Hubbry Logo
SpartinaSpartinaMain
Open search
Spartina
Community hub
Spartina
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Spartina
Spartina
Spartina
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Spartina
Sporobolus montevidensis
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Plantae
Clade: Tracheophytes
Clade: Angiosperms
Clade: Monocots
Clade: Commelinids
Order: Poales
Family: Poaceae
Subfamily: Chloridoideae
Genus: Sporobolus
Section: Spartina
Schreb.[1]
Type species
Sporobolus cynosuroides
(L.) P.M.Peterson & Saarela
Synonyms[2]
List
  • Chauvinia Steud.
  • Limnetis Rich.
  • Ponceletia Thouars 1808 not R.Br. 1810
  • Psammophila Schult.
  • Solenachne Steud.
  • Trachynotia Michx.

Spartina is a genus of plants in the grass family, frequently found in coastal salt marshes.[3] Species in this genus are commonly known as cordgrass or cord-grass,[4] and are native to the coasts of the Atlantic Ocean in western and southern Europe, north-western and southern Africa, the Americas and the islands of the southern Atlantic Ocean; one or two species also occur on the western coast of North America and in freshwater habitats inland in the Americas. The highest species diversity is on the east coasts of North and South America, particularly Florida. They form large, often dense colonies, particularly on coastal salt marshes, and grow quickly. The species vary in size from 0.3–2 m tall. Many of the species will produce hybrids if they come into contact.

Taxonomy

[edit]

In 2014, the taxon Spartina was subsumed into the genus Sporobolus and reassigned to the taxonomic status of section,[5] but it may still be possible to see Spartina referred to as an accepted genus. In 2019, an interdisciplinary team of experts from all continents (except for Antarctica) coauthored a report published in the journal Ecology supporting Spartina as a genus.[6]

The section name Spartina is derived from σπαρτίνη (spartínē), the Greek word for a cord made from Spanish broom (Spartium junceum).[7]

Species

[edit]

The following species are recognised in the section Spartina:[5]

Subsection Alterniflori P.M.Peterson & Saarela
  • Sporobolus alterniflorus (Loisel.) P.M.Peterson & Saarela – smooth cordgrass – Atlantic coasts of North and South America, West Indies
  • Sporobolus anglicus (C.E.Hubb.) P.M.Peterson & Saarela - Great Britain, introduced to Europe, China, Australia, New Zealand, and North America
  • Sporobolus foliosus (Trin.) P.M.Peterson & Saarela – California cordgrass – California, Baja California, Baja California Sur
  • Sporobolus longispicus (Hauman & Parodi ex St.-Yves) P.M.Peterson & Saarela – Argentina, Uruguay
  • Sporobolus maritimus (Curtis) P.M.Peterson & Saarela - Europe, Africa
  • Sporobolus × townsendii (H.Groves & J.Groves) P.M.Peterson & Saarela – Townsend's cordgrass – western Europe
Subsection Ponceletia (Thouars) P.M.Peterson & Saarela
  • Sporobolus arundinacea (Thouars) Carmich – Tristan da Cunha, Amsterdam Island in Indian Ocean
  • Sporobolus mobberleyanus P.M.Peterson & Saarela – Tristan da Cunha, Amsterdam Island in Indian Ocean
  • Sporobolus spartinae (Trin.) P.M.Peterson & Saarela – Gulf cordgrass – Atlantic coast of North America from Florida to Argentina, incl the Caribbean and the Gulf of Mexico
Subsection Spartina (Schreb) P.M.Peterson & Saarela
  • Sporobolus bakeri (Merr.) P.M.Peterson & Saarela – sand cordgrass – south-eastern US
  • Sporobolus coarctatus (Trin.) P.M.Peterson & Saarela – Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay
  • Sporobolus cynosuroides (L.) P.M.Peterson & Saarela – big cordgrass – eastern US (TX to MA); Bahamas
  • Sporobolus × eatonianus P.M.Peterson & Saarela – eastern North America
  • Sporobolus hookerianus P.M.Peterson & Saarela – alkali cordgrass – western Canada, western + central US, Chihuahua, Jalisco, Michoacán
  • Sporobolus michauxianus (Hitchc.) P.M.Peterson & Saarela – prairie cordgrass – from Northwest Territories to Texas and Newfoundland
  • Sporobolus montevidensis (Arechav.) P.M.Peterson & Saarela – denseflower cordgrass – Venezuela, Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, Chile
  • Sporobolus pumilus (Roth) P.M.Peterson & Saarela – saltmeadow cordgrass – east coast of North America from Labrador to Tamaulipas; West Indies
  • Sporobolus versicolor (E.Fabre) P.M.Peterson & Saarela – Mediterranean, Azores

Ecology

[edit]

Species of the section Spartina are used as food plants by the larvae of some Lepidoptera species including the Aaron's skipper, which feeds exclusively on smooth cordgrass, and the engrailed moth.

