Hubbry Logo
Compactification (physics)Compactification (physics)Main
Open search
Compactification (physics)
Community hub
Compactification (physics)
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Compactification (physics)
Compactification (physics)
from Wikipedia

In theoretical physics, compactification means changing a theory with respect to one of its space-time dimensions. Instead of having a theory with this dimension being infinite, one changes the theory so that this dimension has a finite length, and may also be periodic.

Compactification plays an important part in thermal field theory where one compactifies time, in string theory where one compactifies the extra dimensions of the theory, and in two- or one-dimensional solid state physics, where one considers a system which is limited in one of the three usual spatial dimensions.

At the limit where the size of the compact dimension goes to zero, no fields depend on this extra dimension, and the theory is dimensionally reduced.

The space M × C is compactified over the compact C and after Kaluza–Klein decomposition, we have an effective field theory over M.

In string theory

[edit]

In string theory, compactification is a generalization of Kaluza–Klein theory.[1] It tries to reconcile the gap between the conception of our universe based on its four observable dimensions with the ten, eleven, or twenty-six dimensions which theoretical equations lead us to suppose the universe is made with.

For this purpose it is assumed the extra dimensions are "wrapped" up on themselves, or "curled" up on Calabi–Yau spaces, or on orbifolds. Models in which the compact directions support fluxes are known as flux compactifications. The coupling constant of string theory, which determines the probability of strings splitting and reconnecting, can be described by a field called a dilaton. This in turn can be described as the size of an extra (eleventh) dimension which is compact. In this way, the ten-dimensional type IIA string theory can be described as the compactification of M-theory in eleven dimensions. Furthermore, different versions of string theory are related by different compactifications in a procedure known as T-duality.

The formulation of more precise versions of the meaning of compactification in this context has been promoted by discoveries such as the mysterious duality.

Flux compactification

[edit]

A flux compactification is a particular way to deal with additional dimensions required by string theory.

It assumes that the shape of the internal manifold is a Calabi–Yau manifold or generalized Calabi–Yau manifold which is equipped with non-zero values of fluxes, i.e. differential forms, that generalize the concept of an electromagnetic field (see p-form electrodynamics).

The hypothetical concept of the anthropic landscape in string theory follows from a large number of possibilities in which the integers that characterize the fluxes can be chosen without violating rules of string theory. The flux compactifications can be described as F-theory vacua or type IIB string theory vacua with or without D-branes.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
In physics, particularly within the frameworks of string theory and supergravity, compactification is the process of reducing the effective dimensionality of spacetime by curling up extra spatial dimensions into compact manifolds of finite volume, thereby reconciling higher-dimensional theories with the observed four-dimensional universe at low energies. This technique ensures that the extra dimensions are too small to detect directly, manifesting only through their influence on particle interactions and gravitational effects in the non-compact dimensions. String theory, formulated in ten spacetime dimensions to achieve anomaly cancellation and quantum consistency, relies on compactification to produce a four-dimensional effective theory by compactifying six extra dimensions on specific geometries. Ricci-flat manifolds, such as Calabi-Yau three-folds with SU(3) holonomy, are commonly employed to preserve N=1 supersymmetry in four dimensions, yielding massless spectra that include , gauge fields, and multiplets aligned with the . Orbifolds, like T^6/Z_3, offer simpler singular limits of smooth manifolds, facilitating explicit computations of the low-energy physics. The concept traces its roots to Kaluza-Klein theory in the 1920s, which unified and via a five-dimensional compactification, but it became central to in the following the identification of Calabi-Yau spaces as viable internal manifolds. Subsequent developments, including heterotic string compactifications on Calabi-Yau manifolds, linked these geometries to grand unified models and chiral fermion generations. A major advancement came with flux compactifications in the early 2000s, where background fluxes—generalized field strengths like Neveu-Schwarz/Neveu-Schwarz (NS-NS) or Ramond-Ramond (RR) fluxes—are threaded through the to stabilize moduli fields that otherwise parameterize the undetermined sizes and shapes of the . These fluxes generate warped geometries and effective potentials, enabling de Sitter vacua with positive and broken , while the landscape of possible flux configurations yields an exponentially large number of metastable solutions (on the order of 10^{500} or more). Such mechanisms address longstanding challenges in string phenomenology, including the and the smallness of the observed .

