due to concerns over purity and verifiable Levite lineage. Medieval rabbinic authorities further evolved these practices, with (1138–1204 CE) in his prescribing ma'aser kesafim—the tithing of monetary income—as a standard of donating 10% of earnings, viewing 20% as ideal for exceptional charity, though its status ranged from rabbinic enactment to customary minhag rather than strict biblical law. This monetary extension addressed non-agricultural economies in the , where produce tithing held no halakhic force, transforming biblical agricultural mandates into broader charitable imperatives. In contemporary within , tithing remains obligatory for grown by Jews in Eretz Yisrael during non-sabbatical (shemitta) years, rendering untithed items (tevel) forbidden for consumption until separated; ma'aser rishon is allocated to verified Levites, while other tithes support scholars or the poor, with thousands of recognized Kohanim and Levites facilitating distribution despite practical challenges. Enforcement varies by community observance, but rabbinic consensus upholds the biblical-rabbinic framework for local , excluding imported or non-Jewish-grown . Outside , contemporary practices emphasize ma'aser kesafim as a voluntary yet highly encouraged custom, where observant , particularly in Orthodox circles, donate approximately 10% of to , prioritizing the poor, yeshivot, or , though not extending to mandatory produce tithing absent the Land's sanctity. This aligns with Talmudic views that full biblical tithing requires national settlement in , rendering observance rabbinic or exemplary rather than compulsory, with some authorities like Yair Hayyim Bacharach (1638–1702) reinforcing it as a wealth-preserving .

Tithing in Christianity

Patristic and Denominational Interpretations

In the patristic era, interpretations of tithing reflected a transition from mandates to principles of voluntary generosity, with evidence indicating mixed endorsement rather than uniform obligation. (c. 150–215 AD) praised tithes of fruits and flocks as instilling piety toward God and curbing covetousness. Irenaeus of Lyons (c. 130–202 AD), however, argued that Christ replaced the law's tithe requirement with a call to share all possessions with the poor, emphasizing communal support over fixed percentages. By the late fourth century, figures such as Ambrose of Milan, , and Augustine advocated tithing as a normative practice for support and almsgiving, with no recorded patristic opposition during 366–400 AD, though not all fathers addressed or personally practiced it. This period lacked enforced tithing systems, prioritizing apostolic teachings on cheerful, proportional giving as in 2 Corinthians 9:7. Catholic teaching holds that tithing, rooted in passages like Leviticus 27:32, imposes no strict 10% obligation under the , instead requiring support for the Church according to one's means as a precept of the faith. The underscores stewardship through almsgiving and material aid to ecclesiastical works, without mandating a percentage, viewing excessive fixation on 10% as potentially legalistic. Historically, Catholic clergy received tithes in feudal Europe until secularization, but modern practice relies on voluntary contributions rather than enforced collection. Eastern Orthodox interpretations similarly reject tithing as a binding post-Christ, framing it instead as a voluntary act of and conscience, akin to or , to sustain parishes without legal compulsion. The notes its origins but stresses freedom in giving, with some contemporary advocates promoting 10% as a spiritual discipline for and , though not universally required. OrthodoxWiki highlights a recent revival of tithing rhetoric in some parishes as an expression of divine ownership, yet ancient tradition prioritizes proportional offerings over fixed tithes. Among Protestant denominations, views diverge sharply, with Reformation leaders largely deeming tithing non-binding under grace, though many modern groups encourage it as a guideline. rejected tithing as an eternal command, treating it as a superseded civil and urging to give freely beyond any percentage for gospel support. referenced Malachi 3 to affirm tithing's role in reminding believers of God's ownership but did not enforce it as obligatory, favoring voluntary contributions calibrated to need. Denominations like Seventh-day Adventists and Methodists uphold tithing as a core for church funding, with surveys showing strong belief in 10% giving among evangelicals, though actual compliance varies widely. Reformed and Baptist traditions often prioritize passages like 2 Corinthians 8–9, viewing tithing as a helpful minimum but not a covenantal requirement, critiquing mandatory systems as akin to legalism.

