Hubbry Logo
Chlothar IIChlothar IIMain
Open search
Chlothar II
Community hub
Chlothar II
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Chlothar II
Chlothar II
Chlothar II
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Chlothar II,[a] sometimes called "the Young" (French: le Jeune), (May/June 584 – 18 October 629)[2] was king of the Franks, ruling Neustria (584–629),[3] Burgundy (613–629) and Austrasia (613–623).

Key Information

The son of Chilperic I and his third wife, Fredegund, he started his reign as an infant under the regency of his mother, who was in an uneasy alliance with Chlothar's uncle King Guntram of Burgundy, who died in 592. Chlothar took power upon the death of his mother in 597; though rich, his realm was one of the smallest portions of Francia. He continued his mother's feud with Queen Brunhilda with equal viciousness and bloodshed, finally achieving her execution by dismemberment in 613, after winning the battle that enabled Chlothar to unite Francia under his rule. Like his father, he built up his territories by seizing lands after the deaths of other kings.

His reign was long by contemporary standards, but saw the continuing erosion of royal power to the French nobility and the church against a backdrop of feuding among the Merovingians. The Edict of Paris in 614, concerned with several aspects of appointments to offices and the administration of the kingdom, has been interpreted in different ways by modern historians. In 617 he made the mayor of the Palace a role held for life, an important step in the progress of this office from being first the manager of the royal household to the effective head of government, and eventually the monarch, under Pepin the Short in 751. Chlothar was forced to cede rule over Austrasia to his young son Dagobert I in 623.

Unusually for a Merovingian monarch, he practised monogamy, though early deaths meant that he had three wives. He was generally an ally of the church and, perhaps inspired by the example of his uncle Guntram, his reign seems to lack outrageous acts of murder, the execution of Brunhilda excepted.

Background

[edit]

Frankish territories in the sixth century

[edit]
The kingdom of Chlothar at the start of his reign (yellow). By 613 he had inherited or conquered all of the coloured portions of the map.

The domain of Clothar II was located in the territorial and political framework derived from the Frankish kingdom present at 561 at the death of Clothar, son of Clovis and grandfather of Clothar II.

On the death of Clovis in 511, four kingdoms were established with capitals at Reims, Soissons, Paris, and Orléans, Aquitaine being distributed separately. In the year 550, Clothar I, the last survivor of four brothers reunited the Frankish kingdom, and added Burgundian territory (Burgundia) by conquest.

In 561, the four sons of Clothar I followed the events of 511 similarly and split the kingdom again: Sigebert I in Reims, Chilperic I in Soissons, Charibert I in Paris, and Guntram in Orleans, which then included the Burgundian kingdom territory (Burgundia). They divided Aquitaine separately again. Very quickly, Sigebert moved his capital from Reims to Metz, while Guntram moved his from Orléans to Chalon. On the death of Charibert in 567, the land was again split between the three survivors, of greatest importance Sigebert (Metz) received Paris and Chilperic (Soissons) received Rouen. The names Austrasia and Neustria seem to have appeared as the names of these kingdoms for the first time at this point.

Ambitions of Fredegund

[edit]

In 560, Sigebert and Chilperic married two sisters, daughters of the Visigoth king of Spain Athanagild; princesses Brunhilda, and Galswintha respectively. However Chilperic was still very much attached to his lover and consort, Fredegund, causing Galswintha to wish to return to her homeland in Toledo. In 568 she was murdered and within days, after a brief period of grieving, Chilperic officially married Fredegund and elevated her to a queen of a Frankish kingdom. "After this action his brothers thought that the queen mentioned above had been killed at his command..."[4]

Chilperic agreed, at first, to pay a sum of money to end the feud, but not soon after decided to embark on a series of military operations against Sigebert. This was the beginning of what is called the "royal feud " which did not end until Brunhilda died in 613. The main episodes until the assassination of Chilperic in 584 were as follows: the assassination of Sigebert (575), the imprisonment of Brunhilde and her marriage to a son of Chilperic, and the return of Brunhilda to her son Childebert II, successor of Sigebert.

Moreover, Fredegund strove to ensure her position, since she was from lower origins, by eliminating the sons that Chilperic had with his previous wife Audovera: Merovech and Clovis. Her own children, however, died at a very young age and appeared to be by foul play. When Fredegund had a son in the spring of 584, he would have been the future successor of Chilperic I, if he had lived long enough.

Sources

[edit]
A treaty of King Chlothar II and the Lombards (from the Grandes Chroniques de France manuscript, 14th c.

The main sources from the time are the chronicles of Gregory of Tours and the Chronicle of Fredegar. It is possible, however, that the authors contain a degree of bias in their works; for instance Gregory was a key figure in some of the conflicts of the time. The History of the Franks by Gregory of Tours in the late sixth century only recounts up to 591. It is favorable to Queen Brunhild, Sigebert, and Chilperic but extremely hostile to Fredegund. The Chronicle of Fredegar, beginning in 584, on the other hand is extremely hostile to Brunhild. That chronicle includes:

  • The Biography of Clothar II
  • Clothar II deals with the Lombards

Early life

[edit]

Under Frankish customs, newborns did not receive names initially, in order not to spread concern related to the symbolic name of the Merovingian. Wanting to choose a name based on the development of unrest in the kingdom of the Franks, his father did not baptize him immediately.[5] Chilperic and Fredegund desired to protect their child, since their four older sons may have been victims of murder, and there was much political intrigue at the time. He was raised in secret in the royal villa in Vitry-en-Artois to avoid detection.

In September 584, Chilperic I was murdered after a hunt near his villa of Chelles, perhaps on the order of Queen Brunhilda. This event produced general disorder and unrest.[6] In this time Austrasians plundered parts of Neustria, seizing valuable treasures and goods, as well as important documents.[7] Princess Rigunth, on the way to Spain to marry Prince Reccared, was captured by Duke Didier of Toulouse and was linked in conspiracy with Gondovald, who stole all that remained of her dowry, so that she was forced to abandon the marriage.[8] Wars broke out between rival cities, and Orléans, Blois and Chartres stood against Châteaudun.[9]

Fredegund managed to keep most of the treasury of the state as well as key political figures, such as the generals Ansoald and Audon, although many, such as chamberlain Eberul, abandoned her. She took her son to Vitry and sent a message to Guntram, King of Burgundy, asking him to adopt the child and offer his protection to him in return for exercising his authority over Neustria until the boy came of age.[10]

Childebert II, who was at Meaux when Chilperic was murdered, considered an attack on Paris, but Guntram was ahead of him. Childebert II began negotiations with Brunhilda on one hand, Guntram on the other; Guntram, however, refused many of his requests, including allowing him into Paris. He refused to deliver Fredegund, who, Brunhilda claimed, was behind the regicide of Sigebert I, Clovis, and even Chilperic I.[7]

Guntram convened a meeting of Greater Neustria, in which the court recognized Clothar as the son of Chilperic, although there were some doubts about his paternal identity. It was at this time that they gave him the name Clothar, naming him after his grandfather. Guntram then took legal responsibility of the child, adopting him and becoming his godfather.[7]

