Hubbry Logo
Coffee extractionCoffee extractionMain
Open search
Coffee extraction
Community hub
Coffee extraction
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Coffee extraction
Coffee extraction
Coffee extraction
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Coffee extraction occurs when hot water is poured over coffee grounds, causing desirable compounds such as caffeine, carbohydrates, lipids, melanoidins and acids to be extracted from the grounds. The degree to which extraction occurs depends on a number of factors, such as water temperature, brewing time, grind fineness, and quantity of grounds.

Definitions

[edit]

Brew ratio describes the ratio of coffee to water, by mass.

Strength, also known as solubles concentration, refers to the percentage of dissolved solids per unit of liquid in the final beverage. A higher concentration of solubles is associated with a stronger beverage, and lower concentration with a weaker, more "watery", beverage. Strength varies between coffee beverage types; for most it ranges from 1.15% and 1.35%. Ristretto, one of the strongest traditional coffee drinks, can contain up to 0.75 g of solubles per 15 gram serving (over 5% of total volume), making it more than four times as strong as the typical coffee beverage. Strength can also vary to a significant degree between coffee grown in different regions.

As the degree of extraction increases, strength increases, resulting in a beverage that is darker in color and oilier in terms of mouthfeel – however, this can also vary by amount of suspended solids (very small grinds, so-called "fines"), particularly in French press brewing. As extraction time increases, the risk of unwanted solubles – often associated with overwhelming bitterness – being extracted also increases. If yield is held constant, strength is determined primarily by brewing ratio.[1] Caffeine is extracted early in the brewing process, so longer extraction does not result in significantly more caffeinated coffee. Adding water to a drink after brewing changes strength but not yield (yield is determined by the amount of water initially present during brewing). An Americano only differs from an espresso in strength – it is traditionally diluted after brewing to a strength below 1.5% (also resulting in the removal of crema).

Extraction yield refers to the solubles dissolved during brewing. This is often expressed as a percentage of the coffee's mass. It is also known as solubles yield or simply extraction. The extraction yield percentage describes the mass transferred from coffee grounds to water, expressed as a percentage of the initial mass of the grounds. It is given by the following:where is the extraction yield expressed as a percentage, is the total dissolved solids expressed as a percentage of the final beverage, is the mass of the grounds in grams, and is the final beverage's mass in grams. This means that an extraction yield of 20% can be obtained by brewing 18 grams of coffee, resulting a 36-gram final beverage with a of 10%. Yield can also be expressed as total dissolved solids, or parts-per-million (ppm).

Achieving desired extraction

[edit]

An extraction yield of 18% to 22% is desirable for most traditional coffee beverages. Yields of under 18% are considered under-extracted, or under-developed – desirable compounds have not been extracted to the fullest. The resulting beverage is unbalanced and often associated with a predominantly sour taste – acids are extracted early in the brewing process, while balancing compounds such as sugars and bitter substances are extracted later.[2] Yields of over 22% are considered over-extracted and are often associated with a predominant bitterness – bitter compounds are extracted after acids and sugars have largely dissolved. However, in certain situations where advanced brewing equipment is involved, yields surpassing 22% can be achieved absent the characteristic bitterness.[3]

A brewing control chart[4] can be used to control a beverage's degree of extraction and strength. The optimal ratio between extraction and strength is represented by a rectangle in the center of the chart – within that area, coffee is neither over- nor under-extracted, and neither too strong nor weak. At any point along the diagonal line plotted on the chart, extraction and strength are directly proportional.

The following describes the relationship between strength and brew ratio.where is the total dissolved solids expressed as a percentage of the mass of the grounds, is the volume of the water used, and is the mass of the grounds. In other words, the strength of a beverage is the product of the brew ratio and the extraction percentage.

An extraction yield of 18% to 22% and a strength of 1.15% to 1.35% is considered typical in North America. In Nordic countries, the ideal strength is typically considered to be 1.30% to 1.50%. For European countries, 1.20% to 1.45%.

Common brewing ratios
Style Grams per Litre Ratio Strength
North American 55 18:1 1.25%
Nordic 63 16:1 1.40%
European 58 17:1 1.35%

Increasing or decreasing extraction yield

[edit]

Yields depend primarily on temperature, brew time, and grind size, and brewing method. Yield is inversely proportional to grind size; a smaller grain size produces more surface area and faster extraction. A longer brewing time results in a higher yield. French press coffee is often brewed from coarsely-ground grinds, with a brew time of 3–4 minutes. Filter coffee is associated with a smaller grain size and shorter brew time. Espresso is made with very finely ground coffee with a brew time of 20–30 seconds.

Extraction rates vary between brewing methods. For immersion brewing methods, such as French press and vacuum brewing, extraction takes place slowly. Turkish coffee is brewed with extremely finely-ground coffee that is left suspended in the final beverage. Some brewing methods soak a column of grounds, such as pour-over, espresso, and percolation. In the espresso method, water can saturate the column unevenly from bottom to top, resulting in uneven extraction.