Some species of the section Spartina are considered as ecosystem engineers that can strongly influence the physical and biological environment.[8][9] This is particularly important in areas where invasive Spartina species significantly alter their new environment, with impacts to native plants and animals.[10]

As an invasive species

[edit]

Three of the Spartina species have become invasive plants in some countries. In British Columbia, Sporobolus anglica, also known as English cordgrass, is an aggressive, aquatic alien that invades mud flats, salt marshes and beaches, out-competing native plants, spreading quickly over mud flats and leaving large Spartina meadows.[11] It is also invasive in China and California.[10]

Sporobolus montevidensis and Sporobolus pumilus have become invasive on the Iberian Peninsula and the west coast of the United States[10][12][13]

Sporobolus alterniflorus and its hybrids with other Spartina species are invasive in numerous locations around the globe, including China, California, England, France, and Spain.[10][14]

Cultivation

[edit]

Species of the section Spartina have been planted to reclaim estuarine areas for farming, to supply fodder for livestock, and to prevent erosion. Various members of the genus (especially Sporobolus alterniflorus and its derivatives, Sporobolus anglicus and Sporobolus × townsendii) have spread outside of their native boundaries and become invasive.

Big cordgrass (S. cynosuroides) is used in the construction of bull's eye targets for sports archery. A properly constructed target can stop an arrow safely without damage to the arrowhead as it lodges in the target.[15]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Spartina

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Spartina is a of approximately 16 of perennial grasses in the family , commonly known as cordgrasses, that are adapted to saline environments. These rhizomatous plants typically form dense, clonal colonies in intertidal zones, utilizing C4 to thrive in high-salinity, low-oxygen soils. Native primarily to the temperate and subtropical coasts of the , with additional in and , Spartina has a global distribution spanning every continent except due to both natural occurrence and human-mediated introductions. The is monophyletic and polyploid, with numbers ranging from tetraploid to dodecaploid (base x=10), facilitating rapid through hybridization and allopolyploidy, as exemplified by the formation of S. anglica in from S. maritima and S. alterniflora parents; recent studies support its distinction as a separate despite proposals for merger with . Ecologically, Spartina species function as foundational "ecological engineers" in salt marshes, stabilizing sediments at rates up to 17 cm per year, enhancing accretion, and influencing tidal hydrology, dynamics, and . Where native, they support high productivity in wetlands, providing for and aiding in , but several species—such as S. alterniflora and S. densiflora—are highly invasive outside their range, displacing native , altering webs, and increasing management challenges in invaded estuaries worldwide. Their ability to accumulate also positions them for applications in contaminated coastal sites.

Taxonomy

Classification history

The genus Spartina traces its taxonomic origins to the mid-18th century, when Carl Linnaeus described the type species, originally named Dactylis cynosuroides, in his seminal work Species Plantarum published in 1753, placing it within the grass family Poaceae (now Gramineae). The genus itself was formally established in 1789 by Johann David Schreber in Genera Plantarum, encompassing several saltmarsh grasses distinguished by their cord-like inflorescences. For over two centuries, Spartina was recognized as a distinct genus within tribe Zoysieae of Poaceae, but later reclassified to subtribe Sporobolinae in tribe Cynodonteae based on molecular phylogenetics, valued for its ecological role in coastal wetlands and studied extensively in morphology and distribution. Advances in began challenging the traditional classification in the early . A key study by Peterson and colleagues in 2010 utilized multi-gene analyses, including and nuclear DNA sequences, to reconstruct the phylogeny of the Chloridoideae, revealing that Spartina formed a nested within the larger Sporobolus, rendering Sporobolus paraphyletic without the inclusion of Spartina. This finding suggested that Spartina species shared a closer evolutionary relationship with certain Sporobolus lineages than previously thought, prompting calls for taxonomic revision to reflect under principles of . Subsequent analyses reinforced this embedding, highlighting shared morphological traits like structure and numbers that blurred generic boundaries. In 2014, Peterson et al. formalized a reclassification based on comprehensive DNA sequencing of over 100 taxa, proposing the merger of Spartina (along with related genera like Calamovilfa and Crypsis) into an expanded Sporobolus as subgenus Spartina (Sporobolus subgen. Spartina P.M. Peterson & Saarela). This revision, published in Taxon, involved 35 new combinations for Spartina species and emphasized Bayesian and maximum parsimony phylogenetic trees showing strong support (posterior probabilities >0.95) for Spartina as a derived clade within Sporobolus sect. Sporobolus. The proposal aimed to stabilize nomenclature while conserving the older name Sporobolus (established 1809) over Spartina for the combined genus, arguing that the ecological and nomenclatural stability outweighed splitting a well-supported monophyletic group. The 2014 reclassification sparked significant debate, culminating in a 2019 commentary in Ecology by Bortolus et al., who questioned the merger on grounds of Spartina's morphological, ecological, and evolutionary distinctiveness. They argued that Spartina represents a "solid genus" due to its unique adaptations to saline environments, including specialized rhizomatous growth and high polyploidy rates often linked to hybrid speciation events not typical in core Sporobolus. The authors highlighted the interdisciplinary legacy of Spartina—spanning invasion biology, restoration ecology, and genetic studies—and contended that subsuming it into Sporobolus (a genus with ~200 species) would disrupt over 200 years of accumulated knowledge without clear phylogenetic necessity, as support for the nesting was moderate rather than unequivocal. This perspective advocated retaining Spartina as a separate genus to preserve its iconic status in coastal science. The 2014 proposal was accepted by the relevant nomenclature committee, establishing Sporobolus as the conserved name; however, due to ongoing debate and traditional usage in ecological literature, the taxonomy remains in practical flux as of 2025. As of 2025, adoption of the reclassification is uneven, with phylogenetic research favoring Sporobolus section Spartina, while applied ecology often continues using Spartina.

