Hubbry Logo
Core stabilityCore stabilityMain
Open search
Core stability
Community hub
Core stability
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Core stability
Core stability
Core stability
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

In kinesiology, core stability is a person's ability to stabilize their core (all parts of the body which are not limbs). Stability, in this context, should be considered as an ability to control the tone, position and movement of the core. Thus, if a person has greater core stability, they have a greater level of control over the position and movement of this area of their body. The body's core is frequently involved in aiding other movements of the body, such as running; thus it is known that improving core stability also improves a person's ability to perform these other movements.[1]

The body's core region consists of the head, neck and torso (or trunk), although there are some differences in the muscles identified as constituting them. The major muscles involved in core stability, i.e. core muscles, include the pelvic floor muscles, transversus abdominis, multifidus, internal and external obliques, rectus abdominis, erector spinae (sacrospinalis) especially the longissimus thoracis, and the diaphragm. Notably, breathing, including the action of the diaphragm, can significantly influence the posture and movement of the core; this is especially apparent in regard to extreme ranges of inhalation and exhalation. On this basis, how a person is breathing may influence their ability to control their core.

Some researchers have argued that the generation of intra-abdominal pressure, caused by the activation of the core muscles and especially the transversus abdominis, may serve to lend support to the lumbar spine.[2] One way in which intra-abdominal pressure can be increased is by the adoption of a deeper breathing pattern. In this case, and as considered by Hans Lindgren, 'The diaphragm [...] performs its breathing function at a lower position to facilitate a higher IAP.'[3] Thus, the adoption of a deeper breathing pattern may improve core stability.

Typically, the core is associated with the body's center of gravity (COG). In the 'standard anatomical position' the COG is identified as being anterior to the second sacral vertebrae. However, the precise location of a person's COG changes with every movement they make.[4] Michael Yessis argues that it is the lumbar spine that is primarily responsible for posture and stability, and thus provides the strength and stability required for dynamic sports.[5]

In practice

[edit]
Further information: Kinesiology

Whenever a person moves, to lift something or simply to move from one position to another, the core region is tensed first. This tension is usually made unconsciously and in conjunction with a change in breathing pattern. An example to try is to sit in a chair and to reach forward over a table to pick up a cup. This movement is first accompanied by a tension in the core region of the abdomen and can be felt by placing one hand on the abdomen as the movement is made.

As the load increases the key muscles contract around the viscera, which are in-compressible, to form a stable ball-like core region against which the forces are balanced in coordination with posture.

It is commonly believed that core stability is essential for the maintenance of an upright posture and especially for movements and lifts that require extra effort such as lifting a heavy weight from the ground to a table. Without core stability the lower back is not supported from inside and can be injured by strain caused by the exercise. It is also believed that insufficient core stability can result in lower back pain and lower limb injuries.

Research

[edit]

There is little support in research for the core stability model and many of the benefits attributed to this method of exercise have not been demonstrated. At best core stability training has the same benefits as general, non-specific exercise[6][7][8][9][10] (see review by Lederman 09)[11] and walking.[12] Trunk or core specific exercise have failed to demonstrate preventative benefits against injuries in sports[13][14][15] or to improve sports performance.[16]

Training methods

[edit]

Training methods for developing and maintaining core stability include:

Exercise for strengthening of the cervical, thoracic and lumbar spine

[edit]

The cervical, thoracic and lumbar spine is composed of a total of 24 presacral vertebrae and their main functions are to protect the spinal cord, provide an attachment site for many muscles of the body. They also function by distributing one's bodyweight when standing upright.[17] Many injuries to the spine occur as a result of vehicle accidents, falling, and sports and recreation. While it is impossible to prevent such events from happening, increasing intra-abdominal pressure and strengthening the musculature in the back, along with keeping a neutral spine, can minimize injuries like hernias, strains, and sprains.

