Hubbry Logo
English adjectivesEnglish adjectivesMain
Open search
English adjectives
Community hub
English adjectives
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
English adjectives
English adjectives
English adjectives
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Part of a series on
English grammar
Morphology
Word types
Verbs
Syntax
Orthography
Variance

English adjectives form a large open category of words in English which, semantically, tend to denote properties such as size, colour, mood, quality, age, etc. with such members as other, big, new, good, different, Cuban, sure, important, and right.[1][2] Adjectives head adjective phrases, and the most typical members function as modifiers in noun phrases.[3] Most adjectives either inflect for grade (e.g., big, bigger, biggest) or combine with more and most to form comparatives (e.g., more interesting) and superlatives (e.g., most interesting).[4] They are characteristically modifiable by very (e.g., very small). A large number of the most typical members combine with the suffix -ly to form adverbs (e.g., final + ly: finally). Most adjectives function as complements in verb phrases (e.g., It looks good), and some license complements of their own (e.g., happy that you're here).[5]

Syntax

[edit]

Internal structure

[edit]

An adjective phrase (AdjP) is headed by an adjective and optionally takes dependents. AdjPs can take modifiers, which are usually pre-head adverb phrases (e.g., truly wonderful) or post-head preposition phrases (e.g., too big for you; afraid of the dark). The following tree diagram in the style of The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language shows the AdjP very happy to try, with the adverb very as a modifier and the clause to try as a complement.

Complements of adjectives

[edit]

English adjectives can take clauses, preposition phrases, and noun phrases as complements. Clause complements in adjective phrases can be either finite or nonfinite. Finite clause complements can be declarative (e.g., very pleased that I had bought his book) or interrogative (e.g., not sure whether I want to keep reading). Nonfinite clause complements can occur with a subject (e.g., happy for you to prove me wrong) or without a subject (e.g., eager to please). Adjectives that take preposition phrase complements license preposition phrases headed by fixed prepositions. For example, dependent takes preposition phrase complements headed only by on or upon. In some cases, a complement is obligatory; I'm loath to admit it is fine, but *I'm loath is incomplete.[a] A small number of adjectives (due, like, near, unlike, and worth) can take noun phrases as complements.[6] For example, worth can function as the head of an adjective phrase with a noun phrase complement (e.g., worth a second chance).

Modifiers of adjectives

[edit]

The prototypical pre-head modifiers of English adjectives are adverb phrases headed by degree adverbs, such as very and too.[7][8] For example, the adjective tall can be modified by the adverb phrase very. Less common pre-head modifiers in adjective phrases are noun phrases (e.g., six feet long), preposition phrases (e.g., by no means realistic), and determiner phrases (e.g., that small).[8]

Preposition phrases function as post-head modifiers in English adjective phrases. In the adjective phrase foolish in the extreme, for example, the preposition phrase in the extreme functions as a modifier. Less commonly, certain adverbs (indeed and still) and one determiner (enough) can head phrases that function as post-head modifiers in adjective phrases (e.g., very harmful indeed, sweeter still, and fair enough).[8]

Functions

[edit]

While adjectives themselves function only as heads in adjective phrases (an AdjP is often a head adjective with no dependents), adjective phrases function at the clause level as predicative complements and predicative adjuncts. At the phrase level, adjective phrases function as modifiers and predeterminatives in noun phrases and complements in some preposition phrases (e.g., they didn't look as good).[9]

Predicative complements

[edit]

At the clause level, adjective phrases commonly appear as predicative complements.[10] A predicative complement is a constituent that ascribes a property to a predicand. For example, The dinner was lovely ascribes the property of being lovely to the dinner, the syntactic subject and semantic predicand. Predicative complements may be subject-related, as in the previous example, or object-related, the latter being licensed by complex transitive verbs such as feel and make, as in That made her hungry, where the property of being hungry is ascribed to the syntactic object and semantic predicand, her.[10]

Predicative adjuncts

[edit]

Adjective phrases also function as predicative adjuncts in clause structure. Such adjective phrases can be integrated into the clause (e.g., Love dies young) or detached from the clause as a supplement (e.g., Happy to see her, I wept). Adjective phrases functioning as predicative adjuncts are typically interpreted with the subject of the main clause being the predicand of the adjunct (i.e., "I was happy to see her").[11] When this is not the case, such supplements are often deprecated as dangling modifiers.

Modifiers within noun phrases

[edit]

Adjective phrases often function as pre-head (or attributive) modifiers in noun phrases, occurring after any determinative in the noun phrase (NP) (e.g., some nice folks). In some cases they are post-head (or postpositive) modifiers, with particular adjectives like galore (e.g., stories galore) or with certain compound heads like somebody (e.g., somebody special).[12]

Predeterminatives within noun phrases

[edit]

Adjective phrases can function as predeterminatives under certain conditions. Specifically, they can do so only in noun phrases with a (or an) functioning as the determinative and only if the adjective phrase either has such or exclamative what as its head or begins with one of a small number of modifiers (i.e., as, how, so, this, that, or too).[12] In the noun phrase such a difficult little devil, for example, the adjective phrase such functions as predeterminative. Similarly, in the clause how important a part is it?, the adjective phrase how important functions as predeterminative.

Complements within preposition phrases

[edit]

Adjective phrases can function as complements of preposition phrases.[13] In the clause the film characterized him as childish, for example, the adjective phrase childish functions as the complement of the preposition as.

Cases such as the poor and the French

[edit]

In cases such as the very poor and the French which denote a class, traditional grammars see the adjective as being "used as a noun".[14] However, poor cannot actually be a noun here for three reasons: very doesn't modify nouns, there is no possibility to pluralize poor (e.g., *three poors), and most determinatives are impossible (e.g., *a poor could not or *some poor did).

Other grammars see this as a case of ellipsis, where the head noun is simply left out and the AdjP is a regular modifier.[15] In this view, the elided noun is something like one, and the very poor is an elided form of the very poor ones. Other accounts, such as one advanced by Bas Aarts, do not assume ellipsis but instead argue that phrases like these are best analyzed as noun phrases with an empty element functioning as the head, yielding an analysis like this: [NP the [AP veryAdv poorAdj] ∅N].[16]

The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language takes such instances to be fused modifier-heads. Under this analysis, adjective phrases may bear two functions at one time, fusing the functions of modifier and head in an NP where no head noun exists. In the noun phrase the very poor, the adjective poor is the fused modifier-head as shown in the tree diagram below.[17]

Types of adjectives

[edit]

Non-attributive and non-predicative adjectives

[edit]

While most adjectives can function as both attributive modifier (e.g., a new job) and predicative complement (e.g., the job was new), some are limited to one or the other of these two functions.[18] For example, the adjective drunken cannot be used predicatively (a drunken fool vs *the fool was drunken),[19] while the adjective awake has the opposite limitation (*an awake child vs the child is awake).