Prosperity Gospel and Grace-Based Alternatives

The prosperity gospel, emerging prominently in the United States during the 1950s Healing Revivals led by figures like , posits that tithing and sacrificial giving function as "seed faith" investments that activate divine promises of material wealth, physical health, and success. Proponents such as , , and teach that Malachi 3:10 guarantees multiplied returns on tithes, framing as a breakable through faithful financial obedience rather than a potential aspect of Christian suffering. This doctrine, influenced by earlier metaphysics and post-World War II , emphasizes positive confession and giving as mechanisms to compel God's blessings, with tithing often portrayed as the minimum entry to prosperity. Evangelical critics, including those from and , argue that the prosperity gospel distorts biblical by extending Christ's work to eradicate material as a "sin," thereby promoting a transactional view of God that undermines grace and ignores New Testament examples of apostolic hardship, such as Paul's lack in 2 Corinthians 11:27. They contend it fosters exploitation, as evidenced by scandals involving high-profile preachers soliciting funds under promises of returns, which disproportionately burdens lower-income adherents while enriching leaders. Even some former proponents, like in 2022, have recanted strict tithing mandates, admitting past teachings overemphasized Old Testament law at the expense of New Testament freedom. In contrast, grace-based alternatives within evangelical reject mandatory tithing as an Old Covenant obligation fulfilled in Christ, advocating instead for voluntary, cheerful giving guided by 2 Corinthians 9:6-7, where generosity flows from gratitude rather than compulsion. Theologians like John Piper describe the tithe as a historical "gateway" to cultivate liberality but not a binding rule under the , emphasizing proportional, sacrificial contributions that exceed 10% for many believers as an outflow of heart transformation by the . This approach, echoed in Reformed and Baptist traditions, prioritizes for advance over personal enrichment, warning against legalism while encouraging empirical patterns of increased giving among grace-oriented congregations, as observed in studies of sacrificial donors. Critics of prosperity teachings, such as Russell Moore, highlight how grace-focused giving avoids the manipulation inherent in "health and wealth" promises, fostering accountability through transparent church governance rather than charismatic appeals.

Analogues in Other Religions

Islamic Zakat

Zakat constitutes one of the five pillars of , mandating eligible Muslims to donate a specified portion of their accumulated annually as an act of purification and social welfare. Unlike tithing's focus on agricultural produce or income at a 10% rate, applies primarily to idle exceeding a minimum threshold known as , calculated at 2.5% to promote circulation of resources and prevent . This obligation derives from Quranic injunctions, such as Surah Al-Baqarah 2:43 linking to prayer, and was formalized during the Prophet Muhammad's time in around 622 CE, evolving from voluntary charity in to a structured levy by 631 CE with detailed rules. The nisab threshold, set by prophetic tradition, equates to the value of 85 grams of gold or 595 grams of silver, adjusted for current market prices; wealth below this incurs no zakat, while qualifying assets include cash savings held over one lunar year (hawl), gold and silver holdings, business inventory, and certain investments, but exempts personal residences, vehicles, and debt obligations. Calculation involves deducting liabilities from total eligible assets, then applying the 2.5% rate—for instance, on $10,000 in savings above nisab, zakat amounts to $250—typically paid during Ramadan or upon reaching the hawl to ensure timely redistribution. Scholarly consensus among major schools of jurisprudence (Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi'i, Hanbali) affirms this rate from hadith narrations, such as the Prophet's directive to pay one-fortieth of wealth, emphasizing individual self-assessment over centralized collection in modern contexts. Quran 9:60 enumerates eight categories of recipients: the poor (fuqara), needy (masakin), administrators, new converts, those in bondage, debtors, wayfarers, and those striving in Allah's cause, restricting distribution to these to target systemic rather than general benevolence. Historically, under early caliphs like (r. 632–634 CE), enforcement involved state collectors dispatching to provinces, funding public welfare and exemptions for payers, though contemporary practice largely relies on personal or institutional channels amid varying national implementations, such as Saudi Arabia's and Tax Authority mandating 2.5% on Saudis' since 1980s regulations. This framework aims at economic equity, with studies noting 's potential to reduce inequality by redistributing stagnant , distinct from tithing's tithe which historically supported and temples. Non-payment constitutes a major , underscoring 's spiritual imperative alongside its material role in fostering communal .