Etymology

The genus name Spartina is derived from the word spartínē (σπαρτίνη), denoting a cord or typically made from the fibers of the Spanish broom (Spartium junceum), a shrub whose tough bark was used in antiquity for weaving and binding materials. This etymology, reflecting the similarly fibrous and durable leaves of Spartina species that lent themselves to cordage production, was adopted by the German botanist when he established the in 1789. The common name "cordgrass" arises from the rope-like quality of the plant's rhizomes and stems, which are tough and fibrous, evoking the cords produced from related plants in historical contexts. Many species bear the qualifier "saltmarsh cordgrass" to emphasize their adaptation to coastal saline environments.

Species

Sporobolus section Spartina (formerly the genus Spartina) comprises 16 accepted species and several hybrids, all perennial grasses primarily adapted to saline, coastal, and wetland habitats worldwide. This reclassification, based on molecular phylogenetic evidence, integrates the former Spartina taxa into Sporobolus subgenus Spartina, with new combinations proposed for all species. The section is characterized by paniculate inflorescences with spike-like branches and is divided into three subsections: Alterniflori, Ponceletia, and Spartina. Species exhibit varying ploidy levels, from tetraploid to heptaploid, reflecting reticulate evolution and hybridization events.

Subsection Alterniflori

This subsection includes predominantly North American native with thick, fleshy, succulent culms that become brownish with age and often emit a disagreeable when fresh; blades are smooth and glabrous, and panicles feature subremote to moderately imbricate spikes with upper glumes having glabrous or pilose keels.
  • Sporobolus alterniflorus (formerly Spartina alterniflora, smooth cordgrass): A hexaploid (2n = 60, 62) coastal dominant with flat leaves 1–2 cm wide.
  • Sporobolus anglicus (formerly Spartina anglica, common cordgrass): A fertile allopolyploid hybrid (2n = 120–127) derived from S. alterniflorus and S. maritimus, noted for its invasive potential in tidal wetlands.
  • Sporobolus foliosus (formerly Spartina foliosa, California cordgrass): A hexaploid (2n = 60, 62) phylogenetically sister to the S. anglicus , inhabiting Pacific tidal marshes.
  • Sporobolus × longispicus (formerly Spartina × longispica): A sterile hybrid with intermediate traits between parents.
  • Sporobolus maritimus (formerly Spartina maritima, small cordgrass): A hexaploid (2n = 60, 62) European coastal marsh .
  • Sporobolus × townsendii (formerly Spartina × townsendii, Townsend's cordgrass): A sterile (2n = 62) of S. alterniflorus and S. maritimus, serving as the progenitor to S. anglicus.

Subsection Ponceletia

Species in this subsection possess hard, slender culms with short, thick rhizomes (<1.5 cm long), spike-like panicles with closely imbricate spikes, and lanceolate spikelets; upper glumes feature hispid keels. All are tetraploid (2n = 40).
  • Sporobolus mobberleyanus (formerly Spartina mobberleyana): Endemic to coastal regions with limited distribution.
  • Sporobolus spartinus (formerly Spartina spartinae, Gulf cordgrass): A saline specialist in Gulf Coast marshes.

Subsection Spartina

This subsection, including several South American species, features hard culms often purple-tinged, scabrous leaf blades, spreading spikes that are purple-tinged, and closely imbricate spikelets with upper glumes bearing hispid keels; most are tetraploid (2n = 40).
  • Sporobolus bakeri (formerly Spartina bakeri, sand cordgrass): A xeric inhabitant of sandy coastal dunes.
  • Sporobolus coarctatus (formerly Spartina ciliata): Adapted to coastal and inland saline .
  • Sporobolus cynosuroides (formerly Spartina cynosuroides, giant cordgrass): A tetraploid (2n = 40) of freshwater and brackish marshes.
  • Sporobolus densiflorus (formerly Spartina densiflora, denseflower cordgrass): A heptaploid (2n = 70) with complex reticulate origins, invasive in coastal wetlands.
  • Sporobolus × eatonianus (formerly Spartina × eatoniana): A tetraploid (2n = 40) hybrid of S. cynosuroides and S. michauxianus.
  • Sporobolus hookerianus (formerly Spartina hookeriana): A tetraploid (2n = 40) North American .
  • Sporobolus michauxianus (formerly Spartina pectinata, prairie cordgrass): A tetraploid (2n = 40) dominant with extensive rhizomes.
  • Sporobolus pumilus (formerly Spartina patens, saltmeadow cordgrass): A tetraploid (2n = 40) of saline coastal meadows.
  • Sporobolus versicolor (formerly Spartina versicolor): A variable South American coastal .
Debated taxa, such as Sporobolus longispicus, lack full taxonomic resolution and are treated as hybrids pending further study. Synonyms for all species reflect their prior placement in Spartina, with no additional unresolved names in the section.