It is not only certain adjectives, but also certain constructions that are limited to one function or the other. For instance a nice hot bath is possible, as are the bath is hot and the bath is nice, but *the bath is nice hot is not.[20]

Linguist and historian Peter Matthews observes "that the attributive and predicative uses of adjectives have diverged" and continue to do so.[21] For example, the sense of big in Well, that's big of you from the early 20th century is only possible as a predicative complement.

Gradable and non gradable adjectives

[edit]

Most adjectives are gradable,[4] but some are not (e.g., ancillary, bovine, municipal, pubic, first, etc.), or at least have particular senses in which they are not.[22] For example a very Canadian embassy can imply that the embassy has the stereotypically Canadian characteristics (politeness perhaps), but it cannot mean that the embassy represents Canada in the way that a Canadian embassy does.

Other types claimed in traditional grammars

[edit]

Many words that have been categorized by traditional grammars as types of adjectives are categorized as belonging to entirely different lexical categories by modern grammars, such as The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. The types below are mostly of this kind. What these words have in common is, to put it in traditional terms, that they "qualify" nouns.[18] In modern terms, they appear as pre-head dependents in noun phrases. Note that a word may be traditionally assigned to multiple types: for example whose is variously called a possessive adjective, an interrogative adjective, a pronominal adjective, and a relative adjective.

Quantitative adjectives

[edit]

Words like many and few, along with numbers (e.g., many good people, two times) are traditionally categorized as adjectives, where modern grammars see them as determiners.[18] This term has also been used for ordinals like first, tenth, and hundredth, which are undisputed adjectives.

Demonstrative adjectives

[edit]

This type includes this, that, these, and those,[18] which are seen by most modern grammars as determiners. It also includes the undisputed adjective such.

Possessive adjectives

[edit]

This type includes my, your, our, their, etc. (e.g., my friend).[18] These are categorized by most modern grammars as pronouns or determiners.

Interrogative adjectives

[edit]

This type includes what, which and whose (e.g., what time).[18] These are categorized by most modern grammars as pronouns or determiners. (What in exclamatives, e.g., what a lovely day! is an adjective, but is not interrogative.)[23]

How in questions like How are you? is sometimes categorized as an interrogative adjective.[24]

Distributive adjectives

[edit]

This type includes words like any, each, and neither (e.g., any time).[18] These are categorized by most modern grammars as determiners.

Indefinite adjectives

[edit]

This type includes words like all, another, any, both, and each (e.g., another day).[18] These are categorized by most modern grammars as determiners.

Pronominal adjectives

[edit]

This type includes words that "qualify" a noun and must agree with it in number: all, these, some, no, etc.(e.g., these days).[18] These are categorized by other grammars as determiners or pronouns.

Proper adjectives

[edit]

This type includes words that are derived (or thought to be derived) from common nouns and are capitalized (e.g., an Italian vacation, a New York minute).[18] Some of these are categorized by modern grammars as adjectives (e.g., Italian, Christian, Dubliner, Chinese, Thatcherite, etc.) and some as nouns (e.g., the Reagan administration, the Tokyo train system).

Compound adjectives

[edit]

This type includes adjectives, or what were/are thought to be adjectives, composed of two or more words operating "as a single adjective" (e.g., straightlaced, New York (see above), long-term, etc.).[18]

Relative adjectives

[edit]

This type includes which and whose (e.g., the person whose book I bought) appearing in relative constructions.[18] These are categorized by most modern grammars as pronouns or determiners.

Morphology

[edit]

Inflectional morphology

[edit]

Many adjectives inflect for degree of comparison. For example, hot has the comparative form hotter and the superlative form hottest. Typically, short adjectives (including most single-syllable adjectives that are semantically gradable), adjectives originating in Old English, and short adjectives borrowed from French use the -er and -est suffixes. Adjectives with two syllables vary in whether they can mark degree of comparison through inflectional suffixes or must do so periphrastically with more and most. Some take either form (e.g., commoner, more common) while others take only one or the other (e.g., happier but usually not more happy). Longer adjectives derived from Greek or Latin and most adjectives of three or more syllables typically mark degree of comparison with more and most (e.g., more expensive but not expensiver).[25]

Derivational morphology

[edit]

Category maintaining

[edit]

It is possible to form adjectives from other adjectives through the addition of prefixes (e.g., happy → unhappy; typical → atypical), and suffixes (e.g., young → youngish; botanic → botanical).

Category changing

[edit]
Adjective forming
[edit]

Adjectives may be formed by the addition of affixes to a base from another category of words. For example, the noun recreation combines with the suffix -al to form the adjective recreational.

  • Prefixes of this type include a- + noun (blaze → ablaze) and non- + noun (stop → non-stop).
  • Suffixes of this type include verb + -able (accept → acceptable), noun + -al (nation → national), noun + -esque (picture → picturesque), noun or verb + -less (home → homeless; tire → tireless), noun + -ate (passion → passionate), noun + -en (gold → golden), verb + -ive (act → active), and many others.[26]
With an adjective as the lexical base
[edit]

Through a process of derivational morphology, adjectives may form words of other categories. For example, the adjective happy combines with the suffix -ness to form the noun happiness.

  • It is typical of English adjectives to combine with the -ly suffix to become adverbs (e.g., real → really; encouraging → encouragingly).[b]
  • Noun-forming suffixes include -cy (private → privacy), -ness (happy → happiness), -dom (wise → wisdom), -hood (likely → likelihood), -ist (special → specialist), and -th (true → truth).[27]
  • Verb-forming affixes include -ify and -ize (e.g., real → realize; just → justify).
  • Adjectives also form words through conversion, without any change in form (e.g., red (adj) → red (noun)).

Compounding

[edit]

An adjective base can join with a base from another category to form a new word as in blackboard, noteworthy, childproof, fail-safe, uptight, etc.

Adjectives vs other lexical categories

[edit]

Adjectives vs nouns

[edit]

Typically, adjectives and nouns in English can be distinguished by their morphological and syntactic features.

Prototypical adjectives can inflect for degree of comparison (e.g., happy and happier) but cannot inflect for number (e.g., happy but not happys). Conversely, prototypical nouns can inflect for number (e.g., mother and mothers) but not for degree of comparison (e.g., mother but not motherer or motherest).

English adjectives head phrases that typically function as pre-head modifiers of nouns or predicative complements (e.g., those nice folks seem quite capable) while English nouns head phrases that can function as subjects, or objects in verb phrases or preposition phrases (e.g., [Jess] told [my sister] [a story] about [cute animals]). Noun phrases also function, like adjective phrases, as predicative complements, though in a more limited range of contexts; for example, both be and feel allow the adjective phrase difficult as a predicative complement, but only be also allows the noun phrase a difficulty.