Intra-abdominal pressure

[edit]

The correlation between having a significant amount of core strength and spinal health has been well documented by many studies in the past. Some of these studies were able to quantify the effects that antagonizing abdominal muscle had on stabilizing the lumbar spine by increasing the amount of intra-abdominal pressure in order to maintain a straight lumbar spine and to avoid rounding during physical activities,[18] and using simple techniques such as the “Valsalva maneuver”.[19] A simple exercise used to strengthen the abdominals (rectus abdominis, internal/external obliques, and transverse abdominis) is using the isometric or “static” hold known as the plank.

Strengthening back musculature

[edit]

Simply by working to keep a neutral spine and remembering to increase intra-abdominal pressure before performing a movement that could compromise the spine, you are able to drastically decrease your risk for sustaining a back injury. If you were looking for ways to both strengthen and increase stability of the musculature of the spine one could perform various body weight exercises, for instance the bird dog exercise.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Core stability

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Core stability refers to the ability of the trunk muscles, including those in the , lower back, , and hips, to work together to stabilize the spine and maintain proper posture during static and dynamic activities, thereby supporting efficient force generation and transfer throughout the body. This neuromuscular control integrates passive structures like the spinal column with active muscle contractions and neural feedback to protect the spine from excessive stress and . Essential for both everyday movements and athletic performance, core stability forms the foundation for proximal body control, allowing distal limbs to move effectively while minimizing joint loads. The core musculature comprises approximately 29 pairs of muscles surrounding the lumbopelvic region, divided into local stabilizers—such as the transversus abdominis, multifidus, and muscles—that provide segmental control, and global muscles—like the rectus abdominis, obliques, and erector spinae—that generate and movement. These muscles, along with contributions from the diaphragm and intra-abdominal pressure, enable coordinated activation to resist or transfer forces, particularly during functional tasks involving the kinetic chain. Neural control plays a critical role, with anticipatory muscle firing patterns ensuring stability before limb movement begins, as demonstrated in studies on . Core stability is vital for and rehabilitation, particularly in reducing the risk of and lower extremity injuries like anterior cruciate ligament tears, by enhancing biomechanical efficiency and load distribution. Weak core muscles are associated with poor posture, increased , and higher susceptibility to musculoskeletal issues, making targeted a of and sports conditioning programs. Research supports its role in improving athletic performance through better balance, power output, and endurance, though evidence on direct relief varies. In clinical settings, core stability exercises emphasize progressive neuromuscular over isolated strengthening to restore functional stability.

Fundamentals

Definition

Core stability refers to the ability to control the position and motion of the trunk relative to the and lower limbs, enabling optimal force production, transfer, and control while minimizing joint loads and supporting posture and balance during dynamic activities. This neuromuscular control is essential for maintaining spinal alignment and efficient biomechanical function across a range of movements, from everyday tasks to high-intensity sports. It is distinct from core strength, which focuses on the dynamic generation of power through trunk musculature to produce and drive motion. Core stability emphasizes static and reactive control to resist unwanted displacement and ensure segmental stability, whereas core strength prioritizes forceful contractions for propulsion or resistance. The core region primarily encompasses the lumbo-pelvic-hip complex—a three-dimensional muscular cylinder bounded superiorly by the diaphragm, anteriorly by the abdominal and oblique muscles, posteriorly by the paraspinals and gluteals, and inferiorly by the and hip girdle musculature—with integrated contributions from the cervical and thoracic spine for whole-body postural coordination. The concept of core stability emerged in the early 1990s within rehabilitation and sports science, evolving from research on altered trunk muscle activation patterns in individuals with , particularly the delayed onset of deep stabilizers like the transversus abdominis. Seminal studies in this period highlighted the role of these muscles in preemptively stabilizing the spine before limb movement, laying the foundation for modern core training protocols in clinical and athletic settings.