Description

Morphology

Spartina species are rhizomatous grasses that form dense colonies in environments. They typically grow 10–350 cm tall, with erect, terete culms that are hollow and solitary or clustered. The leaves are mostly cauline, with open sheaths that are smooth or sometimes striate, membranous ligules fringed with cilia, and linear blades that are flat or , measuring up to 63 cm long and 3–10 mm wide, often rolling inward under dry conditions. The is a terminal , 3–70 cm long, comprising 1–75 spikelike branches arranged racemosely, alternately, oppositely, or in whorls along an elongate rachis, with branches appressed to divergent. Spikelets are laterally compressed, sessile, one-flowered, and borne on the lower sides of the branches in numbers ranging from 5–40 per branch across representative ; each contains a single floret. The lemmas are 7–17 mm long, 1–3-veined with a keeled midvein, and may be awned or awnless depending on the . Belowground, Spartina plants develop extensive fibrous rhizomes that anchor in soft mud and enable vegetative spread, with some species exhibiting rhizomes up to several meters in length. Adventitious roots arise from these rhizomes, featuring tissue that transports oxygen from aerial parts to sustain respiration in anaerobic soils. Morphological variations occur within the , such as succulent culms in certain coastal species and tinting on leaves or stems in others; hybrid forms may exhibit dioecious flowering.

Reproduction

Spartina primarily reproduce sexually through wind-pollinated flowers that produce dispersed by tidal currents in coastal marshes. These anemophilous inflorescences release lightweight spikelets that float on , facilitating long-distance dispersal, with seed viability typically lasting up to 11-12 months under optimal cold, wet storage conditions before declining sharply. Asexual reproduction dominates in established populations, occurring via extensive rhizome networks that enable rapid clonal expansion and colonization of marsh substrates. This vegetative propagation allows Spartina to form dense monoclonal stands, enhancing resilience in dynamic tidal environments where sexual recruitment may be limited by environmental stressors. Hybridization plays a significant role in Spartina , as exemplified by the origin of the invasive S. anglica, which arose from the cross between S. alterniflora (2n ≈ 62) and S. maritima (2n ≈ 60), initially forming the sterile hybrid S. × townsendii (2n ≈ 60). Subsequent doubling through produced the fertile hexaploid S. anglica (2n = 120), conferring hybrid vigor and contributing to its invasiveness. The life cycle of Spartina is and seasonal, with new growth emerging in spring (late April to May), rapid vegetative and reproductive development through summer and early fall (flowering from June to ), and in late fall to winter (December onward), during which aboveground tissues die back while rhizomes persist. occurs preferentially under saline conditions typical of salt marshes (optimal at 75-225 mmol NaCl/L), requiring alternating temperatures, cold stratification, and aerobic environments to break and initiate establishment.

Distribution

Native range

The genus Spartina is native primarily to the , with the highest occurring along the eastern and western coasts of North and , as well as more scattered distributions along the Atlantic coasts of and . Approximately 16 species comprise the , with evolutionary origins tracing back to the , where phylogenetic analyses indicate the lineage diverged within the Chloridoideae subfamily prior to the development of polyploid complexes that characterize many extant taxa; pre-Columbian distributions were confined to coastal wetlands in these regions. In eastern North America, S. alterniflora (smooth cordgrass) exemplifies the genus's extensive range, extending from Nova Scotia southward along the Atlantic coast to northern Florida, the Gulf of Mexico, and as far south as Venezuela, occupying intertidal zones in temperate to subtropical latitudes approximately 46°N to 10°N. Similarly, S. patens (saltmeadow cordgrass) is distributed along the Atlantic and Gulf coasts from Quebec to Texas, with extensions into the Caribbean and Central America to northern South America, thriving in brackish to saline coastal environments from approximately 47°N to 10°N. On the Pacific coast, S. foliosa (California cordgrass) is restricted to salt marshes from northern California to Baja California, Mexico, spanning roughly 41°N to 31°N. In western South America, species diversity centers in temperate zones, with S. montevidensis (now classified as Sporobolus montevidensis) native to coastal areas of and , extending northward to southeastern and , within latitudes of about 35°S to 10°S. Overall, the native range of Spartina is limited to temperate and subtropical coastal zones between approximately 40°N and 40°S, reflecting adaptations to saline, intertidal habitats that predate human-mediated dispersals. Scattered occurrences in , such as along the Atlantic shores, represent relict populations of a few species, while any presence in is not part of the pre-human distribution.