Historical Development

Kaluza-Klein Theory

Kaluza-Klein theory represents a pioneering attempt to unify gravity and through the geometry of higher-dimensional spacetime. In 1921, proposed extending from four to five dimensions, where the fifth dimension is compactified on a circle S1S^1 of small radius, allowing the theory to reproduce the observed four-dimensional physics while incorporating electromagnetic interactions as geometric effects. This approach was motivated by the desire to unify fundamental forces in the pre-quantum field theory era, drawing on Einstein's efforts to find a classical . Oskar Klein generalized Kaluza's classical framework in 1926 by incorporating , addressing the question of why the extra dimension remains unobserved. Klein argued that quantum uncertainty in along the compact direction confines particles to the lowest state, effectively localizing them to the four-dimensional , with the fifth dimension's radius estimated at approximately 103010^{-30} cm based on the scale where quantum effects become significant. This compactification scale ensures that excitations along the extra dimension—known as Kaluza-Klein modes—have masses far exceeding observable energies, rendering them undetectable in everyday physics. The effective four-dimensional theory emerges from dimensional reduction of the five-dimensional Einstein-Hilbert action. The off-diagonal metric components gμ5g_{\mu 5} are identified with the electromagnetic AμA_\mu, while the diagonal gμνg_{\mu\nu} components yield the four-dimensional metric and a . The standard in this setup is ds2=gμνdxμdxν+(dy+Aμdxμ)2,ds^2 = g_{\mu\nu} \, dx^\mu \, dx^\nu + \left( dy + A_\mu \, dx^\mu \right)^2, where yy parameterizes the compact of radius RR, and Greek indices run over the four dimensions. Integrating over the fifth dimension reduces the five-dimensional action to the four-dimensional Einstein-Maxwell action plus higher-order terms from Kaluza-Klein modes, which arise as massive vector fields via Fourier expansion on S1S^1: modes with integer momenta py=n/Rp_y = n/R ( nZn \in \mathbb{Z} ) acquire masses mn=n/Rm_n = |n|/R, interpreted as charged particles in the lower-dimensional theory.

Early Extensions to Quantum Theories

Following Oskar Klein's seminal contribution in the late 1920s, the classical Kaluza-Klein framework received a quantum mechanical interpretation by proposing that the extra is compactified into a small circle, with its size set by the de Broglie wavelength of particles, thereby integrating the theory with emerging and explaining the non-observability of the fifth dimension. This quantum extension transformed the five-dimensional unification of and into a framework compatible with wave-particle duality, where in the extra dimension generates states. In the 1930s, and advanced the quantization of scalar fields in relativistic quantum theory, providing the foundational tools for developing higher-dimensional within the Kaluza-Klein paradigm by interpreting positive and negative energy solutions as particle-antiparticle pairs. A key feature of these quantum adaptations is the emergence of Kaluza-Klein towers, arising from the mode expansion of fields on the compact extra-dimensional space. For a field propagating on a circle of radius RR, the Fourier decomposition yields an infinite tower of four-dimensional modes, each corresponding to a massive particle with mass mn=nRm_n = \frac{n}{R} (in natural units where =c=1\hbar = c = 1), where nn is an integer labeling the momentum quantum number along the compact direction. The zero mode (n=0n = 0) remains massless and represents the standard gauge field, while higher modes form heavy particles with the same quantum numbers as the zero mode, spaced exponentially in mass as RR is small, typically suppressing their effects at low energies. Early efforts to extend these ideas to encountered significant obstacles, particularly in higher-dimensional gravity. The Einstein-Hilbert action in dimensions greater than four introduces a with negative mass dimension, rendering the theory non-renormalizable, as loop corrections generate infinitely many divergent terms that cannot be absorbed into a of counterterms. Moreover, quantization attempts revealed issues, with negative-norm states or tachyonic instabilities in the spectrum, violating unitarity and leading to non-physical probabilities in formulations based on Kaluza-Klein reductions. A concrete illustration of these quantum extensions is compactification on a dd-dimensional torus TdT^d, where the higher-dimensional metric decomposes into four-dimensional components plus extra-dimensional blocks. The off-diagonal metric elements gμig_{\mu i} (with μ\mu a four-dimensional index and i=1,,di = 1, \dots, d an extra-dimensional index) yield U(1)dU(1)^d Abelian gauge groups in the effective four-dimensional theory, unifying multiple Maxwell-like fields with while the diagonal extra metric provides scalar moduli fields. The 1970s witnessed a revival of Kaluza-Klein-inspired models, with attempts to incorporate extra dimensions for unifying the weak and electromagnetic interactions beyond the original electromagnetic focus. These developments laid groundwork for addressing the electroweak sector through dimensional reduction, though challenges with renormalization persisted until later supersymmetric frameworks.