Once the ideal yield has been reached, the grounds are removed from the water, halting extraction. For this reason, coffee is commonly removed from the brewing chamber of a French press after extraction has occurred. Percolators are notoriously prone to over-extraction, due to a design feature that causes coffee to pass through a basket of grounds multiple times. Coffee may be intentionally over-extracted to achieve increased strength while reducing the amount of ground coffee required. However, this often results in a more bitter, less full-bodied beverage.

Water temperature can affect the degree to which desirable solubles are extracted. A commonly recommended brewing temperature for traditional coffee beverages is 91–94 °C (196–201 °F), which facilitates full extraction of desired compounds.[5] To achieve this temperature, water is often briefly let to come off the boil before brewing. Heat loss during brewing may also occur – in the manual pour-over method, the mixture of coffee grounds and water, or slurry, is notoriously prone to heat loss, and high temperatures can be difficult to maintain.[5] The impact of transient temperature – the temperature of the final coffee beverage after brewed is finished – does not matter as much as brewing temperature; briefly heating coffee does not destroy its taste.

External images
image icon SCAA brew chart (American)[6]
image icon SCAE brew chart (European)[7]
image icon NCA brew chart (Norwegian)[8]

Espresso

[edit]

Espresso yield is generally 15–25%:[2] 25% is quoted as the Italian extraction.[9] Espresso yield has received significantly less attention in the literature than brewed coffee extraction.[9][2]

Espresso yield features a number of surprising properties:[2]

  • yield depends primarily on depth of the "puck" (cylinder of coffee grounds);
  • yield is inverse to puck depth;
  • yield does not depend significantly on brewing time – yield at first increases approximately linearly, then plateaus after approximately 20 seconds;
  • strength is independent of dose.

Strength depends instead on grind: finer grinds yield a "shorter" (ristretto) espresso (less liquid, so higher brew ratio, at same yield gives more strength), while coarser grinds yield a "longer" (lungo) espresso, while an intermediate grind yields a "normale" espresso.

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Coffee extraction

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Coffee extraction is the process of dissolving soluble compounds—such as flavor precursors, aromas, , and other solubles—from roasted and ground beans into , primarily through solid-liquid extraction during brewing. This process begins with roasting green beans to develop their chemical profile, followed by grinding to increase the surface area for efficient dissolution, and culminates in the interaction of hot with the grounds to yield a beverage whose strength and taste depend on the extracted (TDS). Key brewing methods include immersion (e.g., French press, where grounds steep fully in water), (e.g., drip brewing, where water flows through a bed of grounds), and pressure-assisted (e.g., , using high pressure for rapid extraction of concentrated flavors). The Specialty Coffee Association defines optimal extraction yield as 18–22% of the coffee's mass dissolving into the brew, measured via , to achieve balanced acidity, sweetness, and body without under-extraction (sour notes) or over-extraction (bitterness). Influential factors encompass water temperature (ideally 90–96°C for hot brews), grind size (finer for faster extraction, coarser for slower), contact time, brew ratio (typically 1:15–1:18 to water), and water chemistry (e.g., of 100–175 ppm), all of which govern the of compounds from the matrix into solution.

Core Concepts

Definitions and Terminology

Coffee extraction is the process of dissolving soluble compounds from roasted grounds into to produce a beverage, involving absorption by the grinds, of solubles, and separation of the extract from the solids. This process is central to preparing , as it transfers flavor, aroma, and bioactive elements from the grounds to the . Key terminology in coffee extraction includes solubles, which refer to the water-soluble compounds in roasted , such as acids, sugars, , and carbohydrates that contribute to the beverage's and body. Grounds are the finely milled roasted beans that serve as the source material for extraction. The brew denotes the resulting containing the extracted solubles. Extraction specifically emphasizes the transfer of solubles from grounds to water, whereas encompasses the broader preparation method, including the choice of technique and overall procedure. Yield serves as a measure of extraction , representing the percentage of total solubles successfully transferred to the brew. Basic components of coffee beans relevant to extraction include , which imparts bitterness and stimulates the ; chlorogenic acids, phenolic compounds that contribute to acidity, bitterness, and properties; and melanoidins, high-molecular-weight polymers formed during that enhance color, aroma, bitterness, and provide and prebiotic effects. These extractable materials are primarily solubilized during the process to define the beverage's sensory and attributes.