Ansoald was responsible for regaining control of cities Neustria had lost since the death of Chilperic. They then swore allegiance to Guntram and Clothar after their capture. Guntram, attempting to restore order in the affairs of Neustria, likely against the advice of Fredegund and, perhaps, to show his authority, replaced key figures in the episcopal see of the church and moved its location.[11] Bishop Promotus of Châteaudun, whose diocese was demoted after the parish council of Paris in 573, saw this as a violation of canon law; after the death of Sigebert I, he demanded to return from exile, and was thus restored much of his personal property.[7]

Two envoys from Brunhilde, Duke Gararic and chamberlain Eberon, succeeded in swaying Limoges, Tours, and Poitiers towards Austrasian influence, with the help of bishops Gregory of Tours and Venantius Fortunat. Guntram responded by sending troops to recover the lost cities that promptly returned their loyalties to Guntram and Clothar.[7] Fredegund was sent to the Villa de Vaudreuil, in the diocese of Rouen, where she was put under the supervision of the bishop Pretextatus.

During the summer of 585, Guntram returned to Paris to act as godfather of Clothar, as he swore to Fredegund, along with three bishops and three hundred nobles of Neustria who recognized Clothar II as the son of Chilperic I. However, the baptism at this time was postponed. It was expected to reconvene at the council of Troyes, but Austrasia refused to participate if Guntram would not disinherit Clothar. The council was moved to Burgundy and Clothar was baptized on 23 October 585.

While Guntram campaigned to capture Visigothic Septimania, Fredegund escaped custody of the bishop and fled Rouen. During Sunday Mass, Pretextatus was stabbed, although he did not die immediately. Fredegund attempted to fetch doctors and gain his favor. However, he openly accused her of being behind this attack and the murder of the various kings. He publicly cursed and denounced her before dying soon after.[7]

Fredegund is cursed by Pretextatus, by Lawrence Alma-Tadema.

The queen then used her new freedom to rally as many nobles and bishops as could be found to her son. She was reinstalled into power despite Guntram's exile of her.[7] Guntram then attempted to weaken Fredegund's influence by swaying some of the Neustrian aristocracy to his side, and keep Neustrian lands he held between the Loire and Seine by rallying Duke Beppolène. In 587, he managed to capture the towns of Angers, Saintes, and Nantes.[7]

Fredegund then offered to negotiate peace and sent ambassadors to Guntram. But they were arrested and Guntram severed relations with Neustria, approaching Brunhilda and Childebert II, with whom he concluded the pact of Andelot: agreeing that upon the death of one of the two kings, the other would inherit his kingdom. In 592 Guntram died and Childebert became king of Austrasia and Burgundy.[7]

The Austrasia-Burgundy union lasted only until 595, when the death of Childebert II brought it to an end. His realm was then split between his two sons: Theudebert II inherited Austrasia, while Theuderic II received the kingdom of Burgundy. The two brothers then campaigned united against their cousin Chlothar II of Neustria, but their alliance lasted only until 599, when they took up arms against each other.[7]

A young Clothar at the head of the army

In 593, although only as a symbolic presence since he was only nine years old, Clothar II appeared at the head of his army, which routed the Austrasian Duke Wintrio who was invading Neustria, in the Battle of Droizy. In 596, Clotaire and Fredegund took Paris, which was supposed to be held in common. Fredegund, then her son's regent, sent a force to Laffaux, and the armies of Theudebert and Theuderic were defeated.[7] Fredegund died in 597, leaving Clothar to rule over Neustria alone, although the boy king didn't do anything significant for 2 more years.

Ruler of Neustria

[edit]

Battle of Dormelles

[edit]

In 599, he made war with his nephews, Theuderic II of Burgundy and Theudebert II of Austrasia, who were old enough to be his cousins. They defeated him at Dormelles (near Montereau), forcing him to sign a treaty that reduced his kingdom to the regions of Beauvais, Amiens and Rouen, with the remainder split between the two brothers. At this point, however, the two brothers took up arms against each other. In 605, he invaded Theuderic's kingdom, but did not subdue it. He remained often at war with Theuderic until the latter died in Metz in late 613 while preparing a campaign against him.

In 604, a first attempt to reconquer his kingdom ended in failure for Clothar. His son Merovech was taken prisoner by Theuderic at the Battle of Étampes and was murdered at the order of Brunhilda by Bertoald. Clothar agreed that he would become the godfather of Theuderic's son in 607, naming him Merovech.[12]

Around the same time, Theuderic, seeking a marriage to the Spanish Visigoth princess Ermenberge, daughter of King Witteric, created new political tensions. Witteric then negotiated with Clothar II for an alliance, as well as Agilulf, King of the Lombards. The coalition against Theuderic does not appear to have been followed by significant effects.

War between Austrasia and Burgundy (610–612)

[edit]

In 610 Theudebert and Theuderic entered into a war. Theudebert won initial victories in 610, which led Theuderic to approach Clothar, promising to return northern Neustria to him for his aid. Theudebert was crushed in 612, at the battles of Toul and Tolbiac, near Cologne.

War between Clothar and Austrasia-Burgundy (613)

[edit]
Clothar slays Bertoald

As agreed, Theuderic ceded northern Neustria to Clothar, but then turned around and organized an invasion of Neustria. However he died of dysentery in Metz in 613. His troops dispersed immediately, and Brunhilda placed her great-grandson Sigebert II on the throne of Austrasia.[13]

Brunhilde is dragged to her death

At that time, Warnachar, mayor of the palace of Austrasia, and Rado, mayor of the palace of Burgundy, abandoned the cause of Brunhilda and her great-grandson, Sigebert II, and the entire realm was delivered into Chlothar's hands. Brunhilda and Sigebert met Chlothar's army on the Aisne, but the Patrician Aletheus, Duke Rocco, and Duke Sigvald deserted the host and the grand old woman and her king had to flee. They got as far as the Orbe, but Chlothar's soldiers caught up with them by the lake Neuchâtel. Both of them and Sigebert's younger brother Corbo were executed by Chlothar's orders, who then proceeded to execute many of the family members of this house except Merovech, his godson, and perhaps Childebert who had fled.

Brunhilde was accused of murdering ten members of the Neustrian royal family, as well as other Frankish royalty, and was tried and convicted. She underwent a very severe torture and execution by being dragged on the back of a horse and drawn-and-quartered.[14] After this victory, Clothar was left as the sole royal ruler of the Frankish peoples and consolidated his power.