The prototypical pre-head modifiers of adjectives are adverb phrases (e.g., quite capable) while the prototypical pre-head modifiers of nouns are adjective phrases (e.g., those nice folks). Finally, English adjectives, unlike English nouns, cannot function as the heads of phrases containing determinatives or predeterminatives.[28] The following table summarizes these characteristics:

Adjectives Nouns
Inflection comparative (-er), superlative (-est) plural (-s)
Typical function of the related phrases pre-head modifier of noun, predicative complement subject, object, predicative complement
Typical pre-head modifier adverb phrase adjective phrase
Occurrence with determinatives do not head phrases containing determinatives head phrases containing determinatives

The distinction between adjective and noun in English is not as clear in certain cases, such as with colour terms and noun-like words occurring in attributive position. In the case of colour terms, the category can often be identified without controversy. For instance, colour terms used as subjects (e.g., orange is the colour of my love) or predicative complements (e.g., my favourite colour is orange) are typical nouns while colour terms occurring attributively (e.g., the orange flower) are typical adjectives.[16] Similarly, colour terms marked as plural (e.g., the reds in the painting) are nouns while those marked as comparative (e.g., redder) or superlative (e.g., reddest) are adjectives. However, the categorization of colour terms is less clear in cases like The foliage emerged, becoming deep green as the summer unfolds. Here, the modifier of the colour term is an adjective (deep) rather than an adverb (deeply), which suggests that green is a noun. But the phrase occurs as the predicative complement of become and could, in principle, be modified by an adverb like very or appear in comparative form, which are typical characteristics of adjectives.[29] Bas Aarts notes that this apparent dual categorization can be avoided by treating terms like deep orange as adjective-adjective compounds.[16]

Almost any noun may appear in attributive position (e.g., a geography student), but in doing so they have traditionally said to be "functioning as an adjective". Such words are like adjectives in that they function as pre-head modifiers of nouns and resist pluralization in this position (*a geographies student). However, they are more like nouns in that they can be modified by adjective phrases, not adverb phrases (e.g., a cultural geography student, not *a culturally geography student), are not gradable, and cannot occur alone as predicative complements (*the student seems geography). Despite sharing features of both adjectives and nouns, modern dictionaries and grammars typically assign these words to the category of noun, though some describe them as a subset of noun called "adjectival nouns."[16]

Adjectives vs verbs

[edit]

Many adjectives derive from present participles (e.g., interesting, willing, & amazing) or past participles (e.g., tired, involved, & concerned). These can often be distinguished from verbs by their ability to be modified by very (e.g., very tired but not *very based on it) or appear after become as predicative complements. Adjectives almost never take objects, so a case like They were entertaining guests must be a verb.[30]

Adjectives vs prepositions

[edit]

Most prepositions are not gradable, so this can often distinguish them from adjectives, which typically are. As a result, adjectives can typically be modified by adverbs very, so, and too, while prepositions typically cannot. Conversely, prepositions can typically be modified by right (e.g., right up the tree), while adjectives cannot. Finally, preposition phrases readily function as non-predicative adjuncts in clause structure (e.g., after dinner, there was dancing) while AdjPs are typically ungrammatical without a predicand (e.g., *Enjoyable, there was dancing).

Semantics

[edit]

Apart from the general semantic properties of adjectives (denoting properties such as size, colour, mood, quality, age, etc.), English adjectives have various semantic properties that are not as general.

Quantification and number

[edit]

An adjective can express quantification over the events described by the verb. For example, the adjective occasional in She also has an occasional drink (i.e., “She drinks occasionally.”) quantifies over her drinking rather than describing the drink.

Although English adjectives do not participate in the system of number the way determiners, nouns, and pronouns do, English adjectives may still express number semantically. For example, adjectives like several, various, and multiple are semantically plural, while those like single, lone, and unitary have singular semantics.[31]

Definiteness and specificity

[edit]

In English, the definiteness of a noun phrase is usually marked on the determiner,[32] not on adjectives. But certain adjectives, in particular superlatives, are mostly incompatible with an indefinite interpretation of the NP.[33] Cases like *they were best students seem ungrammatical, though exceptions such as they were best friends exist. In cases such as a best-case scenario, best-case is a nominal, not a full NP.

Non-superlatives can also work in this way. The adjectives wrong and right are often incompatible with an indefinite NP (e.g., *they found a right person; here suitable would be better) but are possible in other cases (e.g., there isn't a right answer).

Unlike some languages, English does not mark the specificity of NPs grammatically. But NPs with adjective modifiers such as specific or certain are generally interpreted specifically, while those with adjective modifiers such as arbitrary are generally interpreted non-specifically.[34]

Grammar–semantics

[edit]

Pre-head vs post-head modification

[edit]

A noun phrase with an adjective phrase functioning as a pre-head modifier may have a different interpretation from one with the same modifier appearing after the head noun.[35] For example, the visible stars can mean either those stars that are visible at a particular time or those that are generally visible. In contrast, the stars visible does not have the "generally visible" interpretation.

Compounds vs modifiers

[edit]

The semantic contribution of adjectives as modifiers in a noun phrase is typically quite different from the semantic contribution of the same adjective as a base in a compound word.[36] A green house, for instance, is a house that is green in colour, but a greenhouse is neither green in colour nor a house. Similarly, a bigmouth is not a mouth that is big, nor is a highway a way that is high or software ware that is soft. The phonology of these pairs also differs. With the adjective as a modifier in a noun phrase, the adjective and the noun typically receive equal stress (a black bird), but in a compound, the adjective typically takes primary word stress (a blackbird).

Only a small set of English adjectives function in this way:[37]

  • The colour words black, blue, brown, green, grey, red, and white
  • Grand in words of family relationships
  • A set of monosyllabic gradable adjectives such as: broad, dry, free, hard, hot, mad, small, sweet, etc.
  • A small set of non-gradable monosyllabic adjectives: blind, dumb, first, quick (= 'alive'), square, whole
  • A very small number of disyllabic adjectives: bitter, narrow and possibly silly

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

English adjectives

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Adjectives in English are a consisting of words that typically modify to describe their qualities, states, or other attributes, thereby providing details such as what kind. They serve as a core element in noun phrases, enhancing the specificity and vividness of descriptions in sentences. English adjectives exhibit two primary syntactic positions: attributive, where they precede the noun they modify (e.g., a large house), and predicative, where they follow a such as be or seem (e.g., the house is large). Prototypical adjectives also demonstrate morphological and semantic properties, including the ability to form comparatives and superlatives via suffixes like -er and -est or periphrastic constructions with more and most (e.g., tall, taller, tallest), as well as gradability that allows modification by intensifiers like very (e.g., very tall). These characteristics distinguish adjectives from other word classes, though some words (e.g., certain participles) may overlap in function. When multiple adjectives precede a noun, they adhere to a conventional order determined by categories such as opinion, size, age, shape, color, origin, material, and purpose (often remembered by the acronym OSASCOMP), ensuring natural-sounding phrases (e.g., a beautiful old Italian wooden table rather than a wooden old beautiful Italian table). Many English adjectives are gradable, participating in degrees of comparison to express relative extents: the positive degree for basic description (e.g., small), the comparative for two items (e.g., smaller), and the superlative for three or more (e.g., smallest), with rules varying by syllable count—short adjectives typically use -er and -est, while longer ones employ more and most. Semantically, adjectives often introduce scalar properties or relations, allowing for finer gradations in meaning (e.g., a somewhat tall building), though nongradable adjectives like unique resist such modification. This flexibility contributes to the expressive power of English, enabling nuanced descriptions across attributive and predicative contexts.