Anatomy of the Core

The core encompasses a complex array of musculoskeletal structures in the trunk, , and surrounding regions that provide foundational support to the spine and . These structures include deep and superficial muscles, connective tissues, and osseous elements that collectively form a "muscular box" enclosing the abdominal viscera. The anatomical core is broadly defined as the central portion of the body, integrating the , pelvic and girdles, and associated musculature to maintain postural alignment and load distribution. Local stabilizers form the deepest layer of this muscular system, primarily responsible for segmental control and intra-abdominal compression without producing significant joint movement. The transversus abdominis, the innermost abdominal muscle, originates from the thoracolumbar fascia, iliac crest, and costal cartilages, inserting into the linea alba via its aponeurosis; it acts as a corset-like compressor around the abdomen. The multifidus muscles, comprising short, multipennate fibers along the lumbar and sacral spine, attach from the sacral lamina to the mammillary processes of lumbar vertebrae, providing precise stabilization to individual spinal segments. The pelvic floor muscles, including the levator ani and coccygeus, create a hammock-like base spanning the pelvic outlet from the pubic symphysis to the coccyx and sacrum, supporting the pelvic organs and maintaining the integrity of the abdominal cavity. The diaphragm, serving as the superior dome-shaped boundary, arises from the xiphoid process, lower ribs, and lumbar vertebrae, descending to form the thoracic-abdominal interface essential for compartmental pressure. Global stabilizers and movers constitute the more superficial layers, enabling broader trunk motions while contributing to overall rigidity. The rectus abdominis runs vertically from the to the costal cartilages, segmented by tendinous intersections, facilitating anterior trunk flexion through its contraction. The external obliques originate from the lower ribs and insert into the linea alba and , while the internal obliques arise from the and to meet at the linea alba; together, they drive trunk rotation and lateral flexion via their opposing fiber directions. Posteriorly, the erector spinae group, including the , , and , extends along the vertebral column from the and to the and ribs, promoting spinal extension and lateral balance through its bilateral action. The quadratus lumborum, a muscle, spans from the and to the 12th rib and lumbar transverse processes, supporting lateral trunk stability and unilateral spinal extension. The core integrates seamlessly with the appendicular skeleton, particularly through the hip girdle muscles, which extend the functional boundaries beyond the trunk. The gluteal muscles, such as the gluteus maximus, medius, and minimus, originate from the ilium and sacrum, inserting into the femur and iliotibial tract; they stabilize the pelvis during weight-bearing and transfer forces from the lower limbs to the core via the thoracolumbar fascia. Similarly, the iliopsoas complex, formed by the psoas major (from lumbar vertebrae to lesser trochanter) and iliacus (from iliac fossa to femur), links the lumbar spine to the hip joint, aiding in pelvic tilt control and load transmission between the trunk and lower extremities. This interconnectedness ensures that core anatomy supports whole-body kinetics, with hip muscles acting as extensions of the local and global systems. Anatomical variations in core structures can influence stability, with notable examples in postpartum individuals where weakness is prevalent. , especially , often leads to stretching or tearing of the , resulting in reduced muscle tone and impaired support for intra-abdominal contents; studies report in up to 84.1% of women at 6–8 weeks postpartum, with associated in 81.9% of cases. Such variations may also involve in the rectus abdominis, widening the linea alba due to hormonal and mechanical stresses during , though recovery patterns differ by parity and delivery mode.

Physiological Mechanisms

Role in Movement and Stability

Core stability plays a crucial role in neuromuscular control by enabling anticipatory activation of deep core muscles, such as the transversus abdominis, to prepare the spine for dynamic demands. This feedforward mechanism involves the transversus abdominis contracting prior to the initiation of limb movements, typically 20-50 ms in advance, to increase spinal stiffness and facilitate efficient force transfer without compromising mobility. Such activation ensures that the trunk remains stable, preventing unwanted perturbations during activities like reaching or stepping, and is independent of the direction of limb motion. Biomechanically, core stability maintains a neutral spine position, which optimizes load distribution across the vertebrae and minimizes injurious forces on the region. By aligning the spine in its natural lordotic curve, core engagement reduces anterior-posterior shear forces on intervertebral discs, particularly at L4-L5, where such loads are highest during lifting or bending. This positioning allows compressive forces to be borne primarily by the vertebral bodies and discs in a balanced manner, enhancing overall spinal resilience and reducing the risk of disc herniation or stress under load. In the context of the kinetic chain, core stability serves as the proximal foundation for sequential force transmission from the lower body to the distal segments, exemplified in and running. During , stable core activation enables a proximal-to-distal sequencing where ground reaction forces generated in the legs and hips are efficiently channeled through the trunk to the upper extremity, maximizing and power output while minimizing energy loss. Similarly, in running, core control coordinates pelvic and thoracic rotation, ensuring smooth transfer of propulsive forces from the hips to the arms, which maintains efficiency and balance. Breathing integrates with core stability through coordinated co-contraction of the diaphragm and abdominal muscles during respiration cycles, sustaining continuous trunk control. The diaphragm's descent during facilitates intra-abdominal pressure modulation, prompting synergistic activation of the transversus abdominis and to brace the spine without interrupting airflow. This rhythmic interplay allows for uninterrupted stability during prolonged activities, as exhalation phases reinforce abdominal draw-in to counteract gravitational or inertial loads on the trunk.

