Hubbry Logo
ClamAVClamAVMain
Open search
ClamAV
Community hub
ClamAV
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
ClamAV
ClamAV
ClamAV
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

ClamAV
Original authorTomasz Kojm
DeveloperCisco Talos
Initial release8 May 2002; 23 years ago (2002-05-08)
Stable release
1.5.1[1] Edit this on Wikidata / 16 October 2025
Preview release
1.5.0-rc[2] Edit this on Wikidata / 20 August 2025
Repository
Written inC, C++
Operating systemUnix, AIX, BSD, HP-UX, Linux, macOS, OpenVMS, Tru64 UNIX, Windows, Haiku
TypeAntivirus software
LicenseGPL-2.0-only
Websitewww.clamav.net

ClamAV (Clam AntiVirus) is a free software, cross-platform antimalware toolkit able to detect many types of malware, including viruses. It was developed for Unix and has third party versions available for AIX, BSD, HP-UX, Linux, macOS, OpenVMS, OSF (Tru64), Solaris and Haiku. As of version 0.97.5, ClamAV builds and runs on Microsoft Windows.[3][4] Both ClamAV and its updates are made available free of charge. One of its main uses is on mail servers as a server-side email virus scanner.

History

[edit]

ClamAV was initially released with version 0.10 on 8 May 2002, by Polish university student Tomasz Kojm.[5] In 2007, it was acquired by Sourcefire,[6] which in turn was acquired by Cisco in 2013[7] and now operates under its Talos cybersecurity division.

Patent lawsuit

[edit]

In 2008, Barracuda Networks was sued by Trend Micro for its distribution of ClamAV as part of a security package.[8] Trend Micro claimed that Barracuda's utilization of ClamAV infringes on a software patent for filtering viruses on an Internet gateway. The free software community responded in part by calling for a boycott against Trend Micro. The boycott was also endorsed by the Free Software Foundation.[9] Barracuda Networks counter-sued with IBM-obtained patents in July 2008.[10] On 19 May 2011, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office issued a Final Rejection[11] (a determination by the patent examiner that the claims in a patent application are unpatentable, which is followed by the closure of the application) in the reexamination of Trend Micro's U.S. patent 5623600.[12]

Features

[edit]

ClamAV includes a command-line scanner, automatic database updater, and a scalable multi-threaded daemon running on an anti-virus engine from a shared library.[3] The application features a Milter interface for sent mail and on-demand scanning. It recognizes:

The ClamAV virus database is updated at least every four hours and as of 10 February 2017 contained over 5,760,000 virus signatures[13] with the daily update Virus DB number at 23040.[14][15]

Real-time file scanning

[edit]

In older Linux application versions, ClamAV did support real-time protection via the Fanotify add-on for the Linux kernel (version 3.8 and later.)[16] Alternatively, one could use ClamFS (for any Unix-like operating system supporting FUSE).

Nowadays, the Real-Time Protection in Linux Systems, is provided through ClamAV's ClamOnAcc application (under the name of "On-Access Scanning") – which uses Clamd to provide real-time protection by scanning files when they are accessed.[17]

In other words, the On-Access Scanner can detect and prevent access to malicious files based on the verdict received from Clamd.[17] By default, it operates in "notify-only mode", alerting users of any threats detected without actively blocking file access.[17]

Enabling "prevention mode" can considerably impact performance, especially in commonly accessed directories, so it is advised to use it judiciously.[17]

In order to use ClamOnAcc, users need to first run clamd and then start the On-Access Scanner as root (to leverage its kernel event detection and intervention capabilities).[17]

Configuration for On-Access Scanning is primarily done through clamd.conf, with additional options available in the On-Access Scanning User Guide.[17]

Users can run multiple instances of ClamOnAcc simultaneously with different configurations, allowing for customized protection settings for various directories.[17]

ClamOnAcc (v0.102+) is a client application that operates alongside clamd (the ClamAV daemon), to perform On-Access Scanning.[17]

Regarding previous versions that were meant for Microsoft Windows, a free, open-source app called Clam Sentinel did use to detect file changes and scanned modified files using ClamWin.[18] It did work with Windows 98 and later. In addition to on-access scanning, it used to feature optional system change messages and proactive heuristic protection.[19]

Effectiveness

[edit]

In the 2008 AV-TEST comparison of antivirus tools, ClamAV scored poorly in on-demand detection, avoiding false positives, and rootkit detection.[20]

In a Shadowserver six-month test between June and December 2011, ClamAV detected over 75.45% of all viruses tested, putting it in fifth place behind AhnLab, Avira, BitDefender and Avast. AhnLab, the top antivirus, detected 80.28%.[21]

In 2022 Splunk conducted an efficacy study involving 416,561 malware samples sourced from MalwareBazaar, bucketed as follows: 106135 Banking Trojans (trojans targeted towards stealing financial information); 26875 Botnets (malware for making the victim a part of a botnet); 190371 Information Stealers (programs designed to steal client information. E.g. Keyloggers); 52422 Loaders (program that loads one or more other malicious programs – that is, a stager that fetches harmful things directly into memory); 1321 Miners (crypto currency miners); 30251 RATs (Remote access tools. E.g. Backdoors); and 8273 Trojans (a generic multipurpose malware that harms the user in different ways – generally disguises itself and delivered by tricking the user). Splunk's study concluded ClamAV was 59.94% effective overall at detecting commodity malware – being able to detect 249,696/416,561 samples.[22]

In that same study, ClamAV performed relatively well at detecting certain types of malware in certain types of files (E.g. DOCX files, DIL files, ELF files, DOC files and EXE files), but was less effective in detecting malware in JAR files, JS files, VBS files, Z files, RAR files, and XLSB files. In addition, ClamAV performed well in detecting a few top level categories of malware like Trojans & Botnets but performed poorly on other malware types like Crypto Miners, RATs and Info Stealers.[23]