Morphology

Inflectional forms

English adjectives display limited inflectional morphology, primarily restricted to the formation of comparative and superlative degrees for gradable adjectives, in contrast to the more extensive inflections found in nouns and verbs. This system allows adjectives to indicate relative or utmost extent, such as in "tall," "taller," and "tallest," where the suffixes -er and -est are added to the base form. The comparative form compares two entities, while the superlative identifies the extreme among three or more. The rules for these inflections depend on the adjective's structure: monosyllabic adjectives and some disyllabic ones ending in -y typically add -er for the comparative and -est for the superlative, as seen in "big" (bigger, biggest) or "happy" (happier, happiest). Adjectives with two or more syllables generally use the analytic constructions "more" and "most," for example, "beautiful" (more beautiful, most beautiful). Certain adjectives allow both synthetic and analytic forms, though preferences vary by style and region. A number of common adjectives follow irregular patterns in their comparative and superlative forms, diverging from the standard rules. Examples include "good" (better, best), "bad" (worse, worst), "little" (less, least), and "much" or "many" (more, most). These irregularities stem from historical developments and must be memorized as exceptions. English adjectives do not inflect for , number, or case agreement with the nouns they modify, unlike in languages such as German or Spanish where such concord is required. A minor exception is found in the adjectives '' (typically used for males) and 'blonde' (for females), a remnant of French influence that does not extend productively to other adjectives, though this distinction is observed across English varieties and is fading in use. Historically, adjectives featured more complex inflections, including strong and weak declensions that marked case, number, and gender to agree with the modified noun. The strong declension applied when no preceded the adjective, while the weak form followed determiners like "the." These paradigms were gradually simplified during the period due to phonological erosion and language contact, resulting in the largely uninflected system of by the 15th century.

Derivational processes

English adjectives are frequently formed through derivational processes, primarily via affixation and , which allow for the creation of new lexical items by modifying existing words or combining them. Affixation involves adding prefixes or suffixes to bases, while merges two or more words into a single unit. These mechanisms are highly productive in , enabling the expansion of the to describe nuanced concepts. Suffixes that maintain the adjectival category include -ish, which adds a sense of or resemblance, as in greenish; -like, indicating similarity, as in childlike; and -y, denoting possession of a quality, as in rainy. These suffixes typically attach to adjectival or nominal bases without altering the , preserving the descriptive function. Derivation from nouns to adjectives often employs suffixes such as -al, forming relational adjectives like national from nation; -ful, indicating abundance, as in beautiful from beauty; -ic, denoting association, as in atomic from atom; -ous, suggesting possession, as in famous from fame; and -less, implying absence, as in hopeless from hope. These class-changing suffixes convert nouns into adjectives, enriching the language's descriptive capacity. From verbs, adjectives are derived using -able or -ible, indicating capability, as in readable from read and visible from see; -ing, forming participial adjectives like interesting from interest; and -ed, as in bored from bore, and annoyed from annoy (experiencing annoyance) alongside annoying from annoy (causing annoyance). These suffixes shift verbal bases to adjectival ones, often describing states or qualities resulting from actions. Derived adjectives of this type can subsequently take inflectional endings, such as comparative -er or superlative -est. Prefixes primarily alter the meaning of existing adjectives without changing their category, including un-, which negates, as in unhappy; in-, im-, ir-, or il-, also for , as in inactive, impossible, irregular, and illegal; and over-, indicating excess, as in overcooked. These Germanic and Latinate prefixes attach productively to adjectival bases. Common examples illustrating these affixation processes include:
  • thoughtful (from thought + -ful): "It was very thoughtful of you."
  • miserable (from misery + -able): "The weather was miserable."
  • unfriendly (from friend via friendly + un-): "He can be quite unfriendly sometimes."
  • energetic (from energy + -etic): "She feels much more energetic today."
  • economical (from economy + -ical): "more economical."
  • scientific (from science + -ific): "Scientific studies have shown..."
  • unreliable (from rely + -able + un-): "He is quite unreliable."
  • irresponsible (from response + -ible + ir-): "Texting... is irresponsible."
  • envious (from envy + -ous): "I’m so envious."
  • careless (from care + -less): "make careless mistakes."
These examples demonstrate the application of derivational suffixes and prefixes to form adjectives from nominal and verbal bases. creates adjectives by combining elements such as adjective + noun (red-hot), noun + adjective (snow-white), or adjective + adjective (bitter-sweet). Hyphenation is typically required when compound adjectives precede a noun to avoid , as in a well-known artist, but omitted when following the noun, as in the artist is well known. This process is endocentric, with the head determining the adjectival category. Derivational processes for adjectives exhibit high , particularly in scientific and technical domains, where forms like eco-friendly emerge to describe concepts; is quantified by the of hapax legomena to total tokens, with suffixes like -ish (P=0.0034) and -able (P=0.0007) showing strong potential for neologisms. Historically, saw a shift toward increased derivation from Latin and Greek roots, influencing suffixes like -al and -ic through borrowings that adapted classical morphology to native patterns.

Syntax

Structure of adjective phrases

An adjective phrase in English consists of a head adjective, which may be accompanied by optional pre-head modifiers and post-head dependents. The pre-head modifiers are typically adverbs functioning as intensifiers, such as very in very happy or extremely in extremely tired. These modifiers express degree and can themselves be sub-modified, as in very very happy or quite interesting. Post-head dependents include optional modifiers, often prepositional phrases like of cats in fond of cats, as well as obligatory complements required by certain adjectives. Complements in adjective phrases establish a two-way syntactic dependency with the head adjective and are licensed by it, distinguishing them from modifiers, which involve only one-way modification. For example, adjectives like afraid or proud require a following prepositional as a complement: afraid of something or proud of her achievements. Clausal complements are also possible, including infinitival clauses with adjectives such as easy in easy to , and finite that-clauses with adjectives like certain or aware in certain that she won or aware that he was late. Post-head modifiers, by contrast, are non-obligatory and may involve discontinuous structures, such as phrases following the head. Adjective phrases may incorporate multiple adjectives through coordination, forming a coordinated linked by conjunctions like and or, in some cases, commas for non-restrictive separation. Examples include big and red in a big and red ball or . This coordination treats the adjectives as equal elements within the phrase, often in pre-nominal attributive use, though the internal phrase remains headed by the coordinated complex. Constraints apply to complements: while prepositional and clausal elements are permitted, adjective phrases do not directly embed finite verb phrases without a subordinating like that.