Intra-abdominal Pressure

Intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) refers to the hydraulic pressure generated within the , which plays a critical role in core stability by providing support to the spine. This pressure is created through the coordinated contraction of key muscles: the diaphragm contracts downward to descend and increase thoracic pressure, the muscles contract upward to resist descent, and the muscles (including the transversus abdominis, rectus abdominis, and obliques) contract inward to compress the viscera. This synergistic action forms a pressurized that transmits force evenly across the , enhancing overall structural integrity during dynamic activities. Physiologically, IAP stabilizes the spine by increasing resistance to compression and reducing shear forces on the vertebrae, particularly in the region. During heavy lifts or Valsalva maneuvers—where breath is held against a closed to maximize pressure—IAP can unload compressive forces on the spine by up to 19% in certain postures, while also augmenting spinal stiffness to prevent buckling under load. This mechanism is especially effective in tasks requiring trunk extension, such as lifting or , where it counters external moments without excessive reliance on paraspinal muscles. IAP is typically measured using techniques like intragastric or intravesical catheters, with resting values around 5-10 mmHg rising to 50-150 mmHg during moderate exertion and potentially exceeding 300 mmHg in maximal efforts like heavy weightlifting. Factors such as obesity can elevate baseline IAP due to increased intra-abdominal mass and reduced diaphragmatic excursion, while respiratory disorders like chronic obstructive pulmonary disease may impair pressure generation through weakened diaphragmatic function. Clinically, proper IAP generation is essential for preventing spinal injuries, as it distributes loads to minimize vertebral stress during high-demand activities. In weightlifting, inadequate IAP—often from poor bracing technique—can lead to excessive shear on the spine or abdominal hernias by allowing localized pressure spikes without uniform support.

Benefits and Applications

Health and Injury Prevention

Exercise training, including core stability exercises, has been shown to significantly reduce the incidence of (LBP) in sedentary populations by approximately 33%, primarily through enhanced load distribution across the spine and improved neuromuscular control. Meta-analyses indicate that core exercises are more effective than general exercise in decreasing intensity and improving function in individuals with chronic non-specific LBP, with short-term benefits observed in reduction and scores. This approach supports better spinal alignment and reduces strain on structures, making it a recommended intervention for prevention in at-risk groups. Beyond LBP, core stability training lowers the risk of various musculoskeletal injuries by enhancing postural control and balance, which are critical for maintaining kinetic chain integrity during dynamic activities. For instance, programs incorporating core exercises have been associated with up to a 25% reduction in (ACL) tears in females and up to 85% in males, by improving proximal stability and reducing compensatory lower extremity movements. Similarly, improved core function helps mitigate risks of herniated discs through better intra-abdominal pressure management and spinal stabilization, preventing excessive shear forces on intervertebral structures. In rehabilitation settings, core stability exercises are integral to managing conditions like and facilitating post-surgical recovery, as endorsed by clinical guidelines emphasizing safe muscle activation without excessive spinal loading. For , stabilization-focused , such as sling-based core exercises, has demonstrated improvements in bone mineral density in postmenopausal women, aiding in risk reduction while supporting overall skeletal health. Post-surgically, early core muscle after abdominal procedures is safe and promotes fascial and functional recovery without increasing complication rates, aligning with protocols for progressive rehabilitation. Broader health benefits of core stability include enhanced , which contributes to in the elderly by improving balance and reaction times during perturbations. Additionally, core training supports metabolic health through better posture, which facilitates efficient respiratory mechanics and insulin sensitivity, as evidenced by reductions in blood glucose levels following regular sessions. These effects underscore core stability's role in promoting long-term wellness across diverse populations.