Practices in Other Faiths

In , dasvandh—literally meaning "tenth part"—requires adherents to donate one-tenth of their income, either financially or through service (seva), to support religious institutions, community welfare, and the Guru's mission, a practice instituted by in the and codified in Sikh codes of conduct. This systematic giving parallels tithing by allocating resources for maintenance, langar (communal kitchens), and charitable causes, with contemporary Sikhs often directing contributions to organizations like the , which managed over 100 million rupees in donations for welfare programs in as of 2023. Hindu traditions historically featured tithing-like contributions of one-tenth of to temples or priests, widespread in ancient for sustaining religious sites and rituals, though modern practice emphasizes voluntary (charitable giving) without a fixed obligation. In texts like the (circa 200 BCE–200 CE), such gifts supported Brahmanical institutions, but empirical surveys indicate that only about 20-30% of contemporary report regular temple donations equivalent to 5-10% of , often tied to festivals rather than annual mandates. Buddhist dāna functions as an ethical practice of to cultivate detachment from , involving offerings to , stupas, or the needy without a prescribed or institutional requirement. Originating in the Buddha's teachings around the 5th century BCE, it prioritizes intent over quantity, as evidenced in Pāli Canon texts like the Sutta, where giving merits spiritual progress; modern Theravāda communities in sustain monasteries through voluntary rounds, with studies showing average household contributions equating to 2-5% of income in rural . Other traditions, such as and , lack formalized tithing equivalents, relying instead on discretionary alms or temple fees; for instance, Zoroastrian priests receive variable offerings during rituals like jashan ceremonies, while Jains stress for karmic purification without quantified mandates. The Bahá'í Faith mandates Huqúqu'lláh, a 19% levy on net worth exceeding a basic threshold after savings, payable to the Universal House of Justice for global administrative and charitable purposes, implemented progressively since its revelation in 1871.

Controversies and Debates

Obligation Under the New Covenant

The New Testament contains no explicit command for Christians to tithe ten percent of their income, distinguishing Christian giving from the mandatory tithes prescribed under the Mosaic Law for ancient Israel. Instead, apostolic instructions emphasize voluntary, proportionate, and joyful contributions to support ministry and the needy, as seen in passages like 1 Corinthians 16:1-2, which calls for setting aside a sum "in keeping with income" on the first day of the week, and 2 Corinthians 8-9, which urges generosity without compulsion. This shift aligns with the New Covenant's fulfillment of the old ceremonial and civil laws, including those sustaining the Levitical priesthood, which ceased with the temple's destruction in 70 AD and Christ's establishment of a new priesthood. Jesus references tithing in critiques of the Pharisees, such as :23 and Luke 11:42, where he affirms giving a tenth of herbs but rebukes neglecting "the more important matters of the —, and ." These statements, made before the , address Jewish audiences still under the old covenant and do not impose tithing as a perpetual mandate for his followers. Similarly, 7 recounts Abraham's tithe to as a prefiguration of Christ's superior eternal priesthood, implying that even "paid tithes" through Abraham, but this typology underscores the obsolescence of Levitical tithes rather than requiring a fixed under the new order. Proponents of ongoing tithing obligation often cite these passages or pre-Mosaic examples like Abraham's voluntary gift (Genesis 14:20), arguing for a timeless of firstfruits giving amplified under grace. However, such interpretations lack direct endorsement and risk conflating illustrative narratives with prescriptive rules, as the epistles prioritize "cheerful" giving determined "not reluctantly or under compulsion" (2 Corinthians 9:7), with blessings tied to sacrificial rather than a legal minimum. Theological consensus among Reformed and evangelical scholars holds that while tithing may serve as a practical benchmark for some, it imposes no binding obligation, freeing believers to give according to means and conviction while guarding against legalism. This view counters claims in certain charismatic circles that equate non-tithing with robbery (citing 3:8-10 out of context), which impose old covenant curses on grace.