Syntactic roles in clauses and phrases

Adjectives in English primarily function as modifiers within noun phrases and clauses, occupying specific positions that determine their syntactic roles. In their most common attributive role, adjectives precede the noun they modify, providing descriptive information directly within the noun phrase, as in "the big house" or "a tall, dark building" where multiple adjectives stack before the head noun. This pre-noun position allows adjectives to restrict or specify the reference of the noun, contributing to the overall structure of the noun phrase. In the predicative , adjectives follow linking verbs such as "be," "seem," or "feel" to describe the subject or object of the , as in "The house is big" or "She feels happy." This construction positions the adjective as a subject or , linking it predicatively to the without direct modification within a . Predicative adjectives often appear in clauses to express states or qualities attributed to the . Postpositive adjectives, though rarer in English, occur after the noun they modify, typically in fixed expressions or certain syntactic environments, such as "something strange happened" or legal terms like "." This role is restricted and often involves adjectives that cannot easily appear attributively, functioning as post-head modifiers within the . Adjectives also function as complements within prepositional phrases, following prepositions to complete the phrase's meaning, as in "good at math" or "interested in history." In these constructions, the adjective provides the key descriptive element, often specifying the relation or quality relevant to the preposition's object. In nominal uses, adjectives can function substantivally, standing alone to represent a or group, as in "the poor" (referring to poor people) or "the French" (referring to ). This role treats the adjective as the head of a , often with a definite article, allowing it to substitute for a full nominal expression. Appositive or adjunct uses of adjectives appear non-restrictively after the noun, set off by commas to provide additional, non-essential description, as in "the king, wise and just." These constructions add supplementary information without altering the core reference of the , functioning as loose modifiers in the clause. When multiple adjectives modify a single attributively, English follows a conventional : opinion (e.g., beautiful), (e.g., large), age (e.g., old), (e.g., round), color (e.g., red), origin (e.g., French), material (e.g., wooden), purpose (e.g., cooking), followed by the , as in "a beautiful large old round red French wooden cooking pot." This sequence reflects a hierarchical preference in structure, ensuring natural and idiomatic expression.

Classification

Attributive and predicative adjectives

In , adjectives are classified based on their positional compatibility as attributive, predicative, or both. Attributive adjectives modify a directly within a , typically appearing prenominally (e.g., a big house). Predicative adjectives, by contrast, function as complements to a , appearing postnominally (e.g., The house is big). The majority of adjectives can occur in both positions without restriction, allowing flexible usage across syntactic contexts. Attributive-only adjectives are rare and semantically diverse, often denoting , rank, or ; they cannot occur predicatively. Examples include main, principal, chief, mere, sheer, and utter (e.g., the main issue or sheer , but not The issue is main or The nonsense is sheer). These forms are ungrammatical in predicative position due to their inherent relational meaning, which ties them closely to the modified . Predicative-only adjectives are more common among peripheral members of the category and cannot appear attributively. Typical examples include asleep, afraid, , ill, and alive (e.g., She is asleep or He seems afraid, but not an asleep child or an afraid person). These often express states or conditions incompatible with direct nominal modification, such as health-related or a-prefixed forms like adrift. Certain idiomatic constructions feature postpositive adjectives, where the adjective follows the noun rather than preceding it, often in fixed phrases borrowed from other languages or formal registers (e.g., president elect, attorney general, or heir apparent). These represent extensions of attributive use but are lexically restricted and do not generalize to most adjectives. Positional restrictions vary by adjective type: central adjectives, which denote inherent qualities like color or size (e.g., red, large), freely occur in both attributive and predicative positions. Peripheral adjectives, such as those expressing subjective states (e.g., afraid, certain), are typically predicative-preferred or restricted, reflecting their non-inherent, speaker-oriented semantics. Historically, adjective positioning was more restricted in due to the decay of inflections and emerging word order conventions, with post-nominal uses increasing under French influence (e.g., service dyvyne). By , the loss of synthetic features has led to greater syntactic flexibility, allowing broader attributive and predicative distribution. Classification often relies on syntactic tests, such as substitution with very, which central adjectives accept in both positions (e.g., a very big house and The house is very big), confirming their prototypical status, while peripheral ones resist it predicatively or entirely.

Gradable and non-gradable adjectives

In English linguistics, gradable adjectives are those that express properties capable of varying in degree along a scale, such as height or intensity, allowing them to combine with degree modifiers like very, quite, or rather, as well as comparative and superlative forms. For example, tall can be modified as very tall or inflected as taller and tallest, positioning the property on an ordered scale where objects can be compared relative to a context-dependent standard. This scalar nature enables expressions like a bit expensive or too happy, reflecting gradations of the quality described. Non-gradable adjectives, also known as absolute or classifying adjectives, denote properties that lack inherent degrees, typically representing binary states, extremes, or categorical attributes without scalar variation. Examples include dead, which cannot felicitously take modifiers like very dead or comparatives like deader, and unique, implying an absolute "one of a kind" without intermediate levels. Similarly, triangular resists grading as somewhat triangular, as it classifies a fixed geometric property rather than a measurable quality. Although non-gradable adjectives occasionally appear with modifiers in idiomatic or emphatic constructions (e.g., more unique), such uses are semantically anomalous and often proscribed in formal contexts. Within these categories, adjectives can be further distinguished as qualitative or classifying based on their semantic role and gradability potential. Qualitative adjectives, such as happy or small, are inherently gradable, describing subjective or sensory qualities that admit degrees and scalar modification (e.g., very happy). In contrast, classifying adjectives, like wooden (referring to material) or American (a demonym), are non-gradable, serving to categorize or identify rather than measure intensity (e.g., ?very wooden). This distinction aligns with dictionary classifications, where qualitative terms correspond to gradable uses and classifying ones to non-scalar functions. Irregularities in gradability arise in compound adjectives, where otherwise gradable elements become non-gradable due to and semantic unity. For instance, red-hot denotes an extreme, fixed state of heat and resists modification as very red-hot, treating the compound as a holistic, non-scalar unit rather than separate gradable components. Similar patterns occur in intensifying compounds like ice-cold or razor-sharp, which convey polar extremes without admitting degree adverbs, though exceptions exist in less conventionalized cases such as very wide-open. In usage, some traditionally non-gradable absolute adjectives have shown shifts toward gradable interpretations, particularly in informal or evaluative contexts. Adjectives like unique and perfect, once strictly non-scalar (e.g., implying total singularity or flawlessness), now frequently appear with modifiers such as very unique or more perfect, reflecting a semantic extension via modality or to scales of rarity or . Corpus analyses indicate a historical decline in such grading for unique over the past century, yet its gradable sense persists as a polysemous variant meaning "uncommon" or "remarkable," challenging prescriptive norms. This flexibility highlights how context and conventionalization can override lexical absolutes in contemporary speech.