King of All Franks (613–629)

[edit]

Upon his unification of all Franks, Clothar took up residence in Paris and in the villas of Alentours.[15]

Mayors of the Palace

[edit]

An important key aspect that was maintained in all three administrations of the kingdoms even after unification was the presence of the Mayors of the Palace. The mayor of the palace was originally the king's servant in charge of administrative events of the palace. During the royal feud, however, the role grew in importance as more of a steward of lands to care more directly than the king could and was placed in the hands of aristocracy. One of the most notable figures in this role was Warnachaire, mayor of the palace of Burgundy in 613, who was one of the leaders responsible for capturing Brunhild, and held the position until his death in 626. Warnachaire's wife, Berthe, was likely a daughter of Clothar.[16]

Edict of 614

[edit]

In 614, Chlothar II convoked the Council of Paris and promulgated the Edict of Paris, which reserved many rights to the Frankish nobles while it excluded Jews from all civil employment for the Crown.[17][18] The ban effectively placed all literacy in the Merovingian monarchy squarely under ecclesiastical control and also greatly pleased the nobles, from whose ranks the bishops were ordinarily exclusively drawn. Article 11 of the Edict states that it is to restore "peace and discipline in [the] kingdom" and "suppress rebellion and insolence". The edict was ratified for all three kingdoms. Owing to several abuses of powers by officials, many of whom had been appointed by Chilperic, several mandates were made, among them the requirement that officials must have come from the region they officiate over.[19]

Chlothar was induced by Warnachar and Rado to make the mayoralty of the palace a lifetime appointment at Bonneuil-sur-Marne, near Paris, in 617.

Dagobert King of Austrasia (623)

[edit]
Clothar and a young Dagobert

In 623, he gave the kingdom of Austrasia to his young son Dagobert I. This was a political move as repayment for the support of Bishop Arnulf of Metz and Pepin I, mayor of the palace of Austrasia, the two leading Austrasian nobles, who were effectively granted semi-autonomy.[20]

At the same time, Clothar made territorial changes by assigning the region of Reims to Neustria. But Dagobert, now the semi-autonomous king of Austrasia, negotiated its return in 626.

Barbarian and Christian relations

[edit]

Clothar was no exception in the line of Merovingians of its history of family feuding. This was considered to be a very 'barbarian' custom. However, he was one of the few Merovingians that did not practice polygamy, instead remaining faithful to a single wife until her death. He remained respectful of the Church and its doctrines, keeping it as an ally. He likely tried to maintain himself as a pious king, inspired by the holiness of his uncle Guntram who had protected him and allowed him the throne.[21]

In 617, he renewed the treaty of friendship that bound the Frankish kings with the kings of the Lombards. He likely had the policy of maintaining good relations with Christianized-barbarian peoples so long as they kept good relations themselves with the Church.[22]

Death

[edit]
Imaginary portrait of Clothar II

Clothar died in 629 at age 45 and was buried, like his father, in the Saint Vincent Basilica of Paris, later incorporated into the church of Saint-Germain-des-Prés. His rule lasted longer than any other Merovingian king save for his grandfather, Chlothar I. Clothar's son Dagobert, who had been king of Austrasia, succeeded his father in Neustria and Burgundy. Dagobert's half-brother, Charibert, however became king of Aquitaine.

Family

[edit]

He first married Haldetrude, with whom he had the following children:

His second wife, Bertrude, was likely the daughter of Richomer, patrician of the Burgundians, and Gertrude. This marriage produced:

  • A son who died in infancy in 617.
  • Bertha, wife of Warnachaire, mayor of the palace of Burgundy.

In 618, he married Sichilde, sister of Gomatrude, who later married Dagobert I, and probably sister of Brodulfe, who would later support Charibert II. From this marriage there was:

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Bibliography

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Chlothar II

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Chlothar II (May/June 584 – October 629) was a Merovingian king of the Franks who ruled Neustria from 584 until his death and served as the sole ruler of the united Frankish kingdoms from 613. The son of King Chilperic I of Neustria and his consort Fredegund, he ascended the throne as an infant following his father's assassination in 584. For nearly three decades, Chlothar faced civil strife and partition among rival Merovingian branches, particularly with the Austrasian faction led by his great-aunt Brunhilda. In 613, supported by Austrasian and Burgundian magnates disillusioned with Brunhilda's policies, he captured and executed her, thereby annexing Austrasia and Burgundy to achieve unification of the Frankish realms under his authority. This reunification represented a temporary peak of Merovingian central power, with Chlothar establishing Paris as a permanent royal residence. The following year, on 18 October 614, he promulgated the Edict of Paris, a legislative measure that mandated local judicial appointments over royal impositions and upheld fiscal immunities for churches and nobles, aiming to stabilize administration amid aristocratic pressures without substantially eroding royal prerogatives. Chlothar's 45-year reign, the longest among Merovingian kings after his grandfather Chlothar I, ended with his death in 629, after which his son Dagobert I inherited the unified kingdom before renewed partitions ensued.

Historical Context

Frankish Kingdoms in the Late Sixth Century

By the late sixth century, the Frankish realms under the had fragmented into three primary kingdoms: in the west, in the east, and in the southeast. , encompassing the and valleys with its capital at , was ruled by until his assassination in September 584 near Chelles. , stretching from the to the and including regions like and with capitals at and later , fell to following his father Sigebert I's death in 575. , covering the to with as its center, remained under Guntram's control until his death in 592. These divisions, formalized as early as 577 according to contemporary accounts, reflected the customary among royal sons, leading to chronic inter-kingdom rivalries. Chilperic I's sudden death left under the nominal rule of his infant son, Chlothar II, born in 584, with his mother acting as amid ongoing hostilities with . of often mediated these conflicts, as seen in the Treaty of Andelot signed on 28 November 587, where he adopted as his heir, ceding certain territories and forging an alliance that prioritized Austrasian interests over Neustrian claims. This pact, driven by mutual suspicions of Fredegund's ambitions, temporarily stabilized eastern realms but exacerbated Neustria's isolation, highlighting the kingdoms' reliance on personal loyalties and aristocratic support rather than unified royal authority. Guntram's death on 28 March 592 at passed to without immediate contest, per the Andelot agreement, briefly consolidating eastern territories under one ruler. However, Childebert's own death in 596 divided his holdings between his sons— in and in —further entrenching fragmentation. The era was marked by weak central governance, with power devolving to regional dukes, counts, and influential queens like in , setting the stage for prolonged civil strife that Chlothar II would later exploit for unification. Primary accounts, such as those by , underscore the causal role of these dynastic splits in fostering instability, as inheritance practices repeatedly undermined territorial integrity.

Parentage and Early Succession Claims

Chlothar II was the son of , king of , and his consort . He was born in the summer of 584, shortly before his father's death. records the birth in his Historia Francorum (VI.42), noting it occurred amid political instability in , though he subtly implies questions about the child's paternity through narrative framing rather than direct accusation. Chilperic I was assassinated on 28 September 584, leaving the kingdom without an adult ruler. The infant Chlothar, then approximately three to four months old, was immediately proclaimed king of , with assuming effective control as . This succession followed Merovingian custom of among royal sons, but Chlothar's youth made his claim vulnerable to external rivals, particularly , king of , who sought to exploit Neustria's weakness. Guntram initially contested Chlothar's legitimacy, demanding proof that he was Chilperic's natural son rather than a product of 's alleged infidelity, as implied in ' account of 's speech at a assembly. To affirm paternity, convened nobles and enlisted three bishops to testify under oath, bolstering ecclesiastical support for the claim. By autumn 585, relented and formally recognized Chlothar as legitimate heir, securing his hold on despite ongoing Frankish divisions. This resolution prevented immediate annexation by Burgundy but left Chlothar's rule dependent on 's military and diplomatic maneuvers against Austrasian and Burgundian pressures.