Performance Enhancement in Sports

Core stability plays a pivotal role in enhancing athletic performance by facilitating efficient force transfer through the kinetic chain, allowing athletes to generate and transmit power from the lower body to the upper body with minimal energy loss. This proximal stability enables distal mobility, optimizing biomechanical function during explosive movements. In trained athletes, targeted core stability training has been shown to improve sprint speed and height, as evidenced by systematic reviews of interventions that enhance neuromuscular control and power output. For instance, studies on and soccer players demonstrate significant gains in hop and countermovement jump performance following 4-8 weeks of core-focused protocols, attributing these improvements to better trunk control during acceleration and takeoff phases. In rotational sports such as and , core stability particularly benefits from enhanced oblique muscle control, which supports generation and rotational velocity critical for swings and serves. Strong oblique engagement stabilizes the torso, enabling greater transfer and increasing clubhead or racket speed without compromising balance. Similarly, in linear sports like running, pelvic stability provided by the core maintains optimal alignment and stride efficiency, reducing lateral sway and improving forward propulsion. A strong core also facilitates upright posture and neutral spine alignment, preventing excessive forward lean or slouching, which supports better torso control during running and reduces energy waste from compensatory movements associated with poor posture. This contributes to improved running efficiency and lower injury risk, particularly to the lower extremities and back. Research highlights that core training improves pelvic control in runners, leading to more economical mechanics and sustained velocity over distances. Core stability also contributes to endurance and fatigue resistance by preserving proper form during prolonged activities, thereby minimizing compensatory movements that lead to energy inefficiency. Athletes with robust core endurance exhibit delayed onset of trunk fatigue, allowing consistent power delivery and reduced metabolic cost in extended efforts such as or multi-event competitions. This is supported by findings that core interventions decrease run times in endurance tests by facilitating better load distribution and postural control under fatigue. Practical integration of core stability training is evident in sports like soccer, where balance drills enhance multidirectional agility and ball control, and in gymnastics, where exercises targeting controlled landings improve impact absorption and scoring precision. In soccer programs, incorporating unstable surface balance work has led to better postural stability during dynamic play, while gymnasts benefit from core protocols that refine landing kinetics for safer, higher-scoring dismounts. These applications underscore core stability's role in sport-specific performance optimization.

Training and Exercises

Principles of Core Training

Core stability training emphasizes maintaining a neutral spine position, which is defined as the pain-free alignment midway between lumbar flexion and extension, serving as the foundational posture for all exercises to minimize risk and optimize load transfer. This approach prioritizes controlled to enhance intra-abdominal pressure and co-activation of deep core muscles like the transverse abdominis and , rather than relying on traditional isolated movements such as crunches that may promote spinal flexion. Training programs incorporate multi-planar movements across sagittal, frontal, and transverse planes to mimic functional demands, fostering neuromuscular coordination and stability over single-plane isolation exercises. Effective progression in core stability training follows a structured model, typically advancing through four phases: with isometric holds to engage deep stabilizers, stabilization to build in neutral positions, integration of core function with limb movements, and perturbation to introduce dynamic for advanced neuromuscular challenges. Beginners may start with basic isometric exercises like planks held for 20-30 seconds, progressing to dynamic variations involving perturbations such as unstable surfaces or partner-assisted movements. Programs are generally recommended at a frequency of 2-3 sessions per week for 6-8 weeks, with each session lasting 20-30 minutes to allow adequate recovery while promoting adaptations without overtraining. For hip stabilization exercises, a key component of core stability training, a frequency of 2–3 times per week is recommended for best results; progression can be achieved by adding holds, repetitions, or resistance such as bands as strength improves. Individualization is essential, with adaptations based on age, fitness level, and specific conditions to ensure and efficacy; for instance, older adults or may focus on low-intensity activation phases, while those with conditions like can modify exercises using pelvic tilts to support core engagement without positions. Assessments such as the Functional Movement Screen guide tailoring, adjusting volume and complexity to match baseline capabilities and prevent exacerbation of limitations. Core stability training integrates seamlessly into holistic fitness programs by combining with resistance exercises for strength development and cardiovascular activities for endurance, using multi-joint movements like squats or loaded carries that inherently recruit the core alongside aerobic components to enhance overall kinetic chain efficiency. This approach balances demands across strength, stability, and conditioning, often incorporating core work within warm-ups or as finishers to support comprehensive athletic or goals.

