Hubbry Logo
Crate trainingCrate trainingMain
Open search
Crate training
Community hub
Crate training
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Crate training
Crate training
Crate training
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

A dog in a wire crate strapped into a car for safe traveling

Crate training is the process of training a pet to tolerate confinement in a dog crate or cage. Crate advocates often claim that dogs are "den-dwelling" animals and that a crate can become a "den" substitute and a familiar and safe location for the pet. Most puppies can eventually tolerate crate training if it is introduced properly. The initial stress from being confined can give way to "increased feelings of security, safety, and comfort" after repeated exposure to the crate. Long-term or excessive crate confinement "may lead to emotional and behavioral deterioration over time."[1] On the other hand, if properly done, crate training can play a major role in housebreaking a dog as fast as possible. Confining a dog in a crate or cage restricts its movement and freedom, If crate training is not taken seriously, the dog may start soiling around the house.[citation needed]

Rationale

[edit]

Proponents of crate training argue that dogs are den animals and that the crate acts as a substitute for a den. While this is a widely held belief, there is little evidence to support it.[1] Borchelt (1984) states:[1]

The average dog book refers to dogs as "den dwelling" animals and presumes that confining imparts a feeling of security to a puppy. Dogs, in fact, are not den dwelling animals, although in a variety of canids the dam will construct a nest (often underground) for the pups. The nest is a defense against predators and protection against inclement weather. The pups use it as a "home base" from which they explore, investigate and play. There is no door on the den which encloses the pups for many hours.[2]

Nevertheless, a dog can learn to tolerate confinement in a crate and accept it as a place of comfort and safety.[1] The Humane Society of the United States recommends crate training to create a place of security and comfort for a dog, while cautioning that it is not the best solution to animal behavior problems.[3]

Crate training may also reduce stress and anxiety in a dog that later requires confinement in a crate when visiting a vet, when traveling, during recuperation from an injury, and when confinement is necessary to protect your dog while you are away for short periods of time.[citation needed]

Crate selection

[edit]
A dog in a soft crate

It is important to pick a crate that is the correct size for the pet and is appropriate for its purpose. Often larger crates come with some sort of divider so that a crate can grow with the pet. The correct size for a crate is just enough room for the animal to stand up without hitting their head, lay down and stretch out their paws and to turn around unimpeded. When using a crate in the home, make sure the crate is placed in a location that is comfortable. Avoid drafty areas near doors or windows, areas in the direct sunlight (which may become excessively hot), or areas adjacent to a radiator or heat source.[4]

A crate for use at home can be larger than one used for travel. Crates used for international transport should adhere to international regulations stipulated by IATA.[5][6] If the crate is too big the pet will be able to use one end for rest and sleep while using the other as a toilet, which will undermine one of the purposes of crate training.[citation needed]

A dog's natural instinct is to relieve themselves outside of the area in which they eat and sleep. So if a crate is small enough that they cannot possibly defecate while having enough room to sleep well away from it, a dog will 'hold it' as long as they possibly can. It is this instinct that facilitates using a crate as an aid for house training.

During air travel, an oversized cage does not permit the pet to use the sides easily as a brace during turbulence.[7][8] Likewise, crates that are too small pose a health risk by restricting and preventing proper air flow and ventilation. This is of particular concern to domestic pets of a brachycephalic (short-headed) breed where the requirement is to allow extra room due to the high incidence of death in these pets during transport. Due to their shortened airways and limited ability to cool themselves through panting, overheating while traveling poses a risk to the health of such breeds.

Training

[edit]

When crate training, it is important to use a training approach that is recommended by a reputable vet, trainer, breeder or a trusted training book.[citation needed]

Crate training is often practiced with new puppies as a method of house-training. Puppies naturally do not want to dirty the place where they sleep, so they will try as much as possible to hold it while they are in their crate. Of course, young puppies can not control their bladders for long: about one hour for every month of age.[9] Owners of young dogs will have to continue to take the puppy outside frequently. The crate is the only space in the entire house that truly belongs to the dog, and if used appropriately, will become a safe haven for years to come.[10]

Locking the dog in a crate and letting it whine, bark, or attempt to escape is common, but such approaches may create a negative association with crating. The dog should be slowly accustomed to the crate by making it inviting, for example by placing familiar toys or pet bed inside, leaving items with the owner's scent, rewarding the dog for entering and staying in the crate, incorporating it into play and feeding routines, and gradually progressing to sleeping in the crate overnight.[11]

Part of proper crate or cage training requires that the pet owner observe calm and relaxed behavior around the crate. The pet will attribute any emotional responses such as raised voices or other nervous behaviors to the foreign object in their normal environment. It is important for the owner not to create any negative associations with the cage in order for the pet to accept the crate in a calm manner.

Adverse effects

[edit]

Without proper conditioning, dogs may vocalize their distress and make efforts to escape the crates. Crating suppresses the dog's behavior, removes the dog's freedom of movement and is a negative punishment (removal of reward) under operant conditioning. Dogs who do not react well to negative punishment may find crating highly stressful. Long term or excessive crate confinement "may lead to emotional and behavioral deterioration over time." To the extent that crating reduces the amount of exposure to different environmental and social situations, it can make dogs more reactive (fearful or aggressive) or intolerant of novel situations. Crating "may significantly exacerbate the distress and emotional reactivity associated with separation distress". Behavioral problems that compels owners to crate train in the first place, may be exacerbated by the negative effects of crating.[1]

A dog may form a strong attachment to the crate eventually, feeling comfort and safety, after the initial feeling of distress and vulnerability. One dog behaviorist has compared this behavioral effect to Stockholm syndrome. Dogs that are trained to sleep in a crate, when allowed to sleep in a bedroom, can show signs consistent with that of separation distress, suggesting that dogs may love their crate "perhaps in some cases more than they love the owner." This bond with the crate may interfere with the human-animal bond and exacerbate bond-related behavior problems such as separation distress and owner-directed aggression.[1]

Steven Lindsay in Handbook of Applied Dog Behavior and Training states that while "the role of crate confinement in the etiology of behavior problems has not been scientifically established [...] empirical impressions and logic dictate that it probably plays an important role in the development or exacerbation of many adjustment problems."[1] He argues that "the widespread practice of routinely caging a dog at night and then again during the day for periods totaling 16 to 18 hours (or more) is an extremely problematic practice that should not be condoned or encouraged, because it probably underlies the development of many adjustment problems, including aggression."[1] The purpose of crate training, he says, "should be to get the dog out of the crate as soon as possible, and to use the crate as little as possible in the service of training and space-management objectives."