Exploitation and Accountability Issues

Instances of exploitation in tithing practices often involve religious leaders diverting funds intended for communal or ministerial purposes toward personal enrichment or unfulfilled promises. , churches classified under Section 501(c)(3) of the are exempt from filing annual information returns, which other nonprofits must submit to disclose finances publicly, thereby limiting external oversight and transparency. This exemption, intended to protect religious autonomy, has been criticized for enabling potential misuse without mandatory audits or detailed reporting to congregants or regulators. A prominent recent example is the class-action filed against Gateway Church in , on October 4, 2024, by four congregants alleging financial and misappropriation of millions in tithes. The suit claims the promised to allocate 15% of tithes to overseas ministry work but failed to do so, instead using funds for other purposes amid scandals, including allegations against founder Robert Morris. Following these revelations, the church reported a 35-40% decline in tithing by November 2024, leading to staff layoffs and operational challenges. In contexts emphasizing , tithing is frequently promoted as a mechanism to secure divine financial blessings, which critics contend pressures lower-income adherents into disproportionate giving while leaders amass . For instance, some prosperity gospel proponents have faced scrutiny for lifestyles funded by congregational donations, though convictions for remain infrequent due to the lack of regulatory mandates. Voluntary standards from organizations like the (ECFA) encourage audited financials and donor transparency, but adherence is not universal among evangelical churches, exacerbating gaps. Such issues have prompted calls for internal reforms, including congregational access to budgets and independent audits, to rebuild trust without governmental overreach.

Economic and Social Impacts

Empirical Studies on Personal and Communal Effects

Empirical research on the personal effects of tithing reveals primarily correlational patterns rather than causal mechanisms for financial prosperity. A survey of 4,413 self-identified tithers conducted between 2009 and 2013 found that 80% carried no unpaid credit card balances, 74% had no car payments, and 28% were entirely debt-free, suggesting lower debt levels compared to broader population averages for non-tithers. However, this data derives from a non-random constituency sample of church-affiliated respondents, limiting inferences about causation; disciplined financial habits may predispose individuals to both tithing and debt avoidance rather than tithing directly improving finances. Claims of supernatural financial returns, as promoted in some prosperity teachings, lack robust empirical backing, with studies on religious giving showing no consistent evidence of material enrichment beyond baseline economic behaviors. On psychological dimensions, tithing as a form of structured generosity aligns with broader findings that prosocial giving enhances . research indicates that acts of generosity activate reward centers in the , correlating with increased subjective independent of recipient outcomes. Religious participation, which often includes tithing, is associated with higher and lower depressive symptoms, potentially mediated by ties and purpose derived from giving. Yet, specific to tithing, evidence remains indirect; while generous donors report greater fulfillment, the mandatory 10% threshold may impose stress on lower-income adherents without proportionally amplifying these benefits, as psychological gains from giving plateau beyond modest amounts. Communal effects of tithing center on to church operations and welfare programs, though outcomes vary by institutional efficiency. Tithers collectively contribute over $50 billion annually to U.S. churches, funding local aid, , and that can bolster community cohesion. A of congregational giving suggested that tithing practices encourage broader , potentially extending benefits to non-church entities. However, a 2024 county-level study using Mormon temple dedications as a proxy for heightened tithing adherence (required for temple access) found no significant reduction in rates from 2010 to 2018, employing difference-in-differences models controlling for demographics and economics across 829 U.S. counties. This null result implies that centralized tithing distribution may prioritize institutional priorities over targeted poverty alleviation, highlighting challenges in opaque religious finances.