Unofficial databases

[edit]

The ClamAV engine can be reliably used to detect several kinds of malicious files. In particular, some phishing emails can be detected using antivirus techniques. However, false positive rates are inherently higher than those of traditional malware detection.[24]

There are several unofficial databases for ClamAV:

  • Sanesecurity is an organization that maintains a number of such databases; in addition, they distribute and classify a number of similar databases from other parties, such as Porcupine, Julian Field, MalwarePatrol.[25]
  • SecuriteInfo.com also provides additional signatures for ClamAV.[26]

ClamAV Unofficial Signatures are mainly used by system administrators to filter email messages.[27] Detections of these groups should be scored, rather than causing an outright block of the "infected" message.[25]

Platforms

[edit]

Linux, BSD

[edit]

ClamAV is available for Linux and BSD-based operating systems.[3] In most cases it is available through the distribution's repositories for installation.

On Linux servers ClamAV can be run in daemon mode, servicing requests to scan files sent from other processes. These can include mail exchange programs, files on Samba shares, or packets of data passing through a proxy server.

On Linux and BSD desktops ClamAV provides on-demand scanning of individual files, directories or the whole PC.[3]

macOS

[edit]

macOS Server has included ClamAV since version 10.4. It is used within the operating system's email service. A paid-for graphical user interface is available from Canimaan Software Ltd[28] in the form of ClamXav.[29] Additionally, Fink, Homebrew and MacPorts have ported ClamAV.

Another program which uses the ClamAV engine on macOS is Counteragent. Working alongside the Eudora Internet Mail Server program, Counteragent scans emails for viruses using ClamAV and also optionally provides spam filtering through SpamAssassin.

OpenVMS

[edit]

ClamAV for OpenVMS is available for DEC Alpha and Itanium platforms. The build process is simple and provides basic functionality, including library, the clamscan utility, the clamd daemon, and freshclam for update.[30]

Windows

[edit]

There are IA-32 and x64 variants of ClamAV available for Windows; additionally, Cisco's Immunet uses ClamAV as its engine.[31]

OS/2

[edit]

A port of ClamAV is available for OS/2 (including eComStation and ArcaOS) with a native UI written in REXX.[32][33]

Graphical interfaces

[edit]

Since ClamAV does not include a graphical user interface (GUI) but instead is run from the command line, a number of third-party developers have written GUIs for the application for various platforms and uses.

These include:

ClamTk 6.18 running on openSUSE
  • Linux
    • ClamTk using gtk3-perl; project is named for the Tk libraries that were used when it began[34][35]
    • KlamAV for TDE (development of the original KDE version was discontinued in 2009[36])
    • wbmclamav is a webmin module to manage Clam AntiVirus[37]
  • macOS
    • ClamXav is a port which includes a graphical user interfaces and has a "sentry" service which can watch for changes or new files in many cases. There is also an update and scanning scheduler through a cron job facilitated by the graphical interface. ClamXav can detect malware specific to macOS, Unix, or Windows. The ClamXav application and the ClamAV engine are updated regularly.[38] ClamXav is written and sold by Canimaan Software Ltd.[28]
    • Tiger Cache Cleaner is shareware software which installs and presents a graphic interface for using ClamAV to scan for viruses, and provides other unrelated functions.
  • Microsoft Windows
  • OS/2

ClamWin

[edit]
ClamWin running on Windows 11
Main article: ClamWin Free Antivirus

ClamWin is a graphical user interface front-end ClamWin Pty Ltd. developed for ClamAV on Microsoft Windows. Features include on-demand (user-started) scanning, automatic updates, scheduled scanning, and integration with File Explorer and Microsoft Outlook. ClamWin does not provide on-access scanning. A Firefox add-on enables ClamWin to scan downloaded files.[40][41] Several other extensions allow users to process downloaded files with any software and scan the files with ClamWin.[42][43][44][45]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

ClamAV

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia

ClamAV is an open-source antivirus engine under the GNU General Public License, designed for detecting trojans, viruses, , and other malicious threats, with a primary focus on systems for file and scanning.
It features a scalable multi-threaded daemon for background scanning, command-line tools for on-demand file inspection, and support for automatic updates to its signature database, enabling detection across numerous file formats and archive types.
Originally developed by Polish programmer Tomasz Kojm and first released on May 8, 2002, ClamAV emerged as a response to the lack of free antivirus solutions for servers, evolving into a widely adopted standard for open-source mail gateway protection.
Since 2016, its development has been led by Cisco's Intelligence Group, which has enhanced its capabilities for enterprise use, including integration in and containerized environments, though it remains less suited for high-performance real-time desktop antivirus compared to commercial alternatives.

History

Origins and Early Development

ClamAV originated as an open-source antivirus project initiated by Tomasz Kojm, a Polish computer science student, who released its first version, 0.10, on May 8, 2002. The engine was designed primarily for systems to enable server-side scanning of email attachments for , addressing a gap in free tools suitable for mail gateways where proprietary often dominated. Kojm's motivation stemmed from the need for a lightweight, customizable detection system that could integrate into open-source environments without licensing costs, leveraging signature-based methods to identify known threats. Early development focused on core functionality, including a command-line scanner and basic daemon for background operations, with the project licensed under the GNU General Public License (GPL) to encourage community contributions. By , ClamAV had evolved into a multi-threaded toolkit supporting flexible scanning utilities, reflecting Kojm's ongoing maintenance and research into antivirus engine improvements, such as enhanced for signatures. The project's growth during this period relied on volunteer developers worldwide, who expanded its database of definitions through collaborative updates, establishing it as a viable alternative for resource-constrained servers. Initial releases emphasized reliability over comprehensive detection rates, prioritizing false positive minimization in scenarios.