Specific Exercises and Techniques

Core stability training incorporates a variety of exercises designed to enhance muscular , coordination, and control across the trunk. Foundational exercises form the basis of programs, targeting overall without excessive spinal loading. The plank, for instance, involves maintaining a on the forearms and toes with a neutral spine, recruiting the external obliques, rectus abdominis, and to build static and core stabilization. Variations such as the side plank and 3-point plank enhance balance and stability challenges, making them particularly useful for maintaining neutral spine alignment and upright posture during dynamic activities such as running. Beginners should start with the regular forearm plank variation for general core strengthening and easier maintenance of proper form. Similarly, the bird-dog exercise, performed in a quadruped position by extending one arm and the contralateral leg while keeping the spine neutral, improves lumbar-pelvic coordination through engagement of the external obliques, , and lumbar multifidus. The dead bug, executed by lying on the back with arms extended upward and knees bent at 90 degrees, pressing the lower back into the floor, then slowly extending one arm overhead and the opposite leg out without arching the back, and alternating sides for 3 sets of 10-12 repetitions per side, emphasizes anti-extension control and recruits deep core stabilizers for dynamic stability. This exercise is valuable for enhancing torso control and posture maintenance in activities such as running. It is excellent for core control without straining the back. Additional foundational exercises include the hollow-body hold, glute bridge, and superman. The hollow-body hold is performed supine by lying on the back with arms extended overhead, engaging the core to press the lower back into the floor, then lifting the head, shoulders, and legs slightly off the ground while maintaining contact between the lower back and floor, and holding the position. It targets deep abdominal muscles and builds anti-extension strength and core endurance for improved torso control and posture support during dynamic activities such as running. The glute bridge is executed by lying supine with knees bent and feet flat on the floor, lifting the hips by contracting the glutes until the body forms a straight line from knees to shoulders, strengthening the posterior chain including the glutes and core to reduce lower back strain and promote upright posture. Single-leg variations increase stability demands. The superman is performed prone by lying face down with arms extended forward, simultaneously lifting the arms, head, and legs off the ground while keeping the neck neutral and holding briefly, strengthening the back extensors and glutes to counter forward lean and support upright alignment during running. Advanced techniques introduce instability and multi-planar demands to challenge balance and power. Stability ball rollouts require kneeling and rolling a Swiss ball forward from the hands while maintaining a rigid , promoting dynamic balance via heightened stabilizer recruitment compared to floor-based variations. Cable chops, involving a diagonal pulling motion from high to low across the body using a cable machine, develop rotational power by activating obliques and transverse abdominis in functional patterns. Suspension trainer anti-rotation presses, such as the TRX Pallof press where one stands to the anchor and presses the handles outward against rotational pull, enhance anti-rotational strength through isometric holds that target the entire core cylinder. This exercise is effective for resisting lateral forces and maintaining upright form in dynamic sports including running. Region-specific exercises address targeted areas to support segmental control. For cervical and thoracic focus, quadruped thoracic rotations begin in a hands-and-knees position, with one arm threading under the body and then reaching upward to rotate the upper back, improving thoracic mobility while maintaining lumbar stability through core engagement. In lumbar-emphasized training, the McGill curl-up involves lifting only the head and shoulders slightly off the ground with one leg bent and hands under the lower back, designed to activate the rectus abdominis and obliques while minimizing shear forces on the spine. Effective execution relies on proper cues to prevent compensatory patterns. Practitioners should maintain intra-abdominal (IAP) during holds by bracing as if preparing for a light punch to the midsection, which stabilizes the spine and enhances transfer. A common error is lumbar hyperextension, often occurring when fatigue leads to excessive arching; to avoid this, focus on a neutral spine by engaging the anterior core to prevent the lower back from sagging or overextending.