Broader Societal Contributions and Critiques

In the , an estimated 10 million tithers donate over $50 billion annually to religious and charitable causes, comprising 97% church general offerings, 95% missions support, and 87% benevolence programs that aid vulnerable populations such as the unemployed (31% of tithers contribute) and homeless (29%). This influx sustains religious institutions' delivery of , including , healthcare, and alleviation, often provided irrespective of recipients' , and accounts for 32.8% of total charitable giving in 2006 ($96.8 billion) or 72% in 2005 per alternative estimates. Such funding bolsters community infrastructure and missionary efforts (71% tither support), fostering social cohesion and direct welfare in locales where secular alternatives may be limited. Critiques highlight tithing's regressive structure, as the uniform 10% rate imposes a heavier relative burden on lower-income households—tithers themselves averaging lower incomes than non-tithers—compared to progressive models that scale with ability to pay. County-level analyses of tithing-intensive Mormon communities, using temple dedications as a proxy for concentrated donations from 2010 to 2018, reveal no statistically significant reductions, with difference-in-differences models showing null or insignificant effects after controlling for demographics and economics, thus questioning claims of macroeconomic uplift. Broader debates note potential inefficiencies, such as opaque allocation in centralized systems or crowding out by government programs, though religious providers' effectiveness in service delivery remains contested against secular benchmarks. Despite tithers' personal financial advantages like reduced (80% credit-card free), these do not translate to verifiable communal gains beyond baseline .