Introduced ranges

Spartina alterniflora was introduced to in the early via from , with the earliest documented record dating to 1829 near , . This introduction supported early efforts in coastal by stabilizing sediments in estuarine environments. In the , the hybridization of introduced S. alterniflora with the native S. maritima produced the allopolyploid S. anglica, first observed around 1870 near , , and formally described shortly thereafter. On the Pacific coast of , S. alterniflora arrived in , Washington, in 1894 through a shipment of spat from the Atlantic coast. Subsequent deliberate plantings in the expanded its presence to for shoreline stabilization. By the 1970s, additional introductions occurred in , , as part of wetland restoration experiments using dredged materials. In , S. alterniflora was intentionally introduced to coastal regions of in December 1979 from , Georgia, and to enhance sediment accretion and protect against tidal erosion. It reached unintentionally in the late , likely via shipping vectors in Aichi and Prefectures. In the Pacific, deliberate introductions to occurred in the 1950s from the , aimed at estuarine reclamation and habitat enhancement. The spread of Spartina species beyond their native ranges has primarily resulted from human activities, including intentional plantings for and sediment stabilization, as well as accidental dispersal through ballast water discharge and contaminated shipments. Currently, these grasses are established in numerous countries across , , , and the Pacific, with S. alterniflora and S. anglica reported in at least 20 nations through ongoing human-mediated pathways.

Ecology

Habitat preferences

Spartina species primarily thrive in intertidal salt marshes, where they form dense stands in coastal wetlands subject to regular tidal inundation. These environments are characterized by fluctuating water levels and exposure to saline conditions, with Spartina exhibiting high tolerance to salinities ranging from 10% to 100% of strength (approximately 3.5–35 ppt), achieved through specialized salt glands that excrete excess NaCl from leaf surfaces. The preferred soils for Spartina are anaerobic mudflats rich in sulfides, typical of waterlogged coastal sediments, with a range of 6–8. These soils experience daily tidal flooding lasting 2–12 hours, depending on marsh elevation and tidal regime, which maintains the anaerobic conditions while periodically aerating the surface. Key physiological adaptations enable Spartina to persist in these challenging habitats, including the development of tissue in and rhizomes that facilitates oxygen from aerial parts to submerged organs, supporting aerobic respiration in oxygen-poor sediments. Additionally, Spartina displays , such as leaf rolling in response to or high stress, which reduces and conserves water during periods of low inundation or elevated evaporative demand. Within salt marshes, Spartina species exhibit distinct zonation patterns correlated with flooding frequency and duration. like S. alterniflora dominate the lower marsh zones, which experience more frequent and prolonged flooding, while upper marsh areas with reduced inundation are occupied by species such as S. patens. This vertical distribution reflects adaptations to varying degrees of submersion and soil anoxia.

Ecological roles

Spartina species function as engineers in coastal wetlands, primarily by stabilizing sediments through their extensive systems, which trap suspended particles and prevent during tidal flows. This stabilization enhances accretion rates, allowing for the development of elevated s that support diverse plant and animal communities. In native es, Spartina reduces wave energy by 20-76% over vegetated sections, with average attenuations around 40%, thereby mitigating and creating calmer conditions conducive to . These engineering activities promote overall by providing structural complexity, such as elevated hummocks and channels, that facilitate habitat partitioning for , birds, and . Within the , Spartina serves as a primary producer, directly supporting herbivores including snow geese that graze on its foliage during migration and sesarmid crabs that consume live tissues and excavate rhizomes. Upon , Spartina's decomposes into , which forms the base of the detrital , colonized by , fungi, and that in turn nourish higher trophic levels such as , , and wading birds. Additionally, Spartina hosts various species, including stem-boring moths like those in the genera Diatraea and Chilo, contributing to diversity in ecosystems. Spartina plays a key role in nutrient cycling by accumulating nitrogen and phosphorus from tidal waters into its tissues and roots, with concentrations varying by salinity but typically reaching several grams per kilogram of dry biomass. During decomposition, these nutrients are released back into the sediment and water column, fueling microbial activity and primary production across the ecosystem. Spartina marshes also contribute to carbon sequestration, burying up to 1.5 Mg C ha⁻¹ year⁻¹ in anaerobic sediments, which helps mitigate atmospheric CO₂ levels through long-term storage. Spartina forms mutualistic symbioses with microorganisms that enhance its ecological functions. Nitrogen-fixing bacteria, such as those in the genera and , colonize the , converting atmospheric N₂ into bioavailable forms that support growth and reduce reliance on external nutrient inputs. Various fungal endophytes inhabit tissues and can improve host tolerance to abiotic stresses such as and through protective compounds and enhanced nutrient uptake.