Primary Sources and Historiography

Key Contemporary Accounts

The primary contemporary account of Chlothar II's infancy and early regency derives from ' Historia Francorum, completed around 594, which details events up to that year including Chlothar's birth in May or June 584 as the son of King and , amid disputes over his paternity amid Fredegund's reputed adulteries. Gregory, a Gallo-Roman with ties to the Austrasian court, portrays Fredegund's regency negatively, emphasizing her ruthlessness and the precariousness of the infant king's position against rivals like of , while noting Guntram's eventual recognition of Chlothar as heir in 587 following oaths and diplomatic maneuvers. This ecclesiastical perspective privileges moral judgments on royal figures, often critiquing Merovingian violence and intrigue, though it provides verifiable details on succession crises corroborated by later charters. For Chlothar II's later reign, the Chronicle of Fredegar, an anonymous mid-seventh-century compilation (likely finished by the 660s), offers the principal near-contemporary narrative, extending coverage through his unification of the Frankish realms in 613, the execution of , and administrative acts like the Edict of in 614. Fredegar draws on lost Austrasian annals and oral traditions, depicting Chlothar as a consolidator who balanced noble interests via the 614 edict granting fiscal exemptions to bishops and lay elites, while recounting military campaigns against and with specifics like the 613 siege leading to Brunhild's death by torment. Though its authorship remains obscure and it includes legendary elements (e.g., Fredegund's visions), Fredegar's proximity to events—evidenced by details on sub-kings like —makes it indispensable, albeit requiring cross-verification with diplomas for accuracy on legal reforms. Supplemental evidence appears in royal diplomas and edicts, such as Chlothar II's 614 decree itself, preserved in Carolingian-era manuscripts, which outlines judicial and fiscal policies favoring Frankish nobility and , reflecting pragmatic governance amid feudal pressures. Lombard interactions are noted in Paul the Deacon's eighth-century Historia Langobardorum, citing Chlothar's 616-626 campaigns yielding tribute but no conquest, though this draws indirectly from earlier Frankish records. Gaps in eyewitness narratives post-594 highlight reliance on these biased clerical sources, with no neutral lay chronicles surviving, underscoring Merovingian historiography's entanglement with church and agendas.

Scholarly Debates and Interpretations

Scholars have long debated the extent to which Chlothar II's in 614 marked a pivotal shift toward aristocratic and the onset of Merovingian decline, with earlier interpretations, such as those in nineteenth- and early twentieth-century French historiography, framing it as a forced concession that diluted royal authority by devolving judicial appointments to local counts and nobles rather than central appointees. This view posits the edict as a response to pressures from Austrasian elites post-unification, enabling the rise of influential figures like the mayors of the palace and contributing causally to the dynasty's later marginalization by 751. In contrast, revisionist since the mid-twentieth century, drawing on administrative and comparative analyses of Frankish , interprets the as a pragmatic instrument for administrative efficiency and realm stabilization, not a wholesale of power; provisions limiting royal officials' abuses and mandating local aimed to reduce and integrate regional aristocracies without ceding ultimate , as evidenced by Chlothar's continued oversight of major appointments and campaigns thereafter. This perspective, advanced in studies of sixth-century , underscores that Merovingian kings retained coercive mechanisms, such as assemblies and fiscal controls, challenging the narrative of inherent royal weakness and attributing later developments more to contingent factors like succession partitions than to the edict itself. Interpretations of Chlothar's unification efforts in 613 also divide along lines of causal realism versus moralistic readings of sources; while some emphasize the brutality of Brunhild's execution as indicative of despotic instability, others highlight it as a necessary consolidation amid chronic inter-kingdom warfare, restoring unity absent since Chlothar I's death in 561 and enabling effective external defenses against and . Primary accounts like the Chronicle of Fredegar, compiled circa 660–670, portray Chlothar favorably as a restorer of order, but scholars note its hagiographic tendencies toward Merovingians, contrasting with ' earlier (up to 594) Neustria-skeptical tone influenced by Austrasian sympathies; modern analyses prioritize cross-verification with charters and archaeological evidence of sustained royal itineraries to affirm Chlothar's agency, rejecting declinist tropes rooted in Carolingian-era propaganda. These debates reflect broader historiographical shifts away from teleological views of Merovingian "degeneration," with quantitative assessments of land grants and levies indicating robust central capabilities under Chlothar, sustained into Dagobert I's until 639; critiques of source credibility highlight how clerical authors, often tied to episcopal interests, amplified narratives of royal excess to bolster church , a echoed in selective modern appropriations but countered by empirical reconstructions favoring continuity in Frankish statecraft.

Early Reign in Neustria (584–613)

Regency under Fredegund

Following the assassination of Chilperic I in September 584 near Chelles, Fredegund seized the royal treasury and retreated to Paris with her infant son Chlothar II, born earlier that year, proclaiming him king of Neustria. Amid defections by Neustrian officials to rival kings Childebert II of Austrasia and Guntram of Burgundy, Fredegund negotiated protection from Guntram, who in 585 adopted Chlothar as his heir and confirmed his kingship at a convocation in Paris, while assuming oversight of Neustrian administration. Fredegund directed Neustria's defenses and diplomatic efforts throughout the regency, countering Austrasian aggression backed by and navigating Guntram's shifting allegiances, including the 587 Treaty of Andelot that sidelined . After Guntram's death in 592, invaded ; rallied forces to hold and launched counteroffensives, penetrating Austrasian territory. In 595, her commanders employed a ruse at the Battle of Droizy, luring and defeating an Austrasian army under Duke Ursio, preserving Neustrian control. Contemporary chronicler , aligned with Austrasian interests, portrays as orchestrating assassinations and intrigues, such as plots against , though his hostility toward her and Chilperic—stemming from their conflicts with the church and Tours—likely amplifies such depictions; the later offers a less vitriolic view but confirms her active role in governance. 's regency thus sustained Neustria's independence amid Frankish fragmentation, relying on alliances, military acumen, and elimination of threats until her death from in November 597 at age approximately 50. With Chlothar then aged about 13, the regency concluded, allowing his personal assumption of power.

Military Conflicts and Consolidation

Following Chilperic I's assassination in September 584, under the infant encountered existential threats from , where Queen Brunhilda urged King to seize the realm. , as , mobilized defenses alongside Landric, repelling initial incursions and negotiating temporary truces amid ongoing border skirmishes. In 592–593, launched a major invasion of , capturing several northern cities before 's forces counterattacked. Employing unconventional tactics such as night marches and disguises, orchestrated a surprise envelopment, routing the Austrasian army at the Battle of Droizy near and reclaiming lost territories. Fredegund's death in 597 left 13-year-old Chlothar to rule personally, inheriting a realm stabilized but feudally strained. Seeking expansion, he campaigned against his cousins of and of in 599, but Neustrian forces were decisively defeated at the Battle of Dormelles near Montereau, ceding eastern borderlands. Recovery ensued through opportunistic alliances and persistent pressure; by allying with against Theuderic's around 605–610, Chlothar regained contested areas and neutralized internal Neustrian dissent from overmighty dukes via executions and redistributions, forging a cohesive power base for future unification efforts.