References

  1. https://www.vancopayments.com/egiving/blog/tithing-system
  2. https://reachrightstudios.com/blog/tithe-definition/
  3. https://wm.wts.edu/read/biblical-teaching-about-the-tithe
  4. https://www.churchofgodeveninglight.com/origin-of-tithing/
  5. https://study.com/academy/lesson/tithes-definition-types.html
  6. https://learn.ligonier.org/articles/stewardship-tithing-and-giving
  7. https://www.equip.org/articles/tithing/
  8. https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/6243
  9. https://relearn.org/why-tithing-is-biblical-but-its-not-christian/
  10. https://www.theosu.ca/theos-resource/when-did-the-church-start-tithing-money-instead-of-objects
  11. https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/manual/teachings-of-presidents-of-the-church-howard-w-hunter/chapter-9-the-law-of-tithing?lang=eng
  12. https://www.etymonline.com/word/tithe
  13. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/tithing
  14. https://www.christianity.com/wiki/christian-life/what-is-a-tithe-meaning-and-importance-of-tithing-in-the-bible.html
  15. https://www.gotquestions.org/tithing-Christian.html
  16. https://www.ministrymagazine.org/archive/1958/09/the-three-tithes-of-the-old-testament
  17. https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/tithing/
  18. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Leviticus+27%3A30-33&version=ESV
  19. https://biblehub.com/leviticus/27-30.htm
  20. https://thirdmill.org/answers/answer.asp/file/43254
  21. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Numbers+18%3A21-32&version=ESV
  22. https://biblehub.com/numbers/18-21.htm
  23. https://enduringword.com/bible-commentary/numbers-18/
  24. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Deuteronomy+14%3A22-27&version=ESV
  25. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Deuteronomy+14%3A28-29&version=ESV
  26. https://biblehub.com/deuteronomy/26-12.htm
  27. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Deuteronomy+26%3A12-15&version=ESV
  28. https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/article/7-reasons-christians-not-required-to-tithe/
  29. https://www.ministrymagazine.org/archive/1961/10/tithing-in-the-new-testament
  30. https://hermeneutics.stackexchange.com/questions/4157/in-luke-1142-and-matthew-2323-did-jesus-endorse-tithing-for-all-when-addressin
  31. https://www.crossway.org/articles/10-key-bible-verses-on-giving/
  32. https://boundless.org/advice/what-does-the-new-testament-say-about-giving/
  33. https://cfc.sebts.edu/faith-and-economics/tithe-not-tithe-new-testament-guide-generous-giving/
  34. https://www.thomasnelsonbibles.com/blog/new-testament-giving/
  35. https://www.faithfellowshipfortbend.com/posts/tithing
  36. https://www.desiringgod.org/interviews/can-a-church-require-tithing
  37. https://www.encyclopedia.com/philosophy-and-religion/bible/bible-general/tithes
  38. https://academic.oup.com/book/32343/chapter/268596046
  39. https://brill.com/downloadpdf/book/9789004494039/B9789004494039_s009.pdf
  40. https://www.academia.edu/113456024/The_Confusion_of_Tithing_and_the_Tithing_of_Confusion
  41. https://www.ministrymagazine.org/archive/1985/09/the-biblical-case-for-tithing
  42. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/f51f/6d6f243e9e3438bf1a1de246b807daf27cd5.pdf
  43. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27925507
  44. https://journals.co.za/doi/pdf/10.10520/EJC100781
  45. https://byamukama.com/tithing-in-the-torah-and-today/
  46. https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/4266406/jewish/Maaser-Tithing-in-Torah-and-Jewish-Law.htm
  47. https://colelchabad.org/the-meaning-of-maaser-kesafim-and-tithing/
  48. https://www.christianitytoday.com/2008/08/ancient-rise-and-recent-fall-of-tithing/
  49. https://pushpay.com/blog/6-quotes-on-tithing-in-the-early-church/
  50. https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/01328f.htm
  51. https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/14741b.htm
  52. https://catholiceducation.org/en/culture/tithing.html
  53. http://slaveoftheword.blogspot.com/2006/02/calvin-and-tithes.html
  54. https://reformedbooksonline.com/topics/topics-by-subject/worship/tithes-and-offerings/
  55. https://www.jhiblog.org/2015/02/18/histories-of-tithes-religious-controversy-and-changing-methodologies/
  56. http://gotoheavennow.com/the-history-of-tithing-in-evangelicalism/
  57. https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/help-with-your-research/research-guides/tithes/
  58. https://kingdomwinds.com/the-history-of-tithing-in-evangelicalism/
  59. https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/history/topics/tithing?lang=eng
  60. https://adventistbiblicalresearch.org/articles/highlights-of-the-beginning-of-the-tithing-system
  61. https://www.ecfa.org/Documents/News/20-Truths-About-Tithers-Executive-Summary-eBook-Report.pdf
  62. https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/ma-x0027-aserot
  63. https://www.sefaria.org/topics/maaser-sheni
  64. https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/terumot-and-ma-aserot
  65. https://www.yeshiva.co/ask/59163
  66. https://www.christian-history.org/tithing-quotes.html
  67. http://slaveoftheword.blogspot.com/2006/03/six-advocates-of-tithing-between-366.html