Traditional categories

In traditional English grammars of the 18th and 19th centuries, adjectives were classified into various subclasses based primarily on their semantic roles in modifying nouns, a influenced by Latin models and prescriptive approaches aimed at standardizing usage. These categories, originating in works like Lindley Murray's English Grammar Adapted to the Different Classes of Learners (1795), expanded the adjective class beyond simple descriptors to include words that indicate quantity, specificity, or relation, though many overlapped with pronouns and determiners. Quantitative adjectives express the amount or number of a , such as much, little, few, and many, often functioning to quantify rather than describe inherent qualities; these are noted for their overlap with gradability, as forms like more and most can intensify them. adjectives point to specific s in context, including this, that, these, and those, serving to indicate proximity or . adjectives denote ownership or relation, exemplified by my, your, his, and her, which attach directly to the they modify. adjectives introduce questions about s, such as which, what, and whose, querying identity or possession. Distributive adjectives refer to individual members of a group, like each and every, emphasizing singularity within plurality. Indefinite adjectives provide non-specific reference to nouns, including some, any, and no, allowing vague or general quantification. Pronominal adjectives function similarly to pronouns when modifying nouns, such as the former and the latter, which substitute for previously mentioned entities. Proper adjectives derive from proper nouns and denote origin or affiliation, typically capitalized, as in French (from ) or American (from America). Compound adjectives consist of multiple words forming a single modifier, often hyphenated, like well-known or blue-eyed. Relative adjectives, such as who, which, and that, link a noun to a relative clause, though they are primarily classified as relative pronouns in these grammars. This traditional system, prevalent in prescriptive grammars from the 18th and 19th centuries, has been critiqued in modern linguistics for its reliance on meaning over syntactic behavior, leading to reclassification of many items—such as demonstratives, possessives, and quantifiers—as determiners rather than adjectives. Consequently, these categories are considered outdated for contemporary syntactic analysis, which prioritizes distributional tests like compatibility with degree modifiers (very) or predicative positioning.

Comparisons with other categories

Adjectives versus nouns

In English, adjectives and nouns exhibit distinct distributional patterns and functional roles within . Adjectives primarily serve to modify nouns in attributive positions, as in "the big house," or function as predicates following copular verbs like "be," as in "the house is big." In contrast, nouns typically head noun phrases (NPs), taking determiners and modifiers, as in "the house of the big man," but they cannot flexibly occupy adjectival slots without conversion, rendering constructions like "*the of big house" ungrammatical. These differences highlight adjectives' modificational role versus nouns' referential or head status. A notable area of overlap occurs with substantival adjectives, where adjectives function nominally, often with the definite article, as in "the rich pay more taxes," referring to a class of possessing the quality. However, these differ from true nouns in morphological limitations; for instance, they generally lack forms (*the ) and genitive endings (*the rich's), retaining adjectival properties like lack of inherent number marking. This nominal use is restricted and context-dependent, unlike the broader referential capacity of nouns. Semantically, adjectives and nouns can overlap in denoting qualities, with abstract nouns like "" deriving from adjectives such as "beautiful," illustrating a continuum where qualities are nominalized. This overlap facilitates zero derivation or conversion, allowing words like "criminal" to shift categories without morphological change: as an adjective in "a criminal act" or a noun in "a convicted criminal." Such processes functional flexibility but maintain core distinctions, as converted forms still bear traces of their original category in syntactic behavior. Linguistic tests further delineate these categories. For example, nouns readily accept articles and inflections, as in "the dogs," while adjectives do not (*the ). Adjectives, however, can be modified by intensifying adverbs like "very," as in "very big," but nouns resist such modification (*very ). Additionally, predicative positions after "be" accept adjectives ("It is quick") but not nouns without conversion (*It is ). These tests reveal adjectives' compatibility with modification in ways unavailable to nouns. Historically, the boundaries between adjectives and nouns were less rigid in , where adjectives inflected for case, number, and gender in agreement with nouns they modified, allowing greater overlap in form and function. The loss of these inflections during the period sharpened the modern distinction, reducing adjectival and emphasizing positional and modificational cues.

Adjectives versus verbs

One key distinction between adjectives and verbs in English lies in their semantic roles concerning stativity. Adjectives primarily denote states or properties that hold of an at a given time, such as in "She seems happy," where "happy" describes a static condition rather than an ongoing process. In contrast, verbs typically encode actions, events, or dynamic changes, as in "She runs happily," where "runs" expresses an activity. This stativity is evident in how adjectives complement or copular verbs like "seem" or "appear," a distribution unique to adjectives among major lexical categories. Morphologically, adjectives lack inflection for tense, aspect, or mood, which are hallmarks of s; for instance, "happy" remains unchanged in "The child is happy," whereas the "walk" inflects as "walked" or "walking." Participles, such as those ending in -ing or -ed, often blur this boundary by deriving from s but functioning adjectivally, as in "the boring lecture" (from "bore") or "the bored " (from "bore"). However, adjectival participles do not carry full verbal tense marking and instead align with adjectival patterns, such as combining with intensifiers like very ("very boring") but resisting verbal adverbials like carefully in stative contexts ("*carefully bored," ungrammatical as an ). Syntactically, predicative s require a copular like "be" or "seem" ("The door is open"), and they do not agree in or number with the subject, unlike finite s ("She walks" vs. "*She walk"). s, by contrast, can head clauses independently without such linking elements and inflect for subject agreement. Diagnostic tests for conversion from verb to adjective include adverbial modification and distributional constraints; for example, very run is ungrammatical as a verb phrase but very running fails similarly, whereas very boring succeeds as an adjectival use of the participle, whereas very annoy (using the verb base) is ungrammatical, but very annoyed succeeds (e.g., She was very annoyed with him for not telling her the truth). Edge cases arise with copular verbs such as "be" or "become," which link subjects to adjectival predicates ("She became tired"), and sensory verbs like "feel" or "seem," which take adjectival complements despite their verbal status ("The water feels cold"). Historically, participial adjectives trace back to Old English, where forms like the present participle in -ende (e.g., "slæpende mann," meaning "sleeping man") functioned adjectivally, declining in agreement with the modified noun according to strong or weak adjective paradigms, evolving from verbal origins into a distinct category by Middle English.