Invasiveness

Invasive species

Several species within the genus Spartina have become invasive in non-native regions, primarily due to human-mediated introductions and their capacity for rapid clonal spread. Key invasive taxa include S. alterniflora, S. anglica, and hybrids such as S. × townsendii. These species often establish in coastal wetlands, where their aggressive growth alters tidal dynamics and structure. Spartina alterniflora, native to the Atlantic coast of , has invaded the of the and coastal . On the U.S. West Coast, it was intentionally introduced to in the 1970s for restoration and , subsequently hybridizing with native S. foliosa to form aggressive hybrids that spread rapidly via tidal currents and rhizomes. By the early , invasive S. alterniflora and its hybrids covered over 3,500 hectares in the bay at their peak, demonstrating high propagule pressure from . In , S. alterniflora was deliberately introduced in 1979 to coastal sites for shoreline stabilization and , leading to widespread establishment along the eastern seaboard through intentional plantings and natural dispersal. Spartina anglica, an allopolyploid hybrid derived from S. × townsendii (itself a cross between S. alterniflora and native European S. maritima) that arose in the 1870s in , has invaded and . Originating from accidental hybridization in , it spread across European estuaries via tidal currents and intentional introductions for starting in the late , forming dense stands in the and other coastal areas. In , S. anglica was introduced intentionally in from British marshes to stabilize sediments, with subsequent spread facilitated by hull fouling on ships and local tidal dispersal, establishing in harbors like and Wanganui. Its clonal propagation via rhizomes contributes to persistent high propagule pressure in these regions. The hybrid S. × townsendii, the sterile progenitor of S. anglica, was also intentionally introduced in during the for reclamation projects but remains invasive in isolated sites due to its vegetative spread before evolving into the fertile S. anglica. Common pathways for these invasions include intentional releases for and accidental transport via maritime activities, amplified by the species' clonality that enables establishment from few propagules. Global hotspots for Spartina invasions include Pacific estuaries such as and in the United States, as well as Asian wetlands along China's River Delta and Bohai Bay, where high tidal energy and availability favor rapid expansion. These areas highlight the role of human vectors in facilitating invasions, with ongoing management efforts focusing on eradication to prevent further spread.

Environmental impacts

Invasive Spartina species, particularly S. alterniflora, form dense monotypic stands that displace native vegetation in coastal wetlands, leading to substantial habitat alteration and biodiversity loss. These stands outcompete native plants such as Phragmites australis, Suaeda salsa, and Salicornia species by rapidly depleting soil nutrients and resources, resulting in reduced plant diversity and the formation of homogeneous ecosystems that limit habitat heterogeneity. Studies in Chinese coastal wetlands have documented significant declines in microbial, plant, and animal diversity, with invasions transforming diverse mudflat and salt marsh communities into less varied landscapes. For instance, in areas like the Yancheng National Nature Reserve, S. alterniflora has displaced native halophytes, contributing to overall ecosystem instability. Hydrological changes induced by invasive Spartina further exacerbate by increasing sediment trapping and accretion, which elevates marsh surfaces and converts open mudflats into elevated high habitats. This process reduces tidal flushing and alters flow dynamics, impeding exchange and creating anoxic conditions in sediments. The loss of mudflats, critical areas for migratory shorebirds, has led to substantial reductions; in the National , up to 80% of migratory bird has been lost due to these conversions, affecting species dependent on exposed flats for feeding. Additionally, the invasion restructures benthic communities, reducing diversity and abundance, which in turn impacts fisheries by altering food webs and decreasing populations of bivalve mollusks and other key prey species. The economic repercussions of Spartina invasions include high costs for control and restoration, as well as indirect losses to fisheries and . In the United States, the San Francisco Estuary Invasive Spartina Project alone had expended over $50 million as of 2023 to eradicate hybrid Spartina and restore affected , with annual funding in the millions to sustain treatments across thousands of acres and additional $4 million awarded in 2025. These efforts highlight the scale of investment required to mitigate invasions that also disrupt commercial fisheries through changes in communities. On the climate front, S. alterniflora enhances from anoxic wetland soils by increasing plant and providing substrates for methanogenic bacteria, with studies showing up to several-fold increases in CH₄ flux compared to native vegetation. This reduced tidal flushing further promotes anaerobic conditions, amplifying releases and contributing to climate feedback loops in invaded ecosystems.