Principles of Extraction

Coffee extraction is fundamentally governed by the solubility of compounds within roasted coffee grounds in water, the primary solvent used in brewing. Coffee contains a mixture of polar and non-polar compounds, including acids, sugars, lipids, and volatiles, with polar substances such as chlorogenic acids and caffeine exhibiting higher solubility in water due to its polar nature, following the "like dissolves like" principle. Non-polar compounds, like certain oils and trigonelline derivatives, are less soluble and extract more slowly or require additional factors like temperature to enhance dissolution. Temperature plays a key role, as increasing it from 80°C to 98°C boosts the solubility of these compounds, allowing more solubles to transfer into the aqueous phase, though excessive heat above 92°C can degrade heat-sensitive polar molecules. The transfer of these soluble compounds from the coffee matrix to water is driven primarily by diffusion, with osmosis contributing during the initial wetting phase where water imbibes into the grounds due to osmotic pressure gradients. Diffusion occurs as solutes move from regions of higher concentration within the coffee particles to lower concentrations in the surrounding water, propelled by concentration gradients as described qualitatively by Fick's first law, which states that the flux of solutes is proportional to the negative gradient of their concentration. Fick's second law further explains how these gradients evolve over time within the porous structure of coffee grounds, where intra-particle diffusion limits the rate, hindered by tortuous pore networks and cell walls. Osmosis aids initial hydration, drawing water into the grounds and swelling them, which opens pathways for subsequent diffusive solute release, but diffusion dominates the overall extraction process. The rate of is significantly accelerated by the surface area of the grounds, as grinding exposes more contact points between the solid matrix and water, increasing the sites available for dissolution and . Finer particles, with higher volume-specific surface area, facilitate faster extraction by reducing the path length for solutes, leading to higher yields in shorter times compared to coarser grinds. This effect is particularly evident in methods where water flows through the bed, as greater surface area enhances the initial dissolution kinetics without altering the underlying mechanisms. Extraction reaches an equilibrium state when the rate of solute dissolution from the grounds equals the rate of saturation in the , halting further net transfer as concentration gradients diminish to zero. At this point, the solid-liquid partition is governed by distribution constants specific to each compound, such as 0.81 for , reflecting the balance between intra-particle retention and solution . In immersion brewing, this equilibrium is approached more fully, limiting maximum yields to approximately 21%, largely independent of and , beyond which no additional solubles are released despite prolonged contact.

Factors Influencing Extraction

Physical Variables

Physical variables in coffee extraction encompass controllable parameters such as , contact time, size, water-to-coffee ratio, and agitation or , each influencing the rate and efficiency of soluble compound dissolution from ground . These factors determine how quickly and completely flavor precursors and other solubles transfer into the brewing water, balancing desired taste profiles against risks like under- or over-extraction. Temperature profoundly affects extraction kinetics by altering the solubility and diffusion rates of coffee compounds. The Specialty Coffee Association recommends brewing water between 90–96°C to optimize extraction of desirable flavors while minimizing unwanted bitterness. Higher temperatures accelerate the dissolution of acids, sugars, and caffeine, enhancing overall yield. However, astringency and bitterness from phenolics and tannins are more directly associated with total extraction yield and brew strength rather than temperature alone. Contact time between water and coffee grounds governs the extent of solubles transfer, with longer durations allowing greater dissolution until equilibrium is approached. Extraction yield (the percentage of soluble solids extracted from the grounds) increases with contact time as more soluble compounds diffuse into the water, typically reaching the optimal 18–22% range in seconds to several minutes depending on the brewing method (e.g., 25–30 seconds for espresso or 2–4 minutes for drip and immersion methods), with prolonged times beyond equilibrium risking over-extraction and increased bitterness from compounds like phenolics and tannins. In immersion brewing, extraction progresses rapidly in the initial minutes, but yields diminish after 4–5 minutes as soluble concentrations stabilize, beyond which minimal additional compounds are released. Grind size directly impacts surface area exposure, modulating extraction speed and uniformity. Finer grinds increase the particle surface-to-volume ratio, shortening diffusion paths and accelerating for quicker, more complete extraction. However, excessively fine particles heighten the risk of over-extraction, channeling—where water flows unevenly through preferential paths—and bitterness due to prolonged contact with inner layers. Coarser grinds, conversely, slow extraction, often requiring adjusted times to achieve balanced strength. The water-to- ratio establishes brew concentration and influences total solubles yield. The SCA's Golden Cup Standard specifies a of 1:18 (grams of coffee to milliliters of water), equivalent to about 55 grams per liter, which balances flavor intensity with clarity. For a standard 12-ounce (approximately 355 ml) serving, use 20-24 grams of coffee grounds to achieve a 1:15 to 1:18 ratio, aligning with Specialty Coffee Association guidelines for a balanced brew. Ratios from 1:15 to 1:18 are commonly used across methods to yield brews with 1.15–1.55% , preventing dilution or overly robust profiles. Water chemistry, including mineral content, , and , also plays a crucial role in extraction by affecting the of compounds and preventing issues like scaling. The SCA recommends brewing water that is odor-free and chlorine-free, with of 75–250 ppm, calcium of 50–175 ppm as CaCO3, and of 6.5–7.5 to promote optimal flavor extraction. For soft tap water with low mineral content, liquid mineral concentrates or drops can remineralize it to meet these standards. These concentrates boost magnesium levels to enhance sweetness and brightness, particularly in pour-over methods like the V60, and provide balanced buffering to improve extraction, body, and flavor clarity in both V60 pour-overs and pressure-based methods like the 9Barista, without overcomplicating the process. Agitation and pressure enhance by disrupting boundary layers around particles and forcing water through the coffee bed. Stirring or pouring increases , promoting even solubles release and higher yields compared to static methods. In pressure-based brewing like , 9 bars of force accelerates extraction, concentrating flavors in short contact times but risking uneven flow if not controlled.