Legislation

[edit]

In Sweden, regulations forbid keeping dogs in cages or other enclosures below a certain size. Exceptions are made for some situations, such as during travels or at dog shows/trials. Even then, the dogs have to be walked every two hours or three hours. The size required for an enclosure to be exempt from such regulations starts at 2 m2 (22 sq ft)—about the area of a single/twin mattress—for a small dog and up to 5.5 m2 (59 sq ft) for a large dog.[12][13][14] Similar regulations exist in Finland.[15]

Spain forbids the practice as well, as it is considered animal cruelty by its law of animal protection and well-being like we can see on the prohibition to "Use any gadget, mechanism or utensil intended to limit or impede their mobility except by veterinary prescription taking into account their well-being." as well as the mandatory to "Educate and handle the animal with methods that do not cause suffering or mistreatment of the animal, nor cause states of anxiety or fear."[16]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Crate training

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Crate training is a method of gradually acclimating dogs, particularly puppies, to voluntary confinement in a wire, , or fabric resembling a , which leverages canines' innate aversion to soiling their sleeping area to accelerate housetraining while providing a secure space to prevent destructive chewing, ingestion of hazards, or injury during owner absences or travel. Properly implemented through positive reinforcement—such as associating the crate with , , or feeding—it fosters a of the crate as a retreat, reducing separation-related stress and facilitating in vehicles or emergencies where restraint is essential. Veterinary guidelines emphasize short initial sessions building to longer durations matched to the age and capacity, typically no more than one hour per month of age plus one during the day, to avoid discomfort or resentment, with crates sized to allow standing, turning, and lying down comfortably. Empirical observations from canine health centers note its utility in curbing unwanted behaviors like excessive barking or resource guarding by limiting opportunities for mischief, though peer-reviewed studies specifically quantifying long-term welfare outcomes remain limited, with broader research affirming reward-based conditioning's superiority over punitive approaches in promoting compliance and reducing fear responses. While proponents, including major kennel clubs and veterinary institutions, highlight its role in minimizing household damage and enabling responsible ownership in modern lifestyles, critics contend that prolonged or forced crating mimics unnatural isolation, potentially exacerbating anxiety in susceptible breeds or poorly socialized dogs, prompting bans on extended use in countries like and calls for open-door alternatives as the ethical norm. When misapplied—such as ignoring distress signals or exceeding physiological limits—it risks physical harm or behavioral setbacks, underscoring the need for individualized assessment over blanket adoption.

Historical Development

Origins and Early Adoption

The roots of confining dogs for practical utility extend to their , estimated to have begun between 15,000 and 40,000 years ago, when wolves adapted to settlements and were likely restricted to dens or adjacent enclosures to aid in guarding and . Archaeological evidence from ancient Egyptian sites dating to around 3000 BCE shows dogs integrated into households with dedicated shelters, suggesting early controlled housing to leverage their instincts for pack living and utility as working animals. By the late , amid Victorian-era advancements in , exhibitions, and long-distance transport, purpose-built emerged to address needs. In 1902, Henry M. Backus received U.S. Patent No. 698,782 for a slatted wooden animal specifically designed for shipping "fine dogs and other valuable animals," featuring hinged doors, ventilation slats, and secure latches to prevent injury during rail or sea voyages. This innovation aligned with trends in organized canine sports and breeding, where breeders transported stock across distances. Early adoption in the early centered on and working dogs, with crates—often termed "kennel cages" or " boxes"—employed by sportsmen to contain animals securely during by or vehicle, mitigating risks of escape or harm before field work. Such use emphasized logistical functionality for professional handlers, preceding the mid-century shift toward household pet applications.

Modern Popularization in the United States

Crate training emerged as a practical tool during the mid-20th century, building on earlier uses for transportation and dog shows, amid rising pet ownership and shifts toward indoor management. By 1952, trainer Gladys May Saunders explicitly promoted crates for housetraining and behavior control, emphasizing their role in confining s to prevent soiling and manage impulses without . This aligned with post-World War II trends, including suburban expansion that encouraged family-integrated s, though crates initially supplemented rather than replaced outdoor access. The 1960s and 1970s marked a surge in , facilitated by innovations like patented folding wire crates that eased storage and , coinciding with affirming dogs' denning instincts akin to wolves. Trainers and books increasingly recommended crates for housetraining puppies kept indoors, as dual-income households grew—rising from about 30% of families in 1960 to over 50% by 1980—necessitating safe confinement during work hours. This period saw crates transition from niche tools for to mainstream aids against destructive chewing and elimination accidents, particularly as veterinary and behavioral literature highlighted their utility in early . In the 1980s, British trainer amplified popularity through U.S. television broadcasts and books, demonstrating crates as comforting dens lined with hay, drawing on her pre-commercial use of wooden orange crates for her own dogs. The reinforced this by integrating crate recommendations into training guidelines, standardizing their application for high-energy working breeds to curb separation anxiety and . Unlike in , where crates were largely limited to vehicular transport until later decades, U.S. adoption accelerated due to expansive housing, longer workdays, and cultural emphasis on structured pet rearing, embedding crates in routine puppy protocols by the 1990s.

Underlying Principles

Biological and Behavioral Foundations

Domestic dogs, unlike wolves, do not exhibit a strong innate denning instinct characterized by consistent selection of enclosed, subterranean shelters; observations of free-ranging dogs in urban environments reveal preferences for diverse, often open or human-proximate sites such as under vehicles, porches, or debris piles rather than dedicated dens. A 2016 study of 148 den sites among free-ranging dogs in India found that while pregnant females sought concealed locations for whelping, overall shelter choices prioritized proximity to human food sources and protection from weather over strict enclosure, challenging anthropomorphic claims of a universal "denning" drive inherited from wild ancestors. Crates, however, approximate secure, low-stimulation refuges that align with canines' opportunistic use of bounded spaces for rest, as evidenced by reduced physiological stress markers in habituated individuals; kennel studies demonstrate that prior exposure lowers salivary cortisol and glucocorticoid concentrations, mitigating initial elevations associated with novel confinement. Canines display an instinctual aversion to eliminating in their primary resting area, a behavioral likely rooted in the needs of pack-living ancestors, where soiling dens would promote parasite accumulation, , and predation risks from cues. This reluctance manifests reliably in domestic dogs, who preferentially hold and feces when confined to small spaces overlapping their sleep zone, reflecting an evolved causal mechanism for den sanitation observed across canid in natural settings to preserve group and . Confinement in crates supports countering separation-related distress through progressive , which desensitizes dogs to isolation cues and yields measurable declines in distress vocalizations like barking; empirical assessments confirm that systematically introduced enclosure reduces hyper-attachment s, with habituated subjects showing attenuated responses and fewer escape attempts compared to unexposed peers. This aligns with broader evidence from treatment protocols, where graded exposure to confinement contexts normalizes levels, preventing escalation into chronic anxiety without relying on or flooding techniques.