Acquisition and Maintenance by Cisco

In 2007, ClamAV was acquired by , a cybersecurity firm specializing in network intrusion detection and prevention systems, which began contributing to its development while preserving its open-source status. Sourcefire's involvement enhanced ClamAV's signature database and integration capabilities, leveraging the company's expertise in . On July 23, 2013, announced a definitive agreement to acquire for approximately $2.7 billion, with the deal closing on October 7, 2013. This acquisition integrated 's technologies, including ClamAV, into 's portfolio, transferring maintenance responsibilities to without altering ClamAV's open-source licensing under the GNU General Public License. Post-acquisition, affirmed its commitment to the project's community-driven model, emphasizing continued public releases of updates and signatures. Since 2013, ClamAV has been maintained by Cisco's Intelligence Group, which handles daily signature updates—averaging over 1.5 million new samples processed annually—and coordinates development releases, such as version 1.0 in 2023 introducing improved performance and parsing engines. integrates ClamAV into Cisco's broader security ecosystem for endpoint and network protection while sustaining independent usability for non-Cisco users. This maintenance has ensured regular vulnerability patches and feature enhancements, though critics note potential influences from Cisco's commercial priorities on update prioritization.

Key Milestones and Updates

maintained ClamAV's open-source status post-acquisition, integrating it into the division while committing to community-driven development and regular updates. A significant milestone occurred in late 2022 with the release of ClamAV 1.0.0, the first version to reach the 1.x series after 20 years in the 0.x branch, introducing foundational improvements for long-term stability. This version was designated as the initial (LTS) release under the project's EOL policy, guaranteeing at least three years of support including security patches and signature updates. Feature releases accelerated thereafter, with ClamAV 1.2.0 launched on August 28, 2023, as a stable update focusing on enhanced detection capabilities and bug fixes alongside patch versions for prior branches. ClamAV 1.3.0 followed as another feature release on February 7, 2024, accompanied by security patches for 1.2.2 and 1.0.5 to address vulnerabilities. The project enforced its EOL policy by announcing the end of support for the 0.103 LTS branch on August 7, 2024, with signature updates ceasing after September 14, 2024, urging migrations to newer LTS versions like 1.0. More recently, ClamAV 1.5.0 was released on October 7, 2025, incorporating FIPS-compliant signature verification, metadata enhancements for URIs in and PDFs, and SHA-256 caching upgrades, followed by a 1.5.1 patch on October 16, 2025, to resolve PE file and ZIP scanning performance issues.

Technical Overview

Core Components and Architecture

ClamAV's architecture centers on a with libclamav as the foundational that implements the core antivirus engine for detection. This thread-safe library handles file parsing, signature matching, and scanning of diverse formats including executables (PE, ELF, Mach-O), archives (ZIP, RAR, 7z), and documents (PDF, HTML, RTF), enabling integration into various applications for virus scanning. The engine supports both standard signature-based detection and advanced bytecode signatures executed via an LLVM-based runtime or custom interpreter, allowing for complex behavioral analysis without compromising performance. The primary runtime component is clamd, a multi-threaded daemon that leverages libclamav to provide scalable, on-demand scanning services, typically over TCP or Unix sockets. Clamd loads signature databases into at startup for rapid access, reducing I/O overhead during scans, and processes requests from clients like gateways or file upload handlers. Configuration via clamd.conf allows tuning of thread counts, max file sizes, and scan heuristics, supporting high-throughput environments such as mail servers. For real-time protection on , clamonacc (introduced in version 0.103.0 as of September 2019) separates on-access scanning from clamd, using kernel-level fanotify or to monitor events and trigger scans asynchronously. Supporting tools enhance database management and standalone operation: freshclam automates downloading and updating signed databases from official mirrors, ensuring timely protection against new threats, while clamscan offers a non-daemonized for one-off scans directly invoking libclamav. Additional utilities like sigtool for inspection and clambc for testing facilitate development and debugging, with clamav-milter integrating scanning into or Postfix for email filtering. This component ecosystem promotes efficiency, as the daemon handles persistent loads while libraries and tools enable flexible deployment across systems and integration via APIs.

Signature-Based Detection Mechanism

ClamAV's signature-based detection mechanism operates by comparing byte-level characteristics of scanned files against a predefined database of signatures, enabling identification of known threats through exact or pattern-based matching. The engine, implemented in libclamav, loads signatures from digitally signed compressed database (CVD) files, including main.cvd for stable signatures and daily.cvd for recent additions, which collectively contain hundreds of thousands of entries compiled from community and vendor contributions. During a scan, files are read sequentially, with preprocessing steps such as normalization for text or content—converting to lowercase, removing whitespace, tags, or comments—and automatic unpacking for compressed formats like UPX-packed (PE) files to expose embedded payloads for inspection. Hash-based signatures form a foundational component, targeting static malware by computing cryptographic checksums of entire files or subsections and verifying against stored values. Supported hashes include MD5 (in .hdb files), SHA1, and SHA256 (in .hsb files), with matches requiring both the hash and file size to align precisely, as even a single byte alteration invalidates the result. For PE executables, specialized signatures cover section hashes (.mdb/.msb files) or import table hashes (.imp files), created via tools like sigtool (e.g., sigtool --md5 file.exe > signature.hdb), ensuring reliable detection of unaltered samples but limiting utility against polymorphic variants. Extended body-based signatures provide for code snippets, using a format of MalwareName:TargetType:Offset:HexSignature, where the hexadecimal string represents byte sequences searchable via regex-like wildcards (e.g., ?? for any byte). Offsets can be absolute (e.g., 0), relative to file end (EOF-n), entry point (EP+n), or floating (e.g., 10,5 for positions 10-15 bytes), with TargetType restricting matches to specific file classes like executables or archives. Stored in .ndb files, these signatures leverage efficient search algorithms post-normalization, offering greater flexibility than deprecated .db formats by incorporating version-specific functionality levels for compatibility. Advanced variants enhance precision: logical signatures (.ldb files) combine conditions with operators like for multi-pattern rules, while bytecode signatures (.cbc files) execute custom ClamAV for dynamic , such as emulation or unpacker routines, compiled via the introduced in later releases. rules, integrated since version 0.99, allow importing external pattern sets for modular detection. This layered system prioritizes speed through indexed databases and targeted filtering, with custom signatures integrable via additional .ldb or .ndb files in standard directories.