Chemical Components

Coffee extraction involves the solubilization of various molecular compounds from roasted beans into , each contributing distinct sensory attributes such as flavor, acidity, and body. Organic acids, including and malic acids, are primary contributors to the perceived brightness and acidity in the brew. imparts citrus-like, fruity notes, enhancing crispness and flavor intensity, while malic acid provides a softer, apple-like sourness that rounds out the profile. These acids are present in green coffee at concentrations that decrease during due to thermal degradation but remain extractable, with higher levels in lighter roasts leading to brighter cups. Sugars and carbohydrates form another major class of extractables, accounting for much of the brew's sweetness and body. , the dominant sugar in green coffee (6-9% by dry weight), partially degrades during into simpler sugars like , which bolsters perceived sweetness despite concentrations below direct taste thresholds; instead, they interact with other compounds to evoke a rounded, caramel-like quality. such as galactomannans (17-24% of bean mass) and arabinogalactans (14-17%) extract into the brew, increasing and contributing to a creamy or body, with Robusta varieties yielding higher soluble levels than due to more branched structures. enhances their solubility by reducing molecular weight, allowing 6-12% extraction in hot water brews. Lipids, comprising 10-15% of the bean's primarily as triglycerides rich in linoleic and palmitic acids, play a key role in by forming emulsions that carry flavor volatiles and impart a smooth, oily texture. Although water-insoluble, a portion emulsifies during extraction, particularly in methods without filters, enhancing perceived body and preventing a thin sensation; lipids show higher polyunsaturated content, potentially yielding richer compared to Robusta. , notably chlorogenic acids (up to 14% in green beans) and , contribute to astringency by binding salivary proteins, creating a , puckering effect that balances but can dominate in over-extracted brews. These phenolics degrade during yet remain extractable, influencing bitterness and properties in the final cup. Volatile compounds, released and extracted during , dominate the aroma profile, with furans and pyrazines being prominent. Furans, such as and furaneol, deliver roasted, caramel, and fruity scents, while pyrazines like 2-ethyl-5-methylpyrazine evoke nutty, cocoa notes; over 1,000 volatiles have been identified, but these classes account for much of the sensory impact, with activity values indicating high potency even at low concentrations. Extraction and time influence their release, as heat volatilizes precursors formed during . The of the brew, typically 4.8-5.0, reflects initial extraction of acids, resulting in acidity that shifts slightly higher (less acidic) with prolonged brewing as neutral or basic compounds like (a ) solubilize, modulating sourness perception. brews exhibit higher (around 4.9) due to reduced acid extraction efficiency compared to hot methods. Compound interactions during extraction are shaped by roasting-induced changes, particularly products (MRPs) like melanoidins, formed from and sugars at 140-170°C. These brown pigments and flavor precursors enhance extractability of other components by altering bean and , contributing to body through viscosity and to aroma via additional volatiles; MRPs also boost capacity in brews, with higher yields in darker roasts. However, excessive Maillard progression can degrade acids and sugars, reducing brightness while amplifying bitterness from phenolics. Overall, these interactions link to sensory balance, where controlled extraction optimizes desirable traits like fruity acidity and full body.

Extraction Yield and Quality

Measuring and Calculating Yield

Extraction yield in coffee brewing is defined as the percentage of the dry coffee mass that dissolves into the brew, representing the fraction of soluble compounds extracted from the grounds. The Specialty Coffee Association (SCA) establishes an ideal range of 18-22% for extraction yield, as this balance typically yields desirable flavor profiles without under- or over-extraction. Values below 18% often result in under-extracted brews that taste sour or weak, while those above 22% can lead to bitterness from over-extraction. Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) quantifies the concentration of dissolved compounds in the brew, expressed as a by weight, and serves as a key input for yield calculations. For balanced brews, the SCA recommends a TDS range of approximately 1.15-1.35%, measured using refractometers that assess the of the liquid sample. This metric indicates brew strength, with lower TDS suggesting dilution and higher values indicating more intense extraction. The extraction yield is calculated using the formula: %Yield=TDS×Brew MassDry Coffee Mass\% \text{Yield} = \frac{\text{TDS} \times \text{Brew Mass}}{\text{Dry Coffee Mass}} where TDS is in percent, and Brew Mass and Dry Coffee Mass are in consistent units (e.g., grams). This equation derives from principles: the mass of extracted solubles equals TDS100×Brew Mass\frac{\text{TDS}}{100} \times \text{Brew Mass}, and yield is this value divided by the initial dry coffee mass, then multiplied by 100 to express as a percentage. For percolation methods, Brew Mass refers to the final beverage weight; in immersion brewing, it approximates the input mass adjusted for retention in the grounds. Tools for measurement include refractometers for TDS, which provide quick, non-destructive readings by analyzing light refraction in a small brew sample—calibrated with and suitable for both lab and use. offers a precise alternative in settings, involving of the brew to weigh residual solids directly, though it is more time-consuming and less practical for routine measurements. Home approximations often rely on affordable handheld refractometers, while labs may use digital models for higher accuracy. The modern framework for yield metrics, including the Coffee Brewing Control Chart, originated from Ernest Lockhart's 1957 research on TDS and percent extraction but was standardized and promoted by the SCA through its Brewing Handbook and research initiatives in the 2010s, incorporating sensory data to refine ideal ranges. This development facilitated consistent industry protocols for quantifying extraction efficiency.