Primary Objectives and Applications

Crate training primarily aims to facilitate housetraining by exploiting dogs' innate aversion to eliminating in their immediate sleeping area, akin to denning behaviors, which minimizes opportunities for indoor accidents. Puppies possess limited control, typically able to hold for approximately one hour per month of age plus one additional hour as a maximum guideline. By confining the dog to a crate sized to prevent comfortable elimination—allowing only enough space to stand, turn, and lie down—owners can schedule supervised outdoor breaks precisely matching these physiological limits, promoting rapid association between cues and relief without reinforcement of errors through unsupervised soiling. A key application involves enhancing safety during owner absences, travel, or high-risk scenarios, where unsupervised dogs might ingest toxic substances, chew electrical cords, or sustain injuries from falls or household hazards. This confinement is particularly beneficial for puppies and breeds prone to destructive chewing, such as Labrador Retrievers or Pit Bulls, by physically restricting access to dangers while the owner is unavailable. Additionally, crate training establishes predictable routines that support behavioral management, including anxiety reduction through , where repeated positive pairings of crate entry with rewards foster voluntary retreat to the space during stressors like thunderstorms or , enabling self-soothing without escalating distress. This structured predictability counters hyperactivity by reinforcing calm confinement as a default state, distinct from punitive isolation.

Crate Selection and Setup

Types, Sizes, and Materials

Wire crates, constructed from metal bars or , offer superior ventilation and , making them suitable for ongoing training and home use where monitoring the dog is beneficial. Plastic crates, often featuring solid walls and a grated door, provide a more enclosed, den-like environment that enhances security and is preferred for or containing escape-prone dogs. Soft-sided fabric crates serve as lightweight, portable options for short-term use but lack durability against chewing or determined escapes. ![DogCarCrate_wb.jpg][float-right] Crate sizing begins with measuring the adult 's length from nose tip to tail base while standing, adding 2 to 4 inches to determine the minimum interior length needed for comfortable standing, turning, and lying down; height should accommodate the dog standing with ears erect, plus 3 to 6 inches. For puppies, select a sized for projected adult dimensions and incorporate an adjustable divider panel to restrict space initially, preventing soiling in unused areas and promoting housetraining. Common dimensions correlate with weight as follows:
Crate Dimensions (L x W x H in inches)Weight Range (lbs)Notes
24 x 18 x 1913-25Suitable for small breeds like Beagles; ensures minimal excess space.
30 x 21 x 2426-40For medium breeds such as Cocker Spaniels.
36 x 24 x 2741-70Common for breeds like Labradors; a 42-inch length variant fits 50-70 lb dogs projecting taller frames.
42 x 28 x 3071-90For large breeds including German Shepherds.
Materials should prioritize durability, with wire crates featuring rust-resistant coatings like galvanized or powder to withstand chewing and moisture; avoid thin-gauge metals under 10-gauge that risk collapse under active dogs. Additional features such as double doors improve for loading and , while reinforced latches and chew-proof edges enhance safety for vigorous puppies.

Optimal Placement and Customization

Optimal crate placement begins with positioning the enclosure in a high-traffic family area during daytime training sessions to promote gradual socialization and allow owners to monitor the dog's behavior, fostering security through proximity rather than isolation, which can exacerbate separation anxiety. This setup leverages the dog's pack-oriented instincts, enabling positive reinforcement in a familiar environment while minimizing stress from sensory overload or exclusion. For nighttime use, relocating the crate to the owner's bedroom replicates den-like pack sleeping arrangements, enhancing rest quality and reducing nocturnal distress signals, provided the space avoids complete solitude that might contribute to phobia development. Customization enhances efficacy, particularly with sturdy wire crates that support secure modifications, by incorporating absorbent, machine-washable soft fleece or plush mats or pads for bedding to absorb from any accidents, maintaining and providing comfort akin to a natural burrow's dryness. Draping fleece blankets over the top or sides, in addition to standard crate covers, can further modulate light and noise, dimming external stimuli to simulate a secure interior, block light for a cozy environment, and lower levels in reactive individuals to promote decompression and rest. Chew-resistant toys encourage voluntary entry and associate the space with reward-based mental engagement. Ambient is crucial, targeting 68-72°F (20-22°C) to support efficient without overheating, mirroring the stable, moderate of ancestral shelters and preventing discomfort that could undermine voluntary confinement. Breed-specific adjustments address physiological variances; for sight hounds like Greyhounds, select elongated crates permitting full extension without excess space that dilutes , as their lean builds require tailored dimensions to avoid cramped postures. Noise-sensitive breeds, such as herding dogs prone to reactivity, benefit from added sound-dampening liners or covers to attenuate household acoustics, thereby sustaining low-stress confinement by curtailing auditory triggers that provoke escape attempts. These modifications, grounded in observable behavioral responses, optimize sensory containment to reinforce the crate as a calming refuge rather than a .