Adjectives versus adverbs and prepositions

Adjectives primarily modify nouns or pronouns, describing their qualities, states, or quantities, as in "the car" where "" specifies the car's color. In contrast, adverbs modify verbs, , other adverbs, or entire clauses, indicating manner, degree, time, or place, such as "she runs quickly" (modifying the verb "runs") or "very " (modifying the ""). This functional difference is often marked morphologically by the -ly on adverbs derived from , distinguishing pairs like "quick" (adjective: a quick decision) from "quickly" (adverb: she decided quickly). However, some adverbs, known as flat adverbs, share identical forms with their adjective counterparts and lack the -ly suffix, relying on syntactic context for disambiguation. For example, "fast" functions as an in "a " (modifying the "car") but as an in "he runs fast" (modifying the "runs"). Common flat adverbs include "hard," "late," and "early," where the word's role is determined by whether it answers questions like "what kind?" () or "how?" (). Prepositions, unlike adjectives, function as heads of prepositional phrases that link nouns, pronouns, or phrases to other elements in a sentence, indicating relationships such as location, time, or direction, and they remain uninflected. For instance, "of the book" forms a prepositional phrase, but "*of the afraid" is ungrammatical because prepositions do not modify adjectives in this way. Adjectives, however, frequently take prepositional phrases as complements to complete their meaning, as in "afraid of spiders" where the preposition "of" introduces the complement specifying what causes fear. Such adjective-preposition pairs are idiomatic and fixed, including "interested in," "good at," and "proud of," where the preposition is required for semantic completeness. Overlaps between these categories occur in participial prepositions, which derive from verb participles and function prepositionally, such as "regarding" in "regarding the matter" (meaning "about"). Similarly, pairs like "due to" blend an adjectival element ("due," meaning owed) with a preposition ("to"), forming a complex preposition that introduces a cause, as in "due to rain." Diagnostic tests highlight these distinctions: adjectives can appear in predicative position after linking verbs like "be," as in "the car is quick," but adverbs typically cannot ("the car is quickly" is ungrammatical unless modifying another element). Prepositions, meanwhile, do not function predicatively ("the car is of" is invalid) and instead require an object to form a . Historically, some modern have evolved from adjectives through phonological shifts, such as "hard" (adjective: a hard task; flat adverb: work hard) versus "hardly" (: scarcely, derived from "hearde" meaning firmly but shifting to "barely" by the 16th century). This reflects broader changes in English where the loss of inflectional endings blurred adjective-adverb boundaries, leading to context-dependent usage.

Semantics

Core meanings and qualities

English adjectives primarily contribute to semantics by describing properties, states, and relations of entities denoted by nouns. Qualities such as in "beautiful painting" attribute aesthetic properties, while states like in "happy child" denote temporary or enduring conditions. Relational adjectives, such as "similar" in "similar ideas," express comparisons or connections between entities. These core meanings allow adjectives to modify nouns by adding descriptive layers that specify attributes without altering the noun's basic reference. Adjectives can be distinguished by subtypes based on whether the properties they describe are inherent or extrinsic to the entity. Inherent adjectives denote essential, stable characteristics, as in "natural " where the color is intrinsic to the hair's composition. In contrast, extrinsic adjectives describe external or added qualities, such as "fake " where the redness results from artificial means. Similarly, adjectives may indicate temporary versus permanent properties: temporary ones like "wet " refer to transient states, often event-induced, while permanent ones like "wooden fence" specify enduring material traits. These distinctions highlight how adjectives encode the stability and origin of properties within conceptual structures. In noun phrases, adjectives often intersect with multiple semantic dimensions, combining meanings to provide layered descriptions. For instance, "young French teacher" merges age (young), nationality (French), and (teacher), where each adjective contributes independently to the overall profile without overriding the noun. This enables precise entity characterization through additive properties. Adjectives like these frequently express degrees of qualities, linking to broader gradability concepts. Polysemy is common among English adjectives, where a single form carries multiple related senses resolved by context. The adjective "right," for example, can mean "correct" as in "right answer" or "directional" as in "right turn," with the noun and situational cues disambiguating the intended meaning. Such polysemous structures form semantic clines, allowing flexible usage while maintaining coherence through collocation and syntax. Cultural factors influence adjective meanings, particularly in color terms and subjective evaluations. Color adjectives exhibit variation across languages and cultures; for instance, warm colors like red are prioritized in naming due to their salience in environments, while cool colors like blue may receive less emphasis in non-industrial societies. In English, "blue" extends metaphorically to sadness, as in "feeling blue," reflecting a cultural association absent in some other languages. Subjective evaluative adjectives such as "good" and "bad" encode polarized judgments tied to social norms, often implying moral or aesthetic approval or disapproval. From a perspective, meanings are often -based rather than strictly definitional, relying on central examples and family resemblances. For "tall," the varies by : an considered tall might be 6 feet, but the same would not apply to children, illustrating how categories blur with degrees of typicality. This approach integrates , allowing adjectives to adapt to situational prototypes.

Interactions with quantification and definiteness

In English, adjectives often combine with numerical quantifiers to form phrases where the adjective distributes over the quantified elements, yielding an interpretation in which the denoted by the applies to each individual item. For example, in "three big apples," the distributive reading predominates, meaning each of the three apples is big, rather than the group as a whole being big. This distributive pattern arises from the semantic composition within the , where the numeral functions as a that scopes over the intersective modification by the . Adjectives also interact with non-numerical quantifiers like much and many, which distinguish between and nouns semantically. Many typically modifies nouns, as in "many small apples," quantifying discrete individuals, while much pairs with nouns, as in "much fine sand," measuring uncountable substance. Although English adjectives lack morphological agreement in number, semantic interactions emerge, such that size adjectives can inversely affect perceived ; for instance, "many small things" may denote a larger than "few large things" due to the relative scale contributed by the adjective. With respect to , attributive adjectives in definite noun phrases like "the big " typically function restrictively, narrowing the to the unique satisfying both the and descriptions, presupposing familiarity and in the . Non-restrictive uses, rarer for prenominal adjectives, add supplementary information without altering the core , often via appositive structures like "the , big and fierce," where the adjectives contribute conventional implicatures separate from the main predication. In indefinite phrases, adjectives contribute to non-specific interpretations, as in "a red car," introducing an existential without , though specificity can arise if the description picks out a in . Certain adjectives enhance uniqueness in definite descriptions; for example, "the only solution" combines the definite article's presupposition of a unique referent with the adjective only's exclusion of alternatives, reinforcing maximality and exhaustivity. Scope ambiguities can occur when quantifiers interact with adjective-modified noun phrases, such as in "all the happy children," where preferences in modern corpora favor the surface-scope reading (all scopes over the happy children collectively) over inverse scope, influenced by processing constraints and discourse preferences. Historically, adjectives inflected for through strong and weak declensions: strong forms marked indefiniteness in attributive or predicative uses without determiners (e.g., "gōd mann" – a good man), while weak forms indicated following or possessives (e.g., "sē gōda mann" – the good man). These distinctions, tied to case, , and number, blurred in late due to phonetic reductions and case mergers, and were largely lost by as the language shifted toward analytic structures without adjective agreement.