Optimizing for Desired Outcomes

Under-extraction occurs when insufficient soluble compounds are drawn from the grounds, typically resulting in yields below 18%, leading to sour and weak flavors dominated by unextracted acids and lacking sweetness or body. Over-extraction, conversely, arises from excessive solubles being pulled, often at yields exceeding 22%, producing bitter and tastes due to the overabundant release of phenolics and chlorogenic acids. Optimizing extraction involves targeting the "golden cup" standards established by the Specialty Coffee Association (SCA), which recommend a total dissolved solids (TDS) range of 1.15-1.35% alongside an extraction yield of 18-22% to achieve balanced flavor with neither acidity overload nor bitterness dominance. This balancing act ensures a harmonious profile where desirable notes like sweetness and fruitiness emerge without the extremes of under- or over-extraction. Practical adjustments to achieve these targets require iterative tweaks to brewing variables, such as coarsening the to slow extraction and reduce yield when over-extraction is detected, or conversely fining the to increase solubles if the brew is under-extracted. Similarly, adjusting contact time (brewing duration) can help achieve the target 18–22% yield without exceeding it to avoid bitterness from over-extraction. further influences this process, as and affect extraction efficiency; soft water, with low mineral content, tends to extract more acids, enhancing perceived acidity but risking sourness if not balanced with appropriate .

Brewing Methods

Pressure-Based Methods

Pressure-based methods in coffee extraction utilize mechanical force to propel hot through finely ground , accelerating the dissolution of solubles and producing a concentrated beverage. The most prominent example is extraction, where at approximately 92–96°C is forced through a compacted bed of grounds under 9 bars of for 25–30 seconds, yielding a 1:2 input-to-output ratio (e.g., 18–20 grams of grounds producing 36–40 grams of liquid) and an extraction yield of 18–22%. This process requires a fine grind size, typically 200–300 microns, to create sufficient resistance and ensure even flow, resulting in a (TDS) concentration of 8–12% that imparts intense flavor and body. Variations in extraction volume alter the balance of compounds extracted while maintaining the core pressure parameters. A ristretto employs a shorter pull, using about half the water of a standard espresso (e.g., 15–20 ml output from 18 grams of grounds), which limits extraction to more soluble acids and sugars for a yield around 15–18%, producing a sweeter, more viscous shot with heightened acidity. In contrast, a lungo extends the extraction time to 30–50 seconds with more (e.g., 50–60 ml output), increasing yield to 22–25% by drawing out additional and , resulting in a milder yet more diluted profile with broader flavor complexity. These adjustments highlight how facilitates rapid, targeted solubilization without altering or dose significantly. Espresso machines employ vibratory or rotary pumps to generate consistent 9-bar , which enhances by compressing the coffee bed and forcing water into particle pores, thereby increasing the surface area for solute transfer compared to passive methods. This hydraulic force not only speeds extraction but also emulsifies coffee oils, contributing to the beverage's distinctive . A hallmark outcome is crema, the persistent layer formed by the emulsification of (approximately 0.1–0.2% of the brew) under , where CO₂ bubbles trap these oils and melanoidins to create a stable, reddish-brown that enhances aroma retention and visual appeal. The elevated TDS in pressure-based brews underscores their efficiency in concentrating volatiles and non-volatiles, distinguishing them from lower-strength extractions.