Training Protocols

Step-by-Step Implementation

Crate training protocols emphasize gradual introduction using positive reinforcement to foster voluntary entry and comfort, typically progressing over days to weeks depending on the dog's age and temperament. For puppies, an initial setup often includes placing the crate within an exercise pen (playpen) that provides separate areas for sleeping and resting in the crate, play, and a designated elimination spot with pee pads to facilitate early housetraining. Initial phases focus on associating the crate with rewards such as high-value treats or food to prevent aversion. Phase 1: Initial Introduction (Days 1-3)
Begin with door open in a quiet, accessible , luring inside using placed near or on a within to encourage exploration without force. Sessions should start at 5-10 minutes, gradually extending to 1-2 hours as enters willingly and remains calm, rewarding calm with or . Feed all meals inside during this phase to build positive associations, starting with the bowl just inside the door and progressing to deeper placement over sessions. Phase 2: Building Duration and Independence (Weeks 1-2)
Once the enters voluntarily, practice door-closed periods during naps or quiet times, beginning with 1-5 minutes while remaining nearby, extending duration as tolerance increases. Introduce a consistent cue such as "" paired with treats upon entry, reinforcing compliance without physical guidance. Gradually simulate owner absences by leaving the room for short intervals, then the house for durations mirroring daily routines, up to several hours, always returning before signs of anxiety emerge. To transition puppies from pee pads to outdoor-only elimination, gradually relocate the pads closer to the exit door in small increments (e.g., one to two feet daily) until positioned just outside, then progressively reduce the pad size or cut it smaller until fully eliminated. Provide frequent outdoor potty breaks, particularly after release from the crate, meals, play, or naps; monitor for elimination signs such as sniffing or circling, and reward successes heavily with treats and praise. When unsupervised, confine the puppy to the crate or playpen to prevent accidents and promote bladder control. Clean any indoor accidents thoroughly with an enzymatic cleaner to remove scents that may encourage repeat elimination. Avoid abrupt pad removal to prevent confusion, prioritizing consistency, supervision, and positive reinforcement for successful transitions in most puppies. Overnight crating is recommended starting after 8 weeks of age for puppies, as younger ones lack sufficient control, with adult dogs limited to 6-8 hours maximum to avoid discomfort. Establish a bedtime routine including evening exercise or play to expend energy, followed by a final potty break immediately before placing the puppy in the crate. Once physical needs are ruled out, ignore initial whining, as responding can reinforce the behavior; most puppies settle within a few nights. Use cameras or audio monitors to observe for distress indicators like persistent whining, pawing, or panting, adjusting pace if present to prevent negative conditioning.

Troubleshooting Common Challenges

Dogs exhibiting resistance to crate entry, such as whining, pawing, or outright avoidance, often stem from negative associations or insufficient positive incentives during initial exposure. To counteract this, incorporating stuffed interactive toys like Kongs filled with treats or encourages self-soothing and voluntary confinement, fostering a positive link between the crate and reward without physical . Coercive methods, by contrast, elevate and amplify fear-based avoidance, prolonging resistance as the dog associates the crate with threat rather than safety. Overnight crating of puppies is recommended by experts including the American Kennel Club (AKC), Animal Humane Society, and ASPCA, as it promotes housetraining by leveraging the instinct to avoid soiling their den, prevents nighttime accidents or mischief, and provides a secure sleeping space. To reduce nighttime crying or barking, introduce the crate positively as a safe den by making it comfortable with bedding, toys, and water; begin with short daytime sessions to build tolerance. For nighttime, initially place the crate near the owner's bed, cover it partially for den-like security, and use white noise or calming music; ensure a potty break before bed and respond to brief cries only if indicating physical needs, accounting for puppies' limited bladder capacity. Initial crying often reflects adjustment; for Labrador Retriever puppies, initial whining or crying is common, especially at night or when alone, often lasting 20 minutes to 2+ hours on the first few nights, but usually decreases significantly within 3-7 days if the owner ignores attention-seeking whining and rewards quiet behavior; crate training typically takes 2-6 weeks for most to become comfortable and quiet, though some may take longer up to several months depending on age, temperament, and consistency, with Labs responding well due to their food-motivated and eager-to-please nature, many settling for short periods within 1-2 weeks and sleeping through the night by 10-12 weeks of age—there are no large-scale statistical studies providing exact averages for Labs specifically, with advice drawn from expert trainers and breed resources. Once needs are met, ignore attention-seeking vocalizations to avoid reinforcement, maintaining consistency by responding only after quiet periods; such cries typically cease within a few nights. Escape attempts or destructive on components frequently indicate heightened anxiety, with physiological markers like excessive drooling, panting, or paw wetting signaling panic rather than mere . Transitioning to reinforced wire or heavy-duty plastic minimizes injury risk from bending bars or breaking panels, while monitoring for these anxiety cues prompts concurrent behavioral interventions to rebuild tolerance. For anxious dogs, such retraining involves feeding meals inside the crate with the door open, tossing treats to encourage voluntary entry, gradually closing the door for seconds only when the dog is calm and visible, progressing slowly upon relaxation, and never releasing during whining. Regression in crate duration tolerance, where a previously compliant dog soils the interior or vocalizes excessively after successful prior sessions, necessitates first ruling out medical contributors like urinary tract infections (UTIs), which cause involuntary leakage due to or bacterial presence. Veterinary diagnostics, including , confirm or exclude such issues before reinstating protocols with abbreviated confinement periods—typically reverting to 5-10 minutes initially—and consistent positive reinforcement to restore progress without overextending the dog's capacity.

Empirical Benefits

Evidence from Studies on Housetraining and Behavior

Crate training facilitates housetraining by confining puppies to spaces too small for separate elimination and sleeping areas, leveraging their innate aversion to soiling dens, which promotes and bowel control during scheduled outings. Veterinary protocols recommend short confinement intervals—typically matching the puppy's age in months plus one hour—to minimize accidents while building reliability, with reports indicating fewer indoor eliminations compared to unsupervised free-roaming. In behavioral management, crate training reduces opportunities for destructive actions like chewing or furniture damage in unsupervised puppies, as confinement prevents access to household items during owner absences. Empirical observations from veterinary practice note that this management tool curtails such incidents by ensuring supervision or safe isolation, with crated puppies exhibiting lower rates of property destruction than those left free. Long-term habituation to crates correlates with attenuated stress responses, evidenced by lower salivary (a marker) and reduced stereotypic behaviors like whining or pacing during confinement in pre-exposed dogs versus novices. A controlled study found habituated dogs maintained baseline levels and displayed calmer demeanors upon kenneling, suggesting acclimation fosters tolerance without chronic elevation. In a 2024 owner survey, cages supported objectives in young puppies with minimal reported distress when used appropriately, though varied for entrenched behavioral issues.