Research and Evidence

Historical Studies

The concept of core stability gained prominence in the through foundational research emphasizing the role of deep abdominal muscles in spinal control. A seminal study by Hodges and Richardson demonstrated that the transversus abdominis muscle activates in a manner prior to limb movement, independent of direction, suggesting its critical function in providing anticipatory lumbar stabilization during dynamic activities. This work laid the groundwork for understanding core muscles as a proactive for maintaining spinal integrity, influencing subsequent rehabilitation approaches. Building on this, Kibler et al. in 2006 conceptualized the core as a "muscular " comprising local stabilizers and global mobilizers that link the upper and lower body, enabling efficient force transfer while minimizing joint loads in athletic and daily movements. This definition shifted focus from isolated strength to integrated stability, promoting the core's role in biomechanical efficiency across various activities. Early evidence for core stability training's benefits in emerged from randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews before 2010. For instance, Hides et al. reported that specific stabilizing exercises for patients with first-episode reduced recurrence rates to 35% at 2-3 years follow-up, compared to 75% in the control group receiving general advice, indicating a substantial preventive effect. A pre-2010 by Ferreira et al. further supported these findings, showing moderate-quality evidence that specific stabilization exercises were more effective than general exercise or no treatment for reducing and in spinal and pelvic conditions. However, limitations in early research were increasingly highlighted, particularly the overemphasis on isolated activation of muscles like the transversus abdominis without sufficient integration into functional contexts. Lederman critiqued this as the "stability myth," arguing that core stability paradigms often oversimplified spinal and lacked robust evidence for preventing through isolated training alone, calling for a more holistic view of movement patterns. A key milestone occurred in the mid-2000s when core stability principles were integrated into guidelines, notably through endorsements by the American Physical Therapy Association's Orthopaedic Section, which incorporated stabilization exercises into recommended interventions for management based on emerging evidence. This adoption marked a transition from theoretical concepts to standard clinical practice, influencing rehabilitation protocols worldwide.

Recent Developments (2020-2025)

A 2023 meta-analysis by Rodríguez-Perea et al. examined the effects of core training on athletic performance across various , finding significant improvements in neuromuscular coordination measures such as balance ( [ES] = 1.17) and muscle power via jumping tasks ( ES = 0.69; horizontal jump ES = 0.84), though results for or hitting were mixed and non-significant (ES = 0.30). This work highlighted core training's role in enhancing foundational neuromuscular functions but noted inconsistent transfer to all performance domains. Similarly, a 2025 and in by Guo et al. compared , core resistance, and traditional core stability training for chronic nonspecific , revealing Pilates as superior for pain reduction (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.75 versus 0.53 for core stability training), with functional improvements also favoring Pilates (SMD = 0.71), though no statistically significant differences across modalities overall. In rehabilitation advances, a 2025 randomized controlled trial published in Medicina demonstrated that Pilates-based core stability training over six weeks increased deep core muscle thickness (e.g., transversus abdominis by 0.14 cm during contraction) and improved contraction timing (reduced by 3.55 seconds for transversus abdominis), alongside enhanced contraction ratios (up to 12.95%). Related research supports core stability's effectiveness in sports physiotherapy, particularly for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) recovery; a 2025 systematic review in found that core exercises post-ACLR improved lower-limb and neuromuscular control during dynamic tasks. Emerging trends include the integration of technology such as (EMG) to optimize core activation, with a 2024 review in Exploration of Musculoskeletal Diseases indicating that EMG feedback enhances muscle control and functional outcomes in rehabilitation by providing real-time cues for precise engagement. A 2025 in BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation further noted that while core training yields foundational improvements in balance and power, its impact on sport-specific athletic performance remains variable, suggesting a need for tailored protocols. Controversies persist regarding the overhyping of core stability benefits, particularly for universal in high-impact sports.