Gravity-Based Methods

Gravity-based methods of coffee extraction rely on the natural force of to draw hot water through a bed of ground coffee, allowing for a controlled process that promotes even dissolution of solubles while producing a clean, bright cup. These techniques, including drip and pour-over , typically use a medium size to balance flow resistance and extraction efficiency, with brew times ranging from 2 to 4 minutes to achieve extraction yields of 18-20%. filters commonly employed in these methods trap coffee oils and fine particles, resulting in a clearer beverage with reduced bitterness compared to unfiltered brews. In drip and pour-over , is introduced atop the bed, where it saturates the grounds and percolates downward under , extracting flavor compounds as it passes through. The medium facilitates a consistent path, preventing channeling that could lead to uneven extraction, while the 2-4 minute duration allows sufficient contact time for solubles to dissolve without excessive agitation. This process yields approximately 18-20% extraction, falling within the ideal range for balanced flavor in filter . filters enhance clarity by retaining oils, which contribute to a lighter body and accentuated acidity. Variations in filter geometry, such as cone-shaped versus flat-bottom designs, significantly influence flow rate and extraction uniformity. Cone filters, with their angled structure, promote faster drainage and more direct water paths, leading to quicker brews that highlight brighter, fruitier notes through enhanced evenness in the coffee bed. In contrast, flat-bottom filters create a more uniform headspace and slower flow, fostering greater body and sweetness by allowing prolonged contact and reducing the risk of over-extraction in peripheral areas. These differences arise from how each shape distributes hydrostatic pressure across the bed, affecting saturation and dissolution rates. The physics of these methods centers on hydrostatic generated by the above the , which drives a gentle, through the grounds to facilitate slow, controlled dissolution of solubles. This low- environment, typically around 1 atmosphere augmented by the water head, minimizes and over-extraction of bitter compounds, ensuring a progressive release of acids and sugars for balanced flavor. The dynamics follow , where flow rate is proportional to the and inversely related to resistance, allowing precise control over extraction by adjusting water addition. Equipment for gravity-based brewing has evolved from manual pour-over devices to automated drip machines, enhancing reproducibility while preserving the method's simplicity. The modern pour-over originated with Melitta Bentz's 1908 invention of the paper-filtered dripper, which revolutionized home brewing by eliminating sediment. By the 1970s, automatic machines like the Mr. Coffee introduced electric heating and timed dispensing, standardizing the process for daily use. A key feature in contemporary manual techniques is the bloom phase, where grounds are pre-wetted with a small volume of hot water for 30-45 seconds to release trapped gases from roasting, preventing uneven saturation and improving overall extraction consistency.

Immersion-Based Methods

Immersion-based methods involve coffee grounds in for a set period, allowing solubles to diffuse uniformly without the influence of water flow or pressure during extraction. This static process promotes even saturation of the grounds, leading to a balanced release of compounds until the water reaches near-equilibrium with the coffee's soluble materials. The , also known as a cafetière, exemplifies this approach using coarsely ground steeped in hot water for approximately four minutes before a metal separates the grounds from the brew. This method yields a full-bodied with extraction rates typically between 20% and 22%, retaining coffee oils and lipids that contribute to its rich due to the absence of a paper filter. Cold brew represents a longer immersion variant, where coarsely ground is steeped in room-temperature or cold water for 12 to 24 hours, resulting in a with lower titratable acidity and higher content compared to hot brews. The extended time allows for gradual extraction of solubles, producing a smoother profile with reduced perceived bitterness from acids. In these methods, extraction is driven by toward equilibrium in static conditions, where solubles dissolve until the concentration diminishes, often slowing significantly after initial rapid release. The retention of , such as diterpenes like , enhances body by preventing their filtration out, unlike in paper-filtered brews. Variations include the , a hybrid that combines brief immersion with manual pressure via a for faster separation, and , which uses an ultra-fine grind in a prolonged simmer without any filter, allowing grounds to settle naturally after . Time serves as a primary variable in duration across these techniques.

Advanced Techniques and Analysis

Extraction Modeling

Extraction modeling in coffee brewing employs mathematical frameworks to predict the dynamics of soluble compound transfer from ground to water, bridging empirical observations with theoretical predictions. Basic kinetic models often simplify the process as a reaction, where the extraction yield Y(t)Y(t) over time tt follows the equation Y(t)=Ymax⁡(1−e−kt),Y(t) = Y_{\max} \left(1 - e^{-kt}\right), with Ymax⁡Y_{\max} representing the maximum achievable yield and kk the rate constant governing extraction speed. This form assumes exponential approach to equilibrium, capturing the as soluble materials deplete. Such models have been applied to specific compounds like , fitting experimental data with high correlation. The rate constant kk is primarily influenced by , as higher temperatures accelerate and of coffee solubles, thereby increasing kk and enhancing overall yield. For instance, brewing at 90°C can yield 28-32% extractable depending on grind size, compared to lower efficiencies at reduced temperatures. These parameters integrate physical variables like and water flow, which modulate diffusion paths. Computational simulations extend these kinetics through finite element methods (FEM) to model within porous coffee grounds, solving partial differential equations for mass transport in complex geometries. Research employing FEM for coffee extraction has been applied in studies from the onward, with multi-scale models simulating intra- and inter-granular to predict concentration profiles during . These approaches account for advection-diffusion-reaction phenomena in packed beds, enabling visualization of solute migration under varying flow conditions. A key limitation of these models lies in their assumption of uniform grounds and homogeneous flow, which overlooks real-world channeling—preferential paths through fines or inconsistencies that lead to uneven extraction. This simplification can overestimate uniformity, reducing predictive accuracy for practical brews with variable particle distributions. Applications of extraction modeling include software tools developed in coffee research labs, such as MATLAB-based apps for simulating brewing parameters and optimizing recipes. These tools predict extraction kinetics for compounds like and chlorogenic acids, aiding in the design of consistent flavor profiles across methods like .