Safety and Welfare Outcomes

Crate training provides a secure that restricts s' access to household hazards, such as electrical cords, toxic substances, or sharp edges, particularly during unsupervised periods or phases when puppies are prone to exploratory . Veterinary sources emphasize that this confinement prevents of dangerous items and reduces the incidence of self-inflicted injuries from destructive behaviors, thereby minimizing the need for interventions. In post-surgical contexts, such as orthopedic procedures, restriction limits excessive movement, lowering the risk of complications like displacement or tissue re-injury, as supported by clinical observations in veterinary practice. For transportation, crates compliant with (IATA) and (FAA) standards ensure structural integrity during air travel, allowing dogs to remain stable and protected from shifting or turbulence-induced impacts. These approved enclosures, typically rigid or metal, facilitate compliance with regulations and may mitigate by providing a confined, non-slippery that promotes balance, according to pet travel guidelines. In vehicular contexts, crash-tested crates similarly enhance by containing the dog during collisions, preventing ejection or impact injuries. On welfare grounds, effective crate training fosters owner confidence in managing early-life misbehaviors, such as or elimination accidents, which are common precursors to relinquishment; empirical reviews indicate that structured training tools like crates contribute to retaining dogs by addressing these issues proactively. This secure environment also serves as a predictable retreat, reducing overall household stress and supporting long-term bonding without reliance on punitive measures.

Potential Drawbacks

Physiological and Psychological Risks

Prolonged crate confinement, particularly exceeding 8 hours daily, can contribute to physiological risks such as from reduced caloric expenditure despite unchanged feeding regimens, and joint strain due to limited mobility and weight-bearing activity. Inactivity-induced is also documented in confined dogs, with veterinary observations noting rapid onset—within days in some post-surgical cases—and up to 40% loss in limb muscles after 6-8 weeks of restricted movement. Psychologically, initial or forced crate exposure often elevates biomarkers like , indicating acute stress responses; studies show plasma levels significantly higher in confined dogs than in home-kept counterparts, with serum concentrations rising throughout boarding periods in adults. These elevations correlate with behavioral indicators of distress, though individual variability exists; for dogs showing confinement distress or anxiety, forced crate training should be avoided as it can worsen panic, with individualized assessment recommended for susceptible cases. Chronic over-reliance on crates may foster dependency that complicates adaptation to open environments, as evidenced by welfare assessments contrasting confined and free-ranging dogs.

Indicators of Improper Use

Excessive whining, pawing at the crate door, or barking persisting beyond brief initial protests, such as more than a few minutes after the cue to enter, often signals developing or resistance rather than normal adjustment. Similarly, acute physiological markers like heavy panting, , or shaking during confinement indicate elevated stress levels incompatible with proper acclimation. Following release from the crate, observable , withdrawal, or sudden spikes in toward owners or other animals suggest cognitive or emotional overload from prior sessions, warranting immediate protocol reevaluation. Owners can track these patterns through daily logs of entry/exit s, duration, and post-crate responses to identify correlations with session length or timing. For senior dogs exhibiting incontinence, confinement risks exacerbating or discomfort, as age-related weakness or cognitive decline impairs voluntary control, leading to repeated accidents and heightened anxiety. Veterinary assessment is essential prior to implementation, as underlying medical factors like infections or neurological changes may mimic behavioral resistance.

Debates and Criticisms

Animal Rights Perspectives

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) characterizes crate training as a form of equivalent to , asserting that prolonged enclosure deprives dogs of essential needs like exercise and , potentially fostering , depression, or hyperactivity. PETA's position draws on observations from environments where dogs endure extended crating, linking such practices to behavioral disorders, though these claims predominantly stem from anecdotal reports of misuse rather than systematic data on guideline-adherent training durations of a few hours daily. From an ethical standpoint, animal rights proponents, led by organizations like PETA, equate domestic crate use to the caging of wild animals in zoos, deeming it inherently violative of animals' rights to and natural behaviors. This absolutist framework dismisses contextual benefits, such as crates replicating ancestral denning instincts that offer security and prevent destructive habits in pack-oriented canines, prioritizing ideological opposition over species-specific adaptations evidenced in veterinary behavioral science. In the 2020s, PETA has amplified anti-crating advocacy through public statements and campaigns, such as reminders that "a is just a ," while broader animal rights efforts have tied crate confinement to critiques—highlighting wire enclosures in mass breeding operations—despite crate training for pets involving voluntary acclimation and limited use distinct from commercial exploitation. These initiatives often lack empirical backing for equating short-term training tools with systemic , relying instead on emotive narratives that conflate varied confinement scenarios without differentiating welfare impacts based on duration, size, or enrichment.

Scientific and Cultural Counterarguments

Scientific research counters claims of inherent psychological harm from crate training by demonstrating that properly sized and habituated crates serve as secure enclosures that reduce risks from unsupervised roaming, such as of hazardous materials or self-injury during isolation anxiety episodes. Studies on kennelled dogs, including those in veterinary and settings, show that confinement in appropriately designed spaces minimizes welfare compromises compared to free access in unfamiliar or unmonitored environments, with behavioral indicators of stress (e.g., pacing, vocalization) decreasing post-acclimation through positive reinforcement protocols. Initial elevations in novel confinement normalize with training, underscoring utility in models rather than reliance on unsubstantiated "denning " narratives, as dogs exhibit adaptive security-seeking in confined spaces akin to canid burrows without of long-term aversion when duration aligns with capacity (typically 4-6 hours for adults). Veterinary assessments affirm crate training's role in preventing housetraining failures and promoting self-soothing, with professionals noting lower overall household and canine stress in trained versus untrained scenarios; for instance, acclimated dogs in clinical kennels display reduced anxiety metrics versus those without prior exposure. This consensus contrasts with minority positions from advocacy groups, where empirical backing is anecdotal and overlooks data on improved outcomes in programs incorporating crates. Culturally, the endorses crate training as essential for safety and acclimation, aligning with widespread U.S. practices that correlate with high pet ownership rates and low relinquishment tied to manageability issues. In , skepticism manifests in restrictions—such as Sweden's prohibition on overnight crating and Finland's limits on extended use—yet these jurisdictions report elevated stray dog s exceeding 100 million across the continent, including unmanaged packs in urban areas, potentially exacerbated by reduced owner control mechanisms rather than enhanced welfare. Such policies prioritize unrestricted access over pragmatic confinement, yielding higher incidences of abandonment and outcomes in data from welfare monitoring bodies, underscoring that causal factors like enforceability of boundaries better predict stability than ideological aversion to tools.