Management strategies

Management of invasive Spartina populations primarily focuses on preventing further spread and achieving eradication through targeted control methods, as the plant's extensive systems make complete removal challenging without repeated interventions. Strategies are tailored to site-specific conditions, such as patch size, type, and environmental sensitivity, with success depending on early detection and consistent application. Mechanical control methods, including hand-pulling, mowing, and tilling, are suitable for small to medium infestations and provide short-term reductions without chemical inputs. Hand-pulling is effective for small patches in soft substrates, where complete removal of rhizomes prevents regrowth, though it requires moist soil for ease and follow-up monitoring to address any fragments. Mowing limits photosynthesis and seed production when performed repeatedly (e.g., 3-4 times per season before seed set), achieving up to 80% decline in high-salinity areas after three years, but regrowth from rhizomes necessitates combination with other techniques. Tilling or plowing disrupts rhizomes, yielding 99% reduction in ramet density short-term, though full eradication often requires integration with waterlogging (20-30 cm depth post-mowing), which can achieve 100% control by depleting carbohydrate reserves. Chemical control relies on herbicides applied during active growth periods (e.g., July-August) to target foliage and rhizomes, offering high efficacy for larger areas but with potential non-target effects. applications at rates of 8 kg/ha provide 25-38% control after 75 days, with repeated treatments enhancing kill rates to 80-90% while reducing seed production, though it can temporarily impact benthic . , effective against rhizomes, achieves 100% mortality within 10 months at 5-10% concentrations, with minimal residues in soil/water (undetectable after 14-21 days) and no significant effects on macrobenthos or diversity, making it preferable for sensitive estuarine habitats. Biological control involves introducing host-specific agents to suppress growth long-term, though it remains experimental and supplementary. In , releases of the Prokelisia marginata since 2000 reduced S. alterniflora by 50% and by 15% in caged s, with populations spreading up to 200 m and surviving winters, though large-scale impacts are still under evaluation. by sheep or has been tested in European saltmarshes to limit Spartina dominance by reducing vegetation and altering community structure, but it is less effective for eradication in dense invasive stands. Potential , such as stem borers, are under in regions like , but efficacy data remain limited. Integrated approaches combine mechanical, chemical, and biological methods for optimal results, particularly in large-scale restorations. In , ongoing efforts since the 1990s using and have restored approximately 3,600 hectares of intertidal , enabling native succession and increased shorebird ; as of May 2025, Spartina has been eradicated from 76 sites, with only 6.7 acres (2.7 ha) remaining. In , infestations have been reduced by 98% to 18.7 net acres (~7.6 ha) as of 2024, with GIS monitoring tracking progress toward eradication. Such programs emphasize annual treatments for 3-4 years, achieving up to 88% decline when consistent, while minimizing environmental risks through site-specific planning.

Uses

Cultivation

Spartina species, particularly S. alterniflora, are primarily propagated vegetatively through rhizome division, where stems are cut into sections and planted in nursery rows spaced 12-24 inches apart to produce dense culm coverage of up to 25 per square foot. Seed propagation is less common due to variable germination rates of 3.5-80%, but involves collecting spikelets from September to December, storing them cold and wet at 3-4°C for 1-4 months, and sowing at approximately 9 seeds per square foot or 2.24 pounds of pure live seed per acre. Optimal conditions for propagation include temperatures of 13-35°C with cycling thermoperiods for germination and salinity levels of 8-33 parts per thousand (ppt) in brackish to saline nurseries, though freshwater enhances early growth in controlled settings. Site preparation for Spartina cultivation emphasizes intertidal zones with water depths of 1-18 inches, using well-drained soils ranging from coarse sands to mucky clays or silty loams with a pH of 3.7-7.9 and low to moderate organic matter to mimic natural marsh conditions. In nursery settings, a 2:1 mixture of topsoil and sand, augmented with local marsh soil, promotes robust root development and biomass accumulation. Planting occurs from April to September, avoiding peak summer heat in low-circulation areas, with vegetative plugs (containing 3 stems, 12-18 inches tall) spaced at 2-3 feet (60-90 cm) centers or trade-gallon containers (5-12 stems, 18-24 inches tall) at 5-8 feet (1.5-2.4 m) centers in single or double rows parallel to shorelines for erosion control plots. Hand planting into holes matched to the root ball size is preferred, with anchors like rebar used in high-energy sites to secure transplants against tidal forces. Maintenance involves natural tidal inundation for watering, supplemented by sub-irrigation with freshwater in nurseries to support growth at 20-30°C, and fertilization with slow-release high-nitrogen products or monthly applications of balanced 20-20-20 NPK at low rates to prevent nutrient excess and . Salt-hardening transplants by gradually increasing to 10 ppt prepares them for field conditions, while monitoring ensures survival rates exceed 90% in the first year. Harvesting of rhizomes or occurs every 1-2 years after establishment, using hand sickles or mechanized methods to divide clumps without depleting stands, allowing regrowth cycles. Key challenges in Spartina cultivation include managing fluctuations, as levels above 33 ppt induce stress and reduced , necessitating freshwater amendments or site selection in brackish zones. Pests such as fungi, stemborers, flower beetles, and grazing by or muskrats require protective caging or monitoring, while low viability and below 10% in field conditions favor vegetative methods over . Cultivation must also consider potential invasive spread, aligning with management strategies to contain growth beyond intended areas.

Practical applications

Spartina species are extensively utilized for in coastal and environments due to their robust root systems and ability to stabilize . In the , Spartina anglica has been planted in pilot projects along the to enhance coastal protection by promoting sediment accretion and reducing wave-induced on intertidal areas. These plants can decrease erosion rates by up to 80% in sandy substrates compared to bare areas, primarily through increased of the sediment bed. Sediment trapping by Spartina marshes typically ranges from 0.2 to 10 cm per year in European settings, supporting long-term efforts. Certain Spartina species serve as valuable and for , particularly when harvested young, and hold promise as feedstocks. Spartina pectinata, known as prairie cordgrass, is palatable for during early growth stages and can yield 6 to 16 metric tons of per annually under optimal conditions. Its stems are suitable for production, with pretreatment and processes achieving up to 88% of theoretical ethanol yields from the . Historically, Spartina has provided materials for various practical items, and modern applications include . Fibers from Spartina species have been used for cordage and mats in traditional practices, though such uses are now limited. Additionally, Spartina alterniflora and related species demonstrate potential by bioaccumulating such as cadmium, iron, and from polluted marsh sediments, aiding in the cleanup of contaminated coastal sites. The cultivation and deployment of Spartina for restoration projects contribute to a notable economic sector focused on rehabilitation.