Sensory and Scientific Evaluation

Sensory evaluation of coffee extraction primarily relies on standardized cupping protocols developed by the Specialty Coffee Association (SCA). As of November 2024, the SCA adopted the Coffee Value Assessment (CVA) system, comprising SCA Standards 102 ( and Tasting Mechanics), 103 (Descriptive Assessment), and 104 (Affective Assessment), replacing prior protocols. The descriptive assessment evaluates attributes like fragrance, aroma, flavor, aftertaste, acidity, body, balance, sweetness, and using a 15-point intensity scale and check-all-that-apply (CATA) terms from the Coffee Taster's Flavor Wheel. The affective assessment uses a 9-point hedonic scale for overall quality impression, uniformity, and clean cup, with scores ≥6 indicating high quality. The CVA protocol involves preparing samples with a medium roast level (Agtron #65 or L* 26–29 in CIELAB), a where 70–75% passes through an 850 μm (medium-coarse, similar to ), and a brew of 8.25 g per 150 mL (affective) or 55–60 g/L (descriptive) using at 93 ± 3°C. Samples steep for 3–5 minutes before breaking the crust, with evaluation beginning around 70°C and continuing as the brew cools to capture sensory evolution. Trained cuppers slurp the brew to aerate it across the , identifying notes like acidity or body. Scientific evaluation complements sensory methods through analytical techniques that profile extracted compounds. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), often coupled with headspace (HS-SPME), identifies and quantifies volatile organic compounds (VOCs) responsible for aroma, such as furans, pyrazines, and aldehydes, enabling differentiation of extraction efficiencies across brews. For instance, GC-MS analysis of roasted coffee extracts reveals over 1000 VOCs, with key contributors like 2-furfurylthiol linked to roasted notes emerging prominently in optimal extractions. (TDS), a measure of extraction strength typically 1.15-1.45% for balanced brews, is validated using , though UV-Vis supports quantification of specific dissolved components like chlorogenic acids by absorbance at 325 nm. Studies correlating extraction yield with sensory outcomes demonstrate that yields around 19-21% often yield optimal profiles, balancing sweetness and acidity while minimizing bitterness; for example, drip brews at 20% extraction score highest in blind tastings for attributes like uniformity and overall liking. This range aligns with SCA guidelines, where under-extraction (below 18%) results in sour, vegetal notes and over-extraction (above 22%) introduces astringency, as evidenced by panel evaluations linking percent extraction to hedonic scores. Historical advancements in evaluation trace back to 19th-century chemical analyses, such as the isolation of by Friedlieb Runge and early adulteration tests using and assays to detect substitutes in ground coffee. By the mid-1800s, quantitative methods like for organic acids emerged to assess extraction purity. In the , AI-assisted tools have advanced flavor mapping, with models trained on data predicting sensory attributes like fruitiness from green bean scans, achieving correlations up to 0.90 with cupping scores and accelerating quality assessment. Electronic tongues integrated with AI further estimate full sensory profiles from electrochemical signals, reducing human bias in large-scale evaluations.