Wars with Rival Kingdoms

In 597, shortly after Fredegund's death, of and of —sons of and under the regency of their grandmother —united to challenge Chlothar II's control over , launching an attack after he seized , though Neustrian forces repelled the initial incursion. The cousins' alliance fractured soon after, as Theudebert and Theuderic turned to warring against each other in 599, providing Chlothar temporary respite but also opportunities for opportunistic strikes into their territories. By late 599 or early 600, the brothers reconciled sufficiently to invade Neustria anew, culminating in the Battle of Dormelles (near modern Montereau-Fault-Yonne), where their combined Austrasian-Burgundian army decisively defeated Chlothar's forces, inflicting heavy casualties on the Neustrians and forcing him into retreat. This setback weakened Neustria's position, compelling Chlothar to adopt a defensive posture while exploiting the ongoing Austrasian-Burgundian conflicts, such as invading Burgundy during periods of their mutual hostilities but failing to secure lasting gains. Tensions persisted through the early 600s, with Chlothar maintaining low-level warfare against Theuderic II's in particular, amid Brunhild's efforts to dominate the eastern kingdoms; these skirmishes prevented full Neustrian collapse but yielded no major territorial advances until the brothers' final Austrasian-Burgundian war (610–612) eroded their alliance, setting the stage for Chlothar's decisive 613 offensive. Primary accounts, such as the Chronicle of Fredegar, emphasize the personal animosities driving these campaigns, though later interpretations caution that logistical strains and noble defections often decided outcomes more than battlefield prowess.

Unification of the Frankish Realms (613)

Campaign against and

In early 613, following the death of Thierry II of , asserted regency over her great-grandson , extending her influence across and . Her prolonged and domineering regency, marked by favoritism toward certain allies and suppression of dissent, had eroded support among the Austrasian nobility, who viewed her as tyrannical. The disaffected nobles, including key figures weary of Brunhild's manipulations, secretly appealed to Chlothar II of —her nephew and long-standing enemy—for intervention, offering to submit to his rule in exchange for her removal. Chlothar, seizing the opportunity to end decades of rivalry inherited from his mother , mobilized his Neustrian forces and marched into Austrasian territory, encountering minimal armed opposition as defections mounted. Brunhild fled toward but was intercepted and betrayed by her former supporters, who delivered her and the young into Chlothar's hands near the River. Chlothar promptly ordered the execution of Sigebert II to eliminate any rival claim, then subjected Brunhild to a gruesome punishment: at around 70 years old, she was bound by her hair and limbs to the tail of a wild horse and dragged across the terrain until torn apart, an act symbolic of vengeance for perceived crimes against his lineage. Contemporary accounts, such as the Chronicle of Fredegar, emphasize Brunhild's alleged treacheries to justify the brutality, though these sources reflect a pro-Merovingian bias favoring Chlothar's consolidation. The swift capitulation of Austrasia and Burgundy under these circumstances unified the Frankish kingdoms for the first time since 561, granting Chlothar sole rule without a prolonged military campaign.

Execution of Rivals and Power Consolidation

Following the defeat of Austrasian forces near Châlons in October 613, Chlothar II captured his great-aunt , the influential queen mother who had dominated Austrasian politics for decades. He ordered her execution shortly thereafter, reportedly by binding her limbs to the tails of wild horses and having them dragged in opposite directions until she was torn apart, a method echoing the brutal familial vendettas of prior Merovingian conflicts. This act, detailed in the Chronicle of Fredegar—a contemporary source biased against but corroborated by its alignment with the political outcome—eliminated her as the primary architect of opposition to Neustrian rule. Chlothar extended the purge to Brunhild's great-grandchildren, including the young Sigebert II, king of Austrasia and Burgundy since his father Theodoric II's death earlier in 613, and his brother Childebert. Sigebert, aged approximately 12, and his sibling were put to death on Chlothar's orders, removing any lingering dynastic threats from the Theuderic branch of the Merovingians. These executions, conducted amid the chaos of the Austrasian nobility's invitation to Chlothar to overthrow Brunhild's regency, ensured no rival claimants could rally support. With these rivals eliminated, Chlothar annexed and , becoming the first sole ruler of a unified Frankish since his grandfather Chlothar I's death in 561—a span of over half a century marked by partitions and civil strife. He consolidated power by securing oaths of from Austrasian and Burgundian , who had defected from Brunhild's faction, and by distributing royal treasures seized from her supporters to bind loyalties. This swift elimination of opposition, rather than prolonged negotiation, underscored the Merovingian reliance on kin-slaying and to enforce , though it sowed seeds of resentment among nobles later empowered under his rule.

Central Policies and Administration (614–623)

Edict of Paris: Provisions and Intent

The Edict of Paris, issued by Chlothar II on 18 October 614, comprised approximately eighteen surviving clauses regulating judicial, administrative, and affairs in the newly unified Frankish kingdoms. These provisions emphasized local in while prohibiting encroachments on established privileges, reflecting a response to administrative challenges in integrating , , and after the elimination of rival factions. Central to the was the mandate for judges (iudices) to be drawn from local populations rather than appointed centrally from the royal palace, aiming to curb abuses by itinerant royal agents and align more closely with community norms—a echoing Roman provincial practices under Justinian. Officials were barred from imposing new fiscal burdens or overriding prior immunities enjoyed by churches, nobles, and fiscal lands (fisci), thereby preserving hereditary estates and exemptions from arbitrary royal interference. Additional clauses targeted , such as forbidding the sale of offices or the of bribes in judicial proceedings, and restricted access to royal administrative roles to ethnic , excluding and other non-Frankish groups to reinforce aristocratic dominance in the . provisions included bans on bishops designating living successors and requirements for episcopal elections to occur only upon a bishop's death or incapacity, alongside protections for clerical property against lay seizures. The edict's primary intent was to secure noble loyalty and stabilize rule by formalizing decentralized administration, rewarding Austrasian and Burgundian elites who had defected from Brunhild's cause in 613, without substantially eroding royal oversight. By confirming local judicial control and immunities, Chlothar addressed grievances over central impositions that had fueled factionalism, while maintaining fiscal and military prerogatives. Earlier interpretations, such as those portraying it as a "Frankish " that heralded noble ascendancy and royal decline, have been critiqued by scholars like A. C. Murray as overstated; instead, it represented a targeted, Roman-inspired to enhance efficiency and legitimacy in a fragmented , not a capitulation to aristocratic demands. Surviving in a single eighth-century , the edict's fragmentary nature underscores its role as legislation rather than a comprehensive .