Regulatory Landscape

Restrictions in Europe and Elsewhere

In , animal welfare legislation prohibits the use of crates for confining dogs in domestic settings, except for transportation or short-term veterinary needs, as such practices are deemed to constitute unnatural and potentially harmful isolation. This restriction stems from the country's stringent animal protection laws, which emphasize and limit to no more than six hours daily, with crate use explicitly barred in homes—even possession of closable crates for non-transport purposes is not permitted. relies heavily on public complaints and inspections by administrative boards, resulting in gaps where unreported violations may persist, though penalties include fines or animal seizure upon detection. Finland imposes similar outright bans on crating dogs overnight or during extended owner absences, classifying prolonged crate confinement—beyond transport or temporary medical scenarios—as animal abuse under the Animal Welfare Act, which mandates adequate space and activity to prevent suffering. Dogs over 20 kg, for instance, require 15-20 square meters of living area, rendering crates incompatible with these spatial mandates except in exceptional cases. Like , enforcement is complaint-driven through veterinary and municipal authorities, with documented cases leading to interventions but limited proactive monitoring in private homes. Germany's TierSchG (Animal Welfare Act) restricts crate confinement to a maximum of two hours per day total, forbidding permanent use and tying it to broader requirements for minimum floor space (e.g., scaled by dog size) and twice-daily free-running exercise opportunities of at least one hour each. These rules, unchanged as of , apply nationwide and extend to preventing or other immobility, with violations prosecutable as offenses carrying fines up to €25,000 or . Enforcement gaps arise in rural or low-visibility settings, where local veterinary offices and police handle cases primarily via neighbor reports rather than routine checks. In contrast, the maintains no statutory bans on crate training for housetraining or , provided it aligns with the Animal Welfare Act 2006's duty to avoid unnecessary suffering—though no specific time caps are legislated, leaving duration to owner discretion absent evident harm. likewise imposes no federal or state-level prohibitions, with crate use permissible under codes like Victoria's private keeping standards, which prioritize general welfare over confinement specifics but implicitly discourage excess through nuisance and exercise mandates. Both jurisdictions exhibit enforcement leniency, focusing on extreme neglect cases rather than routine crate oversight, reflecting cultural norms where crates serve supplemental roles without legal proscription.

Professional Guidelines in Permissive Jurisdictions

The (AKC) endorses crate training as a welfare-enhancing tool when implemented with positive reinforcement, viewing the crate as a voluntary that fosters security rather than confinement for punishment. AKC guidelines specify gradual desensitization through treats and toys to associate the crate positively, with sessions starting short (e.g., 10 minutes) and extending only as the dog remains calm, avoiding any coercive entry. The Association of Professional Dog Trainers (APDT) supports crates for short-term management of puppies and adult , positioning them as devices to prevent or during owner absence, provided they align with force-free principles and do not replace exercise or . APDT stresses ethical limits, including regular breaks for elimination and play, to mitigate risks like anxiety from overuse. Veterinary behavior specialists, including those from the American College of Veterinary Behaviorists, recommend capping adult dog crating at six hours or less per session for optimal welfare, acknowledging that while some dogs tolerate up to eight hours, exceeding this routinely invites physiological strain and behavioral issues without adequate monitoring. For puppies, durations should not surpass one hour per month of age plus one, with immediate distress signals (e.g., excessive vocalization or self- attempts) prompting cessation and veterinary consultation. These bodies advocate phasing out dependency post-maturity—typically after 18-24 months—once the demonstrates consistent housetraining and impulse control, transitioning to earned privileges like supervised free roam to promote long-term behavioral autonomy. In permissive contexts such as the , professionals emphasize owner responsibility through exercise intervals every 4-6 hours and avoidance of overnight crating beyond 8 hours for adults, aligning with denning instincts while prioritizing mental enrichment.

Alternatives and Complementary Methods

Non-Crate Confinement Options

Exercise pens, commonly referred to as playpens or ex-pens, offer a confinement option that allows dogs more space for movement than traditional crates, which can mitigate risks associated with prolonged inactivity, particularly for high-energy breeds. These enclosures, often constructed from modular wire panels, enable puppies or adult dogs to stand, turn, and engage in limited play or rest, potentially reducing stress from spatial restriction during house training or absences lasting several hours. For dogs exhibiting confinement distress or anxiety, exercise pens serve as a suitable alternative to crates, as forcing enclosure can exacerbate panic; larger pens provide expanded space to prevent worsening of symptoms. However, their efficacy in preventing destructive behaviors is lower than crates due to reduced ; dogs may escape or access unsafe items if not properly secured, as playpens lack the enclosed solidity of crates. Baby gates or room dividers serve as a less restrictive alternative for dogs that have progressed beyond initial stages, effectively segmenting living spaces to mimic boundaries while permitting visibility and airflow. This method is suitable for advanced trainees, where dogs have learned basic commands and impulse control, allowing confinement to puppy-proofed areas without full ; for instance, gates can block access to prevent counter surfing. For anxious dogs, baby-gated rooms or dog-proofed areas with free access—where hazards are removed and the dog is non-destructive—offer viable options to avoid crate-induced distress. Effectiveness depends on the dog's maturity and level, with taller or pressure-mounted gates recommended for jumpers, though they may fail against highly determined or large breeds lacking prior conditioning. Comparative outcomes show room division supports gradual freedom expansion but requires consistent to avoid boundary-testing behaviors. Tethers, involving short leashes attached to fixed points, provide temporary restraint for supervised settings but carry significant risks, particularly for chewers or active dogs, with veterinary data indicating potential for entanglement injuries, , or escalation. Studies link prolonged tethering to 2.8 times higher attack likelihood and physical harms like or trauma from restricted mobility, rendering it unsuitable for unsupervised or extended use. While short-term application may aid in limiting access during specific tasks, underscores its inferiority to enclosed options in and welfare outcomes, advising against it except under direct oversight.

Integrated Training Approaches

Integrated training approaches for crate training emphasize combining crate use with complementary methods to foster comprehensive behavioral development, such as pairing short sessions with structured walks and outdoor routines. This integration helps dogs transition from den-like confinement to broader environmental by associating crate time with subsequent exploratory rewards, reducing reliance on isolation alone. For instance, after brief crate confinement, handlers can attach a for controlled outdoor excursions, reinforcing calm crate exits with praise and brief freedom, which builds self-regulation skills empirically observed in protocols. Positive reinforcement techniques, such as integrated with crate routines, create multi-contextual cues that enhance reliability across scenarios. In clicker-enhanced crate training, a distinct marker signals rewards immediately upon desired behaviors like voluntary entry or settling, accelerating without ; studies and practitioner guides note this method's efficacy in associating crates with positive outcomes, as dogs learn to anticipate for compliance. This ecosystem extends to layering crate cues with verbal commands or toys, promoting generalization of calm behavior, per guidelines from certified trainers emphasizing principles. Over the long term, integrated approaches include gradual fade-out of dependency once reliability is demonstrated, typically after 6-12 months of consistent , to prevent over-reliance and encourage unsupervised freedom. Puppies achieving control and behavioral maturity around 5-6 months can progress to extended unsupervised periods, with crates used intermittently for rather than routine confinement; handlers assess readiness through tests like leaving the dog crated for increasing durations without distress, transitioning to open-door access or removal once incidents remain below 1% over monitored weeks. This phased reduction aligns with developmental timelines where dogs exhibit sustained house manners, supported by owner reports and training benchmarks indicating reduced anxiety and improved post-fade.