General Principles

Dimensional Reduction and Effective Theories

Dimensional reduction through compactification is a fundamental technique in theoretical physics for deriving effective field theories in four spacetime dimensions from higher-dimensional theories, by assuming the extra dimensions form a compact manifold of finite volume. The general procedure involves expanding the higher-dimensional fields in a basis of harmonics on the compact space and integrating the action over those dimensions, retaining primarily the zero-mode contributions that appear massless in the lower-dimensional theory. For a scalar field φ in D dimensions, with coordinates split as x^μ (non-compact) and y^i (compact), the Kaluza-Klein decomposition takes the form φ(x,y) = ∑_n φ_n(x) χ_n(y), where the χ_n are orthonormal harmonics on the compact manifold satisfying the eigenvalue equation ∇^2 χ_n = -m_n^2 χ_n, with m_n ∼ n/R for large n and R the characteristic compactification radius. This expansion leads to an infinite tower of 4D fields φ_n, where the zero mode (n=0) is massless, while higher Kaluza-Klein (KK) modes acquire masses of order 1/R, allowing them to be integrated out below that scale to yield the effective theory. In gravitational theories, the higher-dimensional Einstein-Hilbert action S = ∫ d^D x √-G R^{(D)} reduces upon compactification on a d-dimensional manifold M to an effective 4D theory incorporating gravity, gauge fields, and scalars. Metric components transverse to the non-compact directions become scalar moduli fields φ parametrizing the geometry of M, such as its volume or shape, with kinetic terms arising from the higher-dimensional curvature scalar. The resulting effective action is S_4 = Vol(M) ∫ d^4 x √-g [R^{(4)} - \frac{1}{2} (∂φ)^2 - V(φ)], where R^{(4)} is the 4D Ricci scalar, the kinetic term for φ ensures canonical normalization, and the potential V(φ) originates from the Ricci scalar of the internal manifold M, reflecting its curvature contributions after integration. As the simplest illustration, compactification on a circle S^1 yields a U(1) gauge field from off-diagonal metric components and a dilaton-like scalar φ ∼ log R from the radius modulus, with no potential V=0 due to the flat geometry, producing an effective action featuring 4D Einstein gravity coupled to Maxwell theory and the scalar kinetic term. The symmetry structure of the effective theory is determined by the geometry of compactification: the higher-dimensional SO(1,D-1) is spontaneously broken to the 4D SO(1,3) combined with the of the compact manifold M, which may yield conserved charges or gauge symmetries in 4D depending on the Killing vectors of M. For instance, translational invariance along becomes the gauge symmetry of KK vector fields. A crucial requirement for the validity of this effective description is that the compactification scale 1/R must be much smaller than the higher-dimensional Planck scale, ensuring KK modes are heavy compared to typical 4D energy scales and can be neglected without invalidating the low-energy approximation.

Choice of Compact Manifolds

In compactification schemes within higher-dimensional physics, the internal manifold must satisfy stringent geometric requirements to yield consistent lower-dimensional effective theories. It must be compact and without boundary, ensuring finite volume and avoiding unphysical divergences or instabilities in the metric. For vacuum solutions of the higher-dimensional Einstein equations, the internal space is required to be Ricci-flat, meaning its Ricci tensor vanishes (Rmn=0R_{mn} = 0), as this condition arises from the trace-reversed form of the equations when the external spacetime is flat or maximally symmetric. This Ricci-flatness ensures that the internal geometry does not source additional stress-energy, preserving the vacuum structure. Among Ricci-flat compact manifolds, tori stand out as simple, flat choices with abelian groups, facilitating explicit computations of Kaluza-Klein modes and symmetries in reductions. Spheres, although compact and familiar, pose challenges for gravitational compactifications due to their positive Ricci curvature (Rmn>0R_{mn} > 0), which conflicts with the Ricci-flat requirement in vacuum Einstein gravity and typically necessitates extra sources like fluxes to stabilize, complicating the basic scheme. K3 surfaces offer a richer alternative as compact, Ricci-flat Kähler manifolds of real dimension 4, analogous to Calabi-Yau spaces and valued for their topological properties in dimensional . The of the internal manifold profoundly influences the effective theory through invariants like Betti numbers, which dimension the groups and determine the spectrum of massless fields. In Calabi-Yau manifolds, the Hodge numbers h1,1h^{1,1} and h2,1h^{2,1} quantify the Kähler and complex structure moduli, respectively, with the total dimension given by h1,1+h2,1h^{1,1} + h^{2,1}. The χ\chi, a key topological measure, satisfies χ=2(h1,1h2,1)\chi = 2(h^{1,1} - h^{2,1}), linking geometry to physical parameters such as particle generations in model-building. For the six-torus T6T^6, a prototypical example, h1,1=3h^{1,1} = 3 and h2,1=3h^{2,1} = 3, yielding χ=0\chi = 0 and 3 Kähler plus 3 complex structure moduli. Furthermore, the π1\pi_1 of the manifold governs aspects of the gauge sector: simply connected spaces (π1=0\pi_1 = 0) support unbroken unified gauge groups, while non-trivial π1\pi_1 permits Wilson lines—flat connections on principal bundles—to break symmetries to subgroups like the gauge group. This mechanism leverages the manifold's loops to embed abelian or discrete fluxes, enriching the low-energy phenomenology without altering the Ricci-flat condition.

Applications in Supergravity

Compactification of 11D Supergravity

Compactification of 11-dimensional supergravity involves dimensional reduction on a seven-dimensional manifold to yield an effective four-dimensional theory, typically preserving N=1\mathcal{N}=1 supersymmetry when the internal space has G2G_2 holonomy. The bosonic sector of the 11D supergravity action is S=12κ112d11xG(R12F42)112κ112C3F4F4,S = \frac{1}{2\kappa_{11}^2} \int d^{11}x \sqrt{-G} \left( R - \frac{1}{2} |F_4|^2 \right) - \frac{1}{12\kappa_{11}^2} \int C_3 \wedge F_4 \wedge F_4,
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.