Features

Scanning and Daemon Functionality

ClamAV supports on-demand file and directory scanning primarily through the command-line tool clamscan, which utilizes the libclamav library to detect signatures without requiring the daemon. This tool loads the virus database into at each invocation, enabling standalone operation for one-time scans, and accepts options such as --recursive for directory traversal, --infected to report only affected files, and --remove to delete detected threats automatically. Additional controls include --max-filesize to limit scan scope by file size and --log=FILE for directing output to a specified log file, with verbose mode (--verbose) providing detailed progress during execution. The clamd daemon implements multi-threaded scanning functionality, running continuously to serve scan requests over Unix sockets or TCP, thereby avoiding repeated database loading for improved efficiency in high-volume environments. Configured via clamd.conf, it supports directives like LocalSocket for socket paths, LogTime for timestamped logging, and ScanOnAccess to enable real-time monitoring, with signals such as SIGHUP for log reopening and SIGUSR2 for database reloading. Clients interact with clamd using commands like SCAN for file analysis or PING for connectivity checks, and tools such as clamdscan provide a command-line interface to submit scans without altering engine settings. On-access scanning integrates with clamd on systems (kernel version 3.8 or later) via the fanotify mechanism, allowing real-time interception and scanning of file access events to block proactively. This feature, managed through clamd.conf options including OnAccessIncludePath for monitored directories and OnAccessPrevention for access denial on infection, requires elevated privileges and excludes specific users or paths to prevent loops, with the clamonacc client handling event processing from ClamAV version 0.102 onward. Monitoring utilities like clamdtop offer ncurses-based oversight of daemon threads and performance.

Database Management and Updates

ClamAV maintains its detection capabilities through a collection of signature databases stored in compressed ClamAV Virus Database (CVD) format, including main.cvd for established signatures, daily.cvd for emerging threats, and bytecode.cvd for detection logic. These files are typically located in a system directory such as /var/lib/clamav and can be unpacked or inspected using the sigtool for verification or custom management. Custom text-based s can supplement official databases by placing .txt or .ldb files in the same directory, though they require manual reloading in the scanning engine. The freshclam utility handles automated downloading and updating of official databases from ClamAV's distribution servers, querying version information via DNS TXT from current.cvd.clamav.net to determine if updates are available. For efficiency, it prioritizes incremental CDIFF patches—small delta files representing signature changes (e.g., 60 KB for thousands of additions)—over full CVD downloads, with full files fetched only if CDIFFs are unavailable or corrupted; CDIFFs are retained for the prior 90 days. Each update verifies digital signatures for integrity and, by default, tests the databases before applying them, notifying the clamd daemon to reload without restart. Official databases receive updates once or twice daily, incorporating community-submitted samples via ClamAV's malware reporting portal to address new variants promptly. Administrators configure freshclam via freshclam.conf to specify update intervals (e.g., daemon mode checking every 2 hours by default in some distributions), proxy settings, or local mirrors for high-volume environments to reduce bandwidth and latency. freshclam implements a self-imposed cool-down mechanism upon receiving HTTP 429 (rate limit) or 403 (forbidden) responses from the CDN, suspending further update attempts until a timestamp stored in freshclam.dat expires (typically 24 hours for 403 errors). Such responses may occur due to the use of end-of-life or outdated ClamAV versions (e.g., the 0.103 series after its end-of-support periods), excessive update frequency, or IP-based blocking by the CDN. The default reliance on DNS TXT record checks helps minimize unnecessary HTTP requests that could trigger restrictions. Developers recommend limiting update checks to no more than once per hour to avoid rate limiting. Upgrading to the latest ClamAV version prevents blocks associated with EOL releases. In environments with multiple hosts (more than 10), establishing a private mirror using cvdupdate reduces load on the official CDN. Alternative database sources, such as the mirror provided by Microsoft at https://packages.microsoft.com/clamav/, may be configured in freshclam.conf. No official exemption process exists for persistent blocks. Manual invocation with sudo freshclam suffices for one-time updates, while jobs or services automate the process; logs in /var/log/clamav/freshclam.log confirm successful "ClamAV update process started" entries. For offline scenarios, databases can be manually downloaded from database.clamav.net (e.g., daily.cvd), though automation via freshclam is recommended for currency. Third-party signatures from sources like Sanesecurity require separate scripts for integration, as they are not part of official updates.

Effectiveness

Empirical Detection Performance

In independent evaluations, ClamAV has demonstrated variable detection rates depending on the sample sets and testing methodologies employed. For instance, in the evaluation for conducted in September 2023, ClamXAV—a graphical interface utilizing the ClamAV engine—achieved 100% detection of widespread and prevalent samples collected over the preceding four months, earning a perfect score of 6 out of 6 in the protection category. This performance reflects ClamAV's strength in signature-based identification of established threats updated in its daily virus definitions. However, broader empirical assessments of ClamAV's core engine reveal lower overall accuracy against diverse corpora. A 2022 analysis by examined ClamAV's performance on a of 416,561 commodity samples, finding a detection rate of 59.94% (249,696 samples identified). This test highlighted ClamAV's reliance on static signatures, which excels for well-known variants but underperforms on obfuscated or less common payloads without integrated behavioral analysis or components.
Test SourceDateMalware Sample FocusDetection Rate
(via ClamXAV)September 2023Prevalent (past 4 months)100%
Commodity Malware Analysis2022416,561 commodity samples59.94%
Earlier benchmarks further illustrate limitations; a 2015 AV-TEST Linux security package evaluation reported ClamAV's detection of Linux-specific threats at approximately 66%, placing it among lower performers compared to commercial alternatives. These results underscore that while ClamAV provides reliable scanning for known signatures in server and gateway contexts, its empirical effectiveness diminishes against zero-day or evasive threats, often necessitating supplementation with other detection layers.