References

  1. https://www.akc.org/expert-advice/training/why-crate-training-is-great-for-your-dog/
  2. https://www.vet.cornell.edu/departments-centers-and-institutes/riney-canine-health-center/canine-health-information/dog-crates-when-use-them-and-how-pick-one
  3. https://www.vetmed.ucdavis.edu/sites/g/files/dgvnsk491/files/inline-files/Crate_Training_Your_Puppy.pdf
  4. https://www.akc.org/expert-advice/training/how-to-potty-train-a-puppy/
  5. https://www.vetmed.tamu.edu/news/pet-talk/the-benefits-of-crate-training/
  6. https://www.akc.org/expert-advice/training/how-to-curb-unwanted-dog-behaviors/
  7. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7895348/
  8. https://www.akc.org/expert-advice/training/responsible-dog-ownership-trainer-edition/
  9. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/all-dogs-go-to-heaven/202211/is-it-ethical-to-crate-a-dog
  10. https://walkatxpets.com/blog-videos/pros-and-cons-of-crate-training/
  11. https://www.caravank9.com/blog/animal-training-canine-domestication
  12. https://dogcatranch.com/the-history-of-dog-kennels-from-ancient-shelters-to-modern-day-boarding-facilities/
  13. https://heinzhistorycenter.emuseum.com/objects/21101/crate-shipping
  14. https://terriermandotcom.blogspot.com/2011/11/before-they-were-called-dog-crates.html
  15. https://www.reddit.com/r/Dogtraining/comments/143mpvl/history_of_crate_training_in_the_us_as_best_as_i/
  16. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016815912400234X
  17. https://www.naiaonline.org/articles/article/the-evolution-of-modern-day-dog-training
  18. https://www.petrelocation.com/blog/post/the-evolution-of-pet-travel-crates
  19. https://articles.hepper.com/do-dogs-like-crates/
  20. https://www.whole-dog-journal.com/blog/how-dog-ownership-has-changed/
  21. https://www.peta.org/issues/animal-companion-issues/cruel-practices/crating/
  22. https://www.heraldtribune.com/story/news/local/2021/01/28/gregg-flowers-crates-its-natural-thing-our-den-loving-dogs/4291680001/
  23. https://www.shreveporttimes.com/story/life/columnists/gregg-flowers/2016/01/16/potty-training-basics-puppy/78614050/
  24. https://pawsitivelygenius.com/the-crate-controversy/
  25. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/306278094_Denning_habits_of_free-ranging_dogs_reveal_preference_for_human_proximity
  26. https://www.confidentmutts.com/mutt-talk/are-dogs-den-animals
  27. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/6221326_Behavioural_and_glucocorticoid_responses_of_dogs_Canis_familiaris_to_kenneling_Investigating_mitigation_of_stress_by_prior_habituation
  28. https://todaysveterinarypractice.com/behavior/canine-house-soiling-back-basics/
  29. https://www.msdvetmanual.com/behavior/behavior-of-dogs/behavior-problems-of-dogs
  30. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7521022/
  31. https://todaysveterinarypractice.com/behavior/on-your-best-behavior-canine-separation-anxiety/
  32. https://www.akc.org/expert-advice/training/puppy-potty-training-timeline/
  33. https://www.paws.org/resources/the-benefits-of-crate-training/
  34. https://www.guidedog.org/gd/events-and-news/Crate_Training_A_Puppy.aspx
  35. https://www.akc.org/expert-advice/lifestyle/choose-best-crate-dog/
  36. https://carlsonpetproducts.com/blogs/news/how-to-choose-the-type-and-size-of-dog-crate
  37. https://www.akc.org/expert-advice/training/how-to-crate-train-your-dog-in-9-easy-steps/
  38. https://www.petmd.com/dog/general-health/crate-sizing-for-dogs
  39. http://www.midwestpetproducts.com/midwestdogcrates/dog-crate-sizes
  40. https://www.petmate.com/blogs/petmate-academy/plastic-vs-metal-crates-which-one-is-right-for-your-pet
  41. https://www.akc.org/expert-advice/training/crate-training/
  42. https://www.preventivevet.com/dogs/what-to-put-in-your-dogs-crate
  43. https://www.preventivevet.com/dogs/how-to-survive-crate-rest-with-your-dog
  44. https://www.petmd.com/dog/general-health/blanket-safety-for-pets
  45. https://www.impactdogcrates.com/blogs/puppy-news/how-to-use-crate-height-to-accommodate-tall-or-small-breeds
  46. https://www.animalhumanesociety.org/resource/crate-training-your-dog-or-puppy
  47. https://karenpryoracademy.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Karen_Pryor_Academy_Crate_Training_Guide-PDF.pdf
  48. https://www.paws.org/resources/how-to-crate-train-your-dog/
  49. https://sdhumane.org/resources/training-tips-crate-training/
  50. https://www.akc.org/expert-advice/training/the-ins-and-outs-of-potty-pad-training/
  51. https://www.purina.com/articles/dog/behavior/training/how-to-crate-train-adult-dog
  52. https://www.preventivevet.com/dogs/crate-training-at-night-for-puppies
  53. https://bestfriends.org/pet-care-resources/how-crate-train-puppy-or-dog
  54. https://www.kongcompany.com/how-to-crate-train-your-dog-with-a-kong/
  55. https://www.eastvalleyanimal.com/using-a-kong-for-dog-training-and-behavior-problems/
  56. https://www.akc.org/expert-advice/training/how-to-crate-train-a-puppy/
  57. https://www.petmd.com/dog/behavior/puppy-crying-in-crate
  58. https://www.diggs.pet/blogs/posts/dog-crate-anxiety
  59. https://www.aspca.org/pet-care/dog-care/common-dog-behavior-issues/separation-anxiety
  60. https://www.blueridgehumane.org/crate-training-troubleshooting/
  61. https://veterinarypartner.vin.com/doc/?id=8562851&pid=19239
  62. https://www.whole-dog-journal.com/training/crate-training-to-keep-your-dog-content/
  63. https://www.whole-dog-journal.com/training/dog-crating-difficulties/
  64. https://dogtrainercleveland.com/why-is-my-dog-regressing-in-potty-training/
  65. https://www.petplace.com/article/dogs/pet-behavior-training/puppy-potty-training-regression