Empowerment of Nobles and Mayors of the Palace

Chlothar II, having unified the Frankish realms in 613 with Austrasian noble support, issued the of on 18 October 614 to secure aristocratic loyalty amid regional tensions. This legislation reserved royal administrative offices for Frankish nobles, explicitly excluding and other non-Frankish individuals from such roles to affirm aristocratic privileges. It further delegated judicial authority to local counts, permitting them to resolve fiscal disputes and lesser crimes independently, free from interference by royal envoys (missi dominici), with appeals directed solely to the king. This reduced central fiscal oversight, empowering nobles in regional and marking a pragmatic concession for political stability, though it eroded direct royal control over local resources. Parallel to these noble concessions, Chlothar strengthened the mayors of the palace by appointing separate incumbents for Neustria, Austrasia, and Burgundy, tailoring administration to subregional elites and fostering decentralized executive power. In 617, he formalized the Austrasian mayoralty as a lifelong position, elevating its holder—initially figures like Warnachar—from mere household managers to enduring political influencers, a reform that institutionalized the office's autonomy and presaged its later dominance under successors like Pepin of Landen. These measures, while stabilizing Chlothar's rule, inadvertently amplified aristocratic leverage, contributing to the Merovingian monarchy's gradual subordination to palace officials by the late seventh century. Chlothar II supported institutions through fiscal privileges, notably via the Praeceptio, an undated decree exempting churches from public charges such as demands for services or taxes by officials. This exemption extended immunity from both fiscal impositions and certain judicial interventions, affirming the church's operational independence amid ongoing administrative pressures. Such grants built on precedents from prior Merovingian rulers while aligning with Chlothar's broader policy of allying with the church to stabilize his rule. In 614, following unification of the Frankish realms, Chlothar convoked the , a major interprovincial blending clerical and lay participation to address disruptions from prior civil strife. Held in the basilica of in , the council issued canons on ecclesiastical discipline, including procedural norms for church governance. These decisions facilitated a partial delineation of church and state competencies, with clerical resolutions insulated from direct royal override in specified domains. Provisions in the Edict of Paris further regulated church-state interactions, mandating royal confirmation for episcopal elections—recasting formal elections as advisory petitions—and barring from seeking protection under secular nobles, reserving such allegiance exclusively to the king. This curbed aristocratic encroachment on offices, centralizing oversight under the crown while preserving institutional autonomy. Chlothar confirmed prior immunities for churches and , reinforcing protections against unauthorized fiscal or judicial intrusions. On the legal front, Chlothar's reforms emphasized curbing official abuses and affirming customary rights, as seen in edictal clauses standardizing procedures for counts and other agents to prevent extortion or unwarranted seizures in diverse regional contexts. These measures adapted existing ethnic legal pluralism—such as Salic and Roman customs—without wholesale codification, prioritizing pragmatic enforcement to integrate conquered territories under unified administration. Later synods under his auspices, like that at Mâcon around 626–627, extended this approach by adjudicating doctrinal disputes with legal overtones, such as clerical discipline. Overall, these initiatives balanced royal prerogative with institutional concessions, fostering stability without comprehensive statutory overhaul.

Later Reign and Subkingdoms (623–629)

Establishment of Dagobert as Austrasian Subking

In 623, after a decade of sole rule over the unified Frankish realms following the elimination of in 613, Chlothar II appointed his son as king of . This decision responded to insistent demands from Austrasian nobles for a local , reflecting longstanding regional preferences and resistance to centralized Neustrian control. Chlothar retained personal authority over and , effectively creating a subkingdom arrangement to maintain dynastic unity while placating eastern elites. Dagobert, born around 608 and thus approximately 15 years old at the time, assumed the Austrasian throne with the support of influential advisors, including and as bishop and counselor. The appointment partially repaid Arnulf's earlier loyalty during Chlothar's campaigns, integrating ecclesiastical and lay power to bolster the young king's administration. Initially, Chlothar excluded peripheral territories such as , the , and the from Dagobert's domain, but Austrasian magnates soon compelled their inclusion, underscoring the nobility's leverage in shaping the subkingdom's boundaries. This establishment marked a pragmatic concession to tendencies within the Merovingian realm, averting potential by associating the Austrasian with the royal heir rather than risking outright separation. Under Dagobert's nominal rule, supported by his father's oversight and capable regents, experienced relative stability, enabling military campaigns such as the joint father-son expedition against the in the same year. The arrangement presaged Dagobert's eventual succession to the entire kingdom upon Chlothar's death in 629, highlighting its role in orderly dynastic transition amid fragmented loyalties.

Foreign Relations and Internal Stability

In 623, shortly after installing his son Dagobert I as subking of Austrasia, Chlothar II intervened militarily against Saxon tribes raiding the northeastern frontiers, aiding Dagobert in a decisive campaign that compelled the Saxons to submit and resume tribute payments, thereby securing the Rhine border. This action underscored a defensive foreign policy aimed at preserving territorial integrity without expansionist ambitions, as no major offensives were launched against neighboring powers like the Lombards or Byzantines during this phase. Diplomatic ties with external entities remained limited and pragmatic; Lombard envoys visited Chlothar's court to negotiate prisoner releases, reflecting occasional mediation in Italian affairs but no sustained alliances or conflicts. Relations with the were cordial yet distant, focused on exchanges rather than amid the empire's eastern preoccupations. Internally, the subkingdom fostered stability by accommodating Austrasian elites' preferences for regional governance, averting the factional strife that had plagued prior partitions and enabling unified royal oversight without constant intervention. This devolution, combined with Chlothar's selective empowerment of loyal mayors of the palace, minimized noble revolts—evident in the suppression of a minor uprising led by Mayor Warnachar in 627—while maintaining dynastic control over fiscal and judicial levers. The realm experienced no large-scale from 623 onward, marking a rare interlude of cohesion in Merovingian .

Interactions with Non-Frankish Groups

In 623, following the installation of Dagobert I as subking in Austrasia, Saxon tribes launched incursions into Frankish territories, prompting Dagobert to request military assistance from his father. Chlothar II responded by leading an army to support his son, engaging the Saxons in battle and restoring order in the eastern border regions. By 626, Chlothar directed Frankish forces southward against the Wascones (Basques), a semi-autonomous group in Aquitaine known for periodic rebellions against Merovingian authority. The campaign successfully subdued the Wascones, after which elements of the exercitus Francorum were redeployed to confront Breton incursions in Armorica, reflecting Chlothar's strategy of securing peripheral frontiers through direct military action. Throughout his later years, Chlothar maintained a policy of diplomatic amity with the in , building on earlier treaty renewals to avoid entanglement in peninsular conflicts and preserve trade routes across the . This approach contrasted with the more aggressive eastern campaigns, prioritizing stability over expansion against non-Frankish groups beyond immediate threats.