Benchmarks and Comparative Analysis

Independent benchmarks have evaluated ClamAV's malware detection efficacy using diverse datasets, revealing variable performance depending on malware types and test methodologies. In a 2022 Splunk analysis of commodity samples, ClamAV achieved an overall detection rate of 59.94%, identifying 249,696 out of 416,561 malicious files, with stronger results against certain file types like executables (up to 80% in some categories) but weaker against others such as scripts. An earlier 2015 AV-TEST evaluation of Linux security tools against Windows and Linux yielded a low 15.3% detection rate for ClamAV, highlighting deficiencies in cross-platform threat coverage compared to contemporaries. These figures contrast with commercial antivirus solutions, which routinely score 98-100% in standardized tests like AV-TEST's annual Windows assessments, underscoring ClamAV's reliance on signature-based methods without advanced behavioral heuristics. Scanning speed represents another benchmarked aspect, where ClamAV often underperforms relative to optimized commercial engines due to its thorough, resource-intensive signature matching and lack of aggressive caching in default configurations. OPSWAT documentation notes ClamAV's slower throughput stems from engine design prioritizing detection depth over velocity, with scan times potentially extending to hours for large datasets—e.g., full system scans on multi-terabyte drives reported at 11-12 hours on RHEL 8.10 systems versus 2 hours on older versions. In contrast, enterprise tools like those from or achieve sub-minute scans for similar volumes through parallel processing and , as evidenced in 2025 antivirus comparisons where ClamAV lagged in real-time file processing. Comparative analyses position ClamAV as suitable for server-side and gateway duties rather than endpoint , where its open-source nature enables customization but trails suites in comprehensive threat intelligence. For instance, while ClamAV detected 75.45% of viruses in a 2011 Shadowserver honeypot test (fifth among participants), modern commercial alternatives like Kaspersky maintain near-perfect scores across zero-day and polymorphic threats via integration, per AV-Comparatives' 2023 business tests. User-driven evaluations, such as those in 2025 benchmarks, affirm ClamAV's "decent baseline" for known signatures but inferior zero-day handling against leaders like , which incorporate cloud-based analytics for 99%+ efficacy. This gap reflects ClamAV's community-maintained database updates, which, while frequent, lack the research pipelines of vendors investing in global threat feeds.
Benchmark SourceDetection RateMalware FocusYear
Commodity Malware Test59.94%Files (executables, scripts, etc.)2022
AV-TEST Linux Tools15.3%Windows/Linux malware2015
Commercial AV Avg. ()98-100%Multi-platform threatsAnnual
Such disparities emphasize ClamAV's role as a cost-effective supplementary tool in layered defenses, rather than a standalone primary antivirus, particularly in environments prioritizing open-source compatibility over peak performance.

Limitations and Real-World Critiques

ClamAV's signature-based detection mechanism, while effective against known threats, exhibits limitations in identifying zero-day and advanced persistent threats that employ or polymorphism, as it lacks robust behavioral analysis or components found in commercial alternatives. A 2022 Splunk analysis of commodity detection reported ClamAV's overall effectiveness at 59.94%, performing adequately against certain file types like executables but faltering on others such as documents and scripts. Independent tests, such as those by Wizcase in 2022, confirmed near-perfect detection of standard EICAR test samples but failure to identify specific trojan variants, underscoring its reliance on static signatures over dynamic heuristics. False positive rates pose practical challenges, particularly in enterprise environments where erroneous detections disrupt workflows. User reports and issues document instances of widespread false alarms on legitimate archives and attachments, with one 2022 case citing 0.78% false positives across thousands of files in a tar.gz archive. ClamAV's official acknowledges the need for false positive submissions, which can take 48 hours or more to resolve via updates, potentially leading to operational delays. While third-party providers claim low false positive rates, real-world deployments, including in gateways, frequently encounter issues with heuristics flagging benign content. Scanning performance remains a notable drawback, with full scans on large filesystems often requiring excessive time due to sequential processing and signature loading overhead. reports from 2022-2023 highlight scans taking over 24 hours for systems with millions of files, exacerbated by options like PDF and image scanning that can halve throughput without them. OPSWAT analyses attribute slowness to ClamAV's thoroughness but note it lags behind optimized commercial engines in speed, recommending daemon mode (clamd) for mitigation though this introduces memory demands during concurrent updates. File size restrictions cap individual scans at 4GB, necessitating workarounds like splitting for larger artifacts, which risks incomplete coverage. A further practical limitation affects database updates via freshclam, especially in high-volume environments or when using outdated (end-of-life) versions of ClamAV. The ClamAV content delivery network (CDN) may return HTTP 429 (rate limit) or 403 (forbidden) errors due to excessive update requests or blocked legacy versions, causing freshclam to enforce a self-imposed cool-down period (typically 24 hours) recorded in freshclam.dat, during which updates are blocked. This can delay access to new virus signatures, reducing protection against emerging threats. Recommended mitigations include restricting update frequency to once per hour, upgrading to a supported version, configuring alternative mirrors (such as https://packages.microsoft.com/clamav/), or establishing a private mirror using cvdupdate for networks with more than 10 hosts to alleviate CDN load. Detailed handling and configuration guidance appears in the Database Management and Updates section. In comparative evaluations, ClamAV underperforms commercial antivirus suites in holistic protection, particularly for endpoint use, where it excels more as a supplementary tool for mail servers or file uploads rather than primary defense. Critiques from practitioners emphasize its unsuitability as a standalone solution on desktops or against evolving threats, with community consensus viewing it as "worthless" for broad detection without layered defenses like application whitelisting. These constraints stem from resource-limited open-source development, prioritizing stability over cutting-edge evasion resistance, though variants like ClamXAV have achieved 100% scores in targeted prevalent tests as of 2023.