References

  1. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4986356/
  2. https://engineering.ucdavis.edu/news/engineers-guide-coffee-bean-brew
  3. https://sca.coffee/s/SCAE_Gold_Cup_European_Extraction_Preferences.pdf
  4. https://royalcoffee.com/understanding-coffee-extraction-other-key-brewing-concepts/
  5. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8545818/
  6. https://sca.coffee/sca-news/25/issue-18/amped-up-using-electricity-to-detect-and-quantify-molecules-in-brewed-coffee
  7. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.5c05673
  8. https://mediatum.ub.tum.de/doc/1734154/1734154.pdf
  9. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/pof/article/34/4/043104/2844780/Modeling-swelling-effects-during-coffee-extraction
  10. https://blog.mistobox.com/the-science-of-brewing-coffee/
  11. https://www.baristahustle.com/surface-area-and-time/
  12. https://sca.coffee/sca-news/25/issue-17/how-strong-is-the-coffee-youre-cupping-new-model-captures-the-equilibrium-extraction-nature-of-full-immersion-brewing
  13. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772502223000719
  14. https://coffeeadastra.com/2019/01/29/the-dynamics-of-coffee-extraction/
  15. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-73341-4
  16. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5740146/
  17. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/pof/article/35/5/054110/2889071/Uneven-extraction-in-coffee-brewing
  18. https://perfectdailygrind.com/2022/12/the-relationship-between-grind-size-and-coffee-extraction/
  19. https://coffeegeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/SCAGoldCupStandard.pdf
  20. https://www.urbansaqua.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/www.urbansaqua.com-robust-ro-drinking-water-systems-water-standards.pdf
  21. https://coffeeadastra.com/2018/12/16/water-for-coffee-extraction/
  22. https://www.baristahustle.com/diy-water-recipes-redux/
  23. https://prima-coffee.com/equipment/lotus-coffee-products/magnesium-lo-co-sp
  24. https://ratiocoffee.com/blogs/coffee-guides/how-agitation-affects-coffee-extraction
  25. https://perfectdailygrind.com/2019/07/pressure-profiles-pulsing-the-3-phases-of-espresso-extraction/
  26. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10408398.2021.1957767
  27. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10907646/
  28. https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/71528
  29. https://revistabionatura.com/files/2022.07.03.11.pdf
  30. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/fsn3.4640
  31. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0963996923010967
  32. https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/14/18/3192
  33. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-44886-w
  34. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00217-008-1004-x
  35. https://coffeeadastra.com/2019/02/17/measuring-and-reporting-extraction-yields/
  36. https://sca.coffee/sca-news/25/issue-13/towards-a-new-brewing-chart
  37. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/587af1d4db29d69a1a226b95/t/60aece65e4f2134d99f6e646/1622068839009/SCA%2BBrewing%2BChart%2B-%2BRevised%2BMarch%2B2019-US-Letter.pdf
  38. https://www.mt.com/us/en/home/library/applications/lab-analytical-instruments/total-dissolved-solids-in-coffee.html
  39. https://khymos.org/2021/02/14/wonders-of-extraction-coffee-part-1/
  40. https://fellowproducts.com/blogs/learn/the-beginner-s-guide-to-total-dissolved-solids-and-coffee
  41. https://sca.coffee/brewing-research
  42. https://www.baristahustle.com/coffee-extraction-and-how-to-taste-it/
  43. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924224419305692
  44. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/584f6bbef5e23149e5522201/t/5d936fa1e29d4d5342049d74/1569943487417/Coffee%2BStandards-compressed.pdf
  45. https://sca.coffee/sca-news/25/issue-9/english/water-and-coffee-acidity-how-to-adapt-your-water-for-different-extraction-methods-25-magazine-issue-9
  46. https://sca.coffee/sca-news/25-magazine/issue-3/defining-ever-changing-espresso-25-magazine-issue-3
  47. https://espressooutlet.com/blogs/blog-articles/extraction-yield-in-espresso-a-comprehensive-overview
  48. https://baristalife.co/blogs/blog/coffee-tds-for-espresso
  49. https://www.adamsandrussell.co.uk/journal/espresso-extraction-ristretto-vs-espresso-vs-lungo/
  50. https://www.home-barista.com/tips/should-ristretto-be-properly-extracted-t45622.html
  51. https://coffeechronicler.com/allonge-vs-lungo-turbo-shot-sprover/
  52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matt.2019.12.019
  53. https://gevi.com/blogs/buying-guide/espresso-coffee-machine-stable-pump-pressure-guide
  54. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3140933/
  55. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0963996918307105
  56. https://clivecoffee.com/blogs/learn/the-science-of-brewing-coffee
  57. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32652586/
  58. https://www.baristahustle.com/lesson/p-3-01-flow/
  59. https://sca.coffee/sca-news/25-magazine/issue-8/english/flat-vs-cone-basket-shape-is-as-important-as-grind-size-in-drip-brew-coffee-25-magazine-issue-8
  60. https://dailycoffeenews.com/2019/10/17/science-shows-differences-between-flat-bottom-and-semi-conical-filter-brews/
  61. https://coffeeadastra.com/2021/03/04/the-four-rules-of-optimal-coffee-percolation/
  62. https://today.ucsd.edu/story/coffee-and-turbulence
  63. https://majestycoffee.com/blogs/posts/when-was-drip-coffee-invented
  64. https://admiralvending.co.uk/blog/the-history-of-coffee-machines/
  65. https://www.seriouseats.com/the-hows-and-whys-of-blooming-coffee
  66. https://perfectdailygrind.com/2017/06/understanding-coffee-extraction-other-key-brewing-concepts/
  67. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-85787-1
  68. https://www.mdpi.com/2311-5637/8/8/375
  69. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0963996912002360
  70. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-18247-4
  71. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0963996921000387
  72. https://www.escondidospecialtycoffee.com/blogs/news/aeropress-coffee-brewing-history-science-and-flavor-behind-the-versatile-hybrid
  73. https://www.headcountcoffee.com/blogs/coffee-news/turkish-coffee-grind-size-explained-why-it-s-the-finest-grind-you-can-brew
  74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2015.06.003
  75. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/13/4/2688
  76. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12152871
  77. https://doi.org/10.17632/y2tz67f6ry.1
  78. https://sca.coffee/sca-news/sca-new-cva-cupping-standards
  79. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/584f6bbef5e23149e5522201/t/6731cfbf355ac535d2d6074c/1731317695988/AW_SCA-102_Sample-Preparation_28.10.24_Secured.pdf
  80. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0023643823012963
  81. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0889157522003970
  82. https://ift.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1750-3841.16531
  83. https://books.rsc.org/books/edited-volume/814/chapter/557358/Coffee-Consumption-and-Health-Impacts-A-Brief
  84. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0963996921005895
  85. https://doi.org/10.21603/2304-8028-2022-20-3-301-312
  86. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/365335895_Accelerated_estimation_of_coffee_sensory_profiles_using_an_AI-assisted_electronic_tongue
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.