References

  1. https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecy.2863
  2. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24408098/
  3. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2863
  4. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/spartina
  5. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234145977_Ecological_and_Evolutionary_Misadventures_of_Spartina
  6. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0141113623004208
  7. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227628771_The_austral_cordgrass_Spartina_densiflora_Brong_Its_taxonomy_biogeography_and_natural_history
  8. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1055790310000205
  9. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.12705/636.19
  10. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265553095_Proposal_to_conserve_Sporobolus_against_Spartina_Poaceae_Chloridoideae_Sporobolinae
  11. https://repository.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1039&context=oceanography_coastal_pubs
  12. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-56983-8
  13. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3310194/
  14. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/spartina
  15. https://www.missouribotanicalgarden.org/PlantFinder/PlantFinderDetails.aspx?kempercode=e126
  16. https://floranorthamerica.org/Spartina
  17. https://plant-directory.ifas.ufl.edu/plant-directory/spartina-alterniflora/
  18. https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/full/10.1079/cabicompendium.107740
  19. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17730244/
  20. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.214.4519.439
  21. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X24002991
  22. https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/plantmaterials/njpmcpg13933.pdf
  23. https://www.vcrlter.virginia.edu/thesis/JanetWalker_DMPThesis2015.pdf
  24. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2019.00484/full
  25. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0304377021001339
  26. https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00926.x
  27. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7357893/
  28. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-58879-7
  29. https://www.cje.net.cn/EN/Y2009/V28/I12/2466
  30. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17208463/
  31. https://research.fs.usda.gov/feis/species-reviews/spaalt
  32. https://www.wildflower.org/plants/result.php?id_plant=SPPA
  33. https://explorer.natureserve.org/Taxon/ELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.133813/Spartina_foliosa
  34. https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:77146683-1
  35. https://phytokeys.pensoft.net/article/1409/
  36. https://invasions.si.edu/nemesis/species_summary/505302
  37. https://pure.sruc.ac.uk/en/publications/a-century-of-evolution-in-spartina-anglica
  38. https://www.nwcb.wa.gov/images/weeds/smooth-cordgrass/Spartina-alterniflora-1995.pdf
  39. https://www.iucngisd.org/gisd/species.php?sc=792
  40. https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecy.3874
  41. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7503347/
  42. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11783-023-1741-x
  43. https://bsapubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.3732/ajb.93.12.1784
  44. https://bsapubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1979.tb06272.x
  45. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/14/10/1633
  46. https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2307/1938909
  47. https://www.dnr.sc.gov/marine/pub/seascience/dynamic.html
  48. https://bsapubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.3732/ajb.1400014
  49. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/marine-science/articles/10.3389/fmars.2021.696333/full
  50. https://link.springer.com/article/10.2307/1352695
  51. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7006405/
  52. https://www.nobanis.org/globalassets/speciesinfo/s/spartina-anglica/spartina_anglica.pdf
  53. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2024EF005421
  54. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10452014/
  55. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11769-025-1522-5
  56. https://milliontrees.me/2024/09/
  57. https://www.sfbayrestore.org/announcement/restoration-authority-awards-4-million-invasive-spartina-removal
  58. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/marine-science/articles/10.3389/fmars.2022.1054402/full
  59. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-27625-5
  60. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11275515/
  61. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328343414_Control_of_invasive_Spartina_alterniflora_A_review
  62. https://wsg.washington.edu/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/Improving-Management-Practices-for-Invasive-Cordgrass.pdf
  63. https://www.sfei.org/nis/smoothcordgrass.html
  64. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6730535/
  65. https://bioone.org/journals/invasive-plant-science-and-management/volume-10/issue-3/inp.2017.25/Large-Scale-Chemical-Control-of-Smooth-Cordgrass-Spartina-alterniflora-in/10.1017/inp.2017.25.full
  66. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1049964402001810
  67. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1631069103000520
  68. https://www.conservationevidence.com/individual-study/461
  69. https://agr.wa.gov/about-wsda/news-and-media-relations/news-releases?article=42660
  70. https://spartina.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/2024_Invasive-Spartina-Project_Water_Quality_Monitoring_Report.pdf
  71. https://s3.amazonaws.com/assets.cce.cornell.edu/attachments/11336/CPR.Spartina.alterniflora.pdf
  72. https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3799&context=etd
  73. https://repository.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3280&context=gradschool_theses
  74. https://www.ecoshape.org/en/cases/pioneer-salt-marsh-restoration-for-coastal-protection-eastern-scheldt-nl/initiation-phase/
  75. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0141113617302957
  76. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2257784
  77. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12155-020-10139-2
  78. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0960852415001893
  79. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/microbiology/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01450/full
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.