Deployment and Platforms

Supported Operating Systems

ClamAV is primarily engineered for operating systems, with core functionality relying on compliance for features like multi-threaded scanning and daemon processes. Official builds and documentation emphasize compatibility with distributions (64-bit only since version 1.4.0, released August 2024), (versions 13 and 14 on x86_64), and other BSD variants, where it integrates via package managers or source compilation. Support extends to Solaris and historical Unix systems through portable , though testing focuses on modern distributions like those based on for dependency compatibility. macOS receives dedicated PKG installers as universal binaries, accommodating Intel x86_64 and arm64 architectures across recent releases including macOS 15.3 Sequoia, 14.7 Sonoma, and 13.7 Ventura. These enable command-line tools like clamscan and freshclam for database updates, with Homebrew providing an alternative installation path for broader macOS versions. Windows support is provided via official 32-bit and 64-bit binaries compatible with and subsequent versions, including server editions; this port adapts the engine for Win32 APIs while retaining core detection logic. Graphical frontends like ClamWin leverage this backend for desktop use, though daemon functionality (clamd) requires additional configuration. Emerging platform enhancements include build improvements for AIX in version 1.5.0 beta (March 2025), facilitating compilation on IBM's Unix variant. Cross-compilation from environments supports deployment on less common systems, but official validation prioritizes the aforementioned platforms to ensure reliability in signature verification and scanning performance.

Common Use Cases and Integrations

ClamAV finds primary application in server-side detection, particularly for scanning attachments on gateways to intercept viruses before delivery to clients. The clamd daemon enables efficient, multi-threaded operation, often integrated with mail transfer agents (MTAs) like Postfix via amavisd-new, which acts as an SMTP proxy to route messages through ClamAV for real-time of inbound and outbound traffic. This setup commonly pairs with SpamAssassin for combined spam and virus filtering, processing attachments in formats such as executables, PDFs, and archives. For broader file protection, ClamAV supports on-access scanning through its fanotify-based engine (introduced in version 0.103), monitoring filesystem events to detect malware during writes or executions on Unix-like systems, suitable for shared storage or backup servers. Periodic batch scans using the clamscan utility address ad-hoc needs, such as verifying directories for known threats after system updates or user uploads, with options for multi-threading to handle large volumes efficiently. In HTTP proxy environments, integration with Squid via the SquidClamAV ICAP module enables transparent scanning of web downloads, including encrypted traffic if decryption is configured, preventing malware ingress through browsers. Additional integrations extend ClamAV to application layers, such as embedding libclamav in for server-side validation of uploaded files in web services, or linking with tools like Wazuh for centralized logging and alerting on detections. In messaging platforms like Rocket.Chat, it scans attachments in real-time to block threats during uploads. These uses leverage ClamAV's open-source nature for cost-free deployment in Linux-based infrastructures, though efficacy depends on fresh signature updates from , which catalog over 8 million threats as of recent benchmarks.

Patent Infringement Litigation

In January 2008, filed a complaint with the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) alleging that infringed U.S. No. 5,623,600 through its integration of the open-source ClamAV antivirus engine into email security gateways and firewalls. The patent, issued in 1997, claims a method for detecting computer viruses via pattern-matching techniques applied at network gateways to inspect data streams for malicious code before transmission to protected systems. had initially contacted in September 2006 regarding the alleged infringement, demanding either removal of ClamAV from products or licensing fees, but negotiations failed, leading to the ITC action. Barracuda responded by filing a countersuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of in July 2008, asserting that Trend Micro's claims were an attempt to monopolize gateway antivirus scanning and seeking to invalidate the patent on grounds of and obviousness. To bolster its defense, acquired patents from to enable cross-licensing threats against , framing the dispute as a broader threat to adoption in commercial appliances. The litigation extended to similar claims against Panda Software, another vendor incorporating ClamAV, highlighting risks to over one million ClamAV deployments worldwide. The case drew significant opposition from the open-source community, with the launching a of products in February 2008, citing the suit as an example of proprietary vendors using to stifle competition. publicly solicited submissions from developers to challenge the 's validity, emphasizing collective defense against assertions. maintained that the was "tested and valid," having withstood prior challenges, and argued its claims targeted imported infringing products rather than ClamAV itself. The dispute was resolved through an out-of-court settlement, the terms of which were not publicly disclosed, allowing to continue using ClamAV without apparent restrictions. No ITC exclusion order was issued, and the case underscored ongoing tensions between holders and open-source projects, with critics arguing that broad software s like the '600 hinder innovation in antivirus technologies.

Vulnerabilities and Security Incidents

ClamAV has encountered multiple vulnerabilities, predominantly in its parsing engines for complex file formats such as PDF, OLE2, and DMG, often resulting in denial-of-service (DoS) conditions through buffer overflows or out-of-bounds reads. These issues stem from improper handling of malformed inputs during scanning, potentially allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to crash the scanning process. While no large-scale exploits in production environments have been publicly documented, proof-of-concept code for some flaws has circulated, underscoring the risks for unpatched deployments in gateways or file servers. In September 2024, disclosed CVE-2024-20505, an out-of-bounds read in the PDF parsing module affecting ClamAV versions 1.4.0, 1.3.2, and earlier, which could be triggered by crafted PDF files during scans. Concurrently, CVE-2024-20506 was identified in the ClamD service module, involving improper symlink handling that risked arbitrary file access. Both were addressed in security patches released on September 4, 2024, for versions 1.4.1, 1.3.2, 1.0.7, and 0.103.12, with recommendations to update immediately to mitigate exploitation. A critical heap-based , tracked as CVE-2025-20128, was patched in January 2025, affecting the OLE2 decryption routine in ClamAV's parser. This flaw enabled attackers to overrun allocated heap buffers via specially crafted files, leading to process termination and DoS; a proof-of-concept exploit was made available shortly after disclosure, prompting urgent advisories from . Exploitation required submitting malicious files for scanning but posed risks to integrated systems like secure appliances. Further vulnerabilities emerged in June 2025, including CVE-2025-20260, a write in the PDF scanning processes that could cause DoS or potential code execution, patched in ClamAV 1.4.3 and 1.0.9. Additionally, an out-of-bounds read in (UDF) processing (no specific CVE assigned in initial reports) allowed information disclosure or crashes via malformed UDF files. These updates emphasized the ongoing need for timely database and engine updates, as ClamAV's open-source nature facilitates rapid community reporting but also exposes it to parser complexity inherent in antivirus engines.