Family Dynamics

Marriages, Offspring, and Alliances

Chlothar II entered into three successive marriages, reflecting a degree of monogamy atypical for Merovingian rulers, as each prior union ended in the wife's death before the next. His first wife, Haldetrude, bore him around 608, who would succeed as subking of in 623 and later rule the entire realm. Haldetrude died circa 604, after which Chlothar married Bertrude, daughter of the Frankish aristocrat Richomer; their son Sigebert died in infancy, limiting dynastic impact from this alliance with Neustrian nobility. Chlothar's third marriage, to Sichilde—sister of Huogaud, count of the —occurred around 610 and produced Charibert II (c. 610–632), granted as a subkingdom upon Chlothar's death, and possibly a daughter named Oda. This union allied the king with Alemannic elites on Francia's eastern periphery, securing loyalty amid campaigns against external threats and internal noble ambitions. Earlier sources like the Chronicle of Fredegar imply such matrimonial strategies bolstered Chlothar's position against rival factions, though exact parentage for some offspring remains uncertain due to sparse contemporary records. The surviving heirs, Dagobert and Charibert, embodied Chlothar's dynastic continuity, with their placements in subkingdoms reflecting strategic partitioning to maintain Merovingian control over divided realms while countering noble overreach. Other reported children, such as a killed in conflict or an Emma, lack firm attribution in primary chronicles and likely perished young without political consequence. These familial ties, interwoven with noble empowerment via the Edict of , prioritized pragmatic alliances over expansive conquests, sustaining royal prestige into the late Merovingian era.

Succession Planning and Dynastic Continuity

Chlothar II planned for succession by designating his eldest son, , as subking of in 623, allowing the young heir to establish authority over that fractious region while Chlothar retained direct control over and . This arrangement, drawn from the Chronicle of Fredegar, aimed to integrate Austrasian nobles into the royal framework and prevent the kind of rivalries that had plagued earlier Merovingian divisions, thereby fostering dynastic stability through shared governance. Upon Chlothar's death on 18 October 629, the realm was partitioned to sustain Merovingian rule: inherited the bulk of the territories, including , while his half-brother Charibert II received as a subkingdom. Charibert, described in the Chronicle of Fredegar as intellectually limited, represented a secondary line of continuity, though his domain was peripheral and his rule short-lived until his death in 632. Earlier, Chlothar had suffered the loss of another son, , killed in infancy around 604, underscoring the vulnerabilities of dynastic reproduction in an era of high and political intrigue. These measures reflected a pragmatic approach to dynastic continuity, leveraging subkingdoms to distribute power without fully relinquishing central authority, a pattern that temporarily arrested the fragmentation seen after Clovis I's death. By elevating Dagobert early and binding him to regional elites, Chlothar mitigated risks of succession crises, enabling the Merovingians to project unified strength during a period of relative internal peace.

Death and Historical Legacy

Final Years and Demise

Chlothar II's final years were marked by a division of authority with his son , whom he had installed as subking of in 623 to appease regional nobles demanding local governance. While Dagobert managed eastern affairs, Chlothar retained direct control over and , intervening when necessary, as in 623 when he reinforced Dagobert's forces against Saxon incursions along the northeastern frontier. This campaign underscored Chlothar's ongoing military oversight despite the subkingdom arrangement, though no major internal upheavals or further expansions are recorded in the immediate years preceding his death. Chlothar II died on 18 October 629 at approximately age 45, concluding a 45-year reign—the longest of any Merovingian king save his grandfather (r. 511–561). The circumstances of his demise appear natural, with contemporary chronicles attributing no foul play or violence, reflecting the relative stability he had imposed on the Frankish realms after decades of civil strife. Following his death, the kingdom was partitioned: acceded to and , effectively uniting the core territories under his rule, while his half-brother Charibert II received as a subkingdom. Chlothar was interred in the Basilica Sancti Vincentii in , a site later absorbed into the Abbey of Saint-Germain-des-Prés. This succession arrangement, prepared in advance, facilitated a smoother transition than many prior Merovingian deaths, averting immediate fragmentation.

Evaluations of Achievements and Shortcomings

Chlothar II's reign is frequently evaluated as a pivotal moment of restoration and consolidation for the , marking the achievement of full unification of the Frankish kingdoms in 613 following his decisive victory over the Austrasian faction led by , which eliminated the primary internal rivalries that had fragmented the realm since the death of in 561. This reunification under a single ruler after decades of civil strife demonstrated effective military and political maneuvering, particularly through alliances with influential Austrasian nobles like and , enabling Chlothar to exercise centralized authority absent in prior divided reigns. Historians regard this as one of the last instances of robust Merovingian royal power, with Chlothar maintaining control over diverse regions from to without immediate partition. The promulgation of the Edict of Paris on October 18, 614, stands as a core legislative achievement, convened via the to address post-unification grievances, including noble complaints against royal officials' abuses and clerical election disputes. The edict prohibited non-Frankish officeholders in fiscal roles, regulated bishop appointments to favor processes over royal , and curbed arbitrary taxation by envoys, thereby stabilizing administration and bolstering support for the . These measures are credited with temporarily quelling aristocratic unrest and fostering a semblance of legal order, reflecting Chlothar's pragmatic adaptation to noble demands while preserving core royal prerogatives like military summons. Critiques of Chlothar's shortcomings center on the Edict of Paris as a structural concession that inadvertently accelerated the monarchy's long-term erosion by devolving judicial and fiscal authority to local dukes and counts, who gained exemptions from external oversight and veto power over royal agents. This empowerment of the , often interpreted as a dictated "capitulation" to secure after Brunhild's defeat, diminished the king's direct administrative reach and foreshadowed the rise of mayors as rulers, as seen in the growing influence of figures like Pepin I after 623. Furthermore, while unification averted immediate collapse, Chlothar's establishment of subkingdoms—such as granting to Dagobert in 623—perpetuated partition traditions, undermining sustained centralization and contributing to the dynasty's perceived "do-nothing" kings by the late seventh century. These policies, though stabilizing in the short term, prioritized over institutional reform, aligning with broader Merovingian patterns of reactive rather than proactive .

Influence on Merovingian Decline Narratives

Chlothar II's unification of the Frankish kingdoms in 613, following the execution of his rival Brunhilda, is frequently depicted in historical narratives as a momentary restoration of Merovingian authority after decades of civil strife, yet it also inaugurated structural shifts that facilitated the dynasty's gradual erosion. His reign (584–629) and that of his son (r. 629–639) represent what some scholars term a "temporary apogee" of Merovingian power, characterized by relative internal stability, military successes against external threats like the , and administrative reforms that briefly centralized resources under royal control. However, traditional accounts, drawing from later Carolingian-era chroniclers such as the Continuations of Fredegar, emphasize how these achievements masked underlying concessions to aristocratic interests, portraying Chlothar as inadvertently paving the way for the ascendancy of non-royal officials. Central to decline narratives is the Edict of Paris, promulgated on October 18, 614, which codified privileges for Frankish nobles, affirmed local customs in judicial matters, and restricted royal appointees from interfering in aristocratic estates without . This legislation, intended to secure loyalty after unification, effectively decentralized by empowering regional potentates and mayors of the palace, allowing them greater autonomy in taxation, military levies, and appointments—precedents that later enabled figures like to dominate governance. Historians such as Paul Fouracre argue that the edict marked a "" by formalizing a supra-regional aristocracy's influence, shifting power dynamics from hereditary kingship toward oligarchic networks and contributing causally to the Merovingians' marginalization by the eighth century. Chlothar's appointment of as in around 623, in conjunction with installing his son Dagobert as subking there, further entrenched this trajectory by elevating the Pippinid family, whose accumulating influence culminated in the Carolingian usurpation of 751. While earlier historiography, influenced by ninth-century sources like , framed post-Dagobert Merovingians as inert "do-nothing kings" (rois fainéants), recent scholarship critiques this as oversimplified propaganda, attributing decline instead to institutional evolution under leaders like Chlothar, where royal survival depended on aristocratic alliances that eroded central prerogatives over generations. from charters and councils indicates no immediate collapse but a gradual transfer of de facto executive functions to mayors, rendering the dynasty symbolically potent yet politically impotent by the 720s.