References

  1. https://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/fitness/in-depth/core-exercises/art-20044751
  2. https://us.humankinetics.com/blogs/excerpt/defining-core-stability-and-core-strengthening
  3. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18296944/
  4. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/core-stability
  5. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16526831/
  6. https://journals.lww.com/acsm-healthfitness/fulltext/2017/03000/core_training__separating_fact_from_fiction.4.aspx
  7. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3806175/
  8. https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/understanding-and-improving-core-strength-2018090414662
  9. https://repository.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2567&context=gradschool_dissertations
  10. https://digitalcommons.kansascity.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1356&context=facultypub
  11. https://www.physio-pedia.com/Core_Muscles
  12. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10242003/
  13. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9166925/
  14. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666638322000962
  15. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23915481/
  16. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3806181/
  17. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S193414821501206X
  18. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3578435/
  19. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7913092/
  20. https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/123824/cdc_123824_DS1.pdf
  21. https://www.logan.edu/mm/files/LRC/Senior-Research/2013-dec-36.pdf
  22. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3233951/
  23. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16023475/
  24. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10050947/
  25. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6945051/
  26. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23916162/
  27. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5056912/
  28. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2990395/
  29. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10552322/
  30. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11319541/
  31. https://academic.oup.com/aje/article-pdf/187/5/1093/25082094/kwx337.pdf
  32. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23284879/
  33. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9340836/
  34. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10576283/
  35. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10726400/
  36. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4242935/
  37. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12113010/
  38. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4166601/
  39. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316856330_Core_Stability_Training_and_Jump_Performance_in_Young_Basketball_Players
  40. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859225004218
  41. https://link.springer.com/article/10.2165/00007256-200636030-00001
  42. https://musculoskeletalkey.com/core-and-lumbopelvic-stabilization-in-runners/
  43. https://sportsmedicine-open.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40798-018-0150-3
  44. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6930174/
  45. https://ericasuter.com/a-sample-core-workout-for-youth-soccer-players/
  46. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4415841/
  47. https://www.nsca.com/contentassets/1066cf7e2c9d4e61b3c1a6e3fea988e0/coach-7.1.2-implementing-core-training-concepts-into-strength-training-for-sport.pdf
  48. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10399110/
  49. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10588579/
  50. https://orthoinfo.aaos.org/en/recovery/hip-conditioning-program/
  51. https://www.nhs.uk/pregnancy/keeping-well/exercise/
  52. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4127517/
  53. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12286126/
  54. https://www.runnersworld.com/training/a65011020/stability-core-exercises-for-runners/
  55. https://public.ksc.nasa.gov/hewp/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/07/July-August-2025-Newsletter-_-Final.pdf
  56. https://www.health.harvard.edu/exercise-and-fitness/the-many-benefits-of-the-dead-bug
  57. https://health.uconn.edu/wellness-center/wp-content/uploads/sites/182/2018/07/August.pdf
  58. https://www.verywellfit.com/how-to-do-a-hollow-body-hold-techniques-benefits-variations-5079591
  59. https://www.runnersworld.com/training/a65488600/glute-bridge-exercises-for-runners/
  60. https://www.runnersworld.com/uk/training/cross-training/a42616374/superman-exercise/
  61. https://www.verywellfit.com/how-to-do-the-ab-rollout-4685018
  62. https://fitbod.me/exercises/cable-wood-chop-low-to-high
  63. https://www.gymshark.com/blog/article/how-to-do-a-palloff-press
  64. https://www.physio-network.com/blog/great-thoracic-mobility-exercises/
  65. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5908986/
  66. https://e3rehab.com/core-stability/
  67. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8961451/
  68. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11389408/
  69. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16764545/
  70. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20006294/
  71. https://www.jospt.org/doi/10.2519/jospt.2006.0302
  72. https://doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2023.123319
  73. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2025.1672010
  74. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61030364
  75. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-13568-1
  76. https://doi.org/10.37349/emed.2024.00254
  77. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-025-01159-6
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.