  68. https://christianity.stackexchange.com/questions/4329/was-tithing-10-required-or-encouraged-by-the-early-church
  69. https://hawaiicatholicherald.com/2022/05/25/father-kenneth-doyle-whats-the-catholic-view-on-tithing/
  70. https://www.catholic.com/qa/are-catholics-required-to-tithe-10-percent-of-their-income-to-the-church
  71. https://www.oca.org/questions/parishlife/tithing
  72. https://www.saintjohnchurch.org/orthodox-christians-should-tithe/
  73. https://orthodoxwiki.org/Tithe
  74. https://julieroys.com/study-reveals-which-denominations-hold-strongest-beliefs-on-tithing/
  75. https://learn.ligonier.org/articles/field-guide-on-false-teaching-prosperity-gospel
  76. https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/article/9-things-prosperity-gospel/
  77. https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/article/prosperity-gospel-born-in-the-usa/
  78. https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/article/5-errors-of-the-prosperity-gospel/
  79. https://cfc.sebts.edu/faith-and-economics/5-critical-errors-of-the-prosperity-gospel/
  80. https://relevantmagazine.com/faith/church/prosperity-preacher-creflo-dollar-my-past-teaching-on-tithing-was-not-correct/
  81. https://gracequotes.org/topic/money-giving-amount/
  82. https://www.rayfowler.org/sermons/1-corinthians/seven-principles-for-christian-giving/
  83. https://www.emerald.com/ies/article/30/2/86/105986/Zakat-changing-the-framework-of-giving
  84. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342149271_Zakat_as_a_Measure_of_Social_Justice_in_Islamic_Finance_An_Accountant%27s_Overview
  85. https://www.almustafatrust.org/history-of-zakat-in-islam/
  86. https://nzf.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/NZF_Understanding-Calculating-Zakat_Guide.pdf
  87. https://www.hidaya.org/documents/mailers/HF_PracticalGuideforCalculatingZakat.pdf
  88. https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/157223/arsalan-narsalan-sm-sdm-2024-thesis.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  89. https://www.zakat.org/what-quran-say-about-zakat
  90. https://www.zatca.gov.sa/en/HelpCenter/guidelines/Documents/Zakat_Individual.pdf
  91. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362151101_Zakat_in_Islamic_Wealth_Management
  92. https://www.academia.edu/75260915/Christian_Tithe_vis_a_vis_Islamic_Zakat_Concept_A_Comparative_Study_in_Socio_Economic_Scope
  93. https://www.thesikhencyclopedia.com/dasvandh/
  94. https://www.sikhdharma.org/dasvandh/dasvandh-about/
  95. https://www.sikhnet.com/news/sikhs-and-dasvandh
  96. https://www.academia.edu/11788313/Hinduisms_Online_Lexicon_A_Z_Dictionary
  97. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Hinduism/Daily-offerings
  98. https://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/various/wheel367.html
  99. https://zenstudiespodcast.com/dana-buddhas-teachings-on-giving-1/
  100. https://www.quora.com/What-is-tithing-Do-most-religions-have-an-equivalent-of-tithing
  101. https://www.tithing.com/blog/comparing-denominations-and-religions-that-tithe/
  102. https://get.tithe.ly/blog/tithing-in-the-new-testament-what-does-it-say
  103. https://archive.gci.org/articles/is-tithing-required-in-the-new-covenant/
  104. https://sats.ac.za/blog/2022/09/02/hebrews-71-12-and-tithing-for-christians-by-matodzi-lawrence-mukwevho/
  105. https://transform.westernseminary.edu/resources/tithing-for-new-covenant-believers
  106. https://www.gotquestions.org/cheerful-giver.html
  107. https://www.irs.gov/charities-non-profits/churches-religious-organizations/filing-requirements-for-churches-and-religious-organizations
  108. https://www.501c3.org/church-vs-religious-charity-tax-law-exploring-the-differences-and-similarities/
  109. https://www.startchurch.com/blog/view/name/what-ministries-should-know-about-irs-form-990
  110. https://fortworthreport.org/2024/10/04/lawsuit-alleges-gateway-church-committed-financial-fraud-with-congregants-tithes/
  111. https://www.cbsnews.com/texas/news/gateway-church-class-action-lawsuit-misuse-tithes/
  112. https://ministrywatch.com/tithing-down-35-40-at-gateway-church/
  113. https://premierchristian.news/en/news/article/gateway-church-to-slash-staff-robert-morris-abuse-scandal
  114. https://divinity.uchicago.edu/sightings/articles/prosperity-gospel-and-financial-crisis-martin-e-marty
  115. https://www.9marks.org/article/handling-your-churchs-finances-with-transparency-and-integrity/
  116. https://j-etr.org/2024/04/03/the-elusive-economic-blessings-of-tithing-mormon-temples-and-county-poverty/
  117. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5508200/
  118. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5665144/
  119. https://ggsc.berkeley.edu/images/uploads/GGSC-JTF_White_Paper-Generosity-FINAL.pdf
  120. https://source.washu.edu/2005/02/financial-future-may-be-brighter-for-those-who-tithe/
  121. https://j-etr.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/JETR-2023-165_1.pdf
  122. https://generosityresearch.nd.edu/assets/20447/religious_giving_final.pdf
  123. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00036840903213384
  124. https://faithlead.org/blog/tithing-is-regressive/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.