  66. https://vetmed.tamu.edu/news/pet-talk/the-benefits-of-crate-training/
  67. https://www.petmd.com/dog/general-health/crate-training-puppies
  68. https://vcahospitals.com/know-your-pet/crate-training-your-dog---an-overview
  69. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318297411_Crate_confinement_of_dogs_following_orthopaedic_surgery_Part_1_benefits_and_possible_drawbacks
  70. https://www.iata.org/en/programs/cargo/live-animals/pets/
  71. https://www.nytimes.com/wirecutter/guides/guide-to-traveling-with-pets/
  72. https://www.travelandleisure.com/style/shopping/best-airline-approved-pet-carriers
  73. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/veterinary-science/articles/10.3389/fvets.2021.601914/full
  74. https://www.journee-mondiale.com/en/veterinarians-warn-your-dog-loses-40-of-muscle-mass-after-just-8-weeks-in-a-crate/
  75. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0031938407002582
  76. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/287437183_Changes_in_serum_cortisol_concentration_due_to_boarding_stress_in_dogs
  77. https://malenademartini.com/crates-think-outside-the-box/
  78. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7126575/
  79. https://indoorpet.osu.edu/dogs/puppy/crate-training
  80. https://www.wihumane.org/behavior/dogs/cratetraining
  81. https://vet.cornell.edu/departments-centers-and-institutes/riney-canine-health-center/canine-health-topics/anxious-behavior-how-help-your-dog-cope-unsettling-situations
  82. https://www.petmd.com/dog/conditions/behavioral/dog-anxiety
  83. https://www.merckvetmanual.com/behavior/behavior-of-dogs/behavior-problems-of-dogs
  84. https://www.carrymypet.ae/blog/view/what-is-caged-dog-syndrome-and-how-to-prevent-it
  85. https://www.aspca.org/pet-care/dog-care/common-dog-behavior-issues/behavior-problems-older-dogs
  86. https://www.akc.org/expert-advice/health/senior-dog-house-training/
  87. https://www.orvis.com/incontinence-in-older-dogs.html
  88. https://www.peta.org/news/a-crate-is-a-cage-is-a-prison-why-crating-dogs-is-a-terrible-idea/
  89. https://www.peta2.com/learn/whats-wrong-with-crating-dogs/
  90. https://www.facebook.com/official.peta/posts/reminder-a-crate-is-just-a-cage-and-crate-training-is-just-a-nice-way-to-say-sol/607299987722974/
  91. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/canine-corner/201203/the-politics-pet-dogs-and-kennel-crates
  92. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/animal-welfare/article/effect-of-the-kennel-environment-on-canine-welfare-a-critical-review-of-experimental-studies/5D17C975CFE03C6F8D2E03499FADED66
  93. https://www.akc.org/expert-advice/training/crate-training-housebreaking-tool-secure-den/
  94. https://www.ovrs.com/blog/crate-training/
  95. https://moderndogmagazine.com/articles/do-we-crate-too-much/
  96. https://www.four-paws.org/our-stories/press-releases/august-2024/stray-dogs-are-one-of-europes-most-pressing-animal-welfare-issues
  97. https://www.reddit.com/r/Dogtraining/comments/hwdpng/today_i_learned_that_crates_are_illegal_in_some/
  98. https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/dog-population-by-country
  99. https://www.lansstyrelsen.se/download/18.8cd5a1b19362fb4fc2340d/1732539020220/Animal%2520Welfare%2520Regulations%2520-%2520Dog.pdf
  100. https://www.kennelliitto.fi/en/dog-ownership/animal-welfare-act-protects-health-and-well-being-dogs
  101. https://www.thisdogslife.co/from-no-crate-laws-to-a-special-exploring-rule-heres-what-it-is-like-to-be-a-dog-in-finland/
  102. https://www.ramstein.af.mil/About/Fact-Sheets/Display/Article/303687/dog-keeping-laws-for-germany/
  103. https://www.kaiserslauternamerican.com/mans-best-friend-regulations-for-keeping-your-dog-in-germany/
  104. https://www3.kaiserslautern.de/gaco/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/DogKeepingRegulationsFactsheet.pdf
  105. https://agriculture.vic.gov.au/livestock-and-animals/animal-welfare-victoria/pocta-act-1986/victorian-codes-of-practice-for-animal-welfare/code-of-practice-for-the-private-keeping-of-dogs
  106. http://images.akc.org/pdf/ebook/Crate_Training.pdf
  107. https://apdt.com/position-statements/
  108. https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.dacvb.org/resource/resmgr/docs/ACVB_template_cratetraining_.pdf
  109. https://www.rover.com/blog/crate-anxiety-in-dogs/
  110. https://www.whole-dog-journal.com/training/creative-confinement-dog-crate-alternatives/
  111. https://pawmos.com/crate-vs-pen-the-pros-and-cons-of-puppy-confinement-options/
  112. https://shophiddin.com/blogs/news/crate-vs-playpen-which-one-is-right-for-your-dog-and-why
  113. https://articles.hepper.com/crate-alternatives-for-dogs/
  114. https://www.fetchfind.com/blog/dog-training-101-baby-gate-training/
  115. https://carlsonpetproducts.com/blogs/news/whats-better-for-your-dog-crate-training-or-a-pet-gate
  116. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7996153/
  117. https://www.peta.org/issues/animal-companion-issues/cruel-practices/chaining-dogs/chained-dog-findings/
  118. https://www.extension.purdue.edu/extmedia/VA/VA-23-W.pdf
  119. https://www.offleashk9training.com/training-your-dog-to-be-independent/
  120. https://taketheleadk9training.com/blog/2020/4/16/avoid-doggie-dependency-crate-separately-and-release-individually
  121. https://topdogtrainingtips.com/2025/05/17/how-to-incorporate-the-crate-into-clicker-training-routines/
  122. https://www.whole-dog-journal.com/training/crate-training-made-easy/
  123. https://www.dogownersacademy.com/how-long-does-dog-training-take-a-local-guide-for-nc-pet-parents/
  124. https://smartdoguniversity.com/dog-training-ask-the-trainer-when-can-i-get-rid-of-the-crate/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.