Community and Extensions

Third-Party Databases and Tools

Third-party signature databases extend ClamAV's detection capabilities beyond its official virus definitions, often targeting specialized threats such as emails, spam, and emerging variants that may evade standard signatures. These databases are maintained by independent contributors and integrated via user-configured updates, potentially improving detection rates for email-based attacks but introducing risks of false positives if not properly tested. Prominent providers include Sanesecurity, which supplies signatures focused on phishing, spear-phishing, fake lottery scams, and delivered via email, claiming to enhance ClamAV's effectiveness against macro and malware. SecuriteInfo offers additional signatures emphasizing high detection rates for specific malware families, reportedly achieving up to 90% coverage in certain benchmarks compared to ClamAV's official database around 10%. Other sources like MalwarePatrol, FOXHOLE, and OITC provide complementary sets for threats including URL-based and spam patterns. Users must verify these databases for compatibility and monitor for false positives, as Sanesecurity documents procedures for reporting and decoding problematic signatures to minimize disruptions. Tools for managing these databases include the open-source clamav-unofficial-sigs script, which automates downloading, testing, and updating signatures from Sanesecurity, SecuriteInfo, MalwarePatrol, FOXHOLE, and OITC providers. This Bash script, hosted on , supports configuration options for quarantine testing and integration with ClamAV's freshclam or clamd, enabling seamless incorporation into scanning workflows. While ClamAV's built-in tools like freshclam offer limited third-party support, community scripts like this fill the gap for automated maintenance, though administrators are advised to review logs for signature conflicts or performance impacts.

Graphical Interfaces and Derivatives

ClamAV, designed as a command-line antivirus toolkit, lacks a native graphical interface, prompting the development of third-party front-ends to enhance accessibility for desktop users. These graphical tools typically provide on-demand scanning, database updates, and basic configuration options without altering ClamAV's core engine. ClamTk serves as a prominent graphical front-end for systems, including distributions. Implemented in with the GTK+ toolkit, it offers a straightforward interface for initiating file and directory scans, viewing quarantine results, and managing virus signature updates via freshclam. Intended for lightweight, on-demand use, ClamTk supports features like recursive scanning and exclusion lists but does not enable real-time monitoring. It remains available through package managers and repositories as of 2025. For Windows users, ClamWin integrates ClamAV's scanning capabilities into a dedicated graphical application. Released under the GPL, ClamWin includes tools for manual scans, scheduled tasks, and integration with Windows Explorer for context-menu scanning, though it explicitly forgoes on-access real-time protection to maintain compatibility with the engine's design. The project, hosted on , continues to distribute updates aligning with ClamAV's database revisions, with version 0.103.3 supporting Windows up to recent builds. Additional derivatives include KDE-oriented front-ends like ClamAV-GUI, which extend scanning functionality with scheduler integration and file manager plugins for distributions using Plasma desktop environments. These tools, often hosted on , emphasize simplicity and automation, such as timed scans and /Konqueror context menus, while relying on ClamAV's backend for detection. Cross-platform efforts, like experimental Electron-based GUIs, aim to unify interfaces but remain in early development stages without widespread adoption.