References

  1. https://www.worldhistory.org/Chlothar_II/
  2. https://etd.ohiolink.edu/acprod/odb_etd/ws/send_file/send?accession=ouhonors1682358093822363&disposition=inline
  3. https://merovingianworld.com/2014/10/18/1400-years-of-the-edict-of-paris/
  4. https://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/MEROVINGIANS.htm
  5. https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/1/article/556102
  6. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/church-history/article/sis-quoque-catholicis-religionis-apex-the-ecclesiastical-patronage-of-chilperic-i-and-fredegund/CC8A49D8F518293EA550A826D0E65A33
  7. https://www.perspectivia.net/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/ploneimport3_derivate_00006924/goffert_pretender.pdf
  8. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/merovingian-worlds/power-in-the-early-merovingian-world-c-450613/864D79EBBFA340A66121A4C4681B50C3
  9. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/556102/pdf
  10. https://sourcebooks.web.fordham.edu/basis/gregory-hist.asp
  11. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/history-frankish-identity-and-the-framing-of-western-ethnicity-550850/persistence-of-gregorys-vision-of-community/AEEA097C1736815D666D99038BC922A6
  12. https://www.medievalworlds.net/0xc1aa5572_0x003ea501.pdf
  13. http://csla.history.ox.ac.uk/record.php?recid=E05937
  14. https://historyitm.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/amos.pdf
  15. https://historum.com/t/edict-of-paris-614-ad-and-chlothar-ii-from-french-perspective.195598/
  16. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Chlotar-II
  17. https://studenttheses.uu.nl/bitstream/handle/20.500.12932/17183/Merovingian%2520government.pdf
  18. https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:b62a7080-8344-42a2-8234-6b3f94435429/files/m9ace57d500d6684873e864ab892c0377
  19. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/history-frankish-identity-and-the-framing-of-western-ethnicity-550850/politics-of-identity-in-the-merovingian-kingdoms-of-the-sixth-century/E0DAD84761AC8AD813DEA489A2E83E47
  20. https://www.jstor.org/stable/286644
  21. http://freepages.rootsweb.com/~otstott/family/ind777.html
  22. https://familyhistory.themartyns.net/familyfiles/7920.htm
  23. https://www.supersummary.com/the-history-of-the-franks/book-7-summary/
  24. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/medieval-queens-daring-reigns-quickly-forgotten-180979246/
  25. https://www.laphamsquarterly.org/roundtable/killer-queens
  26. https://literatureandhistory.com/episode-106-gregory-of-tours-part-2/
  27. https://www.encyclopedia.com/women/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/fredegund-c-547-597
  28. https://www.geni.com/people/Chlothar-II-the-Young-King-of-the-Franks/5544182020970135787
  29. https://sites.owu.edu/trident/2021/05/09/the-ballad-of-brunhilde-and-fredegund-part-two-the-bloody-conclusion/
  30. https://ancestryfootprints.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Frank-Royal-Ancestry.pdf
  31. https://etd.ohiolink.edu/acprod/odb_etd/ws/send_file/send?accession=osu1063646754&disposition=
  32. https://www.historyfiles.co.uk/KingListsEurope/FranceAustrasia.htm
  33. https://www.geni.com/people/Theuderic-II-King-of-Burgundy-Austrasia/6000000004316193251
  34. http://freepages.rootsweb.com/~otstott/family/ind775.html
  35. http://dbagora.blogspot.com/2018/03/timeline-middle-frankish-496-639-ad.html
  36. https://kids.kiddle.co/Chlothar_II
  37. https://www.encyclopedia.com/reference/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/brunhilda
  38. https://www.worldhistory.org/Brunhilda_of_Austrasia/
  39. https://www.britannica.com/place/France/The-failure-of-reunification-613-714
  40. https://ancestors.familysearch.org/en/93XX-5GY/chlothar-ii.-%27der-junge%27-von-neustrien-k%25C3%25B6nig-der-franken-0584-0629
  41. https://brainly.infogalactic.com/info/Edict_of_Paris
  42. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3301360
  43. https://www.academia.edu/16695368/The_Merovingian_Kingdoms_450_751
  44. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/power-and-religion-in-merovingian-gaul/aristocracy/E2653576B1B0384446A55988D29AF407
  45. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9781787440791-006/html
  46. https://www.jstor.org/stable/650508
  47. https://compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1478-0542.2010.00720.x
  48. http://www.konziliengeschichte.org/site/de/publikationen/lexikon/database/727.html
  49. http://csla.history.ox.ac.uk/record.php?recid=E08391
  50. https://brewminate.com/the-politics-of-intellectual-networks-in-early-medieval-late-merovingian-francia/
  51. https://www.worldhistory.org/Dagobert_I/
  52. http://freepages.rootsweb.com/~dearbornboutwell/school-alumni/fam1730.html
  53. https://www.worldhistory.org/image/17142/battle-between-king-chlothar-ii-and-the-saxons-623/
  54. https://books.openedition.org/psorbonne/16448?lang=en
  55. https://www.thefrenchhistorypodcast.com/44-the-last-great-merovingian-kings/
  56. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/history-frankish-identity-and-the-framing-of-western-ethnicity-550850/iocundus-in-fabolis-et-strenuus-in-consiliis/B37843744A98D96E94D5C29730206CAE
  57. https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/66082602/chlothar_ii-king_of_the_franks
  58. https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:409534/s4172527_thesis.pdf?dsi_version=cddf5d28affab2bea0fe45b18213f3b3
  59. https://albert.ias.edu/bitstream/20.500.12111/6534/3/Geary_Barbarians-and-Ethnicity_1999.pdf
  60. https://www.catholic.com/encyclopedia/franks-the
  61. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/228821755.pdf
  62. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/merovingian-worlds/rise-of-the-shadow-kings-613751/A1C9A88A881F9EC46F589EA84BE0C846
  63. https://michaelgheller.substack.com/p/fouracre-merovingians-before-carolingians
  64. https://paulbuddehistory.com/europe/the-rise-of-the-carolingians/
  65. https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/1wxbry/were_the_late_merovingian_kings_really_as_useless/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.