References

  1. https://www.butte.edu/departments/cas/tipsheets/grammar/parts_of_speech.html
  2. https://www.sjsu.edu/writingcenter/docs/handouts/Adjectives.pdf
  3. https://alic.sites.unlv.edu/chapter-01-05-adjectives/
  4. https://semantics.uchicago.edu/kennedy/docs/routledge.pdf
  5. https://owl.excelsior.edu/grammar-essentials/parts-of-speech/adjectives/order-of-adjectives/
  6. https://flyer.vn/vi-tri-tinh-tu-trong-tieng-anh/
  7. https://web.ics.purdue.edu/~vraskin/adjective.pdf
  8. https://nagelhout.faculty.unlv.edu/AGiC/s4d.html
  9. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/grammar/british-grammar/comparison-adjectives-bigger-biggest-more-interesting
  10. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/english-language-and-linguistics/article/determinants-of-the-syntheticanalytic-variation-across-english-comparatives-and-superlatives1/2FCA500541B837B876057DBCC67765F4
  11. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/comparative
  12. https://dictionaryblog.cambridge.org/2018/05/16/good-better-best-forming-comparatives-and-superlatives/
  13. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/studies-in-second-language-acquisition/article/on-the-unambiguity-of-adjectival-modification-in-spanish-determiner-phrases/7A2BC4F85E7B26FE960A20CC697440A4
  14. https://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=56498
  15. https://www.merriam-webster.com/grammar/blond-and-blonde-is-there-a-difference
  16. https://www.oed.com/dictionary/blonde_adj
  17. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/english-language-and-linguistics/article/adnominal-adjectives-in-old-english/7FE64B97915940FD284AB67DE936F497
  18. https://www.wtamu.edu/~mjacobsen/histeng.htm
  19. http://myweb.ttu.edu/bmcfadde/Gram4OEtoME.pdf
  20. https://socialsci.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Linguistics/Essentials_of_Linguistics_2e_%28Anderson_et_al.%29/05%253A_Morphology/5.06%253A_Derivational_morphology
  21. https://yc.yccd.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/PrefixesELLAccessibleJune2020.pdf
  22. https://open.maricopa.edu/essentialsoflinguistics/chapter/7-3-compound-words/
  23. https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writing/punctuation/hyphen_use.html
  24. https://quantling.org/~hbaayen/publications/BaayenLieber1991.pdf
  25. https://www.ruf.rice.edu/~kemmer/Words/classmorph.html
  26. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/grammar/british-grammar/adjective-phrases
  27. https://www.academia.edu/42518146/A_Students_Introduction_to_English_Grammar_Huddleston_R
  28. https://pressbooks.cuny.edu/englishsyntax/chapter/chapter-8/
  29. https://www.academia.edu/49682239/MODIFICATION_VERSUS_COMPLEMENTATION_IN_THE_STRUCTURE_OF_ENGLISH_ADJECTIVE_PHRASES_AND_ADVERB_PHRASES
  30. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/introduction-to-the-grammar-of-english/adjectives-and-adjective-phrases/34AB5EDB6847E80C069C49003A14661D
  31. https://assets.cambridge.org/97805218/63193/excerpt/9780521863193_excerpt.pdf
  32. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356864873_Postpositives_in_English_in_search_of_adjectives_available
  33. https://learnenglish.britishcouncil.org/grammar/a1-a2-grammar/adjectives-prepositions
  34. https://www.grammar-monster.com/glossary/adjective_complement.htm
  35. https://www.unr.edu/writing-speaking-center/writing-speaking-resources/hesi-a2-grammar
  36. https://www.thoughtco.com/what-is-appositive-adjective-1688999
  37. https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writing/grammar/appositives.html
  38. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/375372222_Attributive-only_Predicative-Only_Adjectives
  39. https://www.yourdictionary.com/articles/predicate-adjective
  40. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/368810410_Postpositive_Adjectives_in_Modern_Standard_English_and_Modern_Standard_Arabic_A_Contrastive_Analysis
  41. http://www.lel.ed.ac.uk/grammar/overview.html
  42. https://ff.unsa.ba/files/zavDipl/21_22/ang/Jelena-Djurovic.pdf
  43. http://semantics.uchicago.edu/scalarchange/kennedy97-ch1.pdf
  44. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/~ucjtudo/teaching/textbook/Ch.3.pdf
  45. http://coral-lab.umbc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/SRW008.pdf
  46. https://core.ac.uk/download/14693962.pdf
  47. https://hit-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/2050160/files/HJart0620100010.pdf
  48. https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_theses/4305/
  49. https://wac.colostate.edu/docs/books/sound/chapter6.pdf
  50. https://lel.ed.ac.uk/~gpullum/ModTradDescr.pdf
  51. http://www.universalteacher.org.uk/lang/engstruct.htm
  52. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/189877529.pdf
  53. https://trans4mind.com/personal_development/writing/grammar/parts_of_speech/adjectives.htm
  54. https://opentext.ku.edu/syntax/chapter/chapter-2-parts-of-speech/
  55. https://ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub/essentialsoflinguistics2/chapter/5-4-lexical-categories-and-the-split-between-derivation-and-inflection/
  56. https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/elsj/27/2/27_344/_pdf/-char/en
  57. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347216123_English_Zero_Derivation_Revisited_Nouning_and_Verbing_in_Online_Business_Articles
  58. https://oxfordre.com/linguistics/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.001.0001/acrefore-9780199384655-e-10
  59. https://https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/elsj/27/2/27_344/_pdf/-char/en
  60. https://ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub/essentialsoflinguistics/chapter/7-2-nouns-verbs-and-adjectives-open-class-categories/
  61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2011.05.001
  62. https://oldenglish.info/advanced4.html
  63. https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writing/grammar/adjective_or_adverb/index.html
  64. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357825858_Adjectives_and_Adverbs_in_English
  65. https://webapps.towson.edu/ows/adverbs.aspx
  66. https://grammarist.com/grammar/participial-prepositions/
  67. https://englishintake.com/learn-english/lesson-adjectives-verbs-prepositions/
  68. https://blog.oup.com/2007/08/adverb/
  69. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:389094/FULLTEXT01.pdf
  70. https://journals.openedition.org/lexis/771
  71. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1619666114
  72. https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13428-016-0713-5
  73. https://www.sfu.ca/~mtaboada/docs/publications/Goddard_Taboada_Trnavac_FoL.pdf
  74. http://staff.um.edu.mt/albert.gatt/teaching/dl/geeraerts06_prototype-theory.pdf
  75. https://www.semanticsarchive.net/Archive/jMxMGM1N/leffel2014nyudiss.pdf
  76. https://semanticsarchive.net/Archive/DIwNGYxY/Deal-mass_nouns2.pdf
  77. https://semanticsarchive.net/Archive/jA2YTJmN/Heim%20Dissertation%20with%20Hyperlinks.pdf
  78. https://www.trees-and-lambdas.info/matushansky/Downloads/Rochester-handout.pdf
  79. https://www.colorado.edu/linguistics/2019/04/18/quantifier-scope-ambiguity-english-and-turkish
  80. https://margaliti.com/members/reader10n.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.