References

  1. https://www.clamav.net/
  2. https://github.com/Cisco-Talos/clamav
  3. https://docs.manage.security.cisco.com/multicloud/c-anti-malware.html
  4. https://peq42.com/blog/clamav-an-open-source-anti-virus-for-servers/
  5. https://linuxcommandlibrary.com/man/clamav
  6. https://blog.clamav.net/2016/
  7. https://linuxsecurity.expert/tools/clamav/
  8. https://blog.clamav.net/2022/05/celebrating-20-years-of-clamav.html
  9. https://archive.fosdem.org/2006/index/speakers/speakers_kojm.html
  10. https://archive.fosdem.org/2006/2006/index/interviews/interviews_kojm.html
  11. https://blog.clamav.net/2013/07/a-continued-commitment-to-open-source.html
  12. https://newsroom.cisco.com/c/r/newsroom/en/us/a/y2013/m10/cisco-completes-acquisition-of-sourcefire-1.html
  13. https://blog.clamav.net/2013/10/cisco-community-and-open-source.html
  14. https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/csa/cisco-sa-amp-imm-dll-tu79hvkO.html
  15. https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-clamav-hDffu6t
  16. https://www.theregister.com/2022/12/01/clamav_puts_out_version_1/
  17. https://docs.clamav.net/faq/faq-eol.html
  18. https://blog.clamav.net/2023/08/clamav-120-feature-version-and-111-102.html
  19. https://blog.clamav.net/2023/11/clamav-130-122-105-released.html
  20. https://blog.clamav.net/2024/08/clamav-0103-lts-end-of-life-announcement.html
  21. https://blog.clamav.net/2025/10/clamav-150-released.html
  22. https://linuxiac.com/clamav-1-5-1-open-source-antivirus-released/
  23. https://docs.clamav.net/manual/Development/libclamav.html
  24. https://docs.clamav.net/
  25. https://docs.clamav.net/manual/Usage.html
  26. https://blog.clamav.net/2019/09/understanding-and-transitioning-to.html
  27. https://docs.clamav.net/manual/Signatures.html
  28. https://docs.clamav.net/manual/Signatures/HashSignatures.html
  29. https://docs.clamav.net/manual/Signatures/ExtendedSignatures.html
  30. https://docs.clamav.net/manual/Usage/Scanning.html
  31. https://linux.die.net/man/1/clamscan
  32. https://docs.clamav.net/manual/Usage/Configuration.html
  33. https://docs.clamav.net/manual/OnAccess.html
  34. https://docs.clamav.net/faq/faq-cvd.html
  35. https://docs.clamav.net/manual/Usage/SignatureManagement.html
  36. https://blog.clamav.net/2021/03/clamav-cvds-cdiffs-and-magic-behind.html
  37. https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/ClamAV
  38. https://docs.clamav.net/faq/faq-freshclam.html
  39. https://github.com/Cisco-Talos/clamav/issues/851
  40. https://blog.clamav.net/2021/11/
  41. https://github.com/extremeshok/clamav-unofficial-sigs
  42. https://www.av-test.org/en/antivirus/home-macos/macos-ventura/september-2023/canimaan-software-clamxav-3.6-235305/
  43. https://www.splunk.com/en_us/blog/security/how-good-is-clamav-at-detecting-commodity-malware.html
  44. https://www.av-test.org/en/news/linux-16-security-packages-against-windows-and-linux-malware-put-to-the-test/
  45. https://www.av-test.org/en/press/test-results/
  46. https://www.opswat.com/docs/mdcore/knowledge-base/why-does-clamav-seem-to-be-slower-than-other-engines-
  47. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/answers/questions/5550992/clamscan-is-taking-11-12hrs-to-complete
  48. https://sergiiblog.com/cybersecurity-linux-antivirus-2025-my-deep-dive-into-clamav-bitdefender-eset-and-what-i-learned-the-hard-way/
  49. https://www.av-comparatives.org/tests/business-security-test-2023-march-june/
  50. https://windowsforum.com/threads/clamav-in-2025-the-open-source-antivirus-powerhouse-for-windows-and-beyond.365849/
  51. https://www.safetydetectives.com/best-antivirus/linux/
  52. https://www.wizcase.com/antivirus/clamav/
  53. https://github.com/Cisco-Talos/clamav/issues/620
  54. https://docs.clamav.net/faq/faq-malware-fp-reports.html
  55. https://portal.smartertools.com/community/a95421/smartermail-virus-scanning.aspx
  56. https://github.com/Cisco-Talos/clamav/issues/833
  57. https://github.com/Cisco-Talos/clamav/issues/590
  58. https://www.reddit.com/r/linux4noobs/comments/65qxtj/why_does_clamav_have_a_file_size_limit/
  59. https://docs.clamav.net/faq/faq-troubleshoot.html
  60. https://docs.clamav.net/appendix/CvdPrivateMirror.html
  61. https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/de9077/so_how_is_clamav_doing/
  62. https://www.clamxav.com/news/2023/av-test-2023/
  63. https://www.reddit.com/r/linux4noobs/comments/1nzl6ka/clamav/
  64. https://blog.clamav.net/2024/08/clamav-140-feature-release-and-clamav.html
  65. https://docs.clamav.net/manual/Development/build-installer-packages.html
  66. https://www.liquidweb.com/blog/install-clamav/
  67. https://docs.clamav.net/faq/faq-win32.html
  68. https://blog.clamav.net/2025/03/clamav-150-beta-now-available.html
  69. https://www.linuxbabe.com/mail-server/postfix-amavis-spamassassin-clamav-ubuntu
  70. https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Complete_Virtual_Mail_Server/amavisd_spamassassin_clamav
  71. https://hackertarget.com/clamav-tutorial-antivirus-linux/
  72. https://transloadit.com/devtips/implementing-server-side-malware-scanning-with-clamav-in-node-js/
  73. https://documentation.wazuh.com/current/user-manual/capabilities/malware-detection/clam-av-logs-collection.html
  74. https://www.rocket.chat/apps/clamav-integration
  75. https://www.crn.com/news/security/205921436/barracuda-fights-trend-micro-patent-infringement-allegations
  76. https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2008/01/barracuda-defends-open-source-antivirus-from-patent-attack/
  77. https://www.willkie.com/publications/2008/09/trend-spotting-recognizing-the-growing-risk-of-i__
  78. https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2008/07/barracuda-bites-back-at-trend-micro-in-clamav-patent-lawsuit/
  79. https://www.networkworld.com/article/810164/lan-wan-trend-micro-stresses-tested-patent-in-trade-case.html
  80. https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/boycottTrendMicro.html
  81. https://wiki.endsoftwarepatents.org/wiki/Invalidating_harmful_patents
  82. https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-clamav-ole2-H549rphA
  83. https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-20505
  84. https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-20506
  85. https://blog.clamav.net/2024/09/clamav-141-132-107-and-010312-security.html
  86. https://securityaffairs.com/173446/uncategorized/cisco-fixed-clamav-dos-flaw.html
  87. https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-20260
  88. https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-clamav-udf-hmwd9nDy
  89. https://blog.clamav.net/
  90. https://docs.clamav.net/manual/Installing/Community-projects.html
  91. https://sanesecurity.com/
  92. https://sanesecurity.com/usage/signatures/
  93. https://sanesecurity.com/usage/linux-scripts/
  94. https://github.com/wusel1007/ClamAV-GUI
  95. https://flathub.org/en/apps/com.gitlab.davem.ClamTk
  96. https://community.linuxmint.com/software/view/clamtk
  97. https://clamwin.com/
  98. https://sourceforge.net/projects/clamwin/
  99. https://store.kde.org/p/1127892/
  100. https://github.com/ivangabriele/clamav-desktop
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.